HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-590-040won
li
M 1\
!A 65MENT
CORPORATION
ara
Sacramento
79
P=,41 1NG 'iCOMMISSXOi4 SUMMARY SHEET FOR 11"OND DIVISIONS
J D Zink al Dou Timmons Log'089-01-23-Q!
anci
A I &S 1 Walnut Circle, Chico, CA 95926
a Helen Harrington P.O. Box 124, Durham, CA '95938
7�&jl C~T DESCRIPTION Tentative Subdivision Map
L,OCA�'1"Id t�S' 21 lot,. located at the northwest corner of Bell Road and
- Avenue , Chico area.
?Z,-S;ZSSO 1S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 42--59-40
',OCL TvC_._-- RT-1-AGENERWI PLAN Agri-Rosi PROJECT CONSISTENT?
C-E:tSRAL ;PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT December 221 1588
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
It'ANM CONSERVATION ACT' CONTRACTS? no
BATF APPLICATION RECEIVED January 23; :1989
AT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER--., Morthsta.r Engineering
,:,AXDPXSS, 20 Declaration; Drive, Chico; CA 95926
DATE PLP:". INi DZP.ECTORIS REPORT PREPARED _
d�?I tO%F�+ENTAL CATEGORICAL EXZM- PTION = DATE FILED
AND DATE
ATNEGATI1E GEdLARPMON - DATE ADOPTED_
MITIGATED MEG, DECLARATION DAxB ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT PrPOAT DATE CERTIFIED .
STATE CLEARINNOHOUSE NO.
St:B, colimisTEE HE .;TING DATE -f,5 tG 2 —g ei
vy
ADV180RY' A69NCY HEA INq
ADVISORY AGES '' ACTION
A'PrEALEt7 z,PPE' L IJE' )I TNG DAT8 .. _
BOARD ACTION —
*-*0.1 �8NTS VOR PLANNIN ;3zRLCTCn` Pbt�T
�-
� 4 -
o
16
j��}�/ ±� }7� Co. PlarmIn"I
C4
JAN' 2 31989
j}}��7
' 9� "4'ICI.OIV' � TENTATIVE PARCEL MAI' � ,Ch^oyil�sh t�:�fs�aq
PRHL3IiWTARY 5VnDI:VISION WAIVER APPLICATION
(Pl.eaae check appropriate box)
APtIrTUATIT:. t) D zlez4'. PHONT NO:
t i4yT i z t' r E1L`r%` /Y�5'.QP111laTl PHONE NO:
11�lG R r u`I� t R lrD`Tir.ST�.Cf�TG—rl�/G-
I . �}d; � �f� �' �'; PriGNE NO * �,9 .� •kii
,•;A 114. N, �T!C`N' OF MARI]K(l TO,
1 i)CA1111(ij! OF PROPERTY4. aWNS-KI -72 c'7: RANGE •� L , SECTION;
f9f'Y II iY i A,'t ' 1 1, PARCEL UtjMBER • TOTAr' ACREAGV
PLCI'AC�i�. f"*UB 11r PItt;LI141NAR' TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF T.;.TM,, INSURANCE'
(dated -withih laSt s:bc mflri.thc 0 WITH APPLICATION. INDICATE, Bl,,,LoW THC=, LATE
AND 1~J (1,0RDING VIP- )1 4kTIOB BY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL T,TA CREATED;
BOOK PA
NUM i4l A ,T SIS OF PARCELS BEING C=, TED (including any re�a slider)
-
011'.''lYAUC : TO NA5VPU WAPER COUME OR STOPt, DRNM- � l�Jll. e'Ilif'/ 1D I�CID ele, t
111torf),14T' 1.11", 110D OF D111" kSAL lel21e ,. 441E „5 r'G' ✓.rY.Sr' cJ.
(Chock wiith Health De'paV tmeht
'T JRLL OF WAIV-A c'
�,cya
(Check Frith Health Deprgrtteftt) ;
tor, 11r,WfQj Atqi .EXI3T TO M, 130i.IRBAgY 010 THE ORrG!�,,D t PARCEL?
bIu'AitCt tt°EtEY i41LLf-LAVE I't� I3E I�`}CT1aiTrEii
U) IWO Raviboa 7-�4-80
J' �'
,
Page 2
�,W•Z OF .NEAREST FMLIC ROAD: ✓��L .t°.�> .!fAY �y
�)I TAaicE TO I EE
I�MLIC, ROAD
For ;nfor atJon on wap:mt public road, check with Public lJorks Department)
?% AcC1S TS RY �SCR%1}i' RIGHT -OF -STAY, ATTACH, DGCUt�PtTATTON TO THIS
A IMICATSON.
T' AMSSS IS BY A, i E- cormm =mv m ROAD ENSZ > ENT, INDICATE DEED REFERENCE';
vourl's PAG=E
.jt:E ARE- A.Ii'i HO ACCESS TMISE MUST BE SHOWN ON THE IlEh ATIVN MAP
SII Tri RP -Comp -5G DATA ITI ICAMD BE MI:
I
VOd? ►"NO PAS
DISTAUCL To CITY IM-11TSc
DC".2, S TIE 0eNIEER OF THIS PARCEL NMI GM;i: OR ILAS IM IN THE PAST (YMNED, I:MD
A v,'jOTI'J.LN Z THIS Fin „ 'FY"
J
•
Sr., NATURE OFlA� LTCAZV'
j -
SIGNATURE OF 01-TINEW OF RECORD
FOR o_- ICE USE OIVi,Y
To ;S"cibdivisicn Coimdttee:
Ad-visori Agency: r
t&Llt 'fake Action By:
Appeal. to Board of Supervisors:
' YY�,, ))��rr��ia�•ff y. ,.yam F
Ree i number• / `l 'Tota. Received:
e pt J
Byt
• . nuc, y
a-1020 Advised 7-24-80
FCR IWicE USE ONLY,, t'
BlItt a County Planning. Dept, Receipt # �} 40
7 Count;kv Center Drive r
Orovil.lh, CA 95965-3397 Applicant: -'P. ink- "b,-rtMY110
(916) 538-7601 AP 11
Subdivision Dame (if applicable)
APPENi ..
Mite Piled
LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS
Sunolemental InfolrTati!5n for Planning Department
I, List :-d describe any other related permits and other public approvals
required for this ptoject, including thos�a required by city, regional.,
state and federal agencies:
fi�U�✓D,2y' .9G���CY
2, Peoposed scheduling/associat0d projects: xl-.5.4.1-P
3. Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units,
future development plans)s ! /9
4— What method V11i be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe
how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected;
5, Proximity of water for fixe fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc.)
6. Will excavation our grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate);
c?
7, Dieuctiryns Yrae travel to property (rural and mountainous areas on;j ,r) ,
Hyl.
r
y;i
$. FRVITONME. NTAL IMPACTS AND 14ITIGATION 14EASIJRES--'
TdenCxtv Potentially significant, . P y E icant`,, environmental 'impac'ts associated with
the land division. What project design features or special conditions
of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential
environmental. impacts?iD!%
V. ENVIROIN"(ENTAL SETTING''
3z) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals,: and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects:
Describe any existing structures oil the site, and the use of
the structures. L°".G!*,STr - O.E'l�i�'9�1� G!///7/ .l
b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
plants and animals and ,any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.),
intensity of land use Gone-family, apartment houses, shops; depart-
ment stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage,
setback, rear yard, ete,)
tERTIPiCATION; _.I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluation to the, best of my abi.iit:yr and that the facts, statements
And information presented are true znd correct to tho. "est of my knowledge
and belief,
.. r
�71 U
S?. }� ature
For k'IJ.�Lw '� �•G�'�y
*Ilse seParate sheet for longer responses.
a
GBS Nv
�u r 'fin, t'fanning
J A V 23 1989
SODIVIDER'S STATEMENT Ocyrille� C.�itfami�t
.7%14 4--4,0l>G Mcl p, Date/Z ld zdd
Project
AP #
i . Ei sting use (s of the l and D.eeh4.,ep all
2.
Proposed use (s) of the land
3.
Improvements proposed (See Ch. 20-21 County Code)
4,
Public areas proposed
5.
Tree planting/oP removal (approx. number)
'eve
6
�'t{ covenants
of ashallnbetattachedttocthis
Prelexig
ngaor prrooposedstatement
attached' ht�ne
7.
State type of division] i.e. pt-ivate road, urban rural, etc._ ..
Lb
1040
�a
1, Planning Df�ar tent
NAME:_J.D NK & n TIMMONS
I Environmwm'w ' A •1th Department
CDF (Fore-, W° a hrtment) AP; 42-59-40'
Attn: J ;:•, (a rter (on areas north of red line on map)
Butte C uo ',,,,eriff
PG&E (check title report, for easement)
Pacific Bell
Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map it cabinet)
Sci�,aol District (wall map
%'�lP11, tttr1"6orf
eater Company (;if individual wells are not indicated on application or map)
Durham. Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California treater Service Company (Chico area)
Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District. (Oroville area, SE of ,river)
Thermalito Irrigation. District (Thermalito area NE of river)
Limesaddle ComunityNServices District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd;
to lake)
Del Oro Walter (Paradise Pines .area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe 1 -fill. Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
Paradise Irrigation District
City of . (check wal" ,,:aps for spheres of influence)
Oroviue
X Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
CWMLLE, AREA. ONLY
Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet)
Fea;ther_River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet)
E1 Medio Fire District (check wall nap, a small portion of Oroville only,)
B'TCGS RICHV'ALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE GOUTY)t check 14611 map and title report
to see what applies. Sorae areas overlap.
