HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-030-014i �L; ��µµN,, � )"6
d
•. e .
e v � � � "P
rbt '
� �$ ,.� ,
. �. !
�\ ^ / �
r i � � `�
i IA � f N
� ^ '�
� `/ ` ' e
� • r
• � � , 1
���� ,•
�,
;.. i . '
a
R,
. �
s
r e
j
s
i j
a � wh _ ♦ -0,
Y �.
' , � Vt ' , ^1.V� v
�- 1 .,.
,;,
��;�cp.
�,.
' ,� � 3�j � � 6�
� , �
�,
i � - �
'�
i � � � f . _ }
p
� ,.
PLANNING COMMISSION SU
'_.-----.-._�MMAF<Y SHEET POR 1,t, DxVxST N,S
APPLICAWr Mychal Lahey
► Log#87-03-18-01JD7 SS P.Oico, CA
95927 .._
RWN R Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Ma
Parcels a P to divide
PProximatel - Lo
Y 1/2 creete 2 acre each. "�
LOCATION on the ,
northeast side of ---A . .,
�tissick Avenue �i ��"_`"-"�,-•-,k--�.�
southwesterl -_.PPro aiititely 550 r=oot
Y Of Lassen Avenue 0
-h i c o area.
AaS%SSORo
S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 42-
0 3 - l 4
WNING SR
GENERAL PLANLow Density
GENERAL ELAN CONFOp,M .* NCRYccit��-PROJEC7' CONSIS'�BNT;
B REPORT
CANT
LAND CONSERVATION ACT SIGNATURE _
CONT,I2ACTS DATE OF APPLICANT
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 3-17-87
AG ' NT SURl7B Ot CIVIL
ENGINEER: M. Donn Marshal�`-
ADDRESS 2912 Cusick Avenue, Chico
CA 95926
DATE RLANNIr�(; DTRECTOi7' S
REPORT P.RPIIARED _
ENVIRONMENTAL
E
ETERMI - �, � CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
AND DATE-- DA'r�4� ,
N
TERMINATION Kx
FILED
ECATI�I�; 1�ECLARATION` � DATE ADC7P'1"
�;T1 NEG. � �,�J
DECLAi r �-'ON
DAVE ADOPTED
-�-.,.. ENV+
IMPACT " DAVE CERTIrTED
------ STATE CLEARTr, ,dOiJSL NO,
SUB ` Comm
E
DATE
AbG►ISOnY HEA
RING bAT� �• - , r .'
AGENCY ACTION
APPEALED
BOARD ACTION EA"AR4 N0 J, }1
COMMENTS
VOR PLANNING�.ww�y..... :
DIRECTOR r S
REPORT
r.
FEB 241987
BUT_E C0U __.
—
0MV010, califocWl
(;tN);RAL PLAN C.ONECRMANCE ItRPORT
rOR PARCEL MAP (7R SUBDIVISJON_MAP
1-4
to be coMpleted b,• applicants
a;rrarc�s
l., AI)'plicant Name and address r' -fir C121
Y'rojcct Description �,g_ ---ct--
:.1, Autessor�s parcel Number (s)
li, proposed Use
,% itemare to be completed by the Planning Department:
11t� f.al1�,,ang `s.
Land Coi1servativ� Agreamrnt N0----��--
Gu rrent zoning -S R
Loi,_)•De.✓tSt �,� Rest�P.V1 .
C,�tC�eral clan Designation ,_,�, ,..�.-- �
Not Applicable -�
ta)�Wcable Condi4iot1�l criteria: No
YES
&gri C;ultural"Residential
Agricultural Compatibility �.
& Seger Capacity
:a. Adequate. Eirz Facilities� OKI
:j, Read Capacity & Maintenance kdcess to C6tcmercial & Schools b
Field
Crops
��rcl�ard &Fie p 414R
1, predominant 5-10 Ac percel site .,..
2, t'icinity
or
",3>aoan P nd._rias � r
Attic, viability rot,
Staff Determinatiotit ,�r sect
oes not
d
s,,�tts�tr.►".1;� �onLorm to the Gtneral Plan find roup-:=..
Comtr�Lnha _
RSQUE5`i'1 D LAND DI ISTON i x IFI2AL ALAN Al ,1) `. N� V P
A; 't,'i'lC APPLICANT F012. `.CETT: � ��i AWARE 01' Lttt� AIB' l; xAF
DEQ, MINA-rI;ON 12,CGARDING `I�i) CQNFOItr1ANCt W> � 1'[�1r GES
si.gnattt►rc of Applicant /
Dated
Lt) low (rovi8ed 6,,.80
y ,
f qF` i7F.'T RMZNj Or,
�p.CE
w I r Butte County
RQd' Resear � 17FRrQM - ,S �ttnxn 1lal>artment
S3
v " i,, 1
x _
off ice of Planning �on� 12 l� 7' County 0(,nter Drive
1400 Tenth Street,
Sacramento, CA 9581+ a JUL E� flovil]e, CA `35965
Xr County clerk
County of ButteR„ G. EMERO,
_a.
c, ,ZJgJEC
Filing of Notice of Determination in compliantsi With Section 21108
or 2.:1152 of the Public.. Resources Code.
I AP It Nama
Project Title 42-03-14 mychal Lahey
Tentative Parcel Map Telephone Number
Contact Person
State Clearinghouse Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouses) `;38-,7266
Public Works John Mendonsa
On the northeast side of Cuss
ck Avenue aPprox
Project Location Chico area.
imately 550 feet southwesterly of Lassen Avenue,
dividing' approximately 1 acre
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map I acne each.
create two parcels of apProximately x ------
to
tv Advisor A enc
'Chis is to advise that the ,Butte Co`Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
7-20-87 and has made
has approved the above-descLibed project on (Date)
ardin the above-described project'.
the following determinations reg g
1; The project'
, have a significant effect on the
will, X Will not
environment.
2, An. Environmental Impact Report was prepared for thsp�o�ect
pursuant to the provisions of ctQA.
ursuant to the
d for this Project pursuant
A Negative Declaration Was prepare
previsions of 'CLQA
Of the
3, Mitigation measures X ,were;
were trot, made a condti.o'c ..
approval of the project. adopted
4, A statement of overriding
considerations wa„ � Was not.,
project, ,. 5 P
for this P nal El i2 With comment and res onses Arid reoord of
This is to certify that the final '
Yoval Butte County
is available to the general public sts
project App pla,ining Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95065
And 41,
Date 'Receivedfmr Filing nat OPR SiStreet
d4-i,he
p
Senior Planner
Title
Hazch '},98
Mychal Lahey
Mitigation. Measures for TPM
AP#42-03-14
1 Pay a pro rata share toward installation of a tra,f .'JLi
signal at Cussick Avenue and East Avenue.
2, Pay $75 per lot to the West Chico Fire Station lr't;:1fld,
Inter -Depart p � MeM
�_ orandum
TO: Butte County Advisor
Agency
FROM; Planning Director
8urJJECT , REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPFOR MYCHAL tAHEy
AP#42-03-14 0,
DAT�t
June 29, 1987
This is a proposal to divide 1
approXimatel l 2 acres se crea;L Parcels o
Y / acre each. The Present zo
(Suburban-Residential).The Land Ilse Plan Mat.)"1g is S -R
County General Plan designates this area as L
Residential: of the Butte
There are no .specific or communa bensity
the area. Y plans for
The proposal does not conflict with Count,
adopted or proposed element of the Butte C"ozonin
Plan nor any count g nor am
Y� specific or communit Y General
Recommend a Y plan.
approval subject to the following mitig,t,
Ion
measures.;
1. Pay a
Pro rata share toward installati
signal at Cussick Avenue and East Aon of a traffic
venue.
