Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
042-370-068
P � �1�tyr COM.OSSION Sc�WARX St T FOR ARxGA'Oaty Jacobs Log488-03-30-05 10 Fairway Drive, Chico, CA 95926 ADDRESS,__ Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION -� .._TSM to divide 2.56 acres to create 10 single J .1X 6111 . Y lots, 6,500 SF -- 8700 SF iw�++r�_+.. :u.anruY .tri•uw..r..✓..r�,r�awusr'..a�..r_r:w:C+s':..raw.+.ytKYw.:ww'FMYNiY:KfMFMW'H+:{YK. WSI: ,.".. .'s 1.".."W on the west side of Alamo Avenue approximately 300 Poet LOCATION south of East Avenue, Chico area. 42-37-68 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS) ZONXNG S -R GENERAL PLANw LDR� PROD t�.T GENIrrM PLAN CONVORMANCE REPORTMarch 5, 1988_ .ter.._ �.y,....�,.., DATE OF APPLICANT' S1GNA'I'...UWE LAND CONS EAVAT1014 ACT CONTRACTS? No� March 28, 1988 DATE APPIsTCA" III REC1:I VE)3 At NT/SUAV-SYM- /L IVIL ENGINEERS RFC. Surveyors - ..... .r., , . y.. 331. Wall Street, Chico, CA 95926 ADD RE "lS „.r DATE PLANNING D19ECTOR I S REPORT PREPARED CATIECORICAL EXEMPTION - DA` t r,XLtC) .:. �,......E.._ .� w,. D EY181',, D;'r''lAT I ON AND DATL NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE A.11UVTVD_. _ .. - MITIGA'T80 rM'G. DECLARATION r— MTV' ADOXI jtD_� _ -- FNV'> IMPAl"T 88,11" 8111 DATE CEATT rj t)w_w.Y... ... .._ wrw. . Ir�'1 +4Y LA/ ��IY�ei�l�:eG.V �.,r����`If.�.l_.•„+Y�'ww.a.a._.w...�..d..su+4*J. r�sw..aarowr.:Hi Nhu'N .w4':^... ir. a .rrYu,N ,jU}j ADV:1. Ri0:i1,l :1(IWN4r J, LiHftiRd4Yt, 4J ATE V ....:.....,r ..,..,.. LU �.—.-w+-..wY��:.ti.+.+ww..aµ.,w.rw.w:.i�«r.:r.+,.�. ADV ,60.0! AGl NC:Y ACTIC7N�,_x.��-._. APP13At 81):APPEAL H8,AR;:T40, 5 i.YM+11.YK+r �.4v{.�r:1YMW..x�Mwr�u��.r-r.w1. � rr�+w+u aaaryl.uvrh w.W +I+.. r.+a1.n�n*r.�ww�.�� +iFh J.r w-Wg4�YY :+. P.Y'.x.iriir .. spa, :IFx1.. w �^.�AI�I� ��rltiY �.�4\, rui-.u.n'.r_rw:+f.wYw........_......,.,nawlwwNMrR'.:r.iww.+:a:.yiay._:wtry..sw.,f....'a+Y.u.wM.wnr�ri4,..w�.W.4`a+WM+�..':ww.wwrwa..Wrww...r+.•FWM:.:aw. „M�.^w1:M VOR PLANNING L)TR IC:'.lOR'S KIPORT W.Y:Y.Aw:ir'1YW» rNMiJNM 15r1L+.Yd.K1�:wwrt F�aJ�w)��w+MiY:Jwruw+Yur r,r �AMlinl� Fk B 2= i98 t�IN3 2"RA.l:'F1.?i'�1/�+lV'"i±°yoilEFfEtZ` 1+ nR F'Ai4G'I 1 . MAI' C')M SZ.TBL"):i V S [CSN MAT' items 1-4 to be completed by applicant: i. APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: Trz. Jtz; C6k-c. 0 'J 1, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: t'lJ t b++��_v o •r — �, AssEsSORts PARCEL NU14nER(s): 4. PROPOSED USE: U �,L'=,+� M t The following items are to be completed by the Planning, Department: Is LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT' .r-_...�.•. t;URREtrT ZONING: �^•� GENERAL PLAN DESIONAl'ION3 1i� t3lrt, L+'_� ----------------------- Conditional Conditional Criteriat _ YES NO St is recommended that you p©rform theAGRICULT_URAL-P4,SIDEMXIXL following checked items: 1. Agritultural Compatibility ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORD;a CHECK 2, Water and Sewer Capacity `- �,' GOO NGIAL SURVEY -----� 5 Adequate) Pira Facilities --✓ Ckt SURVEY YES N0 �. Rdad Capacity and bIaintenance 5. Accost: to Commercial and Schools ... WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH jf ORCIMU AND FIELD CROPS AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: 1, predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size WI'THIN FLOOD PLAINT � .. 2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries 3. Ag, Viability not Impaired WITHIN 'AREA� SPECIRIC OR Staff Determinationt Substantially conforms to LAND USE PLAN: " �----- GENERAL PLAN: 1, Land Use If Yes, �'NIC�� A_`'� l�l��li✓ t. Conservation Na>re of Plan 3 Open Space WITHIN URBAN RESERVE. 4. Safety If Yet, 5. Noise _JL:: Name of Rese:.Ve 6. Housing _..y 7. Circulation ` AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN: ioNlNc: - }�' To r �t�3'E' �'C`fii�l l r �,>, �p �F-�,`"`►" L.� 1i,1 nhn �•t1. (:�. -i �1 :�UC�I 1C'r�►,.S i7,�,� h �e r+�' 1` � �� _ . tea r" .Date �'� �y�'�� `•�t� sit. Staff Signature v� CONFORMICAN WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING, F THE ABOVE AFF DETERMINATION REGARDINI AS THE APPLICANT F'On THE REQUESTED LAND DIVISIONy I AM AWARE 0 THE, l:'�.Si naWre of A�+t►licant � `4 Dated �-J%i�'� t: g f`sxhis 'report: tri*,1 'expire Fine; br� di.scakded .itis; (6) months from the data of the staffs naiuze,, Lb 10'OOA (reg --... ,..�.. .r•> .klSf as+t..:15s�9.mh. A'• i:. :�it�:�f,'�i111 0 ce of c> 1 00 .TenthPStreet, i d l se ch Planning D �tc�ivt. Butte GcSr.►rti�.y 1 om 121 Sacramento, CA 958 ' Planning (,ropartment. 7 Count•v 01%e t D t or JUN 14 1988 OrOVUl10i ('A 95965 3- County Clerk CANDACE J GnUB6S, Butte Co. Clerk County of Butte By CM��� Deputy STJ13. xi: � a ViI I of Notice of Determination in compliRtr)ce tait;lt or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. 4j(rotion 11108 ----...,_Log #88-03�-30-05 Project' Title AV rw Nrattt�r TOn(:ative Par -,el Map 42-37-68 Gary Javol)s State Clearinghouse .'umber Contact Persor1 (if submitted to Clear,•ingh,ouse) o-lophono Number John Mendonsx, Public Works (916) 538-7265 Project Location On the west side of Alamo Avenue a south of East Avenue, Chico area. ppxoximntely 300 feet )?reject Description Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 2,56 acres to create 10 single family lots, 6,500 sq, ft. - 8,700 sq, ft. This it) to advise that the i1��t^ tin advisory Agency (Lead Agenne Agency) has approved the above-described project on 6-13-88 _ --- and has mach: rte following dere ninations regarding the above-described(ate, project: ( The project will will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2, An Environmental impact 'Report was prepared for this project pursuant to fila provisions of CMA, A Negative Declaration was pre Provisions of C1Q/1. pared for this project~ pursuant to the 3. mitigation measures .wct. ere, ��pproval. of the pr.