Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-640-019QPAAA M-04 u PLANNING Co SICN' SUNIM., CRY tH^ET 'Ai3iy DIVISInNs. 7T Ralph H. Watts , 9 'Goheva Lane Chico, Ca 95926 Same as applicant ,C�JET DESCRIPTION TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP to divide '1.95 acre to create 6 lots at approx. 1/4 acre each; a ?: ICON 6 hots located on the south side of Oak Way across from Glen ffaven Dr., Chico area. F'rC1R' S PARCEL NUMBER (S) . 42-64-#19 i ,t iII2iG ASR GENERAL PLAN LDR PROJECT CONSIS"TrNT? NE" AL PLAN CONFORMAIICE ,REPORT 2/8/90 DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE 1;1:-W CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS? IS APPLICATION RECEIVED 2/28/9q ,A 'N , /SUF'VEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: +� qo,Dp-,TE Plik-4NING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED Et�; CATEGORICAL EXEti1PTION - DATE FILED - D�'P�-INAT.ION A= DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED ,rMtTi=ED D12G. DECLARATION DATE ADdPTED ko ENV. xMPACT REPORT - DA'T'E CERTIFIED , STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO ,4Tj5. Cj),%L MITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE�� ,ADVISORY AGENC'.I ACTxONm., t�PPEA7aED APPEAL HEARING DATE $()A,Ru ACTION COt� MEt T� r'911PLANcixNG DIRECTOR 5 REPORT:.:, C3 � � r '0�1 / T MTAT1W S=IV'ISION LEM:Ate' SURllIVISXQN SMV;--:`4APPLICATION a r rate box) l (please cheep vP oP f NO: 14 WA Ta`(0 f= r n 1+ - i s PHONE APPLICANT: .. PHONE NO: ADDR1,`Z'0k4-- PHONE NO: ,a OR SUR11VIOR1. ADD tom, SS,. MA L jTCTIC UP Imp-'O: _ 'RANG!, SECTION 1,0CA1150h 'OF PROPER" Y: T%iNSlap Aw„C�9 aO ' S 'PARCEL IRMSER: _ q TOTAL ACREAGE!, PY,1,A71 RAN fltaMIT PRELIMINARY TITLE REpoRT 0Z RECENT ON INDICATE PELOW ITS DATE (dated within tau sax months) WITHAFSs ,rA AND RE0ORDING 1 R114ATION BY I'IHICH TKIS ' �RTICUi. +R PARCEL WAS CREATED': BWKPGE `7 �-�. --- remainder NufA8 M A14D SIS Off` PARCELS BEING (:REATx (it c uGi� ng any )v' 51 Y. i APP R.a r r L OR STP ,i. M DRAIN: 1)1,r iC" FO NATURAL WATER COURSE r+ r �-----"- 'rt�)Ti1.1,D MiHOD?' r��;GAGL" DxSPOA AL. �C',teck wa.+,,h Health Department) PRi)poe%t7 SOURCE MJF VIATER (�jheek with Health Department) 1)0 P()4TSTt AND I'ItQNG LIMES t IST Tp THE SC=Mky SP THE' ORIGINAL PARCEL? i, 5 �A BE EXTEND , 'CV NOT I S'IIMAIS, THE DISTAtla THEY WJ:LL 1t'kVE To FEB 2$1 i FDR OFFICE USE ONLY, , flu( t.t,. County y Planning Dept. Receipt 41 7 County Center Drive Ocovf t le, CA x 5965-3307 Applicant ��} I y-• WA-n-,5 (916) 53$-7601 AP ;1 Subdivision Name (if app.licabrLe) APPENDTX H batt Filed I;AND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Information for Planning Department 1:, hist. and describe any other related permits and other public approvals req+tired for this project, including those 'required by city, regional, state and federal. agencies: 15&4062 2, Proiw-sed scheduling/associated projects: AS4- P 1 Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, future development plans); c"�d1� ONIG y A., What method wi.l how osite andL be utilized to acrom=6ddte surface draina.gal Describe ti downstream "-drainage channels wil1 bei affected: 56 Proklinity of water for fire ,fighting pu°tposes (hydtt ntrs, poAds, etc,).- 6 WILL excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic ;cards (estimate); 7:1 blt.00tiuhs eOt travel to property Crural ari i mountainous areas only), AJA- c :_ 1 r tl . HNV I RONMENTAL IMPACTS AND _ MITIGATION MI::ASIIRES rdoiitify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the land division. What 'project design features or special conditions ofapontttentl( (mitigation moas.,ttres) are proposed to alleviate potential, I i irmen i (mite at:. en -j7 ,v0 'M,4,167' —,,0 le /� vvu►G6 /� G -c <t < ENV1 RoNmE 'SAL SZTTtNG ;t) Deseribe t:he project site as it exists before the project, kicluding information on topography, soil stability, plants -Ind animals, and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. l)esc:rihe any existing structures on the site, and the use of I he structures. 44- al 0.0 0 b/2G/-I 19 9 0 111449 L 01414 /t/C PL4Agr6 6A!fiiYl�t'2ALS d GUL7-Of2AC_., HIS 7-o&7GHL, { b/Z SCOrUle �4S/OEC , b) Desertbe the surrounding properties; including information on ptantS and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, indicate the type of land use, (residential, commercial, etc.), Inc errs ity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, depart- meat stores, otc.}, and scale of development ('height, frontage, setback, rear yard, et&.)•. �}L/n�lU/� d�GN/1RO 'T`U S,G.1C1Tf•7. �/sl/'t3LC F'�r�•tlLf% ., 1-4 �r7 7'� LUE5i �Ud,27'h` USc a lrf A10 Sy q -4z e6s7y� LC - r -i tL !� L S IA 1uT/,4 L C,4R'1 F'IC,ATION [ 'hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in t 11 d1EAC110-d Axhi.bits present the data and information required for this., In I I i;i l ev;i tuat.i'on to the best. of my ability, ,and that the facts, statements and 110'nrrr.`tion presented art; ,:rue and correct to the best of my knowledge, nitd ba 11 ef. .__.,.., Utt t K ` Sig ature Por 7tlko wip tale sheet for longer responses r` 'Tuottld9jah ptjb. ;y t SUBDIVIDER' S STATEMM IName R( C..