Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-450-009A IT , RT�4NNxN'G C:Op�"�l..,SS16i Sl MM 1i3xE�;T�F() AD, D�VISrO��S ALAr1f3 EAST Sim., WT2 AMERICAN IiOhiE SERV��.ES LOG## $ �11-�01"05 ij .575 East 3rd Avenue Chico CA 9592 6, RS Williao W. ;& %,j*nn M. Martis 1021 Sit William Court, Chico, CA 95926 A....._. VESTING TENTIVEIVE SUBDIVISION to divide 4.58 acres to create p CiM—'C`i' DESCRIPTION S, cots ranging in size from 5,000 SF to 221250 SF 13 lots located at the northeast corner of Alamo,Avenue and. East;Avenue: ^ ,M .t area. _ . �. .. B, .SOP, S PARCEL 14UTABER(S) 42-45-47 iI3.G 1R R_ GENERAL PLADI.. PROJECT CONSISTENT?— aENZ AL PLAN CONFOFn1ANC>E REPORT 10%23/89 DATER OF APPLICANT `SIGNATURE CCINSERVA01'.ZON ACTCONTRACTS? r rfx^ITG LICAsnor 02 NOV 89 AI; .. ..ON RECETWED .._ Bruce. mash, Rolls, Anderson & Rolls $,/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: �._. 965 Fit Street,- Chico, CA _- 95928 11/Ylti..iSS Y P;iL :LAN NINC DI RECTOit t S REPORT PREPARED -1. E�d'�'Z CNMEyTAL CA'T'EGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED rj D' .D,T'E NEGATIVE D8CLARATION - DATE P.DOPTED. ,,_ '�. ;MITIGATED NEG DECLARATION DATE ESV < IMPACT REPORT' : DATE CERTIFIED., STATE CLEt�R:CNCiI�JtiSi� NO �,�._ . I j 11 I I I I l TENTATIVE PARCEL MAR WAIVER APPLICATION (Please cheep appropriate box) AGI. l X VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION PRELIMINAR`J 'SUBDIVISION APPLICANT:, American Home Services PHONE NO. 916-891-0444 ADDRESS: 575 East :3rd Avenue., Chico. _CA 95926 OWIIER William W. and i.ynn M. Morris PHONE NO. 916-342-7805 ADDRESS: 1027 Sir William Court, Chico, CA 95926 ENGINEER OR SURVEYOR: Rolls, Anderson & Rolls PHONE NO. 916-895-1422 ADDRESS: 965 Fir Stree.1:, Chico, CA 95928 MAIL NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Applicant and Engineer fAttn': Bruce Nash LOCATION OF PROPERTY: TOWNSHIP 22 N _ RANGE I E SECTION 21 PijU ASSESSOR'S PARCEL rlUNIBER: _ 42-45-47 TOTAL ACREAGE,_. 4.58 PLEASE SUB141T PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY 'OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within 'last six months) WITH APPLICATION'. INDICATE BELOW THE DATE AND RECORDING INFORMATION BY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CR5ATED DATE _ August 30,.1989_' BOOK 116. PAGES 48-50, DUMBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (including any remainder): 18 Lots rain` in in ,,7ze from 50)00 SF to 22,250 'SF DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE; OR STORM DRAIN: Ad,acent. PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL..—City, of Chico Sanitary Sewer 5ystem (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: California_ Water ServiCe Combany _ (Check with Health Department) 00 POWER AND PHONE LINES EXIST TO THE BOUNDARY OF' THE ORIGINAL PARCEL? Yei y IF NOT; ESTIMATE THE DISTANCE THEY WILL HAVE TO EXTENDED. N/A,'r p d I 2 NAME OF NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD! East Avenue and Al ._.... amo Avenue DI'STI.. ".,E TO NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD.; Parcel to be subdivided hat,6471 s 647' of frontage on East Ave and 80' ofrontage on Alamo Ave: For ini=ormat ori on nearest public road, check with Public Works Department) iF ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE.. ROAD EASEMENT, ATTACH, DOCUMENTATION TO THIS APPLICATION. !;F ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT, INDICATE DEED REFERENCE: VOLUME. - PAGE lF THERE ARE ANY NO ACCESS STRIPS; THESE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND THE RECORDING DATA IIVDICATEDi BELOW: VOLUME PAGE' R DISTANCE TO CITY LIMITS: 630 DOES THE OWNER OF THIS PARCEL NOW OWN, OR HAS HE IN THE PAST OWNED, LAND ADJOINING THIS' PROPERTY? Yes _ } SIGNATURE OF APPLIC T .' SIGNATURE OF. OWNER _OF RECORD— �UK-U�ttLt USE ONLY To Subdivision Committee: v _ To Advisory Agency: Most Take Action By: Appeal to Board of Supe rvisot^S; 8xpirat on date: Comments: Receipt Numbers �Qfe. :. 'total Received. ,.?,tA ,7 By L y � , t �I FOR OFFICE'USE'ONLY; Receipt # 1 /COLO P o ' e ct # ���1'7 AP�Er�oIX Dae Filed Enviironmental Information Form (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name and address of developer or,project spionsor; „,!american Home services, 5�i5 E 3rd Atenue, ,Chico,�GA 95926 2. Address of P`I^oject NE corner of East Ave. &Alamo Ave, Assessor's Block and Lot Number, 42-45-47 l 3. Name, addres >, and.. telephone number of person to be contactedconcerning this project, Applicant and Bruce Nash @ Rolls, Anderson &..'Rolls, 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928,- 895-1422 4 Type of proji�ct. (i.e rezoning, subdivision) Vesting Subdivision 5� List and desi;;ribe any other related permi"ts and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by City, Regionals State and Federal agencies- _Gity:of Chico Sewer, oermits 6. Existing Zoning district. R-4 and A-R Z. Proposed use of site, _'Residential. and 'Professional Offices PROJE&- DESCRIM)N 8: Site size: i�.58 Acres q 'II" g( Professional b�fice; 60000 SF 9, Square foota,e of building(s): s , Residential, 1.200 to 2 ` 00 to 7,000Sr 10: Number of floors of constructions' One or Two 11: Amount of off-street parking prov''ded;• N/A 12. Attach site development plan. N/A 13. Proposed scheduling, N/A ' 14i Associated +projects, N/A , 15. An�icipated incremental development. N/A 16 If 'residential, include t,',ie�number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected. '8:,Sa1if, Si,ic�le Family dwellings an zero lot line 1,200 to-2,000 SF 17. If commercial, indicate the type, Whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footaca OF sales area,: and loading. facilities. G— ity oriented profess 01141 offices 6,000 to 7,000 SF " 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and �. loading facilities. N A 19 If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: N/A 20, If the project involves a variance,conditional use or, rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. Use permit foi, Professionalofficesin R-4 zoning district Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? discuss below all. items checked yes (attath additional sheets as necessary). YES No X' 21 Change In existing features of any beaches, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours,,. X 22. Significant change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. X 23. Significantlyofhprojecattern, scale or character of` genet'alt. X - 24. Sign'ifican't amounts of solid waste or littera X' 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. X 26. Significant' change in lake, stream or ground Water quality or quantity; or alteration of existing drainage patterns. X' 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. X 28. Site on filled lar,'1 or on slope of 30 'percent or more. �� X 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. YES NO. X 30. Substantial change U', (, ,.and for municipal services (pollee,' fire, water, etc.) . w „� _X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) X 32 Relationship to part of a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Topography and soil stability; Existing site slopes gently to the southwest at less than 1%. Plants: English Walnut and Almond Trees Animals:: Squirrels and Birds Existing Buildings: None No known historical,, cultural or scenic aspects.' 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animal s`and any cultural historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of laid use Gone -family, apartment houses, shops} department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Northerly Boundary: Single family homes, appy+oximately 0,22 -acre parcels' Southerly Boundaryt LOS Church and multi -family residential Easterly Boundary, Single family homes, approximately M. acre parcels and almond orchard Westerly Boundaryf, Almond orchard CER IFICATION, I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and, in j the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements.; rrmation presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and bel _ Date'16�a/ff (Signature) For C I SUBDIVIDER'S STATEMENT Name America!,Home Services Date October 23. 1989 Project Vesting Tentative Subdivision Mao AP# _42-45-47 1. EXisting use(s) of 't.he land _ English Walnut and Almond Orchard i, 2. Proposed use(s) of the land Residential and Professional Offices 31 Improvements proposed (See Ch, 20-21 ,County Code) _ Street, storm drainage facilities and sanitary sewer facilities 4. Public area proposed Streets ,. I 5. Tree planting/or removal (approx. number) Removal of trees within street richt-of-way and buildiog Dads. 6. Preliminary copy of any condition$, restrictive reservations or covenants existing or proposes% shat -1 be attached to this statement. attached X none 7. State type of division, i.e. private road, urban, rural, etc. _Urban , rM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Primary Uses: A mixture of urban 3^esidential uses, including, detached single-family homes, condominiums mnl.tiple-dwelling structures, mobile home parks, group quarters and care homes. Second:anr Uses Home occupations, professional and business offices, outdoor recreation facilities, utilities, public and quasi -public uses. Site Desilation Criteria 1. Needed ;Cor urban residential development within 20 years. 2.. Adequate water supply. 3. Sewers available or natural conditions well suited to sep- tic tanks. 4. Adjac'ent ov near existing utilities and urban development. 5. Excellent accessibility to commercial services, schools, fire protection and other community facilities. Intensity of 'Use: Zoning allows net parcel sizes of 61500 square feet. Maximum density of 13 dwelling units per gross acre with group quarters and care homes limited to similar densities.* Home occupations, commercial uses, other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain residential. character. Consistent Zones., R-1, R--1 A & C RT -'1, ASR, S -R, SR -5 R-21 R-3, R-4 AR -MH, T'A'P, PA -C. Zoning Factors : 1-. Existing parcel sizes and residential densities. 2. Method and capability of sewage disposal. 3.. Effects on adjacent uses, water quality, air quality, noise, traffics flow and safety, and general:, environmental quality. 4. Proximity to major streets, commercial services and all public facilities. 5. Distance: from airports:, rail Rds and industrial. uses. 6. Existing utilities, walkways i drainage facilities. 7. Local desires. *For areas dependent, upon septic tank waste disposal., soil conditions and the effluent volume based oii the number of bedrooms will determine the actual number of units per acre not to exceed 15 dWelling units per gross acre in any case. !emended by the tlousi:hg �letnent 1�-��-81 Planning Department NAME: ALAMO EAST SM, . UNIT 2 Environmental 3ealth Department Cb.F (Forestry ;Department) AP: 42-45-47 Attn: J. Cram Carter (on areas north of red line on map) � X Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title "report for easement) 7 Pacific. Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Orovale Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) S ho9l District wall map) Dater Company (ifj individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Service CompanL (Chico area) Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation D' -'strict (Oroville area, SE of river) Yhermalit`o Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Limeseddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail. Waterworks (Doe dill Ridge/Forest. Ranch area) Paradise Irrigation District City of . (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Oroville �C Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley CROVILLE AREA MITT : Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Feather Rlver Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check wall map; a small portion, of Oroville only) :CGS, RICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTX):,check wall trap and title report to see ghat applies. Some areas overlap: Drainage District 7i Dra?nage District 2 Drainage District 07,100 D ainage District 1200 " Reclamation District #$33 Reclamation District m2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butter Creek Drainage District IN CERTA N CASES: _ Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept, of Fish and Came (near water and in rural and mountain Areas) Cal Trans (near State Hwy. 32, 70; 99, 149 (Chicr) cutoff), 162 (Olive Hwy, Rithvale HwV.), 191 (Clark Road) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lobs or units) United States Pjreat Service (if projeot USA land --theck. AP books) Parks and Recreation Departtndhc (pt-oparty° n ar sake Oroville) State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oro4i.71e -- watershed) Rock Creek Red aimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport; soutt tf rirc�, Creek acid east of Hwy. 99 ,:dee Mall Map)' Chico Area 'Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions) SPECIAL CA885 check title report for any mention of special" services or easements such as to Thermolito Itrigation District (numbered items) y C A' = ©F I»ETERL�1;:rUN Wo = Office of Planning acid Re* ,ch k. Butte County 1400 ,Teihth Street, Room 1 Planning Department Sacramento,, CA 95814 t 7 County Center Drive or JAN 0 9 1990 Oroville, CA 95965 X__ County Klerk: County of Butte CANDACS J. GRUBBS Butte t o, Clells B 6. YOUNG 0", Utz 1';;1JB.1ir-c=a Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or .21152 of the Public Resources Code. ?x.o j ect Title AP 11 Name 'Vesting Tentative Subdivision 04.2-450-047 American 'Holne Set-rices State Clearinghouse Number Contact ,person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public Works, (916) 538-7266 =ject Location At the northeast corner of ,Alamo Avenue and East Avenue, Chico area. Project Description vesting Tentative Subdivision to divide 4.58 acres to d Bate 13 lets ranging in size from 5 000 s ] g , quare feet to 22,250 square feet. "This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agency s approved the above-described projecton1esponsible Agen 8 orp, .E andhas made (Date) the following determinations ;regarding the above-described project: 1. The project will., .X will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 21 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions ,of CEQA. X I A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Ritig ation measures & _wtrey were not made-4 condition of the Approval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations was, X .Was not, adopted for this project;: This is to certify that the final IEIR with, comments and responses and record of prs�jedt approval is available to the general public at Butte County Planning Department 1 County Center brive Orovill.e, CA 95965 Date Received for Filing and Fo ting At OPR S gnature ., E . bisector of Pl,� nn ng ,... 