Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-640-015M ^4 h l _ t ^4 h l _ �M rM: 7/AA MA 0: 1.1. TOTAL INFORMATION f0w.AAGEMENT CORPORATION Emeryville 0S.snta Clara ► Sacramento P18P-0018 - PLANN ION SUMMARY SHEET FOR ,..t Zai .COMMIES R t {7 DIVISION'S P-71-1ICANT James A. Stevens Lbg# 91-06-04702 G 5; 1875 Oak Way, Chico, CA 95926 ir+►J Stevens', Terrence and Ingrid Butchart RROXECT DESCRIPTION: _ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP and BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION. parcels L0'G�kCti; On the south side of Oak Way; approx. 300 ft. east of Almond Vista Court, Chico area. ASS SSOR'"S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 042-640-015 and 022 ,WfG ASR GENERAL PLAN LDR PROJECT CONSISTENT? Yes GTM2,,,Al PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT _ 5/28/91 DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE LAN CONSERVATION, ACT CONTRACTS? _. Na DATE: APPLICATIW J 8CEIVED 6/3/91 ASENT /SURVEYOR /CIVIL ENGINEER: DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR"S REPORT PREPAREDw maaRol MNTAI, CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE FILED`_- DZ.;ER�Ll NAT10N A. DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED - MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTEDlb ENV IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIFIED STATECLEARINGHOUSE NO. - SM C`WMITTEE MEETING DATE-_.. ADVISORY AGP.NCY fiE_kRING DATEg le) {c ADSORX AGENCY ACTIONA— 1),r is D _ 1 Cbl' 1) t n i M(? Y/ i'! { e 'Mi'm a MUS APPEALED,_, APPEAL HEARING DATE BOARD ACTION commEN'S FOR PLANNING DIRECTOROS REPORT ASSIGM Tb_ DISK" rl , r' 1 C� _ TENTAT'",ttiESUBDIVISION TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PRELINI1`.idARY SUBDIVISION WAIVER APPLICATIOrT (Please cheek appropriate box) APPLICANT: k 4"e S A . Fki PHONE NO: ADDRESS,: 19 7,!i CWNER: PHONE NO: ADDRESS ENGMErER ' CR Fb7MYOR :. v�iMt�l PHONE NO: MILL&j ADDR.ES S MAIL ITOTICE OF liEkRM TO: LOCATION` OF IMOFERTY: TawNsHIP RANGE SECTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUDDk--R: 1.5-,Z,% 2Z- TOTAL ACREAGE PLEASE SUB14IT PRE GARY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (deed viNhin. ?ast six months) WITH APPILT_aA,TION. INDICATE BELOW 711 DATE Ain RECORDII1V-I�s� R44AT ON SY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR NRCEL WAS CREATED -BOgt la8 PAGE NUMBER AND SIM OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (includilzg any remainler): DISTANCE TO NATURAL AL WATER COURSE OR STOPM DRAIN: PROPOSED ;METHOD OP SEWAGE DISPOSAL! �C FY (Check with Health Department PROPOSED =Ma of WATER': (Check 'with Health Department) DGPOWER AND PHONE LMS EXIST TO TIM BOUNDARY OF THE ORIGMi t '.. PARCELS IF XOTy EWTIKhTE 'INE DISTANCE THSY WILL HAVE TO BE EXTENDED: LD LOBO ,�e�iscc. 7-24_g J 4 IM -14E OF NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD: DISTANCE TO MAIIEST WBLIC ROAD- ,(For OAD For i.nforna ;ion on nearest pu>rldc road, check Witli ', . biic Work:' Department XF ACCESS IS BY PPESCRIPTIVE RIGHT--OF-WAY', ATTACH DOS:; ibMiTATION 'TO TtiIS APPLICATION. ,TF ACCESS IS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE ROAD EASEMTS!I', DEED REFERENCE: VOL IE PAGE IF THERE ARE ANY NO A1:CESS STRIPS,, MESE MUST BE 63HOWN ON Tjj3 TENTTATIVE MAF' AND TIM RECORDING DATA INDICATED BELOGI VOLUIE PAGE :DIS=ICE TO CITY IDUTS HAS THE OWNS I OF THIS ",u,EL ,CRCATED A1,4Y CONTI1 ARC8LS? / C� Sf6NA,'.C'(Tf2E�$ OF RECORD _ FOR OFFICE USE ONLYw i y To Subdivision Committee; 'To Adv;i,soxy- Agency: ., 1 -fust 'lake Action By Appeal to Board of Supervisorsi, E=-iration date; Cotur�e-fit s = ' • ,..�..� l� j ,..raj Receipt 1Vumbert198 Total. Received: Oag, ivat�tGo�a�Z. r nCl. [661 X� l I,b IWO Revised 7-24-30 FOR OFMCE USE ONLY, ;11111 to t.,var>ty f' I14,rn►i ng. Deer, . RecCJ pt 11 10" 1' el 7 Count. y C:ertt er, Drive 7 /iPS is Orovi' I Iri, CA g5t)(6-3`397 A I Plicarit ( lift) 5 12f'7EID'i AP U U r Subdivision Name (if appticabLe ) APPENDIX H J1,1n. Mod LAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS ,Sraa lCflental. Information for Plannitisz Department :. 1.1sk and describe any other related permits and other public approvals ` roqu i rets .for this project, including those required bycity, regional, :t nt o -aridfeueral agencies ^j`W' Qf/E� Go0/,t,/1-��Z��J 20 Proposed schadoling/asso.ciated projects: 1, Anti -%ated incremental. development (phasing of subdivision units, fut.uric development plans); 4- Wimt method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe h0W on -Site and downstream drainage channels Will be Affected, PL'OX1J11ity ()f wat.et• for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds~ ett,); 6 iJi I ( a Xenvat inn or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estimate): Mrovl Ions for trovet to p:roperi;y (rural and mounbainot18 aroas ,ply). ti, i NVfftt;titIMENTAL ltlf'A ,"1`aAND lltT,1 A'.'1ON IJEAt,t'Rris1.Si fill -lit i i` t pnt ('qlt i71,1.v saignifirant. Pnvi.ronmenra.l jinptaetti ;a'Ssoc.iatuci whir ihr, l;artil iivisirsn. What project desEgrt ,fcaturps ,117 Spacial condi;i�tl. Yrf oIII Prow.tI (miI,igat,imi inpastlres ) are proposev to aIlwriv1e potoil t.ial ally i r•munentae 1. it rt•:s? �.t. !".f+l•i l lxt)N:di��l`i`AL .Sfs'' iti�st t fli�e.t'itA t110 prof cCt Site as it r.xi,01 bef Ove Ole i)rojeccv, it .s,tlirt� iial=srr^.at ',4�n c'r1 opc,gr�,eitllw, soi t 5h"14i liI.y, jr t7fi; .IrSrl wi r m,l1 s Rawl zIny Cultural, ni Stor ica l or 'scen'ic aspe?t.t -,q. Do -w ibe ativ axi.5t.tnl; Struct"ur"es ern Lhe sixth, ind the use of lilt' '0 1`11CIAI IS i 9 r' 10tgCCVS HAVE lel f)otwrilre the :surrounding proPerties, includiilg information on Ii1 atifs and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspect. J litditale• the typrs of land use. (residential, eronunarr.i71, etc,)s ltiF ltarid u % a iion e - fan, iLy, .apnnrtmo°rrt houSr;S, shops, delta rr- n'it3If? .s't+rt•t!4, ("tt:.), and 3t-ale5 0 riaVelOP11101t`(fie ig t, irontagu, tit ¢r.'dt"it, 'rear yards etc,) FX T 7 U?1OA1b C n %'O /iJG,li f,1% CPR tt1'11'fi:A"1"It?hi; f hereby ceYtii v that the statemerr4s -fu> ritshed above --and itt t 1te.rt t,tt•ll0tf PXhi hi t.s present the data and informGr'timi required for this irlrt ial evallia:tfoll to I'lle best of my abil-tlty, aria that the facts, statements selr�l itil($111l.ttrrrtr prosonted a>re true and correct to the best or my knowledge rtlil For r��,tr�•!•clr el t} slle"etC fill- longe t, rt+spurl.ses. , It's auaWdnlartg� Mai f3�•� h GJ5:NM7ZAr. Pi.ATT C0t1TVQRM.AN`CE REPCiF�T r G(5 1'OR 'PARCMIL MAP nR 8TJ$DTVx__Si0l�7 T°IF�Tc' hams 1-4 to be completed by applicant;, 1. APPLICANT NNIE MW ADDRESS10 l K ILI 2, PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S); PROPOSED USE; MMu follawinp items are to be completed by the Planning Department.; 1;L" "E"''T ZJNING: -t , w LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT: � .. r`A1'r PLAN DESIGNATION: ns Armen*.ISiro='Desikation Cr-'-eria: YES . NO It is recommended that you parform the following checked items: 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK •BOTANIi^;AL SURVEY_ GEO;,OGTCAL SURVEY a _ 6, 7. ,S NO >S, W1311TN DEPARDIM OF FIFISH '-'-'- AND GAME DEVELOPhMNT ZONE: . g0„ WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: WITHIN AtEAt SPECIFIC OR C-taff Determination! Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL, PLAN: 1, Land Use _ z, _ Xf Yes, 2. Consertvatiori ' Nanio of P1::ri 3, Open Space u 4. Safety - ' / WITHIN UR130 RESERVE; Si Noise V If yet 6. rousing .'t Nelme of Itc.."eaA,, , 7 Circulation T}IT;iCi.`'!> r a , 9.p .�: �,'.°� <'<"`r •" ,>•' AIRPGsR'.%. YdhU 4131 TL+11V �..rx.'tt",1�:�`i:;: � •"' "A • � �' _� i' •: .� _ i.%i'''�r. . �r,..o �.f `�y,f Fi�°' � � ✓'°." ✓ d °r �'' >J�.:,..�r .:'w.:,c. .:.1n : Iti ._ .,r G."..:.. %'� � rte.. .. !:Pt" ,•i'.-: r .. i1„1 ` . � w„,,r'' .p kt r „T-11VI C FOR T11R '12„�iu�UEST.D L.1s1si DIVISIoN, AM At�ttiRl: OF l sa ctUUi""1: TA. I 1s,1.:r:+1I'1tiY tCly ?o.. ;I : 1Itt� ... . ".. rsN +:,c.1, WITH TiTC Gi��t, [ :.td ,, tb ZONING ✓ airy � r/y �i .,.,..:� ... _ _.. Sibr►ai.arr of A>aP+l Cr,'Sl — v i ,ta'.vivL twill r-mpr l to , a c . mzanttss fr3ht thew do t �'t" iu1T br� t�is..�'#Lklt d 3+� (Yid � G<, 0l t1'1+-�„yn.1 rl*�i't:.11Y•!'