HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-090-025.._._.._w..W, .....�MZY:tt1"ri�+:i `1.1,i;;%;2PJt�•,��2J� �'��..,"�T k: u- _d+�Y+'...,�......:..+.::,. � ....,+.k
Steve Schuster 88-05-17-04
985 Flying; v Street, Chico, CA 95928 .W.,.»;.>.:�»:,:. F• .�::.w
Clifford Batty
. to divide 7 � ��t��:fi�i
Tentative Subdivision Map t°c create
9 parcels at 1.1+- acres each. :::.,�.> ...,....
..,n ._. -- t _ �`1 :? tj C) i? I" tt c t; ea s t
r�OCA, 7lONn the north side of Kennedy Avenue apprOxiMatcl ,». ..... ,,,�.... .s «>,
of Muir Avenue,
Chico area.
42-09-25
ASSESSOR'S 3?ARCET, NUMBER (S)
SR-] GENERAL PLAN. PROJECT C;C>?h��a�:,STI,'%�'?...>w.,....~ _...._
ZONSNGw.......,,,.. .�._ W....W...,
( PINFIC$ ]C, i�I,AN CV(�Ik'C7l2Y�fANCF "PORT May . 5, ► 19 a_. g--_..-.
DATE ICANT SIGNATURE
X,7�NT CG11V,�aT�V1�T1 ON1C;T CONTtACTS s -,..ANO
DAT APPLI Cn'"7 (7tt
-�
AGF,N'T/StJAVEYOR/
CIVIL ENGINEER", NorthStar Engineering _,...._..« _....:.,...w
20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95926
..........
t 5 . .-....
DATE PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT
�..,..Y.w.» a �.:,........_.—.a....._._..�—».w--«..
IWINTAY, CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE �'ILC��7� ; ....W.W .. � ......,...�......
l rl'T'I t b:'Ci�i117'�nt`� NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATA �1t�U�"CEIO
Mt jTjoi,' q%D NEG. DECLARATION' W. f3NI.'1, ADUP'1'P;L"1«..... ....
-"NV • IMPAO'C tE3�Oit'i' MATE
m (10MJ� x ' ' 1`"1�E'1 tN' �
Itore
11t1G'l ltt=t?tvCY 1i1,oAJI'lNr,�
S(WT
. 119AW
.�
r:11V'1 ".r}iii AOENC II ACTT ON
i . ►J� 11I> 11(J'L''i. CST .W«.,�w..,�...«W W. »..
..a.w>.v.,i,.i4."W�.�".i1W,ls..i+.J..%kltJkb_WW'c�ui,..nW««s..+,wi. YYWrwYur w.Va..YN1?!+>r.A_.,r4Wpu.i..rY4v#+YWKi1«4.Ms.P�r�W,rJ ML�',.Ia
pLANt,i7:No Lj1,VZC'1'0W 6 Ikr,
cc,
Lite I r
tllilavm I% n1v REQUEftM) o1vtnono I AM AWARE OF 111F hME VVA110
141711 71-M 08NMAL PtAi AND ZONING.
Dub:d 849"lituto Or ApPlit-anl
'11.1 ul.'Rox" 1" 11 mpire and bo diacatdto bix (o) montjj+; rrom the dnt(o uC
1AD 1000A (revised 6-81)
rev i;- U MAY
2—Ty-T _r1v
MA -P Q_I'L sL
ltuoii 1,i, to bu completed by applicant-
0mvillo, Callfornii
1. APPLICANT NA1%M AND ADDRLSS:
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
3. MoSIQSOR'S PARCEL IMBER(s):
4. PROPOSED USEt
Th;: following items are to be completed by the Planning Departmanu
CIMP0T VONING; _-fS
LAND CONSERVATION AGREDUUM
01114'.RAL PLAN DESIGNATION.
r,notlitAoiini
ACRicuLTUPAL-RrsiANTiAL YES
NO It is recommended that you pettom flits
following i":0mo-
1. AlricultUral Compatibility
checked
2, Water and Sower Capacity�
MCH4E0WCTCkL FUnDRDS CHECR
3. AdeqLmto Fire Facilities BOTANICAL SLMVEY
4i Road Capacity and Maintenance
GEOLOrIC&" SURVEY
5. AceQ1.s to Co: mccial and Schools
'YE1q
NO
MCI= MT vim CROPS
WIr"IN DEMK-7-1ENT OF FISH
AND'�AME Z)LVELOPRCNT ZONE -
1. Pkodominant 5-10 he. Parcel Size
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries
WITHIN MOD PLAIN. -
3. Ag. Viability hot Inipairod
SLaFf boLcminationt SubstiLitially conforms to.
WITHIN ARIA, SPECIFIC OR
Lab USE PLAN:
GEN'ElIkI, PLAN; 1. Land Use
if Yes,
2, Conservation
Namu of Plan
3. Open Space LWITHIN
URBAN RESERVE.
4. Safety
5. Noize
If Yes,
6. 'si
How reG
Neuse of
7, Circulation
A-111PORT IA140 USG PLAN*
cc,
Lite I r
tllilavm I% n1v REQUEftM) o1vtnono I AM AWARE OF 111F hME VVA110
141711 71-M 08NMAL PtAi AND ZONING.
