The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About042-090-024IT 140TIC Oi4tTIFIRNIJ TO- SearoUiry f or Resou,rc!es �'�1.� IA 16 t ln. th Str°ett", Room 1,.31.1 ts C'a4QA 95814 ��wl�rk. Do Ly unL t 1.,+4 d i^"), iYr ., 69 r ✓7 " h r0Unt o'4 '_ .... [., ("�/�y' yy y�+...r�.�y.�w.�.�y.�.-��-r�..a.+�F�' �`1 ry �,ai VVllil 4' V [�j j,L {/�.J .i•�wryaY4 wWi$VaU.4�V.F111 .F1 nr LwaJ. •*�Y�F:*f RO 11, (Lead ftravoy pR7 J�L�a, 41 grmmva *5x' It -,� a Zrt � �« eA'•'�,.�a.� "4 `. A ,�a �� ^.�.......za . •'+...�.,«�,,,..,,,.w+` `y �.'w'!.�•"+�• �i-..+� � �.'� y'y'Y; xYY ' �y„J: a...az ».w,..,,.., ....tea...:.+....----� , .. ...+.+...,«..M -a — a•1.. .. SW3JECT Viling of Rot ]"ce of Derterr►i.,narinra in Compliance-vi:th Section 21.108 at 21152 of th•a Public Resources Code E Fr 80-10-01"os 1= �... Tontat:i ve Parcel Map AP # 42"09_24 >� 51 Arthur 1a, bhompson • Lane C1�s.r`:� r Buse Number subtZi, d co Sts Ce . eazi.x� Horse �'' 1� - e a riQ �iu.:.a er 1• U. ,�delrior rector. � ��G xa eCr Location _North sidr; o - ,fie Ht 2 riV_ e about 1 u teed; kk a� i� it's liitoT.81Ct1(3li With k�lhilk a2 west c1lico-, fto j eot� �escxipt uzx. _.. .= Dividing 5,9 acres irito 2 parcels, orae Of 1.+ acre and ane of 4.8 acres , four resident'al- -agricultural use; "T'hia8 i,a to ,1';vis,e that the B1�. we Ca'.,a :•. _ Advisory Agency (Lead Agency) his trade the Ero11ow'in,g detetminatio; s re,gari3 .rcA the <�bcwe- described Project: 1, ``Clue pxo;jeat ti_1.1 have a signifietLnt effect cn the LXY ,ill not a�[v:%r'o��merit /% Ari f�in nviranent.zi lm act p" s+ portpreaAr. edfor this -)roject ut'g-uAnt; to � � �.,. k� i t1d ,fid tl w 5 requitod bSoc tlozl 15J8, � ) , y4 Ca:l.ifor� it A6-MiTil S t:1ative Cad: A Negative Dec' aratian ty,ss prepared for t��v.1R �wozed: p�i�suant to the provIL.S tOnS of Ct% .1 eoo f t ie sw t a i::` bezlarwx tion mayb e exal�ined a- 'the w liviroe"y.- e n t n 1 1,ev nt) pal: tmtntt C�au� tyre for : a. we Cr�r• 1. t, t a fern-a X5,65 y / A Notice oe Emtion, wasc�t"tarp ts pr��ect `-- i, exempt from, er�via`nti�n#��t�l e� �w•;;�,, k App dit ae 1 0£ 2 �. •;_ , ,., • "+'M �'•' + .<rY 4W�iYks.kv .rt opt! Yaml4awiM�YAi r. .:"i xgyAwMKuxc4,' �-1�� .� .. .. .., •Y '... nNRU4i^ y::lY. ¢-iv.in7ik,iwr rt�;�%�'y,A�nnn+4Nw..aa Mp.,<,:a , , " .. ... _ ";, _,. •, 14� x�4 ,,' .. ..-- .. -.. s 50.10-tll 05 )'v'fYAMATIOI+I Pro j Oct' Descxi tion r Brief Description: Land division o f S:J acres t iWdo 2 parcels, .-. use. 1 Of 4.8 acres .. for residenta;a1-agx3 oultuxul Q �. ' acre and Y 2.' Location: North Side of Kennedy Avenue. about 1200 •feet its intersection with highway 32, west Chacovest of . 3. ProPose�l Density of Development: 2 DU/5.9 acres' 4. Access and Nearest Public Road : (s � for both parcels; ex sting driveway for parcel 1, Frontage on KennedyAvenue �. Method of Sewage Dis Osal Septic tank - leach,,l.ine 6. Source of Water Supply.4 Individual wells sXstem,5 7. Poto:"Itial for further land divisions and developmentii' Three I;nv.xonntG3nta;l ,�;et:tiz ' additional parccis of l+ acre could i* Created onpa;rcel 2. 1, _ Terrain a. ("eneral Topographic: Character: Relatively 1P�rel b. �ieira.tion: 167-16 5' ± A.S.L. 2. .soils Y a. TYpes arrd �liaracterist�:cs+. Drina .1'ir1_e uaridy loamlt�ose friable soil; retinas moiSturo well, a1luvial-;fazz ziep,os - > i ori n ver 3. Natural nazards of the Land LILt�Y.17�,e for wide range of crops. Originy produc - e and . a• earthquake Zone! No known faults in vicinity; Moderate Earthquake lAtensaty Lone Vill, b• expansive Soil Potential: Low to moderate 4. Tlydrolo�y a. Surface ),Vater Lindo Channel within 11 b. Ground Water!� mile to, south. g y A'v��.lable from e�ttera�.l, abun lajtt valley aquifers. c. Draittagn Charactet'istics: . a. Annual Ainfall. (ziormaly , ,)1o22n�.tur,al pprcolatIon of soils. e. Limiting 1 actors: No nearby drainage fa.cxla t5;es. 5. Visual/Sc:eiiic Quality Modeirate 6. 1egFit4ieh. Almond trees on most Of parcel 2 with underlzY hlar,:k walnut trees (about 7s years 01,d) along 1, trlyy,ngx`asses g i -a , frontage; e l W 76 Archa�.c�logical atid Historical osources in the area: sates in t}tis vxcxjl�ty, No lrnown Butte County General i'1.a�1 desil;ryati 80 S � � AT ON co�itinut I .i (,US„r] UN OF 1�NYli, 'I dT1piN1`AI, 1�1111LT! ( t() 7 ur roi�nda;�ng ct..a tss prchardsrural residential 1 .j t commerc � to east � ] � b Gen. Plan dosi nations: � Orchard & i'a.old Cx`ois; Camar�errial; small area of- /Agricultural Res;i.dett 4 al, �'ur4-,I C. Parcel Sizes: l/3+ acre to lQ+ acres ter t.o.eastF , gone rally 1-i's acres . 12._ Character of Site` and Area: Mixture of Orchards reit•!:” rural residential, some commercial. 13, Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 3 miles .-+14. 'Relevant Spheres of InfIueW,4: Outside ultimate sphere .for City of Chico, is. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (State), Fire Station: Station 42 - Colt<<sset Road. b. Water Availability: Wells 16. Schools ;in Area: Chico Unified School District; CSGY, Cl�ico�, The following impacts have been identified for this land divisioat, �. Thisparcel map will result in the segregation of the,homesite from the balance of the existing almond orchard. Puttzre ct1vision of arcel;. 2, in confoz`mancc� with the SRI zoning, would be of greater signif,i.cance No significant environmental .impacts are expected as a result Of thi two parcel land division, s lb, b,c,lde: Compaction and overCavering of the soil by road improvts" ments and building structures from fixture residential development on parcel 2 generating increased safface water runoff. o?Jo drainage immediate area; ` y Cff-site drainage to the south may be needed to accommodate res ndo Channel mpg,~ovements to convoy surface water runoff to hi x identir l development at l acre densities, though the natural Potcoltltion of the soils may be adequate 'In M6bt cases; lg, lsl: signal of about five acres of almond tre09 frown product' in an area design Tnated asp gi p y t b r Orchard and Field Gras b the General Plan The five acres clogs not re resent a si nificant reduction of agricultural land (with prime soils) 4,n itself),nut it is of ;reate:r importance cumt� atively as orchard land is cAiver'tod to residential L we in the West 'ChiCr� areal Parcel 2, while not a viab7�'e agrJ�culturdl �.azit on its Daunt could continue as an orclaaid with another Otchardist�in the area taking responsibility for its maintenance and harvesting. 4a: Removal of almond trees an parcel 2 froln development of one Potential. residence. Though no specific plans are i end3n,g' for parcel 20 ane and up to four residences with a s;ubsegtxent, pa.. I map appresval, oatild be established with the need to tdmove a eo�` trees sideraule numberof Appendix P - .rage ' `8a of 9 }� , y "1'ENDLX ,..,E ;w NOTICE ,? D TEARMIN�l ON 1r f '% Secret;;,try for Res oux� es FROM.: r�,e4 141.E Ninth St=reet, ROOM 1811. Butte CU. Plannir Colnmza;�z S'acZamenta, `Calitorn .a 95814 `�""� , .,.�..4 7 Co. Center Dr. Orovi Calif Zr County C�erk Couxi y o i�utte; Administration Build* x.859 Bird St y Oroyille, Call!, 9595,�5�„ 80BJUT Viling of Natice of Deterrrtinat�on 3.n compliance wiEt- t Section 21108 or 211.52of Che P;rbl,ic resources. Code roi e.ct ` �.t a .... :.... ,,..« .. ARTTHOMPSON TENTATIVE PARCEL, MAP.,, Cateara.n� ausi�um er Sum:.tte to Cate narouserf onCact Person a ep.one Num er �ectLocaC onlan,�n Befit. 916) 54-4601 ' ....,. ro ... Chico, Butte Coinnty�, Calif. , roaect�3"escx�.ptxon. ; Tentative Patco MaP;, P 42 #Q9�-31 � 2, 4 X ts, north side of Kenred,Y A,ve. , west o4 interSe a.on .S?w:No e., Chive',: Engineer,: D. A. �Kopier .� r+�,' ,S 1 ti� ISI. _ f7 �iJ � �I q ; � • �j�� a VDia ATTVE L- t�LAMTI ; r` -- 0.�1 CtBCARD�;TO` E,R�VxRfJy 1E.d� TAA U �. , 1AG �'. 5, HD 5 CZVD. that: the project doshi,*d kielo�v h�►, t, x,ev:i owed taursuant` to th,4i provisions' of t�� Cali �'crxtia l:rtv�,ro�mont�al btxa" o _ , d :. ete �'t .��t ' k� ci , d.dt ,— r ,ta on kas mean tnacic that+ 3,t tr zl. not Piave a s:�.gn,ifz:cwjt:, effect ttuort thc. et�varanrte -JESCIDIPTION 01V Zeiltatlxv e x" ra el 11,qp AIV 42-09-24 4 422 0_311 3; 'LOCATION Ox' PROJtC' KeYm,edy A-renue, Q;Ej.eo ij< h s ,deo Ke ano.. went op in',prsectiOn W3.tl Nord Avo. 4. 1` k; A_TD ADDUSS OF PROJECT: AVPL,A:7�: Art �.-Thompsol7 Ro`u't; e 2, Box 340 Ohico, Oalifo'rni:a 95926 5. KtTIOATxOv MEASURES on A 'opy ofr the i✓nvironnetttal T(evievlr Direct0t's.ni.t;ial study w'e°ardi.n�; the environmental eP',-Pect of this This s truly was project is aC Lac ed. j,�,% Adopted as presented,., Adopt ed ti th changeet• specific tnodifa,catiOas andsupporting ngFeasois e.i,e attached, 7. A public hearing cm this iVegat�ve..Det:� aratii�n was held by the decision making body 13eatitt body,ltsarod o �u ,er�tisors y D'a t el of betetmita�ioti D�� e•rrtittation _ ,� .. � _ _ DR the bass of thei"snvixonmohis Director's ini.r~. the informatio�n presented ,aresx_n^:3,' ctftattents ceceti,yecl an the proposal and out- 00ft `ROWled e an iticlLpetl Brit~ '.t-esea 51; Appendix - page 1 of 2 .. 4 a We find the proposed project CGr.'11AU '10T havQ ta. ;ignifican, effect on Ghe, O Nixon-melat, and a ZJ?"„C::TIVE � OL.A�?_'�ao: is We find that t 1e Droj ect cotj,ld have a sinit canna effect on the enviranMenbut �o l'1 not in this case bea use of attached mitigation measures described in item S above which are by this re. erence made conditions of project approval, A conditional ?iE!7,,AT VF4 DECLARATION is hereby adopted. 'DATE �'� ignaturc Bernie 'Richter, Chairman Name Butte Cojn�_ Board. off. aupe!rvisors Title * A- finding was made by the Board of Supervisors that item PI(b) of the Appendix "r,” Environmental Chock:La st Forrfl is incorrect and shoi ld be cheeped. 'To" rather than. "Yes': The following reason was given in support of the change: agrjcultu.ral use of the property in question id no longer ec..onomicall'y feasible because of the urbaniza- p tion of the neighborhood. and therefore approval of this project would not be detrimental.'to the adopted long term goal of preserving agriculaure . i, ti{ 1�peridx C - ;Wage W of r: y TTI. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAtUATSOtV` I (g) The Seismic Safety e� emewb' of the Gglieral� plan '�d� cafes this,tpxoperty to be within an arca of heavy groundwatez^ with- drawal with subsidence potential. The ligilifaction potential map shows the area as generally moderate, locally high. This same degree of hazard covers much of the Chico area; ! F y k 3(b) Lkid, division to provide hom,okiites will ultimately, result in construction of buildings; which will reduce the gro%ad area available for storm water ab8orbtimi4 The small number of lots involv6d. in tba s case makes the impact insignificant (although there is an arbawide cumulative offeat . 30A) Wells are proposed as a water source, so thore will be some oundwater withdrawal. The effect of this will xiot be significa�a.t once again, there is a cut,uulative of ect) . F 4(d) The property is presently in orchard-�agvicultuxal use. De- velopment will preclude: commercial cultivatt,ion of this property. 5(c) Hou8ehoI6 pe-ts may be increased in the area due to the change from agricultural to residential use. This effect is not significant. 8 The Oounty General Plan indicates this, as an area suitable for orchard and field crops, riot for urban u.so, although the neighbor- hood in this location includes a number of ,13mall parcels with homes. 13(f) Additional. homesites will result ',n a slight increase it traffic, both vehicular and pnd.estrian. 111- (A-±) ,Additional 1-iomesites in a presently agricultural area will result in a slight increase in demand for all governmental services. ;I(b) This project is contrary- to the adopted goal of preserving agricultural lands. The number of parcels involved here is not signifloant enough to warrant preparation 01: an en'Vironmental iti- pact report, although it should be no=ted that there is area- ;tido u�nu ide clahve off cot. The contribution of this one pro j ect to the general problem of loss of agricultural lands is Very small-, of 8 1 77 �, ) �I , �f� tTNOTI r,l~ OL nr.�rf Rl`IIN t ` 'I'o: 0 SocrctarY for Resoord s qAM &NMt 416 Ninth st., Room l3iI Sat;r imant;o, CA O5814 K �� trtt t ar of BUTTE i0 1, a r re G; r..� ,_, . ._._ p l (Lead A e no X 185 Zvi. e . _ � Qb'y bButte 'f » �..- aa " =t E. nvi.r-o�.___nmental Review �gri-rnent; SUBJECT: Filing of. Noticc' 0 f .Deter.minatian in Compliance with Sectinn 21108 21151 at the Pubsio Resources Code Log7801-16-01 froject Title < Tentative Parcei Ma AP// 42-09-44, creating two parcels. CF. Fox) ° wtate Clearing: odse Ntirnl cr (I su�mitC�°d to State`-" '; learin�;hou,,k untac:t, Porson ;Earl D. Nelson, Director E.R.D, Tile bane Nuntbetr t ro j`eGt Location 4-4777 West of Kennedy Ave. an Hwy. 32 Ch. nLo el,ol ect 00scri p t on ° "' Creating two parcel.e from 1.75 acres This is to advise thg t tho g2l!P ` 0 Btttte A.dvisoxy Agency ,ea Ag; ticy) has mete the f0llotding dcternlih:tt .ons , ,rcggrd,',n1 the above dou,•, ribed project The project has boon 0 approved proved by the Lead Age a tis approved ncy. 2 The prc5,ject Q twill t43'.11 not 'lave ';z sit;nif.icant e.Cfect on the erlIvAronment, 3. 0 Ai, Cnvironmental Impact C Op-o°rt was pi etyaxed for this project y pursuant to the provisions of Cwas quirecl h i ectiot 1S(1 3" , ° ttnet teas tern re - ,C9) 3 14 Califo�`h'.a Attmill .i.,tratlVe �Ald.e', I A Negative irorr��ion�aofaC:1 qAs 1'`t epart:tt for this project to the ptti•suartt Q _ A copy of the No atavc Doc °,ration `,s ,at tz]C?tCrt : � 4. [� A 96 tjcc of 8xombt.ian was filed i.n.ciioaiirtg tltie ;prb,joit exemP'ty PrOm env!, O mental re",riew. A copy of the lvotiCe or Bemp�, o is a'ttaaheti. Ahpentii�C page I of 2' e 4 . _Mitigation n easures adopted by the Lead Agency to reduce the inkpacts of the approved project are: � O 1 il r G.f tarp. D' Xelson Title Envi.tol=bjltal Roviow Diyoato bate page 2 of 7; „----�.,..� y xII. IRW DISCUSSION Or” ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION 'ThI4 pro jaCt .I- a lana a.Vi.s�` onto create two paxcal on Chico. Vie '1.75 Acre site lies between Highway 32 and th:� utb&Vnu�' Pacific,' i xc: railroad about 2,5o feet,northwest of Kennad. Avenue. 5%e site is relatively !(,Voland is in an orchard area with alm3t 0 being the Principal crop. The surrounding land uses are low density resi_der�ti,r,-jl and aP,ri.cu:1lural. The Butte C7otiu ty General ,�'l.axi shows �'a �, property as Orchard and f t,eld craps transitiar�ix�g to 161V density residential use (1-4 DU/aoro). The present zoning is A -2. 3(b): The natural drainage of these soils is , goad due to them. depth (12 feet or more). The placement of one more residence .anti related structures in, addition to the mobilohome on, parcel one should, e have a nominE, eff oot ox. drainage � 4(d) The parcel map apprOival would Further reduce the agricultural capabzlitty Of this P"OPOrty. However, a 1.75 acre parcel. i s not an agriculturally economic unit in itself; the property k" . ,� has 1i.�nitations, namoly Highway 52 and the Southarx� Paci �il_ro�dd..sisal (b) . The parcels are close to two significant hoist' p r i. 32 and. the railroad. w sources Highway Sound attenuation measures sliould be employed 1 on parcel.' � to reduce the noise factor f�*am passi.�tg trains, The raise contours would vary.from 0 to 7 79 decibels on, parcel. 2. Resi- dential uses are conditionally acceptable up to noise levels o±,70dB The future homesi.te on, parcel 2 sh.ould be located as close' ,as possible to the woot property line. a.. The Butte County Genural jaaa land use designatioxj, are in the pro oos of being y amended b the Butte County Pla�a.i�a in If low donsity residential uses wore specifically shownonthe Latad Uso zoning Other. tentat• with _ and with the A- t W � in Conformance with th �a the project co'��ld be found e Genera`i, flan p� � p � .�,Ve parcel maps i.x� �s Vicinity under the orchard and field crops classification have boon denied by the Advisory Agency due to lack o oonformanre Wi,.;,h the General plan. The outcome of thio parcel map seems : to depend on the General pi an amendmen,'ts being studied by 't},o pJa. ing Oommi s�on for and along Highway S?„ A comercial land use esignation is + presently proposed .for this area rathov °,khan a residential designation 13(f) The idoreased use of the Oxisting driveway oncroaohmen ontt� HiGhway ,32 could increase traffic hazards to a slight degroe Tjhtil the General p r mondment for this area is completed" the prcr j ect would coittli at With the GLn�2ral. �?,an goal. of preservi hg prime agr i t>ul lural. lands for to ng-- erm produotx ityApp6hdix P page 7 0£ '8 r i Y -V t 7 i �'q ' fI � .v 1 `'ti. it . � � • V�^i'� - "x submitted to 5t:atc Clearirighouse) API, E vin " TO j NOftCi-'. �r 7�rT !tr�TNA' ION 1 _..�..�. So-c'retary four Reisource,s �� (� 1416 'Nintlx of C. ti.liir 32 west of Ito. Project Descriptioil: S# ree L, Roots �.3 �. Sacramento, CA 558.14 R, #) 1 �,j County 'Cle'1,t County, of Butte 25 County (O'entat Drive OEM A. NWON, Oomfy 0iarlc o`ti1Cr3 OX, 0$j0 :fACMI^!t=" S4 « I;RQAt.t Planning. Department 7 County Center Drive iled) Oroville, CA .95965 SiJTiJSCT: riling of Notice of Determination in Complitt c;e tq t}i Sect on 21108 or' 21152 of '�:lie Public ResoP D Nes'LC 01e 0' Pro j ect'r 'Title Tentative Parcel Vap AP �1 0 8-d3, 42•-09.31 John 'Payne State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to 5t:atc Clearirighouse) Contact Person . John Mendon�jd, Public Works Teles lxan +znbsr (916) 534-42§6' Project Location Nclrth side of Kennedy Avenue; 4 mile ares of C. ti.liir 32 west of Ito. Project Descriptioil: Dividing 4.86 acres 'to create four parcels of 1 1'' acre's each, for homesites Ol Inis xs to advise that the Butte , County Advisory A.,gency Lead Agency) ,has made the following determinations regarding the above-described project. I. The project �d,1�. have a significant effect on the environment. 143 it not 2. An Enva rorimetlt;l Impact Report was prepared, for this Project pursuant to tlxo provisions of CrQA, and was certi.fi ed as recjuired by Section 15085 (g) , 14 California Administrative Code A Negative Dei~laratI on ttias prepared for this project puisuazit tc the PrOVisroTts of ChQA, A copy of the Negativ.o Declaration may be examilted at the Planning Department, 7' County Centex' Drive, Orovl.'ll0j CA 95965, 3. A Notice of ,P gem Lion ,gas filed IndicaY. , ' �•r, 4r"1 a ��1��'I�� t�]�.S pl'G1,�1'�ct .1 On 7.ro is e�eri�pt froa� -P ►` .ftiontal revivia. 4, A statement of Overriding Cons;i;deratiorl was � Was not,, ariOpted .for this EixojLwt. r Ali tiga.tion measures adoptod by tlxt� Cruel: g"ptoy to reduce ,. tlxe impacts or the: approved pr of edi are y Nohe 9�2�81 � J : � ., P1aen rig e�to x n s aa�: 01 =SCUSSiON 0FENVIRONMENTAL, IEVALiVAT,;p 0r fsox on 11 �' 11 -- r, . _13 rief`wDescraption: ,Land d:i.visiozi, of4.86 acres to °create,; r -,our pareols O jj, r. VI 2. , acres eaclx, dor homes;i�tes r_ Location: North side of Kennedy Av6nue, 4 i. mile west of I;Iighisay 32? west of Chico. 4. Proposed Dens."tY of Development: l residence Access and Nea.rost Fu300-foot blic Road(s;) : culr�e-s�cres off Kennedy Avenue. -toad 5- 6. Method of Sewage Disposal: on-site septic w, C.ource` of Water Supply: Individual wellsa.each;r;eld systems. 7. Potential ZOT further Land divisions and, devo�,ont: None under' SR -1 zoning, pm Enyaro:::n.Ftttal Settin'� , . , 2, oLevel 1P ina fine sandy loan Hydrology a . Surface Water : Lando Channel , l b Ground Water : Abundant mors so:xt 5, valley �-�qu5 Visual/Scenic Quality: High - Kennedy Avenue is li,necl ''"i�ith stately walnut trees. 4 Vegetation: 014 peach orchard. The Kennedy Avelaue frontage as lined with several large walnut trees ofr trefttendous size, C 5- b, ' tuttt-zCOunty General Plan designatioi� Oroharcl 9►nd Pie7d Crops Psxxstan Zoning Slt-1 . 7. .Px sti.ng Land Use on-sato: Agricultural-orchard�I 8, Surrounding Asea: a4 Land User,; Agricultural, particularly to 1xlel1 sc�ittll anti i,est. Rural, residences and sone comnterciial to the east and 410119 Highimy 32. b. Zoning: SRI along north side of Kennerl' A -'s south o Kennedy, C-2 to north q along 141ghway 3y. c. parcel 8i.zost i d to i0+ acres -. Generally 1-5 ticres Character of Site x and Area, Trans�.t� onal ru rel urb h, agricultural/ residential arett. J", 10, 11, Neatest Urban Arta : Chi.co l (adjacent to boUndar�) Tinprovements Standards Urban 12 Area, No adjacent to4'boundary, Pire Protection Service; a, Nearest 'Cbunty (State) Fire Station: North Chacj'� Station, Ales. +o . Watef A`itaxlana lit. Nolte other Y • than tie. x els and tt ck capatity }y r.di,} x �hu� -.. a�� Po4n"'' jet O �� •i7 . 