HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-340-049r
PLANNING C ISSTON SUMMARY SHEET, FOR W) DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Carol A. Fuller_ Log#86-01-02-01
ADDRESS P.O. Box 4705, Chico, CA 95927
OWNER Same" '_--
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 4.07 acres to create 4
parcels, 1 acre in size
LOCATION On the East side of the intersection of Shasta Avenue and Cussick
Avenue, Chico area
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 42-34-49
ZONING GENERAL PLAN-"
PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL FLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONVRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED January 2, 1986
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: M. Donn WAar.shall
ADDRESS. 3044 A Monticello Lane, Chico, CA 95926
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S :REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL
- CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION DACE ADOPTED
ENV, IMPACT REPORT -- DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARING8008t No.
SUB- COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE n!ln ltel.
-4
o, , -
�,
�; *s � APPENDIX H
.E'3'EitMII�'1�N
NOTICEX11:
Planning Department
TO; Crffice of Planning and Research ®°' 7 County Center Drive
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 ..,_Oro
Orovi: . 93865 ' �w
Sacramento, CA 95814 MA
or Clerk
County
County of� MllR 13 1985
sumc:: Filing of Notice of Determination In compiiance withIa ti M. DECK R, on 21108 r 2y 1 e2rk
of the Public Resources Code. ELEABy!. 1NarJ _Deputy
proiect Title AP IF ame
N --
34
— 49 Carol A. Fuller
'
Tentative Parcel Map 42.rai..nEnno Num
DLULc
submitted to Clearin house) 534-4266
Public Works John Mendonsa
jest Lova iOn on the east side of the intersection of Shasta Avenue.
and Cussick Avenue, Chico area.
lect cription Tentative Parcel Map dividing 4 „.07 a:vres to create 9
parcels 1+ acre in site.
This is to advise that the Butte County AdvisoryAgency
1,ea Agency or Respons le Agency
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
regarding tive above described projects
1 The project . wili, - will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
Impact Re rt wes prepared f or thls project pursuant
2. An Environmental Imps Po
to the provisions of CEQA•
A Negative Dccgaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be
examined at
Butte County Planning Department
-- 7 Count Center Drive0 i:5, 465
3 Mitigation ation measures_ wea=r were not, made a condition of lNe approval
of the project.
4. A statement of Overriding Canslderations was,
was not, adopted for
this project«
3 11--06Aphen
Date Fcce:ved for Filing SiS Streeter
'SeniAr planner
Title
lievised January 1995
Cih i '
.. .._.... .
4
Carol A. Fuller
Mitigation Measures
AP#42-34-49, TPM
l
Contribute pro 'rata share toWards.installation of a
twaffl,c light at East/Cussick.
2. Contribute $75.00 per lot into the West Side it
improvement Fund. ixe Station
,
Satte U
Ir (10
LAND
0F NATURAL W"AITH
AND Bf:AUTy
DEPARTMENT OF PU13LIC WORKS
WILLIAM (8111) CHEFF, Director
Z COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA
Telephone,,(916)$34.4681 954hS
RONALD D.MnELROY
Buifo Co. Planning Comm. Deputy Dlreclor
VIAR 11 '6bb March
lo, 1986
Carol culler provillo, California
P. 0. Box 4705,
Chico, CA 95927 FXIs AP 42-34-49 ptn,
Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Ms. Fuller,
At the regular meeting of the Butte .County'Ad
March 10, regular the agency visor A
of environmental he g y granted a mitigated negativey Agency head on.
and a pact :for the above• declaration
approved the map subject to the referenced te,Ztative
the attached sheet. conditions of parcel map
approval listed on
If no appeals are timely fl�
Advisory me
If
+'led"within ten. days
y's approval-�..witli the Clerk Of of the date of the
this action will be final, the Board of gu e
p rVisors,
When the conditions of
for youto file ,; approval are complied With, it
forYour final map" With the Bu to Count be be in order
Works for recordation Within tweet ..
by the Advisor A y Dept. of Public
y Agency. y four months of the date of approval
If you have ;any questions regarding this ratter
office, i please contact this
JMjds
attachment
OC Planning
Health
Donn Marshall, 3044 Mpntice,110 tune
'Chico
very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director oP Nblic WorkR
ohn Mehdonsa
SsistAnt Director
LE
91h
Carol A. F,Iler, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, 4 parcels on the east sj,'dc of
the intersection of Shasta Ave. and Cussick Ave. Chico area,
AP 42-34-49
Engineer: Don Marshall
Public Works conditions:
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS-9-tD-I to each parcel from a
county maintained road or state highway.
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from centerline of
access easement.
It. Provide road maintenance agreement.
,54 Indicate a 50 -Vt. building setback from the centerline of Cussick
Ave.
6. Show all easements of record on the final map,
7. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dept. of Public
Works prior to recordation of the final map.
8. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
9. pay off any assessmentsi
10. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street.
11. Obtain encroachment permit, and construct standard road approach
providing adequate sight distance at the intersection of
Marshall Ct,
12. Pay tiny dolinquent takes or current taxes as required,
13. Meet the eo(ju,31rements: of the Butte County Fire Dept,
14i Place note on final map re payment of development fees to
D 4. 4 4. e%"A4"nncp 6441 and lzesnlutlrsri 85 -40 -
Chico Unified School is 1: C per
Health Dept-. conditions$ -
15, provide a 100 Vt. leachfield free setback around existing wells elbhop
within the property or within 100 fti of the property boUftdarieA.
16. Provide a letter or other docurneftta U oil from the California Water
Service Company stating that they are willing and able; to 111UPPlY
domestic water to parcels 1 ',`rough 4i
17, Place a note Oil the map that staters: Development of Parcels 1) 2) 3
and 4 wi.11 require connection to a public Water supply.
r
CAROL FULLER., TPM
County Nitrate Action plan.. Compli,ucyrc
Z$, Meet the requirements of the
the construction
Butte.
of a sewer man to the "p roperty line for
and/or storm
may require
connection 'and the recording of a sewer
future sewer
drainage agreement.
leachri.eI;lc1
the public well site. on parcel 2 and a 7.00 ft-
19, Show proposed
free setback.
The following mitigation measures
are also required:
rata share towards installation of a trai'a.c light
2O Contribute p"o
at East/Cussck.
