HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-070-057APPLIC AN'T
86-03-03-02
ADDRESS 575 E. 3rd Avenue, Chico
OWNER Richard Crawford, c/o 575 E. 3rd Avenue, Chico
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TSM to divide 3.-rl acres tO create.. -parcels,
0-259–acre s --to -0-3 7_- acre.s,.
Avenue
On the north side of Lindo Channel and west side of Guynn
ximately 850' south of its intersection with East Avenue.,
Chico.
ASS'ESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 42-07 57
ZONING A-RLow Density
GENERAL PLAN Residential PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL•, PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE Or, APPLICAN�' SIl
GNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS ;i
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 2-26-85
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER:
A & Q Enaineerina
ADDRESS:-_ 1280 3;'.
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVLRONMENTAL
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE PILED
DETERMINATION'
AND DAVE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
4— MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED g-/
ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CL2AAIN6HOUSE No,
SU8 COMMITTEE MEETING DAT
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DA
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING bIRECTOR'S PnPORT x�
X86-568, Brian Dillavo
(794) on behalf of concerned Gu
the Advisory Agency's a Avenue residents, a
approval of William j4or�-js Ppeals
- subdivision
,n regarding environmental
MaP (proOosed mitigatec, negatiVe dec7aratir tentative
Impact), '.AP 42-07-57,
LindO Channel, 5 lots, Property located the' north side of
West side Of Guynn jjve�ue approxion e
Of Its Intersection With East Avenue, Ch7co area. mately j5O fe t South
MOtIcn: TO REAFFIRM BOARD'f
DECISION, TO UPHOLD THE APPEAL, FINDING
THAT THE SITE is NOT
DEVELOPMENT; PHYSICALLY SUITABLE FOR THE DENSITY OF
Vote.- N M S
2 1 3 ,
N 5 Y (Motion failed)
(SUPERVISOR' FULTON ABS8N'r AT THIS TIME.)
Motion: FOUND THAT THIS PROJECT 18 IN CONFORMANCE 141TH THE BUTTE COUNTY
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING' ADOPTED
DECLARATION OF AND
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
TENTATIVE SUBDIVI IMPACT FOR THE WILLIAM MORRIS
SION, THE PROJECT to CREATE
VE� A SIGNIFICANT
-NT, BUT WILL NOT HAVE, PROVIDING THE
EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT, . 15 LOTS ON
AP 42-07-57, FINDING THAT THIS PROJECT COULD HA
REQUIRED
MITIGATION MEASURES ARE COMPLIED WITH, DENIED APPEAL or THE ADVISORY AGENCY'S A
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISIONPPROVAL OF THE
THE CONDITIONS AND APPROVED THIS WILLIAM MORRIS
IONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES PROJECT SUBJECT TO
00000 AUGUST 21, NOTED ON MEMO E DAT80
. 1986, FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISOpS� ITEMS THROUGH 33,
Vote: S M
2 N 3y4 Y 5 A8040tion carried)
, V , "M ,,,
,Or. S PgR
so
7 1596
•
86-536 Discussion of Morris Subdivision on Gwen Avenue
(Supervisor Dolan):
(Brlan Dillavou - on behalf of concerned Guynn Avenue residents,
appeals the Advisory Agency's approval of Hil liam Wrris
tentative subdivision map (proposed mitigated negative
declaration regarding environmental impact), AP 42-07-57,
15 Lots, property located on the north side of Lindo Channel,
west side Of Guynn Avenue approximately 850 feet south of its
Intersection with East Avenue, Chico area. [from 9/16/86])
Motion: SET NEW HEARING DATE FOR OCTOBER 7, 1986 AT 4:30 PIM.
AND DIRECTED THAT A REPORT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
BE AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD BY OCTOBER 1, 1986,
S Ph
Vote: 1 Y 2 Y 3 Y 4 Y 5 AB (M tion carried)
$OARb OF SUPtRVISQRS MIIJUTIES fot Soptember 230 1,98E
p
it
Pu111C Hearings and Timed Items
�g5'531
0420)
Brian
Disory Agency's illavou n behalf
e hal roof concerned Guynn Avenue residents, a eats "
pp of William pp
Marris tentative sUbdivis'on k
map (proposed Mitigated negative declaration regarding envi
imipact), AP 42-Q7-57, 15 lots, ronMental
property located o
of Lindo Channel, west side of. Guynn Avenue a n the north side
south of its intersection with hast a ea°ximately 850 feet
Avenue, Chico
96-531
(Cont'd)
Motion: UPHELD APPEAL,
Vo (,e -.YM S
1 Y Y 3 N 4 N 5 Y (Motion -Carried)
Recess: 4:35 pm,
Reconvene- 4:57 p.m
Motion: ADVISE Ip.�
TION TO >�Nvi1�ONM1=N`CAL HSA
L)PLE THAT THEY CAN N THEY
STILL. BUILD TANK$,
ALLOWING FOR WHAT THE NITRATE~ ACTION PIAN SPEAKS
POUND THAT T14Ew COUNTY SHOULD
BEAR THE RESPO1VsyT AND
BURDEN OF THIS APPLICANT' IN REPEftRING ES NSI P THE
AGENCY REFERRING
FOR CONSIDERATION 0I SYSTEMS, S TO ADVISORY
PARTICULAR APPLICATION OF LETS, ON THIS
THAT
MISLEADING INPORMATION 14AS G Lig ERRONEOUS OR
BILL MOiIlTIS' > APPLICANT
E}ILtEO7 ION THAT THEY TOICAN r,
CXPEpITIOU I AND GAVE
SE TAPPHE L PPLICATION,.
S ��
Vete; l 1'' � �' 3 Y 4 Y (Unahimousl
y carried)
BOARD OF SU-PtAVIS6RS i1AxNt T1S 6 fot Spptdinbet 160 1086
141.111am Morris, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
north side of Lindo Channel � 'A' 42-07-57, 15 lots on the
ft. south o its intersection Westh Clrast Of CuY n Avenue
A & Q Engineering Chico ares. , Vng, ber
1= (continued from July 21, ].g3G) 'Engineer;
HEARING OPEN` TO ME PUBLIC
Mark Risso was present. He said that item 6
ROPorr_ refers to a f in the Planning Director's
Avenues. pro rata share for a traffic Signal
'I'OngEast Or Guynn Avenues option for traffic safeL at )vast and Guynn
Y improvements
Mr, Streeter said that- there have been discussion
safety 'mprot,ements on East Ave. or a signal further bort;'
t. rather traffic
Mr. Risso said than some residents feel that a r t1,
traffic by making it easier to
gnarl, would create more
cross East Avenue,
EaAvenusa suggested adding the option for frontage
Lasa Avenue.
�, amprovt�ments on
Ptr, Risso said he would Like that.
Mr. Rzsso asked if Public. condition �2 coy
they can't put th 2G ld
e fC, radius property lin r be modified since
.
qtr, endonsa said he would add the wordse i. eturns at Guynn
''if i.ossible,"
Mr, Risso said that was fine,
Brian billavou, a neighbor, agreed that there need to be traffic
safr?ty� impravements, Guy�nn Avenue needs safety improvements. That
street cannot handle any more traffic. A traffic light would increase
traffic because it Would create a short-cut in order to avoid a bottleneck
at N►,�y, 32 and East Av,c,
Mr, billavo.0 asked if this Project could be okayed based up�an sewer hoolt-
water and the fact that the. ,lot sire is mare than the minirtunt rewired`? ups
Mr., I�lendonsa said that ig the proposal,
Mr, 'Dillavou asked if kraf tcImpacts and i
onmpacts on .schools have
red, and the roxie-�lano bridgeand road condition, n
anye from the county staff has actuallypn
proporty and surrounding area,, g ire asked if
One out and Looked at the
Mr, Mendonsa and Mr, Streeter said that :,Planning and Public Works st
have been out to the property, aff
ZLIT'T �.
Mr. Dillavou said that the main objection to this proposal is the density,
lie said that Jane Dolan sent him a letter indicating that she has been
aseced by the Board to organizea, citizens' task force to take a=new
look at the General Plan,. All the present zoning conditions were prior
to the California Environmental Quality Act. Apparently there is more
to the situation, than neighborhood concerns about density, school impacts
and the other things mentioned. Maybe this project is too soon
beforethe questions are answered on what people have decided on what
sort of development should be there.
Mr. Mendonsa said that the Ms. Dolan has not sent that letter to the
county offices. The school district has sent a letter that they are not
opposed to the development as long as school impact fees are paid as
a.
per the ordinance. This project musitconsidered at this time,
Mr. Mendonsa asked the engineer and applicant if they would object- to
including 'the option for traffic improvements on Guynn Avenue cis part
or 't ho mitigation measure.
The engineer and applicant did not object.
Mr. Mendonsa agreed that improving as road increases the traffic on it.
lie said that the bridge situation could be discussed with Bill Cheff,
Wendell Jarman, a neighbor, asked about the 20 ft. sct-back that was
brOLIght up earlier.
I
Mr. Mendonsa said that was referring to the radius returns* tie explained
what thaL means and that it will only effect the subject property and not
that of anyone else.
Linda SLukey, 1019 Meyer-Drivet objected to the density of the proposal.
She agreed that the road conditions and bridge are already hazardous
without additional residencesi,
�oa
William Morris, the applicant, said the Meyer Drivelhas a different
density—for duplexes and triplexes—thati what this proposal is
requesting; As for Meyer Drive, he has talked to the Longs and Ray
Coleman; and they are not interested in him purchasing any of their
property, nor the county, nor curbs and gutLors in front of their
property, so he will be glad to go along with their wishes,
HEARING CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC AND CONVINED ID THE ADVISORY AGENCY
The wording of the mitigation for traffic safety was clarified,
It was agreed that the project meets county requirements a
_ nd all
concerns have been addressed and mitigated, The changes that -
have been made in the worditig of the mitigation measures were
noted.
