Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-340-040'low �=77777-77, 7777�, ll�, Cy, 6A iy "41 J, fx ol� YA t i 5i I :7 tl, Pit l�v It et �7 lye' It j,d 4w 'ALI IIP 12 �P -F JI- - 1� I , III R AT, It, 00% PIP, . I I 1.� - i" , - , "I I � ZAMMMI&C,. -C MMg, , 115 for co z1a, f �6 'C F 8 3 FLMNNING CObZ1ISS10W SM51ATM SHEET r APPLICANT MC CAIN AS S � Ci� TES ADDRESSr 555 East Avenue Chico aINER Walter Kalb x 'HYPE OF AP LICINTION-. Request variamce to parcel size LOCATION. -East side of Bay (Cussick) Ave., approx . Zt/ 4 maile north of Shasta AVe. , AP 42-34-40 PRESENT, XONINGe; S- DATE APPLICATION RECEMD.- BATE. 1VOTICES MAILEDFeb 26 NUMBER: 14 PDIRRS SENT OUT- POSTING :joTiCE 2/22 FIRST -HEARING: March 7, 197 SECOND HEARING;, ADDITI'ONALL, HEAR4GS. %ONING PETITION SIGNATURES PERCENTAGE.- COMMISSION ERCENTAGE:COMMISSION ACTION: Y BOARD ACTION; ORDINANCE ADOPTED: APPLICATION. FOR LAND: _ E PERMIT, VARIANCEor ZO Butte County Planning- ComWission � File No ter' I€ 7 N Date filed Hearing,:date Action by Planning Commission Action by Boardof Supervisors PRESENT ZONING:_. Assessor Map Book 42 Page No. 34_ Parcel No. t� / f REOtJEST- a� tcs P', APPLICANT'S NAME: �ca� SScfGY PHONE: ADDRESS:", 6Os STATUS OF APPLICANT'S MTEREST 1N 'PROPERTY: OWNER'S NAME: y er-- PHONE: — 80& ADDRESS: rr 49.E L J C 0 F r DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 44 �x F EXPLAIN' FULLY REASON FOR 'SKCIAL. USE'. ✓d t z Ain a7 a g: The above statementsare certified by the undersigned to be correct. i1 Signature of Applicant NOTE: Please submit herewith a check or money order in the amount -shown below, payable to County of Butler also ,a H detailed' plot plan showing the location of existing and proposed structures on your property and on the adjacent properties. �', n 8y Receipt No. F_ �:d..:�- a- �o v&-*--`ia 1-'e thi-k- f,,*Ou..rty at i"�UII'Ice af. r .- e.-, I... g _ i _. - cw !,e E w a ' I -m gg l s rcaq p- _ e -� � . - '��s aid :�rtx.6 $F L�_a�. ��. .s,.. y.. S,:. w. � .e+�A_a,,.., o Tr "V4a a fee af $ J Jlg x the Kinmtea.. -.-- »..�... _ 'r -:• E.x.'t"� 3 ..--, r a y .< t. w .+.-a.,`. -.,+c _ F �: y, r. - w . - �s#vim 4 .ls and <a�. of F��"x ?� ±,. # -,r $' tlh .,,.��s'.�Y.q�-x. >..��3��.'c.�''+t�.�ak HI��, ".. $., his i.��'» d �'T � �1�, �• i�d` .a -'T �r 9R� a 9-AIIMIF tsz-fasa.:'Masx. 1 w0c l panic s� tate ency,; pr. TU or r fi-,piu (^c-at3o.��TA-,AT max., jue ped) X44—vi 1,M-Aft-A::k-o of Y r#'aL.". _+ci c mai '.3�_a..-+.w�ac•__.'J•_:=.TaP.,.--.-__�+ueApy�.sw��i..t.y�' t:£c3 r-`a..q .a : a. ',-„�e � dot the i�� � �� � '�i:�.�.+� tom. veil the OT IN : 3 :sn.-c—fliV.V ��-a..W ..o+}frft�.�� /1 1Y>:-t,+nywr...re._=._.�... .ca. AF 40 K -� - _ . i-•-riG �,. 4 SPY �� .: ea �� //yy /'� � .�fj.�J] < _ ____si �.�,4f+vs>c�.r,�_... _ a.«.w .c♦ _ at n a. Y e:i ... � r -s .. - a � «.-r}�.'�-:_> ✓ -^ � -..sav-a-mm< s�C �a.c s-»�t a.'+as,rt+. .�3e-'.sacs i. _..# _ -. _ Fe.-.>a- _ �.>i. r=+Sns' Lq 'G �_el�> •�.� § -� F� S �� Y . - €5 ✓r- �. a -.e -=-..s mss_ .mss - war._ �uu.c��<��:i 4 � _ _ _ _ _ _ -�,a.. `�i.t� �' �- _ --C!' y ca- Ss S�-A, .��.R ��4-�"�3:„. : m . - � a.€y3� if�:i 6"'�>'Y �Yy +r �.q 4.��i �}+z }4 y./-iYe 4tl aS •�`A��.'�. ��� -w4.� C Z��+.-`..:✓ I�y1.0 iRE =:S �� i5l� _��•�iY y�iw i�iy�,=. #O(-ac.£c _. .< ._s -_ APPENDIX D N%G%TIVE DECLARAMON' REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL !MPACT 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental Review Committee of the County of Butte has reviewed: the project described below pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 19x0 {Public Resources Code Sections 21.1.00, et seq.),:and determined that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An environmental impact report will not be re- quired. AR 42-34-40 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Variance to lot Size allow 4 lots as small as 0:879 ac. in an S-2 gone F L E which has l aC. Mini'mUP] I s`7ej located on the `t 111974 east side c,f Cussicis XfBay)C.AtZ:Ap t CN,Co,n Ck Ave. , approx_ .68 mi . 