HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-050-026to
0 I
t
PLANNIN' COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
- _ 84-og-24-05
APPLICANT Dave Forsman
ADDRESS 42 New Dawn Circle Chico CA 95926
OWNER John H. Barker 2-965 Rodeo Ave. Chico; CA 95926
PR0,1ECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map dividing 8.75 ac. to create l_ pcl
.plus remainder.
LOCATION On the south side of Rodeo Avenue, approx. 2000 ft. West of its
intersection with Nord Avenue_ Chico area
ASSESSOR I S PARCEL NUM$ER(S )42-OS-26
ZONING A-5 GEN. PLAN Orchards &Feild CroiaPROJECT CONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECK 'VED S e tt emU e r 241984
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN .� PUBLISHED_
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED -a O. P G. g.
DATE MAILOG LIST Pl.IPARED
DATE MAIL-OUT NOTICES WRITTEN. MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL, CATECORIM EXEMPTION DATE FILED
DETtVINAT'ION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DtOLARATION - DATE ADOPTED,,—
° ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE GER.TIVIED�
SUS. CoMAJJTTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DAIS
ADVISORY A0ENCY ACTION
tOARD ACTION _
Wpl
COMMENTS
ode« c w y."i a'"r*✓
7 a.s ) r t i.nt �r G� 0" i? "� r"m �"� ��' � � �" � t� �'F�.�"uA x"
. C I".ok, e*A,e" vV"[k'mf oP C. ir- £it j i r^,#A I
,,,ry
' A T e? kevo tai wo.
Nb
8. Dave l orsman, AP 42-0y-26, one parcel plus rcmai rldrir on the south
side of Rodeo Ave., approx. 2000 ft. west of its In trlr section with
Nord Ave. Chico area.
OPPUT IWj� xxrV*c
Dave Forman, applicant, was present.
Mr. Mendonsa asked if the applicant was agreeable to showing the homesi:te
wU-L`hin 200 ft. of Rodeo Ave. on that fin -I map.
The app .imat� said that he was.
Mr. M-md,oa a said th- parccl viol.atml th_: 3:1 rale, but the configuration
was approved by thn Planning Cormi3sa.M.
Mr. :For;;m-an said that the uon'C"igura`tioa was chosen in order to get 100 ft.
Of frontagra a d to Set one acre
Kr. Mendonla asked if the .tppLicint object to changithe eorfi.Uuratloi
to meet the 3:1: rule.
4
E
k
1
BUTTT4' COUNTY A Eta" AGruicy nrwurv;S Page 1.1
uccember 81 , 1:9
.;r, NtGndoiisa sold that the project could be con.Jiti.oned to meet the 3:1
rule and the nip could be ehantacl s.lxghtly tri co,nr)ly WitEl ttarit requiremonu.
tax°. Forsm7n was agreeable to that.
F)�iiNRJVCr CIDSLD
iJ,r. Reid said that she project is outside the area of coag rn regarding
nitrates, but the mitigation could be left on, the project..
,Mr. r'eid stated; having reviewed the environmental review checklist and
the Plr-&riing Director's Report of Dec. 17, 1984 and cony mations at this
meriting, I will make a motion to grant a mitigated negattvc declaration
of environmental imp%ict for the Dave Fors►aan parcel map to crekite 2 parcels
on AP 142-05-26 finding that the project could have an ei'f'cet on the
envi.ronmeat, but will now _Piave a significant effect in this case provided
the .required mitigation Measures are complied with. Thcm c mitigation
measures are mitigation measures #1: and 2 as listed within the Planning
Di.reebor's Report of Dec. 1.7, 1984. The motion, is made nriting that the.
p;rojcct is in conformance with the; ,Butte County General Plat" sine )3ctt'tr:
Couaty= Zoning, and the Agricultural Uegrogation has been approved by the
Count;/ of :Butte,. Motiou seconded by the Courity of Butte,
tir. Reid stated: nottng that a mitigated negative: decl:Aratian was adopted
this date, l will make a motion to approve the pare, 1. map of Dave Forsmar,
to dreabe '2 parcels on AP142µ1J5-26, Approval is subject to the following
Gondi5ions
PU'ollc barks conditions. -
I.
ondit:ions.J. FrontageRodeo i?n:IE.C) Aveittie to be consLcucLed to RS -LD -111
sta-lidard i .e , curio, guetet', sidbwal1: and 're,4u;i'�red stree-t
Section for p8ircels i'ti twh gross acreago rai one acre or le~sr=
Submit, dr.ainarge plans to the D`parLtzient:. of Public Works for
approval and install requited facilities.
