HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-660-002J
� i
.. _, .,. . �.,. , .a �,,�.� „ �..�,,
_,. _
t
J
� i
.. _, .,. . �.,. , .a �,,�.� „ �..�,,
_,. _
I
OLA
ALL
i�ltffi wile,
CY
prAp iNINGIIC�3l SSION SUMMARY SN ET FOR ID DIVTSIONE
Craig Dor,alson - oakway Park 5ubd�.� ` $� ''30-02
D+SSS c/o NorthStaj Engineerang,_2A"Declaration Drive, Chico,CA
-.
Craig Donalson/Dennis Deromedi
=CT DESCRIPTION_
TSM to amend easements and property lines
...
dn 5 lots
j,SC,
T, ON Both sides of Lia Way, south of Oak Way,
Chico.
_AS,S�ESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 42-66-02,03,05,08,14 --
Zt;Y�i3 JG A -SR GENERAL RLAN LDR, PP_OJ'ECT CONSISTENT?
GE1BRAL PIAN CONFORCE REPORT November 7, 1989
MAN
DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LA.i'cD CONSERVATIONACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED NCVember 21, 1989
AGE;:IT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENOINE89: Northstar Enginee-"ring
ADD}RE5S 20 Declaration Drive, Chaco, CA 95926
...
DATA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RE'
PORT PREPARED
ENaIIRON,`�EI�TAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
DET�P�iIN�,TION
F:Sb DATE NEGATIVE 'DECI, 'RATION �- DATE ADOPTED,
LAPia*
��sr r► aka MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTEI����,!
ire ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIFIED-
Wt 144 1 )q
STATE =ARINGHOUSE NO
80,B. COMMITTEE MtETING DATE_
ADVISORY' AGENCY HEr1RING Ir1'i'E _� M
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION___
AP:t?kALED APPEAL HEARING DATE .
C
HOARD ACTION,
CO2"tiENT�'OR pLi�tNi"LCTOR'S REPORT ,ST� I{ "I' e �1I,/vm
r � DIF � - _ y �,
I
t, TIMTATIVE SUBDIVISION.. . TENTATIVE, PARCEL_MAP
PRELIMIPTARY SUBDIVISIOI`! WAIVER APPLICATION
,(Please che," appropr. 1,ate "box:)
APPLICANT •� _ PHONE
AvUl2l;S o axe•-� �,��*-";:�-w, 2v�",� �C�o� Ca. ,�.1;.sG�y
FAoN zs0.
1:1°;GINLIxR, 01? St3RVE'r0it. '� �7stsr c..e-s FriONE NO:3-1r50(Q
C
NOTICE OF fla- 'RITiG , T'
10CATIO N OF PROPERTY: >,rWNSHV RANGE SECTION
MONZ- ; OF:,' S PARCEL N MiA': 4 ¢--v '�It TOTAL ACREAGE 7 3
PLEASM, 5U&MIT PRELIMIMPY TITT2 REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE ID SURANCIE
(dated within leaf sic ;months; FnTx APPLICATON. INDICATE ;::BELOW THE DATr.
AND RECORDING INVOiWAI tOkr BY 1-HICH THIS PARTICULk .PARCEL WA5 CREATED;
DA't'V BOOK PAS
t10W1;9 MW SIZE OF 110=8 MING CREATED (in-luding any remainder`):
1)1jr1JANC8, TO NATUF.AL VATER COURSE Oil STOPM DRAIN:
p1jovoorm I.MT110D OF S1r'1rrAGE, ViMPOSAL;
(Check with 14ealth Department)
i
['ItotDotm.,,D 50URCE Oi+ WATER:
iCheck Stith Health Department)
t . v . r t
1f0 V)�J)"T� AND PHONE i.,:�'iES EXIS7. TO THE 130iJNI�1Et. QP I'kiD ORIGINAL -PARCEL?
Iv NoTio lim,1IMATE'vt-' DISTAVCE THEY WILL MW3 TO BE 'P,=MDED
7�
—44 t A0311,
NO x.020 Rovised
°
FOR'kCiUSR; ONLY.-
81,11
NLY:81,11 t,w County Planning Dept ' Receipt
.7, CoqnLy rCentez prive
Orovitle, CA 95965-1397 "Applicant11
X91 is 43$-7601 Atm It
9111 aCA41
Subdivision Name (if appticahle)
-61
APPENDIX H
Wire F i ted
LAND DIVISION APPLIC,ATIOi!S
Supplemental Information for Planning Department
JL' ; Gist and describe any other, relatci_permits and other public approvals-
regtsired for this project, including those required. by city, regional;
state and :federal agencies;
2 Proposed schedulingtassociaited projects: d1519,0'
3, Anticipated "incremental. development (phasing of subdivision '"its
future development plans) ` zef
/[. What method,will, be utilized t6 accommodate surface drainage? Describe
how on-site and dounstrearndrainage channels will be affected.
x
1
5, Proximity of water f:or Etre fighting purp0.ses (hydrants, ponds,
b, WC it excavatton or grading be necessary! Cubic yards (estimate):
74 i)troctiuns Tor travel to property (rural grid mountainous areas onyx
K , I NV' I IU NMENTAL iM PAGTS AND, MITIGAT IONIAA. lOkS
rdentl(potentially significant environmental impacts associated with
the land division. What project design features Or special conditions
of appeov,tl (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential
rnv i ronmentaclimpacts?
9. VNVI RONMI NTAL SETTING*
a) Describe the ptaject site as it exists before the project,
i -eluding information on topography, soil stability, plants
.and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects,
Describe arty existing structures on the site, and the use of
i fit! structures.
b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
1)lants and animals add any cultural, historical or scenic aspects•
indicate the type of .land use (residential, cOnmercial, etc.,),
Intensity of la.tid use (one-familyy apartment Iioisses; shopsi depart-
ment stores, etq.), and scale of development (height, frontage,'
setback, :rear yard, etc.)..
GRRI INfC,Arim i• hereby certifV that the. statements furnished above and in
tilt, al trecheet exhibits present the data and information required for this
tnl iol evaluation to the best of my ability, and ghat the facts, statements
ati+d information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
•;ttd bel.Ief:
ITO k!
For
*0so .4oparate sheet for Jonger responses.
tc/'tiy
°lrl ,,)iiaitldo,aneC1 pUe"1
40
a, Dov H-
��
7
by { n C.-.
Planning Department ( iVAME; ArII1DED OAICP�AY PARK ..
