Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-010-067or y6 C f ,q v + • � .�., a '� ,^ 6 s 6g o9• . b r w a 46. ` i PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET �QI7 LAND DxVTSIONS APPLICANT Sharon Howell 8S-02-12-01 ADDRESS P.O. Box 3353 Chico, CA 95927 OWNER Sharon Howell & Craig Do na l s on .--.,----. PROJECT DESCRIPTION - 2.OI_acre into 4 arrels S- a, ., e C LOCATION at the .north end of T1- r Wa 200 feet north of its i.nersection With 12th Ave. Chico area, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS)""""---- 43-01- 7-& 63 ZONING -s, GEN,----�_ _ � PLAN - PROJECT CO.NSISTENI'? DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 2-12-85 Sierra-11�est -...5437 Black Olive Drive DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN ------Para i s e CA 95969 PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED PUBa,ISHED - 0. G ;� p, G. B. DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL"OUT NOTICES w'RITTEN MAILED DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S ,REPORT PREPARED DETERMINATION ANT AL DECATEGORICAL EhEMP'I�ON DATE FILED TE _ "`—;,- AND DATE' NEGATIVE DECLARATION -DATE ADOPTED .- ----�� 7:. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DEC LARATION - DATE ADOPTED :ENV, IMPACT REPORT ;, �-- DAT1, CERTIFIED , SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADVISORY AGENCY 11UPING DATE n ` ADVISORY' A01ENCY AGr"IoN t _ :BOARD ACTION Ct7MMENT8�����j''������� C' C" AI I�UPg1)1 A h COUNTY OF BUTTE, ENVIRONMENTAL CHhCK'LIST FORM (to be completed by LeaU Agency) Log # 85-02-12-`01 BACKGROUND AP it 43-01-67 81 68 1.. Name of proponent Sharon I-Ioweil 2. Address of proponent and representative (if applicable) Sharon Hotaell. S7.erra Neslr�,, _ 77C7 — I 3 Project description Tentative Parcel Aga _�� _ ITT MAN1)ATORl' FINDINGS OR SIGNI ICANCII YVS MAYB11 NO a. Does the project have the potential to degrade tl�o quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife 5peci;es, cause a fish or wil.cllite population to droll below self- sustaining level`, threaten to eliminate a plaint or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endang€r9d plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California. history or prehistory? X b. hoes thQ nroject have the potential to achieve short-term bernefits to the detriment of long-term, tanvironmentaa.l Eoals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occur: in a relatively brief period o1= time while long. -term impacts will endure into the .future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individu= ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A pruiect may impart on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively sural I , but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant,) d. 1100s the project have environmental effects which, will, cause substantial adverse effects on laLIMan beings, either directly or indirectly? M, 1113TMIMINA'IION: (To be completed key the Lead Ago�ncy) an tho basis of this ini.tiai evaluation: U191: findtheproposed project C,',OUL0 NOT have a s ign1 ricant offect On the environment, and as N1:GXI`M: DECLARATION will, be prepared. UK! fine; that altlxough the prol)osed project could have a signifi- cant effect on the onvirctnment;I there will now be a sIgnificaant erroct in this case becausethe 'HTTTGATION Mr,011M described on the attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE 171iCI.ARATTON will be prepaared. 11'101s rind the proposed project MAY have a> sioiric:atat effect on the emit ronment, and an 1iNVI RONNICNTA , IMPACT REPORT is required, OATI.: March 5, 1985 � � COUN'I'Y OP I111T'1'1:, PLANNI'NC, DriPAttTMINT 'aI a hip T t]e, Associi te-'"PlannerRev tow�' v - ENNEW11111 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IACT5 xp anat1ons Of a 'eyes" ,and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheet(s)) i• EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant, YES �. a. Uns able earth conditions MAYBE No or in changes in geol gic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction orAL — overcovering of the soil? C. Change in topography or relief features? ground surface -- d. Destruction, covering or ifl unique geologic or physicaldfeaturesicatio? of any e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on K or off-site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may mcdify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g Loss of prime agricultural) y Productive soils `—'- outside designated urban y( areas? h. Exposure of people or Propertto c hazards such as earthquakes, landslg,,ides, mud- slides, ground failure or similar hazards? 