Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
044-330-012
i L or - • I r a e.n a �L.'rW3 •S • e 1• .1 PLANNnia GOPMISSION S M IARY SHEET , rn Al'IPLfiCAN12 __ But to r� . ourit Plemnln _ ("a.�at�r Co anty Gent car I)ri� ^. DR r1 cit O�totb,f s' .Tortkr ?Sc o`�iI°lE4r4X.`, .. "f?C 7 ?ESC1 � ION Rp�zonfi } t`x�curs �� �� t;-l;rztrc�Y�'t ran .Eta :�i�lr�ntri n � tsr� LtJC.�rI? ©1G an 'wfio, t niel� Bumill" AvE botwr�ori Eaton Pd': tjrid, i4,10; on Avw. Chi., i �... 1....12...Y.�?j:.., + 1-'7 Get. SUN )PROU,CT OONSIsvI -T?' DA!PE APPLICATION RECEMW .Deceit1bhtr .1,1, � C AA SE UZOICUt TVcTQX' SIGNATUIX- S 0MCK D SATE LEGAL .DE& P'E IAN :MtPAM OR CHLOXEID 4e ATE: LIGATION 110TIOL. WAI:i-T&k'r PWW 'DWTAY A�Maw.Y}ry1•/�• 1A���{y�1'aMYt{r�Y/ �} p.�/ y�y{ tl��yy!MM�MOMI�M�.Y,14[M�OY.Y�Y� `Jy�M�Hry4lM:{y. }rye♦�y�y�1 ,t AT Mmx G LIST ���Mi+� !�YN1:�lX+y yyyry���...���'... rJ 1♦,� �y��y��r GI , a44.i.�{.ABX w4Rrlr�#61�R�r+e+b�yMwiy. - ��''gy„g. ibww�. ,,•. OO WSION =MT 1°WIA 3 Mb�;bnle.�eE�IXtl`wMMr: rx��1YN�y,.�� {(��yy �MX,1��M �1,s mA=���Jbnlfrww+lawr�/Nrwlawwq�www •� 1 ._' ..,���w.T•www.hbswlWiRfw,f`4MY11'1.1wlilWl�.l{t CA,'. BGQRXCA ,,X W. lKloo _- DATA, VIUD � «4��i+Ul. CI�iJk4�dn:A«�J.Y' r►�cY�+•w.�tJt.+MrYuwtl.Me.sauwgq..r . ASD IIA,T ITBOATI t b=WLkTXON - DATE ADO { t i,R IMPACT ,1WOUT A013 OT IPI10 A'R.�.R—"" - -;.wRnYiJ�eWyrRrf.arp�p�;.,rj °R' . 14,Y#MtneMM �y •. �'Y'��( 'MM1k21Yw^sNlA..:hwMl ./ApYY .... YJ`I�'1NnMP�'Mw'ol.taillf.IWM'"W�"aP+i11�YlYq�w.YMMM 001MMUZIM laARTNO 10413.0 el :,V - �RM�s4,MYi�YKMAweaR±R�WMw!wWrrq�s�liihw++n+11M+�M9w.:R wXeM".r �An:u+{+�rnp.�rr�b ': . .. ;.. _ r.�.wwwlfiweWO+n'+4�f+',.7.siRtwlMM4!�'�}tAHMb'�femMyrw'hbr'�iMu4�+c'w+.b'+rWwi+i i � i K AVO 41.I.+#'• '1i.4BID - - wNMMww1M+.rw.Mlrw!N±YNIt +�RMYKM�.Y'+m, n!dY`.w"�li7r�w441./'ifbtM4Y..+._... y + � r , � 'APPLICATI, R I: I( 0l lNf BUTT COUNTY Ps`i�:���1 . )COMMISSION APPLXAN`'r. Read and faffayy Instruct rens as #et for- v rah Also $hld Of this for-m. Applicant'i Name alt S It ., t f lx i"i OMk4gUA Phone Na, . # 40 Q! ., . x. Appf cant°s fN�if�ntj Adi�r��sx ,..�.xa?«,W.�%trf;X�� �f�i. ':'::�rir � +,�.��. s.: >4�,��k3r.�,.�'�. �' ..�,�:m�,:. �.�.��� �:,...� .•�...�... �T:,... �.w...,,�...,,_..�. ADPIl,cant'$Anttrast in gropo►ty OVnern Lessoa, Other) --cI " Ownar`s Name 1=4 Owner's Address Assess. oris ParcuI Number sN { r .r u _ _ Present Zanih - _. ..s. f3eQUES'f',47,,'�,GNING . .: �1. �.... Location, dimen#inns ani! size of area (s) to bQ rezoned a C C�„a t ori tit; st �i,4y o f' 13Urnap Ave, �, .. _T �r, eri a drx �Rd.� Ani -La.S O A� ��thic-0.. Appltcants's reasons for rezanih9„� rl f2 # ,• ZS2 lTkj iZl,� -zemmE ar Ihg"S.,:1go-ep. 4th L'�OLIT1d5 T}� . i it 1 hereby daolare. under penarty ofperlury that haire, read and unddts obd the' Instructions and that the faregofriy f statements are trua, coreiplete §ait1 corre+ t to, the best of tny' knawler+5;a artd belief° �' i Dated,A IOA,1:.bnpfiacht}s 5itta#ura „ f Prosect Pile,Nornbee.