X Environmental Health Department
CDF (Forestry Department) AP: 42-66-02, 03, 05, 08 & 14
Attn: T. Craig .Carter (on"areas north of red line on map)
Butte County Sheriff
PG&E (check title repent, for easement)
Pacific Bell
Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
S ool 'Di tni t -(w 11 map)
Water Compan 'if individual wells are not indicated on application or map)
Durha ,Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California Water Service Company (Chico area)
Oroville-Wyandotte irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river)
Thermalito 'irrigation District (Th6rmalito area NE of river)
Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd..
to lake)
Del Oro Water I(Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail TIaterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
Paradise irrigation District
City of . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence)
Oroville
Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
0ROV11,LE AREA, ONLY41
lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet)
Feather Ri.vtt Recreation Distr'•-.t (see large map in cabin4m)
El Medio Fire District (check wal map, a small portion of Oroville only)
B1005, R:I;CHVALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (LOUTH BUTTE COUTY),. check ,wall map and title report
to see what applies. Some areas overlap..
Drainage District #1
Drainage District m2
Drainage District #TIDO
Drainage District#200
Reclamation District 101$33
Reclamation District #2056
Sacramento and San iloagoin Drainage District
Butte Creek Drainage District:
VI ERTAIN CASES:
Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions)
Dept. of Pith and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas)
Cal Trans (near State Hwy, 32, 10, 99, 149 (Chico cit -off), 162 (Olive Hwy, &
Richvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State Water Quality Control hoard (projects, with more than 1.00 lots or units)
United States Forest Service (if project bordersiUSA land -check AP books)
Parks and Recreation Department (propertl hear Laky Oroville)
State Water Resources Department (property near Lake Oroville watershed)
Rock Creek k6claimation Dist. (west of Chito Airport, south of Rock Creek and
past of Hwy. 99 (see wall map)
Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisionG)
SPECIAL CASES., check title reports for any mention of special services or easetoftL•s such
as to Thermalito Irrigation District (num4,;.'red items)
4,
0
w
lit
gutte coaft
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT
I COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE. CALIFORNIA 95955-3397
TELEPHONE. (91b) 538-7601
November 15, 1990
Rick Rodriguez
NorthStar Engineering
20 Declaration Drive
Chico, CA, 95926
Ret Oakway Park Subdivision, APN 042-660-002, 003
Dear Mr.. Rodriguez:
Thin Ietter is in response to your letter dated November 1.2, 1990, regarding two (2)
mitigation. measures for the rabove mientioned project: Since these fees have been paid for,
all of the subject lots, the mitigation measures can be considered ;fulfilled.
1 ` Should you have any further questions, please call meat 538-7603.
Sincerely,
13.A. Kircher
Director of Planning
Thomas Last
Associate Planner
I3AK' TL,rdm
_ Nort r
ENGINEFRING
Pv Engineers • Planners • S�smPrs
November 12� 1990
County of :Butte
Planning Department
'CCounty Center Drive
OrovilleF CA 9596
Attention Thomas Last
Re Amended 6akway Park SnUivi.sion
A.P. 42-66-02, 03
.Dear Thomas
Regarding the mitigation measures ,for said amended subdivision; enclosed
please find receipts for the payment of the pro -rata share of signaliza-
tion and payment into the '`est Side Fire Station Fund. This money was
paid when the lots were created for the original. bakway Park Subdivision.
This amended project does 'not create any nets lots, nor does it create
additional traffic or daily vehicle trips,
Therefore, satisfaction of the mitigation measures for the original
project should be sufficient in this case.
Please review and comment Sark to this office regarding this matter.
8irtcerely,
NORTHSTAR ENGINEERINO
`71'.D
Rick Rodriguez
RRd
enc:
20 MCLARATIDN DOE
CHILD, BALI 0ANIA 05926
._,., 91fi$0� i6d0J .._ .
COUNTY OF BUTTS
( DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORTS �
7 County Center brave - droviile, California 95965
Telephone,. (916) 5387266
MAPS AND IMPROVEMENTS - PROCESSING RECEIPT
ituty of heap or Development W11T.4:1Y t�A�t S'ei�i3I�T BION
iL5f8110n of Property--'O' narce13 ori tbn. _solidi side o:f Cak Way aoaror.. ':00 ft . east:
0.1,-x 7r. t ;'alga ar.sa. - A,P. 42 ] 4-)Q &-91
_
Appi��ant. •"�a•,;��'v :� 0;th:Iy Recd fromrtE
vIailumtg Address . ?.Qu tox 11055 t31l r..o, CA 95927
;t., SUBDIVISION, PARCEL MAP AND SITE IMPROVEMENT PROCESSING
A. Final Map: Number hof Lots
(Ff;e. Per map plus per lot) FEE:_5—,
5. Improvement Plan Check and Inspection
Estimated ':Construction Cost: _
Fee. P/6 of Estimated Construction Cost FEE; $.,�. -
O. Street Sign FEE $ -
t. Private Road Inspection -- - - FEE., $
II., STORM DRAINAGE DEPOSIT
Total Ur is or Acres in Development
Fee: Utfit/Acre FEE: s
III. ROAD IMPROVE
MENT/T.AAPFt&,,SIGNAL.-FUND i� 126�i. ",
v_., •lcltr-+ .+ .i �f.; .` GJr FEE.
IV. RECORD OF SURVEY ,::- FEEi $
V. OTHER_. .
_.
$
TOTAL AMOUNT, $ x900.99
Director of Pub(fc Works
r�� 7I tjrj89 lti393
ey Date Receipt Nuri bor
LO wo ('novised aC88)
\,w w ,
REQUEST FOR AUDITORS CERTIFICATE AND TREASURER) RECEIPT u
Depa uinov . MB11-C WORKS LAND DEVE-02MENT SECTION`S Date; __ July 7. 1989
PLEASE ISSUE AN AUDITORS CERTIFICATE AND TREASURERS RECEIPT AS 1 -OL -LOWS
pescrlptlon/Purpose Fund Ti'e Fund erode
�
Sub, Fund
Code
Rev, Coda
Amount
DEPOSIT X103
�.
RECEIPTS 10877 & 10878
?Is — GF24"RAL F-10
-
21i15i
80:00
Y "9ATIVE MAP oc CBMKING FE GaU- AL F-10
ZIREES SIGNS ROAD F-,30
_7]:1900
611700
7,475.38
500.00
%IEi E'C31Mt�7� 7IbT7 -__ �� F_:1230-
C. Donalson & D. Deromedi P.O: BoX 4055. ' icci, q&-95927,
Oakway Park Sub. , TSM, & 91. tttvey Bo
=--_---
1, 500.00
-.id
.� .��_.
