Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
042-070-190
r 46 Y r e b t _✓ y�y}iry7 r A view Sub Lo89�. homes CWest '0 2�1 G-0.1 " • rrw:rM4NNiMYTa.w.;N ,n;a.MlY'.H .4425 Willow Springs Road, :Chico, CA 95928' paul Neil, 1021 Henshaw Avenue, Chaco, CA 95926MO r •uy�,m . Tentative subdivision Neap to divide 6.12 ares to " ICSN,....._.. i�C' �7ESC�;'I w ....+....._........�. — ,r, rn 19 lots of 8,000 sf to 13 000 sf -"rst�ly,rµPprrr.+wfiYW+a"ssr"^".—.•r.P.s.�..�.w..wa6-r�.>•.drw.iw..+«+..w+�•.�sa�..w�r.+-.....M r.+.uw+r...+NM..++�swr.....w.�.w«r..w4dw.a.w.es a.w.Pn.Y �W..�rr arnawM.rnr.� the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue, approximately 400 feet '. on riy of (3tyn.n Avenyt , Chico arca. ._.,V �w .�,..... _��..•., ,„� ,_.r_...._. _ r, ,SsS0R'S VARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-07-190':- SR G=RAL ptAA Low Den Resi PROJECT CONS x,sTENT ()NFC RMA1 CE REPORT February 2, 1989 ��.''� PLANt �„ _ .. _.+.�.. ..�.r~ DATE OF ApS�LxCP,1VT NT 94!01a CONSEAVAT1014 ICT CO! TRACT'S? N° -- -.� _�..,......I..w:s+:.: r, ar , .. •. a w a r��.�....��..:,...+.....1.«..i„+.w......d-y rebruary ills"1989 5�,�'?",� ,APPLTCA'i"T0T3 RFC8,1VEO 1SZ_,, �StYRVU0R/CIVIL MCIN�RR�..R°11s, Anderson and Ro11s 965 Fir Streetf Chico, CA W�{( .i"�iMl�i a..W.NIw�M��. _•..•..f.`.rw�i-i(w" -- ......____' �..N+wwPrw,N ...'+w3w.�+.ri�:f+lt-aF11rM#ryws-- . DA`2c: TLANOINC DIAECTOR�S REPORT PfMP 1RED_ .�. ,.�..rr..; r.�....::.... _ .>dd.��....-.. . N q r/iL•IA fiY I�KT i C:AMORICAL EXEMPTION MATE VXL M , ASO DAi.8�NEGATIVE DtC:LATUkTION DATE Af1qPTED MITICYh►fii;b �V.EGDECLARATION�- t�1�.!r� �ADC7���E�.Yr..P...f_.�.,.P.._.w M t DECLARATION ' CYL�,�drw....+ x K.w�F•Y .P�. ... r-:NV. IMPAl"T REPORT 6ATE CEI��'?i� iEY'"w., ,�....�W �.•. �.d.�Y,.� 1 STATjW j'� 9� }y ¢ `� '1� p� "� yfy �''•, Y. p � Y y,. yry TI, 1, f.,IS. �Pjb1GH0W8lal NOl ay.IW+r n i.'s+r.wa'Nrr.+.Hrw+L�Yw`V.+.1. .. wt w..Mw� -•. N�riww P..iw •. .+4r ', Y. __r PPP.4i. u.. wW.• ...rW „., .. ..r-+„w4:ru.. •.M.P_a. .W'w.+.�r.u14..w.�.wd-..a..ia�Wsla+d+�.a'.efwaMYJ:fiN, �.+.i'w.fr..NY. . h'Y�aIt4.Mk Y• c "s±y+hv+.....:., a.,.•u. .Y •.a.wW4 14•�4�r �,�!•N`I�m���i �h�i��h'b�ri r,��'.C.'�:I"..4��'�"�Q�U./M%.{{/q.'��`(\ ✓ ""1 Kul^}{J{��. 'd.•V.aaesN�'Y.L: �'/�ypyy/., ..a ., . r.0 r.i/�.Yir .ai-.�i.�.re+.n.�1'Y+.+.wwMwri�...fwL'rM 4.+.w.+.AAM.+wA:'P'liMNwxi.� .•p•Nrrxe'. i! �+' Ts.i. 7 EKJUY AcISNCY iWARING MTrr �, • %��� 14t:fT1.S4RY ADENO) AC~rflC) i .�.�....�:.;•.P,..._.P.,,d,., ,,, w== --=.�,.�»y.1.�,�y,...rya�..,ly��..,......t,}..t.- ....,Y 4..... y�'.'{.�.,,+.{.r..w..,.,»....r"..»..�.»»�.�.,•.:..P...�.�� } q� �tiYr-k }�. taL�k' t9 M iR4'f ('1R.1+ �l ty j�y� Vj X'SF1a A'�'ii.tl.ih3J�IJ {..� )d: ') I C 1. 1. { 9yN,�Vy ,.. V I, •w! rWH��.rr:_riw'Y.Jna.al.i?N.W.�Krw�4.Yf;'i.d.+•.Yx..r.uwwiiY,.:�'rruMsw.�uL+.:1.+Nka.N�.4Ym MX:rl+i+�!<+..�i+.Kq:bi.YV.r:+44+YY: wrm�.1. ie+wN.a.a K1'.1'i+M+�'d.Ww .. MW.f�YlaA :wM .jq,T ..a.rr.i..ww'1+:+u .: .. ... rK+4*HY.uNife.absu,dl�It+V>'+14�wrWssf�•,i .w.... ah..:N3�: . .. "•.-. •.'''iwiNw�i:r+wL+nWi...s•1i...ri..+�+.i+W.•�wfw+W..iriA.iPY+"Yp+id fi.rryYi.1+WwYi. fM.rYl. i{w.wY...{ri, rr.P'rP•:.rw.P. ,....:�.ia:S7r.1"�+:s.4w..:it:l.'�dilL.+.w�.+.-..»,aui.rvw..w TP r � . 199 I TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION tovi918� Cpliiarpm ^ VISI02�t ;- r 7-NTATI\7E PARCEL MAP PRELIMINARY ',SUBDIVISION "A `VER APPLICATION (Please check appropriate bolt) () /I-�� / ,A."PPLICANT.• R & C Homes PRONE NO. I84_-3955' Auk;ESS 4425 Willow Sorinas Rd.. Chico, CA 959r�a _ VAMP Paul .Neil_ PHONk',; .110.._'345-4702_ )AV,D,?ESS 1021 Henshaw Ave., Chico. 'CA 95926 tUCXITEER OR SURVEYOR; Rolls Anderson. & Rolls:»�HONwry 10° 898-1422 .AvDP.ESS t 965_ Fir Street, CYC' ,o. CA,__ .95928 . I10TIrff OF HEAR ITG TO: Applicant and_ E. nairLcat-.,,c WCATION OF PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP 22 N RANGE ,wl.'E SECTIOtn Nl ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 42-07-120 � T"TAL ACREAGE 6.12 Ac. PLZASE SUBMIT PRELT14INARY TITLE REPORT OR R CF;NT 'POLICY OF TITLE 3:23SURA.NCE (dated within last six months) WIT`; ;APPLItATION. INDICATE .SELOW THE DA'T'E AND -_RECORDING INFORMATION E1 WHICH THIw pP-ri.TICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED DATE 11/6/81 BOOK 86 P.M. y PAGE 7Z 3vCs'30FR AND SIZE` 'OF PARCELS BEING "CREATED (including any retairide ) ; 1t9 lots of 9.000 SP to 1:3.000 SF DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR STORM Dr. A"W _ _ 1.50 Ft. PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public,Sever- (Check with Health Dbpartm Ant) PROPOSED SOURCE OF WAttA California. G'fater. Service (Check with Health Department) DO POWER AND PHONE LINES ;EXIST TO THE BOt=,A!�V OF THE ORIGINAL PARCEL?,V2. IF' ,NOT; ESTIMATE THE DISTANCE THEY WIIL HAVE 'I'0 EXTENDED: N/A, , i page '2 AIE,OF NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD: Henshaw Avenue VISTANC'ETO x�E,REST PUBLIC A, ROAD: Ad'�oinina iry'.ormatw.;ai'� on nearest public road, check with Public Works: 20-partmt�nt ZV ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT, ATTACH DOCUMENTATION TO ,HIS APP.LICATION. N/A 1C7 yACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT f INDICATE DEED FERENCE ` N/A VOLUME PAGE . I THERE ARE ANY NO ACCESS STRIPS, THESE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE XAP AND THE RECORDING DATA INDICATED BELOW,: NSA VOLUI3E PAGE 01STANCE TO CITY LIMITS: 0.7 Miles 1plus or minusa jDD-FS THE OWNER OF THIS PARCEL NOW OWN, OR HAS HE IN THE PAST 'OWNED, LAND JOINING THIS PROPERTY? Yes SIGNATU E OF APPLIC:bNT SIGNATURE OF OWNER OF RECORD Tb Subdivision Co=ittee To AdViso'ry Agency: _ must Take Action $y Appeal ,ito Board of Supervisors: Z,-xpiration date; , C,�nfients ,- _ f �0 " G 30. -' . GSI Total Received: / Z�1,� Cl ►' Receipt Number: 106? T FOR OFFICE USE ON X Receipt # Proj ect # Y'11114.i "-1r1';' APPENDIX E Date Filed _ 2L/89 Pnvir inmental Ihforuation Form (To be completed by appliczsnt) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address odeveloper or project sponsor: R & C Homes, 4425 Willow 5princrs Rd. , CYtico. CA 95928 2 Address of Project: next to 1021 ilenshay Ave: Chico r Assessor' a Block and Lot Number _ 42-07-10 y7 -U" _jCIO { 3. Name, address, and telephone number if person to be contacted concerning this project: _W. Dinsmore c/o Rolls: Anderson & A:olls_, 965 Fir St -_Chico, CA 95928 4. Type of project: (.e. rezoning, subdivision,) subdivision 5i List and describe any other related permits and other Public approvals required for this project, including those required by City, Reg„onal State and Federal agencies! Approval of 'plans and ma by City of chicon _ Butte county DPW and health Department 6. Existing zoning di'zi.11-rict: SR 7. Proposed use of sit, ,_ Single .Family Resident"ial PROJECT DESCF:IPTION . Site size: 6.12 Ac. 9. 8quar6 footage of building(s)' : 2000 SF` ± lo, Number of floors of constructions: 1 or 2 11. Amount of off-street patking provided I4jA 124 Attach site develdipment plan: Attached 13. Proposed sehedul1'4q Sprang/Summer 1989 14, Associated ptbJ O-ots None 15-0 Anticipated ihOttmental development: ;gone l6. if residential, include t":e number of 19its, schedule of 4; unit sizes, and type of household size expected. s- l9 single family homes of 2, 000 SF -; 17. If commercial, indicate the. type, whether neighborhood,, city or regionally oriented-, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. N/A 184 if industrial, indicate type, estimated employment: per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 19. If institutional, indicate the major function estimated employ�pent per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/P. 20. If the `project involves a variance, conditional use ov rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. None Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary) YES NO X. 214 Change in existing features of any beaches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration bf ground contours. X_. 22. Significant change in ;scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lahft or toads.- - _X 23.t Significantly :hainge ,pattern; scale or character of Jeneral ;area of 'project;, �f. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke; fumes or odors in vicinity. 7� 264 ' Significant claange in lake stream or ground water gixality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns X 27. Substantial change in ;existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. X 281 Site on filled land or on sloipe of 20 percent or more. .�Xr,„, 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials; such as toxic substances; flammables or explosivsb . r' , YES NO X 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) X. 32 Relationship to part of a larger project or series of projects, ENVIRONMENTAL SE7 MTG :33 Describe the project site as it exists before the project, inclue4-,I ;informatir i on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe ,ny existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects4 Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (`one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development ,(height, frontage, set-- back, rear yard, etc.). CERT±F CATION 1 hereby c6rtify that the statements furnished above acid in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of Tay knowledge and belief. Date F� 8 f ignature) For' C. __ t4w_�9 ti `, dralln_ FEB n'(. 10i.AN ('C•)N1+'til•:IvIANc�Ii* I 't+:1't)l•;'1' 1 8q, M A "I' C ) r"! s [.t l S7) T V r ' I c') N tv1 A y- orovilla, '(woo!' is 1r=r„)ft 1-1Citi by ci)r.)p1oted by applicatit;' AI'PIiICAN� ,+1:'ii: AND ADDRESS' I E � C N0!'1 as t'aOJFCT DF.SCRIP'IIONkUr317!`v1�tOA1 1c -Lo -re, ASsEas4a's pAfrcrr, l,ut�si �s); 42 0`7 _ tc�v ! j 2 . C) -7 r c� p tZt rZ ��. Pi:OPOSED U,E ,i', i �CtiLF �'n.MIL.�, _�FSi i>Elt"i`IA�t._ r7Sd f o l louil)g items are to be completed by the Planning Department: .}.'lIatPONItIC. LAND CONSERVAIUN AGP.FEFtEIiI d t�r;'jrj!AL PLAN DES2GNATION.- ow Dev-AS1 T'l (RG_5 ep?ta 1. ,;,fir.+1 Emr'nG/fi fe D�sipnatioh Criteriat YES NO It is rsconanended that you perform 1 tho following checked items: xj _ �Y` ---- ARCAMWIAGIdAL RECORDS CHECK 14 ��,..� .. .._. BOTANICAL SURVEY 4, . !/ <�_ �' GEOLOGICAL SURVEY L� �----- - YES 10 wil ----�--^ AN. H AM, DEVELOPifi IIE IF FISH ("Ah IT ZONE: - 1. - - - -- WI' IIIN FLOOD PLkIt': 1.1. ---- IZ. —• LCD USE PUN!,IC OR . ' WI`'FiIN AREA, Staff Detarmioation: Substantially conforms to f FC7 GENERAL PLAN: I., 1,and Use ✓ If Yes) 2, Conservation Name of Plan 3. Open Space ✓ ✓_� NI EtIN UKDAN RESET dF, i 4. Safety c/.- r, If Yes) 5 � :false 6, HoUsiitg L time of Resdrve 7j dirculatich AT :PORT I ,4b USE I I A It COfL"if�flS; =�ee-T 75 t7vf3L 1C SxeWcfLS id_cJl;t%'i . 1I1()'C 2 G Vit U,ee.-r Us{1..L- 13F^ t"r TO ti,}F0,,iS16r PHIL-- RIS�lj 'ClZl ws. o t`r& cUO �,A.i,'� '-r> Pv� (?'nJ LOT..� �17s NI�tT Sit, 'Z a - � �y 1x r +�urRc t•�cn7' � r F tai I o7. w, CSTN Ai' S►=i Bl� Stnft Sl;lie.ture , _ late41— At; TNF ApPI.ICAN'r Mk 7NE a1QUtSTED 1AND DIVISION) I Ali AWARE OP 7 tESTAFF ' ETERMI'IATTOtt PFGARI}ttlt; T7tE IJIT}i T1tE dt RAL PIAN AJib ZOIlINC- 040ASi nture of Applicant r vT'his )c+:dirt %.'ill okpi� p aild be discarded six (6) months trbti the date Of Elie stff MtnditueO, ' Planning Department NAME; NEST-VIM4 SUBDIVISION Environmental Health Department 4 CDF (Forestry Department) AP! 42-07-1.90 w Attno J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) y-. g.utte County Sheriff PC&E (check title report for easement) , Pacific Bela Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) _ cbool S�.� 1i(..!_wal!9/1e Water Compny!.(if individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co _-Y California Mater Service Company (Chico area) Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito Irrigation Distract (Thermalito area NE of river) Limesaddle Community, Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd-. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill R;dge/Forest Ranch area) . Paradise Irrigation District City of (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley Se' ,iVILU4 AREA ONLY: _..Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Peather. River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) B.Z5,,", RICHVALE, GR16LL-Y AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY); check wall map and title report to see what applies. Some areas overlap; Drainage District 1#1 Drainage District #2 Drainage District #100 T Drainage District #200 Reclamation District #833 _ Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District LY; +STAIN CASES t Dept, Ga,meols (only for subdivisions) and mountain p i. Dons) p : (near water and in r areas) kCal Trans (netar Stati-s HH,y. 32) 70; 99, 145 (Chico cut --off), 162 (Olive Hwy: & Richvale gwy:) 191 (Clark Road) Uiited�5tateCSuForestC$erveBoard (projects with more than 100 lots or units) (if project borders USA land check AP books) Parks nnd Rttteation Department (property near Lake Oroville) State Water Resources Department, (`property near Lake Oroville .4 watershed) Rock Creek, Reclaimation. Dist,, (West of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of HWy: 59 (see wall map) Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions) SPECIAL CASESt check title report for any mention of special Servide:; or easetitents such. as to Thermal.ito Irrigation District (humbered items) ii SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT Nara,e _ R.& C Homes Date _ 2/2/89 Project Subdivision AP# 42-07-1&0 qZ-O' - 1. Existing use(s) of the land Residential/Vacant Agricultural 2. Proposed use(s) of the land. Residential, Single Family 3 Improvements proposed (See.Ch. 20--21 County Code) Public. street, storm drain, public sewer & public water 4 Public area proposed Street Dedications 5. Tree planting%or removal (approx. number) _Remove 50, _,,plus_ or minus. old almond trees 6. Preliminary copy of any conditions, restrictive reservations or covenants existing or proposed shall. be. - attached to this statement. attawhed. - X none M 7 state type of division, i,�, private road, urban, rural, etc. Urban:Subd..ivision or County Clerk JL County of Butt ',1N;1C'T% Filing cif Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21,108 or 2152 of the Public Resources Code. 11 d. I L E 5�r,j t Title; Tentative .Parcel :Map Number. 