Drainage District #1
Drainage District 1#2
Drainage District 1100
Drainage District #200
Reclamation District x833'
Reclamation District #2056
Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District
Butte Creek Drainage District
IN CERTAIN CASES
,.� Superintendent, of Schools (only, for subdivisions)
Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas)
Ca Trans (near State Hwy, 32, 70, 990 149 (Chico ct�t-off), .162 (Olive Hwy., &
Richvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State Water Quality Control Board (projects With more than 100 lots or units)
United States Forest Service (if pr j6ct borders USA land --check AP books)
Parks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville)
State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville W= 'watershed)
.Rock Creek Reclaimatioi Dist, (west of bhido airport, south of, Rock Creek and
east of Hwy, 99 (see wall map)
Chico Area Recreation & mark D; St (only for subdivisions)
numbered ion of special services or easements such
as to Thermalito Irrigation District
SPECIAL CASES! check title report for any m
(numbered items)
P w,�
GE'N�Re'�.T1 �L:A1V �O'r7�'�FZM.ANC;'E i2EPOR� its+�•o. Planniq'�a�3mo
Von, OR. S1TS7axVTS20N MAP, nn 2
3 '1989
; ,unS 1-4 to be completed by applicant: , Or-aVill®, CaufOM14
APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS; J � � %/i � /�y//.1% y%�r jf/.r %/�%� ✓�/ 7f •:'/ � � ( /,`�f r ��
PROJECT DESCRIPTION-.
i. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N -MER(�S):
PROPOSED USE:f�ZI
T ,fallowing items are to be cdapleted by the Planning Departments /
✓i''/�-
LAND CONSERVATION AGRMSENT:
b�RAL PLAtt DESIGNATIOt;:
t�'d�tional rriterias
xv ICULTURAL-RESIDE:i7,I-AL YES No It is red6mmended that you perform the
✓ following checked items:
Y. Agricultural Compatibility �. ARCHAEOLOGICAL .RECORDS CHECK.
2. Water and Sewer Capacity "- BOTANICAL SURVEY
S. Adequate Fire Facilities -- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Lt.. Road Capacity and''Maintenance
5. Access to Commercial and Schools YES NO
,PCHAP.D AID FIELD CROPS WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH
AttD GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: AIR
1 Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size /
2. Vicinity of Urban Boundaries, WITHIN FLOOD PLAINS
F 3„ AP. Viability not Irspaired {JITITiti AREAS SPECIFIC OR
Staff Determination: Substantiailv, conforms to' LAND USE PLAN:
GEI�,EPEP,AL PLAN: 1. Land Use If Yes#�/(�
2;. Conservationt!� Name .of Plan
3 open :Space �� WiTiiIN URBAN RESIERVE
+.,. Safety
51 If Yes)
Noise
Name of Reserve.
6, dousing
1 Circulation AIRPORT LAND USE PLANS
Ile
/-I Ay)CStaff Signature pate
y-
A5 THE APPGICANI FOR THE REC}UESTED LAirD DIVISION, I AM A14ARE OF THE AhbVE S' DETERMINATION+ REGARb1NG
THE CONFORMANCE WxTit THE CEN":3tAt, PLAN AND ZONING.
Dated �- ,.`/ Signature of Applidant
* ttis report will expire and, be discarded, six (6) months from the date o tho staff s gnature.
LD 1000A 6 evi.sa 6-87)
1
r �
b
V.hlC7 L'=GE C7T' DETE1ZMMNA"I TON
LEV
a- s
xo Office of Planning Rnps arch 7F'T2c'�r "` Butte County
Room 1
1400 Tenth Street, P4AY 2 3 1989 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Centex Drive
or /,**r , yhn(y� ��yy( }}o Clerk yyr Oroville, CA 95965
X County Clerk by CAl VIEW Deputy
County of Butte
Svs.ECT c Filing of Notice of Determina.t!on in compliance with Section 211.08
or 211.52 of the Public. Resources Code.
Project Title AP 1i Name
Tentative Subdivision Map 42-59-4'O J: D. Zink & Doug 7mmons
State Clearinghouse Uumber Contact Person Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa, Public Works ('916) 538-7266
Projecx� Location At the northwest corner of Bell Road and Bay Avenue, Chico area.;
Project Description Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 21+ acres to create 21 Lots
of 1.1 acres each.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agoncy
(,,Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the abode -described project on May 22, 1989 and has made.
-'(Date.)
the following determinations regarding the above. -described project':'
1 The project will, _X_will not., have a significant effect on the
environment.
2 An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisio,,,ys of CEQA.
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA
5 Mfitlgat'ion measures' X._ vtte, . were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project,
4: A statement of overriding considerations Was, Was not; adopted,
for. this project
This is to certify that the final );TiZ with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at
Butte, County Planning Department
T County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
batd
nat OPR
Received for Piling and
Posta......_-
5itta ure u
I 9 !� B�1. Tutpa.ri
Setilo P1 t ner
Title
K�ni�4Cnri ti�hnh k�iZFi
plimho J.
'
JON 7 1989
e r ".+it a•• �
ffutte Alitount
.. ,
a
P LAND
OF NATURAL WEALTH AND B AL)TY
s_
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, D9tector
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIF�{ORNIA 76965
CEP,TIFIED MAIL
Telephone- (916) J53&6W
0 U. McELRDY
Deputy Dl7ector
June 6,; 1989
J D. Zi r&
RE: Zink & Titmtlons Subdivision bIap
I Qg 7T.itranonsp
c.(
1 Sdalniit Circle
Cl-i.co, CA 95926
Gentlemen!
At the regular meeting of, the Butte County Board of Supervisors held-
eldJune
June6, 1989, the Board. denied your appeal of Environmental Health Dept.
conditions Nos. 23 and 24t as adapted by
the Advisory Agency at its
meeting cf May 1-2, 1989.
Should you have any questions concerning
this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
1hiliam Cheff
Director of Public Works
Mendonsa
si8tant Director
V/kk
Cc Planning Department
Envirowental Health riP-partment
Clerk of the Board
NorthStar Engineering
• �� ., ,, 1, _ „- }
y.ry
,
r
MIA 119$9`
012A w1fo
Eutte vou
Ery c
L WEAiTI-I AND �EAIJTY
_ r
Dap
4 �+ ;W1 D OFN� �U 7�OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Blit) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . ORO c r LIFORNIA 95965
CERTIFIED WL Telephone: 191e 538-7266
RONALD D, McELROY
Deputy Dftevot
May 31, 1989
J. D. Zink RB: AP 42-59-40
Doug Timmons Zink & Timmons Tentative
1 Walnut Circle Subdivision Map
Chico, CA 95926
Gentlemen'.
Please be advised that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has set a
public hearing date of June 6, 1989 at 11:30 a.m., to hear your appeal
of Environmental Health Department conditions Nos. 23 and 24 of the
Advisory Agency's decision to approve your, tentative subdivision map at
its meeting of May 22, 1989.
The meeting will be held in the Board of Supervisors Room, CoLTnty
Administration Building, 25-bounty Center Drive, Oroville, California.
Should you have any queFrLions concerning this matter dlease contact this
)ffice.
Very truly yours,
William Chef.f
Director of Public Works
J Mendonsa�
Assistant Director
JM/kk
cc Plannirig Desai ttnerit
Environmental Health Department
Clerk of the Board
Notthstar Engineering
! uu1H l'
r a• y n
I.AND OP NATURAL WEALTH AND 4EAi7TY
_r
DEPARTMENT of PU13L`JC WWRKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF Dlroctor
1 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, 45965
Telcphonc: (916) 538-7621,
P, '4tn D. K:5L.ROY
,CERTIF+IED MAIL Ubputy DiinCtgr
May 22, 1989
J. D. Zink and Doug Timmons RE: AP 42•-59-40
;One Walnut Circle TSM
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Gentlemen:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory. Agency held on
Hay 22, 1989, the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
environmental mitigations and approved the tentative parcel map on
ttIe above-referenced property subject to the conditions listed on
the attached sneet.
If rib appeals are timely Filed--within ten (id) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency`ts approval--with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, thit action will be ,final:
When the conditions of approval are comp ed faith; it will be in order
for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department
of Public Warks for recordation within twenty.-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this, matter, please contact this r
offa.ce.
Very truly yours,
William Chef%'
Director of Public Works
J h Mondonsa
Assistant Director
JM/ds
attachment
eel. Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
NorthStar Engineering
r,
�T. D,. ZINK & DOUG TIMMQNS, Tentative Subdivision Map, AP 42-59--40
21 its at the northwest corner of Bell Road & Cussick Avenue. Chico
,Plea.., Engineer, NorthStar Engineering.
Public Works conditions:
1. Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Words
or approval and install the required facilities.
2. Provide 20 ft. radius property line :returns at all street
intersections.
_ti.. indicate -a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of
interior streets, Bay Avenue, Bell Road and Cussick Avenue:.
4. Street signs shall be provided by 'the developer at all street,
intersections per County requirements. (.submit 5 alternate
names for each street to the County address coordinator for
approval of street names.
5. Deed 30 from the centerline of Bay Avenue, Bell Road and Cussick
Avenue to the County of Butte.
Vii, Construct one--half plus 12 fti lane street section on Bay Avenue & Cussick Ave.
to RS-3-Ag eometrc standard. Minimum structural section to
be 2„ AC and 8 AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative.
compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works
for approval. "R" value` determinations and other data may be
required to support section design.
7. Provide monumentation as required by the Department of Public
Works in accordance with. accepted standards.
S. Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte
County Ordinante.s, design resolution and other accepted
engineering standards.
9. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10A1;1 easements of record
to be shown on the final map.
11. Meet requirements of Butte County Fire department or other
responsible agency,
12. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County
requirements, accepted design criteria,; and recommendations o:
PG&E.
