Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042-700-007M1 , ,.. ' O 20 Via/ a:. ' � ..... ..... 35 ' : i * 7 Q w ZD, ; rl • • ' � e b A �� \k -f 'a#y.✓' '« r -B ?ri,�"b x.�, " G k AJ+..' � v.••Mk,1." •�.. { .. Lo ». ,. Ilk - 68 -k- P 4 �. --r...... _. - i4 , 170 _ _ .5 171,4 ,..♦: _ -, 9.�0... NJ �.: # , 4 R • ♦. r r t c • 1 I' T7, 4PA'�r, ..- i { � .... .. pyY Y r _ ' iAl s { r _. ! „ r Y , , ,. ,. .. t. • •: - � r t V .. N � ? ) ... Y ,.. J " r Al :... ... ,.. :. r' 1 ,. L PHASE I • i:::r. , r, :.. i.. :1 i ••.. 4 � : t :: r :. r � r moi• ,., ., '» PHASE 2 ',1 N K �^ , a•{ r t r „ .I y g -.,.rd' -•3" }� .'n�7" a' YY .. ALI 4 aR.S� '�.d_ M►�r 'tT. �" ,.•,l ti r „r f, . ..OF S y > L - + ri 1. . $'e.. . . 5 ,. ...I a A- • ; ' !" -:4 Y 77� ... a i , ,r . i •" a= , k. .h i' Ml 1.. G .,t ' r,. } .. w( y.: .`�,1q.{q/ 'd r , , 4„�e a , C r 1 l t M1;I: a , a .^y r. r. ' ,r I • p 1, , , . �:. � w 'r :♦ y :.. ' ri .. 1. :” r y 'y" ,i. ,r' :_. . d r ,- �,:C ,/.I+". rtl �` 4'a k A. y r 92 t "OeP, illiminnow*Nim. .. , !. , 4A1lRll1llMIIA19IN1! u b 1 G. , .J•:,<Y::,,-:r,1•It', ,...:a rv..� rew �.-x-.. s. A� .,.n. ,,:6:. ,, .t Rv,a'ii' ..,r :.. f _ : r p :. r: .. ' . - .. o ,. .. ,. .. , .. - . v.. Y 1 C, � 1+4 u k.,Ae•Nilrti 3,a . mr{mM, x 3N rr,..il ..,, ,a w- e,' ... qq,- ..+. .. -. .. �.�.,. ti .. ..V.. r nx+1x ., t srM' Cr..,ur+ _ _:.n.1.,..� , • .... , - .. r , .. .,.. i4:_ ♦. ., +r n , , . ' ,. _ a S.eL' .. ,. .!:-t....x...u_.r r .. .. „a.: 4 Y ,. - r,. '. • 1., t ,• .. M. J1,I ,•11..,n..r8rok".». ... a '�. .,r r .. t , [ M .: ., :. • N , - r.. .. r ,. . '.0 , ': .... V .. .... .. :.,, .. . .. a. _. \ r,. e ,.. .5..- 1. ,...•k�. r .. a ,. �.. .r p aM .... r> •,> w.>_ __, ., :. :1 ,. . i': g , r , , . K1.. C -, ,., r:.,..n :, ..... .� .,_. :.. N a ik �l t�,: r-xA.-��,,, r. .ar•>Lr .. __ t l p r r r a , {.4 .. A , - !'•, e. 1 x p., .., .: .., .,.. -: ,. r .. u d. ,. .S i . n ,.,. 5 .\ u. 1,... _.,, y'. • 7 p r9 ur_; a•.,rn .a yl$ , ,., .. ,. \ ,. t t�'.. ..r.._. 1- y r• �k +.r � ., 1_. .._ ,.� r , .: .t .. ._,.4 .. F• 1 ...,.u.A.t•,gl .... rnM (. :,. 5- .. t ,, ., r .., .,. .«, ..AF. .,,-. _:_"ns.. �x.._... K: .d,i.,x _,..x iil ,. ',. ,, ..... „ ,'., f. „ „ , Y..... .. r. ,; . .. SA.. ,�....,A .., ..,re?.y;�'a�yt.,..a, � '.' g w ... � � t fi"'r B I _4. ..,. „n mak•,. d, I . :,.. .. ,,. ♦.. 1, � ii��,, rr r w „ds,lAr.6}Yk,.uu.,...d� : s;•�Y.ay��•.{ ,wEeyTt 1��,..,r:.'e.-ir' iA:t:•t45r.,. ✓. 1A' 1.. KGS'4„41F: ATJ.�r,<�J'!n!IARi�.I/M.+*+�n;:.M1k�4,"t1tlJa. rn,ia'v.RT+A,Y�++„4rt^Kfi. .:� }h� 'idM •, M. v... .. : y 'f' t ' 1 ♦, 81- s \ :a•b v ,ti,' :...,ac:..grm,r :.,.. ,.si..wn.. ,, p ry � - (* �, s`},� n..rM.:<•l.n.l.-.rr.•r.,J^,t:,V.AI.rA:;til+a3�tt....w.,..-r,r.-, .�",.�„eael.ArXr�i:,4sPw1-,.a«� 4.��, 4: ,. J a•N, YrA '1 .. 'Fc,,,N..+.iAnrl.n <.k �i�hMR.�k�aMrii r �A.'i R,�r�.. �1}�am� r 'r 5„ :. .:. :,, s`',{ '. 'X -MT G RA A •® 1 PLANNING 7SSION SUMMARY S1iEE'�' FORO 23D DIVISIONS APpLIGANT. Guynn"s Cornet Subdivision (Shastan, Inc.) =DRESS P. 0. Box 4143, Chian, CA 95927 OlrFRER;' ang g Louis B. d Mar uerite R'e o 929 HEnshaw Ave. Chico, CA 95926 PP-OJECT DESCRIPTION: TRNTATIV U'B'DIVrSION 14AP to divide 12.7 ac. to ere.ate 57 lots ranging in size from 7,000 sq. ft. to 11000 sq. ft. CATION; On the southeast corner of Guynn Ave i_and Henshaw Ave. North Chico area XgSEOSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(Sj 042-070-007 and 069 Z4; TRIG SR GENERAL PLAN Low Density PROJECT CONSISTENT Yes GG"t .NZZRAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT 3/23/92 IAlm-0 CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS.- No DATE ,APPLICATION REECEIVED 4/15/92 AGENTJSURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER-. Gilbett Engineering Xk?C TENTATIVE SUBD1171SION TEN`rt;;i'IVE PARCEL MAP PR.EWMQ`IARY SUBDIVISION � WAIVER .APPLICATION (Please check appropriate box) APPLICANT: Shastan, Inc. PHONE NO-. 894-2027 ADDRESS; P. 0, Box 4143, Chiro, CA 9592q OWNER: rLouis E. aad 'Marguerite Rego PHONE NO: 2,42-8419. ADDRESS: 929 Henshaw Avenue, Chioo, CA 95926 ENG32TFTROR SURVEYOR: Gilbert Engineering PHONE. NO: 899-9503 ADDRESS,-: 55 Independence Circle, Suite 101, Chico, CA 95925 MAIL NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Applicant and Engineer Lots 4 & 14 of the Third Subdivision of the John Bidwell Rancho LOCATION OF PROPERTY: Ta*TSHIP 2 2N` RANGE 113 SECTION N/ A ASSESSORf8 PARCEL NUMBER: 42-07-0� & 42-07-69 TOTAL ACREAGE 12.7 PLEASE SUMUT PRELnMMRY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITTE INSURANCE (dated yrithin last s3 C months) WITH APPLICATION, INDICATE BELOW THE DATE AND RECORDING- INFORMATION BY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED DATE _ BOOK PAGE NUMBER AiVD SIZE OF PARCELS BEING CREATED (including any remainder)t. 57 lots ranging in aite from 7,000 sf to 11,000 sf DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR STORM DRAIN: 1 20,00.0 to Lindo Channel_ PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: City of Chico sewer , system Check with Health Department PROPOSED SOURCE Or WATER: California Water Service Oompth Check vith Health Department) DO POWER AND PHONE' LINES EXIST TO THE BOUNIhRY OF THE ORIGINAL PARCEL? yes _ MY NOT ESTIMATE THE, DISTANCE THEY WILL Wz TO BE EXTENDED; r n lOSO Revised. 1-24-80 �llft�,�ti �.1.��©�a�o Rev3.sed. 7���80 �� �� , ,. ,� r FOR 6 E, USE ONLY: 1fUf Lig County Planning Dept.' Receipt # 7 Cotlnl.y (;either prive Applicant _sixQal r-C� (rovll,iCA 959Es5-31 7 t),ICi) 5*38lt1-701 AP Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX H Onto V I led I4AND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Sup2lemental Information for. Planning Department 4, Idst and describe any other related permits and other public approvals regiiEred for this project, including those required by city, regional, st�rt.e and federal agencies: City of Chico Annexation Agreemezit 2, ! roj)osed scheduling/associated projects: As soon as possible. I. AntLcipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units, f itdure development plans): 2 phases /i. What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage', Describe how on-site and downstream drainage channels will be affected: Private storm d:raina5e/l.each trenches 5. Proximity of waiver for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds' etc.): wells. and, California Water Service Company „ 0 W1Lt exc;ivaf,Loh or grading be necessary! Cubic yards (estimate)! Lot graclirig and roadway excavation"sgi;thit'y unknown at tits time 7. 1)f'V(ttt"tWii "fO t travel to propiarty (rutal and mountainous ateas only). ' N A i N. ENVIRONMENTAL i11PADTS AND NITICATION MEASUPES'c frlont: i ry pnlreritially significant environmental impacts associated With theand division. What projectdesign features or special conditions of approwil (rnizlgation meaMures) are proposed to Alleviate potential oriv i ronment�tl impacts? NONE' r? 'M I IONMENTAL SETTING* _ 0 De:4cr be the project site as it exists before the project, i►t(,'sludir►g information on topography, soil stability, plants and attimAls, and ally cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Desori'be arty existing stt'uctures on the site, and the use of I ho st:rttc.t:ures. 1 existing ,aingle family residential unit and associated outbuildings in almond orchard: ti) De8vribo this surrounding properties, including information on p tant,x anti anirnal,s and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects'.. indicate this typo of ,Land use (reidential, commercial, etc.), hiletist'y cat land use (one-fami.Ly, apartment houses, shops. depart- rn-,,nt stures otc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, st h)nck, rear yard, etc. ). Surrounding properties include. an existing residential subdivision,, r�esidentia.l units and almond orchards t:lti{"ITi F`ICA'iTION.- t hereby certify that: the statements furnished above and in thr .tt tac.lied exhi.hf.ts present the data and information requirri'd for this iti l t i.► i eva biaLloti to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statemetits Alld i'i►icrnintion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge ;it►t.l iFs 1 i c� f _ 0.11 Signatures for f(U-1- t so ph 1-6t:e ,shoet for longer responses. h"i ain A .'Vfit3 W g�rrr� CCJTJIV� G�'1V�,:1'4.A.L �I':A.N C01+7�'©RMANCE 7F�'P~�`OR EGR P'AnCEL 114AP. QB St Mr)TVTSTQX MAP TCamia 1-4 to be c-omplettd by applicant: 1., ,APPLICANT RAMS AND ADDRESS: S i-R r-\ S i rA tJ I rJiG . Z, PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS' r , � ► M . 3.ASSESSOR±S PARC:.;, NU?-fBER(S) 01'1 --0 �� - 202 1.O ly^t 4. PROP08ED USE. r-. I ;-<j ,« following items are to be complete'% by the Planning Department: g7i.R5 RT ZONING. LAND CONSERVATION AmEEMENT; Gmr aAL PLAN DESIGNATION: L.Q L,L S) G N 5 IT '-I . €3erel.mmentMfa Deni ration Criteriat YES N0 _ 1«� . '�1,=�' A"iiFr G t-t G 1�' � It is recommended that you perform , —'---� -'-' Zr J the following checked items: '--r" 3. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK BOTANICAL SURVEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY YES N0 WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH --- AND GAME DEVELOPMENTZONE: tlAk n 1J. _ WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: � iZ• ""` --^-- WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantially Conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: G-NERAL .PLAwi 1. Land Use % r; if Yes, el H I C`_ 0. 2. ConsE.vation. X Namo of Plan_- 3. Open Space 4. Safety " S,C WITHIN URBAN RESERVE- E: , .._.._. 5, 5, Noise _, xf Yes, 6. Housing `+< Nate of Reserve.' Z, Circulation 2L AIRPORT 'USE I, ZONING! `,T%'`o5 �N)x10Q�rv_ NT :LAND PLAN: '� Duff Siy na.ttlee ., -. �-� 9 AS THE WPLICANiT FOIL T82, f EOUESTED LiViD DIVISION, X' AM A`4ARE OF `G'ra^iER.dI Tin: ;,BOVE STArF DI-TERMINATION R2C-,Vj)ING THE C+ Vror a* r+";"r� THE PLAN hIJD ZONING. Signature of Applicant. kthi:s roPort W4 e ipire and be diseatded six (A) mantRis fro e dut df tlio stuff aiUnttt;r.tker zap lC)Q(113 � �' %1 LOW DENSITYRESIDENTIAL " rimax7 Uses: Detached single -family dwellings at urban den ' 0ities. ecn oda y Uses: Agricultural uses, animal husbandry, home oris, 6-U.1-door recreation facilities, utilities, public and quazi-public uses, group quarters and care homes. ,Site Designation Criteria: Needed for urban residential development within 20 years. Adequate water supply. Sewers available or natural: conditions suitable for septic tanks 4. Adjacent or near to existing. utilities, roads and single - family residential development. commercial services, schools, fire proaectionsand lo accessibility rocommunity facilities P Intensity of Us � = Zoning allows net parcel, sizes of one acre -5 "� ' One single -family dwelling per parcel T-0--T-5 500 square feet. with other resid­mtial uses limited to a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per gross acre.* Home occupations, farm animals, :other uses and setback regulated to maintain si ogle-family residential character. Consistent Zones: R-17 R-1 A & C, RT-1'1 RT-IAj ASR, M-R S--R, R-M, PA-C. Zoning Factors: �. Existing parcel sizes and residential densities. 2. Availability of sewers or suitability for septic tanks. 3. Effects on adjacent uses, water quality, air quality', noise, traffic flow and safety, and general environmental quality. 4. Proximity to major streets, commercial services and all purjlic facilities. Distance from airports, railroads and industrial uses. 6. Existing utilities, walkways and drainage facilities. 1. 7. Local desires *Develt�Pments, .iith'°'densities in excess of 4 dwelling units Per` gross. acre tiliting septic waste disposal systems must meet Hea.161neP anti be clustered (PA--C) or be provieied trith sever service. C tlnogded by the Housinc; PI Planning Department NAME :.Gtll:'�NIS CORNER SUBDIVISION Environmental Health Department ,Calif. State Forestry/Fire Dept. AP: 42-07-=07 &,69 ATTN: J., Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map) x Butte County Sheriff 1J,:S. Dept. of the Army, Sacramento Dist. Corps of Engineers ,G.& E. (check Title Report for easement) voe Pacific Bell (check Title Report: for easement) ,Butte County Mosquito Abatement (see map 'in cabinet) 1 Distr.ict� �4 dater Ccopany: (V individual wells are not indicated on application or map) Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co. California Water Service Company (Chico area) OWID Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of 'river) W TID Thormalito irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river) Li mesaddl a Community Services District (Paradise area long Pentz Rd. to lake) Del Oro Water (Paradise Pinesrea) Paradise Irrigation District _ Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/forest Ranch area) City of (check wall maps for spheres of influence) Orovi l l e Chico _ Paradise, Town of Gridley Biggs CR7/ILLE AREA ONLY: L.O.A.P,U.D - Lake OrdVille Area Public Utility District (see map in cabinet) Feather River Recreation District (see map in cabinet,) E1. Medio Fire District (check wall map -- small area only) SIfiI,S, RICHVALE, GRIDLEY'AREAS - SOUTH BUT.8 COUNTY' (check Wall map and Title Report to sed what applies. Some areas overlap. 13rainage District #1 Drainage District #2 Drainage District #100' Drainage District #200 Reclamation District #833 Reclamation District #2056 Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District Butte Creek Drainage District IN CERTAIN CASES ' Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions) Calif. State Dept: of Fish and Cane (near Water and in rural and mountains areas) Caltrans (hear State Hwy. 32) 70 99, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy, & Richvale Hwy.), 101 (Clark Road) State - Control United States 'Forest Service (projectsard tth more than 100 lotunits)s or ifprojectbordersU`SA landcheck USAAP books) Calif. State Dept: of Parks and Recreation (property hear Lake OrovilIe) Calif: StatewWater-Resburces Dept (property near Lake Oroville Watershed) Pock Creek Rdclamation Dist, (west of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and east of Hwy, 09 spe map) CARD - Chito, Ar�aR`Recreatioi & Park Dist: (only for subdivisiotns) SPECIAL CASES: chsc'k ii''t1e Report for any mention of special services or easements such as TID or public utilities, 202 55 INDEPE ,I1L]�E�ZT , NDENCE CICLE, SUITE 101 CHICO, CALIFORNIA 9x926 �T T�(916) 899-9503 1,'�ANEERIN FAX'(916) 891-3690 March 14 1995 4 County of Butte�� C Department of Development Services Land Development Division 7 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965-3397 % L( ~ - .7 � Attn: Stuart Edell 5ubjectr Guynn Comer Subdivision - Subdivision Name Change Dear Slim The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Guynn Corner Subdivision is being renamed ^`Eiffel Estates Subdivision", Additionally_, ;the names of the streets within the Guynn Coiner Subdivision are being renamed as follows; bin Court to be renamed `"Chantel Way" Quest Lane to be renamed "Chandese Lane" A copy of the owner's letter to Doug Arnold regarding the street name changes is enclosed. for your reference. Please call this office if you have any questions or need additional information Sincerely, Gilbert.Engineering e� Dei sleV, S Gilbert, `R x 0 Principal gccvti►��"f •w. enclosure - cr Andrew, 1Vleghdadi ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING - PROJECT b8VELOPMENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT, ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS p� ' i v PUT TE COUNTY DEQ/EL0P.M EN i REVIEW C0MMI T TEE M1,NUTES -' OCTOBER 5, 1992 =- Pane 2 nand De e"TOPrnent , DJ v s on dond'i t i 1 BUbfiit road and drainage' plz;ns to the Department. of P'u'blic Works for approval and in tal'7 the requfred faeilit.ies 2 Proyi de 2.0 f eet rad.i us property 'line ret.uurns at 1`1 street inw,erseCLI ions, 2 Pro,-/4,fe right�--W'-*Nay for standard No. S-=5 at all street iAt, ersecon xn = «t a 50 f6. bui1dinQ setback lime r'rom the centerline of Herishaw Avenua, GUvI nh A�,ehue and a' ` i neer ior. streets; Street signs shall be> pr6vided byshe developer at all street irpte sedtiors peg` County! rrqurrertents Submit E, alternate hames ro" �_`°acn street 1_0,ithe County ad:dre,ss coo rditl'atioe fir ,atttiroaa, of street tOW-6s, 3 = �rim `' he �.