The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042-010-082PLANNIN 7: C ISSION SUMMARY SHVET DIV T S701VNI APPLXCANT. Martin Meester ADD,Rr,,SS 831 Greenwich, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map_ to create two,parcels + LOCATION At the northeast end- f1 Estatp lqk__ feet northwest Of Bell Road,, Chico ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-01-82 Orchard and 'ZONING A-5 ---.-GP'4NERAL PLAN-Vield Crops PROJECT C()NqTSTHNT?. GENERAL PLAN CONVORMANCE 11EPORT February 4, 1988-- r — I —. DATE OF APPLICANT S. GNATUfmE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS'? NO D&Tt APPLICAIrI011 RECEMx ED February -i-8-11288 AGr,mT/8UAVEYO41/CIN1IL ENGINEER: M. Donn Marshall ADDRESS; 2912 Cu8sickkyaLue, Chico, CA 95926 DA'L'E: PLANNING DIRECTOWS REPOTAT Pj1LPARED__ ENV,' R044MFNTAL CATEGO111CAL EXEMPTION - DATE DE111W,R64AT TON AND DATE NVEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTV)r+�*-, MWIGATE.D VIM DECLARATION - TWUE' Ar)OPTT-40,._,,, V,NV 1r11`A-*1V R'BPORq, DATE 0 0 C NO. TATT' NIANOU) tN tIApl, ADViSORI WPINCY 118 ARM, D:"Trsd AT VIAL, AGIFMC)t ACTION APPMA.LED - COVVIIIIATS FOR MANNINO MRL-ICTORI 8 RrIPORIP �llt T*t .w x -•yam T'A1wC t:l� t�S.AJ.' G7 F: i-i"LJL�1 1-7.^.l' i►�"Mei 1 h C4+ b�� rompleLNd r r c �^•t , royill$ r�• « j Cd - '9 by a}plicanra %8 c14 1�l0# q� j 1. A1Ei'i3rANT NAME: AND ADi1RlaS5 1'Rq,i[:r t` ►iFsC1dCPTLON; �� •3Ll �. ?_.(� ram.—�,,; ,. -�. �� _� _..., 3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMAER(5): w r A PROPOSED USE; ,rho following items are to be completed by the pl"luutiltg Department. i 1 � _ � LAND CONSERVAxION' Ai}iil��1•�1C�N'i'; „�..._.il"....� ",URRENT 'ZONING, J 1 l,WNFRAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Gandit.ionnl Crit�+ria AGftiCULTURAL4RESTDENTIAI, YES NO It is recomme0ed that y011 p.yrform tha following, checked itrmlt; t. Agricultural Compa[.ibil.ity ARCHAEOLOGICAL, RECORDS 2, Water and Sewer Capacity ----- BOTANICAL SURVEY �•. 1,. Adequate Eire Facilities GEOLOGICAL SURVEY -- � 4, Road Capacity and Maintenance YES NO 4" Access; to Commercial and Schools WITHIN DFpAR7K1ENi OF C:1?li I�h °fiAhl� AND FIELD CROPSAND S AND GAMFiE DEVELOPVr 201n.; a. 11,E�domxn,xrt� ,. �.. 0 aC: Parcel 5z _ tJITti1N FLOOD PLAIN, 11 iltity Urban Boundaries Ag,;. Viabzcity not Impaired WIIHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR LAND - �—'-" St.1l'I t�nt�hrmination: SubS'ttially' conforms tdUSE PLAN: L'1 I�ENERAL PLAN; 1, Land Use Ii 4.�t Name of Plan 2. Conservation 1, Open Space - WITHIN URBAN RESERM, 4, Safety - _ If Yes, 5, Noise Naw 6i Reserve � �--- 6, housing j x ATP ORT LAND USE PLAN: rirculation Da StAft..:Sign AS 'fHR AL�PLICANT FOR 'ST),D LAND DIV,tgION) 1. 01 AWARE Ol' THE ABOVE STAFF 111`I`t;,lhllNAfIX)N RiGARD]N( THE CONFORMANCE WITH TILE Ni: } Niffe Co, planning C mmi, A l 1988 M` 0(:n:IMARSHALLP.E.orovillo, Califol-1114 Civil Engineer9 R.CZ #33300 d4tirnatirlt�xla. 2912 cussicl Ave Chico, California 05926 (016) 803.5259 Design • Planning . Survoycng Butte County Planning Dept. Attention; Msi Laura Tuttle Auguo,t �0►1988 7 County Center Dr. Oroville, Ca. 95965-3397 IEt Tentative Parcel Map AP # 42-01-82 Dear Laura: Pursuant to aur recent telephone conversation concerning condition # 2 on the Planning bireGtor�� letter is dated April 19� iy$3 for the subject project. ' report requires the relocation of a utilitySaid condition and Bell Rd. for improved vehicularsight distance. Dr. Please be informed that this condition was established riot to a realignment of Bell Estates Dr. p much improved sight distance a which has ectioded for a attached diagram ) t the said intersection see I infer that condition # 2 has therefore been adequately satisfied, Should you need a have any questions► please call.' more xnformatioh or have S' c y, M. bo r r� NO'�'LGE Or' �TE2ZN�[ LLVE�`1'01�7 _ Office of Planning'd anresearch° R[7M; 1400 Tenth Street, Ito' m'121' Aut w county Sacramento, CA 95814 I'lannin bojtnrtment or is 7 County Crater Drive °: d."l0 dcovillo County Clerk CA 95065 County of Butte C: �tS' r�r~:w . CiP1:t>.v , t utt. CO, Clark 4 ._..Z._E'MFf30. " ,puty Filing of Notice of Determination in com l,anc„o w rt� or 21152 of the public Resources Code. P it:11 ,�uotion 21108 Project Tit e - -- Tentative Parcel Map e AP �� Nam --------_. 