Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-390-001y ' �r, ' ' '�/ �� li� l �l� ��',' 4 �; � t i;' r r,. k' � i5 r'f c � �-e � J,` ,.7.' �� f N . r a }�. ., q". i., . t 'r Ir < r !„>� { �; .. �.'i 7 ��4 I !• ;, �,. r '� � ! `-1.,. � � } . '�. i r: ' a t � ' q 4 j, � q ., . � �� �� r � ! t'� t !� �` ,� � ��. .��. „ Y !�, y Y 1 i 1 �; �'� �J 1 i r� ,fF�� gg`�r� � r � i!Y. by +_ia , ','. 1 •Jth }A' K f �� 1, 14 I`,1 ryI I ! fr j I,r l��i civ M 1 �I �% �� r N.. 1 L tw ; � r w e ! °�� ! ; f�i � '�, s r 1 or 1 �; e� 1 F 1. �� 4 % r,� i r �1 r r J�� � ��1��. 1 r r �� j° � �” t y /} � 1 , r, t . PPP ! 1 �i. +y J� 1 t f4"f� 1 r h �,J ;�a I ��;t ',� I' ,' ! tr S, fli:'� f 1;' i 71 � �I . �. t rs � �; , 1 p" t 1 ! f, , e. �•Y.,li. i�! 'i � Y tl` , ! A ! ! �Y tl'�, ',' ! 1'' r y 1�'� ._ T {' <' ;lila F ° din t" r t; �' i/ r 1 � ,�-.; r , i�� r � ,k; �w � a r � it �r t. �`� aJ�, .k i °. ! r / r,l Y 1j ( �r � n��!�1 . I� i f 1 I'� � �� � M � b , d � r � �,� L '..,4 r �� t' `ti 1 e_",,, � rr �j�, r ;i �1 aA f y' S` y j ' r y 1 y �,,, rru�' — _ Gd7ii�13 PLANNING Cr7MMISTON SUMMARY 8Mr-, 'j1 APPLICANT:: Jim K & Paula Sands 2585 Gu nn Ave. Chico A,IiDnT, S�s : Y � Ca. OWNER: same TYPt OF APPLICATION: variance to allow a fence 35 ft. :From centerline of Lori Drive" LOCATION: On the northwest corner of�Lori Drive ' and Guynn Ave. Chico A�P. Nth. PRESENT GO141PJG: DATE LE pnryqG4pAy V RECEIVED. ..,._......,W,::..�,........�. DATE . NOTICES MAILRD ; s�� N1�9NER FIRST HEARING: cf- SECOND HEARING,' ADDITIONAL HEARINGS: ZONING PETITION SIG NA'�ifR%S I'�:RCtN'�'AGE W--- NATURES , COMMISSION ACTION: �'�'-!�7/-4 APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE � Butte C011,1iintyPlannirng CoMmission �4"�,� �;C-Mq;,r , f ,�P File No, Date filed .,?1G1�� /% G. lerrar.r�r'�G� t✓�tl�i C��'i fae.� Hearing datef��I.� Action by Plunning Commission r _ � v Action by Board of Supervisors -``- PRESENT 7ONINC: ? Assessor Map Book Paye No f ,, �Q �. Parcel hto, REQUEST; n APPLICANT'S NAME: ADDRESS; 2•J ,4 PHONE., STATUS OF APPLICANT'S INTEREST IN PROPERTY;lr OWNER'S NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS: . DESCRIPTION OF PROP 0 EXPLAIN FULLY REASON FO APPLICATION: , F3 /r'•N`�',: � etc 7`-- t eye •slit , c A,e �U�xrtite;--s CGc.f?.r� - �r�rs rttp .�/k%ui� ,d /rZ� • �(,. ![; X CT rlyC C' G,t.�!L%G'�(iC�J /f � .J ; 1 �c�r �i��� covet -he above sf merits are certified 6y the' undersigned f correct. r nd�'QS' o Itis oorrect Signature of Applictin# NOTE: FtJbase, submit herewfi'}h-a check or men oy order in the amount :how." below,, payable County of Sutto, also a d overt Qalo} plan, showing the locatieh of existing and proposed structures ah yout propertyand,ah iii" adjacent Receipt Mo. sY P` NOTICE TO APPLICANT � VARxANCF� Ordinance No. 1333 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 475, XNOWN AS THE BUTTE, co"WTv 7..e)xT1.*yrq »„. � _ _ �r x:6.1.. VARIANCE from the terms of -the Zoning Ordinance shall be granted only when, because of special circumsi:ances applicable e to the property, including size, shape. tapacra hy` location orsurroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other Property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special, privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. Any such condition imposed upon issuance of a variance must be reasonably related to the use of the Property for which the variance is requested. A variance shall not be granted for a parcel of property which authorizes a use or activity which is not otherwise 'ex- pressly authorized by the "one regulation governing the parcel Of Property..."