HomeMy WebLinkAbout044-054-014•,� ''oma
41�_.
a� P*
.
k.
/A
lei
/•
F
I
r.
i
•
�
r
4
i
to
i
•
�
r r S' r � r+
t ,
1Y
" r
AMITIAX F
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKM8T FORM
(To be completed by. Lead Agency)
FAD 'hog 78-12-'I�-0 > (TPM
I.- BACKGROUND, _ ?90_02-06 '01 (UP)
1. Name of Proponent Robert C Payne'
2. Address and Phone ITum er o Proponent:
'1086 San Ramon `rive clo E17.is Rolls
co---=,a . .' l�rir street
HICO Oai,
=92 „ ..
3, bate of Checklist . Submitted
4+Ag ency,Requirng Check]ist
5. Name of _i f, a�plicabbl mss. 1-v a ce
a ., o create
.Proposal,
4 parcels and V, 'Permit to a11'ow up exes
northwest Chico
I1,, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all"yes" and `'maybe'' answers' are req`iusred' "
on: attached sheets
p
YES MAYBE
NO
_. I. 'Earth. t+1i11 'the ;propa;sal result in significant
a. Unstable earth cc'nditions or in
changes in geo�.ogic substructures?
,.
b. Disrupt. ions,, displacements; com-
paction or, ov :w covering of the soil?
c. Change in top`ography or' around s.ur-
face relief features or removal of
1
tops.oi1
d. D'estL^uct'ion, caV,,,r or. modifier
tion of airy un'a,que geologic, or
physical features?'
e.. Increase iri grind or ry7ater erosion
so! s .' either ori or of ttie
o s,ite?
1
£i Change's, inr depsiton or ero3on
C f beach sands, o.r change's xn silty-`
deposition or, ero.skon` ,,,IC
may modify the` channe.�. o.f a river or
stream` or°the gibed 'b tieocean ,or
any b'°ay, xnlet or .ake?' _ �
g: r�oss.:Of ,primel agrimcultural _Y pro-
c ive .sriils"'outside desinateci
urban areas?.
�.
„Appendix 'F =� ,page 1 rt
of `�
}I
�ti5'4a
YES MAYBE
NG .
h "Exposure of peop e or property �o'
;
geologia. ,hazards. st>ch as earthquakes ,
,
landslides, mudslides:, groundfailure,
,
OrSimilarhazards?
t
2. Airy, Will the proposal result in:
ft.
a. Substantial. deterioration of
.. ambient.:. or, local air quality?
b. The' creation of 'objeci.ionable
, odors , smoke, or fumeOL
_. gniftion of air
C. S.i �.cant alteration,
movement;•moisture or tdmpature;
or any change, in c,limage, eithez
, loca3;ly'� or regionally?
3, tater.: Vill the proposal result in substantial:
,.
aJ Changes; 'in currents, or, thecou' tO
or direction of water iriovemen 87
._
U'>Changes' in ,absorption rates, drainages
-patterns, o,x the rate and amount of
Surf water runoff?
C:; tJeect for off-site surfaee drainage.
i.mpr,ovements ; Itc,luda,ng, vegetatj on
removal, charinelit,,ation or culvert
installation?
U.A1t Brat ,ons 'to the course or fl.ow
of 'Mood, water, s?�
e, Change ,it 'tie amount` of surface
cater in an,,.raatex body?
f:. Di°scharge into surface waters, or
in. airy 'alteaign of sur'face''
water qualit_,y; including, but root,
limited t6 t~empera re, dissolved'
oxygen or l':urbidi,ty? .-....-
g,4 Al:terati6n of, irection or
ra te, of` flos o ,ground Weters?
h, Change 'n the :quantity or quaffity
of ground wa.tr,ers , either ' through.,
direct AddlW4, or wit1� draFa"s
or through ntrercept on
aquifer by cuts or excaVations?
i
Appet, cla.x 'Fagg:
2 `off g
�ti5'4a
YES MAYBE
NO
Reduction in tbe' amount of water
otllerwisc available for public
"
water supplies?,
j
Exposure of people or property
c
to water related_ hazards such as
f 1doding7
4 Plant"Life.
Will the proposal result
in,
..so stantial s"
a,
.'Loss of ve�;etati"on or change an the
diversity _of speciesornumber
,
of'any aecmesof p1.arts (including
trees, shrubs,; grass;, cops,
. q c p
microfldr�. and a uatlents)
b .
