HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-340-138111 ��`�lu' , . � �',' A + • � �
f �� _ � � � e
. • • s » n _ _. ��
� ,' :. 8.
��•
� , .
0 �:r
P
� �
~. f. - '' -
A. � .
• ,Q'
� � .. /� _
n �Y � � •
4 , � 1
�� � .
•c �
w
M .
0
` 'moi
i • .' 1
O •
J
���, ..
M1+d .�
� F
` , I
•, � w � � ,
d� _ � � � � � � � � � •
:a ' ' / •
., .. � .I.
W A �_ �
. ; !1 . �
• A � 2
APPLICANT Prank Brazell Log#87-07-27-x-02
ADDRBSS 610 Tandy Ct., Chico, CA 95926
I OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 15,40 acres to create
3 parols, Parcel. 1 at 5.40 acres, Parcel 2 at 5.00 �aores, Parcel 3 5.00 acr
.. .. M� e s
LOCATION ori the northerly side of Bele. Road, a-1--�---
-_ pproximaL•el---
y 1200 feet west
of Alamo Avenue, Chid, ---------
ASSESSOR'S
---- ---
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42-34-158
ZONING A,5 Orchard & `.�."'" ---�
GENERAL PLAN Field Crops PROJVCT CONSISTENT.?� �yM
GENERAL PLAN CONVORMANCE REPORT
DATE OF' `APF,i,xCAN7.' S xGNATUFtE _
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACT'S?
DAVE APPLICATION RECEIVED July 27, 1987
AGENT/8URVEYOR/C1VxL ENGINEER: RFC Surveyors
ADDRESS s 331. Wall Street, Chico, CA 95926
- DAT; PLANNING blptCTOR' S- REPORT" PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAx,�- r -W ----y- -
DETERMXNATION' CATEC'ORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
AND DATE � N.E DATIVE DECLARATION t)AT'E ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEC. DECI,ARATTON DATE ADOPTEb
ENV, IMPACT REPORT - DATE C9RTjpj b
... STATE CLEAR,1N0HOU8 NO .-
St��ti COt MI�i"! E MUTING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY FEARING DATE
ADVISOR` A08NCY .ACTION
�ON�'ORMANCE itE7C'O�T
_G]ENEF�AL p%.Ai*r v x S T O IV MAF
'OR E'AFtCFiL MAF OR SUBDT
l-
4 to be completed by applicant: --- »
It�imK
APPLICANT NAME AND ppDRESSs
7., PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
3, ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER(S): F
k. PROPOSED USE: the Planning Department:
items arra to be completed by
The following LAND CONSERVATION AGP,@?�NT:
ANT ZONING:
GENERAL, PLAN DESIGNATION:
Conditional Criteria: It is recommended that you porfom the
AGRICIILTURAL°,RESIDENTIAL
YES NO following checked items:
compatibility -- -�CgpEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK
1. Agricultural comp — BOTANICAL SURVEY
2. Water and Sewer Cap
GEOLOGICAL .SURVEY.
3. Adequata Fire Facilities YES NO
q, Road Capacity and Maintenance
- WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH
a, Access to Commercial mid Schools ^---" � GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONES
ORCHARD AND FIE:LD CROPS'
-- D PLAIN
-
1. Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel 5ice _ WITHIN FIAO
2: Vicinity of Urban Boundaries " �� SPECIFIC OR
3 o Ag, Viability not Impaired »!S- WITHIN .ARF.I+, --
Staff Determination: Substantially confoz'ms tob
LAND USE PLAN:
If Yes,. Name of Plan
_ GENERAL PLAN'- 1. 'Land Use
2. Conservation ---_
;...�- — WITHIN URBAN RESERVE,
3 Open Space ---
a; Safety If Ves,� Name of ReserveIx
5. 'Noise X -
5. Housing Y AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN:
7. Circulation
A G
ZONING:"'"`"
F �7✓
C'�MF.11+.7• .,� .ori �N ���.
'"
y?�ra►..y0li _G � .