� 1 a U 1�►TCS Date_ Project AP 1. Existing use I (s) of the land QLD ALMo.VO o c..t- IP_y___-__. Propased us', (s) of the land SW, _JUt S1_O✓t> 3, Improvements proposed (See Ch. '20=21 County Code) �St;• r public areas proposed S. Tree planting /or removal (approx. numbdLE D/6 e,46 o_ �tuD !D "A/� .ALS 1DrlJ -PIA RoA;0_ RIOT-OF-t.Q+/ AA 0 1- )F6Q�V&- 5. Preliminary copy of any condition, restrictive reservations or covenants existing or proposed shall be attached to this statement. attached ''` none 7 State type of division, i.e,, private road, urban rural, etc., `Patv,47c. 1 at M Lb 1040 y, , a JJyy _. GENERAL pI•-AiV` cobs orzMAMCE FOR I'ARCEI, NTAT'OTT SLT$r)l:y I2EPC7RT ON MAP Items 1-4 to be completed by applic&nt, 1 APPLICANT t#AME AND ADDRESS: (.�(.�/• f i�i `�} �f a/ Z. PROTECT .DESCRIPTION: .3r ASSESSOR IS PARCEL MJMBER(S):-- 40 PROPOSED USE: ZO following items are to be completed by the 21&ming Department: C1A.rMa ZONING. _ LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT:1�) •ms's,. iVAL PLAN DESIGNATION: 4XLA1e.J/ �•Qc % `� ` iavoiaament/Sine Desiion CrJteriat YES NO It is recomdtes.;ed that you perform Z. the following clocked items: 3. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK k� 1 BOTANICAL SURVEY', 5, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7. _. YES 4O WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH 1 9.. AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZOM • WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: StAff Determination: Substantially conforms to: WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL FLAN: 1: Land Use _ ---- Tf Yesj-S G�GGt 2, Conservation Name of Plan 3. Open ace 4, Safety .. / WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: _ 5. Noise. If Yes; 6. Housing Name f Reserve e 7. Circulation LAND USI: PUN! CJD�'�•(E;iTS f �" ,r i 5r ff Sigttature �G / ' 'itc° r'.Dite AS THE APPLICANT FOR THE PEQUESTED LA146 DIVISION'; I AS AWARE OF THE 'ABOVE STAFr DETERTIT#IATIOtT RECAC�DING 'IME CONFORMANCE, 'WITH THE GV1ERAL PL,W AND ZONING,, R'a'ted . •.7/'��LD. t Signature of Applicant *This keport will expite and be discdrdes# six6 "months troati ( the date of tho staff slghatur' ;LI", LD 10063 f (tevised 6-87) 1 , 1. g AME'.' RALPH H. 8nvironmental Health Department ^L ?� 'Planning 'Department N `- CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 42-64-9' Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) Butte County lheriff PG&E (check title report for ea,,ement) " Pacific Bell Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet) Sool Dis ri t` (w ll map) h 4 � (YU i Au cl Setter Company (individual. wells are not indicated on application or map) T Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Service Company (Chico area) Orovil,le-Wyandotte irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river) Thermal;ito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) 'Limesaddl:er Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd, to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area) Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area) _ Paradise Irrigation District Cita of . . (check call maps for spheres of influence) _ Oroville X Chico Paradise, Biggs Gridley CR!C7ILLE AREA ONLY: Lake Oroville Area 'Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet) Feather .River Recreation.. District ('see 1',rge map in cabinet) El Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only) BIGCS, RICHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS ('SOUTH BUTTE COUTY): check' wall map and title report to see ghat applies.. Some areas overlap. Drainage. District Aft Drainage District 42 -- Drainage District 9100 Drainage District x200 Reclamation District 15833 Reclamation District A2056 Sacramento arta San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District NCERTAIN CASES: kyr Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas) Cal Trans (near State Hwy. 32, 70, 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy. & Rich gale Hwy.'), 191 (Clark Road) State Water Quality Control Board (projects with more than 100 lets or units) United States Forest Service (if project 'borders,USA land —check AP books) Parks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville) State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville -= watershed Rock Creek Reclaimation 'Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east. of Hwy. 99 (see 'wall lnap) Chico Area Recreation & park Dist (only ,for subdivisions) E . SPECIAL CASES: check title, report for any mention of Special Services or easements such as to Thermalito irrigation Distract (numbered itemr,) + ��:• 3�,- 4a g drat. �.o` u *k �,$ dy ',: x �+¢ "F,.,� il� 3r 'A''b i.!°'�i^ ., '" `. 3a ie{' l"? ° •.,� r t7 w . t"� ^k,' +b `,a'=p* t1d ... - �'in 'til:° �¢: ! ask ,«,.«1 ,*r ♦r. ^'NL '?! a"'4T. 4' w� NO"t'ZC� ©�+" DETE�2.NT2N.A,.'TSC7L�7 , XQ Office of Planning and�,Iese -ch Butte County 1400,TPnth Street, Ro �^121°� Planning Department Sacramento, CA 95h4 7 County Center Drive or AUG 1 01990 Oroville, CA 95965 X County Clerk County of .Butte cAF VACEj U"" C43 C0 6y L, DAMON SXMTECT _ Filing of Notice of Determination in _compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code:' Project Title AP # Name ,!Ventaf,ive Subdivision Map 042-640-019 Ralph H. Watts State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John 'Men.donsa, Public Works, (916) 538-11266 Project Location On the south side of Oak T`Tay, across from Glen 1x,aven Drive, Chico area. Project Description Tentative Subdivi ion Map to-divide acres to Create 6,lots at approx.. 1/4 acre each. This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agencyy (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-described project on August 6,_1990 and has made. (Date) the following, determinations regarding the above-described project': 1. The project will, , XX will not; :have ;a significant effect on_,the_ environment. 