'$75 E3�'r lot into
the West Side Fire Station �.mprovems'trt l�`unr .
y+°� , Contrbtitc
r
qP
Intera-Depart6e.n � Wlemarandum
rt
70; Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM; Planning Director
`PARCEL MAP FOR CAROL .FULLER ON AP 42-34-49SUBJECT'- REPORTON TENTATIVE
DATE: February 21., 1986
arels
's is a proposal to divide 4•D7zan pq is SR -1. Theto create four
cUse
oofyI.-t acre in size, The present
Plan Map
of the Butte County ThereaarPlr=o desispeciet
ficorcommunity
as Lo�a�orntheyarea�dental.
plans
ro osal does not conflict with County zon:i.ng nor .any
the pP
adopted or proposed element.:. of the Buttlan�unty General Plan
nor any County, specific or community p
ecommend approval subject to the following mitigation
R and condi-tions
measures (M)
1. Contribute pro rata share towards install
aton of a
traffic light at East/Cussick. (M)
2, Contribute $75 per lot into the West Side Eire Station
Improvement Fund. (M)
Comply with the Nitrate Action plan.
Residential development may be subject
4-4 '.Note on map :
to school improvement fees.
LMT/ss
Cc:Carol Fuller
M Donn Marshall
t1l'I�IsN1ll \ i;
COUNI1'Y OF 1111.1..1,11
1sNV 1 RONP11 N`1'r11, C l l FC.KJA S'l' 1'flltri
(CO c��nljltitc�cC. lly l.rrt�` rleiicy l
LOP,#86-01-07-0106-01-02-011: BACKGROUNDAP 11112..34..49
1 , Ntime of* liro11olivilt• MARTIN MEESTER/CAROL A, FULLER
rltldresis of proponent 11(1 l-upl,esOlItclti,Ie (if' r►ppl. c°:Il,le)
htar� �n_.Messter � ..Fulle-r�— —.- z... Cly- Donn4la•rshall_,,.
831. Greenw.i cll Dr._ _
a x 0. )3 .x�47.Q5.� . .., .�.._... 3044A,14onLical.l o Lane
Chico, CA 95926 Chico, „ CA 95927 C1'r 1 cn,,.„A 9a926_ w..__
1. Pl'Oj(c t:t ttl'srl•il)t ion TentatiYp.Parcal Maps,
T1. PANDA' 010 l'1�NPINUi Cly .S iNIi'1CANC.ii NOhlA1"111'
_ t; ._ ,..
a. Does til!' lli.ojoct 1111vo tilt' pottAiltial to te'u''vidt' I'IIv
tltlrllit}' of 010 c'rlvil'onmollt, substlantialty retlticA.
tilt' hahitilt or n 1151, oi, wjldlil"r Sllt<'ciLls, C111.1$v 11
l'i"Ol or wildlife popillat on t11 drop bctow sell,
�;ustailliilt; It'velsj thrc ltoll to vi lillinate a 111x111 Ill'
;ttliTha1 tt1111lil"llity, IetIt1CO till,' l I'llihot' or re!strict lilt'
t11, it l'a rt' or 0110"I.ligol-od 111 illl't t11" tall i Ilial r11.
t'IJtllinatr imllo:tmit exi111111le ol, tilt- 111..1iol. 116'rlocl'
�,l t'aI i 1'trin .,l hlyttlrY or 1lrrhistory: u
11. lloos t ill' 111`il j t>t: ' t flak tilt l ,wilt i,tl to lt'll it'vv
"llol f to 'till' 41t=t'timollt 10' 11111,! 101111*
rn�tIrtlllIKAIital 1;,1115:' to :+ht11•t tl'.ru1 lmpl lct t,n the
cliVirtlnlnetlt i�, one w1001 lccil►'s ill it rclatiti=t•1v
Kriel ht'1 iod Ill tillte tvllilo 111111—term imlloc-t” tdil.
t'111111it° into lllr Ilitilit=.1 r
C. 110e0 tit(, llrtlwct haul' imparts vilic�ll ilre intlividil
'11Iy I i1?lit°r41, 11"t CllIIlll10t1vr1y ('A
l,rojoct Igily i1Jplct oil two or vtory sepal'rlit' Io%ollrCl ,
ivhvrt' tilt= hilll:ict loll vat'll I osolircv is relativol1
w�lll;ll1 blit tOIL'I'V tilt' (it icrt (it' t'il't' t17't,l'1 oI' tlltr;,'
impacts till tit(, CI1'1i1•tlnlont ir; silf,lli1'ittltlt,1
�• Il"t"+ Ott' 1'1411t=ct lwJ v ollvijo1lmvlltili t'I'lv...t`+ 101'i4`h
%tiil l ,'loll-- �.tlkx-it.ltl�l1,11 (ill' h'LI111'
"V11141ws. 'ltl rtt tiv:'
u=r .lil°tt�tl�� t11 inrli
t 1 t, 111 lI Vail It 111,E t Irl Itt' t,,hilllt'tod 11v t v I.1',141 :1PQ1)0 f
oil tilt, 'I111,i�; 41I tit it; Iliit 1x1 vt�,Illwt loll
1, hl Iilltl tlll11toittlseki '11111wt,t ('001, 11 MIT hilkv At 'Iijill1t`r'•rint t'I(vct
t 11 til.• t Ira 114ltunt'11t , dolt) ;t N1 GXl`1VlP1 CI .AINA'I'10% wi I 1 he 111`vt1 Ircti.
l ltl I' ild Ihilt ,Iitliollp11 tilt= 11rttl,ostid 11t•o,'t''e'lt vo111e1 11.1vv t1 Sil;llil'i
:,u1t c=1't,c't: t 1111 t 11 ullo,=ltt, tltrl•l' Iv111 ItoI hl= o wigilJ 1'lcaitt
i+i tc'c t P11 Illi= t�,ltit= ltt't';l ust' thce MITIGATION TION lilVAN1111P, oil' �� rihrll l�tl
tit at tatlit'11 Slit=c=t 'lliw,. Ill'rll 'Iddod 141 tilt' Ill Arit't�t, "i`ttitl'1"l�'l.
Irl t l 11:'l'I I O 1�• I I i Ilt, it I ols�l I v I.