'Title "tod tiKlrflh 'Tag%; f .. t • ,I yy - Coun: 'fit •�,_. � L/iND OF NATURAL WEALTH AML 85AUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 t TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 i I i January 8, 1990 American Home Services - 575 E. 3rd Ave. Chico, CA 95926 RE: Tentative Subdivision Map,on, East Avenue, AP #42-45-09 Dear Gentlemen: Attached is the Planning. Directors' Report for the above mentioned project. Even thouh your project w?s approved, the condition at the bottom of the report should be- added to the final map; since this report was not completed for the meeting. Yf youhave any questions regarding this matter; pleast Contact thi8 r office of 1916 538-7601, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 100 p.m. Sincerely, B.A, Kircher Director of Planning Thomas Last Associate Planner TL:jlo t T0: Butte County Advisory Agency FROM' Planning Director SUBJECT; Tentative Subdivision Map for American Home Services AP #42-45-09 DATE January 6,_ 1990 This item was continued from the ]December 20, 1989 meeting by the Butte County Subdivision Committee in order to revise conditions #2, #4, and #15 of the Planning Director's report dated December 12: 1989. The Public Works Department requested that a one (1) foot no access strip be provided along East Avenue, thereby eliminating the need for conditions 44 and #5 of the Planning Department, These conditions were originally added so that through access could be providedto the cul-de- sac, since the cul-de-sac length exceeded the maximum, allowed by approximately 100 feet. To accommodate this request, the applicant was advised to apply for an exemption per Section 20- 4 of the County Code and obtain Fire .Department approval. If the Fire Department agrees, an exemption can be supported since a special circumstance exists on site (existing narrow lot) and approval would not be detrimental to public health and safety. Ordinance 1226 indicates that the 'R-4 zoning district ext. nds 250 feet from the East Avenue tenterline. The way Based on ordinance, Zoning in e, candid show a 250 feet zoning boundary ,from the edge of right- of-way, would not be required and is consequently being requested to be deleted, Since the Advisory Agency did not feel that the lot configuration was an issue, it is ;recommended. that lots 1-8 be used as split duplexes only, in order to :maxiMize open space, The County Fire Department has agreed to exempt the rayl -de -sac length. Provided that the applicant meets their conditions in the attached letter It is recommended that conditions 2 4 and 5 of the original report, (attached) be deleted a►id the project be approved with the following new condition. 1, A note shall. be placed on, the Anal map stating, "Lots 1-8 shall be limited to split -duplex i development only." TL> �u�ieS t":+s. MgnaSn±7 �tYit'16o . JAIN a 1990 Orovi:le, CaUfonga January 3, 1990 County of Butte Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovi'lle, CA 95.965-3397 Attention; Mr. Tom Last Associate Planner Subject- Alamo Fast Subdivision Unit No. 2 Dear Mr, Last; I have reviewed the above -referenced project and have no objection to the lenth of the interior cul-de-sac provided the following conditions are met: 1. Fire hydrants are to be spaced no greater than 300 feet apart. Fire hydrants are to be Clow Rich 950 models or Long Beach Iron Works 614 models installed according to Department of Public Wroks Standard 5-27. Fire Flow shall be 2000 gallons per minute sustained for a period of at leas two hours, 2. The turn -around area of the cul -de. -sac bulb shall meet Department of Public Works standards. Sincerely, BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Bill Holrns Battalion Chief DN/dd �.i�.. .But& C and LAND OF NATURAL VdEr'.'lTW AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (EIII) CHEFF,Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 WiiOE`iO.F!arwangCMM Tolephonet (916) 5'16.7681 DEC1/y�)ry( RONALD D. McELROY DE1,1, 1989 Deputy director �t�bY ('rawnta December 11, 1989 American 'Home Services RE: AP 42-45-47 575 E. 3rd Avenue Tentative Vesting Subdivision Chico, CA 95926 Map, Alamo East Sub., Unit 2 Dear Gentl,emer Please "ie e ,-ised that the above-`tdentifed tentative subdivis:ton will ;be r'evi wed .by the Butte County Subdivision Committee on December 20, 198. Public Vosks vill recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attar}ped sheet. The meeting will commence: at 9:00a.m. in the Conference Room, located at AD County Center Drive, Orovill.e, California. if you have any ques"::i American Home Services, Alamo .East Subdivision; Unti 2, Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, AP 42-45•747, 13 lots at the northeast corner of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue. Chico area. engineers, Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Work: conditior.,js 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for aprroval and install, the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 ft. radius property' line returns at all street _.ntersections. 5 Provide right -of -way -for standard No. 8-5 at all street intersections. 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of access street. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each street to the. County address coordinator for - approval of street names.) 6 Deed 52 feet from the centerline of East Avenue to the County of Butte: 7- Construct one-half street: section on East Avenue to -RS -2A -road standard 44 feet to face of vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be V AC and 12 AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and g5% relative compaction, Submit design to Count}* Department of Public Works for approval. R value determinations and other data may be required to support section design 8 Construct full street section on access street. to RS -2_B road standard with rolled curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, gi, AB, SC 250 prinie, fog seal and 952 relative compaction: Construct one-half plus 12 ft, lane street section on Alamo Avenue to RS -24 access road standard with vertical curbi gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be 2" AC and B" AB with fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Bepa,:tment of Public Works for approval.. 4" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design: 5 Provide mon'uinentaton as required by the Department of Public Gtorks in accordance with accepted standards: 10 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards Alamo East Subdiv son, Unit 2 11 Provide permanent solation for drainage. 12 All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 15 Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency;; 14 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&P. 15 Form or annex to a County Service ,Area for maintenance of street lights and storax: drain system. 1.6 Provide 1 ft: no access strip on East Avenue frontage. 17 Pay off assessments: 18 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i,e. PG&E Pacific Telephone, water, sewer). 19 Pay any delinquent tax-is or current taxes as required, 20 Developer.shal-I provide all required traffic safety signs, including. stop signs: i i r nti,Y SU LAND 4F NA;1JaAl. WEA0I-1 AND BEAUTY , DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH f DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Addrest N 196 Memorial Way p 7 County Cuter Drive p 747 Elliott Road Chico California 95926 Oroville, California 95965 Potadiso, California 95969 Reply to Telephone: 9{6/891.2727 Tel 916/F?8.7281 Telephone: 916/872-6308 Buffet Co. r4anmlag C:ae m December 11, 198 DEC J. J.1989 An,arican Home Services C)r04j% C*Afo ,: Alamo East Vesting Subdivision 575 E. 3rd Av. Ne Corner Alamo Av. & east Av. Chico, CA.95926 Chico Area AP# 42-45-47 Gentlemen: This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public; Works Land Development Section that i4e are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present: information, we can recommend approval or conditional approval. Recommended Conditions for Approval 1: Provide a letter or otherdocumentation f1rom California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the subdivision 2: Prat they letter or are wi llingtand able toher tsupply ation frewerlservice tof o theat ng Y subdivision. 3 Place a note on the map that: states '►Development ofparcels 'within the subdivision will rewire connection to a public sanitary sewe a " 4i Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public water supply-" if you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Chico office, ,sincf?rely w Thomas Reid, R.E:H.S. Supervising aivironfttental Health Specialist Division of Erivi.ronmental health TR/gl ccz Public Works; Planning; Rolis, Anderson & 'Rolls LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH A,D SEAUT'Y y PLANNING DEPARTMENT' 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE', CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601 December 1:2, 1989 Alamo East Subdivision, Unit 2 ,American home Services 57S East 3rd Avenue ChiCo, CA 95926 Re. Vesting TSM, AP#42-45-47 Gentlemen: The Butte County Planning Department has completed the environmental revJ-ew of your project in accordance with the California Envirov'antal Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Ag,,,acy within the required 105 Mays pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Director's report required 'by Sections 20- 63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed: Please find enclosed the Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your. project; Please review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note ariy errors or omissions in out evaluation., please bring them to our attention.; The Environmental. Documents and Planning Directorls Report for your project has been sent bo the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Governwent Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on Which your application was received and accepted. The six month time limit for your project mandated by state law, will occur on June 2, 1990..The Advisory Agency will notify you o the time and place of the public hearing for your project. Tse» Butte County Advisory Agency rom» Planning Director Oubjectr TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR AMERICAN HOME SERVICES AP#42-4S-0'9 Date: December 12, 1989 This is a proposal to subdivide 4.58 acres into 13 lots ranging in size from 5,000 to 27,250 square feet. The present zoning is ,,V,-4 (Residential) and A -R (Agricultural -Residential). The Land Uze Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Medium Density Residential. There are no specific or, community ;plans for the area;. Zven though the parcels c. -Amply with lot depth and size requirements, there are several issues of concern with this request. The major issue is with the configurations and width of lots 1-8. This far -tore combinedwith the setback requirements, will create undesLrable building and yard areas. Particularly, Lots 1, 6 and 1 seem to be the most impacted Therefore, it is .recommended that this subdivision be denied and subsequently brought back with deeper lots. concern is that the applicant is requesting that lots 9 Ir, v.16ped as Commercial. However, neither the Subdivision. -tap 1- t. ru,)r 4-4,: County Subdivision Ordinance permits vesting rights for development. Even though a use Permit is required for acuse in a R-4 zone, a note should be placed on the map indic.atir�g that the westing rights pertain only Z residential development and any :wuture commercial development will comply with applicable ordinar..ces in effect at the time of ,development. Tie final item is that the rear half of lots 1=8 culjt ,!.r A= zoning. It is recommended that a Rezone to A-4 be applied -fnt and approved prior to recordation of the final map. Therefore, it is recommended that the project be denied and brought back with a new design layout: if the project is approved, the following' mitigation measures are recommended» A note shall be provided on the Final Map stating that tiie vesting rights are only, applicable to residential development in: accordance with Section 20-254 of the County Code. 2. A`Rezone to R-4 shall be approved for the A -R portions of : Lots 1-8 prior to recordation of the Final Map. 3, Place a note on the Final Map stating: "Residential development shall not be permitted within 2oo feet of the north lane of East Avenue unlesssufficientproof is provided at time of issuance of. building permits that the noise levels are met in accordance ? the County's Noise Element." tr, 4, Place a note on the Final, trap stating: "Development of Lots 9 through 13 shall provide through access from East Avenue to the cul-de-sac.' Place a note on the Final. Map stating: "Ingress and egress points along East Avenue shall be limited to right turn movements .only." MIYO Pay a pro rata share towards the ,installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alamo and East Avenues. Pay $75.00 per lot fee towards the construction of the west Side Fire Station. S. Join County Service Area No., 124 to provide maintenance of streetlights and storm drainage :facilities. TL:jme cc Rolls, Anderson & Rb lls Alartto East Subdivision, Unit 2, American Homes r. LOG NO, Ar NO 42-45-47 Allamo East Sub., Unit:. 2, American Home Services 1,, Nameof proponent i. Address of proponent and representati,'e (if applicable): 515 East 3rd Ave Brace Nnsh ', Anderson, Rol1.s q Rollsn - ---.< 565 VirStreet CrItco, CA 95928 Vesting TentatiVe Subdivil sio11 I. Project description; I-yam Ml4;NbATCU1IC'ZNI7ZNGS _ .C7F' SZCNZF=CAT?CE YES MAYBE NO 1, Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the env,ronment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife :species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate plant cr animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare important of jtajot X or endangered plant or animal or eliminate examples periods of California history or prehistory? �---- - 2, goes the project have the potential W a,•hieve short: term benefits to the detriment of long-term envircnmAntal goals? (A short term impact on the occurs in a zelatively brief period of time While long onmeniimppa nne ill endure into the futUtd,) lon term impacts will 3 Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively t considerablee?;? (A project may impact on two or Mord separate resources inhere source is rela+ ;vely small, but where the effect of the: res total each £ those impacts on the envir,t;=ertt is significant.) A, noes the project have environmental effects Which will cause: substantial adverse effects on human beings, attlier directly or indirectly? 