1,.500.00
' CICO FITtE STATION -. �� �� '��:�2 1
:Same as aboye'{k`,
7
TOTAL
11,, 055.38
NorthStar „
f
ENGINEERING
Civil Engineers • planners + Surveyors
�fe ��. F�armfng Cortu�c',
August 22, 1990 AUG 2 3 "O"11
oroxille, Califom!d
County of Butte
Planning Department
7 Counts Center Drive_
Qrovill.e, Chi 9596
Attention: Thomas Last
Ret. Amended Oakway Park Subdivision
A.P. 42-66-02 03
Deal xnomas:
Regarding the mitigation measures for said amended subdivision,
enclosed please find receipts for the payment of the pro rata
share of signalization and payment into the West Side Fire
Station Vund, This money was paid when the lots were created
for the original Oakway Dark Subdivision. This amended pro-
ject does, not create any new lots, nor does it create additional
traffic or daily vehicle trips=
Therefore, satisfaction of the mitigation measures for the original
project should be sufficient in this case.
Please review and comment back: to this office regarding this matter,
Slhterely,
NORTHSTAR E•'NGMERING
4
Rick Rodriguez
RROd
en+c 2
,20 MLAW116N. •_.,.
t;1VE
_ GHIG6, CAL1fOHNfA 9596
Nfi07: CE PJB' DE'1",:eRN13T-:N U1V,.
TQ o Office of Pumning aZR eslarc M _ Butte County
1,400.Ten;th Street, R m 121 Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 APR I 1'4 (�® 7 County Center Drive
or
Oroville, CA 95965
County Clerk CANDAC6 J. GRCe-;;3,R buns Cb nr rk
County Of Butte BY ' �Deputy
aJI3JECT s Filing of Notice of Dete. mnation in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the :Public Re:.ouxces Code.
Pact Title AP 1i Name Craig Donalson
M914DED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP $:',-66-02,03,05,08,14 oakway Park
State Clearinghouse Number Cont,,-. -,,t Putson `telephone Number
Uf submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa., Public works 916-538--7266
'Project Location
Both sides of Lia"Way, south of Oak Way, Chico.
Project Description
Pmended Tentative Subdivision map to amend easements and,. property lines on 5
lots.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Ab,,.ncy or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on 4/2/90 and has made
('Date)
the following determinations regarding the, above-described project:
lu The project will, X will not, have a significant effect on the
environment
2i* An Environmental Impact �k,'P&rt Was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA,
X A Negative Declaration vias prepared for this Or6ject pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA
3 I-litigation measures _.were,• �ere not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4 A statement of overriding considerations was, X was not, adopted
for this project,
This is to certify that the final 'EIR 'vith comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Date Received for Filing and
Posting at UPR 4 /10 0 291? � tx viG�dit�a .
Signature'
1f,0 0 Craig Sanders, Assistant Planner
Title
i�
i � :,
it
i
N _ z
ffutteoun
LAND QF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
DEPARTMENT Or,PUBLIC WORKS
WIL.LiANI (6111) CHEFF,, Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE-,OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
j' Telephone- (916) 538.7661
RDNALO D. McELROY
CERTI>+IED MAIL Dspuly, Dieealor
April 2, 1990
i, Craig DOnalson M., AP 42=-66--2, 2, 5, $', and 14
c/o NorthStar Engineering Amended Qakuay Fw,rk TSM
20 -Declaration. Drive
, Chico; CA 95926
Dear Mr. Donalson
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on
April '�, 1990, the Agency noted that a negative declaration With
environmental mitigations was previously adopted for the project on
January 12, 1989, and approved the amendment of easements and property
lines on the above -referenced property subject to the conditions
listed on the attachted sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed ---u- thin ten (1Q) daps of the date of
the .Advisory �gency'ls approval --•-faith the Cleric of the Board of
Supendsors, this action u�ill be final.
Ii When: the conditions' of approval: are: Complied with, :it will be it order
for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for ;recordation u.ithin tu'Onty-four '(24) months of
the date of"approval by the Advisory Agency.
if You haw any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly
y.7urs y
William Chef
tlifeCd.Ptntl�mq Director of Public w`o'rks
JWih Mendon a
Assi8tant bxrnctor
attachment
cc V;lathing Departitlent
Br,avironmentsl Health Department
l4aorthStar,,fngineelci.ng � ,.
Amaiidedr Oakway Park Subdlvislon, AP#' a; 42-66-02, 03, _05# 08, Lind 111;,
amended tentative subdivision timp to amend easements and property
1-ines ori five lots on -both sides of Lie Way, south of Oak Way. Chico.
= Eng
: eer< NorthStar Engineering
Public Works conditions
1
Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works
for approval and install the required facil.itLes.
_Provide
20 ft. radius property line returns: at .all street
intersections.
3
Provide right-of-way for standard Pto.. S-5 at all street
-intersections.
4
indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of
Oak Way and a 5Q' fU., building setba(:'- from the centerline of
U Way..
5
Street signs shall be provided by the 'developer at a31 ;streat
ince sectiona per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate
-names for each street to the County address coordinator for
approval of st-ree_- _hzges.),
6 -
Construct o -e Lal.f plus 12 toot street s2ctiom on Oak Jay to r
RS -2A -road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and s dewnllk
and lir AC, 8" AD, SC 250 prima, fog seal Pad 957. rel.at;i:ve-
compaction.. Construct full .street section on Lie Way and on
-
unnalided road to RS -2B access rood standard .withcurb,: gutter,
and sidewalk. R nimum structural smtion to be 2' AC and 8"
AB with fog seal and 95% relativ: compaction. Submit; design
to County Department of Public germs for approval. "R" value
determinations and other data may be required to support section:
design.,
T
['-:,)vide monumentation as required by the Department of Public .
Works: in accordance with accepted standards.
- 8
Streer grades andl` -ather .features :shall comply with the Butte
County nrdi races, de --4n jresolutiou and other accepted`'
_.
engineering standards.
9
Provide permanent sc*71 da;tion, for drainage_
- - _
10`
All easements of record to be shown on the final map.;
li
Meet requirements of Butte County Fire Department or otta'er
-
responsible agency.