2. l'aY $ 75
per lot to the West Chico Fire Station Fund.
uRH : j me
cc: "'ychal Lahey
�, Donn Marshall
pme Co. Planning Cann
APR 3 Q 1987
M. DONN MARSHALL, ALL, P.E.Oravil{o, C AM4
Civil Engineer
R;C,E. 1133300
3dd�`�C'`tJiv�iffcXlRQ-yn.2-912 CUSSiVk Ave.
Chico, California 95926
(916) 893.6259
Design - Nanning Surveying
Apr 1 I �!$, 1987
Butte County planning Commission
Attention: Mr. Davir! R. H ronimus
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965-3397
RF: TENTATIVIII FARCEI, Dap FOR MHAL LAHEY
DOG No. 87--03-18-01
boar nor. Hironimus
This letter is in response to your notification letter dater
April 13 ► 1987 for the ,subject project, My client under-
stands the mitigation measures that are required and washes
YOU to continue the Processing of this map.
Should you have any questions, please call,
�ancers?ly,
Donn Ivi'Ar8hall
s
DM I;
a1PPUNl1IX V
("MiN'I'Ys l- 11111
(tfVlR0NMPNTAL CHECKLIST FORM
T e` camIl1 rt -c -d- iy load ill �ncy)
LOA II 131-03=18-011
Ali It 42-03-14
1.. Nameor proponent MYCHAL ;HEY _
2, Address of proponent and representative Cif alpl-il irnhl,e)
Mychal Lahe _ T� 2912 Ctr
P.O. Box 3035 s 9 1_,
Chico, -CF §5027
�...,C.i Av`O_q
Ma
Chico, CA MOM
3- Project M C ,' a Wn Tentative Parcel _ Map
MANI)A'I'ORY V T N D l Nv ", ; t)1'
_!ti'i1Y' lil: N(1
�;�, I)awces tlrr prrjvt have the potential to degrade � he
qutal.it> "F tho enuironmvnt�, suhstanti.altv're,duttce
the 'habitat or aI% or wilellire .speciees, cause ta.
fish or wildlife population to droll below seir.
+uhtainini,l lever;, threaten to eliminate a rrltari't 01`
;ani'mnl , ria munity, rceduc e alae number or restyle t the
ranl;e of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
e*1 minaty important examples of the major periods
of I'alirOM hisinry or prehistnry?
h.
Does the proleeet have the potential to aaclllvv(6
:short 't'etia'm hone ri is to the detriment or long harm,
vnvironrarent-al Mools:' CA short -tem impact of the
environment it one which occurs in a relativicely
hrict period of time While long-term impacts will,
endure into the• ruture . ) s�
C, Does thin prolvet have impacts which are i11divil.du-
al ly l imitvd! haat cumulatively considerable? (A
project aaav impact on two or more separate resources
where W impact on each resource Is 'r elati.'vc y
"mal I , hit! - earere the rrrect or 'tne total or those
impacts ri ,u environment is signi ricant, ) X
d. 000, tial prn3eet have environmental arrvcts which
will va"gP pubstantlaal, aaciersv tierrects on human "1
hvings, e ithvr dirvetly or indirectla
Ulf fl PN I Q U A l l ri he 00aiapl e tecl by the head Agonvy)
(ata th, basis of this initial cet,aIaa:atilent
IM l i nil the )e rryler svA ti1�p r��e_i vis t COULD NOT ha7vv a i Iln i l i vatnt, effect
"n thu onv i ronnWnt , and at 1511Cr1.'l)l',C'IAlt' TION tivl l l he prepared.
1, YL i iini Gat although they pre,posed prea;lvet vuli'ld have asignin-
C'AM V 1 f o -'e t op the Ctl'V'i a onmvnt , there Iwl Il nut he a ;; illn i '' v an't
""Qt in this case hce4aUsi, the till" OA'I'ION MEAy+llPkM described on
'he a't'tar heed `hvvt hn vee been added to the p ro j of l , A
111CLAItA1 WN will bee prepared.
1W a i ar,I the Prol.ritz€ctrl pro l vi. t AlA% Avo a s i nn i l l tr ant e I' l vv t an
tire` in' a r0limd-nt,. kanu an LNVIlarrNMI:!0AL INIIwACT lrl,Vnirl, ,is rceclt)i rod,
Ap7:il 13r.,,1M`7_ A _,_.. ('t)IXl'FAY O 11tH"I'li, pl.,ANNINC; l):lsI'��lt'lt`i1iN'd'
David R. Hnn"imus; Asc,�ic Panne
f 3
Ite+vlewweeal llyr _ _ 'rd7i..— y-
r
Iy, ENVIItQNMEN'I'AL IM CT5„ es" and "maybe" answers are required
o a y
xp anata.ons
on attached sheet(s)) YES
MAYBE NO
1. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant:
a instable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures? ---
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?modif ca.tan of ani
d. Destruction, covering or y
-- ...
x
.unique geologic or physical features?
q
e. increase in wind or water ero5iOI71 of soils,
—
either on or off-site?
f, Changes in deposition or•eroson o beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
which may modify .the channel, of
or erosion
a river or stream or the bed -'of the ocean or
any, bay, inlet ox- lake,
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soa„Is �w
g,
outside designated urban areas?
to geolo is
of people or property g
.
h,. E,cposure
hazards such as earthquakes, Landslides, mud-
hazards?
slides, ground failure or sa.milar
2. AIR. will the proposal result in substantial.
or deterioration of ambient
a. Air emissions
air quality?-"..
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smol;c
or fumes?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
change in climate,.
temperature, or any
Locally or reg,onalllk? .�_.
WATBk, will th.: proposal result in substantial:
a. Chan es in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters? drainage patterns
b, Changes in absorption r�.tes,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
Need for off-site surface drainage improve—
ments, including vegetation removal, channel=
x
izatiml or culvert installation?
flow of flood:`.
d. Alterations to the course or
waters?
Change in the amount of surface Water in Cony
water body?an
f. Discharge azlto surface wxtersn incl.iding
alteration of surface- water quality)
but nOt limited to temperature, -dissolved
----
nk;rgeh or tuxbi.dity7
Alteration of the direction or rate of fIOW
�.
g.
of ;ground waters .xouncl Waherst
h. Change in the quantity or quality of q
with-
either t}rough direct additions or
or through interception of an
drawals,
aquifer by cuts Or excavations?
water, Otherwise
i,, Reduction in the amount of
available for public water supplies?
_w
` Exposure of people or property to water
I related hazards such as flbOding7
- .
YES
LIAY F No
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in subst4jjjtj4lj
a. Chin—ge in the diversity of species, or numbor
of any species of plants (including trees;
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, ra.Vo
or endangered species of plants?
ci Introduction of now species of plants into Iftli
area, or in a barrier to the normal replen,;Jpjjj-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in sub;jthfttial-
aT—CTange in the diversity of species, or numl)6rs
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
X.
b. Reduction in the numbers of any Unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
X
C. Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to, existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial!
a. Increases in existing 1;se levels?
Y
b. Exposure of people to s tre noise levels?
7.