149 .. P/,,{) _ J DISCUSSION Or, LNV'IRONMBNT L VALUMION (continued,) r ConsWering the gentle, torr�iin and exxist' ng access > 1,ho': prod e,ct scop ; . t o . proposa; .dona tyv `� � r� (�r'ol.o�pnion �, �I o ��' t,�.�� this project is not expected to Leh` iri t1�o animedz a he area, SR. zonin and °the g, ope ted de�e� � � �n substantial onvironmenta'; ampactrequiring an EIR: However, thr; l ollowin env xonment, l impacts and site limitations have beldenti;Cied :for this pr'oposal lb,3b; Incvoos,ed runo.C:f and drainage from site imp-rv':6%ents, in an area where no clever ope'l drainage :fa:cilities oxisf4. '1'l11s impact should bel:i,mited for J+ acro parcels , g V�.ri.d loam soil. ;Crom, agricultural oaseso� existing orchard. ._and and removal PotOntial walnut Lining dyvenxoHowever) oyKennedY A-venue urbaii_' rvomenes are not required at this location and for + acre ParcOls, The access road should be constructed at a location -Where removal of these 'largo trees' alongKennedy Avenue is not necessary.: 8b, I! increased human popu Ations and genevatiort of agricultural/ residential. la:AJ use conflicts in this transiti^nal ' .and use area whore agricu3.tQ. al oporations aro condurted on'''adjoining lands. 13c increased. traffic at tiva, Mghway_32/Xenneldwy Avonue intersection. 19 Aesthetic alteration due to increase.4 urbanization of orchard lands. a i Appendix P page 84 of � d aI NOTICE OF =TERM7NAI, ION } NOV 71979 TO: I? Secretary foresc�trrwes 1416 NI.nlh, Street, 'Room 1-0011 CLARK A. NELSON, Counly Cloak Sacramento, CA 9551.1 � &, JA,CtrciHa Y, Ddpu�.� /rx County Clark --w--- Cownt; of Bu. t;l;t YROM: (Lead,A o'ncy) rt ,° 'I f3i �Y�ac .�' j nit to! ilevi:ov� 'xre a x1t �� 01-0 VIT 10 171 � 3.� �"'�:� JVOut7,L CioTdisf3t I)z'iV`e SUBJECT; . Ftling of Notice of Determination in. Comp'lianae with Sectic)n 21105or 21152 of the Public resources Code- E10 hog l 70-09-1.4-01 a ti r oJ"ect Ti t 1 rea �Y Tentative rcdlMa 1APOa2-1C)-lq Bohn lex'. H,�art State Marr ng D se I`umber I:_ su mitte to Stag C esir �ng Uousa ont act Person Tg1e p h 0,h Number Earl D.. ;;t•�u,??? lseloziDirector Project Location The south side of Kennedy Avenue about 1,700 feet west of i s e ;s��ion with Std Ii h v :52. west. of Chico. x of ect Desetiptiont, Tentative pa2rcpl map creating three parcels. This is to advise that the Biibto uou t;,•y Advisory Agency Lea Ac Agency hes made the E6116wing determinations regarding the above- desi�ribecl. proje:eta. 1. The project !�'%Will have a significant effect on the will not: environment, 2. /7 An trivironmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant: to the ptovisions of CHQA, and was certified as required y �� 14' California Adinitiit'trative r� uf.red b _ Sect.�.otZ 150�5t ) s lei"% A Ndr�+ative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuantto tl10 Vtovisions of C'QA. As copy .of., the. 'Negative Declata- time may be examined at the Enviror►ment.allti review depart weiit, 7 County Center" Drive, �lroVil.le, Califotnia, 95905,' 5 / A Notiee of Sxomptibn was filed indicating this project ' is n tetript from ar a.ronmctitai roview 't..� Appendix Il pa& 1 t& 2 L - III. DXSCUSSXON OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALU'AT'ION 4 This project is a land division to :create two parcels of five acres in size,wit:h a remaining parcel ,of about 1.0 acres on AP1! 42-10-1,4 The 20 acres ± site is located on the south side of. Kennedy Aveax;ue about 1700 feet west of its intersection with State Highway 320 hest of Chico. The site is relatively level. An almond. orchard is planted on. the balance of the land not occupied by residential structures (houses ane, xelated improvements on parcels 1 and 2 near Konnedy Avenue). The only natural vegetation of note is a large oak tree of about 7`2 inches in diameter located near the house on parcel. 2 Soils in this area are Vi,na loam. The applicant indicates that a soil depth of 12 to 15 feet exists on this property,i Natural drain age of the soils is good. Channel, Slough borders the southern portion of parcel. 3,, the 10 acre remainder. Parcels 1 and 2 a-re located. about 950 feet north of Channel Slough. Surrounding :laic, uses in � this area a.e ag ra cultural (mainly almond and walnut orchards and residential on parcels of 1,0 acres o_ larger, although sore parcels of ?s acre of less in size are located to the east and to the west near the intersection of Kennedy and Wir Avenues. Zoning for the site is A-S (Agricultural, 5.acre minimum' parcels). arc}sard and field cragnation of the Butte County General Plan is The" Land-�Use'Nd des _ ops . he old and]nev(treesTp.lantedarecently, The almondarcelsorchard onaparceln3upsooted also to be replanted: Residential use of parcels .l and 2 will not have much effect on the orchard since the residences already exist If parcel 3 ,is developed for residential use in the future, 'the access road and building pad would decrease the number of trees in the almond orchard by a propottibnate amount. The depth of parcels l and -2 exceed the width by 330 feet Since the, oxlginal parcel, is only, 440 ;feet wide, 250 feet of width can not.bo provided for each parcel. Since the General Plan desig- nates this area for permanent_ agricultural use (orchc -d and :Meld crops), an exception for depth to width ratio (Section 20-122 (1),, wk the SubdiVision Ordinance) could be applied. W 17(',a): No problems are dxpedted in terms of sewage disposal for these parcels, Septic systems are presently installed and functioning for the residences A domestic well wil,l need to be develpped on parcel, 2 at a- location outside of the 100 foot leach- free setback area from, the septic: syste.ina The soil. type (Viva loan) and soil depth of 12 to ' IS feet indicate that sewa ire disposal by septic tanks and leach lines should be feasibly: on the parcels as proposed. Appendix F -pale 8 of 9 4 T0: 0 Seexetaily, for Rer oOurcos F TLED' 1R►1'a >yt.jath Street, Room. `13•"1'1 , 101 Sa(,ramenL-o; C,a;li `ora a 95814 �tlC & NELSON, County Olork , County Clark., County o�... � ��dl' 'JyAClN7'14 County Center, DriV'6 Oi16vi7 le ,-CSf, orriia :,ROM: nviroximen, al Review Department County Center D-VIve 1, O California 95-965- (�'. ed�� x�ov-� 1.i: e , _ i. �.'Log 0� 23-C1 Project Title Boundary Lane Modification AP # 42-1b- '/, 39 40 Pxo;ject Location - Sp�:c,Yfic Sou s o enne 1650 feet east of Muir kve., went Chico area. ect Locati.ort - CtiY -- County Chicon California 959:-6 Buttr4 Description of Nature, Purpose, and Peneficiarles of Pilo rctt Boundary Line Modif lcatl= Name of Public A (In y j pro: AG F3:a j ect Butte County Ad�tory A4e� Name of Person or Agenc�.r ing out Pro j eet _Steven Rystrom - empt Status: (Check QA -e Ministerial (Woec. 115,073) Declared Bmetgency (Sec.S ? 1 0 'I' ( a) Emevg envy Project (Soc . '15071 (b) and (c)) X. Categox cal RxettIptrion. State Type and section awnber.` Class 5(s) r Reasons why project: is eXempt ; — Project meets the definition of a Class A) exemption. ' NOTIdt OF DETEPLM NATION LEU TO; 7 Secretary for Resources q7n 1416 Ninth Sheet Room 131 Sacramento, CA 95 1 814 CI RK A. NssoNo Couniy Clerk �tACil~ltHo nppu�y County Clerk County of Butte FROM.; (Lead Agency) 'Ikl ! I3a��ct ;roe 1;Xlvi ronmonta� 1�e26 epnx� -rnenL " `7 C o iu r' Center er. Driv e .. ._ ...; Oroyi10, California 9 _.t�� SUBJECT: , filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 211.08 or 21:152 of the Public Resources Code BRD Log 70-04.20-04 ' roectrte Te 11 State C xve _P liouse1 a --� Tr to Nuri, eara.n ;use er I su m tte to State , Clearing Louse ontaut PErgotl e ep%one Number Lard. D. Volson, .Dj.rect;or Project Location - The nor'tll side of Oak Way ,about 1200 feet 11 east of Muilt Avdque, west,of 'Cliico. TI raj ct Uescriptiot _ lerlta'iivearcel, u creating_ two parcels. p r This is to advise chat the Butte Oowil;y '� AdyIory Agency �.uaciu t%6UL ;Y has made the �L-all otv'a n detertz ��" .fansregarding the above-described, pro drf s ] , Theect j rohave. a significant l, :� p / �" w�.11 � df on the. =Will not environment 2 , L7 An Environmental Impact Report taas prepared for '•this project pursuant to the provisions of C �(;A, and Was cettified as required by Section 1.5085(8) , 14 dalifotnia Admtnistrativo Code. A Negative Detlaratiori V&s prepared for this project pursuant, to the provipi.otis of -68QA, .A copy of the Negative Declata- tiori may be examined at tlke EnvI Oftmehtsl Review,- partmeniu, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, oalifotnia 95.965. 3, /7 A Notice z f Exempt, Was f:i led indi �' 97 C �' r r. f5 Gly �'�. J1�A.t .. .., .. +'•y' r i ,.n ,.r Tix4 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION parcel �' y parcels, This p'r'op osal 3s tlic division � .AT'!1 42-13-41 aa�i.a Cavo axcils one arcel of 5 acres and one Parcel of 14..5 acs.tz The 19.5 scrO site is located on ttae nortli s:i,de oi' dak {day about 1200 feet cast of Muir Avenue, west of Chico. The land is level orcha d. land composed of Vino fine sanely loam ' 80i1, a Class I agricultural $oil. The Butte County General Plan 'designates the site :dor agricultural. use.,orchard, fiel, crops, and irrigated pasture. Zoning is A-5. The 174ds to the north, west, east and south are also zoned A-S. Surrounding properties are generally S-26 acre parcels in the A-S' district. The proposal, will conform totl�e General Plan' and zoning, with five acre parcels being the minimum allowable. The 14.5 acre Parcel being proposol will be furtlaer divisible to two live-acro plus parcels u 9PSidenti.al use currently exists In the area; mostly hear the Glenwood Avoatue/oak Way into esection. usg)o 4td) The division of the � ( Property and subsec�taent residentialhe :five acre parcel would result in partial removal of the orchard and prime agriculturalsoil :From productivecommercial use i.� an area outside of the Chico Urban Ailed. The 14.5 acre parcel proposed tinued use as an or,�had iox the present tame. isro osed for root S(b) ; Natural drainage of the parcel sizes. Channell Slough borders rope c, on due to tete g property on the north. 8(b) ; Residential use of the created parcel may conflict uti.th : the S)gricultural uses to the west �.nd °in:at ' localitY1 generating add �ional incompatibilities between residential and agricultural uses in an area outside the Chico Urban Area, Ap,'�aciix page a: V NOTICE 017)a`TERMI NATION TO: / / 8�-Cr eta>ty for Resrurces 1416 141.nt:h Street, Room 1.3A Sacramento, CA 95814 0Ia4 XA.NOSON, C00ty ; , JACIPiTMb poputy lant County of Butte FROM (Lead 11 ncy)25 Co".