14 of Shasta Ave... Chico. � G Avg 3. WME. AND ADDRESS ()FLPROJECT APPIICAiNT: McCain Associ at.es 555 East Avenue Chico Gal iforni.a 95926 4. A copy of the Environmental Review Committee's determination regarding the environmental effect of this protect is available for public inspection at the Butte County 21anring Department, 7 County Center Drive:, Oroville, Cal- ifornia. Copies thereof will be -provided to, any person upon payment by flim of afee of $1„0C for the first page and, Y.50 for each additional page. 5. Any person wishing to contest this Negative Declaration may file a written protest specifying the reasons therefor.. Such written protest shale by filed with the Butte County Planning Commission at the Planning Department office within fifteen (15) days from the date this negative Declaration was filed with the County Clerk. If a written' protest is timely filed, s hearing, regarding the NegativeDeclarationwill be held 'by the Planning Commission- Objections may be presented'eitrer orally or in wrifiing at the hearing. 6.. If no written protest is timely filed regarding this .Negative Declaration, the application for the project may be approved without hearing regarding: the Negative Declaration,: ENVIRONMENTAL !REVIEW COMisITTEE DATE B1 1974L By, Laurence d,ayson F1NDINuS McCainAssociates yar?a•,;n 7Z}� S17P Type of Project Applicant's Name 555 East Avenue -AP 412-3 40 Location or tercel No. Address: Chi co, CA 95926 _ 2/1.174 Date Received -- YES i NO l,. the project have Elie potential to degrade the quality of ,Does the environment or curtail the range of the environment (narrow the range of beneficial uses, of the erAvironment:') 2. Will, the project cause impacts which achieve short-terM, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure will into the future. ` 3. Could the project cause impacts which are individually limited; but c umttlat iVely considerable? A project may impact on two or umulatte more resources where ;.ire impact on each resource is relatively small- If the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant, an vIR must be prepared. 'phis finding does not apply to two or more separate projects where the impact of each is i:nsignizic�--it. Could the environmental effects of the project cause subs,an- tial adverse effe'ts on human beings, either direct€y or indirectly? DTER: If any of the, above four .findings questions are answer -ed +=YDS", the project will be sound to have a signif -icant effect on the environment: DETEEi2MINA4 I0 This project will not have a Sig;.iicent effect on the environment_ A Ilegative Declaration should be prep=ped, (Mould not reflect any change in land use or density.) Tl-Ai.s, project could have a significant effect on the environments An FIR is required. ENVIRONMENTAL VvIEW CoMmITTEE i3ae��7 by LavJrenc= 2/1/`74 MC CAIN ASSOCIATES AP 42-34-40 AIMbk t�ETEItMiAC�iT'I.O�i RE SIGNIFI-( ,�gaPENDIY G McCain Associates 555 Ear Aven a Chi Applicants -5 Name and ,.