42-07-M JUL 2 3 1993 R & C Romes (Westview Subdivision) GANDACE J.,'MUNIS, f Utln Co. "C(dCk By A - iler Deputy r ate Clearinghov - Number (If submitted to clearinghouse) None ,--„Aact Person'. Stuart Edell Telephone Number: 538-1266 eject Location: on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue, approximately 400 ft: easterly of Guynn "Avenue, G�ico. eject Description: TENTATIVE SUMVISION MAP to divide 6.12 acres to create 19 lots of 8,ODO sf to 13,000 sf; :” is to advise that the butte County Development Review Committee has approved the above described project on y 28th, 1993 and has made ithe following determination regarding the above-described project: L The project will, _X_ will not, have a 'significant effect on the environment 2. An Envirotimentsal Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. _X� A Negativo Declaration was prtpared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3: Mitigation measures were, __A_ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement e: overriding considerations Was, �7► was not, adopted ,for this project �ral tois certify at thet the final Butte Z'`lannin D partment County Centh comments and responses and ter Dri a rd of pOrovi- le, ect CA55065 o'vid is available to the n rX g i Hate ''Received for Filing and � posting at OP.R Signature Paula S Leasure .11 Assistant Platypin Dire -dot _ Title CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT or, F.T,3 tt °1D GAME CERTMCA TE OF FEE EXEM 'TION De Atinims Impact Finding (Fish and Game Code Sec. 711,4; Section 753.5c, `ritle 14, California Code of Regulations) Project Title/Location Name and Address of Project Proponent (include County): P,, &c C .HOMES (WESTVTEW SUBDIVISION) 4425 WILLOW :SPRINGS ROAD, CHICO, CA. 95928 AP#042-070-190' Project Description: Tentative SubdivisiUn Map to divide 6.12 acres to create 19 lots of 8,(M sf to 13,000 sf. Findings ti7f Exemption: :1 The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a ( Negative Declaration) (Environmental Impact Report) so as to evaluate the potential of this prcjixt for adverse environmental impzct. 2. When considering the record as a whole there is no evidence before the County that the project urffi have potential for adverse impact on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. 3 The County of, Butte has, on the 'basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of adverse effect contained in 'Section 753,5(d), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations; if applicable; 4: The project is hereby found to be de tMI' imus in its effect on wildlife and exp rTlpt from the State Fish and ` Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certifications I hereby certify that the County of Butte has made the above #iitdings of etemption and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on "wildlife",as defined in Section 711:2 of the Fish and Game Code. Paula Leasure Assistant Planting Director -* 'PBy c C ct.l t Lead Agenc;yt County of Butte Date : July 100 1903 S DECLARATION OF FE S DUB (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT R & C HOMES.(WESTVIEW SUBDIVISION) 4425 WILLOW SPRINGS, RD, CHICO CA. 95921 CLASSIFICATION OF ENV'IRONMENT'AL DOCUMENT: I. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ] A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerks Documentary :Handling "Fee ;NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - NO FEES 2 [X] A. Daminimus Impact Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION — FEE REQUII-%D ] A. Negative Declaration $1,250 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee ] B. Environmental Impact Report $850 'State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 4. [ ] OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1 [x] PAYMENT. The above fees have; been paid. See attached receipts) 2 [ ,] NON-PAYMENT. The above fees are required. Not paid.. - Chidf Planning Official By; Paula Lead°ure Assistant Planning Director Lead Agency. Development 'Rev ew Committee i TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED ASD SUBMITTED WITH.ALL?3 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILLED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. FIRRE - COP 9, OF ALL A;ECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE RR REQUIRED FO .ALL APPLICABLE FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABLE PRIOR TO THE VILiNG OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. MAKE CAtCRS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE. ----- - r Batte count )AND DEVELOPMENTDIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965+3397 TELEPHONE- (916) 536.7766 FAX! (916) 536.2140 CERTTF'IED MAIL June 28, 1993 t and C. Homes REt AP 42-07-1.90 4425 willows Springs Road TENTATIVE` PARCEL PAP Chico, CA 95926 Dear Gentelemn At the regular meeting of the Butte County Development Review Committee'held on June 28, 1993, the Commmittee adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the Above - referenced project subject to the conditions listed on the a.`tached sheet. If no ap'�7ea'ls are timely f iled within ten (10) days of the date of the Development Review Comm::.ttee l s approval (July 8, 1993) -- with the Clerk of the Board of -Supervisors, this, -a.ctio�i will be final When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will to in order far you to file .your "final map" with the Butta County, Department of Development Review .for recordation within twe,hty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Development Review Committee State law requires that the Department, of Fish and Came impose and collect f141ing fees as specified to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources. Thesis filing feos are collected during the environmental review process and are to be paid at the time the County files ct "Notice of: Determination" with the County Clerk of the County in which the. project is located. This procedure is required, pUrsuaht to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. To increase administrative efficiency, the stAtute delegated the collection bit filing fees to the County Clerk, The fee required in connectiot with your project is checked below. Ci-AS81FICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION ( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt #25,00 Clerk's Fee X H. De Minimus impact Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION FEE REQUIRED A.. Negative Declaration $1,250.00 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Fee ( B. Environmental . Impact Re port 00 State Filing Fee $25.00' 3 OTHER (Specify) )_ $25.00 Clerk's Fele The fee should be paid to the planning Department by July 12, 1993, in order, for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. Make checks paynble to the County of Butte. The project applicant should be aware that if he or she does not remit payment of the required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law and 'may not, be operative r, vested or final, I, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21089 (b)-, Fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4 (c) and ` Section 153.5 (d) (3 and (7) Title 14, California Code of Regulations. 8h011ld you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 538-7266. very truly yours, Iti Westview Tentative Subdivision Map, AP 4.2-07-190, 19 lot'-�•,on property located on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue approx. 400 ft. easterly of Cuynn Avenue. Chico area. Engineer: Rolls, ,Anderson and Rolls Land Development Division conditions: 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 feet radius property line returns at all street intersections Provide "right-of-way for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections,. 4- Indicate a 50 ft. building Setback Line ,from the centerline of interior streets and 'Henshaw Avenue. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (submit 5 alternate names for each street, to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) 6 Deed 30 ft from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue to the county of Butte. 7 construct One-half street plus 12 root section on Henshaw Avenue to RS-2A road standard With vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk and 2" AC 80 AB, -SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95 relative compaction. Construct full street section on interior streets to RS-2B access road standard with curb, gutter, and isidewalk,. Minimum structural section to be 211 AC and, 81i AB with fog seal and 954; relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval. "R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design. PrOV8 Worksin accordance owith accepted standars Department of Public id_ it 9 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte county Ordinances, design resolution and other accepter engihddring standards. 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 11 All easements of record to be shown on the final maps 12 Meet requirements of the Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency. 12 Street 1 tushall becpa in rd h butte County oqirements� acetsddesign uritdtlla, And, O recommendations of PG&E. If the developer chooses to install the street lights and pay energy costs through the county Service Area (C.S.A.) he must complete the formation of the C.s.A. and submit a petition (to Dept, of Public works) signed by 2/3 of the property owners requesting that they pay the lighting costs through the C.S.A. 14 Provide 1 ft. no access strip along Henshaw Avenue except at access road. 1.5 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer.) 10 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 1.7 Developer shall provide all required traffic safety signs, including stop signs, is Form a County Service Area for street lighting, storm drain maintenance, and sewer operation and maintenance: f Health 'Dept. conditions.- Indicate onditions:Indicate on the tentative map existing wells. Destroy those wells under permit and connect the facilities served by the wells to other approved water sources prior to recordingfinal map 20 Provide a letter or -other documentation from Calilfornia"Water Service Company stating that they are willing and abler to supply domestic water to the subdivision. ..I Provide a letter or other documentation ,from City_ of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to the subdivis-iona 22 Place a note on the map that states "DoVelopment of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer. 23 Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public water supply. 24 Pum and fill the existing septic tanks'. Connect any dwellinq to remain to public sewer. Planning coneltion 25 A development impact fee for Sheriff Faci.litiev, shall be paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter .1, Article It of the Butte CouritV code, pkior 'to issuance of building permits or Use% Permit in the case of ;e► mobile home park: Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit:' Mitigation measures: 1 Pay $75 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station fund. k 2 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states: 'Wood stove and fiteplace inserts installed in any home within this. subdivision shall be EPA approved and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air act of 1988 as amended." Enter into a sewer service agreement'wi�kh the City of Chico. 'NOTE CONCERNING ALL COUNTY CONDITIOwS OF APPROVALS "Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Environmental Health, Plannir,g'Or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated: written requesty the applicant and only as to those conditions or requirements recommended by their respectiv(s departments: Prior to .such approval, verification shall be made; by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the application, fees paid and environmental determination ai conditionally approved. Changes deemed to be major or significant: in nature shall require a formal, application for amendment,. .r „k I Westview Tentative Subdivision Map, AP 42-07-190, 19 lots on property located on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue, ;approx. 400 ft• easterly of Guynn Avenue, Chico area. Engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls (continued from June 21„ 1993) Russ Collar, 4425 Willow Springs Road, Chico, was present.. Mr. Erickson said.he has the information he requested. Mr. Sanders said that a mitigation measure would be revised. The nein had been continued for a sewer service agreement, which. has been received,. Mr. Sanders stated: having reviewed the environmental review checklist, the conversations at this meeting, and the Planning Director's Report of April 15, 1993, T make 'motion to adopt a negative declaration with environmental mitigations for the Westview Tentative Subdivision Map, on AP 42-07-190., for 19 lots, finding that the project could have an effect on the environment, but will not have a significant effect in this Case provided the required mitigations are complied with Those mitigation measures are items #1 through 93 on the Planning Director's Report, with mitigation measure #3 being amended to,read: "Enter into a sewer service agreement with the City of Chico." This motion is made finding that the projectis in conformance with the Butte County General Plan and Butte county Zoning and is not subject to Fish and Game. s. Having found the above., I further move to approve the Game Fees, ect to the following conditions and finding that the approval will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the people of Butte County provided the required conditions are complied with.. Land Development Division conditionsi 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 feet radius property line returns at all street intersections. 3 Provide right-of-way for standard No. 5-5 at all street intersections« 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of interior streets and Renshaw avenue. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per county requirements:(submit 5 alternate names for each street to the County address .coordinator for approval of -street names,.): BUTTE COUNTY `EVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES atW9 28, 1993 6 Deed 30 ft. from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue to the County of Butte. 7 Construct one-half street plus 12 foot section on Henshaw Avenue to RS -2A road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and .sidewalk and 2" AC 8" AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 55 relative compaction. Construct full street section on interior streets to RS --2B access road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be 2" AC_ and g" AB with fog seal and ;55% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval. "R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design. 8 Provide monumentation as required by the 'Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards,. 9 Street grades and other features shall.comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 11 All easements of reco;cd to be 6hown on the final map. 12 Meet requirements of the Butte County Fire Department or other responoible agency. .t3 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E. if the developer phooses to install the street lights- and pay energy costs through the County Service Area (C.S.A.) he must complete the rormat'on of the C.S.A. and submit a petition (to Dept. of Public Works) signed y / property �� �esting that they pay the lighting costs through the CS.A 14 Provide 1 fti no access strip along Henshaw Avenue except. at access road. 15 Meet the requirements of the utility companies Pacific Telephone,'water, sewer.) 