Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-630-032nANNNG COM .3SION SUMMARY SHM .VOA 7 .`�IVU41ion APPLICANT._ Peter Merlo Log#88-03-07-01 ADDRESS___ 1500 West Sacramento Avenue, Chico, CA 95926___,_ OWNEE, ,,,,,;_,_ Same TPM to divide 1.12 acres to create 3 parcels, one ug pAojfC T DFSCRIPTXON-_.......-_. which is 0.83 acres and two of which are 0.15 acres .-in s%ze LOCATIONRe-subdivide Lot 32 o£ Sacramento Avenue ,.'states -- Un l 1 •3 t�Lo 3 -----.r...+......._...,...........�.� C....... parcels, located at the northeast corner of ClotildeWa ryr ncl y t��° t ttC�t�Go,. AR9 co area . ASSESSOR'S PARC;El, NUMBER (S) 422-62-32 ZONINGR-1 GENERAL ptAiTw LDR —PROJECT C:C.i�� il:;a`,i':i';'i�11 �_�_ ..,.....�... W..._...�...a,.. ....:...._..� ,.ate.... GENERAL PLAID C ONVORMANCE VXPORT "G DI1'lt�E APPLICANT S;�CNA7'G,1I LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?— .r _..,»» »,. w..m ..». .., w., , • .4 ,..:: _,» twvs AEP'LICATIV4 RECEIVED March 7, 1988 A(;B, V"" /SC RVB'YOR/CIVIL 'ENGINEER, Rolls, Anderson & Rolls ADDRESS 9'65 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 ` - DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPAREDA� M.»+.t,+w.ru.wwu:.rs,wmw.s:.a.y.+,..:+'.:+.y..+...+...+•..++��- .. ,.�,_..... sW..n.... .:._,��. __-_ , w.._-_..r.:r:....w:.w,wr,a.:r.wY..,.%rs+�w:ir..:.u.w.ww.c.unsrni+-. ,r. _... .. .a.eY.w.. NMk '.ia.w: x-�I EP;fix ;rig t4t4V4Mi., ..�.. _.. CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FlLtD..._y. UET '1 M Ufi11TTON AND T)ATE' NEGATIVE DVCLARA'TION •- DATE AbJ7s'�"�1t� MITIGA'I"T-M N'E"G0Ei. LARA T ION DA'Vr:. ADC.1PTBD -- .w .. FV V , XVIIAt,."r REPORT 'D'DATE �STATT, ..#., _ �....,>r....;._a..w.ay.,.�.�.Y.r� i5y� Y .,,.w... �.:.. Y t.... :..:. �. .,» ..� Y.� . > a., .W.,. .._,�:Y•.Y.�,=..,.�,»w. ... .... .,, , _. i'14�1� � �.��1 .�A`i J. �.l 6�1'�� '6 �1.L��,�r`� � � i l �71.�k'1 e ,.k�..:... �«: _ ..»�»- �rcn"._ _..n,�+«>♦..rr..,.w..+....,... r.,..a . ..m.,... i1D 7.4iC1ltk` AK NCS! YiEA�, rit, I ,'s'i'E ✓c , ,:. , '�- .._ ,.Y. ' ea .. - � �r� :'.-mix.,: ,. 1.11».iriY.w:Y.Y4:.Y+4= a w rsN•. ,k .. Xi,)VrIALSD APPEALUL' ARIN(a �w—:Ps.aw�1 W.�-+..,.�...r.Mr....:WawaM.w..�..-••,.:-a.>rvar l4N.•-...N.Ya.aw.ar.',..w4.r:N.�_. iKr.eo-a,:...k,d..wr.J:.Y.w-s.SI:�M.wu{:+Yi WiM h��f-...N:.i•u Na'=.uvaiilHY H1•ne: :�J'a4: FOR I'LiANNING I.111BIC',1?0RI S R!`IPOAT .,:.�.r4..sYr.i»•`.'u:.r+w++:Y,±.-; .-.-_._wv..i•k _.-vw4,:Y.Ns;,w, Ne'awv:V�sIN:1.�,,. Y!N++..a u.0 .W1i4Y:Y i YrM.'w'..i.a�•1i..V„�YV'.w W+M�M.: 44YYi.+u i:v++ w+'�""'�'Yr>.;..:w'.,M._.+a.w:.:..+.rtMI.r.:iWifY,i.++:.,J.+wwYwN..wt:yroJ.�i::::i,r<..Y..ItrrwrN.l.-�a.ilr::aJvWr.M✓a+YY'«+h ..J�rYf«w.•N'.P,Mp ae'4l> Y..YY.N`Ff+w It I _ _ Eutte, c �� -- LAND OF NATURAL WCAI, IH AND CCAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PU(5WO 1VpgK5 WILLIAM (Bill) CH-PF, f1lPCllot 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . oROVI,l,,I.f, ('ALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone! (916) ,5,11.1,16011 CERTIFIED MAIL RONALD D, McELROY November 16, 1989 Deputy Dtreetar Peter J. Merlo RE: AP 42-62-54, 55, 63 & 64 1500 W: Sacramento Ave, TPM AND BLM Chico, CA 95926 Deor Mr, Merlo; Please be advised thtLt the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear your application on the above-identified property on December 4, 1989. The'AQency will be reviewing the findings from the Planning Department and will be considering your tentative parcel map and boundary line modification. Public Works will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet: The meeting will commence at 9;00 a:m, in the Board of Supervisors' Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, California.. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours William Cheff Director of Public Works John Mendonsa Assistant Director JM/ds attachment cC: Planning Department IuW'i;eiC%nf�►prY�+� Environmental Health Department nira I 7 199q Rolls, Anderson and 'ROILS �ovillm� C,,eliornS Peter J. Merlo id S and L Developers, Tentative Parcel Map and Boundary Line Mo4ification, AP 42-62-34, 35, 63 and 64, creating 2 parcels and modifying boundaries of 3 parcEls located on the north side of west Sacramento Avenue between Clotilde Way and West 8th Avenue. Chico area. Engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public Works conditions: 1 Indicate a 55 ft. building setback from the centerline of West Sacramento Avenue and a 50 fti building setback from tho centerline of Clotilde Way and West 8th Avenue. 2 Show all easements of record on the final map.. 3 Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 4 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 5 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and construct to county standards. 6 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required,. 7 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department. NOTD=CE OH DETE1;,'M=N;.A.=0N TO _ Office. of Planning and 1, searoh ; `'SVP. M- Butte Co"oty 1400.Tenth Street, Room ;121 Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive or 4 Oroville, CA 95965 JUL P, c ��?8 X County Clerk County of Butte SUB-7m;CT ; Filing of Notice of Determination in compl irance with Section 21108 or 211.52 of the Public Resources Code: Log #88-03-07-01 Project Title AP it Name Tentative Parcel Map 42-62-32 Peter. Merlo State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (ix submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 538-7266 Project Location at the northeast corner of Clotilde Way and'Sacramento Avenue, Chino area. Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 1.12 acres to create 3 parcels, one of 0,83 acre, and two of 0,15 acre; This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on duly 251 31988 and has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project:: 1. The project will, X will not; have a significant effect on the environment. 2'+ ...An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CBQA. X _ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures X_. were, Ware not, made a condition of the approval of the project: 4i A statement of overriding considerations was, ._X wntj not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final 'UR with comments and responsaa and record of project approval is available to the general public at; Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Date Received for filing and Posting at OPR. .4 A,,# . g Lire }_ till Turpin, Senior planner Deter Merlo Tentative Parcel Map Mitigation Measures AP442-62-32' 1. Contribute $75.00 per lot into the West Side Vire Station Improvement Fund. 2 Contribute a pro rata share towards ,improvemcnLo of Sacramento Avenue and its intersection with I-liJhway 32. Inter-D►epar me64', Mem®randUM To;. Advisory Agency FROW Manning 'Director SUNMcl" TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR PETER J. MERLO_, AP#42--62.32 DATE July 13i 1588 This is a propospl j divide 1.12 acres to create 3 parcels, two pare, -Is a+, . - ;:.ees each., and one parcel at $3 acres. The present zoning is R-1. The Chico Urban Area. Land Use Plan of the Butte County General. Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential, and the Safety V,".loment indicates that this project is in an Unclassified fire hazard area. As conditioned, the proposal does not con- lict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan., Recommend approval subject to the following conditions and mitigation measures (M)' 1. Contribute $75.00 per lot into the West Side Fire Station on Improvement Fund. (M) 2.. Contribute a pro rata share towards improvements if Sacramento Avenue and its intersection with Highway 32. (M) 3. All lots shall meet the— �quirements of the Ry -1 zone. 4. Prior to recordation of the map, remove or bond the remota]_ of the shed and covered parking so that it 9:s ,Viot in any required setback area. cc: Peter J Merl:o R01180 Andorson & Rolls Inter -Departmental Memorandum TO: Advisory PROM Planning Department SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Ma DATE.:. March 2--, 1988. p of Peter J. Merlo, AP 62-62-32 .� This land division request Avenue Estat,. covers Lot 32, Phase Of the s Subdivision recently Sacramento Avenue y approved and I of the Sacramento Prepared, Estates a recorded. At the time The initial study outlinedpplication, an initial stud Sacramento A=venue Estates Subdivision, all expected y Was consideration of this ision, and imPacts of the tentative it is Su for Parcel map.. 'Two mitigation measures were attached ff:ic3ent apply to this subsequent division. to the original subd` i:vision which 1• Contribute $75.00 improvement ;fund. Per lot into the West Contribute a pro rata share towards Side Fire Station 2. Avenue, Highway improvement: g Y 32 Intersection. o,f Sacramento 3. All lots shall r'eoc the requirements of the R�l zone, Straddling the common and covered Property lines between Parcels 1 com parking area; The structure and 2 is a shed 2OmP y With the minimum 15 ft. will need tt� be rear yard setback, moved to (Ordinance Number DIT it Cc:Peter Merlo Polls, Anderson, and Rolls a TT T, r11'ltl:,�iil g 1.ro �n[1Nry�1` i,ll? lit1T7'li !%+'�'t'1RUN;+ililJ7'AL L:111 C'1y1.I;;7' ( FORM 'to `fie czianplezec7v'[� .' ~, 1 c<trY) Pt09 MERL ,, 1 4I 6`022 2J." 1, N,mo ref proponent PETER J2m15-02'03 and 04 2. O Address Of Proponent and ropresentative if c .,Peter J, w._..:_ �._ ._��..a..Me_�rlo_. appl it°ttMtlt'+ Rt.2 Box g2 �Fzco. 9'2 9 6 5 Fir-- ASlltf�.t�la..llo1sv .� 0 L description Chico, CA garjp project Tentative •. �tNlr Subd� vision MAS A'tq tlj rrcNrr rcnr�rr,> K� E y •►, 11OV!, the project have quillits. of tltc e e tine potential to degrade the habitat of nviranment trade thy+ a fish or wildlife substantially = reduco fish in tvilKll i f c population to dro species, , causo n ant►n: levels, threaten p below sej f' rl t'ommunit to eliminate a plant or range or Y, l.reduce tite number or t•estrlan rhe eliminateaimporttlrrtendangered plant or animal or Of, California histor 'ant of the major Y, or preitistor,,p Periods b • 17oes th IAYlTIi N(1 ., Short-term have tile potonti;tj to acitivvr. onvironmenr,�l to the detriment of ton i- en��ironmenf isals? (A short-term iml�,ctntthe, tatiel p+.yriod One tvh.ich ►trcurs in rt relation t �wntjurc ot, time tvlrale long,.tarm ihll),tors will iron the ftrturc+,j 1K lhrL5g the ctll}" limited l�ic, h, vL imps -tots wirirh rt'c� i ,. brt Cumulati�t'11" � ch ZIN-t i dividu- ivltetre rhe ern r nprl^t on two car° mot b sty �a C':1 small lvh Trat_t on etich 'ro.st.allr'er.� is t'C it 1Ti��1 501171cos impaCtr;hon tilei �. the el"i•et,t cif file, tour t', i ronmrnt iw of thane :�4c�ni1'it';inY,� ��. illoes allile pro,it�G- 11110 envi'l7nmental a!'1'rLt-g whic' 4 A will e4irr�e slit t� tett ial adder"ac • �.�, boings, c�itht�r :1'.. ffoutw tl V J t, on htimirn 1 T 1, 1'Ttri i ►"�'C t 1.1' �?.�.�1'1`;1�„�1T�r�1"1Ct", I; t� '' Oil t ht�basis tpl�tkra! l,r l.r;r►s'l ;��t �. �.,,m bas i : t`ltc ens}"! Tr�i4t. tit I ired tlit g,l°,r, ! r ►til th+ 4'ttS r l`ttirtii.h'n,ati+! `.' t; I j 1 r t f „1,110 f+ �al'1 hrrazH ¢l � a tri r"ix°.liit� effect ! Im, i`iJlcf t`lirli r� I �h t �. C1'i ItI:C.1,11C,�'I'IrrR, wr 11 fa► ►at t*frail°eci,. i rtit't t� f`t'c + i ►rh r? .