Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout043-590-0179 '1 87-03-20-•01 �14OJ ]EC's SLY�Il�A3�2Y 87-11 E NO File No. 113 COMPANY, INC'. Lisa Shuler applicant representative r ADDRESS.: P -O;. Box 4143 Chico, CA 95927 PHONE: 894-2027 Same property* owner ADDRESS; PROJFET'�s'cRx�aYorr_ Variance to Condition 430 of PUD Rezone, Ordinance 4558, for Lot 14 to allow afoot setback rather t°an a 15 foot building setback: from exterior property lines on: prapertyed PUD south side of Victorian Park Drive, just north' ..or _ ,_ located of Bidwell Avenue, _ approximately 1000 feet west of Oak Lawn, Avenue identified as AP 43-59-17 ta�nlarea': Chico GENERAL • PLAN DESIGNATION Low Density ResidentialDATE PRE-APP FEEPAID �$ 1 VMYNOBER: APPLICAT?ON ACCEPTED} FINAL APP'. PAID: $ �PT'NUMBER: RF-20NING PETITION SIGNATURES CMCK D PERCENTAGE: MAILING' LISTPREPARED MAIL-OLS NOTICES': WRITTEN Public: 3-24-87 NOTICES: HAILED NUMBER: 12 Newspaper: _ 3-20-87 LEGAL. DESCRIPTION PREPAP.ED` PUBLICATION N`.lOTICE WRITTEN` DISPLAY` AD PREPARED NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION G P G B R DATE OF PUBLICATION: INITM. STUDY PREPARED' - ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: X Categorical Exemption Class 5a FILED; Negative Declaration FILED: Mitigated Negative Declaration FILED: Environmental Impact Report CERTIFIED; Other: STATE' CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER;_ APPLICANTfREPRESENTMVE NOTIFICATION' OF ENVIRONMENK--AL DETERMINATION �!PLANNIG COh4ISSION �ARING(s) :April 8 1987 0 9.00 a m BOARD OF IiE+MG(s):, RESOLUTION' NUMBER (CPAs) ADOPTED: ORDINANCE. NUMBER ADOPTED: NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (Appendix. 'H) FILED Stiasn Company. inc. Variance (item determined {:o be categorically exempt from environmental review) to Condition of PUD Rezone, Ordinance 02558 for Lot 14 to allow a 5 foot setback rather than o ertfoot zonedlPUDnllocatedconfrom the southsor ideof property lines on prop y Victorian Park Drive, just north of Bidweil Avenue, ap-59-17, e y 1000 fee west pf" Oak lawn Avenues identified as ;AP 43-5917, Chico,. The Commission waived reading of the StMff Findings. Staff stated that there was a notesubmitted fromnCountyfeesaCounsel. Staff stated that the Board waived the PP i tructlon until this issue it;resolved. contractor did stip cans The hearing was Opened to the public. representing Shastan, stated that the house was built in .e sa Shuler, P error, went through the county eappease theproperty RPPEShe that oW�►er'sthey nextare daor. the building plans the willing to plant trees to try t Commissioner Lynch stated that from checking and the setback Was error was with the engineer, not the County, omitted. He asked her how close the applicant checked the engineer'5 plans. Lisa Shuler stated that they checked the plans as close as they could' Kevin Sweeney stated that his parents owned the the property nce.immodgavely to the south of this property. He Was agalnsiC background nformation on the forming of this subdivision. He Stated from the that Shastan told him the building mill ld se lanning15-20 festcivil action in line. property ed that ►s fam y P this case toStop the}construction and have the house moved. Commissioner Forbes asked if the discussion between Mr. Sweeney and Mr. Halbert (Shastan) was a contract. Mr. Sweeney stated it was; gust a conversation, - Herbert White stated he owns property in the subdivision, two etYHe properties over from thiPrwasrin�support�ofted to houses e theSWeeneys andwaset s from the property line. He against the variance. He did not went other houses built in the subdivision five feet from the property Chairman Walter asked if a PUD has 15 ft. setbacks Commissioner Lynch staed that the side yard setbacks were not drawn on t tbo map by A & Q engineering and should have been 1S feet. Bie r+ 'Cg1j [ i Rssl61V ,L' V, t'► 11 iSJ.,'iVi�NQ �o-- - - - �,_ Jack Sweeney