I Irk, I iit,l tlit 11to'.1t1:,cd 111 1) 1 o ( t l"\; 1111 ' it :,iw;ori l'i� ant (II'J'V 't 4All
tli� � 11r i 1 tllunl nt , x1141 ;in I',XI IZONN11 til'i11. I1ll'AV'l lei o"ill" l i, ra'gll i lrc�.iY
111 i 1 January 2.7, 1986 t'tll7NTY OF I11J"I'1J: s l'LArNN I NtiLaura I11:J'�1Jti'1°1+11:Jv`1'
tit
. T(i t to i Associ. t;e planner.
V, ENVIRONMENTAL PACTS
xp anatzons alb "YeS" and I'maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s)) YES MAYBE
NO
EARTH, 11i,11 the proposal result in significant:
conditions or jjj changes in
a. Unstable earth
geologic substructures?
displacements, compaction or
r►.
b Disruptions,
overcovering of the soil
or surface
c. Change in topography ground
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modification of any
features?
unique goolagic or physical
in wind or water erosion of soils,
e. Increase
either on or off-site?
of beach
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
in deposition,
sand- or or changes siltation,
which may modify the channel of
or erosicn
river or stream or the bed of the ocean, or�
a
any bay, inlet or IaRe? productive soils
agriculturally p
g. Loss of prime
outside designated urban areas? ---
to geologic
li, Exposure of people or propertA'
as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
hazards such
]. iii �. s, ground round failure or similar hazards? -.-
s
?, AIR. Will the proposal result, in substantial:
deterioration of ambient
�
a; Aix emissionsor
+_
air grtality` smoke
b. The creation of objectionable odr,^ s,
,
or fumes".
c. Alteration of air mo�,ement, moist Or
in cli.tt, te,
tempo)-atctro, or any change
locally or regionally? ~�---
S
3. }NATER. Will the propusal result in substa'htial
or
Cnanges in currents, or the course
er_
in either
,
div0etion of water movemonts
marine or fresh WULers drainage patterns, d
in absorption rates,
b Changes
or tlle rate and amount of surface runoff?
drainage improvo-
Need for Off-site surface;
including veg station removal, channel-
ments ,
ization or culvert installation? ----
flog of flood
LL�r�
Alterations to the course or
'.., waters? Mater in any
e Change in the amount a t surface
„
:
water body? ...._...- w---,
f, Discharge ?nto surface waters, or in any
including
alteration of surface water duality,
dissolved
but not limited to temperature,
,
oxygc,tl or turbidity'
.A terataon of the direct ion or rate of flow
,
g •
f ground waters?
in the ci4.tantity o.t quality of ground wators,
h.;;Mange q'{ With-
thel� t�ll'oUgh diroet' additions
either-
an
ettherls> or through interception of
iY
exrav"'Ita.ons?
e amount of water otherwise
Redt�ctioln cuts
1. the
i `
avail.ablo for ptrhlic water suppI ewater
of people car property
j . Exposure
related hazards such as flooding?
..........
I
4 . PLANT LIFE proposal res XIS b1A_ NO
.�, Will the p result in
nge in the diversity of species oiubstantial:
of any species of plantsxncl'udin' number
shrubs grass, drops, and S�quat;.c g trees,
b= Reduction of the numbers pl nts)?
a � am unique rare � -LI
or ;endangered species of x�lattt,s7
r
Intro foil of f new spe,.lOs of ,
or in a barrier tc,� 1;�nts into ail
meat of exstill, s ,t`he normal rep.lenish-
d. Reduction in acreagecnle-san a
Y gricultural cropANIMAL LIFE.. ?
Will the
a, Ll r
ange in the diversity s ec es or
n substUntial t
Of Soni` species of animals nGirn��e►,- x
including reptiles
(bixds, land a11i`ma'l5
benth.ic or T � ) : , ,
, .fish arrd shill ��.sh
b. Reduction bandsms or Insects
or endaneredtspee1e5e anima ,
y unique, rara
c. introduction of net+r species olanimal.s i {
an area, or result in into r,
Pr movement o f a barrIer- to tho ml. r
d, animals? gt'ation
Deterio$"ation to c Mist n >
'habitat' g, f'rs1, nr6.
ivildlc: ~--
NQSSh. Will the proposal result in substantial,,-
People
�u
a. Increases xn eist bstant�l
b•
Exposure of e le Pg noise levels?
h p to "severe noise levels?
7.ono
LICUT Ari DGLARE
_ .
Willttr.. .. sad
�.
1,1111txcant I'lght 1n � l,rre? produce
8,4 LAND US
)a . Will the
p'r`oposal result in a ,
suyystantial sr"°lteyx�atinn of the I�'i'e,�LrY,}'; �y
land use O 11u4 4�1 oS�i o�� '
p411iJ1CC'
• fVATUPAL l i:s 'rrI� ES
the . !
lV z l 1
pt-oposa.l result in f
r�. Tnc`tease in. the
re5ot�rces ? rate of t sty o:f any natural
b, Depletion of an -
resources?, non- z eilelvaL 1, hal l r
1. RTSk
F GIPS h T
1Vi l l the
Proposal.
a �uTis o� •substane.
re
plosion or the 7:e
ces (incl I �., "SO'of fitalydM
s �
oil , persticdes ) but not l.itni.tcrl to
chem" Calq ar rad in
event al air accirient or upset canciitic rr- 6
Possible interference With a, ) lr� the
'response t emereitr�-- �..�,
plan or omergenc y eve ctaatioii
ll. C'DPUL:�T'xUN,
bVxl l"tho ISropoSol alter tt c oc at utr. ..
� ion; do- 's� t ,, er ,rt tvth rate op. thb '
population � Irrttnan
the rroposal. affect o�is�i
r%�n
ar crost�demandfo . ,relti.anal LeiisStI g I�c�r.t
;r demands ng
.µ
US
3,
'TRANSPORTATIONCTRCUL,ATCpN: rJi
Y1 t lit
YES }+`tIYBE N0
resul _ d proposal
i,n _
, Generation of sub, ant-i;al additi onal t�
a
,movement..? .ile}lirj
b• Effects on existinQ parking faczXities, or
demand for g
new parking?
C. Substantialm. ct on e;xis ling transp'artatripn
�--"
systetzi
Via• Significant alterations; to present patterns
of Cirr-Ulation
or movement of peo'p1E and/orgoods?'