2. centerl.inthe of Po dao AvrtLy OE Brjue 3t) riclhtr—ot.�-,.ta,r :from the
ottt,e.
3. Yn:iicciL C-1 57 9t. building set.baci, tram the con�rrjine of
RodOO Avrrnue.
4.. ShoY,' all of record on d o final t7:4ir.
. Provido permanent s,oluLlon dor.~ d r4inago
G. Obtain Oncrolch6t1ont ror,atl-CI 1.'VeV71-t i, nr!%, o,:r E'.:tizt ino,
End Consteu t to count st ��tlrl�ir.ds
7. Pay c' iii doli nqu snt t:wt:�:'� � tai cUr.'J'0ht~ La -x, 8 an, roclu'rccl,.
8. M,: t> trttcw rotiu.rumKunts, of Lt7a ituL .r.. County P'I-o tJ.���ar.ETtryt3
J r w
COUD1 U rlL
B U TT B TIV Y ADVISOV%y AC'F:D1r`f r"j "S
December 31, 1.984
DAVE P-IORSWAV, TRA,
page L.
the requiroiirienLs of the usc-.1 permit for an acjricultui-.;<jl
segregation -
10. fleet the 3:1 lot configuration r-zquirements as por Butte
County Code.
Health be U
,p ztv L r,, e nt condition -
11'. Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around oxisting
wells either within the property
or within 100 ft. of the
proper-ty boundaries (note: tq7o wells westerly of parcel I and
one well northeasterly of pa.rc:-1 2).
Planning Department condition:
12. Original o�-,iners inEorm their heirs, successors and assigns of
t which - -1
he restriction ich disalloWs additional dwelling, frou
being locatedion the property until eithot of the following
conditionz o0cur: a) the property is rezoned to any other
zone; or b) at least ten (10) ycai"s has elapsed froi-a-dat-e of
recordation and the Co'notission cjrcu;-,iztancos regarding
said property and other properties in the area have changed
sufficiently to reconsider the restriction.
The fallowin�j VIltlaatiOil Meanurcs must also be compifed with:
I., Conform to the provisions OP the Chico Aroa '-Ifitt-ate Action
Plan if adopted at the time. Of recordation of the final map.
2. Shoal hopie°ito.on I -re parcel within 200 ft. of Rodeo kvenue
on final t.-ap.
9 . M qt, 14t t4c.C:LWxOocI*,) AP 117-13-123) IP -4 ar-A IP8, 2 partebo epproX.- 21100
jt�,ty,, 9% on the 1 atl,
,� so 10
nu. woh.lqt of st d a * f Aaitst Ild ChIto Ara
(toat4 from TIOV. 19� 191-4)
IM-Nt'JIG OJETT
Said
3
id p
Id t
rtob 'be reachil-I With the tt,'"Ot d
34
appli3O(I tot
The origtwal boond!AVY lItIO M
fu� tho Vtlriel M -to on, Litt, ,
guIng to do tile W`Uff' thIrig,
CRI)PrOV-11. of V,`tr4 v1�0jec"t 4,outd rvA, hrAvtl all 3.1t�pa,�,t
�jqy w*Lh tho '."no
tjj(j ani wjut I a�.iLrituat.ivally do a
FROM: Planning Department
7 County Center Drive (Filed)
Oroville, CA 95965
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Detormination in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public R ' COdo
8MM�?BS
Project Title
'APPE Mx L E
Daye..,!'1'o.rsman
NOTICE OF DETERMINATJO'Nq'
rD
Contact Person
John Mendonsa,Public Works (916)
Telephone' Number
534-4266
Project Location On the south side of Rodeo Avenue, approx.
JAN' 14 18ro
Chico arou.
Secretary
for Rt—,,sources`
Tentative Parcel Map - segregation- of
a homesite in an
1416 Ninth
Street, Room 1.311
Sacramento,
CA 95814
ELEANOR M, BECKER, Counly Cleric
County Clerk,
Count), of Butte
By A. JACINIK
Deputy
25 County
Center Drive
Oroville,
CA 95965
FROM: Planning Department
7 County Center Drive (Filed)
Oroville, CA 95965
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Detormination in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public R ' COdo
8MM�?BS
Project Title
Ma AP 42-O5-26--
Daye..,!'1'o.rsman
State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted
to State Clearinghouse)
Contact Person
John Mendonsa,Public Works (916)
Telephone' Number
534-4266
Project Location On the south side of Rodeo Avenue, approx.