•cht e 1 t he of Nentbaww Avanue and .Gvvnrt �c Avenue 1-16 th Gou uy :o"F Butte Construct one hal,-, st r6,et plus l) foot sec; i on 06 'He;IshaW kvenue and Guynn AVenUe, to r S -2A road standard'with Vertical eUr , Gutte4 ;, and sidew a P; and 2'": AC,. 8" AB, SC 2$0 orime ,�. 9 rsla� �ve_comac-on rr l a,-GonsL�-ut fu -1 st��et sect eon -ora all intericr streets to BS -S3 access road 'standa,,d wit' +,uI b� gutuer, and sidswalt,+ Minimum structural sect gon to be AG and C, AB with fog seal and b5% reda�i,ve cotrMpaction. Subre�t design tb County Depal-tmeht of Pubs c,' Wor s for aparoval . �dBdd ,value de-'eMinatiohs ah i ot.11br day°c maysbe requi red tcs suppor?t Sect o,,, dss n. B i�ro�;�3cie� ma'��t mehZ,-iort�A•i� r�equ i i`ed'by the Cyepartr6eht o'f, Eubi is Won't in acc or`dat ce with accepter& standards, g Btr et grades dh,"6 -6thee €satures shall comply With the BG�te 00011ty ord1nantv`ss; ddsigh rdsoIUtion and other acddoted - I ehBA Mee'r'5`s%,Ah,dard, c'. '. o Pr6Vi de; pertrlanelh w sol',.. i o1 for drai h.r.ga,. it All' easements or redot;d tr be shown on the tiha2 reap: l� Me'tst requti remeYKts of tie Btatte douhty Eire (3eparthient ,or at;her re t,p`on sib1s a9��nd�;r 1 Bt reef l' i gh ng 'shdl l be, -,provided i h' accbl-dahce With But te,' Coutmty requiremehte', acoopted detigh cri- tsria, and - re'colmeli datiohs d P&E.1 , 1F BUTTE`CQUNTY DEVELOPMENT. REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES OCTOBER ;5, 1992 Page:',3 ., i i4 Form a Oounty Service Area for storm drainage maintehance and' st r�eet 7 i ghti ng 15 ProVi de 1 ft. no access st.ri p on ,Hensh.aw. Avenue .except at road i nt;ersect'i ons 16 Meet the requirements o` the utility companies aC&E,, Paci fic Telephone, water= .sewer; 11 Pay any dc3ingLtent taxes op c'urrert taxes as required.. i Deveaopr s(a."1 p►'ovide aft required traf<fic safety s~"rens, including stoo signs, ; 18 Nate on the rinaI map Onico urban Area road fees pu,rsuah_ to ?C-1t1C, 05 of theBunte County Code. '� �D p _ , A pi cant nal conpi+ Vrzh all canditiohs a n c mit Hca ons for sewer se,rvide r l anti DeOtt :0 tib < < i ons 21 i A devel€p'ment impact fee 'i o; Sheriff Facilities shall be °pa;d pursuant to the''prbvisns cr 6haoter 3, Article II of the Butte County Cotte, 0, for too i"ssuarc,e 'of building permiL o� - Use- der � A F?� h� case of a tno i y e tame park,.. Said f ee amount- -- - will o'e de erriii0ec' and calculated as of the date os applitat i�on for the building 'permit or Use permit, 22 Meet the re uirp,ments of the Chico Area Recreation and #,arks bistrict for improvements; necessary for a. plass 1.11 -bika way on Henshaw Ary enUe. Health Dept. conditions; 23 indicate on the t entat i rye map t hose wet 1 s t hat are proPosed' L be dest Toyed, under permit , Des- l oy those we1'1 s wader' permit and connect the Facilities served by we to Ther- apprave,d water sources prior to recorcting final map 4 hrovTd'e, a latter or other;docWnehtati0t from cal `ifot`Yoia Yravbr" service C+mpany stating thrat they are t�ti'ling and aide to �Ajop1y 0omestio .water to parce s 5 F'r'<)Vid6a letter or other d66Ument6t�',rom city Of rhico stating that they are willing,and able to su'pply'sewer� 5er�°act tG' parc;el s --57 25 place, a' mate on -'t he 'map that states DeVe l o�mdnt o f parcel s 51 will require cohhection to a public san1ta'ry sewer." , r. e o LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANP BEAUTY LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 TELEPHONEt 1916) 539.7266 FAX: (916) 639-1140 CERTIFIED MA Ir October 5, 1992 Ylsstan In,c, RE Air 42-•07-07 and E9 P, 4,. Box 9193 TLNTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP Chico, CA 95927 Guynn's Corner Dear Gentlemeni ,At the regular meetiriq of the Butte County Development Review committee held on October 5 1992, the Commmittee adopted a negative declaration With environmental mitigations and approved the above -referenced project subject to the condi!, ions listed on the attached sheet. If, no appeals are timely filed within ten (10) clays of %he date of the Development Review Committee's approval (October 15, 1992) -- with the Clerk of the: Board of Supervisors, this action will be final., Vlhen the Conditions of approrlal are complied with, at will be in ordk--A for yoll to file Your ''final map! with tho Butte County Department cit Development Review for rec-'O daS� ion Within twenty f)ur. (24) months of the date of approval, by the Development Review Committee. State law requires that the Department 'of Fish and G4mej impose and collect filing fees as specified to'defray the, cost, of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resourt4es. 'ehese filing ,fees are collected during the environmental review process -incl are to be paid at the time the 'County yilE s a "Notice of Determination" With the County Clerk of the County in which the project is located, This procedure is reguiJ:ed pursuant to $act,loh 2.1152 of the Publ i c E�esoura�als Cor; r? , "1`o Lncrc asc adinin ot! alive eff cyaency, the stattut e delegated the c0lle0tir n of filing felt -s to the County Cler,z, IrJW fee regolred in connoctioh with your project is checked bt�luw, c _ 1 obasta Inc. October 5 1992 AP 92 •07-07 rand 69 Page 12 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT Nr, ICE OF EXIMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt 425.00 Clerk's Fee X ) B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate o' Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerkis Fee 2 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED a A, Negative Declaration $1,250.00 State Filing Fade $25,00 Clerk's Fee ( ) B. u'4 Ironmental Impact 'Report $950.00 State Filing Fee $25,00 - I OTHER (specify) $25.00 Clerk's Fee he fee should be paid to }he Planning Department by October 19, 1392, in order for the, Notice of Determination to be timely filed:. Make checks payable to the County of. Butte.. The project applicant should be aware that if he or she does no remit payment of the required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law ;-,nd may not be operative, vested or ;final:, pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources code soGtian 21089 (,), fish and Came Codr., Sec 711,4 (c) and ;section 753.5 (d) (0) ,and (7), Title 14, California Code of Regulations. Ohould you have any questions regarding this matter, please co.ntar, t this office at- 538-7256. Very truly yours, Stuart Edell Manager,Land Development Division Department of Development Services SF/ds cc Planning Division Environmental Health Department Gilbert Engineering .. .. , _.. !E . ' , v rr iGuynrn!s Corner Vesting Tentative Subdivision, AP 42-07-07 and 59, 51 lots on the southeast corner of OUynn Avenue and Henshaw Avenue. North Chico area. Engineer, Gilbert Engineering Land Development Division conditions: I Submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities 2 Provide 20 feet radius property Zine retuxns at all street intersections. 3 Provide tight-of-way for standard._ No. S--5 at all street Intersections 4 indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue, Guynn Avenue and all interior streets. 5 Street signs shad be provided by the developer at all street intex ecti.ons per County requirements, (Submit 5 a3.terhate ,names lox each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names. 6 Deed 30ftfrom the eentorline of Renshaw Avenue and Guynn tthet;of ei 7' Construct one half street plus 12 loot section on Henshaw � veniae and Guynn Avenu to R5-2A road staOdard with vertlda,' curb, gutter; and sidewalk and',,?" AG, P AB, Sr 25.0 prime, :Fog seal and 95% rrlative COMPadtion COhstrUdt full street section on all interior streets to RS--38 access road swandard with curb, gutter, and sidewalk, Minimum 4t,ructural section to he 2" AC and 80 AH with fog seal and 95% relative compartio.►+ Submit design to County Department of Public works for approval. VIP" value "dete.rminations and other data may be required to support Section design Provide monuinentation as required by the Department of Public 'works in accordance with accepted stanaards. Street grades and other features shall comply with the 8utt;e county Otdina'nces; design resolution- and other accrpted engineering standards, 10 Prova,de permanent slolution inr drainagp 11 All easements of record to be shown on the final. me'-. i `tt 12 Meet requirements of the Butte County Fire Department or other z. sponsible agency. is Street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria,' and recommendations of PG&E. xA#. Form a County Service urea for storm drainage maintenance and' street lighting_. 15 Provide 1 ft. no access strip on Henshaw Avenue except at road intersections. f 16 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., PG&E, Pacific Telephone, water, sewer. 11 pay any delinguent taxes or curre�ot taxes as required 18: Devaloprr shall provide all required traffic safeti, signs, including stop signs i9 Note on the final map Chico Urban Area road fees pursuant to 20-100.05 of the Butte County Code; 20 Applicant shall c;�mply with all conditions and mitigations for _sewer sarvice« .Planning inept. conditior2s; _ 1A developnant impact dee for Sheriff Facilit=ies shall be paid 1piir.:,11an-ft � o the provisions of Chapter 3, Article IT of the Butte County Code, prior to issuance of bu i l,d tig permi is oil Use permit in the caseof a mt,�biIP. home park. said fee lflourit will be deterinined and caL,ulated. as- of the data of ,opplii ahton for the bu 7.ding peri mit or t1s)Popetinit. 2#2 Meet the requiremento of- the Chico Area RoPcreation and Park: District Por ian_Pro`Vemetyts necisssary Eor a claoi s iii bike way on Renshaw Avenue Health Dept: condition Tndica'te on the tentative map ,those wells that are prizposed to be destroyed under permit, Destroy those welh; undest permit and i•:onneCt the facilities served by Wells tn other approved water �5oi5> ces print' to recording final. wap,. 24 Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to _supply domestic water to parcels 1-57. 25 Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1`57. 25 Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels 1-'57 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer," 21 Place a note on the map that states 'Development of parcels 1-57 will require connection to a public water supply." 'The following mitigation measures -axe required; 1 pay $75 per lot ,into the West Chico F:re Station Fund'. 2 The final Map may not be recorded until: sewer service and drainage agreements with the City of Chico have been signer, and sewer service is assured.. IVot site work will be allowed until the final .has been recorded, 3 Place a note on the additional map sheet that states! "Wood 7t.ove and f.1repl,ace inserts installed in ,tny home within this subdivision shall lie EPA apirr0vrd and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act. of `1.SS3 as amended.11 ;i COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES S iiEN50ER 14, 1992 -- Page 11 Prov-ide a letter from the State Dept. of Water Resources Division of Parks c•� ecr•eation allowing the use of Craig Access Road for access to_ t'he property. 2„, ;'�r'ovide an accurate legal 'description of the property. m5t� n seconded by Mr.'Last.and carried unanimously, v;1:1 A closed session for the purpose of discussing pending -litigation With' ens et al was held. It Was not expected that any announcements would be made ire a�rding the discussion. 7,T:: ADMINISTRATIVE PERMITS (None) :X F:51VIEW OF PENDING. SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS Guynh's Corner Vesting Tentative subdivision, AP 42-07-07 and 89' 57 lots on the southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and Henshaw Avenue. North Chico area. Engineer: Gilbert Engineering *stew �Gi lbert and Jay Halbert were present Therp_ rwas a di8oussion, of road 1 standards: Mr. Edell said 2" and 8" is necessary f;r T zs 'there are R Value tests to allow a lesser standard. However, on Guynn rri,ti ?enshaw, there must be 2" and 8" because of the heavy traffic: 86Sarding permanent solution for drainage, Mr. Edell said that if the project _ does not tie into a permanent storm drain system and !each' trenches are used on, -,-site, then the project will be a private road subdivision, With all the lots lartes going to the center of the street. It will be required to set Up for -, Feng into a future :drainage system which would mean com'ing out to Henshaw or .Guyon Avenue, here was a discussion of storm drainage studies, far future storm drains. Mr. Oil Bert asked if perforated pipe can be used from Di to DI when setting up Mr. Edell said not for that - purpose. Mr. , 14al'bert said that there is, a cement cistern which .he is taking care of, which is mistakenly marked on the map as a Well' There W68 a discussion of bikeways. Mr. Edell saidi that Class III bikeWays are in -1khe Oat Trans design standards, A b'i kewa,y can be fitted into a 40 ft. wide road if parking is eliminated, however With only 2required oh -site 'parking spaces, elite natin,g parking could be a hardship on residents on Guynn Avenue. Side streets are available for parking hear HehshaWy if it has a bikeway, but no parking. 1' COUNTYDEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE; MINUTES SE uj5MSER 14,; 1992.Page 12 mr, dialbert expressed a desire for a bikeway on GUynn Avenue due to the garG%jjniity of a proposed school. Mr. Edell said a wider road section would be re=deb and a slightly wider right of way Tn order to have parking also. The riga of way -could go into the lot lines.. Mr. Halbert said he would like to t inpi about the bikeway on Guynn.. It. was agreed to modify the condition to .e3 -a bikeway on Henshaw Avenue only. 14r.e rsflbert ,asked about the second mitigation measure. that says that no site wors� tball be done until the final map is recorded,. It• makes sense not to start ,Ph,oM,projeot until sewer is available, but they would probably want to begin site ye,::ark, prior to recording the final map: fir, Edell said that Bill Farrel wrote a memotoBettye Kircher stating that aril asa other things, there' should be no on site improvement prior to approval of the final map. - llsr":, Gilbert said that' to 'record the map, the conditi'ohs must be met, °Which is impoosAble to do if there can be no on site development. jAr. Edell said i-mprovements can be bonded. The main intent is not get tentative roap approval and get the improvements in before there is a guarantee for sewers. mr. Edell said he would like to add to that mitigation that the applicant must ccmp'ly with al.1 conditions and mitigations for sewer service. That way everyoh'e ,ijoul d be put on notice about the situation. The Draft E R for Northwest Chico sew6r,could have a big impact on this project It ,;gas agreed to discuss the mitigation measures and possibly delete the part Abbot Ad site work prior to final map recordation. The project has already been scheduled for hearing on Oct. Si 1992, With the following recommended conditions', Land DevelopmentDivisionconditions 1 Submit road and drainage plans to the, Department of Public Works for approval and install the required facilities, 2 Provide 20 feet radius property fine returns at all street intersectiohs:- 3 provide right-of-way for .standard No. S-5 at all street intersections: 4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback fine from the centerline of Henshaw Avehues Guyhn Avenue and all ihterioe streets. 5 Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street ihtersections per County requiremehtsa (Submit 5 alternate hameSL for each street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names. 6 Deed 80 ft. from the centerl''ine of Henshaw' Avenue and Gwynn Avenue to the County of 'butte. BUTTS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES SEPTEMOER 14, 1992 Page 13 x Construct one half t' reet : plus 12 foot section on Henshaw Avenue and C�,uynil ,Avenue to RS -2A road standard with vertical curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" AC, 8" AB, SC 250 prime, fog seal and 95% 'relative compaction. ' (�onstruct full street section on all interior streets to 'RS -3B access road standard With Curb,, gutter.,' and sidewalk. Minimum s•tructure,l section -to be 2." AC and 8 AB with fog seal and 95% relative compact i.on . Submit design to County Department of Public Works for approval ''R" value, determinations and other data may be required to support,sect on design. Provide monumental idn as required by the Departii ent of 'Public Works i'n ,accordance. with, accepted standards, 4 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution and other accepted engineering standards. 