�er T57e Blv�oxmznccx��o.ew 7aJ1. "��'L3rarir S. 0o1.�x 1;y CC;Zlir('L� a'7.tlf'_ C�xyov� y10 , C�11 1 fC�a''na4] �9C SUBJECT: Filing of Not ice of Determination in Compl lance with Section 21.108 or 21152„off tite Pubj'c Stesources Code ` IM Log # 81.02-11-0 2) g Lead t�gency t determinations reg the above-described has made the 61.1oWin . deter y, pro j ect !' 1 The1 ro4ect : % ] �5 ]. i, ; p _ have: a significant erect onth o. wia1.1: not ! - environment, 2 17 An Environmental impact~ Repottr grae pi:epa.recl dor this pro7eGt pursuant to the pro'Visidns o� C810, and W18 col: t:ified as' required by Section 15085(g), 14 California Administrative Godo / c A Negative ;at'a.ve ecl.arat ion wag prepared for thi, project p ursilt�nt to the prov%sions of CtQA. A dopy of tih.e liegativd beclara- irioaz may be exaiiiinqd at the >anVir' amental Reva,.e�,Y Depart' 5 Cowltry Center` Dtive, Oroville, Gall:eornia 95965,' A Notice or rskemption coag :C -sled indieta,ting this ;ptojeat is .� exompt from environmental. rov etys t ppendix � , - P gc I o: 2 , Tents.t:ivc Parcel. Map AP tt 42-14.-74 'TheresaCenx�ge tate G Barinrouse Number mitten to g x.• su St:ato C; taxing House. Canta.c t Yer. son .. `l'eT�p ot`��e Sum er pari D. Ne�.sar.�i, .t�:i.reo��a�, _')-5 Project: LoCat; on Oalc lay and Highway 32�, westel*n Ghlco (Parcel :1 x,s �Oq :Geer west G� :tie Oak Way ,Antersection on sott•1h side O ��t1r L^oject Description Diva.dIng 4.3 acres to create tWO paxceI8 Of 1.1 acres sand 5.2 acros for bomo5ite8. Tlv�,s i8 to advise that the Bu -b -to County - Advisor)r At;oncy 2) g Lead t�gency t determinations reg the above-described has made the 61.1oWin . deter y, pro j ect !' 1 The1 ro4ect : % ] �5 ]. i, ; p _ have: a significant erect onth o. wia1.1: not ! - environment, 2 17 An Environmental impact~ Repottr grae pi:epa.recl dor this pro7eGt pursuant to the pro'Visidns o� C810, and W18 col: t:ified as' required by Section 15085(g), 14 California Administrative Godo / c A Negative ;at'a.ve ecl.arat ion wag prepared for thi, project p ursilt�nt to the prov%sions of CtQA. A dopy of tih.e liegativd beclara- irioaz may be exaiiiinqd at the >anVir' amental Reva,.e�,Y Depart' 5 Cowltry Center` Dtive, Oroville, Gall:eornia 95965,' A Notice or rskemption coag :C -sled indieta,ting this ;ptojeat is .� exompt from environmental. rov etys t ppendix � , - P gc I o: 2 , - x 1'AT 4 T1~pN ,;k, �.I l , Project Description i.: Brief Descri ?tion: nand division of 4 3 acres to creat© two parcels of 1.1 acres anct 3.2 �-cres for homesi.tes .. 2, Location: Oak Way and Highway. 32, wes-"ern Chico (Parcel 1 is 400 :feet west of the Oak 'WRy ;bltersea,tion on south side off, Highway 32),i 3. Access and Nearest Public 1tbad (s '� ) � ��.,s-ting. }-Ia,ghway 32 access 'to proposed parcel. 1 and e1+.:sting Oak. Way access to proposed parcel 2. 4. Method of Sowage ;Disposal: Septic w 1.6ach :Melds 5. Souroe of Water Supply: individual. wol.Ls G. Poten.ACi1�•for land al"' cla;�elopment: iionalland divisi-Lhdr ` or r,oton,es are probable ons and/or Environmental Settinr 1. Soils ai `1" es and Cho,,, I-rlst cs Farwell ,_ Yp a. x� 11 .Loam and.. Farwell. .bane i ►: well very food agricul�' turas potei��,, rotaa.nsralnori water tvet��ls, �' underrxigataon; gond permeabil.: y. b. Liimiting Factors: Pxistixig septic Jt�arh-field-frbe areas on adjacent properties. 2. Mydrology a. Surface }Uater. Ione o,n=sine. LihdL mile west. b. Drainage Chara.cteristios: Good sutr `ace d, ainage and sub- drainage of Solas; no drainage acllit31 in area at present, c. Annual Rainf-dll (normal),- 21.221' ' d. Limiting Factors: lack of clTai.iiage pnprovements 3. Acoustic Quali -y: Moderate - traffic noise prom Highway 32,' passing trains on SPAk about 700 e>;t to northeast i 4. Vegetation: Orchard trees ,. Butte County., General Plan designation: .Medium benslty',Residentl,�Ll 1�46.� Bxistang 2on�.ng: S R �f 7. Existing Land. Use o.4 -site» Almond orchaw:,-di No structures ori -site. Bt Surrounding Area: ;t.. Land Uses Adjacent to an aWtomobi l,,- repair shop. inter-, sporsed, scattered mixture 1of rovaiI, residential, suburbazl. residential, commexclal , an, agt i u� t;�ral along devel opiT4 Highway ; 2 torr dor tOrcbgTds 'and residenre:s along Oak Way. b. Zoning: G-2 S- 'A-SRA-1.0 C. Gon. Plan desigbati.ons Co hlmercial 64j acent on the South- easty rnd J along east silo of ;Ii%ghwoy 32 MDR to the � west, t , LD11 to the southtrial , ", ">�pehdiit V page 8 of 9 tt p, " DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) d�ati�b�a ; 'acro', to iia» a;cre; n 9. Character of $ite an,d ,Area: Immediate s.rea is in orc] Ards, V`1t. a Z`lq resid'6,n,ces and commercidl uses nearby. la Relevant Spof Influence ; Within Catty of Chico spheres. 1000 deet west Of "czli. Water Seru1q,a Co. distract. ll. improvements Standards t)'rban Area: Yes 12. Fire Protection Service: a. Nearest County (Sta.to)` Fire "Stati on, Col asset Road b. Water Avatlability Wells. No community water -system in immediate area. i The following environmental concerns have been identified dor this project and for any subsequent land divisions of the created parcels. Substantial impacts are not expected.. l,lr, 3bi Soil disruption and.overcovering, resulting in drainage increases. No natural or manmade drainage :.facilities Exist in the i. ioiiediate areai g oval of productive soils from agr cultural use. �. Rem. 4d, 19: Removal. of orchard trees anr''F ioss of open space] with' -re; :Alt-4ti.t aesthetic impacts. 6bi Lxr►asure of Futuro residents t'(+ Highway 32;/`traffic noise., A developret setback mGy, be necessary iran the h,Lghway. 8a)b; Potential conflict. vii.th adjb%.ni.ng oriharct tises. However, the Highway 32 corridor is co' ,,itinually developing to urban J.and uses, and the locality --is designated for comme'rGial/res':s den'tial use.; (as well as Industrial uses across•;the highway) rather than for Agricultural -Uses ll. Po ulat�;on growth and p g expansion of the urbanized area. l3a c, Incre-stsed area traffic and encroachments onto Highway 32 and Oak 'Way, (any additional division and/or MDR commercial development of parcel._ I will require an oncroachment permit. from Cal'i'rans) t Increal'-ea putliM c service demands t 8 Ap��end�ic '1, page a o 9 M � l STMlt OF CAUFORN1A --TRANSPORTATION AWNCY ._ - �- _. _;yam _,_. e .� _ �- �D�� - ND "O, BROWN JR., G4vfi mor -;�---�--- C�i.PARTWNT OF TRANSPORTATION w ' Dl.#TRICT 3 t K,O, ROX 911, AAARYSVILLe V5901 as ' To l.e,of7one (916) 674-4277 � March 2, 1981 03-110-32 Goorae Ba.roe l 1 AP J1112-' 11-74 �r Mr. John Mendons a Butte County J)epartmerF of Public Works 7 Go ity " Menti r Drive I, Grovil.le, Ca1.3forn:ia 95965 rear Mr. Mendonsa: Thank You for the o � y ppaxtun:tty to review r_ the Geor�,a Tentai;��xJ ' i'alr001. Map, which would creat` two parcels at; the; intersection' Of H1,011Kay 32 and Oak May 3n Chico. It seeMO like% that any development of Parcel :1 as a homes;Lte would n6cessitate direct access from Highway 32. At such time., an eiicroachment permit must he 4bta .nod from Caltrans. An environmental, assessment should be prepared 'prior to the pormtt application which addresses the impacts of the formed Within State right of way. This work to be per-- Would expedite the permit revl.ell px+000Ss. For furthc�ir inforruatioft$ the Applicant should ccntaot Mr. R:i,chaj?d Alexander, Distract ,permits thgineez", Phone (916) 6"14-.44014 tele" e; Sincere ly, LM J. I HOMBATOH)✓' District Director of Tl[ ansportation r,, t3.. D Skidmore Chief., Environmental Branch cr C G + I i ...... .. .. i. , I 161' I TICE, Of-' DSTERMINATTQN E o� TO: Secretary for ResouT ees P 2 7 77 A I.G Ninth St. , Room 131 Sacra;ner►to CA 95814 CLAR{C A. NkI.aC3lV) Gaunty t1,r: 1� ti�y1 11 . I .. i.' '- 4t'�.w,•rv+a.u.,ru,:.,.ro,-{,..+ktnr!Mw�+ ��F'.�'.. (Filed)E) County Clork; County ,of Buttee PRQb9; (,e,qd AgetY) 1852 Bird StreetBane Co unt �; Adv�ory Oroyillo Califorzn.a 959_..5 6 7 Oouzit Cetter Drivo (?r ori l? t C x1 a f arnia 95965 i' SUBJECT: ` Piling of Notice of Determination .ori Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Godo Pro ect TI tl e Tentative Parceliia ' 14, 0, � a:te C -e;arzng ouse Number (I1 submitted tt State CIearl-nghouse ontact Person TI,)lephone Number Ear). D. 1Valso.gg Drector ERC 15, 4"4777 Project Location Cl,qk 'JTn,+", Chios Pro? e�,t Descr:ipt .on reatt.o i of 3' Pa;,Ioels f or resinenti-tl-agrxt:tl ti.alal ►��e , thettCo+u�t .ddv3."ary n+ �ncy . ._ �ieac7 AgeoY) fi � s 1s to a rv�.se f estt, - ,_ �, n .: _ ha. made the fol,lovx:rig deterT'ainations regarding the above-described project; 1, The projedt has been fi)D appr6ved, by the Lead Agency. 0 disapprolVed 24 The profOtt [] will have la significant of -feet on the en�r'ronm�ent Q will not 3,. An E.;tvironmen- Impact Report was propated for this proj'ct pursuant to the provisions of CEQA; acid ivas r:ertlfiod, as re_- quirod by Sectio,; 1.5085 (g'); 14 California Adritti.nigtratzve Code. 0 A Negative Uocl.a.ration 'tvAS, preparod for thi8 _project 'pursuant to the provi8idns of CEQA. A 'Copy of the Negative Docla-ea:4,ion is attached. .�. Appendix 14 - page 1, of 2 4 . tai W-gation measures +adop ted by the dead Agency to reduce the 3 macts of the p appr,oVed project are: Fry - l« Parr qe1. 4 to Ise tl'le e it. l:e soUt' ,'1 rare sats 5E3 and 59 on Final .xap� 20 Deed to the Cduh y of Butte 3o fto right -c 9"way from the 'cente "clines of Glenwood Avenue and Cil tray and a 20 :fti radius return. 3o Indicate a 54 ft. building setback, from the center line of Olenwood Aventle and Oak ways, it 4m Shots all easem6nts of .record on the riiaal 5. pay wiy delinquent ta-Ces r v� i Signature Enir f-�'7 R.�YnL_Tjti h+r f -n r+ Titj'.e Dat.e', Appi z!ndl x 11 page 2 of 2 1 1.� ior 41� Nt"1T' CE Or DI:TE91 LNA`['iQN u C�19791, for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Rooth 131.1P Sacramento, CA95814�` it r 1lX County Cleric. �------ County of Butte I�ROM+fS ' � (Load 11'en.tr 189 . ir_I_ car eT___ R f;1v`tal�rzYtl-1 a2ay eta JJrpar moi t OT671:1 0 ! A I �fJCrl:Lcl.._.. ' ,. O ljn., Calif SUBJECT; . Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 211.0$ ,or 21152 of the PUblis Resources Code { ERD LUQ; 77� 9-t30--0 Proi ed t 7' t e �W Tetltat irve Shu"adv s an AP # 42"114-55 Oak Wad Es safes SEate submitted Co st-te C. Gatvitl; kiouse Contact Ia_rson _ e�cp tone Number �j :Project" Location South side oX Oak Way, easb of t7leilwood Ave, t~tesf Chico Pro j, eat DescHipt on; Tentative Siibdi,vision Map to ovea'te 39 lots for reeiden'tyis-I use. (Amended map) This _ is to advise that the :.._ Bu l t:_e CCowittr Advisor Agency I,eaciency has made the •followInk ', determinations regarding, t•Yte above-•described pro7ect 1. project w"Cee prod ectill -=---�- have a s gni.t icant tf-fec-t on the s Will tot environment 2. P anepl r " trsuartt total Impact Report was Prepared for this aoJ ect he pt ovi cions o,. CSS s cras Certified ag % An �tivironnie equared by Section, 15085(g), 14 California AdmIn.i;sttdti.ve Code} A cteg.,at' t Declaration wao prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of A roper of the Nogativd Declara.. .ti()n may be G%a&ned at t�te.�\Snv rOn.MentdI Reviova Deprartment, Ccaurtty i✓orl :et• Drive, Oxovtilt, C41ifornia 95965: A`Xztaoe of t.�cttt tion ,gasfiled indicating this prajC�ct is exempt from etivirohmental revue. Ap enda.x 13' - ..:age . of.� 1 TMformation reauemlf': ad by the Advisory Agency on ` August 21, ! 8 x �a�^ :in t;1ae 1 .( pal;Lerns o th�:,Ranchaero Aa 3r r Zie finding of the board: Wr , $upervis=0 oa July 11, '19722 ,,log, t the Walnut. Wood Subdi'vJ.8ILvn rsgs xding the Ranchaero Airport was that the airport does not raise a zignifIcant environ- mental issue requjl,,vi g a written, response by the County This finding was made on the basis of comments received at the hear-in concerning its location and use in relate on to the proposed n. Since the project site fo�j .the leisure" ro osed subdSubdiv , o ' s contiguous to and northerly of /the Wood, Estates Subdivision x� �.y Walnut Woods .Subdivision site, it +vould seem that; the rink of potential airplane hazards may be less on this sita since 0 the Ran.chaero .Airport lies to the south. According to Joe Moody of Western. Aovo, lnoorpora'ted, the charter airplane company housed at the Ranahaero Airport, the Plight pattern extexaAa about 'I�z mikes from the center of the runway for tho final approach of lan&ing aircraft. The altitude of airplanes in the ;light path is 500 feet or lower. The runway length is about 2200 ;C(-,et; due to the relatively short len jin �� inn e s normally fly fairly low over the runwa air y g 1 the drops quickly in ordor to make a safe landing, treettoesoand ` eb. utilize the ai/rypo:ft are sma:L l±�.l h•. yy ryyp r�y� iy �y r private plW}(�i 17 and 11GLLtb od Gli planosr VvopdU,17��ev-UypG airplanes do not pPr,810htly use this airport. Tho charterod' n.ne modals with a seating capacity for, irplaes are twiil 4a ; t,,"O crew grid six pa sea ers.`- Ranchaero Airport is 'a private hirport which has a IOW frequency of use. A total off` 10 latdinga and takoi offs of airplanes is the maximum that co old, be expected in one day. 0A some days, there may 'be only I or 2 landings and talte offs. Noisd is more of a consideration now than when the airport originally was established over 3� yeaars ago: The surrounding land. use was primarily agricultural with rLra.l residences in the past. In j recent years, the nearby area bas become more in:habitod With some low density 1;4es aimoh(� the land uses -n the vicinity, A zo,nitl� mup of the. pto j ect area has beAn suit to Western Aero; Incorporated: At the Advisory Agency hearing on Septef b6t' ' 1978; we expect to have the map v7aildbls; the map will have the flight paths; c7 mar zonas and other, p6ptinent information, "e8a,rd�.n.g the IZanohaoro Airport dvavm on it, t r h. • `.., � Leisux'ewoc?d. PGS P_ continued y y{yyryW yj ' v � �o aq rx� � d i ' 0 e G o ea�'GJ { y{ y� w� td dstlbr.4�i4 Ae V \l �Y� �• D l L1� J -.4r J.4� {� �e� hazards �rhxo�. have '� ex n Y � as a xe�-...1� of the V.an.chaq:ro lair�s ort boinG located in the axoa* The greatest p chance of an. airplane acoident would be to the southof the � airpor/ t where 9 of the departures tako place. Me avea, to �the south is primarily Dreher ds so loss of life is a m.lx4mal ra.s Most of the d partuxes:, aro to the,, south l ,d. most �5f the landings are to the north The flight pa.tt6.r�4 Is determined, in part;, by the 1#3.3,'d.s whis are generally* out of the south. About 95/ of all airplane V, approaches are from the north. The planes fly about yZ mile �%, to the west ofthe runway about 800 Oeet above the '^x'o1►nd . The plane continues to parallel Lhe runway for a di Jtance of about; 114 miloo 'bai.Ls to the east and then turns south on a straight pa'tY`' and lands on the north end of the i, nt any, About j/ 1h of all tho planes using the airport fly about �ziAle to the south and then turn and land oi the south end of tre. runway. The final approach for planes is about 5PO feet above the,,,, w ground. A large number of the planos landing at the ai:rp1-t 'w y project s:i,te at a la.elpht of about 300 :feet.. � .tl over the } 11 i Oil . 11 }� U, C pUC�t7N'Y' A` VXtit7iCX �1CwE1�r'a, ae T ' Ait g6st 210 `197,8 rlxriU'�ES � ►t 787-» 6. William"Ntct hols4 u��ncl Y � r�n � �2 �t�esG s i.i�glne�� : RonGxsves _ e n ct�, dro W and AssI'P,.Iatorl'', i AA{1{1 I` 111;» rienbtzsaartl�_ofted t:�a,d h�adjpat»i,� .toi. e,�txzeo`h ,`mdxtt# �''., �, a�tisl tits s had bee,i�'g.nne ' tY�'� oa01 aet�00, 1,asta �"uatsda�yO a urCita � �f:a'►pec th4',t the ap,�� na 4l"�w � :�hpve ' -ipp,,y px a `rc uzz off.'°k a �ntr�hey token ot,:, tt�rr time �o11eri�'th`e. p opos��drt,a�siatl,ot�dt`a �jtxs��b.Lpnn�,. >v 1 M�� `(`t. AdgL sa ,a's' d trjj `: this 'its b8 %. Bob Whit Bomb. AP 34.410»18; southcJe',ilt r:gr'fte of '�ti�ldxest E1Ve, and; L3y;rvieW -,--AP ilters� ct;�ioz , ilxo tleor., dh G arr°oq and A 8scia ties rlr, 11ei'a ,said `ghat this item; %ops being,hef.d for3� a copy 'ot a deed desct bing nn. aecmezit fob; uti.lizati6 o�,ad,jaceni prrp6te ,fax•setiage purptases. y ... TWis t,ein was continued foza tirze weekto August ,28;197$ at' the "ziequ,est of 0;e ltea'.i h Department. r 78--7i-.1.-(187) n t .' '. l.o.i Sauth 'side of , Leis�a��t�o� t�eet .east o� Cf d�ubdivz.s�.on., 39 " ` 50�3ar4tts :Tentative , -Oak E ,. Caood ,A ue.;�,re"st, Cliicor Engineer-. !I.A Ca�t� reaxian. ti-. 4,treeter sa 'ch'ab this wds.' `he�ixj'ig of the ,.1xa Daft, r + Stz , Mdndt�nsa askeA if any,rine' wzbhed o+,speak ldh!•tfZe —Ilk. >rixit�c��un 5mit�i z �6$� Osk'4ay�.ss ' °oae o� the�''ttiaeting, , ivlcsnddnsa r. 7 ied th��x . +011iis is the sgermZ bx .i dbrd 046 dctuslly ,.. e„i t lzdx ert fl s the chi a r,t L'tL or ,"sends 'it, bsdk to Ettv�.xontnezttsl �te�iet Oe,�yat'CttiGnt irar xi►o`4t cbmm�tiCs3,. " Vit:' the 'Sulidivisr b1 Cbttuitf tkera }neetrig H rix» Lsis'. a 'StAl asked bbout t'h,� •off cases, 'turned ;doth in the past year a L thill $ i gd -b,a'ed o ., �., :,. 131, az` : p :tr~rf' 't11at. sfz dIdn” t bbltevt: this, 'b�d�w tt�d �dnied tiny ,a,ppls.ww ion Ott Ole b�lu491 cif' the tla. t 'ugust:21,+�98 vp * "< �UTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AOMNC1 i r11,tj 7.'gS --•- August 21, 1978 j Pago 4 Smith .hart spme comments reg,arcl,�yig the c timtt i R., T. There are to many d�erse eti�ri,ronmett'►a� e.CCccts. [r!t?n,tlbnerl in (� the report as stated on Pages 19 and 20 ,.0 2, "Reference was trade to Page` 6 I. rxroad imoroveit��nts. �i►*�atz't 'A&It atY1� s� olio uItl q ditto, hitt ii rte, '- dig .n narrow Evo lar`: rid wi. or , a in ,°e i1hproyourlic o1.1 tr. Sm7.tnth 't Us, and pall th '"'�t a fear Oak 6�1aw will be w�don)r�d.�' lin wdht on to" say thii doss Of �ro,perty on both sides will be ld. consiclerab.le consterngt'ion to the property owners. Also, he wAv co lcernect %ri,!»h, tie skr e:rits ',1, stictan$ but far aboub 200 Ecco w�',tlx cuxl7s anti guf=tees .t'ktd thOn going back to a .narrow road. =('his i.s VII at ha'ppene,4; ��i.tlt Sacxatnenta Avenue'.) - ,smith said thac if , :� projer.t is opprovcd, "it will 6xeate n areI needed. Fie solid' "W'1ty is, there` such ri rush more Douses than, 'buyers stand in line to whit for �i 11 or. houses-110 4. Deference was mate to. 1'01S6 Iz `"'the develotier feels therd' is s need fors addit.it nal residential lots ..." ' '�Irr,.Smtth felt;' thti,,Z were plenty of houses, as evidenced by the ads in the BAterp;r�sa Aecord. He said, !'We could wait ten years va thbut gett'i'ng attotlter. lot in that area,,11 r 5. Reference ;vas made to Page 2. The etnphas s of noed will, be for tnultja-f +thil y units and low-income he us tng. Mr.. $mitt '6Vi6 this is not tmltiwfanily ; this is not low--i.ncop.%o housing. units & ry Referonce was made to Pages, 5 and 4 r;=garding taxes tlt,bt will be zaisecl. iKr. Stdith ,said that sery 4 ds wk being streCche`d to theminimum, unde"xfunded and xeduo-ed. 7. Reference- was to g size6, 4„1*ha lots ark emeet ,. ,g e Si2b in' order bo, 'the rnir,itnurrtdr�gitilreitteri�s�.,a'" 1�I�: Snii,th said that this means that they .are just as as, they cat; possibly I.e. Lsmall Smith menkioned a talk that: he had had with Igrs. Rriwley',' the" ° ovnerq in Which sloe ltad told .hitn that <<no mattet what kind of dev�:l:opment It Vis; we, car"tdi,nlyrton'r chop that Is.tc1 tip'attto small piec e.11 $. deference teas made to. yoga I�l. ,regarding acoustic qua;Xity." k�Ara xofids, ire, i htl! usccl since 1tiL res3rlgnt .al use, currerct�y e,tists in this arena' Mr. Smith svId that maybe Oak Vny vias lightly a , 3.l�lren y LtSt:d, oJCt+:'.�' upon a titre �it.1l' now 5.t �.5 lltluEl.�t: for. ,herb, , ! t dos p gars e�.u. Mr: Smx,th tras cottcortlr,ci t�`lth the n tip � y Reopl;e using Oak Way tr -get to sottte kxttcl 6k safe iglu au1~n, because of the p C 1Ttt@n <S Avenue anA x�gh,,.`ay 32 ilt(3}',i'Gtli5Cl'. Ij Attgtxst 411., 1978 V ACrNCY13kIXi COUNTY 1Gxtt (IWTG9. 1u?,-o't 211) 1978 ,was 9. Refes;eftee made to Paas 11 regarding 7.atad uso, r0i ecl " ;taa.ea has, a_,combination of ameiculturAl and xesidoitt-tal Idnd usos but i:sI domin_ �' ttel a Mr. Smith' said twnnu ;lti.: ...15..... _..�._...._._.� .�_..4., 'was great and sho sl,d be kept. this WaY. He fOrt'her stated t~ha x. a ,,.awd �la0 op rov0 use she Id be continued. He went on to say that the City of Cltiac �tiOs pro jed!tkMk tha t tlit~ majority 04' the Chico uvbtm expattsiots, should occur, ira. J,-,he ;ga.s;.tea:n and sotAthenstern portions of the tirbao ttrq�ss, no t ,tt the .wept,, a nd riot ott 0.a It Fjay, 10, Reference was msde to Page 14 regarding loss o,> tagriculttrj �l lm'nd 1115 acres 09 p Clsra xi>£cttlurn], ani�tources 13111. `be conveirted to urban xtsea," ll.teEea once was made t o Page 1,6 rogardiug aestha'tric impact, "he" i,X,,,roPasaxv111 result In loss, of, rural., open 8 pa dL.anti.srt0.1"168s of th,e ru:ra� y ios�itete �i th :tr a. -." qtr. Smith egreed to this l2. Reference wtia trade to page `1k16 rdgatdi.ng sewage disposal. Mr. Smith didrl''t £epi the t the id j 000 ga llmus per dtay of :e fluent indlUded ' the other 74 homes approved by 't',ti< ]joArd 13. 