HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-340-083• � .
'9 c 4,. v•
f �
•�+
1
�
..
.
'
� e.� " .� -
a ' �
�
't 1
� .
i
' ,d � �
GG
y.
�
� �. < 1 .u� �
�
1 1 a
' ' _ a
e"
��;, n
.'r
n' -.�.,.
I
' hr �
Y '
f..4
a
„
,.
.�,_'
,.
o ,.
. ;-,
- ��
-.
.
1
acs
,�.
;�
. �1
'
\
,
N '1
�
�� � �
�
M
r
_
..
..
.la_
" ry
,M a
a .+r
.�
�
1�.
,,?
1
�
1
" n^
� ..
J
�. .
"
r
"
'I
a
-
1
b
X
.
i.
' ..�
P
� h� I.
�k�+.� / A
" �
` " "
Aimik
PLANNING COM OSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAW DIVISIONS
Cram Marongiu Log486�01-24-05
APPLICANT
ADDRESS C Connors Court; Chico, GA 95926
389 - -
OWNER Same �- --
TPMto divide 2.14 acres into 2 Cye15, omsh are
PROJECT DESCRIPTION p�1
1:07 acres in size. is
LOCATION
On the NE side of Jones Avenue approx. 700" N of its
intersection with Bell Road.., Chico area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-34-83
ZONING G��_ GENERAL PLAN PROJECT CONSISTENT'_
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
IANC CONSERVATION ACT CONT7vZACTS
APPLICATION RECEIVED 1-23-86
A(3 NT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER,: GDA.
�
ADD REsS: _ _
220 Grand Avenue, Oroville; CA 96965
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILED_
DETERMINATION
.AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED,_
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
SUB. COMMITTEEMEETING DATE..
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE
ADVISORS AGENCY ACTION
APEALED APPEAL HEARING
BOARD A.CT'iON_.
CbMMLNT:i F'C?$Z PLANNING DIRECTOR1 S REPORT-+,1,�.\nt��
1 V -d' .' ^,1Jr5 i y^ �,:Ch�h�Ct t �i moi, LYht i
�t��oa
- l .400, /~ ,, I
BUTTE COUNTY otmo Co. p%. nip r,M
%ERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT
rOR PARCEL MAP OR SUBDIVISIONMAP D F C 2 j
lteats 1-4 to be completed by Qplicant:
Umviflo, Ca�u, „ro
Craig Marongiu, 389 C Connors Ct., Chico, t,J 955926
1, Applicant Name and address Project Description -
To subdivide 2.15 acres into 2 parcels, each of which is over 1 arse.
2. Tiroj
3, Asuessor's Parcel Numbers)
42-3485
4. Proposed Use Single Family ResidentiaI
The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department:
Current toning „_,,
R -r - I ^ Land Conservation AgreementAr-.'�.--------
r1ao uy s igna L utl ' ,. n :
A 1` able Conditional Criteria; Not Applicable
"o Co. NnOng Comm
,"gricultural -Residential YES NO
.IAN 1), i986
x
Agricultural Compatibility
Water & Sewer Capacity
1. Adequate Fire Facilities
/t, Road Capacity & Maintenance
5.. AccesA to Commercial & Schools
Orchard &yield Crops
1, Predominant 5'10 ao. Parcel Site
Vicinity of -Urban Boundaries
3. Agric. viability not impaired
(JrdvJio CaU6ane�a
gds,
Staff Determination: Project does X does not
substantially conform to the Genera. Plan end zoning.
Staff Signature %6✓.-- Date, ✓.4,y'P'6
AS 7t1C APPLICANT ECllt' T13E REQUESTED LAND DIvI81ONi I Ari AWAtIr Off` `Tl1C, ABOVE STAFF
Dg,tERt IiNATION REGARbING THE. CONyomANCF, WITH THE GLNEML FLAN ANO ZONING.