16 Pay any delinquent taxes or current axes as required. 11 bdVeloper shall provide all required traffics safety signs, including stop signs. 18 Count rvice Area for treet Ughting, "storm drain mamenance and ' sewer operation aliul maintenance. BUTTE ColONTV DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 28, 1053 r; Health Dept. conditions 19 Indicate on the tentative map existing wells. Destroy those wells under permit and connect the facilities iserved by the wells to other approved water sources prior to reicording final map 20 Provide a letter or other doclamAntatian from Cal;.fornia Water Service Company stating 4hat they are willing and able, to supply domestic water to the subdivision. 2.1 Provide a letter or , other documentation from - Cl ity • of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply srwer service to the subdivision. J.2 Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels Within the subd lvisj on will require connection to a public sanitary sewer.,r 23 Place a note on the map that states ++Developmer,Gt of parcels within the subd viti,ion igill require uoniiection to a public water supply . ,r 24 Pump and fill. the existing septic tanks. Connect any dwelling to remain to public sewer, Planning condition: 25 A development impact fee for Sheriff Faciliti w- shall be paid pttsuant to the provisions of Chapter 30 Article II of. the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application for the building permit or Use Permit::. Mitigation measures; 1 Pay $75 per lot into: the West Chico Fire Station :fund: 2 Place a note on the additional, map sheet that states: "Wood stove and .Eire eplace inserts installed 'in any home v4, ithiri this shall, be EPA approved and desigriod to meet em ssvo onsistandards of the California Clean Air act of 1098' as amended. 0 3 Enter Tito a sewer service agreement with the City of Chico: ITOTE C014CERMCNO At L COUN ` 11 CONDITIONS OF APPROVA - "Minor: changes nay be approved administratively by the Directors of Environmental Health, Planning or Public Works upon t.eceipt, of BTITTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTE," MINUTES FUND 28 1993 tit _ _�: _, .�� :, . _ !..,V.,, .. . „',`". ,,. ._ _ �1.:�. ... ... J,...C1 . , .. .. •i._. 41 - APPENDIX T COUNTY Off'' BUT!T1E ENVIRONMEN',CAL CNECKLIST`FORM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. Tile No. 042-070::-190 AP No:, 042-070190 1. BACKGROUFD 1, Name of Proponent, R 4 C Hcmes 2. Address of proponent and repreacntative (if applicable), 4425 Willow 'Springs Roai10 Chico; CA 95928 3, Project, description.-. Tantsfive Subdivlaion Map to divide 6,12 aores to create 19 lots ranging in size from g,'ooO sq,ft, to 18,066 sa.ft, YES PAYBE — DIS9USS-t0 i„_OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION I. RANDATOR3� FINDIidG$ Off' SIGNIFIGANCF� 1. Does the project '11ava the potential bo degrade tho X This proposal 'Will not significantly degr,lde the environment. quality of the anvt,rcnmeist, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish nor wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a raze or endangered plant be animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of dalifornin history or prehistory? 2, bees the project have the potential to achieve X This proposal will not impede long term environmental goals, ishorb-term benofita to the detriment of long -teras environment goals? (A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future,) 3. Doee the project have impacts which are individually X This proposal will have a cumulat,ivo i"mpnot sewer and- drainage limited but cumulatively corisidekable? (A projeat services and air quality, may impact on two or oidro keparaLe resources where the impact on each sbsourdb 1 s relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those)'impacts on the environmeht is significant,) 4. Does the PtWebdt have environmental effeote i,hich X.... This proposal will 'bob have a signifibsiit adverse effect on human Will cause substantial adverse effects on humait beings, bsings, eithak directly or, indirectly? I7 sN�t QEba e a bitialevaluaraon I/WE find the proposed project C601,b 40T have a significant effect on the onvironment and a NEGATIVE 4£CLA1tA1`ION Will be prepared, I/WB find "that although,Lbe proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be asighifidant effect in this .-` base becaudb the MITIGATION MEASURES described on Crib attached sheet have been added to the projoot, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. */WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant e£finet on the envirchment, and an .ENVIiM01tNTAL IMPACT OPOET is required, COUNTY bl*BUTTE, DING 1)Er:: DATE.- yobruary 19, 1923 By ra 8 d s' ociat annex kevieNed by:...... y d :aviroomental. Checklist of Environmental Impact Z I?i ENVIRONMENTAL; IMPACTS YES LIE No DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, EVALUATION L, r6 H. Will the proposal result in significant; a, Unstable earth conditions, or chrnges in X_ The proposal will not affect subsurface earth conditions: geologic substructures? b, Disruption, displacement, compaction or __ .. X This proposal Will result in come almost the entire surface of the overcovering of the soil? site being disrupted and approximately 403 to 50% of the site 'being overcovered by roads, homes, driveways, etc., These types of impacts are expected for a development in an urban area and do not represent significant impacts on the environment. c, Change in topography or, grnuild surface _ X. The proposal Wi11 not affect' topography beceuAe the building site it relief features? nearly level, d, Uesbrilation, coveringarmokip icationoSany X The site has no unique physical ftiatures, unique geologic or physical featured? e. or er erosion of soils, Increaeithers�nior _�.,. }C, The proposal Will nab cause sk6sion. The and llevel ls on e oaf site7 = moietexcessivelyamounThenearly area does andetheearea sof rim absorb f. Changes in deposition of erosion of beach X The proposal Will not affoot any waborcourse. minds,or changed in siltabion, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g, lose of prime agriculturally productive X -, While this proposal does represent a conversion of prime agricultural soils outside designated urban areas7 sail to a nasi ential use, the impact Will not be significant'bocaute the area is planned for urban development and is already impacted by adjacsnb rssidohbial land uses, h. Exposure of people or property to geologic X., All of Butte County is in a Moderate Barthauake lntpnsity Zone V111, hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Construction cf buildings bo uniform Building Code standards for mudslides, ground failure at similar saiamlc tone 3 will provide adequate protection to occupants in baso hazardsl of seismic adbi"ity. Z4 hIL Will the proposal rosilt in nobatant als 8,, Air emissions at deterioration at ambient X - ; r; The proposal Will have a minor cumulative offecb on the aiv quality air quality? in the region that can not Ira sittifficant bocauae the increase in�theilfumberCf 'v hicle tris is not significant with "respect bo the Chico Urban area, The Chico Urban aroA is oonsldored a aibddrate non-attainmsht area for CO and Ozone, Plans 'to reduce vehicle trips eta difficult for individual projects and should be implemented on a community wide 'basis, Point sonrte eriasions from Wood stoves can be reduoed by requiring EPA *,•proved wood 'stoves in all new residehtinl dwellings, b, odors, smoke The creation o#' objectionable-.,. X .., Sea the discussion for item 2a, or £urea? b. Alterabibri 'ofair movement, moisture or .:. _ _X .. The ,proposal, Will not affoot. the atmosphere, any in climate, p � g lempotatoraragion�l 3, WAtR Will the propose]. result in substantialt, q rI E&j101AImenital Checklist * Evaluata.on of EnVironment..aZ. Impact { a. changes in currents, or the course or �` x The proposal will not affect any watercourse, direction of water moveme,t,ti ih, either marine or fresh Waters? b., Changes in absorption rata y, drain&ge X The l rbposal will result in some increase ill surface watgr xucsofi, due to reduced absorption from impervious surfacer, The-eycess drainage. patterns, or the rata and Onognt of surface will have to be retained on site thrw4b the use of leach tranches runbffl until. a community drainage syntom is available. The soil, on site is suitable to acconmo.;ate the drainage. Permanent improvements capable of hooking up to u community 'storm drainage agstem will be installed fvr future use, A future storm drainege system Will require significant funding by the residents of the area, All prnporty owners in this subdivisions will be bound to pay for such Improvements by a storm drainage agreement.tics significant adverse impsotc are anticipated, Heed fot off -'site -surface drainage - --- _ _-_ X Project will pYovide_a atoriti:,drain system as xejalted by the Public c. improvecmentsi including vagotation removal, Works Department, channelixation or culvert installation? d, Alterations to the Course or tloW of flood X...._ The proposal will. rot signiticantiy affe;it any flood control channels �. Wate.tal' or Watercourses, e. Change In the amount of surface water in any ,- . X The proposal Will not affect any Waternbus'se, Water body? f, Discharge into surfaco waters, or in any X.- The proposal will not significantly Affect 6urfac6 Water, quality as leng as stormwatur is being rotained on site, When a c;imiunity storm alteration b£ surface Water quality, istoluding but not Surface to temperature, drainage system is installed it is expected that the 'Water Will be is treated dissolved butt or turbidto directod to Lindo Channel to the south, If the webs!: not to remove residential oils, pgsticides, harbioides and fertilizbta, the Water quality in Undo Channel will be iftfomentally degk6dad, it is antic, ated that some type of systi.m Will be used to red u+fe the pollutants the btbrmWater, Alteration of the direction or xaGe of f1oW „_„ X The proposal will riot affect the di eotion'or f1oW of ground WateYs, te, of ground waters? ts� Change in the quantity or giiality,o£ ground _r. l -- The proposal.wil.l. use groundwater as a dcmestio sourea; supplied by California Water Company, Adequate gzoundWater resburcaa are Waters, either thrbugh direct additions or, withdrawals, or through interception of on available, Will be served by public watar system With adequate i. edictidn i Lhbount of ter hdrWlsp ,� �W.;._ --X _ cepaaityest public X osure of tide or prbport, to water' X. proposal p ople or prupetty to flooding, The p asp " al Wiil riot ex asp pe ratted hazaxdalaud► as flooding3 k. FLf12tl. result its LtF , Will, the proposal r sui�st-:ant`iaTt c-, Change in the divtirsity of species, o r _ k,__ The proposal Will cau3d the rsmo•val of spproXimately '13 #tarea of land. that wLtbadally been used fur 'orbhatds Will be removed from. number of any specials of planta (Including trace, abt,%, goals, and btlneti? producti,iri, tteW vegetation t oYmally associatsd Witth rasidential uses trees) Will be infrodticarl, This not �rops,s (laWzi, orlainantal shrubs and .in With the soon as a significant impact because it is cbnniatent planned latil use for the arae. b. btd a numbdta any U?ique) rete The site contains no taro plants, amending > ' 'Leonmenta.l Checklist +► 4 Evn],uatian o£ Env: zontna�nta »_ 1 impact o, introduction of now species of plants 1'nttl k Thr propogal will not effect existin an area; o: in a barrier to the g plant life, replanishmeot af-existing apaolesp d, Reduction ,in Acreage of any agticttltural crop? The Bibb Will reduce the amount of acreage devoted to otobard uaei This is not seen as signifieatat because of encroaching residential development and the planned urban land use for the area, S. Al If FE, Wlll the proposal result in au ,atantiT It. Cumber in the diversity of species, or k _ The proposal will not affect animal life because the site doea nut numbers of any species of animals (birds, support r laird animals including rep,,les, fish and •� ignificanL animal life or habitat,. ahellfisb, benthio organisnjsy r inserts)? pport s b, Reduction in the numbers of an unique, rare ,. The site containm,nb rnro.nnimale,-- or endangered spooiee of animals?- "-- __- c, Introduction of neW sarpeciea of animals into X The proposal will not affect existing animal Life" an area, by in a brier to the migration or movement of animals d. Deterioratioft of existing fish or'wildlifa habitat?' xis The site contains no signifloant Wildlife habitat, 6, Ntli1L Will th" proposal result in substantialt e, Increases in existi:tg noise levels? ,_X _ Thou proposal Will not result in a substantial increase, in noise bri3at9d on site ar in the vicinity, b, bxposure of People to severe noiso lrvels fro to e• abut the (0teenline on the t�urth and Wast: Ttraiden'cs -�--�— p .� I< does Within th 's subdivision will be subjoot_ to noisy dust, and sptaya this aareaAdl-oenut ft expected to huetiniiefinitibUtAXheL!U.eHarrd in of Supervisors has passed a motion of intent to remove the likeenline from this area and rezone the property to gR41. This motion of Intent is based upon the installation of certain infrestructure improvements such as dkaint•Sa and road facilities, Baeause of this change & buffer or setback from a+"oining orchards Will not be Yequited 7c LIGHT AHD GLARE, Will,'the prOPOAhl produce X fibs sUORIiicant rig t tend glate? `" '" Proposal, base iii light or glarredwonlsita br in the vac �ttiynntial lno.i alter se. Will tar resent o result ins substantial The proposal does not oonflicb With bite existing de6lgnated land 'we s eai`-ration o£ the present or plahnel land +tse of an for the area, HOWever, a draft EIR,for the expah- on of sewer and areal , drainage facilities that is presently under revidw,"ib rocommending that a Gahsral Plan Amendment be initiated to Yea,Icb the maximum dehsity frbm 6 dwalling unitii per acre to A dwellin} units par not# t baprnjacE Ohasea ddensity oofd3 t dwmlijj,j�� units p1 t crone Area, conforms to the pkopt�sed Genikal Plan AmeNUht. 14liTl1RAL 12B5MRCS; Will the proPvsal result In au stanti! a. Increase in the rata of use or any natural" .., The propbaal'Will not af£eat any naturd&, kesourcea, Increases? -- - b, brbsoutcosleplation of any non=rensr,ai,le atu%61 the 'proposal Will nbt deplete any natural kbaburbi;s, ►0, B18 OF Uk'SE ,,; liil:, th} proposal invblvo# I eIhvironmerntal Chocklist * Evaluation of Eta Vilgonmental, Xmpaet a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous X The proposal will nnb involve the Use of hazardous materials, not is substances (including, but not limited to, located close to Any facilities which 'store or utilize Fu;.2r nil,_;pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in mater; ala, the event of an acl,ident or upset conditions? b. Posa.ble interference with an emergency X _- The proposal will not affect any emergency services, response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 11. PO ULATIo1 Will the proposal altar lobation, X See the discussion for item 8, ntribution, density o. growth rate of the human population?, 12. JjOqEVIG, V� 11, the proposal affect existing housing, X the proposal'Will not significantly affect hOUL14Ag demand. or oreate a demand for additional housing? 