1Zeference was mt.WL to pages if and 17;area! lies an the reripltexy of the Chico Urbau F,rea; i t lie's bei d thr�i axa ftihR bqn-developndthe Chic_:ea, and t1hs �o�oa] will 4 boAn 9,40 It ti felt b'9t this would be the second mistake--not an ift'ial devdlapment•_'i�sitire Wlriuthere �Would:sbattHe trer.� on Co say that `�, by Gott G gxeatvimpact:ed Oa1„n ay�• M S. pt6bbbly 250-300 average e',aily traffic ii4its above the present loadi. Safety should be r:onsidercd �becuase o£ the aiarrotr stiadts-with ha sliouldzly:a 6, ^ ,established walkways j: thbre.-jqiI1 be an inc'rea sed 84 ty hazard. 14,Mr. Smith said that lot size would be stttaft, zcir our'axesl $5t 1,35:','on some :of the logs is as tMill tisyott can mal;Q i.t. ,:750 1tt, �imith said that, property to es would go up ':for all°ok us, 'ateferetrce was made to Pane 19 Vogavd�ng ifte rtt:accl land V11tips, 17. 1!li.'. Smith fait there was piertry of factual S.taEit'rrc6Ldh ir„ the r, NVk to detty thL owneappro.ttal to go ahead with the pro;jeotb 18, Maw. Smith-rmahUoh.ed 4male alternatives; ;' F �t si like to r a. NO Project. atz, 5r[t,th said than. sor�se of us ta�tul .farm 3s loth;' eJ tie;. �;lilib b, Xb r ex lots watltatt the p-i-- aest: zo.nira C. Wait fay�,ttsft'n rt other sub4 two fill ttp ari"! pro !a a nee>d for more 10 f-8, 5'tudy the % gltth Avonue sttbt %Visa �rst pt d f.iit out V11S, ca 10b or- lots are uttat to i � , r I'iu ;ust 1" l`973 77, L y & oT�pAO ' RkA ��n 00llrz August 21, 1978 pale 6 'Rt. rfiy, Cheryl Jti4l.,, 20 o.73ox 216 ;Chicaskad ig thorn Ito'lltion of the airppt, and' an c7�RtYuX pmirporr~ (R#inphaerU Airport). �.'tlsxass a glztt bxou 1�G: U,p-intttc tJ7lnut,.. Wtiacl.(s subcl;Z.v.Lsitin );lit, �xO „4rt-'rc:Ad. ,'tx , <+or�i,d.�gi'.11{,.l�o',td dnr],a incl o Q 4twt�i�t�Qr6 sik1�, 7Yr��t oQM.54. Cy * S Ma. auhl. mentioned, ti°ce'L rix;.' Ris9 $dhae£fdr hq,d' told hej�, ttiat` O'l.oaded V14 es ' a,f:,t: �rntn. th�� a�,� axt O'Pproacthin$ or takini, p �6s611d .,pass awet'` 'ttlis area s'iliae i:t;b di; ctly in the 11—Y'w of ttze rpproct'ch torthe'xi�riwra'y"; Slie wait: nn to say that Mr. Neil XcCtbc had asl�cd ettat; t>�ira be amended to the a. I(r. Streeter said. thah� Ilse dkdrt" t re.o II I�aYL ind' :abou,t. R�t�i��c�:ra ALLapizt r r in both the County and City of Chlco',Gp,'OV .. ' 4tt. ,Ms. Juhl. Sa. a that in the 'Celexa]' �!.an'rr on'kago,' 6.8` t i1c1 ` ift' stiggests avoiding 'detrelopment. i `ne'at' the olitport=,"°` Mr Streeter wigs not awrarp of th3d in,Cottpiattion lors" Blair t file aad.'Iitopo1ssibid potren,,ial b'dza-eds't nib lhightart flight Pattern�'be Mr. Streeter sugggstod trhht bhi's'nfolmattno'n be a'ttinthed to the, n" utes ii since public response is . su:E:f cie,nt. l - ; Utz. Lawson SM40I mentioned that there ate planos''l~lyratiolbwr',.r�ve " x ills *land, td4'7.qut Woods and the;rcby T�el'surewood,; 'too. Ar. , J`im L6d-erwrctocl„ 1.09.0 is.. 8th St�. , doc anent.ed on; l�lz SmitII'`d paints; L The, Count y -has ;already es tabl. stied itt `the GondkA PjAin z3ha t the , zoni'n 'tsatlld.b : � '11e. said A -SP. ;tbtx nd^.:is a s riy xjyi.�de ttial ` '. type ol: •toning, w,3. a tAtinitinum ai 8,500 s' err. lots, 7a(ntily ` �� JL 1i1r0 �./�"nCL.�p.. I. YqOad Ja id,. none o>; 4ll,e lot.6 '� pproddh,'8y500 dq Et„ w 1the 2. rir. Lddgemood said that ast.ictl aural soil takett out of thir. area xs no taa:;'a :yiti ,any ,other type of r;grieuj tUral said 'tt�ert out ',of producLion 'for development,' 3 rix. 'bedg-exwood ttientionod that as far as a bhudy Tar the need fnr,• housing does, th.,W is a' conaLrti o5 the de'v lal ej,..;. w Mr. r_ e tx th.e Village and 4 rl.� . Led�,��rt�Fatytl cumtt�_tttacl n , C,talr tt�rntri pdr�c, 5. ttr. T'ed,got.• ood staLed that 55r,+ 6e the pdovlo suet+t"!yea preEet singly:- ant% y hey -mt; do 'from: •oft to say, tl6 t "ttt� ct 'hit`t trha t type of be sold". 6 4r: teclgiLm` wood s�ii<<. `that nth" twilch:Strb .AixprSxL is a stash i�i,r�io».t and he doubted tha,,., it would grow. Ite Zarttter tutted th'I't tie dlL:; It believe :tttat ttzo '6l.i;ht 'y+atti'rh tveot o`vhr thetit uil. z �;r 1 "4 11V`.C'l;l: f1OYN TY ADVI uRY Acg'= rx14(J'i'g5_ August 71, 178 r Page 7 leis. Cheryl Juhl corrunentecl on the t710 soil on the pro perty Shp;" said it .is one of the ''Kiti.es t so`U8 in the wo,r,' ld, lhcre is not o pebble sn this sail. '811e ssiti', "To saythat tha; land'isnQ`t as good a�� `better tt;an anything also is not-,true.'ii 'Z"Eta test of the dis'attssfon tri' 'con 'fitted' to tfte 'Boaxd. Mrs. BlAir suited that thes'a,people have valid concerns` about elle `riii, about s1'vi.n; the land, and about expattsion of: urban wrens. +� 78-7-2-(000) :r 1 tits, Blair stated that thete -is specii'i.c zOfling than ollcws integration of agricultural and, residential -1 rbriing: She , dt.-_ i,6gad thst'the Planning Departmont has tried to 'roan people together to the Bba'xd tlt Supervisors and the Pianning Commission to take a position and 'to'save the agricultural ,1 lana but-tve haste• n'ot been suc'cess' uli Mrs.. Blair mentioned that: the 'loss 0, aeon. space ca �1 be persotially objectionable to the people living in this area, because they have enjoyed very and been accustomed. to a've rttrztl'attnos lipriy. p Mrs. Blair said that the 'Bor.rd of Supervisors took part culat poli.�tical 'osit:ions ) p 4 ; .. �p (in her mind vtiith respect to the Walnut 'good.: sub'd.[v�.sion. Mrs. Blair said thateven though the B$R points out areas of concern, the prime thing is lose of opdti space and agricultzaleal lands'. Mrs. Blatr mentioned that housing Vii.thin the range 6i- about: $55,0 $4 00' to 0,000 18 readily matketable She i:urther mentioned that most: ot:' the Iti homey in ,the` ;ntorpti8d Pedord' are in this bracket; yl rix. Reid asked Mrs. `'Blah iB' tihdrd, tyas a prJvision ih'thh . dehe:iM °f,lan for liprogresosive, planning,, �1 Mrs. Blair said, "To take the position that you should'hdVe. ": atgL1 M pardcls at this time in this aretl 'either way you are going to comptoift ,se the AgAt p tits. Blair suggested that all the comments today be inad : part of ttte docuMent . II Mr. Md.rido'i sa mentioned that before certifying this; Ire rsdAct '11 d, to see the i airport issue In the dratk form.' i Hrs Bidi't so id, .that; this lsltotild ba tontiinupd to giv& the %itv1rb4, mdtttal VmviW the Opportunity to add. to 'the report, C� Itt. Roid st,Ited that he thought 711: points should be, answered in the report, Mrs. BlAiV questidlled the lot C611figurestlon of L-Ysl apod lot Zai', Mri Gaproali;an exnla int~ i this to tits. Blair; tY 17 kigult '11 - 7h' M } t 13ujx'rt C6U' Nk r Y AARYI AGVNC MMES ..- August 21, 1978 Pins. D1 air movcd to continue ttlis par A;VO weeks to 41941411Y, September 7, 3,97 ,-.pr the ;oot�m ,rttts to be :included 4-rom the Adv,i-iory, Amay ,�n:�1 Srot I4110 intcresk od, peruons, . for inl:orm5j Lion regctd.Lt�a pd tterA, o]ROrtch:nexo Airport and fbr the concerris',oi: this." subdi,vk.0,on..`; a , sects ded . to by;.Plr.anciots'a ;anc� carr:ie41'tx4a;xmriin;�lr-. Oot-tti:tzued for two weed<s to ."Agpt.ami er, 7 o 1578 . 7$-7^2»(223) 78-7-2-(124)F Forebay Vista Tontat ve Subdiv�,t'.. j: ; Revfised MaP'j 24 iIb5tst'noVbhrresL corner of P7.umas Avenue and 7th. Streets Therirolito{.. Erngirkedr: Frederick H. Pi zzi, xnc. 1 t ;`t,endonea said that this is a revised tentative parcel snap, , Mr: Streeter mentionied that another irti:'t�.aj study` is not res{uirtrd ` Mrs, Blair stated: 1 would move than w7e aocept the negative declaration that was prepared dor Vorebay, 'Vista "J:entat'ive Subdivision rSap--tine or,tg.i,nal, app;.ovaj ork the negativecleciaration wag dor 43 lata;"..tlnLs wrould be -applicable to this application,, tohzEch is a reduction of thlit number o parte s -f tiding that the proposal would not have a significant effect on the environment; 'Notion seconded by Mr. Reid: and carrLcd unanamousiy. 1 Mk' Pierndonsa asked i�f there Was •attyon,e who, wo4ldl, like to spaalt 'to th'o ptoject , Mr, Menldonsa asked; fir', gughss; the roosoA, der the tevisgd idap4, Mr'. aiughe replied,, tha t it saa,s ori gitnely '10 acres, aid nata it is 5, re zonie and there zirc complications in acquiring the ad;jacc�nl , pzaperty; , Dis'cussioa of map. Mendonsa asiced `firs; Iilait if slid wanted a redesign to be cans*derq;d Blair I epi led that it; Nblic C',ovka clic, nI is thi ttt it was kmporuailt, site would go along with the flap; Pird�id made a mo tion to approve ox ob+y Viata subd +,vis ian oft l'trimas Ave. �n Therntalitos, not,► ig t hat a ;)t� evlous stegative t*letlaraLLon 1149 adoptdd and x, tha t the subdivisi drL .is properly z0hed and meet tl °the BuftCrit1, "t �enersl ]?lain,, subject to the follo 4it g eortdi tin tin s ,1 0 ITT, DISCUSSION OV E1IMONMENTAL 13VALUATION phis proposal is the creat cin of a rosy dentx a� subd�»^�ra.s�.on cox��x ��ting of 4.0 lots on 13.6 acres of agricultural land on 0 Way near taighway 32) of e mile wost of 0hico city limits. Density proposed 18 3.0 dwel- ling mits pw'r... acre. 1(b): The land consists of a level agriculturally productive soil," Farwell loamy Which is currently in producixO.g orchard. use, This pro j eot Will result in the covering over of a gj eatp ercen.tage of the (` surface of this soil with an. impervious material. Approximately three , . ;res willbe covered by streets and driveways,, and about 116 acres by housing structures. This four and one-half acre co-moing will "oe about 33 pe cent of the total .and surface area.. 2(a): The residential development will result in localizod reduction of air quality from the consequent residential use of automobiles, fireplaces, home f==aces, etc, (40 dwellings), and from temporary construction activities. 