2000 -.-Feet west of -Nord Angime—.in the
Chico arou.
Project 1)e8cription:
Tentative Parcel Map - segregation- of
a homesite in an
agricultural zone to create a one acre homesito and, a 7.75 acre
remainder.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency)
has made the following determinations regarding the above-described
project:
1. The project will have a significant effect on
the envirwiltiont.
will no t
V\1
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this
project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, and was
certified as required by Section 15085(g), 3.4 California
Adm lnistrwtjve Code,
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions; of CEQA. A copy of the
Negative Declaration may be examined at the Planning
Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA 959or).
e. A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating this p'roj'ect exempt From environmental revie1w;
4. A ding C0151(10ratiOti0 was notei
adopted ror this project,
51 Mitigation measures aeJopted by the Lead A,,jncy to reduce
the impacts of the al)proved pro joct are;
Sea dttachmant
tare
St apl,on A. Streatet
DA to vc 1 0
AP 42-05-26
Mitigation Measures
I. Conform to the provisions of the Chico Area Nitrate Action Plan
if adopted at the time of recordation of the final m41'p.
2. Show homesite on I acre parcel within 200 feet of Rodeo At,enue
on final map.
t�
`'�,���i/f�M•!'fR'4�' '.ari /Y,r••. li/'if iir'l[✓.ifj/ r
�,.. LAND 01: N,ArURAl V1ri IrFI A1`rtO
DOPARTbIPNT or, PUOL.IC WORKS
6 Et
WII.L1AM (8111) DIICf t», Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , OPOVIIwI.Gt CALIFORNIA 75965
Telephone! ON) 53444681
January 3, 190!5
Dave >•orsman
#2 Now Dawn Circle RE AP 4.2_06-16
Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Mr. POrsman:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Atjvi.sary Agency
December 31 1984, the Agency adopted the:mati`at d g y held
declaration. regarding environmental review and ga � negated e
Tentative Palkcel Map for AP 42-05-26 subject to
listed listed on the attached sheet. as
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the
date of
the Advisory Agency's approval ---with the Clerk ofthe Board
Supervisors, this action will be final. of
when the conditions of approval are complied with, it will
Order for you to file Your final ma be in
p" with the Butte County
Department Of ,Public Works for recordation within twenty
months of the date of approval. by the Advisory Agency; --foul (2�1 )
.If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact this Office.
Very truly yours,
William Chef
Director Of public Works
Lt�k.
John t9ond,ansa
�TM:ds 69i.stant Director
Attachment
cc: -Planning �- NnvirOnlnenLal Review
Env:Lrohmentai: H0,41th bepartMent
Ha r.n)artr>3resan and Asaocietses
DUN
0
0.
alp
ro�i1Jo , %
o ,G OW
Pave For -
srnan, Tentative Parcel ti
iap,
the; south side of Rodeo Avenue one parcel
intersection with Nord Ave. approx. 2000 p1Us '►mainder on
.AP 42-05-�6 Chico area. ft. WOOL of its
Engineer; none
Public Works uc>nd*tion$
l• .Frontage on Rodeo
standard, i.e. Avenue to be constructed to ��,_ _
section for curb, gutter, sidewalk and re jUiredbD-111
parcels with gross acreage of ane
Submit drainage plans to the Department
approval and install re uired at"'Cc� or less.
dene of Pu:Falic works for
� facilities.
2. Deed to the County
of Rodeo of Butte. 30 right-of-way
Avenue. from the
centerline
3• Indicate a. 50 ft. building setback from
Rodeo Avenue, the centerline of
4. Show all easements of record on the final al maF-
Provide permanent solution for drainage.
6,: Obtain encroachment eri
and construct: to Coupfol
all driveways
new or exist n9 r
'7 Pay any delinquent taxes or curxt�t taxa.
