The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042-030-061f Y r. • ♦gyp. •'.♦ - ` • N •� kk :i. l� ^.� ' �\ � �•� � � U ` s ��,,, '� �� ., —�-, �. ��E�$ °:�^�: �° �� "� � _ ttj L' fLfL f/ n �� ' - � r y v °A. _ � _ 1. �/� 3, t I �� .' t �•� � � U ` s '� ��E�$ �° �� i �1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY' SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS 84-05-02-02 APPLICANT y 'E1 `ward ,Surmin5l):. ADDRESS #19 Raintree Lane - Clico CA 95926 bWNE,t. came as above PROX-lM DESCRIPTION 3'entatiye Parcel M� c� livicling4 4 acres + to create four Pgrre1s at 1 1 acres + placll LOCATION . On the nortlilrrst Corner of Hensljai Avenue ,and Cuss' ck Avenile Chico area. ASSESSORiS PARCEL NUMBERS) 42-03-61 ZONING SR -.1 GEN. PLAN A9. e's`l. - PROJECT CONSISTENT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED MU 2,_ 1984 Max Albert 1:360 Mangrove Avenue Chico; CA 95926 343-3738 DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN , PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G. B. a DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED .DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MAILED NUMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTORI;S REPORT PREPAIwll ENVIROl •U;NTAL CATF ]OR COAL EXEMPTION DA'T'E FILED tTW AND Dp,TEATIOIV NE iXPIVE DEOLARATION ,DA 'CE ADOPT'D MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED �. ENV, IhIPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIPM SUB, COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE- `\ A\1 -� ADVISOrY AGENCY AC'T'ION BOARD ACTION COMifiEI�T, � /-I- `e P C" � Oroville, CA 95965 FROM: Planning Depar—lont 7 County Cerate Drive (Filed) Oroville, CA 95�QS SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21I52 OF the Public Resources Code, 94-05-02-02 Project Title I'm Titwti-_(13-FSI Su'rminsl,"Y State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse) Contact Person Tele ) home �umber John Mendonsa Public Works _(916) 53p4-426 Project Location On the northwest corner of Honshaw Avenue \renLig., hic-1 area. Project Description, Dividing 4,11 ac-ros + to create :four parcels of 1.1 + acTcs each. This is Lo advise that the Butte County ACIVISOTY Agency —(Lead Agency) has made the following determinations regarding the above -described project: 16 The project 0 will have a significant affect on the environment. 3 i 4. 15, wl 11 not An Bnvirontion'tal Impact Report was PTOP,"rod, For -this 0 project ivirsuant to the provisions of CEQA, and was certified 'fied as required by Section 15085(g)� 14 California Administrative Code, A Negative Doc.'Lavatlorl was prepared f0'r this project plirsuant to the provisloris of CrIQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at tho Planning Department, 7 County Cantor Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. A Notice oCtxemption Was filed indicating this projectis oxempt 'r`,oln environmental reviow. A statement Of OVorr'I dtnt, COn',fld0r,ttI0n t7 was not, _1 adopted for this project. Mitigation me".1suros adopted by the Load Agency to -reduce the impacts of the approved projoct arq, None Signature Stophon A. Sttcetcll' Duly 4 K Sail I t0 -.1 P I a n I I U -r IT I t 10 FENFIXV E D Nona OF -DET2,11MINATMN I JUL, -3 11984 1'0-. Secreta ry for Resources LI 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1.311 ELEANOR M. BECKER, CountClerk Sacramento, CA 95814 y County Mork, County of BUttc By A. JACINTH —Deputy 25 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 FROM: Planning Depar—lont 7 County Cerate Drive (Filed) Oroville, CA 95�QS SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21I52 OF the Public Resources Code, 94-05-02-02 Project Title I'm Titwti-_(13-FSI Su'rminsl,"Y State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse) Contact Person Tele ) home �umber John Mendonsa Public Works _(916) 53p4-426 Project Location On the northwest corner of Honshaw Avenue \renLig., hic-1 area. Project Description, Dividing 4,11 ac-ros + to create :four parcels of 1.1 + acTcs each. This is Lo advise that the Butte County ACIVISOTY Agency —(Lead Agency) has made the following determinations regarding the above -described project: 16 The project 0 will have a significant affect on the environment. 3 i 4. 