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air txaffc?
f. Increase in true ri it ha-ards to motor vehiclos,
bicycli$ts or Dedestrians?
•-- ----
14.
PUBLIC ,SERWi,CI Will the Pl'oposal have an off(>Ct
upon, or result
in a need for new Or alttrecl
governmental services
t` E+are proter:tah`�i,a'
b, Polico protettjon.'
-�..
C. , Schoo is ?
d. Perks ot oC'hr;r 'i•ee,rcatic;7t";l'Facilities?
ax,ax en�tY�.e or
ather goIrornmontal servieos?
— ---- 1
l the prohOsal result in.
USC Of 5tik)!'t"i ntia
, �ttmru r.t:s a L"
4�Eue I or, oneryyYp
,. Substaa�.ti��l' increase cn demand upon exa„�t.
sources
y
.�
to r one rgY, or require tht, development
Of
neiv sntirces of oner.gy'
ti.
i'1"'i'r,T�I' ES. IY1l.l tIle proposal restiI;t j5 ij tl�o�� �a7
r, ��stems,
w or 811l tint%al alteration- to the
a. Poiold
b. er or natcoral gas'
mmt1riizations sV$t01rs
ci Nater N ,.
a 1 x °.
-•-
Sower o s r
e, storm loater drainage?
So1,1d it $te and dtisposal. �
17.
YIDIAN 1•I�r.ALTR. �� t}y�;ro oral r0s�ult
. Cr rit�an Of ally health hatarc} cox' potenti;at
health 'xa�ac} (ecludn
ile��ltl�� .
b, P-Xposure of people to g tell
p . P - po tear tial. l�e�lth
�
1.8
AE8T1fih"CIt5. iJx l 4-heproposa'C result in tl
illyScenic Vista Or
uicv open tothe
lic itwill the,
t�i Proposal
creaiatx of an aesthoticlf�itAlty� 11ot��oe
to *ubtic: view? n
}
pj_%;uSSiON EM IRCINkENTAL EVALL A LION AP 42-34-49
f?ro jec Qes r i r>t i on,
Th
study addresses i mpacts resu 1 t i ngr^r�is lnli;i'al, m two d i st i ncsr
"fen tat I ve parce I Maps, f or Mort I n Meester and Q.,rro I A . Fu l liar. eoth
properties are located on iYlarshal i Court, and create. lots of '1 .01
acres.
1 b"t. Sol i d i srupt i on and overcover Ing w i 1 I re8wl t f r-orrl Construct• 1 on of
dr I veways, houses , and i nsta 1:I at 1"on of water I I ties Tlno amc�r.art t o t
overcover i no, 1/2 acre, i s not s I gn i f I cant foo- an urbart Orea
1 !� iss o4' a,r i Cul turaI so i'l s within the urban area, IS unavcr i dt`aL1,1 e
.3b 1 Get'. Absorption rates will decrease In proporltlan t.n an l ncr elaot
In sut^Faue water runoff. Propel - y is yr i iMh i n the Shasta, Union Drainage
01 :atr t ct and will be assessed Yeat* l y trra l ntenance fees.
On --site facilities --ro not normally required for parcels over
I acre. However, on- and of f -s i to dria i nacge W i 1 1 be r0gLI i red
throughout 'the- Ur ram area by the Nl trate Action Plan.
old': Lotid use on s i to IS e m0tyt1Ir * a l mond orchard. Aar i cu l t rrfal
v i ab 1 1 1 ty has been coMprolm I s+td by res 1 dent i a encrhachmon t
a.t tic th l and d t v l s i erns crimp l y with the General Plan �arrd zon l n, 'i
L.ol
h of the 1= u l l er TPM exceeds the 3:1 rat i 0
s per
l a�r. o• Dolly traffic benerat i tin is dst i rrtateci- a+� 10 trips
ADT iota I' Iniprovamen ts to the transportation system are not .keep i rtq
pace with tra M c Increases.=, The result i s ronCpst i on The CI -111 co
Urban Area Transportat I o?h Study I dent 1 f i as t~a5t/'Cuss 1 ok as reed 1.1`110 a''
tra F'ic signal,. All area loveIopment-5 have been requested to
contrlh,Ute a pro rata share toviar-ds lnstallatIOn of the s oriaI. Each
deve- I aper 's -contr l bort: i ai - 1 s-determi nod by thr 0I rector- o -f f'ubl i c;
Works.
i 4 a: The propert v i s within the West Side Fire Station I m"provenren
Arsee . _COP isin need ta+ o fire, Station, west Of the souther, i pacific
Railroad tracks near 1-1 i 0hway 82. `Crain travel b l raci<s circulation for^
LIP to `1tl m i nut og� , Al I area devel oprnehts have boon reclwestod to
contrllaLrte X75,.00 per, parcel
Al 1 governmenta I sere I be prov i rrlers w i 1 1 e;r„pe1- i enco on i ncV�0;4isrp,
in demand, In general , Service demands hove been anti c i pat'nd In the
urban area and can be extended
144c : Ras 1 dent 1 a 1 dove i epmel7.t May be swbJect to school Improvement
feor,.
16d'. sewer I i oew tv 1 1 1 be extended throughout l -ie urban area 6s ptirt _
r:,r,,f the N l trzate Act l on V' l an I rar:l i v i dLia 1 devo l gapers w 1 l 1' F)e 'requ i r od to'
i n sta 1 1 their Interior lines and fron°tape, stubbed Out ;For eventtra i
lookup.
0
Rc-oomnieneed' M i aat i on -Ne asu-es,
1 Contribution of pro rata share towards installation of traffic
sinnal at East/Cussick.
., 2. Contribution of $75.00 per lots into West Side Eire Station
t Improvement Fund.
Applicants: Martin
Meester;
Carol A. Fwller Assessor •s Par
42-34-44g aQt is
Log 1t 86-01-07-01.
86-01--02_01
--:SHAT
A. P�,l-ci nescrl
1. TYPe of Project..
2, lar• i of Descriptoh:Tentative Parce l
Maps.
Gi idig 2 lots into.