� I HEREBY nECLARE UNDER PENALTY' OP PERJURY THAT'l HAVE READ THE .FOREGOING INSTRUCTIONS AND STATEMENTS AND UNDERSTAND THEIR MEANING AND CONTEXT Date Applicant p `1lt.t.F 9 41" LEV. 1'. if applicant Is other than owner, a proofof agency must be supplied In writing in order to legally sign the "Application for Use Permit/Variance". Application shall be considered void If not signed by owner or his legal agent, 2. All Items on application shall be completed, if an item is not applicable, indl- sate by the symbol n/a,' 3. Explain briefly yet completely the nature of the proposed use-varlanee. This Is very important and a requisite, 4. Ten copies of a detailed plot plan folded 81h1" x 11" shal'I accompany and be made a part of the "Application for Use Permit/Variance' The plot pialI.shall include the following: a. A scaled drawing of the parcel(s) boundaries, b. Location of all existing and proposed buildings and Improvements, c. Location and size of existing and proposed access to the subject parcel(s). d Identify streets bordering property and nearby crossroads. Provide a locam tion map If necessary, Show North Arrow, 5. Applicant shall further understand that the "Application for Use Permit - Variance" shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Commission, or, upon appeal, of the Board of Supervisors. Any subsequent special conditions ordered by the Planning Commission shall be made a part of the approved "Use Permit/Variance"and shad be binding on the applicant. 6. Unless conditions of approval have been complied with, In a one-year period, the "Use Permit" will be deemed expired. I heroby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read the foregoing instructions and statements and understand their meaning and context. DATED: (Apps icamt) » ; July 1, 1977 Chioo, California Gentlemen: Based upon the idea that wo were granted a varianco .to move our fence, so that we could install a swimming pool we have spent over 0600.00',6 xo moving the fence and driveway Be rerouting the following underground utilities: 1. water 2. cable T.V. S. telephone 4. electricity 5. gas The pool would extend to 41 Poet of the center of the road. There would. be absolutely no problem with, sight since the fence is already there and the pool will. be located inside the exist- ing fence. Inclosed is a copy of the variance and the newspaper notice reporting the results of the meeting with the Tanning Commission last year. We were under the impression that the variance vie obtained last year allowed us to install a pools Based upon this assump- tion we have worked many hours and spent a. great deal of money on this project. Added to this the pool would not detract from the neighborhood or in any way be a.nusianoe or hazard to the; community,_ My wife and x would greatly appreciate ,your permission to go ahead and install the swimming pool. Thank your � Jim & Paul& sands 42-07-02_ Mary 'Rose etal 42�38�22 �i 42-39'-1 P, Rt ;9ox 406 & Carolynne Duncan 2555 2535 Royal Circle i Ca4is &, 7s;velyni Hydar�3a China, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926 101 3ori Drive Ohia CA > 95926 42-.07-07 42-38-23 Louis Rego Rt l Bax 484 D { Grew & Diana Patr:ioh 2540 Gwynn Ave 42-39 ,i3 Do"gl as &. Anita Omand Chico', CA 95926 Chioo, CA, 95926 1011 Lsri Drive Chi,c0, CA 95926 42-38-01 42..38-24 , Edward & Mary Netherton 990 Royal Drive i Robert & Ann Sloven 2560 Guynn Ave 42—,19-14 Carell & Bernice xolousek Chico, CA 95926 ' Chico, CA 95926 1009 Lori Drive Chico, CA 9592.6 42-38-02 42-38-•25 George &Madeline Smith 984 Royal Drive Patrick &Doris Case 9 8 Royal. 