Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-021-024q , FOR Z. �x,,.1-.p31r�, �I�'h'iC C"®�E�S�Q�l �t,g�.k�lA�.� ��i,r,,w,..,..q,.......W-.,,. ._a,q..-•.,--,.....�..,w � Robert. Fischer 8$-05--23-2 P.O. Boy 1, Durham, CA 95938 Ca4N��+ Same Tentative parcel MaP to divide 1 W 1 ac"t""' !.O "eate 4 r 1 o�7 JG!C D S 'Rx l3'Z' �diV _ .....•».w�._ .,..._.�... - - • _ �....... q .._.a......_. -q. k:<: *W .« w. ce 5 ? Parcel 2 - 7,125 SF, Parcel 3 - 1519 SF, pu'' a rce 1. 1 7 , ] 5 0 Sri , --� . ». � w, rk. »» � IW R ,.�..a,,,+�1 "­, SF P LOCATION T. arcelat the northeast corner of Dixon S. �. vo and W L-ba.:.....,W«. Avenue, Chico area ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N'UM$ED W �....,:�3-021-29 S.rR ­­.—GENERAL NFRx1L PIAN LDR PROJECT C:ON15IS( ',pt'1' ON X N G _- ..._:.-..._.-------r-•---•-• i',NERt 1 PLAN C ONVORMANCE REPOR may 16, 19$8 -,,, •,-� w .. DATE OF APPLICANT Sxfi�IAT ,.». X,t1ND C;C3N,"aM1TTON ACT CO'N'rRACR'S?_.,_.�..�.,. No May 23, 1988 .w.i - ACf.;N"�`/at71��'LXOI�/CIV'IL 'SNCINEER. Rolls, Anderson & Rolls, Attn: Mika Byrd 965 Fir Street, Chico, CA 95928 .,�; piDY�}�S� 88 -- hA'r -PLANKTIC DxRECT0t0 S REVORT CA"PMO tICAL EXEMPT'ON DATE PILED— 1Jt r'J'EMIM"Ca'17'TON`... AND r�k N'EOATM fat;CTiAR1�TION -; DAT" NO'GDECLARATION DATE ADOPTED_ . .»..w Priv IMPAOT trlr'OR'r' mraT>a cpR1ryvty, . O^" ♦ • W�+t.Wa •i.:r . r.�.. a�a,Nq qW ry.. �„. q'u vq.WwHwnr Miii«W M :qWW !. •rr ». q.YY WY»rY f� ew , WXY1 P., ,G711, t:OKMIri"TZP, HSIM M' 0J�'1'rt �t��!«rX�)t4i �kiai"tVCYi, ��t'a�l�R��ti �,t��t.i.,,.(.,.�Y �4/• :� (ryLr����:a+`�,.�..'"„""'a'"«a Wk.,,a,al,w:,...�.�...«.,,., »w.a,,.. X«tJ K'�•ii y./ �:G 1V8N(! 4 ACTION {�yy (y Kirrii APPEAL 11L."A RTI M A7.X i��,�S1J C'J IJ��:r«.."-«++—.•ra—::_ � -.a,a _r,:...._....-. ,aW:.w�«.._-. «....nm. qrw» ,...,_ fi J(+'M) ACTION ar.,r....,.:.:wul'aWi�w..:w.-.i+lagw...w.uWr.�.w+u«—,�:�W+�..».wr.'.u.aYa�.:�»+W�Ww ':,....«wi:«+.K..w,.�.i.u�...++a,+qa:..-I+y.'....«.»w�.c..w«r+.w.lai�r,W:1�1nyi,.ww 01% 1"011 1111ANNJ.N6 M�i\+'C.,~TnR� V •,\I.1 XMi�•, iY�Wa .-,— �'`i.«iW trv«.WWWgaWY.lMYiw,+iiAi W. »iia'ir1MN.. e;.:a:. «a M., rowi+1..Yr AwAi.wwr;,irW;a¢Y.;.fu.WWY+ .wW c;:E QIF 1:)RIr�EP.MJ:,A c 0, Office of Planning a�i Sacramento, CA 95814' JUL 2, 6 198F) 95963 or X County Clerk County of Butte EMES0 SUB,Tmcm: Filing of- Notice of Determination in compli,Allti� With Section 21108 or 9-1152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP V Tentative Parcel,Map 43-021-24 RobGrt Fischer state Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Teleph;he 'NwOet (if submitted 'to Ciearinghouse) Project -Location Xt, the northeast corner of Dixon Street and West 12th Avenqb, Chico area. Project Descript.ion Tentative Parcel Map to divide 1.1 acres to cieate four parcelst Parcel 1 - 7jI50 sq.ft.j Parcel 2 - 7jI25 sq. ft., This it to advise that the Butte 'County Advisory Agency (Lead Agen or Responsible Agency) has approve(! the above"desctibed project on Yuly 25, 19,88 and has made the following determinations tegatdibg the abbve-described projecti .1. The proi ghificant effect on the 2i An Environmental Impact Report WA8 prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of (20A. A Ne ative Declaration Was prepared for this project pursuant to the' provisions of GEQA, 4i A statement of overriding cons iderat3lons -was, L—Mng not, 0dopted for this ptojecti Th, S it to tetti y that the filial t.IR with comments a,n,d rusponqos an& record of project approval is available to the general public at'. tutto- County Pl6nhilig Department Otbvilltt CA 05065 IL - Date Received for ViAing and 13ill Turpin, Senior 'Planner Mal vidklo.IVAISI�A!01 ^ �Kt+ Am K, L LAN9 l O F f�I A T U �Al �l 't /k i, j I I A r, r, I r DEPARTMENT OF''PUBLI(j W0hKs • WILLIAM {Riil) CHEFF 7 COUNTY CENTER ORIVE . OPOVItI, f tiblbp CERTIFIED MAIL r�I'Atlr.ORNIA 05965 �Nhona: {s ONAtb D. McELROY Dhpuly Director July 25; 1968 Cn, EfnnningCb"M JUL ; 5 1988 Robert Fisher P. 0. I3ox 1 RE AP 48-021-24 c4farn Durham, CA 05938 Tentative Parcel Map Deas Mr. i+i.sher At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on July 25, 1968, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of environmental impact and approved the tentative at acparcel map Ori the attached sheet. subjereferenced Property -subject to the conditions listed on the If no appeals are timely filed--within ten (10) days of the date of the Advisory Agency's approval--.:with the Clerk of