13, IN TAMN/CIRCULATION., Will -the _,proposal TA resuLen. a. Generationof substantial additionalvehialr _ X . The proposal will re resenb an increldental inoreaso in traffic in the movemont? area, Thu project is within tho Chico Urban area and is subject to the collection of traffic impact fee's al.rearly in place. In addition, road frontage improvements are required along and Henshaw Ave, This will reduces the traffic impacts of this project to a less than significant levkl, b, .Effects on existing parking facilities, or X The proposal will not affect parking because the proposal will het%e deeaand for new parking? bo pomplly with the parking requirement's contained Within Butte County Code section 24-35,; c. Substnntial impact ori existing _X— Soo the discussion cc item;l3a, transportation systems? d. alter t oment presentPatterns X Theaproposal will not alter tl'b presoifb pattern of circulation in the circulation people Sa o, Alterations to waterborne, rail or air X- The propodal will hot affect rail or air C;raffin, tr'iffiql f. )Increase in traffic haznrdn to motor _R. The proposal Will r9suLt in an incremental inbrease in traffic and v©Moles bicyclist , s or pedeateianhlt related traffic hazards in the bras that will be off sat by required frontage i'mproVembhts and the nolleoLion of traffic impact fires, ,A portionsignal light at the nof of the Avd, and Guynn used install a 14. PUBLICSERVICES Will the'propoaal have an effect upon,` or tesutt in s need for hew or altered government ativlces', _ a, vire;proterWn? X The proposal is In an area that will have a prossurized waber aysbal With hydrants, This reduced the impacb to fire protebtion sdk1jbe& to a Loos than significant level, in addition projeeb is this -the 'Webb Chino arca which has been identified as 'heading a fire station, A $75 par lot mitigation foods assessed to fund a naw. fire station in West Chico, b, Police ptotecUbh! X The proposal will result in a ihcremenbal iiis.teoso in demand for Police pratection in'the areb,, The Butte County Bdhtd of Su}terVieors has adopted sheriff impact fees that are nolleuted at the time of building permits, `Phis reduces tho impact to police horvJ.oes to a le's's than significant ,tavei, 'Impact 6 Mvirontental checklist * Evaluation of Enva.rOwnental c, Schools? X The proposall will result in a incremental Increase in demand fox school services in the area. New construction will be subject`Lo the collection of school impact fees that are in effect at the Limb of building permit application, This will reduce the impact to school secondary des tchoolea a plannedgfor;the parcel on theAn anorthtbidesof lienshew Av6, between Alamo and Gughn. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? $ The proposal will remit i n a incremental increase in demand for park and rooreabion facilities in the arca. The project is located within the Chico Urban area and will be subject to the collection :of recreation impact :Sees at the time of building permit application, This will reduce the impacts to recreation tacilitios to a less than significant level„ A neighborhood park is planned for the immediate area. e,-- Maintenance of public facilities, including' roads? VO prop osal will result in a incrementel.inars4se in the need Lor maintenance 'of roads and other public facilities :in the area that is, addressed by the collection of traffic impact fees the of at time building permits. E, other governmental services? X _ Thriproposal will not result in a significant incremental increase in demand for till other governmental ser -rices in the area, 35. &ERGY, Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? N_ The proposal will hot utilize substantial fuel or energy. t, Subsbesctia.l increase in demand upon oxisbing sources of energy, or' require the r� X.. The proposal will hob substantially increase the .demand for energy, development of new sources of energy? ttLiTIES, Will the proposal result in a heed for new systems, or subatsntial alterations to the following: A. P0,461- or natural gas? _ . X The proposal will not affect eldatrical pottier or natural gas distribution systems, b+ t,onmtnioations systeaia3k Water The proposal will not affect eommuhicatio'ci sysbems, o, availability? k _ The proposal will pot affeab public Water system's-, d. Sewer or septic Systems? _ X - The proposal is Within the Chico Aron Nitrate Action Plan, Lots of this size can not be 'served by septic tanks end leauhfields: Sewer service has become available in this 'area ,lust as a result of the ox M14 of the Chico Sewer service area, An $IR was prepared to address the impacts of this expansion. The document has boon adopted Wild this ptojeob meats the mitigations recommohded, e. Statin watai draiheBe- X Additional storm "water runoff will ,be retained on alto through the Use of loath tronobes, This is hot seen as a permanent solution to drainage and n commUnity system will be hooded at some point in the future, 'The project should be designed to have the underground facilities necessary to hock up to a storm drain system when available. The applioaht will have to enter in to agreements with both the City of Chico and the County stating that they will nob the oppose formation and inclusion into sewer and stctm draLilb8 asoesemenb districts, These agreements run with the land and subaequsnt owners must also comply.. f, -8olid wasbe and disposalf ,,_ r., ,. $, The proposal will act affect 'solid Waste disposal, 17. IMAlt HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a, Creation of any hoalth hazard or potentia;, _ hazard (excluding mental health)? X The proposal will not create any health hazard, !; h, htzards? re of people to potential health hazard X The proposal will not expose people to any health hazard, , 16, .i. At,} gTkCS_ Will the proposal result in t4a ',150trul - "nll of =ny Aflo i, "t. tr or '!a, .A opo, r=,. z '. .•.... tier. ,,_r,r�r;alai will not kssuit 1P an aeat.Aij,ically offensive view it public, or Will. t1}b prui�osal ienult'Ili the creation f3ttuae in co neisf ftL:: •t.ith itUtr0Und111g development, of an aesthetically offensive site open to the public view? I 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon Lf a quality or quantity of es.istixtg X .. See the discussion dor item i4d, , recreational opportunities! 20M CULTURAL RESOURCES,. proposal n. Will the ro oral result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic X Proposal The will not affect archaologioal sites,. archaeological sitr b. Will the proposal result 3,n adverse:pbysical _ or aesthetic effects to a prehistbtic or. X The proposal will not affect historic "sites, historic building, structure or objectT o, boos the proposal Have the potential to cause a physical change wnhloh would affect X-_ The proposal will not effect cultural reeouroes. unique ethnic cultural values? d, 'Will, the pr6pog.0 restrict existing religious or sacrad use's within the X - The proposal Will not affect religious resources,, potentlgl impact areal avironmettal Checklist * Evalu4tion of Environmental'. Im.0act !F1 .4 MEASURES V41 $75 par lot i ito the s400t Chico Fire i '0pation fund pude a itoto on the additional, map 'shset that states! "Wood stove: aTld O'ea ilaca 1 {serte lip"Jle,� .fit ("4ui D-.:trdl �lliS�h - ti $hall be FpA approvad stuff Ittagnod to meat em1H€ its I ra 1:"rsds of ;'ce California C)ean Air w� amended,, S, Enter into a tewer siervice and, drainage agreement. with the City of Chico. StormWater drainage shall. be retatined on site thorugh the Obe Of loach._'t.tenchod :unt:Cl an area, wide storm drainage system is in -,Lace. All property owners Will be responsibie for a pro rata share of the drainage .system, � i 1 i i I �I i i 9 n . Ir1vironitnental Checklist Evaluait'loftof Environmeintal Impact DATA SHEt`i' Art bascritrton air, - 1.. 'type of Project: Tentative Subdivision Mop Dioldmical Environment: 2. Briefs Description: 'TSM to divide 6,119 dozes to croate 19 lots ti,. Vegetation; Almond orchotd. ranging in size from 8,000 sq,£t, to 23,000 sq,ft. 9. Wildlife Habitat; Small birds and animals common to 3. Locution: On the south side of FIonshaw hyenas, approximately Valley orohatd lands. 2001 wost of Goynn Avo., north Chico area, CulturaS Environme7t: 4. Proposed bonatty of Daveiarmant: 3.1 dwelling unito per acre.. A. ArchaeologicalHistorical Resources is Cho area: Lov) ad g nhaeologiitivityca, !4 Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Moderate. 11. BUtto County General Plan designation: Low Density - 6, __ Access and Liearest-Public Road(n): HResidentialenshaw AveAVe Fronts the: - - parcel ,12. Ezisting Zoning: S -R, 11 Mot;&A of Sewage Disposa,L: Chico sewer, 13, Existing Land use on-site: 1 single family residence, Bi Source of Water Supply: California Water Service Company,, 14, Surrounding Area: 9, Prozimitq of PoKer Lines: To propetty, a. Land Usest Rural Residential and orchards. b, Toning: S -R, A-5 and A -R, 10; Potential for further landtiiviaions and dmialopaent: None n. Gan; PL3n Designation: Low Density, d. Parcel Sizes: urban, under existing zoning, as Population: Urban, B. 21Fnvironmantal Set'tink 15, Character of Site and Aroa: Urban, Physical tnv1rormont:. 16., Nearest Urban Ards, Chico, 1. Terrain a. Ganeral )'9pograpb1c Charactor.: level. i7, Rolovant Spheres of Influence: Chico Lt. Slopes: 0 to 22, r,:, Elevation: 180 feet above sea level, 18." improvements Standards Urban Area: Urban, d: Limiting Factors: None. 19. Fire'Pratection Service: 2. S61101apps a. 1Qearettt County (Stste) Fire Station: Station f# 42 a. and d acl.�a slice. Vino Fine Sandy Loam.... 011itnatoly 4 miles away, Availability.- Pressurized tv star system with b. Limit Faotbra. Nona. � hydttobb , schools 3, Natural, lien yds oft 20 ina,i �atev Unifi d So noel nistrirt. a.. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity zone VIII, b. Erosion Potontiol: Sl:ght, C, Landslide Potontial: Low, d. Fits Hazard! Urban, 0, gzpausivo Soil Potential. Low, 41 Bydrbiogy a. Surface 4ator• Natural Drainage, g ,• b, Ground Water. Unknown, poteatialty limited. Aiundant valley aquifers, c, Drainage Charactorittics: t1ood, d, Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 inches par year, e, Limiting Factorst lions, 51 Visunl/Scenic Quality: db6d, 6. Acoustic 'Quality: Good. y. Air Quutity: Good, except during periods of stagndnt valley a :nvironraental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental impact EP3VMRONMENZAL REFERENCE MATERIAL I. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity Map 11-1, Seismic Safety Element. 12. Butte County Board of Supervisors. Oroville, CA: CH2N, Hill, 1977. Agricultural Preserves Map established by Resolution No, 67-178. Oroville, CA: 2.• Butte Bounty Planning Department. Liquefaction Butte County Planning Department, 1987. Potential Map 11-2, Seismic Safety.element, oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 13 National Flood insurance Progrskm. Flood Inourance Rate maps. Federal emergency 0 Butte County Planning department. Subidence and Management Agency, 1989. Landslide Potential.M n 111-1, Safety E10ment. oroville, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 14. USGS Quad Maps, Ord Ferry, Cal.l,f., i '9690 4,, Butte County Planning, Department. Fr�7r�ion 15. Soil Man, Chico (19251%oroyil:�,3 119261 Potential Map 111-2, Safety Element... Oroville, CA: Area. United States Department of CH2M Hill;, 1977. Agriculture. 5• Butte County Planning Department. tgpgns-Ive Soils 16. Soil Survey of.Chico 119251/Oroville map -111-3,.Safety. element. oroville, CA: CH2M(1926) Area. United States Department C";f hill:, ISM s Agriculture, 6. Butte County Planning Department+ Noise element ii. Butte County Planning Department. Butte Map 2V-1, Scenic,8iahway element. Oroville, CA: Count-..Fire.Protection aurisdictions'and CH2M Hill, 1977. Facilities Man, Butte county fire Department and California Department of 7. Butte County Planning Department. Scenic_ Highways Forestry, 1989. 146Py-1, Scenic Hi.ghway Element. Orov llek CA CH2M Hill, 1977; Butte _bounty Planning Department. Natural.Fire Hazard classes ,Mat13.1-4, Safety F,lemert. Orovill.e, CA: CH2M Hill, 1977. 9. Butte County Plannibt Department, Archaeological Sensitivity Map, OvI%V1,11e, CAI Fames P. Manning, 1983. 1d. Butte County Planning Department: School bistrict M_ Oroville; CA 11. Northwestern District Department of tjdtlbt Reeourcea. Chico Nitrate -Stud 14t, -Nitrate Concentration.n Shallow' Wells., The Resources Agency, State of California, -1983 r +• 'ter r�����'�r�,�... y , �� - Butte,OUAaf DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVII;ES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA n`-)05.3397 TELEPHONE: 191 G) 08.7260 FAX: 1061538-2140 CERTIFIED MAIL May 13,, 1993 R and.0 Homes RE: AP 42-07-1.90 4425 Willows Springs Road Westview Tentative Subdivision Chico, CA 96926 Map' Dear Gentlemen: Please be advised that the Butte County Development Review Committee will hear your application on the above -identified property on June 21, 1993, The Committee Will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Division and will be considering your tentative parcel map. The Land Development Division will recommend the aonditior�s of ap ro�ral as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will d6ifMence at "9 : 00 a.m. ' in the Board of Supe-,rvisbrs � Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, broville, California. if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office at 538-7266. Very truly yours, Stuart Edell Manager Land Development Division Development Services Department SE/ds attachment co Environmental Health Department Planning Division Rolls, Anderson and Rolla 4 a+ Westview Terrace Tentative Subdivision Map; AP 42-07-190, 19 lots on property located on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue approx. 400 ft. easterly of Cuynn Avenue. Chico area. Land Development Division conditions; ], Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 feet radius property line returns at all street 4ntersections. 2 Provide right--of-way fir standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 4 Indicate a 50 fti building setback line from the centerline, of interior streets and Henshaw Avenue. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements: (Submit 5 alternate, naives for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names,) 6 Deed 30 ft. from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue to the County of Butte. i c6nstruct one/half street section plus 12 f•eF,.t section on Henshaw Avenue to RS -2k road standard with vrrtical, curb, gutter,- andsidewalkand 2.11 AC, 8,11 AB, SC 250 fog seal and 954 relative compaction Construct full street section on interior streets to RS -2B access road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk: Minimum structural section to be 2" AC and 8" AB with fog seal and 9.5% relative compaction. Submit design to Land Development Section for approval.. 11R11ValUd determinations and other data may be required to support section design. a Provide montttentation as ;required by the Department of Public Works In accordance with accepted standards S Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County ordinances, design reso`fution and other accepted engineering standards: 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage 11 All easements of record to be ohoWrn on the final iY;ap. 12 Meet requirements of the Butte County Pire Department or other.' responsible agency: 13 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte Cot,nty requirements_, accepted design criteria, and recottmendations of PG&B if the developer chooses }o install ,4 the street lights and pay energy costs through the County Service Area (C.S.A ) he must complete the formation of the C,.S.A. and submit a petition (to Dept. of Public Works) signed by 2/1of the property ovmers requesting that they pay the lighting costs through the C,4-31.A. 14 Provide ft. no access strap along Henshaw Avenue except at parcel. arcel. 15 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer.) 1.6 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 17 Developer shall provide all required traffic safety signs, including stop signs. 18 Form .a County service Area for street 'lighting, storm drain maintenance, and sewer operation and maintenance. NOTE CONCERNING ALL COUNTY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: "Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Directors of Environmental Health, Planniag or Public Works upon receipt of a substantiated written regv.,est by the applicant and only as to those conditions or requirements recommended by their .respective` departments. Prior to such approval, verification shall be made by each Department or Division that the modification is consistent with the Application fees paid and environmental determination as conditionally approved. Changes deemed 'to be major or significant in nature shall require a formal. application for amendment. 7 ) , ,At'j0 CF 1*1A WEALTH AN r IA', ir'! .ems. LAIC] DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7;COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE; CALIFORNIA 95965.3997 TELEPHONE: (916) 5X3.7266 ' FAX; (916) 538.2140 May 25, 199-3 & C Homes RE: Westview Subdivision 4425 WillowSprings Rd. AP 42-07-190 Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Subdivision Map Gentlemen. The Development Review Committee reviewed the pending subdivision application on May 24, 1993, and amended Mitigation Measure No. 3 to read as follows, 3 Enter into a sewer service agreement with the City of Chico It was rioted that the project has been scheduled for public hearing by the Development Review Committee on Monday, June` 21� 1993 The meeting wi11 commence at 9:06 a. m. in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California It you have any questions concerning this matter) please contact this office at 538-7266. Very truly yours, Stunt Edell —. Manager; hand Development Div, SE1)tp cc: Environmental Hoalth Department 'Planni►g Uvis�cfz>, Rolls, Arid.er.son Rolls c. Russ collar RECEIVER :Rick Robiriet MAY 1 1 1993 R & C Homes 1605 Bidwell ;X'Venue ROLLS ,ANpERS(}k Chico, Ca. 95926 $ ROLLS RE: Annexation a:1d Sewer Service Agreement Westview subdivision Gentlemen:. Attaohed for signature is the AnhexAtlon and Sewer Service ;Agreement for the: parcel on the south side of Henshaw Avenue, west of Guynn Avenue in north Chico. The Agreement is to be signed as title is vested and all signatures properly acknowledged.. The signed Agreement is to be returned to the City of Chico Planning Division Office, along with -fees totaling $1825.00 (See attached - copy of fee summary) Also to be submitted is a copy of a current title report (within the fast 60 days) indicating vesting of title in R & C Homes. The ,enclosed Annexation Application is also to be completed and returned tc the. Planning Division Office. To verify that this project complies -with the mi tigatiort measures required by the Northwest Chico Annexation Final EIR -the following docgments are also to be submitted. All of the listed documents are to be prepared or obtained by the applicant -o 1 A copy of the recorded ('Agricultural Acknowledgement Statement ii , 2 A Letter agreeing to execute a waiver of right to protest formation of an assessment district for park. mc�Lintenance. 3. Draft C.C. a' d R.'s 1--ovid ng for ;suubdivision Participation in recy-ling anr. compostible material diversion programs, whin available. } To: R Fi C Holies ; Re: Annexation and Sewer Service Agreement - Westview Subdivision )Page 2 4. Dust and construction e program. quipment ozone emission control 5. Description of proposed storm drain system. 6. Erosion control plan. 7. Raptor nest survey and recommendation. 8 Archaeological records search. U On receipt of the signed Agreement, the Planning Divi, on Office wward the Agreement to the City Manager's Office, along a summary of project compliance with required Northwest Chic�. ECR mitigation measures. If the city Manager agrees that the project complies with the required mitigations, it will be executed on behalf of the City and recorded. Please feel: free to contact me if I can provide any additional Information or assistance regarding this 'matter. Sincerel.yy, C1if Se11ers ,Planning Director CS",pb AMEX AGREE. Vlatt�tohment cc CM CDD .S4.w..... i Bil]. Dinsmore Rolls, Anderson & Rolls, 565 Fir Street, Chino .1 Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO, Butte CountyDevelopment Review Committee FROM; Planning Director SUBJECT- Report on Tentative Subdivision Map for R & C Homes AP # 042-1.70-190 DATE: April 15, 1993 This is a proposal to divide 6.1.2 acres to create 19 lots ranging from 8,000 square feet to .1.3,000 square feet. The present zoning is SR. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. 'There are no :specific or community plans for the area. The pruposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General Plan nor any specific or community plan. A project Negative Declaration with mitigation measures has been prepared for the proposed in accordance to the California Environmental Quality.Act and forwarded to the Butte County Developmjnt'Revie;v Committee within the required 105 bays pu-rsuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5, This project is not subject to the collection of wildlife impact fees ,pursuant to Public Resources Code 2.089 and Department of ,Fish and Game Code 711.4, Recommend approval subject to the following ^itigation measures and conditions; Mitigation Measures: L Pay 875 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station fund. 2. Place a note on the' additional map sheet that states: "Wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home within this subdivision shall be EFA approved and desined amendedo meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act of 1988 as �y g g , of C 3. Enter into a sewer .service:-artd�rr�rna �e» agreement With the City eo, St • m "ter runoff shall b ainerl on in thrd K the usroof lead . Tenches it an area f�ide storm dranag system is in plat . fill property Hers a be re ons'ible for a pro rat sh p of the drain e s tem: Conditions: 1. A development impact fee for Sheriff Facilities shall be paid pursuant to the butte (011n` Department of Development Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTIcR DRIVE= OROVILLE, CALIP08NIA 95965=3397 TELEPHONk; (,916),538-160i April- 26, 1993 R & C Homes 4425 Willow Springs Road Chico, CA 95928 RE Tentative Subdivision Map on AP# 042-170-190 Dear Mr, Collar: The Butte County Department of Development Services, planning Division has completed the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Development Review Committee within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21.151,5, In addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find' enclosed the Environmentalnvironmen our Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for Y project. Please review the enclosed Initial Study/Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please I� bring them to our attention, The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Deport for your project has been sent to the Butte County Development Review Committee for 'their action; California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952,1 requires the Butte County Development Review Committee set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was received and accepted, The six month time limit for your, project mandated by state law, will occur on September 12, 1993. The Development Review Committee will :notify you of the time and place of the public hearing for your project. If there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact; re-evaluation of your project shall be required, } ount - Department of Development Services PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 April 6, 1993 R & C I-Iomes Westview Subdivision 442.5 WilloW Springs Road Chico, CA 95928 Re: Tentativ.- Subdivision Map AP #042-070-190 Dear Gentlemen: An, initial study Of your proposed project, a Tentative Subdivision Map, indicates potentially adverse Impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed enviranmenta,l checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts suitable mitik,ation measures are required as part required purssuantoto the CaliforniaiEnvironmen al Qu omental In ,pact Report (EIR) is _ _ al Quality Act: An early response to this notification, sent to the Department of Development Services, Planning D;viSion, Will expedite the scheduling of you. project. Please forward Your written response within 15 days from the date of this fetter, Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Slincerely, ,13. A. Kircher Director of Planning � d > Craig SaricMers Associate Planner CBS-,jlo tI r i ¢ 4 ww77n H 1 95 FIR STREET ;o CHiCO, CALIFORNIA 969 t8 7EG (i , 4E 81 3.'696.1422 r R ?IVIL ENGINW-0 January 15, 1992 Butte ,County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orbville; CA 95965' Attn: Joe Hunter Subject; Westview Tentative Subdivision A.R. #42=7-1.90 Gentlemen: Due to requestdanays in Pighteen monthproceextension for completionfor the North oofie hereby theeenvironmental review process for the subject project In a letter written to you on June 22; 1990 we waived tate requirement of the CCQA Permit Streamlining Act. Sincerely' RULS, ANDERSON ;& ROLLS .1 William Dinsmore VSD/a'n cc Russ Collar 1 tl C RG Homes April 10, 1989 4' X25 'Wi.l1Ow springs Rd.; _ Chicot CA, 95948 9000 CO, Prc nn1ho Betty Kircher APF?" 1989 Planning Director = Butte County 7 County Center Dr, �mvtllo, cahfomk-) Oroville, CA. 95955 RE: Westveiw Tenatiwe subdivision Map Ap# 42-07-190 Dear tetty, In reference to our conversation today, please accept this letter as our response requested by the (7.J4sty to assert, our intention of continuing with the Westview sk.jt)visioh. We will not be guz:suing an E.I.k, on our own as we are all aware that would be totally impractical for the small nature of our project. Instead we are linked with the portion of the Chico urban Area shown on the attached maps which is an area proposed for annexation to the City. of ChIC0 Pending the completion of a successful annekation and due to the nature of the situation we are requesting suspension of tle one year CSQIIw time limits for subdivision approval under the 'Permit Streamlining Act". Your confirmation that we have suspended the CEQA time limits with this request would be appreciated Any other ,suggestions you might have for actions likely to stabilize this situation pending future developments would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely; f`�( rl Russ Collar cc John Mendonsa public- Works Thomas 'Reid - nvironmental health RC Home, 4425 Willow Springs Rd. April lo', 1989 Chico, CA. 95928 Qufifo Ca P1bi�aig caftan,, John Mendonsa Public Works'"'- Butte County ON to'l 1989 7 County center, Dr. 4roville, CA. 95965 Orovil(oo calitn RE: Westve w Tenative Subdivision Mar, AP# 42-07-.19A Oreetings Please find enclosures that have been forwarded to County Planning .and Environmental Health. Our attempts to be included in the ` p City of Chico Sewer Service Area,has been stymied by City/County concerns of environmental -impact: Due to the status of the situation we are requesting that CEQA time limits be waived and suspended under the "Permit Streamlining Act.".. Blease inform us of any additional actions necessary to avoid ,leopardizing the position of our tenative map application. Thanks. Sincerely, Russ Collar cc; Betty Kircher Planning 'Dept, Rolls, Ahder_son Rolls "i .i NORTH CHICO ANNEXATION Commencing at the inters:, ion of the street centerlines of The Esplanade and Eaton Road; THENCE North 37'52' West along thecenterline of The Esplanade, a distance of 40 feet to a point on the projectioh of the northwesterly right-of-way line of Eaton Road, said point being the True 'Point of Beginning; THENCE South 52'15' West, a distance of 923 feet along said northwesterly right-of-way line of Eaton Road to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; THENCE continuing _along said northwesterly right-of-way line and along said curve having a radius of 960 feet, through a central angle of 23°56'57", an arc length of 417,99 feet to a point of reverse curvature; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly right -of -Way line and said reverse curve having a radius of 1,040 feet, through a central angle of 05'1336", an arc length of 94.87 feet; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly right -of=way line of Eaton Road North 3.8°27' West, a distance of 45 feet to an angle point; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly right-of-way line South 520161' West, a distance of 11007 feet to an a',gl a point;; THENCE continuing along said northwesterly right -of -Way line South 53434' West, a distance of 90 feet to a point on the easterly line of'the S.ii.d.A,D. Ditch right-of-way; THENCE South 37'56' East along said ,Ditch right-of-way, a distance of 31 feet; THENCE South 53'07' West, a distance of 55 feet; THENCE North 37456' West, a distance of 79 feet< THENCE continuing along said northwesterly right,of-Way line of Eaton Road South 59018'40" West, a distance of 635 feet to a point on the southwestti�rly right=of-way line of Cussick Avenue (Bay Avenue); THENCE South 3,7452' East along said southWesterly right -of -Way line of withick the�northwvenue esterlyeright-ofaway lineistance oof6,069 HenshaweAvenuto es intersection THENCE South 57'261 West along said northwesterly right -of -Way line a distance of 3,426 feet to a point that lies a distance of 660 feet, more or less, southwesterly c� tim centerline of Guynn Avenue; THENCE leaving said northwesterly right-of-way line South 37'32" East, a distance of 690 feet; EXHIBIT "A" NORTH CHICO ANNEXATION Page Two THEN" North 52.28' East and parallel to the centerline of Henshaw Avenue a distance of 4,114 feet to the southeast corner of the WoodcrestSubdivis as shown on that Map thereof, recorded in the office of the Recorder of the° County of Butte, State of California, in Book 72 of daps at Page 394 e , p ' right-of-way line of Henshaw Avenue, said on the of t�Qast THENCE North 370331 East a distance of 630 feet to a point centerline of Cussick Avenue; p°int lying 660 easterly of to THENCE North 52°28' East, a distance of 2,722 feet along said southeast right-of-way line of The Esplanade; THENCE North 37021' West, a distance of 4;834 feet along said northeast right-of-way line of The Esplanade, therly earner of to the most sou Philadelphia Square subdivision; as shown on that Map thereof, recorded in Book 95 of Maps, at Pages 22 and 23, in the office of the Recorder of the County of Butte, State of California; THENCE leaving said northeast right-of-way line of The Esplanade North 5?. 