— Geharnl Plan besi�nat�on�. MidiilttT_ac1�71��.'rvw���iR,�,tit'�T��.� fiartuestCanslstent� . �,...,�..;,.,..�.__.�_„ ; �I'. J Sat; Ab�vr� f _ , � •. w..wW-rmax. .....Mi*sn. -YI Ma5n'�...wv+nt� wv.rcv.}rw, M �1u p ,w+�u++.:. _ VI AWY� 2.,,,, AA, Noniber(s), Locatlon Oescrlptlon ',; X- Owe ctship M Le a) Ootd 1ptiort of Area __.».Proof o - kgencs If lid, elt tfi 6 Maps of Area u -Omo Ct: Q1500A.ppficiitlutl tieCillVptf ”",, w f iia gitif N01. ,—...,.. Ap►ifr ntlon 1 alien. by ...... i� INSTNUCTII a" TO REXQNIN6 APPLICANTS - L If appl'Cant is not thoz owner, written authorization by the ow,'ar or, tither proof of 890ncy must be Submittedin order far the applicgnt tq legally sign the p(rpllea-tign. k 1ippHCatirNti. shaft' he' conAirlertitl �rar�s if ,�kj signet( by tha,, phvhdr�dr le��f agent; 2' All, items on application 60311 bo, filr6d in at Completely at prassIN6, If an itam, Is not apOcaOL Please indicate byrthe term INA,. . it it very important that the apphOttan include 6:1 atIcurate and complete description of the property propo"sed for each requaste',tope. The appli ' Eie�*e;C;pt pro,i ocw �f Bate PlleI d Env'iron#iante:l informrj Vorm ' (Ta be oomrrlotAcd by ap 13,oti4t) t , GENERAL z' ' ., firs a�riA'r iGc� , r ;�. / t, Nemo nrid a,adreas of devolgpar or profoot sponsor c-'cx f_R,•�CtN�," S W" a ,tM / t;.�+a.�w. �...�.:.: W.: i.,..r',._..' �... Addxe's s o ro�j dt� t r � . ,�cam' sc r Assessor's Block �+ir Lot Numl�et 4 - :l .-NAme, address, and tel epbone nuniber >F p rst xt tobe o.ontaoked conc^X'tl; ng, this pxoject G•, Type of, projoat' (I.e. xev.0nihfi, mubdiva,Slon: rrc'-JAI,a. 5. List and describe ,any othor re' latc"4- Permi lrt,s Ano 8thex publ I'd approvals; tags ired. fo-e this p1roject, tndli tding those 'eggl.tod by C�.t•y, tL Tonal f, stat ate 5 Existing zordog dfstridt: .y - R Ptoposed ttse of sits; rff �}-.�-..V.»,...�.r,., ,ywyr Site {1 .:te 'sizek ,qf Square footagp oC bull,dl,ng(s). 10. Number of rjoo� s of ronstxuc flan. �r�" � l i Amau#jt. of ,off-atroot p�j:t tK w Proposed s'C!kIodmt t�,i1,.ty , �: "q�•„&.p+ 4: / , �A R ./ Y"lM,, I 5 At�,ti p� t t no,,t,c) me. n.,t, klr pmd"it V n 'u a;E 3'; G9 eg tho number or urjj,t,5,, gchcdvac� all( o'F' unit d SiZO, Qxvoctad,. jwl 17., ia! type, whether rielghborh or tegilona y or At O'dt, O;t' 0 0 area, and 1014 in n d u, s. tr' 1 in'611catia type andloading $,a 8 t i6m; t9d opIplo'm shift, tr I it ties.. P o' t; 19,2 trtethe major functio employTile n, nt per �shjft e'stimTtod, 0 o'ev'Udo r>e�ipancy, load r. �ctd dommunity ben.i' OatiM44 dcili4es�"'toromthepeO'i00t,0. f tho' PrOJOct i4vOIves, it varia state this tloc. conKtitiorla e sta, .1 �tequired, JSL and indicate clearl"Or why cle, applic -At5 "�7- Are the, fo,llowjng Discua$ tems, aPP'licable to the pro below all c I ct Ot lit -8 effects?.