42-01-82 State Clearinghouse NumberMartin M008ter 3. f submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Telejiltone Numbeif John Mendonsa, Public Works Project TO At the northeast end of Bell Estates�Dy726fi northwest of Bell Road, Chico area. rive, a y PProximatel 800 foraL Project Descriptio`-- `_`_ Tentative Marcel Map to create two parcels of 6+ _arses , This is to advise that the bum Count Advisor y Agency has approved- the above-described project�LeadoneNla ncY o2 Responsible A e _y , 198$ g � and has made the following determinations regarding the above-described (Date) 1 The �: , Project; ron e t —c1'l1; X X3311 not, have a significant effect o.. environment n the 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for th' pt1rs11attt to the pt ovis3ona of CEQA, zs project X A Negative Declaration was Provisions Of CEQA. Prepared for this project pursuant to the 3' Mitigation measures _�wcre, � toeire not, made a cond3t3n_ approval of the project n of the 4, A statement of ovoziai3ng considerations this p dject --was , � ,1t: not* 4 d a 0 t tad a This is to certify that the final tip with Project approval . j pp 3s available to tile comments and, res,�ttrae general public at,.p es €trtd reoord of Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive bLGvillc, CA 95065 :bate Received for riling and Posting at OpR. w „ 68 9,0i� n a tit r e Ba.11 Turpin, SOn. 3.0l: plAnrio Title Hevlt ed rtnreh 1086 'r 0: enoM:. AUIiJGCT: OATM Inter-DepartMemorandum navisory Agency Planning Director REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MRP FOR MARTIN MEES'1PIR ON AP#42-01-82 April 19, 1988 This is a proposal to divide 12 acres into 2 - 0 acre parcels. The present zoning is A-5 (Agricultural, 5 acrd parcels), adopted in 1966. The Land Use Plan Map of the Dutte County General. Plan designates this area as Orchard & :yield Crop, located.north and chest of the Chico. Urban Area Greenline. The Safety Element indicates that this project is in an -- Unclassified fire hazard area. The Orchard & Field Crop General Plan designation has a 20 acre minimum parcel size. Five and ten acre parcels are conditionally consistent provided three criteria are met; 1. Predominant 5 to 10 acre parcel size in vicinity, 2. Vicinity of urban boundaries, 3. Agricultural viability not impaired. The parcel is surrounded on three sides by rural residential uses. parcel si."zes range from 1 to 11 acres . CJS^ban boundaries are located three quarters of a mile east near Bell and i:ussirk. While an argument can be made that 6 or 12 acro parcel can be used for speciality crops, surrounding !and use pattern 'ould iftda catE: the land will not. be used for agric,t�ltural purl ses The viability of this parcel was severely diminished when Mri Nichols divided the original. 28 acre parceli on the appeal of the Advisory Ag"cX's denial, the Board of Supervisors approved five aOrO lots for Robert Brown, Robert Nichols and Frank Brazell. 1,he Board of Super;visors found that division into five acro, rarcels on property zoned A-5 and located west of they G, -r, online complies with the General Plan Approval 68 recd` vuaaed subject to the followa.ncl conditions; 1. ContribuiEaq>75.On per lot~ to the West S.�,r'le Fire Station Benefit r`j.xnd 2 Rel ocaa e uta i ity pole at Bell. Estates i�raove and Mua r Avery;e to provide for improved Vehicularsictht da stance parcels to meet the requirements of the A-5 zone LT : j .Ac do, Vii. noon Marshall 0 0` APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Log No, 88-02-22-01. i. BACKGROUND AP Nus 42-01-82 1. 1. dame of proponent . z __ftrt;�n .M �........ 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) 831 Greenwich M. Donn Mashal,l, 4 Chico, CA 95'26 m _ 2912 Cussick Avo(itlu 3. Project description: - Tentatire�Parcel Ma I(. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES MAYBE NO 1, Does they project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, sub$tantially reduce thu habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered pl'at't or animal or eliminate Irnportrtnt examples of major periods of California history or prehistory?........., 2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment of long- term, environmental goals) (A short-term impact on the environmentisone which occurs In a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure Into the future.).....,,,, 0 p N 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable' (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact ort a ch resource is relr,tively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the fir vironmentis significant) ...... , . � 11 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects oil human bungs, either directly or indirectly?. , ....... , ..... , . d f III. DETERMINATION: (ir, w1 completed by th(, Lead Agoncy) 0") thk> bil!Wr of Win initial evaluation. l°V&' find the propos(:ii pruj"ct COULD NOT JrJavt� a (,igriififsant tgf(ict (,Pi ilia: rrtvu(mri(€�nk.anda NEGATIVE DECLARATION wilt be prepared [VE find that although the proposed Project could have tt ,'aignificant eff((ct tiff tlti, Onvironment,thOrewill rwatt be a significant effect in this 0,18L, because the MITIGATION MEASURES 111"44 lb0d On the attached sheethave ween added to the project, A NEGATIVE 05CLAIIIATICN will be preparorf Ll IME find the proposed project MAY have a significint effect oil the environmont, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNT OF'UTTE, PLANNIN(ri DVAFITNir=NT DA'L'E. April 1, 1.988 I's,;" �a"e Wanner Ftevfewed fay. . 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. q, Change :n the diversity of species. or number of any, Species of plantr: (immiditirl era+v, , shrubs, grass, crops. and aquatic prams) . ( Cil b, RUCILIGllon of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of piantri,i j t re leniGhment of existingspecies? ........ , . in a barrier. to tar rararnaat species VAa, Introduction of now spcs of plants Into an arca or Y r . ' . . . C� Cl d, Reduction uch(an to acreage of zany agricultural crop?... . . . . ........ . ..... P Ili, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explrarlations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" ,are required on attached sheet(s).) 1, EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant- YES MAYBE NO a. tfristable earth conditions or in changes in 9e010g c substructures?— . . . . . . . ...... ( l q b. Disruptions, displacements. compaction or overcovering of thn soil? . . .......: . ........ 0 ❑ 1� c. Change in topography or ground s(rfacis relief features'} n J ...... d. Destruction. covering or modificatiola Of ally unique; gbologfc or physical featurcrr;'y ... , , [c,T (l. 11wro ase in wind or water erosion of :coils. either on or cuff site? .......... .. ..... I"d f.j [ , f. tAlaanges in deposition or erosion 0 beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or (trosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or tiro bed of the ccrami of ,mv icily, inlet or lake? . . ............... . 9. Loss of Prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban aroma' h. Exposure of people or property to geologic riazards such as earthquakes lands dw,, mudslides, ground failure or similar ha.rards? ..................... 2, AtN, Will the proposal rrMsull in substantial: a. Air will.1;i,lons or deterioration of ambient air quahtyl� . . . . .. . . . ......... : C � � b. The creation of objectionai odors, smoke or fumes'",. ......... . ............ , . ....... 0 0 LL c, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change In climalr locally or regionally9................. ........... . 3, WATEq. Wilt the proposal result in substantial: a, Chalitles to Currents, or the course or direction of water Movements in eatlat,r marine or fresh waters?. .... .. I ..,.....>. ....... 0 tai- i b, ChOnges in absorption ratesdrainage patterns, or tho rate and amount of;,urfaaco runoff'.. 0 L71 1�1 c. Need for tiff site) surface drainage improvements, including vegotialion rt),mevral. channeWatiora car t,,itvert inc,tallotion " ........... , . , . . d, Alteranren�o it) the (wurso or flow of flood wa(ers'? �e. Chanffi' air tr,,� amount of surlace water in any water hody") CJ ......... ... f, waters,Drseharlp� Int, " surface any alteration ewit?rtu lrclUc'Inj banot Ilmllriq 10'Palperate d�olvrdoxygen or turbldityl... . j. Al'teiatv,rr (tl tt o direction or rata (it fh'aw Of (around walers) . , , . , .. h. C;hruirIi, ," r lhE3 gtlaralily or quality Of tlioutid water,; wither thruupil Ulirrdr,l ,utrhtirartr tj r^wilhrla,XWals, or through intere ,tplreara cXf ,an aquifer by ;ruts of oxeavatiorm'� LI tj k t. Hrr(li,ar.hora In the amount of water, otherwise tavalltlblo for public water "lip iww) , . , , , 11 M. j, Exposure; of people or property to woter relatecl hazards sucli a;j flu+o(Xfn(l,, .... , .. , , , , . tai Lj 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial. q, Change :n the diversity of species. or number of any, Species of plantr: (immiditirl era+v, , shrubs, grass, crops. and aquatic prams) . ( Cil b, RUCILIGllon of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of piantri,i j t re leniGhment of existingspecies? ........ , . in a barrier. to tar rararnaat species VAa, Introduction of now spcs of plants Into an arca or Y r . ' . . . C� Cl d, Reduction uch(an to acreage of zany agricultural crop?... . . . . ........ . ..... 1 M 0 U. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result In substantial; YES MAYBE No a, (;11a11rie in the diversity of species, or iiumbers of any species of animals (birds, InitL) animals Inluding reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or Insects)? ... , ..... ❑ ❑ b. Flediiction In the numbers of anv unique, rare or endanw^red species of animals? ... CI ❑ tyl c, Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a wirrier to the migration oi a ❑ � movement of animals? ............................................. ............ . d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?.... ......... •.. . .. 0 i ➢ 6. NOISE. Villi the proposal result in substantial. a. Increases in existing noise levels? ............ .... .. .... .. , • • � � . .. 0 ❑ P 1-1 b. Exposure of people to severe nurse levels? ............ ....... . ............ .. ❑ 0 It 7, LIGHT AND CLARE, Will tiie proposal produce significant light and glare? ..,...... , ❑ C) D. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned, land use of an areal ... ... ... ... ` 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. increase in the i,gte of use of any natural resources? ...... ............,.. .......... G) b, L)epletion of any nonwrenewityle natural resources") . . ......................, ....... 10, RISI< OP UPSET, Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including. but not, limited to oil, CS pesticides,. Chemiirais or radiation) In the event of an accident or upset conditions' ? , , .. ❑ 1:1 b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan'?.. C3 "1 0 ii, POPULdensity, oATION. Will the proposal alter location, distribution. de r gr owth rtxtdr of the human population") ..... .. ......... ................... .... ........ 12, HOUSING, V00 the proposal affect existing housing, or create a daniar'd 101 110,111101411 housing`? —. ................ .............. . 13, TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in ❑ a, Gener9ti0h of substantial additional vehicle movement? .......... . ........... ., b. Effects ren existing parking facilities, or demand for now parking? . . ........... . ........ c, Substantial Impact oil existing transportation systems? ..... • .. ........ . .... . .. . ...... d, Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or .,, [3 ❑ goods? ,....... .....I .,,.., ..I.— I...1.1. .....,......... ...., . e. Alteratiuns to waterborne, rail or air traffic?..., . ..... . .. . . .. • , , , , .. , . , t, Increase to traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrlans7 . , ... , , , .. , , • . 15. ENERGY, Will the proposal result in; a. USO Of r)tibstantial amounts of fuel or energy? ......................... ..... Ll U b, Substanlial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, rir totpittv the dwiclopmeint of new sources of energy? . . .......................... . . .. .... d f l a1 16. UTILITIES. Will the p�,opogai result in a need fornew systems, orsubstantlill altotallonz; to the following, a, Power or natural gas? ..,.................... ......,............ ....... ❑jJ b, Communications systems' .......... ...... I ... I ....... ....,..,....,,..,......... 111.1 0 r c. Water availability?.... ....................... ...... ...................., ❑ ❑ d, Sewer or septic systeni? .......... . . . . .... . ........ .. ... .... , .... .. , In Ci I>7. e, Storm water drainage?.. ............ .......... ............................. 0 in I. Solid waste arid disposal? . ,., ........ .............. ................ 