8,
9.
10.
11,
12.
11
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
significanE light and glare?
LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a
g'ubst—ial alteration of the present or plan -nod
land use of an area?
NATURAL IMOURCE8: Will the proposal result in
gubsiaMal:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? —
bi 'Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
RT8K OF UPSET, Will the Proposal involve,,
a. A 19k of explosion ov the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited, toj
oil, pesticitles, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
1). Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
31strMu'tion, density, or growth irate of the human
population?
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or eveato a domatd for additional housing?
- -X-
k YES MAYBE NO
13, TRANSPQRTATIQN/CTRCIiS�b,TiON. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additi-onal vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking filcilitzes, o
demand for new parking?
C. Substantial .impact on exis ing� transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
Of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an of `pct
upon, or result in a need for` new or altered,
governmental services
a. lire protection?
b. Police protection?
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other Lovevnmental services'?
15. ENERGY, tiVill the proposal result int
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel ,or eyxel.Fgy?
b. Substantial incx t.,.-; in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
15. UTILITIES. Will the Proposal result in a need :dor
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following.
a. Power or natural gas
b : Communications systems?
c. Water availability,.
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e• Storm water drainage?
f, Solid waste and dispck al?
17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will the proposal result in .
a.ire" i n of ary health hazard or potential
lioal.th hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
oo�uc mon of any scenic Nista or view open to
the public, or will the Proposal, result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensi,e site open
to public view?
4-
v1K
WIN
k
4
YE S MAY -P
NO
RECREATION. Will the proposal Tesult in a:1_impact
'
upon the quality or quantity of existing xecreatiolin;c
opportunities?
20: CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a.i
._ W111 tie proposal result in the ailteratio,
w,
of or the destruction of a prehistoric dx.
t,
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physJca,
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does
the proposal have the potential to cnu$r,
a physical change which would affect uniquo
ethnic cultural values?
d.
i
Will the proposal restrict existing reJ1g:,ous �"'
-2L
or sacred uses within the Potential. impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL'E-VALUATION AP 42-03-14
see attached.
QN—P-E—E—N—V —IRMQ�NMENT A L—EV6LQ ATI Q�., AF1 42 -OB -14
'II:tjo,f,Sb, c,f,J6e: Development of an additional homes ito on 41,10
Subject property Will result in additional dil-lPlacementi d1sr-uption
and OvercOvering of the soil through development c) -F -LI-10 I-101tiesite and
tho dl-lveways. These changes 1,4111 result in an incropq1:4 it, sborm
water- r^ unoff from the property and the potential for riddluionl
erosion and siltation of nelghb( rig waterways. The property
Is Within the Shasta Union Ora inage Assessment DJstrI(.,L Ljr1d Hill be
required to install curb, gutter and sidewalks alono 1,0
frontage and Provide a Permanent solution to dr 11propertya naej.
consist Of d I rOct I no Lhe. water, 'to the SUDAD outf a I I()I I nc-ithis W1 I I
of the property. This may require the acqU 18 1 t I on o(,
Installation Of facilities. OOVto the east
etlents and
the All of eut4--e County is within a Moderate Earthquak
Zone VIII. The subject property is located approximatee Intensity ly �
southwest of the Tuscan IvIonocline) a fault system of u kno six miles
n
ons'ruction Of buildings '0 Uniform Building Code standards fortivjLy.
seismically active areas should Provide adequate protection to
OCLOpants In case of seismic activity.
I Sa, c I f : Th I s project W 11 1 contr I bate to tra ff I c and re I ated tra f ( I c
hazards In the area. Traffic light funds have been established for,
the intersection of Cussick Avenue and East Avenue. Contribution (il, a
PI"O rata share toward Installation or traffic at
Intersection N lights at ghat,
would help provido a long-term solution fo
that Intersection. r, congestion at
1 148' This project will
PrQ bOttion services
"ePresent an lilcrease I ri
in
detTlarid for
fire
1`0cOMmended that the
tlfi area that
applicant l
is currently
impacted.
it Is
1-11'e Station assessment
pay
area toward
a $75 per, lot
construction
fee to the
We.t Chico
station on the west
Vide Of Chico.
of an additional
fire
14b -f: This project
for public 80"Ices
will represent
In the
an Incremental increase
I n demand
area.
-S-URMTS-L-Od MlEina4-1—i -s
Pay 4 Pro rata share toward installation of a traf f 1 c z i one I at
Cuss iCk Avenue arld East Avenue,
2. pay $79 per lot t�, the West Chico Fir
Station fund.
0
APP lIcant : l,jy(,-,[ial Lahey Assessor `s Parcel it
42-03-14
Log # 87-03-10-111,
A.
,DATA SHEET
1. Type of Project"- Tentative Parcel Map.
2. Brief Description: Dividing approXiMatelY 1 Into �WQ.
paroeJ5 of approximately 1/2 acre each.
3. Loca4ion: on the northeast side of Cuss Ick Avoiii,je
approximately 550 feet southwesterly of Lassen Avenue) 11-1 the
Chico area.
4. Proposed Density of bevel r-,.—enL; Two dHe I I I n�i i it I -ts per, ocre -
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 15-209.
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s) .0 Property Fr-ollbs or, CU!�Sjck
Avenue.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal". Individual septic 5ygUems„
8. Source of Water Supply"- California Water Service Company.
9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property.
10, potential for further land divisions and dovelopinent*- '1 hIC-1
existing zoning allows parcels of approximately 6600 sqUoro
feget each on public sewer. Health Depart-m8ht reqyiremont6 and
road access recta ireMet-its preclude further davelopment of- 11 -he
p�-opet,-ty at this time..
gay._Lrqnptijn t —al Seth �ti n i
ebysica
Environment'.
1.
Terrain
a.
General Topographic Character". Flat valley land.
b.
Slopes: 0-29**
c.
Elev'-tion-- 775 Feet above Sea Leveli
d.
Limiting Factors:
2.
Soils
a.
Types and Characteristics: Vl:na Fine Sandy Loam) well
drained with good permeability.
b.
Limiting tactors.' None.
8.
Natural Hazards of the Land
a, Earthquake Zone.' Moderates Earthcluake IMt0r11;1tY Zone VtII-
b.
pros ion PotonLial*. Slight,
c.
Landslide Potential: None.
d.
I -Ire Hazard -2 Untlass ifirid i
eii
�.Xpahslve Soil Pobentlbl*- Low,
4.
Hydrology
a.
gurfaCO Water: None On site,
b.
Grouhtlwatert. Abundant valley aquifers, ary00- Of heavy
groundwater wlthdraN81--
c.
Drainage Characteristicso. Property is WIM11h the Shasta
Union Drainage Asse-qsment r,,Istrlct. Drainage must be
taken east to a nearby 01-4t$8111 line,
-7-
04 Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24".
Q. Limiting tactors: Availability of drainage 9aselljoll 4s.
S. VISWal/Sconic Quality." Moderate/developing urban areo.
6Aaoust i �, Qua! 1 ty: Good, wt-ban/SUburban residential
environment.
7. Air Quality.- Good, except during periods OF stagnant mij-,
D_UaRal_callEnv�on �ent:
S. Veootation: Residential 1andsc6ping with sceUterecj 011"ehord,
remnants.
9- Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals co,11111c)n
areas. to U1-11,3an
CLI'll-ur,ttki Env i ronment:
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources 'in the area
sensitIN-Ity area. Low
114 Butte CoUnty General Plan designation: Low Density
Pesidential.