V,
E 0 NT NO J
1,
P
Mr.. Reid stated;: having reviewed the environmental review checklist
and conversationsat this meeting and the Planning Director's Report of
August 5, and June 24, 1986 1 will make a motion to grant ,a mitigated
negative declaration of environmental impact for the William Morris
subdivision , a project to create 15 lots on AP 42-07-57 finding that
the project could have an effect on the environment but will not have a
significant effect in this case provided the required mitigation measures
sire complied with. Those mitigation measures are #3 and 6 as listed withinthe Planning Director's Report. of August 5 with additional wording on fib.
The additional wording to state: "or for safety traffic improvements on East
Avenue or Guyan. The motion'as macs.} noting that the project is currently
In compliance with Butte County Gone -nal flan and Butte County Zoning.
Ilav:itig found the above, l 'further m'"vL L approve the: project subject to
the following conditiors and finding that approval will not be
detrimental to the health; safety or welfare of the people of Butte
C'ounLy provided the required conditxono, are complied with.
1.
k2.
3i
4.
5.
Submit road and drainage plans to the Dept. of Public Works for
approval and install the required facilities.
Provide 20 fti radius property line returns at all street;
intersections if possible.
Indicate a 50 fti building setback line from the centerline of
interior Streetsi
Street y the developer at all street
intersec.t;i.ossper County (Submit 5 alternate street
signs_
p a
names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval.
of street names.) -
Dead 30 ft from the centerline of Guynn Ave. to the County of
Butte;
6. Construct full. street s , on on i.ntertrr street to RS_24 road
standard with rol.l.od curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2"` AC, 8" A.B,
SC 250 prime, fog .seal and 95% relative compaction.
7. provide monumentation as required by the Dept. of PublicWorks in
accordance with accopted standards.
8. Street: grades and other reatures shall comply with the Butte County
tlydi.nances, design resoluLi.on and other accepLd ongineering standards.
9. Prov!,Oe permanent solution for drainage.
10. All easements of record to be shown on the final map..
1J.. Nteet requirements of 'Butte County fire Dept, or other responsible
agency.
12. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte county
regitl.remenLs
W , accepted design r ,p _ g criteria, and recommendations of P=
13 Pay off assesstttents.
� ,,� Hwy .sk +9s' v.+ wrR . w{Y°etrp+r''.hb«i±Y^-ht++M1`d dA`" < w r y' v +� •f••.
�T{}� �•MM.- .y�� � '"'A' V 'S ' [�� �/-' �!.
.i�aL MIaWNif. M MY 'itY+\laii'iYk v:S[V(�'. fMk,.1 YikIN-MYf.� Ln...r'w; 'fi
. bw., a'i, , «'"':".., ,h .._� ,,.., .. .:.•...xA..«... .i.Y.w',t.r.k+',;;(.._..,.... ,. +,. -.1—
-------
1
14. Meet the requirements of, the utili_
Telephone, water, sewer). y companies
(i.e.,, PGCE, Pacific
r
1.,5. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
16. Place note on final map re Chico Unified School District
17. Annex to .i,cf-, fees.
existing or form district for
Maintenance.street lights and storm drains c,
g
18'Show 50 ft. building setback lime from creek bank.
19; Aplzla.cani: shall
slop signs, Provide all necessary traffic
y sl.,giis including
Health Dept, rondit5.n18i
20,
Cnrlxca e
t on the tentative ma
destroyed. Destro p those wells that are pro os s
served by the wells those wells under t ed to be
final map, Permst and connect the facilities
approved sources prior
to recording
21, Provide a letter or
Company statin
tither documentation fz•orn California (Dater Service
water to the statingthatthey arc wiling and California able t h ,
F iect: e
supply domestic
2'? C'rovidc a
letter or other documentation from the Cit
ataLing that they are willing and able to supply y of Chico
P1�� Y sewer service to the
23. place a note an the map that states e
15 will require can''developmnecti.an tt a public sanitary sewer,"
nt of parcels 1 through
�►,lare a note on the plat► that states
tliz'ough 15 will require connection la"develop "development
o s
parcels 1
25, rlecyi� the requirements of, the 13ut`te Co�unl', Nitr �1cti uPpxy•'i
I
2� Coitnt�ct the exi,sLin � �' ate
on Plan, �
g dwelling to the pUbli.c sewer,
Planning Dept. conditionsi
1
27`, Show Linda Charinel floodwa �� �
y as a no developnient" area,
28. Designate a 25 i~t,
bank and 5o 1't, no tlevelopmi!izt arc�n I`t•e�m the toll of Linda Channels
SLructurc setback bo est6blished along Li.ndo Chahne]
29.
onNote on riia
Construction Spoils s Lo
lae rclnoved or reaisrributeii
-site. No deposition of spdils within creek banks:
2
50, Noise control; a) Constriict 6 ft.
property` Pirie, or 6 solid masonry wall on west
Plant dense screen of tall Vegetation on a
3 ft, berm or with a b .f t = solid board f erlce o -
C) 'Note on map;
structure to atteilunte outdoor noise love,, of 70 d1' to 45 C
�'
CNEL,
j
31 All lots to have 65 ft. of frontage, or 65 ft. at building setback line.
The following mitigation measures are also required;
32. Meet`�e requirements of C.D.F, including $75.00 per lot contribution
to t4est Side Fir -Station fund.
33� Contribute pre rata share towards installation of a traffic light at Fast
and Guynn"Avenues or t!"raffic safety improvements along Fast Ave. or Guynn 4
Avenue,
Motion seconded
by Mr. Streeter and .carried unanimously.
.Frv;-...:...:..:.ti4r4k'-M1lw`k'^i'TIr'ifilin4+nX1%R1�711iYlir ..1i i'7`[y;1p;�-•y���4L'"rxarl:.xx«,}y+ .xyw.+-a�..� '
.�1:C�1�}.C�►���
4.
William Morris, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION, AP 42-07--57, 15 lot;N on the
north ;side of L,indo Channel, West side of Guynn Avenue, approx. 850
ft. south of its intersection with East Ave: Chico area; Engineer
A & Q Engineering (cont. from July 14, 1956)
Mr., Streeter said that one of the issues was/mitigation on Lhe traffic
signal. A proportionate share will be required for the intersection of
East end Guynn.
not
Brian Dillavou complained that he was/notified of this meeting,
He wanted the item continued so all the nelighbors could be Present.
The main problem is the increase from 7 logs to 15 lots, There
will be an adverse impact on Citrus School. This density seems
too crowded for a buffer/low density zone. Guynn is a narrow street,
There is a one-lahe bridgo at the end of Guynn. Referring to the
,,Pt"er sent to t:re neighbors b- htr. Morris, Mr, Dillavou said it does
not seem possible for the home; to have the proposed sgt1are footage
unless they are all 2 story. Mr. Dillavou does not want his pr,-�nerty
value lowered. It does not seem lake people will build expensive :ores
near a railroad track.
William Morris soid he sent all the neighbors a letter explaining the
proposal. Since there is already an existing house, only 14 new lots
will be created. The lots have been assessed already, and they will
not be low income housing. These lots are even larger than
necessary. The street improvemehtr and street lights wall not be a
pr l�lern. He comn]:ained about the delays t•o th e r project.
Bill Curtis, 2409 Guynn, wanted to know if the present home+veers
would be forced into the sever, if it is brought in. What is the
timetable and the cost?
Mr, Reid the agreement to sever this project would only be between the
City of Chico and this developer. Any other connections would be
voluntary,
Mr, Dillavou said that the one car presently associated with the
property is Much :less than what is proposed, The Guynn Bridge Estates
project only brought in 7 new homea,
BtJTTt CtlU1V'l'Y AbVISORYA08NOY M!NUTNs
_ ti7'tix5.y Z1:r 1��6
i
There was a lot Of discussion about what had;
neighbors were no`e notified, gone wrong
that the
F1r. Streeter said: �.n G
issue has .that tragic issue has been
There also been discussed, resolved.
is a 50 £t• setback from The proposed density 'i'Ite density
Game f'or structures, and a r fL-. t xs allowable,
m Lindo Channel requested b
pro.�ect meets the count no development �:rea a Y ,, T and
concerned. Y guidelines as far as the Planning• The
g 17opt . is
It was agreed to continue the item in orde
nezghbors.have been properly order,to make
August 18 p Y notified, sure that ,all the
1986. The item was continued to
1,
side
'
north side TENTATIVE SUBbxV.TSxoN
of Lindd Channel
ft. south of . West AP 42-07-57
Ei & its intersection w• aide of G„ 15 lots on the
Q Engineering xr' East Ave.Ynn Avenue
Chico ' aPProx. 850'
Mark Risso area. Ung1loor
referred tonoted that them
7 lots. s a revised
Mr. c. map for 15 .lots and the
.,dell noted that Public _ g da
r1r, works received �� en
so said a re ri,sed
like R o add to th at codition ma
on May 28
accordance e condition ��# is not possible 19$6;
with Public i Provide in all cases,
a technicality. Works connection to 110 would
directions;'' so as t° not Publi-C hon
street in
1r. Edell said he
gorse it would did not think g LIP on
want to go to have to be cond it would be a hang UP'
that trouble. emned to get 'tIf worse
Afr. pand the came to
P'sso said county does not
Pro rata thattrafficang the
share for item #6
Y public works .for si nal the mita
a trafficg at East/Guynn mitigation measure for
Mr. Streeter said signal at_that there are no plans
intersection.
other inthrsectionthat the contr'
10 ons abed." could be apPliea to
Pfr, R , Pecif .
asso wanted t some.
contribLSjo w o know what ati
- ether subdivision an the
Afr. d.