18 East, a distance of 1,186 feet to a point on the westerly boundary f the S.UD.A.D. Ditch right -of -Way; y of THENCE along said S.U,D.A.D. right-of-way North 46019'36" East, a dista of 116 feet to a tangent curve to the left; nee THENCE along said curve having a radius of 785 feet, through_ Of 19°46'13", an arc length of 269453 feet; _a central -angle THENCE Continuingalongsaid S.U.M.D. might -of -way Nor distance of 505 eet th 66005'49" West, a THENCE continuing along said S-U-D.A.D. right-af-way North 73'24'24" West distance of 117 feet; , a THENCE continuing along said S-U.D.Aa right-of-way South 63°47133" West, a distance of 217 feet; THENCE North 37446' West, °a distanceof 110 feet to a point on the northwesterly right-of-way line of Eaton Road; THENCE South 52012' West along said northwesterly right -of -Way litre of Eaton Road, a distance of 564 feet to the Point of Beginning, said point lying on the the centerline of The Esplanade, - � 'I�li'111iif11 11r a.v d Yt"Ilitiil'1 Ili, 111 1 t'i, i'l/ yWfl�,i1t`I,1�1111111,1,1.1 / 1 i / 1, jl�ll'111i,11t11i1Y rii�tT/iltl/AI�l11�Y�1 r 1111 l/ 1.11 t rlitlt;11111 ti, i 1111 l{f �i'1�f�11 f1' _. _... ., 1 C k�Illllll,\111111'1 �ilr 6 A ,lallil'1 IYli,ill,; 11111, 1,1, 11,Y, 11,1,1 i 1 , Illli .,1 I,t,l,lil, 1111;1 1,/Illi 'l11'1'llll { � 1 _ 1,111`1111, li�All'+�'�t�l'lil�el l 1.'1 1 f.d p 11 lf IIAl11Y lil 1.1,11 1,1 i,ll 1 ii,l, '1111 t,l�l/ 11111 tif. �I �/ �� it I�AI X11 Ytr it 1�1�1,11 , l 1 l Itll'1'1'I,i� 1 1/. illi 1 iiY 1,1 I,i '' YI''ll - �) 1 � 111 11't l !Ili rll i id ' 1 11'111'1 Illl l/ '1 ' 11 l l {1111 * - - �! IAi/1d^I 1;11 1,1, A. ''1 !1•. i til 1,1,11,, 11i/,,111j 111 1 1 I'lllf Y i �� � � .�, �1;1 1 _ I1i11,1,'1111,11� Arrl'i�1 Iltl oil.; 1;'�et��liliirl .I,r�1r,11M+�r '. � / 1 1. .. _ 1t Vit• i �Mr, ! � 3.. , plljiiiii4l ,11,1 v LOCATION MAP I�aa arY. ra�«Ct*oo D rr OF FORTE; CHIdO ANNrXATION... . 't,YWI 4/ILN N.M:1 NON[ �. , MAP .. ...... i u� cxolaiT `b` $HEFT / big 1 _ aar�ms.dnA awlac++w_ 0.ria Ir :_ -._. -------------- _. APril 4, 1989 r-BRTIFIFD MAIL £i. C Homes :4425 willow, Spriggs Road 'Chico, CA 955;28 Lei rfentatiVO Subdivison Map AP 42-,'7-170 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMEN-r 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95985-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 I' As there existsthe potential for significant environmental impacts from your project, an Environmertal impact Report will be required pursuant to the California Environmental the Butte County Erivirormental Review Guidelines. QuTh�yElRtwll need to address all of the po-L. tial environmental effects of the project listed on -Attachment A appended to this letter hose .issues ye Iter as well as local laws and required be add,rossed by all applicable state and guidelines. Tf you wise, to appeal the re quirement for do so b submitting to the 'la ing9 Department, awithirEIRi 15udays from the date of this letter', a written notice of protest specify.in the reasons why an EIR shoo,ld not be required and the required appeal: .fee of $220.00: 1'f no written protest is t mely filed', an 'eal evill be requited. it you choose not to appeal, the preparation of the Erg may be initiated by filing the following with the Planning Department, 1. One- Authorization and A reemet�t F Environmental �mparrt Reports dated�and�sitriedhe Preparation of oi' record or their agents co g y all owners 4 (COPY enclosed), 2 Four selection; in writing on Attachment 8, of five i consultants from the County- a ppr,oved consultant List to whom , 6J , Request fox, proposals RFPs. slxall be sr the County-approved consultant list as well,1;isAttachinent`Dton which said 9,,elections are to be indicated are enclose,!-,With this letter). 3 A Request; for Proposa?, and Contract Admi $1100.00. ixistration Fee of ?; 4 Ari EIR administration fee of $225.00, on receipt of`the above, the Planning Department will prepare .and mail an RFP to the five consultants shown On Attachment B. '',Che Planning Department will review all responses to the RFP �choos� a consultant, and notify you of the firm selected. Upon 1pt of a letter from you .indicating conourrence with the ertvironmental consultant selected, and funds sufficient to cover t,,he consultant's fee; the Plan; ling Department shall exec u I e a :tontract with the selected consultant. Ia full copy of the County's ETP. Consultant and Contracting Vrocedures is enclosed for your use. We stronglyeuncoura e otj to read it in its entirety to familiarize yourself, with the process- and the costs involved. If we do not receive a response to this letter within 15 days, the project will be set for hearings before the board 'of Supervisors for denial. :f you do not wish to continue with the project,;please notify this office at Your earliest convenience so that the file can �?e cclosed f you have an g` y -questions re Ardinq this matter, please contact this office any weekday between 10:00 a.m. and 3:o0 p.m, Sincerely, 13. A. Kircher firctor_ of P ' dhn.ng. Brent L. .Moor. , _A1200ciate Planner ESM ! ,1 r znclosures cc: Rolls, Anderson, & Rolls ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, CONSULTANT StLECTIO,N XND CONTRACTING :.','s OCEDURF S' 1, The County may retain consultants J, -,hpryparation and evaluation of Environmental impact Repr,;:,1:!l (ErRs) . If a consultant ►is retained, all cc- r is incurred for administration and preparation of the El"i shall be borne by the applicant for the project. 21 The Planning Department shall establis: a list of .pied environmental impact report consultan��- established 'list will also indicate the firm's „# The astfieid o expertise: '` pv,rticular field of Environmental impact report consultants wishing to be placed ori the list shall suk.,.,3 t a res-ume indicating the firm's principal personnel., work exper ienca, statement of qualifications, areas of expeiri,ise, and any:; other ;information deemed necessary by t.io I'^.a;7n;)ng Department, Selection to the List will be based ov exporience, knowledge of the county, and available exr,,rai;t si to ensure high- quality, quality, in-dep+`- and comprehens,"rF environmental impact reports. Consultants with a poss ,ale confl. cj•, off' interests with a project, directly or indirectly, s1Yal-1 not be considered as consultant for the project. 3. following the determination that alp PTR will be required for a .pro j ect - a -letter shall be sent- to t,. e applicant stating that a consultant must be retained to prepare the EIR. The letter will also inform the ap;v,lcani of the issues that will need to be addressed in the E',R, aprpeal procedures, and a generalized description of the cansultant— selection process. Alist of Covaty-approved consultants, an Authorization and Agreement Form fo-r the Preparation of EiRs and any other pertinent information will., also be attached. 4 The applicant may initiate theparation filing .the following with the PlanningDepartmenthe. RTR.by a. One Authorization Pnd l.greement Form for the Prepration ofownersraf ental Impa,.:t Reports dated and signedY °,Io.r. d or their agent -(s ) b. consultants fromtheCountyiin writing, of five (5) am -approved consultatat listto whom Requests for Proposals shai.l be sent; c• A Request for Proposal and contract Administration Fee of $1100. i, m, This fee covers Plannin preparation of #:hc No°tice�P of rtment costs, includa ng'.; reparation; up through submittal of the Draft ErR b the consultant., and acceptance of the document b the Planning De Y g ..partmeht d• An ETR administration fee of $225. This fee' is estimated and cover the County for processing the EIR. the costs incurred by process, and Upon completion of the finalthe EIR,the applicant to the certification of PPlicant must costs in excess of the estimatepay the County any refund to the applicant any � p ThdeCou deposit. 'hall County shall The not c �ar lus ertify the final EIR and act on the project uatil the applicant costs in excess ofthepaid the County any estimate. costs are greater than the At such time as the shall a estimate, the applicant pay the additional amouIlt exceeds within 10 days of notice b g $200,00 Coordin',tor b g Y the Environmental Review payment is Y registered mail. In the event that not received for the l,amount in exces-, of $200.00, the EnvironmentaldReviewaCoordinator will immediately cease the collection agency. Pr°cessing the EIR and notify All required fees may be receon ipt of the above, the plannibmittteda on one check. the Request Department shall prepare for Proposal and mail ,it to the selected consultants and the project applicant. Bid proposals will be submitted to the Planning by he specified in the Request for Pro osDepartment- date. submi.ted proposals shall at a minimum agree with the scone :ofP 1. The e servicers and sl,a Proposal specifications as outlined in the Request for Proposal; and period of time. shall be valid for a defin Incomplete proposals may be rejected, xte The Planning Department shall review and evaluate the sc content and completene-s of the bid determine the bid whish best demonstpata�sals in orderpto qualified staff to the abili,.y and provide the services re he Planning Department gu,�red' may hold interviews with any or•all Tof the selected consultants to help in arriving at The scopes content g a decision.: Provided will be of a completeness and quality of services quail importance with cost: 6= "'he planning Department's decision shall be cc letter to the applicant indicating ash date of t stained in a the proposal. Upon receipt of � leiter expiration of indicating concurrence with the ficientenv,jronmentalecoPPlicant selected; and funds fee, alis Plant, 3ng Department shalloexecute theecontractantns tact. Z.t I Tf less tha�wo of the." ;.� selected consultants submit a bi.d' or if, following a discussion with the ,appl:icant, it is he judgement of the Planning Department that exceptional or extraordinary circumstances exist that would use; of the selected consultant the-PlanninprDe and the shall, at the , ques+ of the applicant, mail Out UP PVtorthree additional. Request for Proposals. Prior to the Planning Department sending the additional Requests for Proposals, the applicant shall pay an additional fee of $150 to cover administrative costs associated with the distribution of the Request for Proposals and review and evaluation of the responsive *-id Proposals. If the project is substantially revised during the term of the DIR contract, the applicant shall pay a $1.85 project revision , rred in redistribution snecifeq ests-for-comments,Gosrev.is�on of the proposed i_ations, and additional contact with responsible Agencies. r� AU HORIZATION AND AGREEMENT FORM FOR THE PREPARATION OF EDWIROr (ENTAL IMPACT REPORTS tiro j ect Title project Type and Application Number I hereby authorize and request the Butte County Planning Department to prepare and send Requests for proposals for the preparation of ari Environmental Impact Report for the above project application to the consultants indicated or, the attached. sheet titled Attachment B 2 I understand that the gavironmeAtal Impact Report Administration Fee is an estimated fee and that prior to certification of the final Environmental Impact Report for the above project application I will pay the County any costs in excess of the estimate. I further understand that failure to pay, or to make provision for payment in manner y, �=t �ithin 30 days of demand for satisfactory to the Count payment, may be deemed by the County, to be an abandonment of the application and the project. 3 I understand and agree that failure days of to respond within 30 mailing to any request by Butte County to clarify, amplify, correct or otherwise supplement information required by Butte Countenvironmental y for this be deemed 4o be an abandonment of the applic�tion,.�ndythe project. I also agree and to pay the actual cast technical studies any or reports required by the Butte County Planning Department and prepared by otlxer experts or professionals, provided I have agreed to the such studies or reports. preparation of Z-1w5nature of Owner of Recor oz Agent Date g gnature o Owner of Recor or Agent Date I _ ITP.ature ol. Owner of Record or ,Agent "-'""Dat e Signature Of. Owner o Recor Or Agent _ Date x BUTTS"' COC TTY Consultant List GENERAL SER VTCS Ed Christofferson CH2M Hill, Inc. 12. LSA P.O. Box 2088 1.57 Park Place Redding, CA 96099 Eureka CA , 95501 Biosystems Analyses, Inc. Golden Gate ;Ener 13. EcO-Analysts Bldg. 1065, 9Y Center. Ft. Cronkhite 1025 Village Lane Sausalito, CA. 949.6.5 Chico, CA 95926 .Mundie and Associates 4gOr 1`. Bendx Environmental California Street S„. Francisco, CA 94118 Research, Inc, ..390 MarketStreet San Francisco Suite 418 CA 941,02 Sedway Cooke Associates 1.01 Howard St., 2nd F1r. 15' Raymond Vail &Associates San Francisco, CA94.105 1410, Ethan Way Sacramento, CA 9585 S. 'ones & Stokes Associates WESCO 1725 23rd S`c. , 2nd Floor 16 . Sacramento, CA 95816 14 Galli Drive,, Suite A Navato, CA 94949 • Wagstaff & Associates 2550 Ninth St, Suite 205 17. Leonard Charlcas Berkeley 58500 Bohan -Dillon Y. CA 94710 7. Cazadero, CA 95421 Western Planning and En_. 11.860 Kemper Road EIP Associates ub Aurn, CA 95603 • Suite 3 18 . 1311 ,Z Street � Sacramento Suite. 200 2. Quad Consultants � 95814 2530 LT. Street,19 South Cosi -� .Sou � Suite 302. Env. Company. Sacramento, CA 95816 P•O• Box 944. Orindao CA 94563 9_ Harding Lowson Associates .10324 Placer Lane 20' Re11e Atwater Moore Dames & Sacramento, CA 98827 221 Main Street, Suite bop j San Fran: 10 Planning Concepts r CA 94105-19J.7 203-C Ynrk Street 21. Resource Management inter. Nevada City, CA 95959 1010 Hurley Wayv Suite 500 �13 Community concepts.. Sacramento, CA 95825 P.0• Box 249 22. Hawkins/Mark-Tell I4ariposa, CA 95338 P•C. BOX 619008 Roseviller CA 95661-9008 1 ` .