Dub:d 849"lituto Or ApPlit-anl
'11.1 ul.'Rox" 1" 11 mpire and bo diacatdto bix (o) montjj+; rrom the dnt(o uC
1AD 1000A (revised 6-81)
N
y'
V e.
NC7rlGE OF DE RIZMMNA X0W
Office of Planning andBtut`;t:e Coii
rh k"
KF � rlt'y
1400.Tenth Street, RoomPea91L'1i�Plrtirig Dopattmerrt;
Sacramento, CA 95814 NOV~ g �aA� `'+ 7 County l onter D�y9 vr.'-
C"t"(it/3lle, CA 95965
or
X County Cleric CANUACE J GRUBBS', CF1tte Co, Clerk
County of Butte ByG.-MEF((— Dehubj
; ulT J'ECx tiling of Notice of Determination in complianc!q with Stiction 211.08
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Pcoject Title AP It Name
Tentative subdivision Map 42-09-25 Steve Schuster
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Nuialit r
Cif submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 558-7266
Project Location on the north side of Kennedy Avenue, approximaue1y
2000 feet east of Muir Avenue, Chico area.
Project Description Tentative Subdivision Map dividing 10 acres into
nine parcels of 1+ acre each.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(,Lead ,:agency or Responsible Agency)
pp project on 10 - 1- 8 8 and ha%; made
has approved the above-described ro'ect (Date)
the following determinations regarding tho above-described projectt
1 The project will, X will 'noti have a significant effect on the
environment.
2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of MA.
X A Negative Decl.atation was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEOA.
5. Mitigation measures X were, were not, made a condition of the
approval, of the projects
4. A statement of overriding considerations teas, _ was not, adopted
for this "project
This is to certify that the final E R With comments and responses and record of
projett approval: is available to the general public at
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Date ecfor Filing and
Posting atvOPlt t ///Q,
..,
ignature
Bill Turpin; Senior Planner
9 1 8.2 Title
heiriand hIarcb 1986
F
Steve Schuster
TSM, Mi'.igation Measures
AP442-09-•25
.; Contribute $75.00 per lot to the West side Fine 0k.dL-ion
Benefit Fund:
2. Contribute a pro rata share towards the improvelDcnL and/or
signalization of the intersection of I(erinedy anal lliUhway 32.
lnter-Departs tNemorundum
h4'
M Butte County Advisory Agency
FRONS planning Director
sUrURCT: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR STEVE SCHUSTER ON
AP#42"09-25
PATL'i October 6, 1988
This is a Proposal to divide 10 acres to create 9 parcels
at J+ acres each. The present zoning is SR -1, (Suburban
Residentialo, I acre minimum). The Chico Urban Area Land
Use Map, an Element of the Butte County General Plan Land
Use Element designates this property as Agricultural -
Residential. There are no specific plans for the area.
As conditioned, the subdivision can comply with the
General Plan and zoning requirements.
The property is located within the urban areao and will be
subjeqt to the payment of toad improvement fees at the time
only collected from properties
Pees are
of building permits.
within the urban area, and spent on imptolrements within the
urban area. The City of Chico Engineering staff has
intersections which heed improvement, to which
prioritized 1 8 will be applied. The intersection
the transportation fee is not included on the list,
of Kennedy and Highway 32
and therefore Wi 1 11 not be improved with road fees. Creation
of 9 lots, Will generate approximately 96 vehicle trips
per day. This traffic ,8 -
expected to feed out tr, Highway 32
�h
at Xennedy. ''Therefore, the project has the potential to
impact the intersection of xennedly and IHighway 32 and a cly
i licant has already
lAitigation measure s appropriate. The app
agreed to contribute a. pro rata share towards the improvemen'l.,
and/or signalizatiOn Of Kennedy and Highway 32,
RECOMMNIDATION :
A. Vitd that;
I. An initial Study was completed in dompliQncc with MA4
2. Said Study and comments received there On J,elehti.f'od the
potentially significant environmental 01',1400tr- that t
project May have had but
4 PrOTI mads'
a. Revisions in the project plans or ')0sals
ould, 'd
by or agreed to by the applicant w avoid � n
1" a E001', -LO a POI
suck �fftct8 Or TA4Ug te such ef: , (3
where c1 ear no significant environinaNntal effects
would occur, and
Butte County Advisory Agency
Page Two
October 6, 1988
bi There is he substantial evidence before t1le
County that the Project as revised M,,-I,y have a
significant;effect on the environment
I .
3. A Proposed Negative Declaration has beall coMpj,otod
in compliance with CEQA and is approved and E-100pted.
Be Find that Siad Negative Declaration together with Ell ly
comments received during the public review process J)ave
been reviewed and considered.
Co Approve the Proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to allow
the creation of 9 - 1+ acre parcels from a 10 acre lot
on,AP#42-9-25 (Steve Schuster) subject to the follcwing
Mitigation measures W and conditions:
lo Establish a 100 foot no residential development area on I.,lbo.
West Property line. Note on sheet attached to map this '100
foot setback shall apply to the homes only, and not to
accessory facilities Such as Wells, Pools and patios.
2. Contribute 4 pro rata share towards the improvement and/or
signalization of the intersection Of Kennedy and Highway 32.