X.B. Pay off assessments
14, Meet the irements
Pacific Tele shone, iaater, seweity companies �i..e;, PC&E�
requof the utility
`II ;
i
ZINK & TIMMONS TSM AP 42-59-40
15: Pay any delinqueit taxes or current taxes as required.
16. Developer shall j;►rovide all required traffic. safety signs, including
stop signs,
17. Extend Shasta Avonue to tie to interior access road and Bell Road.
Design to be approved by Dept, of Public Works prior to Advisory
Agency hearing.
1.5= Construct cul-de- Ic on Bell Road at intersection of
Cus ick Avenue,
1.9. Form a County Service Area for street lights and storm drain
maintenance.
Health Dept. conditions
20. Provide a 100 ft: li:,achf eld free setback around existing wells
either within the p1;•operty or within 100 £t. of the property
boundaries.
21. 'Prove the zeqi"
th an s0wage disposal area on each parcel.
patcel any parcel not proven to contain
the usable sewage disposal akea required by the Subdivision
_ Ordinance.
22= Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are proposed to be t
destroyed under permit in order to provide required usable sewage
disposal areas, AestrbV those wells under permit and connect the
facilities served by 010 wells to other approved water sources
prior to recording iM final map,
23. Provide a letter or other documentation from California Cuter
Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply
domestic Hater to the subdivision,
24 .Place a note on the map that state,, "development of parcels 1-21
will requif,e connectioxi too public water supply,,,
35, Meet the requirements o�7 the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan.
35 Meet the requirements of the State Regional Water Quality
Control Board,
37. Locate and if necessary t&locatce the s�'wage disposal system serving the existing dWdlling onto its j, spective parcel;
,m,
(�jAintlrl. ,
M110mla
ry
SaGoU/1
n • y W �~�
tAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND (4CAUT1'
s �2- DEPARTMENT OF'PUBLIG WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95966
V.
Taft -phones (516) 538.7681
RONALD D, MtELROY
Deputy blreator
May 1, 1989
J. D. Zink and Doug Timmons RE: AP 42=59-40
,One Valnut Circle 'rStr(
Chico, CA 95926 '
Dear Gentlemen!
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
May 1. 1989, the Agency continued its review of the above -referenced
fubaect to May 22, 1989. The item was continued because the map has
been rev ;ed to 21 parcels and 'that item must be republished in the
newspaper.
The next meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the toard of
Supervisorst Roos;, 25 County Cer,t,er Drive) Oroville, CA,.
If you hava any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
toff ice.
Very, truly yours,
William Chet'f
Director of Public Works
S�n t�endonsa
Assistant Director
Jhl/ds
ccPlanning Department
Environmental Hoalth Department
NorthStar Engineering
E
May 8, 1989
MAY 101989
�.fr •.r C9ivville� �nlifarilt�
LAND QF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Addross q 196,1Aemorial Woy 0 7 County Center Drive 0747 Elliott Rood
Reply to Chico, California 95926 Oroville, California 95965 Puradise, Colffarnia 95969
Telephone- 916/891.2727 Telephone, 916/S38-7281 Telephone: 916/872.6309
J. D. Zink
Doug Timmons
1 Walnut Circle
Chico, CA 95926
RE: Zink & Timmons Subdivision
Bell Rd. & Cussick Av., Chico
AP# 42-59-40•i
Gentlemen;
This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works
Tend Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application:.
Based on present informatiOni we can recommend approval or conditional
approval.
Recornmended Conditions for Approval
1.. Provide a 100' leachfield free setback around existing wells either
within the property or within 100` of the property boundaries.
2. Prove the, required. usable sewage disposal: area on each parcel..
Combine with an adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to contain the:
usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance.
3. Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are proposed to be
destroyed under permit in order to provide required usable sewage
disposal areas: Destroy those wells under permit and connect the
facilities served by the wells to other approved water sources prior'
to recording the final map;
µ 4, Provide a letter or other documentation from California dilater Service
Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic
water to the subdivision.
5. Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels 1-21
will require connection to a public water.supply.l'
6 Meet the 'tequ rements of the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan,
7. Meet the 'requirements of the California State Regional Water duality
Control Board
x_
Ca, pj
C)
ou
•--- �„,, r.' ,/, � �1,Wit`' �t,
LAfyQ 01' h1AYURAL �ArEA1TI.1 A110 IIf'AUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEEP, Di"clor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telcpkohe: (916) 538.7681
RONALD A. McELROY
Deputy Director
April 17, 1989
J, D. Zink RE.- AP 42-59-40
Doug, Timmons TSM
I Walnut Circle
Chico, CA 95925
Dear Jar. Zink and Mr. Timmons;
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
April 17, 1989, the Agency continued its review of the
above-referenced subject to May 1, 19$9. The item was continued
at the request of the Environmental Health Department.
The next meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m, in the Board of
Supervisors Room, 25 County Center Drive. Oroville, CA..
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
,office.
Very truly yours,,
William ChePf
Director of Public 'Works
JoVn Mendonsa
Assistant Director
?M�ds
cc! Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
NorthStar Engineoring
- guite CounL�[
LAND OF NATURAL WEAI:TH AND BEAUTY"
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA. 95965-8391
TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601
i
April 6; 19199
,
D. Zink
Dog Timmons
I Walnut Circle
.Chico,. CA 95926
RE. REVISED Tentative Subdivision crap
APS` 042--55-0-040
:Dear Mr. Zink and Mr. Timmons.
Enclosed is a copy of the Revised Planning Director's report to
-the Butte County Advisory Agency concevning the proposed project
referenced above. This report has been prepared pursuant to the
requirements of Section 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County
;Subdivision Ordinance,
Sf yt�,u -have any questions regarding this report, please feel free
to contact 'this office betwOen 10!-00 a.m. and 3:00
`Sincerely,
B . A. KIRCAER
p' ctor of Planning
Bent Moore
Associate Planner
PM:fcu
;�' cc t ii'orths tar �ngrieerng .� I
Enclosure
'nter-Departmental Memorandum
Butte County Advisory Agency
:Moul Planning Director
gG78JECT RegIsed P.eport on Tentative Subdivision. Map for J.D. Zink
and Doug Timmona for AP# 042-59-0-040
%T April 5, 1989
11his is a proposal to divide 21+ acres to create 21 lots of 1.1 acres
tach. The present zon.i.ng is RT --1-A (Minimum Density Reside:nti�Sl
1,rr-iler) . The Land Us4e 'Phan Map of the Butte ounty Genera], Plan
4asignates this area a;s Agricultural -Residential The project iii E
3.rs Located within the Chico Area Land Use Pla, :.
a nt:w map was submittekd on March 28; ;1989 showing a new :tree it
,�lignment which, refiracts the recommendations of the Initial St�ldy.
l ha new reg idti Map does not conflict with County zoning
revised Suhd�i�.s
any adopted or, proposed element of the Butte County Genera. Plan
mor any County, Spec fig or community plan.
uJ'Ct3- :i.Lt'ti�i��tTt,cr..d Y'�.F:G1Sllt��'
A Negative Declaration ha:5 been prepared for the proposed project in '
^- accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act ane'r forwarded
to the Butte County ka.* isory agency withiai the required 105 clays as
*'rlandated by the: California Public Resources Coce section 21181.5,
recommend approval of the proposed revise:d Tentative Subdivision Map
,zabj ect to the followi,n.g cis
'fi r f Pa the west Chaco Fire, Station As se.ssment. Fee _ of $75.00 a
�' �i��r lot
prior to map recordation.
��i ecu
rt,,, J . Zink and Doug Timmons
No;rthstar Bngineei:in r
r
01 ,w
�tf�A Vie. Maim' Cgft��
A)R 61989
b. tMlla, Callfonua
COUM OF SUITE
DEPAMtF.x`tT OF PUBLIC WORKS
7 COWLY Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(916) 538-7266
DATE Aprj,1 5, 1989 *}
'tWTSED �,AP
�SUBJ L J:D., Zink & Doug Timmons — TEN AUVE SUBDIVISION? MAP
AsstsSORI S XAP BOOK DTMMEp. _ 42 PAGE' _ 59 __PARC1q,(s) 40
LOCjUION, 21 :Lits at the northwest corner of x3ell Road & Cussick Avenue.
Chico area.
,Attached is a copy of the above-described tentative matp ;for your review.If
you have any suggestiois, additions or recommendations concerning this project,
please returr them to this office by _. �---- -,_--
:Nj)TE riAMI IS SET VOR A.A. April. 1-7,: 1989
Very truly yours,
WilliAm Cheff
Di,L-ect;or o ; ,Public Works
Cshn MendoTia,3
lstant Director
M/kk
attachment
cc: Planning Department
txMxonme,atal Health Department
LD 1160 (A6 viseu' 11/$7
��:• __
.. � �'�;xtt'ffis fix. �i nein; G7tr}nY.
rovi!!a, Cali#aYnia
Suite 61
LANG) OF NATURAL WEALTH AND nEAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBI 11C WORKS
WILLIAM (13111) CHFFF; Mrector
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROViLLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephone: (916) 538.1681
RONALD D. McELROY
Depuiy Director
March 291 1989
J, D. Zink RP: AP 42--59-40
Doug Timmons TSM
1 Walnut Circle
Chico) CA 95926
Dear Mr. Zink and Timmons:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee held
On March 29, 19890 the committee reviewed the above -referenced
tentative subdivision. As .a result of this meeting, Public Works
will recortmend the: enclosed list of conditions.