8Meet the .requirements os_ the butte Count as required
9• Meet the requirements of L•hc u � .Fire 'Department,
segregation, Use permit for an agricultural
10 Meet the 3.1 lot configuration r�:quireme
County Code,
nt as ps�r Butte
Health Department condition.
wells 0, leachfield free setback i1 Provide a 100 ft
er within the property sok around existing
property boundaries e, wit;llin 100 fta of the
one Well northeasterinote two wells westerly of
y of parcel) parcel 1 and
Planning Department condition:
12. Original owners 4
eit he'
the restriction Whi.chInEor�t�cias�1110Ws�add:itiona
successors and assigns ot~
being located an the property until either dwellings .from
condition; occur. a) the
propert r of the follOWing
zone; or b) at least ten (10) y is re�;onoa to an
rccor:dation and the Commission fids circumstances
ts has elY other
said pro nrt p' d from date gof
p' Y and other properties in the ��rcanhaverchanged
sufficiently to reconsider the restriction,
k
The following Agation measures must also b t
e complied with:
I. 'Conform to the provisions of the Chico Area Ali Lrate Action
Plan if adopted at the time of recordation of the final map.
2. Show homes to on I acre parcel within 200 ft. of Rodeo Avenue
on final: map,
•h
1•
l
` 1
i'
r
�1
December .F Q, 1984
Butte County Pl:snning Commission
#f7 County Center Drive
Orovilles California 95965
Attention: : Mr. Dave Hironitmxr, .Associate Planner
Subject: Tenten-ative Parcel Map., AP # .42.05-26
Gentlemen:
in response to the suggested mitigation measures listod in the
envsronrmntal evaluation dated Oct. 26a 1984) I will conform to the
provisions of the Chaco area nitrate Diction Plan if adapted at the
time of recordation of the final mala, The homesite shown on the
tentative parcel map is as far as practical from the Southern Pacific
tracks
1 have deposited with the Chico Unified School district a check
In the amount of $625,00 and have signed a echool impact mitigation
agreement as written by the School. District's attorney Neil McCabe.
Ater discussing the storm drainage issue with the Butte County
Public, Works Division It is ,9, ��pi.nion that due to soil conditions,
the agricultural nature of th , property and the fact that Rodeo Ave.
elevation is higher than the property the storm drainage :issue should
cause no problem.
Thank 3rou,
Yours very truly,
Div s Vor. s man
No 2 New lawn Circle
Chico; 95926
9000 co.'dor plowng C� armM
11
?�spv�lle;� litot�i
' 0 APPENDIX h
COMM `1" OV I T"1'1.
LNVIRMOIE,ITAAL CHECKLIST FORM
(to compl e l'et y l.eaa Ai;cr ey )
T.ca9 # 84-09-24-05
C. BACKGROUND1I' 1i 42-05-26
1. Name of proponent Dave Forsntan
2. Address of proponent and representative; I°.i f apnl.3etil�;l.
#2 New Dawn. Circle
a aC i; CA,. 959 2 6G
S. Project description M Tentative - Parcel Mqp
I 1 .
MANDATORY FINDINGS Op S I GNI T'T CANCiI 1'LS MAYBE NO
FATE.
a. Does the project 11ave the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of , fish or wildlife gpecie;, cause a
fish or wlldlll'e population to drop beloiv selr-
sustaini.ng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal, corr,11)1nity, reduce the number or restrict the
range or a rare or endangered plant or animal or
elifliint�te .important e,aamPles of the major prriuds
of Cali fort;,, history or prehistory?
b. lto(-s the pru,i -s-t have the potential to ac.hi.eve
short-term bei c>l a!; to the detriment of l,on1;-term,
environmental i nai.s? IA short-term impact on tike
environm^nt is one tvlaich occlirs in a relatively
brief period or time cal :ale lonlr-torr impacts trill
endure into the f11tt1rO,
L. hoes the pt•rsiect h.aVO imp!ct< which are Jvdividu>
ally limited', but cumul.atil•e1)• coils .ldera, :v? CA
proivet may impact on two ot, more separate resou-•ces
avhez ? 41.c impact on each resource is rv!atively
s?nal1 but w}Irtirw the cf1'ect of the tc�tatl of th,ise
Impacts Olt Clic• oli ironment is sihnifitant,) `
pl'O ect 1111ve en,, i t•onmE1ntal e Cf ec is tghiria
l�i1l C11118e Sl1bStdTlt1,1l adverse effects on human
heinl,s, piths• slirectlN. r>r inciireetl\*,?