=oje_. _ We're not, made a conRli tion of the fir. A statement of overriding cons idetat � tvas, � �wcr�r n for this project. ot, adopt,ed Phis is to certify that the r project approval is availinal, n"n 14ith Comments and te,p�at13(n3 and tacor(l of able to the gencral public at, Butte County Plm- ning Department 7 Cit+nty Center Drive Orovillo, CA 95965 Data Received for Filing and Posting at OP1t Al Bill turl)in, Senior pl awlC .. 8 4091 4 Tit- __ _ _._ _ ,, ttr3viridtt fiax�al► int3� NNW s Gary Jacobs TSM, AP#42-37-68 MitigabIon Measures 1• Contribute a a traffic sz pro-rata share final at fast an$to�rards the , A�.amo Avenue , t I ,���t�.�t� of �= at Benefit r X75.00 per 1ofi 'to the he test Sidi x�'°(a.-o Staiiotl y t i i;. a Inter -Depart An emora ndum TO; Advisory Agency FROMS Planning Director SUBJECT, REPORT ON TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP p�� GARY JACb ON AP#42-37-68 )3t,1 nA7Et June 1, 1988 This is a proposal to di ride 2.5G family lots ranging in size from 65to create square feet each. The to single Residential) present zonin is S- feet b X3700 Map de the Butte adopted April 26l Plan R �d Usehpl .988. The Lana Use designates this area as Low Density Residentia:l� P�Aah Safety Element indicates that this project is inn Area unclassified fire hazard area, The an The project will comply with the zoning andene Provided all of the following conditions andgmatig� Man measures (M) are complied with. ataon 1, Incorporate a design near theolowtion trap into the storm drain impacts to L ndo Channelduridingscharge to 'm nimize flora. g periods of law x• If deemed feasible b y the Works, shift Alamo centerlDheatomthe east Of and the sidewalk and curbingarour, and split so that they d the two walnut trees y do not need to he removed, 3. Contribute a pro rata share towards the installation of a traffic signal at East and Alamo Avenue, 4• Cantute O(Mi Contriibb BenefitF per lot to the und. (M) West Side Fire 5. All lots to meet tho and dimensions of them nimus. size, frontag©, sotbac)e R zoning district. 6, Revised Lot S to net 65 feet of frontage at building line. If building setback 14r -o is naL the standard 20 feet, the building setback shall t the g designated on the map, be LT :1mG ec Cary Jacobs KFC Surveyors inter -.Departmental Memorandum Ta; Advisor Y Agency FROM. Planning $USJECTz part Jacobs. tentative DATE; Subdivision Map, AP April 5 1988 9*�5'�wgg The Pianhlh this pro g Commission considered pert a rezone the rezone Y March. l0 i98g, hear1ng on to the They reCo,mendedpUest �O' PUD to 8-�R on the ,rezo goats yet. The ThepBov ' and forwarded ne as of r An Initial Qarcl.has not held a allow considerationtuds prepared of this mapor the rezone Which Will I. Wager l be amended to the pollution In Lindo environmental Channel was pollutants Into Checklist addressed recommended Llndo Channel. T° reduce Under Item 3f of , the following m i charge of urban 9ation measure Is incorporate a the Ioyv Pollution Channel dUpOlnt a of pgento the storm drain of disf to flto ow, minimize impact, near 9 Periods ods f LoW TWO largo Llndo. sa ft.g walnut trees (50�� right-of-way, diameter) are located Possible. The These trees shall b Within Aiamo's following mitigation measure a retained Cohsider if at all to atlon should _ is recommended; the east and s be 9fven to shlftlh 'ees: pllttIng the sideWalk and Ala centerlln�; 3. Traffic WiIL cathing around the Avenoe east Increase on the ftpllowln Avenue Alamo Avenue Intersection. and through 9 mittgatron measures TO offset traffjg� the Alamo Contri are recommendedr increases, Contribute a pro rata s traffic signal hare t towards at East and ;Alamo the installation Contribute a AvenUe, of a turn lanes at .pro rata share towards East and .Alamo Ave the instaliatton of 9, The property i<s locatednue, left fire services In the accommodateresidential are limited, Northwest res i dent l a l A nevi station of town 4 protectlan growth; hay, been Where recommendedln a timely manner, the f To lhsdre planned to fol low mill adequate Piro gation measUre Is ;r k. Co"ntrlbute $75.00 per lot to the West 'Side Fire Oeneflt Fund'. 5. Many areas around Chico have a moderate to high potential for archaeological resources. Areas of level terraii7 near water are considered the most sensitive. A record sejaroh should be requested from the North East Information Con'tei~ to determine whether an archaeological survey should be prep rod, With the applicant's written agreement with the dboVe mentioned mitigation measures, the environmental document will be complOto. Schedu I i ng of this map will not proceed Unt i i the Ve2one to S-A Is acted upon. LM'f I r 111. DETERMINATION: ('ro he roriipieted by the Lead Agency) On the of 11hi:i tiaionl hvafiialinn I - WU It rid the proposed project COULD NOT llinvil o signilicant 01v i "i If'() NivirrtlirttriIt, Ond rr NIEGATIVE DECLARATION well be Prepared WC tied that although the proposed project could have a significant olfl!ct oil Ilii#r hvirohrriont, 11101V will not. be 6 significant efleet in this caste laecause tho MITIGATION MEASURES rjoscrrbttrj 0h Itiz; attached shool hiive been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be repateci IrWE find tiie proposed project MAY have a sighlfic;ant effect on the onvironr.npnt, find an ENVIAONM�NTAL IMPACT A8PORT is required. I)A i'1 February, 4 t .81988 ..... w..... COUNrT latj iT PLAY" INC; f AnTMrNT BY Z4. 