objected to a house so close to the property where he fives, The hearing was closed. Chairman Walter stated that the condition that was laid on this section of the subdivision, Condition 30, was approved by the Commission and agreed to by Mr. Halbert on August 30$ 1986; then on October 7, 1986 the Board approved this subdivision with Condition 30$ Ordinance 2558. He stated that Mr. Halbert knew at both of these times the setbacks and accepted the condition. He said that on November '17,, 1986, Mr. Halbert filed the final map which was recorded on December 5, 1986; then on January 21, 1987 Mr. Halbert took out the building permit on this hOUSe. He stated that Mr. Halbert has known of the requirement for 15 fti minimum side yard setbacks since August. He stated that there are seven (7) lots that are the same size, with five (5) other lots on the outside boundaries of this current subdivision as recorded. He stated that the property belongs to Mr. Halbert and it is anticipated that Mr. Halbert will develop more subdivisions around the edge of this property. He felt that this Was the only one of the five exterior lots that will have this problem. He estimated that the building was approximately 707 completed when the developer stopped construction. He said the staff report talks about the building envelope, but there nre Many nice houses that are 35 feet or less in width. He stated that moi - having the variance would not make the property unusable If the house that Is there now Is not put In. He did not feel that all of the comments In the staff report were pertinen4--. commissioner Lynch stated that when the Commission worked on this 8ub3IvIsIon they had a difficult time coming up With open space for the project. He stated that they had to use front yards to Meet the requirement of the PUD for common area. He felt the owner is responsible for the engineer's error. He stated that the map was submitted by a professional engineer In error and he could not make the hardship findings to Justify a Variance. Commissioner Forbes a9i%eed. Commissioner Lynch felt that the problem was self-imposed. Chairman Walter, agreed thatthis was a self-created problem. It was moved by Commissioner Lambert, seconded by Coforr',,t�sloner F'orbess and unanimously carried for denial as follows' A. Note that this project Is categorIcally exevpt from environmental review, and Ba Find that there are no special cIrcumstsrices applitable to the property ihtludlrig s12eo shape) topot)raphyo location, or surroundings, that the strict appllcf:itlon of this,chapter does not deprive the property of privileges -eInJoYed by other proo'erby In the vicinity and under identical -rohing classification because the developer was fully aware of the i-etsbrictions and those to Vgnore the rdst-t-IttiOns of the PUD; an4l 60 "I8810"N 'N' 1. , n FILE NO. AP �Sdbg_l BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA - March 26, 1987 01I'L(CANT OWNER: Shastan ComPany: jn�.. Same REQUEST Variance > to the side yard setback ►^0-=qu 1 cements to a 1 1 ori a AP NO.. f eet f room 'bhe SOtback i'�sl,rturn: roPertYty I i ne k sxzE - 'I 7 acre LC1G'OI Ow Lyn the east s 1 do of V i rtor%i art Park i `rex an i mate l Y 250 feet south Of Fe i r'CatG� Lane In the 8rYriwood PSi-k Subd' i v i s i on I off ti`te South side Of SOLIth Sacramento Avonue west F Chico. EXISTING ZONING. .PUO BONING 1-iISTt]R'Y; Pi1D` 10/7/86 /`id�36 Ord , 2555 SURROUNDING ZONING!caned i�'Ul�, i�AG and ASwk SURROUNDING LAND USE: Single family re8'i dent i a l at urban densities GENERAL PLAN nE8IGNATION'. Low Dens i ty Rea dcan t i a l APPL.ICASLE REGULATIQN8g Butte County Code t�Sect i'o Government Code �b��6 24-19 �Ot1ME1+1TS � n ,�.19 and CRF'CE:C 1t�C7„"e The butte CcauritY C7epartment Er�v i rorimon wa 1 Health OePartmOmt of Public �I�wrCc 80d the E3ta�iuie t:oj_an ty lihad no �inrtteWor. 