42-39-15 Vernon Oswald Chico CA 95926 7 Drive Chico, CA 95926 ` 1007 Lor Drive ! { y 95926 42-38—o342-39-01 �. , Richard &Michele Bei ch 978 Royal Drive Paul &Cecilia Nei]. 2585 Guynn A2-39-16 �. Jose ph & Margaret Navarro Chico, CA 95926 Ave Chino, CA' 95926 2565 Guynn Chino, CA 95926 42-38-04 William & Bet' �,rk 42-39-02 Wm & 42-39-17 972 Royal Bari{ Francine Hubbard 1008 Lori Drive i Michael & Susan Young Chico, CA 95:'` Chico, CA 95926 1000 Fran:is Drive Chico, CA 95926 42-38-0 5 i 42-39-03 a, Michael & R. Fitzsimmons 966 Royal Drive Donald & Patricia Slee er p 1010 42-39-18 Chris & Sharon Prater Chico, CA 95926 i Lori Drive I 010CA 95926 1008 Frances Drive Chico, CA 95926 42-38-18 + "Nm & Shirley Slavik 2570 Royal. Circle 42`39-04 Jack & Nancy Dooly 42_39-19 Stephen & Chico, CA 95926, 1012 Lori Drive Chico, CA 95926 Catherine Pilugo 7.01.0 Francis Drive Chico, CA 95926 42-38-19 John & ;Paula Hangartner 2560 Royal circle 42-39-05 Charles & Jeanne La el 42-39-20 i; Oh , too CA 95926 1014 Lori Drive Chicon CA 95926 �h.11iam & Geri Hugge•tt 7.012 Frances Drive Chico, CA 95926 42-X38-20 Reginald Reibel 42-39-06 Gary & Bonnie Y1illhoi.t 42-39 21 2540 Royal Circle Chico, CA 95926 . 1016 Lori Drive Chico, CA 95926 , uth Thomas 756 D1 Caminito Road Vallbroak, CA 92028 42-38-21 Norman & Sherry Hammond 42-39-11 Ronald & Dinah Dandlilcer 42-39-22 2530 Itoy Circle Drive Chi-ca, CA 1015 Lori Drive DsPt of 'Veterans Affairs 95926Chico, CA 95926 Jacob 3e Shirley .Hengst 1,016 Frances Dr _�� __ Chico�_CA 9592ri BUTTE COUNTY PLIVIVING C0�1147 Y 11 �w 61� 1 e W rl:A Id lIL6 fJ r Sands !'n' V i:i�N.f & e. 3!.0 �t Y -from •e ll(-- �center"16 Of Lori to z�ri-ge�o�s otv d�;�r.4axcs�:` 79 kk d "A-11" 1� .t S � C �7 i« ` r5:"c1,. Gw �.t2en.b..Llocated � 3YA tile nort aed as Arres r�� Lori Drive � ru rxn Ave n � dcnt� -- ke 42-39'-01 # Chico '.this is a'V,;,r .ance request to allOw a fence 35 Of T;Ov i �`J�'iVe a The Applicant States �''� Y :CrO t the cen•€ girlie "We would like to Plat a P001 3 n our hack �y±� PrOseA t� :�.ocation of the fence,d W .� Y Under the a�z�5tar ta""c axxd leach lines � is not cs ulak�ZeY �'�'e C:UrX/Jntly have a, 1-juge L,,jrie yard a � '� di: �ftau t to %e bis,, � 1a d rii�,lY :. p 4 and, xxx i ax• op'nj,oa11 a wastO of IFtn � P�*�r c.��.t.�rxd,;lwiag .: �'c�xtcc� � � "r©tx�,ti appea�Aan�.�e Of the side � a,.d and a S make � f3�'" � mope p:.�, ''ii'n1; X01:• a -�.a�r aarge ent�uc�� b .�W yard Poo; and pj,ay area f -or the children. nlne en u -y" s��:i,��4 being yah cry€irt, cars d��l w;,c slot11y� and 1.,741 d.r� �a�, o3 a i O �:r�t,�r. 800! ,:l.�li . Fwx��'�e extended 06nce Would not c��e�a'd�e a 1)liilc' f"Ct'�'I Cl �� L is too far bank oh the . of; d • e �, w be dzie 't;1 t13a c� wzanci c�a� and °� Me � a�3�sn � ast� .. x xt wrould corner. ca y y j ant, -d fjn the section 15, r Of the Enabling Ordin.,,100 "V'a-'Lances"Vor1 tate tOXMS of the zona . ? �, � . be granted anly when, ��e��use� �sr ��ec���.~r�?