Streeter . area had
said he did
riot knots Of"
hand, Streeter hand, bub that
Game dated asked if Mrs could be looked .0
March 1986, Bisso was aware
P•
measures to be . It discusses Exndoof the
�lnplemented, letter from r`
Channel and ash and
R:isso said asks fore3
he had not seen the
htri. Streeter noted letter., '
ha
batat and the Fish a
aeon Protection ✓ nd Came ro
g Undo land _ I neuests for
f rout
&--from Channe encrc% a"Ont
on state Protection of ri
drainebe p otectlon far tqgtt' lands and pariah
r 9uttla.t - . a setback
`e y in Eindo
Channel
COCJNa�==`
Sp
RY AGLIVC:Y r�xb1CJT
.. July 7i x98G
•
Mr. Risso said
they have a
on the north side lready established a boundar
Th~Y Would of the channel bank
not encroach onto ' considerabl Y xt as mostly
State lands., Y north;
Mr. SLree er said they have a handle on
Bill Curtis the structure setback.
Would he 7 said he is a neighbor,
lots When actuall lie asked he was
difference, ye . Y there will be 15, notified
crowded, concerned about- That makes there
This developmenttraffic. The bridge a big
' would add about 100 trip aedaY,
Mr. Edell said that tri already
for the density,,the 15 lots came about because seta
was increased. to make the
sewer for itself,
was re
Pay , the required
Fir.. E number of lots
Curtis noted ,that a negative declaration Was
Mr• Streeter said suggested,
negative declaration ere are h mitigations.
Tt would be
F1r, d MitigatedCurtis said that if
have come to the people knew the �
He doesh t meeting or be better spy �t was for 15
t think: the subdivision is w•prep ped to ob. they Would
about the 15 lots,
a.se peo le deet to the project,
and p should be
I•Ir. Streeter �aa.tl notified
In number of it was a clerical error
lots . The neighbors to fail to
Fit. Curtis �aanted to ighbors were notified at type the increase
developer contribute to the
►vhere ,.leash;
the sewer line would go. Also tvouxa
sac have the cost of a traffic alight, Also
th
rounded: corners?
the
Fir.. Streeter e cul_de•»
said there would be a
Itlr. ];dell contribution to a ;
said the engineer would traf£ir_ sIghal..
Mr. Curtis make it as safe as
asked Possible, for access,
And has a traffic far on either side
Also what about study bee,, done? of GuYnn entrance would it go.
entrance lnto C street ligh'ts7 And There is a dangerous traffic Situation.
uynn a slop light at tte
F1r.. Edo] L proposed
explained what
and sono tubes for t•u ares req a
aired s far as street lights—_
strer.t li hts. street lights.
g Me explained What Or a CSA can be pull_ boxes.
WOhdell Jarmah 7s required for roads, formed to '
no other said he thought the
lots that znstall
there. The The neighbors was `oW density. There are
harrow,
otvn Y are afraid. that lora doh .t :want
property values, cost housin w smaller homes in
homes. All this will The neighbors are hot o x11 go ih and lower their
hot- Present because they l cit-rus School - pposed to 7 lots with nice r
prese Iso, ,
Y all thought there would Th other ,,.
Mr. Streeter Neighbors are
explaiiod how the Y he 7 lobs,
dehsii-v ;».�.u_. _
Mr. Streeter agreed 6,,* -t perhaps the ite% should be continued for +-he sake
of the neighbors not knowing about the 15 lots. He discussed wha'L ias been done
regarding study of the traffic and the mitigations suggested.
Mr. Jarman said he made a traffic c:ourti> of his own. They don'twant too many
houses on too little land.
Mi. Risso said that the property canAot be split furthor then the 15 gots
proposed. The sewer wovld be corning down the center of Guynn Ave; Tho
developer will cont cibute to traffic costs. There will be rounded
approaches and a taper ottt 50 ft. or more. There will be a stop sit,,a at
that intersection. He explaii,i.4 that the roads in the subdivira.4 in wouI'd be
according :o county standards. Ile said that Guynn is narrow in order to save
the treesi To widen the road would mean cutting down trees, fie noted that
the lots are actually larger than necessary. The project meets zoning and
General Plan requirements and meeks county standards ar,' --tlatiottso
Bill Norriis, the applicant+ said Lhat CC and R's are al. =wn upi The
houses will be of a certain size -about 1550 to 1600 Ile l-,,,uilt
a house off Dixon and nest; Undo that was 1780 sq. ft, L,r, . ld for over
$120,000. These houses should b-. like that. They will pul,. in street lights.
Mr. Ravid said this agenc7 is not especially concerned with the type or ''.Uses
but should be concerned `'hat t-rafr'IC studies are complete an4 safety -aures
care'taken care of.
Mr. Streeter thought t'r^ main reason to continue the item is to make su_-e
everyone knows about ni, ,;proposed 2-1 lots.
The item was continued for one wee,',
0
BUTT. ,COONT3 ADVfWRY MENU MINOTES - r7UY 7, 1586
r
3. WILLIAM MORRIS_, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION, AP 42-07-57 15 lots on the
north side of Lindo Channel, west side of of Guynn Avenue, approxi
850 ft. south of its intersection with East Ave. Chico area.
Engineer: A & Q Engineering
Mr. Mendonsa stated that this item was continued from July 7, 1986.
This item was ei�,oneously published. It was published as 'seven lots.
This item was continued to this date but we have to republish it with
the proper information. So it will be heard next week. We can take
any testimony that anyone has.
Mark RisQo A & Q Engineering.
Mr: Risso stated that staff was supposed to look into the tra_Ffic situation,
Have you come up with anything on that?
Mr,. Streeter ,asked if he meant on counts?
Mr. Risso stated, "yes."
Mr. Streeter stated that his department did look into the Windins Greek
Subdivision to the east. it was approved in September 1980: There were
no offsite traffic improvements required in that particular case.
'T'here was further di ,cussion on traffic counts in the area;
Mri Streeter stated that at this point that mitigation measure #6
be amended to read "Contribute pro rata share towards installation of
traffic lights along East Avenue ant' the vicinity ,and we will work
with Public Works to determine the location.
There was further discussion on traffic and pro rata share.
Mr. Mendonan stated that there has been a considerable amount of discussion
regarding traffic signal deposits. Mr, Cheff is the Director of public
,,orks but also the traffit engineer, I am not sure this has been presented
to him, as he has not said anything to me: I will discuss this with Mr.
Cheff and I will contract you if he wants to talk to you. We will have a
definite recommendation by Monday
Mr, Mendonsa stated that this item will be continued to ti. July 21, 1986
meeting,
butt COUNTYADVI'SOJtY AGENCY M NM8
Bubo Co, Planning Oo,",
orovilieA Quforelq
BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVIST.ON COMMITTEE MINUTES PACE 1
June 11, 1986
PRESENT; Stu. Edell, Tom .Reid, Steve Streeter, (Diana Shuey)
ALSO PRESENT Marr Risso, W fl..m Morris
William Morris, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION, AP 42-07--57,15 lots ()ft the
north side of Lindo Channel, ldest side of Cuynn Avenue, approx. 850
ft. south of its intersection with East- Ave. Chico area. Engineer:
A & Q Engineering (continued from May 28, 1986)
Mr,. Edell said that the revised map is for 15 lots. Hedini ributed
copies of the revised map to the committee: The density wat3 increased
based on the sewer capacity.
Mr. Reid asked .if the existing house would hook to the sower or remain
on septic.
Mr. Risso said it. would to oil the sewer.
Mr, Risso had a question about the zoning.
Mr, Streeter not,:A the requirements for a corner lot.
Mr. Edell noted the Vire. Dept. requirements, tie said that Fish and
Game was worried about 7 Lots. They are concernedwith the riparian
habitat of Lindo Channel.
It eras noted that perhaps Fish and Game should see the revised map for
15 Jots.
Mr. Edell sa:.d that Public works conditions would not Change from the
original ones.
Mr. Edell noted that the project, WDWN 'be bnneking to SSA 47
Mr. Risso said that is correct.
Mr. ,Edell said he would add a condition 1x`19 that the applicant provide
all the necessary traffic safety signs including stop signs.'
Mr. Risso said that. Public Works condition 112 is incompatible witli the
subdivision.
Mr, Edell said that would apply where possible.
Mr, Risso said that Mr. Morris purchased the land and it is in his name
now, A pareel. Ma -1) will be filed in a .few weeks also in Crawford's none,
BUTTE, COUNTY SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 11, 1986- Page 2
Mr. Edell said that Fish and Game Would have plenty of timesto respond
Lf this project is heard by the Advisory Agency on July 74
Also the Fire Dept* would have a chance to comment on the revised map
also. The condiLions,would probably not change unless Fish and Game
has something. The Fire Dept. condition is already general enough.
Any major changes would require Coming back, to this committee.
Mr. Edell Said that entrance would have to fit Lhe area available.
Mr. Risso,asked Mr. . Edell to point out to Fish and Game Lhot. they Will
Use the existing outfall.
Mr. Streeter noted the mitigation measures, including a Per lot fee
for the Fire Dept., traffic light, and a no—development aroo requested
by Fish and Game.
Mr. Reid verified that the City would handle the sewer for that number
Of lots.
Mr. Morris said he Was Waiting to the 30th for something.
This it.Lifl, was to be scheduled for Hle Advisory Agency meeting of July
7, 1986.
P"blic Works will recommend thre following condiLoIns,*
!-ULlio 1401,ko
1. SubMit road and drainage plans to the Dept. of Public lJorks Por
OPProv,11 and install the required
2. Provide 20 ft, radius pro -r. 'rty line returns at all 0 treet
intvVoections.