�ar� n AP 42-34-40 c 1/14 Kari an.ce to lot size late Received No. Of Project Location or parcel v%ronmental impact repot;. is required for any project which may have An the environment. Effects a Sig- include � nifican - effect {sttbs�:ane so - both primary and secondary nater.. both p- environmental consegtlBnc - of u�delines to deckle vnether to make a The following questions shall be used .as guidelines -s unknown, report. jIf $i1S6FEr i ` negative declaration Car an, enVirOnme7tai impact write +,Unknown" in yesino column.) CHECWST YES Nt3 significantly ciange prese1. nt rases of the Gould the project area? See Notes.) project significantly conflict: with the Butte Cour 2 Does tht-, Project General Plan or any element thereof? Could theojest affect the use of a recreational areae r . (See Nates, �, Could the project have a �ubstantia��aaestttet:ictrable neg feature value�^ ative effect on an area or �. 14ill any natural. or man. -matte features ill the project area found in other parts of the which are unique, that is, not Nation, be affected? ----". County,State, or 6. Vill the project involve construction of facilities on .a. — szope of 25 percent or greater? 7. Will the p-rojecc inIvolve significant cuts br fills? - Could the project cp:t:se substantial flooding, erosion, Or S. siltation ii1 the project involve con;.t�tzct on of facilities in an g. area of geologic hazards? iii. Gould the project change existing features or involve con- areas along the Sacra -F strnctii:! ra�a a, special building permit Feather River Floodway, in any aresubject ion . the mento area in close proximity to any river, to xnUndataoa in an inun at2.0 reservoir or natural d-raina$e channel. S .. T s theproject one of 8 series of cumulative action, whir whole have significant although individually small, may. as .a environmental impact? 12.. Gould the project brraci any published national., state, Or litter control `? local standards relating to solid waste or '-he project ar or the project site serve as a bita_, food sourc- ness..; .b � .' Source of water,, etc,; for rare or endangered wildlife or fists species? ­. ,zA tine ar�.iect signif,_cantly affc ct fish, wildlife, or planes 1Aic or cause substant.al interference with the move - meat of any, resident or mig" ory fista or ;r�� �� _' �i? a-17-cies? 15. Are there any rare or endangered plant species in, the prc- ject area? 16. Will the project remove substantial amounts of vegetation including ground cover? � 17. Gould the project change existing features of any of the af' I regions watercourses or other bodies of Vater? g v i8. Gould the project result in significant change in the hydrology of_the.area? (SeeNotes-) 19. Could the project: significantly affect the functioning of an established community? (See dotes. 2o. Could the project physically or economically result in the displaceutent of community residents? 21. Gould the project signi iawa'- Toussaint rB tt C n B alth Ci3coo K.Y..-...o. .. max.._ -s-.,5:.,: ,-� :.:.M _• - —_s_-_.: �.. UK, k— F _ ft $ :' ti= r ` Varian e to lots size �o�aZlowrt 4 lots_ -;• as ;small_�as,=Q�8�9 acre in an ,S'-2 _zone ,.�rhicY�;=l�a_s.e_7�. acre: ,_ ��,_� minimum lot size C7n the east side os Cussickz (B y- =Ave; ��a roXasaate a 6$` mile north of Shasta Avenue Chaco L- ',P McCAIN ASSOCIATES ` 555 East Avenues Chico_ SCA 95926 3 ,�3 Walter,'Kalb, Rt.; 1, Box 4q..9 -L 111c C&. 95925 e V110"44 . • . R Before e� scheduled for Commission. 2/lis 7�ia� � 74` ,$ _ A `£ � A( " Vi'��' n rye. „#s _ �-.,� ;cf� o��• a• � `��L: �t.r� � � f�e' �� 4.`:� - »a, — � mss- - - c.,E-.. -• =+<.:r-.....r-a"s a.� �..