SiEnatute of Applicant it
Da Leel l`"_._ r �.1
LD l000 (revised 6-80)
TO ; OV
Office of Planning and Research FROM c g
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814 PnDertmit
7 aunty Center ``Driv
or Drov:a.l lr�'�i*0466
x County Clerk
County of Butte ELEANOR BECKER County Clerk
str�_r cz - g By am u. F A. JAC Nyi peputy
Pilin of Notice of Determination in com Wince l,;
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, P w tl!E3ect;tan X110$
Project Title AP it
Name-�•-_:...,.v.;,`
Tentative Parcel Map 42-34-83 Craig
State Clearinghouse. Number Nlai�t).t�ra.0
Contact Person-
(if submitted to Clearinghouse) 6�1ephone Number
Public works John Mendonsa
(916)534-4266
Project Location
Oil the northeast side of. Jones avenue a
700 feet northwest of ,its intersection with Bell Rd., Chzly
Project Description co area
Tentative Parcel Map dividing 2+ acres to create
two parcels of 1+ acre each.
This is to advise that the Butte Count Ad
(Lead Agenc+ or Fs onsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project onMarcT0, 1986
and has made
(atethe fallowing determinations regarding the above-described) project;
I. The project. will
—X_Will not, have a'significant effect on the
environment;
2• An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this project
Pu rsuant to the provisions of CEQA.-
X A Negative Declaration was Prepared for this Project
Provisions of CRQAi p p p pursuant to the
3. Mitigation measures X_Mure) _were not, made a �.Ofidition of the
approval of the project,
4, A statement of overriding considerations �_ _ was, _{ was ,gar, adoptedfor this project.
This
seis approval certify that
final LIR with comments and xr.'Jponse,t and record of
project, Pp le to the general public at:
tutte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965 ✓�
Date Received for filing and
Posting at OPR 3-24-86
S; a t a
�.; Stephen A. Streeter
Title
PM
ttevsed htarclt 1086
Craig M,arongiu
,Mitigation Measures
TrM, APf42-34-83
],. Contribute $75.00
Tmprovemer�t Fund, per parcel into West Sidi Piro Station
y
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
TO: Office of Planning and Research FROM: planning Depurt►pent
..._. 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 7 Gounty. Centor Detva
or Sacramento, CA 95814 Orovi11e CA 9aJa5
x County Clerk
County of Buttej
SUBJECT: o hingof Notices of Determination in compliance wit � Section 21108 or 2 $�
f the Public Resources Code. MAR 13 ,
elect Title AP #Name q£3R7
��
lerk
5y N.- t�h
Tentative Parcel Map 42-34-83 Craig maron a.0 rput
State Clearinghouse Num r Contact Person Telep one Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 534-4206
P o ectLL�catton
on the northeast side of Jones avenue approximately
700 -feet r.arthwest of its intersection with Bell Road, Chico area.:.
jest Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 2f acres to create two
parcels of 1+ acre each.
This it to advise that the Butte County Advisory Aaencv
bead Agency or Responsible Agency.
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
regarding the above described project:'
16 The project _ will, ' will not, have ,a significant effect on the environmer,
2. An Environmental impact Report was prepared for 'this project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA,.
_.Y. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CFQA.
The E1R or Negative Declaratior, and record of project approval may be
examined at:
Butte 0011113 ,. P` Plnnning! nepnrt mont:
..........,.....1 F......... ...: i.__i L_.LYu i- ULUV111C li),- )`ll�'� •
3. Mitigation measures Y , were, _Were not, made a condition of the approval
of the project.
4. A statement of Crot:relding Considerations was, was not, adopted for
this project.
Dat�mo Z,e Received for fining .,;-11X86 �0/,.�
SigKht4re _.
Stephen Ai Streeter
8enior Planner
Title
ROvised, Oanuary 1985
Inter-Departm�nu memorandum
TO; Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
SUBJECT' REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR CRAIG MARONGTU ON AP 42-34^83
DATE: February 21, 1986
This is a proposal to divide 2.14 acres into two parcels of 1.07
acres. The present zoning is RT-lA. The Lard Use plan Map of
the Butte County General Plan deAgnates this area as Agricultural -
Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the
area.