12
Street lighting sball be provided in acco.dance with Butte County'
requirements, accepted design criteria,, and recommendations of
PG&E.,
13
Meet the requirements, of the utility companies (i.e.., M&E', ,
Pacific Telephone, water, sewer). .
14
Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
15
Pay Chico Area Recreation fees if applicable.,
16
Developer shall provide all. required traffic safety signs, :including
stop signs.
AMENDED OAKigAY PARK SLtBDIVISION
Planning Dept. conditions
17 All hats are to conform to the requirements of the zone.
Health Dept. conditions
18 Provide a letter or other documentation from Californi
Service Company stating that they are willin a Fater
domestic water to the subdivision. g and able to supply
PP y
19 Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico statin
that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to the
g
e;
i 20 'lace a note on the map that states "Development of lots
the subdivision Vill xe wire connection to a within
q f
� ZZ Place a note on the map that states '► public water supp�,y„ r;
Development o lots
subdivision will.. require connection to a public; water supply-. I,
Within' the
22 Pump and fill existing septic tanks and connect constru
by the tanks to the public sewer. ction served
NOTE' Previous letters provided by utilities are sa
compli.anc,r with conditions 1 and 2; tisfactory ,for
The fol.1
w0ing mitigation measures are required.
23 Contribute $15 per lot to the tdest Side Fire Station Fund.
24 Contribute a
pro> in share towards the signalization and/or
improvement of the Yntersectxon o Oak Way and H
p
Sth Ave. and Hw . 32, f wy. 32 or ttest
41
a y
su He coull
SAND Cid NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
-. --„ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK,
WiLL1AM (8111) CHEFF, Directot
I 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965
j Telephone. (916) 538.7681
RONALD 17» McELROY
Depufy Dfeczot
i
`February 28, 1990
Craig Donalson RE AP 42-66-2,3,5,8,14
,c/,o North5tar EngIneering Amended 0akway Park TSN(
20 Declaration 'Drive
Chico, ,CA 95926
Dear 'tr. Donalsoh
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Subdivision Committee held
on February 26, 1990, the committee reviewed the above -referenced
t,�ntative :subdivision. As a result of, this meeting, :Public Works
u$,11 recommend the enclosed list of ci, ndit3wns.
s project has been scheduled for the Advisory Agency meting of
Arpil 21 1990. The meeting will commence at 9KJO a.m. in the Board
,of Supervisors Room, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, CA4
if you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office:
Very tritly yours,
William Chef
Director of Public Works
,iAn Mendonsa
Msistant Director
s ,
attachment
cc Planning Departh��-nt -
BnviYonmentAl Health Department
NorthStar Engineering
�u1Fe 4c. P�raiotng
FE 8 2 9 1990
1�rovill�y, ,
C•al
t C;
Oro
1 aF � � "lit k .,. �- n-. •'� Y a. w''p�'`.�.
,butte coun
v
ra .
y
4� -' LAND OF NATUAI, WEALTH. AND BEAUTY
r -1DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC HEAL
TH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
Address 196 Memorial Way ❑ 7 County Center Drive 0 747 Elliott Rocd
13eply to Chico, California 95926 Oroville, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969
Teeephone<• 916/891.2727Telephone: 916/538.7281 Telephone 916/872-6308
i
February 16, 299Q
Craig Donaison RE Oakway Park Amended Map
C/o I orthStarr Engineering Lia[Jay, Chico
20 Declaration Dr: APr 42-66-02,03,05,08 & 14
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Mr. Donalsons
a<
This department has advised the Butte County Department, of Public'14orks
Land Development Section that we are prepared to act on the above application,
Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional
approval.
Recommended Conditions for Approval
1. Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service
Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic
water to the subdivision.
2i Provide a letter or other, documentation from City of Chico stating
that they are 'villing and able to supply sewer service to the
subdivision.
3: Place a note on the trap that states "Development of sots within the
subdivision will require connection to a public Sanitary sewer."
4. Puce a note on the :yap that states "Development of lots within the
subdivision will regtdrd connection to a public water supply-"
5: pump and fill existi-tg septic tanks and connect consttuction served
by the tanks to the public sewor:
s NOTE: Previous letters provided by utilities are sati8factory for compliance
with Conditions 1 and 2
�I
1( s
" •: "^�'s. : r .. Eutte I
LAND 0f NATURAL 1NEALTH AND E EAUT1'
DEPAP.TMENT OF IDUBLIdi WORK
WILLIAM (8110 CHEFP, D rector ,
7 COWITY CENTER' DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 96965
Telephonet (916) 52.8.768.)
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Detector
February 20, 1990
Craig Donalson Rt, AP 42-66-02, 03, 05,0 08 14
c/o NorthStar Engineering Amended Oaki4ay Park TSM
20 Declaration Drive
Chico,, CA 95920
Dear Mr. DOnal.son:''
Please be advised that that: the above -referenced project will be
reviewed by the Butte County Subdivision Committee at 3:00 a.m. in
the Data Processifig Center c(-,nference room, located on the ground
28, 1990, Y, e, Orov Ile., California on. February
floor at #1 Count 'Center Dr�.v
The Butte County'16dvisory Agency will review the project at 9:00 a.m.
on April 2, 1990, in the Board of Supervisors' Room, #25 County Conter
Drive, Orov:lle, Cal.ifoznia
Public Works will recommend the conditions listed on the attached
sheet. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact this offiwle,
Very truly you'r`s,
William Cheff
Director of Public Work$
Johh 'Mendon ,r
A8kgtant director
Mid s
attachment
cc Planning
Health
NorthStar &,g
2 1990
1.�..„
a
r(tte 1(ouftf
LANCE OF NATURAL WEALTH AND SEAUTN
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- QIOVILLE, CALIFORNIA 05965-3391
TELEPHOt,, 918) 538-7601
.acember 6, 1989
Craig Donalson
4/o 'Nor nStar- .Engineering
20 Declaration Drive
tChi 1,"O , CA 95-0,26
A:ea Amended' TSM, AP#42-66-02, etc.,
Vear Mr. Donalson:
14he Butte County Planning Department has completed the
en.vironmental review of your pj:o j ect ,in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act sand forwarded. to the Butte
County Advisory Agency within the regL red 105 days pursuant to
the California Public Resources Code Section 21151,!5:. ' In
aiddition, the Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-
63 and 26-99 of the ,Butte County subdivision Ordinance has been
completed. Please find enclosed the .Environmental
Dotument8tti.on/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared
.for your project.