the Board of this s action_Will be final", IS!hen the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be ,1order for you to file your "final map"I with the Butte County Department Of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by the Advisory Agency, IfYOU have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this s Very truly yours; William Cheff Director of Public Work, 41h Mentioh8a Assistant ])hector d11/ds attachment cct planning Department Environmental Health Departtneht Rolls' Ander86h and Rolls ` Rra►,c t Fisher, TPM ra!' 1)xxan St, a, AP 43-021-2�i nor and West 12th Ave,4 Parcels Chico at the theist Public Warks conditions area. Engi^eer Rolis, Worson and Rohit corner 1. .I~ronta e g on Dixon and West 12 standard, i e.. 12th Str for parcels wxthCurb, gutter, sidowaxks to be const ruct�tj Plans to the Department acreage and required. scree required partment of Public Woe ecr.e or loss.SubmJG00CH,on facilities. o'rks for approval . (h. t my►;Ci 2 nc:ea to and trltli rt OF West the County of Butte 30 12th Street and D' ft. right-of—t,�a 3 xon Street. Y from the cc, Yt)"cate a 50 tlhor:�t.ne Ond Dixon Strut. building setback from Streets. i✓'erine Sil(�lJ' of l�!4i�i'�i a11; oas'erztents the cen of record on the final. rna Provide Permanent: solution p' Drainage fee of<5550 -per erre; drainage or pay Chwco V 6 Pay off an vecino Storm Y assessments. 7 Obtain xn encroachment to county Permit for all. driveways, construct standards, 3s; new or S existing, and i'aY any delinquent taxes or current taxies Fleet the requirements as required, cit the Butte County Fire Departure i'xt►nnf.ng Depb, conditions: nt; All lots created shall adhere to �1 the aPPl�cable far each West Side C . $75.00 zoning regulations, Ch Fire Station Benefit fee sh benefit lot created b fees shall be Y the proposed si,bdivisio all be Parcel map. Paid prior to n , Fire S paid Lt,.tion tori. of the "final Health Do]'t , c the recordat _ondxtzon�: 12 Cinder permit dwe1:j,n procedure, destroy, g to a Public water supply, exist�t►g r�Nl1 and connect t. 13 Sorv" he �'rovide �► �.etter a.ce Cam an , or other +documentation domesJ.j t S stating that the from Colironnia Itt t c water to Paracels 1 ,, 4Y are t�ill;rng and ob�.e ,t Iyer �'� Provide a to e. .,apply that theyletter or other are t,,illing and ablemlo tn from m CitJ' of Cliicr� supply sewer stating service to ptli"cell G+ �r FISHER TPM �. Place a note on the map that states "development of parcels 1 4 will require connection to a public sewer system." :t6 Place a note on the map that states "development of supply.'" parcelo 1 G will require connection to a public wager 17 Connect the existing dwelling to the public sewer', Pump W111 -1 the septic tank. 1 Inter -Depart n I 'Memorandunn roi Advisory Agency PROMI Planning Director suaJECTI TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP pOR ROBERT FISCHER, AP 114 3 -0 21.- 24 DATE July 12, 1988 The proposed project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map 1 divide 1.1 acres to create four parcels, Parcel pne at 7'.150 Square feet, Parcel Two at 7,125 sruare feet, Parcel Three at 7,519 square feet and Parcel :Four at 24,523 square feel.; The project site is located at the northeast cornor of Dixon Street and W. 12th. Avenue in the Chico Urban Area The Chico Area Land Use 'Plan -has si nated the g project si Jc de for Low Density Residential uses. Suite L:ounty Zoning Ordinance designation is Suburban. Residential which allows for one single familydwelling g Per 6,500 square feet. The proposed projeCL. conforms to both the Butte County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance The ability to provide an adequate level. of fire Protection services in the Project area has deterio ated in recent ye&ro due 'to the rapid urban growth rate. The . project site is located in the West Chico Fire Statioh Assessment Area, The Fire Assessment area was established to raise funds to provide a proper level of fire Protection. A fee of $75.00 per lot has been established as an adequate amount to cover the costs of providing fire Ptotectx1on services6 The $75,00 fire benefit: fee must be. paid prio, o recordation of the final map: A NegafiVe Declaration has been prepared for this project; Pursui-Int to the California Environmental Quality Act. No significant effects were identifi,ed by the initial study, RECOMMENDATION A. Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and considered in na nd alat making thus decision and adopt a Negive Declaratio13 Approve the Tentative Parcel Map for RoberL 1,"ischee, AP#43-021.-24 subject to the following condit.ions l All lots created shall adhere to the applicable zoning regulations, 2. A $75.00 West Side Chico Vire Station Benefit:' `.Cee ;akal l be Paid for each lot created by ,the proposed subdivision Fire 8tafees shall. be paid prior to the recordatrion of the final benefit finaioh parel map. BM.Jmc cc. Rolls, Anderson & Roll: Attni Mite Byrd �r APRENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTTE 'ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be corriploted by. Lead Agency), Lag NO, 88-05-23-02 I-BACKGROUND GFtC+Mr ND AP No. 43-021-24 I. Name of proponent __ 3-__ROBE 2. Address of proponent and representative ()f applicnble): Robert Fischex Rolls, Anderson . O Box "1 y .�_ " Rolls, Rolls Mike Byrd ..__CA_ 9.5.9.2.8x z _ Wroect description; escrlption. Tentati �e Paso a.ry.. . �. �_. II, MANDATJRY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE YES MAYBE No 1. Does the project have potential to degrade the qualityof the reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cuse fish or wildlife environment, Substantially totd�op below sr lt-sustaining Levels, threaten to oiiminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal err elirtilhate important p major his or prehistory?....... exam les of rimar periods of Cr 2. Does the project have the potential to ac;hreve short-terns benefits to the detrlmrMnt of fnng� term, environmental goals? (A shtortyterm impact on the environment is one which occursin d relatively brief period of time while long-terra impacts will endure into the future.) , ., 3. Dors that project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumtrl�Zttvofy considerable (A project may impact on two ormore separate resources where the impact on each resource rs relatively small, but where the effect of the tott"l of those Impacts on the anvironment is significant,)_., . ... .. .. . ...... ............ 13 0 4, Does the project have environmental efterts which will cause substantial adverse: effect, on human beings, either directly Or indtrectly7......... .. . M. OP-TEWIIVATION- CTO be eatrotp(ritrxd by the Lein Arjoncyl Ori tho u btlsis i tlils; rmtaipf pVtrtu��tiC�n: I1WE find IhO proposed project'COULD NOTr7,ifrrrtrit ��ff�rvt r�ir tltir r�nvirrrrunr�trt stn �. DECLARATION will be prepared d i NEGATIVE �- 1Vea sired thatalEl74ugh the proposed pro)rtot could have a�signifit unt c�lfcrr;t lin thtxnrivirYjhrt7enk, Nrarttwl�ltnr�t fres significant efrect in this case because the MITIGATION MEASURes rli�,�c;rrt111d rare III() attached shr~willave been added to the project. A NEGAI Iver DECLAAATION will kae preparrllkl f WE find the proposed project MAY hot .a!;rgnrfiron I eftoot on t IMPACT rIEPORT is required he envtri�nntent, anti an ENVt�IC�NMfµNTA1� ., C,OUtI OP I3uT T, P NI EPArrrmENT GATE: 8y Asso Brent 'Yr. Nloor �_ PeVlewed by; Blanner ciate IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS "'MAYBE" tire required on attached sheet(s) a (Explanations of all "YES" and answers `I. EAATH, Will the proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE NO Unstable earth conditions or in changcts In geolugiC: substreiotures? ..... , .., ... , ...... • G1 0 a, 1), Disruptions, displacbmcllis, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ...... o, Change in tomography or grounrf surfaoe relief features d, Destruction, covering or modification of any unique 001001C, Or physical leaturov' . Increase In wind or water erosion of soils:, either oil or off sito? .. . ......... . .. f. Changes in deposition or erosion of klaach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or river or stream or thin bed of the o>rc)rtn tar tiny' ,. erosion which may .modify the channel of a , C1 . p bay, inlet or lake" ....... ......... ........... ......,. ....... ... ,,, g Less of pnmr agriculturally product soils outside desinntn N' ltrilan arctar, j ....... it, Exposure of people or property to W ologiC° hazards stash its tlrtrtttquakCts, IandrylirJes. mudslides, grOUnd latfuro 01, simitar hazards" , .., , ,... 2. AIR, Will the proposal result in substantial': a. Ali- t�tntel trans or deterioration of amIW2nt :air quality ? ... � . � � ° . 1 D b. The creation of ob'jectional odors, smoker or fumes`........ , a ...... c, ilterataorI of 'air movement, moisture, or temperature„or any change III ci►rriMe lonally or, legtonally'?..... . ... ........ ............ . .. ..., . WATEf4= Will the proposal result in substantial a. Changes in currents, or the course or, dlroction of water ►Movements in either marine or fresh waters" ........ .................... ...... ...... ....... p� rd, I� C M � � 1d ii � • Ie{ t5, C'nall os In absorptlorl rates, drainage patterns. w the �ilt..s�rld amountcJs blase runoff c, rued for ctff site ., urfaco drainage improvoments including vegetation romoval. off- ,.ilanrle+or rpt cr►;vert Installation'? . , ........ , , d. Altattom510 tilt: course flow 01 flood waters? . . . . ..... . .. . ..... . . � ts I e. C;h trrtlr rn thio ;t'rnr)unt of surface Water in any water body" ............ ° .......... f. Nschalgv Into "orlace waters, or In arty alteration of 5urfac0 watt r quality. inciudincg but I� not lintlteqf tr) l(^rrlpa'i�ature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity`? . .... Alter-Ohllll Of lite) direction Ot rate or f1r,)W Or ground vvrlta'pt;; Ie. Chrtnrlk! tit tilt,! rllranttty tri quality of ground waters, either t1IIough 111`60Wirfatiran�, or by cuts tlr l,xc,rtu�tion, withdrawals,rrr through interception of an aqu►for t. [+�ductlotf .in thio amoilrtl of water otherwise avallatile for public valalor t. Ekpn5ute of people ar property to water related hazards r,ur,h 4r; 1100rJlncf'” ,: E3 4. PLANT LIFE. Will tate proposal result in substantlzli: rr,rprt, art e in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (ItriltrrUnit if s, Change . . . . . . ........ . � � shrubs, y rays. crops, and )quails pianis)` .. ta, ReductionI of tite numbers o1 any unique, rare or endangered species tai: plants'?........ f� 0 a, Introduction Of neW species of plFints into An area, or in a harrier tta the normtll « a E3 . rttplenlshrnont of existing 915ecluS7 ............. . . . . . . :. . ..... . ..... . .. . .. .. d» Seduction' Ire acrgFlge of ally ngrfculturai crop'?,,.,.,... ..,,...,,.,,........,...,.,,.,. 1 a: \ �\ ar,� sgG��� • � d � t\'a `• \a"� rte 't , .' ' • " asrar s�oaV rs at aP�mals t s�\� �cr S dei ott� Gy01011t0t Cps a� ia�\uaot thg PtoP°sd1 eGras, ° \1 P•�g� g�6we-t°cl sPrt{tt\rtCto\fig�tg... • '' t \a lvgc�M NON p r� a�dUrtgUg. Cfltg o ga,ai tgs�t\1:tna ohaOq \06\3 \t� bets o\ ary a\sl�ra as a r g: �rma15 e 0\ t \ s�No gd�G��oa rn \r a� SP nG1as o 1t1i3`��t\a�'t o.1 0\10) at a `� a,�,srrir ©tar`°`"Po d \ tasrtl r 1\1 tt�e p�oPasa �o\�a \aver\s� ' � t,• 0\g� \V\ gx,attr� atsvorg ears cjar` 1t9\,\ ar P aad \ar`a g \„argat geoCb\ sg aa \o rad,tGe srh c\r \arr bsurg osa\ P tro qje0\k ON... • a• �,xP � �,�\ \1�a �ioP araal �\\ar�i�an ' • , , • • • � P ,� • \ 1�' CaPa,a1 s\a�tra\'• 'Gg � \ reSU\\ 9•0 1 O ar arcd ProP°sa 5a cGgs ra\ r8 � �sg ON aay na\ arra\ rasoorce ” 10 a1\. \7 W °\ a'p\e OeL 1tt�11g� g n r gw X ra\ �1aar` 9. \a ga u o� oa. ,vn\va. a�'es vr'w � � vPs�� � aGu�`�raa dap\ a5a\ tr s�rba\ C w a 001 Jr\\ \h Prue o\ �� art lig gque 0 lar' ar gn a � g o\ the C� b �� vp��'� ori or ra\e+�ata\rpt\l rr t•r�y resp°nsa P or grog\\r rM� � \ goosr �Ga\s g g0Gt g d fiS1\� a P 0 des. Geo �a �rl1i a� �5rr4b�\ta •' P�as�rYt\art��ar\�xg \ �\\gt \oaat\�a• a da�`��� \o� a ,» ' a,ratrasa sir Gtaa\g, �1Jr1 o'35rO9 Ovo 01) tG a it`vgra �srr\rr�5 or a Owl a\ vet~ \ Not rra \ 1d a� 'C PJ\ot G a aeoorr , derotl�a ON P aP W t` ,,,bs\ tr a\ t%\r•, .w ` sad gy m Y I\ Vol) 1r 9 s c� rr eit to\tai ��rr5q ir5�00q at�� �`osgot a of c\TG\)\\+lain tt a� ay, a a1a� ��a� ID \\ G19 tri\ \'r PaG` Na Pigset~x P G'1 of \'Odastrrd a�,�ara avv�i vAatr ia�wa\�sVol 6s. S I APPENDIX F COUNTY OF BUTT ENVIRONMENTAL CH CKUST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Lag No. 88-05-23-Q2 9 AP No, :Aag7� -24 1 raAr-v RC)l1ND 1, Name of proponent..__ , of proponent and represonti tivrl (it' rtpplicable): Mike By;r 2, Address Anderson & R011111 Robert i schen Rolls, P .0 Dttarham ► . C O . , _ .m Tentative Par . Traject description - .