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage,`` 1i All easements of record to be shoWn on the filial map. 12 Meet, regUi rements of Lhe Butte County f=ire Departmeht or other responsible agency.: 13 street lighting shall be provided in accordance with Butte County requirements, accepted design criteria, and recommendations of FG&E 14 Fora a County 5 -Ur vi ce Area for storm drainage maintenance and street Iightirig. 15 Provide 1 ft : no access ' 4�jt ri p on Hehshaw Avenue except at road intersections. 15 Meet the requi`r'ements of the Ut.i.lity compahies (i.e. PG&E,. Pacific Telephone, Water, seWer. 17 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 18 Developer shall provide 'all "egUired traff-ic safety signs, ihclud$':he stop sighs. is Note on the final trap Chico Urban Area road fees pUr:,uant to 20-100.05 of the Butte County Code; Planning 'Dept. donditions 24 A development impact fee for 'Sheriff Facilities shall bo paid r,lUrsuan't to the provisiohs of Chapter 3) Art,;icle iI of the Butte County Code,, prior' to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the c4se of a mbbi l e home parks Said fee amount will be de'termihed and caldUll�ted as of the date of -application for the building permit or Use Permit„ h t BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MINUTES SEP;1"EM85Ri 14, 1982 Page 14 21:' Meet the requirements of the Chico Area Recreation ani' "Parks District for improvements necessary for a class III :bike way on Metnshaw Avenue r Health Dept:: conditions. 22 T_ndicate _on the tentative map ifhrse. wells tha are proposed to be destroyed under permit. . Destroy t hose- wells .Under permit and connect" the facilities served by qel l s to other approved . W`ater sources pri.or to recording final Inap. 23Provide a letter or other documentation- from California 'Wate.r'Service Company stating that they are Willing and able to.suppiy domestic Water to parcels 1-57 24 Provide a letter or other ,documentation from City of Chico stating that 'they are willing and able t supply sewer service to parcels 1-57. 25 Place a, note on the map that states "Development of parcels 1=57 will require connection to a public sanitary sewer." 26 Place a note on the, map t hat states "Development of ,parce 1 s 1-57 wi l 1 require ".Dhhection to a public water supply. Proposed mitigation measures; 1 Pay $75 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station Fund. 2 The final- Map may not be recorded uhtiI sewer service and -drainage agreemAntc with. the City of Chico have been signed and sewer service is assured. Not site work will be allowed until the final has been recorded. subject to revision prior to the hearing,) 3 Pliace, a note :on the additional map ,sheet that- states.- "Wood stove and I fireplace inserts installed, in any hoire Within this suddivision shall be 8PA approved and designed to meet emiss o'ns standards of the California, Clean Air Act of 1988 :as amended: At X ADJOURNMENT i ISI ��..'�•'n�l..-"r ,,.„� �... - r• count, c� LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH /;ND' ECAUTY LAND DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Plri Qning De'rmIrtment DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES q �y 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95985.3397 i J Sept emBreLFH , (si9)g?'22c6 SEP 6 PAX: (911 538.7.140 Otoi o e, Callgol"n a Shastan Int. RE: AP 42--07-07 and 69 P. 0. Box 41,43 Tentative Subdivision Map Chico, CA 95927 Guynn's Corner Dear Mr. Gentlemen; After nevi EIV,` of the pending subdivision app Iicat ion the, Development, Ravi Commil:.tee on September 14, 1992, the project has been schF dul Edd for hearing by the Deve l opme,,It Review Committee on O::tobe.r 5, 159.2. The committee will review the findings of the 'PlAnrling Division and will be considering your tentative subdivis•Ion map, The recommended conditions of approval are listed on the attached sheet. The mdet i ng will commence at 9:00 a.mi in the Boat -d of Supervisors' Room, �oUnty AdInini'str<a,tion Building; 25 CoUnt'y Center Drive, Orovil.I,e, California. If you have any question: regarding thi!� matter, please contact this office at 538-7266,, Very truly ,yours; Stuart Edell Manager Land Devel oiament bi vi si on Development Services Department 85/ds attachment ctl, Planhing biVisio'n l=nvi ronment al Heal `It hi Department Git'bert Engineering,'' 55 IndepAndence Circle, Suite 1, Chiclo .% CA 95926 �, �••,- �� a,.. it IGuxInr.'s Corner Vesting Tentative Subdivision, AP 42-07-07 and 691 �7 jots on the southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and Henshaw Avenue. North Chico area. Lard Development pivison conditions: I submit road and drainage plans to the Department of Public Works for approval: and install the required facilities. 2 Provide 20 feet radius property line returns at.all street intersections. Provide right-of-way for standard No. 8-5 at all street ' intersections. 4 Indicate a 50 Et. building setback line from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue; Guynn Avenue and all interior streets Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street intersections per County requirements. (Submit 5 alternate names for each ,street to the County address coordinator for approval of street names.) 6 Heed 30 ft; from the centerline of Henshaw Avenue and Guynn Avenue to the r:ounty of Butte `7 Construct one half street plus 12 foot section on 14enshaw Avenue and Guynn Aveviue to RS -2A road standard with vertic ci ctxxbr gutter, and sidewalk and 2"AC, 811 A13, Sc 250 prime fog seal and q5% relative compaction. Construct: full street section on all interior streets to R8-313 access road standard- with curb gutter, and sidewalk, Minimum structural section to be 211 AC and $1" A$ with fag seal and 95% relative compactioni submit design to county Department of P"blic Works for approval: "R" value determinations and other data md`? be required to support section design] Provide monumentation: as required by the Department of Public Works in accordance with accepted standards_ 9 Street grades and other features shall comply with the Butte County Ordinances, design resolution` and other accepted ` engineering standard's 10 Provide permanent solution for drainage. 1,1 All easements of record to be shown on, the final: map+ 12 Meet requirements of the Sutte CoUnty Pine Department or other responsible agency,, l BUTTE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC On Monday, O.cto,ber 5, 1992, at 9;00 a.m., the Butte County Development Review Committee will hold public hearings at 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, (Board of Supervisors' Room), to consider the following projects ITEMS FOR . WHICH NEGATIVE, DECLARATION WITH ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATIONS HAVE BEEN RECOMMENDED 1. Ouynn"s Coiner Vesting Tentative Subdivision, AP 42-07- 07 and 69, 57 lots on the southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and Renshaw Avenue. North Chico area. 2 William Hengst, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 39-22-34 and 36, 12 parcels located approx. 1700 ft. northeast of Fimple Road near Lorton Park Drive. Southwest Chico area., The above-mentioned applications and maps are on file and available for public viewing at the Office of the Butte County Development Services Department, Land Development.Divisioo, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville California Comments May he submitted in writing any tuna prior to the hearing or orally at the meeting listed above or as may, be continued to a later date: If you challenge the above application in court, you may be limited to raisilr►g only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hi�_iaring dest�rlbed in this notice or in written correspondence de Li.Vered to the Development, Services Department, Land, Development 5ivisloni 4-It or prior 'to, the public hearing. DEIVELOPf4ENT REVTEW COMMITTEE Stuart I-dell Manage„ - Land Development Div,ls on De;partMent of Development Services To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Wednesday- September 2, 1,592 4/ ,1 X11' -- ( •� AOUttZve Count'' L A N0 ©F NATURAL WEALTH ANIS BEAUTY DIRECTOR'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 060013.0397 TELEPHONE: (910) 5387601 FAX, (916) 638.7705 `%a -o? --0 TO: B attye Kircher :FROM: Bill Farrel _ SUBJECT G'JY'NN'S CORN1R SUVDI.4ISYON, Jay Halbert DATE At1c' ust 10t 1992 After spend'ingr considerable additional time reviewing the file op; this case a.d visiting the site and surrounding area with the applicant and his engineer, I have concluded that a mitigated negative declaration is appropriate. I have x.equested staff to contact Mr. Halbert today; August 10th, to inform him of this approach. Staff -is further requested to ideIntify suitable measures and conditions to mitigate the impacts of this project.. These should be sent to the applicant promptly with the requirement that they be accepted:- Among the items that should be included as mitigations are: iinfthence bt6ftduse Chicoof all Urban AreaoSanitaryriate 1and identified • -'Sewer and Storm Drainage Master Plans EIR, Tlie requirement that prior to final map approval, sewer service must be assu;ced and made availahli. Storm drainage from the site shall not, excdea ek'issting conditions �- No internal improvements, grading or gree removals, or CA - site improvements shall take place prior to approval of the final map. Br,".j! odt Paula Leasure Craig Sanders I�let�r+tnhelyarfinnt Stu Edell AUG 17 19g2 �II•ovl!!�, Gal✓#ornfa NOTICE OF DIETERIlMATxt TO; Ofc. of Planning & Research ]Dept. -01P.- 7i;_ County Clerk; 1400 Tenth Street: Sacramento24d 0 7, CA 95814 1R.OM Butte County Planning, 7 County' Center Drive, Oroville, CA 95965 SUBJECT: Filir:g of Notice of Determination in compliant2 '" T((o21152 of the Public Resources Code.� , rn GM Project 'Title: Tentative Vesting 'Subdivision Map OCT 211 1.992 AP Number: 042-010-007 fix; Ooy Name: Vynn's 'Corner Subdivision (Shastan, Inc.) CANDACE J, GRUBBC, Cutio Co. Cleat Ey --a—mter Deputy State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to clearinghouse): none Contact Person: Stuart Edell 'Telephone # 538-7266 Project Location, on the southeast Corner of Guynn ,;Avenue and Henshaw Avenue, North 'Chico area. Project Description: Tenli >✓e Vesting Subdivision Map to divide 12.7 acres to create 57 lots ranging in size from 7,000 set. feet to 11,000 sq. feet. "This is to advise that the Butte County Development Review Committee has approved the above-described projec► in October 5, 1992 and has made the ,following determinations regarding the above-described project; 1.. The project will, X will not, have a .significant. effect on the environment; 2, An Environmental. Impact Report was prepared for this project, ,pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. X A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA; 3; Mitigation measurfs _ Xwere, were, not, made a condition of the approval of the project+ 4 A statement of overriding considerations Was, X was not, adopted. for tils project. This is to certify than the 1"ina,l EIR Wiith comments and responses and record of peajeet a�+proVul is Available to the general public at They Butte County Planning Wpartment, 7 County Center Drive, oroville, CA 95465 Date Received for Filing AndLL== J_ Posting at OPR Signat•ire Paula. S,, Leasure t Assistant Planning Qirector. Tine CERTIFICATE OF FILING FEE EXEMKION DeMinimus Impact Finding (*Fish and Game Code Section 711.4; Section 753.5c, Title 14,_ California Code of Regulations) f rAec� Title/Butte County Location; Guyi\n's Corner Subdivision, Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, ap oe southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and Henshaw Avenue, North Chico area. erect Description: Tentative Vel -ting Subdivision Map to divide 12.7 acre to create 57 lots ranging, in size .from 7,000 sq. ft. to 11,000 sq. ,' Vadings of Exemption (attach as necessary) 1. The County of Butte has conducted an initial study and prepared a Negative Declaration so as evaluate the potential of this project for adN erse environmental impact: 2, When considering the record as 'a whole, there is no evidence before the County that the project. v,;J. have potential foxan adverse impact on wildlife resources or the 'habitat upon which the wildlife d ends I The County of Butte hash, on the basis of substantial evidence, rebutted the presumption of II adver e effect contained in Section 753,5(4), of Title 14, California Code of Regulations, if applicable. 4. The project is hereby found to be DeMinimus in its effect on wildlife and exempt from the State Fish, and Game filing fees required by Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Certification. T hereby certify, that the County of Butte 'has made the above findings, of fact and that based upon the iin nitial study and hearing record the project will not dividually or cumulatively have 4n adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711:2 of the Fish and Game Code. Paula S, Leasure Asst, Planning Director (Chief Planning Official) V. P ECLARATION OF' FE (California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4) NAME AND ADDPESS OF APPLICANT Gynn's Corner Subdivision (Shastan, Inc_.) P.O. BoX 4143 Chico, CA 95927 CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT: 1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION; /STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION' A, Statutorily or Categorically Exempt $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling 'Fee (X] B. DeMinimus Impact Certificate of Fee Exemption $25.00 Clerk's Documentary handling Fee 2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED C ] A Negative Declaration $1,25.0 State Filing Fee � $25..00 Clerk s � Documentary H:andlng Fee C B. Environmental Impact Report $850 State Filing Fee $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee 3; [ ;] OTHER (Specify) $25.00 Clerk's Documentary Handling Fee PAYMENT/NON-PAYMENT OF FEES: 1. tX3 PAYMENT. The above fees havebeen, paid: See attached receipt. (s) XON' -PAYMENT. The above fees are required Not 2 • C paid. Chief Planning Official By: Paula Leasure Assistant Planning Director Lead Agency; Development Aeyibw d6mmittee TWO COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ?ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK S OFFICE THREE do TV's OF ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION ARE 12EQUSRED FOR FILING ALL APPLICABLE. FEES ARE DUE AND PAYABI�� UN'I7'YRCLERX' S OFF CCE.E FILING O 1��IAKE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT WITH THE BUTTE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE COUNTY OF BUTTE: ., ,. •...., ,.. , —�"-�•:'•r�^r-- �"�,�.�... S•••rr r.�+-car-�•7+- •+�.-r •�,...*;_� ^r^+'rr*Ym•s^t'.* �"'.`►,r^"`�.,.,,�,,..-„ lvy �-9 3018 ��, Y+JST[ gCCRI►T MUS. 7aTAIy* '.'- I �i CCR tli co WORKS �^�Cp t/fQ gL11M ITf vwgiwNcae - ruatie UOCUM RNTf 2oNiN� kNV NCALTii o�r��en ,. AF'PLICAN'f RECI:►V'Lb FROM APPENDIX I 41, COUNTY OF BUTTE PIWIIRONMENTA,L CH1:CKLISi,r 'FORM EVALUATION" OF ENUIf.6NMENT1M IMPACT Tile ,qtr. X13 No .t' "��t, 1!��;�Mtiil"!Z`fI7, GAS► BACKGROUND 1, ?tame of ProP onentl Guyhu's tornoe Subdlvisidn iihaitany tnd,) ls: +sdr�riruS di p; sg.,„r , 'Mu ;ri :,nsoctativo (if appllcable)s pati, Box. 4343, Cbleo, CA 9592 ` 3. 4od—. description: tentative'5ubdivisioh Map to divide 13,6 aeras to creiito 67 lots ran9ing in site from 7,00o sgrft, to 11.,Ot10 sq,ft, o- - lrx ,TI MANDATORY b TNbINGS 01” SIC*'!IF'TCANCE eviel?