?lease tbv;i ow the enc,lor:jed Initial Study/Planning Director s
r
report with conditiohs Of approval if air 1i.cable. If you note
any errors or omissions in our evaluation,, please bring them to
Our attentrior .
Th, e Environmental DbcUMerits .and Planning Director's Report for
Your protect has been sent to the. Butte County Advisory agency ,
for their actions California Government Code 'Sections 65950 and
65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings
and approve or disapprove your project wa�thin si:� months from the
d -ate on which your application was received and accepted. The
six month time limit for your project mandated by 'state .law, will
occur on May 21, 1990. The Advisory Agency will ioti,fy you of
the time and place of the public hearing for your project
I,
r
11
To Butte County Advisory Agency
From: Planniiag Director
; eject AMENDED TVITATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR CRAIG DONALSON
AP442-66--M21,03,05,.08,19
Date: December 6, 1989
This is a proposal to amend easements and property lines nn five
lots. the present zoning is A-SR (Agricultural -'Suburban-
Residential) . The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General
Plata Map of the Butte county General Plan. designates this area as
LoW Density Residential.. There are no specific or da�,dtunity
vl,-ins for the area.
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any a.doptod-
br proposed element o£ the Butte County General Plan ,nor any,
C.-ounty, specific or community plan:
RElc:ommend approval.
TL: jmc
cc! Northsstar Engineering
Ii
APPENDIX F
couN= 0r, mi -mm li
I
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
LOG No. 88-X09-28-07
AP No. 42-14-90, 91
4A, C;RQTJTM
1. Name of proponeint. C. Donalson &_D, De)romed
t, Address old',proponent ,and representative ti.. appli.able)s
P,O. Box: 90`55 NorthStar Engineering,
Chico CA , 55927
._:..sem.,. _0 Declamation Drive
.. Chico, CA 95926
1, Project description: Tentative Subdivision Man to 411ride 6.8+ acres to create 20 lots,
11,4,AD' MAORI, F=Nmk, r'NCS 0V SMC31gTVMC1AXCM: YES MAXBE NO
1, Does the project have tho pctential to degrade the quality of the environment
substantially reduce the .habitat of a fish or, wildlife species, cattle a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, tha~eaten to eliminate
a plant or animal Community, reduce the somber or restrict the range of a rare
ot endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important e"les of MiL'Jorpe - a n
of Californ is history ar orehlstory�! —L^
11 Does the project have, the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the
detriment of long; -term envi,,Vonmental gopls? (A short-term impact an the
long-termimp will endurEi into the futul-a.p time while
environment s oonntt kehich ocowrs in a relatiyel) brief period or t
3r. Does the project have kmpacts which Are indi#idtially Baited but, cumulatively
considerable? (,k project may itpact on two or more separate resources where
the .impact cin each resource is relatively small, but %here the effect of the
total of ',:hose impacts on the tiltvironment is significant.)
4,.. Does tote project have environmes*A1 effects which will cause substantial ,
.adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
t1T. 1 E',r Rr�LLIv �='ON (To be, toRpleted by the Lead Agency), On the basis of
this initial evaluation!
VWEfind the proposed prpjet t 'COULb Not have a significant effect on the
enviMnment and a NEGATIVE DEt;LARATI04 will be prepared.
l,IWB find that although the proposed project'COULD terve a significant effect
on the environment, there still not be t significant effect in this,thecase 'because
project, AMITIGATINEGATIV9 DECLLARAT:IONdwill, bit prepared sheet nava been added Ca the '
INN find Cho proposed project MAY hava at significant effect on tfte environment$
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NEFORT is keq»tiredx
L
WUNTY OP 'BOTTE, 'PLANNING DEPA!#1ZiF3tT
Noveinber 1, 1985
aGeilr� M: fiat le .
itSsotiat
iidviewktd by: .
!/ .,G
ii
�yw
a -N V2ClVIri7�.lV'.CAL
ZNiPAC"'TS ,
(gxplanations of all "YES" and,"MAYBE" answers are re quirad on attached ghee6t(s).
N I.k-M, Will the proposal _result ir, significant:
YES KAYBEI NO
a.
Unstable earth conditions, or dmges in geologic substructures?
X
b.
Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcoveri:nA of the soil?
c
Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical
feHtl,tr6S?
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off 4-�!e?
X
f.
(manges in tepotaf,tion or ;erosion of beach sands, or changes in silt .,tion,
deposition 9r erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream
or this bed of the ocean at any bay, inlet or lake?
Y
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban
areas?
h.
.Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes
landslides, mudslides, ground Failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Vill the proposal result in substantial:
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?_
b.
the creation of objectionable t5dors, smoke or fumes?
_ )(
c.
clteration of imate, locallyror regionally? Jture or temperature,, or any change in
I. WAtEP. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a
engesmne in cu rents,or orwthers7�$e or direction of 'Water movements in
b.
Changes in absoi)tion rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount
of surface runoff?
Y`
c.
Need for offrsite surface drainage improvements, including vegetation
re=oval, channelization or culvert installation?
d.
Alterationsto the course or flute of flood waters?
e+
Change in the amount of surface water in any 'water body?
F.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water
quality, Including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)
g.
Alteration of the dire -tion or rate of float of around watersM;
�.
h.
Change in the quantity or quality of ground •waters, either thitugh
direct additions or withdrawals, or through, nteircelntaan
of an aquifer
by ruts at excavations?
A
1.
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for publ.it, water
supplies?
j.
Exposure of peaple or property to WAterurdlated hazard'ssuch as flooding?
t1Nf hIF . Will the proposal: result in substantial:
a*
thAnge in the diver'sityl of 'species, or number of any species of. plant:;
(including "trees, shrubs, grassy. drops, .nd aquatic plants)'?
�~
b.
Redetccian at the numbers of any Unique, rare or endangered species of
Plan" ,
_
c.
Introduction o
the normal replenishmentofexisting gpecie o an area or in a'barrier to
g p o
n
d.
Reduction in Adteage of .uiy agricultural crop?
�1 ,
i
jr
3,.
A99 L LIF£'. Wifl � tlne proposal result in ss bstantiala ~'
YF.S MAYBE
NO
a. Changs nanthe adiv S
isiof spcies, or numbers of any specie'' of animais
(bir}'
includingre tiles fish and shellfish organisms
or insects)?
b. Reduction ,in, the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of
animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an ;area, or in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
.�
d. Deterioration of existing fish or Wildlife habitatT
`,
XgTSFg. Will the proposal result in substantial:
A. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of 'people to severe noise levels?