X
3. Contribute $75-00 Per 10t to the West Side Vire Station
Benefit Pund, W
4. Note on sheet attached to recorded map: ItAft are, of high
nitrates has been mapped Immediai-,oly south of the -pro.
Wells should be tested requlatIly
Pollutants, for nitrates and otheprerty
If Pollutants are detecto6t an alternate
Water supply should be sn-cured.11
5. Pach lot shall have 1,'o feet of frontage as measured at
the building setback line. If the building setback,
7, pie
is not the stando;4d 20 feet (i.e.Lot 8)t building setback
line shall be 5.%own on the recor t
ded map,
6- Lots 2 and I should access from the, now in,Uerior road to be
Oonstructt:d.
7. All Paj.-cels to conform with the zoning disLrict., reclVirements,,
LT: rac
CC% �*,Leve Schuster
North8tat Engineering
Bme Co. Flmning Comtir►,,
JUL 2 8 1988
O�ovll®A C;aliforaia
Archaeological Reconnaissance:
of Schuster's Proposed 1 C -Acre Subdivision
on Kennedy Avenue West of Chico. Butte Country. California.
Prepared For:
Steven Schuster
Chlcoj California
Prepared By.
Jensen & Associates
Archaeological consulting and Research
41 Skymountaln Circle
Chlco, Californla 95928
1
introduction
In order to assess the archaeological impacts of a proposed subdivision project involving
approximately 10 acres of land located in west Chico, Butte County, California, the developor
contracted for a records search and on -foot reconnaissance of the parcel in compliaivx With
recommendations received from the Northeast California information Center and the
County Planning Department, Accordingly, on Saturday; June 19,1988, the outhor Butto
cted a
pedsstrien survey of the project area for the purpose of locating and recording any evidence of
prehistoric or significant h'storic use and/or occupation.
The 10-00re parcel consists of a square piece of land bordered on the south b Kenn
Avenue, Y edy
on the north by an almond orchard, and oil the gest by, ,an existing subdivision of single
family residences (see attached Schuster Parcel I.ocatior? Map). The CLrrent proposal
calls for
subdivision of the parcel into nine single family residents lots. In view of the Potential effects
Of future construction to cultural resources which might exist within the area,
consideration of the general archaeological sensitivity of the region; Butte Count and other
in
regulations required that cultural resources be fully inventoried and formally assessed
to
project approval, pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
as
amended (16 U.S.C. 470), and procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic preservation (36
CFR 800),
This report details the results of the required archaeological survey and inventory and
provides appropriate recommendations, All fieldwork procedures followed guidelines provided
by the State Historic Preservation Office (Sacramento) and are in conformity with aat
Professional standards, pted.
Record Search
Prior to going into the field the archaeological records of the Northeast Ca i
Information Center (CSU -Chico) were examined for any existing recorded prehistoric or
significhht historic sites within the project area, In addition; the National Register P,Ioric
acea (11501 1987) was also consulted, No $ites are currently recorded for the projecttarea
nor imMadiatelyadjacent lands,
Fieldwork
As noted, fieldwork for the project was conducted by the author on June 19, 1988. The
on-foot survey inQved criss-crossing the'porcel from north to south, examining the surroce
for evidence of pest use and occupation. Ground squirrel burrows and recent gardening activities
have exposed subsurface areas throughout the parcel, and these Were inspected for evidena sof
buried cultural material:
Survey Results and Recommendation
No evidence of prehistoric or, of early historic use or occupation was encountered within
the project area. in view of the negative results achieved during both the records search and the
field survey, archaeological clearance for the proposed Schuster subdivision is recommended;
with the following general provision: should future construction activity reveal evidence of
subsurface prehistoric or historic cultural material, a qualified archaeologist should be
mntacted immediately in order to assess the impacts of the project to the cultural resources
involved:
Reference Cited
United States Department of the interior"
1987 National Register of Historic Alaces, Federal Register through
June 23,1987, Washington, D.C.
—. 1.1, f1,4 le l
RAJ 192 0,3 Mi. TO CALIF. 87 55' 593 HAMILTON CITY 6.0 Ml. 2030000 FEET n$
a ••Y•V ,�• I'•••• •r nY17gy�Y9
n �� •.«, • isY;r i'lr•� °' . Inr•Ya •W f-" r•• •a • ! }}aY1NtiR •a . i
n • •ii•r x.•l IY Yr l s • ♦• ••• «D }. + •• BI�WCIIN• R♦} Yk} Y
8 / •. A•••} . �. 1} '., �� P u D,!jrY i • . 'P .•�•af a��i`tr a•ko ,
II ?.♦, �] iiva•a } ,i r 1 .7` h .+•• • l° 4 'tiF • } } h •••. •••} , «� «♦.v
// . .} < IIN n♦ }IYrr � N r r1 •% �i •�rce • • ••i ••ir+ •k#far4Y.
�,,* - p, � y'6 ' �/••Y'i•YL� « rta•r• xf• • r#e t F fr v •ril« ••••! Y#} •.