_rlo1JSStON OF .. ENV_�g IRj!it�[E1PTM EVA ,UATI ON is Does the project have the potential to degrade the duality Of the environments snbstentiaily reduce the habitht of d � k this proposal will not si!3nificantl,y degrade the environment, %ish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlioe populathtt to srdp below self-sustaining levels, threaten to olimihete a plant or ahlinal community, reduce the humbor or restrict the range of a hero or nhdangdeed plant or dnimal or eliminate important example's of major, pariads of California history or prohlstotryt 2. Roes the project have thepotentialto achieve short-iorm benefits to the Attelmeht of long-term environment goats? k #his 0.006sal Will not impede long term onvironin6ntal gasps iA short-term impart on the environk It is one which occurs n a relativelybrief period of time While lohg-term impacts -Will endure into the futures.'] Does(A project may the project have impects raba are individually : limited but cumutativaly considereble't `r Yhis propolhl will have a eumulativo impact sewer bpd drainage servitet and impact on two or more torreratd resource# where the impact air quality. on each resource i s relatively small, but whar+ the'e9fact of the totds Of 'those impects on the onvlronment It afightficaht,) 4. Doesae 'suhstantial adverse effects hn human beingt; either the project, have anvirohmedtal effects Which will cav_,_, X finis ppoposat Will not have a significant b'lversa of get on human hetngh-, dieictiy,or indfrectlyl TII. DETERMXNATION On the bbasis of this initial evai,uationi I/JWC find the proposed project COULD NOT have a 'significant eff3et on the ehVironmont and a NOATIYE btCLARAflON will be prdpared, Wt find that COULD have a tn MkTIRATIMI MEA6URE5odpscHbbh, the d an tie aposed ttbcheil sheet hvelb affect will be n eparediceiit affect iH this case because the' eect add d to thenifleant project. A NtOATM DECLARATIONwill 1'l be prepared, 11WE find the propd%6d project MAY have d s9gnifieaNt affecton the environmohts and an 01106NMUItAL ;IMPAt;f!�WORT is reduirod, COUNTY (!k hUi(C�UIIINLNG Dip RTi,:VT��yt�'v"-'l Unt�s August id, 3.092. >jyl�/i Gj Mdars, gasociRte Planner Noviewed j by: i nvironmenta! Checkl r� Evaluation of IEnvironmeritai Impact ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS res MAYBE "0 DISCUSSION OF ENVIROUM99WAL EVALUA.TION 1. &tq. Will the proposal result 1,i significantt a. Unstable earth conditionsr orthenges in gt3logic substructurest ^_ �� X the proposal Will not affect subsurface earth conditions. Mfs b'. bvercoverl, d'splacement, compeatfon or ovnrcavering of .ha sash —u —� X this proposal Will insult in some almost the entire surface of the ait6 being disrupted And apprAkimetely 40% t0 bn% of the site being overcovaead by roads, homes, driveways, otc.. These types of impacts are expected fore deveiopment in an urban aro8 and do not represent significant impacts on the c. Change in topography or ;surface relief environment. X ,ground featuresP _ The proposal will; not affect topography because the building site is nearl level, y d,. 00'structi0n, covering or modfficatIon of ;any uhique 0e0149fs of physical feature sl _s X The site hes no unique physical feeturos. e. increase in Wfnd cr, water erosion of soils,._ either on or off site? __ X _ The proposal will not cause eros%oh. The soils on tite are deep ar.J absorb moisture readily, the bite is nearly level and the area does hot receive eAcesoive amountu of rainfall, -- f, Changes-in deposition of erosion of Beath sands, or changes in sS:tetion, deposition or, erosion X.: 'The prorosohill not eifect'any wetvrcuurse. "Ich may modify the channel of a rix+or or stream or the hod of the ocean or Any bay, inlet or ' g, Lost of prime agriculturally productive sdils ou tsidc designated einem treeat �� X While this proposal does represent a convarsicn of prime agricultural soil aes to ridential Use, the impact Will hot he significant boebuse the area is plalMe). fcu urban development and is Already impacted by adjacent residential lend uses. h«« toosure of people or property to geologic hazards such as eerthgU6kes, land ,ifde's, X All of Out" County is in a Moderate th rthquake Intensity Zone VIII. tudslidai, ground failure or sfimilar hazards? Conitruction oi`buildings to Uniform 5gIlding Cotle standards for tali.ic zohe 3 Will provide adequate to protactioh occupants in case of ±seismic activity. 2. 6LA-1 bill the proposal rttUlt in substantial; a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quelityt __ X . �_ _._ The proposal Will have a mihpr cumulative offect on .1h6 air quality In th+e regioh that can hot be quantified and is not soon es si�ihificeht because the increase in the humber of vehiclo trip's is not sighifitaht with respect to the Chico Urban area, the Chico Urban area is considered a moderate 'non- Attiihment croa for CO and Ozone, plans to reduce vehicle trip's'Are difficult for individual projects And should be implemented on a community wide basis, point tource emissloha from wood stoves can be reddced by requiring EPA approved wood stoves in All new residential dwellings, b. The creation o* objectionable otldrs, smokA or fumes? _ _ X See the discussion for item 26. C. Aiteratjon of ail~ movement, moisture or teri,poratura, or, only change in climate, locally .� k 'l,e proposal will not affect the atmbsphero, or ragiohall,yl WATM Will the proposal r+3tult in iubtfintial3 a, Changes in currehts.p or the cbilrsd or direction writer movements in either marine or fresh The propasai will not affect any Watercourse,of waortt , EnVironmerital. Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact 3 b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, k The proposal will result in some inceeaso in surface watek' runoff due to, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? reduced absorption from impervious sur?acas. The excess drainage will have to be retained on site through the use of leach trenches until a community drainage system is available,. The soli on .site is suitable to .accommodate the drainage, Permanent improvements capable of hooking up to '6 comrunity storm drainage system Will be ihutalled for future use. A 'fUture storm drainage system will require'significeht funding by the residents of the araa, All property owners in this '"subdivisions Will be bound topayfor such improvements by a storm drainage agreement. No significant adverse impacts are anticipated, c. Need for ofd»site surface drainage improvoments4 x_ project will provide a storm 'drain systoln as required by the public Works including vegetation tombval, ehanneiization or bepartment, culvert installation? d. Alteratido.s to the course or fipw of flood x Thewill ,not significantly affect anjt flood cnntrb<I ,channels or Tatersl Tate tlon $e$. e. thange in the amount of surface watet, in .any X.: The proposal will not affect 611y Watat-course, Water bodyf f+ Discharge into surface waters, at- inany �� x TMa,proposej-W111 ant-sil3nif,:arktiy effact surface Water quality alteratfaft of AUrface Water quality, including but not limited to temparatnre, dissolved oxygen or turbldityt q. Alteration of the direetien or rate of flow of k The proposal ,will not Went the direction or flow of ground waters, ground waters! h,- CMdngein the quant'uty or quality of ground _ _ , it.. Tha proposal will uao grbuhdwator as a domestic source supplied by California watersi either thio gh direct additions or Water Company, Adequate gkcundwtter rsioueces are available, Withdrawals, or, through inte'rceptibn of an aquifer by cuts or excavAtionst 1. Reduction in the amouht of water atherwisa _ % The project will be 'served by public water system with adequate capaeity available *or public water suppliast J. Exposure ppeopla or property' to Watar-related x - �— -• The ro oset Will hot e p p xpose people or property to flooding, hazal-ds oath as floodtngl 4, PLANE LIFE:, Wilt the roposa) result in substantialt tit Change in tho diversity of species, or number of X The proposal Will cause the removai of approximatoly 33 acres of Almond trees shrubst tbming more lt o me ihtain due !b ehcrentiai residential Are eshrubs gresipecroaitss�fenda6td6ticcllants traefi p q p ) orhamentelthat New vegetation normally assaWith resroentiel utas (laws, (town, uwill and treat) Dacia}ed introduced. This is hot ieuil as a significant impact because it is consistent with the planned land use far the area, b, koduction of the hUmb'ers at any unique, rare or _ k.-- Thl site contaihi; no rare plahti. endangored spedlos of pi ht'st C. Ihtroduetion of hew speeies of plants frith an � k The proposal Will hot Affect existing plant life area0 or in a barrier to the normal replonishme,lt of existing speciest d. llidUction In acreage of any agricultural drop? x _ The site Will reduce the amount of actdago devoted to in almbad bechaed� this is hot seen 0 sighificaht betaUsn of eiltreaching residential development and the planned urban land use for the arta. Si AHWAL,LIM, Will thi+ prgpasal t-e'sujt in 6ubstahtiaik I Environmental Checklika * Evalua4bri of JEnvironmental a impact a. Change in the diversity of speoies, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, tend Animals `� including reptiles, fish and shellfish, oenthic - — X The proposal Will not affor_t animal life because the site does not support significant animal life or habitat. organisms or insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of Any' unique, rare or endangered specfes of ---- X The site 'cohtains animals? no rare animals, C. Introduction of now speotes of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of - K The proposal Will not Affect existing animal life. animals? d, Deterioration of existing fish or Wildlife habitat? X The site contains 110 significant Wildlife habltat. 6. 1101SE.• Will the proposal result ib substantial3 a, Increases in existing nofse levelsf --- _ X The proposal will not result ih a substantial increase in noise created on site or in tho Vicinfty. br Exptlsure of peapte to severe noise levels? 7. LICa1TAND GLARE, Will the Proposal produce signan't X The proposal Will not expose people tc severe noise levels, lf_ht and glare? �_ X- The proposal Will not result in a substantial inorease 17 light or glare created on site or in the a- LAND USE. Will the propotbl result in A substantial vicinity. ! , Alteration of the prosont or planned land ube of an areal �— - •—xx - The proposal does hot cohi�tci with the oXisting designated (end Area. use for the NoWaver, a draft ETR for the ekpansian of %ewe; khd drainage facilities that is presehtly uhder reV'i6w is reeomaehditig that e' Gcheral Plan Amendment be initiated to raduce the ma*imum dsnsity, from 6 dwelling units per acre to a dWalling uni;lt par cera to address sewago, drainage and traffic impacts for the entire allfa, The project hat a dapslty of 4.16 dwdliing units per hero. This to Mieeh as substantially can General Plan Amehdmant Pi,,iecially since it 'is hat rmih to the proposed 9, NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the amendment ma ever ecru,`, 1f the proposed y proposal result th sutis ant•Iail a. lhceoase in the rate of use of any hatu'ral k`. reiourcesl ...� _ The proposal will not affol t any rstural rosoul`ces. of Any Winvolvatural resou rcest x 16. RT5t.dP UpSET.et Will the propoialjoh _ _ The prenasal will not de ti, p !e any natural resources, a. A risk of ex losion or rejeasd of hazardous substahces (ircluding, but hot limited to, all, — The proposal Will not ihval+Athe u%e pestioides, chemicals or radiatioh) in the event of hazardous mat aHalt, nor is located close to any facilities Whish store or, utilize Of eh acaideht or upset conditions? such materials. b. Possible interference With an emergency response lan at. emergency P emergency X bvabuatiuh plan? ^�-- roural will not aitAr1 d p ahY hmargehey services, PUi.At119N. Will the proposal alter location, tl sari y i button, dohsit br 1lroWth rate Of the human k sea the disiussian int itam,lj, populations 12. �_______ proposal affect exiiting housih or crreate+Ga demand for additional housing? 9. --= .. k .- the proposal' Will hot signifi td' nil+ a ffect 1 housing demand. ; ii. t ANSPGatAltb11/CIpCULATIDN Will the proposal result iht s v ronmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact a Generation of subsiantlel additional vehicle % The proposal will represent at, incremental increase in traffic is the area. movement? The project is within the Chico Urban raren and is subject to the collection of traffic impact feet already in place. In addition, road frontage improvements are required Along both Guynn and Henshaw Ave. This will reduces the traffic impacts of this protect toe last. than significant levalc b, Effects on existing perking facilities, or deiind 1C _ The proposal Will not affectParkingbecause the proposal will Have to co>nply for new parking? with the perking requirements contained within Butte County Code section 24- 35. c. Substantial Impact on existing transportation %. See the discuttion for item 13a. systems d. a p Ignificant elteretions to re patterns of __ circulation or movement of People ie and[ar goods? % ._ ._ The proposal will not :alter the preseht pattern of circulation in the area: e, Alterations to waterborne, rail or Air traffic? r_ K:, The proposal will not affect rail or air traffic. fr. Ihcrease in traffic hazards to motor vehiclesi bicyclists ar pedestrianst k The proposal Will result in oh Incremental increase in traffic and related _ _ _ traffic hazards in the Aran That will be of#" set by required frontage improvements and the collection of 'traffic impact fees, A pardonof the fees will be used to install A signal light at :the corner of Cast Avo. and Guyon ,Ave. 14. PUGLIC_SENVICE5. Will the proposal have an effect upon.: or result in a Head for nail or altered government, 'services; - a, fire protection?X . The proposal is in en area that will hive a pressurised water system with hydrants. This reduces the impact to fire protection services to A. less than significant level+ in Addition the project is the west Chico area which has been Identified as needing A fire 'statian. A 5,75 per lot mitigation fee it Attested to fund a new fire station in West Chico. b. police protection? _ _ % The proposal will result In A lnoremahtal increase in demand for police Protection in the area. The Butte County Board of Supervisors has adopted sheriff impact foss that Are collected at the time of building permits. This reduces the impact to poli«:e cervices to a less than sighificant level. C, Schools?' %. The proposal Will result in A incremental increase in demand 'for school services, In the prep. Hew construction wilI be subject to the collection of school Impact fees that are 1n effect At the time of building permit Application. 'this will reduce the impact to school services to a less than significant level. An elemohtary and 'secondary 'school Aro planned for the parcel on the north side of Hanshaw Ave, between Alamo end Guyhn. d, Perks or other recreational taeflitiatt x :. The t cpoaei will result in A incremental increase in tlemand for park And reer00116h focilitiet in the area, The project it located within the Chico Urban area And will be tubjact to the c6llectibh of recreation impact fees at the time of building permit application. This will reduce the impacts to recreation fecilitlet to a lots than significant lavol. A neighborhood park it planned for the {mitai'•iate tree, e. Meinlennnce of pubfic facilit lea. Including k the proposal will result in a ihcrelnehtal 'increase in the need for roads3 maintenahce of roads and other public facilities in :the area that is addressed ay the collection of traffic Impact fere At the time of building permlts. f. Other governmental sor'v{eest' % aepill significantItldeamental increase In dem4hd rt ul of for bthar servicesna a 15. tyrOv. Will the proposal rosult ilia i _. . 