HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-022-035V
� '
y
a
. m
,,' . i �
` � �
.. �'
'b
,� �
•i
,.
' � ��
. �
.• M
C �tY .. / tl`1, r ,
1 "s J
a
r 'C `� � '
�, , . 1 ..
V
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISIONS
Webb Brother Construction 6-08-04-01
APPLICANT Y
AD15WS 389 C Connors Ct. , Chico, CA 95925
OWN;Fred & Mary Aisthorpe�_
Vesting TSM to divide 12.54--- acres; to crop Lo 44
PROJEICT DESCRIPTION—
lots ranging in size from 7,400 to 11,500 square P§tt (Chico Sewcl:
LOCATION on -the south side of West Lindo Avenue approximately 500'
east of the fIol.ly Avenue, Chico area
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 43-2-2--85
ZONING SR GENERAL PLAN.
LDR PROJECT ,," ONOISTEN�'?��,�
=-- ---
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE RMORT DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
LX ND CONSERVAT'1 ON ACT CONTRACTS'P - —`--'
DATE APPLICATION' ;RECEIVEDAugust~ 4, 19$5_,- _----
Bili Dinsmore, Rolls, Anderson & Rolls
AGENT/5t1RVEyOR/C IVIL ENGINEER= - =
�. 2 6
ADDESS •
R X55 pit Streets Chico, GA 959,.
lOAT14 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RLPORT PRBVARED ___ ,,..;rte=
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILLiO.,�
DETERMINATION
AND DATE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION .e DATE Al"�C?PTElO ._ ��., :u:.. . _
MITIGATED NEG- DECLARATION - DATE AbOPTE -%2
ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE CERTIVIBt �, .tt.... ._ .
S1ATE CLEARINGHOUSE
ter, �
N
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING
ADVISORY AGENCY' HEARING DATE ,
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION��
APPEALED APPEAL HEARING DATE .�..�.
BOARD ACTION
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S
j:ErL
C) S�. D
%IIJ-U t"oullLy
all6le vqrchL ED VItAIIIIIII4 Department
X office of Plan" 11 ) I
1400 Tenth Street) RQJF121 7 (Iolull V GentOr Drive
Sacramentoi CA 958I 4 15 CA 95965
bEc 2 2
or
x.
County (;lL'rk ANORBEC�l<ER' County Clerk
Count%, of BuUe Deputy
BY pljanvo wI(It Sootion 21108
r.iling of Notiv.(, of DoL01:1111WILIOn in Cot"
or 21152 K)f the Public RegourcOs Code.
AP 11 N A. 1110
proje Construction
Tentative Subdivision Map 43-2"2-35 Webb UOS,
State 'Clearinghouse Number
Contact Person 'r't�lephone Number
(if submitted to Clearing'11OUSO)
SCH#86093010 John Mendonsa 534-42
6.0
public Works
project Location 13etween W. 12th and Wi Lindo Avonues approximatelY
500 feet east of Holly Avenue, Chico area.
Proje-ct Description Tentative Subdivision of 12.5 acres into 44 lots
ranging in size from 7,400 sq o ft: to 11050Q Sq- ft'
vise that the, Butte Coulit Advisor
e c
`('his is to ad ency or Respunsi.ble Agency)
(Lead Ag -15-86 1 and has Made
has approved thy:above-describod project On kData)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project',
IaVL
will not, I a signif je. 1111t effect on tile
Ii The project will
environment.
-ed i.or this project
,-ct- Repol,t wa:, prepai
21
ptIrs
An Fnv . f CEQ& -
ualit. LO 010 provisions.0 arvd for this project pursuant to tile
gati.vt- Dc'cllra"L)n WAS prep
A NL
provisions of C8QA-
hjiti8atjt)n me , .._._..:'Were "kt, madeA condition of the
a%il't-L-4 I
w
3, approval of the pro A riot adopted
,
44 A statement 01 ok,(.rritfltij,
foe this project, of
the filvil 1�,111 (,mImenLs and and rpCor
This is to Certify thatthe pull jic aL-.
project approval is avjilable LO 010 V
County Center Driv('
orOVIIJLI, CA 95965
pate Rea4ived for Fllf�Ig
12—lb-86
Posting At� Plan ner
Stephen A. StteetOrt Sertiar
q"' T i t lo. govj.sad Harch 1986
wr►
construction
Bros.
,,bb Measures
Mitigation 2_35
TSM, Ap#43-2-
r 00 per lot to the
West Sade Vir(l Station
1, Conti ybute r �"l a
Uenefi,t Furcal. s construction 01 a
yo rata share toward Avenge oxtonsio•
e oyez Linda Channel at Ho11y
n
2. Contribute a p"
new brag
J
151
a Ya
CERx'IPIEb MAIL 0tPA
Wl tiT�tCN7 OF PUBLIC WOplttl
7 CoNN'ry r �N'1 � IAM (13,11) CNjjFf', Director
+ R DRIv8 . drfaviLI.r , CALrFa►+1u 1
1'.�1*'OhOa (916) $34.44pl J
Butteo. E'ionningt t
D E C 1 1986 as"A, ►, r
OroyMO, f',a`tifora 4 1986
Webb Brothers C
;s 389 C ons ruction
aarmors Court
Chico, CA 95926 AP 43-022-35
�� •
boaBlack Oak V
r Black e Sub
er�tinh
At the regular
December 15 meeting of the B
1986, then Butte
County Advrsar..
of environmental gency granted
subdivision impact and a a mitigated n Agen°y head on
concii.tions of p on approved your tentative�vesLj11 cleclar�rt;ion
the aboYe_refere ga ti rt
pPPr°Val listedneed pro.erty subjectat sheet..
l'n the
nPPeaIs
the Advisor are timely filed-"1�ithin
SuPervisorsy Agency's a ten (10
this nttj Il ProWill'—W i.th the Clerk far the days of t11c date of
'When the _ �»�na1. 8°al'd of
conditions of
for you to file it apP> oval are COMPlied Of Public your Final ,i P..ied i<gth
�4`orks for recor tnaP Vi.th the Butte Cou 1L.yrv30,11. be
the date of aPProvra,l dations ` ill order
by the' Adv.' Ory -Ag@nc ty�four (24) OIlia`hseaf
�� you have nny 9b
office. estions regat`din
g Lhzs matter, please cgntract this
very ,truly Y0t, `V1,
1J1111am Chef f,
it'ector off" 1'111111c Worl.s
Jai-lll r n
JM/ds Assistant 'Din
oP
Cc., P1811 ii.n
8nvirohhmebtal rnt
t�eci.
Flealth be.
Polls, Ahdorson rand Partment
kol:ls
Black, Oak Vesting 'Tentative Subdivision, AP 43-02235, 44 lots (At
010 south side of West Li.ndo Ave. approx. 500 ft. east: of Holly Ave,
Chico area. Engineer: Rolls, Anderson and Rolls
Public Works 'conditions:
I Submit road and
drainage plans to the Department of Pijb:l.it< Works
for approval and it tall the required facilities,
Provide 20 ft. radiusro ert
inter. sections. p p Y lane ret tarns at all st:r(,(,i
3Pnovidections. of-way -for standard No. S-5 Fit; all strp(
4 Indicate a 50 ft. building setback line from the centerline 01.
interior streets, West Linda Avenue and West 12th Street,.
S Street signs shall be provided by the developer at all street
intersections per County requirements.
ate
names for each street to the County address t�coordinator mit 5 nfor
approval, of street names.
6 Deed 30 from the centerline of West Lando Avenue and West 12th
Avenue to the County of Butte.
7 Construct full street section on interior streets to RS-2-B road'
standard with rolled curb, gutter, and sidewalk and 2" ACj 811.
AB, SC 250 prime, Cog seal and 95% relative compaction
Construct one-half plus 12 ft, lane statret section an (Jest
Linda Avenue and West 12th Avenue to RS�2-13 access road standard
With curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Minimum structural section
to be 2" AC and 8" AB with fog seal. and 957. relative cohipaction.
Y p
Submit design to Count De artment of Public Works for approval,
i� it
R value determinations and other data may be required to
suppirt section design. Realign curve on M.--,st Lando Avenue per
Dept. of Public Works.
8 Provide monumentation as required by the DeptarLoent of Public
Works in accordance with accepted standards.
h Street grades and other .features shall comply with the lluttd
County Ordinances, design resolution acid other accepted
engineering standards.
.1 Provide permanent SOILI ion for draihngc
All easements Of record t l be shown on t1jo fjnal. map;
l.2 Meet requirements Of Butte County Tire Department Or nl.Mter
responsible agency=
13 Street lighting shall be hrovirlod in accordance with Butte County=
requirements, scceptod design criteria
PG&ia. , and recoinmendriticau„ of
Black Oak Vesting Tentative Subdivision
14 Provide 1 ft. no access strip along West Lindo Avenue,
15 Pay off assessments.
16 Meet the requirements of the utility companies (i.e., t'CA81,
Pacific Telephone, water; sewer),
17 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required,
18 Provide all necessary traffic control signs including ntop signs.
19 Form C.S.A. for street lights and storm drainage mainLunance.
Health Dept. Cond tionsc
20 Provide a letter or other documentation from California Water
Service Company stating that they are willing and able to supply
domestic water to the project:
21 Provide a Letter or other documentation from the City of. Chico
stating that they are willing and able to supply sewer service
to the project,
22 Plane a note on the map that states "development within the
subdivision will require connection to a public sanitary sewer:"
23 Plue a mote on the map that states "development within the
subdi0 -in will require connection to a public water supply i
24 The sewer system within the subdivision shall be compatible with
any applicable master sewer plan of the County of Butte or the
City of Chico; Provisions to abandon lift stations shall include
connection to the permanent sewer main in conformance with the
applicable master sewer plan.
25 Complete a waiver of protest of annexation for a formed or
existing area or entity for the provision of sewer ger.vice
to the area:
26, Comply with the Nitrate Action Plan including a recordoi:Loil
of any required waiver of annexation ptoLest agreo"Urit,
27 Provide for payment of tiny future pro rata share for nowor trunk
or facility con8tructi.or7, Consideration shall be giv`,tr ,for fees
paid or improvements constructed prior to the adoption or any
additional fees.
Planning "Dept; conditions.,
MACK OAK VESTING TSNTAINE, SUBDTVTONS
28 Obtain necessary permits from the Reclamation Board riid C
Chico for encroachment into Lando Channel,. ity of
9 :(Install a sediment trap in Lindo Channel if requ'i.r, od by
Fish and Game.
The following mitigation measures are required:
30 Contribute $75.00 per lot to the West Side Fire ,Stofil iter=
Benefit Fund.
31 Contribute a pro rata share towards construction
bridge over Lindo Channel at Holly Avenue extension,
Now
TO; tnterd
DepartmeQjtoI Memorandum Iii
Y Agency
rROM: 1'l'-Innin
g Director
suUJ1,7cr: REPORT ON
RP#43-022-35NTAT VE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
nnr�: WEBS DRCa!1:'�lL'`R
December 2, 1586
This is a Proposal to divide
S -R 11,000 square feet each acres to
Of 7,000 to
isuburban-Res�.d=nt�.a1 eac:��, create 44 lots
Butte County General p ). The Land Use present zoning is
Density Residential. lan designates plan Map OZ the
Plans for the There are no this area as Low
area. specific or community_
The proposal does not
adopted or proposed conflict with County zoning �»
nor any �.'ount. element of the g noy
Y, specific or co Butte Count any
mmunity Plan, Y Genoral Pla,
Recommendation:
Approve the vesting Tentative Map on �p
g conditions and mitigation -022-35 subject
1• Obtain necessarymeasures
and Cit Permits gym)'
Y of Chico for frOA the Reclamation
encroachment into Board
2, Install a sediment ti Channel.
by Fish & trap in Lindo Channel if required
3• Contribute $75100
Benefit Fund. (m) per lot to the
West Side Fire Station
`� � Contribute a
new bride Pro rata share
eXtension. �m)r Lihdo Channel construction of a
at Holly Avenue
LT.�me
CC., Webb Brnthers
Construction Anderson & Rolls
r
ilPPEND1 X r
Ct)IT-T ' warlilt`l'Ti
ENVLitONAMIWAL CHECKLIST FORM
(to 1i0 Compietr' Y Lett( JlgenCYJ l,a II 86-08-04-01
APS ff 93-2-2-35
i; . I�ACK(1tO1)NJ1
1. Naine o r proponent EBB5-110 aEi3 � TBI TSON_.>
2. Address of propohent and representative (i,' appl it'ttbirYJ
Webb_Brotthers.Cunsi±ruct nn -,w,— Rolls.,
Anderson- &,. Rolls, 411;1,:1, � l��it,�tnore)
r@ -go -
,,
3C Connors Cali t
89Chico,, CA 95926
Chito CA 95926
3 Project dcscription Tentai.ive Subd vii oil Map �w�:. - L�
Tl, A1ANl1ATaRY I iN 11N(rS, U1 :TCN„Tl'7 ACi
Yf;s r1AYFIa NO
a, )Docs the prrject 'lave the potential. to degrade tilt!
quality or the environment, substanti,allY reduce
the habitat Of a Cash or wildlife speCies, Cause n
fish or wildlife population to drop bcdota ser- or
sttstainiitlevels, threaten to eliminate a plan
animal cng leitl,, reduce the nutnher or rosi'rict the
range or a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate .important e;camples of the major Periods
or California History or prehistory. --
b. floes the project have the potential to achieve
:short -t, rtn beneritS to the cictri.itten't• or long-term,
environtttental goals? (A short-tOrtit impact on the
environment 1% one which occurs in tit. relatively r
brier period or time while lona;-term impacts Will _I
endure into the ruture,)
c:. floes the project have itttpac,ts whichinaividtt-
ally "limited, but Culnul"tiVelY cot's icirra"ile? (A
project
II Impact on two or more Separate resource'
where the impact on each resource is relativeli'
small, but where the effect of tale total. or those
impacts on the environment is signirirant.)
d, 110e:s tite proieet ht1ve environmental crreets whlc°l't
will c:ttise substantial advOl".30 corrects on human
beings, either' dile tly Ut lttd'irertiv'? _ _�-
[,I 1. ll1"I111MINA'I iON I'lo bre liy tilo lead A►.;e.ncy i
(its tlac�basis c+f' tlitw ittit1al roti°,tltintioai;
WIT 11i'V
Ill htFincl tltnt1int�nitr, alidtiit�ia�t�t�MIVl'•1.(`..ARA`I'1t11.'nWII
tett jLietlttlit' 1) r(
ty. 411411
1,1ti1: ltci that atthough thcti 11r"►'o sed the t-0 ilI 1wtt�h4ila
,a signi-fir�titli
l'iittt
stn trrl'vCt
tile catty i ronntrnt ,
el`1't"vt i.i this rtt+t+ hc�cai sk, the' MITIGATION EA-li l tS F'\NfiC;A�l1UI:cin
the att- lett Shcwet iliW1 1-10n ncldcd ts� tlrc� I j t
JW(.L. %Id ION Wil I be pt l.at c,l,
t>"1Vti I11141 the lir, aildratt�tFNk'llttN,,M1,N1-0JOCt NIA) Att�`IMPA(;"1't;RI-I'Vililnil ii�$ raquiredt
,�...
the w�n'v i rc+rimc�n t ,
)A"l.' September 22, 19$6 , cOUNT'i W. 1111'1"1`1., PLANNING Lilii�t�[t'rhltilv'l'
Laura M t;tle,At5 z at6 plannet
i R
TV. ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
7`xp anat'Ons o a 1 "yes"
on attached sheet(s) yes and }, maybe" answers are required
l: tARTH. Will the proposal result in significant; YB8
a. Unstable earth conditions
MAYBE No
or in changes in
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displ,acementS, compaction or
overcovering of the soil's --
X
"-'
C. Change in topography or ground surface`
relief features?
d: Destruction, covering or modification of allyX
unique geologic or physical,
features?
e, Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on
or Off-site?
f. Changes in deposition
or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation , deposition
or erasion which
may modify the channel o,
a river or stream or the bed oe the.
ocean oar
any bay, inlet or lake?
g, outside of designarime tedcurbanQare llproductive soils
h• Exposure of people or property?to
hazards'such
.,
as earthquakes, landslides
slides, ground f'ai,l;ure or similar hazards?
2. AIR. Will the
a. proposal rest;ilt in substantial:
Air emissions
--�.
or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
Or fumes?'
C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or
...
any change in climate,
Locally or regionally?
3. WATERs Will the proposal result in substantial.�
a. Changes in currents or
X
the course or
direction. of water movements in either
marine
or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorpti,j� rates, drainage
Or
patterns,
the rate and amount of surface runoff?
r. *Ud 41'Q2` r9 *a#.rad, r.,, rfoce drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel
ization or culvert installation?
.--h
d• Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
--- ---�
e Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration Of surface
`t
water quality, including
but not limited to temperature, dissolved.
OXY90 or turbidity?
g• Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
Of ground waters?
`1
h. Change in the quantity or qual.it ers
Of V ground �vo.i:
either through direct additions 'or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts
Or =aVations?
i Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available
:Cor public water supplies?
J4 Exposure of people Or property to Water
related hazards
sucli as flooding?
YES
MAYBE
NO
Q
PLANT LIFE: Will the proposal result in substantial:
"d.
Change in. the diversity of species, or numboT
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rale
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal repjoj'j�tsh,
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural, crop,? �----
—
--
d;_
S.
ANIMAL LIVE. Will the proposal result in substtj,nt:i.al:
a. C3i—MgTe in the diversity of species, or
nuT"j)0'r9
of any species of animals (birds, land aniinals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benthi:c organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rar(
or endangered species of animals?
c, Introduction of new species of animals into
an area, or result in a barrier to the miprati,on
or movement of animals?
dr Deterioration_ to e'c sting fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE. Will the propo sl: result in substantial::
a. increases in existing noise levels?
b. tx osure oflevels?
' p people to severe noise
�
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
signi icant lig t and glare:'
V.
S.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a
su— s�-t:ial alteration Of the present or planned,
land use of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal, result in
suHtanttal:
a. Increase In the rate of use of any natural
rosouroes?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
ld,
RTSI UPSET, Will the proposal involve:
a. A vis,-
of explosionor the release of haza;rdy
ous substances (including, but not limited t;o
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) .;n tile
event 01 a, accident, or upset conditions?
an6. Possible interference With � emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plait?
11.
P01**-,'U,'ON. Will the proposal alter the location
ristY 7;T 1,,n, density, or growth rate of the huitian
populatic��!)'
1,
HOUSING. Wi,il, th,: proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand fog• additional housing?
i
i
'
M
13. TRANSPORTATION/CZRCIILATIOI . 's' YESMAYB'lx CCS
xasult in Will the propz.,
a. Generation Of substantial additional vehicja
movement?
b, Effects on existing parkin
demand for new parking? g facilities, or
c; Substan,t;ial impact on existing transport5�tion
Systems? d. Significant alterations to
Of circulation or movement hfepeoplesent aandM4R
goods? 7
e. Alterations to waterborne rail or air tra � :.
f• '.
bicyclists or Pedestrians? l c7
Increase in .,_.
traffic hazards to motor 'vehicles,
14. PUBLIC ShRVIGFS.
Will the proposal .have an e'f`fect
upon, or 7esult in a need for new or altere
ga%-ernmental services: d
a: Fare protection?
b. Police protection?
c
SCliools?
d. Parks or other recreational ;facil?.tios?
Ma.ialtenance ofp ublic facilities
roads?
including ---
f, Other governmental: services?
15 . ENERGY, Wi Gl, the
Is
Proposal result in: --�.
." e o f substantial amounts o f
b• Substantial incre fUel.or e,,,. 7
ase in demand upon existing,
sources of energy, ur re wire the
of new
,--
sources Of energy? development
16, UTILITIES, Will the
Proposal 'result i n a
> need for
new stems or substantial alterations
following,
to the
a: Politer or natural?
b Communications
systems?
C. Water a:vaila}1i.jjty:
d. Sc iter or septic taaik? .'
----
e, Storm water drainage?
f Solid waste and disposal?
17• HUMAN HENI.,TH. Will theProposal—
a. Citeat�ori of ani` ,
health )' health aza.rdrorupotential
•--
hazard (
b � Exposure of x'cluding mental }iealr..l�) ?
people to
hazards? potential Ile ;a.1,th
18 . AESTHETICS, 1V1.11 the Proposal result in the
a S'rrucryt ox n of anyy
X
Scenic Vista, or view open to
the public or w111 the pita asr
creation of result in
an, aestheticallp ail the
to public view,? Y ffensive site
open
-. ... 4 4
q r
fat ar - O
YES
MAYBE NO
19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impti(!,t
Upon the quality or quantity of existing recregj7,(' J(jn a7,
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric Or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in advorse physjeaj
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?
y,
c.. Does the proposal have the potential to causo
a physical, change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
^i
d. Will the proposal restrict existing reli iou`:
or sacred uses within the potential imp,. -t
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 43-2-2-35
See attached.
d—ok
VOW
0
11111111 OF E11VAL EVAL M _ON AP 48-2-2-at5
'I 1j.; Permanent over -covering is estimated at 4.75 acres jr,
t)(411dings and driveways. Temporary soil rokids,
P"00tor. Basic disruption will be MUCh
development -related lmPaCts were ads qi_j4j,k,.,,,q
I(i the 1982 Chico Urban Area EIR. .1y Oddressed
lbpe: Soils On site are not sUbjett to erosion. Lindr.) (+jMfjneI 11,
be Protected from erosion by emplacement Of sacked corlOf'OL, W
outfall. The stabilized area Will extend Prom a around the
channel's center for a width bove tho Pipe to Lha
8b,c: Stormwater runoff will Of approximately 6 feet
greatly increase with davOlOPment. To
handle drainage demands� underground facilities
throughout the subdivision,
Channel. permits W, tOrminatin will bQ UOMstrLICtOd
9 in a new outFnil
red frog the State DepaAG(rlent of Fish and Game and The Reclamation into Lindo
11 be requi in
Board.
ae: Lindo Channel has been restructured for Urban drainage needs and
has adequate capacity to servo this subdivision.
A flap gate Will be Installed
during extremely high flowls, During
the outfall to cut Off dra uring low flows, additional drainageriage
MOY provide breading areas for mosquitoes.
8r-' Applicant has agreed to
If recommended by Fish and GameInstall a sediment trap. in the channel,
11apd' An "uneven" orchard, in term,
, Of tree spacing and age, covers
Inuch of the site. Most of it Will be removed by developments As a
Pr'OPer'tY within the wt -ban area, surrounded by residential development,
conversion of aq land to residential uses ' t
llbo5d: Linda Channel Is not significan-.
dense Urider`0101�4th suPPOrts riparian Vegetation dharacter,jZed by a
of vines and shrubs an overstor�y
41110w, alder, and "',alhut- Riparian habltdatasn at- Of cottonwood,
complex In terms of Plant and Wildlife e One Of the most
County` and the State) r, diversity, Throughout Butte
I par, I an I
of the outfall Nil, Intremontal is becoming sedan qee,Od. Installation
habitat In Lindo Channeli Y reduce riparian vegetation and
sacked concrete be It is recommended that the outfall arjCI
removed. locate,{ so tha I t no trees over �all in diameter are
12* Houses 00 both
Impacted by Mol sides Of West 12th and the accest4 rrjad will
Plahting of a r Se) light, and commotion generated by, trafflc, be
out'sidb edge Ni a8t-growing vegetative screen on the ncmess r-ood,,ai
11 protect existing residents,
"Saycsf* Full bLilldoUt Of the subdivisionwill
trips per
lot Pdrs 0 total of 440 A.D.T. The bulk of the generate 1tt,arfic it
vehicio
expected to flow north On Holly to 80zt,
Highway 59 Or The esplanade, bhorito over to Highway a20
10
°
Holly
" unt,Circulation
Element and the CATSThe ultimate r°tuts! k- Of-woY
11
Tle �3utte uto Warner~ as an arterial
ey�tc�nd 1 ng south A cr i t i cal I t nk 1°� "Ile hlo 1 1 Y
-1"he �:N ; t r rt
W 1 1 l permit. cons i sthenbri dgeof uovernLsndo Channel Add 1 tic of f 1 c
and l n need of rep l 'acement , A M'etY
Avc�r�ue extension i s
bridge is substandard ig or replacing it constlWtuft
o the bridge cage without Old
l den i the developer should contr i but; =a c�r4 rata
n ac".s, .
t,,azar,d . To offset imp ovements
share towards needed roadWaY impr §,.
cr :ste a neW 1 ink between l- i ndO ai td '12th
1.3d: The subdivision W11
la4caus, `12th does
�
ess to Esplanade car East*
Traffic is not expected to be rerouted from HoilY
not provide direct acc
drams wi 1 1 be installed and the ci?avol oiler W1 1 9
Three new fire hY the Wept i de Fire Station f��t`t 1 t fund.
contribute $75-00 r
coat Per lot to r
r1� p sery l res oar^r t��e
14b,doe,f'
As a project within the.. urban area,
provided with a minimum of modification' ct to school. lmprovoMent
'14c' Residential ' development may be sub,le
fees.
ity Water and sewer will be extended throughout the
16c)d'. Commun
subdivislon provided to Llndo
Ce= channel+ Work in the channel should be
� As discussed under 3n_, drainage w�11 be actual. conditions
summer and earlY fall.
channel v t a a new °utl mes; the t'�epartment o'�
11mitea to 1oW flow The Reblamation Board and
are to tie determined by
F, I sh and Game �a►lal
11,t% Work within
Li redo Chan"nal has the pote�itl al to remove
vegetation
-7-
Applicant:
Webb Bros. Construction Assessor"sparcal
43-2-2-35
L09 #
DATA SN��t-
A Rra�Lect-Qvr
z=j2-t-ipn
1 . Type Of Projklct.- Land division.
2" Brief Description: Subdivision of
ranging in size from 7,400 sq. fta into 44 lots
to 11,60gq4 Pt.
S. Location: [between West lath and West LindO0 Avenues,
8pproximately 500 feet east of HollY Avenue, C11it,
4, Proposed Densit,
of Development.- 3.5
area
54 Amount of Impervious Surfacing:
6, Access and Nearest Pub]' MO1'e than 1,175 acres.
Public Roadfs).- Parcel
and West Lindo. New road will Fronts On West 12j;1-1
link the two.
7, Method of Sewage Disposal: City Of Chico sewer.
8- Source Of Water Supply: California Water Service Co
9- Pro""m1by of Power Lines: To original Parcel. mpany.
10- Potential for further land divisions, and devolOPment:
Division will permit the construction of 44 dwelling units,
B._Environmental Setting i . . ,
ent:
Terra i n
a. General Topographic CharzIcter Level valley land.
b- Slopes: 0i-2%.
c. Elevation" 185t.
d. Limiting Factors: None,
Soils
a.i Types and Characteristics,.
Loam, a prime agricultural tollc Vina deem
and Vina PIne Sandy
pwell drajoing.
,
b. Limiting Factors: None. ,
Natural Hazards0 f the Land
a. Earthquake Zone: M
Erosion Potential: Oderate Earthquake Intensity Zone VIII.
t-,ne to slight.
c- Landslide Potential* None.
d. re Hazard .-
Unl:,.l ass
eI f I ed/ I rr I go�lted.,
. Expansive Sol, p,ote
4. Hydrology htl6l: Low to moderato.
a«
Surface Water: Undo Channel
Lihdb Avenue. is on the north side of"
OrOUMdWator: Adjacent to a confirmed nitrate
contamination area.
a. Drainage Characteristics;
Artlelcial drainage to L.Indo
Channel Will be constructed.
d4 Anhual Ro*hfall (normal):
m 1 22-240,
Li
Iting Fbctors** Area of potential
levels. subsidence, nitrate
�� Visualf's
6* Aco c Quality. Fair.
.
Usti
„
r`�olse levels From r�enerally good,. subject
7. Air Quality; Fair. 11roa ro .
d operas; ns.to Sporadic
porad i c
Polo
ErIv i
Vegetation:9. Riparian
i
W 1 1 d l i fe Nab'tat:r i an
vegetation
egetat i on
operations and Limited a on along Lindo Ltr
Cua `u 1 urban encroachme �� pro.JeetItirrsl orchard.
Envir nesil:ra Iry 1�r"avl+us a
Con a t: 9
1�- Archaeolo
inc�udih g�ca1 and Historical Resources
71, Butte. C 9 unknown
ounty Ge ccs ; fisc ori
Res i dent 1 a l . neral Planria C4trw
des i �na1~ i pn
1S. Existing Zonin g_R.
�x i st i Low Cans 1 i=Y
14 ' Surroun 9 land Use
ding Area: on-sit.,Unevenl
a • Land Use Y spaced and
Uses:
a
b` orchards Single-family res. aged c�rehard.
c Zoning: Pl a S�R. pastures, i dential,
stria l 1 pockets t7 f:'
Gen_ n desi
d- Parcel 9nations.
e Po Sizes: o low Density aesldent.
15. Chanact low
r m 1/2 to 5 acres ral,
atter of $ite density..
infill cote and Area:
16, Nearest ntialUrban
1� RelevantSpheresArea: ied neighborhood with
Bistr"ict Chi
,f '"fluence- Y of Chico.
Butte 18 drove. inty ltnosqu l toco Area cret In Chiand�pa Ch l eoUnified,
atio
Improvement,, Sta batement pistr rk bis'trict 5th l
1 required, ndards Urban ict. j CSA ##
9. Fire n Area: FU11 '
Protection seroir urian i
as Nearest Cou "e° Improv_
a-44 ilea; nt (State) Fire
b. Stat 'on.- 442
20. Schoo Avarlabilt, 2
1 s i n Areal Chico Un 1 f iced hydrants to be i rtsta ii les; 444,
School dl strict, led,