2a An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, XX A Negative Declaration Was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. 3, Mitigation measures XX were, were noty made a condition of ,the I pproval of the project. 4. A statement of overriding considerations MAs.Mwa8 not, adopted for this project. This is to certify that the final 1IR With comments and responses and record of project~ approval is available to the general public at; Butte County Planning Department; 7 County Center Drive Oeovilleo CA 95965 Date Received for Filing and Posting at: OPP, August 8, 1990 i 1 "? i Sigtaturld 0 �` Cr4ig, _Sanders Assistant Planner— M Title . ftntrir�r4r� �5,,t..lk n ti Y3 ti ~V LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH VND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) CNEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIYE' , OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 CERTIFIED MAXL Telephone. (9t6 r, 8-x266 RONALD D,McELROY Depafy Director August 7, 1990 Ralph_E. Watts RE: AP 42-64-19 9 Geneva Ln. Tentative Subdivision Map Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Waists; At the .regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on A-agust 6, 1990, the Agency adopted a negative declaration with environmental mitigations and approved the tentative subdivision map on ,the above referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the attached sheets. Approval of the project included moving the cul-de=sac right -of=, ay to the east property If' no appeals are timely filed --Within ten (1.0) days of the date of the Advisory Agency Is approval—with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, this action Vill be final.. When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will, be in order for you to file your "finial maps' with the 13utte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours,, W31lliam Cheff Director of public works net rn+ M6 Co. Ptbeml � 00 A1,00 8199 i C,tirovillo, ohn Mendonsa C",�ltfornlml Assistant Di ector JM/k1 a ttadhmeri is cc: #1a='" ng Department Environmental Health Department - ' 4 'Ralph H. Watts "iSM, AP 42-64--19, 6 J aha located on the south side Way across from Glen Haven Drive. of Chico area: � Oak Public Works condition: �. � Submit road ,and. draF t for approval anins�3ge Plans to the Department of Public LUil the Works required facilities, Provide 20 ft. radius property line returns at all intersections, ;street- 3 Provide right-of-way fa intersections, r standard No. S-5 at all -street 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line .from the Oak Way and centerline access road, nterl ne of 5Street signs shall be provided b intersections per y the developer at all street p County requirements.. names for each street to the County addreSsbmit 5 alternate approval o street names.)' coordinator for 5 Construct full street section on access street to R - standard with rolled curb RS -2-B road AB, SC 250 :gutter, and sidewalk and 2r, AC80 Prime, fog seal and 95% relative Construct compac't.ion one-half plus 12 ft. lane street section cr, Cxic Way to RS -2_A read standard with vartica�. curb;: gutter, and sidewalk. NEinimum structural section to be 2" fog AC and 8" AB With seal and. 95% relative compaction. Submit design to County Department of Public Works ,fora n.t „Rig value Y and other data designations g mayPbevrequired to support sectiotj 7 Provide monumentation as required b Works in accordance Witt, Y the Department of Public accepted; stgndardsp 8 Street grades and other features shall comply with the butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other acoe�,>Led engineering standards. 9 Propide permanent solution for drainage; 10 All easements of record to be shown on the final 11 map, Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department responsible agency. or other 12 Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with requirements, accepted design: criteria, and County PG&E. recotmnetidationsButtie 1 Provide I ft. no access strip at east side of �4 acces Pay off assessments: s street, r, v 2-41. WATTSTSM AP 42-64-1.9 .7r Developer shall provide all required'traffic;"safety signs, including stop signs. V_;,alth Dept. conditions: Provide a letter or other docurnfentatiUn atom California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the subdivision. r Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they ate willing and able to Supply sewer service to the subdivision. 29 Place a note or! the 'map that states "Development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer" 21. Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels within the subdivision will require connection to a public water; supply" 22. Storm drainage trenches., if utilized, shall comply with locatio►`� nc depth requirements includi.n�; 3eeparation from water wells and water mains :.tigation Measures; 23.4. Pay a pro rata share towards installation of traffic signals at State Highway 32 and Oak Way. 24. Pay $75.00 per lot to the West Chico Fire Station Fund y Baffe Counk it ��-- LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY �'" DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS WILLIAM (BILI) CHEFF, Dlrectoe " 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . ORVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone- (416) 5384681;CERTIFIED MAIL RONALD Dr tA.ELROY June 29, 1990 Deputy Director ;Ralph H. Watts RE AP 42-64-19 9 Geneva Lane TSM Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mice Watts. Please be advised that the above-identified tentative subdivision' will be reviewed by' the Butte; County Subdivision Committee on July 11, 1990. The m.6eting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Data Processing Center Conference Room, 'located on the ground floor, of ,#1 County Center Drive, Oroviller California. 