B \ � / r• '•• vn 14 w f .+} - y •••«• ♦ • •.p p a •r1}. P... /�h —
1 )j/) }d Il`a« } N• }F` 1 } r < !'« fV•I• ••• O Ye }'}•
�Y� J t#}w • a}« .! h aYl LY }• i 9N} • Y« •L • N P O •.f # }YY
4Ryy M
—JN I!/ //'.: +} YL'T L L C aLti ! } r •Y ♦}Lr Pd 9• f ,�•.�•, .a q Y •}F•J.Y Y4}^«,
♦ '� yf \ • • • a•1aJ
I Y rL Yu..' }.Q Y,11} 3 }YJ 1 Y 'ii• •rrla•% n•�OYi}tib is
I 11 � rA Y r• -Y Y 1-•' r i J••4/. Y Yil°}' } \.
�
N.ENIVEOY .+.#. ti l5 .'" E n • •� • • -_- 1 �11}7••Y!^
�L✓ .:. .r .� �w Yui• • �'
;p y � .a r •i •• 1 «�•a •N}N }r ♦ .• -' uq r • •.• ••r • �" jp �,... . �
11 4Cf ar r r1 VI s . •*r . a r } •• •! •� ,
h,' r•� 4Yr L} 111 }' Y 1J ?• } r « f#{ ,_e ....... 1�I', •,�
!•„. a :".}'�. is'•}.•a•A rin., i•:' : 11 �; hs /a 1naS
e��Cmal:e 1
,AI ♦L an 1•�cr area «. {•µt . h ” � 1Yt's'J
. . •=A•r }♦ ••r•ei}i YY.a±*« -,'., .. •at a#. } 1. 1 aA+•ri IfNYrL Y} 1 L,r.aF. �P 41 }71. 1�, •�.ryry /^�
ll �_= Y. rr . �L#• «•♦ «•+ ,: as 1. •,# } ..:r .. .. } ••• :i: ai••r• «•yY U}. S �Yr .4UwJ5��
_...cm. cc «Y Y: #rnbx r•,t'�.-'. .. '},rear r•.••r LLYra }srrL +.L } .F'• L,.� 4Y I��nJ< tri ,.ic.vif•.r „ao s •r +: tt:; :•�..'�y Z�
Subdivision tart
p �.�« !� •• • ••• ♦YY. A' J •LV eJ FY N'.' •• ♦ 'O J• �,/ h,° a •
14 \. er •,.. fp 1A L•« YA YAt} • Y"F # - k } 4 r. �1eC
AY ;Y. 1 Y}Y.••l •a•• }}FIY N ♦Na #a - , J'•Y aY1 •a!•' AL LY NN M. Y •• ♦-•• V� •. � ��.
' •r re •AY :•. - •a•a /. v. ur •I, •rn Ya.•}«1 I JL±N` •I.YF S " k •••Y.•• • i #. �`.,.� I!
' •r♦r1 ,. �{.♦ • 1••'Ya1• rYw J as • L • • r «•� /s �� a } �. � •Fr #t' � ♦AN«• • •• Y« tf }•.YN3 �' •• Y 1 Y I.• }.
ar •}• f Y}• }L ItYY.N .• r . }L «• « N•Y• L11 'NI P}#} rY••Y t IY 1paL • •k / -eni y L` u
.; .}F•n♦ •IL... ••rNL ., a Y ,. } N F/ f!• . �� •♦ r... : n• ' } IF• V
t, ., r!•N} # Y..: ,.♦ «' '+ •A r}r w, 11 •ht • ;YIA
P x u1 ••Y,r Y�A1,w 4 • ••1 t'4.' 4;1+• • yI h}}•^}/
�, t r• •..Saa a # .♦ . ,• r a e k }.LYa agy Wap from [601)'
A C •• La••rp je • } • :: o � � • • ••e d r N ••1. r• •� IN • . n
1 X35.. •Ye•.i •. • •+
LA'S
15? • ay} Card Iyer Yr..+. c rtOAK�Nw 7 5J.J•�•yY'.r Yr.a ` A •_•/�� Y ♦ •Y• Y`e 'Yn#•••• • ,.se.iaF1 }}Y.
1/ ( i V `/• P *•Y144 NI Aa+, kY�`/FAF'}:
n
y r' Y.♦Y«. p.•a• � O Nr ; X. «•'• • .♦• Ya"i W. 11 t -•.y.• : ♦{{ #Y ��4L
U r^. 1 ^ • /h fi II
it t e • try 11 VENUE 1 Y..E • .p.Y•' • S.• • " a:
' .-•- _SACRAMENTO • - /471 t • wry • a La c` * #�>♦"
GG } • I•MY ♦ A. �"Y� VIw
01
t1Y P
} :: I x. J, .. , IIA . is.. :r•. � e..,_ `y /J9a
950000
' Y
' °� a • II •! /, . • .' `, FEET
1 '
/44 !
Tr' .. Y38 • « a`s._... 1 re + L}Yt1.
C • • MP, ti� Y a} r
•
�� -� Luw V.Y• .� , /i yV`i�"•NI {. Wf, Al•4}« YNr �.N� /.
12r II o ~� � tY''� •..n �.Y YJ - J:.•, Y-,-�,,.,.+ . „r a. �oa'<±. 4 �
Y "r� M \
O a6"yOY:Q"}YYkY t • -J/
~r
1 �'- �� :.: -�'""i-y..h../. q Y��NnY�rl siwli N' � _,,..16 • wiat �.