�� L 31) i3`d (revi8ed 6 �87 ) if C,,'E- 7:7ZAT-- PT-Alar CQT4- "oiMAN L REhaRT :FOR PARCEL "MAP . PLn ST7P,D=VSSYOIV' MAP to be completed by tipplic Sr'PLICANT N1I'�E AND ADDRESS: C� r ' �+ PROJECT DESCRIPTION:'" rx ASSESSORIS PARCEL NUMBER(S): 4, PROPOSED USE; -The following items are to be completed by the Planning Department: CURRENT ZONING: LAND CONSERVATION AGRmENT: GMERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: �%� C - ' i DavelammentjSits Desienation Criteria. YES NO It is recommended that you xatform 2. '^ �-�-- the following checked items: ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK 4. 4. BOTANICAL SURVEY 5 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 6. 7.; YES NO $+ WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF 1:ISfi — AND GAME DEVELOPMENT 'ZONE- 9. It1. ' WITHIN' FLOOD :PLAIN- WITHIN AREA SPECIFIC oR Staff Determination- Substantially conforms. to: LAND USE ON: GENERAL PLAN: 1. Land Use �� � _ If Yes) 2. Cons4rvat:on Name of Plan 3. Open Space 4. safety J� WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: ' `. 5. *,'Diss If Yes) 6, Housing Name of Reserve 7. Circulation Y K,— lof;! AIRPORT UND USE PIAN' CftoTS: _. ll y - D.Itd Staff Si-;nature._ C�"��C.�� lam, r r. � � jl'N4 �i � • st " , C/00turESTMrLANZ DIVISION I Orf. AWARE OF tc Aad ' . Ao' THF ,1PPLTCAiVT oR �� , Vi; sTA�r Dr.°r rrfZttA"TYctr ftLG,kwxfaG TIM CONFORMANCE WITH THE l 'VERAL PL.1N AND zottING: f3att3d SignAtueei of Applicant . 1�l is report will bXpire and be discarded six 6 isonth� ,f=rom the date of the staff signature. LD 100013 (reaiaod, 6-87) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL +l "Primary-' Uses: Detached single-family dwellings at urban den - 3 -ties l Secondary_ Uses; Agricultural uses, animal husbandry, home occupations, outdoor recreation fac_lties, utilities, public and quazi-public uses, group quartersand. care homes. BiteDesignation Criteria. Needed for urban residential development within 20 years.,.- . Adequate water supply. Sew,, ;available or natural conditions suitable for septic tanks 4., Adjacent or near to existing utilities, roads and single- family residential development. Good accessibility to commercial services, schools, fire protection and other community facilities. Intensity of Use: Zoning alloars net parcel sizes of one acre: to 6,500 square feet. One single --family dwelling per parcel , dwolling units per gross acre.* HomeUoccupatonnsd occupations, farm nimals with other residential uses lima other uses and setbacks regulated 4o maintain single-family i' residential charac uer onC onsistent Zones R --'p, R -I A & 01 RT -'1, RT -1A, ASR, M -R, S -.R, Ir: R-5,' SR -1, Tit :11, R -IS � PA -C. Zoning Fadtors 1. Existing parcel sizes and residential d..usities. 2. Availability of sewers or suitability for septic tanks. !€ j. Effects on adjacent uses, water quality, air quality`, noise, }' traffic flow and safety, and, general ennvironmenta? quality. 4. Proximity to major streets, commercial services and all Distance fzomiai airports, railroads and indust public facilities. 5• �- � 'rp trial: uses. 6. Existing utilities, wallniays and drainage facilities. 17. Local desires; . 1 BUTTE COUNTY RE09EET FOR GE?FRAU PLA=N :ONFORN.AN RE?{31 T „ ♦ Items to be completed by app 1 ic2nt I , APPLICANT NAME AW1 AGirA-ESS i CO 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION � 84 3. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: a'y'e f� G PROPOSED USE' �✓'� �'�- Submit this r'orm with one copy of the tentative map ta; Sutte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovil l e, California 95965 The P! anning Department w it 1 return the completed con#ormano 'r report to the app/ icant for his/her Signature. The conforman[e report mUSt be tUbmitted-with the app] ication to the Land Level opment Section of CUbl iC Work'!9 'jj{y(♦�jF, ���/j]{ry(/jam/ , y � ��'Yxs>A.xWdx.kYx♦'w6b.YanFcveS:aftf'�:�,i.j ♦ CI, ,L el Ma Marth 8 7 1988' 1l� 5 BUTTE CO. P -WINING OEPAR It _"O 4 ... .:SA.k+.Mfrs-.ti:mr�4.xs�i.::+.".3e;.:w rs:',.::a<� ..:,auk a::•:�d f pOTTE COUNTY ADVISGRY AGENCY`MINUTES PAGE 14 OCTOBER 28, 1991 7. James Stevens, TPM AND BLL, AP 42-64-15 and 22,, 2 parcels located on the south side of Oak Way approx. 300 ft. east of Almond Vista Court. :Chico area. Engineert Jirn Stevens Jim Stevens was present: He said the existing dwelling has already been connected to public sewer and water as part of the subdivision map which created the parcel. Mr. Reidsaidthat in that case condition #5 could be deleted. Mr. Menc!onsa said there would be a condition about payment of Chaco area. traffic zees, Mr, Reid stated: having reviewed the environmental review checklist, the Planning. Director's Report of Sept. 10, 1991,,and the conversations at this meeting, I mase a motion to adopt a negative declaration of environmental with mitigation measure for the James Stevens parcel map and impact w� g _ a and 22, n ' P 42 -64 15 boundary line modification to create 2 parcels o A finding that the project could 'nave an effect on the environment, but will not have a significant effect 4n this case provided the required mitigation measure is ch;mplied with. That measure is item #2 as listed within the Planning Director's Report. The motion is made noting that the project, is in conformance with the Butte County General Plan and Butte County Zoning ,and is de minimus with respect to fish and wildlife impacts. Having found the above, I further move to approve the project,. Approval is subject to the following conditions and finding that approval will not be detrimental to the health, ,safety orwelfateitf,the people of Butte County provided the M aired conditions,are compliei blit Works �tonditionsl. 1. indicate a 50 fti building setback from the centerline of Oak [Jay, Show all easements of record on the f..nal map. Provide permanent solution for drainage: 4 Pay off any assessrriunts. 5 Obtain encroachment permit for all drivewayt, new or existing, and construct to county ;standards: 6 Pay any delinquent taxes or curreh't taxes as required. 7 Meet the requiremehts of the Butte County Fire Department 'Place note on final map regarding C.A.R.D fees. payment of 9 Place note ot, final map regarding/Chico area 'traffic fees. it ,�_.. .. BUTTE COUNTY 0171SORY AGENCY MINUTES PAGE 15 OCTOBER 28 , 1991 STEVENS, TPM 1jeulth Dept. conditions, 10 Provide a letter or other documentation from C1 -Water stating that they are willing and able tosupplydomestic water to parcels 1 and 2. 1 Provide a. Letter or other documentation from the City of Chico stating that they are u4illing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1. and 2. 12 Place a note on .the map that states "development of parcels 1 and 2 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer." 13 Place a note on the .map that states "development of parcels 1 and will require cane nection to a public water supply." Planning Dept. conditi,,oa: 14 A development: impact fee for Sheriff is facilities shall be ,pa,ldpursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3 Article '2 of the Butte County Conte prior to the issuance of building permits or use permits in the cage oi- a mobile home park. Said fee amount will be determined :and calculated as of the: dater of application of building permit or use permit.' The following mitigation measure is requ3,red l Pay the .$75 per, lot development impact fee to the Butte County Fire Dept./CDF for- the Hest Side Fire Station -Fund-prior to recordation of the final roan: Motion seconded by Mr.' Sanders and carried unanimously: ...