6
3- i.ncatIon: On bothsidesWard,ls OF
i rt tersec`,t i on with C`a F Marshall Court, at
4 Proposed Dens i it h Wuss i cl< Avenge.
6- Arnoun{ Y of neve] o
of It»pervious Pmnt 1 d.ir./acne,
G. Access and Near Surfac i na: APpr•ox i mate l
t curt . est Pub! i c Road(s): Y 102
Frontage acre,
7. Method Of ge on t� arrsha I l
i3. Sewage bisposal:
Source of Water Su individual s
9- ProximityPPIy; California Water. pra.osed,
10- Potent i a f f: Power Lines.* 1'0 or 1
For furthter land ginal parcel
d i v i W i on;a and devC 16PMent
B. None.
� �r'o-. �m�n�a1 Seth i
Ph si'cal
1 Terra rt
J. General To
b. Pographic Character-; Level
Sl oPe 0-27.. valley la
Elevation: 1751. nd.
LImitirig Fact...
3s None.
Types and
..Characteristics: Vina
sgrt"are. subsurface drainage. Ftrte Sandy Loam•
productivet Weil suited ; fair
b• Limiting Factors d to ag'
S • Na tura I Hazards None
a• Earthquake ?of the Land
b- erosion _one. Moderate tsar
eon Pis ential : S1 i rp�.►ai<e .interlsi t
c- Landslide P°terytialht` �y Rohe VI
c1. t=ire Nano X
H zarr!:
e. ExpanUnclassifled;
`l - t`tydro 1 oqysive Soil Patent i a 1 L ON to Moderte
a. Sur Face Water e a
b GroundWatar None In Immedit.
Clraina W th1n Nitrate vicinity.
9e haracterisics Actlpn plan arca.
artN CaY . Ura I ns t�►ester I
'. Annual
is i y r�Nl lt°`d,
dAha to
e n fa 1 1 t Mal):
Lir» i t i rr;�
i ua l /Scc- a t"actcrr`s t`Jdne
Y
r1 1 c ()l:ta 1 i ty : Fa I r.
.8
i`
6. Acoustic Quality „ r
7. Air Chia 1 i ty Good . Fa i
Bj-p. 4j! ca_IfFny,irnnm.
Vegetation.- �3. "at;ure almond orrchard.
Wi ldl ifs 1-#abitat;
b i-r*d,, # s�lu i' rre 1 s Lim 1 tac-i by res i den t✓ i l
� etc. _ encreachmon#-
;. u i twirl a FtLi ronrnent
10• Archaeoio
1 1. Arch g i cal and 1-1 i stor i cal
County General Plan designation: Resources i r, tha
hesidontia1. , oa= Unknown.
1- Existin i-ow�Crenc,ity
xst'ing Zoning SR -1
g Land Us(2 on-site: Almond
crchar,d
1-1- Surroi,rnd i n9 Area;
a- Land Uses:
b- Zoning.: SR.,SR-1,
R Tent al, reo a0. OPerati
C. Gen., Plan R- � . ons,,
Gen'w designations
Low -Density Residential. Asr�cultWrai-Residenf» 1,.
d• Parcel Sizes:1/34
10 10 acres,
e. PoPuiation
15. Charaober
16. of Site and Aroa:
<Joarv,st Urban Area✓, Subur�ban/
17. Re l eVan t S Chico. . 'fir cultural f`r i nga -
18. 1mP`OVeme Phe✓es OF 7nFluenco
19- nts :standards Urban City OP Chico
dire Protection S, Area: Pursuant t S'U'D:A.D.
a . an orV `r ce: to Pub i l c Works.
County State) Fire Station
b. Water AVailab
w,.()
SchoolsArea:
i I i ty 8n�-
i r� Ari :
Ch 1 co 'r n� capac i t
Un i +' i ed School �' o hydrants
District.,
off. - '� � - .. - �
C: �
'I 1 p.
. • r
�' '• ,�
.0
� � �'
y - ��
,. � * V � � r
a ..
'o
p n
�� � J , �
r\
� �/
�
'
•��.
a"
...
� .
.' �
. w°
�
� k '
, �
�.
' r .
i
r
�
�
�
�i
� 0
� �
�
'�
•
n
`
•,
1 �� j ,
�
�..�
- •
�
D
4
�
.y
,
� •r.
J1 ;
��
1
� M
�
.
� I e
11/`.1 1'
PLANNING COIDSSION
SUMMARY SHEET FOR AI ----------------
D DIVISIONS
APPLICANT Martin Meester
Log#86-01. 07_0'1
ADDRESS 831 Greenwich Dr., Chico, CA 95926 µ
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TPM to divide 2.02 acres to create 2
parcels, I
acre each.
LOCATION At the northwest corner of Cusick Avenue and
Bel Road,
Chico area.
--------------
A$GESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-34-49 r `
ZONING op . J GENERAL PLAN
_'� b/'�.• PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LAND .CONSERVATION ICT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 42=36-49
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: M. Donn Marshal.
ADDRESS: 3044A Monticello Lane, Chico, CA 95926
DATE PLANNING DIRECT'OR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
AND DATE
NEGATIVE_DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION DATE ADOPTE 7
ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE ---NG%rOUSE tTO
'UB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE-,�..
ADVISORYAGENCY ACTION
APEALED
APPEAL NEARING DATE
BOARD ACTION' ,------ _.
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DI
RECTt�R
a ' S Am
JURT�.
ar � iy wo. � " u �e e e _, n �` 4 ., � f �' �IP`4'1 I 1 _ Y _ _� n{�'•� a d,� —
11 V% "t00L K -e
C4W 6,,5_ r
" k
Io%ICE OF '3F- ',F, MWA* N APPENDIX H
TOs
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room FROM: Plannin
Sacramento, Cq }S8d4 8 Department
or LI,ount Center Drive
..�,._ CountY Clerk r llle, CA 95965
._
County of Butte WAS !9
go
SRJWfiling of Notice of Dete
of the Public Resources��
de« j 6td�h Section 21108 or 21152
Ce
y lNn�t�R Deputy
M ject Title
ftr
Tentative Parcel Map
—w—au Number
Cif submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public taorks
jest I-ocati.oc� At the
'Road, CY�wa.00 .area.
42-34-49 Name
Martin Meester
Contact Person
Tele. one
John Mendonsa -
northwest canner of cuss.. 534-426
ic]c Avenge and Bel
4t;:nzatjve Pa- -
two 1aAroei.��e
of 1.01 acre each.