� lig 1°► iaMr 'tir,l r ^rr I,ti till \� * trri�a,.,r+i i I !t't't' I Cali;ll.i hit't'i� sl � l,lti ri. .,.. lt,i tl lt'i' I t.:\ Iy ttj Fifa i 'late ti �c i. the ittCrr,�irt i tint p.. Villa*.t a l,ktifit tart Cl1:C'1,1f>.11ltt', t,i 1 ; �t' tri K°,1 r�l,ic�tf Cr► A. t!lt► tic," 1,1bod rata di tt Itt p rn i ►�r t, A Nl.C1,1i'T1tr, l.'lsl. i incl tltra tile tnlit'unr�lt�r�f l kit �1-� h,lt.�. rt '��il,ttifi�rittt , it,11'i:t t ",1 C Idt►tia+l1 ti'I'ali, it`llr.t(:`t" lrl.l'Cria'l' �:►i'tt t ott h 2 .i>. i"cr7uiteri, Ctrllrt`��C�t� C11� 1311'i"1�1 , l'l=lh'N1Ntl D1:17A111'M1:NI' Laura - r tre Platinax '+ TV', }1h1V7�RONhirIVT'AT, IMPACTS 4 U anatzons o a 1 "yes" and "maybe" answers aro �'cquiresi on attached sheet(s)) 1. ;ARTH. Will t}ie YES Proposal result in significttiit+ a.Unstable earth conditions MAYBE NO or in changes in geologic substructures? bi Disruptions, displacements, compaction ole overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or relief features? ground surfaco ---- d. Destruction covering or modification o unique ' ;�� h'tty q geologic or physical features? e. .increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or K off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach -- sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which inay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the any bay, inlet or lake? ocean or 9. I,Oss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban area? • Exposure of peopleor property to �;..,,.. hazards such as earthquakes, 1.andsl des mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 2, AIR. Will the proposal result iri substantial; a. Aix emissions or deterioration air quality'? of ambient by The creation of objectionable odor ----- or fumes? s s stnolce k C. Alteration of air movement, moisture; or temperature; w or an change i_"4 locally or regionally? n climate, 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water ]movements in either marine or fresh waters? b• Changes in absorption rates, + or drainage c. rateount of g patterns, � draina�erim rove- ments, including vegetation ---- removal) cha n ization or culvert installation!al, channel- d, :alterations to the course or El' of flood waters? k ey ' Change in the amount of surface �vater ill any water body? =— --. f• Discharge into surface i� z or in any -- alteration of surface I watwxxrs, but not limited to tompe •ar q alItYj including oxygen r or turbidity? S• .4lteration of the di ' recti a�z or rata} i"l of ground waters? h, Change in the quanti,tyor either through direct adrl quality O vi t �or1n i dratvals, or through inte7•ception of an by cuts ore caVa.ions`t i Reduction in the amount of Water otherwise Grail abxe for public Water, supplies? j; exposure of peoplo or property to water . related hazards such ns flooding? �. .. YES MAYBE NO 4: PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in subgtatxtial: boll' a CTi,inge in the diversity of species, or num of any species of plants (including trees, and aquatic plants)`, 1L - shrubs, grass, crops, b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, t°nM � or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into tall area, or in a barrier to the normal replew shm ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S. ANIMAL LIVE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. C ange in the diversity of species, or numbers of animals (birds, land anboal,s of any species including reptiles, fish and shall fish, benthic organisms or inseots)o b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? of animals �- --° c. ornof resultwinpacies barrierto the migration an area, or movement of animals? d, Deterioration to existing jIsh or wildlife v habitat? 