Date
Staff Signature
LANDDIVISION IAM AWARE OF
ABOVE STAFF MERMiNATIO REGARDING r'
S THE. APPLICANT FOR THE REQUESTEpLAN ANDIZONING
A ,+
THE ABOVE
WITH THE G
Signature of Applicant
Dated -
rt will ekpir+a and be tli scared sk ! A) n,pnths Froin the date iitO Staff gignaturn.
fthis 'repo..
L� g00A (rev# ed
6-81
1 "A.`°J.
�'p,'" 4wa',� 1{i dA r�ltll
N04CE OE IJETEaM,X i'A d0N
X*0 = Office of Planning and esealch F Butte
CUtatyfalr
1 90 Tenth Street, Roo 21
� Planning ��ra�iat't:ment:
Sa �amentty, CA 9581 G 7 County Co0ar Drive
or OCT 1 5 1987 Oroville* ' OA 95965
X County Clerk CANDACE J. GRUBBS, Butte Co, Cork
County of Butte
BY -- a -Pkfir_A+C Deputy
straw.. VECT : Filing of Notice+ cfDetermination in compliance with ftpt_q tun ?1108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP li Name
Tentative Parcel. Map 42--34-138 Frank Brazoil
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Toloptiotia Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendons'a 538.7266
Project Location On the northerly side of Bell Road; approximately
ely
1200 feet Qwest of Alamo Avenue, Chico.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map dividing 15.4 acres into three
Parcels, two at 5 acres and one at 5.4 acres.
This is to advise that the Butte County _Ad`yi5ory _Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on October 12, 1987 and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project;
1.. The project will, will not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
Z: An Environmental. Impact Report was prepared for this prtiject
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
X
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigation measures X were, :were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project:
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, � wAs iiot, adopted
for this project
This is to certify that the final. SIR with comments and responses and record of
project approval it available to the general public at
Butte County Planning Department
I County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965 1
Date Recdived for Filing and
Posting at OPR_ 1�
Sigifatuee, A
Stephen A. 8treetor, Senior Planner
Title
itavited Haech 1066
";rank Brazell
Tentative Parcel Map
Mitigation Measures
AP#42-34---138
1. Sf'�oOW on the final map a 100-foot residential building
se,tba.ck line adjacent to all property bounda:cjod
bordering agricultural use parcels.
2. .Pay $75 per parcel into the West Chico Fire GaLio't
bonefit fund.
3. Pay a pro rata share toward the traffic signal :fund at
the intersection of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue,
Inter -Departs ��q morandurr�
Butte Count
mg
�`� 170,
County Advisory Agency—
PROM: Planning Director
SUBJECT: REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR PRANK B"
AP#42--34<-13$ RAZELL ON
DATE!
October 5, 1987
This is a Proposal to divide 15.4
a., 5.4 acres and 2 at 5 acres into 3
is E -5 g acres each. Parcels,
(Agricultural - The L -all �L- zoning
Map of the Butte Count 5 acre parcels)
as Orchard and Field crropsneral Plan desiTna:tes' L Use Platt
Chico Area Land Use Planpadopthisinarea isgsub'_ Luis area
Board of Supervisor. 3ecl to the
August of 1982 by the
A finding of coziformance with the Butte County
Plan is made based on the action of the Board off'`
cn pctober 15 Ger►eraa
for Robert K,` 190'. In approving the 'tentative ParcelMapson AP42-34_2 Brown on AP#42-01roject si -35 and for
Of the Chico Area hGreenline in is subject Rtoethe Policiesichols
for Brown and Nichols approving the Tentative Maps
creation of 5 acre or larger Of Supervisors found
the General Plan, parcels was in conformanceWith
A Negative Declaration with
for ��doption. The MitigationitiUatjot Measures Measures is
recommended
are. n
1. Show on the final map 100 -foot
residential building setback
line adjacent to all
use Parcels; Property boundarieshordering agricultural
2 Pay $75.00 per parcel, into the west Chico F
Benefit :fund. ��e Station
3. Pay a
crata share
intersect,
toward the traffic
SAS:jmc sinal fund at
ion of Alamo
Avenue and East Avenue. the
cc Frank Brazell
RFC Surveyors
I l �w
Tor
FROM;
SUBJECTS
DATE;
Inter-Deparl
Advisory Agency
9
orandum
Steve Streeter, Planning
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FO4?