1 A �- SIS• Th i s pro :IcCt i s Property a request to line, on �' irce a structure b deet requ 11- 1 n a a parcel l 1 ocated i n t',ram t- boundaries, I bot setback a P l Planned Unit Development o side ►ect property the per i meter property ] I rte The s;,.;h ' pment of tt-re Plitt and the soot and both the projec�t�, project, her 1 y side property the eastrer'fi setbaci< 1 I ne which was coed 1 t i w;;ad '✓ line ne t~e org tt-re or bactr within around the perimeter require per i m� ter the Jewel npment of a i 5 foot bti i id i r'r9 the lots. that 15 foot she pro j�:,� t , tJn rrrcast ca }' the side Due to an dvErsi9ht at the maack is in t the lot; Of this he rear yard area ,� Project ryas overlook ed.t I cu l ar l cv4a,. i rig tr I m� the fact that Property also .�o was final map E3ased and the 1 boat setbacl� on 't'Vic tier i meter or Nratwe app l i ed on data Shown Na. nca tr ti, dor and on the reQordc d shown on the ulgdln is issued.. Building constructicnaP� bulid+n current j ..t Permits being framed a net w �' under construction has started and the Within hbor complained about wh110 t 15 r , of ut the br � he strr,rctrrtr`•e was not I f I ed Of. 'M , the Property 1 ne, �, i l d I 1"1 '9 be i n3 constructed var i ran Problem . and the The app l l carlat eras ce pro lures The for Contacted and consbructIon u�ti1 were explained, both re4orrrn ca f Su the s i tuat i can i s rectified.:The a pp i i r=' nt o Or' the pery r stirs ar"'. reed tc, waive ca N �ferecl to stop the Processing SUbseu�uent 1 y tile Board Bec:�use + ees for this i s , Subject _o f the curvature pro Jett, Java i o p, opera,, i s Slightly b i the street and the pment, but 1 ar^'oer than0111-lel ayor�rt:, of the lot, the south also narrower r itits a feet i ropc:wt�, 1 i ne an i n the s W i i.h the rer�►�� I red aorrre ava l l ob l e deet on 1 b foot o4back development for b►..r i l d i ng, the nrrth prc,C�ert. x on 1 t�rrte l � have at least _ � r�lcast o f true Othor^ � 1 I rye on 1 � 3� �lrlWi. t"t;. side 5�S_ F , "IdED bui 1din K�arct Is lry t»hp rare 1 , any bu i l d i rl Yard setback ejly� 1000 available. di t rererit oonstrr�rcted ' were •gini:orced an allls tsar -1 }cul �r nature than otl erg woo d have a yard s;aace wor,;ri d b bu i 1 d 1 nests i n be p+ art en e m 1 n i rt I Zed an the development t i i e l y d a long narror+r hour i n that back �CCdMMENi^rA1-IQNr. ��''wryr.l'id rosr.jlt. A= Note that thIs, r�rwvtew, and 15 is cateoorlrrall y exempt; r r, cam environment,, F fi nd that; there Property Including are i eecIO, circumstances surround i nos, that ' ahape, aPP i i cabl e tra the Pro o+, ttie strict t'c'�'raphy 1 Vicat i On or, pt t v I 1 e0os en io ed alp 1 i cat in chn and urtirxler Identical Y by other ptcr� depr t vel the prop ertu to the vicinit" sand Zoning nc� 01 ass t f" i c:at i' o►is because Grant ar I once to a 1 1 caw the c:ortst'rrtGti on Of ti brri 1din b ft. [3U'r'r. p COU' Ty PLANNING CQi�1MISS�ON STAT'F h INDIN _ 1"t^+ani the side property line as ri 59-17 C Shastan Com an acwn on the site Plan fol- rale � Y , Inc.) subject tca the1. f'ca i i r,v� ncy gond i I;'r ora �; z Applicant must cam i ststutos, ordinances� endregulations. +e hal all api cabi o stat -end local (�RM fi � gu i at ernn s Attaahmonts: Sito Plan Loca-k: i on Lxh i b I t III I S t �u*e'ea. i'letmyggC!Omft APPLICAVON FOR 19 1987 BUTTE COUNTY PILANNING COMMISSION �rovillf" Caltfo, n f4 APPLICANT: Read and rollow Instructions as set forth on attached sheet, Applicant's Name Applicant's Mailing Address. -Pr IS' I Phone Nta,. Applicant's interest inen ro rJ wne�r� le p -p Y ( lessee, other]-�_ lt�t '►''" Owner's Name and Address" rr —� Contort Person for Project r ject (If other than applicant)_ { `3 hule( t f Assessor's Parcel Number(s)� `` —-------- -- Present ?onfng R�1 Location and size of parcel(s)��"���_��� Street address t'(s� �_riG Xi try— jj". I le -fids tot travel to property (rural and mountainous areas only). I Li. Type of variance requested; ----.