24 AIR, e a. Air eI the proposal result in substantial; missions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b• The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes! -.. c• Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? �• WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial; a— Changes in currents, or the course or direction err water movements in either marine or fresh Waters? b• Changes in absorption rates, patterns drainage or the rate and X amount of surfac , c. Need for off-site e runoff?surface drainage improve- -- men's, includin ver iyation or culvert vegetationChannel- d: Alterations to the course or flow of flood ...waters ? -.._.` �- - e• Change in the amountof surface water in any water body? -- f. Discharge into surfacewaters,or i n any �.._ alteration of surface dater ualit but not limited 'to temperature dissolveduding ' ozygen or turbidity? g• Alteration of the direction or rate of flow Of ground waters? h• Change in the quantityof either through directaddit ons bre With- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? i• Reduction in the amount of 'water otherwise available for public water suppi.i.es?' Exposure ofeo p pl.e or property to water related hazards such as flooding? r 4• PLANT LIFE, Will the YES_ MAYBE NO a. g Proposal result in substantial: �._r ��han e in the diversity of any species of °f species, or number I shrubs> brass plants (including trees, '�. Reduction of hernumbersdoaquati.c Plants)? or endangered species of Plants. unique, rare C. pants? Introduction of new species of or in a barrier e plants into an ment of existing species? othe normal replenish d• Reduction in acreae of any agx-cultural crop? 5. ANIMAL LIFE. a —(,7 z-______ Will 11 the `- -- --�- proposal result in substantial: C�any in t?le diversity of species, or numbers °f any species of animals including reptiles Cbirds, land animals benth'ic organisms I fish and shell fish, b' Reduction in the numbers 4ofs;an or, endangered species of animals?anynioue, rare Introduction of new s an area or pedes of animals into X. result In a barrier to the or movement of animals? mi a. , Deterioration to existing gr.ati:bn ly habitat? b fish or wildlife 6; NOISE: Will the Proposal -- a,. ,ncre p result in substantial; b. ries in exi:stir;g noise. levels'? E:cpo;ure of people to severe noise levels? LWill the HT AND GLARE -' - g sxgni. zcan 'li ht and proposal produce glare? -- LAND USE. }fill the proPosal result su stantial alteration of thin a land use of an area? e Present or Planned 9, NATURAL RESOURCES; tVi11 the pro asa su stantial P 1 result in a. resource in the rate of use of any natural resources,.,, b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural` resources? 10, RISK OF UPSET. ti�x 11 the a. A ris. o proposal involve: e-' ion or the release of hazard, es ous substances (includi.ng, oil, but pesticides not limited to event of an accident radiation in the bi P conditions? po��sible interference with response an emergency plan or emer enc gency g Y evacuation plan? I!. POPULATION, Will the F"�� proposal alter the location; densItY; or F Population? growth rate cf the human l HOUSING, Will the proposal, affect or create a demand for additional housing, housinexisting? ti ___SE MAYBE NO Will the proposal. ].3. TRA�+ORTA�;CION/GIRGULATION. substantial additional vehicle — result in; Rte a. Generation of movement? axlting facilities, or — b . Effects on existing pa . transportation demand for new act e�cistng on Substantial imp --- ----' c� patterns systems? resent d. Significant alterations top people le and/or movement of P p — of circulation or _ as?rail. oY air traffic? goo Alterations to waterborne, e, hazards to m otor vehicles, ease in traffic f, Incr pedestrians? bicyclists or ELIC RVICE• Will the proposal have an effect 4 PU VI S need for new or altered TP on , or resu t In a governmental seris a. Fire pion? ---' rote'ction7 .. b, police p �. C. Sch0c15? d, Parks or other recreati nal fac llinclud ng e, -Maintenance of public roads? — f roads governmental services? Will the proposal result in: l5. ENE--` do existing, a Use of` substantial �mi�ndemandfupl.nr energy? b, Substantial increase sources of energy, or require the. development .