` yes(attAch additional,sheets as in exiA , tinA C6acures an beaches, lak or hifts, or suintant' ' I la'A alteration Of qbntourg, 22, a-LFI0ificqnt chango in scenir views or vistas from 3, �,ng residential areas or PublILC JandS� or 2 �I 9fti f 10 an t . roads ly! change Nltterft, elatiera (.1 Scale or ciharaater of 24. Significant ntnounts, oe ,,Ol,d, ware Or litter, 25, nL du,, t h; S m o k o fum'6.1or odors 'n, Vioinity. i- 4- 26, Sig"ViCicant ch,-ingL, in lake, quality"or quantit,,t, or Or grotIfId" water Oratioa, of exl';t' Patterns, iftP, drainage,J a�vels , Ift, the vic"'*Inity� an c istinlg b0i8c or vibrdtionl 28. Oft, ftlludAufttj or on, slope of 30' pdrdbat or, more, 29. U or dispo,4,,,j,j of Potohtially havxard' q , hI 5u0,IV'4S toxic substntjoos, -Ou, a, e al es, or explollq1v,G�S- 0 G „ OF, SOERVTSORS tr j= ouMu Co, Plannt"o Comm. COUNTY Or: BtltT9��� 4, 8 1980 1tRk Gfti2AL NOTLC6 , " OAIN, Oro��1h� _ , i D+ita, D'eaemhgr lt380 - l Tat Plan iri Subject; Ff bfin anC� cat;fi J'on]cse 1?sE conceniW chaninY1lq.r' � 'L onLnI; If f: to Rw for AP 044-5`3 o�016-0, proon Bum na venue between 9at0n �toec and Lassen I1 hao bean refettc to you, Please ,otudy'the mjtter k 1' f rot yout itiformati"6nli F.ir�ame 'take t'he i'blicwi»' i►ct on: P gaff Q—tudy t=-n r:rr, Report 'Ce iloerd oh ._ AcfVipe adtiah tdkenj sigh beivtry, an retuti cl'etk 64 the 'Bon id of�BUpe�vispro,; 4 im hotietl`, to "tkle i J� i /� 5tgneture df De�lartinent I�ier1 ...�. t TI LD 81.86 TO: Butte County P1:tnning Commission Stall Findings Alarch 11, 1981 ANT APP'LIC:.�.� Butte County Board of, Suporvisor's L ; OWNER.: ban 4 Catfiy, Jenks, 2.998 Sardi Dtive 61� co, Ca., and others RIrQUEST: Rezutio to "R- " (Mti'1t1-Family Reside xtial EXISTING Zu,. LOGXTION': East side; of Bur'�na 1,V&nue between-1aton, � ' Road anis Lassen �ve i AP Nb: 44-33-0-102 44-33-0-12, ' r , 14 i 15 ExxSTxNc LAN17 USE: Single family djvejiings. Mobile home on (44.33-102) Jenks' Property SURROUNDING LAND 89"' Notth-singlo family; 1v0st-sing1e family molailr hotftes°; s,iuth-mr�bile home park; eG 4` r;oy t, ants; oast.condomini um p a artme par g evelb ed, d - titi St,1,0OUNbING PARCM STU Varjedi i/4 acro j+to S acres and ;,urger II. znN'ING HISTORY: "A-, Ord. 522, August 29, 1995; ,,52"`ktf, Ord. 2133, 'August 9; 1980; ' Ad.Iacent R 3 to south a %d east; OHi 2136, September 1611 19,80 GENERAL PLAN �' , MediUM :bens�.tykei i -:tial APPLICABLE RE-CULt�TTONS' bensity allotaed 'i s "uIj to 8 d to ,� in 9, i p Acte, << un;, is er, ANALYSIS: Staff recoft-a's "tiaat P"r3 zoning be �,afttitod "i on a,!tivo. parte", 9 , I Tito RAS zone is cansi�tent with both the adopted and Vropr,ged C3enetal Plans, Tho rcc_Gntly` adopted A-3 OfO to t'ha ea��`t, and south also oxtonds to the north ancl� s ccirineots to i3urnup Avenue; creaj,ing+i{'1an'da" oZ S ngIe ' 'atn.tly toning AjOng the caste s s io of Rini ocip Avonue TIt'e oxistiii sin �,e tdtily homos would reltlairi as ail owdd, usos in the R*3 lone, w 10 "C1"i'7S COUNTY