This project has been scheduled for the Advisory Agency meeting of
April 17; 1989. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the "Board
of Supervisors Poom, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Vory truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
hh Mendonsa
Assistant Director
JMIna
attachment
cc Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
NorthStar -Engiheering
�J, D. ZINK & DOUG TIMMONS, Tentative Subdivision Map, AP 42-59-40,
21 lots at the northwest corner of Bell Road & Cussick Avenue. Chico
area. Engineer; ItorthStar Engineering. 1
Public Works conditions:
1.; Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works
for approval, and install the required facilities.
2. Provide 20 ft. radius property line. •eturns at all street
Intersections
3,. Indicate a 50 ft. 'building setback line from the centerline of
intarior streets, Bay Avenue, Bell„ Road and Cussick Avenue.
4.Street Signs shall be provided by the developer at all street
intersecti.g:rs per County, requirements. (Submit 5 alternate
names for each street to the County address coordinator for
approval of street names.)
5 Deed 30 from the centerline of Bay Avenue, Bell Road and Cussick
Avenue to the County of Butte.
6. Construct ona-half plus 12 f'ti lane street section on Bay Avenue & Cusick Ave,
to RS -3"A geometric standard; Minimum structural section to
be 2" Ali and 8 AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% relative
compaction. Submit design o County Department of Public Works
for approval. ''R" value determinatioAs and other data may be
required to support section design.
7; Provide monumentation as requirod by the Department of Public
Works in accordance with accepted standards._.
S. Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte
County. Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted.
engineering standards,
9. Provide permanent solution for drainage.
10i All Casements of record to be shown on the final map.
It. Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or other
responeib;ls agency,
12. Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County
requirements, accepted design criteria., and recommeudations sof
PG&E.
13. Pay off nssessments.
1.4. Meet; the requirements of i he utility companies U,e. , PGM
Pacific 'telephone, water, sewer)
. QUIZ
LA.P'4D 1 ATt.: T l t
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (B111) CHI=FF, Dlrect&
7 COUNTY CENTER ;DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596.5
Telephone: (916) 535-7661
RONALD D. MGELROY
Deputy Director
March 15 ; 19$9
1, D. ZiiLk RE: AP 42-59--40
Doug 'Timmons TSM,
1 Walnut: Circle
Mico, CA, 95926
sear Gentlemen;
At the regular meeting of the Butte County SubdivisiotI Committee
held on March 15, 1989, the committee continued its review of the
ebove-referenced subject to March 29, 1989. The item was concini ed
because the map may be revised and the Health Ddpartment needs rr're
information, Public Storks will recommend the revised enclosed conditions,
The ,next meeting- wi•11 commonce at 9;00 a.m. in, the conference room, #3
County Center Drive;, OroVille, CA,
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
�►ffice : _
Vert truly yours,;
William Chef
Director of Public Work's
.Jonly Mendonsa
"sistant Director
JM/ds
cc; Planning Department
Environmental Ntalth Department:
NorthSltas: engineering
i,
Tentative Subdivision Map,
AI' 42-59-0,
d D.
ZTNK DOUG `CI.L�tO S, Chico
.. �'rGhweSL" corner of Bell Road &Cussick Avenue,
21 lotsPn'
-�neeraorthStar Engineering
l area, g�
t.
' P'ublic Works conditions;
oad ;end drainage plans to the Department of public Works
1,, Submit roval and.jnstal-1 the required facilities.
fit app
Provide 20 Vit•
radius property line returns at all street
intersections .•
setback lane from the centerline of
S, indicate a 50 rt, building
Bell Load and. Cussick Avenue..
anterior streets, Bay
ns shall be provided by the developer at all street
40 Street sig Submit 5 alternate
intersections per Countp requirements. C
names for each street .z the County address coordinator for'
't
approval of street naMes. % Bell Roaldand Cussick
Deed 30 from the centerline of Bey Avenue
Of Butte.
Avenue to the County Avenue Cussick Ave.
on
' �, Construct ane -half Plus 12 j4 �jj imsmrstructuraleet nsect on to
to -RS -3-A geometric standard, ime,. fog seal and 95% relative
be 2" AC and S AB, SC 250 pr
Submit design to County
compar
ction. ks,
Department of Public t�o
"R" value de
aroyal;. terminations and other data may be
for pP ort section design.
required to sup:D
= uired by the Department of public
7, provide monusnentation a.r
eq ted standards.
! Works in ac-, atdance wcith accep _ l with the Butte
S'. Street grades and other features shall comply'
resolution and other accepted
County Ordinances, design
engineering standards.
! ermanent solution, for drainage.
} 9: Provide p
�, 10
All ea!3elftents of record to be shown on the final map•
ttixemeat$ of Butte County tare Department or tither
re
Meet q
responsible agency •
• ll be provided an accordance with Butte "aunty
12Street lighting g shaed design craterias �tnd recommendations of
requiremectts f accepted
PG&E.
13, Pay off assegsments»
Me the requirements of the ut." t. companies (,i•e•� PGCE,
14, M water, sewe',*j,
Pacific Telephone,
'' - �► Mam9>� �N11lii
ARBu ite I/ 0!!�"r
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND StAUTY
l• DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK'S
I
WILLIAM (Bill) CNEFF, Direr,tor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 4594$
Telephone: 016)A'EM 528'7266
RONALD D. IACELRDY
Deputy Ditector
March 8, 1989
J. D. Zink RE: AP 42-59-40
Doug Timmons 'Tentative Subdivision Map
I Walnut Circle
Chico, CA 95926
Gentlemen!
f Please be advised that the above-identifed tentative subdivision will
be reviewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee on March 15, 1989..
Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on
the attached. sheet
The meeting will commence at 9;00 a.m. in the Conference Room, located
at #3 County Center Dtive, 0roville, California.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office:
- - - _ Verytruly yours:,
tVillibm Chef
Director of Public Works
ehn Men onsa
ssistant Director
JM/kk
attachment
cc Planning Dopartment,,
Environmental Rea'lth Department
NofthStar Sngiiteering
J. D. INY & DOUG TIMMONS, Tentati
ve Subdivision Map, Ap 42-59�-40,
e northwest corner of Bell Road & Cussick Avenue. Chico
21 areaotsEn ineer: NorthStur Engineering
•
Public Works conditions:
1.
Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works
for approval and install the required facilities.
°2. Provide 20 ft., xadius property line returns at all street
intersections.
3. Indicate a 50 ft4 building setback line from the centerline of
interior streets, Bay Avenue & Bell Road..
4.* Street signs shall be provided
developer
CSubmit 5taaternatestreet
interseetionG County .,oun,.y r q rements,
nares for each street to the. County address coordinator for
approval of street names.)
3. Deed 30 frot3 60= centerline of Bay Avenue & Bell Road to the
Cout y of Butte.
/ 12 . ft, lane stroet sent l un on Bay Avenue
vV itE:r�v ��on to to RS-3--A geometric Standard. Minim►�se4lrandu 95% relative
be 2" AC and 8 AB, SC 250 ptoC fog
comodction. Submit design
to CounyBpandmotherent rdataxmaytabreks
for approval.. Rt valise determinations
required, to support section design.
7, provide monamentation as required by the Department of Public
'forks in. accordance with accepted standards.
8. Street grades and other features
shallion somply other accepted theButte
County Or(inancds, design re
e;:gineeriiig standards.
9; Provide permanent solution for drainage,,
record to be shown on the final map.
10'. All easements of
11., Meat requirements of Butte County fire Department or other
responsible lagenc.V.
12, Street lighting shall be provided in accordance With Butte County
requirements, accepted design criteria, and recominendAtiOhs of
PO&B
13. Pay.off adsessmen is
14 rJeet the requirements of the utility companies (i-e,, PG"'
Pacific Telephone, watar► sewer)
i
....,.....
i
I ZZNK
& TIMMONS - TSM - AP
42-59-40
15.
Pay any delinquent takes or
cu.x•rent taxes
"16.
nevelo er r
A - shah.
as required,.'
p Ovide
stop signs.
all
required traffic .�a�et signs,
Y
including
17.
Extend Shasta Avenue to
Resign to be
tie
to interior access `road
approved b
Agency hearing. Y
De pts
s and
of Public Works
Bell Road,
Prior to
Advisory
18•
Construct cul-de-sac on Bell
Road at intersection
of Bay
Avenue;
e
is
IC
!„z#:rye Bete Co
- L.AND QF NATURAL WEALTH ANI BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7' COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3391
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
February 27, 1989
SID. Zink
Doug Tim,-nOn
I. Walnut Circle
Chico, CP, 95926
RE: Teffitati-Ve Subdivision Man
APF42-59-40
Dear Mr., Zink and Mr. Timmons
Enclosed 1s a copy of
the Planning Director's report to tho
Butte Caunty Advisory Agency concerning the proposed project
referenced above. This report has been prepared pursuant
to the re _uirements of Section 20-63 and 20-99 of tine
Butte County Subdivison Ordinance.
7t you have any questions regarding this report, please
.feel free to contact this office between 10:00 a.m. and
3too
Sincerer �+
B -A, R.�RCHER
Dir
ecivt.7r of planning
LAI Ae
Brent Moore,
Associate Planner
cct ;VlotthStar Engineering
Fn�,��r�sttre
inter-aepOfrh n .Memorandum
Butte County Advisory Agency
Planning Director
u Report on Tentative Subdivision Map for J.D. Zink and Doug Timmons,
AP#42-59-40
February 28, 1989
This is.a ;proposal tc divide 21+ acres to create 21 Lots of
1.1 acres each. The p.esent zoning is RT -I -A (Minimum Density
Residential .nailer). aThs Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County
General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential.
