Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-090-028'Q a '. S. � Y '� �' �• 'ti. •_ ►_. ° , � , � ,s .'P• � � ;. 8 � . � a i, � — . � '�' � � b�' o , ,� •gyp' ' 1 ,� � � •t•� �. • �. • i 5 _. i . a' - • - � ° � •� _ •o - � � � e •� 0 � r • a •r � � � . . i, .n. • « . OWNER Same PROJECT D= - e ► Ttlntat; �rA U„-,,.� u , __ ... •, e domB of i ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-09Y28 -- ZONING Cwt GEN, PLAN_ Commercial ._._: PROJECT CONSISTENT?_ DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 5/21/85 —__Eng _.; NorthStar Ent: '177 DATE PUBLICATION NOVICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED - 0. C. P. G. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL= -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN' ` MAILED NUMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTOPIS REPORT PREPARED ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED DETERMINATION ..�. AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED lZ 77-, MITIGATED NEGATIVE bECLARA'i'ION DATEADOPTED ENV, IMPACT REPORT W DATE CERTIFIED SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING WE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD ACT.:CN a -Mildred Fletcher, AP 42-09-28 on the north side of IIw Revised Tentative p intersection ►with Kenned. 32 aroel MaA►4 parols y Ave„ approx. 1200 ft. west of its HEARING 'OPEN area,. NorthStar Engineering Mark Adams was to 2 parcels Present. Since the ma p has Also many of the Public GJorlcs condbtionseen �hareenofrom 4 the condition to meet Fzre De Parcels mitigation measure. Ft• requirements, t appropriate, 4 arements, is covered by a Iv1r. Streeter said that;. the so it will r said that Fee will be double the fee Per lot. (On the Fire Dept. for residential, Mr. Mendonsa said Miti.gation.) concern is that condition #13 could be covered. Also, it Should 3 be deleted property, and a note on noted that since that school impact fees; the final map might clot be needed commercial. Mr. Streeter said that regarding There could the G-2 zone allows dwellings with be apt�rtments, for instance. out a "SO se pei snit; It as agreed eed to leave theChiCa school Mr.. Adams asked condi.tion as is. abou,� ,, the requirement to meet Cal Fran. Mr. Mendonsn said it needs to s requirement,, be Pu,r`cel 2 may q a Permit from �al on the map that entrance to y re uare Mr. Adams thought it would be Trans. obviotts, but the condition is okay. Mr.l�eid said that that the details were when the. Nitrate A to the 4t not worked out Actio .Plan rues started, all h iJealth Dept. conditxonso there wall be addition recordation of required waiver as followuc t� lonal wording °f antexatiry. incl.udi.ng the Fii3ARl'N'G CLOSFD n protest agreement.►t Nr, Reid stated., having reviewed the Meetingenvironmental review checklist and conVersat" and the planningb � h motion to adopt irecto.r s Report of >, ions at for the MildredpFl.etcher aced August 1, 1�3t35 x this t1litig' negative declaration of will make AP 42-.()r-28 finding negative ma env�rcnmenWi ectmpt e but w g that the ro. p revised ma.P, to create 2 ill not have a signiFi.cnnt effet~Loindehaseca . Parcels on miti P an eifeet cin the environment %a f 1 on mrrasurr< is listed within the .�'l.anhino Director, Wi h se provider! the re The $75 g erector The mitegation measure gaited fee to be changed s Report with the is #1 as The Motion is g to $150 fee as agreed following County Cr-nerAl.ml�Znn 7ndnOtinDutta Count t,o by the g correctiottr b that the project is ahplicaiit: Further Move to a in conformance wi.t:h the ?3 PFr't�r e the Y oniog, Fiavi,ng found the above, lutti and finding in pI i4llohottbe�r3etrir�ieo welfare r,pgehcet n yroval the followi.t�g conriti.ans, cotni,l zed U'i th; peri l e +at' ui.. e CotrtiL _ n tel to the health i Safety or y provider, + he requital condition, are nCJTT CbCiNTY M;V�fi0l{� iu�r K u: il'.ie✓x Lf�e:a .Y.�+�.i7G:�a 1 r:.��f ,. .,.. Public Works conditions: 1. deed to the County of Butte 40 ft. right-of-way from the centerline of Highway 32. 2• Indicate a aS ft. building setback from the centerline of (Iwy. 32. 3. Show all easements of record on the .final map,, 4. Provide permanent solution for drainage. I- pay off any assessments. 6. pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. is Meet the requirements of Butte County Ordinance 2463 and Resolution 35-40 regarding Chico Unified school District impact fees. COnstrurtion of entrance to .Parcel 2 will rera Ltire encroachment permit from Cal Trans. Ifoalt.hTlepL conditions: 9, provide an area for wells and 100 ft, l.eachfield free setback around Lhose area8 on parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4. Mi Provide a 100 Et. l.eachfield free setback around existing wells tither within the property or within 100 ft. of the property boundaries. 