R FRANK BR
September 10 17 AZELL, AP 42-34-138
9:8:
This project is
Mr. Brazell., a redivision of a
land division o e2Advisory Agency parcel previously c�;oatcsd
and one �$ acres into two gave tentative
of 15 + 8 acres on toparcels appa;oVa . to a
U map is to redivide the , one of 12,5
acres after t October 21, 1985. The cur acres
and one he final curve larger Of the two x`c�ttl: te1�ta-
at 5.4 Y) into three parcels (15.4
_acres. Parcels
The initial , two at 5 acres
as well as adjoining
Prepared for t e
Nichols joining tentative h prior Tentative
IS
sufficient for consideration oRobert Fare�1 Map
cation w` Brown anis
with the amendments contained Robert
this current appli_
The Butte Count in this memorandum,
I
o Y Sheriffs Department .states.
density n law enforcement in this
Y which that "The primas
exstin will increase tease Would be Y
g levels of law e calls nor service an increase in
mental checklist), nforcement" (Item'14b, taking away of t Y from.
h� environ-
The Butte County Fare De
into the West Chico Department recommends
mitigate the imactsFre�station benefit payment of
Is also required tc to ''he Fire fund as
$225
Watery into Department. Thea means to
Tender Fund, v,' -J-ch the Butte Count applicant
Department (Item 14a zS collected b Y Fire Department
Of the environmental check Public Works
Residential traffic hecklistJ
intersections generated by this tentative ma
ta.ve Maps along East Avenue and
Signal at have contributed a The Esplanadd.p Would affect
an intersection pro rata share toward Recent teita.
Avenue, along either a traffic
the traffic Ss recommended that a 1'he Esplanade or
gnal fund at Alamo pro rata share be East
'Phe Mitigation Avenue and East paid toward
gation measure adopted far Avenue:
concerning the. residential
agricultural buildan the prior tentative ma
(Items 6b uses .is also reco g setback frim adjoining
17b of the mmended for this j inin
environmental checklthiso entati.ve
Recommendation map
mitigative Declaration re
gati-on measures I gardin
Issoca g enThmmended, impact With
ose measures are:
Tentative Parceolap, AP 42-34-138 (Frank
September 10, 1987 zell)
Page 2
Show on the 'final map a 100-foot residential building
setback line adjacent to all property boundaries borering
agricultural use parcels.
2. Pay $75 per parcel into the West Chico Fire Sta;��cy�
fund. benefit
3. Pay a pro rata share toward the traffic signal, fund i-
intersdction of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue,, the
SAS/sj
cc; Frank Brazell
RFC Surveyors
(`ctlI\- l Llt'(_ jsiil ji'
l:tiVlltlt;ti���1�I_N•l',11.
I"(lip
�.t. (
i3�x06-21i,.�i
IIA-- K( ---.ROUE l) f,cx 85.06-24-02
I15-07-10.01
1. Name 01' p nt e1)t N 142.01.35r tr7_34_'��,
pro one _Robert B ,
2, - `_"__--- rOw�, Robert F4icha.X s,? 42-34,25
Address or Prot)oilAnf Vit_ .1,4 iIC na.,.._Ii
2
Does the project have the
ytta]ity of the environnrcntpoCentirrl to de„
the habitat o1• a fish _or w. lslbstastiall �redc f:hC
rich or rvildli1.0 to s rcrlurc
siisr,ainin, I pulation to drop pedes, cause a
b levels, threaten p below self-
. anima] Community, reduce the eliminate a
ran a crl` number or Plant or
tl r 1,c 01. endangered restrict
eliminate impot'tant e plant or animal or
thc
or call forImPO"tant "tant • xamples of the mayor
07• prehistory? periods
flues �-o
shu the Is 1OL't have the I)Otcnti rl
tt-to'm betlei-its to the �Ict'l to ac=hieve
eavyronmental finals? iment 01, long-
environment is CA short -ter b >orm,
brief' one Which occurs i m impact on the
�`ndirrcpirltodt'or time 14111lc 10n ,. n a tel
atiVely
b firm impacts wt l l
NAYIlIl 1i(
C, bocs the project have iln arts
ally limi ed n which are i<.x
project may imbactcomulati'vel le? (A..