�---------- ---.: -�� C. APPROVAL OF Z NUTFS OF OCTOBER 21; 1991 Mr. Reid made a motion to approve the minutes as typed. Motion seconded by Mr. Rendonsa. AYES'z REID AND MFNDONSA ABSTAIN: SANIJERS MOTION CARRIED __-;_ ---------------- --_- W---------------:--------=-----, Mr. Reid suggested having a discussion at n triter date regarding boundary 11fie modifications and the qualifications for processing; them as such rather than as parcel traps Mr. Mendonsa said that perhaps County Counsel and the Planning Director should be present. It was-agteed to place the discussion on a future agenda: MEETING ADJOURNED . I-SINUTES RECORDED BY 0i SHUEY DEPARTMENT 4'F PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (0:111) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY cFNTER DRIVE • OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Teluphohe: (916) 538-1681 RONALD D. McELROY October 29, 1991 Deputy Director James A. Stevens RE. AP 42-64-15 and 22 1875 Oak Way TPM AND BLM Mico , CA 9592.6 Dear Mr. Stevens: At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on ( October 280 199.1: ), the Agency adopted a negative declaration with gapproved wo the conditions listed on the attached sheet environmental mitigations and a raved the above-refr�renced project subject If no appeals are timely filed -- within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval (November 7, 1991 ) with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors) this action will be final, %len the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be :in order for T,ou to file your "final map' with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, P�ecently enacted legislation (AB5158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effective January 1, 1991, requires that the Department of fish and Game lu+pose and collect filing fees as specified 'to defray the cost of managing end protecting fish, and wildlife trust resources, These filing fees are r llected during the environmental review process and are to be riaid at the time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County Clerk of the County in which the project is located. This procedure is required pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public resources Code': 7116 increase administrative efficiency, the statute delegated the collection Of* filing fees to the County Clerk. The fee required in connection %-cli your project is checked below; CLASSIFICATION OF EN Lg0NWZNTAL DOCUMENT 1. NOTICE OF E%EMPTION STATEMT OF M14:PTTON A. Statutorily or °„ Inev, ,-4 scally Exempt $25.00 (Twenty -Pi. --pt, 1',:., .ars) Clerk's Fee X) E. De Minimus Impact - v;iextificate of 'Fee Exemption $25:00 (Twenty --Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETmffNATION - FEE' REQLrIRFJ? A. Negative Declaration $1,250.00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars) State Filing 'Fee $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee Environmental Impact Report _ $850 (Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars) State Filing Fee $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee S. OTHER (Speci fy)' $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee The fee should be paid to the Planning Department by ( November 11, 1991 in order for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. Wake checks payable to the County of Butte. The project applicant should be aware that if he or she does not remit payment of the required filing fees, the project arproval may be invalid by law and may not be 'operative, vested or f-inal_, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section .21080 (b), fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4 (c) and Section 753,5 (d) (3) and (7), Title 14, California Code of,, Regulations. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contract this office. Very truly yours William Cheff Director of Public Works 1 John Mendonsa Assistant Director .rte/ds cc panning Department Environmental Health Department � Jt� 'ff7_.S A. STEVENS, TPM AND BUI, AP 42-64-15 and 22, 2 parcels the 'south side of Oak way, approx. 300 ft, P located on Chico area. east of Almond Vista Court. Public Works conditions; f Indicate a SO ft building; setback from the centerline of Oak Way. Show all easements of record on the final map. �s Provide permanent solution for drainage. Pay off any assessments Obtain encroachment permit: for all d.rivewa ss construct to county standards.. i new or existing, and Pay any delinquent taxes or currer.,t taxes as required, Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire department. Place note (In final map regarding C.A.R;D, fees. 19 Plane note on final, map reuardPayment of g/Chico area traffic .fees. Health Dept. conditions Provide a letter ��, � cu rr*_ ,n r they are Milling a ale ,,� kkta,supp�.Ytdomestic ion from ateraator arce1ng that Provide a .letter Parcels 1 and 2, th documehtat� 4 .a that they are wiZ i"` ahs to ` from the City of Chico statin sup , sewer service to parcels g x . F F cels 1 and 2,. l Place a note on th� elo rcent of pare 'will :require conne t= n at states.a parcels 1 and 2 a Publi s tarjr se!Wer. 13 Place a note on thrb:V)"i IIS at stat s; rill require con necdselSFment of parcels 1 and 2 t?biiic pply.►� -Planning dept: condition; 14 A development impact fee for Sheriff's ecilt es shalt be to the provisions of Chapter 3 :Article 2 of the Butte County Code prior to the issuance of buildingpaid pursuant in home park.. Said. fee amounwilbe determined and calche case of a mobile: date of application of building, perma.t or use permit. 7•ated as of the The following mitigation measure is required: l Pay' the per lot development impact fee :o th€ui+�e Fire finalPt,Cap for the West Side fire Station �ia� .1 pr ,or to recordation final map, don of the S. coull .. ....... DEPARTMEF(r OF PU13LIC WORKS, WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Ditector 7 COUNTY CENTERDRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 CERTIFIED MAL 'Telephone: (916) 53a.7Ee1 RONALD D, McELROY September 181 1991 Deputy Dtreclot James A. Stevens RR:: AP 42-64-15 and 72 1875 Oak Vay TPT\1 ANT) R111 Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Stevens'. Please be advised ,,hat 'th4t Butte Count, Advisory Agency will hear your application on the Above -identified property, on October 28, 1991. The .Agency 1.611 be trev ewi,ng the findings from the Planning Department and %A, 3,1 'be considelt`ing ,your tentative parcel map and boundary line modification, Publ'.c ,forks will recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet, The -meeting will comhn ence at 9:00 a.m. an, the Board of, Supervisors Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive Orovl lle � California. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact thii� cr�fce: _ Very truly yours,, Wi.l,liam Chef! Director of Public Works f �t John Mendbn8,4 Assistant 'D�, rector JM/ds attachment cc Planning Departseat. Environmental 4eal,:h Department CL.j K "! Suite coun ..rte"'`• M-- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH IJIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Addross 0 196 Memorial Way 7 County Canter Drive 0 741 E1lloll Ruud Reply to Chico,, Colilotnia 95926 oroville' California 95965 Paradise" Calllornia 95969 Telophsre.- 916/891.2727' Telephone: M/538-7281 Telephone: 916/872.6308 WQUst 7. 1991 ,Names A. Stevens 1575 Oak Way Chi Co CA 95926 A. Stevens Parcel Map l S/S Oak Way, Chico AP 42-64 -15. c Dear Mr Stevens 1hdgo4rtment has advised the Sw.te County Department of Pub? itr ' worksLaAd Develoncaenit -Sect on ttaat we are- prepared to aC-t 011 the above aopli:ation: Sased on c%,L-Zent iTilforviation4 we can recommend a0prdval or =ond;:tional aoorova r ecam'mended Conditions for Apgi7oval 1. Frbvidii� a Iette-r or othot documentation from Cal-Watoe statins, what they are willing and able to ! IiUooly domwe5�i water to`' oarcels' i t& 2 Src,rirle a tetter- of other documentation from t" a Citv, o Chic:a stating that they are willing and able tOi iply sewer 3ervlLe tea parcels i &, S w . P lace a note on the map that states "devolopmevit of parcels & 2 will require connection to a public sanitary seg or " ..a. Place a Mote on the Map that states "dovolbotn nt of ZarcOls 1 '2' vial! rpciuzre connectiorr, to a public water suoply= " 5. Connect exist0ig tdwoiling to public sewer, puma and fill the seem - tic tarli under taarmit from Chico E iov'ironmontai Hoal th Department. ! t ten... Autte, icountw, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE? (916) 53$-7601 September 10, 1991 James A. Stevens 1875 Oak Way Chico, CA 95926 Ret Tentative 'Parcel Map and Boundary Line Modification AP No. 042-640-015 and 022 Dear Mr. Stevens: The Butte County Planning Department has complet.ed the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and fonvarded to the Butte 'County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public ;Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for yow- project: Please review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. if you nate any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention, The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County AdvisoryAgency for their action. California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within sig: months from the date on which your application was received and accepted. The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the publi e hearing for your project, ,If there are modifications to your project; not related to mitigating an identified impact, re-evaluation of your project shall be required; Inter -Departmental Memorandum T4; Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT Report on Tentative Parcel; Map and Boundary Line Modification for James Stevens, AP No: 042-640-015 and 022 DATE: September iD, 1991 This its a proposal to divide ,57 acre to create two parcels of .33 acre and ,24 acre, The present zoning is A -SR (Agricultural -Suburban Residential) . The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Irletrit;nt of the ,Butte County General Plan nor anyr specific or community plan. A Negative Declaration has been prepared Lfor the proposed project in accordance to the: California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within ti b, required 105 days pursuant to the California Public :Resources Code Section 21151:5.. _. Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and Boundary Line Modification for James A. 'Stevens, AP No,: 042-640-015 and. 022 subject to the following mitigation measures: Provide mitigation measures to reduce the impacts on police prntectiort sertitices to the approval of the Butte County Sheriff, C,c,, 2, Pay the $75.00per lot development impact fee to the butte County 'Fire. Department/ CDF for the Nest Side Tire Station Fund prior to recordation of the final map: JR:ba cellPublic Works James A, Stevens i Soptember 4, 1991 County of Butt Planning Department 1 County Center Drive Cxovil.le, Ca. 95965 Attention Brent Molpre / Joe Hunter' Res Tentative Parcel XIP and. Boundary Line Modification for James A Stevens AP No. 042-640-615 and 022 Gentlemen: 'Regarding the suggeiatedl m.3,tigation measures fox. said project per the Appendix T Envix�onwental Checklist dated May 6, 1 the following statements, 991, we offer Enclosed Is executed Sheriff's Agreement. Department Mitigation MM; 2: Applicant' has no object oft --to °tY�e-payment of-the, $75.00 1'ot Fire Station 'Fund Fee. pes We trust this inforn".lation. is Sufficient to allow, th l pro joo� to proceed for scheduling fpr the Ad`ri a- Agency, If You should have an . questions please call this office ,, Sinceroly Janis Stevens 6050 1375 flak Way- CA ayCA 9:192`6 AGRIi EMENT RUNNING WITH THE LAND RE XITIGMTION OF IMPACT ON SHERIFF'S S DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the undersigned are presently the '`wners of th <.? land commonly known a:s AP No.40_64-/5`"J oo?_ , which is located in the unincorporated area of Butte County, Cal -i fornia, near GN/Gtr _, the legal description of which is set forth jai, Exhibit A atltache.d hereto and incorporated herein by this refero- e; and WHUYAS, said owners propose to develop their said land, and,: in connection with their development proposal, have submitted an, application to thel County of Butte for the following discretionary 'land Use entitlement: subdivision map gfre l map _ use permit *)C other (specify F''cl W; and WHEREAS, said owners recognize r -hat the cumulative impact of development- in unincorporated areas of the County of Butte, i.nk::luding their, proposed development, has created and is creating the need to augment the law enforcement :-;ervicP-provided by the Butte County Sheriffs Departmant and has Li --creased and is increasing the need ,�or the Shdxiffrs Department to acquire facilities and'equipment necessary to provide such services; and WHEREAS; said own<i s are aware that the County of Butte is studying methods to provide fut6ing to acquire such equipment arid. facilities by establishing developer fees, establishing an assessment district;, e:;.tabli.shing Mello -Roos districts, or some similar, fair, read,onal,'Ae and appropriate funding mechanism to finance Such equipment and facility wJ.quis tion or to fund environmental and other studies as relay lbe deemed r1ecessary to determine the needs for such equipment and facilities, and said 6tnniers re,�t7gnize that tx',le iwposition of Such a funding mechanism or Combination Of mechanisms Will benefit their said property. WHU,EAS said owners wish to mitigate the impact 'of their proposed development on the Sheriff 'Delpas:tMant's ability to provide adequate law enforcement services but recognize that the Co=i:y of Butte does not at present have such funding mechanisms in place or. other adequate resources nect5ssar:y, to provide such mitigation. _ NOWT THEREPME, said owners do hereby, agree and consent as f ol�.ows 1 said owners consent to the es4abli shme i,t of such funding mechanisms,' agree not to protest against establishment of the same, and agree wo pair their pro rata share thereof, ,4 2. Said owners agree to coojaerate and support the County of Butte in obtaining the approval of such funding mechanisms from n other property o,t4ners within the unincorporated area of the County of ,Butte in the area •-� 3. said owners agree, prior to Via,] (issuance of any building permit in connection with •or related to their use, permit) to 'pay such Sheriff Department impact mitigation fees as may be imposed by an ordinance of general application adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the Coldnty of Butte as to discretionary land use entitlements reviewed and approved by the County. It is understo i that such fees shall be deposited by the County into a separate designated county fund Limited to u.se for the intended purposes of m t,igating h ;pacts on the Sheriff"s Department and providing equipment and facilities for the Sheriff's Department. 4, Cn lonsideration, the foregoing and other good and valua:bit- ionsideratioh, the undersigned owners expressly agree kt. that the foregoing shall be an agreement running with the land and sthall be. )binding upon their heirs and all successors in interest,. DATE� 45�FP7t 7`" aY) ajwde1=1 STATE OF CALIFOTMIA COUNTY OF 'BUTTE on .....c.rt �r x991 before me, the undersigned, a Notary ,. Publ ' c 'in and,,, the State OX C<tl .forn a, personally appeared. s��s personally known to me, [[proved to me [ ] on the ;basis of satisfactory evidence to be the ;persoft(s) whose names are: subscribed, to the within instrument and acknowledged that they exs ecutAd the; same,, WITNZSS my hand and official seal. O 101C L SEAL a+* TY MY a f ft-jn.WICS May 26, H09-4 Naive (Typed or, rime ) sher. agr -- �� ORDER NO - l§U--120541 RB CLTA GUARANTEE (1* -13-78 ;1 TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN': JAMES A. STEVENS, AN ' nUO.RRIED EL,'A )SSS TO PARCEL I AND TERRENCE J. BUTCHART AND INGRID M. BUTCHARTw HUSBAND AND 'WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS AS TO PARCEL II THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE u),ND HEREINAFTER DESCRI13ED OR. REFERRED TO COVERED BY T111S GUARANTEE IS A FEE AND EASEMENT THE LAND INCLUDED WITHI14 THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL MAP HEREINBEFORE REFERRED TO IN THIS GTJARA14TEE IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALI:F=41A, COUNTY OF BUTTE,, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS PAROL I A LOT 15, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTA:nT MAP ENTITLED, "OAK WAY MANOR SUBDIVISION", WHICH MAP WAS' RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MAY 3 19$,8, IN BOOK 108 OF ;MAPS; AT PAGE(S) 86, 87 AND 88. PARCEL I -B:, A. NOR -EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR ROAD PURriDES, PItIVA.TE SAXITARY SEWER FACILITIES ,AND PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE PURPOSES OVER ALMOND VISTA COURT, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN ASAP ENTITLED, COAX WAY MANOR SUBDIVISION", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED' IN THIS OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CAL:r 'Oy2NTA, ON MAY 3 I98$1 Ig BOOK 108 OF MAPS, AT. PAGE(s) ',86,, 87 AND 88 EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING WITHIIJ THE BOUND OF PARCEtj I -A, ;DESCRIBED ABOVE. PARCEL A '12 FOOT WIDE STORM DLAAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE WESTERLY 12' FEET OF LOT 6, AS SHOWN OTI THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, DOAK WAY XANOR SUBDIVISION", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE Or CALYFOANIA, ON MAY' :30 1988, IN BOOK 168 OF MAPS; AT PAGE(S) '86, 87 AND 88. .r ORDER NO. BU-120.541 RB (,,U, 'A GUARANTEE, P ``. CEL 1:-D: A 15 FOOT 'WIDE EASEMENT FOR TEMPORARY STORM WATER DISPOSAL OVER TTfE EASTERLY P14D SOUTHERLY 15 FEET OF LOT 5, AS SHOWN ON THAT iCIM- TAIN MAP ENTITLED, "OAK WAY MANOR SUBDIVISION", WHICH MAP WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COI:TNTY OF 'BUTTE, , TAT'E OF CALIFORk7IA, ON MAY 3, 1988, IN BOOK 108 OF MAPS, AT PAOE(S) 86, 87 AND 88. A 10 FOOT WIDEPRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER THE SOUTHERLY 10 FEET OF LOT 13, AS SHOW4 ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED, "OAK WAY MANOR SUBDIVISION'S , WHYJ CH MAY WAS RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF ''�.',rE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON MAY �3r 1988, IN BOOK 108 OF MAPS, AT PAGE(S) 86, 87 AND 88. 