3rent U e, As i to Pla tnia kviewed by; - APPENDIX COUNTY OF BUTTE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Log No. 88-Qa "L5-01 AP No. 47-37.70 L BACKGROUND t. Name of proponent Gam Sacbbs F'TLl� 11131# ;qtr 2, Addiecs of proponent and repre=sentative (if appli(,able) co, ;CA 95926 331 Wall. Street Chico, CA 95925 3. Project descrlption-Raz4n� 11. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIG INIFICANCE YPS MAYBE NO 1. Cues the project have potential to degrade the quality of the envirorinaenl, siib,itially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popiilanon to sirup below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cornrriunity. reduce tiie number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal orWirrith ite importrint ` examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. ,.. , , 0 D 2, Beres the project have the potential to achieve short -terns benefits to this delritrierit of king. lerin, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environrnent is one which occurs iri a relatively brief period of lime while long-term impacts will endure into the future 3. Cogs the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cuniult l►vely rrontiidcarlable') (A project miry MlPact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is reIntively small, but where the effect of the total of those it°pacts on the or vironmoht is significant ) • .......................... ... .... f7 b 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantialadverse u[fucks r�ii hunaelt beiltgs, either directl or indirect) o,{ p 111. DETERMINATION: ('ro he roriipieted by the Lead Agency) On the of 11hi:i tiaionl hvafiialinn I - WU It rid the proposed project COULD NOT llinvil o signilicant 01v i "i If'() NivirrtlirttriIt, Ond rr NIEGATIVE DECLARATION well be Prepared WC tied that although the proposed project could have a significant olfl!ct oil Ilii#r hvirohrriont, 11101V will not. be 6 significant efleet in this caste laecause tho MITIGATION MEASURES rjoscrrbttrj 0h Itiz; attached shool hiive been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be repateci IrWE find tiie proposed project MAY have a sighlfic;ant effect on the onvironr.npnt, find an ENVIAONM�NTAL IMPACT A8PORT is required. I)A i'1 February, 4 t .81988 ..... w..... COUNrT latj iT PLAY" INC; f AnTMrNT BY Z4. 3rent U e, As i to Pla tnia kviewed by; a 2. AIR, ;Will th'e proposal result In substantial, Y 41 All or t' t,lerlLl tliolr of t1111I9fe111 tar Iltl(lyay b, Cfle CI r »� r: rt±;thou of 'ob)Ilchortaf Odors, o $, ss moke or fUhte,') C. Alfuldnort of air Movement, moisture or temperature, rat any change In.lima. tr.. , ruoltulailp , p .... .......... tlly or . 1 tiNA'tER, 411111 the'prriptasalreWI! in substantial. ENVIRON. MENTAL IMPACTS wdlwo... of wittar rrloverxle In ...,..+,. n..... thormartut,,or fl xl,l.Ir301100, 131 all "YES" and "MAYBE", answers are rtsqulhud ....., ... h,r.Ir,IuyF�,rrldbsorph011r'ates, drainage f on _atldehr!d she(llis)) 1 c, IN, oil llur' of, site g p atrrtaLt, drains a ltYt rovan1oflls. Including vttyetaflt3n Irtiflon Car ruh';;rl insla►Isltion'3 1. LA11TH. WIII UK.' Prarmsal result Irl sIg111fittal1t , rnntnv,af, ;i, I ln,lablr3 t'�tirfh conditions or In changes In ge:olor)lc slibstructules,? Yf=1' MAYBE NO la. Ih:.ruf3tltarls, vispldciirnenls3, corn gallon or uvnr'cuveling p� I n water In any water body? , of the gill c. t,`hrinr'it; ul In PotJirsPltY or c)rormr! surt,aco r•elfof fr,ahirr?s2 C 1 fwl (C , d- fat shuFitor►, t overlrtg or nlodtllc,�tii7ti of any (� L ' . AIlt'fi'iltoll of file ditt'Ctrtln or rate tat flow of ground wati.'I's`+ url'que Jr'olot)ic or l,hy :ir3„rl fr alUrr„ . e, ("(1ULIgl' Ill Wind or w,11or woc;j rl of :50116, either oil „ If (,I�,nlrlt' all Ills± tt'IFJrit,ty of gllallty of grOUIld Waters wllil,h,lw,ll;, rat or off silo? (. Ulijrlges In deposition or erosion Cats iii r:xcavah(att�laGlrftlthnm, IHI'�dtat.lt„n I,II iiia ,untruni off In Oroslon which may modify the channel of a river or of buaCh sands, sfreanl or changes tit siltation, dofrr3,lllaurt t3► 141Y. finial or lake', water olherWl s available (or PllL1llc ..... or lhobsaci of the ocn;trt ctreli sutoh ,,s 1100rlifl '1 l7• I r,,y Of PI line agrlCtr►Ctlriill .. Y Psuduclivr� m ,ails outslrfo c[t'arf�nutr!d urban altz��'a h l:Xposl,ru of people or (..1 Li [r?• propelty to geologic hazards; mudslides, grotirtd fallure or slrndar hazards? .... ,itch' as earihqualces', (urltls;llr)t�s, ....................,. , .. , � +, , , I). r{t'tlltt.11txll r31 ►lrri nllnlbety of 1 t a 2. AIR, ;Will th'e proposal result In substantial, Y 41 All or t' t,lerlLl tliolr of t1111I9fe111 tar Iltl(lyay b, Cfle CI r »� r: rt±;thou of 'ob)Ilchortaf Odors, o $, ss moke or fUhte,') C. Alfuldnort of air Movement, moisture or temperature, rat any change In.lima. tr.. , ruoltulailp , p .... .......... tlly or . 1 tiNA'tER, 411111 the'prriptasalreWI! in substantial. a, GlIdut14s Ili cllt rr:tlts, Or the course or direction hr'' h wdlwo... of wittar rrloverxle In ...,..+,. n..... thormartut,,or ....., ... h,r.Ir,IuyF�,rrldbsorph011r'ates, drainage f patterns,orfileralealrtrl�lmq,rtttr�fsutf�tGt�ft.. ..