The project site is located within the Chaco Area Land Use
Plan
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning. However,
Lhe proposal does not adhere to the policies of the Butte
County General Plan, nor specific plan. The proposed subdx-,=ision
street design conflicts with the General Plan. 'policy which
calls for transportation facilities which service the needs'
for rapid, efficient, comfortable, and safe passage of people
.and commodities. The proposed roadway geometry and
intersection, alignment does not provide a safe and efficient
intersection design from one road link to another.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed
project in; accordance to the California Environmental,
Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisc.ry
Agency within the required 165 days as mandated by the
California Public Resouoes Code Section 21151.5.
Recommend denial of 'Proposal Tentative Subdivision: Map due -
to subdivision street design, which conflicts with policies
of the Butte Cot;.nty 'Ger}eral Plan.
II! the Advisory Agepgy can 'make the finding that the proposed
subdivision street design is the safest and most efficient
irtersection design ftdm one road link to another then the
appropriate; motion would be as ,follows:
Approve the Tentative Subdivision -Map subject to the
following condition:
1. Pay -the Ilest Ccio''onAssessment Fee of $'75.Oa
per lot priortomaprecordation.
)314 f cu
cc: J.b Zink and Doug Timmons
NorthStar thgihe4erinq
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Centex Drive
Oroville, Ca.. 96965
ertnt'Brent Moore
Re.-Zink/Ti= ns Subdivision
A.P. 92-59 40
bear Mr. Moore;
As: a follow up to our letter or: February 1.5, 1989, T am writing to
expand our comments regarding the read alignment of the subject
project. After our review, and discussions with County staff, it
is out contention that the alignment originally proposed for the
Bell .toad, Bay Avenue intersection beet suits the needs of the
area. This alignment proposes that Bell: Road be turned at it's
eastorly end to intersect. Bay Avenue perpendicular to Bay Ave, and
that this intersection coinc;"de with the Marshall Court
ilntersection..
We explored alternative intersection and lot configurations,
including having Bel.? Road intersect- Bair at Shasta Avenue (see
enclosed sketch) . We felt our original, proposal superior for the
following reasons
1... Re-routing hell Road .northerly to meet Shasta results in a
'"pie-shaped" 'property, south of Bell. This remaining piece
requires eliminating one lot entirely or creating three odd
shaped lots. The detrimental econ.omir effect ensuing from
either -of these options would ba significant.
21 By aligning Bell. faith: Marshall: we eliminate the "problem"
intersection without creating an additional 'problem", the
sort which would be created at the intersection of Bell,
and the projection of Shasta
Further, the existing alignment of Bell would have to be
retained to provide access to existing parcels southerly of
the present alignment, Wherefores -access to these parcels
would be made much more difficult
20 0etlaratiton brine
Chico, CA, 95926
(916)'891-1,600
,R
n
February 1.7, 1989
Bell Road Realignment
Pacr'e 2
4;, Lastly, The County Public Works stmt' had a concern
r regarding this new alignment. They feel it would provide
an additional thoroughfare from the Esplanade westerly into
the Bell-,Muir corridor, thus encouraging faster development.
x of an already sensitive area. Considering this realignment
is not within the County Road master plan, they feel that
i the proposed Eaton Road extension. Will be a sufficient East
_.West arterial link to this area, and would prefer not to
have another,
z We treat these comments will be sufficient to allow this project
to proceed to the Subdivision Committee and then Advisory Agency
roeetings. If you have any questions, feel free to contact this
office.
Sincerely,
NOkTHSTAR ENGIN"EERI'XG
C'/alaMeb Stevens
CC Jane Dolan
Karen. Verctuae
Carl: beveren
J.D. Zink
Dong T"immons
encs
,h
MEMO
b -.,.
Nixon!amm
FESS k
California Onvarmat6o0H sFJ SIERRA C'roviJld Cul6omter
A.vZaeotogical sisafou Department of Anthropology
Inventory 1N OUTM California State University, Chico
.; TE}IAIIA Chiro, CA 95929
'"� pu11t+L3 =Nf1Y
,n.f s' sdAsr�
(916)895-6256
I
Date:
` { PPhriiar�r 1 1 A
m -s
SR
x �t �.
r
TO Butte Coun+Y Planning
47 County Center r] -
Oroville, Ca. 9596
.. R
re: An 4j-9 -4n I hl l�- f lel dt� a4U %y
Dear County k?lsnners
A, review of the above, project has revealed the following:
x>, , The area indicated as within the project boundaries is o:xlsidered to be
archaeologically sensitive. Present are:
Easy access to natural sources of water
Flat meadowland or flat land near water
South and/or east Facing slopes
xx Previously recorded sites in the Vicinity
xx Other _Although the urbiect arra is considered io b� ;,odrat�ly,
sensitive for cultural'resources we are recomrr�endin that no
surv, ev be conducted based on the mature of the ro'ect.
_operations.
Mee strongly recx nr-nd that ali archaeological rec onna.iss.-mce be conducted ducted of
t:he area by a qualified archaeologist and appropriate irutigation measures
prepared.
A kzaown site or, sites bas/have been previously recorded in the project area.
Projfl---t: operations will have a negative impact on these cultural resources.
We recamxesad that a qualified archaecl()gist be contacted to asses site
.cduPOnents and prepare a mitigative proposal:
Dthera,A survey s nil* recorturiende$ for the.above C.L.proieHowever, should
any peistoric or historic cultural materials be_encountered during project
oR=-tiOb8x all Work shbL'ld cease immediately pending an inspection of the
site and materials by a qualified professic'nal archaeol ist This person
old be able to assess site significance attd stagest mitigation measures.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on th%sr
Us know` what decisions are made regarding the project: p please let
. Sincerely,
Dr'. h%kot;o kowta
Northeast Xnforrnatioo Cenkee Coordinator
February 15, 1989
Butte County Planning Department
7 Cuuity Center Drive
Orovil.le, CA 9.5965
Attention` Brent Moore
Re Zink/TimmonsSubdivision
A.F. 42-59--40
Dear Mr= Moores
Regarding the Initial Study for saij tentative subdivision for J. D.
Zink and Doug Ti=6'1!s on A.P. 42-59=40, we offer the following comments
concerning the recommended mitigation measures.
MMI.,A records search has been requested from the Department of Antlro-
pology a:t CSU Chico. A copy of said records :search will be forwarded to
you and its recommendations will be followed.
ne2: The proposed roadway is in the process of being redesigned. The
w alignment will alleviate any concerns for motorists safety. A print
of the redesign will be sena to you.
MM 34 Thecurrcels being created are all over 1 acre in size thus not
requiring s and gutters, Lot design and road design will be to Dgart�
meht of public Forks standards with regard to drainage ,and erosion.
MM '4: Developers will contribute $75.00 per lot to the gest Chico Fire
Station fund.
We trust these comments will be sufficient to allow this project to be
scheduled for the Advisory AgerIf ,you have any questions, please con-
tact Jim Stevens or myself in this office.
Sneerel:y
NORTHSTAR ENG NERVING
Rick Rodriguez'
VR.,d 20 DedWaflon Drive
Chico, CA 9506
1;9 Lb) 8g3»,boo
rt
t}
tie,
Co.f
LAND OF NATURAL WEA -LTH AND BEAUTY
.` PLANNING DEPARTMEN-r
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROWLLE, CALIFORNIA 95965=3397
TELEPHONE, (916) 538-7601
rebrua.ry 7, 1989
8.. b. Zink and Doug Timmons
I Walnut Circle
Chico, CA 95926
i e Tentative Subdivision Map
A_ -P 42-59-40
Log #89-01-23-01
Dear Mr. Zink and Mr. Tim-nons
A.n initial study of your proposed project, Tentative Subdivision
Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment
Irefer to the enclosed environmental checklist
eliminate these or
impacts,' suitable mitigation measuresTo Geare
required as part of the project
impact Otherwise,an. Environmental.
Report (EZRj is re
Environmental quired pursuant to the California
Quality Act,
Zn order to assess the potential for adverse impacts and to
determine what if any, Mitigation measures would be a
regarding archaeolc)gical sites, you may contact thepfollowie,
f Ce for a records_ search
and senstivii~y evaluation P, si
ng
Lte.
Pan a and/or location ma
p (preferably tit sectiOl Towns
R 9 i must be sent along 'With a fee h1Pr and
.%nformation Center for this service:+ °f '�-0.00 payable tf-.' the
Northeast Information Center
% Department. of Anthropology
California Stare University
Chico, CA, 95929-0400
Attention; Curator of Records
SIhould the office recommendthat an archaeological survey be
tanducted, it will then be necessary
individual who is professionally qualito you to contact an.
fied to Provide such an
evaluation. A list of qualified local consultants is included:
One of these individuals can be hired to perform the survey and
PrOvidP mitigation recommendations as warranted
„t
r
1989
BUTTE COUNTY DEPARL4ENT OF PUBLIC WORKS O►ovtlje, Call&,4,
Lr,,`iD DIVISION REVIEW REQUEST
To::(likom DATE- Jan. _ 20, 1989
AP HO.: 42-59-40_ _ RETURN BY: 210/89
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
A�'t ICA TT:: J: D. ZINK & DOUG TIMMONS
ENGINEER: NorthStar Eng nePL r rL Ly
Coli-DITIONS AND/OR. C01-2•1ENTS
This proposed residential subdivisioi along With many others heinq
developed in the greater Chico Area •rill have an adverse impact on
the pari: and recreation facilities in the greater Chico Area.
Therefore, the Chico Area 'Recreation ane 'ark District is,reguesting
that the subdivision be required to pay park fees when the Butte
County Board of Supervisors. adopts the, appropriate ordinance and
fee schedule. Furtheri that the Dutte County Board of Supervisors take
immediate steps to establish a park fee for the greater Chico area.
cc: Betty Kirchner; Butte Co: Pianninq gy
z LTD 117o" (Rav, 6-80) rry, a jhes, ,66m,
1 Manager,
... _. -__-- - _.. .... _:.. ..:- ..