12. Existing Zoning: S -R) Suburban Residential.
13. Existino Land Use on -sites One single. -family -dwelling,
y4. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Usest Single-family dwelling
b. Zowng: 8- A at Urban densities.
R, SR -1, RT -'JA.
C. Gen. Plan designa-17,ions: Low Density Residential and
Agricultural-Residentiald. .
Parcel Sizes: Approximately 1/2 acre to J+ acre.
e. POPU I at 1 or i z' Urban densitles.
115w Character- of Site and Area-* Transition area between Urban and
suburban densities on the Chlco fringe:
16. Nearest Urban Area: C111co.
17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: SUDAD, Chico.
IS. Improvements Standards Urban Area's Yes.
19. Fire Protect -ion Service'
64 Nearest county (State) Pire'Station: Cohasset Road
Station #42.
b. Water Availability., California 148 -iter Service Company
hydrants.
20, Seflools in Ai-oa: Chico Umirled School District.
" � d ' e.��
��, '+ � � ® �a ..� •fes'. \ a�
kN'e' • a
n �' l �,
� � �
` � ^ . �
n A, n
a a p
y'
a
�� �
��,
:n
,1
.. ;�..
\ � �� l0
� r
� � . .� 1
� . p.
.+.
4^ s "
�. ,
d �
• �,
1
M 1 � � �
.� .
- F � ,.
. � ..
K',±n � � r
'� � � :a
t. ,
iii '' �
a r ,
.. r Q. �
1 Rd4 - � � ti,_��i�S '�
. gym. ._ � v
i'
APPLICANT'_ D1 Do �n pgar�.
AuDrcRESS 3044 A
PMonticello Lane, Chico, CA 959
Purchaser 26
-i Mr. & Mrs. Maurice N1. blarshali, 2002 Va11
omlars�8a Ave. , ch' t�p, CA
PROJECT DP-"CRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 3.4 d
I G'l 0s into 4 parcels,
at nacre'- and 1 at acres a
LOCATION on the southeast corner of Shasta Ave. and Bay Avo
----�----�_._.. s i Chi cv .
ASSES(�R'S PARCEL NUMBER s
, () 42-03-14, 16 and 42w34-49 +�-
ZONING _'�
_�;��� �°-'� _ GEN. PLAN
---�----- \,`�--�-- PROJECT CONSIST�IT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 3 - 6 - 8 5 - M . Donn Iviar s 12x11
address above
DATE PUDLICAT; ON NOTICE WRITTEN
PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED • O. C,. G. B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE HAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN'.
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR t S REPORT PREPARED MAILED NUMBER
�-----�.-_:..---- �---......�
ENVIPOMIENT
DETERMINATION CATEC40RICAL EXEMPTION - DATE VltED
AND DAT);
NEGATIVE DECLARATION -DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION :. DATE ALOP
TED �p
ENV, IMPACT REPORT - DATE CFPTIPIrl D
SUB. COMMITTEE MEEIINQ DATE -----_,- ___—,
ADVISORY ,AGENCY PlEAPING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
BOARD ACTIO
d.
C. TENTATIVE Porn MAP & BOUNDARY LINEMODIFICA4PION:
8. M. Donn Marshall, AP 42-34-40, and 42-03-14 and, 16, 11 Parcels on the
southeast corner of Shasta Ave, arid Bay Ave,
M. Donn Marshall ChicO, ]engineers
OPEN
M. Donn Marshall said that the boundary line modi
been deleted from the project, f'cat40n Portion has
Mr. Marshall said that the lots Will be over one acze
for frontage improvements will not apply, so that condition
Mr- MdndOnsa said that was correct,
Mr. Reid said that this project is included within the Iqi-t'rate Action
Plan since it is within the Chico urban area, There ll'
recorded agreeeing to Join an assessment d, ave'ta document
formed. The requirement 'strict forwsiewerha if it is ever
to sewer ' for Onsite facilities for ftiturn connection
s isn't worked out, yet for Parcel maps. There wil
the map required for connection to public water. l be a note on
It Was noted that the aro rats, share for a traffic signal will Probably
by small.
Mr. Reid said that after all, thea
to Public water. Won't be a u0ndition for connection
CLOSED
Mr. Reid stated.' having reviewed the environmental reviet,
the Planning Director's Report of Truly checklist and
8, 198,
grant a mitlgatednegat1 06vO declaration will trine a motion to
M. Donn t environmental impact for the
Marshall parcel map to create 4 parcels on AP 42-24"49i 42-03-14 and 16�
finding that the Project could have an effect on the environment, but will not
have a significant effect in this cage Provided the Ve4uired mitigation measure
is compliodReporor'sdwith,t of July 8with, That gation measure is #1 0 8 listed within the Planning
unanimously, 1,985, Motion a
seconded by Mr, Str--Gter and carried
Mr. Reid stated..
this date, 1 will noting that a mitigated negative declaratio
make 0 motion to approve the parap.1 n Was adopted
Marshall to create 4 parcels on Aj-� 42-04-49 and 112- . .IP om"f Mt Donn
is 80)3 It to the following condition., a -03 14 and 16, A,PPeoval
in, conformance with the Butte County Ven nd also noting that the project is
eval Plan and Butte COUnLy Zoning.
PUxfL COUNTY AI)VIsoRy AqNdy MINUTES 1/2,2/85
BUTTE COUNT'S' ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES Page
July 22, 198
Public Worki conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable recess RS -9 -LD -I to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinanace and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of access
easement.
4. Provide road maintenance agreement.
5 Frontage on Cussick and Shasta Ave. to be constructer) to RS -9. -LD -II
standard, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk, and required street section
for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Submit drainage
plans to the Dept. of Public Works for approval and -install required.
facilities.
6. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of
Shasta Ave. and Cussick Ave:
7. Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the centerline of Shasta Ave,.
and Cussick Ave:
8, Show all easements of record on the final map
9i Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dept. of Public Works
prion to recordation of the final map.
10. Provide permanent solution for drainage:.
11, Pay off any assessments.
12. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of tho'street.
13 Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach
providing adequate sight distant:e at that intersection of Marshall Court
and Cussick Ave,
19. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
15. Meet the requirements of Butte County Ordinance 2463 and Resolution
No. 85-40 regarding impaet fee for Chico Unified School District.
planning Dept con1itiont.
16. Final map may not 'be fi le. -I prior t.1 MI-] zone brling afft? :t vee
a
eutte G jng c-,,1.
BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY MINUTES J U L 24 1985 Page t)l
July 22, 1985
0MV010, cautomi a
Health Dept. condition
17. Provide a 1:00 ft. leachfield free setback around existing wells either
within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundaries,
18. Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service
Company stating that they are willing and able to Supply domestic
water to parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4
19. Comply with the requirements of the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan.
The following mitigation measure is also required:
1. Contribute a pro rata share towards installation ()p a trtaffte light
on East and Cussick
Motion seconded by Mr. Streeter and carried unanimously,
_�--- -=------------
APPROVAL
---- ---- APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 15 1985
Mr. Streeter said that on the Glen Harris Farms !tem, AP 9949_478 the
motion was made by Mr, Reid and seconded by Mie. Streeter and carried
unanimously. (page Via)
Mr. Streeter said that on pages 8 and 9 on, the J'anellyn Ripley iterrj,
AP 68-03-85, Mr. Streeter had catstained and only Mr. Reid 'arid Mr, Mendonsa
voted in favor of approval.=," The motions were carried 2-0.