17, HUMAN HEALTI-L Will the proposal result in; a. C'ealion of any lieaftii hazard or potential health liizard Icxr;tudtng r11E4nf.lt li+; lthl`r . Lj 4; b, exposure of people to potential health hazards? ......... .... ..... ..... 0 ❑ 16. AESTHETICS. Will the propo:tul result in the obstruction of any scenic vita or view open to the public, or will the proposal result lig the crotiYtiori of an aesthetically offensive sitn upon topublic viewl, 11.1 ..... 1 .....1111............ . ,.....,...•,. ,. .... 0 Ll IV 1ti. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an irnpitct upon the quality Or quilntily (it t+xivlinia rrsr.rentiorial oppoounities*) .... ......... .......... . 20. CULTURAL i ESOURCES. a, With the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistr:inr or Iwitoric archaeological site'' .................................. ..........r... ..... b. VA,'l the proposal result in adverse physloal ter aesllletic offects to a prv, istorir, or historic ❑ building, structure; or object? . .............. .. ....., ....... ................ c, Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic, cultural values?...— ...,,.,..... ........ ............. ...........f . d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? .............. ..,r,,«,,,,u,,.:F........... ..a,,.. , „ rr,,,,,,,,,, 0 ❑ W 14, liQUl.IC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for now or aftered government services: YES MAYfIC NO a. Fire protection? ... , .. ............... C1 (* b. Police protection? . , ... ,. . , , .. ... . , _ CJ hl f't1, C. schools? ................ ................................ ................,,. ,...... ❑ l tlJi d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ......................................... .... tm7 e, Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ....... .............. . ❑ i { ►.� I, Other governmental services? . , , 1111. ................................... (A Ll �Jv 15. ENERGY, Will the proposal result in; a. USO Of r)tibstantial amounts of fuel or energy? ......................... ..... Ll U b, Substanlial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, rir totpittv the dwiclopmeint of new sources of energy? . . .......................... . . .. .... d f l a1 16. UTILITIES. Will the p�,opogai result in a need fornew systems, orsubstantlill altotallonz; to the following, a, Power or natural gas? ..,.................... ......,............ ....... ❑jJ b, Communications systems' .......... ...... I ... I ....... ....,..,....,,..,......... 111.1 0 r c. Water availability?.... ....................... ...... ...................., ❑ ❑ d, Sewer or septic systeni? .......... . . . . .... . ........ .. ... .... , .... .. , In Ci I>7. e, Storm water drainage?.. ............ .......... ............................. 0 in I. Solid waste arid disposal? . ,., ........ .............. ................ 17, HUMAN HEALTI-L Will the proposal result in; a. C'ealion of any lieaftii hazard or potential health liizard Icxr;tudtng r11E4nf.lt li+; lthl`r . Lj 4; b, exposure of people to potential health hazards? ......... .... ..... ..... 0 ❑ 16. AESTHETICS. Will the propo:tul result in the obstruction of any scenic vita or view open to the public, or will the proposal result lig the crotiYtiori of an aesthetically offensive sitn upon topublic viewl, 11.1 ..... 1 .....1111............ . ,.....,...•,. ,. .... 0 Ll IV 1ti. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an irnpitct upon the quality Or quilntily (it t+xivlinia rrsr.rentiorial oppoounities*) .... ......... .......... . 20. CULTURAL i ESOURCES. a, With the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistr:inr or Iwitoric archaeological site'' .................................. ..........r... ..... b. VA,'l the proposal result in adverse physloal ter aesllletic offects to a prv, istorir, or historic ❑ building, structure; or object? . .............. .. ....., ....... ................ c, Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic, cultural values?...— ...,,.,..... ........ ............. ...........f . d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? .............. ..,r,,«,,,,u,,.:F........... ..a,,.. , „ rr,,,,,,,,,, 0 ❑ W a � I A 0 IiCLlSS)pN OF ENVIRONMENTAL. EVALUATION (a AP #42-0 1 -82 lb; Construction of the roads and two estate houses will overoover an estimated 1/2 - I acre of the total site. This level of ovarcoverIng and COMpmction of the soil surface is not significant. le.