DETERMINATION 1'I'o hL, c,llpplc�tcc} lad• t11e I<eac) Agency)
On ,the basis ofhi�� it1'it(Ot Ovaluation;
1J,10i find thc propos'v T project COULD NOT ha t -o jA s il;ni.ficant eJ'1"acct
c111 the envi rdnmOnt , aaaad a NP:r'; I TVI: DECLARATION 1vi l l be prepared.
1 hIl; find that tt"tthoug;l t11s• proposed proic('t Could have a 'sign � x
eant ef*foct tit) the L'Dvta•taalmcant, there will not be a significant
1.=fCect in this �_.aso hecause the mrrT,GATTON A1C-1AS Rt'' -8 described all
-tile attrarhed sheet have, hkenl add('d to the I)VclJect. A. NIiGATTVV
IJ W1 '11tHTtON 1yi l l lacy paep:araci.
1S1tis' rind the propclscd pro,ieet MAY have a �si,grtif`Icant ef.foet on
t�11(. environment, and an )iNVTRCt,NMEINTAL ►`111ACT ItliiMI` Is required.
October 26, 1984 iPOVIINT), Cly: Rb,r,T IILANNI C; h}'`AR`INfIiN`i'
Davi F' R;
Associate Planne
Reviewed by:
.� I,V. ENVIRONMENTAL
ACT
xp anations ot all_ °'yes''" and "maybe' answers are required
on attached
sheet(s))
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant;Xi:5
: Y
NO
�t.P;l'EE NO
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?'
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d=
Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion Of soils
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a .river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
gi
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
Outside designated urban areas?
J
Exposure Of people or
p property to geologic
--�~
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
?. AIR. Will the proposal, result in substantial:
a.
Air emissions Or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of air movem nt, moisture, or
temperature, or any chan4;e in climate,
locally or regionally'?
3. 44ATER. Will the proposal result in substantial.,
a.
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or freshwaters?
b:
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patter
or
or the Yate and amount of surface runoff?
C,
Heed for off-site et"rface drainage improve-
ments, including vo etation removal., channel.-
ization or colvort installation?
d.
Al.tevations to the course or Flow of flood
e.
waters?
Ch.xnge in the amount Of surface water in any
watel body?
f.
Discharge into stirf�ice waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved
oz+igen or turbidity?
g,
Alteration of the direction or rate of flar
o," ground waters?
h.
C�tange ' the quantity of ground graters,
either 'through direct additions of with-
ithdrawals,
drawals,or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
i.
Reduction in the amount of water othentise
available for public water supplies?
�
j.
Exposure of people or property to stater
related hatavds such, as flooding?
YES
riWYBE NO
4.
PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in .substantial;
CHang:e
a. in the diversity of species, or number
of
any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of -
any unique, rare
or endangered species of plans?-
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existin- spec4es?
d;. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substanti,11.,
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of
any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any
unique,'rare
or endangered species of animals?.
c. Introduction of new species of animals into
"—
an area, or result in a barrier to the migi°atiot
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a Increases in IxiSting noise levels?
b. Exrosure of people to severe noise levels?
.`
"r.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
signi icant light and ,glare',
0.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su�an— i`al alteraltion of the present or planned
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
substH tial
a: Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
oi
b. _ any. non-renewable natural
es,
resources
10
RISK OF UPSET,. Will the proposal involve;
a. A ris; of explosion or the release of hazard
ous substances (nclading, but not limited to
oil, Pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b, Possible intOtfOronce with
an emergency
response plan, or emergency evacuation plan?
IL
PU ULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
stribu on, density or
growth rate of the human
population': ,
X`
12.
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing; housing,
0'14 Create a doirland .Cur additional housing?
�.
t YES ?MAYBE NO
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand fr p g?
impactl�on existing trans ortatiotl
c. Substantialn p
systems?�
d. Significant altcratiozs to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people 'and/or
goods?
e; Alterations to waterbOrne, rail or air tra fir?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicl,as
X.w
bicyclists or pedestrians?
-
14.
PUBLIC Ilill the proposal have an e;ffocYt
_5.LRVICES.
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental, services:
`��
a. Fire protection?
b, Police protection"'
c: Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. rlaintenance of public facilities, including
,
f
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15.
tNBRGY. Will the proposal result in
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16,
UTTLITIhS: Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b; communications systems?