PLAN14144; CC Marc} 11; 1;9231 . rsSl:nN Ai ITEMS &I bMICH XEGATIVE j'U'RATIONS its�tif t �:°:t; r' ly A °m7vvCt7iTMENDED " 'Butte Cowat7 PlawALng Comtniss Rezone '1'rbm trS�R r Suturbata-Residents "�R�S r� a t to (Mtllt� Vama:lyRtr sidentit l )' prorra.rty locaUed on the east silo a1' AUraap Avg., bPtwetyn Raton, Ad. and tag en Are , ident3i'ied as Ap 44- 4 15 move described paxti U.16111y res: 1'h e Std X09.0 f t : of -the , NV 141 f t . ,- the tW 41 of � th"o St lO4 ,£t. 61' the itr� ft, ; the , 2 0:4 Wit. ' . th*M NN '75:O ft. Of the SR 330,0 r t. , and the :SW 3, 06.9 ft OS the S 75+0 t, of the IJW Ii 0,0 ft,j of the S� ��t7 ft or, tot o:r 11140`tar Sub" psr map Oe reooa,d its reap b 0 k' o oh page �?j or: fij,? ,irl the bf,1ict of the i3�xtte Cotmty eo0vdptj gn6 ail tj"at pgIt of bu,tno Acre. Xooated act 'ao ntto the IN 460.0 ft: of �ggad ,Tot uotrtaildin" .0 gores O1."e or less, .Ohioo. j S�! ADOPT' 01Dl!lA:tCE 2207:, POLIC 11LUjI?C: DUTTE iCOU[QTX P PROPOSED NECATiVE DECLARATION COI�IINY53ICN AND RE20NE,NNZNG TO '�it-3" (MILTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) �'RQ yrs—g" (SUBIM-RAN REMENTIAL) PROPERTY LOCATED ON 'JAI BAST SIDE 0�" BURNAP AVENUE; BETYWEEN .EATON ROAD AND LAS AVEP#�sE, IDENTIFIED AP 44-33-2 L3 14 15 i1S b 102 CHICO p en Commission negative declaration e Y g Proposed! ndrrezone 8 he BuCte�rcount Pllanresidential) (multi f8aiil• raalic kf,rom , s -R aident a (suburbAn ri � Y idential) i 1} to R-3 A venue ►p1.roperty located on the east side of Burnap �, nd Lassen Avenue, identified as AP 44-33-12� 14 15 ana102n Chico was dhe'd as advertised, ;i3, Bettye Blair' g , plaints director set out the background oil the rezone. The Planning Commi1sian recommended approval, ' E+srl.'�alson, environmental review director, set out the background of the negative declaration. This is a higher R density .and wil result: in additional traffic. more raaidences will be pots aircraft notes. The a ntially enpoaed oil conditiona-.ma to He recommended a negative declaration, limn the density in Che area. Hearing,. open to the public. Appedr:jg; of the people Ilion was representing about 9S percent R 1. Terry Iriou. Mr. — le in the effected azea. The been ,that the neighborhood was not awarneofave three pArcnls zoned foI r "S-+ " g R zoniA and ,the peo a in The area h bieen recomdiended the Inot � ,t,] area were awarad zoning had been Included: Hrr was against the zonine.thot the rrR-3ra ie " It Y E The neighborhood ti Thdl n residences, There is no sewer within a mii't of this area: There is no trailer ark in the p ,area. �r This area is basically single family res3dence$t area is RT—i+' zoning. ten baits ofduplexes across `that the street were done wMe'n Che�arehuhisor st311 '!A-2" zoning. There are three of the Was ioaing people involv©d in Che a, who are op,ded to that toning, tie asked that the Board zeconsidex this entire arra. t'he would like Y a rro thio ,proF�c�, resolved ritorium on future,b�xlaing until Supervisor Whedlde ataeed that because of the tebt3tton lain t he sting; the Board changed the;zaring and ' timo P Mrs Yrit�n,,;� eayiagathehe ny was mists � resented. Thexin is onl one big zoning t.. that is hav �� _ o g parde.l in the R-.3 eo�amuu3t w�►etts tfiae p Y g work da�,e on xt. The rest ire 'open, fields d the to .Bo#zd q a' reco+nader the ent3rt:azes6 _ I 60b'Q t1 �,' Nit Jenks. W. ith" felt :that ;if cnudemiinitum is allowed next to his 'property, he should fie allowed to build condominiums. His property* is 315 feet by 70 kept. xf there is no sevd:r,'they-tiall have to meet the percolation tequirements'. There are 'E4 condominiums almost, completely surrounding his property, The ".RT -111 zoning is a tabile home park. The same 4.th the duplex down the street, they are apartments6 He felt that the tqk 3" zoning conformed to the whole area. Supervisor Wheeler stated that Mr. Jenks had told her he was -' content with 'the "S -it" ttesignation. Liken many of the large rezones notice is not Sent to theeo le i4aividuall . The Board made this i'R-3" P p y `,. zoning. There are apartments next to hit 'praperty 50ervlsor Dolan stated that the people knew the zoning was coming fanrarii with as "S -Ali designation and, when the Board considered the matter' t vas changed to "A-3" zoning: Ht Jenks was left in'the "S -Et" zoning. and tie others received "R-3" zoning 3: Petd Catalano. Mr. Catalano statiPd he dvned the lot next to Mr. Jenks. lie fdlt the Board :needO to draw the line am Tai r as ;the "R49 g ry �, ,&h rise p n hi,s back yard. zun.�tn" . E#e ob acted tr, two sto e a nrtments i 4. Kathy Jenks. tars. Jenks stated that a person, co build a Wo story house next door to him. They will be'hav11ng twostory' apartments' staring at them. There are apartments arolihd t5e cother that looks into their back, yard. She felt that as conatruation was accomplishe'do the road would be improved. 5. Anita "utrang. T1s. Strang she voul.d like to: tee single, 2 family character of Che neighborhood maintained; Jim Tyke: Mr. Tyke stated he was the rather of Lot= y:3 �Aich 4 presently !zoned "S -it's toritng. He set Out -the zoning far the parcels, surr�,'c►udirig' and adjacent to his property., Directly attoss the street from hien is 4 mab�le home pant or s; singl d faviily todident a�. trailer arca: As far As he was concerned this was. ;a mobile home park. As fair ds the carnet o Lot l5 ab eating tosomeblr,e looking down ipto hid back :yard, there is already a t,•wo story house that looks into his propel ty. 1'tiis' is an s"res that the iaajarit" y would take iosud With this bung all ifj 1'0 area. Wax' felt ' 7a Delbert Wait. Mr. the area wase toot's', in qhs "R-i� zoning than in single fainly redidences. in the entire area there are Airpl,oxes- and mobile home P' drks, apartmetsts Ond vith 'the od.,X" toning there caul be hot,�aer and ;tittle that could .caUee s health robxeta. a felt that s would *t thtl ata 1n* biat,t+tt c _ 6141111011-104- � S. `Perry Iriort. lair. inion was inteteistcd 3n stopping future evelopment. Ha. s.sked that the line be drawn and allow the rest of the fee to be singlefamily residential:' 9a. Dan Jenks. lair. Jenka statll ed he would m+i' rather see " development on Burnap Avenue 'thara. ,t y taking out oro-hands. lU carol ;Lund. his. Luia t stated she owned tha two story housQ eifig di.scussa. she was cFatn�:t high riga apartments.; 11 Kathy Jenk_�►. ats, ,tanks etated' that fir,, triorn, was day ng let the 66 condamini,umt be built and then sFop them there: That is fine. for him. to say. These °fwypes ;of developments complere:ly surround their roperty. , I Mr. Trior�i' ler ea}�i:tg stop the line thoraii why not' etdp it ons r►er and 6ilowr their laird to :be ni n 'the+It«3'r roning.,, n' r l� 111ts Cale at,vn. Ms. Cibidtdu stated hai,� property pias, ursddr canaid8kzatts►aw r,iae did aeSCnnt to baa included in, the "R: 3" xniag. Thi doi:aa diad t" t, 49fic era heavy. Shea would Fara to ase ;Cha "R-3n tesla/s 5ahmud bar property. l caring` clod d to the pytrlit and confined to the board; Cal motion of Suparvia.ar Wiie clear, ascondea, by .$uparvtaor Lemfsa ' +rud r1nanim<*usly csrrled, findjbg the proPoaad, projidet could mot neva a ilagulficant 'ffact on the anwiranuteRrite a negative declaration was racaemaesne�ad. , on md"' do of Supetvlsor `hhaeler, secondad' by Suparvisot� Dalen Y And iantnizoouxiy carariad, utr,didg th prof act in tonfarmity taitka, th,s General Plan; :noting tl:a,t the Enviroudontal Ravi w bepartmeint checklist has dean tivievetd and ;Pmpl�etad; the resavinea from "3"g;' ' # �i ,� �eubur'tan raaidential� to it�3 (multi family tcwidtntial)`; property located on the most side of, Huraap; Avenue, hAtwaan Eaton Aaed std Leysen AVsnuC, idebtii`iedfeta' Aid A4 33-40xeGo rrraa:' eYppravadQ Ordinance 210 ' gear Adopted and the. 1 41rman authoriod 60, aigni Cin motion of Supery am Whaaldr, eecondad y Sapearvisot Dolan and Unenimouely carrisa the resrone► from "S-R't �sutyurban ra6ide>atial to OR-,31' (multi,fal. y re aidentiatl)'; propatty located on the saet ®�lde or 3urnep ,�vesaaua . 5atween gatiari' .Road and >:,eisaan Av'eanue, identified as AP 44-X33-11', 13;' 14 att4 15, Cnida wras denied wthotiC prej,Udice �n,ttatitiin�o:f� SUpervaior wtaeeleri aeccnded by 5uprrvisoi Dolan an« ur►enitaouely im rriede' the Plaruattag Aepartmatib wad insttuttad 'to Stody; end initiate tatain9 for the remaining pnr.ceals in the r'g-� r' xahing destgnartlo,�, in thak ar'e , axe;ludina the p+rrceii it ..ttai' tly uadnr, dsvalap eine E anr� feyr the aersllar� port imeii thaC are cdrtarxCly its grr >tonitar to, be taaiYidarad fcr ri0810ferxily keetf di'ntas in thL4 irrex; ,43' . 