P n two or ) re Separate (�
Where the impact on each resoure 5harate
Im a1, lttrt ivltert' the effor relativelvurccs
imisaCtti on the Octc`nl�trortmcO is sjhe total or
4n t'] those
its ilac`s the+ Cunt,}
tvi I 1 ltrtt it et have Vhvi t'onment;il
cause substftntial adverse c I're4ts )vhich
heirt45, aithet• directly orrcets o
or inr.Iircctlt.7 n human
t I nt 'rr. Irl I n 1't. to 'V
Oil tileb;1� i � ohY thr t.r,td eiRoncy). .�
r this tllitial i+V:IIGtIt
_.,
IAT. find the p1'0110sctl r,o +IOrIi
opt rhe environment p 11 t (C1liLtl NO,I Ftrtvc,
rritd tl NIrtIA�CVfi C1iiCGAkATIUt�rllvi 11;ti i� ri e,tint Otto ot
find that al though tilt ltrciltct t+tl troht prc�sarod,
Vaht 01'rre't rail the+ enVi ronO Il
1'rcct In this c lfir liCranse + hhr 1 i !Octt COOld h'JVO ,t sil;n il.
`+ I Zvi 1 no t lir o s i+
the at`taehet( sheet hIV0 br ttt�lddc�riltrirArhONt l' r• I,nil" e,lrit�
NrViI�APAT IO'N t+tll he lytoparad. roJcct,.,� tlV.Reriuerl ori.
ria A N)"OATIVIt
IA11 find the pr`oi,osoil Itrt�,irct
the enc i r0 then t MAY Ilavr a s I ,
} s rinrl titi 2tl,�1,lI;NrAI, IDIItA(.rl,r'I�tiltl�nsercc�3re...,
`-...�:.,tu]jj Z6}., 198$ r rlr
1: , l GANN I NO IlI 1lAit'I'biRN']=
ity C� r ib
David' Ilironimus
Ass "te Plan er
la
TV, ENVT RUNN1P%1T:aL IMO A rTS
AJJ ati` to t tonSot a `•'yes" and "maybe''
answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; YES
a, nstable earth conditions
N1AY13r-hlrl
or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d•. Destruction, covering or modificati
unique geologic or on of any ---
physical
k
features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils
either on or
off-site^
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands,
�^
or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which
may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the
ocean o
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prime agriculturally soils
outside designated urban
-----
ara5�°ducta,ve
h. IrXposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such
as earthquakes, lands
slides 1lcles, muci-
, ground failure
or similar hazards?
�� AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. -
Air emissions or deterioration
-�
air quality? of ambient
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke -- ---_
Or fumes?
c• Alteration Of air muVement, moisture, or
temperature,
or any change n climate,
i
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal
F --,Changes
a. Chan es P posal result in substantial:
n currents, or `the course or
direct'cin of water movements in either
marine
or fresh waters?
bi orathesratein aandramountp rofes' drainage
patterns,
urface
c. Treed .for off-site surface dra:inagerimprov
meats, including vegetation remoVal, channel-
i:ation or culvert installati
=
1.ers? on?
d+ IteratioTlS t0 the C'Otlrse Or ,flow of flood
JcG
e. t,"Wnge in the amount of surface Water in any
water body ?
f: Discharge into surface waters �' 01, ], it a
, i any
alteration of surface
ancliidan
+ water qualztI
x
but not lifiited to temperature, dxssolVed
ozygen
or turbidity?
9. Alteration Of the dire tion or rate of flow
of ground haters?
h. Chane in theuantitY � of ground eaters '---�• `.
ether throughdirectadditions or
with-
drawals, oz' through interception of
aquifer by can
uts
or excar,*ations?
is Reduction in the amount at water otherwise
Available for -
public
dater supplies?
J Exposure of people or property to water`-=
related hazards
such as flooding?