�_ Lot area or building site Lot: width � Mobile home size Front yard setback Parking requirements X- Side or rear yard setback — Llverequi requirements n rgp(rements Other (specify) Sf Description of r - Jeff use anc$ =- c fj _ �.t' attached sheet) Description of existing land use Dxist"I/Proposed Stowage disposal method',.. Proximity of power and phone lines!..."! e td u Water source:` td f �"r't "Y� 1 ' i �'Ly , Pioxlmtty of water for fire fighting purposes (hydronts, ponds, etc,) 1' _ Will excavation or grading be necessary? Cubic yards (estfma+e) List and describe any other related p&#mits and Other public approvals repelred for this project, Including those required b city, regional, State and Federal agonclt,V: ,I ,n !iat:�t};tid;?�19.ca;3 tt($tsi� airs q foll'g`Wing„questlons pertatnonly to variances to the minimum parcel size required w4hin the zoning district, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATIOUMEASURES *' identify potentially stghilicant environmental Impacts associated with the variance. What project design featurOs or special conditions of approval (mitigation measures) are prottosed to alleviate potential environtrleninl Impacts? ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING*' - Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including Information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cuiturai, historical p y 9 ..!' or scenic aspects, Describe an existing sttucturUs on the site and tate use of the structures. LL. _ Describe the surrounding properties, Including information on plants and animals and ahy cuiiure'I,his'�wie�i or scenlo aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (single-family, aparfrnents, shops, depart - men[ store§, etc,), and scale of development (height, frontage, setb, wk, rear yard, etc,). * Use separate sheet for rcnget responses, Q' c.� CL d I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I have read and understand the Instructions and that the foregoing statements are true, complete ,and correct to the best of ,my knowledge and belief. bate -' _ A Date � � �” c'�' � Property owner's y ^qna' " Applicant's sI T�ature Variance number Request; Variance to, Location and size of parcel(s): located on the VERIFY: A.P. Numberfs) Zoning and Requirements Ownership L -;-ton Description Proof of Agency 'J +;ceded) coples of Plot Plat rn W 0 LL. Ll.. 6 ,2 - dant Received_. ... Receipt Number _- Application Taken By,,,_,: 41--59' 7, et'c. Shastan Company, Inc. P.O. Box 4143 Chico, CA 95927 43-59-.7, Herbert White 1650 Bidwell Ave, Chico, ,CA 9592,6 43-59-21 etc. 43-29-121 Mark Miller Rt. 2 Box 196 August McDowell Chico, CA 959c6 13715 South Carus Rd. Oregon City,. OR 97045.. 43-59-3 43-29`-123,etc. John Sweeney 1624 Bidwell Avenue Muriel Turner Chico, CA 95926 498 E Sacramento Ave'. Chico, CA 95926 43-29--115 Violet Quiring 1622 Bidwell. Avenue Chico, CA 95926 43-29--59 Fred Clappon Rt. 2 Box 194 Chico, CA 95926 43-29-73 Robert Lee Britton At. 2 Box 193 Chico, CA 95926 43-29--74 Harry Weathers Rt. 2 Box 192 Chico, CA 95926 43-29--16 Sharon Bailey Rt. 2' Box 19$ Chico, CA 95926 43-29-118 Herbert White Rt. 2' Box' 196A Chico, CA 95926 BUTTEN. (NCOW11ss I Ora 01,110 Coo Pl oaning 00mrn. COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9506 MAY '1 PHONE: 53LI-4601 � 28 98 Oroville, Califoraia TO Environmental Health Lynn Vanhart DATE: 3-23-87 RE: PR_ p "ir REVIEW A14D ENV]:ROi�lgEN1+A�, EVAT.,UATION thEnclosed is preliminary data our office has received or e following project; Shastan Company, Inc, generated concerning L09487-03-20-01. - Variance to Condition # 30 f p 2558 for Zrot 14 to allow a 5 foot setback rather buildin setback fror+ ex A,-. UD Rezone, Ordinance s e o Va.ctoraan Park Drive r than a 15 foot imately 1000 feet west of Oak_Lawn Avenue Of Bidwell Avenue a ruth Chico. PP=ox- We are making an. assessment of possible environmental impacts Preparing ec environmental document, either a Negative D�lasaand w M11 itigated Negative DeClaration or an Envirohmental Impact Deport. Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation or YOU can. offer in opinions your area of concern or expertise that relate to either In physical,, social, or economic impacts that this Project may ether p J ygenerate... Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. generated by this inquiry, then it shad bs as If no response is significant environmental impacts which are potentialh,fromhthe project. We appreciate any assistance you can provide. Sincerely, _ .,a au"e' Co. Div, of Env. eaifh: MAR Z Stop en A. Streeter Senior Planner �rovtl1ef Caltforr,te C otiiments.��''?• 33'7 "7'%, 1. r. ,� � ►. �, (Write or type in .spnce providod &return thew she pLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLro CALIFORNIA 95965.3397 pHON E: '530.1601 April 9, 1987 Shastan Company* Lnc, 2.0. Box 4143 Chico, Ca, 95927 Res Variance, AP 43-5917 Gentlemen: 'planning Commission held. -regular meeting of the Butte County At the reg our request for a Varian, to Condition �►30 of PUD April 9, 1987, Y for Lot 14 to allow a 5 foot setback rather Ordinance 2558, property lines located Rezone, setback from exterior P p Bidewll jus north of than a 15 foot building Avenue, Chico, was on t1 squth side of Victorian Park Drive, j Avenu P roximately 1000 feet west o Oak LAwn denied in writing, you must do sO; you desire to appeal this decision y the 'Board of Should y 75.00 to the C3.erk l prior to with the appeal fee o Oroville, California, Supervisors, 25ofC un g_Center DriVe, er qd which is at 5.00 P•'m` ► the e expiration day appeal p the expi . Thu1987, Thursday, Hpril 16, contact questions regarding this matter, please Should you have any. q this office between 10:00 a:m: and 3.00 P.M. Sincerely B: A. Kircher 71Xterp "o of Platin n A. Streeter Senior Planner °SAS : lr i a4411 �p' �'lannhy� APR 6 198 01.0411 i, califp� Adm1nistrative'Office APrl 20 1987 To: 8111 Cheff, D' ' hector of Public Works Frnm; Mike P Yeatt Deputy Administrative Officer Subject; Waiving of Application Fe es for - Brynwoad Park ZD.r,el�c/ Item 5-02 for waiver of on the Board of Supervisors the Br application fees f March 24, 1.987 agenda way a Ynwood Park PUD, Lot 14, for varix�sedto uild g setback lines uest waived the application fees fer thease be a in arl nc , for t the Baard of Supervisors k Py Deputy A'ministrati e MP/Vs Officer Cc Bettye Kircher Jim Johansen, Au , Director of Planling :uditor Controller n, LANE ; try�,i„�; ng 5U :8.d of ? Ur i ., IS r 1 A FAIRGATE L N ri b � w fr, Q, 3K- � Pn.o,%uc.. .yr to 'N 0 4 � �, ��t, r• � r 4- Y t 3 10, - .. viw {y y. r 941 1� Ca c NL8 No. q q . 17 BUTTE_ COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING. . DATES., APPLICANT.,' REQUEST a n,., a. t.� t: -co � EXISTING ZQIVEt SCALE �.qutYLtw; w-r,s -ra AL bw A s'Tn:,s�^� �tiiv`�mem�irma�m�.�is�awoi�ae�cne. .exec.. �V1�$� ` y / • `O R\ 9C� C9 f a 9 to OAK N � v aW0O0V for W CAMERON�N yp t . AIMENDIA q / � � Ca,�D � � ��>, � � , Y EN,R DR„WESTI -W j its SAGRA, ENTO 7 V 1800 1400 r i? AS11AT1S ec AVE NBURY C a Y c .�. "SHADY Ci WOODLT I +J\� GLEN r G sr' SURKE• t u k Ak SHIRE a LJ j \/ p fc CT" ORL aP rrr CT. I Bigcc t3 DR. WINKLE n c ,� �4e' Lai R. IOGE LN, S ! � v � -' � SCOTT9• � �FAIRGgiE LN. cli, r J 8� TaAll m p GALE C* 1 BIDlyf��! 1 IM T � �-U; CREEKNAYEN PL Pad +— STE'NART Z y too A a.L WE89 JV- ]201 + �.--'Btu '1 1 - mx AVE, 1 .•1 i. PARK RANCKAERO t• .� AIRPORT�`'i I '•,+ ��ii••i rid .SANTA. CLAPA ' � Vii• y� � ' 2000 C� �VBUTTE �yy pp��r+rrr.r1r .. Nrr�. �yA,. 'w` _.- '�,Vy ,rte �+ `' 'w{ ��^+� j •pry • .,F.0 c��r Y 1 1 PA,.7N , Y.... { ./iw �I1.4 IVpr "—�-+.,�.