The proposal. does not conflict with County zoning not any adopted
or proposed element of the Butte County GenoVal Plan nor any,
County; specific or community plan.
Recommend approval subject to the _following mitigation measure (M)
and conditions ,
1. Contribute $15"4into'West side Fire Station Improvement
Fund (M)
2. Note on map: Residential development may be subject to
school improvement fees
34 Comply with 'Nitrate Action Plan:
LMT/ss
CC: Craig Marong,iu
GDA
i
Craig Marongiu
389 C Connors Ct.
Chico, Ca 95926
February 11, 1.986:.
004 09, nommg
Butte County Planning Department F; 2 1986
7 County Center Dr
Orov l l e, Ca 95965 +Qnrvll j 041 0014
Re Parcel Map for C. Marongi;u, Jones Ave, Chico
Log #86-01-24-05, AP#42-34-83
Attention: Laura l'uttle
Mitigation of Fire Service
I agree to contribute $75 per lot to the West Side Fire Station Improvement
Fund and will forward the funds prior to recording my Parcel Map.
If you have any questions, plea:ie call me at 391-3351.
Sincerely,
Craig Mdron'u
I.
II.
APPI1NDlY ,F
COUNTY 0' ]3[ rn,
ENVIROWIINTAL CHECKLIS'l' IORI`l
(to Cha eonip]Lt� y I,en t\genc)``�
1,09 N 86-•01-24-05
All N 42-34-83
BACK Gly UND
1. Name Of proponent CRAIG MAR NGZU� �•------�-w----`
2. Address of proponent Fn1d representative (if appl, i.o4 i�l.e)
Cra--_-icrAaro",
389C Connors Court 2_x-0-ArAnd- nt`e
Chico. CA 95926 Orovil`le, CA 85965
3, project —Tenta.
tivePara�Mato ..;._
1,IAN'L OR1' FINDINGS OF S- N:il{r_� NCh
Y}'S MAY B N CJ
a. Does tale project have the potential to degradecelll'
quality or the environment, substantially
the habitat of a Ci.slt or lvildlif'e species, cause a
fish or w.i,ldliro polyttl.atiot to drop below selr-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reiiuco the number or rl;strict the
endangered plant or animal Or
range OL a al e o
eliminate important- examples of the major ]terxods
of California 111story or preilistnry? �-- --
b, aes the project have the potential to achieve
rrt-term benefits to the detriment or Lang -term,
ironmelltal goals? (A short-term impact on tits
cl.vironmen't is one lvhich occurs in a relatively
brief period OF tillle while long-term impacts will, �
CndUre into the rtlture.) — »
1 ite�l but cltmulatively-consider ind? (A
L, Does the project; have impacts which ll fable? ti
_ _ally i`m s
Project may fillpact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect or the total or those
impacts on the environment is si.I;ni.r}etint,)
di floes the project have environment. it urrects lvllich
will c:ause substantial acivrrse orrirrts on human v�
lof Indirectly?
l rilgi
ITI. }11:'1'1;Iti`11 IA"C1ltN ('I`o be cOMPICLMI by tile },Clrl Agency)
Cttt t}lcx bas 'is M* Oil'; lith}al cv;ll�lat}oil'.
efl
111V1 Mid t.ile propOsQt,ldllli�ltil?GA'l'iM11,�1i31.0 �i�hltr\i'}t1N�llvlj�rtl�lt�lil;reillltecleci
01
colt the t''tly i l-oluicltt , ion
lr�lYli r}nkl that attholigh tilt, I)I.oposod
cttn ollitlbo nhaveliriianirl~
,,,mt o rl`ect oil the (.11v i l'onillent ,
c±l'1'eti"t in thIN casco i'ee mso the iii'}`I GA'f'IttN I+l1:AoitJltl'l�l rlew;c rihecl cin.