6 Environmental Checklist * evaluation of Environmental Impact a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or enargyt X The proposal will not utilize substantial fuel b. substantial increase in demand uponexisting sources of energy, or require the deveIopmeht o4 X ` — —' orenergy, The proposal will not substantially Increase the demand for energy, naw sourc," of energyt 3S. U7141TIes. Will the proposal result in A heed for new systemso or substantial alterations to the folloWingl a+ Power, or natural gas? `_X the proposal will not effect electrical ower or haturl p gas distribution systams, b. Commuhidw ons systems? _,. X The proposal Will not affect communication systems, C. Water aviliability? X The proposal will hot affect public Water systems, d. sewer or saptid systems? — X �" �— The proposal is within the Chico Area Nitrate Action Plan. L. v ,his size can not be served by septic tanks and leachfields, .Sewer ..erVide is hot currently Available-in this area end this is project rot Within'tha existing sewer, aervice district. The City of Chico has the discretion to oxtehd sewer servicq to this property by expanding the district. The City squires tho applicant to sign A tower service and storm draihAge agreomeht which also has a provision for the future annexAtion of the prorarty. An Elk addressing the service area expansion and annexation of a large area, in northwest Chico is currently in protess and it is expected that it will be completed some time in 1003, NO Im rovements, soil disruption, or removal of the orchard should occur until sewer service to 'the property is guarantoed, e. storm Water drafnagel X Additional storm Watulh ruhoff Will be retained on site through the use of leach trenches. This is not soah as a permahent "soldtfah to drainage And a community system will be need_d at somo point in the Sutura, The project should he designed to have tbo underground futilities necessary to hook up to a storm drain system whon available, The applicant will have to ontae'in Cityco Athe nd to willgmarits hot both the the they 1poseith formation nd ihclusion to seweryAndatihq storrmthat drafnegoo assessment districts, These ogreaments run With the land and subsequent owners must Also comply. Sfr solid waste and dfsposali ~_~ U the proposal Wilt het hifect solid waste disposal, 17. HUtM NEALT% Wilt thp,proposal result inl e, Creation oI any health hazard or pote.ntfaI hazard (axdludiny'hir'sta'1 , heaithjl `_ ` K_ The 'proposal will oat areata any health hazard. b. Expdsura of k, 16,16 to potential health haxardsl _X .. The proposal Will hot Axpose paople to any neeith Tiazard, ie. PESTHMCs, Will tba propt'saf result in the Obstruction of any scenic vista or view bdiln to the public, or Will the"-- U, The proposal will hot result in an Aesthetically offahsive view because it proposfii 'result in the creation of An aesthetically is consfsteht with. surroundihfl dovelbpmont. offehslve site opeh to the pp?lid vlewi 10, RECREATION, Will the proposal result in ah impart updh the, quality or quahtity af`ekis'tihitrecrebtiohal apjiortunitfosy k ms. sae the discussion for 'item 143. 2b, CULTURAL. RE56t1RCE5_ " a. Will the proposal 'result in the alteration or destruction of it oedfilGtni+'le or historic X,.. The proposal wi'li hot iffeot arci,a;f5g'ical site's+ archaeolcgioal aitei ' L ' t wircnmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact 7 b, Will the Proposal s' cal or— in adverse oryhistoric — X The proposal will not affect historic 'sites, o thetgc,eff rib scture prlob�ecst C, boes the proposal have the potential to cause a _ _ �{ X The proposal w911 not affect cultural rasources, physical Change which would gffact uniquo fthhlc cultural valuasT d, Will the N'oposal restrict existing religious at, _t_ _ X_._. The proposal Will not effect religious resources, sacred uses within the potential impact aeeat yy p [Environmental Checklist * Evaluation of Environmental Impact 8 Environmental Checklist * Evaeuat on of Environmental r� ?�a�t _. �. DATA SHEET R. Pro3ect Description 1. Type of lProject: Tentative Subdivision Map 9. Wildlife Habitats Small birds and animals common to valley grasslands, Hoh-critical Winter habitat tot` the dear hard. 21 erfar description: TSM to divide 13.6 'acres to create 61 lots ranging Cultural Environment, in size from 7:400 sq.ft. to 11,00b sq.rt. J. Location: On the southeast corner, of Guynn Avenue and Hinshaw Manua, lo. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the areas tow sensitivity area, north Chico area, - A. proposed Donstty of Development: 4.2 dwelling 'units per acro, 11_. nutt6 County General plan designationt Low Density, out building, almond orchard. G. Amount of Impervious ,riurtacingi Minimal, 12, Existing koningt S.R. 6.. Accessand Nearest public Road (s): Hefts haw G Guynh Avenue. i9. Existing Land Use on-site: 1 tingle family residence. 7. Method of Sewage Disposals Chico sewer. 14. Surrounding Area: s. Source of Water 5upplys California Wates 5eruic0 Company,. a. land Usess RUral Residential and orchards. b. toning: S -R, A-5 and A -R. g. Proximity of po+.er Liners To properly. C. Gen. Plan Designationt Low Density, d. ParcelSizes, Urban. e Populations Urban, lb. potential for folrther land divisions and'developinontt alone under axisting zontngy _ 16. Character of Sita and Area., Urban, C. EnyiFonmontal Setting 16. Nearest Urban Area hico, physical Enyiroanent 17. Relevant Sphares of, lance: Chico. 1. Terrain Ia. Improvements.: Standards- trban Area: Urban. GonoralTopographic Cheractart. LeVal. b, 4lopaii 0 to 21A. 19. Fire Protection Servicot C, El ovations 180 feet above sea level, e. Hearoat County (State) Aire Station: Station 4 '42 d. i.iteitinil Factors1 Hone, approximately 1 mile. z. Soils b. Water Availability: Piper Water System, a, Types and Cberactoristicsi Vins l=ine apody LpaM. 16. Schoois in Araat Chico Union School District. b. Limiting Faekars: None,, S. Natural :Hazards of the.i~dd - a, Earthquake Xonat 4•darate Earthquake fntansity zone Vttt. b. Erosion Potentials Slight, C. Landslide Potentialt Low. iia Fire ,lizards UNbah. e, Expansive Soil Potchtiali Low: 4y Hydrology Surface g b, Ground Wato H Unknown, pttintinliy lim a e itad. Atiuhdebt valley aquifers. c, Drainage Charbi.A.Histicat Good. d. Annual Rainfall (normal). 22 inches 'par year, e. Limiting Factnrit Hone, 5. Victual%Scenic tN iityt Goody 6., Acoustic qualltyt Goon. ya Airquality: Good, except dura+- t odt of i<tapnaht Valley h1rr. gielegical Environments tl. Dagetktiolfi Alfriihd crchi<f'u', y Environmental Checkllgt * Evaluation of IEnviro nnr��;n#al �m�ac# ao ENVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL 1. Butte County Planning Department. Earthquake and Fault Activity 14an it-1, seismic Safety Element oraville, CA: CH21d Hill, 1977. 12• Butte County Board of Supervlsc.rn., 2. Butte County Planning Department. T.iauefacticn Aar,ctultural Preserves Mab established by Resolution No. 67-178. Oroville, C14: potential tea 11_1 Seismic safety element. orov 11e, GA: Butte County pnliing Departments 1987. 3+ CHZM Hill, 1977, Butte County Plannilyg department. Subsidence andInsurance 13 National Flood Insurance Program. Flood. Rate maps, Federal-EmeryO+cy Landslide Potential.Map 111-1, Safety Elements-_ orovills, CA. Management Agency, 1989, • CH211 Hills 1977: Butte County Planning Department. 14. USGS Quad Maps, ord Ferry, Calif., 1969. Erosion Potential Map 111-7 safety Element. oroville CAs 15, Soil Map; Chico tLMILoroville 119261 CH2M Hill, 1977. t Area. United States Department of Agriculture: t. Butte County Planning Department. Expansive Soils Mab 111-3. Safet•r element: oroville, CA: CH2M92 16. soil SUArea.ofUChic Hill, 1977: States/roville, Agrioulterra. Department of 6. Butte. County Planning Department. Boise t �?ment Map ItI-i, Sc�enir>: Hiahwab element oroville CA: 17, Butte County planning bepartment. Butte CH2M ilial; 1977. C4 unty Vie protection �7urisd;ctions and 7 Butte County Planning Department. Scenic Hiahwas ]�acilities Maw. Butte county fire Depar�:melt and California Depaxtinent o£ Map V�-1,.�..►► Scenic Riahway Element. Oroville; CA 'Hal]., Forestry, x,989. CH2M 1977. 8. Butte ,County Pl:anning,•Department. Nat raj Fire 1. Hazard.classes Maxi 111-4, Safety Element. Orovilles CA.; CH2M. Hill, 1.977: 9. Butte UOUnty Planning. Department. Atchaeoloaical sensti*✓ity trap orovillu CA: James 19+33 , P. Manning; 10. Butte. County Planning bepartmentt School Cirotrict MAPU. Oroville, CA 11. Northwestern District bepartmeiit of Water Resources, Chino Nitrate Study afar s `;t_itrate Concenttatian in Shallow Wells. Tiie :Resources Agenays State of Californias 1983. co��n � S�A COUNPPPOA IV�WVAMI 105-339-1 TELEPHONE (916' 538-7601 August 21, 1992 Guynn's Corner Subdivision Shastan Inc. P.O. Box 4143 Chico, CA 95927 Re Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map on AP# 042-070-007 and 069 Dear Gentlemen: The Butte County Department of Development Services, Planning Division has completed the environmental. review of your project in accordance with the California Environmental (,duality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required, 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code Section 21151,5. In addition, the .Planning Director's report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance has been completed. 'Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning Director's Report which has been prepared for your project: Please review the enclosed Environmental Memo/Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if applicable. If you note any errors or. omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to our attention: The Environmental Document/Planning Director's Report for your project has been sent to the Butte County Advisory Agency for their action. California Government Code Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings and approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your application was received and accepted. The six month time limit for your project mandated by state law, will occur on January 19, 1993, The Advisory Agency will notify you of the time and place of the public .bearing for your project. If there are modifications to your project, 'not related to mitigating an identified impact, re-evaluation of your project shall be required. i inter -Departmental Memorandum TO Butte County Advisory Agency FROM: Planning Director SUBJECT: Report on Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map for Shastan Inc. AP #0442-070. 007 & 069 DATE: August 20, 1992 This is a proposal to divide 13.6 acres to ct0te 57 lots ranging from 7,000 to 11,000 square feet. The present zoning is SR (Suburban Residential). The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this ;area as Low Density Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed Element of the Butte County General -Plan nor any specific or community plan. A Negative Declaration with mitigation measures has beer prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to tae California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. Recommend approval subject to the following mitigation measures ,and. conditions: MITIGATION MEASURL: 1.; Pay $75 per lot into the West Chico Fire Station fund. 2+ The Final Map may not be recorded until sewer service and drainage agreements with the City of Chico have been signed and sewer service is assurz d. No site work will: be allowed until the final map has been recorded. 3. Place a note on the additional map sheet that states: "Wood stove and fireplace inserts installed in any home within this subdivision shall be EPA approved and designed to meet emissions standards of the California Clean Air Act of 1953 as amended:" CONDITIONS: 1. A developnit1nt impact fee for Sheriff. Facilities shah lie paid pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Article Ti of the Butte Courty Code, prior to issuance of building permits or Use Permit in the case of a tt►r)bile home park. Said fee amount will be determined and calculated as of the date of application. for the building LAND OF NATURAL WEAI.T14 AMID 8E'AUi' -� Department of Development Services PLANNING 'DEPARTMENT 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE » OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397 TELEPHONE: (916) 538.7601' August 14, 1992 Guynn's Comer Subdivision �Shas',[an Inc.) P.O.. Box 4143 Chico, CA 95927 Ke: Tentative vesting 'Subdivision Map AP #042-070-007, and 069 Dear Gentlemen: An initial study of your proposed project, a,. Tentative Vesting Subdivision Map, indicates potentially adverse impacts to tha environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To reduce or eliminllte these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are requ�red as uired pursuant to thart of the e California Environinentall Qualityect. Otherwise, an e tal Act. pact Deport (EIR) is q - p An early response to this notificat[oi4 sent to the Department of Development Services; Planning Division, will expedite the `scheduling of your project. please forward your I ritten response within 15 days frc;m the date of this letter. Should you have any questions relJarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 a.m: and 3:00 p.m:, Since B, A.,I cher Oireclpr of Planning Craig Sanders Associate Planner CBS:jIo cc Gilbert lrrigineerng II, f� tit MINASIAN MINA`SIA N, fliNASiAN, SPRUANC"„ 8A8QF3, TAEI7H S SCARES o• ,e ar.nw.u• ATTORNEYS AT LAW � uL A. w�•+uw, 1„<.-toallnt[o or pia►tiflor.•L ca�ro�atla/+tt w+ILI •.•. w. Iw wy,yCC, INC, I/t1 Smts J."', •.� 0•w lTwt [:T JOMi, C•wL CJ ON 9w•vy Jtll.161, -L,J.t ic•'r, 9•sem tit. INCA _ C•'l�CTO+, 4e• , lt,t.j,a •, d, Ora 1111 wwy;i•�.wto., ..+1.•nta/ .11.IJ,1 l[►iw [T -COT. OwOVILLt. G.LIwOw.11� u, :*"In tocw t:9 7bt},137f T cl.c��o.+c i9 u1 !!1.1ta� J•IG M•Cl. V. IC•TON L. t'[LL CO wit 1119 t■1t)7.0IS 7 Auqust 29 19c�,e Susan P.of:£ BUTTE ., COUNT? C011t,1S L 25 County Center Dive 4roville, C, 95965 Re, Chico Sanitary Sewer Master Plan - CCOA G a:pliance Dear ,MS. ROy£: This is in response to the g4-stions raised by lite 1lnard of Supervisors, and You, regardtng the Negative Declaration adopted or the Chico Sanitary Sewer Master plan. Those questions did act challenge the adequacy of the san kary Sewer Master ?lad itself, but rather the inadequacy o£ the analysis and procr�,!e;res Used o h determine its e_.ect on the environment.. For the nr.asons .set Earth below, I have concluded that the Negative Decl;.ation Was insut£icient and that an Environmental Impact .Report (Eiit) should have been prepared. In addition, ji. appears that the CEgA requirements for consultation, notice and comments were ZQA prcnerly followed in connectioh With the Negative Declaration. 1. TH^c PROJECT., • The sanitary Sewer the ?udeline £or Master- plan is providing sewer service to the entire Chico giyan ,:ea, ?resently, ;only those properties ins_id.e the City )','Tails (a?g„sakelY 14;-000 ac;es� approxiriatell serval by the sewer s st f 24,000 population) are hewer em - With a -few dxcettions. The tan'itary Mas..e Plan contemplates the expansion of that systza to se've 22 000 acres with a population in 0: that of 6c, 000. co ,s" uc�e iaprovements would be requited, the post- o ' t , t.; oh is estimated to be ;20,000,000 to $3b,0' 0,000; including trunl:lines, bt5 aping stations and callect'ioh sY stens Al hough the sanitary sewer Master pian does not speci£ e:as, address the expansion of the t�asteNater Treatment P1.peci k premised upon such expansion inasmuch at the is only one-sixth of the capacity needed to Present plait has k:7 plant process the ..lows t ndo The availability of such facilities will allow ddvel0p=en1. ' sities four to six times greater than allowed with 'This w`' .e?t•ic will result it more rapid residential grdwth, ring police and ;ire Protection, "M s and other manic=pal f kip Ms. io£l: ugus . 