>., 1 c, IN, oil llur' of, site g p atrrtaLt, drains a ltYt rovan1oflls. Including vttyetaflt3n Irtiflon Car ruh';;rl insla►Isltion'3 to , rnntnv,af, d Allt,tillluns 10 Ihtt ,;C1ltrafJ.Ui II01v o1 flood waters? , , M �7 e, t,llarlpt Ill the t3rrlount of surface water In any water body? , , ... � ....'. ... `,, 1. t11St.I1Jtt F! l IIItFI yt111114r! wait rs, ur in arty allijiatlon til ynrfac(' wil101 Ulsl lllllllr't1 113 1tt1111',el8ltll(!, jji1 ii , +luallly. IrnauCllurl lilt dlssulvt.d oxyoerl (it'tillbidily') ' . AIlt'fi'iltoll of file ditt'Ctrtln or rate tat flow of ground wati.'I's`+ (� „ If (,I�,nlrlt' all Ills± tt'IFJrit,ty of gllallty of grOUIld Waters wllil,h,lw,ll;, rat oillit"t t i 111roligh Interception of till tit ihfer by or Cats iii r:xcavah(att�laGlrftlthnm, IHI'�dtat.lt„n I,II iiia ,untruni off In water olherWl s available (or PllL1llc w11or titll3lXtittt,".� ., t, L"13I�'�ruf' til pc'tl13lt,' Or property to water l'islated hazards sutoh ,,s 1100rlifl '1 4, PLANT LWE. Will Illi' (3luPus1ifI '`iull In substantial: a. (',IIilnfj ' ill IIID rilvr'lSlly Of speoles, or nuMber Of any spp.citly Of plants '(IflCitltjlilr 5hillb!i, "rass. clops, and aquatic plants)? � irises, ....................,. , .. , � +, , , I). r{t'tlltt.11txll r31 ►lrri nllnlbety of 1 t i. any ufilqul;, male or F;(taan,- Bred s t; ° w� q P cit.,rnf pirutt?, .,.GJ C. lnlrudr3rhnri' l�f C7 nriw specuas of plants Into ars �ar(til, or in i1 l�, t rlar It_t Iht^ reTalcntshtnerll of tmistin s � Pe'oles7 lsorrnal Cly f�eljltt;llF)n In Fl�.rflr`.iCle if any lgrtdIIIIa I prop?, 5. ANIMAL LIFE.. Will they proposal result to substantial; n, (".hlJrlge in file diversity of species, or numbers of tiny species of animals (baclh, iond YES MAYBE NO !Minals including reptiles, fish and shell fish, benthic organisms or- insects)? , , , b. Ftetluction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anlrnalH,) El 0 C. 1171roduction of new species of animals irttoan area, orresult in a barrierto the mir;r: i., rnovement of Animals?,...., itltltr d. Dutuiit,rahon to ex,s irtg fist! or wildlife habitat?.. . y , , ., , „ , G. NOISE, Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in exisling no,so fevols?... , I)' L_x�osu y t tc. of people to severe noise levels? ... .... , . C7 7, LIGHT AND GLARE: Will the proposal produce significant light land glaro? L' U C[�. a. LAND USE. Will the proposnl result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of An arta U, NA r uHAL RESOURCES, W,'l the prolyosa) result in substantial. a, Inti eSe in the rate of use of any natural resources? , , , , „ (� �I tJ, I)c!pteGon of any non•retiviwable natural tesourceS? .. , ..... 1U, RISK OF UPSET, Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of explostoh or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited tooil. pcsti(aiies. chrmrrals or r.ildlation) in the event of an accident ora slit condition., 1) b, Pussible nnterfr renee With an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?.. l7 p 14,P0"t: OJ ATI.. nit t P hnittnn popul ttihr t,it 10sR1 alter location distribution, density, or orl x .. , growth rate of thr: a a 12, HOUSING. will the osal aller,t pr.. t1�JI151d1iIJ existing housing, ol. Cry ate a demand for atiiiilit rtttl' , .. , . • ., .... .,.,.,, .... t� IS. TRANSPOATATiONIcIRCULATION, Will the proposal result in: a. (ity 001tion of substantial !Additional vehicle movernent t5. irift?tls ori exisiing parkingfacilities, or demand for now arking? •.. i t i r„ya'i.i„6„ .. c„ 311bstontlat Impact on eXisting transportation �• � �. p s y stems?,.. d, (loo ifi) hl alteraltntls to tiood5� pr9seht patterns of circulalioh or movement of people and/or ....,.. nhtliailotts iu wattzrbtJote, rail or tits traIli c7, fi lncreiise lit triable hat Ards 10 motor vehicles, bicyclists or Pedestrians,? ..,,,, yy�,.� 17. HUMN HEALTH. Will the Proposal result in' A. trreation of any health hazard or potential health Hazard (t;xciuthrrl.l moni�il irenlliti7 . b, Ex{ � trrw of people to potential health hazards'? . ... , 1.6. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal !suit in the obstructiorl of any scenic Vita or view 011011 to © N, thr 'public, or will the proposal result In the crertlion of an aesthetically offensrvp site open !ht tg. RECAEATION, will the III ,0losai re:ttilt til an Impact upon tale quality or g115ntily.of rlvit.n(l- 0 1 rr elvatronal oppurluntUts"). . , . ., . , .... , . ,1.. ...... ......... .. . 20CI L"tURA,L RESOURCES, a, Will tris: prt>p6tal resell in the aileraliirn of or fire d(,stru4tlor, ni a prtrhlsltn°fp t7r hti;toric 1 0 0 a archecologicalsar.0 ................ r. ,,,r,...rl „ fa', Wr11 the roposal resuil'rll,n adverse physical or aasthettc effect to a Prehistoric Or historic Uir: ritR!�1.,,«. ,,re e,.., «r ,.; building, structure or ti r c, 0005 the OroposalhaveMapolunlialtoCAI IseAOilysicl�lohrttr�rwhltRltWolslrl`ttlteuittttltluu i t,11101c t;ultural va►uus`) , ....11...1.. , r . , , , d. ;It the proposal restrict exfsi ^g relrgtotl.l or sacred usw.; wIt1101 the hotrtl►lit*1 Ilnptit l L'j ..Yi11'«1� .,Rr.r. «r r..ls......, r, .. i.f have an t;tfr:ct '1130M or result in it i10ml for now or J4. PIiL U SGRVIC a, Will ttttr ;propowil YDS MAYBE NO rtltereo goverl,"IN11 tjulVtt;trtt: tui prolection.,. ,, „r_.,«,,, ry p, Fire❑ P t] . , .fR •,l ,..I., ,f., ,.r.♦ , , ........ i , . u. police protection.. 