C, Nater;
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage'?:
W
f. Sol.ici waste and. disposal.? .�
17,
CIUAIAN HEp,,TH. Will the prop(�sal result in:
a. Creat'n of an health hazard or potential.
healt.'tazard any
mental health)'.>
o, xposuTe of people to potential health
hazar,'s
13.
AESTHMC Will the proposal result in the
o s trtrctl, j'Vista or view open to
of any scenic
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation -- an aesthetically offensive site open
to public
4
Y l
YES MAYBE
No
19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in, adverse physi.ca
or aesthetic effec`.s to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
X.
c. Does the proposal have the potential to caus4
athan h sisal e which would affect unique
p Y � g
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing Teligious
or sacred uses within: the potential impact
area?
V. DISCUSSION OR ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 42-05-26
See attachment;
r,
a�
DISCUSS113N QF ENVIBOWMEI l8L_gYALUATIOt! AP 42=05-26
P is a division of on o acres tt create a 1 acre er c ssi te.
This r•ojeCt for the segregati
42-0.5-26
B: The Butte County Board of Supervisors, in approvin
to allow the segregation of a hamesvis
conformit , fount! that thng the Use Permit
Y with the policies of the Buttes and Project was in
11: See item e. Y general Plan.
13:: An additional dwelling will
vehicular movement in the area, leading traffic along samount a"� additioitiai,
9 Eat Avenue and both the Highvyay 32 nterl increase in
the Esplanade intersections,
intersections and.
14a,b,d,e,i= Though not: significant
incremental increase in demand for ' this Public seervry icces ies will
« l represent an
14c: The Chico Unified School District has indicated
Project will incremental) that this
Y contribute to conditions of
within the Chico Unified School District. S1.
attached
from the Chico Unified School DistricOvercrowding
t
letter
lir. The proposed development is
and individual septic s stems, to utilize individual
though not wiin an arealofthighlls
th
nitrate conCerrtratians in the groundwater,se
identified as a Contributal-y source of nitrate Pollution systems have been
groundwaters in the Chico area, It is recommended that the conform tot E pollution in the
h Chico Area Nitrate Action Plan if adopted atPthe etime
of recordation cf the final map,
IX. MAIVDATu�t'Y,;.,FII�T7IP�lGS Op' SIGIVIFI
___CANGE
b. See item 14c ` t school s`)
C. Accumulative impacts include those to schools
storm drainage of f ects in the area,
, tr`af f C
s and
Adverse affects on human beings could include epi
high nitrate level.% in groundwater pozutle to
Appchdix Ii Pa8e 7
s � 42-0,r-,.26
51JGGE�7EI7,,,,ht x `t' I GAT I f]N_ME4aSURE
i
Conform to the provisions of the Chico Area Nitrate action plan
if adopted at the time .of recordation of the final maps
a. Show a hnmesite on the map that is located as far a% practical
from the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks.
It is also suggested that the applicant or his representative contact
the Butte County Department of Puk�lint ctkChicoarding UnifiedoSchools tO
storm drainage' in the area and to co
District 'regarding imr'-acts to school facilities within the school
district
Applicant; Assessor- Pa'rta5 4 42-05-26
pp ante Dave Forsman Log iV
DPfA_SHEET
A i?roect�Descr ip? an'
Type of Projects Tentative Parcel Map
1 TYP re ati-in of a homesite in an
�„ Brier Description: Segg9
agricultural zone to create a one acre hiomesite and a 7.75
acre remainder,,deo i'ivenue, app raximAtely
>. Locati on t On the south side 0f.RD
-Ooo feet .wesi; of Mord Avenue, in the Chico area.
4. Prop y of Devel apment a Overall density of 4.Z75
acres Sper Ddwelling unit. One acre per dwelling unit on the
smaller parcel. Minimal
5. Amount of impervious Surfacing=
6. Access and Nearest Public. Road(s):
Property fronts on Rodeo
Avenue
7. method. of se0age Disposal inch vi dualuwel l OSeptic Systems
a. Source of Water Supplya
9. Proximity of Power {,_ines: To existing home on-ito development:
gip.
Patent al f or further o�nunti 1 i thenprovisonso�f tl'►eapproved
�
ne
under existing zone g
homesite segregation Use Permit terminate.