3(b); The 33 percent covering of the permiable land surface with pavement and buildings will result in increased surface water runoff Runoff will need to be accommodated by project drainage facilites. Lind,-, 0hannel lies west one -fourth milts from the property and, is proposed as the drainage water disposal channel. No existing storm drainage systems are in the area. Rainfall is 20 to 22 inches annually. The. ;soil on the site has good surface and, sub;"sup^:`ace drainage. Gto= whiter discharge into Utdo 0 annel may cause some" turbidity from. sediment, etc. and flushing of cantaminantes (ail, themica,ls) eto.) from the property into the creep. 13.6 acres of primo: Farwelll loam agricultilral land currently in Almond orchard use -will be withdrawn from produotion and converted into urban residential uses. Manny of these orchard trees may be retained for landscape purposes, but all will be removed from agricultural pro- duction;. ;(c)a bo estic, animals (dogs and caste) will be introduced into this < agrWcultux�al area. 3(d): The orchard is hi bitat for wildlif e and the project will: destroy 'his , tabit u to some e; ,Aont. lea o.'t the trees Will be retained for landscaping per.posos; though due to huma-t inhabita:tion of the "area, most gild" w9 except soxe birds will migrate el8owhere or be lost. G(a) Res.i6bntial use of the pvoperty will create noise in this exiot ng rural area from residential activities and iT'Laveased traffic. 1, ti 1 '.M Y MtO}.MMTAL P'.t AtUAT OBT " " 2 Residential light will be created in this rural area as a vesult of n g y - Butte Cowity Gono,7,,al Plan. for 8 The prop rty �.s designated "� the low density ieoiden.tial use. Zoning is .A-M Tho Chico General Plan designates the area for agriculluj�al uses. This project sne- lies outside the Chico General Plan. "Green Line" which. d.esi.gnates the City's t' limit of urban, expansion and lies outside the proposed Cif,7 of Chl'bo's Sphere of Influence. The property lies rxi the far western adg-� of the Chico 'urban. Area as designated in the Butto Coun --y General ''�'� sr and aft. ext one-half mlle out From vLhe bistinj� urban de-volop6d awea. The Butte Coutlty General Plat, sand 'Use ?dement toxt states tua't "the location, of the various Urbz.n uses should strive to avoid randoli I solated developments that et&se uneconoMlc e' :tension of public Utility services and fac:� .hies `thio-Agh ,premature d2tav�elopm,ent of vacant .,and. (gage �•�?) 9(a) The subd.ivi�sion deVe:l.opment will temporarily }i,hcrer se the rate of use of na:l.ural. resources for 60n8tructi0n purposes, many, of which are non--renewable. X! c The proposed. density of development is 3.0 (-dw�al.ling 'o-nits per acre (40 :Lots on 1316 acres). 11he estimated population fdr t],,„e.40 residential :hots, upon. final build-,,,'ut, will be about IGO people (based on P45 ;people per dwelling imi.t). This density is a low urban density. Howevev, the existing area is Gen rally agr' 0111 xr�x , rural.-resi aenti.al with a very low populeti.on durisitq . 'To the north and to the east dear Yiwv. 32, residential use oocltxs.. This proposal will realalt in ir- c- --xs :d popula. lon growth and denaitj es in this oUtl'Yj.n.g area. A rew- s.t.�%Nnta al subdivision. W�lnu+ Wraods, ha-8 been pioposed fox4 tho agri- cultural .and that lips to the south adjscent to this property. D18-- pevsed rural ;vesidont,es exist along Oak Vali. "13Ca, ty result- in significe-tt � �.es�.d.entiai use of this ;propel w�.11J treaoei gMostaofothi.-. tj?&Licthe �will bye�generated00 �onto OaI tWayrtowa.rd t r of ex�ease: ~ J the oast onto Highway 32 =6 into Chico. The ex sting t; --Mf±ia load on a' k 'Way at i��Lghijay 32 .s ad,11 eig . hundred units per day (19,77Public Warks Department couui; 1v771,A`DT t0h.e' `t~raffio geneVa tion from. this ,proposal 3,11 reprosent; a 3o - 11.0 ,percent Oak Way. Oak tray and the other voids in the area4r() relative17 narrow 1 rural stroots with no °ur'ban impihovements ((-,umbo, guttovs, sid.ewalke .J *., tidontial or dhatilders) and w �h light to mod.crats t a ,c leads. t+ bin re, use of the site wjli jmpa(,,t these currently n.on.y-urban roads with. S g- nifi.ot atly inerea8e6..rt sidentia"i tx;; ' ,c and the neol for .further �mprove- V tevresid6tadevolopment along Oak Vay will further impact tbo surl' a is = access route into `this area. This Brost ex+ pansio iy of whirl: this proposal is a si.gtifi.can r anal early pais y will , , llln � DIMiSSI:ON 0P' EN 1' V:�.ONM ZM rU,ASaUnlI0N > ; Ireeul.t in .increased; demi ds for ��o�d. mai.3:tena�ce axed y n''rovement., such of,r. t ae irit� al' o:ad imp ve lents w be 'sup l .ed ��: et Priv, n de-� velopp , t-y omes ments Wath. 'some evoAtual neer ,or Coup Work a f', the area "deo 13(d) This increased traffia use Ma Oak Way mal,; impact the Oak Wad/ from �g enter ;:.1to aid exit, Highway 'Highway 32 in`bersection as vehicles 32. X hwa„` 32 cur- ettl.y has heavy traff; , ` 13(f) y No facilities for pedestrian travel tr�l,et s�,xlc�re the area currently is rural,, agricultural. .Che devel et pment is relat'ivel�� isolated from existing residei:tial/urban-dev'.rloped areas. Children' : -� ' - p g he ovoads` for travel: to I^ 4 .from the cu�?den`Lial. development will be usi�l t , area schools- and to surrounding areaa.` 14: lAcreaso" .d demands T'!or public services will be creat ed. 14(a): The ndLtrest Butte County E,�re !) partment stati6ns ax,e four or more miles distant (Cohasset station and Nord s`Latioa). A3sponse time is tea minu•ves minimUT 14(b) : Sheri2f patrols will nerd to be regularly maintained' in this existing rural area. 14(t)t Area schools are Rosedale E_lewaentary School and Chico Juniow and SLiov High Schools. This development, will add an estimated twenty children to these Schools, mostly ef:Cecting the elementary school. The area is rural in mature aridwithout urban improvements: Busing may not ti be available �':rom the sate to the posedale elementa��r school since the property lies within 1)�- mi,l.es of the school. (the limit of busing). 14(d) )o development Sthe ince parcel sues will be', rather small. (9 to 1/3 acre) } and roor ational facilities are pi anxted;' the ptotject will create demand for ,area pants and recreational: fshilities. 14(e) : Demand for Public Works UeparL-m-ent road maintenance will be t' Licreased due to increased traffic use of area coupty- roads. 14(f): Demand .i:or `other serviues will be created: mosquito abatement, building insprsation ata,.lenvironmeatal heAl`bh inspection. 15(a) Residential u. ae of the site will, generaile ixtcreased energy demands and. consumption in this oxi.sti t— rural, non-resident' area. The property lies outside the oalifornia Water Service Camp= district boundary. ;-ervice to this property from Cali,forni.a dater, Sorvioe Comp�uay requires eniargemen- of their serve o,e area to include the subject er � and the extension of the mw�� ' the O.aklaw A Avenue/vest Sac�ame�to Avenue area or frs�m,#��. h z�i. i. U prop '"'y n, water lines one.= half 1 g 'v��y �2. Use "of well water zay be more fedbible. A it M14W, i D15OU'SSTON Or' FaVIAO1VMWtAL PMC:IA'. ICK pg. LI} proposal W111 alter the 'vis xal appearancdi OX vtwal agrlau],t=al area. d r7 21(c) : The proposal has impacts Which aro ir.di idually limited;, but cumulatively considerable.she follpwiug impacts have bean adent f ed 1. Covering o� -the soil 'by imporviou,a surfaces percent of the total area): 2» Localized deali:ne in air quality. t 3. Gexaera•I;�.on of �.n.creasedr surf ace water runoff It. Potential. for clischarge o.f materials a,hd. contaminants into. e 1jin.do 0,=ne" -. - • �.6 aCyiiJs :p�imeOonvPnv:oo �yjt). land into urban res'.dential use 6. Generation of residential "d, traffic noise: Generation of- vesi.dc4wbia1 light in a rural area.. 8. Oonf i ict with the 0hico Ouneral Plan. Population Srowth a'nd inducement to urban expansion by Ioap-frogging, development in an existing rural/agricultural awea. 10Generation of tratgic. II : lncroased traffic -ase of the area's existing rural roads an, estiZ.0ted 30 to 40 percent increase. 12. rnoreasod., trat.fia circulation, at the Oak WaY%ilil*ay inter- section , 7`\ these o of twafXic hazards to 13edortwirural roads from this increased traffic circulation.. . C1,,, eation. ats%child en. ri 14. Ovoa,tio'A of 1 creased .,d.emand for Iblic services 013. Oreat,z on. of ixLc,,pased demand for utylita.es and energy, 16 One-ha�,A mil'o e densian 0± Ca ilox!#a Water Serva:ce 00t IP water lines ,nto the aroa r L { t=,! it _ V DETERMZNAT�01� V • ' JJII /!n� y{y y (Q „^ a 4N.�ple d �Mx[1 h.5: 4+. � fl +��,}4 ,, • 1 \ 5\ 'tr 'r' y1\t 1 a On the basin of this initj,al evaluation:; finch the proposed 'p!co ject CDUTeD NAT have a siOiiificant effect can the environmi.nt, and a N.EGAT 'VE p MA" ATIpN r.. s rEo0=endpd I C1 I find th4t although the;, p.:oposed pr9ject could hhatoe a signif'ic"int effe f�t on tY1e environtttsntt there vlAi --*got be a significant offe.ct in this case because the ,( m3't gation measUros desOribed on an attached sheet hive been added tc„, the pr�'�RP►T oject. A 'NEGAJTIVE DELL aN IS U ) O I find the propose; projobt MAY have a significant effect on the enVii�mment, and an MVIRONMENTAL, xvftcty REPORT it required. �t ' Aate November, Port 8WV1HbNMENTAL ftVXEW DEPARTMENT Reviewed bye _ Eatl D. 'Naleon tnVironmeyltal Revio'%4 U3.reator ppe hd ix � pago\ y ry� i. N 'May 90 lqq To Butte CoiAnty ,Committees, Oommiosions and .Boarder Laving any concern for 01, with a propoa'6a sub- +1 division on Oak Way in, Ghtoo that ma.y be wsari`:'m'i`�ard_.at Ra`ute 2, ';B" 80 4--s t)hiao, Ca 959?6. Parce.1:� s 042" 14-0-090-0 and 042-14-0-091. There ars so many tad.verse Environmental 4f so4s which +., 4 c:`It, oit be''aV id.edlttha-t have heot reporter, to you �n the 'a ,1iA, for itLeisure Wood ,states" that I only need reg- mind you that pages nineteen and twenty are the Mics important in tboe e.n,tire document, (� Of great concern +:o` y of us who live on Oak Way i:s the im:paot on this narrow, two Lane oad,withotit an: shoulders curt ' M, I�y , . and �utt�rs= or dra.a.n_ 'aae..�..immPx�°v?;- l Monts. 'This underlinO ' portion is trom .1) � p page 6 Wo_ fear that Oak Way, will be widene0,0 with lora, of property on bath sides and a't, great expense to t4,e present property owns ro m r , If this project is approved be 9 o•�thE� tnroade will''be ` lZ., g y becoSe made ,.nto a riei�ltura.�, nand and 'Oast iiia w3. , Donflg t the cine-thousana single family re,sident4"t fo�� e v subdivision lots that have been tentatively appro-'✓sd It the city and county in th.o 011j0o area, i uncierst��,nd st of thtae have nat �'�t b. mei een cdevel opod; ��hy is. 