the attached "hoot ha4v I)Lcejt� adLIQLI til tole llrojv t. A N}irrA'rIV
IllIGLAITA'VION wo 11 Ilc Isl•c'pal°x l I
1 /IV}, (' i ntl thr it l"t) tAjjkI'dl lbl NV I R Nbil;N`I Allr1 i MPAM'ill l P 11 t,tti norl•rcl
tI1C� t*llyi 1'C1151114.►1i , i1K141 �. Il
('AJN'1'Y 01'c htivl;, PLANNING 11iiPART -}i
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL PACTS t� eS1i and "maybe" answers are required
Xp nations o a 1 y YES MAYBE NO
on attached sheets))
. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant:
or in changes in
Unstable earth conditions
geologic substructures?
compaction or
b. Disruptions, displacements,
of the soil.'•'round
overcavering surface
in topography' or g
--
c. Change —
relief features?
modification of any
d. Destruction, covering or
geologic or physical. features?
unique g soils,
e. increase in wind or water erosion of
off-site?
either on or
f, Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
in si ltation, deposition
sands, or changes
OT erosion which may �rodifY the: channel oi.
of the ocean ar
a river or stream or i•he bed
, inlet or lake? -
any bay, productive soils
agriculturally
-
�,<..
�, Loss of .prime:
otits.de designated urban areas?geologic
property to
-
h. Exposure of people or
hazards'such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
hazards?
slides, ground failure or similar
Z,; AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
deterioration of ambient
a. Air emissions or
air Quality?'
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
b.;
or fumes.
C, Alteration of air movement, Moisture, or
in climate,
temperature, or a!ay change
locally or regionally?
3. WATER, Will the pro D os al resu:`. t in substantial. - -_
u11e course or
a, Changes in currents, or
direction of water movements in either
�.
marine or fresh waters? atterxis,
in absorption rates, drainage p.
b, Changes
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
drainage improve-
—
c teed for offwsite surface
n,, lading vegetation removal, channel-
u
eiit �
ization or culvert install.atiolr"•
flow of ""l.00d
d; Alterations to the colAtse or
--
tV a't e l` 5 7
o 4ateVs in the amount: of sua' ;i,re water in Mn?
,
water body?any
f. Discharge into surface Ater > li in including
qualify,
alteration of surface Fater
limited to temperature, dissolved
but not
oxyget1 or turbidity't
of the direction or rage of floi�
Alteration
of ground watersxcund 'cvaers r
g o
or gual.it o of
h. hange in the quantity with -
either through direct additions
ethers, interception of air
oi' through
draw,Oreotherwise -
aquifer by cuts o "
of water tivise
is Reduction in the amount
for public water supplies. .--;
3L
available
of people or property to water
i Exposure
related hazards such as -flooding?
YEs �, AM E
M
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substa. klia.l.
a, zange in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
and aquatic plants)'?
shrub!:, grass, crops,
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
Introduction of new species of plants into art
C.
area, or in a barrier to the normal re "e:nish„
X
ment of existing species? �„ .,
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
....
5,
NIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial
a.Caange in the diversity of species, or numbers
animals (birds, sand animals
of any species of
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects)!
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
Introduction of new species of animals into
c.,
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals? .--_-
d, Detera.Grat on to existing fish or wildlife
sy
ha') itat -----
NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial.,:
a,. Increases in existing noise levels?
levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise ray --
---y-
7,
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
signi scant light and glare? ._.
So
LA14D USE. Will the proposal result in a
Su etantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an area?
g.
\IATUi�At RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in
su stantial;
a. Increase it the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural
X
resources?
1.0,
RISK OF UPSET. will the proposal involve
A a � 0 explosion or tine release of hazard-
a;
ous Substances (incjuding, but not limited tO t
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in
event of an accident or upset COnditions7
b. Possible interference with an emergency
evacuation plan'?
response plan or emergency
ll. POPULATION, 4'Vill the proposal alter the location,
the human
istri ution, density, or growth rate of
population?
l
gOUSINC. Will the Proposal affect existing housing,
,
or create a demand for additional housing's
YES
MAYBE, NO
+
T1RANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Willill the proposal
1
result i'n:
Generation of substantial additional vehicle
uM
a.
movement? facilities, or
b. Effects on existing parking
demand for new parking?