�- of new sources of energy? result in a need fOT the ropsal res 4- 11 --)L l6, UTILITIES,.�, Villsubstantial ;alterations to new system., , ..Y-I'l-- following ? -- A.- a, Power or natural gas , �-- _- CommunI c t ons systems? b iS c. Water availability= d. Sewer or peptic tank? - — e . Stortrt water drainage? ..__.- f+ Solid waste and disposal? UMAN HEALTI3. Will the proposal result in: 1.7. H Health hazard or potentia] a reat�on of anyecluding mental health)? health hazard Potential health b Exposure of people top hazards? propo,al result in the l$: AESTHETICS: Will. tsceicVista or view open to oostruct�on of any ro osal result in the the public, or will the p . p offensive site open creation of an aesthetical y to public view? 4 `mss 19. RECREATION. YES MAYBE NO upon the qualitllorhe pioposal result in an impact opportunities? Y quantity of existing recreational 20. CULTURAL RESOURCES , -- --- a= i11 t e proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistor historic archaeological site? ic or b. Will the proposal result in adverse physics) --- or aesthetic effects to a historic building, structure or c. hoes the proposal have the potential to cause y a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses, within the area? potential impact V• bTSCUSSTOIV_ OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATrOIVAP 43-01-67 �$ See E, attached sheets, V and 6 �XSClJ�57C1P�l,,.Q�..�I�lUif<Cll!�M'�N;T�L.,��:V�LUF�TxgN �� rrapea°ty xs with i,n Chi.uo's urban area identified by the. p This p Census: Zb 16e: Surface runoff Will inc�vament% to accommodatee any�+itncreases. Works will require drainage impr 4a; An almond orchard now covers the site. Development will cause the removal of numerous •gees • + 1060' west 0 th L s 6b. Southern Pacific Railroad is locaked / s Saila, ��»w-lu. r� Ce�xdent% will be subjected�tQn►�a�s�ld�negl � �� �; ,dpi, 16dN property, aver, federal standards. '14eav ly xnsGl g indoor noise levels, s". residents Will be affected by cons truc-�ian t,aise and i�: �1ei�ghbor n9 le�sin;g orchard.lass of a visually p will be, generated. i, an 1n additional 20 vehicle trips pet" dad Area br•idglos oven b.indo Cha nnel docnvolumes. ot have caThis timpact is not acc. to Ara �,►. rajected traffic accommodate e„a sting p si+ni cant. individually serious, but is cumulatively Casts of pr rodding services Demands far. all gcavernment�cl se vices Will increase, As in-iil in growth is expected in an urban areGaj g Project in the foothills liero will be less than frac a similar, p ha..ara and should be 1: a« Dead brush ,ran site constitutes a fire removed- cinq overcrowding Chico Unified School bi��trict i.s artpetlrend�velalper should 14c,l '► a caf f et this impact, �eement. 7n within the system.work contact Chi.cc lJnifi ��t�ehool Cc�►,.�n�y'�aard ufduperv�sar�nar.•Icipts an the event that the the aq► eei►ent would be null and void. imposing sch�a�al �°ees ardin�ance imp RWOC iba A hic]h�'nitrate area is immeC�iately south of the property: the City of Chico ,�, indicated that septic 'l:�:an�;5 �r�Y c".a prime cantribut�ar of nitrates °�a has in carder to address this problem, The the groundw-atp jw a r�si.ties on a nitrate ac iera Plan* and County 0+~�utie have b �.n warl•.inq an septic ..ar►ls. plan Will address a11.k�wable r1 unat/acre and dwelling am lion e with the nitrate action plan is required. PlAnmmandati.ons have been made frac i, dwal ing units/aura. P and area Itr. Cltm4ti ative imp acts to Chico i ni.fiad School ri.ct bra., C aver 1_,ndo Channel are passible: r tlssessor `s liar-cel. ��� Applicant: niwaron Howell 475-01.67 and tan Log D�1TA�,5N�GT A. r�,o;nt„�DsciM Et an 1. Type Of Proaect� Tentative Parcel Map .