Levee _ N rwn. •IY •R#F•rn } _ .Ii.Y •1•+ _
j ^„ � �� P k•}iv•k�iY}c>aYr kYf1 aL .I.
1�A � .. < Y I i { • . Y •
r 1, 11 `/�. � � , ��, �•u 1441!• u• «i YI«
!f•rk
TY 22 N
1 }}
Y
/S •
o r
p,J t : ;',' n
L
r_ Y
,. / C�/Y p�p•Yrr x+53 ;� }
f. 21 N.
1+Pum(ll � il�n � � ym�Ah"'tl,Aa • u i •
p -�aww.y
a ` RFd«YPswrrrscYOx l 00
�4
} Y ,
0 Y
dullo 0(4, #'fanning Comm,
OAV
l(J1V, ti 198 Awqq
O"OV1116, California
NorthStar
Engineering
Civil Engineers • Planners Surveyors
Ju►ne7, 1988
County of Butte
Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Attention: Laura Tuttle
Re.i Schuster Tentative Subdivision Map AP #42--09-25
Der Ittle
I g on behalf of our client,, ,Steve Schuster, regarding the
su. ft,itigation measures for the subject project.
Wo find the mitigation measures 1 5 acceptable.
A records search has been requested from the Northeast T_I)rormation
Center )f California State University, A copy will be forwarded t a
you.
We truss -is information will be sufficient for the project to
proceed. Should you Have any questions, please calf, this office.
Very truly yours,
NORTHSTAR ENGINURING
Cask Rodriguez
RC (I
20 DeCIOWiOh DrIVO
Chino, CA 95926
016) 80- 1600
T California
Archaeological
Inventory
�.0 UU\1y UUUI�,{l5�\JIJ I! B4TTE
GLC4. SNASTA Department of Anthropology
�I5CP PLL+AS $IS-umu California Statce University, Chit -0
LASSEN MHew Chico, CA 95029
►n00c Mwifv (916) 895.8 t�
Butte r- bfannfng CaDsime: 6-7-88
JUN 101988
TO: Butte County Planning
47 County Ci~.nter Dr. Oroviils, California
Oroville, Ca. 95965
re AP 4? -09-25 .
Dear
County Planners
..s
-
�'
A review of the ab -me project has revealed the following:
-411- The area indicated as within the project txsundaries is cons darer to
archaeologically sensitive. Present are: be
E amass to natural sources ot; water
v- . Flat meadowland or .flat land near water
Scxath and,/or east facing slopes
Previously recorded sites in the vicinity
=i
other: ce �Aricw� of an^King+vr—
We stn --
.-X- fly ret end that an archaeological rewnnai.ssance be conducted of
the area hY a qualified arehaeolcaist and aporoorate mitigation measures
prepared.
A known site or sites has/have ber,l previously recorded in the project area
Project operationsW.1 have a negative inpact on these cu;Lb+ra.L res ;tA; r
�'e recum►end' that a g1alified archaealOgist he contacted tri assess situ;
corrtponents 3nd prepare a mitigative proposal.
Sincorely,
Or. Makoto Rowta , %
Not theast Information Center CLbtd:iha.tor
5
ri
APPENDIX F
COUNTY OF BUT'rE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Log No, 88-05-17-0 4
AP No. 42-09.25
L BACKGROUND
1, Name of proponent
2. Address of proponent and representative (it applicable):
Steve Schu.- er ]111ne r ng
- -
t�o�t Star
_... 20 Declarati.on 17rive
98� Flying V Street
,, C78926 .
•Tentative; Subdivision Map
3. Project description.r. _ �.
11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YEs MAYBE NO
1, Does the project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, subslrttylially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range .of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important o Li 01
examples of major periods of California history it prehistory? ..... , .. u • .......1 • ... � .
2, Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the tletrirnent of long-
term.environmeltalgoaI0(Ashort-termImpactontheenvironmentIsonewhichoccurslna EJ rA
relatively brief pt riod of time white long-term impucts will endure Into the future.) ........
3, Does the project havetrripactswhith are Inailviduallylimited, but Cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small. but where the effect of the tut& of those impacts on thlti environment is
significant,) . , ...... ( Ll
4, Does the prink ct have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human loeings. -ether directly or indirectly? . . .......... . ....... . ... . . . .. . . • , 13 0 �
111. DETERMINATION: J-) ut? uutnpleted o. tiro Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation
pWt� find the proposers project COULD NO`T haJ a sigwricant effect on thu environment, Anda NEGATIVE
DIECLARAYION will be prc+P&Od
I'Wt„
in that although the proposed project could have a significant effect Ori the onvlronrnent, there, will "Ot
be a significant effect in th,s case because the MITIGATION M�ASURSS do6cri od on the allacnod sheet nave
been added to the project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared,
d I;WE find the proposed project MAY have asignificant effect on the environment, and an raNVIAONM5NTAL
IMPACT g5PORT is required.
COUNTY OF BUTTE, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BATE.: .tt. ,May u e j
- i,aLlra 1�I.� Sociilre Panner
r4avlewed by:'
I NVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(l xplinations of all "YES" and "MAYBE" Answers are required on attached sheat(s).)