7C Z, r3F�EFtMZri7A =Z ON (To be- completed by the LeAd Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: I/A find the prnipnsed project COULb NOT have a significant effect on the environment and u $EGATIVE DECLARAT'I'ON will be prepared. I/WP find that althortgh the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there will riot bee, significant effect in this case because MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the the MITTIATYON project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared, iM :Find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the 00ironment and. an ENVIRONMENTAL XMPAt= REPORT is rewired. CoUM OF BuITEO PIAN�414, G DEPARTMENT DAZIr: becember 4; . 1989 4 Reviewed by!.�- rY.'rr�T�r2C�r?rrEl`7Ax.. :crrPA.G�'S (Explanations of all 11YESP and "RAYBEP answers are required ,on attached sheet(s). i. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant,:��Es MAYHE NO a. Unstable, earth ronditions, or changes in geologic substructures? _ .7_ b. Disruption, disfilacement) compaction or overcovering of the soil? c, change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. C,truct:I,on, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? — a.. Increase in hind or water erosion of soils) either on or off Situ? f, Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands,, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or .any bay) inlet or lake? S. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h, Exposure of people or, property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, + landslides, mudslides, ground failure or similar hazards? Z. ATR, Will WthepoP r osal ,result in substantial; a. Air omissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. ``je creation of objectionable odors, stake, or fumes? c« Alterati_., of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, .locally or regionally? 3. WA Will the proposal result in substantial: f a. Changes in currents, or the course- or direction of water movements in V either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, 4raih5ge patterns, or the Tate and amount of surface rmtoff VVV c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements', ircludit�g vegetation removalf ehannelization or culvert installation? �l d. Alterstions to the course or flow 'of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water to lity' including but not limited to )eratute dissolved oxygen or q yi g � � Y g. Alteration of the direction ar rate of flow of ground )raters? h« Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters) either through, direct additions or withdrawals) or through Interception of an aquifer by outs or excavations? i. Reduction in the ariount of wate• otherwise available for public water tf supplies? .-- ,j. Exposure of people or property to water-ralated hazards such as flooding? t,, PLAN']`L1#F. Will the proposal result in substantial: a, change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants G (including trees, shxubsy grass, cropAo and aquatic plant's)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique) rare or endangered species of plants? c.. Introduction of new 'species of plants into an area) or in a barrier to i the siormal replenishmIont of oxisting spedios7 �w d. RediAdtion in acrOtge of any agricultural Crop? ------------ ANTMAT. 'T.IFE, Will the proposal, results in substantialt YES YBF NO a. Change in 6he diversity' Of species, or numbers of any species of animals land in eludi g reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms (blyds, animals ' or insects? ua�, taro or endangered s ecce b. Reduction in tki q g species of numberx of any uni animals? Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to u C, the migration or movement of animals? d, Deterioration. of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ L. NOTS1. Wi11 the proposal result in substantial; a, increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levOIST t„ TIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce 'significant light and glare!8. %,A21Q (ISE. Will the proposal ;:esult in a substantial alteration of the_. pret.ent cr planned land use of en area? q NATURALi?E50URCES. Will tl'e proposal result in substantial; a. increase in the rate of use of any naturall resources? b, Depletion of any '.tart-renewable natural. resources? 11' IZISK OFUPSET. Will the proposal involve: a, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited toy oil, pesticides, chemicals; ar radiation) in the event of an accident or Lpset condztionsl j b, posGi.ble interference with an emergency rltsponse plan or eme'gency evacuation plan? density or 1. Will the proposal alter location, distribution, f ,pOT't"TI0tt.- grauth rate of the humane population? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal. affect eyisting housing, or create a demand for additional housingl 15: �ON Cj_gMAATIb% Will the proposal It in: TRANSPOR7ATT/salre a Generation of substantial additional vehiclemovement? ---= ------ b. Rffeets on existing parking facilities, o:c demand for neW parkins? c. Subs,antial impact on "isting transportation systems! d. Significant alterations to present patters of circulation Or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to Waterborne; rail or air trafficl - f f. Increase jnt traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . 4, N1 tTC SERVTCtEs Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for :neW or altered government services: a Rite protection? ter. r b. Police pebtection3 - c. Schools? d, parks or other recreational facilities: e. hiaintentznce of public facilities) including roads? V f Other governmental services? J _S� i 1 15, ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYri) NO 1' a, Use of substantial amounts of ,fuel or energy? b. Substantial increa�iq in demand upon existing sourao, t,f` ienergjo or require the development of new sources of energy? TIT.TT?& Will the proposal result in a need. for tick,; js t+ -ms, ot. s'Jbstantial alterations to the following; G a. Power, or natural gasp C� b, Cormunicat ions systems? L c, Water availability? d.. Sewer or septic systems? e. Storm water drainage? f, Solid was>;e and disposal? tT. MLAM HEALTH. Will the .propost.w. result 3.111 1, A. Creation of any health hazard or potential b,aznrd (excluding mental hearth)? b.. yxposure of people to potential health har.a:rdt't 18. t,ESTf ,TICS Will the proposal result in thn oloti, ,tion at any scenic vista or view o a the public, or will. the yy.ro;Sosal''resolt in the is p L'rB"�tiOn OE an �`.lcally offensive site pp ^n to pul'`liC View? 1 Zj~gCRpATIotJ, Wily the proposal reault in an i6pso'u upo1. the quality or C, gbahtiry of existing recraat, .gal opportunitit -0 'id. 1;�fljs`URAL RESOURCES. in the alternti•!i or derttuction of a a. Will the proposal result prehistoric Or historic archaeological a'te? — ..–..-. b. Will the proposal result in adverse phytna1 or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, t'Tucture'ot, object? c floes the proposal have the potential to •rause a pgysical change which would affect unique ethnic cullit,A valuesi d.. Will the proposal :restrict exis°Ing rextgious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? •---_�, `I )�C80CTSIST0J%T CSF 7ENiT RC1N]NI Nx 4 1 , E V}� ,T7A2YdN Soo attached,. k -4- - jb,r'o. There will be some disruption, displacement, compaction and oyorco'vering of the soil to facilitate site development. Since the project will require on site and off site drainage facilities, this 1�ipact will, be insignificant. There will be some potential erosion Of the soil duriag construction of the site since the project site is basically level, this impact is considered to be Insignificant. b,c. The absorbtion rates will decrease due to the over.covering of I, tl e soil with impervious surfaces. But this impact will be reduced by the installation of appropriate drainage facilities, therefore, reducing runoff cotcerins. Off site drainage facilities are currently being installed along Alamo, that eventually drains into tbR Undo, Channel. This project will tie into that facility. 4a, d. 'this project will result in the reduction in acreage of a orchard crop. However., since this project is located within a urban area and is planned for development, this should not be a significant impact 6b. Residential development of parcels 9 through 13 would expose people to noise levels that exceed :hose recommended in the.Noise Zlemc 4: of the Butte County General Plan. The no-iBe.element Vindicates that residential development within 200 feet of the ,northern lane of East Avenue would expose people to the noise threshold levels setforth in the General Plan. 'However, it is the a.pplicantZ,'intention to develop these bots as professional offices, which would be compatible with the noise leve: ia,c The project will result in an incremental increase in traffic Movement and traffic concerns on Alamo Avenue at the intersection of Last Avenue. In addition, the ctAl-de"sac exceeds the 500 foot minimum established for urbanized areas. If the project is redesigned so that the proposed li-nited access points along Fast Avenue are carried through to the cul--de-sac., this impact should be insignificant. Also, the access ,,oints along East Avenue should be limited to right turn movements only. 71his project will also provide full street Iff1provements within. the project boundaries and is subject to the Cf'ti.co Urbar. Area street fees which are established to offset potential impacts. The applicant should also pay a pro rata share towards the installation Zif a traffic signal at the East Avenue and Alamo Avenue intersection. Signalization of this intersection is not covered under the street facility mproveme�.)t fee structure adopted by the Butte County Board of Supervisors for development within the Chico Urban. Area.. As such, At will be necessary for the pro rata fees to be paid. 14a,b,c,d e,f. This project will represent an incremental increase in demands f*,r public services is the area. The project lies within the west Chico Fire Station Assossmont areai similar projects in the area have paid a $7,5.00 per lot fee towards construction of a new fire station on the west side of Chico. This action has been found by the Fire :Department to be an appropriate mitigation. measure. Park fees and school fees are also collooted ;at the time - of issuance of - -- building permits which will off,+et this potential impact: The applicant will also be required to form a Community Service Area to pay for the maintenance of public facilities including the roads. 16,a,b,c,d,e. Powert communicati,bris_,vater, and sewer lines will have to be extended to the propertiY to ,serve the individual. lots. These services are all. available and are not expected to be significant., ig 'the� ' represent res will ro ect re ent _an .i ii `tcremental .crease in demands t f p recreational facilities within this: Chico Area Recreation n str Xt. Vowever, fees are collected. at the t'me of building permits to offset this potential impact. The following are the recommended mitigation measures: 1. Residential development shall not be permitted within 200 feet of the north lane of East Averrze unless sufficient proof is provided at time of issuance of building permits that the noise levers are met in accordance with tha County's noise elemelt. 2. Unless the project iti redesigned, through access; will be provided from East Avenue Go the cul-de-sac. 3. Ingress and egress points along East Avenue shall be limited to ,right turn movements only. 4. Pay pro raga sharp towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alamo and East Avenues. S. Pay $75.00 per lot fee towards the construction of the West side Fire Station, 6. Form a Community Services urea to pay for maintenance of I� f the public H..ght away.; _ o c _ �„5 F Applicant American Home Services DATA SHEET Assessor's Parcel 4 42•-45-41 Log '# 89-11-02-05 ,A, Project Description 1. Type of Project: Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map 2. Brief Description;: A request to subdivide a 4.58acre parcel into 13 Lots rang.Lng in size from 5,000 square feet to 22,250 square feet to accommodate split duplexes and offices. 3} Location: North of East Avenue and east of Alamo Avenue. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 8:07 dwelling units per acre. 5. Amount o r Impervious Surfacing: Approximately 40 to 50% for the .,osidents and the commercial will beapproximately 80 to 85%. 6-. Access and Nearest ?ubl.ic Roads) Alamo and. East Avenues: 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Public sewer systems. 8. Source of Water Supply; California Water Service 9. Proximity of Power Lines; Along Alamo. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development; Parcels 9 through l3 can be further subdivided with the R4 zoning. B: Environmental Setting Physical Environment; 1. Terrain a. General Topor,raphic Character: Level Valley Ploors b. Slopes:" 0-2% Sloping westward, C. ElevatiOA4 175 ft. A,S.L. d. Limiting Factors: None 2. Soils a,. Types and Characteristics: vina fine sandy loam brown 2 to 3 feet thick loose friable structure, retains moisture,, Well drained and good permeability. b. Limiting.ractorse none 3. Natural Hazards of the Land qu i ate Earthquake Intensity zone a. Earth ake zone. < Moder, VIII b. Erosion Potential; Slight C4 Landslide Potential: None a. Fire Hazard: Unclassified e Expansive Soil Potential: LoW I v 4 a.droSurface Water: None on site Hydrology b. Ground Water: Unknown area of high ground water withdrawal with some subsistence problem. C. Drainage Characteristics: Generally westward d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 to 24 inches per year e. Limiting Factors: None 5. v,i,sual/Scenic Quality: Fair with urban development encroachment. 6. Acoustic Quality; Good 7. Air Quality Good except when stagnant air occurs in the valley. Biological Environment: _ 8. vegetation: Walnut and Almond orchard. 9. wildlife Habitat: Small wildlife expected in orchard or Urban fringe area. Cultural Environment-. lo. Archaeological axia,Historical, Resources in the area. Low sensitivity area. 11. Butte County General Plan designation,: Medium Density Residential. 12. Existing'Zonitig. AR and R-4 13 Existing Land Use on-site: vacant and orchards 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses" North single'familyresidents under East an construdWest single family.ction, South a chCrch and apartments, orchard; g. b. Zoning: AR and R-4 c. Gen. Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential da Parcel Sizes: .22 acrek to 9 acres. e. Population: Suburban densities. 