... �,.y. �� �:rai�..•Y-rl
�I�r..�„iAri:»W
cc: Betty Kirchner; Butte Co: Pianninq gy
z LTD 117o" (Rav, 6-80) rry, a jhes, ,66m,
1 Manager,
dim
APPEf4'D'IX P t ;'r
COUNTY OF BU` tt
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
Log No. 89-01-23-01
AP No. 42-59-40
L BACKGROUNt7
1. Name of proponent J. D. -z;ink ;and Dough Timmons
2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable);
1 Walnut Circle North5tar Engineering
Chico; CA 95925 20 Declaration DriVe
Chico, CA 95926
3. Project description, Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 21+ acres to create
2.1 Lots o1 1.1 acres each
II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YEft MAYBE NO
1. Does- the project have potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Wildlife papulation to drop,
below self-sustalmng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the rarige of a taro or endangered plant of anihial or eliminate important
examples of major periods of California history or prehistory?,,
2. Does the project trace the potential to achieve Short-term benefits to the detriment -of lortg«
term, environMental goal a? (A short-term impact on the envitunment is one which occurs Ina
relatively brief period of time while long-term imparts wit endure into the future.)„ .. I] 0
3. Does the projecthaveimpacts which aruindividually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate resources Where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is ,
significant,),,,....... ..... ... ....., ..... ................... .., ...... .. M 0 4`
4, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on f
human beings, either directly or indirectly?..., , ,. ,, . , ,, , , , , ,. ,0 o[id
'III, DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluatiori
I/WE find the proposed project Ct)UJ.b NOT` have a significant effect on the environment, and a. NEOA`rl'VI!
bECLARATION Will be prepared
tef
/MEfindthat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the MITI GAtIO-N MEASURES described on the attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NkGATIVF_ DECLARATION will be prepared.
IME find the proposod project MAY have a significahl effect on the environment, and an ENViRONMENTAL
IMPAOT REi PRT is required.
BU`fT PLA IN b PARTMIEN
CdUN P T;
February 7, 1989 r3
y:
[)ATE: Brent L .�� 61 5 b, L sn 161.6 P1nner
Paviti od by.'`r
3. WATER. Will the proposal result In substantial'.
a. Changes In currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or
fresh waters?. . ........... ..........., ... ..... .,.....
0 13
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?..
❑ 0
c. Need for offsite surface drainage fmproveme .,.. g to , , , . , , , .. + .,
channelizalion or culvert installation? .. , , , .. , , ntsY Including vegetation removal, i
Q O
d, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters7.............:.............i;,:..:„,
q< W, ENVIRONMENTALAMPACTSP,
o. Change In the amount of surface Water In any water body? ......... .,. , , .
D ❑ f
;(EExplanatiens of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers are required on attached sheet(s),)
❑ 0 11r
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ........,.,,.......,,....I 1
j
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result In significant: YES MAYDE No
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?_. , ......., ..... , ,
❑ ❑
Cg,
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? .. . . ..... : ...:.. . .
❑ ❑
M
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ...........
❑ q
Q
d. Destruction,covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? , , .. ,
❑ O
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? ....... , .; ..... r .. , . , ..
D 1:1
C
f. Changes in deposition or erosion o; beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion n which
may modify the char, '1el of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay, a Jake? ,,, . • �, . x. .ch
.. ..................... .....
0 ❑
C
g, foss :of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? ._.........
❑ O
191-1,
h. Exposure if people or property to ger>Ioglc hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure cr similar hazards? .. ,,. .: :.
❑ ❑
®`
24 AIR'. VAJI the proposal result. In substantial:
a. Air, emissicns or deterioration of ambient a:r quality?. ...., ... , .............., .. ., , , . , , .
0 13
b. T ecreation of objectional,odors, smoke -or fumes?.,.. :.....;,...::...,. 44—......
Cl ❑
[
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperoare, or any change In climate, locally or
regionally? .... ........ .... .:. ....... .... , :. w ♦ .:.. ............ ...
0 CJ
3. WATER. Will the proposal result In substantial'.
a. Changes In currents, or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or
fresh waters?. . ........... ..........., ... ..... .,.....
0 13
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff?..
❑ 0
c. Need for offsite surface drainage fmproveme .,.. g to , , , . , , , .. + .,
channelizalion or culvert installation? .. , , , .. , , ntsY Including vegetation removal, i
Q O
d, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters7.............:.............i;,:..:„,
❑ ❑
o. Change In the amount of surface Water In any water body? ......... .,. , , .
D ❑ f
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface waterquality, including but
nottiimited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? :...:..........:......,...:,,,
❑ 0 11r
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ........,.,,.......,,....I 1
❑ ❑ Ile
h. Change In the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or
withdrawals,; or through Interception of an aquifer by cuts orexcavatiohs? .....:,...,,.
❑ ❑
1. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies! ........
❑ Cl Ga'
J, Exposure of people or property to water related ha, .Ards such as flooding? :...:, ... , _.
❑ l7 i
4, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result In suostahila'I;
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (inclurang treed,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? . ....,:r;
b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ,,,,,,,, f7 I''!
c, introduction of new species of plants Into an area, or in a barrier to the normal
reolenishment of existing species? ;.,..,:.,,..,. ... ..r,..> .................. 11
d. keduction in acreage of any, agricultural
3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements In either marine or -
rfresh:watonl.
fresh watonl.. ,<.....................{ .,,,... .,,... ...............
Cl a N(
b. Changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns{ or the rate and amount of surface runoff?..
i74
>l"XiECNVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
ohannolization or culvert installation'...::........1..................{.{.........,..,
® IL—_ M_
(Explanations of all "YES" and "MAYOE'"'ariswers are required op attached sheet(s).)
CI 13 011
e. Change in Om amount of sorface, water in any water body? ...... { .......... { ........ , .
Ci l3;
t Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but
not limited to temperature. dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ......................»,.....
Cl 0 w
1. EARTH. W11I 'tne proposal result tri'slgnificant, " r "'; YES h1AY8E
NO
a. Ur•i�table cart. c4' nditions or in changes in geologic substructures? , , ... , . , ......... , ..
0
El
Nr
kr, t'r •ptions, displacemt=nts, compaction or ove:rcovering of the soil? ...... . :..........
D
j. Exposure oir people or property to water related hazards such as flooding?..._ , , . , ,. { ,
Ud
„c. Change in topography or ground. surface relief taatures? , , ; . { . . ...... .... .
a. Change in tr,e diversity of species, or number of arty specles of plants (includinq trees,
d{ Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ... , ,
11
0
C1
e, Increase in v ind or grater erosion of' soils, either on or off site? . , ....... { ... , ....... ...
0
n
t
f: Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes In siltation, deposition or
0 1.:1? d
erosion which may modify the channel of a riverorstream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay, Inlet or take% .... .. ...... {....... ...,..,... . .,.... .......
[I
E3
P g y productive 4f• Loss of nate a rIG+.'t#urate five soils outside designated urban areas? .,..., I..Y
D
0
tv
h. Exposure of people or property to geolo is hazards such* as earthquakes, landslides.
earthquakes,
mudslides, ground failure or similar haza g s? ........,. , , { . " 'rthq
, , { . { , , .., , . , .
0
n
24,AJRi Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ..... . .............................
0
0
b. The creation of obleeNonal odors, smoke or fumes?,................, , ..... .... , .....,
d
�
i�
c, Alteration of air movement,, moisture, or temperature, or any dhangain climate, locally or
regionallyl'........... {.•..,,..,.."..............{,.......,,............«., .......
Lf
3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements In either marine or -
rfresh:watonl.
fresh watonl.. ,<.....................{ .,,,... .,,... ...............
Cl a N(
b. Changes in absorption rates. drainage patterns{ or the rate and amount of surface runoff?..
Ci � 1
c, Need for off-site surface .drainage improvements, including vegetation removal,
ohannolization or culvert installation'...::........1..................{.{.........,..,
® IL—_ M_
d, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ............
CI 13 011
e. Change in Om amount of sorface, water in any water body? ...... { .......... { ........ , .
Ci l3;
t Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but
not limited to temperature. dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ......................»,.....
Cl 0 w
g. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters! ...... ......... ,.......
h. Change in the quantity or :quality of ground waters, either through direct edditions or
withdrawals, Cr through interception of an aquifer by cuts of exdavations? .... { .:.......0
UL
L Reduction iro the atnourit of water otherwise available for public water supplies!....
j. Exposure oir people or property to water related hazards such as flooding?..._ , , . , ,. { ,
,b Ci l
4. PLANT (IPE. `Mil the proposal result In substantial'
a. Change in tr,e diversity of species, or number of arty specles of plants (includinq trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? .., ....... ....,,.{....... ..,.,.
0 a V
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ohdangered specles of plants?...... {,'0
a tZ
c, Introduction ,of 00W species of plants Into an area, or In a barrier to the normal
replehishmentof existing species?, .... ........... .... ♦ .. , . { , . ......
d. Roductidh In adreage df any ogricuftutal drop? ........ ... .... r , +.. a . { . r 4 . , { , { . r ..