`t, EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant`. YES MAYBE NO
a. Unstable earth c,ondittuns or, in changes in geologic substructures?.. ... . ... . . . . . e „ 0 n W.,
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovcl Ing of the soil? .. , .... , f:7 LJ 1
c. Change in topography or grow .i surface relief feats. es`? , . . .... . , . , RQ
d. Destruction. covering or modification of any uraaquo goolooiu or physical lwjturor,'a 00
e. Increase in wind or water erosion cif soils, either on or off site? ........, ., M l J t)ti
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, depn.ilirrra r`ar
erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stroam or lho bed of the oc: arara or rtny
bay. inlet or lake`) .. .............. ............. .............
g. Loss of prime aag0culturaily productive soils outsido de,ugnrtted urban ar(,w, f) lXi f;l
h, Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquak(e, lonrt+titles,
mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? . , .... . .. ... . ...
2, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial
a. Aar emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ..... , ... .... ... , . , , 0 n PQ
b, The creation of oblectibnal odors, smoke or fumes? ..... , , ..... , .. , .. , 0 n M
c. Alteration of air movernert, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or
regionally' ..... ................... _ _ ............ ..... ,. ... ........1„ ,, 0 0
3, WATER„ Will the propo�,;l result in substantia'.
a 0 ages in currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either Marino or
ish waters? ..................... '. „ ,.....,,,.......,,„.....,,...................,i0
b. Coanges in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or thea rote and amraunt uf,;urfa ,, runoff? , .
0 0, C�
c, Hee,j for off-site ririrface drainage improvements, including vvr°tetittror4 mi liovnl,
chinnulization or b.Avei t installation” .. . . . . .... . ... ... .... , .
C). f I
d. Alterations tis the c;u,ar5e, or flow of taood waters? . . . .... .. . . . : . .....
0 t,.) W
e, Change in the arnoaint of surface water in any water hody? ........ , , ...
0 0
t. Da c harg,e into su0ur:r'_- waters, ur in any alteration of surface water quality ar•w`rartrr,.f but
nal lin?itwi to tuinpetal Lire dissolved oxygen or turbidity's .. , .... - ... , , , ..
0 0
g Altoratinn of the climCl,on or rate of flow o ,. �und waters" , - .... , , .. „
0 0
la, t hamp! nt the giraxltity or quality "f gruirnc. �,, Balers, either through dir(rf Farlditioif,, car
wilf'arlrawals or tFin iqh intOrcepbt�¢i of an ot,toi()r by Gaits or oxei1vatI0M, " . .. „ . ,
r)
1, flodimhora in the •rir,unf of water other'wiso cavi ilable for publir water supphr,o�
C
J, Exposuru .if people or property to water rela• r. hazards such as'floodinq e
4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result In substarur Il:
a, Change in the diversity of species, or numbe,t any species of pl�invi hri,.taldinq tiop,,
CJ 0
shrubs„ grass, crops and aquatic plants)`? ... . , .. ..... ......
b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rat r ends igered species of planta -it ... ....
0 0
o. Introduction of now species of plants into it area, or in a barrier to the normal
0 0
replenishmiant of 8xistuag species . , .. , , .. ... ,
d, Heductiort in acreage of any agrirulttn'al crO. .... , , , , , , , ,, , , ,. ... , . , . , ..... , . ,
;0
13, TRANSPOR`f'ATION/ClACULATION, Will the pro{wosst result in
. 5, ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: YES MAYBE. NO
rt, change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? ... , ...... . ................... ,
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? .. � ...... .....
itniinats including reptiles, fish anu shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)
b. I1c±c1tiction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anim ils? ...... L7
a. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? ... . ......... .......... . .......
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result i n a'barrier to the migration or
movement of animals? ..... .......... .......,. .. .... ...,..,,..,...,.... ......I
d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people andaor,
goods? . .............. ..,,,.,.,,..,.. ,,...,,..,.,. ..,....,
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ....... . ...... .. 4 , , , . • , .. • ... , ....... .
d. Deterioration to exist►ng fish or wildlife habitat"?,. ....... ....... ................ I
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
f, Increase In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedostriansl...., ... • , , . , i ,
a. increases in existing noise lovely'? ..............................•......•.....•....,
1), txposure of people to severe noise levels? ........ ..... •.., •................
AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? ..... .........
7. LIGHT
6. LAND USE, Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or plaiined land
... .
p
use of an area? ...................... .......... ..,
�. NATURAL ViES')URr 3. Will the proposal result in substantial.
a, increase W the P o of use of any natural resources? ................. .......... • . ❑
O
platlor J any non-renewable natural resources? .......... ....• ..... .......... El
10. RISK OF UPS., f, 'tat involve;
of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil,
,,,A risk of explrsion
pesticides. chemicals r, - .ai%,on) in the event of an accident or upset conditions ? ,.., 0
p
or emergency evacuation plan'.. 0
U
b. Possible interfererce with an emergency response plan
11, POPULATION. Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the LJ
hurntin population"? .............. ... .<,.,..,,........... , ,.........
9-2. HOUSING. Will the propu4al irlf0ct existing dousing, or creato a domand for Aildiutmal ri
tj 1 1
huiaitirig., ..... ..... .... ... . ...... , .... , ..
.»