.02 acres to creat
.This Is to advise that. the
Butte county Advisory Y Agency
iia., approved the aboYe described Lea Agency or Kesponsihle A enc
Mgardi Prof ect and has made the fo9lawIn d to
"� the above described .project:
1; rminatIon
s
L The project will
will not, have a: signlfkant effect on the environment.
An Environmental Impact
fact Deport was prepared for this project
to the provisions of CEQA,
pursuant
X A Negative Declaration was
provisions of CEQAs Prepared for this pro
ons
j pursuant to the
The EM or Negative Declaration and
examined at; regard of
project approval'ma be
butte county Plannin De Y
7 Department
----•..... ur Ve
3• Mitigation measuresWe're,n 9�
of the project. -
were not, made a Condition of the a
� Pprcwal
A C
statement. of f3verridng Considerations this Project. Was
was . hot, adopted for
bate Received for PIling 3-1-,6
Si re 4
�. ��reeter
Idnilbr
kevised January 1985
Martin Meester
Mitigation Measures
TPM, AP#42-34-49
1 Contribute a pro-.rata share towards install
tragfic signal at East and Cu
sick, anon of a
2• Contribute X7.5.00
Improvement .fund, per lot into the Westside Fire SLa a '
pion
t� our
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND (FAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Dlieclor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) $34.4691
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Difeetor
Bogie Co. PianMing C'..offm March )1, 1986
MAR 4 1996
Martin Meester orovlle, caforal?t R AV 42-34-49
ptr_.
831 Greenwich Drive ',tentative Parcel Map
Chico, CA. 95926
Dear Yxi Meesters
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
on 'March 3, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negative declaration
of environmental impact and approved your tentativo parcel map on
the above-refereuced property. Approval is subject to the conditions
of approval listed on the attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed --within teen days of the date of the
Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
gupervisors, this notion will be final,
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in
order for yu,i to rile your "final map" with the Butte County Lept. of
Public Works for recordation within twenty-four ((; nths of the data
of approval by the Advisory Agency,
If you have any questions regarding thi;y matter, please contact this
orfioe
Very truly yours,
Wil.li.am Chef
Director of r,bli,c Works
awn" Mend nsa
A istant Director
J14/d8
attachment
cc Planning
Health
Don Marshall, 3044 Monticello "Laney Chico
Martin Meester, IEDiIA'TIU.i PARCEL MAP
corner of Cussick Avenue and Bell Road
AP 42`34-49 Parcels
oSareathe northwest'
Engineer; ➢pan Marshall
Public Works conditions:
-1, Provide two-way traversable access RS-9-
a county maintained road or state highway.
gLD-1 to each Parcel :from
2. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ord3.r�t�ttcjc
f'or dedication on the final map. utyd Dffi ,-red
3. Show 50 ft. building setback line measured from cC:nLerline ra r
easement. P 4ccer.
4• i`;rovide road maintenance agreement.
5• Indicate a 50 ft. building setback from the centprIinQ o
Cussick Ave. f
• Show all y
easements,
of record on the i'ixtal map.
r' Provide street name signs per rwr
tilorks prior tea recordation of the ufina,lrrmap. t the L'ept of Public
3• rrvri4ie
Permanent srslut on for drral'Nag .
9- �-`*Y any delinquent taxes or r.�.rretat tares as required,
10, Place note on ficial map re paytnpynt ref arta cry tJnif' erl
fees as per County Crdint7inee School District
x 63 _ �axld �esolutir n 85_1x0,
Health Leptj conditions:
ll. Provide a letter or other documentation fro�:sC
UerVi.ce Company stating that alii'orni tea they are willing; and able to supply
domestic Water to parcels l a t 2 y
12. Place a note on the map that 4tates "development
will requi.x�e connection to aerpplof parcels l and 2'
Public Water suppl,Yu
13. Meet the requirements of the Butte Ctajanty Ni.traLp
Action Plan,
Cam:pliance may require the installatiull of a ;,ewer main to the
future
swine for i'uture serer connection and the recording of
future sealer Uer�rire and storm drainage agreement,,
The following mitigation measures are al;,o required-:
14. Contribute a pro-rata share toW�jrds installation of a train
signal nt Bast and Cussik. i"iG
15, Contribute. W
` 75.4o per lot 3n'to the Westside "ire Statioh Improvement
T'�tnd ,
Inter-Departneenial
Memorandum
TO, Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Martin Meester on AP 42-34-49
DATE. February 18, 1986
This is a Proposal to divide 2.02 acres to create 2
each. The present zoning is 8R-1 Parcels,
(Suburban Residentia,�. - 1 acre
The. Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Paan desk bates
area as Low DPlant 1 acre Parcels);
Plans for the area. Residential. There are no s g this
p;9cific or community
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor
Proposed'e1e g any adapted or
element of the Butte County General Plan nor ally Count
or community plan.
y, specific
Recommend approval subject to the following Mitigation Measures
1. Contribute a pro -rata share towards installation
I&. of a traffic signal
at East and Cuss
2• Contributes $75+00 pez lot into the Westside Fire Station ion Improvement
LMT:lr
"tMartin Meester
M' Dunn Marshall
r
AP1,cN
CC21. NTY OF BUTTr-
ENVIRONMENTAL CIi);CKT.ISI, FORM
(to e complete �y Lead Agency)
I: BACKGROUND Log 1186-01-07-01;86-01-02-01
AP 11/2-34-49
Il.
1. Name 01" proponent 21�MARTIN MEESTER/CAROL A. FULLETt
2. Address of ``��
proponent and. representative
Ma(if apltlaeable)
rt: in Maw —XP ra
$31 Greenwich Dr. p O `--`----~---}'ice.-Donn—Ma-r-shaa4 -.
Chico, CA 95926��_4705
C_ hico.CA 95927 _ �3044A-Monta`c-91-10—Lane
3. Project description .�_--
Tentativ4..