1-] 6 p Co scltaols .......... Q facilities? ,,., d. Ptoks of other recreational b e. ai,iillenancr. Of ptiblic facilities, including roads, t.r ovirnmenta services?,«,,,.,,,« ..... .,,r....,....,,,..,. ..., 1, G�11 to 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal resiiit in: a, list, of substantial amounts of {tial or energy? , f In demand upon existing sources of energy, or rer{tllrtr lite U Ci b, ;;uhslanttal increase dnvelopment of new sources of energy? , , , _ .. , . , ........... result Ina need for neWsystenls, or Substantial alterations to the 16, UTILITIES. Will the proposal following. a, Power or natural gas? .. ....... .............. b. taontmurucalrons systems?,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,«,,_....,...r,:.... .. ❑ Q c, WitiLAt t, railability7 , , , . , . . . Y , . „ ...... , . 1 .., . , . . , ... . d, Sewer or septic system? . . , ... . , «, . ...... 'f t rm vrttlet drainage'...... , «, e. filo. ' , f, 5t�licj :VOSft'. and .disposal? .......Ili«r....,,lr,,,,,,,,,,,,,,«,,;r.«,. 17. HUMN HEALTH. Will the Proposal result in' A. trreation of any health hazard or potential health Hazard (t;xciuthrrl.l moni�il irenlliti7 . b, Ex{ � trrw of people to potential health hazards'? . ... , 1.6. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal !suit in the obstructiorl of any scenic Vita or view 011011 to © N, thr 'public, or will the proposal result In the crertlion of an aesthetically offensrvp site open !ht tg. RECAEATION, will the III ,0losai re:ttilt til an Impact upon tale quality or g115ntily.of rlvit.n(l- 0 1 rr elvatronal oppurluntUts"). . , . ., . , .... , . ,1.. ...... ......... .. . 20CI L"tURA,L RESOURCES, a, Will tris: prt>p6tal resell in the aileraliirn of or fire d(,stru4tlor, ni a prtrhlsltn°fp t7r hti;toric 1 0 0 a archecologicalsar.0 ................ r. ,,,r,...rl „ fa', Wr11 the roposal resuil'rll,n adverse physical or aasthettc effect to a Prehistoric Or historic Uir: ritR!�1.,,«. ,,re e,.., «r ,.; building, structure or ti r c, 0005 the OroposalhaveMapolunlialtoCAI IseAOilysicl�lohrttr�rwhltRltWolslrl`ttlteuittttltluu i t,11101c t;ultural va►uus`) , ....11...1.. , r . , , , d. ;It the proposal restrict exfsi ^g relrgtotl.l or sacred usw.; wIt1101 the hotrtl►lit*1 Ilnptit l L'j ..Yi11'«1� .,Rr.r. «r r..ls......, r, .. i.f DISCIUSSION' OF ENV IRONMeNT L EVALUATION AP 41 42-87-70 The proposed project has gone through several zone changes in thq past few years. In 1983 the property was rezoned to Planned Area Cluster. Then in 1986 this property was rezonod to Planned Unit Development. The proposed Project was never develOPOd and subsequently the applicant wishes to propose an alternative zoning. No dieve . lopment plans have been submitted as port of the rczonlng application. If the request-, ware granted It will rG7.0he 2.405 acres Of land south of East Avenur- 8djacc*nt to Alamo Avenuo. The requested rezoning to suburban residential would allow the applicant to subdivide the proper -Ly into 6,500 square foot lot minimums. 018COSSION OF CHECKLIST ITEMS ib, 8b, 16e: The compaction and overcovering of the soil will occur as a result- of converting a walnut orchard to residential development. Over 509 of the site Is expected to be overcovered by building structures, driveways,, sidewalks, and roads which wl I I Impacib- the soil and filtration. Substantial increases in runoff Into the Llhdo Channel would occur from subsequent development of this lot. TV4,- State Reclamation Board is the responsible state a0endy for drainage: Into I -Indo Channel. If a separate drainage outfall is required$ a drainage permit must be obtained by cot-Itactirio the Reclamation Board, at 1516 9th Street, Room 335.-10, Sacramento) California 95814. lo, 4d: 2.405 acres of historical orchard property wAll be converted from agricultural uses to residential uses by the proposal, The property is located within the Chico Urban Area and has not been used as a prAr:)ductlye orchard fcv long duration of time. The loss of prime agrItUltUral 16hd Is not c� isidered a sh,;nIfIcant Impact. 8 It 4 '-, Ircretitsd urbanization along the Linde Channel will result in higher exposure of Pollutants to the water flows In the channel, The Call,fornla Department of Fish and Game has expressed a concern in the past about drainage from the urban levelopments into the I -Indo Channel. Urban development along the channel will Increase drainage into the channel and subsequent nutrient- loading which result!,. in eutr6phic6blon of the water. Mithastion measures ahibe developed to reduce nutrlentti sediment, and other Impuritiesould in resldent;181 runoff Into the LIhdo Channel. SJ4 Flooding a�ong the Lindo Channel Is always a possibility. However; flooding at this location Is not expected to be a significant factbro The ethanoel Is designated as 6 special flood hazard zone by 3 the bepartmFMht Of Housing and Ur -ban Development$ 'Irlood hazard boundary 1 46 some m -tune walnut trees may neceositate removal to OccomrnotlijLe residential streets and building pads. site plans for the propot,;ad 2.4 acres should be prepared in such a manner as to ,preserve as many mature trees as possible. 6a; Ambient noise levels will increase as a result of urbanization, However proper landscape and building site plans will helm to achieve a more serene urban environment. 7; Security and street lighting will increase glare and lighting in the near vicinity. 8: The zone change request is consistent with the general plan designation for this property of medium density residential. 111ho general plan requires the following zoning factors be considered its designating zoning: w 1. Existing parcels sizes in residential densities: 2. Method and capabilities of sewage disposal. 