3 3 , Plare a note on the ma that sL.ates 'r p � parcel development will require the provision of sewage disposal, area in compliance with Butte County requirements," !2, t"omply with the requirements of the Buttc County Nitrate Action Plan, including; tho recordation of required waiver of atrnexation prr)Lest ngruhmOht, Tho jolit)wi;nr mitipatian measure is required: Pay $150,110 per lot into the (lest Chien f'i.re Station Pund, ,"Motion seconded by Mr. Stredr,Pr and carried unanimously, bOTTE COUN2'Y ADVI80RY AOtOC'Y" uINtlip r- {� NO -OCR Off' :D:SrrIEnM=NA9X0)N MO Office of Planning and Resch � � �o Butte County 1400 Tenth Street, Room 1.2 Planning Dol)a��tment Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive or DEC 2 3 10 oroville, Cit 95965 XXX County Clerk County of Butte GLEANR M. BECKER., Cou iy Clerk S'U']3.JECT Filing of Notice. of B4te�.`mi';C" i in compe x nce with Section .21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP # Name Tentative Parcel Map 42-09-28 Mildred Fletcher State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (.if submitted to Clearinghouse) John rMendonsae Public Works 534-4266 Project Location On the north :side of Highway 32, approximately 1200 feet west of its intersection with Kennedy Avenue, Chico area. Project Description ..•: Tentative Parcel Map dividing 4.7 acres to create parcels, 1 of 1.85 acres and -1 of 2.85 acres. This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Ardency (Lead Agency or Resonsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on _ 12 -22 -ST and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will,_w11 not, have a significant effect on the environment 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for -his project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3; Mitigation measures „were, were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4 A statement of overriding conside 'atyons was, was not, a,' � xted for this project. This is to certify that the final ESR with comments and responses and record of project approval, is available to the general publi i hJ- li. r, Mildred Fletcher Mitigation Measures TPM, AP#42-09-2$ s 1. pay $150.00 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station Fund. 11 Butte _i, Court t4- 6. ri�,Ir +aY �k �� li1,r� 1 `Fa j, 11➢ lIiS'�3f� "s`' -. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC: WORKS WILLIAM (6111) C JJt-: r, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephnne;(916) 539,4681 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Director Buffo eo, P1Anning CocnrM DEC ? 5 1986 December 22, 1986 OrO416, cafifo , Mildred Flet her RE; AP 42-09»28 1639 Upland Drive Tent:ativa Peecel Map Yuba City, CA 95991 Dear Ms, Fletcher: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on December 22, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration of environmental impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions of approval listed on the attached sheet. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency -'s approval= --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this fiction will be final. When the conditions approval are complied with, it will be in order for you to file your final map" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty --four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, Tf you have any questions regarding this matter, please cont:o t this Office:. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works , In Mendonsa i,stant Director M/ds cc Leanning Department Environmental Health Del)ar,tment North,5ta;t thgineer; ng J Mildred Fletcher, AP 42-09-28, Revised Tentative ParcelMap,4 parcels on the north side of Hwy. 32, approx. 1200 ft. west of its intersection with Kennedy Ave, Chico area, NorthStar Engineering Public Works conditions: 1. Deed to the County of Butte 40 ft. right—of—way from the centerline of Highway 32, 2. Indicate a 55 ft. building setback from the centerline of Hwy, 32, 3. Show all easements of record on the final map; 4. Provide permanent solution for drainage. 5— Pay off any assessments. h. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 7. Meet the requirements of Butte County Ordinance 2463 and Resolution 85--40 regarding Chaco Unified School District impact fees. 8. Construction of entrance to parcel will require encroachment permit from Cal Trans. Health Dept. condtionsi 5. Provide an area for wells and 100 ft. leachfield free setback around those areas on parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4. 10. Provide a 100 ft. leachfi.eld free setback around existing wells either within the property or within 100 .ft of the Property- boundaries. 