13. Cnv%rpnmsntalsetting
Phys'cs1�;Env_xr.gnmen��
J, Terra-ili
a. Sohoral Topographic Character: Flat valley land
b. Slopes: 0-2"l.
c Elevation: 160 feet ASL
d. Limiting Factors,., None
2.. :soils �.. a high quality., deep
a. Types and Characteristics. Nord loam,
soil
b. Limiting Factors: None
Natural Hazards b+ the Lana
a, Earthquake 'Zone: Moderate E,art'hquake intensity Zone VIII
bw Erosion Potential: Slight
c, Landslide Potential: done
d Fire Hazard; Unclaszified
e E par►sx ve Soil pbteoti ai Law
AP 42-05-26
4. Hydrology
a. SurfaceWater: None on-site
b. GraUrid Water.", Abundant valley aquifers
ca Drainage Characteristics% Property drains generally
northwest toward Mud Creek.
do Annual Rainfall (normal): 20-22 inches per year
0. Limiting Factors% Storm drdi.nagv +acilities in the area
generally limited.
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Good
6. Acoustic Quality: 14bderate due to adjoining Southern Pacific
Railroad operations
1. Air Quality: Good
Biological -Environments
8. Vegetation: Valloy orchard lands
go Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley
orchards
Cud -Enyicoame 4-o
10, Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Low
sensitivity area
11. Butte County General Plan designation: Orchard and Field Crops
12. Existing Zoning: A-5
13. Existing Land Use on --site: Orchard and One single family
dodiling
14i Surroundiiiq Area -i
a. Land Uses:, orchards and single family dwellings at rural
densities'
b4 Zoning-. A -S and C-2 to the southwest across the Southern
Pacific tracks
ci. Gen. Plan desighationst Orchard and Field Crops and
Commercial to the southwest across the Southern Pacific
tracks
do Parcel Sites: Generally I to iO acre Partelsi Mostly 3 to iO
acre parcels e.
Population -Population at rural densities
15. Cher -Atter of Site and Area% Transition area between urban +tioge
ap.o frStL-ntjve agricultural lands
16, Nearost Urban Area: -
i7. Relevant Spheres of Influence:
le. Impeovomehts Standards Urban Area; NO
iY* Fire Protection 8OrVittt
aA Ntarezt County, (State) Fire 8tAtibhc Nord Station 41 and
Cohasset Road Station 42
b* Water Availability: Tanker only
20. Schools in Area-. Chico Unified School District
Appotidix V (b)
CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL D18TRICT
1163 EAST 8EVENTI-4 STREET
CHICO, CALIFORNIA ?59226
891--3004
11, 1934
Butte County Dept. Of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, Calif. 95965
Attn,: John Mendonsa
SUBJECT: Tentative Map for the Dave Forsman Parcel
AP No. 42-05-26
Dear Mr. Mondbnsa:
The project in question is located within the area served by Neal Dow
Elementary School., BidWell Jr. High School ctrid Chico Senioi- High
School. The district's projections indicate that the project in
r"I,.111M,tion would lead to the creation of one residential unit which
expectod to generate .23 students -,It the elomehtary level
(K-6)., 10 LsLt-Jerits at the junior high level tV-9), and -10 students
at the senior high level (10-iZ. These sti.tderits., when combined witi,
students Cjonerated +11orn projects in the same school attendance ar
Would place Bidwell Jr. Kirth School beyond it-, capacity. areA
The Districts projocticinvm* indicato
,cts will generate
1,37,3 additional juniorhigh StUdOnts witi.'-i Ridwell Jr. High School
attendance area although there is only caot
junior, high
students. Thus, the cummil,-,tive effect of Approyal 0+
these pro,jectsv including the Project in qU9StibJ,,, is ttij
Bidwell Jr. High SchoOl 1,04::� Students beyond capacity. , place
It sho"'d be hotedthat the school district has PreVIOUsly submittbd
to the tint krd of 8LIpej-VisorS regarding conditions of
Overcrowding., and the E�oard held a ho,,iring on tl,i r,SLIajC$Ct 01-1 JAMU'Iry
10� 1954» l am enclosing for your information 'A
copy Of A letter
Culla Co. Plan 4n900 `1*
1904
4f r
y
Fjutte County Department of Public Works
October 11, 1924
'age 2.
which Mar -tin J. Nichols, Chief Administrative Officer, wrote to the
President of the Chico Unified School District Board of SdUcAti ort,
dated Februar° 1, 1924 (copy attached) . Mr. Nichols indicates that
the Soard of .upervi cors Supports the documentation on rondi ti ons
of overcrowdir,g.... Thus, the Board of Supervisor% has recognised
that overcrowding exists in the Chiab Urii°fiod School District.