'The Butte County Advisory Agent; will review the project•.on August b, 1990. The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors' Room,..U5 County Center Drive, 0roville California. Public Works will recommend the conditions listed on the attached sheet.If you have any questions regarding this matter, please Contact this office-.: ,. Very truly yours, William Ch off Director of Public Works J4fin, Mendonsa Assistant Director attac ent cc gAnning 'D.eparktment Environmental. Health Department ia�s.F'flerrrrti�g ,`' broAl€e, C64forn a ' �� .�'.;;�w�� .,..eek"`- I� �•e, LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEA(IT `t DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK'S WILLIAM d6111) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telepnone: (916) 538.7661 RONALD D. MeI=LROY Deputy Dlwilor July 11, 1990 Ralph H. Watts RE- AP 42-64-19 9 Geneva. Lanes 26 TSRChico, CA 959 dear Mr. 'Watts- At the regular meeting. of the i3utte County Subdivision Committee held on :July 11, 1990, the committee i'e:vieved the above-referenced tentative subdi��ision- As a result of; this meeting, Public Works aril) recommend. Lhe enclosed list of conditions. This project has been scheduled for the Advisory Agency meeting.of Attgust 6,, 1990. The meeting will Commence at 9:00 a;.m, in the ',hoard of Supervisors Boom, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA I you have arty questions regarditpg this matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours Villiam Chefs° Director of Public Works 1� ffitj riendonsa si scant Director Jrs/ds attachment cc Planning Department Envirdbmental Health: Department, �hri�ti �b.l�asmin9 JUL 'Eq�tl ., C�rov'�I4a, C�lforn'� Y , ZINC oun LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY + PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTYCENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CAI IPORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 536-7601 June 26, 1990 Ralph H. Watts 9 Geneva Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re Tentative Subdivision lv1ap Dear 1VIr. 'Wath The Butte County Planning Department has completed the environmental review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. Iri addition, the Planning Dl ector's report required. by Sections 20-63 'and 20=99 of the Butte County Sut, div sion Ordinance liar been completed. Please rind enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Plaiviing Director's Report which, has b Pn prepared for your project` Please review the enclosed initial Study/Planping Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. if you note any errors ur omissions in our evaluation, please: bring them to our attention. The Environmental Documents and Planning Director's Report for your project hrs been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action, California Goverument Code Sections 65950 and "65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set liearrngs and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was received and accepted. The six month time limit for your project mandated by state law, will occur on ,August 29, 19906 The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the public hearing for your project, if there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact, re- evaluation of your project shall be required, u � Ale BUTTE SIERRAlifor tiie ��� a�ENN st&Klvou department of Anthropology t roh ? vo of WEEN BUTTER California State Unlve entrsity,;Chico ft)ventor ! ,?� MOM MIAMA Chico, CA 95929 ! PLUMAS TRINITY (916) 895-6256 SHASTA r r II May 14, 1990 Butte County Planning Department guffeCo.i��nnTn�emn.., #7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 MAY 2 3 1990 RE AP # 042-640-019/Watts; I.C. # L90-32 Oraviilo, Californta T22111 HlE, Section 94 CSC3 Ord Perry 7 5'quad, 1.95 acres Dear County Planners, In respi ase to the request received. May Vii, 1990, a record search for the above cited project was conducted by examining the official: maps and rccords for archaeological sites in Butte County. RESULTS PREHISTORIC RESOURCES There are r,o previously recorded sites of this type known to be located in or within one mile of the project area. However, there are unrecorded ethnographic; village sites which are known to have been, located somewhere along Lindo Channel. HISTORIC RESOURCES: There are no previously recorded historic archaeological sites known to be located within the project :area or on .adjacent parcels. The nearest historic property is located ift the town of 'Chico. This National Register of Historic Places property is Bidwell Mansion„ constructed by General. Join Bidwell in 1865, and still standing today. PREVIOU.SARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATI0JJS: According to our records, the project area has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The closest survey is to the north of the project area (B-4-301), No historic or prehistoric Artifacts, features, or structures were observed. LITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed were the official records and mapsfor archaeological sites and surveys it) Butte' County. Also reviewed were the National Register of Historld Places, the Cal if or�nia Inventory of Bistorie Rea6urees ( 1976); California Historical Landmarks 0982), California Points of Historic InterAent,'and 'Historic Spots in California (1,956) RECOMMENDATIO1N8i Based upon the above information. and the local topography, t4 sensitivity for prehistoric resources is considered to range Prom moderate; t,ra high, while the sensitivity for historic cultural resources is considered to • .