� YES MAYBE NO II. MANOATOI;y {FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE �. Claes the project have potential it I e spec es. crade the ause .1 sh01 im wildlife popul,i�ll,�rrrlln drop . red�rce the habitat of a fish or w a plant or animal community, rr,riirce the I+clow self=sustaining levels. threaten to r liminrite a p . ISI number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or ehminatrt rrrrportant numbe os of stria periods of California history or prehistory? .... nt 01 otentialtoachlovr, t ,t theenvhenefits tr- tile �ronmentisonowhichnt�cursnn- - f 00$ thio project have the p C] form impacts will andure into the futurcl,) . relatively lt�isf period nmental oot time wl'ikle�loingintp� y Ignited, but cumu;atively corsidt;rablol 3, Does proleGthave impar%kswhich areirttirvidua6ii of 1ho eImpacts,trca o each resource f A p -elect rilay Impact on two or mora 5eparnte resources wherry the )Mlinonet a each rosodree but where the efieCk of the tc�ta Is relatively srtiall. . ... .... ...... . Orl 4, Doe th�� project have environnlenkai effo t vrhi h Will Cause suustanti l tadvertsta effects.... hur"an heings, either dtrclatly or indirectly' y i�N: tTr) t)+.K1ilrl�lrt!ia by till"k:ad klrrru:yl Corti ttr'b hu;iu tui till"' Initial evttlutttii n� III. L)eTIwIjI\l INA TI Ment and a NEGATIVE ()It till, rmvrron j,,Wr find thO pr013osod plr� 310 COULD NOT nav<r r� �trinitrc;uIt uili=ca CECLApATION will be p f o i°WE find thatdlthottgh tale prop r, soo project r;r]ultt t1�Vl� rt Eylflnit►t sltlEt E�rr)� ► t rit5vd on the ath�cherJ�t tfG. "?11t9Mi.4Y be a t the feC rin this AtN b()VAU IEGO tbE MI t.AAATION will PrOPar�t'rf' been added top . MAY bouts a ,,c�rrlfioanl ,lfic�ct on 010 tyrivirtiri 11 int, and an iNVtF�ONMGN'TAt- p pAfC`t ASPOR-f isiiid the e°oulr�di _ `1`ME,tvT COON OF Et11, ',PI NNI Fm atp( ..�� �,'r� annel oy" Brent L+ 'Moore;'0 As 0i Ac;vfowed by: _.. m re IV, t-NVIi#ONMENTAL IMPACTS If' XuklnAtiuns of all "YES" and "MAYBE" answers rare required on attached sheet(R) i 1. EARTH, Will the proposal result in significant: YES MAYBE N a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ......... . . . ........ 11 LA b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcdvering of the soil? ....... . . . .. .. . .. td,,, c, Change in lopntltaphy or ground surface relief tnatilrrss,7 ... . ........ ... : ........... I t1 d. Destruction, covtiring or modification of any unique geologic or physical fom arcs) ...:. e. Increase in wand or water erosion of soils, either oil err off site) ..................... , I. Changes in deposition or erosion of reach sands, or changes in siltation, derm!.aition or orosion whiult may modify the channel of a river or or'tho bed of thfr oc(.-art (it any Gayintra or lake'? .................... ............. .. . ........... , ... el. Lw u of pr,imu agrie;r,lturally productive. soils outSidee desionolcd urhar� arr:aa:,"r la. Cxpusuro of people or property to geologic harards such as earthq *K(Jt,. Irfnif,hNnrx CV ►nuds ides, ground failure orsimrlarilazards? ................................;:...... n Int Z Alli. Will the proposal result in substantial: Ka Air umis5runs or dotoriorahun of an1biOnt air eluallty) .. ........ ..... , .... .... ,!1 dW b. The creation of ublvetionai odors, smoke orlumes".... . ....... . ........... . . ....... I� C1 c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperafure, or any change in clitnatiz, locatiy or I. legit►rally9.......................................... .....................I...... a LI 3- WATER, Will the proposal reestlit in subotamtal a. t,htart es In currents, or the ,. e or direction of water wovements in either matine or g cout., , . fresh waters') ... ...... ..... I , , , ..... 0 fs, urftic;e rutiolf'a . 0 0 c. Need for raft situ.;.:rface dtauttago irnprove�nwol , including vogota'ion romoval. coannel.,lation or rfalvert installation? . .. , ... „.. .. ... , . Q 1-1 d; Atte r;ationa to V -w c oorsc° w flow of flood wators" .. , .. Cl t'l l e, C.lat;ar►r es In the amount of surface waster -iia any water bod� "' 1 y ... ... . . . . ......... . �7 LI IV f. L' 1w,hatile utter sturfaace waters, or in any alteration of aurfaia vav,-r quay,tyr, in(,iliattinrl trtit riot l►n►ilr-rl to tumpoi,attire. dissolved oxygen or turbidity" ij, Allvi;abrin of ow ,litcclioti t.,r rate of flow of cgrourat! h, t;i,-amlt, it, it o riUdrr't11V or quality of ground waAttwi. vil'lim through t7mr q,l 4arhlalrranf, Of wltly,;irkawKalti, m through interception of all 'agt,ieoy by Cut!, UI t17,C. %i1ti;tr9r, L ri r, H-�luctior'l In thtl amount of wafer othon!.=see avat►ltihie tCar public watc r ,;tXlaZ►liw�� �� , � „ C! 0 C I. kxpocrtare of people orproperty to water related Ilklialds, 6tich tiara floriolrrrl`°,. 4, PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substfaidiaal a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants r►richidinq Imes. sorubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plant)? .................... , ........ l Ca CCS: b. Reduction o' the numbers of any voic or endangered speones Cif plants`? ........ CIntrodtactio, of new species of plants into an area, or In a barrier to tho nortral � rt?pltafllt r lr 1, of existfl+tl species? .. .... ............... . . . . .. , ... , , , , , , .... J. ns, o of otly Agricultural drop? ................ ....k....,.,,..,...... S. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial: YC$ MAYBE -NO a. Change In the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and $hell (ish. benthic organisms or insects)? .. , , ....... _0 Ci b. Reduction In the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals1 ...... 0 0 IV c. Introduction of new species of animals Into an area, or result in a barrierto the mi farotion or movement of animals? . ... «. .... . ...... ...... .. ... . ... . , . 1:1 In �r d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife 1,:Lbtat?........... ««.«......;,.«............. .. (e1 C rd b. NOISE, Will the proposal result in substitintial a, Increases in existing noise levet.,7 « ....... . .. . . ........... ............. . ....... . , ..... ( f [['11 Ii. Expcsaire of people to severs noise levels? ..`................................ ... . ... 1. LIGHT AND GLAR[. Will the proposal produce significant linht and glare? . ........ . .... : EJ n �r t). i»AND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . ,. ........... .. ...................... . .... d Cb 9. NATURAL RESOURCES, Will the proposal result in �,ubstantlal; a. Increase In the rate of use of any natural resources? b, t)epletion of any non-renewable natural resources ................... . . ........... . CI D Iid 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve. a, A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, f pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions ? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation, plan?,, 0 Ci It POPULATION, Will the proposal alter location, distribution, density, or growth ratty or the' human population? ««........ ..........,........... 1Z HOUSING. Will the proposal 'affect existing_ housing, of create a domand lot iliftlillrnal housing') .... . .....«. ,..,....,.. ... . ,,. ..,. 1 13;.'TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result Ira` a, Generation of substanlial additior►al vehicle moveme.10 . , ... , ... «, « « « ................. b. Effects on iaw*fing parking facilities, or demand for new parkinrd'? .. , , « , « . . . .. . ......... d e, Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? ..... [ate d., Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods".. ..........r. ........... «.«..« .......,.:,.r.. �-yy �e. Alleratlons to waterborne, gait or air traffial.......... . ,, . , . «. , «. « « ...... ........... f. Increase in traffic Hazards ;to mt t0i' vehicles, bicyclists or pedesthdrisl. . ............ 101, PUBLIC SERVICES. Will�Y , the Proposal have an effect 'unee for now of altered government services: Pon, or result In a ar Fire protection? ...... YES MAYUJI N . a b. Police protection? , CI'j it1x. r.X...r........... .r..rr........ r..Y , c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational faci(itios? of Maintenance of public facilities, IncludinclYroads? .. „ < . rf Y ........... Y f. Other governmental sorvfces?..... .• , r . F , ..... . t . + , . , Y r + . ! r . Y • X s , Y , ...Y .. ..... . ', :. � l 15. ENERGY. Will the r)roposal result in: a, Use of substantial amounts of fuel or Cinergy' rY I). Substantial increase in demand upon existingIy development of new sources of energy? , . , .. , sources of energy. or rr quire the � ItM1I'' 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result to a need for new systems, or substantial alterrrlit�ns o following: t the A. Power or natural gas? b. Crax linunicalions systems ....., , f 1 I(r c, Waster availability? ..... ........ .. C] �I . Sewnr or septic system? , e, Sturm water dralnafle,? ....Y. 0, , , '.'..,..,.... ...................... I� I. Solid waste- and. disposal? ... , ..................•......... 17. HUMAN HEALTHY Will the proposal result in: a, Oreirtion of a3rry health hasard or potential health r arard (exCludinl , wegtal hr„altli). 171b. Exposure oC pr.typle lu Potential ,inatttl hazards' yY1ry.1. Q L� 1a• AESTHETICS Will thin proposal result in the Obstruction of any scenic vista orvtraW Open the public or 1,81111 the pl'rtpesdl result the grttat�on qi an ries"thr lrotl'lly affun,>rvr� =,iOpe eo to public view,,,, ,81 pa.n tri M AECAEATION.