15. Character of Site and Area: Urban fringe rapidly development area. 16 Nearest Urban Area: Chico 17. Relevant Spheres of z,nfluence. Chico 18. improvements Standards Urban Area: Yes 19. Fire Protection Service: metol miles. ) e Station: approxi Station 42 a. county (State) Fir., b. Water Availability Hydrants 20. Schools in Areal Chico Unified 9 6 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCEMATERIAL ., Map II-1,Earthqu6ke and Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-7,7, by CH2M Hill - :20 Map 11-2, Liquefaction Potential: Seismic Safety Element, Butte 1 County General Plan revised 1-77 by CH2M Hill. s 3i Map III -1, Subsidence & Landslide Potential: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan -'Avised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 1 t 4. Map III -2, Erosion Potential; Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-771 by CH2M Hill. 0, Man I1I--3, Expansive Soils: Safety Element, Butte County ..aeral Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill r ;0 Map IV -1, Noise: Noise Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 7. Map v-1, Scenic Highways: Scenic Highway Element, Butte County General, Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. S. Map III -4 Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hill. 9 Archaeological Sensitivity Map by James P. Manning, for.Butte County Planning Department, 1983. 10 School District Map, Butte County Planning Department. Ili Chico Nitrate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration in Shallow wells, 1983, by Department of Water Resources, Northwestern District, The Resources Agency; State of Cal,fornia. 12 Agricultural Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67- 178, Butte 'County Board of Supervisors, December 5, 1987. 13i Flood Insirance Rats Maps, National Flood Insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1988, 14. USES Quad Maps, Plord, photorevised 1969. is. Soil Map, Chico (1925)/Oroville (1926) Area, U.S. Department of Agriculture. 16. Soil Survey of Chico (1.925) /oroville (1926) Area,; U.S. Department of Agriculture. 17, Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map, Butte County fire Department and California Department of Forestry. Butte County Planning Department:. 965 FIR STREt'! GHICO« CALIFORNIA 95928 TELPWONE 916-895-1422 ' Qua COO* Co. htanning Gomm. Rricierson OU; 1989 CIVIL ENGINEEgS December 7, 1989 brovilie, Caofomut Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Attn: Mr. Tom Last Associate Planner Re; Vesting Tenta%.1 Subdivision A.P. X42--45-47; Log #89-11-02-05 Dear Mr. Last: We are submitting this letter on behalf of Mr. Bill Morriss applicant, for the above referenced project. We have reviewed your letter at,i environmental checklist form dated December 4, 1989. To eliminate potential adverse impacts. following mitigation to the environment, Mr. Morris proposes the from this subdivi. �g ion measures. - 1. Place a note on the Yinal_ Map stating; "Residential develop- ment shall not be permitted within 200 feet of the north lane of East Avenue unless sufficient proof 18 provided at time of issuance of building permits that the noise levels are met in accordance with the County'snoise element.tl 2 Place a note on the Final Map stating; "Development of Lots 9 through 13 shall provide through access from East Avenue to the cul-de-sac." 3i Place a note on the Final Map stating; "Ingress and egress points along East Avenue shall be limited to right turn movements only." 4i pay 'pro rata share towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alamo and East Avenues. 5. pay $75.00 per lot fee towards the construction of the `West side Fire Station. 6i LT6in unty Service Area No» 124 to provide maintenance of streetlights and storm drainage facilities sincerely; ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS Aa Bruce A. Nash HA�i�dlw r o Y r-. v utte couft 4AND OF NA`sIJP,AL WcAkTFi AtF. BEAUTY PLANNING ,DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 3397 TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601 December 4, 1989 Alamo East sub., Unit 2 Aj(jp_rican Dome Services 5u5 East 3rd Avenue: cni,co CA 95926 Ret vesting Tentative Subdivision AP #42--45-4.7 Log #89-11-02_-45 Dear Sirs: An initial study, of your proposed project, a Vesting Tentative subdivision, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment d environmental checklist). To reduce or {refer to the enclose eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of theproject., otherwise, an Environmental impact Report (EiR) is required pursuant to the cali,for-nia Environmental Quality Act. An early response to this notification; sent to the Plana -Ing Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project, please y P y to of this forward - our .written. response: within. 15 days from.. the da latter. Should you have ally queregardingstions this matter, please contact a this office between 10200 aim, P•m. Sincerely, B• A. KiRCHER Director of Planning Tom Last Associate Planner TL : j to cc; William and Lynn Morris .. COM OF .BUTTE DEPA DffiJT OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Oroville, 'CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 �a November 2, 1989 American Home Services REi AP 42-45-47 575'E. 3rd.Ave. Tentative Vesting Subdivision 'Rap Chico, CA 959.26 Alamo East Sub., Unit 2 Gentlemen: This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above-refetenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department for environmental determination, and to' the Environmental HealthDepartment for its review. This application will be considered complete when we have received notification from the P1annJng.Depar.'tment and the Environmental Health Department that all necessary Tufa have been received These departments will contact you regarding any additional information they may requi.re., Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works JV,hin Mendonsa sistant Director JM/kk Cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department Rolls, Anderson & Rolls LD 1120 (Revised 2%88)' ,5 _a 2 1 we e►w�'n r� iqs AVI MWMLM ►areae wnw 4 DRIi M ml, Emeryville Sa:nta Clara 1.' = 0' m 11 PLAIMING COtfUM1,SSION SM -MARY SHEET FOR L.PND I?IVISSONS Alamo East (American Home Services) Log 4`'9-01-05~03 3'73 v 3rd Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 Donald E. Crane and Donna a. Crane Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map �5-ai jI:CT DESCRIPTIONOR 50 L to o- vow �'�Ai:1Otd o-ts located at the northeast corner of Alamo Avenue and 'FLS � yellue . Chico area. _ - .5586RI5 PZRCE2 NUMBED.{S) #42-45-09 R -A, A -R GEN -VF= PLAN Med. Den. RePROJECT CONSISTENT? �tj5R.tL PLAN CONEOP14ANCE REPORT December 21, 198$ DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE � O CONSERVA??TION ACT CONTRACTSNo T'E AP'LICAMION �KECEIVED January '5, 1989 .aLtdT/BURVE`lOR/CIVILtiGINEERi; P.a1 Ls Anderson, & Ro1 ls, Attn Bruce Nash �. DRES5s 965 Fir Street., Chico, CA 95928 tAlZ PLPIgNTNG' DIRECTORS REPORT PMEPARED u ?IRONMENT�1 , CATEGCIRICAL EXEMPTION =' 'DATEPILED D�`.%gRMINATION AND DATE NEGATIVE 0tCLAWiTTCN - DATE ADOPTED, MITIGATED ME04 DtCLARATTON DACE ADOPTED - 8WI, IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIPTED. STATE CLEARINGfIOt= NO. tJ COWN111:7 TEE MEntiING DAT ►, ,�iJSOAY AdtNC`I .CiF,ARING DAIM Aj 'Ij TORY AGENCY ACTION Al" {. APPE, .i, MIWAING !",AT EOAAD ACTION, CrOMMENTS,' reoR PLAIN:, No.: 0-RZ.C"w'OA 1u,'RT � «a.....-.x� ,.°''/ m ,� � r � rte,' .. � .,tf ���F�-. p ,. p'�,r^ {ri:. y� . _ � P, w:" • �/' � �eir�`� !'"r�`" _ .�%,{:"r. �.r��'� �`i?'"`.,+' �..�.»r VESTING" TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION J TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ` Clay, Cali#or»ia PRI'LIMINv'Alf. Y, SUBDIVISION WAIVER APPLICATION (Please check appropriate box) Ay«LICANT' American Home Services_ PHONE NO, 916-891-0444 ,P-DDRESS 4. 575 East 3rd Ave., Chico, CA 95926 C*,njER,S Donald E. Crane_ & Donna J, Crane PHONE NO. 916-626-4222_ p,,DVp,ESS: P.O. Box 813, __Diam-and Sprincrs, CA _ 95619 , j9EER OR SURVEYORS R6.11s, Anderson & Roll's PHONE NO 916-895--1422 AZ,,5P,ESS: 965 'Fir St.. Chicoe CA 9592-8' JX&IL NOTICE OF HEARING TO: _Apolicant and Rolls, Anderson & Rolls, 965 Vir Street Chic%a1, CA 95928 Attn Bruce Nash ash OF PROPERTY! TOWNSHIP,"'N RANGE 1 E SECTION 21 ('PTN) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 42-45-9 TOTAL ACREAGE 10.76 !�,x.;,Elz,$Z SUBMIT PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE n,l`'SURANCE (,dated within last six months) WITH APPLICATION. INDICATE FLOW THE DATE AND RECORDING INFORMATION BY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL. WAS CREATED SATE November 27, .1895_ __ _ BOOK 1. PAGE ._ 48 �sM-IBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (including any remainder)t. 33 Lots ranging in size from 5.250 SF to 4'7,,37 5 SF bISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR STORM DRAIN: 900 more or less PROPOSED METHOD` OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL! City of Chico 'Sanitary Seeder System (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF NATER: California Watar Service Company (Check with Health Department') Do POWER AND PHONE LINES EXIST TO THE BOUNDARY' OF THE ORIGINATE PARCEL?,YES IF NOT, ESTIMATE THE DISTANCE THEY WILL HAVE TO EXTENDED : — ,4/� A ,A Page IMIE OF NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD: East Aventx ,-t,nd iA8to Avenue 1 STANCE TO NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD., Parte �d„w be subdivided has 647 1 of f 2Ae on East Ave. 1 4061_ _of frontage.. ,,.Alamo eve. 6Vorrinfor}ation on nearest public road, check with Public Works 09 a _. -kms FOR OFFICE USE ONL Receipt # � .�+� . p ject APPENDIx_E- Date Filed —� Environmental Information Form (';lo be completed by applicant) GENERAL 'TN%ORMAT:CON 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: American , Eone Servicesj 575 E. 3rd Ave. Chi o CA 95!)26 2, address Of Project: NE corner of East Ave. & Alamo Ave, Assessor Is Block and Lot Number 42-45`9 address, and telephone number of person to be 3. ' tame, this. 'project : A l icant and contacted concerning 965 Fir St Chico Bruce_Nash @ Rolls Anderson &Rolls, CA 9592$ 89514-22,. 'ect: i.e. xe7onng, suhdvision? 4 Type of pro? Subdivision _ ` ibe any other related permits and other p cr public approvals required for this project; including r Regional, State and Federal 5 , L�.st and dem ed b. city, those required ermts for stout drainat;e�is_ chi+ztfeno agencies: _; Lindo Cna»tlf'l and City of Chico Sewer.Hermits: 6. Existing zoning district:, R-4 and A -R .Residential 7,: proposed use of site; Sinctle: and Mult1-Famil pROJECT DESCRIRTION 8 Site size 10.76 Acres 9 Sc ara footage of building (s) 1,500 to 2;000 SV 10 � Number of floors of constructions: One or TWO ` Ili Amount of o f f --street parking ptbvided N/A 12. Attachsite development plan: N/A 13. proposed scheduling: NfA T 14. Associated pliojects:. N/A 15, Anticipated ;Lndremental development: N/A ;res i "dential 4;ncf4de the number of units, schedule of k urti t r-',zes0 and type of household size expected. 21 Single Family dwellings, 1,500 to 2,000 SF to split Single Family dwellings on zero lot bine, 1,200 to 1,800 SF t 2 Multiples Family dwellings 17. if commercial, ,ndica�:e the type:, whether neighborhood,, citycnr regionally oriented, square footage of sales area) 4 and dingfacil�,ties. N/A is. if industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, .and loadJLng facilities. N/A 19 If institutional, indicate the 'major function, estimated employment per Ishift, estimated occupancy, loading faccilities,Nannd community benefits to be derived from the p j 20. if the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning appl.icration, state this and ,indicate clearly why the applicatiorl, is required. N/A " Aro the following xA ems applicable to the project or its effffq.�:ts? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional 'sheets alE- necessary) t YES NQ" 'X 21. 21. change in axisting features of any beaches,, lakes, or hills, or substantial alteration of ground. contours. 22. :Significant change in scenic views OV vistas from existing residential areas or public lands o;r roads X 23.' significantly, change p';�ttern, scale or character of general avea of project. ' F X 24 Significant amounts cif soa,id waste or litter. X 25 Changin dust j ash, smoke, f :u � a or odors in vicinity, X 26,. significant change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 7 Substantial change in existing noise or vibration lsvels in the vicinitY, y fir, 25�: -site on f�. A -d land or on slope of 30 w - percent or mare. �. 294 Use or dirsposal of potentially hagardous materials j such as toxic substanri;es, fi'tmmables or explosives. n YES N0 \\ max . 30. -.substantial change in demand for mun .cipal services (policei fire, water, sewage, etc,) x 31. substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas., etc.).; X_ 32. Relatyo, ship to part of a larger project or series of ,projects ENy7ROM4ENTAL SETTING 33 Describe the project site as it exists before the project; including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical ar scenic aspects_. Describe any existing structuress on the site, and the use of the structures. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intipnsity of land use (one--family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- , ack,' rear yard, etc.). CERTIFICATION: x hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present thedataand -- information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief i i j (Signa t'U.r Ford i i v1 '41 5, 33. pro'ert Sita Topography .and soil stability: E�tisting site elopes i entl' to the-- southwest at» less than 1%. Plants: English Walnut and, Almond Trees Animals.; Squire.^els; and Bird , Existing )Buildings: hone No ;known historical, cultural or ;scenic aspects. 34. Surrounding. Properties Northerly Boundary;: Single family homes,, approximately 1.0 -acre parcels. Southey �y Boundary; LDS Church and Multi -family residential. Easterly Boundary, Single family homes, approximately 0.5 -acre parcels and Almond ovchard. Westerly Boundary: Almond orchard /'• )A IST Z- 7—,. a -eiee JAN x+r rfi• r•r: c arii ir: •r�•r �C'G'%�r�1 J1C �'-�'-, C:T_TVf•:1•_Ar, 1ir.AN (IC`)i�Jt•`Cff�f-tANt:1•: r•Zf•:l'C)1•._I'��f//a TOY&I, MAI' c-3 r4 -wur") 'ry r sr oN, MA-P. +•ts J; 4 r.o bo ca g t Pzed by applicant. ..s.. "A.j'PI,tCArri 3:A"'r Mtit. ADDI'.ESS >P___,_i-'i'1Y1• 'y'f'7� , i JiVO ECT DESCRIPTION:�..r ]. ASe re-MR I S PARCEL MMER(S) PPapasl:D 'U.Sz _ _ SI1� / '3' /?7l 1f 71' i2L-2// i� ,fir �/�%f=ri ✓ TPira ,fo f tasting ite= a-ra to be cc--?,leted by the Planning Depart-tent Ll >;lrr mull (G: _�j%/: t • LAND CONSERVATION AGFUEE itil': K;"t4.5%i�.:� I!Lhll .DE5xIC.rih t�llr _ / r "%'/"71 %/7.:1 , i~�'/ •,+, �'�� K r�'�- � rr� ..- � '� r;. �r+lnrnnatiSit 9as2. at-srt Criteria;: yE« 210 It is recc,-==dg; that you perform the foiloving chect<-�d itezts,• ARCXAEOLCGICAL RECORDS CHECK f" G%• BO'T'ANICAL SURVEY GEI'LOGICAL St3FSYEY rYx _ YES NO Xi° HIN DEPART-MZ )F FISH — AN, • GAME DEQ =F2 ff iT ZONE: M. FLOOD PLAIr'. I2. kx HIN AREA, SPECS?IC'OR Sof Detes,asnation: Substantially confozz 'to; LA'D USE PLAN: -1 jMtERAL PLAN: I.. Land UseIf i Yes , 2. Conseivato:t Name of Pian Oren Space L, Safety / iii AM URBAN Pj= M., � L t Noise _ If Yes, 5. Housing I-/ 13me of ResarVO 7. Circulation' i�rr ,L +�/nJ�1<lt-' fti _ C /"7`1J Al :PORT Lim USE 1 LAN ir.'