11. Place a note on the map that states "parcel .development will require Oe provision of sewage dispos-3l. ar County requirements," ea in compliance with Butte 1.2. Comply with the requirements of the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan, including; the recordation of required waiver of annexation protest agreement. The following mitigation measure is required: 13• posy $150.00 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station Fund, 0 Inter -Departmental Memorandum To: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM, Planning Director SU13JEcT: REPORT ON TPM OF MILDRED FLETCHER ON AP#42--09-28 1)ATE: December 8, 1986 This is a proposal to divide 4.7 acnes to create two parcels at 1.85 acres and 2.85 acres. The present zoning is C--2. The Lana Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Commercial. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal duos not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County Genaral Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. This project is a revised map of a previous approval for four lots on the same property. Additional development on the west side of Chico will have a significant adverse effect on fire protection in the area. This current project should not be approved unless an tIR is prepared or suitable mitigation measures are adopted. The Butte County Fire Department has determined that it would cost approximately $75.00 per lot to provide adequate fire protection, including the building of a new fire station. The applicant proposed the mitigation measure below as part of the previous approval in 1985. If the mitigation measure is again, proposed, then approval of the project is recommended. 1. Pay �'A. d per lot into the gest Chico Fire Station Fund. DRH jmc cot. Mildred Pletcher �I NorthStar Engineering _r r COUNTY 01 i T'lly t.NviiiONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ,,to e complete y Lea Agency) Log al 85�q - 21-01 AP It A2 -09-2g t: BACKGROUN 1. Name o f. prt N1il oponenclredletclier �lic�rltJ.6)+: 2, Address o,f p1'eponent and representative (if apl Iddresed P"'OP �icr NorthSta_x.. EnC.t}t� Sunbe Connors ._C1 _,.Sit I .......... Land Div: -s ion: Project clescrxptxon� a Y ; MANDATORY V NDING.S OF SIGNIF;ICANC}a Yl -8 ItAYB� rv" ►t Does the project have the potential bstantial,�ygreduce rade � quality of the environment,eci the shhabitatdo a fish.POPU0tionito1dropfe pbelow�selfse �► levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or sustaining reduce the number or restrict the animal. community, dant or animal or Val of a rare or endangered. 1 periods eliminate important ex', prehles ©stormajor y? or California history or 1. b, hoes fire 'rneneC tsvtotile thetydetriment ofachieve l,ong,t 'rm, short-term b act an the environmental goals? (A short term lre environment :i ► one iv}iich occurs term impactsew 11 brief' POTiod of time Labile :Lona endure into the future.) si _ c, Does the project have m} ,Acis which are andi,vidu cu�nu'latively consideyab , CA ally limited, but i5roject' may impact on ttao pr more separate resources ivel;,� where the impart theeeffeet of tileCIA reSOUTC0 xtotal.aof those small , but i , i ficant,) - impacts on the. environment is sll,ri c1. Does the p'rojr�'t }ittve environmental effects which will r4tuse ut►i�etallavei adverse effects on human. elthrr ciiicctl)' oi° indirectly? °,AvIoN C'ro he c'omj)l 'te(l by the 1,ead Agent k'1 Oilthy. basis ofi this initial evaluation! i W1= ct fiend the 111'oposed p�r(Iject CC7111:D NOT have a sLi;liieiPrelaTcd- f ....�,ctn the environment, and r► '�(1±t1A'CTVI; Dl.(:},AItA'l'1ON wi 11 be p1`ep yni.Cr• 1�1V1: find that ►�lfiitc:►gh the proposed Projoct could have a axe, effect on the eneca°seethe �11TTGATION NMASUM S dethere Alill not be scribednon r:fl`ert in r1i'Ks cast, b t project. . A NhC�AT1Vh the attach +,l shoet have i* n dderl to the p j piiC1.ARA'fTON Will lie prepa.w ed . i/ IVli ri.ncl tiie proposed project D}A1' have it sl.}rti�itant effect on fife rnvtronment, and an p,NVil>ON�11NlAl., 11vti�ACT itli1011'1' is recluii-G C't�liN`I"�' C7t` ilU ►», i�GANN C M-PARTMIIN`1` � Planner hy;w V r . -iron�.mL1� , A88-Oc .atO Ikcvi,e�qcd by; i -be'+ answers are required Inc, ENVIRONMENTAL IMP�CiSf,yes" and "maY �p anations o YES MAYS. NO on attached sheet(s) ra oral result in significant; 1. EARTH. Will the p P es in a;—""�lnstable earth conditions or in Chang geologic substructures? compaction or t10 Is , displacements , , b. overing of the soil? overc • �, car ground surface f. c, Change in ,,opographY r. relief features' nr modification of any �( d. Destruction, covering. unique geologic or physical feat ures?