0 1.:1? d
to E. Will16
,.ANIMAL .the pxoposalresult s'ubsta'ntial YES MAYBE NO
a. Change, in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land
animals7ncluding reptiles, fish and shell fish,'benthic organisms or insects)? ,...,...i... '❑
b. deduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals.? ..1, _b p
0
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrierto"the migration or
movement of animals?....,,..,».».,..1.,..,,.................1,», Ij
,
11
IV
d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?.,;,.,,...,;..,.,.,,,..,,, l]
❑
V
6, NOISE. Will theproposalresult in substantial:
a.. increases In existing noise levels?...........,.,... ❑
(]'
C��
b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels?......................:....,.5.,i,,.,,.,,,,, O
Cl
7 LIGHT AND QLAAE. Will thu proposal produce significant light and g°are? , , , , , ,,, , , , , , , , Cl
❑
'
8, LAND USE. ill the proposal result In a substantial alteration of the present or planned land
use of an area? ... ...... ....,.,11...,,.,..1.. ... .,..., ....... .. 0
0
Ell
S. NATURAL. RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in substantial:
a.. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . Y ..... i ... , . , , , .1 / . , . ,.,, t. , . l , ; , ❑
CI
29'
b• Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? ...................»,,«..,.»...,.,. ❑
Q
10. dvlSK OF UPSET,_ Will the proposal involves
A. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (Including, but riot limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) In the event of an accident or upset conditions ? .,.. ❑
❑
L9'
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation. plan?., ❑'
Ca
❑
'11. OPOPULATION, Will the prbposai alter location, distribution, density, or growk�"t fate of the
human population? .........,.,,,......Y,.;...,,........Y.,�................1,,,,.,1„Y. fO
O
12. HOhouUSING. G. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for addition.
..,_.,,...,,,.,,...Y.,,,...,..11:,.,..,.r.•,..I,Pajs..9,...t
❑
,,.,,i..,M„nal
F1.
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION, Will the proposal result in;
a. Generation ofsubstantial additional' vehicle movement? ..................YY.i1,,,:,,., ❑
❑
L
b. 'Effects on existing parking facilitles, or demand for new parking?,.,. :>., 3
D131/
. ... . . . .... -413 Y
c. Substantial Impact on existing transportation systems? , . , i .. , Y , , . i ... , , . , . , , .. , . , �
0
Cl
d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or rnovement of people tw1lbr
goods? ..... .............. .......
e:Aiteratlons to waterborne, rail or alt traffic?t]
tj
Va”
.•...........................11,,,.,,...;,.,
f, f'iiorease Irl traffic hazards to motor vehiclesrbic c�lisls Or pedestrians?, ..........
y p ; i s o K
d
ti
14, OUSLIC SERVIC S Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in_ a need for new or, x
"altered`.go. eenmelirit services, 'YIDS MAY�BE'Nb
a, f=ire protectic ri7 ... . 1 .; ... 1 . , . « 1, . , .
�
❑
Ct
b. Police prole,,tion? , , . ... .... , .. , ...
c. Schools?.•;> ,:.,..,....+,,<..,..,. A.. ........._....•• „ ,
d, Parks or other recreational facilities? ... . ..... . ..... . . . ., .. , ........... — , . 1 . , ..
b
e Maintenance, •f public facilities, including roads") ..,1...............................
0
11
(Z'
f.Other 'goveri mental services? .... .. . .,.,. ... _.. ..... +1 .....
0
13
�f
15; ENERGY. Will the proposal result in;
a. Use of .ibstaritial amounts of fuel; or energy? ...:.. ..........,. ,.........,,1
Q
o
[
f e
b. Substantial increase In demand upon existing -sources of energy, or require the
develd.pment of net)i -;Durres of energy? A ) A+ y " k'. ,1.' . ........ .. •
�
16, UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in aneed for new systems, or substantiri alterations to the
following:
a. Pooy,.r or n4tural gas?....................................... ...... ,. .... .,
b. Communications systems? ......... ..;.....,:,..,.+..,,...,...............
b
❑
qY
,c; Water availability?,......y.........,..,....,.+.,...ii.. .......,.........+...,...... ,.❑
C7
fV
d, Sewer or septir, yste.:r7 ,....+.:,.,.«..........:....i•.......,:........,....«,....,.,.,
CI
Q
I '
e. Storm water 'drainaae'........••.+...................•..-.....................•.i ....
Ci
d
f. Solid waste and disposal?...............
❑
0
t
r
,1..,................. ................
1,
17. HUMAN HEALTO. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any healty► hazard or potential health hazard (excluding Mental health)? ..,.
Ll
tS
0
b. Exposure of people It, potFntial hO.�Jth haza
r
18, AESTHETiCS. x,9111 the prt,t).r result i:'a ',.ii ob'sttuctl i bf any'sCenio vista or view bpen to
the public-, or will the prop a. :tosuit it, !i'vi ciio' �' �t.an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?.i...•I..IIi�.M ,1.+. .1' ` �. 1.'e •., •A ,.. Y.M. • ...,..1. Y..
0
�}
0
i.1yy{.y
W
19, RECREATION, Will the proposal result in a.t irnl equality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunitieF') .......... ....... i, . .................. ...........1.+1
y1y1
0
�
20, CULTURAL RESOU,kCES',
a. Witir the N, upr,Sal result In the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic
gNhaeologicalsite7 1......... ..............i. .......
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical' or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric tir historic
0
0
rtr
building, structure or object? ....,., ... .,..... ,. .... .•...,
Does theproposal hAvO the potential tocause a physical Chang which would affectuniquo
.
ethnic Cultural valuos7........... :......;...... ),..,..ilii... ......................i
❑
a
"
d. the proposal restrict existing religldus or sacred uses'wlthih the potential ttitpact
�
FM.1
jWill
a; ted? ).•....i.i..:1l,..., k.,i...`%krTsM.)..,.%pi::M/•It•....•ii.•P....,•i)is.k.•).... ..L.i.•
"`
r
14. PUBLIC SERVICE.,'.. Wt i the
i altered government Propos
ent services;R al have an effect upon, a n, or result in a need for new or
a. Frarote
p coon?
YES
.,. MAYBE NO
b r,.r.
. Police protection?..... Sir• .ii.
c Schools? «,,.4. ❑ e C7
d. Parks, or otherrecre,,.:..«ii..4.. Y. ,«. ,i .. '
Par recreational facilities? . i . �'13 0
e,A at ....r• ;.4..i.,:...:i, ❑ ❑
Maintenance of public facilt! its, including roads? ,. ..
f.. Other governi'
mental services? , • } ❑
.;i,,•.•Yr.••
153 ENERGY. Will the proposal result in;
a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase In demand upon existingY p
development of new st�urces of ener ource~ of energy, energy? . 9Y, or require: the
16. UTILITIES. Wilithe- ro
fohowMngR p pOSal result ,Ina need for new systems, or ubstantial alterations to the
i
Powe a• r or natural gas?
b
00mmunlcations S
-
ystems?
.:
c, Water availability? , • D 0�. ♦.,..1 Y. •t..a. •i• �j.
d,Y Y ail .Y. lN'
. Sewer or septic system? . . ; . . Y LL . i ..... i .. ❑ p
Storm wafer drainage? 4.i•. r ❑ p a
e. a » .
.. J.a '
Y Y . 0
I, Solid o«rasfe and disposal? � r . . `.. . i . ,,,.
•..s..-..•,•44 Y.Y,asY...Yirif Y..
»Y: „ r.....,. i. Y.. •.1 }i:.t:; r. i..3.i[i
❑ ❑
(' 77. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in;
I�
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
g ►trent; , health)? .... ❑ &
b, Exposure of people to potential health hazards? . ❑
a a . r • .moi
fa. :AESTHETiCS, Will the proposal result it, the obsiructlon of any scenic vista bev
the public, or will the proposal result In the creation of an aesthetically Offensive
to Public vrew?........ few open to
:43is......... ..... Ysiteo
ei.iii:.i.Y♦aLL;i,..Y.«.ax.i46iI.Y•i.,,a pen
4Y.
b o �
RportunitiProp i re'"ult In an Impact upon the quality orgUanti
19. RECREATION. Will the Proposal recreational o
.Y GY.Yr4311;.i•f4,',',.iiia..... tY ofexistlhg
♦i .ii Y, Y;-[.YG[i•YY i_4Y.ii Yii. ❑ ❑ ILJ�
20.. CULTURAL RESOURCES. V
6-Willaeo agicalsite? ult ih the alteratloh of orthedestruction of a prehistoric or historic
[... a,4i..{YYY4YYi Y,i la4 i... aYi.,❑
b, W"' the proposal result In adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
bulldin structure r ob ectfi
g« q p
Potential i ax[it iY 4 Y - ..i 40ii.41Y�44a. i.1,,'�)'.,, lyirY4i Y. 4.y irI FY 0 ❑ �'�"
C, toes the proposal have the otehtial to cause a phy8lcal change which would affect Unique
ethnic cultural alues� , 4
•.Y Y4 it Yi i4[«-»4.14,:.1 Yii.YYYIY»YLL.sy YyiY:i[[.ilil .YiY[1?. 4''. i.. �i
13
di Wiil the proposal restrict existing roil toes
area? rel
religious dr slated uses within the l Impact
potettitia
..4 4rf'YY YLL:! YL*,iYiiT.Yy'i"iYY Y.F..+Y YY 41'Y'.41\ iY �❑: t.t
D18CUSSTON OV ENVIRONMENTAL EVAwATION AP # 42-55-40
l,b,e,3b,c,f,16e: Development of 21 lots for residential development
will result in some compaction, displacement, and overcovering of
,roil.. The proposed density of one home per acre and anticipated
minimal earthwork necessary to prepare building pads and roadways is
eypected to minimize any significant impacts related to compaction,
displacement, or overcovering of the soil. Residential development
.orf the project site will result in some increased stormwater runoff,
which may create additional erosion on -situ. It is
anticipate' that
installation of curbs and gutters and a maximum residential density
%of I dwelling unit per acre will mitigate .any significant drainage
or ;toil erosion impacts.
lc: The project site is relatively flat valley land. very little
.earthwork is anticipated in developing 21 homesites. No significant
changeIntopography or ground surface relief features is expected to
locCur as a result of the proposed subdivision and residential:
.development
lg,4d: Twenty-one plus acres of historical orchard property will be,
converted from agricultural land 'uses to residential Land uses by the
proposal. The project site is located within the Chico Urban Area
and is surrounded by residential development at urban densities which
has minimized the commercial:/agricultural value of the project site;.