� _,171 �c� es 200',� into � p arcel s� 3 a Drief Description: Dividing ,AIS acre.. and i at .66 acre a.r ro.t;tmately Location! At the north end Of Misty Way, pp north of its intersection with 12th Avenue, Chico area. Of nevelcpment.dw�"llig units per acrd. 4. Proposed Density �iodeI'n li Amount of Impervious surfacing: 6. Access and�Nearsiuosal�oXdividtrtalsty Way septic tangs«'th Avenue. 7. Method of sate p 1,r�.1 south. �� Service company. owerpLines $`. Further f�. Gna.trce b•F �Wy�t�r- Supply: California Wa�te p'ur 9. pro,"imity i. development: 1.Q. 1=�r�tential dor further land divisions providedsewer i5 secured. divisions possible under S-R lot. �nv�.�woriment�l_5et�,ri� '17y awn anyi rqnmRn 1, , Terrain a. General Topographic Character -P Level valley land. b. Slopes'!- c. Elevation. 177 p.S L. d. Limiting p'actorsm. None. W. SaiIs a. Types and nharact,eri%tics; Vi,na pine dandy Lo tti. beep well. draining prime ag 50i.l. b. Limiting Factors; None. -. Natural. Hazards of the I- and a. Sarthquake Zone Moderate V11" b. Erasion potential: Low. c Landslide Potential- None. d. Fire Ha ardt L,Jnclaesi+ied- S:pansive noi.l, potential a Law to nitderato. 4. Hydrology a. Surfac=e Water: Lind© nhan�telt��c' nort�pundwtter b. Ground Watery dverlies `tot~tt de c� rea of vhagh�°rji.•trat,e area. withdr~,awal. lmm�.di.ately Proper-Ly-Lydrairl'M S-S-W, to Si_g c. '�r•a5.nage Gh�cracteri�t,yc�s� Chico Craok 212-2[�:,i d. Annual Rainfall normal': �w e. Limiting Factorsa Presence of ni•hrates will, limit densities owd an septic tank w :�. Vis�.tal./Scan' pity: Acoustic Qcal ity S. p`. r;. p is major noise gumurator. 7k Air Muality 1=ai� Aft S,. Vegetation % Al mind orchard o st�trroundi.ng resi den'tyi al 9. Wildli+e {habitat; Compromised by development. G1Ajt�iwal-GnviL'Mnmen 10. Archaeological and Historical designati�ton: Lowces in -DenQl tyhe � Low, Ito Vutte County General Plan EesidentIal- 12. Existing Toning' S--R. Land Use an-Sit- Almond orchard. E; i sting 14„ Area; Surrounding residential al uses, +ew remaining a Lm-nd Uses% Maw density orchar dee b. zoming S-R- to Gen, Plan de>ignation - Law�i7ensiiry Pesidnntirco do Parcel Sizes: 1/:3 to 10 acres,, ! %2 to 1 acre common- e. population Low density, 1s, Character- of Site and Area. Established neighborhood yin old almond orchard area- Nearest City of Chico' Chico if r Nearest Urban Aref 17. Relevant Spheres c•tf h� tea f cre ttiaencet City oa dl gar ark 17. Schaal 'Dis�trict4 Chico California Water Service' Company' lid. improvers ants Standards Urban area; Pursuant to Publ Warks« 1,9. Pir,v Protection Ser 441 tY (Stag) Fire Station! Stabt�n #+ miles z. Nearest �Ctae�tn*�� � miles northu south; #41, b. Water Availability: 20. !stwhools in f4rea Chico Uni+ied 5chaa, 'District, APPENDIX H 1,10TICE OF DETERMINATION • ni lle rtment TO.. Office of Planning and Research FROM: 71Cuun ' Centex Drive 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 oroville C/�111�i��?�+ Sacramento, CA ` 95814 or ELEANOR M. BECKVR, Couniy Clerk County Clerk County of Butte By �A. J,ACI�ITh Deputy SUIMCT-. Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21109 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code, 85=02-12-01 AP �� Name Pro t ect e ��-01-67. � 68 Sharon 11OWC11 Tentative Parcel DIap Ing use Njimr Contact Person Telep one Num f ) _ (1f submitted to clearinghouse) _ (97.6) 534-4266 John mendonsa, Public IVorks ._..._1TOX lDat�el•y' 200' north Pr � o ect atlon At the north olid of rusty 11q ay, a P1 Of its intersection Al'ti-I 12th Avenue Chico area. t i?criP on TentaiVe Parcel clap to divide 2.01 acres into 1)arccls at .4 to .55 acre each. is to advise that the Butte 'County I— ar r�enc ». _LL '"'.,": -�-g en or Responsibie �►gency t1.�� Ag Agency tw approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. project 'will, Will not, have a sign f icant effect on the environment, 7, �.. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the proviAons of CEQA. A Neegatl�#e Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the The E1R or Negative Declaration and record of pm -ct approval it Y F examined mt Butte Caunplanning t�ept tmetlt tq .