Mr. Streeter made a 6tion to approve the Advisory Agency, minutes of
July 15, 1985 as corrected, Motion seconded by Mr. Reid and carried
unanimously, 3
MEETING ADJOURNED BY CHAIRMAN MENDONSA
MINUTES RECORDED BY STELLA SPOOR
r APPENDIX NDTX H
NOTICE OF DETRRAIIIN�l97i
TO.- Office of Planning and Research FROM Plann ne rt t
.__._ 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 Cou Center Drive
Sacramento
CA 95814 - Orovl] e, c' $4
nr c
X County Clerk
County of Butte ELEANOR M. BECKEk Courd-V-0ed(
S[1> ECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compilancewith �ctlon 21108 or 21157 qt y
of the Public Resources Code..
85-03-06-04
Project Title AP # 4 2 - 0`,1- 04 £ 1 G Name
Tentative Pared Ma ) r, 42-34-49 M. 1:)01111 MnVr;ha1J
Boundary Line Modification
State C caring ouse Number Contact ersonold' e�e Num r
(11 sul-mltted to Clearinghouse)
,john Menclonsa, Public jVorks 534-4266
Or! the southeast corner of Shasta Avenue and Bay Avenue, Chico.
Pi'6jeCt Description `I'entatxvo Parcel Map to diva ems" 1" acres intoparcels,
at 1 ac., I, at ac. and 1 at 4 acres, and Boundary Line Modification.
This 13 to advise that the Butte County Advisor A encu
c'i�AgE��cy or Responsl le Agency
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
regarding the above described project.,
1. The project _ willo ., will not, have at significant effect on the environment.
ZAn Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant
.. to the provisions of CirC,lA.
A Negative Declaration Was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA,
The EIR or Negative 'Declaration and record of project approval may be
examined at:
Butte County PlAnn3ng Department
Al
CnuntV �Cettter_. 17rtve ..flroy.i.1 1 G,5�J65 �_�
Mitigation measures , were, _ were not, made a enndltion of the approval
of the project. I. Contribute a pro rata share towards installation
of ga tra. fia light on Esst and Cusick,
a. A statement of Ove'erldin Considerations was, teas not, adopted for
this project.
Date Received for Filing .� /85
Signature
Stephen A. Streeter
Senioe planner
T1t o _
(') 'i
Revised January 1985
LAND OF NATURAL W L A I T I I AhJCi [�RAUft
DEPARTMENT OF PU13L'IC WORKS
WILLIAM Will) Ch EVV, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVIL LE, CALIFORNIA 9596$
Telephone! (916) 6,14.4681
$ttFPWt'q�pi6t3f1Ttg�.°Of RONALD D, McELROY
W& Deputy Director
JUL 412-4 1985 duly 23, X98
Orovillet Lalitarnia
M. Donn Marshall n.i AP 4P-34-49 and X12-0
30+4 A Monticello Lane 3- and 16
Chico, CA 95926 QPM kI,?r'.
Dear Mr. Marshall
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
on July 22 1985, the agency granted a mitigated negative
declaration regarding environmental impact and approved th,e
tentative parcel map for the above -referenced property oubjert
to the conditions of approval listed on the attached oheet,
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten days of the date of the
Advisory Ag'.3ncyt s attPrOval- -with the Clerk of the ,Beard of
Supervisors, this action will be final,
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in
order for you to fi?.e Your "final map" With the PUtte County tiepin,
of Public Works for recordation within twenty -Pour tr,,nths of
date of approval by the Advisory Agency:
If you have any questions regarding thin matter z,yn
this office, s plc ; contact
"�"ry truly
yours)
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
. t�rk
do Metadcanna
d'hM��d;s r'As stant Di.redtor,
attachment syr
po Plainniner
Realth
M. Donn Marshall, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP & BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION,
4 parcels on the southeast corner of Shasta Avenue and Bay Avenue.
Chico,
AP 42-34-49 and 42-03-14 and 16
Public Works conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable access Rs -9 -LD -I to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state highway,
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinanace and offered
for dedication on the final mIp.
3. Show 50 ft. building setback li
easement, ne measured from centerline of access
4. Provide road maintenance agreement,
5. Frontage on Cussick and Shasta Ave. to be constructed to RS -9 -LO -11
standard, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk, and required street section
for parcels with gross acreage of one acre or less. Submit drainage
plans to the Dept. of Public Works for approval and install requited
facilities.
Ci. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of
Shasta Ave. and Cussick Ave.
7. IndicatCuse a 50 ft, building setback from the centerline of Shasta Ave.
8. Show all easements of record on the final map.
9, Provide street name sighs per requirements of the Dept. of Public Works
prior to recordation of the final map.
10, Provide permanent solution for drainage,
11. Pay off any assessments.
12. Provide cul"de-sac at the end of the street,
13. Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach
providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of Marshall Court
and Cussick Ave:
14. Pay any delinquent taxes or Current taxes as required.
15. Meet the requirements of Butte County Ordinance 2453 and Resolution
No. 85-40 regarding impact fee for Chico Unified School District.
"Planning Dept, cosi lt,iL,n
!6. Final snap may not 5e filed print to SR -1 zone 'beit g ` c.;ct3.ve,
Iieal.th Dept. condition:
17• Provide a lop ft. leachfield free setback around n�ttr7tin w�l.�.s e:i.t.ltrr
Within the property or within lap ft. of the propc,,,,tLy bcundaxins;
18. Provide a letter or other documentation from Califr,rnia 4later servace
Company stating that they are willing and able to Iljppl,y dome,tic
water to parcels 1, 2 3 and 4
19- Comply with the requirements of the Butte County Citi I.rt:4te Action Pl,,,jtj.
The following mitigation measux,e is also required;
1. Contribute a pro rata share toward, installation c)f r) tx,,Iffjc light
on East and Cussick,
Tot Butte County Advisory Agency
Fr
ROM: Planning Director
SU8JECTt Report on Tentative Parcel Map
for M. Donn M. Marshall.
AP 4-2-0*S-141 16 and 42-i4-49
DATE: July 81 1985
This is a proposal to divide 8.4 acres into four parcels, zoning
+acres, one at 24- acres, and one at 4+ acres. The present it PA -C
(Planned Area Cluster) - proposed for SR --1 (Sttburbah Residential, I acre
parcels) i The Land Use Plan Map o -F the Butte County General Plan
designates this area as Low Density Residential. There are no specific
,or community plans for the area.
The pl-opotal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or
proposed alement of the Butte County General Plan nor any County;
zpoti+ic or community plan.
The Board of Supervisors approved a Rezone from PA -C to SR -1 on this
property 7/2/857 Ordinance 2476. This m complios with the recently
aper ived zone on-site.
Recommend approval t!ubjemt to the following mitigation
treaturo/conditidn%:
M3 ti g,atiotl,�Mg�wt�It�
I* Contribute a pro rata share towards installation of a traffic light
on Gast and Cussitk-
lOto On map: rezidootial development it zub�uct to school impact
feet.