�xe�1t>��arahall apE 1 scab e til L�aoGr,j: ry ia1.cluding si o g a 1Y v :f carat ton o u • oL nc :i*xa. ,r ^ v aha oµ of the � r , i�ia� td.a,,,t application Ordinance dc� � ' e euc11 Vrrop�,°rtyJc3. privw.1eca�:s enjoyed by Other Property in ttae V icinit•, andidentical class if. ia"ation. if the C dMni ssion Can imake theae b d�;�zgs, i t t�rOtxl r� 4~ apk�'�c�p� iate to grart this Vari-'a nca BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - September 2., 1976 C, VARIANCES 1. Jim X. & Paula a. Sands - Variance to allow a fence 35 ft. from the centerline of Lori Drive on Property zoned "A -R11 (Agricultural Residential) located on the northwest corner of Lori Drive sand Guynn AVe,; identified as AP 42-39-01, Chico 77-19-1-922 Mr. ,Lawson read staff findings. Proponents: Jim Sands said that two other people in the area had he ewishedtto move athesexistinfor g fencetYpe of action He added that g Opponents: No one. The hearing was c1losed (999+49) and moti Camenzind, seconded by Commissi aver Tlaebi made by commissioner would be depriving the applicant of h, finding not to do so residents of the area under the same pclassificaties on , by other AYES '.• Commissioners Camenzind, Gilbert, Smith, Thebach, 'Watson, Natters and Chairman Hanford. . NOBS: No one. ABSENT•C ommissioners Le Clerc and Moore. Motion carried. k September 1, 1976 Butte County planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 Gentl.emens L feel that an addition to the fence on the property `zoned A-It,located on the northwest corner of Lori Drive and. Gu would cause a reduction in visibility leading to unsafe trraffic�conditIons. Safety should be our first conaideration and this addition would not be consstant with this philosophy: Jim Sands was aware of the deed restrictions at the time of Purchase, and should have planned accordingly. All the homes in this area have the same restrictions and,for reasons of safety, none of the owners haQe attempted to circumvent this particular restriction, This action would also be detrimental to the attractiveness of the homes in the area. T feel it would not be in the best interest of the surrounding area to permit this action. Sincerely, . pmand S E 4, + ,/ p Gv . ��%�CFiL,df/�.✓ �i"�Lt..f YGIG,��G.G„c.�S,.J l: GL�C.�.d 4f�-�G. .fit-c�-���2 .�°Le..,, ,,r�,,.�t,�.�.7��G ��r✓ � .,ti,r�.���, . 4e G' y 4 r 11976 .�+�. Age ( l . if •�J•/+�M / ± i a ',.1. WRY �� 3 • V y ♦ LANE) OF I.1ATURAI, WFAIT'I'l AI':;F,c,� PLANNING COMM18SION LAWR15NCE J. LAWsON DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -. ORGVILI.E, CALIFORNIA 95965 Tolophono: 534,0)01 September 3, 1970 -.Tim K. & Paula Sands ?585 Guynn Avenue Chico, rA 95920 Re AP 42-39-01 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sands At the regular meeting? of the Butte County Plonning Commission, held September 2, 1976, the Commission approved your application for a variance to allow a fence 35 ft. from the centerline of Lori Drive, on the northwest corner of Lori Drive and Cuvnn Ave., Chico. This variance is granted subject to an appeal during the eight (8) day appeal period which ends at 5:00 P.m., on September 10,, 1976. If no appeals are received, Your vztriance will be consi- dered granted after that date. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, BET'T'Y BLAIR Planner IT cc: Dept. of Public Works Health Dept. ---------------------- Inter-Departmental Memorandum To; Clerk of the Board of Supervisors PROMI Lawrence J. Lawson SUBJECT; Letter from Carl & Bernice Kolonsek re: Variance granted to Jim and Paula Sands DATE; February 17, 1977 The minutes for the Sands' Variance indicate that the letters referred to in the Kol onsek letter were not acknowl edcled Four letters were received. Several things could have occ,u,rredy the Chairman could have overlooked them, they could have been laced in the wrong file, etc. I do not believe the omission is 1eyally critical, however, since I do menu Code Section 65801 dealing with fornial rut es of evidence or