�)� ✓2or7x/��� /9t"t1-� uG"�"U!,�+ T f-t1:� � r= G17' ,t�t,11��CX Cr,�c. i'' � A— t r 1 e,r)e f� l=2 sic t2 d22,E/Q S c41 Y"t'E� y .r,�.r-1 f?� _ 1r=F: , +,7 ?'r'�-�ll'r•il r-r° ;fir.:,'» •moi .!.:G,. �i4r�•�/�`1'� � �97'?�.S � �/�75:�'` l"L='�i'7v� ; ..1'7�'Trf'z � t G� G�tJ�'L�: � ,r4p�t�c�..�; Start Slyltature „ i //7 )ate AS THF: APPLICANT FOR THE RL�WES,Zb Wt DIVIS20tt, I AM KUARi: OF i fE ABOV , STAFF ? CtERH11tA'CtOti F,t c;Awx?l( 'L'& C:O,ti0PMANrE Wlti 114E GtItAkL FUJI AND ZOti'It1G. , dated r `J 5' Signaturt± of Applicant,7 +`•'li)it IvTO i �i11 e " ire Gild be di?tnrtdrd s)R 6 nnrttht from the Date bf the st.3fi tignstUrP„ 1 xP ( � Lid 1000A (revised 6-87) ^gra, ,rte w 101.1 DRTSITY RESIDENTIA, p`,; ma,-., Uaess 'Detached single-family dwellings at uroan den- c�ey- Saconola 7r Uses: Agricultural uses, animal husbandry-, home occupatxans, outdoor recreation facilities, utilities, public and cuazi-pu.oiic uses, group quarters and care homes,. ..cam•,-++' r � Da sicn- oa Criteria: �.. ;-'eeced for urban residential development witgE hin 20 years. Adeauate water supply. Se'ver's aval-Ilable or natural conditions suitable for septic v an=y s -- ,,...-.�. 4, Adjacent or near to existing utilities, roads: and single - al A. family re idential de�relopment. k ,� Good accessibility to commercial services, schools, .fire p"otection and other community facilities. FER`; 3nt_nc,: -.7 of Use. Zoning allows net parcel sizes of one acre to 6 50 :Quare feet. One single-family dwelling per _parcel with other residential., uses limited to a maximum density of 6 dwell",itg units per gross acre.w :Home occupations, farm animals, other uses and setbacks regula-ad to maintain single-family �=. residential character. Consis-to-ent- Zones R-1; R -'I A C, RT -1, RT -IA., ASR, M -R, S SR-- Sk iI M -I , R-Ic i PA -C Z onina 'Factors : �,- 1. Exisring parcel sizes and residential densities» r ` 2. Ave .lability of sewers or mutability for septic tanks. ■, Effects on adjacent uses, water quality; air gttali y', noise.., traffic f low and saf ety, and general environmental quality. -� . - 'Proximity �, majory , services and all. U � vublic�facal Zesstreets commercial. se , ' -Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses: w M 6. Existing utilities, walkways and drainage facilities. `y Local desires *DeVeloptnents tilt], densities in excess of 4 iwellin,G units per` gross acre utilit'ing septic Waste disposal systetns must meet Health Department requirements And he clustered CPA -C) or be. provided with stwdr service: 50 r r °I r R A tender by the Housins `N To MFD Uig DH~iSITY R:. SITD1ETTLa- Uses: mi:c,ure of urban residential uses, including, Fria A d¢ac .ed sin le-family homes, condominiums, multiale-dwelling structures, mobile home parks, group quarters and care homes. SecondaT^r Uses Nome occupations professional and business o 'Tlces, outaoor' recreation ac, ties, utili J. public aryl cuasi-public: uses. Site Desir-Tiation Cr"term. far urban residential de-velopment within 20 years. Veed r, 2. Ade ^uate water supply. 3, Sewers auai.lable or natural conditions Drell su_tcd to Sep- tic tar?ts. . 4,. Adjacent or near e ist�nc util Lyes and urban deTrelormen�. 5. Excellent accessibility to commercial services, schools, fire protection and other ccmmunity facilities. y Intent sit-r of Use: Zoning al? own net parcel sizes of 6,Sao 13 dwelling units gross scu�,tre �"t- i1a-'t:-mum density of per _ee homes limited to sims.lar acre with group quarters and care densit'les.* Home occupations, dommercial uses, other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain residential eharac er. Consistent Zones: R-1, R--1 & C, Rm-11 A,-DRI S_R7 SRI-5i. a -R t -2 , R-3 , R--4 , API , , PA-G, , }. '. Zonina Factors 1. s4an, parcel sizes and residential densities. r,:� . 2 Method and capability of sewage disposal, water air quality, 5 Eiyecvs on adjacent uses, quality, traffic float and. safety, and general eivironmenta3 noise, _ qua3.�.ty. 4. pro�; ty to major streets, commercial services and a-11, ' pv.olic facilities. ts } railroads and Distance from airpori ndi�stri al Uses-6 5 . 6. Existing utilities, walkways .and drainage facilwties. Local desires. a i *For ared.s dependent upon septid tank waste disposal, soil conditions and the effluent volume based inn the number of bedrooms will determine the actual number of units per ac.e. not to exceed la dtvelling amts per gross acre in any case. Y At ended by the, tlyusii g 51 Y ` " Y� bletnent 10'•Z=1`. JAW 8g SUBDIVIDERIS STATEMENT fylrnyi�la tralffaruet . tame _.Mnerican Home Services _ Date. December 12 1988 Project Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map AP# 42-45-9 i. Existing use(s) of the land _English walnut and Almond. orchard N. Proposed tM.se(s) of the land _single family and Multi family Residential 3Improvements proposed (See Chi 20-21 County Code) Street. storm drainage facilities and sanitary sewer facilities. 4. Public ;area proposed � Streets lantn p q/or removal (approx.number) Removal o`r" 5 Tree trees within street right-of-way and building pads. 61 Preliminary, copy of any condition,, restrictive reservations or covenance eXisting or proposed shall be attached to this statement. attached, X_ none 7, state type of division, i.e. private road, 'urban, rural, etc, Urban r x4r �r1Y� rM ♦i . +taYl• Planning. Department ;NAME: r ALAMO EAST Environmental Health Department 4 CDF (Forestry Department) AP: _ 42-45-09 Attn: J. Craig Carter, (on areas north. of red line on nu p) I Butte County Sheriff PG&E (check title report for easement) Pacific Bell x Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) S ooI Di rict.(w 11. map) 1 i _ Water Company if individual wells are not .indicated on application or map) Dunham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California.Water Service Company (Chico area) Orovilie Wyalndotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) .r Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along. Pentz Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mall Ridge/Forest Rench area) Irtigation District City of (check wall maps for spheres of influence) ---'3�Paradise Oroville _ Chico Paradise Biggs Gridley W.04ILLE AREA COLY' Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) _- Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet) . El Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) '3IC-OS, P.ICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report , to see what applies Some areas overlap. Drainage District #1 —� Drainage District 02 Drainage District 1#100 Drainage District #20O — Reclamation District #833 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District AIR CASES: f-YET"' Sdperintendent of Schools (only torr subdivisions) Dept, of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) ` - Cal Trans (neat State Hwy, 32, 10 95j 149 (Chico crit=off), 1.62 (Olive Huey. $� cl rRoad) StateWater'QualityControl Board (projects with. more than 100 lots or units) United States Forest Service (if project bonders USA land --Check AP books) Parks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville) State: 'Water ReEfources Department (property near Lake Oroville -�- watershed) '� Rock Creek Reclaimation Diet- (west of 'Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy,, 99 (sed: wall map) Park Dist (only for Chico Area Recreation & subdivisions) SPECIAL CASES; check title report for any mention of special services or easements such', as to Thermalito Irrigation District (numbered items) T january 6 , 1 ` 90 County of Bu�t I3)*arty ent of Public Wor:Ks i Crurty Cent,'er Drive C;rovi11e, cauifo="n a 95965 Atten.--ions B;11 Chef: Rot Tr -plea on the corner of East Avenue and Alamo. Dear Gentlemen I have talieeto Bill Morris, k.he developer of A-58 acres on Eas and Alamo: 11;;-are not interested iri giving to the County of Alj ate 12' of East Avo we , frontage or 10' C30' from center) of Alamo Avenue; 'r,'ofrre#, r r we 'Will give a o a 11wited riifnt- of way nor rettmns .fn Alamo East a ,d Ja,1 a'-jjG `to a nes prcpo,,, ed street off Alamo, apl r i:t ate1^ 235 s'quare feet each, Sincerely. j i I I i i_ I I i S?3 A 3 A Y 'ti r.. , w ... Balite Icowi� [AND OF NATURAt WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS' WILLIAM (Bill) CHE~FF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9590 Telephone: $916) 538-7681 RONALD t1. McELROY December 20 1989 Deputy Direeto American Nome Services M AP 42-45-47 575 E. 3rd Avenue Tentative Vesting Subdivision Chico, CA 95926 Map, Alamo East &ub., Unit 2 Dear Gentlemen; At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivi:-ion Committee held on December. 20, 1989, the committee revievied the above -referenced tentative subdivision. Asa result of this meeting, Public [forks will recommend the enclosed list of conditions-. 'This project has been scheduled :for the Advisory Agency meeting of January 8, 2990; The meeting will commence at 9:00 a,m. in the Board ,of Supervisors Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA. If you have any questions ro?arding this matter, please contact 'this office. Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public. Works fit _ J n Mendo sa Assistant Director �f�ds attachment ttt Planning Department Environmental stealth Department Rolls, Anderson and Polls C1 E G � � X989 �; Ca�Cf�ri�r Amer.ctn Home Services, Alamo East Subdivision, Unti 2, Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, AH 42-45--471 13 lots at the northeast corner of Alamo Avenue. and East Avenue. Chico area. engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Works conditions: I Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections. 3 Provide right-of-way for ,standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. 4 Indicate a 50 ft. bu,4lding setback line from the centerline of access streetw Indicate a 55 ft. building; setback line from the tenterline of East Avenue, 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street initersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street name,.) 6 Deed 52 feet from the centerline of East Avenue to the County of Butte. 7 Construct one-+alf street section ori East Avenue to RS -2A road ,standard 44 feet to face of vertical curb, gutter and sidewalk:. Minimum structuval section to be 3" AC and 12 A% SC 250 prime., fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department: of Public Works for approval. "R" valu(s, determinations and other data may be required to support section design. S Construct~ full street section on access street to RS- -B read standard with rolled curb, gtitter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 8" AB, SC 2501 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Construct one-half plus 12 ft, lane street section on Alamo Avenue to RS -2-A access road i8tanda,rd vith vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk, Minimum: structural section to be 2" AC and. S" AB with fog seal and 95% relative compaction, Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval. t"R" value determinations and other data may be required to support section design, 9 Providein moumenation as required by the Department of Public accordanceWorku-It.h accepted standards. 1C Street grades and othej, features ahall comply with the Butte County Ordinantes, design t-isolul:i.on and other act:epted engineering, standards �vMa�o.P�an�tnp� a uo 198q : I I Alamo East Subdivisohf Unit 2 i 1:1 Provide permanent solution for drainage. s12 All easements of 'record to be shown on the final map. 1 13 Meet requit'erments of Butte County .Fire Department or other responsible agency. I i 14 Street lighting sJipll be provided in accordance with Butte Count requirements, ac opted design i { criteria, ,and recommeridation.s of PG&E._ 15 Form or annex to a County Service Area for maintenance of street lights and storm drain i system. 16 Provide 1 £t. no access strip on East Avenue frontage, 17 Pay off assessments. 18 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e.,, PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer): 15 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 2t7 developer shall provide all required traffic- ,safety signs; 5.nc�da.n,g; 4 -. stop signs. 21 Acquire right-of-way and construct full street section on, East Avenue and Alamo Avenue frontages of the "Not a Fart'" parcel I to the standards required by conditions 6, y and 8. _ i Bina � bEc ZZ 1989 ,1 y N'o=: co:" :D:=ER'M=NAT= N Office by Planning an4:-eserCh bE ,'� _ Butte County :1400 Tenth Street, Rob 12.1" � Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95 7 County Center Drive or AM 1089 Oroville, CA 95965 r Y County Clerk C A 'DACM J. U Vj` , 3' County of Butte E, G. EMERQ otm TH:Cx: Piling of Notice, of Determination in compliarce with Section 2110$ or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, llrrfect Title AP 11 NameAmerican Horne Services Vesting Tentative Subdivision trap 42-45-09 Alamo .cast a C,te Clearinghou= Ntmber Contact Person Telephone Number ( i;f submitted to Clearixighouse) John. 1, andonsa, Public Works; (916) 538-7266 ' Project Location � e nor east corner o Alamo venue an as venae, Chico area Praj-ect Description Vesting Tentative Sub d�.v son blip dtvi dine l0 .76 acres ixYto 20 Lots + a 4.70 acre remainder. This is to advise that the . Butte County- Advitory Agency y (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved, the above-described Project on April 10, ,1989 _ and has Made (Date) the -following determinations regarding the above-described, proj ect- l,; The project will; X- will. not; have A signifloarit effect on the environment 2w An Eftvironmenta:l Impact Report wPas pre ared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEaA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project Pursuant to the Provisions of CEQA. i 3. Mitigation measures X Dere; were nots made a condition of the approval of the project, 4,, A statement of overriding considerations tvas, Y was not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses record of project approval is available to the general ptblie at Butte County Planning Department County Center Drive Oroville CA 95965 Date Received for Filing and ✓ Posting ab OPIZ S'- nature 4 6" � Bettye Kircher �'� Di,redtor of Plan l ht T1t1e %IVItod �t4edJJL 108E Alaimo -East (American Home Services) P#042--45.-0-009 %ri:sting Tentative subdivision Map r UZ-TSGATIQIT MEASURES 1, Place a note on the final map stating that single-family dwellings constructed within 200 feet of the near lane of East Avenue shall meet the sound attenuation requirements for multi -family dwellings. 2. Contribute a pro rata share towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alamo Avenue. Avenue and Fast. 3. Contribute $Is . 