15, wl 11 not An Bnvirontion'tal Impact Report was PTOP,"rod, For -this 0 project ivirsuant to the provisions of CEQA, and was certified 'fied as required by Section 15085(g)� 14 California Administrative Code, A Negative Doc.'Lavatlorl was prepared f0'r this project plirsuant to the provisloris of CrIQA. A copy of the Negative Declaration may be examined at tho Planning Department, 7 County Cantor Drive, Oroville, CA 95965. A Notice oCtxemption Was filed indicating this projectis oxempt 'r`,oln environmental reviow. A statement Of OVorr'I dtnt, COn',fld0r,ttI0n t7 was not, _1 adopted for this project. Mitigation me".1suros adopted by the Load Agency to -reduce the impacts of the approved projoct arq, None Signature Stophon A. Sttcetcll' Duly 4 K Sail I t0 -.1 P I a n I I U -r IT I t 10 COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 1,10RKS Buffe Co. Planning 00nm 7 County Center Drive droville, CA 95965 JUL 201984 916-534-4266 916-534-4339 oroville, Cafornla July x.7, 1984 L R�: AP 43-03_61 Edward Su minsky Tentative: Varce! Map 19 Ra3.ntree Lane chicon CA 95926 Deaf Mr. Surmiris y: At the regular meeting of -the Butte County Advisory Agency held Jitr the Agency adopted the negative declaration regarding environmental 984 , A p AP 43-03.61 review incl approved :the tentativ+z parcel ma for subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals timelly1--with ilod--within ton (10) days of the date of the Advi sory Agency a pp --w i tf the 'Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 4 this action will be final: When -tile conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your' "final rriap�r widi the Butte County Department of y Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) Mori, of the date. of approval by the advisory Agency. If you should have uestions regarding this matter, please contact F `cn� q J this office,. Very truly Yours, William Chaff Director of Public Marks `�.Ui P,ierrtlotl Assistant Director JIM/ r1a A tachment cc4 pl aril i rrg - Lnvi ronmen till Review CnvironmPntdl HODIth Depar:knit�iit I�a� A:Llsox`t L11 1110 (Revised 2-28-84) MAS Edward Snninsky Tentative parcel Map, .Four parcels on the NW corner of Henshaw Ave. and Cus Uck Ave. Chico -area. AP 42-03-61 Eng:.ueer,; Max :Albert Public Works conditions; I. a:ndicate a 50 ft. building setback from the ccntexline of Cussick, rne. and Henshaw Ave. ?. Show all easemeht8 of record on the final map. 3. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 4.4 Pay off any assessments. 5. Obtain encroachment permit far al-1 driveways, new or existing and construct to county standard'., 6. Pay any delingaont taxes or current taxes as requu�ed. 7. Meet the requixemente; of the ;Butte County Fire Dept. Heal.+h Department conditions; 8. Provide a one hundred feet (100') leaohfield free setback around existing; wells dither within the ;property or withinone hundred feet (1001) of the property boundario:3. I, 9. Locate and if necessary relocate the sewage disposal system serving the existing dwelling onto their respective parcele. I U r Inter -Departmental 'Memorandum To: Butte ;County Advisory Agency 9 FROW Planning Director c SUBJECT. Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Bdward Surminsky on AP 42-03-61 DAM July 5, 1984 This is a proposal to divide 4.4 acresa- to create four parcels 1.1 acres+ each. The present zoning—is SR -1 (Suburban Resi- dential - 1^acre parcels). The band Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Resi- dential. There are no specific or community plans for the area.. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element ;of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or ,community plan: Recommend approval bH:lr cc; Max Albert' YES MAYBE NO 19 RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantify of existing recreational oppo,rtuniti.es? 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. a.Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric o historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic 'building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ✓. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 42-03-61 Project Description 1. Type of Project: Tentati,Q Parcel. Map 2 trie:f Description: Tentative Parcel Map dividing 4.4 acres + to create four parcels .f 1.1 + aches each. 3. Location: On the northwest cFrner of Henshaw Avenue and Cussick Avenue, Chico area. 4: Proposed Density of Development, 1 dwelling unit per acre, S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Moderate 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts onto t Cussick Avenue and.I1en.shaw Avenue. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal, Septic. 8. Source of IVater Supply. Wells 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Property line 10, Potential for :further land divisions and development: None as all surrounding lands .have been subdivided for single family residential. Northwood Commons ;is developed multiple :family housing. Environmental Setting I Terrain a: General Topographic Character: Flat agricultural: land b. tlevationi 160 :feet ASL c. Limiting Factors: None 2. Soils a. Types and Characterjstics Rc;ceht vall.oy alluvium -sediments. MOde'rate liquifaction potential,. b. Limiting Pactors: Liquifaction potent�tnl 3 Natural Hazards of the land a.. Earthquake 'sotto: 6 miles from epicenter of 4.0-4.0 quake on Tuscan Monoc;l i ne, b, Erosion Potential: None c. Landslide Potential; None d. Fire Hazard,- tnclass'if ied- e. Expensive Sohl, Potential: Urban l` lodorato-Shr:.nkage 5-7 f. Potential subsl:detico area, .