3, Indioate a jo t,t, IMildi'19 Votbaok line j,rom th(�
interior Straet:3' cf!mt0tlino of
4. street signs
lull be provided by the devolop(jr at all street
111t�!!Isections per County rvVirL 'met' tS - (Submit 5 alternate
Street names for nach street to the COUIILY OddreeiS Coordinator for approvalof' ,Treat names , )
t' klud 30 Pt, f'xiom t)w Centorline Or (!Llynn Ave,
6, vOotruct full strl?et section On interior Stree
oar t Ltj jj$_�_B
C
ot%nda."Lj With r0110d curl), gutter,aid,JdCWnlk nand
2"
AC 811 Abo SIC C'_'50 prime, fog Seal and 95 relative compaction,
os roqUillcid 1,,Y the Dopt, 01" Public Work,,; itl
BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE 11 , 1.986 MNI.T.TTEE MINUTES Page 3
8. Street g"d"s and other featured sh�rll com 1'
Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted�(1r181rJr+tih L
ring sotandwids.
9. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10. All easements of record to be shown on the final mut),
11. Meet requirements of Butte County Fre Dept. or r WIN' rnspon hale
agency:
12. Strec-t lighting shall be provided
requirements,in accordance With Butte County
accepted design t raria, and recommendations of Pr&Iv.
13, Pay off assessments.
14. Meet the requirements of the utilty companies (i.e., FGM , Pacific
Telephone, water, sewer.)
15. pay any delinquent takes or current taxes as required.
16. Place nate on final Map re Chia:) Unified Srhoul District fees
]."1. AnniAaron to axistr'rtg r)r i'f:�rrr diatrict. for street sights and storm drainage
maintenance. g
12~,. . hOw 50 ft. building aetback line from creak bunk.
19Applicant shall Providaneces8nr
:rCigns, ac stop ssafety signs including
MEETING ADJOURNED BY SICU I U[,, ,L
MINUTE8 EECogD80 '13Y DANA S11UEY
BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 4
May 14 1986 q
- William Morris, TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION, AP 42-07-57, 15 ots on the
north side of Lindo Channel, West side of Guynn Aven e, approx. B50
ft. south of its intersection with mast Ave. Chico area. Eng.i.necr:
A & Q Engineering
Mark Risso and William Morris were present.
Mr. Risso said that they can't comply with Public works condition #2.
Mr. Udell said that the improvement plans cell for driveway ucct.ss
to the lots. With that access the 20 'ft. radius returns wOul,d not
'be needed. lie asked :if they would bepublic or private strooLs.
Mr. Risso said 0ey will be public streiets'.
Mr. Edell said he would probably want foil returns but you cant do
that with a pedstrian ramp. He explained that situation.
He said something about the curb at the property line.
Mr. Risso said it would be across the property line and something
about:a 41 ft. street.
Mr. Edell mentiuned at 51 ft. right-oC-wny.
He explained what kind of street he needs.
Mr. Risso said that: they could be private streets.
Mr. Edoll explained that on private Streets the lots would go to the
center of 'Lhe street. A driveway would be okay.
Ms. 'Tuttle said she would rather have a public Street: She wanted
the condition changed to just meet the Public Works specifications
and wait to See a plan.
Mr. Edell said that without buying the neighbor's property you could
not havo any returns at ally
Ms. Tuttle asked about the previously recorded map.
Mr, 'Risso sairl it, wasn`t recorded and may not be recorded.
Mr. Risso said they talked to Water Quality and will go with the sewer
system.
Mr. Reid said that the problem is that the Nitrate Action Ilan is not
specific. It uses terms like practical and feasible. That is why
they ask for information in order to give relative costs.
}
BUTTE COUNTY SUBDIVISION COMMIT'T'EE MINUTES
May 14, 1986 Page '5
Mr. Risso said that if he has to go srwer it will be for .15 lotS in
this subdivision.
Mr. Morris said he has talked to Lynn VanharL and Tom Reid. At this
point he could go e7.thC-r way.
Mr. Reid discussed the options relating to going with city $04(2r.
!,ir. Morris thouglatsewor would be a surf thing, over the rj(aXL 5 years
anyway.
There was mention of some Cal Wa't'er property.
Mr. Risso said they would probably come back with a propos;,,11, Cora ,l5
lot subdivision.
Ms. Tuttle said that the different number of lots would not mattx�r to
Planning.
Mr. Risso vaid they only wanted this "toot iai�; basically to discuss and
Clarify the sews ,r system,
Mr. Morris said by would like to Clarify the road aec(,ss.
Mr. Edell said' it, e:asi.or to go With a public road. fie would look into
010 Situation. lie ment Loned the subject Of safer access.
Mr. RISSO said they find provided deeds for something regarding s
prior parcel, neap.
Mr, Edell said it has not recorded yet.
i+(r, Ris,o Said they would be changing; it on the map.
Mr. Edell. Said it could: be ,."cane at any time.
Mr, Risso said the hind has boon annoYed to CSA 47,
Mr, Morris said the fees hrive been paid.
Mr. Rdull asked if street lights are included.
Mr. Risso said that they tire,
Mr,Risso snid he wot.tld come bacl; to a Sub livision Committee meeting
with revised map for 15 hats,
This item traS scheduled for the nett Subdivision Committee meeting in
weeks,
Public Works will reoo,-nmend the fbllowirtg conditions:
BUTTE COUNTY ,SUBD.f ISION COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 1�i , 1986 Page 6
WILLIAM MORRIS, TSM
1. Submit road and drainage plans to the Dept:. of Public Works for
approval and install the required facilities.
2. Providu 20 ft. radius proporLy :line returns at 111 street
intersecLtons.
3. Tndxcate a 50 ft. building setback Itue from the <'enterline of
interior sLroets.
4. Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street
ntersertious (rer County requ,iremenLs. (Submit 1 alternate street
names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval
Of street n�imc+s. )
5. Deed 30 r t,, C,rom the cent(irtitie of Guynn -1ve. to the County of
Butte.
6. Construct full stt'eet so.ti.on on interior street to RS --2-13 road
SLandurd wi.t.h rol'l.cd curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 8" Ala,
St; 250 primo, fog, scat and 95% retntiv(-, compaction.
7i Provide mc)tnumentation its roquired by the Dept. of Publicldorks in
(ICCUrdanc o tvuli accepted sttandnrdw.
8. S'Lruvt t;t4ldos and other features shalL comply with the Butte Count
Ot'ditttinces, tleMio;n !-gtlolution and other acceptd engineering standards.
9. Provide pe►'manont solution iar drainage.
10. AL] eas011ients of record to 'bo shown u„ the final map:
11. Meet requirements of Butte County fire Dept, or ether resp p 1si.ble
12. Street lighting sliall be provi.cie4 in nccordnnae with Butte county
rertuirettrent.�, ,itrcepted desll,ii criteria, and recommehdations of PGH.
1.3. Pav or[ assessments.
14. Meet the requirements of the utility companies ( ;e-, PG&E0 Pacific
Telaphone, woter, sowetr )
L5. Pay tine delinquent L•7ves or current ttikes as required,
16, Place note on final ttr7p re Chirco Unified School. District fees.
17. ArineX to existing; Or form dist'vict Tor street lights and storm drainage
418int.enanae4
18, Shaw 50 ft, building setback line 3:t om creek bank.
,
w7777
� H
l i;am rlkl(Os,"TSN, AP 42-07-57, 1.5 'lots n a north We, of i ricltr
.� C:honael, West side of, Guynn Ave., rapprax. 85 "ft, .South it .its
intorsert
'.un with East Alp. Chico area: .
1.
Submit load and driinago plans w the Tept. of 11bl i c W Ail<s for
r
el�itrr��r�tl Land nst�all Lha required F acili ties.
2i
Provide 20 ft. radius prof ert;y Upe returns at .al'i st'rer-t
R
building sev>=1��ac.�i� i,tne from the centerline
3e of
interiorstre0ers..
3 :
Weet, s i l ns shOl tat providad by the developer at. all Wool:
interset Lion; per County r.aguiremnnLa. (Submit 5 al.ter,n,.ra Meet~
namos for eech street to the f OUN trddress coordinator or for approval.,
C street names;
rr m the funtarl.ine of Gwynn AVIV* ;t,o the, County Ok
ti.
Construct Cull, strbdt section on irate i.nr OWL to RS-2-B roar]
Standard SO rolled curb, guRe?, onrl sidewalk and 21r AC, 811 AB,
C 7) pr%me, rog seal and 9S% relative comq,ta ono
i'r,t'firlt rranutr,antraLlon gas required by the Dept;. at PublirW rks itr
�r� cr%rl.rnfc= i•�i l•l 'xar�r.c��rtitrti �trarrdaai-rls,
Strf*rtt prades aatirl of hvr reaturou sh'i'll t•ratplaly With the Piut"t r.'l Count
rir dinenr eq, des!Rh Rn rubOCatlutiOnr and hOr acc�;epl.d englneerir +� ,
; ,tariuryr
r+.
Provide pormantt'rt: :Snuff. ion rrrr drainage.
C'.
All r ra+ 3k��.`Gr'r is of racurd to bp shown in Lhe final Map.
! :.