00 per lot West ' h construction of the West Side Fire Station. 4 dace a note: on the final map stating that access to the remaining lands from East Avenue will be subject to review, and approval of the governing jurisdiction at the time of development of the remaining lands. W r IJ Eu fic county",: - t IARp UE NATUPAL WEALTH ANDi3IAUTY � = DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC-- WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHErF, Rlrector 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Ttlepnone. (916) 538-7681 j RONALD D. McELROY CERTIFIED :MAIL Deputy Dltee,oi April 100 1989 American Home Services RE: AP 42-45-09 a75 'B. 3rd Avenue Alamo East TSM Chico, CA 95926 Dear Gentlemen'-; At the regular meeting of the 'Butte County Advisory Agency held on April 10, 1989,: the Agency adopted a negative declaration with environmental: mitigations and approved the tentative parcel mai; on the Above-referenced property ;subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheet. if no appeals are tiltely filed—within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval----with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action will be final. When the Conditions of approval are complied with, it Vill be in order for you to file your '"find mapt' with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-dour (24) months Of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency: if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this officer Very truly yours, William Chef Director of Public Works _ 1 J,qhn Mendonsa Assistant Director M/d s attachment Cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department Rolls, Anderson and Rolls ALAMG BAST TENTATIVE VESTING SOBDIVISION MAP, (AMERICAN HOLE SERVICES) AP 42.45-09, 33 lots located at the northeast corner of Alamo Avenue and Fast Avenue. Chico area. Engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Works conditions; 1 Submit road and drainage plans to t,,66 -Department of Public Works fora approval and install the required facilities. i 2 Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all street intersections. Provide right-of-way for standard No. -5 at all street intersections, 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of Alamo and cul--de-sac street. 5 Streetsigns shall be 'provided uy the developer at all street intersection.:s per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for etch street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) 6 Deed 30 from.the centerline of Alamo Avenue to the County of Butte. 2 Construct one-half plus 12 foot lane street 'section on Alamo Avenue to RS -2-A, road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk and; 21" AC, 8" AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Construct ,full street, section on cul --de= sac street to RS -2-B access road standard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural, section to be 2" AC and.8}' AB with fog seal and 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public, Works for approval, IV' value detersii.nations and other data may be required to support section desigh. 8 provide; monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards: 9 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County 'Ordinances,, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage: 11 All easements of record to be shown on the final maps 12 Meet requirements of Butte Cbwlfty Fire 'Department or other responsible agency: 15 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requiremtr hts,, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG&E. 4 a; ALAMO EASZi; TSM 14 pay off assessments. 15 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer). 3.6 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 17 Form CSA for street lights and storm drain maintenance.. 18 Detweloper shall provide all required traffic safety signs, including stop signs. Jloalth.Dept. conditions: 19 Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service Cocpany stating that they are willing and able; to supply domestic water to the subdivision.. 20 Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to the sub— division. 21 Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer." 22 Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels ulthi n the subdivi,.sion will require connection to a public water supply." The following mitigation measures are requ red t , 23 Place a note on the final map stating that single --family dwellings constructed within 200 ft. of the near lane of East Avenue shall meet the sound attenuation requirements for multi—family dwellings, 24 Contribute± a pro rata share towards the installati.oh of traffic . signals at:. the intersection of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue: 25 Contri.buto $75 per lot towards the construction of the West .Side Fire Stat:Gon 26 Place a note on the final map statingthat access to the remaining lands from east Avenue will be subject to review and approval of the goner -ling jurisdiction at the time of development of the remaining lands. Buito r�' �IatnnPnq �'►iSt. ' APP5 198 Cealiforrlie Me nIr' a R, a DEPAFITMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIfONMENTAL HEALTH Addresat CK196,Memorial Way 0 7 County Contor Drive ❑ 747 Elliott Road Reply to Chico, Colifotnio 95926 oroville, Collfotnla 95965 Patodlse, California 95969 Telephone; 916/891-27:27 Telephone: 5116/538.728.1 Tek.plronet 916/072.6308 April 4, :1:989 American Home ,Services RE; Alamo East Subdivision 1 575 9i 3rd Av. (Revised Map) Chico, CA 95926 Alamo & East Aves., Chico - AP#42-45-09 Gen tlerien This department has advised fi.iie Butte County Department of Public works Ladd Development Section that we are prepared to ;act on the above applications Based. on present information, we can -recommend approwil._or condi tional;approval. R.ecommiended,_Conditions for Approval 1. Pro -vide a letter or other documentation front 'California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply i domestic water to the subdivision. 2. Provide a letter or other` documentation from City of Chico stating, that they are willing and able to supply seiner service r to the subdivision, 3. Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer." C Place a note on the map that states ttdevelopmetlt of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public water supply", if you have any questions, please o,ontect the Chico office: Sincerely, Thomas Reid$ R.5 Supervising Sanitarian Division of Environmental RePI th chi Public Works 'Planning, R6118, Ando rson & Rolls a i f- Nw Ed, ffe'i (login LAND OF NATURAG WFALTE-f AND BEAUTY t PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COONTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95905-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7561 1114'rial. 51 1969 ;�D o East 14ome Services 575 E. 3rd Avenue CA 95928 'Vesting Tentative Subdivision ',-sap AP# 042-45-0-009 rear gentlemen. Snclosed is ,a copy of the Planning Director's report to the Butte ,*ounty Advisory Agency concerning the proposed project referenced ,above. This report- has been prepared pursuant to the .requirt�Iordinance. Section 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County .wf you have any, questions 'regarding this report, please feel free -a Contact this office between 10;00 a.m.: and 3:00 p.m. jzce'rely, A . X1RCHER director ofPlanning 'Du)vid A. 14ironimus &w.tociate Planner -DAR " f -:u co -1 Rolls, Andet bn and Rolls ml' closure Inter-Departmental Memorandum Tod Butte County Advisory Agency Plallaing Director ABJECT Report on vesting Tentative Subdivision Map of Alamo East (American Homes) AP# 042--45-0-009 T)ATE: April 5, 198:9 ,hi,o is a proposzt:l to divide 10.76 -res to create 20 lots ranging in front 5,250 square ' feet to 47,15 square feet plus a remainder: the present zoningand'Clse'P�.a RMapdoftthe)and A-R Butte CountyAGeneritural-- e.,i,dential )if Plan designates this area as Mediam Density', .'here are no specific or COMM city plans i`or the area, i �'he proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, .specific or community plan. ecommend Approval with four mitigation measures as 'ollowTs 1 Place a note on the final map stating that single -family dwellings constructed within 200 feet of the near lane of East Avenue shall meet- the --sound attenuation requirements for' multi- family dwellings. 2. Contribute apro rata share towards the installation of traffic. signals at the of Alamo Avenue and 'East Avenue. Contribute $115.00 pe Iot towards the construction of the West Side rite Stet 4on. Place a note on the final Map stating that access to the remaining lands from East Avenue will be subject to review and jpproval of the governing at the time of development of the remaining lan DH : feu cc: Alamo East Rolls, Anderson and A01.18 t "; •, �I .�; �Tu� des. �q+tIng Comm BAR301989 b co��ftst rovma, call I A H D OF IUATUEAL VVEAtTFI A(4 Dr 8EAQT', -= DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS -� WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 1 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone: (916) 5:. i•7691 RONALD D. McELROY Deputy Director March 29, 1989 Americati Home Services 42-45-09 575 E, 3rd Avenue Alamo East Tentative. Chico, CA 95926 Vesting Subdivision Dow, Gentlemen At. the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee held On: March. 29, 1989, the committee reviewed the above -referenced', tentative subdivision. As a result of th,"s meeting, Public Works ,ilk_ recommend the enclosed list of Cond, , ions 17ni.s project has been scheduled for the Advisory Agency meeting of April 10, 1989. The meeting will Commence at 9 1. 00 a.m, in the Board or Supervisors Doom, 25 County Uentter Drive, Oroville, CA, l;E you have any quelstions regarding ithis matter, please contact this "Off ice. Very truly yours; Wi.11i.aln Chef Directbr of Public Works ;John Tian onsa ss stunt Director JMId. attlachme;►t L : Plattni.ng Department Environmental Hdalth Department Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Ut —' EAST TUTAT VESTING SUBDIVISI-0N M6:) (AMERICAN NORSE SERVICES) Ay MO � Tats jkocatecl at the northedst corner of Alamo Avenue AP G2 -x5-09, 33 " And East Avenue. Chino area. Engineer: Ro11s, Anderson end Rolls P' 'clic Works con dit ons: Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works ' for appro''*aI and install the required facilities. Providil 207 ft. radius property line returns at all :street Z interslecwions., 7 Provider ght-c,--way for standard No. S-.5 at all street W intersections. 4 Indicate a 50:. building setback line from the centerline of Alamo and cul: -de -•sac street. ns scull be pr:vided by the developer at all street 5 Street s1$ irements. (Submit 5 alternate intersections per County requ names fr- each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street. names.) Deed 3t7! from `fie centerline of Alamo Avenue to the CoiintY of Butte. 7 Construct one --half plus 12 foot lane street section on Alamo au�tter, and Avenue to RS -2--A Toad AB,d5C 1 Otprime, fog seaal l anCl 95% sidewalk. and 2" AC; Construct full street section can cul-de relative compaction.. utter andard wi sac street to R�'�.nzBum strucC alssection t tbec2" NO- and 8" and sidewalk seal and 55% relative compaction. SubmitIIRII value design AB kith fog � u '�P o ('nutty Department of Public Works for app detera nations and other date may be required tolsi: ort section design:.:. 8 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Warks in accordance. with accepted. standards. 9 Street grades and other features sonlandcomply other accgtedButte County, Ordinances, design reso. atx. engineering standards: 10 provide permanent solution for drainage. the final maps 1l All easements of record to be shown on .. 1-2 Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other responsible agency i d i►y a design with Butte County 1.3 Street lightit►g shall be provided and recommendations of requirements, accepted cr 965 FIR STREET • C'RICO, CALIF0,RNIA 35928 m TELEPHO:. ,9'16.896-1422 O�� �.g'� �p�» pig ■'7ni.alie.A a 11 Dube Co, P►mnning Comm,& F- OHS CIML ENGINtSS March 20, 1189 cra» C?cavilie Butte County 'Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95,965 Attn: David Hiroo mus Associate Planner Re;: Tentativa Subdivision Map (Alamo Bast) AP n42-45-09 Log No. 99-01-0503 Gentlemen- We entlemensWe are submitting this letter on behalf of American Nome services' applicant for the above-referenced project. We have reviewe,,.l your letter and environmental checklist form dated March 14, 15189. To eliminate potential adverse impacts from this land division to the environment, American Home Services offers the following mitigation measures: 1: Place a noti on the r"inal Hap stating that single-flamily dwellings con!trutted within 200 feet of the near lan,—, of East Avenue shall meet the soutid attenuation requirements for multi-family dwellings. 2 Contribute a pro rate share towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue. 3 Contribute $75.00 per lot towards the construction of the West Side Fire Station. Place a note on the Pinal Ma stat°ing that access to the remaiAing lands from East Avenue W1l1 �e subject to review acid approval of tiie governi hg '.Jurisdiction at the time of level opmOht of the remaining l and;; Sincerely, ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS Bruce Ai Nash BAN/dl cc: American Home. SeVY'Ices '5 .- satti i "°fir.'" �Y•Y T County lAi<D' f t r TUPA! ;1jEA•Tr t i1w DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director i 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 4.5965 Telephone: (916) 538.7601 RONALD D, McELROY bepntg bjfeo+�r 1 March 15 , 19$9 ,American Home Serviced RE: AP 42-45-09 575 E. 3rd Avenue Alamo East Tentative Chino, CA 95926 Vesting Subdivision Map y } Dear Gentlemen {' Pleasebe advised that the above -identified tentative subdivision will be reviewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee on March 29, 1989, r Pablit Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet. The meeting will Commence' at 9.00 a.m. in the Conference Room, located at W3 County Center Drive, Qroville, California- If you have any questions regardingthis matter, please contact. this , 3 office. 'Very truly yours, William Chef i bircctor of Public'Works J Stn Mendonsa Assistant Director JM/ds attachment cc: Planting Department Environmental Health Department R lis, Anderson and 12olls F ALAMO EAST TENTATIVE VESTING SUBDIVISION MAP, (AMERICAN HOME SERVICES AP 47_-45-- 9, 33 lots located at the northeast corner of Alamo Avenue snd East .Avenue, Chico area. Engineer., Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Works conditio 's.- I Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities. .2 Provide 020 ft. radius propertj line returns at all street Intersections. '3 Provide right-of-way for standard No. S-5 at all street intersections. , 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of Alamo and cul-de-sac street. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street int•orsections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate nares for each street to 'the County addr ss coordinator for approval of street names.) Deed 30 from the centerline of .Alamo Avenue to the County of Butte. .7 Construct on--half 12 foot lane street section aA Alamo plus Avenue to RS-2-A road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 81" At, SC 250 prime, fog seal. and 95% relative compaction. Construct full street section on cul-de- sat .street to RS 2-B ,access road standard With curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section to be 21" AC and 8" AB with fog seal and 55% relative compactim. Submit design to County Department of Public Works .for approval. "R" value detettiination% and other:: data may be required to support section design: 8 Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards, 1 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordit,-ances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage 11 All easements of record to be shown on the final map. 12 Meet regi,4 tments of Butte County Viv, Department or other rospoosible agency; 13 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County rogoiruments, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of PG��. J; ia.rc: 14, 1989 Baffe UOUIIN _ LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMIS&ON- 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE i- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 PH0N E: 338.7601 `MOrican Hame Services :7 S 'E E. 3rd Avenue Chico CA 95926 re; vesting Tentative Subdivison Map AP 42-45-09 Log =89-01-05-03 esentlemen .An initial study of your proposed project, a vesting Tentative Subdiv son Map, indicates potentially adVerso impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To zeduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project. otherwise, an Environmental zmaact Report a is Act . IR) required pursuant to the raliforn.La Environmental Qu An early respoW;e to this noti:cication, sent to the Planning 'Department, will expedite the scheduling of your project. Please forward your written response within: 15 days from the date of this letter. Should :you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00p.m SincerEly, E: A. Kircher Director of Planning David R. Hironimus Associate Planner DRH:1t Enc cc Rolls, Anderson & Rolls 6 APPENDIX T COUNX-z Cw BUTTE CNV Z R,pNN1�.NTA.L CI3E CKL 3 S T (To be completed by bead Agency) LOG NO. 89-01-05-'01 Ap NO. 42-45-09 q ,� I A.CKGRr;3UNI3 Home services (Alamo Easy) �. Names of proponent { 2, Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 373 ', 3rd Avenue Bruce Nash Ros1s, Anders-n. & Ro s . icra, ------ -565 Fir S •tr e e. _ha.co, CAa 1.i Fzoject &escription: Vesting 'tentative Subdivision Map AT 1R1' F2NTJZNGS OF SZGN'SF=C.ANCF YES MAYBE NO ; 3 I, Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce tha habitat of A fish or wildlife speciesy cause a fish or substantittlly wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten toeliminate or animal contmuriity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a 'rare a plant or en$artgeked plant or animal or eliminate important examples o£ major periods i of California history or prehistory? 2. pt�et the project havt4 the potential to achieve short-tem benefits to the +,t, prrvironmental, eoal.r? (A. ;ahvz't-"terra ;rannct on the ,,. y_ ,t ,�f �• err " °.s one which occurs in a Vethtl"ly < .rs:£ peria8 of time while Ot wYro,tr .t• �_._. � -term ittpacts will endure into rite future,) long-term 1. Does thepro,ject have impacts whichlimited but separate resourceswhere considerablei. (A Project rtes on twoororey is stall, but. where the effect o£ the the impact on each resource .relatively total of thostt impacts ort the environment is significant,) Hues the have envirottmerital effects which will cause substantial )` rt, proje�:t adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? lt7ETERMXNATxoTi (To be completed by the 'Lead Agency) , on the basis of this initial evaluaticn: 1/*4E find the proposed project COtgb NOT have a significant effect on the tUATIVE bECLARA ION will be prepared, environment and a find this because onment Lttihdro Will otths Ebe aosignificant effect I ot/W8 acase n the envi bthe MEAStrt S desezibed Ch the attached sheet have the MITIGATION project. A NEGATIVE 1gVAARATION Vi.11 be prepared. J I/Wt find the proposed ; roject MAY have n. significant effect on the environment, is required. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IN ACT REPORT COUM & bUTTEi PLANNJW MPARTMENT March 14, 19 89 ty.`—' Wt.y Taavid R. xyron�mus Assoc at Planner Reviewed byt. �i _ Ir�rac�zc�rm�[>�r �At, r_r E+�r-rs " (Explanations of all "YES" .and INAM11 answers are required on attached sheet(s). ,14 EAR2ii, will the proposal result in significants YES LJAYBE _ NO. Ucnstable earth conditions, or changos iit geologic substructures? 1o. visruption, ditplacement) compaction or overcovoring of the soil? L c,. change in topography or ground surface �reli.ef features? d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in windor water erasion of soils either on or off site? f. Chang( . in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urb. � G areas? r,ZC h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides'. ground -failure or similar hazardika 1. AIR. Will: the proposal result in substantial: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air :quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors) smoke-or fumes? _ C c. Altitration of air movement) moisture or'teinperature, ari :° A;.cax: climate, locally or regionally) 3, WAT R. will the proposal result in mubstantiat a. Mangea in cun,:,trts$ or flits course cit direction of Watek movements in }� -pr marine or fresh waters? CHanges in absorption rates, drainage patterns) or the irate and mount C of surface runoff? d, treed for off-site surface drainage improvebentt, including vegetation removal; channelization or culvert installation? d, Alterations to the .Course or flow of flood waters? _ e. Change in the amount of surface Water in any hater body? i.--Discharge into surface waxers, or irk dny dlteration of surface hater quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? g, Alt, ration of tho direction or rate of flow of ground waters? h, change in thee quantity cr quality of ground waters) either through direct additions or withdrawals) or through interception of an aquifer by tutu. or excavations? I. geduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? „I jo Exposure of people or property to water-related hAtards such as flooding? + ls: PLANT LIVE, ta411 t1,e proposal result in'substant .al a. Change in the diversity of species) or number of any species of plants (including trees) shrubs, grass, crops) and aquatic pdhtsj? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique) rare or. endangered species of plants? y e. 1 Introductionfwpdciot of plantsintoan area) or in a barrier to he oductlon of replenishmentg p d. Reduction in acredge of any agricultural drop? , ,�C a I� ANIMAL LIFE. Wil), rhe proposal result 'in substantial.: YES MAYBE NO a, change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals ,. (birds, land animals .including rept)ls, .fish and shellfish, organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of X a.7 .mals? c. IntrodUction of new species of animals into an area, or in a carrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife. habitat? (I. LOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ). lyTGfiT AND GLARE. 01311 the proposal produce significant light and glare? u- 8, LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. g TUML RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial., s. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion: of any non-renewable natural resources? 10. RISKiISK'OF-UPSETUPSET Will the proposal Involve: a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardour. substances (including, but not limited 0, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident. or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency v i:- evacuation plan?' 11. POPLUTION. Will the proposal alter locatim,, distributions density or i growth rate of the human population? _ t 12. _oUSTN, Will the ,proposal: affect existing ,housing), or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION CIRM ATION. Will the proposal .result in a. Generation of substantial additional vphicla movetgent? . I! b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for neW parkiitg7 e. Substantial impact on existing transportat.,�h systems? x _. d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafyic3 f. Increase in traffin hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? '1X 14, PUBLICSERVICES,have an effect upon, or result in a need Will the propornment sal or Aj, Fire protection? b, Police protections c. 5chools7 d. Parks or ether recreak,ibftal facilities? .., e. Maint+,ttiahee of public facilities, including roads? f. Other gdvernmental services? -3- .•.' 'ENERGY Will the proposal ,result_ n: SES MAYBC N0 at.,,, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? els. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas?t b. Communications .systems?G. i c. dater availability? _. d. Sewer or septic systems? ' e, storm water drainage? C_. E. Solid waste and disposal? MJ1aAN. .LTH. Gill the proposal result in; a. Creation of any health hazard or potential haiard (excluding mental health) b+ Exposure of people to potential health hazards? i IGS. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic Vista .be view open to the public, or will the proposal result $,n the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? M RECREATION. Will the proposal. result in an impact upon the quality or opportunities? V L qvantity aristi recreational aig; 20. (,!AC TUP.AL RESMMCES. i _a. will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction. of a prehistoric or historic archaeological side? b, lthproposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects tol pro -historic or historic building] structure or object? c. 77oes the proposal have the potential: to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d,. Will the proposal .restrict existing religious or sacred usr_s within the potential, impact area? ISYSC USSXON 6V V!VATjJA!r:EOX aee'attached. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP # 42-45-0.9 1Lb,e,f,3b,c,f,l6ei Development of 20 residential. lots on the ;northerly 60 percent of the property will lead to some disruption, d.splacement, compaction, and overcovering of the soil which will 'dead to changes in absorption bsor tion rates, drainage patterns, and the rate ,and amount of surface 'runoff. This may lead to an increase in soils both on rosi.on of s • or off-site. in order to reduce these impact there will be a need for surface drainage improvements bath on and off-site. Butte County Development standards for subdivisions of this type within the urban area will require u permanent solution to drainage and installation of appropriate facilities. 1: Development of this property will represent a minor loss of agricultural land. Since the project is located within an urban area and is slated for development this should not be a significant effoct. All of Butte County is within a moderate earthquake intensity onn VIII. The subject property' is located approximately 6 miles southwest of the Tuscan mdcjaocline, a fault system of unknown activity Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate protection to occupants in case of seismic activity. 4d See item lg: 5bi The Noise Element of the Butte County General Plan indicated that dev-elopment within 200 feet of the near lane of East Avenue. vDul expose occupants to noise levels above those recommended for residential areas. This noise area is zoned R-4 which will permit multiple family, residential dwellings and neiginborhood commercial tises with a use permit. Development of commercial uses in the noise area would be compatible with the policies of the NoiseElement of -she General. Plan: Construction of m,'Iti-family dwellings would require noise attenuation in accordance with the ;Uniform Building ;ode and could be made to comply under the conditionally acceptable standards of the Noise Element. Single-family dwellings, however, are not subject to the noise reduction standards of the Building Odes Accordingly, single family dwellings would either have to be setback at least 200 feet from the near Lane 'of East Avenue, be rade to requirements for multi meet the sound attenuation --farnly dwellings; or sound attenuation devices such as sound walls be onion impossible constructed along East Avenue. Si n, it is im ossible +comtemplated for the remaining ;P o since the type of development to recommend an appropriate method notfor ownmitigat.ing noise. Accordingly, the developer may wish to show the remaining portion as not being available for development until such time as either' a Certificate of Compliance is granted or Other action by the Advisory Agency takes place. 5,,110121 This project will represent the first lots of thLs size in the immediate area. Since the area is panned for densities in excess o'f those proposed by this project and since extension of City f of Chico sewer lines is ,taking place to felicil.itate implementation of doth, the City and County's 'General Plans this project can he considered in compliance with those plans. The affect on neighboring prop sties may be to trigger requests for similar lot sizes. Depending on the 1�.'.:ation of those �rec(uests they too could be considered in compliance with the General Elan. 13a,c,f: I_caffic generated by the 20 subdivision lots of this project will represent an incremental increase in traffic and traffic. hazards on Alamo Avenue and at the intersection of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue. As this area develops, a traffic signal at East Avenue acid Alamo Avenue will be necessary. The applicant should be pay a pica rata share towards the installation of a traffic signal. gnalizatlon of this intersection is not covered under the Street facility Improvement Fee Structure adopted by the 3utte County suoh, of Supervisors for development within the. Chico Urban Area. As such, it will be necessary for the pro rata fees to be paid. Traffic generated by eventual development of the parcel shown as. "remaining lands and consisting of 4.7 acres could utilize either Alamo Avenue or East Avenue for access. .Because of traffic safety concerns orlon East Avenue and increased turning movements in the middle of the block, ii. would be desirable to direct all traffic onto Alamo Avenue in order to utilize the intersection and traffic control devices for entering East Avenue. it is recommended that a one -foot no access strip be required along the East Avenue frontage. 