The cumulative effect of approving land divisions within the area
served by Bidwell Jr.. High School, including the projoct in questions
is significant and adverse because of the conditions of ovEjrcr'owding
discussed above+. please advise how this cumul7tivO impact is to be
mitigatedprior to approval of the project.
Sincerely.•
pcaiyi n
G. Thompson
Business'Man agor/Comptroller
FST: vv
cC: Neil McCabe, At+*,..,wney. -
beve;l aper/Appl i cant
.,R
Cu4 fo �a.. �ianninq Carr�na.
t i► ,�;? 1984
Cdrovillo, �C:�1i4�rnit�
CHICO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRIC?
1163 East Seventh Street October 11, 1984
Chico, CA 95926 'Date
(916) 891.3004
ewl _Submitted Subdivisins oParce
or ls on Studant Hous n
Tmn�Ct of N Y
-11
(A,P Na, _42-05-26 a 1 Units
:l vi si on ar Parcel NamQ :� eve Forsman `Tentative parcel Ma
Sub Chico Senior
Neal DOW'Bidwell Junior ._._.� Senior Nig -�.
Attendance Argas --_"�. Junior High
Elementary. ,
1 _Units V ,� ,43 =
43 K-12 students
,23 K-6 students
.43 K-12 students X .54 (elementary factor)
— .20 * 7-12' students
43 K-12 students X .46 (secondary factor)
10
*Asp i fined to.10
---= �' Senior Hi g
Junior H ,gig _
J ,
Senior High
Junior High
Elementary School Chico Senior
r Bidwell Junior,
Neal DOW ...�.� -- 1712
1185 Capacity
423.... Capacity ` '..�.----
Capacity M 1143
855 198485 Enro11 merit
1984-8.5 Enrollment W 367
1984-85 Enrollment -
student Stations 569
Student Stations
Stu'den t'..Stations 61 Available 330 }�Vai 1 ab1 a
._..--...---
---, Students Generated
Available
StuderIts Generated from Subdivision 558
Students Generatr:d from Subdivision 1373 List -
from Subdivision
.. 16 Lisp
List -- Under or (Over) 11
Under or (Over)) Capacity
Under or (Over)' 45 Capacity 043) . ---.--
(�y
Capacity
Octobetm 26, J 984
Response due tfate; .�
I'
co
BUTT', •
215 OC)Ur4TY CENTER On. / CAbVILL, CAUFORNIA 95965 -MOO / (910) 534-4631
Y
o.
o
n
t8
MARTIN J. NICV= February 7, 1984
CHIEF gwoo TA ym off'
00MERSof THE WARD
Ai. SAAACENI
JM1E COMM
1ALoA WHEELER
MATHA MOSELEY
LEN FULTON
Mr. Robert Ross, President
Chico Unified School District ,
1163 East Seventh
Chico, CA 95926
'Dear Mr. ROSS:
S
Re; Chico Unified School District Request for Board of
Supervisors to Adopt SB 201 Fees
This is to 'inform you that the Board of Supervisors has considered
your request to adopt building permit fees pursuant to SB 301 and has
rejected the proposal While the Board of Supervisors suppartss the
documentation on conditions of overcrowding accurding to criteria in
the California Government Code,•they did not support your D'istrict`s
contention all reasonable mitigating measures had been considered and
appropriately disregarded.
Alternatively, the Board of Supervisors offers_a sugges 'ion for
Chico Unified School District to seek a bond issue election as set
forth in the Mello Foos Act of 1882. In that regard, our Board wishes
to recommend a committee be formed to pursue the election to be placed
Upon the November 1984 ballot. Members of the -Board indicated a
willingness to actively support the measure. Project committee
suggestions to Mork toward this end include 'the following persons:
Bob Jeffries, Jane King, Marta Fuqua, Karen Vmecruse Jere Bolster;
David Jones, and Pat Furr
V y o r
Martin Nichols
Chief inistrative Officer
MJN/MP/sac
EXHIBIT 8 tuhlo Cto, `Planning Comm,
J, ,tl lie r,a .,i�C 1it raj 1984
gFi:cd U'.:.`IC
sr, t:oL t'�ivTf:: y'r` C��nvllla; �atilgrnlA