29, 19132 Pago Two 2. LIM?tfiATI'0:;5 Ort ;Er,ATIVE DECLARATIONS: As you YAOw, th- Public Resources Code,(P.R.C.) allows the adoption of a Negative 'Declaration only if there is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project may nave T sign Mcant Mect on the environment (P.R,C section 2.1080(c)(i)) If an Initial Study identifies potential s cnificant efLects on the environment, a Na,34 ive Declaration. cannot ire adopted unless revisions Bre muds in the project to avoid or mit',gate those effects (P.R.0 section 21080(c)(1i)). The Resources Agency Guidelines (Guidelines) unformLy adopt the "substanhial evidence test" for determining if an EIR oe Negative Declaration is appropriate (Guidelines sectionn 15002(f)(1), (2)t 150663(b); 15064(g); 15070). In the context of environmental review, the `substantial evidenciO test is not a balancing test. In other words, if there is substantial evidenc0 that the project m,3y have a significant - eC, ect on the environment, the lead agency may not disregard that evidence. It must either prepare an EIR or else revise the project to avoid -or mitigate such adverse effect (c!4 Friends of 113`" SStdeet v CitV of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal. Aca.3d 988, 1002] Beginning with Friends o Mammoth v. Hoard of Sunervi_sors (1972) S Ca1.3d 2471 259, the courts have interpreted C:QA in a manner which will "afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory larguagie". This 'has been stated as a standard "which will imposes a "law threshold" requirement for preparation of an EIR (No bill 1^c4 V. Situ of Los Anaeles (1974) 13 Ca1.3d 68, 84) j, DETEah12F;IliG SIGtiltICANT EVtECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT - The phr33e "Significant effect on Che environment" is d;e,ined by statute (P;R.C. section 21068), by the Resources Agency Guidelines (Guidelines section 15382) and by case law friends of Manmoth v, 13oard of Sunervisors (1972) 8 Ca1.3d 247, 271), It connotes a 'substanC al, or potentially hulistant a- advers+s chance in the envirbnnent. The effect need not be iw»edi,ate, The adoption OfL a long range pian that will ultimately produce sigr:ificant effecta requires an EIR (City of Santa Ana V. 3d S-21753_1. City of Garden Grove (.1479) 100 Ca1.App. 533). -The Guidelines contain an appendix listing specific physical impacts that normally trill, he regarded as significant, including iitpaCts which trill; indtvice substantial growth or ccncenttaton of population y Ms. Rot! August 29, 1989 Page Three extend a, sewer trunleline with capacity to serve new development 4. THE INITIAL STUDY DISCLOSES -SI(3,%TrFICANT CFFCCTS Ott THE t—".VrRFt—J'MEN'T- - The `environmental checklist accompanying the Initial Study admits one environmental impact, acknowledges t three others, And rules out the rest. The ad�,lit'��teadpoimpact liis, of coarse, -the need for new tYstems or alterations to Sewers or septic tanks. The 1 -acknowledged " poss[bles" Are impacts an population, locations distribution, density and growth rates, And the need for police and ire protection. Given the recommendation for a, Negative Declaration, one would expect the narrative portion of the Initial Study to explain away, or minimize, those impacts. 8owdvd-j in this tide# the narrative does the opposite. . It clearly demonstrates that those imPacts will be substantial and cumulative. I'ndeed, the description 6-9 the scope oeth6 project set forth in Section 1, above, was; taken from the Initial Study itself. That circundtande also brings into question those portions of the checklist which*conclUde that the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan will not result in disruption of soils, discharges into surCace waters, alteration of su'r!acd water quality} alteraticn of present or planned land use, the heed for schools, parkso roads and other public facilities, or the need for other, governmental services - all of which would seen inevitable with the massive expansion contemplated by thn Sanitary Sewer Raster Plan. The conclusions Of an environmental checklist must disclose the data cr evidence upon which the person coinductina the s'.tid*.* relied., (Citizen's" Association For tonsibl; Development of the qig',100 Area vs. County of In1fd-(jqe5) 172 Cal,App—ld 151, 171) Theme zs no such IdE—a �'O­explain the or-iddiond in this case. Perhaps the City intended to rely on earlier studies, section V t cc the Ini'lal Study cites, is references, the (1) City 01 Chico Plan (2) Chico Municipal coac, (3) Final Report - SIhiti %Ori�er ftatee Plan, and (4) Pinal Environmental In -Pact RepoCt 'co Area Ld�4d Use Plan However, the initial Siu&y dot sklmmAtize the relevant conclusions of those documents, I. . a lead agency Intends to rely on earlier environmental ddconclusions,z for its cohdjUdjoso it must include such summaries. "' (-C'-'Minct�on vi Solano SoU_ntv Redeveloomebt Acencly, (1181) 115 CAliApq.3d 4911,501-7 _503 4 'R` Ila. Rof a "'gust 29, 1988 Page Four 5• CONSULTATION, N°�' ICD rOM�E' S t Inquiries to the Count Di-ector, Adminis,r.ative Y Plannin • beYartmrnt have I Officer 4 Director; Public taorks !de ative disclosed no recon! and Envir g Declaration or then taotics of the onmental Health guidelines require a lead °f Intentionunty receiving tile ai-ad agencies as to Who he cY to s k conmenks wot:ld be prose, of i c t t The the .lead a (Guidelines Sectionan RxR or t oc..1k v from the t4atice9enC7 to lend co 15063(g)), a Declarakion othe_ of Intenkion tc pales of the Negative They also require " agencies With jurisd tion re„ Declaration, and P it, to possible the Pr. -,eject (Guidelines °Ver the agencies and P=en :" includes section 15073(b)).resour all public •Phe ces tia"Icted by '^` °t have agencies term resronsible Sec^ion 210691 discretionar which will Guidelines Y approval power carry out the secq',on 15381) over it (P.R.C. ado :scY.now �e.dging khat the City pt.z6 o. khe Sanitary ewe is the lead agency recocn{Zed that discre.ionarY app nvaimPlementation Qfster Plan, fit Y for the upon foplementation by Power of otherthat should be Y the C a9encies,plan involves the territ.jOh the a ounty of But a The Plan de -end. annexations to the Cite �ountY Local ted Control Board Agency kO unincorporated ,» Plant), It (as tb �` Chico), and Y Formation (as to. follows expansion of tile Regional Water to notice of the that'`they are "res the Wastewater Tr�t�it_r (Gulcelines se.tionPreparation of P°rsxele agencies" entitled not followed 15073(b)) Apgar the N gative Sanika iN connection w entlYr that Declaration. Sewer .aste, with the requ renent was Plan . environ ental review 6 • R` ;�8= of the Notice IIlewas ttlegative peclaraticn August S . D9&a. urination twas he f ie�. w Copt ed oc�t,�u August 2, 1988. A Pror:e^d1'icS unless lt. h the a .e, Count+ of an r the on1Y a:ai. Y is willln.. Y Cla on action Eo compel coido, a ene"" would ko rethen ehe C$0A tare the fora of a P Wi,.tt CE be coat„eacenenk would recuest eti.ticn for tJcit GA` that would of bMter ination;wrto dire 'the Cit°f tMandate, Probably prepare d:ti Elft reopen Che Y n set asideht petition would for the S CE Comment the Notice ha+•o t° be filed by I” S^wet Ma"stet Process, and to statute of limitations y September pe. (P. t.C. 6i 5 n7 {In OC erTto nee ikion .action 2 t,the •�1"thcucfi an argunenk htchk be exhaust is administrati f nada remedies priorthe t couhty failed to to adoption of :the ;� a ,lit �t �' �'� �� C vi'`��eY'y Yw�a��ya v t ix•`71k � ' s v ? � �1 � y�� " f`4. ilia• --_• ♦Y TM' .. � ♦ , SS .'; lir �� � !!.{�!! ,YtF ��r tiJ fF•Y w♦�t 7{�t�n.Y7F *'�`v�,.+ 1 I� > 11�� f q.jZ r.♦. Jt YY f tr��r^Y vC�+ S}r"fN t!�'`f{s f :lt+ta t r � J,1f S� i:��Y �•+'!"tFRt�' sl k , ' w. '•Y �% f � '.'. li Y! + 4t#�,1.,'we� �� ' � � k�tii��a u.�t�,,�y�,��!��+II�i ��f ,FAY 1 « a, �. _ Ms • iiof �. r ., � ,r w t�r5 r t � \�Jln !'R.� r T 2;dY ' . AuUuZQ 29 1 X. gaB" • t.. «;} r Y t + . ���...itG, x l�i�j fi, ..r1 �t , Paye Five .r Y .♦, < i.i` 'J r��t „,�r ii ���{, ,lhn'f(��G.iyih♦•.i�d�s r,Fy.rl Negative Deglaratl6h; haCMa{u ;� r.�;tJ;{+ ���ii''1a��tah'rtlnxa« X inasmuch as the County' did 'not receive�ldY;hardly`saem persuasive of the Negative peclaration as required:Yb tice.of4t}3e preparation e r 'c't �aRh�` Ythe Guidelines; I hope' the `forago in' _� �,z� (� �.�,`�.♦.mss•,' let me know it r can e of,anformation•will'be holpfuT. Y further asaistanc®. Qlease avery. truly youx;t,` �MINT�SIAN, `MI21ASY11N • SkOANCEj, MINASIA.Y, HAEE,Rt METTH & SOARSS 13y WHS/cj WILLIAM m. SPRUASCE Y i p . t • ls4 {.',,��I+ �~'{�}V+r{ri4 �'{ry );�e't^'e� w�.:'i 1�" ''t}' `+K 'Ny.a: r+�. .ry?r � �t *��Y i t iti�fY kti tr�dJ pY C1 V'• ' r ' 1.w!:�.ri�t.yi.'.bt,.r ;'� ".�4f 15...4,' r�F•�V.. W A +?' a.C4t _ Y'i:.:'. 1 "Butte coup i f� TI Aa %AA*C,aw'I`Iq AhlV 11[AlJiY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH R apiy tq ® 1469 Humboldt Rood 7 County Center drive 747 Elliott Road Rap1y Ioi Chico, California 95928 Oroville, California 95965Paradise, California 95969 Telephone: (916) 891.2727 Telephone: (916) 538-7281 Telephonn. (916) 872.6308 Fax: (916) 538.2140 May 19, 1992 Gilbert Engineering RE: Guynn's Corner Subdivision 55 Independence Cir., Ste: 1011 SE Corner Guynn & Renshaw, Chico Chico, CA 95926 APS 424-07 & 69 Sirs: This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public Works, Land Development Section, that we are prepared to act on the above application. Based on present information; we can recommend approval or conditional approval. Recommended Conditions for Ap rp-oval 1 Indicate on the tentritive map those wells that are proposed to be destroyed under permit. Destroy those Wells under permit and connect the facilities served by wells to other approved watei sources prior to recording final map. 2. Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply domestic'watee to parcels 1.57. y I Provide a letter or other doZumentation from City of Chico stating that they arty willing and able to supply sewer service to parcels 1-57. 44 Place a note on the map that state's "Development of parcels 1. 57 'will, require connection to a public sanitary sewer.." 5i* Place a'note on the map that states "nevelopment of parcels 1=57 will require connection to a public water supply.'" C, n A =AN M063 AIR ENVIRONMENT FOA A HEALTHIER TO(v1ORROW Gilbert%Gwynn Subdivi , Conditiah May 19, 1992 b* � Page 2 ; f 6. Destroy the existing septic tank on the property under inspection by this department, Remove the existing residence or connect to public sewer and water supply. Permanently close the existing underground storage tank Under permit process. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Chico 'taffice at 891_2727. incerely, I%mice Severin, R.E.H.S. Program Manager i)Jvision of Environmental Health VS%gl ccs band Develo nent Panning Shastan Inc. Loralynn Engellenner, II.E.H.S. t t ' 05'/28/92 14:20 '8`8913220 . CHICO UNIF.IFD bD QJ 001 OM""E' OF A, .SSLSzANT' AdAST ; � a EN on ce r • ' S��'i��`l��.�' 1168 F:�1"�5'I' .-s 1� VENTS STREET ADA2T1YLgTTZA7M SERVI'G'+wS CHICO. W, 95928-6899 (9Z6)1891-3140 tgtc. ."91-3000 ' May 26, 1992 Post4t- brand fax trnnsmmPi mem #otmes ► .., h- W. Stuart Edell, Assistant Virector Butte County QePc Par r+ Department of Public, WomacQ� 7 County Center Drive 9 Re: Chico Unified School District Response to, "GLTINN,S CORNER YE5x'Il�CG SUBDIVISION (Shastart, Itic.- REVIS%I) #I TENTA7TVISION VE S[JBDI &) MAP- (A. P. No. 42-07-47 69) Dear 7v1ie: Ede11 4 a Disc rep esentai ves have revieWed the information contained in your memorandum dated April 24, 1992 regarding the Guyna's Comer Vesting Subdivision for property located, on the southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and'Henshaw Avenue. DiRdEt xepre yenfatives have determined t}iat the proposed project will negatively impact Chico Unified School Di57ict and, therefore, warrants further environmental analysis gCFIDOL FAC MnnS F(RR SU ENTS GE T1 BY TH F, PRQ- POM DEV EIAl N=' .sem The Guynn's Comer'Vesting Subdivision trap proposes 57 residential wets. Applying the,Distxxct's .43 student yield factor, this -development will generate approximately 25 school age Children. ' UO2 ing current D st rict: actual student enrollment data: and projected student enroll- ment data, Prow, alreadyaplmoved new residential development,. each elementary; junior iii. ;h and senior High school in the District is filled tD Capacity. To mmodate a 50+ percent increase in xtudent enrollment in recent years, tiv: Dist let (1) reutilized existing school f`aCilit s, (2),tt111izea-interim. elementary school lacci ities, (3) placed relocatable classrooms on existing elementaryinstituted school campuses, (4) inted mutt% track year-round education in three existing elementary schools, (5) occupied, one new uzbari elementary school on a year -•round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary on a traditional school schctiuie Ss in the rows of constructing a third • .school. ... elementary school (8) has placed interim facilities on the second gyp_ ,uses pendia; , the av�Iab>7zty of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has pIantted to build a new junior hl; b%middle school and (IO) has planned to expand one existing senior high schot,L " plahhincg Dephrtment MAY 2 '7 1992 .. .. orou�ito, �alitorrita .; ny128/a2 `14:21 '�'sa1922U CHIC 4 UNIFIED sn ° � (7jd02' , . r Ar W, Stu='EWI, Assistantrirector ehriay 26,` 1992' , , Page• 2 f° ♦ _the District continues to be a participant in ,the State School Building'Program whrrcan the cost of constructing new school facilities is shared by the State ad by the local dis- trice in a pro rata fashion, The Statewide heed to construct new schools afar exbeds 6ail6le pro rate. State ,funding; therefore, needed new Chico unified School Llistrict school facilities have not been provided in a timely manner. Local Chico, Unified School District revenues generated from school inve t fees, coupled with the proceeds from om t iioune needs ion bon. b approved by the voters tri Apn-t 1988, will. meet the � � previously' _ Y g g y Local birthrates and reviousl 'apg ed residential dyelopments but will not meet the student housing needs generated b new devel meat, 71e District anticipates housing increasing numbers of shute ag in intexim f i ties fuctd n9 becomes available to construct new schools. 7 -pact oLP»..:,pasr �Jeyelo,�ment an Coca t7iu1�X S`c7uaol art Schoo�s, Cinte District elementary, junior and senior high schools are filled to capacity, it; is evident that students ,,u ated from, the Guynn`s Comer Vesting Subdivision cannot be served by existwg facilities. In addition, there is,currentiy no funding mechanism 4 that, win enable the District to provide 5ziliti,es for these students.,, ' Basedon the District's .43 strident yield factor per average (1,280 square feet) hoose hold, the 57 msiuentiaal units in this development w�l yield approiamately 25 students that must be housed in Distdct schools. The. 7, -strict projects that ]anger residential units Will. yield more than .43 students per hr` :sehold and smaller mmidential units Vii yield less than .43 sftiomts per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than avera;e bonseholds, the District utilizers a imiEgat on cost based oii square footage of habitable space in each household. Mrttgatioh°oIm pact on f✓Irico UntX Schonlstiict SchoniTs • 'T hg I3istiict is Wised to oudty apirrov l c, imP oposed. tentative stibdivi&p� M_,- -application tuiless the project fAy_nLfitiaates its impact on the District The 1991M Der ifacile ce -squait cost to fn11 n of Baca r_esidentia ��2 r square f t. This amount i as � eeded tea re fleet. the- m*,t` of inflation, school f it ities needs, reca� changes and other cost of luen,cing factors: -The full mitigation cost of $5.29 per square foot of new .residential. del elopment will include school impact few (currently $1.58 per square foot).. The -, hod1#pact fee will be strgplemented Sufi an agpropr_iate amount of cash or in lieu ties)..ga The pa ` school �'�� (fees and cashd or school �oz in l �u�rva�le�tt must fully��tag' to � x�ct of the I� development on Driet schools Since the school mitigation cyst established by the District is based on habitable footage of the residential Unit add .Istria represeut�adves ane not informed of the itable SP each eachsiciential umt in the p�`aposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is Pro- vided to allow vile who is knowledgeable,of the habitable space of each residential trait in the proposed development to maks herlhis own calculations; , , 1 1 i1 BUTTE COUNTY'DEPARTM�"��Nrt ` OF PUBLIC WORKS 1�1� LAND DEVELOPMENT SECTIONn/G2 ��"`' COMMENT SHEET AD/`.. TO • DATE: April 24, 1992 AP NO.: 42-07-07 & 69 RETURN BY: 5/26/92 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE VESTING SUBDTVISION MAB APPLICANT: GUYNN'S CORNF.�R.VESTING SUBDIVISION (Shastan.3 Inc.) ENGINEER.- Gilbert. Engineering _ CONDITLONS AND/OR COMMENTS DEPARTMENT Of- (fit;?BLI`(; WORKS 7 County C, Ork;er Drive Oroville, �'PA 95965 (91 a) "r.I8-726.5 DATE April 24., 1992 R 1f1.MMTT.8 SUBJECT: GUYNN'SCORNER VESTIV�`,'G'$TJBI',G:VISION (Shastan, Irc.) J . SLU)NISICK ii P ASSESSOR'S PARCEL. 'NUMBER(S) : 42tQj 07 6 LOCATION =57 lots located on,, hr_soutl least cornu of Guynn Avenue and _- Henshan) Avenue. `isIci.th Chi,'�;i ,area. Attache.,, are documents s~c gc.rdi�ig and a copy of,, the above- described tenth Ave map ?;,r y001r review. If you have any Suggett i ons, additions or r;ecomm,0ntl;idt ions cohcerni ng this project, please return them to this'effice kio later than May 26, 199 Very truly yours,. William chef D, rector cf Public Wf,tirks 44-1 Stuart Edell Assistant Director' SE% kp attachments cc : rtri7ng Depa�tme.ht i Butte Co. Mosquito Abatement EnvPlcironmental He4`►tl) Depa.rtmaint Chico UrAfied School Dist.: Calif. State Forestry/raze Dept Calif:'Waiver Service Co Butte County Sheriff City of Chico Army Corps of trigineet-4 Superintendent of Schools n P.G.