.`Ioot rrquirr,.MehtA.S it RutQ County r.iro Dept:; eir other rP�rrt�rasible
tr;(4 i.tW Ing , itill' ho lrrOvtdgd in n'ccordWe with Butt£: r'uunt,y
nr•Ita1110"M irl, Ur.COpLv4 FJt,nIgn r hyrio, and re'C:rlfrilixondtitiohs of PO&E,
r
' rq oft ri*sC,'ssinr,Y"W'
`�ir,rkl tl+�roquirot,,jont.r tri t.ho utility C6Mpstrtir,, (I,,,, pol ,, Paciric
l'r+Irlria�xnsr, :,,.ttt;+r:� :ar•r:r+r�-,
i t �z .r t ,lrl i ttgur rat ta+tm or currou Was its roquirr~rl r;
"r
Plor ew,!" Farr final trip 1. rte C.hiC•ta -i'ntt ied Sckitou; District fet ,
1r r tea r,,,i�t rnx_, r,t TOr"I d'lsLrlrl, l+,r strort lights W ston +Eraihag
^ •�
.'•ie `+ W 6 t W t l d i n! Rutl)ack WE 1 mm rree.k hunk,
r5P9
I Mt.
I AM MO,
" tr1,
Ap,alact3nt, slarall prova,dr al.l nacessGary urK7f'fir itafety sa ns 3nclutl'trlP
tut
�ttrtl signs.
:I4n
Th,;;l rondtta,otrs;
rnEli;tate Batt the t'entativ.0 map those weUs that arta proposed to lee
destroyod,. Destroy those well.s-'under permit and coonoct thetaCi11, 3e:3
;xrrved by the wells to other npprrovud water srJtlrrt~.a prior to YeCtlr tl tll
r;
I' aril n.n p ;:
�t
or on from Cal<afrat° Water 8c,t'v'f.t`e
�r,::i0tany
�,tntln>~,rthato�tat'r t�.rtr�rt.t"nt4alti jind' rah.j.t� to siatil,n
1? y willin s pply domestic
water to the: project,
Provide ,a letter or rather doctinvontatJon from, the city of 'Chico
StnLinP, th.et they arc, willing, sand cabby to supply .seiacr service to the
f,rra.jcrt ,
'
pl>ioe a tlot.e on the m,np that states "devolopment of paicels 1 through
15 vil.l require conrecLion to a public Satli.t,-iry sewer."
has
ttt,'.aoarrfi7.imrrit of jitarcels 1
r
t'Irr°caaa:h f�ewixllnrohurefarrihnt�ctic nmr
r 4upply:,r
writnt
µ
XtIoL thrA rrIritaarOmenLs of the Butte County 1•li.4r;~ateACL101-1 F'l.,�ra.
R.r `
either;, t:.ho + .ki 5tirag dwell i riq r.,r) (:Pity pnbl is sLwc'r.
'•aa.ar,;
lof,k, coneiitararls
7
: flvk i lAnd'r) C:h;innol f 1oofIv.-wy z s �n 'Eno taovtAopMOl)L r xnren .
0 215 ft, no d0vo rapment aten From the 'top of Lindo Channel's
t I :- t,l rur l ratty %(10-.ack— Par, ost tabl. I shed nlonR Undo Channel.
'ir t t, ; :k,ap; C'On., t rttr't i on si-,r) tl,4 Ln )o romovcrl or rrrlistri but ed
•y,7-�,,.t tx r y�''t,ticaaitn of ti 11 s t5Rhin
I1n c r ccs f.anc,,;
Nol u.y trial rol i Nn ;t,rurl i'a ft . stil art mal rranry wn).1 on, west:
W
�
I
prp�;)arty I hiv, or hlr not dorso scnoon, of t .1 vegetation oh a
x f"t, bc,rm tor �%i'th o 6 t't,, solid board Irertce; ri`rc)Note on map;
,'ra �^ C
� 1r CNi;L,
5
rEir -tart? � dA to
r.tt l.r�ittrt:tac� rauLdnt�r nta'f,>ta lr.»vt.l:'s c,f
t �
All lot,,( Lr► have hi f't: of frralatkijju; gar 69) fty ret, but`l.ding setback lime,
x,.
i"F,l'rA,•a °' ^.l.! a,} st, ariai I't` t:^,leer q stro also roquIfred
,,r,a tf;rl"C aytut"t'" yryuf 1. il C', Ii,I�, ltatludifin, $714M por IoL cohtelbutio�n
t t I°:rC+t ext. "{Cx.1 r rtwyl rl l a rSaE i !,jell.;
Ev "xlrt r�€1]�lt lal to $`.Itil •fartr t+ 't,aW,arxl;7 In tail ltal ix,l riI k9 t:l"xi1'fiC Ltg-I,t a fw'l „„
'
" a (--ov.,o) ai M tar' ; Or t rlt,tI i i oL y Iai,Ia► ovoll101d s, cal rang f;ria Avu,, or 4 uynn
w.
Fu
APPI}NDTX r
°t C6LINTY OP BUTT}l
LIINVTIt(}Nbt> NTA1'r C11}}CK1,I5'I` 1gRM
(to-be complete y }saa Agency)
Lag # 86-03-0342
AP It 42-07-57
l BACKGROUND
�..
Name at proponent WILLIAM MORRIS,
if applicable)
ofproponent and representative t� apn 1.n
g- E39-
i i 3rd Avenue
William Mo r r i Ch 8 0 E �.h_.;3 �,r,ce�,--�-Sui.te C
enue
ico CA 95926
12
C ice, CA 95926-
3 Project clescriptioi Tentative Subdivision Map
YIDS DIA BB NO
1T, 1`1ANDA'1`I1TIY FINDINGS bF 510NTEICAN ntx
a, 1?res the project ccti h�►vr� thepat' j al to clegrade the
substantially reduce
duality o1 the environment, cause tt,
the habitat oC a fish ar, wildlife ppbelow self -
fish or wildlife population to drop
susta�ni;ng levels; threaton to eliminate a plant or
animal canttnun,ty, reduce the number or restrict: tltr:
al or
range Of a rare or ondnn�erect Plant or periods ,
Gllma.na.te important oxaniple$ of the major p -
of Californ a history or prehtstorY'
b, Docs 'tile pro j>ect 11ave the potential to achieve
sladrt-term benerits to the detriment a long-term,
environlitental goals? (A short-term impact on the
ottVirontttant is one which occurs in a relatively
brie of time While lont�m g-teimiumts' wi?1
Period t
w
orldure rota the future )
c.'Does the pt'oaect hake impacts which aro inditlu
all. � limitedj but cumtt:tatiVely coilsidcrablot
project may impact oft two or Moro sep(lrato rosotti`ces
tively
Wtt 111 the iwherc tftcact on eocl`Cect a(t the, totalis or those
snt:il I , l�ctt _
,nt�i ranmcnt is s1 gnil.ic-ants)
impacts on the `
W11itth
ttt t o a l"ccts
lloc.s tle p.oto-t have .orivltutlmoni�' c,,s ail Human
se e.1"
r directly or indi ""
t'i,il1, i��{ltSE` 'a'4ib5t:1nL1.tl1 atve't . . X11
lyt.ifit,�s, either
TTt t}hit,t1�I LIN
ON (TO ho compictod lit` tltb t.a:r Agency)
oil the basS'0rt)1i", iltit],11 CVtilttttttlCln:
I/Wr rindt1w pt�op'asetl t1d1NMUATIV111,�'11; NOT i"tARA'I"Cc)fl)VIVe�twiltlnbei
prepated,
_ on the enk,i roili�ttxlt ; ,t1tt1
%ti Will riot be
tld I1avr tt t tii'l'i-
prop h 1' sea stgniric'mit
�V l flvli E i,rtcl t 11t i ct l thcytt,fi the 1 t c'I tlic
c'ant oN'oet oti the olIV l IOhill rtt ,
o rroct 111 t 114 C, t� IlL
Y *alic�c+itt ttitcla lyl tclAth a)r�j cc�tl, A NRR r IVT;, t
tho iltt,Ichedt ('11 t It
bjh(;LAI?ATIION %Jill, her prvlmIT0,
1/1V1i 1 iml the 11mjlo4t'. itt"ofl,ect oil,
si
Vl17l�Nbil ', hlt*Slcl"1'r1Crl'III11 lt'1"tr sorec(f ire 1
the ewfl ronment %Biel cin t,N
C IINIY o It11'1 II , Ph TiPA11t 'I'
s...--mow
. �t.Nt1 � tr
;. �... ._..., .�.. ANN �
t:�, o ate Planner
,aura M+ e
�-
Itevl otvecl t _ �
lv. ENUTRONMENTAL INPACTS
xplanations o a 1 ''yes", and—maybe'' answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
YES
MAYBE NO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a.
able earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c.
Change ill topography or ground surface
relief features?
d,
Destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
.wither on or, off-site?
f.
t;hanges in deposition or erosion; of beach
Bands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
aL river o stream or the bed of.the oceanr,
o'
any bay, inlet or lake?
g+
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2: ATR.
Will the proposal result in substantial,
a..
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b:
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?(
C, .
Alteration of air movement,.mois'ture or
temperature; or any change in climate,
local''ly or regionally?'
S. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.
Changes in c erentt; or the coUrSeL or
direction of water movements jnr either
marine OrL fresh waters?
b,
Changes in absorption rates, d'ra:inage pabterr_s;
or the 'rate and amount of surface runoff?
6,
Need, for off—site surface drainage improve-
—...�`
inents, includi g vegetation removal, channel -
nation or cul�rert installatibnl�:
d.
Alterations to the course or,flow of £food
tVaters?
e.
n
Change in the nt of sur
amou face water in any
water U 7
y'
f.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
...
alteration of surface water quality, including
.
butL not 1 a mited to temperature, dissolved
o�g� ar turb idity?
g.
Alteration of`the direction, or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h:
Change in the{ua,titlty ox qua Li ;gx`taund Ovate rs' r
either through direct additions or wia h�-
drawa s; or through interception of an
agi�i: e by cuts or e�zcavatibns?
i.