=..:�-��,,;..c.: std ". ' say counN LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND 8 E A U T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 53&7601 April 19, 1.990 Ralph H. Watts 9 Geneva Lane Chico, CA 95926 Re' Tentative Subdivision Map AP 042-640-015 Dear Dear Mrs Watts: An initial study of your proposed ),ject�ent: ` ve Suelsion Map,indicates potentially adverse in pactsto theenvircnment (refer to to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as )part of the project. Otherwise, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. In order to assess the Potential for adverse impacts and to determine what, if any, mitigation measures would be appropriate, regarding archaeological sites, you may contact the following n ofixce for a search and se F� records sensitivity evaluation. A site plan and/or location map (preferably with Section, Township, and Range) must be sent along with a fee of $10.00 payable to the Information Center for this serv%ce. Northeast Information Center Department of Anthropology California State University Chico, CA 95929-0400 Attention, Curator of Records Should the office recommend that an archaeological survey, .be condu rY r you to contact an individual who ill is It will then be necessa for professionaaly qualified to provide such an evaluation, A list of qualified local consultants is included, Carie of these individuals can be hired to perform the 6urve and mitigation recommendations as warranted y provic�ie Inter-Departmental Memoranaum TO Butte County ,Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT Report on "Tentative Subdivision 'Map for Ralph R. Watts AP 00,42-640-190 DATE June 26, 1990 This is a ,proposal to divide 1.95 acres tr create 6 lots. The present zoningis ASR. The Land Use n kr ,p of the Butte County General Plan designates this area ai, ,X t 'there are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with county Zoning nor any adopted or proposed: ielement of the Butte County General Plan nor any spEcifiC or community plan. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed project: in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advis'^:y .Agency within the "required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 211,51.5. rtv evh c b - Q . ,v� u irk wti t.o.5 r4l Recommend.- ���� � �' � d 1. Pay a pro rata share towards imt;tallatio z of traffic signals at State Highway 32 and Oak 'Way. 2 Pay, $75,06 per lot to the West uhico Fire Station Fund,, CBS:bb r� AP'EN�X v COUDrXYC 0' 3F 1:1tY M CIYECXTA:ST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Lor, No. 90--02-2$-01 AP No. 042-640-019 t _ 'FtA.f�KGRt7L'INI~+ 1. Name of proponent Ralph 11. WattS Address of proponent and representative (.if applicable; 9 Geneva Lain Chico, %,'A 959.26 Project description; _ Tentative Subdivision map f T74 NfAWDAMOPY 'F=IsT xwc;s .O ' YES MAYBE NA I` 1. Does the project have the potential todegrade: the quality of the environment, substanti.ally reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, rause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levelsy threaten -to eliittinate a:plant or animal community, reduce, the number or restrict the range of a 'rare or endangered plant :or animal or eliminate important examples of major perio6s of California history or prehistory? 2. Dees the project have the potential to achieve short -terra benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals' (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relat.lvely briefperiod of time while long-term impacts will endure into the future.) 3. Does the project have imparts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project May impact on two or more, separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant,) 4. Does the project have environmental effect.9 whicl-, will cause substantial adverse effects, on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IIT.. D TERMSNA220N (To' be completed ty the Lead Agency), On the basis of this initial evaluation., IIWE find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will he prepared. although PP -project significant effect. .se because this ca nment,there will not be significanffectinca an theenvironment, oat a the MITIGATION MEASURES described on the attached sheet have been added to the project: A NEGATIVE DECLA ATION will be prepared; TA'& find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the enviro'nment and an. ENVIROt , ,1;V1 I14PACT ItEE'J ,' is required. COWITY OF 9ME, PL.WING DEPARTHW April 1. .J.990 ay. 4AA Craig . Sanders Atsista .1 planner Revieukd b ,+r. ; . Te4pure „G M j� V S1ZlJNC�.N'L'�n']C1: M'Ly?