'PARCEL IT—A: PARCEL 1, AS SHOW11 ON THAT 'CERTAIN PARCEL MAP, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTEj STATE OF CALIFORNIA j ON FEBRUARY 21, 1980t IN BOOK 15 OF MADS, 94 .SND 95. AT PAGE (S )" CEL 11—B AN EASEMENT FOR TUGRESS AND EGRESS AND UTILITY PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON THAT Ct,RTAIN PARCEL MAP, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE,. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FEBRUARY 21. 1980, IN BOOK. 75 OF MAPS,, AT PAGE(S) 94 AND '95. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF PARCEL 1I—Ai DE8CRIBEb HEREIN. ..X PTIONS 1� GF1 ERAL AND SPECIAL BaU= COUNTY TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1.991-52 A L 2;N, tUT NOT Y'E'T DUE OR PAYABLE. i l w , P1 'i. SHERIFF S 33 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, G 9°'.36 ( g 6) 038-731 XI CK, GREY i� -64_15, & ?2 '^ JA14E8 3 E Elis - 0 . .2 The Butte County -Sheriff's Deparl*-Men.tlowest hzs the OiilCiEr-to-citizen. rat -10 of a r'y law es':rorcement agency in the E1.Titir'- stcte Buaqet CdnSt'ra=ms s severely limit t^e services t 5 G�apa-1- ne-' Can 'prov de the citizens 0= aLltte County, 1Vew construction or re-zon-nc sates the possibility a flu.t.ther impact on the resources o- department w,it the a+i ��t ona? caa? s -nor -sere ce. ^ jis wi? ? result _n. a surth +r czeteriarat on o.: the,, 1ev-* of service provided by this ae*;3aui, �i.^ilt�?'L tC) d t e c.„ t4 --ns O's Butte E,`blin wy r' - 4 -., `15'' « _ Yams bei;omes availahi tiZ" j,n t!;e evert' T*Gz'y. mechanism th s deParimei.'C increase the n,.t-� r of sworn ve_sOnn�� bn there 1iou a be o ohje•r�.�on .Ck Y.�w pr -posed dove opment or, re- t one .. u4�ti = txl2 t �itie a lnoweVe= y Ci2partraent 'egret U'! y opposes any new cievel opmeft-t or re-zoni11 ,' Very t-�:i y ..yours �.;os'.. CYcyy $}.i£iii-CCirC£'r t 'eatte 60'an PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-33917 TELEPHONE. (016) 538»7601 .Tune 25, 1991 James A. Stevens 1875 Oak Way Chico, CA 95926 Re. Tentative Parcel Nap and Boundary Line Modification .Al? iso. 042-6140-015 and 022 Log #91-06-04-02 Dear Mr. Stevens:: An initial study of your proposed project} a Tentative Parcel Map and Boundary Line Modification, indicates potentially adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the ericlospd' envirunmental checldist)._ To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of the project. Otherwise; an Environmental Impact Report. (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An nrpoto this -'l to the Planning, will expedite the scheduling o£y unp project. Please forward yaurvrt�e�`esponse within 15 days from the date o£ this letter. Should you. have any questions regarding this rnatter, please contact this office between 10,00 a.m, and 3.,00 p.m, Sincerer, B. A. Kircher Director of Planning x ,rent L: Moore Associate Planner BLI'&u a; Enclosure APPENDIX 'I' CoWiTY OIF BUTTE £N9IRONM9Na,I'AL , CT ECKL'IST FORM EVALUATION OF,;,� BUVZR0X1+MNTAL :IMPACT PlleiN'0. 042-640=015 and 021 Log No, 091-06-04-02 AP No, 042-64o=015 and o22. I. BACKGROUND I . James A. Stevens 2 fta75 oak Wal,, cdafco, California 9sgI6 S. ptoject descriptfol: Tentative Parcel szo and eoundaty Line Modification to divide .57 acre to Create two parcels Cne At .3a acre and :24 acre. xes ►urns, NO DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAT!UAT3:-')N — AftrI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1, bees the prolect have the potential acr�legrade the x This proposal will tial Significantly degrade the environment. gutIl[Yol "the env Itolimeht, stiibstintfaity reduce the hj6ltal of a fish or wlfdlltb specleS, cause a ftsh of wildlife populataln to dropbelow self-sustalninff levels, threaten to elim16,1e a plant or animal coinunity, reduce the numbet at restrict the cantle , of A rare or endangettd plant or animal or ellm1hate I�portaht exarmoles 61 malor perlods of Catflotnla _hrxtiory or prehistoryt Dox --5 the ptolecl have the potential to achieve _� x This proposal Will not Impede long-tetm ehvttonmental goals, short-tetm benefits to the detriment b. .Irmo -term environment goals? (A short-term ItdAtt on the environment Is one whICn ocCUfs 1 a lelatIvely btlel period of time While long-term itroatts will endure into the future,) e Impaely cts ich a Individual :a, lies theited leicct' x may have a signilidant c'umulative Impact on the bput a e emir hmePaosaI may Impact on Nov more separate resources where the impact on each resource I s tela.lively small, -but where the cited of the total of those Impacts on the ehvltontnetit IsSignificant.) a, ooei the project have environmental effects which x yhfs ptoposaf will hot havE a slbnllicant adverse :eltect on hurrah wtit cause Substantial adverse effects on human beings. being$, either ditettly of ihdtreCtlyt III. X)EtpRMINATION on in bas's of thisinitial evAluatloh: t/lit find the ptopmdd protect Coutts Wt have a ;slghlflcaht effect on the 2nvllonment and 8 MiCATIVE bE('.LAiATIoN will be prepared. IIWE find that Although the proposed brolect WJto have A flghifttAht effect on the ehVltoiwmeht, there *III hot be a 116hillcant effect In this ta.se because the MITICAT104 AAA UREs described on the Attached thebt have been added to the prolett. A 1,1WATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared« uvre find the otboosed pfol'ect MAY have A Sjohilltant el ect cd the ehVitohment, and an t:WIRCWtWAL IAMTI­ REONT is requltev. 0ATCt Dune 21, '1001 12bi.,rtTY' .. V 61T Hy: Ilrertr L. Moor] ReV i eared by r I ;EnV1ro=6nta1 Checklist * EvAluatiOn of Environmental; Impact -IV'. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS a Yes."YBF Nn DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION s, tAKDA. will the proposal tesutl tit signi(icant: a, unstable earth conditions, or changes 1n 900100C substructurest x The proposal will hot affect subsurface earth conditions. b. oisrupltIt displacement, compaction or avetcoverfno of the sant x This proposal will result In some disruption, displacement, " ctr^paction and overcoVeting of the site as a" result of development of structures, driveways, parking areas, ett, one out of the two parcels being Created currently has tesidentlal dwelling on It which Would minimize eatlhwork needed for residential development„ The fiat valley tertaln also mlhfmlzes the need for extensive ea'rthwotk. c, change in topography or ground sutface relief fealurtst X `�' The project si►e i3 chataterized by flatwhich lends .valley .land Itself to residential .development without the need for lar5e'amounts Of grading. d. destruction.COVeringott:)odillcatfond('.ttty WOO geologic or physical teature:st ', x._ ThesttoJect Site hat ho unique physical featutes. e. ihcrease In +tnd or Water erosion either on of off s I tet of soiM', x _ The proposal will not cause erosion, t. es sAnds, ordlangess tin sioltStion, deposibtion x rhe proposal w]if not affect any walarcoutse,. Of erosion which r,:wv modify the channel of a river b. s.trOM 6N, the ►,M or the ocean or any bay, fhlet or lake; 9. Loss of ptIme atrltulturally productive soils outsl8+i des gnated ufba'n ateast X esent a sloniticant toss of prime the pra area nd i_sect site Is located wfthln, the urban of hico ndIs i Presently developed into residential land agri tlf or One uses houslny is