Reduction of the numbers; o:f "any
unique; rare or endangered ',speeies
Alm
of plants?
c.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an, area, or in a barrier
to the :normalreplenishment of
ex sting species.:
d.
Reduction in acreage of 'an y,-
cultural crop
5. An" nial'. Life., G1 ll the proposal result
in,
sub 8t arm ial -
a:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of.'
an ma s (birds ,, land animals,
incl ding-re ptilesfish andshelll=.
"ish,
benthi.c organisms, ;,Ins etts or
m 'ta auna) `?
b'
Reduction 6f th e numbers; of ani
unique; rare .or enda'ngrecl specie's
of animals?
_
c.
Introduction of- new ° spedies of
a; or result
nYmals' into an aree
a barrier ba the migration or'
movement of animals?
} ' d
Reductioi' of , encr�oachnient. upon, W or
deterioration to existing fh or:
habitat?ji"
taldlife
Appendix"' F
'� 6
page 3 9'f r
Y4
6. Noise. Wi11 the proposl result ri
sub ntial ; a
--Y-
r
a• Increases in'noise levels2
Exposure of People to severe noise
levels?
T: Li ht and Clare . '
---, Gli,ll the
proposal
nro u"Ce 5-icant 1x�;ht or 914e.
tel
$ . Land u"s a Will the p_o osed It
in�•�nifxnant; r p resu
A, A1t,eration of the punned . 7 and
of
ori area us e
wliie will demonat,
rablyhl eadrend
alteration? to such
{ b; conflict uses;
properties Joining
Or conflict with
estabaiodeCrea�tional,
eduea=
1-6 nal r reli 1ous.
..
or, sci�
uses of a� .ntiiic':
n area?
Natural _Resource....-"
the
result in sub staK'iali1l proposal
a. Demand for, or increase in the rate
of use- of
any natural sources?
b ; Depletion of any nonrenewable.
-
natural resource?
l0. Risk. of Upset: Does the
proposal
�in�o1v.,e a ra;slt of ,an 'exI
, 5Tosion,br,
i:he release mof, hazardous
subatanc,e.s`
(ncludln but not limited to
pes tic;ides ' ,01-1'
chemical s or rad'.
in the event e an accident
conditions? or upset
ll, po elation; Wi1. ll the,,propo.sax
signs cant7;y alter` the Io.caicin,!
distribution,
,densl.:t l o .. &o !-h , .
rate of the human o ulaiort;r,f an
P p
axes ar p�1 '
y Ica7.IY`. d'i:vid'' .an
establa;shed:
community?
nw. : Wa.11 t11e proposaY
sign
ant].y affect eXistin. haus in
or create a` detand for
additi-o�,
hous 1 ng;? 4
Append".x
Page.' of
r
Ar
13. Tr�e"rtation%Ca rciilation. , tiiill• the
YDS MAYBE Nq ,
proPosa xes.ti t in: 4
a.. Generatton of substantial"'additional
v`ehi�etilar
movomont?
b. jignifIcantr effoct's on eki_stn
parking facilities, `for
or dem.arid
new parking?
w.
cSubstantial impact upon existing
trs,nsportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present
patterns of circulation
or movement
of laeople:andJor good8?
e, Ae ations tc waterborne, '.
rail or
ir�raff`ic?
f. Increase" ri traffic ha ards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists
WL
or pedestraris?
14. public Services. TiJill; the 'proposal' have
,aT e , ect upon, or`
re:,xIt
need .in a :substantial
for new or. a,tered
o;vernmenta;l
s"ervi3.ces In any of the followi.n
areas :
a. Fire protect1 n.