2. r-inal ni.,ip may not be filed prior to SK -1 zone being effective
(anticipated
I.MT,. I ki:
CC % M. Donn Mai-zhall
Inter -Departmental Memorandum
Tb Planning Commission., Board of Supervisors, Advisory Agency
FROW Laura Tuttle, Associate Plannerl'
SUBJECT: Environmental Analysis for Donn Marshall for Rozoac3 and
Tentative Parcel Hap on AP 42-34-4
DATE:
April 1, 1985
This property was approved for a 4'5 -unit cl,ustor development
under the name of Shasta -Bay instates. An iinit;i,al study was
prepared sufficient for consideration of this latest project:
Rezone to 811-1 and Tentative Parcel Ntap.
The previous initial st�}dy anticipated higher, level of
development and envirMa. ental impact than will be realized
with 1 -acre lots: However, the areas of impact remain the
same: sewage disposal, traffic, drainage, demand for services,
schools.
Environmental Health and Public Works standards will ensure
~owage and drainage are adequately handled. Traffic impacts
tl he reduced byinstallLng urban improvements along road
1, mages. A mitigation measure oil the PA-C which required
co cribution of a pro rata share towards installation of a
traffic light oil East and Cussick will be carried forward.
The County has no means by which impacts to public services
can be reduced.
No ,further action will be taken until an agreement is reached
with the sc)lool district, or the school fee ordinance is
effective (+j- 30 days)
A )`litigated Negative Declaration is recommended:
LT/ss
cc., Donn Marshall
Mr F, Nits Maurice M. Marshall
r
r APPENDIX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST F01W
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
ERD Loi'; //
83-v02-07-03
I, BACKGROUND AP
42-34-49
1. Name of Proponent Jon Grrgolre
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent
500 Nlaj.n S'trect Carlton I,oweji
11co, GA 95926 2 WiMiTi—iis )f l.! -i'lJ'alle
0
3. Date of Checklist Submitted
4. AgencyRequiring Checklist
5, Name o,E Proposal, i� a�pl.icab e Rczonc �5-I2 _to P,1-C
71 , ENVIRONMENTAL VIrPAC"
(Explanations of all ind "maybe" a.nsv ers etre
required
on attached sheets.)
IBES MAYBE NO
1:, Earth, Will the propo al. rest It in significant
a. Unstable earth coed •ns or in
Changes in f,10010,;i_c istvuctules ?
om--
b, disruptions, displ:acemenk s, com-
pact ion or ovor covering of the soil?
paction
c, 'Change in topography or, ground sur-
face relief features or removal of
top$nI l?
yC
1
d, Destruction, Covering or modifica-
tion of any unique geologic or
physical featu..es?
e, Incro,nse in wind Or wauar erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
f; Changes in deposition Or orosion
of beach .ands, or changes in silta-
tion, depOw i t i0h 01: 'tOS .On WhiCh
may modify the channel of it river or
stleam or the bed of the ocuan o1
any bay, inlet or fake?
g� 'Loss of prime xigHcul.turally pro
dueti.vo soils outside designated
urban areas?
�(
Apprndix r page
I or
ir:.
YES MAY131r
N0
It.
Exposure of people or property to
geologic Hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mudslides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
C�
�(
?. Air, Will the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial deterioration of
ambient or local air quality?C
b.
The creation of objectionable
odors snir" e or fumes?
c.
Significant alteration of air
movement, moisture or t ojrlpowa'turC
or any change in climate., either
locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in sub:stant.al
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of w4 er movements?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of,
surface water runoff? X
c,
Reed for offsite surface drainage
improvementsi including vegetation.
removial, channolir ation or culvert
installation?
.i,
Alcor tions to the course or, flow
o� flood waters?
e.
Change in the amount oC`surlace
water in any water body's
f,
Discharge into surface wato s, or
in any alteration oG surface
waterquality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygeiA or turbidity?
g.
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of, ground waters?
h.
Chailgo in tho quantit-y or qwali.t.y
A
Of gl'ound 't"'At.o s either th:rcugh
direct additions or wit•hC1l;awals,
or thr out;tx in t ercep tion of an
aguifrr 1w cut or excavations?
Ar �ndix I�' .. page 2
of 9
a
i. Reduction in the amount Of water
othFrcvi.se available for
public
eater supplies?
j4 Exposure of people or propert
to dater related Hazards
flooding? suciy as
4. Plant Life , J l Che
in substantialY,ti: Proposal result
a: Loss of Ve;;etat.i.on or change in the
diversity of
species or 'lumber
of any species of
trees plaits (iilcludin
shrubs
grass, c, -ops,
microflora and aquatic plants)?
...
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare
or endangered species
Of nlzants?
C. Introduction of
nets species of
0"Mr-5 inrcl an rtl-cM, or i.n ,y ly��r�-7er
to the
normal replenisl7melit of
eti,sting
species?
d. Reduction in acreage
Cultural crops of any agri-
5. Animal Life. the
Will he
proposal Yesult
in substantial;
A C4 an,t;c .ttt elle cl verGity of
or numbers of atly species
rpeci�,sx
u
animalsirdsland ani
inoludirigreptiles,
efishmals and shell
fish, bentltia
or,t;atismsy insects stir
Microfauna,) ?
bi ReciUCtio11 of tltc' numbers of any
unique, rn
e or en(181180ted species
Or' animals?
C, Introduction of tient specx.os of
animals into
an arca
a barrier to the migrarioneorl� is in
movement Oe animLj l s 7
RCdU,Ctiotl Of-, C �,
date •'n.Cl,oachment upon, or
r *oration to ex -'s ting rich or
wildlife
habitat
� C.
Appendix V
- page 3 of 9
6: Noise. Will the Proposals u i t re in Y..tS
substantial;
�- YBE N
a. Increases ill noise levels?
b • Exaosure of people to evere nos
levels? se
-�G
7. L L-3 ht and Glare,
Pro uce sgnanCCJli;t�thorprlareal
8. Land Use. Will the1
ink PzopoSaZ result
�nificant:
a» Alteration of the Planned land use
of
an area,or establish a trend
which will demonstrably lead
alteration"? to such
b. Conflict with uses on adjoining
X, G
properties, or conflict Caith
e" blA._.'., d
reercational, educa-
tional,_ rel ions
or scientific
LISOM
9. Natural Resources. Will ttie
.proposal
resi�J t in stiff,; akxal
a. Demand fu , .
r or increase in the rate
of use, of
ativ natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
a.LL
10. Risk of- Upset, noes the proposal
nvotve a risk oC
an e:Plosin or
' the release of hazardous Substances
(including, but
not 1 itu5'tecl t,o oil,
,-pesticide's chemicals or radi:a.t ion)
in
the eve'' t OE an accident or upset
conditions?
ll, Po ulation, C1ill the ProposnL
signi` icantly altet the lc crit ion,
distribution_,
densit or ,i� the Y� f �;,totvth
rate ohuman.polat�lation of
an
,area or titys.ical.l.y divide all
estahl.i.sho�l ommuni.ty?
c
12, flousin{;, Will the •-
_-_---L proposal.
si ;na t ic�intl �, �,IEFect otiistrn ; }tousi i ,
or create a (Icon IIILi FOV
t'tddi, Tonal
housing
.._._.. Ap��ndj,x
_
P 'r
page 4 ol"
13 . ,-ans artation/Circulation.--x
proposa resu Willthe
Y-
NO
in
a; Generation of substii
vehicular movement7antial acicttonal
h-, Signi.fcant effects on
parking facilities,
ne or demand for
parking?
C. SubstIntial�---
tr,IaspoImpact: upon existin
rtation
---__.
sys'tomS?