notarge enoughitohaveca viablucomnerfaeagtricultura land use, h. of people or ous es, to dslidelc hazards hazards such as eaftheuakes'; Iandillllit' x Ail of But te'County is In a Moderate Earthquake Intent Ity zone viii. mudslides, ground iailurta at si liar l:aza t ds f construction of buildings to uniform Building code standards will ^ provide adequate pt otection to occu incase � ants p" or salsmlc atiiylly,� .. ALS Will the proposal result in substantial: a, Alt emisslons or deterloratl' air tiUaflty7 on ol° ambient x `— No significant irraact to alt tluailty Is ekpected as a result of this b"reject. b. ofefumes{ion Of obiectlottabitb odors, smoke X The. proposal will Sol create obJectiohabie odors, smoke or fumes, C. Alteration of alt 'movement, moisture or tempera Cure, or any ,change in clirate, The propasai will not attecl the atmosphere. locally or regionallyt 3 iyAtfk. Will the ptaposdl testift to substantial. a, changes In currents, or, ihit course of ditection or water M, 4,ementtr In dether � The proposal will hot affect ally watetcourse, matibe or iresh watetst la. elletts,for th stdltelAnd am. unt"ofdsurfacce "'—` •-- - fine propofed pttfect wilt have an I;wstgntfican;t.thrpacl on absorption D rates, or the rate and amount of surface runott> __ 11 iLInvironmental-checklist * Evaluation of Environmental 'Impact J..V r. zv.v-LAuIVi1Lvwziu Lmra%-xo tcontl.nuea), YE5. MAYBt FAL-L.L i76'UOICJ Vi. gill V L A%V111'1Tj1'1-x kiu r+ Y HL Ut!'X.L Vi`l fContinuetii C. weed for off-site surlaco drainage x - Wain age improvements have been mde to service surrounding Irorovements, including vegetation removal. develcGr><int. The Proposed map Trill allow the cteatlon of one new channelizatrcn or culvert InstallatlOnr single family dwelling on a 24 acre lot %hich Is not anticipated to over burden the existing drainage systee+. it Is anticipated no new surface drainage Improvements are necessary to accomodate the proposed Tentative Parcel mtp. d. Oteratloris to the course or (lots of flood k _, The prcoosal will riot signifiicantiy affect any flood control clianneis materst or watercourses. e. O!'ma-bIn the Ann i Il of Surface water In any x The ptoppsa.1 Vi t I not of f•�ct ;pray w+,rptcourse. I. Os scharge Into surface waters, or In any x The proposal krli hot Significantly affect surfaz#., water oualtty. alteration of surface water quality, The proposed tine of the parcels will allow storm water and flntfuding but not limited to temperatuter Itrlgatlort water to remain mostly on the project Me, due to the _ dissolVed oxygefr or tUrbidityt -tetativis TlAiness of the project stte. tt, ,4ltetat[an of the direction or rate of flow x The Proposal will not affect the directran or ilow Of ground Water$. of ground waters? h. Change 16 the quaritity or quality of ground x the otoposal will not directly affect any aquiver. waters, either through. direct additions or withdrawals, or .through Interception of art Agiriler by cuts or excavations? 1. Reduction In the amount of 'water otherwise x It Is proposed that each home wilt be serviced by Callfotrila Water available for public water suppllest 3ervlce, 1 le f 0 petty To water- Exposureh�za x The proposal will not expose 0609.1e or property !o flooding. deo ttla�. PL _ANT:_ LIFE. Witt the ptoposal result in Substantial; A. Change In the diversity of todcles, If tt The dlVefslty of ofant sptcies will be expanded as residential non- ntaabef of any species of plants (lnclu Ing native landscapes ate installed. ,vd substarittal reduction of the trees, shrubs. ,grass, croot., and aquatic number' of oXI stthg species is anticipated due to the parcel sizes piants)T requirtd by the existing zoning ctassitication. ti. Reduction of the numbefs of any unique, fare x .. The project site contains no rare or endangered plahts, of endangeted species of plaritst c, introduction of new species of plants Into x The pfoposalwill not Affect,, W slits; plant life. An area, of In a battler to the n:stmal tepleolshment of existing species# d. Rtduetlon to acreage of any agricultural k _ The 'site does flat contain any corimttlafly viable agricultural trop. crept S. NIAh1rLrr:E., 11111 the proposal result In MAN A. Change In the diversity_ o' species, of x The proposal will not affect atitrat lite because the site dces not numbers of any soetl'es of ariimalx �tbitds. 3uppoft significant animal life of habitat. � land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, behthic oroanlsms of thsectslf p, Reduction In the numbtts of any uniqut, rare x, The site contains no rare animals, or tndanodrod species of antra tst t. Introduction of new species of animals into the ofroosal will hot Alteett�xtstlhg anirmil lite. An atta, orin a battler to the mlgtallo-i Of WVement pt Animaist �En iironmentacl Checklist Eva.lp4t.ion of Environmental Impact 4 V ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ''ES MA'+'H'E No , EVALUATION (Continued) d, Deterioration( of eXtstl.hg fish or wildlife habitats -- X The site contains no k,ar: (leant wtldllt^ b, —wit . Wi llthe proposal r* -'11. ttr'existittr) nolse levels( _K:.. The proposal W' II not result In a substantial Increase in noise trer:led n+ ;r»- �w Or Ih the vicinity. hitposur.e o:' people to severe noise leva;l �- The prop will not expose ea leto s P p evere not-se levels, $1111 Ari: r;::1^ gi ytrr. pt .r, ,' sat.tit. siA�zr cane rcaltt and qi• tet __, _x�. The propow Ktli not fesUlt in a substantial increase in light or glare created on site of In the Vicinity, a. r.�r�► use. Wt�' — ' .'LsulI In a subs.tantlal artlrat on �l Inc Present �r ` punned' land use of an X The prapo3al will hot alter the lane use In the area. The protect areilt _ site is toned AIRt Which allows one dwelling unit pdr feet and Is designated by the Butte County Cenerral Plans x" LC 00n31(y Residential, The proposed project conforms to Botta the genetal plant and toning, 9, NATtJ,AI. a"d EAc Wirt ,the propr�IAI result ih SUES antraI: A. Increase In the ra#t at use at any natural resourtesf k The proposal will hot affect Any natural resources. b. nesoreirces# bl any Tian-renewable natural x the proposal *1.111 hot deplete #I)y natural tesourtes. aa, I►SK_ r uas r, Will the proposal Involve: A. A risk of explosion or r but ho 'Ot rnIted ous substances tihclUding, but not tlmited to. to. k Thep Tiltlocproposal *111 not Involve the use of hazardous tnaterIll's Olt, pesticides, chemicals or radfaI[on) in the � not i`s, ed clobe to An latililies which store or utillxe such materials. eyetnt of an accident Or upset cohditlonsf b. lyosslble tin or fence with to emo Dian? response plan or emergency evacuattati plant k The PtoPasal will not affect any er*tgency service's, sI• doxtrirnttL,"O rxtit the p?oposal alter location, arstrabutront d'enstty or growth tate of the human x The proPosal'Will not signiflcahtly affect the Pop:Ilatlhn of the iaopulatlohl area because the proposed densitydceS not exceed that planned and being developed In the iz, or cleat 0 iandhe otr,ad attect existing hauslhs, or create a deriahtl for' atlditional housing( x _. area, The proposal Will hot sidnilloant y Affect housing demand. 13:, '1`PANSPORTAT0641C19CULA`rICNJ. Will the proposal' Mull in; a. teheaatfonofvehicle ;tlbstantfal Additional X Ir�hvethehtt _ the pr oral Wtfl represent ah lnetentental Increase In #rattf+ thr� {the area, The proposed pro ect will 1 vee t generale approXlmately to additional l le trips per day. The project site is SerViced by Oak ftry which h.ns the hecessary capacity to carry Ih additional vehicle It pet Bay without a reduction In the level of service, the drnposed prolett will have a cuhmulative Impact an the rbglonal traffic of the chtco Urban Arta. Mbwevet, it 13 antfelpated the adoptod traffic Etattizflhi�afor theChico Urban Wiltthe cutrou101ve tilt s Area degra�e P. M40-It (In existing parking tactltttes, or demand tCb new Parking( X The proposal will hot At (Ott parking betause the proposal WIII have`. to ctMPIV WIth the PArklht; rdquirements contatnedsWlthin Butto county Code Seeltoh 24-35. +tet Environmental Ghec2t is Evaluat' Of EnuiJ`onmental Impact IV. ENVIRQW-BNTAL IMPACTS (contlnued) _vEs M�vn . NO DISCUSt;i92rT OF ENVIRONr'EN'PI; EVALi7A"I'iON tcontfnuedl _ C. 3ubstarrt►at impact on existing trael'o, tial 3 Stems tong Y p — ---x - 'rhe proposal will d. Significant g nal or moreMilt not significantly i t; y rt;iact the ttanr ,pr to t i on sys I�r. Of OeW peopJe:andtor goods? 