Reduction in the amount of jua.ter otherwise
available dor public water supplies?y
j
exposure of people or property water
's
to
related. hazards such
fl.00di.n 't
YES
MAYBE, Nth
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposalresulti.n substantial.
a. Chane in the diversity p of species,, or number
g �
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of an), unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existiri- species?
d Reduction in acreage of any agr'a cultural; crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. 11%'i11 the proposal result in sub$tan,tial,;
a Change in the diversity of species, or number's
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish.,'
benthic:organisms or insects)
b. Reduction, in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Intr6duction'of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. De,l,eriorati ori: to e :fisting fish or wildlife
habitat?
6,
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a Increases in 0-is'ting noise levels?`
b.' Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal: produce
signi. !!int lir.ght and glare?
S
LAND UM Will the proposal result in a
susu`�sttantial alteration of the present or planned
land tise of an area?....
9.
NATURAL 1tE8OURCE8: Will the proposal result in
sutanta.al
a.` Increase in the rate of us -e of any natural
resources?
b Depletion of any ,non--ione►vable natural -
_ resources,_
10..
RISK OF UPSET. Will ,the proposal involve;
Ai A risk of bXplosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but riot Limited to,
oil, petticitles , chemicals or - adia'tion) in the
event of an accident 6r upset conditions?
b.Possible interferenceWith an, emergency
response pian or emergency evacuation plank
11;
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
distr�.bution, dens,Lty, or growth rate of the human,
X
population u-
12.
HOIJ81NC Will theproposal affect existing housings
or create a 'demand for additional housing?
;_
I
t
t
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET 1'OR LAND DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Richard Crawford Log 495•-08-13-01
ADDRESS %'William Morris, 57.5 E. 3rd Avenue, Chico, Ca. 95926
OWNER Same
PROJECT D,�SCRIPTIONTentative Parcel Ma Q tdi.V dQ 3 57 aeras- jn-tp two parcels 1
3.18 acres and 1 @ 0.39 acre
LOCATION On the W side_of Guynn Avenue, approx. 8500 S of its intersection with Cast
Avenue, Chico area
ASSESSOR IS PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-07•-57
ZONING A -R __-- GEN. PLAN Low Den. Resi. PROJECT°C:ONSISTENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECV15IVED 8/13/85
Eng: A & Q Engineering, 1280 E. 9th Street, Suite C, Chico; Ca. 95928
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED
PLACE NEW8PAPER NOTICE(427.) PTIBLISTI D - O, C. P. G. B.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPAREL
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN � � ��� MAILER NUMBER
.DATE PLANNING DIRECTOVtS REPORT PREPARED,
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DEGLARAT.ION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED , lb -?!,.
ENV; IMPACT REPORT .. DATE' C RTIYIrD
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY iiI`•ARTNG DATE &�21
ADVISORY AGENCY AC;TTON
HOARD ACTION
COMMENTS
'= LAND OF NATURAL WIFALTM AND U
•� ���'�..���- C A U T Y
DEPARTMENT OP PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (13111) CHEFF, Directcr
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVR . OnOVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9$765
"0 CO. Planning CtarrM Telophonae (916) 534.4681
SEP 2 4 19 U RONAI,R D. McELROY
Deputy biractor
Oroviilei California September 24, 1986
Brian Dil..laVolt
2440 Guyrxn Avenue Vie: TentativeSlibdivision Map
Chico, CA 95920 AP# 42-07,57
Dear Mr, Dillayouc
At their special meeting on Septem'her 2
decided to re -hear and xeconside_r �' 1986) tl" Board of Supervisors
appeal Of tfle
approval of thls Tentative Subdivision�Map for WilliamAdvisorMorris ongencY'n
AP1r 4P-07-57;
The public hearing will be held On October
the Board of ,5uperva.sors' ROOM, County Admin str`6iat 4:50m'2n
County NrAter Drive, Oraville, CA.Building,$
If You should have any que8tions regard
this office, ing this matter, please contact
Very truly Yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
Frohn M�ndonsa
JM,/ j h Asaistant Director
CO Clerk of the Board Of kiuperv*.gors
A & Q Engineering
LPlanning
Environmental Iroalttx
1
,t ryw
�Q 4: Richard Crawford, AP 42-07-57i 2 parcels on the west; aide of
Guynn Ave., approx, $50.ft. south of its intersextion with East
Ave. Chico area. Engineer-. A Engineering
Mark Risso, of A &„; said the conditions are okay, but they will ask
for a convenant, for on-site.
Mr. Edell said that would probably be asked to be paved.
Mr. Risso said they would put in a full roadway at such time as the
large 'parcel is split. He asked if regarding item #5 of the Planning
Dept. requirements, if the best Side Fire Station Improvement Fund has
been adopted by the Board.
Mr. Streeter said that it is being handled as a mitigation for fire
protection --he doesn't know what official action the Board has taken.
Mr. Risso didn't know if it was legal oi- reasonable.
Mr. Streeter said that since it is a mitigation, a specific county
ordinance is not required.
Mr. Risso said it isn't listed as a condition.
Mr. Streeter said it has been a mitigation on several maps, but hasn't
been an issue since they haven't been filed yet.
Mr. Edell said fees have been collected, but there is no specific fund
for the West Side Fire Station.
Mr. Risso said that if it is not a mitigation measure, then it might he
an illegal collection, subject to refund.
Mr. 'Edell said ''possibly.”
Mr. Streeter said that it is listed as a mitigation.
Mrs: Streeter said that the engineer had agreed to it.
Mr. Risso ,said tha` they had riot agreed to it They had not been aware
of i't until recentl,r. It is an illegal condition. They would agree to
it as a mitigation.
Mr, Risso said that regarding drainage, they would apply for annexation
to the County Setvice Area.
Condition #4 from Planning was deleted since it is covered by #14 from
Public Works,
CLOSED
Mr. Streeter stated: having reviewed the initial study checklist and
the discussion at today's meeting, I will make a motion to grant a mitigated
negative declaration for the Richard Crawford parcel map to create 2 parcels,
AP 42-07-57, finding that there mcy be a significant effect on the environment
but there will not be provided the mitigation measures are adopted, those
being 11, 2, as listed within the Oct. 10, Planning Director's Report: The
third mitigation would be „z5, 'to meet the requirements of the Fire Dept.
for the contribution for the Westside Fire Station improvement fund. The
motion is made noting that the project is in conformance with the Butte
County General 'Plan and honing. Motion seconded by Mr. Reid and carried
unanimously.
Mr. Streeter stated: noting that a mitigated negative declaration was
adopted, I will make a"motion to approve the tentative map for Richard
Crawford, AP 42-07-57., for 2 parcels, subject to thy: following conditions:
Public Works conditions:
I. Provide two-way traversable access RS -9 -LD -Il to each parcel from a
county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for
dedication on the final map.
3. Show 50 ft. building setbeick li.*ne measured from centerline of access
easement.
t+. .Provide roeA maintenance agreement.
$. Frontage on Guynn Avenue to be constructed to 13S-9-0-11 standard,_.
i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk and required street section for parcels
with gross acreage of one acre or less, Submit drainage plans to the
Dept. of Public Works for approval and instal required facilities.
6. Deed to the County of Butt. 30 ft.. rigt.'t-of-way from the centerline of
Guynn Avenue,
7. Show all easements of record on the final map;
8: Provide permanent solution for drainage,
9. Pay off Any assessments.
10. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street:
11, Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing; and
construct to county standards,
12. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
13, Meet the requirements of the BNitte County Tire Department.
11w: Meet the requirements of Ordinance X463 and llesolrttion 85-40 regarding
Chico Unified School District; fees, Place a notd on the final map
that issuance of development permits may require payment of school. creep:
B TT8, COUNTY AbVI;SORI.' AdltnY M1110T.US - 10-2145
Planning. Department
15. Note on ma
County Genei:alAll construction on
Plan Noise Ele . parcel 2 shall
comply with the Butte
Health Department condition mens
16. Protide a 100 ft. tt`
either within the leachfield free, setback
boundaries property or Within ack around existing Wells
��, property
Show a 50
and z, ft. leachfield .setback fromtiledrainage way on parcels
18• Provide the required usabie sewage disposal area. on each
19, Indicate o
destroyed n the tentative map those wells t parcel:
y under permit in o that are
disposal areas, in order to proposed to be
facilities served by y those wells under required usable sewage
to recording � the wells to other permit and connect the,
9 final map,
approved water sources prior
20. Provide a letter or o
Company statin ther documentation
water to 9 that they are willingfrom Cal;fornia 14ater
to a parcels i and 2 Develo and abbe to supply Service
public Waters Develop will y domestic
uppl,y, require connection
2i. Meet the requirements of the Butte Count
The �ollowin
9 mtigatia►r meastirly 'Nitrate Action Plan...
22 Shoal Lindo Channel f1oa s are also., required;.
dway as nno development's area.
,23. Designate a 25 ft, n0 d
Channels bank, development area from the
24. Meet top of Lindo
the requirements of g
cont►"ibutioh to Westside Futte CoUntyP1rire Sot e peimprovepartme t ,
Motion seconded by Mr. Ped and carried nanimou 1 ent fn including
y.
I3t;�'m� COtiNTY A�`VrStll�� AG�IVCY M�'IVCI'i'ES �.
h1OTIC.r- aDF
DF-MRJAVIATA APPENDIX 'H
TO:
Of#!co of Planning1400 Tenth and Research L
0M
Sacramento C est' Room 121 P1 nn Department
or , A 95814 7 o'unr 1-
X-, IF Orovtlle' .,.�..�,
CountY Clerk ,
Cour Bunte
ELEANOR M. BECKER, County Clerk
County of
S ECT: Filing of Notice of By Dopuiy
Of the .Public termination in compjiance with Sectio
Resources Code. n 2110s or
21132
ect the AP/
Tentative Parcel Map Name w--...._
tate C ear n 42-07-57
use Num Richard Crawford.