MANDATORY FINDINGS
OF SIr;N1T{ICANI�E
OF Y MAYBE NO
a. Does the project E
rave the Potential to degrade t}Te
quality of the environment substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause ,a,
fish ox wilrl"re population to drop below self-
scastaintng levels, threaten to eliminate a }slant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range Of a rare or endangered 'plant or animal or
eliminate important OXOMples Of the major periods
Of California history or prehistory?
b. noes the Project have Potential
short-term benefits tot�tile detriment tofalloneve
environmental goals? (A short-term impact onttl�'c'
environment Is one which occurs in .r relatively
brief Periodof time while long-term impacts wi
endure into the ruture;) ll
c. Does tite project have imitacts tvitic:h are in.dividt('-
nilly limited, but c:umulat.ivei " co-n5iderabndi U-
wheect may impact on two or more separate resources
tvhot'e the impact on each resource is relativelL,
sna;all p
but wltea'e tite effect ot" thc� t�wfi;tl or those
impacts on ti),e twnvironment is signirico.
d, nocsill the itr$Ub$t itavz, environmental erfocts which
will cause suitstn.ntial tadvcrse erroc�ts on human
beings, either direr-tly
T'iu.t._ITNA7 ret.._N oa' indirectly"?
(Pct cullaitIc�tc'chN' te Itc�
-
Ag,ency'I ,A,
()n the Eons}s of tltls Initial cvrultt;�ti.tta).
K„ llWE find thu fyrttlt�7;crl '}t)'tt,IOCt COUl'l) NtTi` haavc, a s�i
on titc� c�ntirctn�a�t�,7t, rami ;i N'I'11�1i 1)"CLA}IATH) tvil,raltetr;'�att 0r1'"t
' ..} itt'eitxii cci.
tAlli rind that although 't}tc. ltrovosed ttoivet Could have El si r
crane erioc�t on rhes ��atvit.0milont tf)ra qni Ci=
tha~0t that th}s "Se lacYc,iu;r tlrr MITIGATION MVA i 4 ra si e'Vib anfi
i '
ugh ,S r ��• .�
At
r. cl s h c c t . , 1 tE.., cl .
icon racicic.[ tatltc')"o.icyc't"+.cbed c)t
DHIL .AMI'l;t)N avi l l Etc,+ prt'lttt►'c il, A Nl GA'f'TV.1
rind titer ft'a'oitct5�`d .ic`ct Mr1i' (t:av_e ka sia;niricsant 0rrec't 0
the e)aviromli int, ;and an t.N1� IZONMIXUA}. X\i1aAC"l"� Et};}'(tip'"le is realuir�e 1,
DAIT"; January 27, 1986
` » -
COUNTY t.)i. tEllTTli, PLANNING DliitAit' N1PNI'
Laura. - T ^ ,
title; Assoof to Platinar
koviewed by; `1�
a
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IIA CTS
onXattachedanationsheet(s)),tYes" and "maybe" answers are required
1• EARTH. Will the proposal result inYES NO
significant;
a. Unstable earth conditions
or in si–'
geologic substructures? nifi
a
b.
bisruptxOns, displacements,
compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography
or ground surface --,
relief features"
cl. Destruction, covering or modification of any ~r
unique geologic or physic ,11,
—
features?
e• Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
.-
i. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition
or erasion which may modify the channel
a raver
of
or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any hay, inlet or lake?
g• Loss of prime agricultural], soils ----
outside designated urban
areas?oduct�ve
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic'
_
haz!,,rds, such
as earthquakes, landslides, muds
slides, ground failure
or similar hazards?
2, ATR, Will the proposal
a --; Air emissresult in substantial;
ions or deterioration
air quality? of ambient
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes? b ---
�%
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature,
or any change in climate,,
Locally or "regionally?
3. WATER, Will the proposal result in-substant"xa l : ._._..
a. Changes in
y
currents, or the course or
direction of water movements
in either
marine or fresh waters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates ae
or the rate and
amount of surfacenrunoff?terns,
c• Need for off-site surface drainage i�
Ments
mprove-
including vegetation removal, channel-
ization or culvert installation?
d. Alterations to the course
or
waters? flow of flood
to Change in the a
water body? mount of surface water in any
---
f• Discharge into surface waters, or in any —
alteration of surface
—
water
but not limited to temperature) dissalvedudang
o�tyget1
or turbidity?
g: Alteration of the direction or rate o flow
Of ground waters?
hi Cslange in the quantityor quality of
either through direct additions or with°_und Ovate
drawals
or through interception of an
aquifer 'by cuts or
excavations?
I. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public
water supplies?
j, Exposure
posurehofapeople or property" to wftter -----_
h
as flooding?
"2
YES MAYBE
4 PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of anv unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
C. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptile.,, fish and shell fish,
NO
benthic organisms or insects)?
b Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals? �y
c. Introduc�can ofnett/ species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or, wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substan'7al:
a. increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise level,
7. LIGHT AND.GLARE Will the proposal produce
'significant light and glare?
8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a-
su s5`ta ial alteration of the present or planned
:Land use of an area?
Oi NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in
su stantial
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resouroes?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve.
a. Avis n explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
Oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11, ?OPULATION, ,Jill the proposal alter the location,
r!Istii u on, density, or growth rate of the human
Population?
12. HOUSING. Will theproposal, affect existing housing,,
or create a demand for additional housing?
-4-
YES
MAYBE
NO
13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?—
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
C. Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
---
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?,
f, increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
Upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services;
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
—
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
—=
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services'
1.5.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in
a. Use of substant-.al amounts of fu -1 ,or energy'?
b, Substantial in: cease in demand upon: eAsting
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?:.
lb•
UTIIIES pro lalterationsresult in atoetheed for
newLsTstems,�Vorlsubst n ialthe
Y
following
a. Power or natural gas? .�..
b. Commur.',:a`tions systems?
_
c Water ava labil ity
i, sp--ret or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f, Solid waste and disposal?
17
HUDIAN HEALTH, Will the proposal. result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental. health)
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
�.
18.
ABSTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the
o`Gstxuct on of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
-4-
I9. YES
RECREATION. Will. the
IAN.' B Np
�� No
proposal result �K.. an impart
upon the quality or quantity of exis'ti2�a-ecreatigtjjj;
Opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES,
a•ivIll t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of
a
historic archaeological site?ehistorzc or
b.
Will the proposal result in adverse phYs=cal
or aesthetic effects to
a pxehis r,c or
historic building, structure or object?
C. Does the
proposal have the potential to cp,use
a physical change which would affect
-7X-
ethnic cultural value,? unique
d. Will the proposal
restrict existing religious
or sacred uses Within the
area? potential impact
V. DISCUSSIO OF ENVIRONMENTALr,.
EVALUATION
AP 42-34-49
See attached',.
i
1
.