-Wqi the prrrpost.rl rosu'It in alt) intpj)(,,t tiprrn the�rlu��lrty or riur�:nut of ri recrealkpi rl r)pportunrti'es`� , . .... � .. .. y .,xis 20. CULTURAL NeSOURCEsY a, Will theosal res ro p p ult tri the alteration of or the destruction of at prohistorm, tit lri taarr,; archaeological site? b. Will the proposal result rn adverse physical or aesthetic effects to tt irrehistorm r)r hurt xr budding. strut>lure or 'object?' r. rK YY,.•-•, Y..1.4rNx.•i.. Y.,. c etltn$ utu atovalue the poton tial toMise aPhysical change which Would affect unigrae d, Will Ytttile proposal rosl"Ict existing religious Or sacrad uses 'within the potontiaf irt��p�act area!) Y,.YX,1 14 �, ..,,IYf.,N1.Y.NYY,Yii,YYl1.1l YYtf {l'Yl h.l.1:.I Fe YrY,. j'''�j r'��.0 v 01$CUSS'ION OF ENV'IRONMENT AL EVALUATION AP4v h3-421 t bw Very little grading will be necesaary dura to thu nsel otonca Of acces roadways °to the proporty and the rel at i vei y f 1 Vii. t°errr I rt . No s i Op I f i cant e r fec t is anticipated with regard to d i Ul `1 J 1 on recur" d i sp i acement or cc�mPmct i orr . Some ovel'- ova?r 1 nsa of thrw r�R:x I i w'i l 1 as a result o f the development of driveways, w i den ! "M �v yes buildings, etd,& Over cover I ng' Of the 8o i 1 w 1 1 1 resin i i r' Sorrtz i ncrer��,es trl ,,tot-,mWater runoff` 10; The prc.,jeet site translats of some of the f i nesw r'trr' i cul 1wur'1 1 Y productive so i i a i n the vai 1 ey . However, due to sur°i°r.,ur ding res i dent i a l urbanization) , tile tie project a i to has been 1 �Olderwr d econom i t.a l 1 y unp roduct l ve as a commercially viable air i t;ul tura l ., I v�.r sd i t s is aperat» I on i No loss _ of prime agr~ i cul tura 1 1 y prOcluct� ani. I c 1 poted spa IvercaYer i rig of the soil with I roper~v I bus. s1_trfacO Will h;3ve: a m nor I mpaet on the rate and amountOf surface Public utnlorits 6epartmer't ar'e drainage requirements of tl,e Bu tte considered adequate to m l t l ga to arty runoff crL_atedby the pr°oPOzed p► Dread J» Tile pr ojact site Is located jjjst south of the I..Inda Cl mnrrel,. .. F 1 ,�od i n0 t'a i ting the L i ndo Channel i �ct edalways a to r�spasr i �rIlletyi r i i' 1 cam p 1 ac kor1f»i cru l ocat 1 on r Ilowc_ver� a Is not. e,xl. K1 Some mature almond traces 1 yeay n l ansa fear eacbe h lot; i crt,ecj rshould mba� t e~p rir' i vaway arra! bu 1 1 til I rtg eeci 'L pads t,t..ot, arse 1 1 n such a rn�►ntrer as t o presr- rvo as Many mst;urra trees as Security aitid out(-j aor r„es i dent i al ” 1 ght 1 ng will I ndreasa g l are Dhd I gI-rt 11-10 i n the nil ghborhooe . >3; The Chico At�ea Land 'Jse F' 1 an has! des I gnated the pro jest site 4, rr 1014 dens i �ti y res i dent i al userdin rice li a i uwhel chow 1 l owso ror onne vingl e- f rrm f l y des i on.tt i onr Is Suburban Res dent dwelling per r~+ 50 sR�ud►Ae feet: `rhe proposed prgo,.iec4 coMfOlma Ord I the Bu tate iw.ounty Genero l plan, and Zoning ,nance . Via, c= Infill r^esI beth 1 a1 bevel opmerrt= along . b,est I i;k r avenue s zona i nual l y de-grading the level of ser-v l ae on the 1,ot'1 0und i ng ryetfr+,rk Ther lar pcased p,Oject will contrribu'te to tJ10 curiiulatl+re traf�f i c Impact can tI'te street; llotawori<. In ti-lo v i ai ni ty. West 1 t~,h Avenue4, which ct°r acus as the sale COl i �'CtOr for, this {.,r�t°JOct s l to x n. 1 n�tr:rse�ts with Thea '�sl;� l �+nade at Aga t�'�,r y t Po se traf't l o. hazards l n the Nuhuo as trgri~" f i e� Will poorly a l i f.)ned I nt:er sect. t► This Intersection congest I ern l ncreat08 w 1 1 Inbrea5aci doMonds for public dery i casill 0 Kil' as thel b l�tlss rre ru:{ yn dova,IOps, Costs ,tssoclathl with public Lows . ex as i�esul t of The 4t-reI ed 000 esti dent i al located n,fl-Mstr �.ictur oa w rl. a_s. urban I zed deve l opmont y�` storm drains:, etc . 