- The soils on-site are not subject to erosion. Ig,4d: soils on-site are vina loam, a prime agricultural Until recently, the property was In agricultural production. Oil tlio day of the field trip, the property appeared to have been discal i but t'10t planted, The property is zoned A-5, and Is located north of the Chico Urban Ar"66 Green line. The General Plan designates property for orchard tkild Field Crop uses. The Intent of the General Plan and Chico Urban Ara Greenilne Is to preserve agricultural soils and land for agriculturnI Uses. The agricultural value of this property Was greatly diminishOd When It Was, divided In late 1985, Adjacent to this property on the north are two iarge agricultural parcels measuring Bo and 113 acres each. The so acre parcel Is planted Irl orchard, The agricultural viability of these larger oarcels may be 111)1),nlred with 'the construction of additional estate homes, New raildents may complain about dust, noise, spraying and odors Which coklid create problems for the agriculture community. Land Use c(1flicts between suburbar, res, I Id.gnts and their agricultural neighbors 1 often result in the agriculturist moving further away from town. The property Which adjoins residential use may be subdivided, pushing rural residential uses further and further Into agricultural landsi A condition of the original oarcel map was to designate a 100 ft. no development area from the northerly property line. This building setback Was Intended to reduce land Use conflicts between residents and agriculturalist. This buffer is ihsuffldleht to reduce nolle or dust unless it is 1,1e6vily landscaped with trees and bushes, 2aib, Normal agricultural operations will generate a great volume Of dust, spray, fumes, and smoke from burning slash, These operations may cause te'moora-y localized air 0UaIItY problems. 3b4 Development of tw:) homes I tet ane; attendant but buildings and facilities will generaile h Increase in stt ormwaer runoff, this Increase is not significant gl,#(�n parcel sl,,,P- -,n,i tors'airl. 6bi sweeping 11 --ho orchard floor and running other ho,,kvy OOU I Omen 11, V/ I I I gonerate a great volume Of lldlse. There Is no natura' Oer between the agricultural oarcels and these new res I dent I a I parCtl I Ch w I attenuate the noise, Noise levels from equipment during 'hat �t.:st and pruning operation$ could exceed 80 d8 at property line. -nolse level will Interfere with outdoor act lvjtles, speech, and pvssi;-''Y sleep, "5- 0 Cli lco Urban Area Land Use Plan has designated this p Noperty fill" orchard and field crop use Minimum parcel site under this Generm Plan designation Is 20 acres. Five acres Is Gond W onally consistslit provided three criteria are met: I. Predominant parcel size In 1=lte vicinity of five to ten acres,, 2. Vicinity of urban boundaries, J. Agricultural viability Is not impalred. Surrounding this propet'ty wast, east, and south are parcels of 10 acres or smaller, ImnledlatelY north are large agricultural parcels. Urban boundaries ars, Located 2/4 of a mile east near Be 1 I and c!iss i ck . The division of tho parcel 1 tl to sjljt%ll units will A mit their use for agricultural purposes, Since this p6rcel Is now only 12 acres and is surrounded by small parools on three sides, It Is not considered a viable agricuILL,11361 parcol. Additionally, development trends In the neighborhood WOLIld Indicate these parcels will be used for estate housing, not agrlcul WI' e - I1 Previous land division actions by the Board of $llporvicors has established this corridor as sui`table for rural ranchettos. Division of this 12 acre parcel will contribute to the trend of fl1/a acre lots along Bell Road, iia: Division of the, 'lot as proposed will allow for the construction of two homesltes. Each residential structure is estimated to generate 10.7 vehicle trips Ot This traffic wl'II flow out Boll Estates Drive to Muir Avenue, distance looking east along Muir Avenue at Bell Estates Drive or. A large utility pole is located Immediately at the lr, .Inn of Bell Estates Drive and Muir blocking the line of sight. T- pole should be relocate'!. 