0 IES
MYBE NO
Wild the proposal result in substantifll
4. PUNT L►FE: of species, car number'
diversity
the
a any species ans including trees,
of any species of p (
plants)?
shrubs,, grass, crops, and aquatic p
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
b.
or endangered species of ' its?
new species of plants into an
C. Introduction of
barrier to the normal replenish-
area, or in a
ment of existing species? a ricultura'l crop?
of any g
d. Reduction in acreage ,,.
•, - .�..
iorsubstantial
5 ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal
rs
species,
a, C tinge, in the diversity Pe
of animals (birds, land animals
of any species
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
incl udi
benthiorganisms or insects)?
Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
— `4
b.
or-endangered species of animals? .---
of animals into
—
c. Introduction of new species
or result in a barrier to the 'migration
an area,
or movement of animals?
` Deterioration to existing ,fish or wildlife
d, ,
habitat?
NOISE. will the proposal result in substantial;
levels?
a Increases in existing no ,.�.
of people to severe nolevels.?
b: Exposure
7. LIGHT GLARE: Will the proposal produce
_AND
s�.gni icier 11,g t and glare?
B. LAND USE. will the proposal result in a
of the present or planned
su stantial alteration
land use of an area?
5, NATURAL RESOURCES: the proposal result in
su staFt—i7.;r
yhe rate of use of any natural
a. Incre,-y ,,
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natuxal�
,F.
resources?'
10. RISK OF U'p,SET. 11111 the proposal involve:
the relbut`ase of
A r3,s ` a explosion or,
ous substances (including, not limitedrtc�.
or radiation) in the
eil, pesticides, chemicals
or upset condxt�ey
• ce with an emergency event of an accident
b. Possible interference
evacuation plan'
�
e
response plan or emerg ncy
proposal alter the locatiot►,
11: POPULATION, 1+1111 the porErowth rate of the human
ststrx utaon, density,
population?
_osal affect eXisting housing,
4, HOUSING, will the prop
housing?
...--
or create a demand for additional
YES
MAYBE NO
X3,
TRANSPORTATTON/CIRCIJLATI'O�t. Will the propos, f
result in;
a. Generation of substantial additional vehit-l.<
movement?
b_. Effects on e-xisting parking facilities, or
-F
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportatiot:
systems?
d, Significant alterations to present p4ttorn8
of circulation or movement of people an,11or
goods?
e, Alterations to waterborne, rail or air t,,eaf jc:?
f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
c
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an affect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
Overnmental services;
a. Fire protection?
,>tC
b. Police protection''
C. Schools?�»
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
Xc.
e. 11ai.ntenance of public facilities, including
roads?
h -
f. Other governmental services?
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
se uf substantial amounts of fuel .or' energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existig
t g
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of enemy?
16
UTILITIES, Will the propsal resuu '` t in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
fo lJ owing
a., Power or natural gas'!rc
b. Communications systems"? -`
c. Vater availability:
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e; Storm water drainage?
k'
fi Solid waste and disposal?
17.
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in
a: Creat on of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health .
hazards?
1$.
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruct of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or will the propd6al result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
YES
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
Opportunities?
20 CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object? r
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
fE a physical change which would affect unique'
ethnic cultural values?
d, Will the proposal restrict existing veliglous
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?,
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 42-01-35, 42-34-26,
42-34-25
See attachment
E-VALU:7TIOII
3b,c,f: The development of nine idditional h()(JjLjsitos on Lhe
three projects (four on ttie Eirown map, four on the Nic-,J1tjls map, and
one on the Drazell map) will result in some overcovorljjq, compacUon,
and displacement of soils. This disruption Will 104d Its an incrtL-lase
in Storm Water runoff and an increase in erosion potp(jtlal and
siltation potential. DUe, to the site Of the parculu I)Pirig created,
any ncrease will not be significant.
Igs The three subject prcpertios are in an area of Vi,ria loam which it
co;isidered to be a, prime agriCUItUrial soil. DevelOpment, of, the three
projects Will remove appro-ximately @5 acres from lcje"tjer holdings
generally considered to be viable for agricultural pursuits.,
Additionally j development an the parcels Could cause neighboring
property to be loss suitable for agricultural uses due to the
encroachment of homes and other residential facilities.