0 t�, supp�aI"►; t,.l�i s property Ines,) sewer t}nesa adjacent developmen �s. W�aiHer } a,;cessi b1 e via tli+� rc�sul � of eas i 1 y � i overcrovadWi act f ee Unified f l ed 5 ropl cpm, a Sir ltlo l time 1 qc" Tl ie Chico co ent.. Tt� relieve ;,i s p int III l H'ie Chico ahool q}etrir developm developm- wire such rap! d �.rrben al 1 t~e } dsnt Q1 ect ai to `V�11 1 1 req eatabl }sV'�_d i"or' mend o iwhl -- Pro, has been l i develop bt t'i 1 d i n9' permits y scl�aol arca• a� time of obtaining paid aci{'i< ?ryas � E1Qctric fee-4 t?e f v i ded by the p this e Pro ated In supra 1 Y i ng public ut' l l t i e$ will b p ent'i o i p L 1} ('d by the 1service c.e rrobl ems are.8r, s to be $�pV� the � i ty of t:ctmpanY • No s Water a} l ell cr .i;rm tired With tht i 1 } ty aero } ca • Sewer i s sv tl-�e Chico property titer S ^vice rompenY. Action Plan o newer California W 'The N i trate ted to a span 1 tOrY sewer s,ystem� canned u i res 1 tory ro�ects be l-i f i e l d systems- co s irhat resi de.nti,al p tic and rather than u't } l i Z ti ng sep l cacthe e p,nthrOROI 00Y �5ystem r aas per'f or^meG} by ► 3SS cal p�ecords check Ch l co , on Flay �0 1 po An archseol og University, 'roJ8'tt site . Nw at Calftirn}a State oepartmen�^ rGhaeal s i cal clearance for the gnted a were. d ecessar"y wV-r 1 cli �r �-.1 fat i r�r� meosur es cemed' n ftn„ther, mi -6L y i J APP] i cant= Robert Fischer AMS iUSIs'f) 1�t>O 1kS=�11�' 1.02 DATA SHE[-:I' A. PRO.JrCT DESCRIPTION l Type of Project: nn"T~ Toad i vat d1 Parcel1 acrar top .t �yot;e foul Sri of Desc P` 1 d I I d f l., parcc1s: Parcel 1 7r Fardel S - 7,51 scl. ft. , Parcel 4 - P-4,52.3 �xj- Ft.' Lacair i tin = At the northeast corner of D' xon G l.,reet and WOw,t, 12th avenues In the Chico area. 4, Pr oPoged Density f Development" pout dwe ur► I �" acre. 25-50%. 6 Amount OF Impervious ous Surfacing �, Dixon ^ e and 6 Access and Nearest Pub l i c Road ` tnest: 1 � tip �1ven�_r Street �' Method of Sewage Disposal » City of Cis i co sewer System. 8: Source of Water 'SuPPI y » Ca l I i tit^rt l a Water~ Serv.l ccs , g , I�rox i nl l ty Of power Lines". To property . t p d Divisions vi s r oris and Development: Pair~cel Potential al For Further Lori 4 could be subdivided fur•�,i-ler provided an acceptable des 1 Gn could be deve 1 rayed 'to provide ,�ccOst to clew 1 otter I`1 ENVINotIMENTAL SCTTI:NG j tys i s 1 E�riy i rronment 14 Terrain en errrainTopogrsph i c Character: Flat vat 10y land. b._ Slopes c. Elevation: Ar--!r ox 1 mate,l y 45-55 Fe-ot above Sen Leve 1 . d Li'►ilibing r-ottorisa Name. 2. '$oils 1 na Fine 'Sandy Loon :: doeP i a lypns Arid CG os- wel 1-�dra l n i no � cr.�l-.��ab I a of sr,ppot^t 1 rte 1 arwtae variety of rOl b. Lf'itllii:ltlOus' paCttrrr, t`1�arkier :l e 1 I �Ir i�iotOr al'�+3 Subsidence S. tJat.ural ii ixards of the Iwatid 5ar•tlhe . . •y d. . � » . ty 7011e a � � � hquak � ]; ti �k�rstw � i tt�akc�' "done • � lc� rr oi# ,a L,a� t... ka . erosion 'oteri I: i a I - Low. t:. Lands 1 i de potent r a 1 t Low d Fire ttaxai^ != Unci ass N I rid w urban i:,1-ea. cKXFransive Soil Pct;oritia`I: h'toderate• . Hydro1 o0Y a. Sur Mce Water­. The Linda Chonnol r°un> In close r`j"o'A1 tit fib° to tl e north of the PraJOC"' site b . Orounrlwitar» SCh i co ,aquifer, = On site. c DrainagehariGiwerlsL-ica d.. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24" e Limiting f=actors. 1',Ione- 6. visual/scenic Quality: Good. 6 Acoustic Quality: Good: 7, Air duality. Good E� 1 o 100 1 ca 1. Env -1 ronmen, 8 vegctat i on s The remnants o.l: an almond orchard ov e pre�,eti f,, 9. Wildlife Habitat' Common') wildlife assocc i aced w 1 t;,h urban settings. Cu 1 tural Eny. i ronment 1 U Archaeol og i cal and H star' cal Resources in tho Area: Hl o i, seas t t I v i ty + Recot-ds check was made on May '201 '1988 for att archaeo'loglcal clearance. 11 . Butte County General Flan Des-ignation'. Low Dorisl t;y Fees l dent^ l a l , 12. Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential „ 18. 'Existing Land Use on Site: 'S I ng 1 e- rami 1 y humaru i remramte., ,tf an aid, almond orchard - 14. Surrounding Area:; a. Land Uses' Resldentidl, b. Zoni rig. Norah of th€_. L i ndo Channel 'is Agfa i CLO L- ira 1 Res 1 dent i al east of tho project site Is R-1; west If, SUbLlrban Res I dent; i a l +c. General Plan ides l gnat ions: Low torts i ty i`` es l dant. i a i ; rIKrr th of L.i ndo Channel, ivied i um CAens i ty ,Res 1 dentia l d. Parcel Size: Ranges from 6,500 sq- ft- to 'I acre. e. Population= Urban rest dent_ i al 1 � Char acter of Site and At.. ea; Urban r es i dent:, i a 1 16, Nearest Urbain Areat City of Chic' 1 '4 Relevant Spheres off Yr►f l uence= City o f Chico, Ch I co Area Recreation D i sta l c t jai. l:ltrprovemaht Standards Urban Area'. yes 19, Fire Protection Service, a, Noarost County (State) Fire Staticin u t t: e County , E i r- Station 044 tai Water Availability.* C;allfclrilla Wator Sor^vie.e tanker, truck 20* Schools in Area i* li l oo Unified $ h6o i Wi8..'