� e. increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off-site`? beach f, Changes in deposition or eros"ondepositi.an sands, or changes in siltation) channel of or erosion which may modify river or stream ox_the bed of the ocean Or X a ri any bay;, inlet or lake? oductive soils G„ `Loss of prime agriculturally PT g. outside designated urban areas? geologic to g he Exposure of peop e or property landslides, mud- , hazards such as earthquakes, Slides, ground failure or similar hazards? Z, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial; Air einissioals or deterioration of ambient is a' uality"r X air q -actionable Odors) smoke b The creation � of ab .�» or fumes? c. Alteration. of air a,ochmngeiinoclimate�ar temperatur, or any - locally or regionally. f result in substantial 3. WATER, Will the proposal or the course Or —Y'.7—Changes in currents, either' direction of water movements in marine or fresh waters? drainage Pat.terns,X- b. Changes in absorptiull rates; to and. amounce drainagerimprove- . un c. Needifor off-b t., vegetation removal, Channel or u'� S inc luding ve g . z ,.. meats ,....�.,: ization or culvert Lnstal.l,atiOn? �- d. Alterations to the course ax flow of flood Waters? e , ;hang e inthe amount of surface .Water in any water body? or in any f� Discharge into surface watersUality, including alteration of surface water dissolved but n,at limited to temperature, azyg en or turbidity? g>, Alteration of the direction ar rate of flow � :�—• of ground waters? of ground waters, e ia the quantity ox tvi.th h. Chang . either through direct additions Y ar through bit of an drawals cuts or exoavrati.ons? aquifer by f water�otherwisei ..._:_ i. deduction in theblicunt water supptpewarer available for P ea 1e o` property E posura of p p flooding related hatardr such, as 7 ''_' 4, PLANT` LIFE. YES Will t'1e NO proposal result a h substGas ge' in the iversi ty of sp::c '�zrl-, ;' al es ar numbs �f any species of plants (including trees, shxubs , grass, crops, and aquatic plants) ? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, or rato endangered species of Plants? c. Introduction of new specie ecies of pt an area, or in a barrier to the _ normalrepl�ni ment of existinb species? P sh' d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural ural p? Su 4NI14AL LIFE. Will. the Proposal -result in substantial: a• C ange in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rareor endangered species of animals? c• Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. ,Deterioration. to existing fish or Wildlife `x 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial !-7—Increases in existing nt�al' '— x noise levels? bi E-%posur9 of people to severe noise levels? --. 7; L;i.GIiT AND G'.ARE. Will the proposal produce s g iFic`ant light and glare? 8. LAND UElj': Will the proposal result in a su stantial. alteration of the presept land use of an ares.? or Planned 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in s sFa Tlt�fJ.�.f a. Increase in. the rate of use of any natural resources? b. D�iletion of any non-renewable natural: —y resources? 10. RISK OF UPSETthe . {Vi 11 RISK proposal involve; A is—off eXplosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but . not limited to oil, Pesticides, cheiidcals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset Cndit ions? b. Possible interferetace onditncy tido an c response plan or c emergency evacuation plan? 11. pOpULATION.-- Will the proposal alter the location, dIs Tr_ I* on densit >', or. --c�. Population? growth rate of the human 1 ):, HOUSING, i at Will the Proposal. affect existing housing, T'es, e a aemand for - . additional housing? , 1 ; _ L3- -G- YES MAYBE 'No 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Will the proposal �~ resu t in. a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new paiking? c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? 3C f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles ' bicyclists or pedestrians'? �( 1.4. PUBLIC SERVICE,,Z. Will the proposal have an effect -upon-, or result in a -need AFor net, or altered, governmental services: a. Fixe protection? .), Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? Xe- Cce. e.fi4aintenance of public facilities, including roads? XG f. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in 'apse of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? - 16, UTILIMS. Will the propsal result in a _need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following, a. Power or natural gds? b, Communications syszoms? k c. Water availability: x C- d, d, Sewer or septic tank? k e. Storm wator drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal': 17. HUMAN HEALTH, Will the proposal result in. a. creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? c.. b, Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. A STHETTCS, Will the proposal r:sult in the Jbsstructinn of any scenic vista or view open to the puiiic, or will the proposal result in the creaiion of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? -G- e YES MAYBE NO 19, RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20: CULTURAL RESOURCES a. Will e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological: site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or objact? X C. noes the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposaj restrict existing religious `— or sacred uses within the potential impact area? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION, AP 42-09-2 See attached. } r 1 AP 42-09-28 Depending on the ultimate use Of the p"vcm1q, significant overcoveVing of the coil could occqr. This nonld load to an increase in stormwater drainage and both on or Of -site erosion. Butte County Department Of Public Works standards for commorcial improvements include a requirement for a permanent onlution to drainage, and as such any drainage problems would be solved at the time of actual construction of commercial buildings. Single-family residential uses, though not likely in this area, would not overcover as much soil and would not create a significant drainage problem. lgl4d; TKv subject property is currently approximately 40% developed as mini -storage. The remaining 60% is the site of an old orchard. The subject property is planned for commercial development and znned accordingly, And conversion of this land to commercial uses Will not represent a significant loss of agricultural soils or crop acrosgs, 1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII. The subject property is located approximately 6 mile, southwest of the Tuscan MahOul0t, a fault system of unknown activity. Construction of buildings to Wofform Building Code standards for swismical ly active areas will provide Adequate protOCtibn to 00CUPaUts in came of seismic activity. Q Commercial -related hoist and light may increase dependimg on tho typo of development on the site. Noise levels are currently high doe to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks and Highway- Z2 Which are Adjacent to the subject property* People working no site oe nearby may he exposed to severe noise lovols. 10114a,16ct Lack of community water facilities in the ares inhibits fire protection available. Potential fire hatards are greater with commercial uses due to the Korage and Use of inflammables and other hazardous materials on site, depending of the type of busitozoes ostahlishod. Future commercial uses on site May make it mocossary to extend California Water Service Company limbs to the subject property, The California Department of Forestry does not o0ei,ate a fire ztatioo wont of the railroad tracks on Highway 12. Freouent train tra+V" impairs COY's ability to respond to firms in a timely manner. At o result, an area ON b0heKt for the purchase of zi half -acre Kre station situ and building went of the Southern Pacific Railroad trays has boom identified* The applicant must moot the loqQiremonte if the California Department of Forestry. Wattift AvOtional traffic, especially truck traffic, Will be generated Y widitional commercial deveUpmont On the QW Highway 32 in this lwatiOn in a high traffic area with few facilities for pedestrians n- bicycles. Heavy truck traffic generated may increase the doturibooliom of the road s"Ofanos On Highway 32. The Applicant should consult with the California Apartment of TOaM5POVtQiOM to OXplorl MKKOdt Of Mitiqltihg potontiAl traffic impacts, 14bjq8jV hough not %ighthtl0ty this project will represent an incremental martato in doolmd for public services. IX'b,c The prosect has the potential to impact the environment in terms of increased traffic generation and safety hazards, increased stormpoater drainage and related erosion and siltation, and dale to inadequate fire protection for properties west of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. It isrecommended that the applicant contact the State Department of Transportation regarding mitigation measures related to traffic on Highway 12 impacts, the Califfam-ia Department 'af Forestry for fire hydrant requirements and/or payment into the -fire station fund, and the Department of Public Works regarding drainage facilities for commercial development. .�f (p Applicant: Mildred Fletcher A - Assessor's Parcel 4 42-(" )9 -'-:Ie Log # SS -05-21-01 lo Typo of Project: Tentative parcol map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 4.7 acres to Create i-OUI- parcels of 0.87 acreo 0.87 acre, 0.85 acre, and 2.01 Acres. 3* Location; On the northeast side of State Highway :32, approximately 1200 feet West of Kennedy Avenuej Chico areao 4. Proposed Density of Development-. 1.15 units per acre. 5. Amount of Impervious SQr+c'%cingt Potentially near 100%. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on State Highway :32. 