6 NOISE. W3,11 the proposal result in substantial: a Increases in existing noise levels? levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produ('- r, s .gni icant lig t and glare? -- -- F 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? `4 9. NATURAL RESOURCES: will, the proposal result in substantial: a, Irn :rease in the rate of use of any natural resources`!' 1 b. Depletion of any non-reno'wa b—' � resources? 14, RISK. Or UPSET. Will the proposal involve: WA res } At explosion or the release of ha;Aardy a ,ous substances (including, but not limited to, oil., pesticides, chemicals or radiation) i"ra tae event of an accident or upset conditions? _ � .�• b, Possible interference with can emergc,ncy evacuation pl4all? , '` . response plan or emergency � 11, �-. rION, Will the proposal alttar the loc:;at it)n� POPUI the hrarraa t , a7striFulxon, density, or growth rate of population?' 1 HOUSIN(a. Will the proposal ai fpct existing hor_tsing, housings or crorl. s a demand for additional _= Yh," RAN SPORT,kTICN/ CIRC '%T 1gN . Will the proposal result in: a, Generation of substantial additional. vehicle movement? g asking facilit , Or Effects on eXistir p demand for new parking?transportation, C. Substantial impact on existing -. systems?to I atteriis d. significant alterations to present People le and/or of circulation or movement of p p goods'? ;Alterations to raaterbornc, rail mato rLvehicl.es ) 'increase in tra�aestriansd's o f' cllsts or p bicy 'rBI.IC SEkVJC S will ��.he proposal have an effect P d for new or altered DIAY .iE �, _.-----------'. upon, or � esLllt �:n a nc.e governmental services:. a, `Fire protection? b police protection? C. sc�1� cls? `-"-- d. Parks ar other recreational1including e, Maintenance of pub/---- roads" f, Other governmental services? �jil.l the proposal result in: or �. is. ENERGY. f substantial amounts of fuel' existing a `--fie o' u b , substantial increas ©r+ require the development s o f ener gY , --- soul4— af new sources of energY'� ed YTrE�_, jVill the prapasal alterationsin atnoethef or l b U�' T._ _----- -- o r s u'b s t ant s al new sti-stems , f 011 outing. �. a, power or natural gas?b. Cammunication5 systems? .....— d, Sewer or septic tank? _ e, Storm. water drainag'e"'.": solid wgste and disposal' Will the proposal result .:.H8ALT11, health hazard or potonti al. w µ c en o f anY (excluding menta 1 health) a .1•-hrh0,%0, le to potential health b .G• of peov ham:. ,, ' ,�'l .the proposal result in teroi to 18 AtS`.fIEVQCS, ,cenir vista or View op tructIon o.. ��.ti, w.ho proposal result in tl�o the public, or l� offensive site opel7 creation of an cnl •�' to public= view's 4 ��a i y8 tJAY NO l9. RECREATION. Will the proposal. resin. 'n an impact upon the quality or quantity of exise. :., recreational, Opportunities?% , - 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehic'orie or historic building, structure or object' c. Does the proposal have the potential to 4. use a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacreu uses within the potential impact area? u V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AIS 42-15-02,03 and 04 See attached. } ... .... / .:.:. . ........ ... .. .... ... r.. . ...:..-:y ;.,v : .;_,...s _.. 1,}i;,.,r irarr .. .w wf+.'r. .. ., N.a .: +.W,. n.y...�3ii;:.e,f.+YWr q:,., p..ryN «.v . 