{ _ AP 4,2.03-61 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONME14TAL EVALUATION (continued) 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water: None b. Ground. ]Pater; Heavy groundwater withdrawal area, potential subsidence area c. Drainage Characteristics Subsoil permeability, moderately rapid to rapid d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24 inches S. Acoustic Quality: Good Biological Environment: 6. 'Vegetation: Walnut Orchard 7. Wildlife Habitat- Small animals that dependon the current land use Cultural Environment 8. Archaeological and Iiistorical resources in the area: Moderate to lois but is close to area of high sensitivity. 9. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural -Residential. 10. Existing Zoning: 8R-1 iii Existing Land Use on-site: Orchard, one single :family residence 12. Surrounding Area: a. band Uses: Residential With one small orchard directly across Cussicic from the property b. Zoning: SR -1 c. General Plar, Designations: Agri.cultural-Resdont:i`a:l d. Parcel Sizes: 1 acre 13. Character~ of Site and Asea! Single falitily residential 1.4, Nearest Urban Area: Chico is. Relevant Spheres of Influence, Chico 16, Fire Protection Scarvicc: a, Nearest County (State) fire S1-,ation: Chico 112, Butte 1142 17: Schools in Areae Citrus rl,ementary, Chico Unified School District lb, c,o; Develop%Ont will result in some disrupt -,1011, displacoment and compaction of tite soil which shall increase 7°uno:ff. I-IMve'ver, the topography is very flat and no erosion is likely to occur. Ig i The land use is currently an orchard. 'Che Proposed project will result :in seine plci.ine agricultuxii. soils .lost. This impact is not significant because the surrounding land use is single family rosidonti,al and tho project Is compatible With, the surrounding land f use f: `Cho project's anount of imperveablc surfaces will. change the drainage patterns :incl alio rite and amount of surface water runoff. A peTmanont soltitiOn to drainage tivi.11 be recittirod. 3It; The water on the pro j pct . , to wili lie supplied by private Wtlls . There will be ivithdraWals ;from underlying aqu .ffvrs. h Appendix: E z IMP 6 s AP 42-03-61 DISCUSSION OF TNVIRONAIBNTAL EVALUATION (continued) 4a,d: The land use is agricultural; it's currently a walnut orchard. Project development will limit tic amount of trees able to be left on the site. we do recommend that buildings are placed to preserve as many trees as possible, 5a As development occurs, small animals which, rely on the existing land use may be impacted upon. 6a,7: Project development will increase noise, light and glare levels in the existing neighborhood. 8' The current land use in the neighborhocd of '-he project is single family residential. Nearby is Northwood Commons. The project is. completely compatible with the existing land use and will not change any trend established, 9a: Project development will increase the rate anduse of natural resources by virtue of the fact that it wi.11 bring in approximately 8 to 12 now persons into the area. This is thought to he a non- significant impact. 11 The project will bring :in some new persons (see 9a) . 13a,c: The traffic counts for the local roads that serve the project are as follows: Boil at Cussick 880 ADT tat 1770 ADT Cussick immediately in front of project site 990 AUT Renshaw 1560 ADT T'hese 4rc fug+ 1981 :From Public Work.-) The project will creato all additional 5 to 90 vehicle trips a clay. •' cuunulative impacts on the transportation system 9.t o1n th;i s parcel map and others in the area, could rohuire a traffic signal at :fest sand Ile Cussick. 1.4d -i:; Residential development will increase the need for public services, Vivo service will be providod by Butte County Station No 42. The local elementary school 1,s Citrus, Ci;tru� ,s in the Clla.co Unified School District, which has dotormined than this project will have a. significant (cumulative) effect on the dist-eict's schools, This :finding has been supported by the Butte County Board of Supervisors, who have not yet adopted an Ordinance billowing the collection of fens :Cor nnancing school facilities. Soo the attached letter from the Chico Unified School. District l6a, b : Power and communication lines e:tist up to the property lute, Stormwater drainage will be provided. TI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OV SIGNMCANch b, See :i.tem 14 Appendix V - page 7