�(
7,,
IUGTrT AND MARE. Will the proposal product,; significant light and glare?
X..
a,
WM list. Will the proposal result in aLL substantial alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area?
w
LATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in substantial;
a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
,
b; Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources?
�
}�
; .
RTSK.OF UPSET. Will the proposal involver
i
a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substance}t (including, but
not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiati6n) in the event
of an accident: or upset conditions.?
.'
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
r
POPULATION, Will the proposal.'alter location, distribution, density or
a
growth rate of the human population?
_—
12�
t affe.e existing housing„ or create a demand
£orsadditiomll the ?osal
13
t
TRANSPORIIATION/CIRCLtLATTON. Will the proposal result in:
as Generation of substantial additional vejjd1e movement2
b. Effects on existiri arki facilities or
g p nP , demand for nett parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing transportation systems?
_ ._._
d; Significant alterations to present patterns of -air culation or
movement of pw,ople and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, tail or airtraCficT'
f. Increase in traffic hazards to 'motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrian"s?
lG.
Pl1BLIC siVICES. Will the proposal have an 'effect Upon, or result in a need
for new or altered government services*
a. Fire protection?_
b. Police protection)
c. Schools?
d. Pars or otherr recriational facilities?
�()
e. Maintenance of publ':4 facilities, .including toads'!
f ; other governrae�tital U ervides?
t4 �i
5-
_ Will tl,_ proposal result in;
YES_ HAYBE
NO
A_ Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy?
16,
UTILITI.S. .Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial :alterations to the following:
a. Power or natural gas?
.X
b. Communications systems?
%(
c. Nater availability?'
d. sever or septic systems!
e. S,',.orm water drainage?
_
f. Solid -waste and disposal?
17
HUIWI'T•MALTH. Will the proposal result in -
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental
health)
,
b. Eyposure of people to potential health hazards?
8.
E5 IGS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic
vista or view � the proposal result in the
or i'si
creation of an aestheticallyboffensivee
site open to public view?
`
l 19..
PXC?FATION. Will the proposal ,result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
X
20.
CULTURAL N'C...,5ditt.LI:a
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or dcsrtruction of a
prehistoric or historic archaeological. site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or Aesthetic effects
to a, prehistoric or historic building, structure or object?
c. Does theproposal have the potential to cause a 7.hyrical change
Which vuuid affect unique ethnic cultural values?
g. within
d. Will proposal restrict existing relsious or sat -ted u4es
the otentiial act ;tTea2
1�S CT J S u Z CJN . c�F . ENV ZTLOI�TM 1V'�AL; E'VaLtItYIkIX t did
vita! rrr-4tched.
i°S.CUSSICN OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP # 42-1.4-90, 91
Two, houses Are now constructed on the property, and a portion of
'tVI& new road graded. A certain amount of disruption and compaction has
,'ajeo.gi,dy taken place, At buildout, approximately 2.2 acres .are
jent,cipated to be overcovered with ro�idways, and single family
re ,deuces. Approximately 32% of the entire ,property will be
olv'aaVered with pavement and buildings. This level of overcovering is
;xidt, significant for the urban area.
Ig,,4a,d: Soils on-site are Farwell loam, a soil well suited to fruits
zR6 irrigation. The productivity of the soil is evident by the number
'04 have been an
that hbplanted in the vicinity. This particular
proporty has an old almond orchard on it, which apparently has not been
taizGs 1 care of. Residential development will cause the trees to be
rer.oved, and replaced with urban ornamentals. This impact .is not
ignlficant for tie following reasons:
1.. The property is in the urban area, designated for residential.
development,
2. Residential development has made inroads in the neighborhood,
maki-tg intensive agricultural production unfeasible.
. A sic acre lot is not an economic snit capable of supporting the.
average family.
2b,c,16a: As the property, is within the urban area,
Venoity Residential uses, ,Lull Cuban .drainageK.r..:�. b
rec fired. A temporary seepage tren.c., is shown on the tentative
P�.and
15divisidn map. Thismaynot Be an option gi-,en the Nitrate Action
subdivision improvement manual. The decision as to what is
an appropriate level of improvement and the timing of the improvement
Wil- be the ,Oepar,.ment of Public Works. it may be necessary, for
drainage to be piped south through Sacramento Avenue Estates to an
cut -all in Big Chico Creek.
If;
According to the. Chico Urban Area EIR, residential development,.
does not result in serious discharges of pollutants into the area creek
system.
3h: Community sewer will service this property. Two existing septic
tanks will be removed. With their removal,
and the abandonment of the
wet;l, groundwater quality underneath the property may imorove. it
should be. noted, Lands in theammecliate area have tested high for
nitrates. Area wells have tested at 60 mid per liter. The maximum
level of nitrates consider acceptable for drinking water isl 4s ml/L.
3i: Cal Water will be extended to service the property. At this time
they .have ;no .known capacity constraints.
4c: The removal of almond trees and replacement with urban Landscaping
may increase the species diversity on-site.
j
i
b; According to the Cali;(ornia Natural Diversity Data Base, there are.
no known rare or endangeit.ed plant or animal species located in this
g -,neral vicinity.
Construction of 18 hoiAses and the use and enjoyment of 20 house
by residents will gener:3te noise. This noi:3e is not a significant
impact, and it compatib:,e with surrounding noise sources in the
0 The land has been planned for low density residential uses, five
6wel.ling units per acre. Division as proposed will result in 2.94
cbv.eJ3,ing units per gross cacre. Development density is consist�mt with
CcPunty zoning and the adopted General Plan:
�lultdi.vision design noes not comply with the surdivision improvement
r1l anu .l. Specifically, Butte County Code Section 20-1.33 limits the
Idinyth of cul-de-sacs in ur1.)aa areas to s'oo ft. The purpose for this
is to insure r.ead,y access to 11.1 lots in emergency situations.
azmpl,;iance with 'the Code Section can be remedied by reducing the length
aZ the cul-de-sac, or providing a secondary access.
1 Division and developmbnt can be considered infill in west disco.
ter
buildout, approximately 50 people will live within the project,
g opposed to the estimated 8,that reside there at thus time,
1.. ,f. A new road will be construc,:ed to serve individual residences.