►C"L'�'' "MAM" answars')are requited on attartied sheet(s)- (E:cplanat ons of all "YES” and YE5_ MAYBE NO 1, EARTH. Will the propopal result in significant: geologic substx'uctures? = a. unstable;. :earth conditions, or changes in glo g - compaction or overcovering of the soil? - b, Disruption , displacement)c -- -- c, Change in topography 'or ground surface relief features? or modification of any unique geologic or physical d. Destruction, covering features? Increase in wind or water erosion Of sails, either on or off site? — e. beachesaands,orchannelocha changesinosiltatio0jr f, Changes in deposition or erosion ofam deposition or erosion bemowhich mayinlet or, lane? or the bed of the or ,;an or any y, - Loss of prizie agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban g. areas2 h. Exposure of people or property togearthquakes, _L ground faiiurelgarlsimilardhazards3 landslides, mudslides) ground Will the proposal result in substantial: ✓, Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? a. b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or .fumes? Alteration of ,air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change, in c: climate, locally or regionally? 3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial: direction of water movements in/ a, changes in currents, or the course ,or marine or fresh waters? either b; Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattOrns;, or the rate and amount /a / of surfa+"e runoff? surface drainage improvements, including vegetation r� c. Need for off-site removal/ channelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood craters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? 1 f. Discharge into surface waters, at in any alteration of surface water to temperattire, dissolved oxygen or quality, but not .limited Including b _ turbidity? — Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of"ground waters? g in &.aquantity or quality of ground waters, Dither through h, :Change' withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer direct additions or by cuts or ' � � ise available. for public water n the amount of water otherw i. Reduction in _ it supplies? supplies hazards such as flooding? «.— j: of people or property to water -related x. pL,AN'f LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial., e in the diversityspediesr or number of any species of plants a: Chang. aquatic iants)7 and ( includ g o grassy ci 'ps' .. _ or earlan' erect 5 g pedes of uj 1 . _. tini ue, rate b, }teduetion of the numbers of any q — plants? of new species of plants into an areas or in a barrier tti Introduction c t,the normal. teplenishment of existing d: Reduction, in of tiny agricultural latQP? _ y� Y ANIMAL LIFE, Will �e prbp�isal result insubstatd ial r a, change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land aniaais inc";tiding reptiles, fish and;',Sellfsh, organisms or insects)'? — , b, :in the: numbers of any unique., rare or endangered species of andimals?n F c:. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier, to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration of' existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ �i, BOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial: a. increases in existing,noise levels? V b. Exposure of people to severe noise 'levels? LGHT AND GLARE. Will, the proposal produce significant light and, glare: $, USE. will the proposal result in a su'+stantial alteration of the. present or planned land usz of an area? 9, NATURAL RESOMCES. Will the proposal result in substantial: ��. Increane in the rate of ttse of any natural resources? bi Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10. RTSK OF trpsm Will the proposal involve.- nvolve:A, A,A risk of explosion or release of ha ardous substances (including, but not limited to, ail,, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event i of an accident or uipset conditions b. Possible interference with an .emergency response plan or emergency evAcUation ;plan? 11. the p. p location, distribution, density or growth rate ofill g the human - - 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,, or c,teate A demand for addaional housing? 13. TPANSPORTATIONICIRCULA [ON. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement;? /* bb. Mects on existing parking facilities, os demand foie new pUrking1' c. Substantial impact on existing 'traUsportation systems3: �J d, Significant alteratkons to present patterns at: circulation or movement of. people. land/dr goods? x e: Alterations to watelieborne, tail or air traffic? f, Increase in traffic hazards to taotor 'vehicles, bic!lists or pedestrians? _ 14. UBLIC.SEP.VICES, 'Will the proposal have an effect upan) or result %n a need fqr new or altered government services; a, Eire protection? b, police protection? C, Schools 7 d'.; Parks di' other reereaitignal fadilitias? e Maintenance of public fadilities, including ;roads! f,, tither governme,ctal services?: �g� Z—MGY. Will the proposal result in: j S t�fAYSE NO a Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? _ .