7. Method of Sewage Dispozalt Individual septi,c systems. G. Source of Water Supply; Individual wells. 9. Proximity of Power Li ties; To property. 10. Potential for furthG, land divisions And development-. Considerable under the existing commercial zoning, 1. Terrain ao Benoral Topographic Character: Platvalley land, b. Slapes. 0-2%. a. Elevation: 165 -feet above sea level. do Limiting 1 --actors.- None. 2. Soils a. Types and Characteristics t Vina and rarwell Fine $Andy Loams generally well drained with good permeability. bi Limiting rActorst Nane , 3. Natural Hazards of the Land ao EarthoUa400 Zone: Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone Vjjjj b. tF.r05ibn Potential: Slight; c, Landslide Potontialt Nome. do rire Hazard: UhrClasSi+iOdo ok Expansive Soil Potential: Low. 4. Hyde,ology a, Surface Water: Nomo on site. b. Ground Water-; Abundant valley aquifers. c, Drainage Characteristics,. Property drains to the northwest along Highway Z2 towards Mud Crook. do Annual lRaih+All (normal)'. 20-22,11. e,. Limiting Fattoi,,sr, Limited storm drainage -Pacilitio-s in the AroaA So Visual/sconic Oluality. Madmimate. 6. Acoustic Dualityt Li;iited duo to Highway 2 trafT.Jr- And the Southern Pacific Railroad tracl-ts to the hortheast. 7. Air OQ41itYg 000di except during periods of agricultural burning. � _~ ' piq�ogicaj._==�=+=�~~___ ' land and other 8° u--eta6icm: Generally valley orchard ~ sgricultural mgesi�n -t�he'area. 9wWildlifp Habitati Small birds and animals common to Y0110y L E --n 10. Archaeological d Historical Resources In the area: Low sensitivity area. 11. outto County General Plan designation: Commercial. 12. Existing Zoning; C-2. (orchard remnant). Surrounding Area: a Land Uses". ���m rozo^�-=w/"-=y.^�u~tu^_~ -___ along � ~ -- �2 residential and - Land side of State Highway , r _ northeast"agricultural uses -10--n'Q the s outhw%est side of State "inhway 32" Generally ~ric"1cra1 and, rural residential outharn Pacific Railroad uses to the northeast of the Sor tracks bordering the subject pythe northwest b~ Zing: A~5 to the northeast" C-2 to ] southeast and southwest" c^ Gen. Plan designations: Orchard and Field Crops to he northeast, Commercial to the northwest, southwest and southeast. l 5 cre parcels to the northm�a�t, z1 Parcel E3i�e�: Generally -a ^ -�� the southwest and southeast, 1/2- to 2=acr* parcels w` 4^25 acres to 10 -acre parcels to the northwest, io Rural ral!re�identiel densities. 15.. Character u Sitean _ _� r�pw���f "�d Ar�a� Des/elopingstrip�� ���p commercial along State Highway 32. 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico~ ' Of Ihf14en�e� �h��o^ i�7. Relevant � h es o ' ` Standards 6a��f�s Urbam Ares\t Yes, - i8" Improvements em ~ 0° Fire Protection Service� �ati Fire�"�'Road�oha��t �ad a" Nearest County (State) ~` Station #421 and Fair Street Station 444" � b. Water Apai1abiI1 yx Flro tenkers and wells only. 20*° Schools°= in Area: Chico Unified School District" 9 APPENDIX H NOTICE of ®i TMMINA ION POSTED' SES' 6- 1985 REMOVE; w 1585 To: office of Planting and Research FROM: Planning Department 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, CA 95965 .d county Clerk un t: County 'of Butte Dor SuWECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 2AS604-2185 Jt of the Public Resources Code. EL EAlv, � CCCKER, Co` . ty Clerk )ale AP 4- 0 9- 2 8 Name ct itF Mildred Fletcher Tentative prcel Mar `Siite C i=- ingT use Num e6 x contact arson Telephone Humber (if submitted to Clearinghouse) Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4266 Pro act Location On the north side of Highway 3,2, approximately 1200 deet west of its intersection with Kennedy Avenue, Chico aroa. �o y.t;.t Description Tentative Parcel Mar dividing 4i7 acres to create four parcei.s, 0:87 acre, 0.87 acre, 0.85 acre, and 2.01 acres. This is to advise that the Butte County A,...:...... ...w L�cnnnei lwAe1AlRhV. has approved tl* above described project a regarding the, above described project: The project _ will, ,Y will not$ have a significant effect on the environment. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuint to the provisions of C1rQAe 30 4e i1nations A Negative D416arat on was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The P-51, or Negative Declamation and rocord of project approval may be examined at: Butte County planning Dapartment Mitigation measures _. were, �._.. were maty made a condition of the approval of the projec:t. Meet the reeommendatibns �)f Butte County Fire Department regarding paymeni� into West Chico Pare. , a'`�,on site fund for commercial rots, A statement of overriding Considerati re ",,vat, was nofi, adopted for this project. Date Received for Filing ,,;,-,9,15, ..•,.., sTgntt e Stephen A. Streeter Senior PlAhter it C toy4 "' Revised januat Y 1995 4 4