HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-010-018-
r
0'
�. yr
,•.
� -
•
l
�—•�
°
N
1
a
r+
P
I
� P
f
b
-
R
APPLIGIlNT Ed W. Ritchie Log#87-06-01-03
ADOP280"73 Portal Drivej Chico, CA 95926
OWNER Leland Edgar and Lois J'. I3orga_n, 413 W. 4th St., Chic,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Subdivision Map to divide 8.77 ao�es �o
create 37 lots ranging in size from 6,500 SF to 11,500 SP
LOCATION on the north side of W 12th Avenue approximately -..-..�..�,_„ 00,L.
200�dt��: �s.:�►}
of Fern Avenue, Chico area
y
ASSE;SSORrS PARCEL NUMBER(S)' 43-01-10
S -p
BONING _
---GENERAL ?LAN Low ensity PROJECT CONSISTENT?
GENERAL PLAN' CONFORMANCE DEPORT
DATE OF� APPI„TCANT SxGNATURE
LANDCONSERVATION' ACT CON"T'RAC'i'S?
DATE APPI41CATION REC81VED 5-29-87
AGENT/SURVL,iYOA/CxVIL ENGINEER: Po11s, Andersen &Rolls �. ..
ADDRESS: 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 55926
DAT9 PLANNIING DIRECTOTi, r S REPORT .PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL - DATE FILED
DETERMINDETERMINATIONCATEGORICAL EXEMPTION `" - _
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
.-.�MITIGATED N'EG► DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
. �. r PTSD
. .�
ENv. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERT1F'TpT7
_.
.�.m...a.w.
STATE CL8ARINGHOUSE NO.
w.r•'u+ .ru�y W.ww-,ter...—y.. . wYfr a+:tdu..wx...ae.,:yy;yy�yf ....za.Y�n#-N:us>..w
��..w..1p.">.n.w...u.a«a .+�. a'.x,:rU. •.f+r1n. ra.f uwy.u.at+,"y: "'"–++..�.wrr+.w+...�Vw.4r
+WyiWiu..•Wrw..•�µF,e,a."yW..+w4.w.�.yw.�:waiar+..vy,+w'.nYhMNAoiLYerrirf+ti
S'UB' CnktzITTEI?, MEETING DArET ....
AOV180RY AGENCY HEARING UA` 8
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTT
"D Co. PiannIng cbmm
DEC 2111987
Or -villa. Caii{brnia
WPM, I: ,F,.i..
DEPARTMENT p)a PLIU Id WORKS
WILLIAM (bfil)' IIL'ii1=, I�It'c�etor
7 CQUNrY CCNTER DRIVE , DIiO VILLC, CALIFORNIA
Totni>hor�n' (9RIFORNIA 95965
538-7260
RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Dirno
December 22, 1937
Fd W: Ritchie
773 Portal I)r, RE; Almond Grove West Subdivision
Chico, CA 95926 tentative Subdivision Map
Dear Mr, Ritchie;
In our letter dated December 16, 1987, �nform%��
Supervisors action of approval of the above referenced 3 you iteritativethe dsubdivision,
Map, the attached m.tt gation measures Caere inadvertently ottjitked,
lie apologize for any Inconvenience this may have caused you.
if you should have any questions regarding this matter
this office at your convenience. ) Kase contact
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
ksMendonsa
J_irector
D
JM/klc
cc; Panning Department
Enva.ronhiOntal Health Department
Cleric of the Board
Leland 9. & Lois Bor,6en
Rolls, Anderson & Rolls
key a
ALMOND GROVE `.rsSj (Ed Ritchie)
4. Contribute a pro rata d
ars the cotstr
Avenue Bridge. share towaction of cite 1101,1y
5. Contribute $75.00 per lot to the tlest side r
P ire ftat- area,
. ill Lots to meet the minimum size and dimension reCu� -s
S -R zoning district.