14 This project will represent an incremental increase in demands p r The project site lies within the .for Chico sPire S in the assessment area. j Similar projects in the West Chico Fire Station apses. area have paid $75.00 per lot towards construction of a new fire station on the west side of Chico. This action has been found. by the Fire Department to be an appropriate mitigation measure. 16a,b,c,d: Power, communications, water and sewer lines will have to extended into the property to serve the individual lots. 19 This project will represent an incremental increase in oomands for recreational facilities within the Chico Area. Recreation District. Recommended Mitigation Measures 1. Show the easuntil suchetimescis�itheaAdvi:soryaAgencyas a grantsna development such Certificate of Compliance or takes other action. Any action must be accompanied by a plan for noise attenuation where appropriate as discussed in this initial study. 2. Pay a pro rata share towards the installation of traffic signals at the intersection. of Alamo Avenue and East Avenue, 3. Pay *75.00 per lot towards the construction of the Wiest Side Fire Station. � 6- 1 Applicant: American Home Services Assessor's Parcel. (Alamo East) 42--45-09' Log # 89-01-05-03 1 DATA SHEET' Project Description 1.. Type of Project: vesting Tentative Subdivision map 2. Brief Description: Dividing 10.76 acres into 20 lots a 4.70 acre rjmainder. 3. Location: The property fronts on Alamo Avenue, approximately 200 feet north of East Avenue and ,fronts along East Avenue, approximately 180 feet. east of Alamo Avenue' . 4. Proposed Density of Development: 3.3 dwelling Units per acre,. The property fronts on both Alamo Avenue and East Avenue. The 20 subdivision Lots will take their access via Subdivision Street to Alamo Avenue. The remainder parcel has frontage on both Alamo and East Avenue. Amount of impervious Surfacing: Approximately 50%. 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on East Avenue and Alamo Avenue, 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: City of Chico sewer system. 8. Source of Water Supply: California Water Service Company. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: To property. lo. potential for further land divisions and development: The remaining 4.70 acres has significant potential for development. :B. Environmental Setting Physical. Environment; 1. Terrain a. General Topographic Character: Flat valley lands. b Slopes: 0.�, 2 C. Elevation: 175 ft. A.S.L. di Limiting Factors: Done 2i Soils' a Types and Cha;:acter.sticss vina fine sandy beams; generally we4 drained With good permeability. b. Limiting Faei;orss None: 3. Natural Ha2ards of the Land a. Earthquake zones Moderate earthquake intensity Zone VIII. b. Erosion Potential. Slight. c. Landslide Potential-. None. d,. Fire HaZai.d; Uncl6tsifled . e. Expansive Soil Potential i Low. 4. Hydrology `gam a. Surace Waterl Nei: ;cn-site. b. Ground Wader: Vnknown. Area of high ground water withdrawal with soico substance potential. c Drainage Characteristics: Property drains generally to the West. The area is within County Service Prrea #25, North Chico -Shasta Union Drainage District and discharges into Mud Creek. d Annual Rainfall (normal); 22-2411 per year. e. Limiting Factors: Potential substance area. 5, visual/Scenic Quality: Fair, impacted by rie.ghboring urban development. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. Air Quality: Good except during period of stagnant valley air. Biological Environment: 8. vegetation; Existing english walnut and almond orchard surrounded by mixed orchard remnants and suburban development. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley orchard. lands, Cultural Environment 10. 'Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area;: Low ,xensitivity area. 1. Batte County General Plan designation.: Medium Density Residential 13. Existingo 'Land Use on-site Walnut and almond 12. Existin Zoning: . A -R and R-4 -orchard.. 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land uses: Generally suburban residential development with commercial development along East Avenue to the east. b. Zoning: A -R and R-4. it. Gen, Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential and. Low Density Residential with Commercial further to the: east along East Avenue. d4 Parcel Sizes: Generally 1/2 to l acre parcels with larger, undeveloped orchard remnants scattered throughout. e. Population: Suburban densities. 15. Character of Site and Area: Rapidly developing fringe area. 16. Nearest Urban Area.- Within Chico urban area. 1.7. Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico, Chico Area Recreation District, CSA 25: 186 improvements ;Standards Urban Area: Yes. 15. Fire Protection Service: I , Nearest County (State) Fire Station: Cohasset Road Station 442. b Water Availability., California Water Service Company hydrants and fire tankers: Advisory Agency 7 County Center Drive Qxoville, California 95956 RE Revised Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Alamo East Dear Agency Members: The Neighborhood Council, has reviewed the revised map dated February 1:, 1989, and on the basis of this review unanimously recommends that it be disapproved as submitted: The revised map does -not address the problem of access to East Avenge raised in connection with the original map. Instead, it creates- a vituat! a•1 where vehicular access off East Avenue would be vituall,y manditory. The County and the City of Chico ought td pursue a firm policy of keeping vehicu- lar access to they East Avenue corridor between major inter- sections to an it"reduci e ininitoum since that :facility will have to carry the bulk of the cross town traffic for at least Another decade. We continue to believe that our original recommendations outlined in our letter dated january 30, 1989 represent good planning, and that the ,end result would be a more attractive, intimate resi'den'tial environment. We, therefore, urge the Agency to work with the subdivider and his engineer to incor- porate the features we have recommended. Sincerely f� lam' a r Irl A.R. Schoertfe1.d' Chairman Executive: Committee Copies: Supervisor Dolan Clif Sellers Executive Committee , s Qcrifa �o. Manning eomn, lj FFA i98 COUNl'Y OF 'BUTT BroYigs, C:efornfn , E DEPARTiiM OF PUBLIC WORKS 7'County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 F k )),ATE; February 2, 1989 REVISED? E\'TAT1VE $LT& )? Alamo .Eas t (Anm ican HCM 'Services VESTIM; SUBDIVISION MAP 3 ASSESSORER 42 `S 11AP BOOK NU,% PACE 45 PARCFI(s) 09 LOCATION 20 lots'rj1.us remaiining larids located at the northeast corner of rAlanlo Avenue and East Avenue. Chico .area. Attached.is a copy of the above-described tentative map for your review. If you have any suggestions, additions or recommendations concerning this project; please return thein to this office by February 23, 1989. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works J� Mendorsa ?johnCistant Director itl kk attachment ccs �16ritgng,JD-a agt-1ent Environmental Health Department Fotes(t^ry Department Pacific Bell Chico Unified School ?dist. Ca! eater Service Co City of Chico Superintendent of Schools Chico Area recreation & Park Dist. Supervisor - Jane Dolan, Cussick Area. Noighboi:hood Council tD 1160 (Reprised 11/0) .... Ali ::.. ..... .... . ......:.. . .....: .;;. M �.3.._ . , 109 "d C— plairming corm � FEB 2 1989 , KP 041e, Gaftf=6 Butte U04 i ' mow 1At,;D or HATURAI lAYA14111 Al,*0 1)1Alfl1 J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Address CX196 Memorial Way D 1 County Center Drive p 747 Elliott Road Reply to Chico, Calliortmia 95926 Otoville, California 95965 Paradiae,. California 95960 Telephone; 916/891.2727 Telephones 916/538.7281 Telephones 916/872.6308 February 1, 1989` American Home Services PE; Alamo East Subdivision 575 E. 3rd Av. Alamo & East Aves,,, Chico Chico, CA 95926 AP# 42-45-09 Gentlemen: this department has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional approval. Recommended Conditions for Approval 1, Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the subdivision. 2. Provide a letter or other Ipcumentation from. City of Chico stating that they are willing and !?e to supply sewer service to the subdivision. 3. Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer." that states 4. Place a not6 on the subdivision will -quire Connectionvtooampubl c 'parcels water thesupplya if you haveve any listed gns regarding this letter, please contact the Sincerely; 1homs Reid; Mie supervising Sanitarian Division of 86vironmental health I 1,R/gi cc: Public Works; planning; Rolls, Anderson &atolls Advisory Agency c/o John Mendonsa 7 County Center Drive Orovi.11e, California 95956 RE Alamo East Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map Dear Agency Members The Cussick Area Neighborhood Council has reviewed the map for rhis proposed: sul-°divi,sion, and by unanimous vote of its eXecu- tive committee opposes the subdivision design in its present configuration. We share the concerns of Supervisor Dolan regarding the East Avenue access and the less than desirable; size of the Lots numbered 21 through 31. We also take excep- tion to the implied proposal for multifamily use of lots 32 and 33, notwithstanding 'their obsolete R-4 zoning designation. We have consistently over our four year existence pushed for restriction of vehicular access to Fast Avenue to the maximum extent practicable. The obvious reason is that this vital east west thoroughfare can ill afford additional impediments to the free and safe flow of traffic, Traffic interuptions betwean future traffic signals at Cussick.and Alamo will reduce the capacity of at least the two outer lanes, and will have a tendency to degrade the env.roiiment in a number of ways It is our position that the area does not warrant additional multifamily uses on East Avenue. If the planning agencies of Butte County had not been rendered ineffective by lack of funds and personnel,, the zoning mistakes of two decades ago would have been corrected by now. The ;,4eighborhood Council recommends that the map dated November 1985 be disapproved, and that the subdivider 'revis'e the map to incorporate the following .features: 1. Dedication of a l foot non -access :;trip a" rung the East Avenue frontage 2. A 6 foot high masonry or stucco wall along the East Avenue frontage for sound attenuation and privacy. 3. An interior street through ,lots 15 and, 26 to connect the main access street off. Alamo with a double cul-de- sac locateo 30 feet m!b!, c,ott erly of the East, io.,Onue right of way. 4» fiede~ign of all lots commencing with t uL :.2 ,:o permit larger singlefamily and/or duplex lots. r reg Alamo East AP#42--45-9 _ Dear County Planners, A review of the above project has revealed the following: The area indicated az� Vithin the project bourOarie.s is oxisidere 1 to be. archaeologically sensitive. Present ace: Easy access to natural sources of water Flat rnea&*Iland or flat land near water South and/or east: facing slopes PrEr ioUly recorded sites in the Vicinity Other:— We therzWe strongly. u , =x�archaeologist and aFpL��pa a mitigation measures of the area by a 4qa ifs ed og prepared: A known site or c.xtes itiasjhave been previously recorded in the project area. proje+.:t operatir� rill have a negative irlpact on these cul,t�ral resources. We recar-e d tt•' , qualified archaeolog.sst-. be con t assess site T comporlen,t s and L, �r a . nit:igative proparal: 5th ity to 'keview� end eaml'ent on thf: proposal. Please let Thank YW for the oFVartun us knot what decisions are made regarding the project. Sincerely 40 �4o L_ r. takoto Karma t3artheast Information Center Coordinator JAN H 1969 ;. hoM � euE D �EHt► Department of AnthrPoy atijomia OLEHN 5>swrou California State Unive•rsit , Chico Y tg:wological U5EN ll wsmonE SUTTEE smETEHFA Chico, CA 9592$ rtvr�nt '.. tory U lSl f� LAMAS MHRY (916) 895-6256 STA Date: Jan 'uarY26, 1,989 - 20r Butte Coulty Planning ;<7 County Cenbar pr. Orcvil p,. Ca- 9596i reg Alamo East AP#42--45-9 _ Dear County Planners, A review of the above project has revealed the following: The area indicated az� Vithin the project bourOarie.s is oxisidere 1 to be. archaeologically sensitive. Present ace: Easy access to natural sources of water Flat rnea&*Iland or flat land near water South and/or east: facing slopes PrEr ioUly recorded sites in the Vicinity Other:— We therzWe strongly. u , =x�archaeologist and aFpL��pa a mitigation measures of the area by a 4qa ifs ed og prepared: A known site or c.xtes itiasjhave been previously recorded in the project area. proje+.:t operatir� rill have a negative irlpact on these cul,t�ral resources. We recar-e d tt•' , qualified archaeolog.sst-. be con t assess site T comporlen,t s and L, �r a . nit:igative proparal: 5th ity to 'keview� end eaml'ent on thf: proposal. Please let Thank YW for the oFVartun us knot what decisions are made regarding the project. Sincerely 40 �4o L_ r. takoto Karma t3artheast Information Center Coordinator all P&HO C®. Plaste�Tng a COUNLY OF BUTTE s DFPARD U OF PUBLIC 'WORKS 7 County'Center Drive Orovilla, CA 95965 �tW ville CaGfotna (96) 538-7266 January 5, 1989 American Home Services RE: AP 42-15-09 Alain) Fast Tentative Vesting i 575 E. 3rd Ave. s;iodivision Map ;Chico, CA 95926 Gentlemen: This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the above -referenced property is being submitted to the planning Department for environmental determination;, and to the Environmental Health Department for its review. This application will be considered complete when we have received notification frame the planning Department and the Environmental health 'Department that all necessary data have been received: These departments will contact you, regarding any additional information they may require. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public works j 3V,Yui Mendonsa sistant Director ax/kk cctPlanning Department Environmental Health Department Rolls, Anderson & 110118 LD Jlio (Revised 2/88) �� - F!l7pO. P�A7i�!litf � �n+"u779t� JAN , ;�� °st � `I�lt+cY11ie6 �+Jifnrniti COUNTY OF BUTTE D£PARnM OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center )),rive Orovil.le, CA 95965 (916) 538-1266 TATE'. January 5j 1989 , � 7ECT,i Alamo East (American Home Services) - TMJATIVE VESTING SUBD VISION MAP AssEsso ' S MAP BOOK NUMBER L2 PAGE 45�I'ARCFL(s) 09 ,LOCATION., 33 lots located at the northeast con�Or of Alamo Avenue a,,�d - East Atrenue. Chico area. -- Attached is a copy of the above-described tentative map for your revio'g. If or recommendations concerning this project, you have any suggestions, additions please return them to this office by January 26, 1989 Very truly yours, William Chef£ Director of Public Works - hn MendonSa sist.ant Director " attf stun LD 1160 Oevised 11/87