3. effects of adjacent uses, waterquality, air quality, noise,, traffic flow and safety, and general environmental guali'tiOtl# 4. proximity to major streets, conInercial services and all public facilities. S. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial users. 6. Existing utilities, walkways and drainage facilities. 7: Local desires. 11,12: The proposed project may influence some in=fill development on the vacant 2.9 acre lot, currently, the surrounding area has various intensities of urban development ranging frorn multi to to sin!21e family, to religious land uses. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the current population densitiessnd growth projections for the area. 13a, c,, f: The development of this property will have a cumulative impact on the existing transportation network. The historical plan for ` this site, as well as the existing adjacent developments show no design sensitivity to piili I transit to help promote or facilitate the 4'; use of public transit to reduce traffic impact.. The de%relopment of this property will constitute total buildup for the properties which' Alamo Avenue services. Access at East Avenue will become a problem, as y.. a result of buildout and may necessitate dome traffic control w mitigation measures: such as left-hand turn lake pockets, signal lights, and intersection lighting. Funding for :such improvements will ¢' have to be made through development impact feea, �w 4. 1.4: Increased demands for public services will occur as this 'property develops, costs associated with public services will be lessened however as a result of this acreage being located adjacent to I.-Xisting urbanized development, The required residential infrastructure such ars water lines, sewer lines, storm drains, etc, to support this property are easily accessible via adjacent developments. 14`c: Chico Unified School District is overcrowded Ria a result of rapid G" tarban development. To relieve this problem, a school impact fee hojjA been established for all resident.,,.dl development in the Chico school area. Any development of this' proprtty will require such fees be L,,316 at the time of pulling building per;., •t;: 16, Public utilities will be provided by the Pacific: Gas and Fjlectric: Co.ap-any. No service problems are anticipated in supplying this property with utility service. Water is to Lata supplied by the California water services Company. Sewer is availa!:xre from the City of Chico sanitary sewer system. The nitrate action p'iAn of the Chico area requires that medium to high density rt-sidentiaf t'O'OJects be convected to sanitary sewer system rather than utilizing beptic systems. BL M :ref �. 0 { Applicant: Gary Jacobs Assessor's Parcol 042--37-0-070 Log 0 88-01-, (xi DATA SHEET A. Project Descr_iot on 1. Type of PruJecto. Rezone from PUD to Suburbnn 1tesideht'iol 2. Brief Description: To rezone from a planned unit development (P.U.D.) to Suburban -Residential (S -R) 3. Location: Between Alamo Avenue and Quista Drive, approximately 182 feet south of East avenue, Chico. 4. Proposed Donsity of Development: One dwelling unit per: 6,500 square feet 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 30-50%. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s) Property access in b Alamo Avenue. Alamo is a Small residential y dumps into East Avenue. street which 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: City of Chico, sanitary sewer. 8 Source of Wates: Supply: Cal Water. S. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. 1G. Potential for further land divisions and development': The 2.4 acres have the potential to be subdivided into 5,500 square foot lots under the current zoning and general plan designations. Environmental Setting Physical Environment;. 1, Terrain a. General Topographic Character: Relatively flat valley terrain. b slopest 0-l%. C. Elevation: 180 feet above sea level. "=inviting Factors: None. 2. Soils a Types and Characteristics: vina fine sandy ,loam, brown, rich --brown, chocolate brown. From 2 to 3 feet thick. 501.1 tetains moisture very well,, and has a good perrneability,. b. Limiting Factors None, 3. Natfural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake Zone; Moderate. b• Erosion -Potential.: slight: c. Landslide Potential None. d. Fire Hazard; Unol.assified. ee Expansive Buil Potential: Low. 46 Hydrology a. Surface Water; t,ndaslough runs along the soilthern �6� .. ........... 0" border of the property. b. Ground Water N/A C. Drainage Characteristics: Property dra;i►is to Alamo Avenue and then to the L ndo Channel. d. Annual Rainfall (normal); 24 inches. e. Limiting Factors: None. 5. visual/Scenic Quality: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good. Biological Environment: 8. vegetation: Remnants of a walnut orchard. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Marginal, due to urbanization. Cultural Environment:, 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the o'rea: Moderate to 'low including unknown; 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Medium density residential. 12-. Existing Zoning: Planned un -it development. 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Single family residence with outbuildings in remnante of walnut orchard. 14. Surrounding Area; a. Land Uses: Bingle family residential and Latter Day Saihts' Church. b4 Zoning: Agricultural residential, suburban residential, unclassified,, and residenttal-9. C. Gen. Plan Designation; Medium density residential and low density residential. d. Parcel Sizes: Parcels range from 6,500 square feet to approximately 5 acres. e. Population: Urban density residential. 