�-
d. 5'f""ificant alterations
--�
r erns of to Present
of ,�o circulation or movement
Plc tinct/or
Fjoods?
e, Alterations`�.--
air traff.%c? to waterborne, rail
or
i. increase in, tra C --..
is ha :ands to motor
vehicles, bicytlist~s
o.k pc est
1 Pedestrian.?
is ;�
I. et°tlilthe ro
L t�pau, or re P poral have
for tl1 t in
t�ntr or a ub;,
6QrViC08 "n r,3 i t(� gid, �',�Veri7mvt1tr7�ilntial
� f tltc
following areas;
a ; Fire I- •ection?
b, Poli ce
c • School;; g
or oner racrsat5.o,al
fa c i l i ,8?
----.�
ek Maintenance of
includiroa
nn ouhlic .Cacili ties,
, ds?
,.
Otherse
�;Ovt�t-ijtnentr1l
�C
r s
V].ccs?
15 : En---y,Jf the
...�..:
proposal. res ultin!
a, Use Of substantia
or cnergv?
allf�`Uttt:� t t`uel
o,
b Subst�lntr�l�.•
etl5t�nc� 4 tlCrea-90 Ill delltctnd
upon
Soutc.e', of enol' r of
tyh develaPment;
sources
o Of nett'
f et�cry?
y
YES MAYBE
-NO
16 .
Utilities: Will the proposal result
in a neeU-for new systems, or sub-
stantial alterations to the following
utilities
a. power o r natural nasi
b, Communications systems?
JL
c. Watery
d. Sewer (will trunk Line be extended,
providing. capacity to serve new
development) ?_
�...„,
e. Storm: water drainage?
7.
Human }lealth, Will rhe proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health) ?
b, Exposure of people to potential
health hazards'
�.
18.
Solid [taste. 14111 the proposal result
in any si;nificant i,rpacts associated,
with solid wast- disposal or litter
control?
19,
Aesthetics,, Will the proposal result
in t e o)struction of any public
designated or roco nizod scenic vista
open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of art
-
aesthetically of ansive site open to
public view's
--
20.
Recreation, Will the nropogal resW-6
in aR impoet upoll th.o gllnlity or
quantity of existing public recrea-
tion facilities?
21,
Archeolo ical/.HistoricA1. `Will the
proposal result in an a terati.o l of
a significant Archeological: or
historical site, structure, object
or building?
iC
,
Appendix V
page 6 of 9
YES MAYBE NO
22. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a, Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment:, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels,, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal com-
munity, reduce the-number ur restrict
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of
Califortia history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short term henof!L., to
L e detriments oC uublicl; adopted
lona-temp onvir:^.,mental ioals7 .
c. Does the project have impacts which
are indivdu,slly Limited, but
r°tmul'I ivoly co"r"dol"Ihle? (a project
may impact on tw.; or more sepPrate
resources when ::"ho impact oil eaci
resource is rol.n �4.vely small.,
where t.11e e,f f ec L of the total
those impacts oto ',he environitmeiL, is
s ianificant' )
d, hoes the project have cnvirotimental
effects which t��i*-L cause substanLi�1
adverse cffect8 on human boiris,
either diroctrly or indirectly?
AppcndIx F pale 7 of 9
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1'1'07ect Urso
1,.
Type of P ,*Joet: Rezone froth S-R to
Brief Dcsc;t'ptian:- PA-
3 • Locatiotl: C 4.5 units l A C, .; single stat•,y,, 10
�I • p otitherst corner of Shasta `'"tIV0-sem,
Pro osed tibt,s,ity o1` netirelo Pinent: Avetitttnd P'.
5• amount of lml,crviotIs ,SUrf,,, - ; 5.4 DU/Ac,t`o t, Avenue.
�• Access and Ne;a►`est I'uirlle 12ontci s �70ss density
� �pproximato��y 60
artd to i3ft,t Avenue; Access i ty ;hast,'i Avc�nur
00
'�_ l4Cthod of .Setvage Disposal:
lacrcolation rate Septic; 10 11"t'cs ticr inch average
G locations) . (range 3
8: Sottrrc 01' IV�ntcr eSulal)lY`; Cal. to 28 nt nates per incl at
p. ProximityY of Power Lines: Cali, Water ,Srry cc
ld• Of 1'o t' ace fit
1'tirthct' land diva.sions and do
Parccl Will be Cully developC�l b vcloprnextt: (sono
Environmental ,Sett:t y' this pro :e .
F J c. t
r�ltyg1Cal T�ntr, t•pil� ���%,
1 , �•e va in
L
General 'C`ophgraplt c Character. Plat
c. EloIlation: i7s
foot A.S.L
d: Limi,tit,g
soils ranctaa`s ;_ None
4,
a • TV'Pos and ChL rac
teristics3 Vina fine sand
mo,sttit`e we'll, Surr'ace tl,`tti.nage fair, y loam -
Cood ,is rictaltur,nl. soil. retains
b: Limitl.ns , sui�cirainagc good,
�, F ac to t•s t None
aNaturtil. ila:�ti`ris o1' the Land:
a • l,ttrt)tclual;c Zpne t
L• erosion Potential �ladct`ate t,artl� tral o intens ,
c• Nodcrato LlgtielaactioS.l.�oh�ntial Hy zone Vill
• rit'e Il;tzard: Unclassified
c. r-,xPans*iIto Soil Potential 1`1yd 1 ogy
LOW to mode ra tc
a• ly,` a i n a i
i,e Cltciractcr:stics; parcel cera.%ns to the ►vest taty
b :Si,asta Avenue and iia
• Annual Ra in fa 1.1 y Y A et�ttc and
C. rna'2'liitl.� ��t�
L nii,t ng C'actorti; iVonc "` 24" year
5, Vi5Ila /Scenicua3 it r:
6� Acoust'i'c ttal.iQLI y • A� victil.tut'it'l Residential
7•�ir f, ,Y • llurtt res3dentlrt�l✓A.t;ri�cul,l:ut°tti
tallty "aod - doclinin ;
AP 42-.>4-4d
1TSCLI.S:SfON 01' INVTRONNii:NTAL r,VALUATTnN (continued)
13ialOc ical Ellv:i 1'oIlMont:
+8• V090tat ion; A matoro almond Orchard covers elft iro parcel.
'There ale a fele English and Block Walnut t � l .