- _ .a ,mss.. - - Ft3 INTER EPA=S201TL M, "-L-."r._. QUI EST TO: CALIFOMIA DIVISION OF, F{}SiRY 17��Ave -OroV REDUEST' : e° and CcI��nt. SCE4 42-34-4G ZONE. S_-2 - N CRi `�'IOY CE Ra O sUEST *. Variance to lot size. tQ allow 4 i nsz ag S= , t 1 as a .879 acre in an S--Z zones which has 1 sa LOCATIM: Shasta Ave. Chico e f APPLIC_AM MCCAIN ASSOCIATES ADDRIESSr 555 B-Asr Avenue, Chico, ea. 9592£ G WN- Wralter Kalb, Rt. 1, B ox 40-9-Z. Chico, COM4ISSION ACTl0 SSD=- D ?arch 7, 1974 EWIIRORMN': AL REVIM SCHEDULED: REN}A'I°R, REUES�€3e Prior to Mar., 7 DATE, DISTRUBITED : Feb ; 19 ATTACH u-mTS Copy ofy Plan, cl T'3'_ 1 icaiion. RET-UMED REQUIPMME S AND COQ T- Yl - ----- Ca. 9,59 I f i BUT' sj COPLANNING CO_A MISSIOI HOTICF- OF PUBLIC MMAR NG AND FILING OF N.EC7dTIVE IDECLA ON €as"MING IiNVIRONI MENTAI T161PAC' 14;)ticas 1.5 ba by qivoa by the Butte County Plamiing Co fission t:irvt pm. lia :hearings will be :Held on Thursday, mard1a 7, 1974, a; 7:3c rs rt o r i.r. Board of St erv�.s rs * Poor�t = Bu County Af5m..n: mt;ration Building, Oroviile, Cala.fronia, regarding the :? i 9, AssociateRequest: variance to parcel size for propcin d a-2'' f:%in yam Dens-y Subukban �esi.dential? locatt d on the oaat s oda of Bay (Cussick-) Ave., anprox. 3/$ Milo .test of ShIgta le e. identified as AP 42-34-40, Chico.. 2. Plann1mg Commisslan Irit? nt-ed - Pr©posea ordinance amending Sion 6 of Ordinanc,� 475., to correct inadvertant ommission trach in enactment of Ordinance 676E i e_,. the ommission of int.roftctory language of said Section 6 specifying those uZa.% aor which, 3. um* p armi:t is required in "A2'" Districts'. The abo mmntioned application, petition and map are on file and for public vlewing at the Office: of the Butte 'County P-' inn?nit o rt�rea t, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville }3iTTTF. COUNTY PLANNIE TGM� ,TSSIO LAWRENCE J. LATISOId DIRECTOR OF PLPI IMG To be, ia' lii�hed n the Chico Entegprise Record on Saturday, Fob u ary 23, l:F ice . d i Y r C ..yam p�iJ� av I*. ''v.* 41 0 .1 ` 4.3 ..,6• d _ x = _ AP 42-34—a `ti M Walter R & Lorraine C Kalb � -chic- �µy Yi rrrri YOM,.. ii MMOM X 40,9k �g��- } Ca a 57 AP 42 34-48s ra u i Carl Carter Rottscha3k e•ix _� x t. Rt 1, Box 409R Chico,. Ca. 9.5926' AP 42-01-45 Ha T* &. Dorothy G BellAP 44-03-54 G Bax 515 Glenn & Susan M Kendal icor Ca. 95926 _ R 1, Bax 409KChi.co . Ca, 95925 AP 42-01-52 Merle Carver AP 44-03-55 Rt 1, Box 409B- Glen Jr. & Cecelia Chico, Ca.; 95926Kendall 2058 1fontrose Brave Thousand ©arcs, Ca,91350 AP 42-01-53. Kenneth li & Ch44-04-16 arlotte J' Thomas Schram E�3loe,etal Hall Rt„ 1 Box 409C 36.51 Golden Leaf Drive Westlake village, Wes Chico, Ca. 95925 Wes Ca, 95926 AP 42-01-54 AP 44-04-I8 Darrell W Bernice C Drake V M & Phyllis V Bartram , BRt 4 o Rt 1, 3;ox 409D Rt 4 -o x 544 Chico,: Ca, - 9532 95'926 AP 42-01-51 Will D & Elena D Fi ark t 1323 Woodland Ave, Ban Carlo_, Ca 94070 BUTTE COUN°t'Y PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 7,. 19,74 74-32-1-799 D. VARIANCE 1.. McCain. Associates Regnast varia=_ce to -a-cel size for property' zoned "S-2" (Minim -Lb, ? :sitR: Suburban Residen tial), located on the east side of Bay (Cuss -ick) Ave.,, approx. 314 mile north of Shasta Ave.,. identified as AP 42-34-40,; Chico. Mrs. Blair* read staff findings, A Negative Declaration Regarding Environmental impact was .fi.led with the County Clerk on February 11, 1974 and there were no appeals.. Proponents. Everd McCain, w tl- the aid of a map, explained his reasons for requesting this variance --one of them being to save a row of beautiful tree. !