'The loss of prime agricultural land is not considered a Significant
impact.
lh: All of Butte County is within a moderate earthquake intensity
Zone VITT, The subject property is Located approximately 5-6 miles
southwest of the Tuscan Monocline, a. fault system of unknown
activity.' Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code
standards for seismically active areas should provide adequate
protection to residences in case of seismic activity.
8 t The proposed subdivision is consistent with the present and
planned land use of the area. The project site is designated RT -1-A
by the Butte County Zoning ordinance. The sand Use Map of the Count;y`
teneral, plan has designated the project site "Agricultural-
Residential".
13d,f: Roadway geometry and inters] .ion alignments as proposed by
the tentative subdivision map will create significant hazards to
motorists.xt is essential to provide safe and efficient
intersection design from one road link to another, The short
stagge' s in the alignment: of intersections as proposed should be
eliminated to mitigate motorist hazards. The proposed roadway in the
should
' Langel Court,
subdivision should be realigned with Shasta Avenue
and
in addition„ Bell. Road should be converted to a cul-de-sac where it
intersects with. Cussick Avenue and access from Bell Road to Shasta
Avenue through the proposed subdivision should be provided. Other
off-site traffic impacts are anticipated to be mitigated by the
traffic .impact fee which has been levied by the Butte County Roard of
Supervisors for the greater Chico Urban Area to mitigate overall
traffic impacts. caused by urban growth..
14a The proposed project will represent an increase in demand for
fre protection services in the area. Theproject site is located
Wi,�hin the West Chico Fire Station Serv.+ice Area. An a :sessment fee
of $75.00 per lot is required to be paid into the West Chico Fire
Station Benefit Fund prior to recordation of the map. It is
,anticipated. that such fees shall mitigate all significant impacts
azooci ated with the proposed project in relation to fire protection
fa`f:vices
14b The Butte county Sheriff's Department is responsible for law
r,n,forcement and protection in the project area. Rapid development in
;county pocket areas of the Chico Urban Area and restricted budgets
have reduced the department capacity for preventative patrolling and
rapid response to emergency calks
14c: The Chico Unified School. District has been impacted by rapid
urban growth in the Chico Urban Area. School facilities are close to
capacity and as a result a school impact fee has been instituted to
finance new school facilities:
17a: The subject property is within the Chico Nitrate Action Plan
.area. Additional septic systems in this area may contribute to high
nitrate levels in the groundwater. The project will have to meet the
requirements of the Butte County Environmentil Health Department.
ucli requirements are antic.pate3 to mitigate any significant adverse
;impact caused by septic and leachfield systems
20a The project site is identified as an area of high sensitivity
.for archaeological resources. Due to the high, sensitivity factor of
the site, it is necessary= to preform a records check through the
Department of Anthropology; California State University, Chico, in
order to determine if significant sites may be located on the
property. A records check will detArmine whether an archaeological
survey, of the property will be necessary and whether any further
mitigation measures will be needed.
.Recommended Mitigation Measures:.
1. contact the Department of An':hro ol.o
p p gy, California State ,
University, Chico, to request a records check to determine the
archaeological significance of the site and whether any
additional mitigation measures are necessary.
2, Realign intersections of the circulation network within the
proposed subdivision so as to provide safe and efficient
intersection designs:
3 install curbs and gutters to mitigate potential soil erosion
problems and facilitate drainage of the project site,
�6-
DATA SHEET
Project. Description
1 Type of Project: Tentative Subdivision Map
2. Brief Description: Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 21-
acres to create 21 10'(:s of l.ol acres each.
3. Location At the northwest corner of Bell Road and Bay
Avenue, in the Chico urban Area.
4i Proposed Density of Development; 1 dwelling unit per acre:,:
5i Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 5-10%.
6. Access and Nearest Public: Road(s) Property fronts Bell
and Bay Avenues.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual: septic and
leachfiel:d system,
8. Source of water Supply Individual weals.
94 Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to property.
10 Potential for further 'landdivisions and development: No
C further, subdividing possible under current zoning and
General Plan regulations.,
B Environmental Setting
Physical Environment.-
1.
nvironment;1. Terrain
a. General Topographic Character:. Flat valley lands.
b. Slopes: 0-2%.
c. Elevation! 175 ft. A.'S.L
d. Limiting Factors: None.
2= soils
a. Types and Characteristics: vina fine sandy loam,
generally welldrained with good permeability.
Excellent agricultural valley.
b_. Limiting Factors None.
3. Natural Hazards of the Lard
a, Earthquake %one: Moderate earthquake intensity Zone
VIII.
b, Erosion Potential: Slight,
c. Lard"Slide Potential: None.
d, Fire Hazard: Unclassified/urbanized.
e, Expansive Soil Potential: Low:
4, Hydrology
a. Surface Water: None on site.
b Ground Water: Abundant valley aquifers.
c Drainage Characteristics: Property is relatively flat
and there are no apparent courses of drainage,
d. Annual Rainfall (normal)'Limited".draina
e tac,�a
e. Limit ng Factors: g ties
currently exists.
5.
Visual/Scenic Quality! Good.
6
Acoustic Quality: Good:
7
Air Quality: Good.
Biological Environment:
g,
vegetation: valley orchard and agricultural lands.
9.
Wildlife: Habitat: Small birds and animals common to valley
orchard lands.
Cultural Environment:
10.
Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High
archaeological sensitivity. _
11.
Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural-
Residential,
32.
Existing Zoning: RT -1--A.
13.
Existing Land Use on-site: orchard.
14,
Surrounding Area;
a. Land Uses: Single family dwellings at 'urban
densities.
b. Zoning: S -R, SR -1.
C. Gen.. Plan Designation,! Low Density Residential and
Agricultural -Residential.
d. Parcel Sizes! Manges from `1/4 acre to l' acre.
e Population: Urban/suburban densities.
15.
Character of Site and Area! Urbanizing.
Nearest urban Area: Cit of Chico.
!7 ,,
1.. tl avant Spheres of Influence., City of Chico, CAL
Co. t and Chico Unified School District.
18.
°' ipr c e� mep ! s Standards" Urban Area! No
1.9.
Fire rru2'e . ' ;..,; "Service:
a. Nearest X'Zity (S•tate') Fire Station: Station 441
t:
located on Cohass'--,"',n-gad.
b. Water Availability' CAr. Water Service Co hydrants
and tanker trucks.
20.
Schools in Area: Chico tnifieQ" Scitonl District.
+ r. ,`
Oat A
Ob
JAN � 31989
COU1W. Y OF BUZTE
DEPAFZ'1Ti T OF PUBLIC WORKS (7roril18, Cst!falal
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(916) 538-7266
January 20, 1989
J D. Zin'
Doug Timmons RE: AP 42-59-40
,I Walnut Circle Tentative Subdivision clap
Chico, CA 95926
Gentlemen
11is is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the
above-referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department
for environmental .determination, and .to the Environmental Health Department
for its review.
This application will be considered complete _when we have received
notification from, the Planning Department and the Environmental Health
De-partment that all necessary data hwre been received. These departments
will contact you regarding any additional information they may require:
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
_ l
J . Mendonsla
sisttnt Director
/1dc
cc: Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
Nor-thStar Engineering
LD 1120 (Revised 2/88)
n ,
,�.
OP
b
W
F' .t '
t
g.
PTACT SUB, U
PrAt
1� v!
EC. 17, T» / . «w
22N. E 1
w
• D .
00-50
r3�p
,, R.�°. r. ,l fA',' ai X13
�. s
�... r,aIy. '_.."ad .,Lr, rw„X�'�r„' 4.��,a ��'..,■._.
. y x•�`k 1��Pa�� X f��.,+�r'.1°.h�%'w"p,:,wC'�_
.!. l o '.`.�!iJ_'r�'tY.3”Py1 i"t •M .... ��.� �5rS.= '""� �k 'MF ,Iy ' ; {1
NSe'f
7'.. �9
W
IGS.us !GU u`U
4
�yiy►6+
n
IB!!S Rtw
27 Lay
°r9�rdl4
P4,
7AC
p,14ACwiJ ba
14 Oa
f«r , • l.Cl2.I`A«�`
1�C59" C -
rA�'C
PryJ+' —•,.�. ? 3 EcsiJ. vi � "/ ��r`
iCP
"
a t c3'f�ad15�,jCJ1
`. M
ry 3r5xn
4Ai
"
J
r-6�
y
I4 M1l.,6
5.91
�A
I- ,tl64j�n .!k1Aly
14 4
2.2"
v5K 49 OIAC1tiGf
461.�SA
I- ZIA C 1A Z' pAC 7
PUIOZ-74
'00 PhfY
AVE
9 -C- USSICKA.
1. tiGIA
142
21£ \ 4
40
14
1. CIA
M. 9.
14'F . ; YAssessor's I
At'r
TENT. sum), mAp
'
,
.-,.... . �_
�%f�rp�, No 42»59.
p'SrAN,t 1; r $f� ! 104 A0. P. 6'1 y Iw�,+� i
8AY MA �C. apfy tjf �tc�tto t: Cal
L ,
:
it
� vf�fr �rr�, I� 1 n`t.�r