Substantial impact on existing transportation
c.
systems? atterns
ofpeoplesent
do alterations to
goods?traffic-
to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
�{
e. ,Alterations
e.
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERV:[CES- Will the proposal have an erA,, ct
in need 'or new or altered
upon, or result a
governmental services.:
a, Fire pxotection?
b Police protection?
c. Schools?
d, parks 0-1,,other recreational facilities?
including
...._.�
e, Maintenance of public facilities,
�
roads?
f other governmental services?
15. ENERGY_. Will the proposal. result in:
amounts of fupo�norex sting?
_ �.
W- Use of substantial.
b. Substantial increaseriredemand
u rndthe ,development
sources of energy,.
of new sources of energy?
�. UTIL?TTES. Will the proposal al�erationsatoeed thefor
substantial
ae systems, or
ollowing
a. Power or naturals gas`'
b, Communications s,;,
X
c, Water avail al i l its
d. Sewer or Septic tank?
�-`
e Storm wt ter drainage?
=---
,
50l ,d waste and disposal?
�,..
17. iiLO HEALTH . Will. the proposal result in!
health hazard or Potential
., tlon of an
,rea
excluding mental health)?
health hazard (health
E;c osure of people to po tential
b.p
hazard s7
18 AESTHETICS, SCS, Will the p�yoposal ?result in the
Vista or view open to
axon of any scenic
will th proposal: result in the
the public, or
creat.�b of an aesth ically Offensive si�:e open
ere
to Public view?
LL .5
MAYBI! isit r
RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
Upon t e quality or
quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RES0URCES
a. Wxll t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b.t Will the proposal result in adverse phys4cal
or aesthetic Affects to
a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?'
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which
would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
n: Will the proposal restrict existing reli r'
or sacred uses within the
area? potential impact
V. DISCUSSION ORE
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
AP 42-34-8$
- See attached,
x
i
Al U-IMOO OE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALU61:10N AP 42-34-83
The project Is a 2 -acre two -lot parcel map within thea Chipr.s url-)an
area,
104. Tl -,ere is no alternative to conversion of agricultural soils
within the Chico urban area. This property has resident -es ov, 'Chree,
sides which Impacts Its suitability for agricultural u�e.
3b: Surface water runoff should not be a problem wlth the mscre
parcel size and well draining soils.
11: Infilling of West Chico is continuing.
18a: improvement or Cuilla and Jones to County standards H111
minimize potential Impacts additional traffic may cause.
'14a: The property Is within the Oest Side Fire Station Improvement
Area. All developers have contributed $75 per lot for the purchase or
a 1/2 -acre site and development of a fire station. The fee Is the
oril Y means to minimize I Moacts to fire seryIce delivery
11bjd$e1f; Service demands hove been anticipated in the urban area
and can be extended cost effectively..
lolo Residential development will be subject to school Improvement
foes. Unit size determines the fee amount. A 8 -bedroom house 18
approximately $650.
16a'. Extems 1 on of Cal I f oi--n I aWater 1 1 nes shOU" d be cons I dored. The
property does fall within the nitrate area. High nitrate levq,t. have
been recorded in wells located north-east. The groundwater qt ,,;. Ont
Is south:viest.
16d9e: All proport-les within the urban area are required to comply
with the Nitrate Action Plan, Sevier and drainage facllltles wl)l be
extended according to 8rown and Caldwell's master plan. Developers
have to install frOntaoe Improvements stubbed out to each lot.
Recommded Mion'
1. Contribute -76 per lot to the West Side 1 -Ire Station Improvement
Furqd.
2. Note on map , Fos ident lal dovelopmaht wil) be subject-, to scl1c:)p1
1 tnprovement f
a. Comply with Aitrate Action Plan..