'and/or The Proposal -�..� —x— op 1 will iTol a let - ' i r the p. es n, area. e k pattern o! cfrculatlan in the Alteratfcns to waterharne. " if or aft x 1. The ptoposai Will not affect tall or air ttalltc. lacrease' In traffic hazards to ;Color vehfeles. bicyclists of pedestrians? k Tiir proposal will not t' I'MUC +tits the result Pn a s{onif+cant increase in trartrc and related ?Will hazards in the area, Pt osaf have an effect upon, cr resui In a need gar governm,t of setvices new or a,lleted a, Fite ptotectlont i for fire Protection tht ar alptofectnsttteti station Ps a42, The eariatbundet,ln � seta lce area rotated WlLhtn the fire Proposed con and talion hln9Station 043, WestzSide rte. Fite. To support the cost of tat[or, <bF has established a l evked by a impact tee of 375.0o pet lot The project site is se vlted by a pressurized Protection deq utel rtaiti system With lite hydrants to"Ich is anticipated to adequately mltlgate the impacts b• ryaft;e prtitectlonr services to a on �flre less than sight{icaht level. .he proposal will result in a Increr:0tital increase Ih demand far polite protectlan fn the area which cahnot be serviced by the present NPattwient eutietCounty- Int 0Wtdue ng the tiscalif ftrwacitisatethe p�dJectnondthe sheriff's Depatiment an Impact analysts was Ptnjectlon of the direct Current Performed whlLh is a associated' With rg3ldentfal r eVentiel gtt»srkh btdpo§ed by thA Tenand Map. 0efiuses property tax Is the only fevenue land produces sou, ce res ideinl far uses .produces far police protecifon services, The Cotte county therift has estabitshed t of population as the base ithe levet of pet loot service. to reviewing the Ptann{ng Depatthent determines It Che project cat support the base line ievr:l at service With existing taxation structures. he ptoposed test will treate ohe additional lot T average h•, he which t r6tull of 2.49 people residing on the newly creat► on treated rot will teclulte the, Then&Iy project to support officer at a cost of siso.00 pet Ytar, of land Ir,ptoYemerhlts Wouldecqual thattor alrfesidentiall othelchi area currently developinb with an avetage afar pat Value of irwravemehts made and land cbstt beim srao,000 pet lot. This value will produce a total property tax revenue of 3t,3rio.00 9astd on the Current a PotIlartment latmula set by ,h8a at tet the Passage of ptoposIIton 'to the autte county Cenetal Fund will ter annually i;r ia,oss; al the total property to apprbxtmakeiy dd each year x fevetlues collected each �Abroximately 2>% of the County ►�IVe by the f3oatd or 5u etvlsors to s taI Fund t3 then a)lacated the county theritt,s impartnsent. As such ftbm the 523? �ttsppor.t sutte,s Cenetai trona the shefpff•s gbepattt�nto will approxtnatoly sGa.jt or- let receive in property tax revenue new lot and possible tmprovements. araVfagtYea�li tesiceotal Golice PtoteCttonsetvices. C►rt ltl created will ptoduce a deticft of $66.65 just foil cumufallVe gtarwth within the County ,has Impatted the sherift•s depaftment to that: today he department apetatlhg at 0 is, •erl. per thousand pobuiatldA whfth falls short `E�x.�ironmental Checklist * Evaluation of, Environmental Impact 6 267, ENi�IRONMENTA, IMPACTS (continued) YES uxunE nib. DISCUSSION- OF' ENVIRONMENTAL EVALIIATION i r'arr t i rued i of the base level of service of �.o officers per thousand, continued growth under the ekisting proper ty tax program can only be considered a significant impact on governmental serVlces. The creation of one lot ,-, an urban area does not Constitute a In elbaal'f. acietncumulatlylysed on th e above Ienarohe ioactstake - pan A diftetehl significance, in fevfewing the project the, county trust consider cumulatiVe impacts which are dellned by the MA llUIdeIInes section 15365 as •oUmulatfile Impacts from seVeral proJects is the change in the environment which results from the +ncrementaf inceativicenimpact of the project when added to other closely related Present. and reasonably forts eeable probable future projects. VIUMUimpacts can result from IndlViduaIIV minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time,` The requitement to discuss pumulatwe impacts Is intended to. prevent agencies from taking A *Set lal, MO-Plan-at-a•lime- approach to envlronmenlal Analysis, Unless CUMUtatlVe Impatts are anaiy;ted, a -course 'of,atiion will be set befote understanding Its long-term Itvacts. Thus, a proper CumUlative Impacts analysis must be preparers befofe a project gains Irreversible manentum, within the next year the CoUMV of nuttewilt grow by apptoklmateiy t,eig new houslhg units The projected new growth would require 4,6 new officers be added to the sheriff`s basedtonnthehaboieafiguto resion y enooughcre enue will beigenet�atedeto - hire 1.91 ofttcers resulting In the'coUnly sheriff Department falling further behind In meeting the Pot Ice protection ierVtce levaSs needed to protect the public's safety and health, such ImpActt !cost be mitigated to a lest than significant level with adequate mitigation measures of addtessed In an OR so as to allow' a statement of oVerrriding considetarlon. e„ schoof3t x The proposal will result „ n Incremental lnr,rease In demand for the AM Is ant tipated to reduce schooloimpactss bvhthe locals school to lets than A signiflcant level, d, !larks or utNr rCcreA 0iNIa1 facltltlest x The proposal will result In.a Incremental ihtfease In demand for park and recteatfon facilities in the area. e. atntenancetit public facll'Ities, Includlog ria dsj _x, The proposal will result In a Increiaental Increase to the need for mashtenante of roads and other public tactilties In the Atea. f. Dttief governmental servltest x .. The proposal wlit tesuit in A incremental Increase in demand for All other governmental services In the area. I$. tmmtY. will the oropoial r'dsult in: a, Use ;ot substantlal' amounts of fuel or ener9yt x The ptopasai will not utillze substWIAI fuel or energy. b, 6ubstantial,ihorease ih dtmand upon existing sources of energy, of reoulre. the _ x The proposal will not substantifilly ihtrnkle the demand for energy. development of new saurces of enetgyt 6, tJML#trES. kilt the proposal "result In a need ('dt m3w or substantl new sysiefollowing: al alterations to .be a. powerof natural gast L x�- The proposal will hot affect electrical powet or riatutal gal distribution systems. u znvironm.ental Checklist * Evaluation of EnviroaW.�ntal Impact 7 .IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) ' YFS MAYBF No DISCUSSION OF ENVIRQ NMENTAL I ON R`EVAL�JAT (Continued) Communications nictions Systems? x The ptopvsal wili not affect communication systems. C, atyt X The proposal will hot affect public Mater systems. d. Sealer of septic systens€ _ x The project site wl i l be serviced by Otte ct ty of Chico sat11 tary sewer System. e. storm Water drainage? x_ The proposal will not affect drainage. f, solid waste and disposal! x The Propoxal 'will not affect solid waste disposal. lT. "FJLTir. WlIi the proposal result In: a. Creation of any health he=Gard or potential Hazard (eXcludingmenial health}j x The proposal will not create any health hazard. b, haZre u; people to polentTal health zard haards( _ x The proposal witi (tot eXbose people to any health hazard. AESTt-MCs. Will the prtarosal result IIton the of airy scenic open the _ X_, The-propo al Will not result in an aesthetically offensive view because I( public, r public, of WIII the proposal esus'( in the Creation al a UltIn ea Is consistent With surrounding development. of an aestheticatty ofterist i site open to the Public view? 49. a-0a 1 )e' Will the proposal (esult in an impact UP-0a trae quattly or Quantity of extstirrg _x_. The proposal may result In an incremental Increase in demand tot perk recreation al opporiunttTes and–recteatlon facilities. ",ever. It is anticipated the park and recreation Impact fees collected by the chlCo Area itecreat'ion Dlsttict Wt" mittgate th- imPaCts of the ptolect on teaCreation to a less thah slgniticant level, za. ctitna�c ti eSancta, a, will the proposal result in the alteration or destruclian of a prehistoric or historic x ti The prosect site is tdentlfled as ai area at high sensittvlty i'or Stsensitivity atchaeologiCal silet ahchaeologttat resources the at atlas igh due