'Y tv r'.lY:•tl bA D 1201 "s 1 ..N G NV I aiVM NT AL EVALL) l IAN AP 42 -v; -,()p1 its and 0,01 West Chico, on the urban side of the Green line, ropidly developing. Along Sacramento Avenue, subdIvis parcels of 6,500 to 13)000 sq. ft. This proj 10n$ Infill. ect ),i Uoban-,,tuburbrjn I'he Genera I P I an des i gnat 1 on on s I to I s Lout -Dens I c Rog 1 dent I a l. The 00151 gnat i on was establ 1 shed by the Ch I cc Area Land 1_1te pl an on which an EIR was Prepared. All general 'Impacts resultino FO were 8n,31YZed and adcressed at that time. CEQA OM developmont that: 1 59 83 (a) In approving a residential proj*ect meeting the roquirO eMents f this section, a piblic agency shall lilyllt itt; j_jxaml nation or environmental effects under CEQA to effects whIch- Arita peculiar to the project or the parcel on which thQ P(-Oject would be lotateds although the effect m8Y occur on or off the site of the PrOi'-'-"ct1 Vnd Were not analylhd as significant effects In a Prior EIN on the ZOMiho or community Plan with which the residential project is consistent. (b> The aPPlIcation Of this --Ottlon shall be limited to residential Pl"Qjet4ts which are consistent with a community Plan adopted a-, Pbrf: Of 8 general Plan or a zoning actioll whic-17: (1) Zoned or designated the parcel on which th e oroj,ict woul located to accomm,',date a Particular density of residentid be al development, and (2) WOS the subject cc an EIR ceri-,Ifiod by the Lead Ar,)P-mcy far the Planning or 2,%Iihq a,,tion Thc� initial study will thtron impacts this deYeIop1,0M4-. Potul I a,- tc: 1b: APprnxlmate. 11/ hiilf of thf, pr' ,Operty 1411, 0V0r*'cOv'--r1ed by roade; 'Ind buIIC,t;10S. 1110 PQr-r y 1 Wated on and swrrounv� 1,)y pr I me, :1!3 1'..,Irld tt t, urban �3r, r)nvr1_siren_ (18 Unavbldab,�-,. 'i 2b,C: i=Ulj urban dr,4-0naoe w", tle t1equ I red tri --;ul-,�rmoO OPP-site ImPrOveMents may Lie .' thit pr a, oM rwrr Sacramento Ayoriuo, , I I rod to t, I e I nto F,,,.jr I 'I bovo 1 Of"e- I form a �dro I h,�Iej (�j I k to CSA 479 (010 Chico Crjec, demoDownstreamI ty -1,1 1 1 . -ated, ac 4a,d: Twenty-two acre,,s of almonds wil I be Uprooted. Removal of the troes will contributes to declining production and crop yields. 8oyond the economic impacts expected (loss of business to dryersj hullers, --vood chemical firms, etc.), tree removal will affect neiI ghborl aesthetics. Trees provide shade, moisture, visual rollef from urbanizatiOni generally Improving the appearance of a nelohijorhood- Only those trees within rights-of-waY and proposed bwlldlng foundations should be removed. Trees should be ratalnod along West Y.',acramento Avenue - t.,j: construct I on act I v I ty shoul d be 1 1 in I ted to 7 a, ((1. to 6 P m Monday through Saturday. -- project complies with the General Plan and on I 130,c: Average daily traffic is estimated at goo ve�llcles.' Recent counts for Sacramento Avenue are: 4,5$0 west of Oak Lawn 570 at Glenwood 12,990 east of Highway 32 On the adjacent stretch of Sacramento Avenues traffic will incrouse ItZurbj gutter and sidewalk along West Sacrament Avenue sand t)acra- nento Avenue may need to be WICICnOd- Inf.artor streets Is needed. The Sacraffiento/Hlghway 32 intersection is In need of Improvement, t-ealignment and sionalization. Developer should contribute a Pro rata share towards its Improvement. interior streets should bf, realjonpd to connect with r0ilds ,_south of Sacramento Avenues l 4: 51r -o protection Is 10ade'quate tqow �t of thr r:illroad tracks4 A now station Is needed in tile genet -al vicinity- All ?jeveloper$ in this nelohborho6d have agreed to tontribut-la $75 per lot for construat10n Of a fire Station. bulldin,,) perm jt.will be 'IzubjeCt tO chcaol fees If isssus-2d withln four yi!