6
Applicant: Craig Marongiu
Assessor's Parcel 4
42-84-83
Log 4 86-01-24-05
DATA SHE -:E1
A. Pr(,Ject De-scricit ion
1. Type of Project: Land Division,
2. Brief Description: Tentative Parcel Map divlriin(j acral
into two lots of 1+ acre oath.
S. Location,. On the northeast side of Jones Avenue)
approximately 700 feet northwest of Its 'Intersect, -)on with 8011
Road) Chico area.
4. Proposed Density of Development: 1 d.W./acre.
54 Amount of impervious Surfacing: Minimal.
E. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Frontage on Jones and
Clulla Lane.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Septic systems proposed.
8. Source of Water Supply: Individual wells proposed.
9. Proximity of Power Lines: To original parcel.
10. Potential for further land divisions and development% Nono.
B. vironifienta I 5ef,-Um
Phos ical Ewylronment�--
Terra I n
General Topographic Character: Level valley land,
Slopes'. 0-2;r..
Elevation'
Limiting Factors"* None.
a. Types and Characteristics: Vina Fine Sandy Loam, deepji
well draining soils classed as prime agricultural,
b6 Limiting Factors' None,
S. Natural Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake Zone". Moderate Class V111,
b. Urbsiah Potential. None.
C. Landslidd Potehtlalt None.
dk Fire Hazard t Untlassirled.
ei. Expansive Sol! Potent-laig Moderate,
44 Hydrology
a. Surface Water: None In Immediate vicinity,
b. Groundwater: Within area of nitrate conobrn,-
C-i Drainage Charattbristics". IMMedhatdlY Outside of $U0ADj
no community drainage available,
d Annual Rainfall (normal)-* 29-2410,
G. Limiting Factors: Nitrate aron, outside or SUDAOi
5. Visual /Sce"Ic QuOltyt Good*
6. Acoustit Ouality: Good.
7. Air Qual i tY- Good
�S?�ooiCal i='nvrnr,t.,�nt.
S. Vegetation`. Grasses.
y. Wildlife Habitat: No known rare or endangered spoil in
vicinity.
10. Archaeological and Historical Resourco
Including unknown, s in the ai-044 Law
11 autte County General Pian designation.
Agricultural-Residehtiol.
12 Existing Zoning: RT-=1A.
18. Existing hand Use on-site: Open space.
14. Surrounding Area:
a■ Land Uses: South and East.'
West: rural residehtial# North and
Qrchards and field craps,.
b4 Zoning: RT-1A, Sid'-1 A-.5,
c. Gen. Plan designations: Agriculturral-Reslienialy Or-chardand Field Crops.
d. Parcel Sixes: 1 to 80 acres.
e Population: Rural densities.
15. Character of Site and Area.,
1 f:. Nearest Urban Arc, : Ch a l fringe Of Chico
City ty Of Chico 1 m i 1 e :way.
17, Relevant Spheres of InflUence.
Chico, CSA 25 AGreenline at Jnnes,y City of
� Nitrate �,tien plan.
'1S. Improvements Standards Urban Area: nla
19. Fire Protection Seralcee
no Nearest County (State) Fire Station. #42p
b. Water Availability" Engine capacity. 441.
90 Schools in Area:
Chico Unified School District
r� ♦
1
�
LL,
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY" SHEET FOR LAND Dlvxrt,IONS
APPLICANT Giovanni Ciulla 83a12-20-0
ADDRESS c/o Joseph Hassell P 0. Box 3475, Ch i,C ,v C .1927
OWNER Giovanni Ciulla
PROUECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel. Mali c7jv7.cl i n g 2, 2 1 -ti c 4roate
two parcels at 1 ,acre each
LOCATION On the northeast side of Joales Avolltle, ,jpj .pOxi.mat rYly
700 :feet northerly Of the intersection Of J01,es Avvi,lu(, and l�cl.'l. Rmad)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-34-83
ZONING RT -IA � GEN. PLAN Ag Res PROJECT C(JNSx.SI'E,NTi
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 12/20/83
E.nL: Jase171 I•lags � - ----,ri
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHES
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED O. C. P G. B.