L S
U
DISCUSSION' OF ENVIRQNME2j&L EVALUAILON
Pro-leot q-ScCjp-tL9
?n
40
AP 4E-34-49
This Initial study addresses impacts resulting from two distinct
Parcel Maps, for Martin I'lleester and Carol A. Fuller. Both
properties are located on Marshall Court$ and create lots of 1.01
acres.
1b: Sol] disruption and overcovering will result from construction of
driveNayss housess and Installation of Hater lines. The amount of
OvercoverIngo 1/2 acrep Is not significant for, an urban -,j,",ea,
19: Loss of agricultural soils Within the urban area It; unavoidable.
3b,16e: Absorption rates will decrease in Proportion to an increase
In surface water runoff. Property is within the Shasta Union Drainage
District and will be assessedyearly maintenance fees.
acre. On-site factlities are not normally required for parcels over
. HoHevero on and off-site drainage will be re.qtjlred
throughout the urban area by the 141t -rate Action Plan.
4d: Land use on sit*., is a mature almond orchard. Agricultural
viability has been Compromised by residential encroachment.
811 Both land division - comply wjtj-j the General Plan and Zoning. Lot
2 Or the Fuller TPM excieds the S ratio.
13aoct Daily traffic oeneratioij Is estimated at 10 trips Per d.uip 60
ADT total. Improvements to the transportation system are not keeping
Pace With traffic increases. The result 19 congestion. The Chico
Urban Area Transportation Study Identifies East/Cussick as needing a
traffic signa,i All area developments have been requested to
contribute a Pro rata share towards Installation Of the signal. Each
developer's Contribution Is determined by 4- Director of Public
Works.
l * The proparty is Within the West Side Fire Station Improvement
Area COF 1in mood of a fire st8t)0171 West Of the Sowi;herm Pacific
Railroad t,-ackshoar HIghHay 39. Train travel blocks circulation for
up to 90 mlnutesAll area developments have been requestecc to
Contribute $75.00 per Parcel.
All governmehta! service Providers Will experlence an !norsoIso
In dernandi In general, service demands have been ontIcIp6tbd in the
urban area and can be extended.
14c,! Residential development may be subject to school Improvement
fees.
16dSGP40r lines w1,11 be extended throughout the Urban area as part
Or the Nitrate Action Plan. Individual developers will be required to
install theirinterior lines and frontage, stubbed but for eventual
hookup,
—6-
i
u
w
0
Applicants: Martin Meester
Carol. A. Fuller
Assessor •s Pairco I it
42--34-,;tq
Log # 86 -01 -07 -01-
`01,
6 -Cil -07 -01i..0. '.,-92-01
DATA SHECT
A. ag iec�cr
... o;3
1. Type of Project" Tentative Parcel Maps.
2. 'Brief Descriptio"n.Dividing 2 lots into 6 Parcels OF 1.01
aeras each.
3- Location; On both sides or Marshall Court
intersection with Cussick Avenue. ' a, its
4. Proposed Density of Development:
B. Amount of Zmpervi��s . 1 d,u./acre,
6 • Access and Nearest Public aRond(s) ,ApproximatelyFrontage
g 1/2 sero .
Court.Frontage on Marshall
V4 Method of Sewage Disposal:
8. Source of Water Su 1 individual septics proposed.
8 Source
o o PP y' California Water-:
proRas
Y f PoEier Lines; To original
'i Cl » Poton tial for furtherdivisions
'Parcel.
1� hd d i v i s i ores and devel OPment: None.
E3«_iiroihreta1 Sct�insa
PiZysi rgb1r, � Cont
9 Terra i n
aw GeneraV Topographic CharaC.ter
b Slopesr 0-•29. Le+ve,l vallVr land.
C. Elevertion 175t}
d. Limiting Factors: Nonce.
2« Soils
a. TYPes and Characteristics
sUrrface, subsurface dra l na eY ha Fine dandy loam a ra i r,
product 1' ori . O Wei 1 l suited tc aa.
b. Limiting Factors: None:
3. Natural JAazards of the [_end
2. Earthquake Zone., Modef�ate Earth uake Zntehs,l t
Erosion Potential Slight`• �' Zone LTi.
Landslide Potential: None:
c� l=Ere Hazard t
e ,
Expensive So 1 line t' ass i i ed.
4. My,C11,0l ogy Poten t i a l r Low to Moderato,
a., Surface klatet None in Immediate vleIni'ty
b. Groundwater: Within Nitrate Action Plan area,
c. i7ralnage Characteristics
rid lay. Drains west�+rly towards Shasta.
d. Annual ka l nfal nortoal ),. t2..24,�
Ae Limiting Pactorrs: Nbne.
5. V i, a, a 1 /Seen i s oUal i t e Fa i r.
p
6, ACcust i C �Ldc� 1] i �
7 Air Qualit y: Fair.
iolo
_y: Goedk
8, Vegeta{: i on
9. Wildlife Mature a l morlo o
Habitat: Limite,d by
orchard,
birds, squirrels residents
s etc. al encroachmeh.to
G u1�a_L_ Env iro
nn�P
U
Archaeological Archaeo l oia
gllee
)I'. Butte'Couand,His
toric
Residehtnty General Plan al
Resources
'nthearea,1. +'signation:
Unknown.
13, Esting Zoning; SR- 11 ow-Dohsity
`• existing Land
Surrounding Use on -,it,..
Area,Almond orchart{,
a. Land Uses:
b. Zoning: Res identil� few
c. Gen, 9- SR SR -1. as. operations.
Plan rtesignatians
Lo►v -Density Res i Agr 1 ct-11 tura l -
d Parcel Sizes: deritial, ResldentiaT,
e. Population: 1/3„ 1 s 10 acres,
15- Character of
16. Nearest Site and Arc���
1 �F - Re 1 e'✓ant Urban Area c Chico" r Suburban tags i ou 1 tura l
is,Im ro Spheres of InfleJence,� fringe.
p veiments,
19- Fi Standards Urban t4rt3aCit. of Chico
tre Protection Service D-A.o
a- Nearest Pur scant roS�'ubl i
b. County Public c Works,
Water Ava i t rib i l i a Station: qn
20, Schools Y= En #42.
in Area." Chico gine ca,acity,
Unified School hydrants,
District.,
_gam