------------ 7 (otitit centeY I)r.iv 3 Miti ation measures ,_,,: were, �i , were snot, -made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations was, was not, adoptedd for ` this project; r Date Received for" l -fling Sim Grey Stephen A. Streeter 0-416r i'lYin tip r Title k R,�vised January 1985 ♦N 1 � I tieounin I wrr r All(,, l)i, l{t ,U;y LAND OF NATURA r DEPARTMENT OF F'LIRLIG WORKS WILLIAM (Bill) GHE -, Director y COUNTY CENTER DRIVE I OROVII.LE, CALIrORNIA 95Sb5 Telephone: t1161 534.4681 RONALD o. mceLROY D,�}}eCO•plan ln9 °u' 1985 D iputy Director � 6 M a r c Yl 2 5 0 ) Oroville, lltornla RE : AF 4 3-0 1- 6 7 4 6 8 Sharon flowed. Tentative Parcel Map P. 0. Box 3353 Chico, CA 95927 Dear. Ms. Howeli.; held of the Butte County Advisory Agency At the regular meeting adopted the negative declaration Marr -b '15, 1985, the Agency d the Tentative parcel regarding eft review and approve conditions as listed on M0P for AP 43-01=-E7 & 68 subject to the Goa the attached sheet.i days of tile: date of appeals are timely y_ .thin ren... C,lOi �' �, filed --w if no aPP Agency's approillbewtll the Cleric of the Board Of the Advisoryfinal. Supervisors, this action. 'Will approval are complil�`d with, it will be in Vhen the coAditions of ,,.Final map" with the Butte County order fOt you to the y nt a>; Public Works for recordatothAgereyntyrfour (24) Depart�me approval by the Advisory ,r,onths of the date of app lea$0 If you shou.d have any questions regarding this matter, p cOntact t}lt.s aEftc'e Very ti^ fly ypu>"s, William Cheff Director of Public 'Works %ohn Mendon�3a Assistant Director JM.dg AttAchulc"t nin8 gnvfionmontal Review Plan gnvironmer,tal Health neparbmEtnt $terra Wiest Surveying #r♦ Sharron Rowell, Tentative Parcel Map, 4 parcels at the north end of Misty Way, approx. 200 ft. north o4 its intersection with 12th Ave. Chico area. AP 43-01-67 and 68 Engineer: Sierra West Surveying 2uhlic Works conditions: I. Provide two-way travers�ible access RS-9-TSD-Tz to each parcel from a county maintained road or state highway, 2. Access to by reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered for dedication of the final map. - 3. Show 50 f.t. building setback line measured from centort Lne of access easement. 4. Provide road maintenance agreement. 54 Show all easements of record on the final map. 6i Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final map. 7 Provide permanent saletion for drainage. 8. Pay off assessments. 9. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required. 10. Meet the requtrements of the Butte County rite Department. 114 Clean out and repair existing drop -inlet or vLsty Way. Health Department conditions: 12_. Provide a 100 ft leachfield .free setback around existing wells either withtn the property or wtthin 100 ft, of the property l�aundaries (Vote: These are two wells north of ~lie property..) 13. Provide the required usable seWbge disposal area on each parcel. Combine witli an adjacent parcel any parcel not Proven tocontainthe usable sewage disposal area required by the Subdivision Ordinance. 14i P~ovide a letter or uthrr docume,itation From California Water S'�wtvtct' '- mpany stating that they are witItn; aritl abbe to supply domestic water to parcr515 '1 2; 3 and 4+ 15. Comply withthe rogitiromaii'ts nr the Adopted Butte Cokitity Nitrate Action plan. �VRa .,..., Tch Butte County Advinary Agency 1�RROM: Planning Director SU83ECT9 Report on Tentative parcel Map for Sharon Howell AP 43-01-67 and 68 DATE march 13, 1985 This is .a proposal to vivid, 2.01 arres into Our parcels, three at a43 acro and one at .66 acre. The present zoning is S" -R (SuWar ban Residential) . Thv Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates th % area an Low Density Residential. There are no speci+ic ar community plant +car• the area. The proposal dee, not conflict with County zoni no nor any adopt, d or proposed element w+ the Butte County General Plan nor any County, spocl+ic or Community plan" Reryummend iapproval a Lt' T r 11 t Cc: Sharon Howei 1 Sierra+ West Sur+veyinq