„ ,,,_
b.
,�,,, .
•est "
Police protection?
----
G
cs. Schools'?
d.. Paxics ores ot~hoL 'retreat'"
faca lit i�_ ' a oral
e`. Maintenan.re of public faczlitie"s
includin% roads.?
f : Other governimen'tal services "�,
Energyptop oso, l rdsult in;
a, Use of substantial "amoun'ts o it10`l
or energy?�
b. Suistant�al;' increase inclemarid upon
existing sources,o't
energy, ar
require the devel6pment of view
sources of enemy?`
l,6 : UtilltZe's". r�Ti1I the proposal result
in a•c� dor .
rie�r systems
, > or subs
statitj ialterationg` fNo' "the fol.lowrrig
tit3lities
- C App dik, P`
Mage o f'.
YE8 'N1AYI3E
NO
sustairirig .level;s, threaten to
el.? minate a plant or animal com-
miinity,; reduce the number or" restrict
the- range of a rare or endanerecl
plantor animal or �eiimina ' imp'oxtant
p
examples of the major periods of
Cala fornia history or pr°eltisto-ry?'
b; Does the project have the potential
..to ` achieve short term benefit's, to
the detriment of publiycly adopte d
lon -term `eyiro46
L{;men'tai goals?
c. Daes the project have impacts whieki
are individually, lim ,ted but .
cuiiitilatively. considetable? (a project
may impact on two—or more, s epara t e
xesotltc<es where 'the impact, on;. each
ritso, rce, is rel,stively small,,, but
where the effeot o the total.of
those idpaets on the environment is
significant)
A— Does the project have environmental
ef,fe.cts, which wi i cause stibstanta;al
adverse effects on human beings,._
either directly or i.ridirectly2
i
r.
Appei
'`'7, d:ix
page �` o,
Appy*odnt : Robert C. Payne Assessor's Parcel
DISOMSION ERI) Loi 78,12-23
A.
Proj ect Dedcri.ption
I.
Typo of Pro j cc i :_ Tentative Parcel Map & Use permit'.
2.
Brief DesQrip ion,_To create 4 :parcels ('I.! to '1.24 acres); use.,permit
to allow the development 'of, sib duplexunits on each arc_el. ,
Location: South side of Lassen Ayonue about, 660 f eet west of its
int'rseO on, with The E8planade, northwest Chico.
4.
Proposod Density of Development: 2 6 DU/ache (2 E diip exec or :48DU)
Amount of Impervious SurfAbout
6.
Access aad 1 axpx st Publ.i,.r Road(s) : Property roxitt,Vin, Ijassei�,'A-venue.
Method of 8 - wasee D i qo ' ., f mes & leaehfields
£i.
SoizxGe of 4Jr S ppl C all 0 rr�;i.� Water S;ervico Company
�.
Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent
10.
'Potential fox further land. divisions and development,: Proposal for
six duplex units on. each _-parc,el., total: of 24 duplexes (48 DU).
B,
,Environmental.Se'Gting:
Physical.
Enviro7ment _
a� n
a. Genoral 'opo9rtzpl�ziC., Chavacter:_' . Level
p_ diess than.
Sl es o
G: l;levtiot: '180 feet above sea l e'vel
actor None
2.
Soil s
a. Typo. an a Garactr,t,st:.rs:.;, Bina dine sandy loam - effective teeth
of S' '";eet or more, retains' moisture;' fair�.V well, r surface
drainage] good subranag e.
L7.�n iri FcictoJ
3
Natuxal Uazaco s- of tla e La1d
a. lJar"thuale Zone: Naris
b. Eros on I?otent�al °,'- Sly -get:. d. Fire Heard.° TJnclassafiecl
C . Landslide' Pot;ohtj.a : Zow e. Exp:ansi�re Soil, Potential,
L ow'
Hydrology.
Surface Water; N1A'
'r7