'theSc`e sixth a ruoh to stand st,Lll and Wait for bud+ ye7 ` ease bear with me asp Z mep tion othea^ items from the ,a �tM�irc'!Hniun+bl Ao�tt�l�y �ap��;> , 4R o reports ' MAY Raw lcwmY ii I' 11 �{ it ""�( IiNtIr T 1 ( i ..!'he develoT).elt, �Lgel,�.�y.,alln+ii�]�MEr i:oaP. I ( ,.lr But the de opoj,, ld:Ld not inulcerlmke ,marlcot :CCiea;i.blli-- t�l' ;a cud tiw �� a d ►"�I� ;Vivine "i hie 1.10 �l. fir h t rca , is i,k� a)�t��3i:rvey�t�s a+yti'3� JIaview;,� a ]3uttle O1an,y e,;� n, a h c arm{a tat1iL h. ;x�e�triaa7Ced ri I ! , Th� 1bc► �phas:�, aid x�eiied, It xious; `�tgw,i1.a' �ft�; MUIr,','I«-'[+'AMx�`Y .F?iJytxT�► .ein($iiit)4V !'..0OML lt1jt7s,)�;`?!r:, i".. v ,� A t 1 1 � r mCix axpeni3iH, sixi .I.eFi'aii5. homes,+o., �? 1 Th number of sin lo::: £ami"�,y residenteete �n'iiecl - p aiicl, approv�;d alread.yF i�ee'tis 'the es` �.lna ed , t't an i 1 andcoul.ci iEmneed tha° daU°dand{j p. 2 Tholve �3ioma queat.i n, (c�,onc(%,!vn n�!; W,heFi�'he�r the 1 i yis amoUnlo aaf eta. b6 tluoit w�,1;�, bEii raa.eed UriLlJ» 1�cave irlo-:t 3ased ediats cid: this iso! ated devo7Lb 1410xi't - i.. 1' 7 :�' rl 3.nc�ud��g st{rt,�aaaniterlaci., and ;lav, t.faa»a,e== rie'n;t,, pp. 3w y fi The )1,6ts ard, ilei bid :U1 ar°dex+ to. mi.':eti the ni,ijiimun VL$ u remeiato. p. `;f 'chat, mbartia that they arbe ais l �i`71S .f�3AY,{: 5t >�+� ar'eqreiaAs .are iii��y little side�ntia t��sF cur.'tomty l._ caltistIgs, 3;n tN>is C�roa f x.:_„11; Ma Maybe Oak' 114�a:l' wa,6"°Li.g�lrtay lHae � ' cinch � upc� ai a �ti'me t lzcp in rt,iafi.b, forha ses;i, _ichi»�..aire7. � dog�i , t t�rei z:px�v elc gglara i ur(_, slWIa d: d,mba,ha:tibYi o� t ,P - rw r. cal.and read; :l�t►r�titil land usreggt bU °1., aorr9 cap t,ixrr 1)11 YES AND LETT Is h;i�� °�o. ec•tr-:Iri. t":iat, the ;Yn,a_f'ur�LI�G'�, f the :;C }ia.ctS 1xr'hTan ;evol-lrtsion i o i.r>c0UV, C;ftcltr„r71 srld sov,he�'�ste�n..gcrti,an.a��'�e `[Jr}bait `C �.._. r. �� .. r. p area n ,iTO,C �.Nr7"lid 11) (j +. NOT' ()r� G1�I ��Yo A' —r.., li I �� acies �a1` J.?''miat:. ]; pis Ill :°:LCU1 Ut`ti soi re citxxrie wi:l� ' e oa7r rer�tE;d to Urban, 11` .T j .... .._.?..:.. p. i� The Pk () os<e i tJi 1. restr�l e rt Liss,_ ciF rti'1 �d , o f i ,` M,w.YI/IYH Ir» YIWnY» Ya.r k�'yl Lf ,ce.. _and , ..fila VSs, of the rt,�r"'"a ;a furs I � in_ t°te_ areall �`�' " I SF3WaBxis'Jib:t� Fit 41� ?'�t"t Of gxJ, �i�sP,�4 day die:: lots i, the 'to�tel e leant Whitt,6 lWou ld 440 to lee air�,Opblf ere e»" thx�augh leach, f _�f .dlt Wit .d about 1C�0C'60 per aa- y.y The �'e;�1t3Tt tN�,ij3 f��xiti �, thb, our �r*�#,�r. gti�od p :rce.1at,l:,c,"t , aja �i� `�iIjI.1 "6ba,kr 1" I�-n ."I. o,. I,� ( I "'` 1 i t u 1 ,J� 1.^ f[..faf■■in■■■w�wrtt, - ii I +I, qd• e • �ih { S rid,rC?i 'A E, 5f t n "�i�)e ,j@7" �a. "W�...-..; �• w.h.r..r f .i... r -,W r...w 4j... ff..,1, f 1 .� Ww . y Ty"" �t �l .il tl, ,Girba ;n ,�l ` 3 •y. .t;....� � ;r .W.b Y.Q3'lctl IbR : 'n1P1 1 , 11�pl 2�111F Yr C "Ir' dl I� Crett �^r�t'oit�h��Nktico �x��r6<ca a1�Crr��f�ttti"��(.�i�t�14f;lFr�,aJ;c; trtl i11f.�,,eti. x�eetl��;ntn' dF��lr°�rt�M,:� a��t. ��ir,ti�l�l`.7;rrK` 8 r s dN ^ . s �)a'ri eX;t�arls3on ; I ,1 �. t"i'" � �n I�rG� s e�� yo�ut,�,tiaxl� t �'..`� ,��f-•� Ic �, r... i I 7fi1h1y;1?w� ynLts'k;p�melaa� �au;rt,� t'ho reralt)c�re�'s�t Sl;i',:��E la'.�E► ,�9vai� al��'�.; � a �• I 1 ! 1 1 '{ ).L4 �.' r � y4` �yil•��A�1'�! ,�'�.'.t�.� i,%t 11 Ip` � dl; I h',j41 s w I ' �. , � i I Z. L �{ �,r.�� is ��,,, ��; ,�f�� I� ��,�I� il';��,��1��l�f;l1 i��f�lC�r+ �� ;�hl��n►��II�Ili��, "�1I `i`!� �` , I�thEi;tite Will 'hie a, great ;� A,im awtOarO?lVay�Ih 300 aVeragedai1 yt affiE" 3ta"yi�4 3blbyj"� kfl xe�b"�4at')a '� t Ta, 17 jl1,,l B14 u s 0 o9 tho narrow1�)toe t,ti�)_ IAIIh 110 I c)r,gpt ,b�.; shed wal�zNa•y., tyhF;re" 't xir�rlBtSt�►�`1�� Y.......w.l j►.W.•�..R l.rwnr,l,' �..�nl .Mi R..t IIS not eine rr'i]."I. be SrYIr J.«l. Xoo: Wall arae . y S8'.IW:qOa 7y i-hcllt wOre 85 ! X 135 4' • I � � ppp j ' • ��•�er`l, t�a��es for i�,.l�l, o'f' u�6 '(vo'u�� E o� u' � 1 'r,;,, r ,�, ''•1 � � L.z3. eport ment;i.onO this ah ��t+tl 1�,►. I Incvroa:jed Culla Val am.,31 v fiesJeN'x) ,,ig��. o of tYr'L t { �. w �F ic�ul�Uay W and "vilL C a`use Che as:3assa�d. v��yLtl� 16, rtt ��'� . _.r..� ., ., �....�... ...ty pntt_�of iv�rrc u�ndax�,riot �� ,��1 ro) inc'rea'se �� is n,: the l� �r'c��osal Wouldbeams %(; fl rsYk� urb<n.13t cr 'Lri t;;�i s lor3al ,t3`_n there anc"rE cLS1.Tl r).:rea �[irlJ:' Ort,li' taxp_s. -. iw�w>aw�7mrin�®�I,iiir■�Iwlsu:vmoY.onlain�ra.�msauru�q,ncn... of orad fal.►tuaZ y ] ,' g lu 3.nformat,i�azr. ,in i;his SIS:. e 3:^�1)lbrt t,hAt is very ;r egat;:'ive tbwar,O, theprojeCt �„r�at� wl,l ao o:�E itIha��fNitlsdn ,b IhF` .cour7t tlhif �ttfx:rrla,to3:� y`_ sy groups #.1 II pp al ismer ��, rav a Alf t'Orn � e �I p)�a 2� ? 2+Feta ,uc�W; h� ;Pro �as)� n! U,'Inln the Report �._.......� d Actio r:dNr'�;,..�rr��so Rete'�xtion of `the �a�►.d ciin ..r..,,..�....., 2. LI o t s wit1 n the PreOeht 'L � ��.�... oxlin h�yl 3, Vait for other ttulbdivisioris to f1,1,1 up and I �1fs prove �a ruaed for mfare �.a•ts. Study the tigbtf, 1+ AlefI ' 1;rs.v��,usal��HoW'�marrira�.otsta �.nr� out �).�iV �'ew 1tr�.ts are left,, ix1 I)The'� Vil,Uagelr. � c ��nd �.x Calif orni�`a I. ark I I , 1 '1.'hdrik Zrol.l for your inte'f est ghd rpno4;��h� l e ,�4 fl, 1 � � 'r'i,4h �f j'i ,y`'i. ` Tentative parcel Map kP 42--14-96 . Fwd Revxralds ,tll it ` NO7.`IG�+. OVOT"E,ORMINATiON Earl D. Nei Sort, �Lrty+,,1,orY II r yy�pppyyy ' T�roject zocation Front ori Oak Way, 600 feet SVI of izvey. 321 Chia" s1 t� _i 1 , _ SLf Lj Tldo Qh4nn roJ ect Desi!—. pta.on ° �JI s To.; %/ Secretary for: Resources Street, ;\. 980 . 1416 Ni nth Rooni 1311 Sacran►ent'o; CA 5fi1lF CIARIGA'NI�5UN , C.Punty, Clam rte; ';,-..a .�.�,,��Js'� C►uputy; ,jfJ l'yi%u i rk- County of F 25 Cjo'll E:y, e e'er rave 'a` 1;rxy c�oXtftlrti ll;l1.� : e"a," loro :1. o �r;,.�.�� "� >�� #18-11,,00,11rit,v 0ont6r Dr Ve cni 9.LL,96 SUBJtCT: Filing o Notice of netermina,`tion in Compliance with section " '21108 or 211. 2 of they Public Resources Code „ ARD Log 79-12-16- 01 i 0. roj',t,ct TIE .e Tentative parcel Map kP 42--14-96 . Fwd Revxralds tate CleMhouse Number (If submitted to State Clearing House bTlt�ct personTe�.epFionei�um 'or r�r�� Earl D. Nei Sort, �Lrty+,,1,orY T�roject zocation Front ori Oak Way, 600 feet SVI of izvey. 321 Chia" s1 t� _i 1 , _ SLf Lj Tldo Qh4nn roJ ect Desi!—. pta.on ° Creati,xig two r,ux1oeld of 0.8 acre and ;1:.9 aotes, for one additional ree-iii :nce. This is to -1dVi e that the T3iWF-.o Co13.tit,tr Adyx.sary Ageiicy y(Lead A.`ency, ..�.._ has mule ,the following determinations regarding the above -dip -scribed c project f t L Thero'7 eat j % w l have a s �;nificant ��.tfeot ert � _. �the � %% T dil1 not environment ; 2, L7 An trivironmental Impkict Re -port w -as ptWpa od fo;e the u�oJ'0-ct V..npursuant to the `�arov�isions of %'y�'�(7Ei, and was G`ortia fi�t� d�u 1 'required by Section 15085(g) , its Cali ornie Adminis,tr4ti. o Code,, X% A �Tegat.�.ve Docwlatat iot wda ��re a�.ed lot t�'frapro oct ti�suaxt i` j J p , t to the prov1sioiis o� CS? A, A copy alb the°'Nefat ive Declar-ru tion may be o;katAined, at the Env:i'ronmontal Depart moot ,,, i County, taenter Tlriv , Califorid ai', 3. '/ A, Notiiq of Exeraptioti was f .lod it dlcatit,e; \ h18', ect is or5 I r 79-12-16r.01 XIX. OiSCUSSxON OP 8WtUONM9NV'TA"u BOLUATION Profeat `,Description` n ; "ype of Projeot ,,entative Parcel Map.,,1 33v .ef Desgrip't,ion ``,Band division eVeatItS two parcels of ,r acre and 1.9 acre, for one additionAa residence, ` j w) Location: Both proposed parcels; froxtt dxl Oak Way, 500 feet S�.'�e �s 10 SW of Highway 32, Chico. ldated 16 mile east of i Lindo Channel Method of Sewage -Disposal.- Individual. 04 Site 00 '16 leach fields Source of Water Supply: Wells.' CWWo. 1'.Lae�x propoaed, to be 'r} e:xto4ded into area to serve aj)�roved Oubdivisians. Proximity of Zj: es: Adjacent. Potentialfo"v further land divisions and development: Parcel #2 can be further divided into 4-•6 par6el.s. (Good soil. cspability) .Environmental. Setti a. Soils: Vswell Loam, a priw, 4 Class I-11 soil of loam. or;,If�Ae' sandy loam, e with adequate surface and sub"outf , o w' Surfaaa� Water: None it ',mmediate area Vegetation: Open field, bounded by Orchards and opens Butte County General Plan designation: Transitional az ��,between f Medium density and Low density Residential". � r'`_ LxistingZoning: S-P: Existing Land Use on6-site;. One single-fAinil.y residence. Ntajoj ii�ty of site is ,1sndovolope.d .open lan(I - previous agricultural U0 Surrounding Area: Land 'Uses: Orchard6, dispersed rural ro,sidences along`'(? approved subdivisions to south, commercial along Reay. Zoning. S-B.. (A-SR south of Oak Way ^, 0-2 at bald Way arad Ny. 32). Gen. Plan d.esignat ons Medium Density ' lesidential to east. Low Density Residential to west. (Chico G.P. ._ Low Density Re4idential'Agriculture adjacent on west) Parcel Innes: arioua y4 acre to 10+ acres. Pop'utation:'In immediate area, rural densities. Character o,t Site and Area: Developing., transitional ares of Chico LTi^baii Atea ,t `� ppp6ndix V -page' 9 of 9 44 DISOUSSION Or' EMI,044CTA,L 4Vl�TJ��UN,, x'he following issues have been id,ontifLed. as areas of special. concern a.z� the a�'nl�.can°L s �.o osr��. applicant � � proposal p (wh Lah will. allow development _ Of one new residence),,, 1. Surface drainage may be diXficult to readily aceomm,oda°Gb (Lindo Channel located 1� xilq to northwest) Butte County Public Works Department will require a drainage solut'On for parce-.s Z�rtaer throe acres. I 2: Compatibility of additional residential use in a l ocali`L-y Of 0%,8ting agra.c ultj&aj uses 3. Location og access driveway on a curve of Oak "vJay, eeulting in spme restricted eight distance. a These concerns as well- as al.l o a��o t4 !J� .LI1.Ltii.l.A�lc�.1:r .�. �., ��s.i.f ri� U , r�`,1 �14it ex� U.4 iw.. ♦:,€7.�; 4.€., W hi �i..�.�'6 U %.:+.� J, ,i .re not expectsd to result ' , , in sup`stantial elXect;, (even upon furthw dvision of the proper�tiy and additional ro,�iaenuial 1,16e). Consideringthe low density of u' se pr, r,posed, the exp F't ng land use planning for `the area, and tb.e ex st lag disperses. rural residen°t'al land use pattern in she a�e�z, this project should have minimal effect on the area.. llowever the access nmaybe o important consideration in design actual drivewayaUae ? AppondiX - pt-4ga ,qa e�f. t: