HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-022-004a'
q. ,
a
�
..
� �
'i
`.
�
/
I
.1 �
�
I
r1
of -
� ,,
��
� �'�
1 c � �
I
,.
�
�
� ,�
� 1
�
.,a
' �
� �
\ •
9
n
e
. ,
<." .
�
APPLICANT Lowt.11
ADDRESS 724 R
OWNER Walte
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
0:8 act:e and 3
NNINP OMMISSION SUMMARY SHEEN
Smith
:a Ct. Chico CA 959,
fargaret O'Brian P . r, u, -
e
R LAND DIVISIONS
81-07-19-03
E
and
Lingo Av° on the south side o:6 Lindo Ave Chico area.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 43-02-2-04
ZONING S -R jaw PF81rr?'
GEN. PLAN Residential
PROJECT COI's; ICTENT2
DATE APPLICATIOri RECEIVED ull1 g � 198 4
Max Albert,ErF}- �ia3.MTnv -� CIUCO CA 95926
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRIl"TEN'
PUBLISHED
PLACE NM,48PAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISIIED _ O. C. P. G. B.
DATE MAILING LISA PREPARED
DATE MAIL -OUT NOTICES WRITTrN
MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION -DATE J:"II,ED �----.:
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPT L.Lt.,ZJ_�
MITIGATED MATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
ENV. IMPACT REPORT - DATE CERTIVIED
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE �,,
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
WARD ACTION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—OFFICE OF THE GO R GVORGE DEUKMEJIAN', Governar
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
r 1400 TENTH STREET M
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
(916/445-0613)
�ephen A. Streeter May 9, 1-985
Butte County Planning
7 County Center Drive
Orov l l e, CA 95965 Goch
�, karriln9
Vol
Subject: Lowell V. Smith Tentative Parcel Ha UVOU
SCH #85042305 � ovi11�4
Deer Mr. Streeter:
The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named envimamental document to
selected state agencies for review. The review pe}iod is closed and none of
the state agencies have comments. This Letter acknowledges that you have
complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draft
environmental documents, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Acts
Please cell Price Walker at 916/445-0613 if you have any questions regarding
the environmental review process. When contacting the Clearinghouse in this
matter, please use the eight digit State Clearinghouse number so that we may
respond promptly.
Sincerely,
Jahn 13. Ghanian
Chief Deputy Directs
Office of Planning and Research
'FIVE MILARATION MARDI
IMPACT
1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been
reviewed pursuant tQ the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21100, at, seq.) and a
determination has been made that it will not have a significant
effect upon the environment.
Log 9 84-07-11.1-03
AP 43-02-2-04
2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Tentative Parcel Map dividing 3 acres to create four lots,
one at 0.8 acre and three at 0.7 acre.
3. LOCATION OF PROJECT2
On the south side of Lindo Avenue, approximately ].A 50 feet
cast of the interscetion of Holly Avenue and Lirdo Avenuo, Chico.
4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT:
Lowell V. Smith Max Albert
724 Refecca Court 1360 Mangtrove Avenue
Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 95926
5. MITIGATION MEASURES:
6. A copy of the initial study regarding the environmental effect
of this project is on file at 7 County Center Drive, Otovi'lle.
This study was:
F
,j Adopted as presented.
Adopted with changes. Specific modifications and
supporting reasons are attached.
7. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the
decision maRing body.
He-aring Body Butte County YWvisory Agency
Date or Determination
Determination;
On the basis of the initial study of environmental impacts the
information presented at hearings, comments received on the
proposal and our own knowledge and Independent research:
We find the the
project COULD NOT have a significant
effect n t 6 environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is
hereby adopted,
Wo find that the project COULD have a significant effect
on the anviro-iment but will not in this case because of
attached. mitigation iwaguves described in item 5 above
which are by this reference made conditions of- Project
appruval. A conditional NEGATIVP DECLARATTION is hereby
adopted:
Signa ture
I i A.—
i t lb
Date:
f
COUNTY Or' uff:r7 I,.
IS NVI.!Od ,Jr,VAL C1ihCK1 e ' FoRM l
(tZ he complete Y g I! 84--07-19-03
;11" Tf 4-02-2-04
i 73ACKGROU11I1 u.-
entLower V . Smith �. d�
l.. Na I ixable)
2. Address 0l' proponent and representatMa �i�t ttpp
t Max Albext
724 Rebecca Cou..���, Y.., �.
360 Mangrove_ jv�nu �-,
F 95926 �. -�
Chaco, ------..`"` Chico, CA �J-�-526_,.
�-
a, Project description ,
�r.
1'l.�i hiA C3> NQ
rl
.._._)A ---- SIGNIFICANCE
NCT
[ l . IANtlA10RY 1"iNl11I�(; , .�... ..._-� to cle 't00 t`he.
a. Does the praject 'have the-Potentialsubstantially vaclurc�
duality of tor onvironmeYlt> species, cart e
the habitat o l ;�, �a xfislutationl to�olTO Pbetota sol t`"
fish or, wildlife I l dlintinnte a plant ar
sustaining 1et,eJS3 threaten to
. » reduce the number or restrir t the
aniiiial' cominunx.y ,
l Or
t imp T' ., cry ? is
rt1ngG' *' p � � �� Cali 111R1jC71`
• lull ' �. ortar:. �ampl 7C`x �b7C .,.-.
Of tt r
are () enilanlc reel 1 ant car anima
el na _
at Calxlor•1�ia hstc�ry� or ljt�,llxst
,raject have potential tee :tcliieve
h. hoes the Tthe
Short-term bcnE' l its to � sltdrt termt Lmpa"t on cur" in a relatior vely,
encklronmental s;nacs'. l
011v1t•onmTt?oclic�r time ttwhiilc�lox`s',, xm impacts will
brief p.
ellolttre into thr ;"uture.'j
�raicc'1 hatit� imLStcts tahich are individtt-
Does the l cr�nsidrrat7le?(A
ally _1im1tCr1, 17th rtimulatxvclm
project may impact 011 ttatx or mc2e Isrelat resources
"Ict on }ca tll " soUl. tl�e'�tC7t;�l�O�v ihC�S`'
where the imp"
imal.l , but whirl tits
impacts On the onvlroll?lt(,nt, is
the nt��j'Sig,
ntt
ltl
cnp
C:eet}ttvr e�lCctsOthtman
d' al �t: vee
lail Causf, ;git)sl
xrejctl.c.g
beings, either iroctly, , 1 ttl�l
„
t L11Ti 1:DitNAI"..TttN� (T(br: �watnpt.ttt,►1 hyo for l r~art �1E,c�ttcy'I
11 .,a._,,. ., .
(1i1 tht� hash, `�iC 'thi, initial t�ti�saltl,lt matt +11ii'icant effect
r�r,,�d �re�lcct C",lllii.11 Nt'r httve 4t sil; xr xared.
t' x'161 find inl i r. nment , �xlltll a VrJ Xl'� V1, 1)IT.1,0AI ION jai 11hr' l 1
the •1. d. lta'~,c ix si�;ltit i
r 101.'Wti proiect Ile, a si llit iettnt
i/IVI: l'iltd that �11t}tztui;ll Iitc l t' 1l t•'ttt+t.e tai 1`1 tl
cstttt effect On thu t�nvil°s7umctnt , , �NrMATIVV
c: fCect i.tt
this �.st� he:4e�ia,0ntl�Cl,li1tt tcSAtlie
li7rr5�icclt�e5crilxa ctx
thus at txac hell shc�r�t iia x�tr�r�1.
11T.Cl.AVA1 T ALN ty i 1 i ht,,lt' 1'
t,�7�pItNMI N't'Al. il�iPAC l' 11111�OWr is rekitli t ect .
lllVti ltttrl the propi7sed pr jest C�CAIr httx^e �t t'1�Lnii"9��nixt cel" ec ,�n
tho environmellt, F111d an 1
z_, t's�ItN1"1r" OTitUl l't; , 1111
A4u8tANNI NG 1S131?AR'I'bih.'l'1'
All
2 z 98h n
pialinin `I`ec}xnxca an
ljeV 1 t,tuvd by !
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL I&CTS
TEhep lanations o E- all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s)) YES
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant.-
i—.Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptiun8, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
di Destruction, covering or mollification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition, or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
Or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
2, AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a—. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b, The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
c, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or aoy change in climate,
locally or regrionaliv?
3. WATER, V�Iilj the proposal result in substantial;
T—.changes in cuTTenti;. or the course or
direction of water r-)vements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b, Changes in absorption, rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c. Need for off-site SuTfat:e drainage impTova-
ments, including vegetation removal) channel-
ization or culvert,iftstallation?
d, Alterations to the coursor flow of flood
waters?
e, Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f, Discharge into surface water$) or in any
alteration of surface water quality, including
but not limited to tomperatuTe, dissolved
oz, gen or turbidity?
g. Altetation of the direction or rate of flow
of ground wators?
h. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions of -,441th-
drawals, or through interception or an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
jo Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water Supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such, as flooding?
'MAYBE NO
YES
4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposalresu:t in
a• C ange in the diversity :substantial;
MAYBE NO
of an s ecies of plants (including species, or numbe(including trees,
grass,
shrubs)
crops, and aquatic plants)?
b Reduction of the numbers
✓'^
of an-tr unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
-. Introduction
.:
of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the
normal replenish-
ment of existing, species?
d. Reduction
in acreage of any agricultural crop?
---
5. ANIMAL LIFE. Nill theproposalinrsubstantial:
t al .
a C a�nge in the diversity o f
---
species, numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including
reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthic organisms
or insects)
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique 'rare
or endangered
species of animals?
c Introduction of new species of animals into
-�
art area, or result in a barri-Br to the migration
or movement of animals?
d, Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOISE. 1Vil,l the proposal result in substantial:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b,. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE Will the proposal produce
sig J<cant -light and
gjare?
I`
LA11D USE. IVill the proposal result in a
su stantial al.teraltion of the
present or planned
land use of an area?
NATURAL
stantial.�tlRChS: IV, the proposal result in
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion Of any non-renewable natural
resources?
10. R;ISX OP UPStT. Will the proposal involve.,
a. A
—_.-
risk of explosion or the release Of haz ard-
ous substances (ihOluding, but
not l.im.ited to
Oil) pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the
event
of an accident or upset conditions?
b. Possible interference
with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plgn?
ll; POPULATION, 19ill the pr,
---�- oposal alter the location
distit on, density, or
Population? .gTo�V'th rate of t110 human
/
l HOUSING;. will tho }proposal affect e housing,
XistiOr create a demand. for additional
housi.ng�g
C
0
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. ;Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?"
f. Increase in traffic hazards to (tutor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an el'i''oct
upon, or result in a heed for now or altered
governmental services;
MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection' Vim'
b. Police protection''
c. Schools?
d. parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, .ncl,udin,g
roads?
f. Other governtt:ental services?
15.' ENERGY Will, the proposal result in:
a. Ilse of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. ;Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new Sources of energy?
16. , UTILITIES. Will the propsal result in a _need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas'?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water �..
d. Sewer or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
1.7. HUMN HEALM Will the proposal result in
T Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential 'health
hazards?
18, AEMi_ ETICS. Will the proposal, result in the
obstruction of any scenic v sta or view open to
the public; or will the proposal result in the
creat3,on of an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
.4-
—kw
✓1�
i9. RECREATION.. 1Vill the Proposal res ,rFS MA--�r.a No
open the quality or quantic• ist in ar impact
PPortuni�tles? Y of existing recre4tional
204 CULTURAL RESOURCES. V
a Hill thesal of or the pdestructiorYresuaf lt an the aiteratiori
b. WillIstothc ric archaeological sitsIehi.storic or
tic Proposal result in adversephY$r
or aesthetic effects to a G
historic buildin prehistoric or ---^
e the structure or object?
C. be s Proposal .have the
would affect uni
a physical cwhich
d:
.han Potential to cau's'e
g
ethnic cultural values? quo
Will the proposal restrict
or sacred uses Jvithin4thet existing veli ions ---
area? potential impact
DISCUc ETON of
—�
EIVV'IROIVIti1$NTA,L EVALUATION la,g; The AP 43-02.2..04
soil talon proposed development will ovCrcover �i
g away some agriculturall p()rti,on of the
3c: Department o Y Productive soil.
being curb f Public Works will
into Lind:o,Channe1 er al'a sidewalks• require-. t So improvements
1 also be A Permanent solution for
Or connecting to exWill required either tllrouah
Reclamation Board g drop d7ainae
fall, (if needed) will be i.nvnxvedon from adjoining paresfacilities
to Linda Channel; all°�v�ng a next/ drainage out
-
II Tone.he creation of :Four
tva11 Avt�nute additional traffic parcels and
Lando at rna four neiy residences
However nay the
minimize this impact s sight distance is good which i,i,,OW West
14a; is
Count help
water for fire y Fire Department states that
p.rojeCt and protection available ��' there P
teat the atllin 1U00 Is Pressurized
set•vicc, Project should hook feet of the Proposed
up to Cal Water for this
14c: The subject
Schaal District inp�]x��chtconditions
is located within the Chico Unified
W--
to ugh 65 4 7 of : of overcro►vd -
through 65974 the California COVernment Code' g exist,
.Butte Count a to parcel ma Pursuant
Besrd, o n cannot he sections 65970
findings; f Su makes one ofPProved un
less the
the foll.owing
• "That an ordinance pursuant
adopted., or to Section 65974 has been
2 • That there are
social specific
overriding
o:C the Cit environmental factors 'vic11 the ,
Council or Board of , economic,
the City or Count Suno`rvisors . Judgment
residential dovela thereby lustif , would benefit
pment ot.l orivisoIgetapproval of a
Subjecto Socti.on 65974 lr
AP 43-0-4-2-04
DISCUSSION OF, ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued)
The Board of Supervisors has not adopted an ordinance pursuant to
Section 65974 and the Advisory Agency cannot make tilt required
findings in place of the Board. It is suggested that the applicant
contact the Chico Unified 'School District and satis:f ), them that
this project would not have a significant effect on. tlieir ability
to provide services within the district.
According to Neil McCabe, school district attorney, the applicant
has signed an agreement with the school district to 'ttiitigat'o the
impacts of creating the residential parcels It is expected that
the school district will countersign the agreement and notify, the
County within the neat week or two.
20a; The project site is located in a moderate to low archaeologically
sensIt `ve area as designed on the map prepared by tr,iTchaeologist Jim
Manning Upon discovery of any cultural resources dUri.ng subsequent
grading, excavation or construction on the property, an archaeologist
should be requested to evaluate the find.
"Applicant: Lowe11 Smi�
DATA
SHEET
A.*$so:G'' s fart el 4 C-- ). Z -,04
Log f 84-07-19-03
A. Protect :Uescr%p� ,
14 Type Of I?xo�ject: Tentative Parcel.
rifa
2. Brief Description: -Dividing 3 acres .
0.8 acre and three at 0.7 acre an L
3. Location: On the south side o� L' 1
et east of the intersection o flop A e
---------
feet .
Chico.
Proposed y P 1/3 DU/Acre,
4 Amount
Densa.i, of Develo ment.�--
5• of Impervious Surfacing:
5. Access and Nearest Public Road(s) : Parcel 1 fro - .
Avenue other mss- 1• ni
> parcels access via 50 foot roa.dtva _easement.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: _. Individual ;-�
Source of Water Supply: :ve Is to k.
�� Individual tvel].s
Proximity of Power Lines:
s i t7 o f lie r ti nsl4---_____
10. Potential. for further land divisions :and development: Each
Parcel has the Potential i=on a further -land division.
B. Environmental Setting
Physical Environments
'1. Terrain
a General Topographic Character. Fairly level, undeveloped ground
With scattered trees
b Slopes: 4% to the soutlnvest •--, -- �..;..:_.
i
ce Elevation:_: 1$5 190 rPPt �1,ST
d Li,' '.ting Factors: .
2. Soils
a -Types and C�xaracterisr�iCs
Vina loam %vel su lied with
Organic matter retains_ moisture we1.1 and �.
b Limiting Vactors Gravel 5.s al7undant ll
retentiii'P
3 NatuVal Hazards of the Land "
a. Earthquake Zone; _Modorate Earthquake intensity done lri
i
b. Erosion Potent�.�l:,�ibne t•n
---��5 d. Pire Hazard., Unc:Lass� 'ied
c. Landslide Potential:_ Nono
e. E%Pancivc Soil. Potential:
4, g
tow
,a Surface Water: Lindo Channel . to the north
� ��'Y'Q�� jirC'��' 7 tiirTn Qirt+*nUG'
Appendix r±'
Data 51wet Ontinued
AP 4302-204_
b. Ground Water:
c. Drainage Characteristics: Gb w :Lily draina e :is _good
d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22 to 24 inches
e. Limiting Factors:
5, Visual/Scenic Quality: Good
6. Acoustic Qualityt Good wj - h „moderate traf.fti r noise
?. Air Quality: Good
13iologicall Environment
8 Vegetation:, Annual: grasses assorted mut trees
9. Wildlife Habitat: Limited habitat rijzar~an anng-j.•nrIn rh:,rrc1
Cultural. Environment:
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Moderate to
low
11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Dens its Rosidential _
12. Existing Zoning: S-11
13. Existing Land Use _on-site:_ Undeveloped
14. Surrounding Area
a. Lang. Usest Reslaential, orchards
b6 Zoning: 5-12; R-1
c Gen. Plan designations: Low Density Res1d!�ntirq.1 Pit1i7;r� -
Medium Density Residential
d. Parcel Sizes: .66 acie to 5 acres
e. Population
15. Character of Site and Area Re idential: with orchard and field cro s
16. Nearest Urban Area Chico
17. Relevant Spheres of lnfluenncei,^County S�`µvicc Area #24, G11ico
.Unified School Disty 7 c
184 Improvements Standards urban Area: _
194 Fire protection. Service; Butte County Piro
a. Dearest County (State) Lire Station-, Station #42. ..
b. Water Availability? Tanker truck capacity,
0. Schools in Area: ,_,_,._Chico aroa scho} 1s
App endix V(1y j
00,7 P
;!1►�mltdytraiivb Uf(I�:n
Bufte Co. Plannin Comm 1163 PAST SEVENT11 STREET
tt''nn ^^ CIIIc(), CALIFO► IYIA 45e26
U
� G 22 984 Arsb{i Code (916) 891-3000
Oroville, CaRformitt Au cJ u s t 21 1.984
County of Butte
Department of PlAblic Works
7 County Conte,,; Drive
OrOVille, CA 95965
Attn: John Mendonsa,
SUBJECT: Lowell Smith Tentative Parcel Map,
Assessor's Parcel No. 043-02-2-006-0
Dear Mr. Mendonsa:
As the result of the Developer having entered into
agreement with the Chico Unified School an.
i7istrict to meet certain
specified :onditions relative to the subject project, the
District is now sat.isfied that this project will not have an
adverse impact upon schools in the Distract. consequently, is
no longer necessary for the County to consider school mitigation
measures relative to this p'rojec
ery truly yo
Superin e e
PZd/kh'
CC4 Neil H. McCabe
Aobin Thompson
8titte County Planning Department
Afmt 1D
NOTICT of DB'C'Fl?MIjiA_ "N Noy 9 "1984
Secretary For Resources 3-511 ELEANOR M.BECKER,County Gcrk
tc►. ].416 Ninth St'reei, Loom
CA 9 S 81.4 5y � A, JAGtNtl ,.,,..Deputy
Sacramento' of Butte
County Clerk, `County
25 County Center Drive
Orovil.l.e, CA 95065
p l: ann;in g
DePartm0n,t (piled)
FR0�1. 7 County Center Drive
Uroville, CA 95965
e o Determination in
Compliance
Of NoticC
nh
Section 21].05 or 2.115.2 of the �,x...,.._--.:
project Title _ AP 4302-2--04
'1"entatave Paxcel Nla mbar ( submitted to State Clearinghouse)
State clearing
Nu Tele one Number
S"s4y4266
Contact Person (_:) appxax.
,7arrn Nlendonsa iuial? xks Chic
•pct Y,ocatfolt Cn the south side Avenue andvLindo Avonue>
Pro)
feet s l o.- a r s e-- �` c w o f---------
pro) ect Description:
one at p $ acre
pv ding s acres to create four lots,
and three at 0.7 acre
t e C ot► my Add i s o r A ----------""
(, ,eat Agent
This is toclvzse that
the tlto above-descxiheti
has
made the follatvnc; determinata•ons regarding
pxaject - have a significant effect an
t •
'rho pro j ec t will the eTiv4vonment
Ktq a.1.'t riot oxt tits prepared for this
Art nn iroi tnorital Impact Rep and was
• pursuant cnt to the prow sia rs of GnQA,14 California
project p .y ua. ed by Section: ].50$5 (g)
Certified as Fall
Administrative Code'
.
x.onras prepared e
1
far
this Project ct
aratA COPY . the
gotive notLra.s onsof CEQA•
NKI ursuant 'to the proexaeaPlanning.
DecIaration may A959
'vrov :e,
7County Center Dre>
Department) ton as .11od ind catIng tills PT03'e
ct
.?�eat'1rov�cv.
s'Notice o. w
as not)o Groin env?ronrcn
Cans.icicrati.an
sta:tentanG o� (�v�orr7 ; .c to reduce
adapted [or tlirs project.the 1,�;atl' Ag(.n y
�t3.ti ation meCtsuresaa`7opvete a project r�re:
5. the ' 'pacts of the,, 1 i
ono
S rttl't't?
.. hon A, St tot
entol°lanftCY` -.-
Novoiphet 9, Tint W
a,
Mile count
LAND OF NATURA!, WrALI'1'I AIN is 3 EALJ
DC.PARTMENT OF FiUBLIG 1VORKS
WILLIAM (Rill) �f�lr f-F, 01routor
7M ,.'Nr'/ " eNTER DRIVE • gR()Vlljl,l , CALIFORNIA 95965
Telephonal (hifj "3,t,+q1
October 29, 1984
Lowell V. Smith ;rE: AP 43,-.Ont,,-04
724 Rebecca Court
Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear fir. Smiths
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held
October 29, i984, the Agency adopted the negative declaration
regarding environmental review and approved the Tentative Parcel
Map for AP 43-022-04 subject to the conditions as listed on the
attached sheet.
If no appeals are timely filed-wityin ten (10) drays of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval--with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisor:, this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are: complied with, it will be in
order for you to file your "final map" wit') the U."te County
Department of Public `Yorks for recordatioli 4ithin `we;nty=four (24)
months of the date of aprrova:l by the Advi.sTry Age, cy
If you should have any questions regard,it ,.) Lhis mat er, please
contact this office.
Vety truly yours,
William C
� heff
DiXAOCtOr of .PI- lic Works
Jahn Mencinn'tM
A�;�sist.��nt I:�irectv>:-
At. tachment
cc; Planning - 83nklironlnonLal. Review
Environmental Hoalth tieparLmenL
Max Albert
4 ujie Co. P 6otig Cama`
O C 3 o 1984
�Droviue� Cahi bmia
r
Lowell V. Smith, xeritat ve P
of Flop arcel. Map, approx.
AP ! y Avenue and Lindo Avenue 14go, Pt.
�3-0�2wo4 on the south side ofeC�as't' of the antprsecti _,n
Engineer; Mai Albert �:t ',do Avenue. Chaco are,
Pub1.:%^. Works conditions:
-. • Provide two --way traversable
from a counter able access RS -9 -LD -11 to
maintained road or state highway, oitrh parcel
2. Access to be .heserved
for dedicationt he final map; in deeds as
3. Shaw 50 ft, bullper
county oxcia.rzr,itlec and offered
easements
r 1 da.nb setback Nine measured . .zed
4 fx'oru cenLerl.ne of access
4• Provide .road maintenance
agreement...
5: Fron tag ori West Lindo Avenue to be constructed to standard; i.e., curb
for parcels with 'gutter, sidewalk ancC re • , RS-.9-LD_11
drainagep gross acreage of ore u�xed $treet section
plans to the ne acre or less., Submit
and. install. the partment ai` public
Wor
required Facilities. k�l .fo.r approval.
6. Deed to the County of Butte
of West Lindo .? ,renue 30 ft. right-of-way fromth
e ceny�er�,in�,
7. Indicate a 50 ft. bualdi
Lindo Avenue, ng wetback From the centerline of Wiest
8. Show all easements of xt;:ord on the Final -:map
9• Provide street name
Works sign.• per requirci�pnts of the De
prion to recaxdation Of the final map,
Dept. of public
p�rinaneri Solution. for drainage.
11.
Pay off any assessment ;
• P.rovide au.lweCe..,
yac at the end of the
street.
x3.aSr a,' . delitiquejlt tares or current tragi:
14. Meet hire rG uirem�nts of thees a rec�u.ix•ed:
Butte Count C�t�
11antling 1)k _ -'Pt. C:(ln,�it;].�Jl1i y are Depf;,
Ea
��. P1,0ject t,, � crt all re tiirez ;
i.Urtc,tl'ut tZ�i� , rtc.� rzi' tli�y l rriat•d Prior to
�, a ntrw d iaitartC;Q uutx'�aII to �auetu Ch�►nccal:
tle�t�th ,I�rCFt,, c��nel:t�.rnr:
16. ProVido, 'in arE.rt w 11
t
i
C,,."Or l:, ,a.:t�l � yt l'ac�hi'icl,N1 frury 00t,bar..k arouncq
C
1
LOwri,ru, SM .T11, THII
17, Provide a 100 f.t.
Within the leaehfield free setback -a
parcel 1. property ac within free
se rnuritl
existing weJie eithcx
of tp�+ xo er
1$, p p ty boundaries on
Show a 50 ft.
leachfield 'cam. + ..
cls from the drainage wavy on ?Rx eel
i9, Provide the re
Combine with squired usable sewage 1.
seise n adjacent parcel an disposal area nn each
sewage disposal axes required b ,� parcel. not pareol.
.Y the 5ubdiv.s,i.orpir�ven to ec�tatuit1 the ur,
20, UtYder permit ord ' na sable
:procedure �' nee
to recording a final mapdesb•ny th; exiStin
well pn L•he Preperty prior
21, Where necessary t
indicate on the rr:a provide the requixed usable
water well lachfi than dwellings shall be sewage des o
'Id free a constructed p sal area;
22. C area. within the
amp];,r with the requirement
if adopted prior to m s of the Butte
to the map recording and i.f County Nitrate Actintl
pi'n0ect by the Butte Count the plan pjan
California Stage Re y Boards made
gional water of Supervisors pplicable
Quality cooritraJ. and/or
.Board ;
TO. Butte ,County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
SUBOECT Report on Tentative parcel Map a4 Lowell V. Smith'
on AP 43-02-2-04
DATE: October 17, 1984
This is a proposal to divide 3 acres to create four l otZ I one at 0.8
acre and three at 0.7 acre. The present zoning is S"R
(Suburban-Residential)`fhe Land Use Rlan Pap 'of ti -le Butte County
General Plan designates this area as Low Density Retidential, There are
no specific or community plans for the area.
The ppro oral does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or
proposed element of the Butte County General Plan nor any County,
specific or communityplan.
The project is r f--aammended for approval with the following conditi.onss
1, Project hookup to Cal Water's pressurized serwir_e as per Butte
County Fire Department requirements.
2. Project to meet all requirements of the Reclafnation Hoard prior
to construtting a new drainage out4all to Linda Channel•
R+R I kt
cc_ Lowell Smith
Mai: Albert