13, TRANSPOR`f'ATION/ClACULATION, Will the pro{wosst result in
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? ... , ...... . ................... ,
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? .. � ...... .....
f
a. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? ... . ......... .......... . .......
l
d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people andaor,
goods? . .............. ..,,,.,.,,..,.. ,,...,,..,.,. ..,....,
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ....... . ...... .. 4 , , , . • , .. • ... , ....... .
f, Increase In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedostriansl...., ... • , , . , i ,
for now or
0
'14, PUBLIC $EA'VIC95. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result to a Head YVIS MAYO NCS
altorud ti,gvorrtnl'Grtt services.
a Firo protection? ,
...........„ ,.... {j
b. police protedtfon? .. Y ..... , , , » ......
,..Y,i.� „»A.0 14
C, schools?,,.A,,.1„.,Y.Y.,.
onalfacilities? .,..Y,
d» Parks. or other recreational Y . , . .• , .. , , j1�A1
Y
e, Maintenance of pubtio facilities, including roads? «4
1. Other governmental services? . ; . ., ....
15, ENlEnGYA Will the proposal result in'.�* M!
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or allergy.
f energy, pr t(tire tile,
increase, upon d)(stin Qo
6S
bA SubstantialYY, Y}
development of new sources of energy? . . , 1 «.
IUTILi TIES. WIIC the proposal result in a treed for new systems, orsubstantiol alterations to iho
following:
'
ra« Gower or Natural gas? , , , ! , .. , » « �
b, Gnmmunieatrana systenls?Y
„1„YV Cl Cl I
cY Water
ability? ..A....,... «...AY
a er avail
d Sewer orS,.
epttc system?', » , , .. Y . , , , , «. ,..,,.
YY ,•
Y.» »
Y
Y»»,Y,...,«..,,.,,f,,.IYY.,Y.YY
I�
a, Storm water drainage? , Y . »
- - i osal7 «,Y.»i.,«YA,YY,! „ a`;Y,A...,,.,,,
ra I�1 �
fY Solid waste and d sp
17, HUMAN HEALtH, Will the proposal result in' ttli hazard texcl I
aY Creation of any health hazard or potenitat traa udrng rhentrat hoalth)
b. ExpoSur) of people id p . ,; .
otential health hazards”' .. , .
sta or view f3porl to
1�, AES NE7i
S. Will the � osallresc,rlttin the tlt If7b Creat iontion o C an aesthetoicaitytoft ns vo 9.40 open �
the public or will the PtOP .. , , ... .
IR•
to pc.ib►rc view,l.
19, t:1E00tATION, Will the proposal result in an impact upOtl the quality or,gttnt`lily (,)I oxisting T � r K
recreational opportunities , , Y • Y , , , R
20, CULTURAL CtESGURCO,
a. Will Iile proposal result in tit ,aiteratton of or the destruction of a prehlMOVIc Or 11151, grid
arGtlae41ec5icalsito7 YY « ,oYtstoaYY�,,,f..».YA..,,,,,Y.
A, 1
b; Wllt tilt: prupt a{tC rvStQt to adverse. physicaC or aestrietCrj, all c. - prehistoric Or hinloric
......,
building, structure or obJeet7 , • , ,
. 4'V /„ z,A1A,»f IY,•},IYI ,Y Y,.., YY«,. Y, Y,,, 1,...
i, boesthe proposal have thepotentialtocauset#pays► tilnhahgt wilidhwouldetfeclulllclua
ethhiccutturalvalues2Y„Y.Y, ,.,�•;,,,,•«,YY S,,vCthinthe po
tohtllxi irrlptxbt
d Willt'hep p
g g eared ust�
area'i'” Proposal rostrfct exlstin religious ar
,IY,»,YYiYV+i Vf •,VYkYa YA 1»V iYF,/VI,YVt,
iSal a,to t'lonstrt.ct can and Occupation of nine slncgle-follilly rozidet-1cor
r+r l 1 l eri�r�; r'te an estimated 101.,11 vehicle trips perms wn 14, Total bra f t I e
Vs thoreftire e -Mooed to be 96 -trips daily. Currently cj i Kennedy
Avenuep traf f 'i c vol irnes are opprox i mate) y 760 car's dmy,: b l y l to 1 Cin
r'arjd deve i apman t ,will Increase traffic on Kennedy by "rro F" r: t l r
counts at the intersection OP l�1u 1' r/H i ghrray 82 anO l;';ow :,#ifl gtnway SP, oi-o
-V900 airld 9300, respectively. 'rho Intersection o f 1, o*irir-icly/i-1l cahway
w;ar tiot counted;. K nnedyJ'H i ghway 32 13, art I rregu,I rtl i ri er^scact i art rfir l l:lr
poor s l !iht d i stanr;e . The : ntersect, i orn OP Cast/1A l rj rw ny J22 Is In nr: o(J gat"
a traffic l laht to facilitate 1 eft furl"e. It Is l'o0c)111mondod, to of rset_
traffic i ricrea.ses, that :a pro rata share bla comtr i,l,[. Gati to the ,
recon t gurat i on andior 1 mproveme'nt of the Kennedyol11 9Piwoy 32
In'tersecti:on, and Improvement of the east Avenue.,'11,11f';tlir»,4y 3e
intersection. Fero rata: shares will be determined by rahe Director- o t`
P bl 11-2 worlrs.