� Dr. Ken Kendall, Route 1, Box 409-K, Chico, said that moving the easement 20 feet to the north would be a decided advantage to hij-;- as an adjoining property Owner. Paul Cavassa, Route 1, 'Sox 409-H, Chico, questioned the payment of taxes if property line did not go to ;enter of the roan. After some discussion as to the interpretation of the ordinance When it comes to the inclusion: or exclusion of the easemen= when computing the size of a parcel, Mr. McCabe (B48) said that this is a gray area and that the new ordinance passed last week by the Board would clarify the question. Ccmmissioner Smith 099+141), finding that the trees .are a special facture 6 zhe pragert, and ��rar the Co made 9irai3ar findings to preserve existing aesthetic valuesin other areas, made a motion to approve this variance sifbject to the condition as recommended by staff. Her motion was seconded by Commissioner Hanford.. The condition is: y Subject to verification that the sewage system serving the mobile home on Parcel I is :located entirely on said parcel or,. if not, it shall be relocated so it: is entirely on Parcel I. AYES: Commissioners Camenz nd, Hanford, Moore, Smith, Theba.ci Watson, Watters and. Chairman Gilbert. NOES: Commissioner Sylva. ABSENT: None Motion carried AM s qz3 - ao D A VARIANCE !4 MeCa:.n Associates - Request variance to parcel size for property zoned i13-21: (Fii.nimum Density Suburban -Residential), lactated c-a tine east side of Bay (Cussick) Ave., apprak 3/4 u+ile nor'ij of Shasta Ave. identified as A -p 42-34-40s Chico This is a variance request en a parcel in an "S-2" (Nini3 um_ Densis •. co-a..8�S3s�. � zoning, district, located on thL'. E:aS t side of Bay approxi mately 314 mile north of Shasta Avenue, identified as Ap 42-34- 40, 2-34--40g "hica. Tine request is to allow an exist lvig parcel to bc: divided into fog fats with the access Asx these lots being the easterly 3€i ft. of the parcel and the westerly 30 It. of the: adjoining, parcel. ,The .gross area of ' aeh parceA As 1.07 acres 1-7i th he net ate= on each lot (excluding r tgit-off=*flay) being1:33 to .879 acres I� The Butte C€a1s_71ty3wdivision Ordinance, Section 20-14.4 Definit ons: I defineslot as A p-arcel of land used or capable of being, used Wider the provisions. herc-pf including ng bath building site and the required yards and other ODei, :paceas defined herein:, and having -the required road. orA street frontage. � The "S -2`:p zone defines lot area, "Rinimum required area of a lot pay= d a Virg unit shall be not less than 1 acre-� f Therefore, to. consider a 'lot of less than or -E-, are (net) would not mee=t I th¢ -requirements of the lot by definition. There is one existing; structure, a garage and also a mobile home, � located on the most northerly Portion of this parcel. T;�a app has a< :and `di.vi si.on proposed for this property.. T'ne - - ButteCounty General Plan indicates low density res dentia, 1 - r YeSii;g4i s p4 -i acre. If she Commission can e the findings ptwsuant to Butte Corm- ty Enabling Ordinance, Section 15 $ "Variances from the tem- cif the ordinance small be granted anly when, because of special ci.w•c-zamst-an.ces applicable to the aroperty including size, , shapes topography, ? ocation or surz-ov..ndings, the strict application of the zoning deprives sucf: p mperty of pxjvileges enjoyed by other pi-3perty under idem ca3, z�ni g ica $irJ2T .., } it v G Ls be pP rr ss AA_ �::;� ..> -;` tvr�� nersr�€ ae„a�� AS.. LAM :' asz<.anct is r.p i ._h., __1"a appmved subject to he - fo3 3.6wi ig con .tion) . 3.. Subject to Verification that the sewage sys-te serving the mobile home on, Parcel l is beated entirely an said paxi cal or if not it shall be lacaced so"it is entirely: CML Paal l � -xy- y g �.edvL:r v i�- a.& ..�"°"' - - - '.-l.x•...J fin, - f _ Q' � Moved Ieft no addrEs_ � liumber C3 ma slic Moved, rot iorwardabi� Add(essee ,UiikrOVvtt arER a�jfiP �a�� E yea r `gp 44-03 g--C-ecelia GlenJr �endail' Drive ont�case Ca.9I364 oaks thous _