& Calif. State Dept. of Fish Came Pacific Bell J APPLICANT: Shastan, Inc. PHONE N0: 594-2027 ., ADDRESS: P. 0. Box 414 , Chico; CA 9592 OWNER Louis E. and Marguerite Rego PHONE N0: 342-5419 ADDRE,Sta� 929 Henshaw Avenue, Chico, CA 95926 EbTGIY' �R OR SURVrLOR: Gilbert Engineering PHONE NO: 599-9503 ADDRESS: _55 Independence Circle, Suite 101, Chico, CA 9592 MAIL NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Applicant and Engineer Dots 4 & 14 o� the. Third Subdivision of the John Bidwell, Rancho LOCATION OF PROPERTY: TOTiMSHIP 22N RANGE' 1 E . SECTION N/ A ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 42 07-0'j & 42-07-69. TOTAL ACREAGE 12`.7. PLEASE SUBMIT PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR RECENT POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (dated within. Iast_,sik months') WITH APPLICATION. INDICATE BELOW THE DATE AND RECORDING INFORMATION BY WHICH THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL WAS CREATED DATE BOOK PAGE NUMBER =1 SIZE OF ;PARCELS BEING CREATED (includLng any remainder) 57 lots ranging in size from 7,000 sf to 11,000 sf DISTANCE TO NATURAL WATER COURSE OR STORM DRAIN: 2000' to Lindo Channel PROPOSED 14ETHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL. 0i` y of Chico sewer .system (Check with Health Department) PROPOSED SOURCE OF 'WATER: California Water Service company (Check with Ilealth Department) DO POWER AND PHONE; LINES EXIIsT To, THE BOUNDARY OF THE ORIGINAL PARCEL? , Y e s IF tOTy ESTIMATE THE DISWICE THEY WILL HAVE TO BE EXTENDED: zy LD 1020 Rdvised 7i..24"80- 119 FOR OWE USE ONLY: But t o County Planning Dept. ;, Receipt # 7 Coitnt,y Center. Drive Applicant C prnv:tin, CA 35965-3397 n r (9916) 538-7601 AP It 4 Subdivision Name (if applicable) APPENDIX'H 1%575; ANG 6 Onto Fi led IAND DIVISION APPLICATIONS Supplemental Infor,iation for Planning Department J, mist and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: City of Chico Annexation Agreement 2. i'rnposed scheduling/associated projects:As soon as possible. 3, Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units; ftaure development plans): 2_ phases 46 What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Desuribe haw on-site and downstream drainage channels will. be affected. Private storm draina e/leach trench.e 5, i Proxithit,y of wat,Ar for fire fighting purposes (hydrants, ponds, etc,)t wells aLl California Wate- Se)cVice Company 0 W i 1 i excavat, tuts or grading be necessary'! Cubic yards '(est mate) t „Lot gtldina:_and roadway excavations quanity unknbwn at bhis time, k 7, ` lylrctu uns or travel to property (rural and mountainous areas on;ly). X/A yJ f )-.NV I RONMPEMAL IMPACTS ,AAND MITIGATIONMBASI)RES t l vitt i Py potentially :significant environmental impacts associated with !if(, hitt! (tivision. What project design features or special conditions or approval (mitigation, measures) are proposed to alleviate potential, nv i ronmetttal impacts? NONE t) MV l RONP18VAL -SETTING" $t) De.,4cribe the project site as it exists before the project, TttolutRag information on topography, soil stability, plants anal animqls, attd any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Desoribe any existing structures ort the site, and the use of I fit! sl: t.lucLures. 1 e- ;fisting single family residential unit and associated olitbuildings inalmond orbhard.. h) Des'cri'be the surrounding properties, including information on. ' planLs anti animals ,and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.; Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), lrt�nSlty of land use (one-family, apartment douses, shops, depart- ttt SLords, rtc.)'; and scale of development (height, frontage, S beck, rear yard, etc.). Surrounding properties include an existing residential :subdivision, residential units; and almond orchards tTIVI'IVICATION. C hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in thO ,tt tit 110d exhibits present the data and information required for this TrM i;tl evacuation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,' statements artil ittt'hrMAtion presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. :and hcrl fief. I)aI z+ S ignAtut-o For *11-40 -Mlvet for longer responses. 11/85 y owdoMenetl Win 666 V% 8V -ling 4 t r d' i-t �: N 0115 0 G T+TEit.A:L��' fll�N.>ta ORMANC� I2E7=SORT Q?� cxE MA'' 0E STJSDTv:rsTOiVr MAp toms 1-4 to be complated by Applicants :Z, .APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS: S)-Lf? S i /A Pj 1 J C, PROJECT DESCRIPTION; 1, ,ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NURBER(S) O y 2 - 007, Q (ac'i 4,, PROPOSED USEi yq following items are to be completed by the Planning Department, �;A' iXfa ZONING: 1- LAND CONSERVATION AGREEMENT- cmtpAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS LD tni leiM S O-""I Ic ES) D GAJ ► 'I 2-401' tient/Site Desip-ation Criteria: YES NO C t4 -T-ra Gf -� r- x It is tecommended that you pe_fo= i` _ the following checked items; ` X ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK X BOTANICAL SURVEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY YES: No WITHIN DEPARTMENT OF FISH / o' AND GAME DEVELOPMENT ZONE: NlA 9, llf WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN: WITHIN AREA, SPECIFIC OR Stzff Determination PLA ": Substantially conforw to: LAND USE N: GENE, RAI, PLAN; 1. Land Use If Yes :L1 1-t 1 e-.i,J 2. Conservation �X- Name of Plant 3. Open Space 4. Safety WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: 5, Noise _ if Yes, " 6. Housing �� Name of Reserve. ZONING 7. Circnlat�on ' KING: TQC CO13rr Ca(�-�/�- AIRPORT LAND USE PL V4i Cct S:Pt•2C)T'(_=C.,� L IH.10 Q-11 CO UfP-P?, 60 X11'' CYC j=lLL ►- (F�f"i _rf3A.7 f' �J.�..ar NthE Si};natf'= rsc«: =�, ti.�l( ►.. Date : �% �%-�9 2 Ai Zl{E ,11[':'I, CC. VT FOR TI'S:, kgOUESTFI) LAND blft ION, I A14 AWARE OF `H8 ABOVE STAVV Dkrnti 12.1A` ION M-NO- iIZOING THE CON ORMANCE WITH THE O=PAL PW AND ZONING. LlatiSd . ..:. ! � Signature of Applicant- fftis ro ort bill dk lkd and be discarded six 6 la r B P p C) months �fzcttt tit�date o� thi5 stti'f si nritlrc Ow DENSITY RR1:;SIDENTIAL 'Prima ral Uses: Detached single --family dwelling's at urban den cities. S°condarY Usess Agricultural uses, animal husbandry, home occupations, outdoor recreation facilities, utilities, public and quaZl public uses, group quarters an,d care homes. Site Designation Criteria: 1 Needed for urban residential, development within 20 years. 2. Adequate water supply. • . A for septic Sewers available or natural conditions su-table f tanks. 4. Adjacent or near to existingutilities,-roads and single - family residential development. Good accessibility to commercial services, schools, fire 5• protection and other commuzL.ity facilities.. Intensity'of use Zoning`allOws net parcel sizes of one acre to 6,500 square feet. One single -family dwelling per parcel ,vi.th other residential uses limited to a maximum density of b dwelling units per gross acre;,* Home occupations, farm animals, other uses and setbacks regulated to maintain single -family residential character. Consistent Zones: R-1, R-1 :J'! F C; .RT-1_, RT-1A, ASR, M-R, S-R T�'� SR-1 , TM-'I , R-Mi3-, PA-Ci E.� stirs parcel: 1, • g _ arcel sizes and residential. densities. Zanin Factor sewers or suitabili� for sefltic tanks. 2. Availability of I "I ect on adjacent uses, water quali air quality`, noise, 3. traffic flow and safety, and general env�^onmental qual7.ty. �-. Fro:�imi to major treets, commercial services and all . p ies. � public facilt 5. Distance from airports,.railrvads and industrial uses. ` 6., testing utilities, walkways and drainage facilities. 47. Local desires. *Developments with densities in exdess of 4 dwelling units per, dross acre %tiliz- septic waste disposal systems must meet Health Department requirements aha be cl,usterecl (P:�l-C) or be providers With server service. T. tto 1 Amended by the Ftousin,r, f+letent I0-29=$1 NOISE SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED GUXNN'S CORNED. TENATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP BY Tom Barrett, M.A. Biologist and Environmental Planning Consultant roe De ��'i ion The project under investigation in this report is the Guynn's Corner Tentative Subdivision Map and consists of 57 lots to developed in two phases on what is currently a 4.1 acre almond orchard: Project Location Located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Henshaw Avenue and Guynn Avenue on Lot 14 and a portion of Lot 4 of the Third. Subdivision of the John Bidwell, Rancho near Chico, Butte County, California. Scope Of Survey and Report - As required by the Butte County Planning Department, this report is a noise survey of the immediate environment within 200 feet of all property lines. Methodology Two noise surveys were conducted on and about the project site on 10 April and 17 April, 1952, A Realistic Sound Level Meter (+/- 2dB at 114 dB) was used to measure noise levels, The "A-weighted decibel (dBA) scale on the fast was Due to the location and the love vehicular use of response roadw setting s on the Westland north a cursory noise analysis was conducted to determine the influence of the Southern Pacific Railroad to the west and: East Avenue to the south. If the sound level exceeded standard residential levels (see below) then a more indepth studywould follow. Background For planning and environmental health ;purposes, noise is usually evaluated from two perspectives, sound energy levels and annoyance (noise is usually defined as annoying or unwanted sound). The intensity and frequency of soun'd energy levels are measured in decibels (dB), and weighted on a scale that closely approximates human hearing (dBA), The dBA-weighting`corresponds to frequencies in the 500 to 10,000 147, (hertz) range as the human far does not respond to low frequency sound Page 1. T.A. Barrett, Energy & environmental ConsuitiL12 Tz +; 4,scond perspective is to account for annoyance depending upon the type of noise and time of day. The day and night noise Level averaged over a 24- hour period is known as the Ldn (noise Level, day -night). This indicator is used as noises are considered to be more or less annoying depending upon the type of ,noise and time of day. Another way to characterize noise levels is with the community noise' equivalent level (CNEL). CNEL averages noise levels over a 24-hour period and then weights noise levels for evening (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) and nighttime (10 p,m. to 7 a.m.) levels. Obviously, most people perceive noises to be more intrusive during, evening and late night hours: Another effect of sound -energy is that it decreases with distance. Sound levels from isolated sources will typically decrease by about 6 dB for every doubling in distance away from the noise generator. Continuou�r noise (similar to noise ?enerated from vehicular traffic on a highway) will decrease by- about 3 dB fox every doubling of the distance from the source. The California Department of Health Services' (DHS) guidelines for general. plan noise elements identifies the normally acceptable range for low-density residential areas as less than 60 dB with a conditionally acceptable range between 55 to 70 dB. The acceptable range for high-density residential uses is less than 65 dB with a conditionally acceptable range between 60 and 70 dB (California Department of Health Services `1987); The noise element of the Butte County General Plan uses the DHS acceptable noise ranges as a general guide in the environmental review process for proposed projects. The County's noise element uses an Lein value of 60 d73A as a maximum acceptable community noise level: The City of Chico's General Plan allows residential 'uses a maximi,tm acceptable exterior C1vEL value of 65 dBA, Results The first survey, on 10 April; was conducted between 1600 and 1715 hours. The air temperature was in the mid 60's (°r) with a moderate amount of humidity (50 -60 % R.H.) and no apparent wind. This time of day corresponded to ruvh hour traffic along East Avenue. The project site is located from 800 to 1,500 feet from tact Avenue, Sound level reale 'ngs seldom exceeded the threshold level (50 dBA =/- 2 dB) of the instrument.' During periods of increased traffic flow the sound level rose to about 55 dBA and only exceeded 60 dBA twice in 15 minutes when vehicles passed within 10 feet of the instrument. Page 2. r, w. TA. Barrett, Energy & Environmental Consulting At 1645 hours a Southern Pacific train passed. The warning horn was blown south of Fast Avenue (about .5 miles away) and this event registered in the 55 dBA range. The railroad tracks are located approximately .3 miles (1,500 feet) west of the project: site, As the engine approached the nearest point to the project the meter recorded a Sound level of 61 dBA. After the engine passed the sound of the railroad cars diminished to just below 55 dBA. The second survey was conducted in the morning of 17 April, 1992, from approximately 0830 to 0930 hours. There was a strong wind blowing from the southwest and the humidity was high. Sound level readings were higher due to the humidity and wind. Traffic noise along East Avenue was registering from 3 to 5 dB higher than the previous survey's results. Traffic was producing readings around 55 dBA with one peak to 60 dBA in one 10 minute interval. The peak was due to a diesel truck engaging its Jake -brake to slow down. Conclusion This site is well buffered from most traffic related noise emanating from East, Avenue by the the subdivision and the almond orchard on the south edge of the project site. Typical residential fencing will further traffic noise along, the orchardportionof the south edge. railroad and the project site as well as buffering effect of the buie from the Noise from the railroad should not. be a problem as the d p ) g he buildings and vegetation between the railroad and the project site will diminish its level and annoyance. At this point in time the sound level is below the allowable city and county standards and is in the conditionally acceptable range of >55 - 70 dB'. Traffic noise along Guynn and Henshaw is relatively high due (60-.65 dBA) to its proximity to parts of the project site but infrequent in duration so that it should not be a problem: Noise generated during the construction phases will effect the residentsalong the southern boundary of the project site Page 3 �� T.A. Barrett,_s�nergy & EnvironmentalCansulting .; APPENDIX A. COMMONSOUNDS AND THEIR DECIBEL'L'EVELS $ollnd Level in Decibel- Threshold of Hearing 0 Whisper 20 Office Building 40 Conversation 60 Factory 80 Heavy Traffic 100 jet Aircraft 120 Threshold of Pain 140 (Source; U.S, Department of Housing and Urban Development.) COMMON NOISE LEVELS OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Construction Equipment Level at 50 feet (dBA) ;Ear, thmoving Frontloader 70 Backhoe 85 Bulldozer 80 Tractor 80 Graders 85 Truck 91 Paver 89 Materials Handling Concrete Mixer . 85 Concrete Pump 82 Crane 83 Stationary Pump 76 Generator 78 Compressor 81 Impact. Pile Driven '101 Jack Hama" iet 88 Baranek and Newnan, Nose from Construction Equipment rid Operations; Building Equipment and Home Appliances, EPA, 19710 , Page 4, n j� BIOWf ICAQBOTANICA . REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED GUY'NN'S QDRNER TENATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP BY Tom Barrett, M.A. Biologist ailid Environmental Planning Consultant i 1� The project under investigation in this report is the Guynn's Corner Tentative Subdivision Map and coksists of 57 lots to developed in two phases on what is currently a 12.7 acre alt pond orchard. Pro___ie, ct Location The proposed project situ;: is located at the. southeast corner of the intersection of Henshaw Avenue and Guynn Avenue on Lot 14 and a portion of Tot 4 of the Third Subdivision oil, the John Bidwell Rancho near Chico, Butte County, California, Sc f rvey and Reliort As required by the Bu°Cte County Planning Department, this report is a summary of a "biological and botanical survey of all drainage swales, creek or river frontages, vernal poolsi wetland areas (marsh or mountain meadow riparian), valley oak woodland, or areas of special biological importance as mapped by the DepartmF nt of Fish and Game, waterfowl concentration areas, anadramous and warm vi+ater fisheries. Methodology The survey was conducted on two occasions, one triornng survey and an afternoon survey. The perimeter of centire project was walked as well as two roughly diagonal transects Any and all plants and animals were noted with special. care given to the presence of any plants and/or animals of special Concern. The presence of sensitive habitats is also of great concern to the State of California and U.S. Government, The delineation of 'wetlands is critical to efforts by the Army Corps of Engineers to preserve the amount of remaining wetlands in the U.S. It is also critical in that most of the rare, endangered and/or tl realkenea species occur in wetland areas: Page 1' r a " Energy & hvironmental T.A. Barrett, Consulting i Environmental Setting The proposed roposedanna project site lies within what was once considered to be valley p P habitat between Lindo Channel on the south and Mud Creek to the north. Due to the intense agricultural practices in the area, very little of the original habitat remains. Remnants of "natural" habitat can be found along creeks:ides or other non�cultivatable topographic features. None of these features are part of this proposed project site. �I r A botanical survey was conducted between 1600 and 1700 hours on 10 April, 1.992: The temperature was in the mid 60's (°F) and there was no measurable wind movement. The almond orchard located on this site is a well-groomed mature orchard.. Virtually all of the on -crop vegetative matters has been eliminated: or controlled through mechanical or chemical mglans. The shortness of the ground. cover indicated that it had been recently mowed. There were no plants over a half-inch tall except along the fence line on the south side of the project area. The following plants, were observed (most, if not all, of the observed plants are considered to be weed species): Johnson grass Sorghttm halepense Filaree Erodium spa Big heronbill Erod'ium botrys Pineapple weed. Mateicartu matt'rcartoides Chickweed Stelloya media Shepherd's purse �Capsella bursa -pastoris Old Man of Spring Senecio vulgaris - Common Dandelion Taraxacum officinals Grasses Promus- sp.s Festttca sp.s Clovers ]" folhim sp.s Cheeseweed ,Malva parviflora Valley Oak Queretcs lobata Northern California Walnut J'uglans hndsi There were numerous Valley Oak seedlings found along the fence line at the southern enol of the project site These Valley Oaks have grown up as a result of their placement out of the way of normal cultivating and gardening practices. Their removal is not significant as none of them are well established, -Tri-fact, if they grow too ,much bigger they will bring down the fence they, aregrowing along. The survey did not identify, any possible rare; endangered or threatened, plant species on thI8 site: A listing of rare, endangered or threatened plant and ' Page A number of birds were observed within the oi,chard. None of the birds ob_erved were either state or federal listed. This does not preclude the possibility of the existence of migratory or foraging listed birds passing over or through the site. Cultural practices, however, eliminate most orchards from becoming adequate habitat for these listed birds. The fullowi, ', , a list of birds observed: in the orchard: American Crow Corvus bracyrhyncos Common Raven Corvus corax Brewer's Blackbird Euphagus cyanocephalus European Starling 5turnus vulgarus Northern Flicker. " Colaptes auratus Scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulenscens Rock dove Columba livid 'Brotivn-headed Blackbird Molothrus ater Yellow -billed Magpie .Pica nuttalli Anna's 14ummingbird Calypte anna No mammals were observed, however there were numerous burrows in the ground indicating the presence of gophers, voles, mice and/or other small ground dwelling animals. The presen.e of human habitat at the south edge of the property noxma1hr means that domesticated animals (primarily ) would have access to the :o; chard and would prey on most animalrz there cats fb P p P whi.Lh combined with farming practices would control the o ulatU ins of these animals Conclusion The proposed projectsite was essentially flat. There is no evidence of • is drainage swales, creek or river presence of any Sensitive habitats such mountain meadow riparian), frontages, vernal pools, wetland areas (r, ixsh or mous p alley oak woodland, or areas of special bilological importance as mapped by the )7eartment p of '.Fish and Game; waterfowl, concentration areas, anadramous and warm water fisheries ;Chis project will iia result in the loss of sensitive ttitbitats or rare; endangered and/or threatened plants or a`nimals.: T,A: Barrett, Ener y 2WIv ental Coni Iting ., APPENDIX A BUTTE COUNTY"S RARE, 'ENDANGEREDA.JD/OR THREATEP4ED SPECIES AND SPECIE5 OF SPECIAL CONCERN Vascular Plants Status ^ientif e Name. Common Name Fed State Chamaesyce hooveri Hoover's Spurge C2/- Fritillaria pluriflora Adobe Lily C2/ -- Hibiscus caltfornFcus California Hibiscus C2/- Ju ncus leios permus var. le as ermus Red Bluff Rush C2/-- Limanthes f occosa subsp. california Butte County Meadowvfoam P;/E Monardella douglasii var. venosa Veiny Monardella C2/-- Orcuttia pilosa Hairy;Orcutts Grass C1/E Orcuttia ienuis Slender Orcutt Grass C1/E Paronychia ahartii Ahart's Paronychia C2/-- Sidalcea robusta Butte County Checkermallow C2/- Tuctoria greenei Greene's Tuctoria C2/-- "1r s_ Haliaetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle E/E Aguila rhrysaetos Golden. Eagle --/SSC Accipiter cooperi Cooper's Hawk __ --/SSC Accipitee striatus Sharp -skinned Hawk - /SSC Buteo regalis Ferruginous Hawk --/r Buteo swainsom Swa nson's Hawk C/T Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier --/SSC Elanus ul caerreus Black-sholdered Kite 'Fi' Falco meticanus Prairie falcon -- SSC Falco sparverius American Peregrine Falcon E/E Falco col ntbarius Merlin (pigeonhawk) --/SSC Athene cu,ticularia BurroWittg Owl --/SSC Co m eyzus americanus occidentalis California Yellowbilled Cuckoo C/T Numenius arnericanu8 tong -billed Curlew �/SfiC leteeia vireos Fellow-brested Chat --/SSC Dendroica petechia Yellow Warbler --/SSC Progne subis 'i Purple Martin Arthropod . J Des d6cerus call knicus dittzoryhttst,:{ Valley Elderberty Longhorn Beetle T/— Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp P/ -- Conservancy Fairy Shrimp P/.. Wage A-1 LI ironmeconsulting T.A. Barrett, ErieMYOnhtel Status definitions Federal: E= endangered, listed under the federal ESA. T= threatened, .listed under the federal ESA. P = proposed, to be listed under the federal ESA. C = Candidate species CI ,^ Category I candidate, species under review for federal listing. C2 Category 2 candidate species under, review for federal listing. E = endangered, listed under the state ESA. T = threatened, listed under the state ESA: FP = fully protected under t14e state ESA. SSC = species of special concern -- = no official listing Page A-2 4 M Administrative Office OFFICE OFTHE ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT 1163 EAST SEVENTH STREET ADMIXISTRATIVE SERVICES CHICO, CA 96928-6999 (916) 8171-3140 (916) 891-3000 - April 21, 1992 ,Mr. Stuart Edell, Assistant Director Butte County Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Chico Unified School District Response to "GUYNN'S CORNER SUBDIVI- SION (Shastan, Inc.) - TENi'ATLVE SUBDIVISION MAP" (A. P. No. 42-07- 07 & 69) Dear Mr. Edell; District representatives have reviewed the information contained in, your mem urandum dated April 14, 1992 regarding the Guynn's Corner Subdivision for property located on the southeast corner of Guynn Avenue and Henshaw Avenue. District representatives have Districtand determined' trefore wproposedPJect arrants further environmental negatively impact Chico Unified School _ , � analysis. ,SC1400L FACILITIES FOR NEW STUDENTS'- BY THE PRO- POSED DEVELOPMENT Se, tune The Guynn's Corner Subdivision proposes 57 residential units. Applying the District's .43 student yield factor, this development Nvill generate approximately 25 school age children. Utilizing current District actual student enrollment data and projected student enroll- ment data from already approved new residential development, each elementary, junior high and senior high school in the District is filled to capacity, To accommodate a 50-4- percent increase in student enrollment in recent years, the Distiir'Z (1) reutilized existing school facilities, (2) utilized interim elementary school facilities, (3) placed relocatable classrcionts on existing elementary school campuses, (4) instituted molt track year-round eduOation in three existing elementary schools, (5) occupied one new urban elementary school on a year-round schedule, (6) occupied one new elementary school on a traditional school schedule, (7) is in the process of constructing a third elementaryschool, (8) has placed interim facilities on the secondary Campuses pending the availability of new school facilities, (9) acquired a site and has planned to build a new junior high/middle school and (10) has planned to expand one existing senior high school. Mr Stuart Edell, As t 15irector April 21, 1992- Page 992Page Z The District continues to be a participant in the State School Building Program wherein the cost of constructing new school facilities is shared by the State and by the local dis- trict, in a pro rata fashion. The State-wide; need to construct new schools far exceeds available pro rata State funding; therefore, needed new Chico Unified School District school facilities have not been provided in. a timely manner. Local Chico Unified School District revenues generated from school impact fees, coupled with the proceeds from the general obligation bonds approved by the voters in April 1988, will -meet the student housing needs generated by local birth rates and previously approved residential developments but will not meet the studenthousingneeds generated by new develop - merit. The District anticipates housing increasingnumbers of students in interim ;facili- ties until funding becomes available to construct new schools. Impact of Proposed Development on Chico Unifaed School District Scho Since District element:wy, junior and senior high schools are filled to capa( ity, it is evident that students generated from the Guynn's Corner Subdivision cannot be served ry existing facilities. In addition, there is currently no funding mechanisir that will enable the District to provide facilities for these students. Based on the District's .43 student yield factor per average (1,280 square feet) house- hold, the 57 reside-ntial units in this development will yield approximately 25 students that must be housed in District schools. The District projects that larger residential units will yield more than .43 students per household and smaller residential units will yield' less than .43 students per household. To adjust for the higher student yield factor in larger than average households and the lower student yield factor in smaller than average households, the District utilizes a mitigation cost based on square footage of habitable space in each household. Mti °atiora af.]`mpact ora Chico Unified School District.Schools .. 4f , ._.. il _.. ._ I The 1991192 per habitable ;pace square foot cost to.folly mitigate the impact of each residential unit is $5.29 per square foot. This amount will be adjusted as needed to re - fleet the ittipact of inflation, school facilities needs, regulatory changes and other cost influencing factors. The full mitigation cost of $5.29 per square foot of new residential development will include school impact fees (currently $1.58 per square foot). The school impact fee will be supplemented with an appropriate amount of cash or in lieu equivalent (land or school facilities) 'approved by the District. The combination of school impact fees and cash or in lieu equivalent must fully mitigate the impact of the developriment oh District schools. Since the school mitigation cost established by the District is based on habitable square footage of the residential unit and District representatives are not informed of the hab !table space of each residential unit in the proposed development, it is not possible to confirm the total, cost of the mitigation at this time. The following calculation is pro: vided to allow one who is knowledgeable of the habitable space of each residential unit in the proposed development to make her/his own calculations, Mr. Stuart Edell, Assistant Director April 21, 1992 Page 3 CALCULATION Total habitable space in residential unit(s) times the current cost for full mitigation in effect when paid ($5,29 per square foot in 1991/92) equals total, mitigation. For example: 57 units @ 1,100 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $301,530; or 57 units @ 1,280 square feet/unit x $5,29 = $385;958; or 57 units Q 1,400 square feet/unit x $5.29 = $422,142;- Omer M17t-igalfon Considerations District representatives are currently in the process of acquiring land on the northeast comer of the Henshaw/Gwynn Avenues intersection for a future elementary school which will serve an area roughly bordered by Bell/Eaton (extended) Roads on the north, the Esplanade on the east, Lindo Channel on the south and Highway'32/Nord Elementary School attendance boundary on the west. Since the majority of the students will ultimately be able to walk to school, consideration should be given to the construction of sidewalks in the area. if you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact Me at 891-3209. Sincerely, Michael NVeissenborn s ,. Facilities Planner Administrative Services MW/mkl cc Dr. Robert L Barbot, Superintendent Stan, Hensley, Assistant SuperintendentlAdministrative Services PUBLIC WORK Aa BUTTE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF P LAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION NG1.� G_ffD�'`�+ COMMENT SHEET TO .`DATE:,r4, 1992 AP Nn 47-Q7-07 & 69RETURN BY : 5 /14./9Zr PROJECT DESCRIPTION: TENTATIVE SUSDVION MAP' APPLICANT: GUYNN'S CORNER _SUMI-V- ON- (Shastan. Inc.) ENGINEER: Gilbert Engineering CONDITIONS AND/OR COMMENTS: /1 J, COUNTY OF BUTTE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 'WORK9 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95965 (9i6) 538--7266 April 14 1992 Shastan, Inc RE AP 42�- '-•07 & 69 P,O. :Box 4143 Guytin't; 1"orner Subdivision Chico, GA 95927 TeriiraCive. Subdivision Map 1 rpon tlemen': TNis is to notify yo l that your application for a tentative map for the above—referenced pr'operLy is being submitted to the Planning Department for environmental determination and to the Environmental Health Department for its review., This application will be considered' complete when we have received ,notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health Department that all necessary data have been received These departments Will contact you regarding any additional information they may require. Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works Stuart Edell Assistant Director SE/kp cc Planning Department Environmental Health Department Gilbert Lrigineering LO 1120 (1/'92 6.12 Ac 1� a. ac AC. t ',� n I Ac. 1lJ lA3AZ L4 ? - 1 ,.oJAr /0.ooAC. PM 86-71 c� ioaoQc 'L�'`•'ltac sa yc.�ri 44lOODCRIo'ST SUB -n 297.31 3� 4� —4 t -w:,S .,• 8.61 AC \ s ROYCE L N - lO AC.* '�.✓ �A Mir � r 35 lQ. DOA 20 zr + 5 3 0 74 I /3 12 �o e. 3 0 • �X i ^ vEc AST AVE EAST ! _�; �3 '� .4, 6' ii�Ae CR • ,1 , ' 64 v 1pi t;531 .1 1 3.73Ae = PABd.EM'GOD 77 , PINS $Iu'6 . AM Ad-9Z i 73 1 �, , ' M .. 633Ae j / /s _ " ( 2 _ 16J RJ 77/. 9.i�t/I �j w �."t� 90 iD 1 r, • 2 r �- JC 193 30 ^ z Ej� 1 G �,e�` yi.=•'• 3.26A-- ,3zI .6 le c� -EpGEW QO dIL�.A6E Y"z 1 CJ - 7 PT, S. 8.E 872-4-/ --6 ► `.?-i�� ' "- la„V46-92 szo 860,3 `iO ' 9S • 86Ae 320.E 1r — AeN 11 ;. JM . 203.53 ... 2AC p z 98 7.+1 Acs � - /7 s 0P,OA `2-fir zAe / s ID. t%qn \a-p WINDING CR ES7: �'Q y 43, `7q .^99 l Orem Mob MA bq Assessor's MO'p Pio. 42- 07 a Sidiarll .3rd !�t/d, r3s',O,R, Bk. S Pq, 8 County of Butte; Cain4l, Ct/ssick 7`yrccl MOA. Sk. >' Pg, 48 REViSEb3 If)• 91 "Y. loll ,�� MM URBAN RESERVE INDEX MAP NO 96kE a� IL ,�� MM