-2ars. i 6c I d". C,:)rrMUr0ty water and :ewer "!Oa t 81,1tty�: C,;tunbyGanera*, May havo been occupled by fiat lvc� Amorlcnrit; anis Although the 18md has bets -n ri iurvo%, will be roc�jljlr'ed.: P —th- r_1 t Tiro map needs to be v*0d0jS1i:0ed tO cl t'1�5r" s� or ltllerlear lotsy 7,!5. T oo 't. ontiorner lobs. Lot,! ;, and 61 haysdouble W-10 tre.b . le froh,-Iaoei which It. uhde5lrnbIeh A 15- fOQt side yard setback needs to be provided buildiMOS and Lot 32, F? r�gmm�snded-M'i,��at i an ensure$. 1. Annex to CSA #7q- 2. Retain almond trees on each parcel. 3. Limit construction activities to 7:00 a.m. 600 P.111 Monaay-Saturday. 4. Contr bute pro i^ata share towards improvement Of 3acr,umen.`O Avenue/Highway 32 intersection. 5,. Realign interior streets to connect with roads ' bh of Sacramento Avenue. into the West Side Fire Shat i anti xmImprovement6 . Contribute $76 per lot Fund.. 7, Have an archaeological survey prepared- r3. Rodesign Map to comply with section 24-33 and Subdivlsio"t ordinance. • ApPlIslant : Peter J. Morlo 06 Assessor `s Parcel it 01, and 04 Log it 86-02-26-01 DATA -!aji- EE- T A. 1. Type of ProJect: Land division, 2. brief Description: Tentative su:dlvlslon Mop dIvIdino 22.2 acres into ninety lots of 6,600 Sq. ft. and Ono lot of 1 B. Location: On the north side of Sacramento Avonue across from its intersection with Sb. Amani-- DrlveChico arta. 4, Proposed Density of Development: Net 6 d.u-/bai, gross 4 5. Amount of impervious Surfa-Ing: Roads 7.7 houses 8-8+- 64 Access and Nearest Public Roads 5: Access 0('f Sacramento Avonuek City of CHco reolonal sewage 7. Method of Sewage DisPosalt system. a. Source of Water StApPlYt. CA' Water o 9. Proximity of Power Lines! To orloinal patIcOl. JO. Potential for further land divisions and development: Development of 90 homes"te-3- will follow recordation of the mapa �c ranent 0. General Topographic Character: Level valley land. b. SIOPe$t +/,- 2t, c. 'Elevation: +,,'- 170'% d. L1mltIhq 5rictoi-81 Nonce Solls a. Types and Character- iVtlavFarwttll Loam 6+ Feet well SUPPI 1 od " I th 0 qan 1 C mater 1 ;;311 ; sinooth surf ace s prod,� surface q Urfate arid u�,ut-face dralina,,.0, b, LI'm itli-10 Factors! None. 3, Natural Hazai-ld-k', of the I -and a. Earl hqu6ko. Zone! Morjrjra, o &'-",jne V1t1- Cro8ion Potehbial: Nonf:i iC-o d* r1ro Hazard: UrbahlZnrl- e4 EXpaht, I Va So 11 Patent I a 1 L -OW 4,, Hydrology a. surface Water= None, on site„ b, Groundwater: U,jdfarltiln by area nP nlbrobn contaMlnatlort , Ural nage Character-Istics! Drc-11nay Chico Cre;!y. -9- .M * d Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24 P. i_im tine Factors (Jutside. of Sacramento Avoinu Dry nmga District 5. Visual/Scenic Duality' Fair. 6. Acoustic Quality: Fair. `/. Air Quality Fair. ofaaicaFn�yirc�nmcnt: 8,. Vegetation Almond orchard. 4. Wildlife Habitat: Limited to .hlyds, 8quirrelij otc Cul n.jrgl L nv i rt onmen 10. Archaeological and H,i storr i cal Resources In the area' High- 11. igh•11. Butte county GeneralPlan designation: Low-Density Res i dent, 1, a`1 12. Ey;isting Zonings A-SR. i S . Ex i st i nq Land Use ora-site:. Almond orchard and homes i to - 14 Surrounding Area-* a., Land Uses: Single-farmly residential b. Zaan i ng A-SR C. Ginn . P 1 an des i great i ons ; Lore-Density Residential. d. Parcel "81zes 6,506 sq. f i to 'I acre. e. Population: Lown density residential. 15. Charactser of Site and Area: Rapidly devoloping residontlal area in orchard lands. 16. Nearest Urban Area: City of Chico. 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: city of Chico, CA Water- IS. S. Improvemt nLS Standards Urban Area: Curb, gutter, s i dewri i k , dra i mage) fire hydrant-, rr i 1 l be required, iq. Fire Protection Services, a. Nenrezb County (State) Fire Station'. 0441 4 miles b. Wator Availability.' Engine caPacItYi hydrants 2p. Schools in Aron: Chico Unified School blstrlct --