Specifically, Lots 1 and � � Jod tinder the
I of 7500 square feet, and Lots 13 144 shall leave r
at building setback lane. c� ark to be a minimum
6r fejt of lot frontage
7. Contribute a pro rata ,share toward the installation
at West 11th and The Esplanade, and � u u traffic signal
}last Avenue and Cusick Avenue,
8.•
Sign and cause to be recorded in the office of th
an agreement, running ui.th the land, agreeing to su o y
the formation of an assessment district or other e Butte Count Recorder,
farmed for the Support, financially
g ' maintaining and/or constructing may be
Purpose of
storm drama e faczlit�es within Lindo Channel,
g required
Nb'Z'r,CC'.t+
rr�y OfficeP
of Planning and search
1400 Tenth Strep 11oo►n 21 k ;, = butte (".�r►IIlt.y
Sacramento; CA 95814 otc 18 198 Pianrtl,tr►1 t►►+[trt�°C►►rr+trt:,
or7 County (,rIrrt_ri►• 1)1*Iva
Cravi,.llr,r CA 95901)CANDACE J, GRUBBS, Butte Co. Clerk
County Clark B Q. EMERO
Country of Butte Da'outy
�L773JI�3C".��: Filing of Notice of Letermination in compliance wIt1► Sratior► `l.t,iUB
or 21152 of the Public R�aaources Code.
Pro7ect Title
AP 1f .x
Narn�?
'antativo subdivision Map 43-01-18
State Clearinghouse NumberEd W' Rita(;lri. s, Almond Grove WeFit.
(if submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person '1101elrtrone Ntrntlrrr
_ 5CH If87081107i John Mendonsa, Public Works
Project Location (916) 538-7266
On the north side of W. 12th Avenuo., apprdximately 200 feet west of fern
ve ji Ghic area _
Project Description"
Tentative Subdivision tiap dividing 8.77 acres to create 37 lots. ~
This is to advise that the Butte County _Advisor A enc
(Leahas approved the above-described project:don8encDecember 08 le mber 15 0 1ASonoor an
and has mode
the following determinations regarding the above-describedprojoett
I. The project will, X_wiTl not; have a significant effect; on the
environment,
2, An Environmental impact Report teas prepared for this projectpursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for
provisions of CEQA. this project pursuant to uhe.
3 Mitigation measures X Were
approval of the project,
y sere not, made a conditicrn or the
4. A st xtement of ovorriding considerations
for this project, , ._ was, _X wa;q n()t , adopted
'Phis is to certify that the final 91P I ith comments and resp(,JMse J rtl)cl
project approval is available'to the 90her:»al public At: record or
Butte County Planning nepartmont
7 CoUnty Center Drive
proville CA 95965
Date Received for Filing and
Posting at Opp 12-18.87
'
Signature
,=---- �.
William Turpin
8 5 5 8 Senior Planner_ _
itle
R",Iscd Martis 1986
... Ritchie
Cntative subdivision Asap
;, _43-01-18, Mitigation Measures
1. Provide erosion control plans as para of t11j' draillwy,
package submitted to the Department of Publ. j,(j C' CV)� (3
Erosion control will cover the outfall into Tdhdo ClIannel.
2, Apply fo,: an diligently pursue the forinati.oll Of. a
County service Area or community services 010trict.to
provide .for the ongoing maintenance of drainage faoj,Jties.
3. Lots 24, 25, 37 and 1 shall access off the neF,j roads to 't:)e
constructed. A one foot no access strip shAII be 91lown
on the final map along West 12th Avenue,
4. Contribute a pro raga share towards the conatruction of the:
Holly Avenue Bridge:
5. Contribute $75.00 per lot to the West Side. Vire station area,
6. All lots to meet the minimum size and dimension required
under the S,-R zoning district. specifically, Lots l and
24 to be a minimum of 750o square deet, and Lots 1.3 and
14shall have 65 feet of lot frontage at building setback
7. Contribute a pro rata share toward the installation of a
traffic signal at West 11th and The Esplanade, and Sa,s't
Avenue and Cussick Avenue.
s
yInter ale art
ra: aM'y
e
noiandu
mAdV sort' Agenc
P +c3 Fig
rnom; Planning
nutiJEcr, ED RITCHIE TENTA'T'IVE
SIUHDIVIS20
�anrc: September 16 1987 . N MAP ON AP 43-.0�»�
��.
Residents along
5 West 12th Avenue ex
and densities at the Pressed r
Agency meeting, September 14 �ancLis about
present At that hearing, a Comparison,1987 Advisory
neighborhood
Grove West. Subdivision. was made with the ctt the
figures but was unable 'Staff propos Almond
to, attempted to
Selectively counted; as such vexir'Y these
rt appears that parr,
an accurate picture. Defin n the figures ois were
Of Lindo Channel g the neighborhood
not ,represent
along West 12th west of Holly, east fFern as south
excluding the nets 175 Parcels., f Fern and
size project area The average properties
Ys .12 and 19 acre .49 acre. lot size
acre each in the The smallest lot
The proposed subdivision existing neighborhood.
the existing
neighboxhon des have a hi
Alexander Gardens but is full ghat density than I
and recent , Lindo West Subdivision With
is designated east of Holly Avenue; Holly Gardens,
units grated fOr low-densit
Units per acre: The proposed subdivision us The property
per acre: This n nets' SIX dwelling
w?thin the urban neighborhood' is defined 4.22 dwelling
G��Y and count area by the census as being located
With these The Proposed .and the City dinance
documents su e' v.sion is cc s Sphere
general area, and with deVelo y compatible
Pment pat4erns in this
With adoption of the
decision was made b Chico Urban Area
Urban suburban y the Board of Land Use Pian, a
I manifested growi�n to the "Urban at lsors to limit
Pressure s in the Greenline area, This
on agr4cultural and serves to policy
usesonal per$pective' low lands west of to reduce growth
should rJ and medium- wn: From a
to preserre 0 permitted where density residential
agricultural infrastructure is available]
and commrd�1Zity water lands+ sewage disposal
are available drainage'
Staff has in this neighborhood,
contacted t ghborhood,
circul#ation he developer. concernin
con--•ibute a'mprovements, The
Pro rata share appla-cant has Additional
tYrtfic signal at toward the grcad to
W+a;,t 11th The h installation of a
s
�gnal at East and
''ata shares Aventto and Cassia Planade and a traffic
on the is consistent with t Requiring those r
Holly Gardens Subdivision.
Advisory Agenc ., xao
�.o1•i. �` s action
Ed Ritchie TS 1 ,P 43-01-1$
September 16, 87
Page 2,
According to the Chico Urban Area EIR, the Sycamoro, Mud Crook
and Lindo Channel systems are restructured, modifj,od channels
designed to provide the major area -wide storm dral,►aage flood
control. for Chico Creek. Lindo Channel supports till Intermittent
corridor of riparian vegetation. Potential impactor to riparian
vegetation were not considered significant for a MImber of dif-
ferent reasons:
I. Bank disruption and armoring resulting from out:fal.l
construction is limited to a few square yards.
2: Summertime flow into the partially dry channel, will
suppirt area vegetation.
According to the Chico Urban Area EIR, the California Regional.
Water Quality Control BoaLd believes that no large-scale or
gross pollution impacts are likely to result from urban drainage
discharges, assuming typical residential and commercial urban
developments rather than intensive industrial uses or other uses
capable of generating concentrated contaminants. The primary
time at which general urban drainage contaminants are of concern
is during the first storms of autumn after the dry summer period.
A grease and sediment trap could be installer; in the outfall or
inlets to further restrict any urban pollutants from reaching
Lindo Channel. The additional drainage from 37 lots will.
result in an insignificant increase in drainage into Lindo
Channel.
The final concern expressed by residents was timing of -infra_-
:truc ture Avenue
such as the new school, fire station, and
struce bridge. The Schoo' District has applied for a Use
Permit to establish the school. The exact construction schedule,
if the Use Permit is approved, is up to the School District. The
County has no jurisdiction in this case. According to Battalion
Chief Holmes, approximately $30,800 has now been collected for the
fire station. He intends to start shopping for a suitable piece
of property. Construction of the new station and 140117 Avenue
bridge are subject to the availability of State and local finan-
cing. Both of these improvements will benefit the entire commun°
ity and are beyond the control of one subdivider.
Recommend two additional conditions
Ww\ 3 Contribute a pro rata share toward the ih8hallation of a
traffic signal at West l.lth and The Esplanade, and East
Avenue and Cusick Avenue.
c'Ov4p 9. Install a sediraent/grease trap in the drainago, inlet, if
deemed advisable by the Department of Public Works and 'Pith
& Game.
LMT/ "s j s
co; Ed Ritchie
Rolls, Anderson & Rolls
nPl'liNl)IX l�
(,'MJN'1'Y= Of'- _13117711i
IiN1r! Itt)NMIiN7'Al. CIWCl 1 T,,, 1'c7RM
(tri I'le rnrnplt�ict �}� l.�rll;eticy)
Ilnc,ht;ltr)11ti1i AXE 11 4J-0,1-18
1 .
Name tr r proponent ED W. RITCHIE
Prt')Portortt ;rrlcl 1'0))rtsolltativc (l�1 trpplirralrlr�l
Ed W . Ritchie._ . Ro1.1s_, _.Andex aO.ft & Rolls
s
773 Portal Drive,
Chico, CA 95926 _. 965. Fix .. Stl-Q0t
S -
Chicon 959
:i, Pr()tact dvi,rript ion Tentative Subdivision
mftp
1 t , %IANUl1,'f OR`r I' I N 1JI N6S til' t� l t;N 11' l (;ANG'l3
_ YFM Tlt ABI No
a. iictc:, tlrr� prr�jc'rt hlavcr tltt' p0tcential to d08racit, 111t4
tlaa,al.it} <<C tl,c, t'ttviton.mc'nt,, stills tantl:ally tic?dljt
tltc' tilaliitrit cr1' a I tsh ter hildl ire species, cam"t' to
1'isli or tvildl iI'v poptr7.; tion tty dl^op below so1l°
Sttstailtint; levels, tltrc�taten to ctlimitlate a p1r1111 oi`
an i rt.al nrmtalti tY, reduce t�ll.e nuntbor lir rc.qtIri ct- t-irr,
r�rni;c' ril .r "'rt' (" endttnl;el-cd plalt�t or animal ()I.til tm�ill.atr� impor Malt r,wxamla.los of �thcy major poritrtis
rxl� (:alil`rrrnia history or pre11iStti1'y"
li, lltic' ; t_lrt Irrrt Wet ItraVO the potential to achieve
s�hriTt 'tt'rrn llr�n�+tits to tbc' d�+«trimetit of long-term,
c�rtt�irtr,�ntc>rtta'L �,rr,rl:,:= (A short-terill finp,,art oft t1w
c1tv i t°tillrnc°n t l lira'' ivh i 4.h
occurs i n a re I at ivr 1 y
briel" Irc'rtuil t i time wilily' 'long-term illiplets W1.lI
endure into tlic� ftlttire.)
c. lltac� t}tr lrlriltarl• 1111"! imparts Illicit a.rc 7nalic«idu
a1:ly l imi ted, but `tunulatively cunsideraj)je?
ht'zajt'k't rn,ry impact on two or mors ,;Op a�rate resources
WItC'1 c tliv impact tin r_'ar11 'rl":Sit rco Is rel at 1 v:el V
S111111 Drat tGhc'rc' thtt tjrl'ciet of the total or tji)st~
impacts tin Ole onvi rollment is sl-
rl, lttrt'+ 't11c'' l�rira'tt t ltitvt' ('n1*irO1'n11i'ntxil erl`'eetS tVllic'b
t1'i11 6'ialr' '5 U17;i tit l7t lia. 1, add-'C'rr'tiC e meets on litlim:n
itlit-I, clirc>c•tI} of 1lid i1,0et y?
III , Iih'i'1'C! 11 �.a"1'Ir't".t"1'�w l,rr� ttyrnpli'ta�cl 'Iter tlic, Loos l Agency)
tilt, lr,rsii;, t11 t'1,1111tatiml:
Lind 1110 l�rtrprr,cc,tl ptr,lt''t t'tllJNolj"ltlrtt� ,r 'r IClt11"lt°trot ci1`I'r°t.�t
} %-1t tilt, CIN. r l frrrrntult , troll a �Ylalr�"l°I1'l: lW('LAl1A'HoN willbtu lrrc�ptrrctiJ,
✓t
l °ikl. r oral f lltrt a l tlu1ttl1ir l htr Ir r rrprx>a'tl prti l t't t rwri ltl 11,IV e a s i,gn 1. I'i .
e=ar'tt r1'1t r 1 tall 111v t'nvlrmillivnt , tlwty wi l i not N, ii sig I r"lctlltC
t1tiri ralw itc, —11rsr t'liv 1`11'1'1t1A"1"1ON PtlintlUlCl ti tlr��;'11r3lac�cl -t
t ltt' ,tt t.r, lrp.�r! ahr:'coll
''t llavv IiVvil oddrd ttr tlttr lata j�t't l , ,'1 NIa;A`l'11"1"
tlt,, lrrclper;Sc'rl Ilrci,iec�t MAY 1►tttio ..I s11,�1ti ri,t'tttat efl'ec�t crra
t Lt.'.�t i t r, °itrtlt , rtn�i ,In LNVI ltt►lrN N1Al, I�IPA(' 1t1a'tllt'f" l s rc;rltr i rc'cl
11A7JULY 8, 15$7
_. t;t111N"I'Y ty1� IIIJ'l'7h, PLANNING lllilrAlt'IAI N'1`
Laura M. U el C11 e Planner
_ _. ' god br` • � �°"
f
IV• ENVIRONNENTAL I ACTS
on attached sheet(S)ft
TER"ip unatlons o a l yes1V and 'maybe" answers are required
]• EARTH. Will. the Proposal result in significant.
,17—Unstable earth conditions
Y.s MAYBE NO
or in changes In
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements,
compaction or
overcovering of t}te soil?
C. Change in
.
topography or ground surface
relief feattiresn
----. _ »�•
d, Destruction) covering or mudificatxQn of any
.unique geologic or physical,
features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion.of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or,erosion OX-beach
sands, or changes in
--
siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify-the channel,
abay,
iy of stream or of
any bathe bed .•o f the ocean or
Itlet or. lake?
9. Loss of pr me•agriculturall
outside designated urban soils
areas?odut�tive
h. Bxpasttre of People or property �o geologic
hazards such as earthquakes
landslides, muds
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2. ATR. Will the Pro osal
p P result in substantial,
a. fir emissions or deterioration
ail, quality? of ambient
b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes? -----
st
c. .Al.teraticxl of air movement M04sture, or
temperature, or any
changei
locally or 1`egionally? n' ^..timate,
`--'
3,. ittATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a; ntiali
Changes in currents,
or the course or
direction of
marwater movements in either
ine
or fresh waters?
b, Changes in absorption rates, drainage
or the
g patterns,
rate and amount of surface runoff?
C. Need for Off-site surface drainage improves
merits,
.
including vegetation removal, channel
izati.on or culvert installation?
d. Alterations to the course or waters? flow of flood
e. Change in the amount of surface water in ajz+�
water body?--
f+ Discharge .into surface waters, or in any `--
alteration of surface. avater
=-
qua0it
but not limited to temperature ,dtysoincluding
oxygen
or turbidity?
g. Alteration of the direction
or rate of flow
of ground waters'
h. Change in
w
the quantity or qual.itV of wal:r.r,
either through direct additions
or witllnd
dralaals, or through interception of an
agUi:Fer by cuts
or excavations?
Reduction in the amoune of Crater Otherwise
available for se
public water supplies?
of pe
7. Exposure People or Property to water
related hazards
such a$ flooding?
2
�'
as
YES MAYBE,
NO
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
or number
a. ''Flange in the diversity of species,
of plants (including trees,
of any species
shrubs, grass crops, and aquatic plants) ?'-
LIGIgT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?–
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an:
�.�.
area, or in a barrier t0 the normal replenish-
LAND USE. Will the proposal resultin a d ,
1 ent or planne1,
su stantial elte ation f the Pros
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ori}
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal. result in substantial;
a,: C}�ange n the diversity of species, or numbers
species of animals (birds, land animals
NATURAL RESOURCES Will the proposal result in
of any
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms or insects) ? a
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals? .�.
animals into
reSourCes?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural
C. Introduction of new species of
result in a barrier to the migration
an area, or
or movement of animals?
4,
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
All
habitat? .�.
6.
NOI5E. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a-Tncreases in exist-ing noise levels? , __.- ..—
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?'
7.
LIGIgT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
0
saga ant light and glare?
�.�.
$.
LAND USE. Will the proposal resultin a d ,
1 ent or planne1,
su stantial elte ation f the Pros
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES Will the proposal result in
aubstanta.al:
a. Tncreaso in the rate of use of any nat 1j5a1,
reSourCes?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural
�'
resources?
10
RI,SiC of UPSET. Will the proposal involve
A cjs plos'on or the release of hazous ard-
a
stances (Including, but not limited to
spb'st3cides, or radiaton) in the
e chemicals
event of all accident or upset conditions? w_
b, Possible interference with an emergency
evacuation plan?
_ ..
p s plan or emergency
11,
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location,
rate of the huffiM
r str ut an, density, or growth
population?
12.
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing;
housing?
--
or create a demand for additional,
.y
W TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Y8.
result 'in; l�N. gill the -S ASE No
a• Generation of substantial proposal
----
movement? additional
b • affects one vehicle
demand xisprkanarking facilities, or
c• Substantialnimpact Ongexis --__.
d• systems?
tiny transportatjo,,
Significant alterations to --__
Of circulation or .� Present patterns
movemenC of patt�rny
e • ��ople and/or
Alterations to tivaterborne, ra.a„�.
f• Increase in t or air tra.f
bicyclists raffic hazards to : is c? "---
or pedestrians? motor vehicles,
14. p--UBponLI, o7`esu''
C SIERVi r, �
S. • 1Vi11 the propo
u
a in a meed fOr sallave an effect
governmental. services; new or altered
a. Fire T,'`otectien,?
b• Police protection
C. Schools?
d• other
Warks or r
e, blaa Parks
or ce o r recreational facilities?
roads? public facilities
f • Other ' including ---..�
governmental services?
15 • >~1VFRGY, �
_--- 'fill l the Proposal `
T' Use of substantial amountsuo xn
'• Substantial fuel -or
sources of increase in demand uenergy?
of new e.nergY' or require theon existing
T 7 ..sources of energy?, development
16, UTTLITIFS ,.
neiv--- ..� t systems lVill the ro os result in a
•' or substantial alterations need
following, for ,.
a, Power or to the
natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water avai.la.bility,
d Sewer or Septic
tan:?
e, Storm water dnd disposal? f, Solid waste a
17 IfiUNAN 14 Will t1le
a. CTeatzon 6x.i: ati°� Propasal result in --'
health hazar,.t, ��lt;l hazard cr potential
P� Sure of t '""t of t' 'a:i mental 6
hazards?p ople t,�� t r��tt a l heaX h?
1$s
011.4- h��S Will r
o uctxon of a .3�e proposal �es, v t .,,� "�•
the public, or wi7ylsthe'c vista or vG�,� ,,, she to
creation of an aestheticallyoSal result �r�
to public vier,,? Y Off nsiVe s,ite,
.4-
Y!f
•
YES MAY BH
NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an,impact
Rponte quality
or quantity of ex-ting recreational
opportunities`I
20. CULTURAL TESOURCE5
a. Will t e proposal result in the alter&*Lions
of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
•,
b. Will the proposal result in adverse Physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure
"
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic
cuptuPal valuers? existing relYxous
d. Will'the ro osal restrict ex .
Or sacred uses within the potential impart
area?
V. bI'SCU5S1'Oti OF ENVTZONMENTAL' EIiALi1ATI0N
AP 43-01-18'
See attached.
E
F
•
4
ON OF
�:N
VIR�10NMEENTAL �CVAL�QATI�QN
1b: Approximate,, Y 409 OF the Property will AP
development. This level 0 overcovering be OvercOyured pq I �jj
what exists now, f
the Urban area. but Is not Is a s I an I f I (,ant-
significant for a Property I oc 10-n9e from
A new outfall 4),-od within
Linda chaOnol
Installation or outpastrwcture is Proposed to be
,Is Vary greatly.
with sandbags to Provido drainage Of the co"'S`I_t�uctOO P1 I th I n
roject aroo.
;Problem; TP10 Me L I
or ript"op toot
that channel , S For,
eras, 1 On doo:�� t�ht)wld bo armored
ab,c: 1)1)h becom;�,
the FUJI urban drainage improvements
Proposed density.
StOrIT) to"�tars will be col d
conveyed to L'ndo Channel Will be reqL,jj,,, to support
via 'a now Outfall t locted on site and
]Installation Of the outfall 0 be coh't,
hr the channel . May Involve the removal ,ttUcted4
10 ensure tha6 the drainage ystem Or' same vog0tation
Properly, and are me I n to) nerds and out fa I I cont , n
a County se:'vice area allo to Function
8e� F: Cdnstr,,uctlon hou I d be formed.
Peak Of a how outrall
Flows and reduce the period of tilnto Linda Channel �jl I I increase Channe I . The actua I Me It takes ase
not Me8surabl, amour, OF Water
Products charige. r flowing In waters to roach the
w (Dralnage waters to the channel
washed off of roadv"_1y, will CO
Given the nature 3 ntain p,tr should
this impact it hoof Linda Chonoel detergent., sediment olowm
t and tile s Ize of this and debris
significant.
ltl LIndo Channel has bee
n mapped as dovelopment�
1,Cdoral government, -rho flood Zone doe Flood bOundF,)-Y by tile
ment. The 8 !;
AVC)nUe Pave 8 ZOnc- A
""113idered sl Ighto Potential hMonaextend ��Outh Of Linda
*'�ord Persons ,no
'rho property is
1-re is Currel,itly
'Ou 1 ar Ze and age, Planted
n the? e.�Gmbv' P41 th all-iond t
sight Olvi8IOM and roo8 of
Property for at of' 8.7 9cr'e8 Or allnondt'. This imp tly result
ficant bec all-Se 4LUrt,OUhd,1r1q roSIdentlitil act dtroo
Intensj,,e agricultural uses not cons I derod
tf.le 1982 Conversion of Purpo$esi have ca('PrOml.�;ed the
Impact urban Uses has been rUlly
Chico Urban Area Land use plan �
7., 0evolopmont Lnvironmental
will of 37 hom,_:,sjtes
IMP.1c light and and use Of the
glare onto
.he
aurrOuMding pr 'rea f ter
is lot considered significant, of.
8 The P�*Oporty Is designated LOW
-Density roof
I s
Minimum partel "'Co under the z Residentiol
780o 8q, ft. Corner lo,b zoning 18 6500 .
be revjSed S. I q. ft. o �S-R.
have 65 to meet t Would appear, t 8 on SoNory with
reo 'the minimum that Lots 11ho ;�
and i4 do eatmeasure
lot frdntag Stah"'d, All C 4 h'ect to
e at the building Cul-de-sac lots me
tlr�Measure 63 fe(�,t 0 setback must
revised larger setback greater at Setbackt If Lots 18
I@hated,, they should be
Vdvited 0/16/87 _6_
W I th 'the above-ment I oned mod I f I cat 1 Ons, d i v I s I on as Pl"01:,osed comp I I or.
with the zoning and General Plan designation.
11: Division and development as proposed will increp4-h the denrlty of
this neighborhood and the feeling of urbanization exPOV,lenced by
surrounding residentse Densities are compatible with surrounding lot,
sizes and should not pose a slonific8nt problem,
18a,c: The Chico Urban Area Transportation Plan 11"Olf-i5tes that the
Wa-ner Street extension and Holly Avenue bridjo Shoulor i
' be constructod
prior i -o the year 2000. Warner 18proposed to becorn(i 0 new arterlo'l
serving the northwest quadranti The Warner Street Uxtens lori will 1,)olp
to alleviate overdependence and congestion on Highway 32 and The
Esplanade.
All developMeMts within the immediate vicinity have been contributing
a pro rate sh8rL, toward the construction of the Holly Avenue bridge.
The falr share payment will be determined by the Director- of Public
Works based on an additional 870 vehicle trips per day generated.
I af: Lots 1, 24) 25 and 37 8hou I d take access from the new rr -.ds to
be constructed. The reason for this Is to allow traffic to enter West
12th Avenue at two CNntrolled access points.
,14m: r1re service is now Provided out Of Stations 42 and 44, both of
which are over three miles distant. LDF recognizes that a new fira
station needs to be constructed to serve northwest Chico. They have
ldeOtlflOd the West Side Pit -0 Station benefit area located Nest of The
Esplanade as the Potential service area for the new station. All
developers within the proposed service area have, been contributing $75
per 'lot for construction of the station. Without expantion of cor
0,01 -vices, fire protection would be inadequate to serve a growing
PoPulation.
lo,lb,�Je)f.' Increased demand for governmental set -vices has been
an".1cipated within the urban area and can be. accommodated with a
minimum of lodification.
14c: Residential development will be subject to school improvement
fees,
'16tsdCommunity water and sewer, will be extended to serve this
development,
i 6 t As noted under Items 8b and ac, urban dr8lnage, mulct be provided,
A county service area should be formed to Provide for ongolno
Maintenance of the facilities.
18' Surrounding residents have had the pleasure of, viewing an expanse
of trees through the years. That view will now be changed, replaced
by suburban development,
1
Miti ation Measures
recommended
as part o f the drainage � rnt'�e't5�'C��ent
1.
Submit erosion control plans k'
the Department of Public Works.
package submitted to Channel -
the outfall into Li ndo Channel -
control should .;over
�,.er,v i.re
l d diligently pursue the formation of a count, ,
for ani cie for °t.h(� (.�iiijo i ng
2.
Appy sere i cas district to prow
community
area or
maintenance of drainage facilities.
Lots 1; 24j 26 and 87 to be fit-om new roadN �,o be
S.
Access from
constructed.
the construction OF the Holly
i
Contribute a,pro rata share,to
Avenue bridge.
lot o the West side Fire Station Hr" �7cw a
-t
b .
-
gc►r1't,Y" i bind $75 pe r'
Lots 1 a and 14 to
6.
ft,. ; .
Lots 1 and 24 to be a ���tmbuindingosetback line.
have 65 fit. of frontage
s
*
APP'l I cant '
•
Ed W. Ritchie
DA_1_6-5�"
AP jk
Log
A pr9, . i (_ till 1s.77
'I c '" Lat1d dil/15lon' jj��Jon 11aP
Type of project', ,,t,tlyg Subdi moV,01 y
�etscr!PbiOn: - flu
Brief I into 37 lots' side, Of West h AVO
acres on the north Chico area
-S. Location: 't of Fern Avenue) 4.22
22 6lu'"Cro'
200 feet :east ).velopment- sive. nO�4
of Extf--n west
ed Density SUrfAcl ne. Frontage
or►
4 PrOPos rVIOUS
Amount of Impe ,,t public Road'
91
Access and Nearest community sewer.
6. access to be .31 : Water Service Company,
method Of Sewage DI Spos California. arcel.
source of Water Supply"- .. -To original P ev e I Opmen t:
Power Lines " o0s and d
9, proal m I ty of P11 land divisl d0011100 units'
10 Potential for further 18 37
ermit constrUttin of
Division o
will
taIr Sett:nq
Ph s'i
mane
a I Env I �,__ Level - valley land.
-rerjr-a 1 n T,p,ograPhlr- Character'
B.i General V-2% :Sea Level
h. Slopes! i75_180 feet ac. boVe
ale None.
ractorl! Loam] deeps
d.. Limiting A Vina tFlne Sandy
20 SO! ISctef�, 1 st 1 cs -
3. Types and Char aprime
agricultLAral
well
b. Limiting, Focto!"'sh'e Land
Natural Hazards Of t Moderate Class
56rthquoke Zone:
potentivllr Low,
b. Erosion ote
pnt- I None
-
Landslide
Vire ";a7_ard'* Unclo8s'".
d, ive Soll ,�,O tont I a I , None- north,
expong Channel .urtdw8tet_
y vi&-aoa14ydrOl OPY V18ter L I Md'J I , 0rwit rd OPOratlon`s*
in i6 !9ur F3c Area of heaqy�jo If I ed by Orc"
- - aal, a
b Gr6umdwOtOt orl stics* 22-2410.
Droinage Char horItIal
d.
Annual r lNone- has Motu r
Fadtorl-_ nOvenUO
p. LimitAng wllby'L.1 corr
0
tisV.,u8i/Scohic
trees . Good F
6., Acoustic Quo"tGood
o
t+
rov i dad by G„ i tido. Ct'�arinel
i cal Lnr.�
L31. a r O1 1 Ve or ed • hab i 1.at P
8. �egetat Habitat'* Limited
g, W►2 Survey
ant = n the WOO"
i Env' 1'ronm� -- esor. rces
and Historical R
eo l og ► oat ecommended . LoWjen�;
1 tl Archil C,.1 earance recommended-
an desi gnation:
ared,
pr��' Coun Y General Plw
t
1.1 •
Butte t i al . orohsrd
Q05 1 den Zon i ng : g -R . �lmbn�l
-xistin9 d Use on-site*
1�{rXiS�in9 Lan dentlel
is. Area' i1 -y resi
1h. gurroUn ►U es Single-fam si Y pesidc�nl;:le1.
f •
LOW IJet►
a. Zonin: S nations~ 3 acres.
b . -des r 4 to
C.
Gen. (�1an urban lots elChborlrood.
parcel S1y. Low density- ban area n
d• population= Area- Ur r #'
e• ter oI Site and Are
% Chlco' of Chlool ,,A is
Char City roycrrign
1 Nearest Llrban Are o Influence = Full
i m
16. gpherr-s dards urban Area
J7. Rel ev an Stanc h ,
Improemeli s #4'Z, �* Miles,
1
required- on Services Station
1 g .
Fire NPareS .County (State, p i r'e a� i ,Y, hydrants
a- trn9ine coP bi5tr►ct
Watef"lAvallab►fitys 5ohaol
Schools in Arca*
Chico Unified