�.._. b, Substantial) increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or V require the development of new sources of Ohergy? UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the f!0 110wingt apogor or natural gay'? b. Communications systems" -/ c, Water availability? ---- v d. Sewer or septic systems? --- -^-- e. Storm water drainage? --- v £. Solid waste and disposal? _. .i� IgI61 HEJS - Will the proposal result in a Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding.meittal Cf health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vstarr vie-+ open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creatian of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 1 . gECREATT4:4. Will the prop,)sal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity' of existing recret..tional opportunities? CUL, _. TUPtL RESOURCES, a. will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction of a V prehistoric or historic,-rrhaeologicai 'site? --- b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change' which would affect unigtte ethnic cultural values? r--- d. Will the pvopa-kal restrict existing religious or sacred uses, within the potential impact area? `I) -X SCiiSST-ON OV,N V Y c NI"cT✓NTAi, _cT�. .C7 ZO V See attached. y4. y r r l i I)ISQUSSION OF EI MRQNHENTAf� E`�A��Ci 'l'fflN AP # 042-640-019 1b,3b,c,h,16e: Development of 5 additional homes on the property along with driveways, roads, patios, etc., wil! "lead to compaction ot, overcovering of 40 to 50% of the soils on-site, This Nvill lead to changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns on the property, and increase,the amount of surface runoff. The applicant: proposes to dispose of st Mace: runoff through the use of seepage .renches until such time as storm drainage facilities become available in the area, Use of seepage trenches may introduce oils, phen.)Is, fertilizers and other productsof residential use into the ground waters in the area. The design of any such seepage trench must meet Environmental, Health Department requirements. As such, adequate protections are guaranteed. g: Approximately 2 acres of orchard land will be converted to ;resid'entia4 uses; The area is already heavily impacted by residential development, and the loss of an additional; 2 acres will not be significant. 11,, All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthqv eke Intensity Zone NqH.. The subject property is Located approximately 6 miles southwest of the Tuscan Tvlonocline, a fault system of unknown; activity: Construction of buildings to Uniform Building Code standards for seismically active areas should provide. .adegiizte protection to occupants in case of seismic activity: 4d: See Item. 1g. 13a,c,f: This project will add from 45 to 60 trips per ;day to Oak Way, which currently experiences approximately 1.400 trips per day at 14ighway32. As such, this project will represent an increase in If affic and traffic hazards on Oak Way. Installa#ion of a traffic signal at the Oak Way/Highway 32 intersection would help alleviate traffic hazards at that point. It is suggested that the applicant contribute a pro rata share towards the installation of a traffic light at the Oak Way/Hi$,hway 32 intersection. 14a , Butte County/CDF does not now operate a fire station west of the: Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. Access to this area by fire, trucks can be restricted by train movements. At any time, the train can block the tracks for 20` .minutes �i'inder federal guidelines. The average hoose burns in 8' minutes. To serve a browing population on the west side 6f town and minimize the risk, of inaccessibility, to this area by rlroad operations, the Fire Departnten.t has building established a Pee station fund. Each developer is requested to contribute $15.00 per lot towards the purchase and construction of a new fire station. g In p addition, the Board of 8i.ip sons has adopted a resolution requiring Pn all parcels -lot tenders. b Vii With the 1 County's current a X200'00 ,for tribui ase of waY,w..financial situation it a is snot known whether paid fire protection services will be available beyond August of 1990: Y a . w 1.4b -f: This project will represent an, incremental increase in demand for public services in the area. 20a: The project site has many of the attributes associated will, archaeological sensitivity. It is recommended that a records check to performed by the Northeast Information Center at the Department of. Anthropology at California State University, Chico, to determine if an archaeological survey is necessary. JI. _ MANDATORY FINDINGSOF STCNIIyIC, ANCE a: See. Item 20a. nested Mitigation Measures 1. Pay a pro rata share towards installation of traffic signalsat State Highway 32 and Oak Way. 24 Pay $75.00 per lot to the West Chico Fire Station Fund: 3, , No mitigation measure is recommended at this time regarding archaeological impacts. If a records check indicates that an archaeological survey is warranted, then a survey must be performed in order to determine if archaeological resources exist on the site and if so, to formulate appropriate mitigation measures,' 4 Applicant: Ralph H. Watts Assessor's Parcel # 042-140=100 Log # 90-02-28-01 DATA SHEET A. Project Description 1. Type of Project: Tentative Subdivision Map. 2. Brief Description: Dividing 1.95 acres into 6 lots ganging from 9,000 square feet to 13,500 square feet. 3. Location: On the south side of Oak Way, approximately 300 Meet east of Glenwood Avenue, to the Chico area. 4. Proposed 'Density of Development: 'Three dwelling units per acre. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing:. 40-50%, including building sites, driveways, patios, roads, etc. 6'.: Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Property fronts on Oak Way. _ 7. Method of Sewage Disposal: City, of Chico sanitary sewer. S. Source of Water Supply: California Water Service Company. 9. Proximity of Power fines: To property. 