�,� • L / ^_ HEARING sc/^� COMM 1 APPL.IC?1Nis RE 7 will Il, ®lINR: �4Qta \ tL'"�..W1•i,,re)•�-+ya "io A 4k..rO W � /•� ppi BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COM�IISSp CENTER DRIVE OR0VILLE, CALIFORNIA COUNTY PHONE: 9 " 534-4601 CNC TO: cit ChicoIR y 5 1987 P-0- gox3 4 2 0 auf•►•e Co. Planning CommGomm, DATE: 3 2 3 NNING OFFICE Chico, CA 95927 MAR 2719$% r ®F CHICO RE; PROJEG'r REVIEW AND Oroville' Califoruq ENVI;ilOIVNTAL EVALUITION Enclosed is prelim' the follow- data our Office has received protect; �hastan Company, Inc, _ or, generated concerning Log#s7-03-20_61 - AP#43-59-17, -------._ -• Variance to Condition 255s for Lot 14 to 430 of PUD buildin allow a 5 foot setback rather Rezone, Ordinance s e of Setback Prot a »;---..... Victorian Park Drive - han a 15 foot itnately 1000 feet west of Oak just north of - uth Bidwell Avenue, approt 1•F Lawn Avenue . Chico fie oe Maikngg an assessment of Possible Preparing an environmental dOf Possible environmental impacts and w.:11 be Negative Declaration or a either a Ne goport :Declaration; Mitigated an Environbental impact Report.. pleasE provide any factual statements you. can offer in our ideasfor Y area of concern �orexpertise nthat� elate�torez pl=;;sical sociul1 cin economic im pinion., pacts that this project thea Please respond �, p J may gehe,rate. P wi. xn 14dast•,•r., generated by this inquiry, t ti•.. above-noted date. q 5, then it shaller.r, If no response is Significant environ mehtal i arced that impacts which are not�ntb�� the re are .no We appreciate � :^ram the project. any assistance you can provide, Sincerely, S en A. Streeter Senior ) ,lanner comments: v� ---- bU I I L UUU:i I l' i LIT. UL1 10I. IL',i dokAgfil[RE Pi;07ECTION STANDARDS REYIE puttoCo. Plcnning Comm DEVELOPy.ENT NAME. shastan Co; nc.." APB 4"— .7 LOCATION Victorian Park Dr., Chaco DATE 3 / 31 87 This project must meet the vequirements in the Uni form*M4­4 calif, Dopartment of Forestry Building Code amended to Butte County stndards. Butte county .Fire Department Cooperative fire Protection *0 In Accordance with"Section 13.00 (Fire Standards) of the ,m.ruvement Standards, the water requirements for this } parceliproject are: (Applicable standards are checked). RICHARD D. TILLER ( } oattalion Chief 1 13.01-1 Requirement _Class I. A water supply for fire protection will not be required. 4 } 13.01-2 Requirement Class 2. A pressurized water j e9t17e9 system with adequate numbers o£ hydrants is pre- ferred, but if this is not feasible, the following option will satisfy the fire department require- ment for water. ( ) a. Water storage tanks with a capacity of 10,000 gallons or more, equipped with direct all weather access and fire department connection (S-29); b. In ground swimming pools equipped with a drafting connection or drafting access; or, ( ) c. A dry standpipe system plumbed to a reliable water source. Such standpipe system will not exceed 1,000 feet in length. There must be at least 10,000 gallons of water available and strategically located for each 10 dwellings, or portions thereof. (Example: it dwellings would require two separated sources). Provisions must be made to insure that the -water stored is always available and accessible for use under all weather condition ( ) - z y p, y q Tentative hydrant 13.01-3 Requtremeht Class 3. A preasu razed community water system is required.. ovations are t�dicated oln the attached preliminary ma Final 'locations must be exactly indicated and recorded on the sinal map- hydrant size Number of hydrants required , maximum hydrant to hydran' spacing feet, and installed according to Butte County Public Works specification tan nair+e Fu ma e S47 and requirements of local water agency. Required fire flows are gallons ,oer minute. Mitigation flows listed under other conditions. t 1 13,01-4 Requirement Class 4. Water for fire protection is required. The preferable system is a hydrant system capable of meeting the fire flow requirements. If this is , t feasible, a system involving Inde pendent pumps, static water storage and "dry standpipes may be subsLntuted, Such a system is subjectto hp such a system must flow thea r�uval of the fire department. The available waver flow from gallons per minute. The minimum volume of water in storage must be gallons, Provisions must be made to insure the system provided is maintained to its design tapacity. 13.01-5 Reoufrement class 5,. Pressurized water for fire protection is aVai able withirt`t,000 feet of the 'created parcels. in lieu of bearing the cost of installing a fire hydrant(5)the deyeltrier ma . pay into_ the fire department hydrant fund. Pay in- lieu fee into hydrant fund based ukt teA ag e.ricy bin tl,25 per frontage foot. Frontage is indicated by the red line on the attacfed map. Approximate fee i S Final frontage calculation to be made by surveyor and recorded on final map. Frontage calculation will include both sides of the street on included streets. Required Water system for fire protection must be installed and operating prior to building construction. )�X) Other Conditions.'.,...-- No onditions:_ .. _,... -- -_ No object:ionsa " Response times for the first 3 fire engines is as follows: CDF/BCFD minutes 1. station d. •;, - = ins -a� Les 2.. Station 1._,. , 3,4 Station _ Minutdt5 16 the Safety tlement, of the Butte County General plan, this project area is class' Mdas a_ i ) ,fire hazard area: sirl - SAOiti`11 county F'"re warden Battalion Chief li local ~stet a;enty requ'irQ-ert s for hydrants ray be core restrictive. A1 :T '1 F N ,% I U R A i. EIV F A 4 ' `� PLANNING COMMI SION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE — oROVILLI CALIF ORMIA 85965.3397 PNONEs 53840) ;hastan Company, Inc. March 300 1987 Box 4143 3hico, Ca. 95927 Re: Variance, AP 43-50-17 f Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Staff Findings concerning your application for a Variance to Condition #030 of PUD Rezone, Ordinance 2558, for Lot 14 -to allow a 5 foot setback rather than a 15 Boot building setback from exterior property line located oii the south side of Fust north of Bidwell Avenue, approximatel,T 1000 Victorian Park Drive, J feet west. of Oak Lawn Avenue;, Chico. A public nearing has been set for April 8, 1987 at 9:00 a.m. This meeting will. be held in the Board of Supervisors' Rt.mn 25 County Center DrivVe, OtOvillei California. ' Should youhave any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between 10:00 aim. and 3%00 P.M. Sincerely, B, A. Kircher Director of Planning David R. Hi:roniif►us Associate Planner DRH:1r Enc. Planning Commission given by the Butte County Aril E', cion Notice ,is hereby g County Adminis- that public hearings County dotupervisorsneRoom, p in the Butte County tration Center► 25 County' Center Drive, Oroville, California; regarding the following items at the following times: "'r'AgTTR'PS. 9:00 a.m. 9:o0 a.m. NEGAT Vito Quatraro - Rezone from "U" (.Unclassified)ceothe to R-2 (Residential) on property located an the northwest corner of Laburnum and East 9th Avenue, i�e,tifed as AP44.5-02--2-07, Chaco. Sigler pest Control - tj5e Pejo tconformto oingausefonCe d expansion of a pre-existing _ locate property zoned a--RofAEri9 htS reetesapproxinnately 550 on the south sid_ feet east of Bartlett Street, identified as AP#04-34-L-40Chico. , + Shastan Companyr Inc, - Variance to Condition 430 of CL_OOa.m• setback PUD Rezone, Ordinance.142558 for Lot l4 -to allowa 5 foot setback rather than a 1.5 foot building se PUD from exterior property lines on property . Planned.Un t Development), located on the south side of Victorian Park Drive, 3ust north of Bidwell Avenue approximately 1000 feet west of Oak Lawn Avenue, 11 identified as AP#43-59-171 Chico: s and Negative Declaration with The above-mentioned applications, map Center at ti ation Measures are on file incl aaDepaxtment�,�lCountywce center s Mitigation g Butte Col Planningapplications Drive�fice of Oroville�eCalifornia, If you challenge the above app ose issues you or in court, you may be limited to raising only thsaxibed Nn this notice► someone else raised at the publ3. hearing a or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission, at or prior to, the public hearing. BUTTE COUNTY PLANI3IN6 COMM SS`ZON B.A. KIRC8M DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published in the Chico Enterprise Record on Thursday, March 26; X987. vJ.4 lla --ZCounty Public Works county Environmental Health City of Biggs City of Chico City of Gridley City of Oraville Town of Paradise Planning Department State Transportation .Department DCa S'C�CC WATM;F2 Butte Watek :District =California water Service Co. Del. Oho hater Co. OWiD `.Chermalito Irrigation District Other U T. a:!rnrMS JLZ::i•1' Hoy z COMMENTS State Water Resources Department U.S. 1; MAR 241987 BUTTE. COU' lTy PLANNING COMMISSION Or"111e, Califoratq 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA S Ca PHONE: 534-460 TO: John Mendonsa DATE:: 3-23-07 Public Works RE f PROJECT T2 "VxEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Inclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning Inc. - Ap#435--17, the following ,project: 5hastan Company, Log487-03-X20-01 - Variance to Condition 430 of PCD Rezone, ordinance 2558 for Lot l4 to allow a 5 foot setback rather than a. 15 foot r l C oa:ted �l�guth , building setbac from e;�- ter,'ox o�op_eY��-�'ine5 sid- o t'ictorian Park Drive, just north of Bidwell Avenue, approx- imatelY„ il,000 feet Qwest of Oak Lawn Avenue. Chico. I Ve are making an assessment of possible environmental impacts and will be either a Negative Declaration, Mitigated preparing an environmental document, Negative Declaration or an Environmental Impact Report. Please provide any :factual statement.:; ideas for investigation, or opinions or expertise that relate to either you can offer in your area of :oneera impacts that this project may generate. physical., social, or economic i Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date. If no response is hs generated by this inquiry, then it shall be assumed that there are no impacts which are potentialfrom the protect. i � significant environmental We appracia-to any assistance you oan provide. Sincerely, €, 5 g"pi`1en A. Streeter. Senior. planner 0.rs r Comments:�7xrdr�_-.--� ---T- `u�"� .,-- (VIrite or type in spade provided & return this nheet.) t' ;x w al J • s J • +� • , x;92 This sot of , Plans an s l picationsfi05Y" 7°` w 20, s s-�-_.e kept on the to at al! ,me id i}.is r.u'tlawful1D' 1 e any changes or a terat;ons on samo with �7vlc written Permission fro the Department of Public TYPE io Works, County of Bu e. , I W I )r LL1 . O —wk I m r a I io .o .— ------ _ I 1.0 N I pp 20 : oil ! ,............... N U -t I Mat rials & Workm:I�'ux#,'I'l( &m'�' �, _ 70", r also with- Reco nixed'' mood R 1 Acco 9 lin,f "all pros'' rihed for th Spe,,ifiod use in } e ' ' rm ilding, lumb n & al E1 icgl :Acle, chanical 'Cada' a a c y d Q: N o r © a a o va:a, ray. �9' ► w 0 w OPEN SPACE EASEMENT .�I NN r r 0•00` ! N 08, 25.00' tp pj `fes setback of 5 ft, frc)M y roperty Clues and a set #k 14 9UIL{SING p p >. f RTMI, of 5Oft• from the road tiPr;rs•r-tee: ✓✓✓ centerline shall be clear 'f structures or equipment Xcep� _ For � � ft c�Ll �"rw-koverhan , +� X9,92` U'tiLi�i"•r b. � �. S 99035'39` W PHl1ASE rr�zr 4114r( 'i q 19$7 O OD PA 1 r BRYW DO D PARK SUB NO, t , PHASES i, 2 6 3 43'"59„ k , DTIV LD'T 14, J. B. R. 2ND SU6 IN SEC. 27, T. 22N. R. I E. M. D. B.6 M. 3.55 4 3 58 r(,�;,.�» .;r+C=� Y •w+�Y S rj FFASt- 3 31.)r fAan�V 4 •ry y �v ' F C ELI a 4-11 �Jl VJC'rORlAN PA RK :.e 9 AX AC '4A,, 14,dr, •”' � f+'i .. 9K1 ,• k4 � •5 r. a 'Ve rr ( �„, Gv� "' lC•j ' '.;. 3;� v SUNBURY . M ^a<,w..n.� " � .. ..�. ,� ,fit ;�_•.-o«� � �,�, � ...,. n 4 �' �'...�^ , c G`"� "1a " " i w w s 1 •~4`h»� �* �`ii.a .s�ln - ., r'O 7 �. : � � •Y u a "� .P � w.s„ 14 .ry 34"1 J7 x.'taFi 6"• is ' n Assessor's Mop No. +43-69 4 M �' P 1 4;• w.a r `._ County ofButte, cal t, J"hyo Af r'; i ew o It i'Jr^, t r "+tfj4V*' 104 A10 61 10`5• y`';