14a Fire Station #42 Is located three miles east of the subject
pr^oper"ty, Fire Sta t I tan #4t is approximately seven miles to tine rtor t'h .
8ot:h :or these stations are located on tine.east;; .side, of -the SOLIthor n
Pac i r i c Rai"I road trackstis momy as twel ve tra i ns utl l` i'ze thesettrZickz
dal l y,_ and can block any oner 'intersection for up to twenty minutes.
r".OP and the County <i 'ecogn I ze the need to ,construct, a new f;1 re stmt; I on
f on the west side of the railroad tracks Towards this ene, area
developers have been contributing $ M per 10t towards the purcheso.. of,
the property and development of the station. This dere l caper It, o 1 f o
requested to contribute $ 5 per lot to offset fire Impatts0 ,If,
>rOrrrMun I ty hydra mts are riot instal 1 ed, resolution o i* itho, Boord of
Strper^v I mors wi 1 7 ;require a $200 per lot fee for the, purchasLz of water
t-e-nders . - -
1'Residentialdevelopment w l l l i ncrea8e demoncls for MI 1
jovernment a l sery i des . As a property w t th t n the urban area , demands
hLVVa 60 -en eXpeateol and are not; s i on I f'i cant .
14 e Fees i dant 1' a 1 deve1 opt*f � t w 111 be subject to the paymentk, of schoo I
tees to the Chico Uhified School Distridt
16(1Y.d propiert I et w 1 Il be served by 1 hd I v I dui l wal is and sept I a
systems
160: No on -!;1 to storm drainage f oo t l i t t es are ea Pocted
'flea: Immediately South of the i,.Nr°c+i:.tirerty In ran atwraar yrs h i h
M "i trates W i ttr'-atas may have beam causcad fey t Mpropr±rr ° arils I I cat 1 01.1 of
for*t t I. i tar.,:s w- r..,es i rent 1;-n i sept; i c sy toms , Whatever the I r t; ause y
n r Crates dam be hazardous to 1 hfant,s and tine el deo l y. N 1 ta°rretes i l m I
Cho oxygen absorption dapadlty of reel b`14=d col l s� t�r�.l:°erre own r z ,
should be adv l sed of the danger ' ;area n 1 trate l evo l � may repro8on t and;
mon I tor the Ir we 11 s regU I ar, I y;
20a! It Is unknown what., If any y arehoo-ol o a l ca l arts hr i stofr , i ek-el
r-esrir.rrSres, may be present on tl�'r i s pr^oporNty, A recoi-ds search shor}rid' be
r,agwt� sted from the Nortl6ott Inf'ormat-loo Cent«er$ Lal lfprni>" State
Un I yet, -sl tyy, Ch I to, The d i e etvt I oras fear obta i rr I no the records 8oarch aro
/
Ai,r Quality. Good.
B i of o_ i ca 1. Env l ronmen l
f3.
Vegetation'. ClUmp of trees on SOL;thWe$t prof eir ' i y corner,a
h.'
W:1 1 dl i f Vlab i tai: Limited bar surrsound 1 nt.) agr l a'Pt.i i I�t[r^a 1 and;
resid011tlaluses.
� Cul lural knv j rontneni:,
i r
Arc haea 1 sig as i and"f i star 1 ca 1 RQsourass r n :1,ti, Aryea = Ldva
i nr: i t.id'r ng wnknown .
i l
Butte Co °'; Y General Plan Designation: Agr- i oul i:ural -�
Res i demi +� , y o .
1:8.
f x-1stirlo zollrGIY�. .,it _,1 .
1 a.
Ex 1 st, i no I_arrd Use an a Ein=t, . Pocket IL
southwe"si; c:orher.
1 4.
Surround i no Arai
a'. Land Uses= North, West ant ~nu i br,rhards� Chico co Urban
Area. Gieen l 1 ne z - 1: as°t: 1 a"rge s 1 nGl t s; } "' , ,. 1�:nmes
b-. Zoning: SR -1> C -2,-
c, General P1an Designations: Ordh-mrd 'relril rol s
Commorcial Aw,4,lcultura I-Realdent Iaf
d. Parcel Sizes; Wsstt 26 acrea, South: 25 oar os,, 9 a0cre-44
East; f .X11 acres. NorW-, 9 aures
--
O i Population-' parse : -- - -
15..
Character of Site and Area= itrl nge of urban Ger eG�.
16.
Nearest Urban Area: City a,r Chico; 24- miles south, I
17.
rzo l eYont Spheres of in f l uena : Cly of Chico, Chico Aroa
_-
Rocroa,tioh C►i5trlct
18
Tit pros rilol t Stondae�ds Urban Area: See subd 1 v� i s l cavi des l :grM
standards..: -
1�
!='ro t'P"ot;e�t;iv� �ierYicaw
Nowrost County Ctatre> 1=1 re 81:at I ;on = 1143 :t rrtf 1 es easy.;
441 , "7 1111 1 es north.
by Water AYallabi'1ityUnknow)'
21y .
5ehoo 1 s In Area Ch 1 ao , Un i f i ed Schoo 1 01 str i at,
-g