DATE MAILING I"L`aT PREPARED
DATE MATL-OUT NUTIC88 W2ITZ83N MAILED y
Nt11riS3k,R
DATE ;PLANNING DIRECTOR"S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONhiI±,PI"SAI,CAT'I;cIC icAL EXEMPTION w ,DATE FILED
DITEIlMI±NATIOfJ u
AND DATE
NEGATIVE DMARATION DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED
SUIT. CC�'I�9T'I"I'I,I� MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGE N(lly INARI NC DATE
ADVISORY AGENT; i ACTION
----------------
BOARD ACTION
- _.. .
COMMENT'S
i
.. HT ,� ...u✓."y�
a..,,,"1 .:✓'"'�"''�* r "� A'�°,"`�� as •'�• "� li f� .t`/5 J' � � �R,
Y o ar
ft �dMM1 a>+lid'`+�'<`w' '"aw �R' .is�w'�A r ♦ i'L l�
1 OI" PUMA(' WolliI\*t
QEPAR M 14
CLAY 0ASTLEW IMY, 0111'""t
7 COUNTY CLNrrR 01111r>r, 00�rr 1 i , r nt �rurrtnr, Sib
Tclaphurin IrW4 0011 wtJ.Ili 9111.i)MA (1300 CNC11`
Uayuty Dlrocto,
tiu}to Co, Plranning Comm,
'JAN1 t.1 1,9,84Jammuz.�, 19811,
Orswilla, cau oCmii
RE: AP 42-34-83
Joseph Hassell Tentdtivi~ parcel 14ap
{
P. Q. Box 3 475
Chico, CA 95927
[dear Mr: Hassell
-for
This leti-er is to notify you t rtkli7ownCasfflIuoka75h4of
42-34`-83, F �, 5�a Y� hG, bet
pal,)(jivider
rra''laps page
a 1,0 pose41 f cr fUr'thrr
}
Ap
72, and this p<^oEler�y i s pari: o'F the pr operii
y p
1 '
division,
We have rliscUS:ed the it�ia�iorl ti�ryLhoUr
Ciu17a to
county cpLinsel, and 11 ave come
fit►rlhcr clivid�' �l�lris proporty,
C,
j -I'm
1._
e the' �o��ltision that for hil�.
he would have to.file a $U17diyis_i,on iila)
he
1
c
therefore, Wform YOU that. we cannot
process the ptit^cod Irlap that
t
4ie
irl1��
applied for.
1'rit17 1*ectur"d
to ttriS ina'1r4.er, p erlsc
If you should have any questions
.contact our oi'fiico.
Very truly your,,
Clay C a5110berry
Diructor of Public Work%
original Mound by
joVitti MCtjt)0N A
,]cahri t�'11r1c1rt�;�
A,s1 �i,s't�ltlalrcir.'�ar
X1.1/its
5 t:
CC:1 p7�nliltl l'11Vrii"G�1Cllrwn' 34 �'tC'vI0VI
Dvirolalt,1161 1'1ca1 t:h
Giovanni C401�1, C/o 30w,vpil Ild,Svll,
C
C11 co, CIA tl°,�!);.' j
{
Inter Depurt ntal"Memorandum
t
T61 ietta,e Kircher, Planning Director
FROM! DeparUient of Public Works - Land Development Section
SUBJECT, Planning Director`s Report
DATE; December 20, 1983
The following application will be needing a planning D)jrrecLor's
Report:
Giovanni Ciulla TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, two parcels
on the northeast side of tones Avenue, approxi-
mately 700 ft. northerly of the intersection of
.Jones Avenue and Bell Road; Chico area.
AP 42-34-83
JM/ns Q
�W
n
0 w� o
p
h
P