Shasta Avenue. r ees along
9_. Wildlife habitat: provides habitat far bird
r
Other small 111a111111als. ?, ,SCIul; `rols
C01 tUral EnVi ronmoot
lo. J1rci1ae0109ic.al anti historical. Rosourccs in thci trl�ctl:
known i�it 1111111ediate aro,
11. nurte County General. Plan designation:, Low Density Residential
12 Existing Zoning: S -R
i.,r
13, EXAtin, . `
,I, nd Use on' -_s i tc s Mature almond oi•c:l nrd
1.4 . >ur•r•ollnrl ifig llrarT
a Land Uses: Agricultural residential
b Zoning: SR, SR - I:, RT -1A
c. Gen. Plan d0signata.=: Agr•iCtlltural-Rcsidcrltial and
LOW Density Kes idential
d. Parcel .Sizes: .48 acre to Z2 acres
T. Population: Rural residential
15. Character or site and Area: Agricultural Ros iclonti.al
10- 1`OUrost 11rhnn Area; Chico
17• fire Protection Service:
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Butte County
Station 'l'
i•rant ier Circle.
b Water Availability: 3 hydrants raq.tired an talit'oM.1a
15.Water Service mein lines
SchLOIS in Arco: QUO Unified school District
lb; ib,c; 1Gjn Vere l3t�o,icct tivs.11 Te.suIt In d151i'lacemant, calnpc.lct.i.on.
di5rtlptiolr rTncl ava"rc�otFc�ring of the soil. Appr'ojimately 'rap; mP tilt
soil will be covered b)o imPer�•ious mOtcrial
1 ,. p This will
1 11 significantly
Will be required. l& parcel is Viti7to
the drainage
increase the
amount a (` storm z•unoi'f. A atmrltrc.rtt sal,
Assessment District; ,r 11"001:11 1e Shasra Union Drainage
solve dr�rinage problems � l to �r1i a:��sting line Is
to
be install a ran Appr a.� Itgatol 600 root of culvert will
Shasta Venue,
1gj 4d'. 8.4 acres or ot•c*heal land with V�inra rh1c srTiiciy 1"oatn ;;oxl:
will. be converted from the historic-iase 1'01• agriculture to residential
The site is 1oc �rtrei within the doss gnatecl Ch:l:io Uz bnn t1Ttio7 and
S cast of the urban nrowth bourldrlr � }
ioal•�l�of Sr►p ivisor�s �1tat;rlst (the grconjjn0) adopted by the
will, be re►na��ecl during '' 1182 A mn'i or i ty or the almond trees
construction, some Should be t^etrli,rrccl 1'or
r`esidentia i use and 1 rinclscrrpin, .
1h: SLtbs:icieTllLw is r � ,,. . , .
1 potential IV' nl, hrla�alzl in this area due x,11 part , to
elle roundL of gtclund►vatel' tv.i.tl7clrlrtval tvili.ch occurs, .� ti�Uctr.lrai. design
rrncl l"aundati,on plans Should take this factor into account.
w
Appendix i1 Page 8a or 0
:. • ril, A2_3a-4�J
0 A �
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued)
2a: Deterioration of air quality in the localized area will occur
to a limited extent as a. result of this proposal in c ori j unct ion
With previous and future projects in the arta, proposal will.
acid about '360 vehicular trips per clay to traffic co►.11115 on Shasta
Avenue and Bay Avenue
Sqd l'lae orchard liaal)itat for various small mammals and birds will.
be reduced b; this pVO j cct
6a: Noise levels on the site will increase from rosidential con-
struction and activities and increased vehicuinr traf`ric.
ga: The density .for this project willb�5.DU/acro,
This is
Within the maximum of 6
DU/acre tho 1tDensity
Residen .ldesignation. The project is consistentwith o
planned
land use for this area.
ula-
8b, 11: This project Will create a pocket of higher density po p
tion than the surrounding arca; this 11111 coli l}.ct somewhat with
neighboring uses and population. This conflict will he reduced as
time goes by and the surrounding areas are developed to Similar
densities
l) a,i;, f 0ouf 3 til VOII}r111a11'
lcday
WibWaaao(iby �tac
residents of the pi000_ed 45 rveringunits- itemflstcrtt
traffic counts av ai We (Public Works, 1951) show an ADT or 2700
oil ,Sh;as t i 1lvonur just wos t or the lispl anrido ;end 800 ADT on Boy Avenue
at lic.11 Road.
Street improvomonts to rac i l itatc traffic movement and increase
traffic safety for motor vehicles, bjc,yclists, and pedestrians will
be necessary. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street w d0n:inl; 11111
be requirement; or public: Works, A traffic signal contribution
Con either the lntersect }oat or hast Avonuc:/Cuss i ck Avenue or Shasta
(Menne/Tho Esplanade way :also be a requi.rament
The increase in traffic usage of Sly ast:;a and bay Avenues wilt caal,l
for increased ntaa,intcnance to these roads
14t An increased demand for public services w} 11 occur. The
anticipated revenues versus the costs to prov}do those scrv"cos is
a concern which warrants further review, Two major areas of concern
are schools and Police protect!" The Shori rl`'s Department Cools
this project will require (additional police scrvic:e to the area at
a time when existing paatro.l allocations are at tall inadequate level:.
New developments i.a, this area have boon impaaetillA thn schools that
st~rvc it, Those schools a�lroa,cly lativo etlrol.lmconts l�eyantl ctaptacaty.
parer to the attached letter from the school.. distract. 'Phis project
will be di:acussed with the C.0 SD4 Board an April Ca, li}13a.
,lal,,�atrl i Y ra - page 8b or 9
W -34-49
DTSCUSSTCIN OF TNVIRONAIENTAL IVALUATTON (continuod)
1ncroased road usage on Shasta Avenue and bay Avvijljt wi 1 1 reclui re
more maintenance
15a; Tncroasod energy usage Wi.l,l occur from the Construction of
45 dwelling units. Energy conservation measures 9boul d be incor-
porated in the construction of these dwellings.
l6cs Water will be provided by California Water c .
this delrelopmcnt, Property -for a well site nary bV rcclui rod. in
10th Sower servico could potentially be provided by the City or
Chico. the os timated costs for such an extonslon should be obtained.
for comparison with the septic system alternative,
1?a, 3h: The Environmental Health Division has rcivIcwed the sewage
Isposal plan and requested revisions be made. l:r�rl,ior approval. had
'�C.G1r ^�•tecl for a tentative subdivision on the :carne situ.
"2c: The impacts o Y. p primarily °"•• j-�}. �� °' l " of sa.��airkcGrn�e ertar.n, r°:rritarrly to the
fiscal impacts i4 th! .rcrr.t'ired public services sand t'he effects on
elementary and socc" 1i 00110ols of the Chico Unified School District.
Secondary crrocts or Lrarfic; wc,rofion and drainage will he mitigated
by conditions of the 'public WorKs tri rortivilt, 'firough the offects on
thc� $01001 district ore not substantial Cor tl;ia particular project
this project, in conjunction with other ptanned and proposed projects,
will impact the school district. Negotiations are tinder way to assess
a school impact roo por dwel'ling unit. Action by the Sc'lggyl clistrict,
the 13oaacl of SulierVisors and the City of Chico will. bo .involve , r
this decision. A Mitigation
5itrinc�surec��.sopr'oposr a dtdd��uss the impactot1 thci school district.
agreement by tho applicant and the school district.
comparable c trc rcclu i res
Appond x lr Y page, 8,e or 9
IV. DETERMINATION
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
on the basis of this initial evaluation:
0 I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effecteffect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
s r,..e6mmeiided-
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures desc:.ibed on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
is RECOMMENDED
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant
effect on the environment, and an ENVIRnNMENTAi, IMPACT
REPORT is requiared .
Date blanch29, 1953 ( nac,_ _
(Signature)
Ciai,q Sanders
Planning Technician
Ford
I3ii"t c l a urs" [''I"�n .L n �; c p 1:
Reviewed by _,
-ephen A Strector
Son or Plannet
*A sup�tlettient to the 11V-O iously cortMcd ruR (V, the Chaco Arai
talld Use Ilan$ 80-72 SC11 1( 80092314 is rccotntncnzlecl ill t1las case.
The stipplement WoUld foc115 on the fiscal iml?act:� to pi:ovicic the services that would be required aloh wl th tr'i 1 ric
Circulation Itd t1rainage np,icts.
AppendiX V pacJP g` of 9