10. Potential for further `land divisions and development: ' None under existing Yi ngi 13,, Environmental Setting Physical EnN ironment 1 Terrain - a. General Topographic Character- _ Generally :flat valley lands. b. Slopes: 0-2%Q. c. Elevation: Approximately 170 feet A.S.I., d. Limiting Factors: None. , 2 Soils a. 1`ypes and Characteristics. Parwell Loam, generally well d';ta ned with good permeability and excellent crop potential. b, Limiting Factors: None. 3. Natural ]Hazards of the Land A. Earthquake Zone: Moderate Earthquake Inteno ty Zone V111. b. Erosion Potential: None. C. Landslide Potential: None. d. Fhm Hazard: Unclass Eyed. e. Expahslve Soil Potential: Moderate. 4. Hydrology A. Surface Water: 'None on-site. b Ground Water: ,Abundant Valley aquifers. c Drainage Characteristics: Natural drainages to Lite west tm dards.. ,"8_ 4 Sandy Gulch and Big ChicoCreek. See a o trenches re proposed forstormdrainage facilities until storm do�ns become available. d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 20-22" e. Urniting Factors: None. 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Moderate; impacted by entro rching urban development. 6. AeousUr, Quality: Good, 7. Air Quality: Good. Biologie.al Environment: $. Vegetation: Valley orchard lands. 9. Wildlife Habitat: Smallbirds and animals common to valley orchard lands. Cultura [_Environment: -'10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area; I.ow sensitivity area. 11.'Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential. '12. Existing Zoning: A -SR. 13`. Exi.;Aing Land Use on-site: Existing orchard, 14. Surrounding Area: r k., l}'e� Or'charu �j;rAir�ant; and single-family dwellings at .'NF, urban to suburban densities. b. Zoning: A. -SR. c. Cerra Plain Designatlon: Low Density Residential. d Parcel Sizes: 1/3 -acre parcels to 10+1- acre parcels. e Population: Suburban. density. 15; Character of Site and Area: Rapidly developing fringe area of Chico, 16. Nearest Urban Area: Chico, 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico, California Water Service Company, Improvements Standards Urban Area: Yes, 19, Fire Protection Service: a.. Nearest County (,State) Vire Station: Cohasset Road Station 042. b. Water Availability: California Wafter Service Company Hydrafrts. 10. Sc'hoo'ls in Area: Chico Unified School District: ,"8_ ENVIRONMENT,&L REFERENCE MAP: fru L 1, a1p -1,Etaaal Fault Activity: Seismic Safety Element, Butte Mty rnrevised -77,� CH Al Hill, 2. Map ILiquefaction sed 1 77, by CH , -.2M Hill,iSeismic Safety Element,.. Butte County GeneralPlan 3. Map M4, Subsidence & Landslide Potential: Safety Element, Butte County Genoral Plan revised 1-77, by'CHX Hill. 4. Map 111-2; Erosion Potential; Sitfety Element, Butte County General .Plan revised I-77, by CHX Hill. 5. r used -3 byExpansive C�2M I�iilSoils: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan 6, Map IV -1, 1N0ise: Noise Element, Butte COLtnty genera.) Plw-i by CHsI'vi Hill. Map V-1, Scenic Highways: Sceiic Highway "rleineiit, Butte C",oijn'-ty General I?Ian revised 147, by CHIV Hill. 1. Nfa.p J,14, Natural 'Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Bu'fte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH f -1111 9. Archaeological Sensitivity Map by James P. Manning, for Butte County Planning Department, 1983; 10. School District Map, Butte County Plaivning Department. 11,` by Chico DepartmeStudy Map, Rour p, eses, 1y'orth vtConcentration, in Shallow _ t�Ve71s, 1983; Department of _ tern District, `Ibt. Resources Agiyncy, State c'r California. 12. Agricultural' Preserves Map, established by Resolution No. 67-178, .Butte County Board of ;Supervisors; Decembeir 5, 1987: 13. RateFlood, Insurance Maps, s,ational Flood Insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management 14. USGS Quad Maps, Ch:.o Photo Revised 1960, M Soil Map, Chico► (1925)/Oroville (1920 Area. U.S. Department of AgrICUlttYre - 16: Soil Survey of Chico(1925)/Oroville (1926) Area, U.S. .04artn ent' of Agriculture. ,� _ < -. ,.-• �, ; his �. _ it = Butte® , �'t,AND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY DEPARTMENT DF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH d i Addrasa• $1 196 � emorxal way 0 7 Ccunty Canter Drive _ 0 747 Elliott Road Reply to Chick, Colflornl d 95926 Oroville, California 95965 f aradiso, California 95969 Telephone: 916/'891,27.27 Telephone 916/538.7281 Telephoner 916/872.6306 March 21; 1990 Ralph. Watts rd. PjarA1ngC011n RB: Ralph Watts Subdivision Geneva Ln., rZ %990 Ss Oak Way, Chico �R Chico, CA 95926 AP3 42-64-19 _ ,� Dear Mr; Watts: Thisdepartment has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works Land i Development Section that we axe prepared to act on the above application. Based on present nfo>rmatian: we can recotrmend. approval or conditional, approval. Recommended Conditions for Approval 1: Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to the subdivi- sion., 2. Prov�.de a letter or other documentation. from City of Chico stating that they are, willing and able to supply sewer sere; e to the subdivision. 3. Place a note on the map that states 'Developitient of 'parcels within the subdivi- Sion will. require connection to a public :sanitary selves." 4 Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels within the subdivi- sioti hill require connection to a public coater supply." 5. Storm c tAinage trenches if utilized:. shall corrpl.y Kith location and depth requirements including separation from water wells grid coater mains. If you have any questions regarding this letter$ please contact the Chico office listed above., Sincerely, Thomas Reid, R.tiR Si, Supervising Environmehtal Health Specialist Division of :Environmental health TR/g1 cc: Public Works; Planning