14a, This property Is not served by community water or fire hydrants. Mater tenders are the only means of transporting water and fire pumping ubpnratus to the site In the event of an emergency. At the time of map recordation, the appllcan4' VIII be assessed a $200.00 per Lot charge fold the purchase of w ° tenders, This Is a requirement of the Sulatl l Y l s I on Ordinance, ens : ed oy the Department of Public Works, III the northwest quadrant of town fire services are limited. The nearest station Is at Cohasset Road, 3 1/2 to 4 Mlles away, To accommodate growth In the northwest cors=r, the fire department is assessing a $15,00 per lot fee for purchase and construction of a new fire 5tatl0h. 14b,e,f: Residential development will Increase demands for governmental services. As a property on the fringe of an urban area, services are limited, 14d: School ll>=,pact fees Will be assessed when building permits are submitted for the houses. lsc,o; Properties Will be served by private wells and septic "systems. 17b; Future residents of the property may be exposed to dq t, pesticides, fertilizers, and other agricultural produets which may result In health hazards, �6� Recommended Mitigation Measure i, Contribute $75.00 per lot to the West Side Fire Station benefit fund. P. Relocate utility pole at Bell Estates Drive and MUIr Avenue to provide for improved vehiclar sight distance. LMT Ir 0 Applicant: Martin Meest;er Assessor's Parcel 42-01-82 Log 0 88-02-22-01 DATA SHEET A Project Description I , Type of Project Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Description: Division of a 12 acro 106rcel Into two Parcel of approximately 6 acres each. 3, Location At the end of Bell EGtate,s Drlve, approximately 600 ft, north of Muir Avenue, Chico. 4. Proposed Density of Development: I dwelling unit per G acres. 51 Amount of impervious Surfacing I/2 I acre 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s)i Access from new road to be constructed, Bell Estates Drive and Muir Avenue. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic tank and leachfield; 8. Source of Water supply: Individual wells, 9 Proximity of Power Lines: At. Muir Avenue,, 600 ft, south: 10, Potential for further land dlviolons and development Division Would permit construction of 2 houses, B', Environmental setting, Physical Envirohment 1. Terralh a, General Topographic Character! Level. b, S I open : 0=2'/0 C. Elevation: 160-165 ft. A.S,L, cl. Limiting Factors; None, 2� Solis a. Types and Characterlsticst Vi'na Loam, generally well drained with good permeability, Classified as a prime agricultural toll b, LImlting Factors None. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a, Earthquake Zonet Moderate earthquake Intensity zone Vi I I b, Erosion Potential, None c, Land -slide Potehtiait None d, Fire Hazard: Uncla's'sified e. EXpansive Sol! Potential Moderate 4 Hydrology A. Surface Water: None on-site b, Ground Water: Area of heavy groundwatol, Withdrawal, Potential nubsidehce area. c, Drainage CharacterlstIcs: 8h6e't flow wost:er'Iy to Mud Creek, Drainage pattern Is not well defined, k do Annual Rainfall (normal): 20--22" e. Limiting Factors, None Good a, Visual/Scenic Quality: ood, Ago operationo result In g, Acoustic Quality: Generally g periodic high noise levels during periods of Agricultural 7. Air Quality: High, excep burning. glo_ logl_s:al ;Envirohment: eget So Vegetation: Plowed fieI d rov�no desg not cover, r icant v for�l°inaroWa'�er. ,. it g. Wildlife Habitat: La p Is unsuitable for habitat, Cultural Environment: IC Archaeological and Historical Resrjrces In the area: Unknown; Ground surface disturbed, no survey Will be required, orchard and Fi,elc 11, Butte County General P'1 an designation; Crops. 12. Existing Zoning: A-5, adopted In 1966,. 13; Existing Land Use on-site Vacant. 14. Surrounding Area: Orchard, W and S: New homes under a, Land Uses: N: barn, field. construction on 5 acre lots, E: b. Zoning: A-5 C. Gen, plan Designation: Orchard and. Field Crops. d Parcel Sizes: W and �: 5-1i acres; N: 60, iia acres-, S;. mix of 1-10+ acres e, populatl^n:: Rural densities, i5. Character o! site and ,Area: N/A 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Ch1co 17, Relevant, Spheres of InflUence: N/A i6. Improvements Standards Urban Area: N/A 19, Fire protection Service: a, Nearest(State) Fire Station: " County Cohasset Road �2 b, Water Availability: None on-site, 20.Schools In Area, Chico Unified School District U9-