(If su"bmitterl to Clearinghouse) Contact rson
Public Works Tele One Num
ect L"ocati► John Mend
onsa
On the west 534-4266
its intersection with side °£ Guy Avenue
Pr7oEast Avenue, Chico aPProximately 850 feet south of
ect trip areas
at �!.q
Tentative Parcel Ma r acres and one at P ..o divide 3:57 acres
•3S acre, into two parcels
Thh one
is to advise
that the
-._ to County Advisor
has apRroV,d the above described ltziii]A en Y Agency
g cy or Res
ga rdi the above described proje cs�jec't and has made the foll0 en �
8 deter"minationa-
l� The projec* Zvi!!
..... Wll! not, have a significant 'effect on the
2.
.._. Jin Environmental Impact environment.
Paot Report was
to the
provlsIons of CEQA prepared for this project Pursuant
�. A Negative Declaration
Provisions o f CF -QA. Was prepared far this j
pro ect !''suant to the
The 9IR or 'Negative
eXamtned at; l�clatatian and record of
�ut'te Cqunt nro1�f apl9rova�i may
y planning Department
i Gnunt renter
3. Mitt tion measures_.'' rtZt,made
...�
Of the protect - were, were a condition of the a
�`• A statement of Overriding approval
i
this proj ' 6 Considerations
Date Received for Fili_ -_... was, Wasnot, adopted for
- ng lUL2�l�5
Sl re
8 tephen A, S
Senior Plannereetnr
_�t e
AV
.. Revised Janus
Richard Crawford, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 42-07-57, Mitigation Measures:
, Show I Indo Channel floodway as 'ono development's area,
2. Designate a 25 ft. no development area from the top of Undo
Channel's bank.
3. Meet the requirements of Butte County Fire Department, including
contribution to Westside Fire Station improvement fund,
rt
'LAND 0i` NATURAL WrALTH AND BEAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CI-18FF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROViLLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone. (916) 534.4681
RONALD D. McELROY
e
co Deputy Director
�p
�
�nhiry
4' Codd, October 21, 1935
r°lv/0 �"8S
Richard Crawford RE, AP 42-07-57
C/o William Morris Tentative Parcel Map
575 E. 3rd Avenue
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Mr. Crawford:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
October 21 1935, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
regarding environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel Trap
on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions listed on
the attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the
Advisory Agency Is approval- with the Clerk of the Hoard of 5upet^visors;
this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will :be in order
for you to file your "final map!' with the Butte County Department of
Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months from the
date of approval by the Advisory Agency,
If you have any questions regarding this matter; please contact this
Office.
Very truly Yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
JM/ds
A sistant Director
attachment
ecZT.lalining
Health
A &'Q Engineering
Richard Crawford, TENTATIVE, PARCEL MAP, 2 parcels on the west side of Guynn
Avenues approx. 850 ft- south of its intersection with East Avenue.
Chico area
AP 42-07-57
Engineer: A & Q Engineering
Public Works conditions
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS -9 -Lb -II to each parcel Prom a
county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for
dedication on the final map.
3. Show 50 ft. bu-ilding setback line measured from centerline of access
easement.
4. Provide road maintenance agreement.
5. Frontage on Guynn Avenue to be constructed to RS -9 -LE -11 standard,
i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk and required street section .for parcels
with gross acreage of one acre or less. Submit drainage plans to the
Dept. of Public Works for approval and instal required facilities.
6. Treed to the County of Butte 30 V tight -of -way from the centerline of
Guyna Avenue;
7. Show all easements of record on the final map.
8 provide permane~t solution for drainage.
9. Pay off any assessments.
10. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street.
11, obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and
construct to county standards,
12. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
1.3. Meet the requivemeots of the Butte County Fite TlcPartment.
14, Meet the requirements of Ordinance 2463 and, Resolution 85-40 regarding
ChicoUnifiedSchool District fees, .Place a note on the final. map
that issuance of development permits may require payment of school fees.
Planning Department Conditions
15. Note on map' All construction on parcel 2 shall comply with the Butte
County General plan Noise Element,
CRAWFORD, TPM
Health Department conditions:
16. Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setbcck around existing wells
either within the property or within i00 ft. of the property
boundaries.
17. Show a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the drainage way on parcels
1 and 2.
18. Provide the required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel
19. Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are pruposed to be..
destroyed under permit in order to provide required usable sewage
disposal areas: Destroy those quells under permit and connect the
facilities served by the wells to other approved waiver sources prior
'to recording final map.
20: Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service
Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic
water to parcels 1 and 2. Development will require connection
to a public water supply.
21. Meet the requirements of the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan.
The following mitigation meas-,res are also requited:
22. Show L'indo Channel floodway as "no development" area.
23. Designate a '25 ft. no development area from the top of LindL.
Channel's bank.
24. Meet the requirements of Dutte County Fire Department, including
contribution to Westside Fire Station improvement fund.
1lk
-�
•iYir'
Inter-Dopartnn*U Memorandum
TO: Butte Uounty Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel 'Map of Richard Crawford on AP` 42-07.57
GATT -t October 10, 1985
This is a proposal to divide 3.57 acres Into two parcels. The
present zoning is A -R (Agricultural Residential). The Land Use: Plan
Map of *'he Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low
Density Residential. There axe no specific o.r,community plans for
the area
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning not any adopted
or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan not: any County,.
specific or community plan.
Recommend apprv�l subject to the following Mitigation Measures (M)
and conditions:
1. Show Lindo.Channal floodway as Ono development" area,. (M)
2. Designate a 25 ft. no development area from the top of Li:ndo
Channell bank i (M )
3. Note on wap: All construction on parcel two shall comply with
the Butte County General. Plan Noise RlLiment•
Residential development may be subject to school mitigation fees.
5: Meet he requirements of Butte County Fire Department, including
contribution to Westside Fire Station improvement fUnd.(A)
LMTtlr
cct A & Q Engineering
1280 t. 9th Street, Suite C
Chico, Ca: 95925
14 & Q A rGINEERING
C141 2ngineers Quffo Co. Planning Comm,,
.1280 E; 9th Streei
r
Chico, CSL 95926
893-06.11
�7rovilln., C#llts,.rr�
September 26, 1.985
Planning Department
County of Butte
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attention; Laura 'Tuttle
Re: Crawford Parel Map
AP NO. 42-07.5
Gentlemen:
In response to your letter dated St.ptember 13, 1985, concerning
an )IR for this map, the following is offered:
Item 10: An outfall is not proposer] for this subdivision.
Item 3b: it is intended that these parcels be annexed to CSA 47,
`tem 3j`: The parcel's boundaries lie north of the Lindo Channel
levee. Any floodway included within the boundaries
of the properties will be designated a a non-develop-
ment area on the final map.
Item 4b A 25 foot no-development area measured from the top
of bank will be shown on the final map.
1tom 6b Any development west of the proposed cul-de-sac will
be built with appropriate sound deadening construction
materials.
The above noted items may be used as mitigation measures for
the parcel map approval,
if you have an uestions JOase feel
y q � Pfree to contact this o1=fice.
Very truly yours
Mark: E. Risso
cc: $ill Morris
APPENDIX r
COUNTY Or 13IM11=
ENVIR0NMENTAL CHECKLIST FOUL
(to e Complete by i,ead Agency)
,off 11 8S -U$-13:-01
AP X AP 42.07-57
I, PACK_ GROUND
1. Name of proponent RICHARD CRAW]+ORD
2. Address of proponent and representative Cif appl-iC01,c)
Richard �CrawfordA Q—Engincor.ing --
C/o Wm. Morris, 575 E. 3rd Avenue J1280 E. 9th Street Suite C_
cbico, CA 95926 Chico; GA 9592
3 Isroject description Tentative Parcel Mars ®.,: .r -------
'[X. 'MANDATORY FINDINGS 01. S10NIE—ICCAN-CE
Yns i;1AY1R NO
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade thu
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause tt
fish or wildlife dopulation to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a ware or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate importarr't examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory- .--»
b. Does the project have tine potential to achieve
short-term benefits to thr detriment cat` long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief p(+ri.od of time whale long; -term impacts will
endure into the future.)- `
c. Does the project have impacts Which arc individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? CA
project may impact on two or, more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant') ._
d, hoes .hc project have env i, ronirrental offerts which
will cause srabstantial adverse effects an huMnll
Mrrini;s, eithor directly or .indirectly?
IiI 11C;CCRAitNA' LON„ (`1't, he completed by tine ix d Agency)
inn thO1)5r, Or this initial ovtOuaticr.ns
1/n find the proposed prr,,ject COOLD NOT have a slini ricgnt effect
on the environment, and a NECIATINV. MICLA14MON will be prtpared.
-�µ 1/111, find thatalthough the proposed project could have a sigt"r'
cant eCfert ort tine onvxronmrnt, there will not be a significant
e rfect in this CASOL because tine MITIGA`1'I0N NMASU11138 described on
the attached Sheet have been added to tire projc,ct- A NINATIVTI
biiCLARATION will be 11rcparecl .
t/W1., fi.'ncj the propoac�d project MAY have a Sfgnirlc;ant effect on
the envi ronMent, and an IINVi RONMI,*NTAL MPACT RMit�i1R'.l' is required,
(`t1t1N,1"Y tli IIU�I'"I't;, PLANNING D11PART1�MEN=t"
DATE,
September 13 1585 �
Laurass M. titte> Asso ` ate Pl.aririet
le
W2-
y,
V. ENVLRaNMENTAL IMPTS
xp anations o ail "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
`SEs
MAYBE
NA
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?.
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overc'over: ng of the sail?
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of aay
features?
unique geologic or physical �-
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of sails,
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erusion of beach
sanus, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a .river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
X.
any bay, inlet or lake? _
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, iandsliaes, muds-
tlides, ground failure or similar hazards?