1h;; All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake InteritiitY
Zone VIII. The subject property is located approxtimately 6 mtllzs
Southwest of the Tuscan Monocline, a fault system Of unknown n,".ivi'Ly.
Cori struct i -;n of homes to Uniform Building Code standards for
seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to
rosiderits in case of seismic activity.
The subject properties currently exhibit some minor 1ocoll,2.(ed
flooding during periods of heavy rainfall. While development 0+
humosites on the properties may slightly increase this tenderi(ly
tbwal-ds flooding, any increase should not be significant due to the
size of the partbls4
4d: At the present time, approximately 721 1/2 acres of the t,_ibJect
property (an all three properties) is devoted to row crops and
irrigAted pasture. The existing field boundaries and irrigatioh
facilities do not Follow the parcel boundaries as shown on the
tentative m.-! ' x-
is. Additionally, the fields as they eist, are not Wholly
located tin, the individual original parcels. As s,.ich, the viability of
those fields as they exist will be severely reduced. As such, the
historic agricultural ose of these properties Will be lost,. While it
can be shown that 4 and 5 acre parcels of speciality crops can
Gb"10timos be viable os -economic units, historically such size parcels
are not used for intonsivo agriCUltUr,11 pursuits. Sue also item 1g.
6b, 1'/b, Establishment, of nine additional home-siton in an array that
is P3�-eddmihahtly aqriCL1ltUr.11 Will eXpO5e future rosioontG to -noise
and dust created by agricultural activities and May OAXPbe-10 therm to
sevore health hanardt associated with agricultural chomicals, It, is
recommended that a 100 +Cot: building setback be established on al
boundaries adjacent to agricultural use PArcel-s4
Appandi P - Pagd 6
�jobt J,�. Elrnwn
cant L-r.Robert C. Iql-,,-hols,
Loci
Frank 9ra=ell
j. Type of Project' Tentative Parcel Map t. no 0,kvidin(J
f Description: Three "tentative ' ive Part,U,' '�'aP,' 6
Of 12.2 tk(:,rL
Brie parcels, one Onr'
acres into four i f, t 0 four
two at 5.7,. acres each; one dividing 28-4
acres, and
parcels, one 0 at on5.3 agcre12.s 5 each -,acres one
at acres, three 00d one
e t
dividing 2e acres into two parcels,
at 15.8 -%cres. Bell Road Pram Muir Avamkt:-� to
Loc-:�,tlbnt On the north side of Jones Avenue in the Chir.0 area'
t east Of dwellitIr
approgimately 400 fee
4. Proposed Density Of DeveloPmen 5 acres per unit to
12 acres per dwelling Unit.
pervious Surfacing: Minimal
Amount of Impervious fetint Oil tiel)
6i Access and'Nearest , Public Road Properties
Roaddividual septic SYst*'"
7. Method of Sewage DisPOsal: in
8, Source of Water Supply- Individual wells
9. Proximity Of it -ower Lines: To property nd develoPmeilt' Som��
r further land: divisions a unrlc.I'
it '.j i Potential +0 for creation to 6 acre.par 91sr
additional potential
the egisting toning.
Terrain rap
dopes: - hit Character: r-,lat Valley 1,*And
General
Topbo
b. to 2%
c. Elevation: 160 to i10 feet ASL
d4 Factors-' None
Vina lo"i weii 'A"'y w
a4 'ypbs and Characteristics:
Grained 'Aitle with 000 d perme�abilitY-
b. i,imitihg Factors: None
e
AP 42-0,+5 42-34-16* 42-34µ25
Character of Si i,e and Area: E.t sting agri Ctrl tut^ Al area an thou-
edge of an area of mi „r. d subi-krban residential and ngri cul tUral
t.tse5.
16. Nearest Urban Areae Chico
17. Relevant Spheres of Inflltence: Chico
10. Improvements Stand r"ds Urban Area: No
19. Fire Protectio.rt Service:
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Cohw3vet: Goad
b. WateroAv#ailability: Wells and fi� a tant ort.3 C(11y
20i Schools in Area: Chico Unified School Distl—iet