procedure states in pari:..... "There shall be no presumption that error is prejudicial or that injury was done if error is shown." Secondly, the Kolonseks did not exhaust their legislative remedies by filing an appealof the Commissions' decision with the Board in a timely manner. I believe the Commission approved the variance based on the criteria contained i'n Section 16 of the Enablinct Ordinance - Variances which states. "Variances from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance shall be granted only when, because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundin4s, the strict application of the Ordinance deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical classification." The Commissign minutes state.... "The hearing was closed and motion made by Commissioner Camenzind, seconded by Commissioner 'Thebach, finding not to do so would'be depriving the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other residents of the area under the same classification. /ma BOARD or supj.�RVISog$ COUNTY of Bul".rr IiNF11P.lZAZ, NOT1CC Chico. Ckoil9(,5%!6., l'''.��y/('orzi:�.a y 5 %! 6 ., Ja.n.uax'Y 28,19 t7 0. Board Cf wupery sQr s PaL. Box 2_69, av[!• t«w provl er " � a Ga13.�'OZ'I1'� 95965 • �n r`r19'i H-Onorable BOaxd Members: CAI • ids Letter is in ref erenc a to a var.4=ce rcaxa.t.Fd to Jig snc Paula Sa-ud,s, 2585 GUY= Ave. lie p 42-39-01 PlaznIzIg Caamlission Of'face,Oroville. W The nzar,t3.xxg of the Planning Corjmltte9 "as held Sept.2,,1976. on Se 1 stters From 14'iva Peoplo residing on Dora: Dr, opposl.raj; the vVariance v;ere delivered to trG PlaxUiing Comm: s9io,vz rjffa.os 'm orov,116. _ e letters Of correspondence opposing tile variance ,,gs � � notes, recdwtrt�d ora.. the taped m3 notes of tile Planning Corr-r+,_ittee but Ware• not read at" tre meetir_g. The, *rrritte incite n m s read there w_�.s no O0zO3itjOA to the variance, Sizzce the letters ware not prssan4ad to bs read; we feel t%:e findings of the incor�peteut Planning Commi ttae need to be revxe azdo e are asking the _Eoard of Supervisors to have the Planning Co.m3ttee d to reVierr and revoke the va-riance and that the nese -sgu 7 corrections be made to confozr.- to tha areas requirements. 7e staierents in the Application fcr_ the variance ire:aa not carried out anc1 we, f,.el the facts as presented in the application by Mrs. S and, arm ggasti.onable, Tsze Varisi_nce does not con:£or,-n to the rEs t of the area,,. 14 e, u`7y nuisance a_.na a presdrits a safety hazard. i•�o �.:o�yld aFpreo3.s.toa, + an: on the ; � � immediateacti of a�a.tter. �. Li c t.Lc'atsr c. r • N ! 4 Sept.eml>er 113, 197 t.�m ru POula. Sands 2595 Wyn:� '11venue clat-09 Ca e 9 5 9. VZ: 42-39-01 Tltt,a.r .let.tlax will be your Official notification, that your .rc:q 3e8t: for a variance to allr+t•" a fence 35 ft from the c-onterlina of Lori. Drive, on the northwest earner of Lori. Drivia and Guynn .Ave. Chico, ,is considered gperiod. since F W a�►ppeal s wer:o received h- thiappeal n the a� s � riad Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please Z0al fr;c-t to contact this off_ir"e. Sinc6rely,' Lawrence %7, S aw8on Director of PbAnni,nq 'OL-Pt. 4:1f Plib ,i c Works 31 r ....-r��"Sr"'rr+iki+�r.—.+.•,...++,..r..-+.ti.s.r«rw:.^w..+...a.:wr+Ta., r... ...r .x . v M:.,. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMIES NOTIC>r OP PUBLIC IM-ARINCS, No -Lice is hereby given by'the Butte County planning Commission that public hearings will be held on Thursday, September 2) 1976, at 7:30 p.m,ir in the Butte County Doa,rd of Supervisors' Raom, Butte County Administration Building, 1859 .Bird Street, Orovilley California, regarding the following: ITEMS ON VMICH NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING LNVIROMVIENTAL IMPACT HAVE BEEN PPILED 1, James and Peggy Sorrell - Rezone from "R-1" (Single Family Resi;iex,�t al to "R_l A&C" (Single Family Residential, Arts and Crafts} property located on the northwest corner of Fast- First Ave. and Terrace 'give, 400 feet west of Mi.one Way, more particularly described as: Lot 85 of "Longfellow Terrace Sub No. 211 per Map of Record in Map :Hook 19 on Pages 3;� & 40 of the Butte County Recorder. Containing 0..20 acres, more or less, identified as AP 45-371--21, Chico. 2. M & T Inc. Rezone from "A-2" (General) � ) to "C-2.11 (General Commercial.) Property located on the west side of Esplarw!.de approximately 270 ft - south of Eaton Road, identified as AP 44-03-140, more particularly described as:. Lot "A" of that certain parcel map recorded in Map of Record Map Book 50 on Page 8 of the Butte County Recorder. Containing 1.23 acres, more or less, Chico. 3• Don L. Rai rris - Use Permit to allow a commercial do; kennel on property zoned "A-2" (General) located on the northeast side of State .Hwy 32 at Kennedy Ave. p identified as AP 42-09-40, Chico. AND ITEM DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EX�I� PT_ PROM EN17TRONNIENTAL REVIEW 1. Jim K. and Paula J. Sands - Variance to allow a fence 35 feet from the centerline of Lori Drive on property zoned "A -R" (Agricultural. Residential) located on the northwest corner of Lori Drive and Gwynn ,,,e., identified as AP 42-39-012 Chico. The above mentioned applications, petitions, maps and draft environmental. impact reports and/or negative reports are on file and available for public_ viewing at the Office of the Butte County Planning Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville, Californiaw FnvirOnmental. Impact Reports are also available at college and county libraries. BUTTE 00 TY PLANNING COMMISSION LA'NRENCE J. LA1,11SON'' DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To BE PUBLISRE?a IN THE CHICO ENTERPRISE RECORD,, SATURDAY, AUGUST 210 19760 �t5s� ♦r uR' ® NErY&RFoY G L- 0�p ' o .a. T N4nrc.a2rlve� ffvBc�ta,e� �� r G4aot y ��°•��ireo P,�r2io,y � i Gr.vG6G OdW.4R.p Avk KoZe+�s�,C wll wo )^ Amp' Ia ` ©iy,a�ra PA-14 7151i A� tr h.�Nng.p a .4rvoGlks.t ��• G000sn�nr 5 Co.vsre✓th lv� W 8® hrEN6 ST � �. BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMIt�iISS ON �{�IP\N�a �t!�'�''S: Stir .2, /'3►76 APPLICANT= J,M K. yf-P,.� a, sen,Ds C�1�.Ne-R: s,A�,�. F�EQUEST� t�aat,�,,,cQ � ,��� � �„� ��CIS`PING ?O6\!E: ,aA-R„ S,/!L E 3S ,=i 7�e1ah� :'H8 C�>vs��► o La<+/ P:Q �r too 4zM�9wr .K" COUNTY OF BUTTE 7 County Center Drive r.. ns Yu Oro�ville, California 95965 To s Y= OFFICE ofUr p KNOER f . , CiKW@'GOf�`' AIiG�!+'7U a xI PLANNING COMMISSION R EAZN CN„4KEIS Unclalmai gg Rduaai `'^' _ Irisurtic�Gnt Alldre9s".”""_.r' No sunt slrY r illm o'"' - - NI) !SIA , '�� ., Ipl" '�.1i •� t nyY�i(�pq 42-��38—fA.: arruY�l, hu " Wm & Sey Sl avilt , U G 23 1976 9 2570 RCirole Chi;oo, 95.926 carne r i_I~, crier:. ✓ Moved -Left nO Address COUNT' OF BUTTE k 7 County Center Dxlve f, Orovillea California 95965 "4 « a undev Iti��i1� 76 OFFICE OF 4!¢� PLANNING COMMISSIONAh To REhpoN CHECKED ap�rr►ot, 4e! ..,_, r use kta*60trnkr«ovttd/ 26—;,3 4-0 �' 1p w aWac rA AdEti Vex a ech+ol ter abaal sucx+tR� _ Box "oapat otnc�la t3ei+w_ ate C�i;�dTY fi ,a,at� 0o rsA aero �t u�ar ctat: Pal o, CA 95968 Au G OROVI L i?', I a