15: Character of site and Area: Neighborhood residential; 16; Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 17 Relevant Spheres of InflUencet. City of Chico, Chico Area Recreation District and Cal Water. 16. Improvements Standards Utban Area. Y'es. 19, Fire ProtectionService: a; Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Station 442 located aPPtokimately 2 miles to the northeast of the project sits:, b. water Availability: pine hydrants.: 20. Schools in Area: Project is servers by Citrus Elementary School, Bidwell .junior High Scho;)l and Chico Senior thigh School. suffe CO. Pla"ntng Cwntm APR .1. ,) 19,88 California 1� 1�1 11 OQ(�l�1 Ca]1�11Q(j�l M,rrc Crav�llo, Caliiaraor Archaeological 1{� �� s.,.�.� Department of Anthropology (��(�� CaliforniaState University. Inventory V'3UUL�.�iQ ►tu•••.s s�s.i,� Y. Chico vSSCOO rc" w Chico. CA 05929 ,- ..pork rwt«,rr (916) 895-62x6 Da to. Apr.. 14, 1988 ' TO: Butte County Planning #7 Ccunty Center Dr. Oroville, Ca 95965 re: AP#42=37-68/Ja6obs Gear County Planner s A review of the above project has revealed the following: XXX The area indicated as within the project boundaries is considered to be archaeologically sensitive. Present; are: XX Easy access to natural sources of water XR' Flat Meadowland or flat land near water South and/or east facing slopes Previously recorded sites in the vicinity Other: _ We strongly recorrmend that an archaeological recannaissance be conducted of the area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate mitigation measures prepared. A known site or sites has/have been previously recorded %n thero erg area. Project operations will have a negative impact 'on these culturap resources. We c n nuc and prepare aimittiiaati epr000asa.t contacted to assess site XX Other:: A survey is not recommended for the above project. However, snouta any pretla,storic or historic cultural materidis -be encountered Ouring project operatyons, all wort snou a cease itnmc arse y peri ingan tspec•t~Loh ot: the sLtre aid materia s y a ,qua i.ti.erz arc aeo og:-st . Tl1a.s person wouldear, a to suggest :appropriate ttt gat ion measures Thank you for the opportunity to review and ccmnent on this proposal.. Please let us know what decisions are made regarding dip project. :.. aLnc�rely, &,,t ere kv- 2_ .-"7%,,,...,_,, Dr 4 Makoto Kowta Northeast Information Center Coordih�-itoc FILE NO.. 88-24 OUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - February 23, 1988 APf'LICANTc Gary Jacob OWNER: Same as above. REQUEST: To rezone from Plannad Unit Development (P.U.D.) to Suburban - Residential (S.R.) AP NO.: 042-37-0--070 SIZE- 2.405 Acres LOCATION; Between Alamo Avenue and Ouista Drive, approximately 182 feet South of East Avenue in the Chico urban area. EXISTING ZONING. Planned Unit Development. ZONING HISTORY.: Zoned PUD by Ordinance No. 2553 on 7/1/86, zoned PAC.' by OrdinanceNo. 2372 on 9/18/83, Zoned A.R by Ordinance No. 1227 on 1/1.1/72. Prior to 19`72,_ zoning was A-2. SURROUNDING LAND USE: To the north of the project site, is multiple family dwelling units; to the south, Undo Channel; to the east$ single family residential, church? to the west, single family resq+ retial. SITE HISTORY: The proposed project has gone through several zoning .changes in bhle past i"eta in 198-8, the property Was reZon+ad to Planned Area C 1 uator 4 Then, In 19e6y this Property was r^eZoned 80bin to �' l panned Unit Dove l opment . The =WON" BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS - February 23, 1988 proposed PrOJect was never developed and subsequently t -ho applicant wishes to propose tirl alternative zoning, GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION'. Medium density res I dotj,f; I tj I . APPLICABLE REGULATIONS9 Butte Cr , ity Coda Spot t on, 24-26 et. seq. , 2� - 26 and 24-159. COMFNTS RPrPTVi7n:. C,Ibv- or Chico RLAnning Department: "No comment." .aepMrtmei-it or Public Work : "Urban improvements W I I be requiraid for a subdivision of or development of this property." Cuss I ck Avenue Neighborhood Counc11: "We have no problem H I th tho proposed rezone to what Hill amount to a lower residential denolty anti I ower I and coverage than the former d I ass 1 f 1 cab 1 on wou I d have r(� IU I ted in. Surface water runoff should also be less„" .Butte County Sheriff.-- Deoari:ment: "The primary Impact on law enforcement in this case Would be an Increase In density which Will increase calls for service, baking away from existing levels of low enforcement." SWhtfa County Fire D6bartment: In accordance, to 13.01-3 requirement Class III, a pressurized community Water system IS reOUIred4 Tentative hydrant locations are Indicated on the attached preliminary map,. Final locations must be exactly Indicated and recorded on the final map. Number of hydrants required for the Project is I, maximum hydrant to hydrant ZPati)10 Is 500 feet, hydrant size shall be Clow -Rich 950 or Long Oeoch 614 and installed according to County Public Works Spec ifIcat ,lons 8-27 and requirements of local w6ber, 8gencles. Required fire flows ar-e 1000 gallons per minute. in tiddItIon, the applicant must contr-4ibute $450 Into the west Chico Fire Station Fund.', -Cb1cp Area bigtt-,.Ict�: OTho Chico Area Recrebtloh and Park District (CAIRO) advisez that 6ddlfloral res ldent lol development 10 the District conbir-i-vis to impact existing recreation and per, Ies.il k fatIllt ,ANALYSIS: I This project is -- request to rezone 2-405 acres from PUD (Plohmed Unit Development-) to (8wburban-Res Ident iol), This PribPerty has been tJje subject of sevel-al rezoning requests in rot rit times, as I 'I rid I caited, under the site lql tory section of this report. The changlhq of the BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS Februar 23, 1 988 resulting oning ordinance is very tryingfrom Zoning su I t i:ng i n is the ne i ghb-)r%J-i Careful consideration must be made the develon� poln't of vlew Policies, made to insure theiltlent of the area. goals, and objectives of the Count 2-0011-10 reflects the County,s 00noral Plan The zone chan9e request is consistent with the good level of neighborhood support. C►hOral Plan and f011OWing zoning factors be ,considered Thedeseneral Plan requir�esathe annti rhg zc�n i r�c�'. �Existing Parcel sizes and n residentiai donslties. 2. Method aria capabilities of sewage disposal Effects of adjacent uses, Water quality, air quality, and general environmental u noises, traffic flow and safety, Proximity to qua i i t i e�� . major streets, commel^cial services and ali public facilities. Distance from arporrt�,.% railroads and industrial uses.., Existing utilities, walkways and drainage facilities. Local desires. 3. 5. 6. 7, The 'ub'.ar-ban-Res i dent's al aracter of development for this neighborhood,., reflect the su'rOundin can be minimized through The impacts an the envhronment 011 the necessaryproper mitigation measures. infrastructure in place qr in close project h., support future development of proximity to Residential zoning As this site as allowed b Council indicated by the Cusick y the Suburban - Council this project has Avenue Neiohborhood favorable project, been endorsed by the Public as a RECOt�CMENDAT 19AS -- A. A• Note that the requirements of the Catiforkf Act have beet✓, cow a Environmental p1eted and considered in mak In Quality i^ecofnirterid the Board o f Supervisors adopt a Na to and o this dec i s 1 on and €� t 1 ve Dec 1.�r�at i on 3 B. Find that the bjproposed rezone conforms objectives including the text and Ma to the 061 1cie8 and Plan and p of then Butbe County General goals C. Make the finding that the zone change request hich meets all zoningactb q st 1s a consist W Plan under the r criteria outlined within thauCeneral h medium density residential designatiOn 3 BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF FINDINGS February 23, 1388 D. Recommend that the Board of Supervisors Tido rezoning to Suburban-Residentlal thatproperty an ordinancti AP 42-3'7-70 ( Gary Jacobs) . i d��1 � 1 f 1 ed as BLhi -'reF Attachments to the Commission and C'i'Eies; Location Exhibit Environmental Documents M ✓�rh, :. � rix' -�It1� ��' = {� �� ANA. N:f./iRA r..+.f ANIIT N Ni7Rts ,���v�' �,. •• 1 " dam IN notiR a .,i x ta.m, w, �^r►'� �. o� y. 0 s ll pvtK ems„ �., r " � a ., J�is...e d �1 A •!1` ..=.. �{e � � s � tr �-• q ^ti tae �Sj;•1<'4� ri�r ��.•aw . a �lt+s Kn .ArA v :31h.v,ut s Mui �,F..vi N3" V ,� i5 t t,l A, a Pn r �t y s /} rot d v R°.. F f rj ii '}t`, t,t �` Ir•v«p,'C ', K' � 4A Fei rrf. ''�i, �� .'>1 'R.+ Y. �� x � ). ' � Y. , irk � ��. ...� t �.:'"`� •�`� tir N. ?� 6 Y iY+r �?+ y G�, o d + �, g, � a�, lj Y\fir �r �#. �..� r,r;,r ,,,� fit'- '!.+ rt tl (,e m :i, .IST K�, n� y tw+�'� Q+'aa, �`S+r•r'" N� r ,� v'r,w''^� 'I .x i•5' `irrA��vvV�pyy i� .^ S ��'wt.` +'"'e t� r, �r *5,'y, 4e' .1 a, FAd �+`� yam"' 4 ' lr ` Y.,ryr�. '�'Fi'-Wr. i ��ks �ti � •` %++ K,C 4 lAt �:v,.•vyrY. • L tip�� .,, r;"�w,..1 �.^., � �'.}� , fv:` ', Ypxjr'� •,,s „ r l ^V.•C• :" ,• iy... OV r.v„ tr� � ° �E�1=`-•,, y 1 ; rir� �L ! �°�:� .,.E .s s ! R,a 0�� rt r+' . Hr O crui..awyN ri��•t � ���, ; t x", si � _0^1"�`.?. ,..�,,� `'i � � tt..__..:'_.{'� `' /�' �ti v A .z R u Ar ;.n -cry 1 31,�s1 4 Gr r 4a+ r •. �� i� � ,�..�-•�� moi' � � f �� � w � 16) 1 I � �w i • , � b.eti � `�.�—""� � r'A � a'btb \•a�t+�, 1. r.,"��+•'`y�" ,� -� r '� rj ' �{. t� ,.;`l44 ryY�.. ,.✓ " ,�yy h r�`}\J G.rT a I, s+ � 4 W � "r. `� , �..: 4 1 yl•:. ai . Y,� � �3 .+.rf •iir,�,.• ^s'� y .�.k� y �`it a `t �w�� • `�' �, w • � �q � '�` ri'"�y , , . �, ..,• �' d� � I, �` / Fi yFt¢ � �+,a,r P ✓^' "• • �1 `4�t' f u i- � �• r _ �.. , y �" a � � i rA �� .>'� �''� y 9 ? 6 � •y�ex rr. ym4�, ta. ` : �'� 9d .�'t 6..�io+ 1 • � � r � r � 'fir l �`+ �*��� y '� �'� + tis; 1.,,, a'° . y �A � a t 1 � *' r � `'`- � r � • Uihh+fir T �, a.. bqv , sj. / °a r.. , GS C�` \► Y+` rxn' �.' �• J�" ` T A JAI 9 �t�h. �. �� s . K y. ,'' .,,+r4I. f +�+ °t Z'+�.. y A' ashy MM.. � � r 'r� - .'��� �r. �+i •. ;'�• r �. AbA M. r" x x ' .� r,'' . ;. `+ `v, +Ko r � �.� ,r •'� 1, �' �. t A.+t � s•' - r yY � : Ir + » ,� • t/�iajl � � " �r' r � �° r 1 r � rSe� e r J i r , .•w, Y",� �•':.rry tt'� !� + r 'r d� :r �1a°T iFG»��.L+.,, 4��s� � 1 w � ► t� •," �} -jit � �' }F���� r ';;j r,' ,I �''.o. ,r+r.^ '� ` "•' �y.;4 A.� r,�',,,ra". ` ,(i" r i R '1 •. �7 1� �y r � l� , !f � ✓'"' r,'�,r/ ``".•..L».:Mi,..�:. �T� `�{ {,,, o .` r�'�, r+ r r .qr+, a• i t ,� � ✓ � r ,r j�.,* A • ,�, / � , S r ~ t pti ' r _. t"v yr.Y Ast sri i + .v rrw1 j r' ro •t r " x >� f�„ri• •#�J'f.�y��ly ,.: ,,�� `r .�Y �r��ir .�' ..» .�*."y �4 A`'� f � y �or al,°• ,Ml�•��I vr'„r,- t ' Ri'rb,•y r4 rlvv � � .. a �+ a `.. Fr' �,r� d �� rr `y,� • ' '� �'' »h0 e d q � c�; • /�+�' t, !t s r 4+ _ H'."f'. "� � t, ;+'+' ( d'' ,�'� ` �r +rt # tl Q,,y y'��a,\a i.'1.� �' it r � + 'l o•�s) •' . r' / • . d•, ,,�/- ;fir '+!�."� 'b i �'Fi •° r ,I'tr ` y w rel:-t•a+,+^ r ,.i'i� �' ..►' y ., � S r h � �� P`rq 1 � m II