• Michael Clayton,,Assoc. 5:764 paradise Dr:.' Corte Madera,. CA 94925' 24,. Crammer Engineerin 9 Inc. P.O. Box 1240 Crass valley, CA 95945., Leonard Charles & Assoc. 58500 'Bohan-�DillonRoad Cazadero, Ca 95421 .25.E Environmental. Planning 880 W. lst St. Suite -615 •Los Angeles. CA 90012 :27. TSS Consultants 8413 Jackson Road Sacraments CA 95826: 2- CommunitY Dynamics One Auburn Center. Suburn, ME Suite 204 A4210 TO Advisory Agency SROM Planning staff SUBJECT.- Revised Initial Study for R a C Hoes Tentative subdivision Map AP M 42-07-170 DATE. March 300 15$3 Due to new information regarding utilities to support the 9&C Homea Subdivision which was provided at the last Bunte County k Subflfeision Committee Meeting it is necessary to revise the Oitial study for the project. when t1m initial study was conducted it was represented by the :pro' proponents that the required residential infrastructure such as water lines, sewez lines, storm drains, etc... to support this proposed development were accessible via adiacent developments. However, at the Aubdivision Committee Meeting it was 'revealed that the project site was not within the City of Chico sewer Service Area and as h result the proposal will require an expansion of 'the existing City of ch"ico sewer system. Appendiu O of the CEQA, Guidelines lists impacts which are normally considered significant. Extension of a sewer trunk ll.ne w,i.th capacity to serve new development is specifically listed as an example of a significant impact. (Appendix G of the CEGB! GOdelines Item 8). The necessary expansion of the Chico sewer system represents a significant impact whichrequires the Preparation of an Mnvironmental impact Report (EIR) in accordance to Section160t3of the Public Rat5ources Code which mandates an Elft be prepared when a significant effect on the environment is identifiedi, in addition, page 4 item 16d of the Initial Study dated March 12, 190 should be changed to read ng and a Mandatory Finding of significance has been made regarding Utilities proposed to serve this proJect The Environmental Determination for this 'project as been revised as fbllbws I/VE find the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL, IMPACT ItEP6RT is requested a fe`Ga. �innnrng Pmft ;Ar3 01989 0rov;11a0 GolifarniButte t " Gunt .lam,... , LAND OF NAT1)R11L WEALTH A14D B I A U T Y - DEPARTMENT OF PU13L,IC WORKS WILLIAM(EIIII) CHEFi=, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE', CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephohet (916) 538.1681 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Director March 29, 1989 R and C Homes RE; AP 42-07-190 4425 Willows Springs Road Westview TSM Chico, CA 95926 Dear Gentlemr.k. At the regular' meeting of, the tUtte County Subdivision Committee held on .March 29, 1989, the committee reviewed the above -referenced tentative subdivision. As a result of this meeting, Public Works will recommend the enclosed list of conditions4 since thea as not been, scheduled for a further meeting at this time: 'The ro,'ec4 has not been pp a stated that 1•hey will be submitting a vesting trip and the Planning Department will be doing more review. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this ioff ice. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works Jobe Mendonsa ffssistant Director, JM/ds attachment cc Planning Department Environmental` Health Department malls, Anderson and Rolls r 7-7-11 i !�'!?stviewSubdivision ( R and C Homes, �, Tentative Subdivision .Map,. AP 42-07-190,, 19 lots located on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue approx. 400 ft. easterly of Guynn Avenue. Chico area. Engineer: .Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Warks conditions, I Submit road and drainage plan-, to the Department of Public Works for approval and install she .• lured facilities, 2 Provide 7.0 ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections Provide right-of-way for standard No. S-5 at all streat intersections. A Indicate a 50 ft4 building setback line from the centerline of interior streets and Henshaw Avenue. J Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all st- et 'intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) Deed 30 from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue.to the County of Butte, 7 Construct full street section on interior streets to RS -2-B road standard with rolled, curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 8" AB SC 250 prime, fog seal and 957. relative compaction. Construct one -halm plus 12 foot lane street section on Henshaw Avenue to RS -244 access road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be 2" AC and 8" AB with fog seal and 957. relative compaction Submit design to County Department of Public- Works for .approval: "R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design: 8 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards. 9 Provide permahlant solution for drainage, 10 All easements of record to be shown on the final map, r, Meet requirements of :Butte County Foe Department or other responsible agency, 12 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of Pca. 13 Pay off assessments. 14 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PGS Pacific Telephone, water, sewer); 15 Pay any delinquent tastes of current tastes a?; required. I ON liUTTE COUNTY DEPARnim OF PUBLIC WORKS LANA DIVISION REVIEW REQUEST `A To;--�,.�-� %%.. DATE: Feb. 16, 1989_ AP No. 42-07-190 RETURN BY; 3/9/89 PROJECT DESCRIPTION; TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP APPLIC�tT: _ WESTVIMM SUPDIVISION(R & C Homes) ENGINEER: Rolls, Anderson & Rolls CONDITIONS A+TD/OR COMMENTS , Se ✓v 1 c i— .#f L 1� +:%,*r�cy yj * !' i rd tp��a, � .. y� ! til i u ivi'A�'W '�•��j %a �'�j�r,17+�.. �r�„,r�F1' �+KQ'� Lib 1110 (Re+t6u'8!°T��aF�m,W �a 4 �( � n r _.uµifo Co. Plant 'I COM a ' LIAR 1989 �.r•-r` Chr�Vil!&, Ctliii+amla ASU He V 0 .. t 1. A {'4 D CY l< I.' A T li )' N' i. '.'i .^. fit•, t'. t' " +� DEPARTMENT OF POJ13LIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CMEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE.'oROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephones (916) 538.74131 RONALD D. tAdELROY be¢uiv Dlt�olot March 15, 1989 R and C Homes RE AP 42=07-190 4425 Willows: Springs Road Westview TSM Chico, CA 95926 Dear Gentlemen; Please be advised that the above-identifed tentative lebbdivision will be reviewed by, the Butte; County Subdivision Committee on March 29, 1989, Public Works ua'ill recomwond the conditions of approval as listed oil the attached sheot, _ - -_ The meeting vill commence at 9`:00 a.,m. in the Conference Room, located at P5 County Center Drive, Croville, California. if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this afce. 'Very truly yours, WilWam Chef Director of Public Works 1 1 J n Mendonsa Assistant director JM/ds attachment cc.- P1;4nnJLhg Vepartiment - Rnv ronmental Real,th Department~ Rolls, Anderson and Rolls y w - , Westview Subdivision ( R and C Hames }, Tentative Subdivision Map, AF 42-07-190, 19 lots located on the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue approx. 400 ft. easterly of Guynn Avenue. Chico area_. Engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Viblic Works_ conditions: 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilita2s 2 Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections. 3 Provide right-of-way for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections; 4 Indicate a 50 ft. 'building setback line from the centerline of interior streets and Henshaw Avenue. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all streot intersections per bounty requirements, (Submit 5 alternate n.tnes for each street to the County address coordinator for Approval of street names.) i Deed 30 from the c�-:tterline of Henshaw Avenue to the County of Butte. 7 ConstrucL full street section on interior streets to RS-2-B road standard with rolled curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC', 8"` AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal. and 95% relative compaction. Construct one-half plus 12 foot lane street section on Henshaw Avenue t6 R8--2-A access road standard withcurb, gutter, and sidewalk, Minimum structural section to be 211 AC and 8". At with fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval. 'IR" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design. 8 Works�.naccordancewith -Provide mowraccepted by the Department. of Public ' ted standards. 9 provide permanent solution for drainage. 19 All easements of record to be shown on the final. map. 1 1 Meet reruirements of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency: 17 Street lightitig shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criter.la, and recommendations of PGM 13 pay off assessments. 14 Meed: the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&R, Pacific ` blephone, water; sewer) 15 Pay luny delinquent taxes or current taxes a's roquired l i�.'� E:u. Plenninq C� A16 R -_ - -�1 rIAIUI? AI WlrilTll } lfi 1oIAIfi'r ` DEPARTMENT OF P1!BLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address 196 Mamortal Woy 0 County Center Drive 0 747 Elliott Rood Reply to Chico, Cofifornia 95926 orov1lle, California 95965 Paradise, California 55969 'Telephone., 916/891.2727 Tolephono:916/538.7,281 Telephone: 916/872.6308 K -arch 9, 1989 I; aC Homes, RE. Westview Subdivision 4425 Willow Springs RoadS/s Henshaw Ave., Chico _ Chico, CA 95928 AP#42-7-190 Gentlemens This department has adviseld the Butte County Department of Public Warks Land Development -Section that we are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present information; we can recommend approval or condi- tional approval. Recommended Conditions for Approval 1.: Indicate weicate on the tentative map existing W0118, Destroy those permit and connect the facil tik?s served by the wells to other approved water sources prior to recording final map 2i Pxuvide A letter or other documentation from California Cgatur Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the subdivision. I Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to the subdivision: 44 Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels within the subdivisoh will require conhectiort to a public sanitary sewer, l � i l ' r 4 Page 2 z; 5. Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection toa public cater supply," 6. Pump and fill the existing septic tanks, Connect any dwell- ing to remain to public sewer. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Chico office. Very truly yours, Thomas Reid= R.S. Supervising Sanitarian Department of Environmental Health cc: Public 'Vbrk ' Planni*g Rolls, Anderson & Rolla TR/vs to - r as 1 LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 05965.3397 PHONE: 530.7601 Rarch 13, 1989 a C Homes ,44'5 Willow Springs Road ;Chico, CA 9.;928 .e; Tentative Subdivison Map Ap +42-01-170 i;entlemeni 'The Butte County 'Planning Departments- has completed the initial otudy of potential environmental consequences anticipated in iconnection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which is being forwarded to you, ?,lease review_ the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any ,environmental problems which could be r11Y�nirn zed or avoided by the which the project is carried out. Also, Tease review an pare and manner in recommended mitigation measures or conditions aof approval. ,after reviewing the checklist, you may see ways to improve the project design. Design improvements to minimize problems are Perxcouraged. if you note any errors or omissions in our P -Valuation, please bring them to out attention. x6a will be notified of the time and place of the pudic hearing for your projec7i. If you have any questions regarding environmental review, please contact this offide incErely . A. Kircher DJ=0cto.t o p; arms g Associate Pl.ann�r' BUM: It CC4. Rous, Anderson & Robs 965 'pit street Chico, CA 9592 t mak'' APPEND, T �NV2�20�7NiT�NT.AL, GFr�C7�L,TS'T �'C.7RM (To be completed by 'Lead Agency) LOG N0, 89-02-16.01 AP No. 42-07-170 ".. ACh'GRQTT'NI3 7,, Name of proponent F & C Homes(_ Westview Subdivision) 1, Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 4425 W1110W Springs Road- Rolls Anderson and Rolls Chico,,CA 955928 965 Fir Street ico, CA 9592b 3y Project description Tentative Subdivision Map to d VI' de 6.12 acres to create~ 19 ,lois o 81000to 13j000 square e I ee .:. :u. MAWDAXQIZ-2. FZNDTN0S - 0V STGNTVTCAN'CE YES L4AIaEiJCI,_, 1. floes the �tiroject have the potential to degrade the quality of the: envir�naent, rubstanti,'Ily reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife ;population to drop below self-sustaining levels, thret,ten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangerad plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods of Califoen.ta history or prehistory? 2- goes the pi-ject stave the potential to achieve-short-term benefits to the detrima►t of long-term environmental goals? (A short,-term iapact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief'period of ti,uie while Lang-term, )mpacts will ondure into the future.) _ 3, Does the project have impacts which are individt*,,"4 'limited but cubulat vOy considerable? (A project wy impact on two or .cute separate resources where uvQ impact on each resource is relatively small) but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environrsent is significant.) k. Does the project have environmental "e£!:octs which twill cause subst+ntial Adverse effects on human beinyst either directly or indirectly? tl ic.Tl, pr±;-xgTzmT1I,WrT_QN (To be completed by the Le,�d Agency).on kale basis of this initial evaluations /A find the prop,ts0d project COULD Wr have a sighifi.c"t effect rn the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATXON will be prapared. I/A find that although the proposed project CGULD havo A significant Pffect on the environment; theca will not be a signifidan" effoah in this case because the MITIGATION HEASUP.ES described on theattao,a6.d sheet have teen added to the project. A NEGATV.t DECLOATION will be.lrrepardd. TVA find the proposed project HAY 'nacre a signi£icint effect on the envitenmenLo and an W11PONWNTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. COUNTY 02 ➢UTTE PLANNING bEPARTMENT DAlus Larch 13, 1989 ayt ..rw $rend 7r %1o0�'G:� Associate Plann0 Reviewed by. i i t� jy� v T NVT_RONNIEN' .AM TMI—Ac-rS (Explanations c£ all "YES" and "MAY answers are required on attached sheet(s), 1. EARTH. Will the 'proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcover.ing of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surfuce rbliex features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical featuresT \/ e. Increase in wind or water erosion of & .;s, either on or off s?;e7 f. Changes in deposition or erojion of beach r'. Ads, or changes in !Ration, deposition or erosion which may modify tM k nnel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet.: ake? S. Lofts of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urbanM a.rE,aO h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial, a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambtent air quality? _ ✓ b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteration of air wrement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. HATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a.. Changes in. currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waterz? _ b, Changes in absorption rates) drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? _ c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvehents, including vegetation / removal., channelization or culvert installation?' d. A'l'terations to the course or flow of flood Waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discha.rgie into surface waters) or in any alteration of surface Water quality, including but not limited to tetperature,, dissolvdd oxygen or turbidity? g. Alteration of U;,) direction or rate& of flow of 'ground waters% h. Change ir, the quantity or quality of ground waters) either through direct additions or withdrawals) or through interception of an aqui ut by Buts or excavations? i, Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public Water supplies? d. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding? 4, PLANT I,�. Wil.l the prmpobal result in substantial; a. Change its the diversity of species,or number of any species of plants (indlueing trees) shrubs, grass) dropsi and aquati- plants)? b. Reduction of thenumbors of any unique, rare or endangered species of e. Introduction of new species oflants into ari area) or in a bar>ier to the normal replenisl*tnt of existing spedies? , d. Reduction ift acreoge of any agricultural drop". r +, ANIMAL, L'IF'E. Will the proposal result in substantial.: YES 14AYBE �i 0 a. Changei of species, or'Tuobers of any species of animals theanimals including reptiles, i'ish and she�.lfish, organisms or y insects)7 l� b. Reduction in thenumbers of any uniquet rare or endangered species of J ani mals 7 c. Intr_duction of new species of animWca into an area, i.r in a barrier to the migratio x or movement of animals? d. Deteriorati;ort of existing fish or wildlife habitat? NOISE, Will the proposal result in substanti'al3 a. Increases fn existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? try i. LIGMT Alit GLARE. Will the proposal oidd(^ca significant light and glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an areal 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increase in the rate Of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? lo. RISK OF UPSET. Wixl the proposal involve: a. A ;risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to,, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible 'interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? _. 11. 0jja " ON. Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density or gi.)wthrate of th. human population? 7124 HOUSING. Will the ,ptopoaial affect existing housing, or create a demand fox additional housing? t- 13, TRANSPORTATIONICIRCE?TJATION Will the proposal result in 4 a. Generation of ibstantial additionalvehicle movement? t, Effects on existing rJWking facilities, or demand for new parking? `j!r c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? Vii. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to Waterborne; rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards 'to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14, pitBt,IC. MVIGES, Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services: a. fire protection! b. Police. protection? c. Schools? 4444; d, 'Parks .- other recreational: facilities'1 e. Maintenance of putlic ft,ii,lities) including roads? f, Other governmental v ervicels't yy v: fir. FliEPGS( Will the proposal ro5ult in: _Y SMSL NO a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or onergy? ice. b. Substantial increase in demand upon oxisting sourcez CZ, -inargy, or require the development of new sources of energy" --- �, 7r'3IL?2Tg54 Will the proposal result in a need .for new syx,temst or substantial alterations to the follovinu. a, Power or natural gas? - 3G b. Communications systems? — e. water availability? d. Sewer or ;septicsystems?-- o. Storm water drainage? ✓_. to Solid waste and disposal? _ 17. liiPAO MALTH. Will the ;proposal result in; a. Creation cf any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental V health)? b, Exposure of people to potential -heal-th ,>azards7' la. CSE, ,'MICS. 1411 the p=roposal result in the obstruction of any scenic ?lista or view open to the public) or will the proposal result in the Creation of an aesthetically 'tftensive site open to public view? .�. 19 ptggPgjATION. Vill the proposal result in an, impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opporturhitiesT 20, { `T;P6L MSt7tERgES. ,. Will the proposal result, in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the. 'proposal result in adverve physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building) structure or object? c. Doss the proposal have the potentirl to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?_ d. Wilthp ilosalreseistilig religions or sacred uses within l em alo- areal SCLISS=CSN . i F L-3VXII-CONMFNTAL .-EVAT,[TATTON Zile attachedA -4- 1 VTSCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP # 42-07-170 lb,3b,16e The compaction and overcover_ing of the soil will occur as z� result of the converting of a walnut orchard to residential eVplopment. it is estimated between 30 and 5o percent of the roject site is expected to be overcovered by building structures, 9,riveways, sidewalks, and roadways which will impart the sail and �ei,ltration. Substantial increases in storm water runoff into the fjindo Channel will occur from the development of these lots The l ,,,tate Reclamation Board is the responsible State agency for drainage Into Lindo Channel, If a separate drainage out fall is required,,a :rainage permit must be obtained by contacting the Reclamation Board, of 1.4'16 9th Street, Room 455-6 Sacramento, CA 95814 jg,4d: 6.12 acres of historical: orchard property will be converted ,from agricultural uses to residential uses by the proposed tentative, zubdivision maP. The property is located within the Chico Urban Area .and has been planned for single family residential housing. The parcel size of 6.12 acres is not considered to be a commercial viable agricultural acreage. The loss of prime agricultural, land is not r-pnsidered a significant impar -;. 3et The proposed project will result in an increase coefficient of storm water runoff and a shorter concentration time. Such factors <-oil! lead to an increase in both amount and rate of overland flow, producing larger and more frequent peak flaws in Lir-3o Channel. Tt is anticipated the standards for drainage in Chapter 20 of the Butte County Code will mitigate any significant impacts caused by additional amounts of surface water in the Lindo Channel:. 3f increased urbani!?,ation within the L�',rid'o i�hennel" Drainage Basin will result in richer exposure of pollutants to the water flows in. the channel. The California T?epartment of Fish and Game has expressed a concern in the past about drainage from the urban developments into Lindo Channel, Urban development along the chonnel will increase drainage into the channel and; subsequent nutrient ;loading which may result in eutrophi.cation of the water,. 8di Possible nutrient loading in Lindo Channel as aresul": of this proposed project in and of itself' may have no significant impact, however, cumulatively it may lead to eutrophicat ton of the water in the channel which would deteriorate the ekistin g fish and wildlife habitat. of : the Ambient noise levels walnut warchard increase are.:ult of urbanization on ` g._ i However, proper landscape and building site plans will help to achieve a more serene urban environment 8: The proposed project is zoned S-A and designated by the Butte County General Plan as Low Density Residential. All Lots off the cul -de' -sac must meet the requirements of section 20--121 of the Bute County Code which states as follows: "Lots Which f I.-dat ah a curb street or on the end of a cul-desac shall have frontage of 40 feet or more at the front lot line and 65 feet or more, at the street ;;setback lines". Redesign lots on the cul--_e-sac streets`o conform To ion 26-121 (2). 2: it is anticipated the newly adopted street facility improvement f4jos will mitigate any significant impacts to the transportation 5yotem within the Chic,:) Urban Area. 14at The project site is located within the benefit area for the ►est Chico Fire'Station assessment area. As such an impact fee of t75,0,0 per lot has been adopted to provide necessary fire services t is anticipated such fees will mitigate any significant impacts the ,,roject mayhave on fire services. West Chico Fire Station as ,essment fees shillp be aid prior to recordation of the final ,-O,bdivi cion m&ri 14q: Increa8ed demands for public services will occur a5 this property develops. Cost associated with public services will. be ?.eassened, however, as a result of this acreage being located in close proximity to existing urbanized development. The required residential infrastructure such as water lines, sewer linen, storm drains, etC. to support this property are easily accessible via adjacent developments. 36,s Pubisc utilities will be provided by the Pacific Gas and ziectric Company. No service 1'roblems are anticipated in supplying this property with utility servi,ct�. water is to be supplied by the California water Service Company. Sewer is available from the City of Ch,co sanitary sewer system. The Nitrate Action Plan of the Chico ;area requires that residential propertiesof less than-one acre ;ensi.ties be connected to the sanitary sewer system rather than utilizing septic leachfielel systems. Applicant: R & C Homes Assessor,!s Parcel 42-07-17.0 Legg # 89-02-16-01 DATA SHEET A. project Description 1. Type of Project: Tentative Subdivision Map' 2. Brief Description: Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 6.12 acres to create 19 lots of 8,000 square feet to 15,O00 square feet each. 3'. Location: G:- the southerly side of Henshaw Avenue, approximately 400 feet easterly of Guynn Avenue, in the Chico urban iarea. 4: Proposed Len:sity of 'Devel:opmenti-,. Three duelling un 'f-s per acre. S. Amount of Impervidus Surfacing: 30-50 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s;i: Henshaw'Avenue. 7. Method of Sewage Disposal; City of Chico, public sewer. 8. Source of Wa,ter Supply: California Water Service Company. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to property. 10. Potential for further landdivisions and development: No further land divisions possible. B. Environmental Setting physica,: Fa�vironment Terzaiit a. G�tneral. Topographic Character; Flat valley Land. b: siopesz 0-2%. C. tievat on: 180 fb. :A•S.L d Lima,tS49 Factors Ione 2 . Soils - a. Types and Characteristics. Vina loam brown, rich- a. brown. From 2-3 feet thick, soil retains moisture well and bas a good ;permeability. b. Limiting Factorgv: None. 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake 'Zane: Moderate earthquake intensity 'one VIII: b Erosion.Potential: Slight. c. Landslide Voteritial! None. d. Fire Hazardz dAcl.assi.fied e. Expansive Soil Potential: Low. 4. Hydrology a. Surface Watere Lando Slough runs approximately 1/2 mile to the south of the prof er-t site. b. Ground Water: R/A di D,t .. g p ". ': ains toward the sou na e Characteristics. Property d'. 7;r d . Annual rainfall (normal) z 2 e. Limiting Factors: None, ' 5V visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6 Acoustic Quality Good. 7 Air Quality: Good. Biological Environment: 'I 8. Vegetation: Walnut orchard. 5. Wildlife Habitat: Common animals and birds associated with agricultural orchard: Cultural: Environment: 104 Historical in the. area: Modertealow includingunknown, 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential, 1. Exi ting Zoningi. s -R 13. Existing Land Use on-site; Orchard: 14 Surrounding .Area: a: Land Uses: AgricultuL'ial orchard operations, single family residential and multi -family residential. b. Zoning S -R, A -R , R-4, and A-5. C. Gen. Plan Designation: orchard and Field Crops, Medium Density Residential, and Low Density Residential d. Parcel Sizes: Parcels range from 6,5.00 square feet to 20 acres. e. Population;: Urbanizing area. 15. Character of Site and Area: Urbanizing: ` 16. Nearest Urban Areal,- Chico. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico, Chico Area Recreation and Park District, 1F. Imbrovements'Standards Urban Area: Yes. 19. Eire ,Protection SerVice: a.- Nearest County (State) Fire StationE Station #42 located approximate]_v 1 1/2 miles northeast of the prof ect site,. b. Water Availability: gyre hydrant. 10, Schools in Arca: Chico Unified School. bistrict: February 16, 19$9` R & C Homes RE AP 42-07-190 4425 Willow Springs Rd, Westview Tentative Chico, CA 95928 Subdivision Map - Gentlemen This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the r ovproperty g dPlanningDepartment ltp t fol.- environmental determination$ and theEnvironmental Health Department for its review. This 1 cation will be considered complete when we have received notif ::Lon from the Plan ting Department and the Fnvironmental Health. Depar,,,.At that all necessax-y data have been received: These dopartments will contact you regarding any additional infawtion they may require Very truly yours, - William Cheff Director of Public Works Afm Mondonsa sistant Director y ;r A , 1+ 0 A K2] I HENSHAW �,,,r A,« mak. ,.�,.....- ., :,.. N., � ..-_...�._..—...•. ti«... .,_. af.= /L.'{ ,6N "t ,Wa...� ♦ 660 h III F c _ % -. �l , �_ S " _'. `'.,A-+,� .� . 4 r`�� .,.,.y'+r.,,/"Fy"�. � "+:w�.,�[`. , ,♦.•`.ev..'�. ri xIy_ X �-"'_a :�,�,.ra •J.wa ,.��•.,I r �. _1Q``1.. , , - .4 rjM���r,.ia .,,:+�Fri ,.� ./ `0..i'»"A^..7� 7f1F3- J'l1. .l _ �;�"",:. '4y+7y.YJy,�amrr!,-+�"scS'� A{,�,�l � !w,� t`'..G_;Y,J,�', ..S. ,, 12 .4fF.y .', �f4J_ W�,,,CF� . �YY � �,.,,��y. ?/F,`e+. ;_.�—.)�-. 'C.Y . ."..�...,.i/,lt.,z/:-i;, �•F� w�"ce� 1" �JJs ��,..Au�fyij r�.. ' ,YmA fc:am,♦#.... r, fr+c"�!K��.."..' f».s=1.+«.,9p.'�/`�k-t.� 7i",s- XK :syyln.`�2i��".,�drr�. .a� .�'�';f�G paesw,r ;e ,i..,r�ir.C' t�r« "k,�'i�.iY , ' �1 ar,U,, #.R:�K�. .FF�1.fJ CAt� �,hY}P'a' '4 >FT r_a+•,fi�.7l.r_n, ;'#h♦',N•�{��,... s A7,. _". ��_ , ✓v"'��. ,i" -u.'.. c, . .� r i ✓rAjr \ � t�r Y � fi •c y•a.f .�it -51 i� 1�E<S,} rU/dJ 4 612AC 66-ilovo-Ac/0 0040 %1 1` i1i1 F' /0 40t ..a,�.3 42 C", 10.00AC6 8.6 a" •� Stamm 16 6 log,( OD VILLA Ir Sri F 81� A+ r 411 (L�� 84At. 77 ZZ ENTo S BD, Astessor s Mo Fo. 42 07� i.mm 7 r♦3=6- {b : .. 1 f '.I � t i w County of Butte, Calif. � t k x Pj, 4 y a l `, 1