" new road will access onto Oak way, approxmatel,v h,!` �.�
d',-.ngercus bend., Most of the traffic is ea; L,-.,
r �t a
its "'-' �...i id ..ti.,
, e n.
intersect.lon, of Oak �and�Hi Highway 32yis2hotnimpr improvedwith traffic
*, g y fir
slxgnalo turn rockets., stop sign, or acceleration and deceleration
lanes. Oak wav is paved with a variety of widths. on the frontage of
Oa6e, Way Estates'it has been improved to 20 ft. south of centerline with
cuL.:b gutter, ;and sidewalk. Along this property frontage, Oak Way will
nel._-�d to 'be widened and upgraded to full urban standards. It would
agp,ear that oak- Way has recently had a fresh chip: seal coat applied
mr, a project within the urban area;traffic impact fees will be
assessed at the time of building permit application. The traffic fees
w'iu..l pay, for improvement and si.gnalization of East Avenue and Highway
.312,E West 8th andHighway32 and: Sacramento Avenue and Highway 32, to
Ina=e a few intersections. Traffic fees are not: proposed to be used to
improve Oak. Way and Highway 32. Therefore, it will be necessary for
the developer to 'off -set increased use of this intersection by agreeing
tc contribute :a pro rata share towards improvement and/or
signalization. Based on the traffic modes, funded by the Butte County
Azz-ociation of Governments each household in Chico generates aft
est'7 imated 10.vehicle trips per day. The total project is estimated
to, generate 214, vehicle trips per day.
14a: As rioted' on the data sheet attached to the initial study, the
nearest fire station is g44, approximately 3 1/2 miles to the
scr'"mtheast. Butte3 County Vire does not currently operate a fire station
west Of Highway 32 and west of the southern pacific Railroad tracks.
Witte County Fire recognizes the need to.construct as new fire station
-the general vicinity of oak way and Highway 32. Towards this end;
r t ;oy have been: requesting a :?7-S.00 per lot fee to off-set station 1
:,truction and operation ccists . It is suggested that the developer
� �rtouoff$set00 per
lot fire the west side fire station improvement
i �-
! ' ' protection services.
14b,0,f: Division and development of .the property will increase
`-aismonds for governmental services. This impact is not significant for
t ;following reasons
The project is located in the urban area where growth has been
anticipated.
The property is surrounded` by developed properties and can be
considered infill,
14.Cz School fees will be assessed at the time of building pe ,,�,,.l t
� rlicatioa to co.'ztruct schools in northwest Chico. A new school
hii been proposed ,for AP 42T-1,-30 located approximately 325 feat east
P. the subject propertyi
rl9 r The Chico ,A-' : i R,?ctreati {*f' e:r , �.T. ;. ;?.•1.-; been expressing
ccacerns
development ir. Cir .:., i 1T„�.AwA9 1 iexisting part-cs and
e.creationtservices. G iven .., :, �J �, tai: : -xis development, it is not
feasible to nrov' ide private recreation facilities on-site. I: is,
t erefor.:a, recorntttrx,, .-ded that the developer work with CARD to off- set
Vacts to park°:.c . An appropriate mitigation may be payment of Park
tovement fees or participation in a district to fund cons.t:uction
,arl maintenance of parks.
��SC; d t Community water andswiin significant rve the
pr`operty • The subdivision may
result11 be extended to Senficant envi�,onmental.
CR
d induce growth if it involves the extension of sewer maims.
Impacts
�c side7.ines contain; an appendix listing :specific .physical impacts
that
guidelines
will be regarded as significant, including impacts which
a ll: Induce substantial growth.; or extend a sewer trunkline with
,capacity to serve new- development. In order to assess the potential
impacts, it will be necessary for the applicant to submit the following
atlor to November 27, 1988:
1, Submit a conceptual sewer plan to serv�a the subdivision, include
line sizes, size and location of sewer main to be utilized
Det
erminmwhether - existing awer, maid will require extension,
ara new main willbeconstructe
3. Analyze capacity of sewer main to be extended (in teriY►s of gallons
and residential bedrooms), service area (i,e,, geographical area
to be served by main) and cap,,tcity committed to projects approved,
:but not yet built
20a: The property straddles an area of high and unknown sensitivity
for archaeological resources. It will be hecessaey for the applicant
;i
the �
NS�rtheast "In urmation '> Centel,"; dal state Uriiversity,.
;o. For the p< yment cf a nominal fee, the university will, provide a
1:d search of i:he vroperty_an make a determination as to whether or
,an archaeological_ st�rvey should be prepared
: It is unknown what impact if any the project may have to
r ealhgical resources. The records search, procedure will be used to
d�,terrCine the likelihood of finding resources and whethe:r a survey
o�i=uld be prepared
11.43: The project may result in significant impacts to they environment
d iaftCe growth. if it involves extension of sewer mains
"5-5itional information from the applicant is required -to analyze this
trrcw .ssmtial impact.
Re:='mmended Mitigation Measures
1- Contribute $75.00 per 10t to the west side fire station.
2- ,Contribute a p.ro rata share towards the signalization and/or
Improvement of the intersection of Oak Way and Highway .32
w Work with Chico Area Recreation District to off -set impacts to
recreation services and parks.
line sizes, size and location of sewer main to be utilized.finclude
4. Submit a conceptual sewer Dlan to serve the subdivision
5, Determine whether an existingsewer main will require extension;
,or a neyr man will be constructed
6 Analyze capacity of sewer main to be extended (in terms of gallons
and. residential bedrorms), service area (i.e., geographical area
to be served by main) and capacity committed to Projects approved,
but not yet built, PProved,_:
Additional Conditions of aDbroval:
I- Ail: lots tc, comply, with the A -SR zoning district.
1. All lot design and cul-de-sac length to comply with adopted codes
of Butte Coi:anty.
3. The large brush pile behind the existing hout`i will need to be
removed with CDF and Air Pollution Control District requitement.
'Gt1T , lr
li li
.I
ixxicant: DonalsonlD'eromedi Assessor's Parcel .#
42-14-9o, 91
Log 88-09..28+601
DATA SHEET
A «- Project Description
1 Type of Project: Land Division
2 Brief Description: Tentative Subdivision Map dividing 6.-8
acres into 20 lots, 19 @ ,25 acres, 1 @ 7 acre
3. Location: On the south side. of Oak way, approximately 300
feet east of Valley Oak Drive, Chico
4. Proposed Density of bevelopment: 2.94 dwelling units per
gross acre.
5-1 Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Approximately 2.20 acres.
6 Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Frontage on Oak way. -
access from new road to be constructed.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Community sewer.
S. Source of Water Supply: CA `Vater
9. Proximity of Power Lines: To frontage of parcel.
10i. Potential for further land divisions and development-
Divis,lon will permit the construction of 18 houses.
Environmental Setting
P ysit,:al Environment:.-
Terrain
nvironment;Terrain
a; General Topographic Character. Level valley land.
b. Slopes: 1-2s.
c. -- Elevatdni 155--170 ft. A.S.L. _:
d. Limiting Factors: None.
Soils
a. Types and Characteris>t cs: Farwell loam; chocolate.
brown loam of a light ;,andy texture, from 1-3 ft. thick.
is easy to cultivate and retains moisture well,
Subsoil is 3-4 ft. thick, friable, loose and granular.
Well suited to fruits and irrigation.
h-: Limiting Factors: None.
3. Natural. Hazards of the Land
ai Earthquake Zone: Moderate
b Erosion Potential: Slight
c Landslide Potential: None
d. Fire Hazard. Unclassified,
e, Expansive Soil Potential., Moderate
4. Hydrologi
a: Surfact Water: None in immediate vicinity:
b• Ground Water: Area of heavy groundwater withdrawal.
c. Drainage Characteristics: Generally southwest. Will
need to be upgraded With engineered facilities.
.._,. ti
d. Annual Rainfall (norm.41 ): 22" annual average.
e. Limiting Factors Area of highest nitrate
concentration.
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Views of developed and developing
single -family ;residences.
6. Acoustic Quality: Good
7: Air Quality: Good
Biological Environment:
8. Vegetation-: Almond orchard
9 Wildlife Habitat: Limited to small, birds and mammalz which
are compatible with orchard operations and surrounding
'residential development:
Cultural Environment:
10 Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: High
unknown,
11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density
Residential.
12, Existing zoning: A"SR
13. Existing Land Use on-site: Two homes, neglected almond
orchard, large pile of trees, and brush on Lots 18 3 and 4.
14. Surrounding Area;
a. Land Uses: S:tngle-gamily residential, new developments
and €ew, orchards to the west.
b. Zur„ing A-SR, S-R, R-1.:
C. Gen. Plan Designation,. Low Density Resident:,al, Medium
rJensity Residential.
d. Parce? Sizes: 1/4 acre 10+ acres',
e.. Population: Low density - urban.
Is. Character of Site and Area: Quickest growing sector of the
community._
15.. Nearest Urban Area: Chico +/- 2000 ft4 east at Highway 32.
7• Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico, CARD, CUSD, C:S.A.k1424
18 (Mud Cree- Sycamore Drainage D7;strict)
Improvements Standards Urban Area: Full improvements
required.
19 Fire Protection 'Service
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: x44 � 1/2 miles
southeast,
utheast, 442 6 1/2 miles northeast.
Water Availability; Hydrants will be reouired
201, Schools in area: Chico U;if: ed School: Distrtit.
ti,
BUTTE COUNTY
`
Consultant List
SPECIALIZED
SERVICES
Archaeological Consulting
and Research
1.
Archaeological Consultant
2.
Archaeological Services
Suzanne Baker
Roser Werner
609 Aileen Street
P.O'. Box 3127
Oakland) CA, 94609
Clearlake Highland, CA
95422
3.
Cultural Resource Facility
4
Robert L. Hoover, Px.D
David A. Vredrickson
Coultural Res, Consultant
Sonoma State Univ:.
114.4 Buchon Street
Rohnert Park, CA 44928
San Luis Obispo, CA '93401
5,
Michael E. Macke
6.
M and A Praetzal,lis
Consultin3 Archaeologist
Historical Archaeology
7685 Clay Avenue
705 Madison Street
Huntington Bnh., CA 92648
Santa Rosa, CA 95401
7.
Retrospect
8.
Archaeological Consulting
Cultural Resource Manageme:7t
Peter M. <Jensen, PHiD
Robert A. St113nger
41 Sky Mountain Circle
25Doering Lane
Chico, CA 95926
Watsonville. CA 95076
9.
California Archaeological
10.
Janet P. Eidsness
Consultants, Inc.
Archaeological Consultant
Robert I. Orlins
24$8 5onnenfelt Road
P.O. Box. 1932
Bayside, CA 95524
Woodland) CA 95695
11.
infotec-Development Inc..
12
Office of Public Archaeology
M 3. Moratto
M. Glassow
19423 Millage Drive
Dept. or Anthr6?ology
Sonora, CA 9:5370
UC -Santa Barbaro, CA 93106
13.
Professional: Archaeologist .Ser.
14,
Westec Services Inc.
Alfred Farber.R.
L. Carrico
6635 Quail Way
5510 Morehouse Drive
Paradise, CA 95,061
San Diego, CA 92121
15.
Woodward -Clyde Consultants
16,:
Archaeological Research
R Knudson
Dept. of Anthropology
100 Pringle Avenue
Cal: State Univ. Chico,
Walnut Creek) CA 94611.
Chico, CA 95920-0400 `
1. .
David Chavez
18.
Env rosph�:re Co.
Consulting Archpeologist
De, D. M. bavy
P.O. Box 52
555 Capitol Mall) Suite 625
Mill Valley) CA 9494X
„iacramento, CA �i5814
l
i
art r
`
f
19 • Inter ourttaiit Research
aEO. Pacific
Cultural Research Con
Consultants
Museum Corisu ltants
P.O. Box '32
Larry Bourdeatu '
'Sillier City, NV F�9428.
23'0 KcGaffigan Mill Ito
Boulder Creek, CA 95006
21.. Public Archaeology Research
James G. Maniery
22, Winthrop Associ.at6s
P.O. Box 1601756
James T. Rock
Sacramento, CA 95816
347 Guthrie.Street
I
i
Ashland, OR 97520
-
t
r
r,
November 21, 1989
Craig Donalson
&
c/o NorthStar Engineering 1.neering RE: AP 42-66-02 03 OS, 08 14
20 Declaration Dr. Amended OAKWAY PARK
Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Subdivision Mag
Dear Mr. Donalson
This is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the
above -referenced property is being submitted to the Planning, Department
for environmental determination, and to the Environmental Health Department
,for its review.
This application gill be considered complete ;when we have received
notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental. Health
Department that all necessary, data have been, received. These departments
will contact you regarding any additional information they may require:-
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public 110-rks
Jahn Mendonsa
sistant Director
ai/kk
dc' Planning Depark4ment
>hvironmental Health Department
Northstar Engineering
A
M '1120 (Revised '2/88