to alfeady extensive development which has occured a d h , previbthr3 archaeologi'cai clearances granted for the area, It Will notbe neCefsaty to conduct a records search or arthaeologlcat sulvey. b, will the pfoposal result In advetse physisaT or aesthetic eftects to a ptehIttArle or X "`— The proposal Will not affect his.torrc sates, historic buildfng. structure or object? cl goes the pteposal have the potentdal to cause a physical Change which would affect X_ the proposal will not allect cultural resources, unique ethnic cultural val.uesr d, will the proposal restrict existing tetiglaus or sacred uses within th4 x. The proposal will not affect religious tescurces. Potential impact area( V SUGGESTED MIT16ATI09 MEASURES t, Provide mitigation measUres to reduce the imapacts on poll•Ce. ptotecllon setvites to the; apptoval of the Butte county sherllt. I. Pay the sIs.bo,Per lot develoNjoht impact fee to the Uutte County Fite %epartinent/TDF tot the West Siidenal Fite station Fund prior to recordation of the fInap„ a 37g1ronmehtal Cheak]l:tst * Bvaluation of ';environmental :,,Mpact (Continued) b. zoning: ASR DATA SHEFT' c, cen, Plan Designation: Low Density Rest d. Parcel shims 8125 sq. ft. to 1 acre A, Proier_t oescrtption c, Population: suburban Poputa,t►osi 15. Charaaer of site and Area: suburban 1, type Of Prolectt Tentative Parcel Asap/Boundary Line Nodllfcatson 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico z. Brief Description: TPA(/BLAi to divide .57 ;acre to create two 17. Relevant Spheres of influence: Chtca. CARD, & CUSr). parCAis OI .33 mete and .24 We. 18, Improvements Standards Urban Area: NIA s. Locaticrs. south side of oak way In the thico area. 19. Fire Ptotectlon service: 4. Proposed Density of Development: suniti.25 acre a. Neatest County (State) Fire station: 043 S. Amount of impervious "surfacing: minimal b, mater Availability- Fire Hydrant 6, .Access and Nearest Public Poad(s): Mk Way rAelhod of sewage Disposal: CftY Of Chico Sanitary sewer 20. schools In Area: Chico Unified school District b. .Source of water Supply: California Wates' SerViCe Ci. 9. of tandrdevelopment. BLMtbd o. further land divisionsnt Potential lot No furShet potential under current zoning classification. S. Envircewn-stal_settin9 �siCtlti �aV.tTOnment_,.. t. aTerfaln CenerMi Topoglaphtc character: Flat. ValieY lent' b slopes: 0 to 1% C. etcvatlon: '165` ASL d;. Llt: 'ting Factors" !tone 2. softs rs, Types and characteristics: Vina Loam; a rich brown loam, 2 to # inches thick. WrOe Ag toll. br Limfttng Factors: None 3. Natural tiazards of the Land a. Earthquake zonal: Moderate, earthquake intensity zone Vitt. _. (Erosion Potential., None « Landslide Potential: None d. Fire Fsazardt Unclassttled e1 expansive soil Potential: modetate 4.a droioiiYsurface Water., None b, Ground Watett Area of Heavy troundwater YrlthdrAwal. c, Drainage charActerlstics., on site. d. Annual Rainfall (normal), 22 e. Limiting Factors, Mone 5. Visual/sceni'c Quality: Excellent 6. Acoustic QUAlltyt Good It, Alt Quailtyt rood elolOgIcalEnylronment: 6. Ventatfot:'Urban Nohti native plants And orchards. p, Mil lllto ttabltat: smaII birds And animals common to urban a'teas. cdltlltal Environment:;, 10. Archaeological and Historical Resources In the atei. Nigh 11. sensitivityy Area Butte County Ccheraf Plan designatlorl., Low Density ReildePlI al 1t. existing zonings ASR Existing Land Use ori• -site; Residential i%« sueroundln0 Area,, a« Land Uses:: MOANS. resldo..nilAl _. 9 `EnVironmenta;l Oheaklist * EvaltAtionl df ,Environmental'Impact (Cont h)Uedy ENVIRONMENTAL REF"RENOE MATERYAL J Ma .I1-1 Earthquake and Fault Actl ity:. Seisml �Sa,tyby (,H,i I�Utte county GeneraY Plan revlse8 . Cti Hriltl Ytieuunti°Gnalt' seButCoyeeerPahrvd 9-97f eby 3, p 111-1 subsidence & Landslide Potential;Safety of t , butte County General Plan revised 1.77,6y' ��i ' CounyiGeneral5Platiev�sedl'I-77f tiyy CEHi M I`t1'i,Butte S. Mae 1�! l -g, E'V'p al sol l ss feriyy El Mme-lnt, Butte Co nt Genera Pfn revised 1-7, 9), M p IV --1, Noise, Noise Eli? ept Butte CounlKy General Plan revised 1277, by CH7Mli I (. 7. Btaiif GoUniY Ge�era�hP� rsi'revlsendg(( 7�?hgyv'CHErtiletiglt; M�p 111-4. Natural Fire 1p� Classes; safety Ee ent; Butte County Genel-ra an rev sed 1-77, by CH2h� ht i (1 . Archaeorogical.Sep?lt,iyity Map b lames P: Manning, for Butte County Plann ng Oxcart ent, 1983. ig, g5choo blstrItt Map, Butte County Planning Depa r rmertt , 11. h1 Nitat Stud 1 ap, Nit ate Oncentif ti it, in &esOgcds,,tNO1jhWejj?,nuw1 e1?. di bi6i s begattmeT e (J�s %antes1012. %Icqj,tUraItP .eCaorn(a, Agense o servesMap estabIIsh4d b Resolution em e�1758, ig u7tte County Board of SUpery stirs, 13. roogr m, Feaera R9me genic' anagementlAgency. 1989 Fe 14. USGc Quad Maps Chico, i5, soil 1a C>ttcb f 19?5)/Orov11 1e 0920 Atda, Depar m�'rrt o Agr cU gture, 16' 5011 urvetmentyooff Ch 17 �tuce/Oroviile (1' 26) Area,`U,S, DepaV. NMI.tionC Ia Rrotettion. Jurisdictions. an t�es 1, tr3utte CoutfIre De atment anornia Depprtment of o�estry. Ru to CnUnty Ptng Depart(nent, COUNTY OF BUTTF bEPARTrM OF PUBLIC 14ORKS 7 County Center., Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (916) 538-7266 DATE: June 3, 1991 SUBJECT: James A. STEVENS .. TENTATIVE PARCEL, MAP & BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUH8ER(S) 42-64-15 & 22 LOCATION:_ 2 parcels located on the south side of Oak Way, amtox 300 ft, east. of ,,Almond Vista Coiart. Chico area. Attached; are documents regarding, ani a copy of, the above--described tentative, map for your review. Ifyou have any suggestions, additions or recommendations concerning this project, please return thein to this office no Inter than June 24, 1991 Very truly yours William Cheff Director of Public Works Jahn Mendonsa sistant Director JINt/kk vich LD 1.160 (4/89`) j l , COUM OF BUTTE DEPARUM, T OF PUBLIC WORKS 7 County Center Drive Orovillc, CA 9596 (916) 538-7266 June 3, 1991 James A. Stevens RE AP42--15 & 29- 1875 Oak Way Tentative Parcel bfap and Chico, CA 95926 Boundary Line Modification Dear Mr. Stevens» E This is to notify you that your application for a tentative ma..air the above-referenced property is being submitted to the PlanningDe t,"'.tment for environmental determination, and to theEllvironrental Healt"N L ,tment for its review. This application will be consideredcomplete when we have received notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health Department that all necessary data have been. received. These departments will contact yot:.regarding any additional information they may require. Very trtiiy "yours, William Chef Director of Public tiorks I JJghn Mendonsa sistant Director JM/kh cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department 14'112 (Revised 2/88) 1\TOT�C�E �l�' T�IE�ER.Ytii�I�T.A.T:=01V #X'Q _ Office of Planning and Research VROM z Butte County, 1400 3enth Street, Room 121 Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95814 7 County Center Drive or Oroville, CA 95965 County Cleric County of Butte' Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 211.52 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP' '# Name 111,11 and ELM 042-640-015 and 022 James A. Stevens State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number' (if submitted to Glearinghouse) B. A. Kircher (916) 538-7601 Project Location Swvth side of Oak Way in the Chico area Project:Description X114 and BW to divide .57 acre to create two parcels, one at 33 acre and one at .24 acre Theis is to advise that thn `Butte County (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approvedtheabove-describad project onand has made (Date) the following determinations regarding the above-described project. 1. The project will, will not) have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report vas prepared for, this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this projent pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were, were not, made: a condition of the approval of the project; 4 A statement of overriding considerations was, _;,was not, adopted for this 'project This is to certify that the final "PIP, with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at Butte County Planning Department 7 County,Oenter Drive Oroville, CA 95065 Date Received for Filing and Posting at OPR Signature Title tt' v35ed �ihreb 1986,