..x
2; AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
L
3. NATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
T
CChanges in currents, or the course or
direction of water movaments in either
marine or fresh waters?._
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
..$L
c.
Need for off-site surface drainage impro've-
inents, including vegetation removal, channel-
to , �,)n or culvert installation?
d.
Atation.s to the course or flow of flood
te
e.
Chan t. in the . amount of surfs.
*body? ce water in any
water
r,
f.
Discla,•ge into surface Waters, or in any
alter' xtion of surface ater quality, including
p. r�limitturbidity? temperature, dissolved
out
g.
AltOvitio'fi of the irection or rate of flog
of g7 ound 'waters?
h,
Ghangi in the quantity of ground 'eaters,
eithev through direct additions or with,
draZt 1s, or through interception of an
aquiDtr by cuts or excavations?
_
:1.
Reduc.'Jon in the amount of water otherwise
avai) yble for public water supplies?_
I
p p. p pro' ... y e r
��a Ovate
a' 1.., or rd ert t�
.
rela oduhazard s such as �16�odin .
g
_ .
W2-
4, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result YES MAYBE NO
in substanti
a•'—age in the diversity of specal.
ies, or number
Of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crop:,, and aquatic
plants)'?
or endangered species of of any unique, rare
Reduction of the nu;,ibers o
c. Introduction of new species aofsplants ---
area, or in a barrier to the normal into an
into
ment of exist'np species?
d. xeauction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S. .ANIMAL LTTE. Will the proposal resu]; in substantial:
a. C ange in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare -- -
or endangered species of am -pals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals
--
An area, or result iinto
n a barrier to the mi
or movement of animals? gratlon
d. ,Deterioration to eX.isting fish or wildlife
habitat?
y
6. NOISEi will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increasos in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?74 LIGHT AND --�+
GLARE, Will thero os
signs fxcant light and glare p al produce
8: LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su`� gst n ial alt; ration of the present or Planned
land use of an area?
9: NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
su s tarAta al
ao Indroase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b Depletion of an
resources? Y nonrenewable natural ---
P.
---�-
'La, RISK OF UPSET. Wx11 the roposal involve.
a• JL
A rxsk`o explosion or t�,e release of hazardµ
ous substances (including, but not limited to
oil) pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
eve
rYt of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plart,7
11� POPULATION; u
Will the proposal alter the location,
isrx orlon, densiVy, or
population? growth race of the human
i 2tOUSTNG Will tho_
or crea:to a demand fprOPOsal tg hous
for additional
r
~
YES
MAYBE
NO
13,
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION;. Will the proposal
result xn
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
.,
b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
""-
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
x
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? -
..,..,...
is
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
— —
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14
PUBLIC SERVICES, Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need :for new or altered
governmental services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
----
c, Schools?
Ae
d. Parks or other recreational
e. 'Iainten.ance of public facilities,
ides, including
roads?
�1
f. Other governmental services?
154
BNERGY, Will the proposal result in
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel,or energy?
b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b, Communications systems?
c. Water availability
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and dispasal ?
17,
HUMAN HEALTH, Will the proposal result in.
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard mental. health) ?
b. Exposure of eople to potential health
p - people
hazards?
15,
AEMtTICS, Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to
the public,_ or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
1`9.. RECREATION,
Will tha YES �r Nd
upon the quality Or e Prioposal result in an
opportunities? y of exist n impact
R recreational �
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, '
of proposal result
or the destrucin the alteration
tion of a
historic archaeological pTehisto'ic or
b'. Will the result site?
Proposal
or aesthetic X
p result in adverse phYsi cal ---- _L!
historic building to a
C. Does Nang, structureeo�rsobric or
the proposal have the jest?
a physical chane potential to Cause
ethnic cultural which wools affect
d. Will the values? unique
or sacreaProposal restrict existin
ares uses within the l impact
religious
Potential impact.
V, DISCUSSION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL
See attached, AP 42-07-57
E'�AL UAAL
N
07SGUa5L0_N 0 -07-57
ENVIRONMENT& EVALUATION AP 42
1b: Overcovering and compaction of the coil surface is estimated at
15,000 square feet.
le , : soil erosion is, only a concern along Lindo Channel. An outfall
into the channel could cause bank erosion.
19: Conversion of agricultural soils within the urban area is
unavoldable.
3b,c,16e: Drainage Improvements.are required for parcels of less than
one acre In the urban area. Dralmase could be provided for In a
number of HaYss Including:
• outfall, into I -Indo Channel
• annexation to C.S.A. 47 Immediately north (preferred hothod)
• full compliance with Brown Caldwell drainage plan underway.
A tomporary drainage system could be Installed with Public
Works and Environmental Health approvals
Ap,,.IlcaMt must Indicate how drainage will be provided for. Any work
within I -Indo Channel Will require Sta-te Pe"'MIts'
Sjt Linda Channel is a mapped Zone A flood boundary. The fIbOdw4Y
shall be shown as a no -development area on the Tentative Pat -cel Map,
4b;5rjt Undo Channel supports riparian vegetation, a limited habitat
statewide. The band of vegetation Could be protected by dosignatIM0 a
25* no -development area from the top of the bank.
6b: The Parcel It 400 feet east of the Southern Pacific Railroad
track. Persons On site will be subjected to periodic noise levels
exceeding 70 dB. Noise levels will drop to 64 d8 if development on
Parcel 2 is placed within 80 feet of the cul-de-sac- Interior noise
levels wouId then be w I ti -I I n Coun ty qu I do I I nes -
1s8,ct Because of sPeclMl circumstances, cn :t;
�, accev will be
permitted (Outto County Code Section 20-184). Access road to be
constructed to the RS901-2 standard, 40' to face of curb,
Further division of Parcel 2 will require contribution Of Pro
rata share towards I msta,[ 1 a,l,, I on of ,a troff- I c I I ght on East Avenue.
16d,e: The Nitrate ActIOM Plan requires install8tlom of sewer and
drainage lines in the entire urban area. Individual property Owners
will be ,,ospooslble for inst 114tion of frontage trunk lines and
collectors to each 10t,
1,4ai por many years bhei City has been Working towards ottabll8hlM9
, *
ogroehways" along area crear si Chico has been very act lvo in 80cur'I 1`10
Hghtt-of-w8y for construction of a bike path ta'lring the north side of
Undo Channel i the path has been crimstrutt-ed in Winding Creek Estates
east of Guymn Avenue, This property would provide a needed link in
.6"
the path, only if Winding Creek's hath is maintained. Comments havo
been requested from Chico as to their intent to own or maintain a
future bikeway in this aroa.-
Applicant: Richard Crawford Assessor's Parcel 4
42-07-57
DATA SHEET
A. Pro sect Q scription
1. Type of Project: Land Division.
2. Brief Description." Tentative Parcel Map dividing 3.57 acres
Into two parcels of 3.18 acres and .39 acre.
So Locationz On the west side of GUynn Avenue) e5O foot south of
Its Intqrsc4ctlon with East Avenue, Chico.
4. Proposed Density of Development: i d.u./pat-cel.
5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: An additional 16,000 square
feet,
6. Access ani Nearest Public Road(s): Private access, Guynn
Avenue 1501 east.
7. Methodof Sewage Disposal. Septic systems.
L
8. Source of Wa t et_ Supply,
California Water ServIce Company.
9. Proximity of Power Lines.* To original parcel.,
106 Potential for further land divisions and deVelopMent. Access
limits development potential.
env ironmental Sett in
Physical - Env innampm—t-*
1. Torraln
a. General Topographic Character'. Level valley land.
b. Slopes: 0-2X.
c. Elevation: 180 feet above sea level.
do Limiting Factors". None.
2. soils
a. Typos and Characteristics: Vina Fine Sandy Loam) deep,
well draining agricultural soil.
b. Limiting Factors: Moderate liquefaction potential.
8* Natural Hazards of the Land
a, Earthquake 2ohel-, Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIllo
b. Erosion Pbtentialt. Low,
C. Landslide Potential: None.
do Fird Hazard: Urbanized.
e, expansive Soll Potohtlalt Low,
41. Hydrology
a. Surface Water: 1. 1 mdo Channel is south property line.
b. Ground Wa4b-drt. Overlies area of heavy orouMdwater
Hithd-bwol,
c. Drainage Characteristics. OrainS !South to Linda Chanritl
do Annual Rairifal I (normal )t 22-; 4'0.
e. Limiting Factors.'
6. Visubl/Scenic Godlityt rair - urbanizing area.
6. Acoustid Quality.* Fair, sporadically Impacted by Southern
Pacific Railroad bporaiblbns*
Air Quality*. Good.
8 of ora i cal Environment:
S. Y09etation: Grassland.
4. WlIdlIfe Habitat: Only al Ong Lindo Channel
,Ctu l tura1 Environment'
10,. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area= Loan
11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low --Density
Residential;
12. Existing Zoning: A -R.
13. Existing Land Use on-site One home and barn.
14. Surrounding Area.
a. Land Uses, Residential developMOrits, Orchards north, West
and southwest.
b. Zoning: A -R, S -R, 'R-4, P -A --C.
c. Gen. Plan designations:, Low -Density Residential.
I
Parcel Sizes: Minimum size to 10 acres.
e. Population: Low density.
15. Character of Site and Area: Chico suburban neighborhood.
16 Nearest Urban Area Chico
17. Relevant Spheres of Influericiet City of Chino, California
Water Service Company, Chico Area Recreation and Park
District, Butte County Mosquito Abatement District.
18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: Full standard required on
lots smaller than one acre.
19 i°ire Protection Service;
A. (dearest County (State) Fire Station: #42, #44.
b. Watei, Availabllity: California Water Service Company.
20. Schools in Chico Unified School District.
meg.: