Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-010-029is ■i A 1 � - 6 f y r r •�h _ , r - APPLICANT ADDRESS xen Karasnski Loci#85-11-•27-03 1300 Nord Avenue Chicon CA 95926 Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Ma x.y F to divide create 2arc�els of 0.40 acres and 0, 0_• acres to • LOCATION A the. ..South 47 ac corner of ._ F res each. Chico area. ern Avenue and G�oxr G �+ nc�o Ave . ---- _---------------- ..� ASS'ESISOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S)43=01-29 ZONING _ - � f GENERAL .PLAN- GENERALPLANCONFORMANCEREPORT GlJ NRO-tCT CONSISTENT? y�y DATE OF AP`pLICANT SIGNATURE LAND CONSERVATION ACT ----" CONTRACTS DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED November 26, 1985 AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Rolls 9(r And ADDRESS: Erson & Rolls 'Fir St. -- — , Chico, CA 95926 DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED MIXRONMENTAL - "-- DETERMINATION `-- CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND DATE DATE FILED NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED . MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION �- DATE ADOPTED „fir .ENV... IMPACT REPORT - DATE 'CERTIFIED STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO 11 i .._a bnn • fl ue GOA .. _ ' le, udlitorp LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BE•A6f4Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS " WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - ORoViLLE, CALIFORNIA 75965 Telephone:(916) 534.4681 RONALD D. McELROY Daputy Director February 25, 1986 Ken Karas, nski RE; AP 43-01-29 1300 Nord Ave. Tentative Parcel. Map Chico, CA 95926 Dear Mr. Karasinskit At the regularmeeting,of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on :F'e'bruary 24, 1986, the agency granted a mitigated negati.:ve+ declaration of environmental_ impact and approved your tentative parcel map on the above referenced property. If no appeals are timely filed --within ten days of the date of the A visory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, As action will be final.. When the conditions of approval are complied with, i1; will be in order for you to file your "final rnap" with the Butte County Department of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency. If you have any questions regarding thIs._matter, please contact this office. Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Works 1 J' hn Mendbnsa Assistant Di,recto.r JN/ds attachment cc Planning Health Rolls, Anderson and 'Rolls John P. McKenzie, 4 Steele Court, Walnut Creek,, CA g4�g t , Ken Karasinski, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2 at the southGrrr t corner of Fern Ave. and West Lindo'.mve. Chico a, na.ls AP 43-01-29 Engineer; Rolls, Anderson and Rolls Public. Works conditions are: 1. Frontage on West Lindo Ave. and Fern Ave. to be constru0L0d to R5- 9 -LD -I -T standard, i.e., curb, gutter, sidewalk and xcc�tt rod street section for parcels with gross acreage of one acx,e or l.cps, Subr t it drainage plans to the Dept. of Public Works :for approval and install required facilities. 2. Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-Waytrsn c West Lindo Ave, and Fern Ave. . entexiire of plus 20 ftradius alr:turn at ,intprsec tion: 3. Indicate a 50 fti building setback from the centerline of West Lindo Ave. and Fern Ave. 4. Show all easements of record on the final map. 5• Provide permanent solution for drainage. 6. pay off :any assessments. 7. Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing,; and construct to county standards. 8. Pay any delinquent taxes oz current taxes as required. Meet the requirements of the Butte utte County Fire Dept., 10. Place note on final map re payment of school fees for Chico Unified School District as per County Ordinance No, 2463 and Resolution No, 85-40. Health Dept. conditions 11. Provide a 100 ft. l.eachf"fiing wells that Property eld free-etback around exist are er boundaries. remain either within the property or Within 1,00 ft. of the - 12, Provide required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel.. Combine With an adjacent parcel any parcel. not provers to contain the usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision ordinance, 13. Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are pro to be destZ", yecl under permit in order to provide required u;�ab'e to disposal. areas,, Destroy those Wells under permit and ableese the facilities served by the tells to other approved water sources to recording the fi"al map, prior 14, Provide a letter or other documentation from California tater Service water to parcel l; Company, stating that they are grilling and able to supply domestic . 15 Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels: 1 and 8 will requird connection to a publ.ie Water supplY." y NEN KP.RASZNSKT, TRM 16. Relocate the existing sewage disposal system onto itg ,rc,�pect ve parcel. ].7. Comply with the requirements of the Butte County Nitrate Action Plan. Compliance may require the recording Of sewer vervice and _storm drainage agreements. The following mitigation measure is also required: 18. Contribute $75.00 per lot into the West Chico Fare flIttibion Site Fund. NOTICE OF l)E'PiE t�Pl'I NBxX it f�A�iihlATION To: office of Planning; and Research 1400 Tenth Street, Roo FROM• Plannln Sacramento, CA 95814 i �4Tyurtrnct�t or Count ('Miter. DrJrV� xx COunt' Clerk vill.e, (,A 95965 County of Butte FEB 4 6 1986 S[1�7BCTs bilin of Filing Notice of DeterFW4ni of the Public Resources podgy, , i c �e; ¢�rE th Section 21108 or B IN0muiv 2i 1S2 •- -_.� Deputy ject 1'it a AP # ecu Tentative Parcel Ma43-01-29 Name tate Clearinghouse Mum P 43 0 =29 Ken Karasinsk - iIf s ubmitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person ---- , Public Works Telephone Number Project Location John Mendonsa 534-4266 At the southwest corner o,f Fern Avenue and Linde Avenue. Chico area, KU) DeScriptian west create 2 Tentative Parcel Ma,p to divide 0.7 ac Parcels of 0.40 acres and 0, 47 acres each. res to 'Phis is to advise that the Butte Count Y advi stir `------.. has a Lea enc approved the above described '9gency or Responsible Agency regarding the above described proje °1 t and has made the following determinations • 1• The project ` will, L will not, have A signifacant effect on the environment. 2• ....,,,_ An Environmental Irn Pact Report Was prepared for, this project to the provisions of CEQA. pursuant A Negative Ddelarat on was provisl!= of CE PCepared for this project QA. pursuant to the The EIR or Negative Declaration and record o examined at: f project approval may be Butte County Pliinning, nepartment 7 r.niimi ..,_... Mitigation measures were, Of the project. ► :�_ were not, made a coinditlon of the approval 4, A statement of Overriding Consideratio was, this project. a not, adopted for Data Received for Filing 2-27-86 / i i at re t when A Streeter 8onior Planner Title 54 t`1 Revised Manua .. ry I -q85' ,i l'� r r � � 'w'_ Inter-Departmnnt�J. elnorand roc uin Butte County Advisory Agency FROM, Planning Director. suerEcr; Report on Tentative :Parcel. Ma Of Ken Karasinski on AP 43-p1_2y DATA; February ls, 1986 This is a proposal to and 0is acres each, divide 0.81 acres to create 2 The Land Use Flan Ma The present zoning is S_R parcels of 0,40 acres area as p of the Butte Count Suburban Residential), Low Density Residential,. y General Plan designates this Pians for the area. There are no specific or community The proposal does "'ot conflict 'With Count propcsed element of the Butte Count y zoning or communit nor any adopted or Y plait, Y General Plan nor any Count Y> specific A mitigated Negative beL4aration commended with the following z@gard'ing environmental impact is re - Contribute measure: 1. Contribute $75,00 est Chico per lot into the W Fund, Fire Station Site SAS. -Ir cc; Ken Katasinski Rolls, Anderson, Rolls, r APISH NDI \ F COUNTY OF BUTTT: ENVIRONMENTAL CfffiCKIA - 110 RM (to be completed by Lend Agency) Log It 85-11-27-03 I , BAC KGROUND AP i1 � 3-01.-29 1..- Name of proponent Ken Karaslnski 2. Address of proponent and representative (i C applicable) 1.300 Nord Avenue Itol1, Ander_:,sotl &;,Q�;__ . . Chico, Ca. 95926 865 Fir Street Chico, Ca. 95926 3. Project description Tentative Parcel Map ZT; MANDNVORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFTCANCC- Y,I S MAYBE NO a. Does the project have the potent.,al to degrade the quality ci tile environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or Wildlife species, cause a fish or Wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plaint or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range or a rare or endangered plant or an-imal or eliminate important examples or the major periods of Cali.Carnia history or prehistory' b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term benefits to the detriment or long-term, environmental goals'? (A short-term impact on the environment is one Which occurs in a relatively brief period or time while long. -term impacts will endure into the Cuturo.) c. 'Does the project havc impacts which. are individu.- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively m�tacll tsbut onFhere tile cntiironmenft�ol's�'ho total o:r tltr�so . ,. ) p' . gnxfrc�ant. _ _ _ _ d Does the project have environmental efrec.ts which Will cause Substantialadverse vrrects on Mullan C, beings, either directly or indirectly? II't. tll:1144ITNKfNON (TQ bo completed by the Lone Agency) on the basis; o(' tills Initial Ovccicc;'tion; I'/IVE I`ind the propo"ted pro,iLct C001.l) .NOT have a signirleant offect ort the environment, and a NFG;A'I�1V1: I)ECI.ARATION will be pre�prered. IJIV1i rind that although they proposed project Could have a signiri- crtnt errcct on the cnv,il°o,tijfent, there will not be a significant erl'oet in this ease beeau:'Lz the M1'I'IGCi1T10N HI-WCIU'S doseribad cin the attached shecst have. beoll added to tile* pr(;jvct, A RE(IATTVI's DliCURATtON will he I)ITI)arod. UWE rind filo proposod hroloct MAs havo it ;cifnifiennt orrOct oil the env i rolsnlent , and an TINVI RONMI.NITAL IMPACT 111:I1t1,I T is r©clu i red. 11ATI, ,ebiruary 1.9s 1;986 t:GtC)N'1'Y : V* BOT` I, InANNINO D11WA127t`HNT Steph n A. Stree'ttt Senior planner ® required ENVIRONMBNTA�_ IMpACTS,� e5„ and ''maybe" answers are a 1 Y YES MAS_.: x anatzons o on attached sheet(s)) significant: __-- . l A� I, Will the proposal. result in- changes in --- conditions or -Cl- a, Unstable earth geologic substxuctures? compaction or p displacemen7s, `. .---- b.Disruptions, overcovering Of the soil. ground surface --. -,�-- o rah or c . Change in top g p y - relief features? modification of any , d. Destruction) covering or is or physical features? �. of sols, �. unique geolog e, Increase in wind or water erosion beach or `jOr either on of f. Changes in deposition eresiondeposita.on in sands, or changes erosion which maY modify the channel of bed of the ocean or or river or stream or the a inlet or lake? any bay' riculturally productive soils ag X' — g, Loss of prime outside designated urbaroaexty�to geologic or p p mud- ud-ho Exposure of people landslides, hoExp earthquakes, — --- hazazds such as earthq similar hazards? s1�.d'es, ground failure or result in substantial: AIR.Withe proposal f ambient 1 t deterioration o a' Aix emissions or ___-- quality? smoke a4x' q eCtionable odors, objectionable — _ b. The creaticri of or .fumes`?moisture, or air movement) Y hange in climate a c. AiteratiO of temperature, or any L - locally or regionally? in substantial,: Will the propose]. result 3 ; SVA• or the course or in currents, in either a, Changes direction of water Movements fresh drainage patterns> - marine or b Changes in absorption rates, runoff? improve- improve and amo�rface - or the rate dranag e or Need for orf-si.teluding vS eta e d removal, chann ments> culvert installation?. izatio or or flow of flood d Alterations to the course in any _l waters.. of surf ace Mater in the amount -_ e+ Change water body? or in tie f, Tl suha ,e into itil'"ding d st rfaceewaterr�luality, alt era temperature) dassoly limited to to but not or turbidity) oxygt� ectiot� or rate of flow the direction �..,., g. Alteration of of ground waters? of �,jround waterer ox quality i uarttity h, Change �n the q or t�a�h` either through direct additlos interceptionof an .,. dra�'als, or through by cuts ° rOfi Ater otherwise e�u%fer amount water supplies? i Itedtction in the .rte evadable for public to water' le or Property t%posure of people p as flooding? related hazards such ;,2� 4 ' PLANT LIVE, YES a• G an`ge In 'the the proposal result NO of an diversity of in subst,. Y specyes o species, or nCdal; shrubs, grass plants (number b Reduction o f the reps and Including trees or endangered species aquatic plants)? pecies of ��ts' una,que, rare --- C. Introduction of °f bla�4ts? area) or in a neW species of barrier the normal into an ---. ment of existi,a4 to normal re d• Reduction � species? plenzshW in, acreage Of any agricultural c 5` ANIMAL LIx ropy-- a,e Will the proposal �( of anxn the di�ersit result in substantial, Y species Y of species tial, Including reptilf animals (birds \ or numbers benthi c fish and ' land animal; b. Reduction 3- or insects hell fish, in the numbers or endangered species of an c. Introduction of Y unique, rare °f animals? an area, or results species of or movement o in a barrier to into d, boteradrat` f animals? he migration--� --__ habitat? ion to e�cisti.ng fish or wildlife 6. NOISE a.`n Will the proposal Increases in existin result in substantial: • Exposuro of people .to5oise levels? 7- LIGHT AND CLAREevere noise 1eV,Is? Vll :...,. the g leant proposa light andglare?l produce 8. LAND USE. Will the sUT—St use zalteration al proposal result in a �... land f ,an a�of o • the present oY, planned NATI1 RAL ._RESOUItGES i �Yl1 Che su $t��ntial; a. Increase proposal p rosttlt in in the rate b� use resources? of any Y natural bo Deple On of any non-renewable natural resources? RIS OF UPSET, r, . a• A ris • o ex 10-s the proposal Involve aus subs plosion or the -ances Including)ret 11 Of hazard oil, pesticides but not event of an chemicals or radia limited to, b. Eossihl accident oro the e interference ti+rChset conditions? response plan or emergency an emergen,cY =-- ll� g �Y evacuatio POPULATION, 1Yx11 the n plan? ri s Crb�it� bn proposal alter the population? denszty� Or growth rate of location, the human 1 HOUS INr,, Will t1, or create a demand- Proposal affect evstin f fbt additional housing?g housing, r YES MAYBE NO ;.. 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Wild, the proposal. result ins a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b, Effects on e) sting parking facilities, or demand for new parking? --- Substantial impact on existing transportation --- c. systems? d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circul.atiop or movement of people and/or goods?— e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? r� .�. f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or alte'.ed governmental services! a, Fire protection? G. b. police protection'? ---- --- c.- c. Schools? Parks or other recreator:j1 facilities? e.- Maintenance of public facilities, including r.oad5? I Other governmet,.tal �yrvI ces'? l5; ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: amounts of fuel.or energy? T.— Use of substantial b. Substantial increase in demand uponn existing sources of energy, or requi•,e the development of new sources of energy? 16. uT'ILI;'IES. Will the lsroposal result in a need f0v substantial alrtera.ti.ons to the new systems, or folly wings a. power or natural gas? b. Commun.icati.on� systems?' C. Water avai.laAllty: �e d. Sewer or septic tank? e . Storm water drainage? �'. Solid waste and disposal-, 17, CJUriAN HEALT i'. Will the proposal `result xn : heath hazard or potential a�;rea:�on of any health hazard (excluding mental health) ? y. b. Exposure of people to potential health , hazards? _r 18. AESTHETICS, Will the proposal: result in the to ostructxan of 'any s'cehic'vista or view open the proposal result in the the public, or will creation of an 4esthetically offensiu`e site open to public view? a u4- _. -_ rs: YES MAYBE NO 19; RECREATION. Will, the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreationa.1 oppo,rtun ties? - 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES, a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site's ?� b Will the proposal result in adverse phys cal or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact a;Tea? V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION See attached i PiggggglgN_OF-ENV IRPNMENIO!=_EVALUATION AP 4,** -01-2y 1bj3bjc-. Future construction of a dwelling with parcel 1 will generate additional surface water related improvements an er rUnOf. Drainage would be directed to Linda Channel located immediately to West Linda Avenue. The tate the north across Reclamation Board regUlates drainage Involved Outfall into the channel. Though only one additional parcel i, i a Permit from the Reclamation Board may be require'd. , ZhIl6d: The 'Division of Environmental Health has COMPIPted a list of recommended canditi-ans. In addition to the standard Conditions for Water supply and Sewage disposal, complianct_ with tho OLAtto County Nitrate Action Plan is required. :3j: Linda Channel is shown an the Zone A flood bound&% y maps a Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmLnt. Iof thenundation is not expected to be a concern far the project site. 6b-' The property from Passing traihm an the Lis Zubject to noise Southern Faci+ic Railroad. Since the railroad is qr)o, Or more away, special Mitigation moaslure, ;Are not neCes,%,ary. 13c! Seven to ten vehicular trxpt Per day will be added to West Lindo Avenue. 14a*w Fire protection in the West Chico Area is limited due to considerable residential growth _jL railroad (which can block emergency recent years And the presence 0+ the ncY vehicles from rosj3onding), In addition to Payment into the Fire Hydrant Fund, Butte County F.41 -e Departmont, recommends Payment u+ $75.00 per 10. L Station Site Fund, into thO West Chico Fier 14b-+* The project WillhI ave A n0rilinal effect On Public services availably in the Chico urban area. A note will be rUqUirod an the fin, -Al Map that buildinrj Permits may be ZQbj0ct to school impact fees to the Chico Unifi.ed School Diqtrict per Ordinance 2463 and ROZOlution '85-40. Applicant: j�en K.arasinaki D LCff!g_,RLIEET Assessor's Parcel 0 Log # 05-11-27-03 A ercji%%t Aggeripti n 1. Type of Project: Tentative Parcel Map 2. Brief Description: Dividing 0.87 acres to create 2 Parc0l-' Of O acres and 0.47 acres,. and West Lindo Z. Location: Southwest corner Of Fern Avenue Avenues Chico area. I opmentt 1, dwelling urdA per 0.4-0,,47 4. Proposed Density Of Devel acres. S. Amount of Impervious 8ur+acing-. Moderate 6. Access and Neatest Public Road(s)-. Frontage ort West Lindo 2 also fronts an Fern Avenue Avenue; Parcel 7. Method of Sewage DisposaA., individual Septic tanks s. Source 04 Water Supply: California Water Service 9. Proximity Of PowerLines: Available to Part:t--1 2 jo. Potential +or further land divisions and development— Limited until sower services available Per the Nitrate Action Plan. B. Envr�rnmenh~.Sei rig, 1. Terrain r-,,el,-Atiyely J,evol Valley a. General Topographic Character: b, Slopes% 1% +/- C. Elevation- 177' AS.L. d, Limiting Factors: None 2, Soils aj Types and Character' l Stitt: Vince fine sandy loam; deep, drailniMgi prime agricultural %Oil, b. Limiting Facto,,si.- None :3j, Natural Hatar-,-, of the Land a. 5-arthquai, Zohol Moderate imtonsity VIII b. Erosion R.-itential: LOW t. Landslide j�.Itehtjal-. None d. Fire Hazar', Linc) M3%Jfind e. Expansive 8Ptil Potentialt. Law '�-o Moderate 4. Hydrology Lindo Channel ZO' to the north a. Sur+ato 4 b. Ground Wai '. .1UvorlioG area of heavy groundwater withdrawai. tmolediatoly Outside of high -nitrate area. UiAeatterie*tittt Property draimv, toward Limdo Channel d. 'Annual Ra$%4all (normal)'^ e, Limitinti f r,ttOes- Nitrate% from septic %Y0tUM%* 15. 1liouiallScenic tluality. � 'Iy% 80'utherm road 800' to the 6, Acdur,,t i t QUaL""Pacific Rail Gouthwest, Air Qualityt. Tai r Sia], ogi cal ,�Envi r-onm�nt e 8. 9. Vegetation: Landscaped Plant species, blacEr walti,i� trees. Wildlife Habitat: Minimal U on-site; riparian hats t to north along Linda Channel: . Cultur_-1-Eaviranment 10. Il. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Loin Butte County General, Plan 12. designation: Low nert Existing Zoning: ol`�y ResidentialS�-R t3. q Existing Land Use on-site: House with related improvements and vegetation described above, 14. Surrounding Area: a= Land Uses: Low density residential remnants uses with orchard b. Zonings -N c Gen. Plan designations: Low Density Residential. d• Parcel Sizes: 1/3 to 10 acre, e. Population: Low Density 15' Character of Site and Area: Established neighborhood in former al menti orchard area. 16. 17 !Nearest Urian Area: City of Chico limits within 3(X)O, Relevant Spheres of Influence: City of Chico school district, Cha. cia Un f i od Chico Area Recretion Parks Ui. strip t, Cali forria W�At lei or Service Company. Improvements Standards Urban Area: Curb, " gutter, ��nt s dodo! `!4Qired by Public. WorEes. 1 Protection Service: '10$-iarestsoLkth; Stunty �tion304 re Station. Station 044, l/^ 20. �a.ter Availability: Fire hydrants in vicinity SC -1.10 abs in Area: Chico Uhifi,ed School District STREET . CHICO, CALIFORNIA 959`26 • T@L[PHON6 916.895.1422g.p�1 965 FIR A nciersOn r4ola CIVIL, ENGINEERS February 24, 1986 Butte county Advisory Agency 7 county Center Drive OroVille, CA 95965 Attn: Tom Reid Subject: Karasinski Tentative, Parcel Map Gentlement. The subject project will require usage of ten feet of the building setback for leachfield area* We hereby request this usage, as this project can not be completed without it. very truly yours, ROLLS, ANDERSON & ROLLS William Dinsmore WD: j dd36 4?hi co Fran Wozhd, Poe. 1298 NORD AVE: CHICO, CALIFORNIA 95926 (916) 343-4300 February 11, 1986 Stephen A. Streeter Senior Planner Planning Commission 'T County Center Drive Uroville California 95965 lie: Tentative Farool Map, .AP 43-01-29 Dpr 4 fiTr. Streeter., This is the letter you need confirming that 1 agree to Pay 75XQ per lot into the West Chico Fire Station Site Fund. At this time I am also sending a clv ck for $110.00 to the public works (1('Pt. +yy� Gia (.n.Ly�. Ken. Xaiasinsk r • Inter 'De airtift s: p n ! IWemornndu TO, Butte County Advisory Agency FROM; Planning Director usJtcr: Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Ken Karasinski on AP 43-01'-29 DATE: January 29 1986 This is a proposal to divide 0.87 acres to create two acres and 0.47 acres. The parcels of 0,40 The Land Use Plan Map of thebutteCounty Generalis S-R �Planrdesigna es this area as Low Density Residentia There are no specific or community s plans for the area. The initial analysis of this project indicated that the ,five criteria for a Class 14 categorical exemption were present and a categorical ex- empti.on was recommended. However, recent information and study indicates that fiLe protection services in this area do not meet standards for urban areas and, therefore, a Glass 14 exemption is not appropriate. Accordingly, this project should be continued so that either an initial study can be periurmed or adequate evidence can be received from the Fire Department that this project Will not have an adverse effect on their ability to provide fire protection, DRHtlr