7 '�"'�� +: y'.11 J � 5 REM:FE- PORT Ap,r?:acant: BCPC Owzier; Dan F ,Cathy Jenks ,& others - Request: Rezone from S -R to R-3 q• rjocation on the {V side, .ot Bttrnap Ave , between. Eaton Ra, .,, • Lassen Ave . , Chico' '.; .. Date;Aob1:On Retllte-'.-?,J: Number of Pavools . �" rri� 3.Q3 rcres Ftai niz t�amm hsioi %irldin�d Rind the project in. co:At ori ty :with the General P1anf and Dote that the Environmental r<evidi DepPirtment i checkl:45t has been reviewed arta recommend adortion of it Negative Declaration of rnyaronmcnta i impact; and 1'laz ia�^ oommjs,5ion Act:Lon, Recommeit. nppr()vai o£ the Project to the Butte County Beam of Supe°risers a, 9 JsSjj� Donner Wheeler oominen' ' ted th?t he feit that the. Commiss.lon` !� previous dedisIl, or (Airport 'reVolt 6not to alidw this density J.h this ' Vote; 3-2 A;�' Gominssieneirs Sdhra�ex, hcnnet�t �thtl �hn�;rmnn ' ;` `` . ti + r, An9 Lambe tt Gdinm�ss�,on:,rs 1Vhee�.c� _ "STAIN, d t; j Y 'VF wltw M DIS atbljolou ITST Vol, Rb X„/. Cowat'v ,env,, ;40414 V, 114ZIGATIaN WAT�,N city of MeZ Burg watot, Vidb' City o. Itlu(I xhum .�x� 4 }�.s „ l;.ty 04 Gridleyotovill.e-wzyond. lxr, Dict, City OX uroville Varadito lrri Det• MtZ of Paradise Hi,-hvalo Xrr County " Table Mot. ,.,, �iGo�c r`nzaepore itin )3ept Thottalito Irr. Dist'- DaMESc WAS Ri N SAtl.X'TI . 7- --Ch--co Water Co. 1xea �: o& Park Mot, Bloom Or Mtn' aal n v��fi Durhom. AreaPoo o ` GG park 'Dict ,. Blv'sh Oreek Zste'tes Peather'River qo6o & PVk Ditit- tate Wator District Park . he Rea, &Par CA Water Serviao° Coo W" a,00r llirhl vara Roc. � Park �;L ; Urban oro & part o� ttoviila) Stato Iynx' � Red. DoabY,� � ... Del tiro Woter Co. Stoto Vi ah 4 Came Dept: �.�ex'ttd,i.so ��3 nes-� sc�aa� I3TST�2SCl'C Fenthet Polls cLouisiatta► 'oroet Pacific) t+ch Iutua.. Butte Cotamuoit7 f of age Oman Miitati . �Skansen Sub,) BUt4 a County, Supt at Schools CTrean ,Acres, k0lenwood, ,Dr, Chigo) 0A C4a o Dnivero , Chico` Labor Camp Ch 'a Unii'iod Gridley �'+� Durham �tx�.�led. Lake Madxone Woter Mai. ., � - MagAlis Co. water Mi8t. Mdrrar ��txtY .. ,ppe� , golden Feather tSn�,an , mills) Cr nigh, Mulberry � Water 1, Chit;o)_ Gr9dlo taxon Ndxthwoodo Mutual �Po-;ceoh Vat�ot) Or ovalle El.emetitaxy Rhm�re Water ordvxlle c�c�lou nigh 'Springs of Vita Wata,rO, 1ermo UniD e �;�'iiariaxcigau. Cpx tags) polerma Utta.ata ;; , ()7i,anbnd ;�tzGerntioisbi) " fihoxml,d CTi:at� aat'lCicil�l Y l lC 'i��+ 'w e��7 a M1�.� e C` '.a�Si.M'Y i IP {.♦ , -' M.�D-urb_a�nk Alb4"" UviUl�i���y Dig Li ♦ V1y+ylr& X6ll17dd e) , • Stox �y Boner �Jotitai. ';Dibt *f&— 2' AL 'ani ,rti L" X"rtin � a�'to lrr, Dist. 'edr i ria Y Service Area 26), . FIB � �,,T�caW, yy r� µ y yy ..._ J� � Medio 1tire -Pvo dot!'../JrJ,��J�:iry ��yyi, � .:i.0O�.t�'i ti� i .L/i+ liL sNGk L/ Y A7 i� C!7'EJ ki"�*v U � agtate llivia�oir��a��Farostry �;..t.. `_ • + f 'M6800fTO 'AIM'tM J? PITS ITAIUCT8 'Tan B�CB `p1 OTEC' q rte:....:..:. «.w:..;«,........ •o"�e"`. iiMMe f'a`t-tcol Cbunfy of 1, PI.A N i11G UERARTMOT'S:INTERDEj!A ijM%IAL F EVIEW RE��EST PlOnning Commission'i,r y TO'�,., 4L{tAtr,rji£36l—t13c..;.c�l:�, Oovl(a,Cnf+ifbr�privo95gb"r; REQUEST', $mjs ,,'a. e0.ti ¢leni APIVO,,- Cel-86)44-n-Jt,_13t ` 147 15t 102 DESCRIPTION Or PROJECT- rliezon....f't9 ifR-�B" e11(1'rban lingli n.i`l) i 11 [-tt ti qtr in LOOM ION:n �ULq ido,_.o1 ]' nap w _- {.IS LILYYAefl .' Cly i d 'q citP'fl AYo Ch.ircj j ALWAN `: , F D0RESS: �,.���� �inilrt'iry fir*hf-�•r 'h r• ��Cl�rn f i � .-.. „.._.d,_� : _. OWNEt; tQY���+�111C4Bi:b.� y� 1- PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHebULI. b _ . ATUAN OATfi REQUESTED,, AMP p bA"E DISTNIBUTEr�, ,,�I�rl� r �;. A9 t ATTACHMENTS. Capt af'applicailnrr �t,piat Plan. RETURNtD:, Z COMMENTS--. 4 ..-"_=„mow-_.�...,-...;� : •,rte ' r t, i y P NI !R M l IIViRC7LPAR NG DEP.' 'i- E� .. _ P1ormin Cahlrr}itxi4 T �iEVI�tA� MENTA Couy can -ro: i 11 i1 z' t�1li '�'litttf�,Yltal Health' or Dtiv�t' f„ys�,�y���,,,,, 4ravil�or Caliifern�d 95967 OWUEST" ReVieiy Ct trim nt ' E. 21ti�P AP NO, f' ..., tSI =56 44- 53= I - t4AW A , Cl$CkIP'rlON aE PAOJCCTc P01� x � n + �� i5' 41 k�tx�C1 Rq'gllcTeT,tLal 'f;a "P--,t f.vupiTl0R � ,W-Ou r s" „ �.y'�+' ,- rx tt� rL7�y9 f • f a �rt',Av 1Y iJV �- - . ... MFY'c'+��K�4VJC.1Ywiiuh�-:. �_•.:. •py1C-�i�Fwt-�:w'CrWM:,.. �c�sW.+v_.Wcifi�+:b3�4M'a6xT1�fS�= APPLICANT:"Y��mcpi... aW�er: . m Alist F �rw A'ETURN SATE A—QUESTED: A,ttr y e4 11Y;11eaFt�t DATE 01STAf lUTED:. � JAS i N ATTACNINNT CP MIcPat1�� $t pf1 �,Jil9`;�:4;�Q[r11+ , b.. flF.TUfifVEbi ' CDM�4EN I s1i ���f�`���t� �'L:��d-i���.d►.���ijt�/t :i'��ll� � fj t �{j,.�; 4rL� w iwC�4[ c1y � � �'VP�, i N 'T�s. � t�3 fl�c1-• :r -- 7 7- �' C"1 w �. pinnnrrrr'�cmmi:iiari l iIRC1E Mrd '� PLANNING ( E'' FiTM_ENT'5 7c;ttrrnn'ar Drive` ?' n w pp U, ©rdviii�F C�IFr�erniM .y5965' ror 61 ^-h., � ws.1 RE'Q J.EST., r pos.. LOCATION., �2� w��� �at.� ,.o:� :����t�x� Acts., eD�.�#,� Aire.. 1 Chipuuttv Co,-: ,i 1 �, Y APPLICANT: r C tuft �. S ri15 i�� � �n yo � ' Rtq' k KANNIWV WMWI$MN AdTioNf 9GNE,DULE[3 (; FiETtlFi�i 17ATk-A,t00ESTS0: r15Af' `e'bznz y l , ' 1981 DATS'01STMI'SUTtta: ,. i' .�, �L�C)Aj ATTAONM i�rT5; app �N' pol� �tiori Sc plat 0-.Iaq. _r ..� i.. , P 7Z , ids! � �•� ^ .. ,Yep: -.. . - "^' ' u t ma _ 'r t _ , ..�..u�,,x;,,,,m.;..� rx wiwa u. .. ."-�':wp....wal�wu«kr-+..u.wv.•�..----::.`-r•--•- , ,r ;,A a ofG teier � �IiNG bEPAR INTERDEP "iTMENTAL RVEW Flanf iorpEIRECIGES7C . C,CS.iLAN,.,�C val '. Qct��:�'� a� CCi` oBn l CClroolv�l iv l6ayiy cal � r FiE(�UE51'a �� fl� iewr ,�c1�, ®into Co. PlanrtingC� 9z8ufornia 6 `NJSfig_ �J• �� '�*0� p: rE 1 2A b ., 5GR O � P S7, lEC`t'� `OLtt "f.3.»t�i' ��z'tsrnr'hAn Orov?11a Califcrnls i' r.�,.,_ � S��a fi ZETi�� ry'1.� J L.OcAl oNz APPbLANT: ADDRESS= ° Qlc�iris�a ram OWNER: PLANNING COMMISS16N ACTION SCHEDUL�b RE'iJRN I]ATE EEOUE5 TEb; ASAP DATE CI51`RIBi„ITEb:" ATTACNMtNTS: 'Copy ryf ddpli atiiin plot plan, f 100; u FIMONED.- k CbMMENTS; s I I , a , PLAMN1ND_EPAR_r► EN1`' AlMEN AL REVIEW RE50t3'ONTERDEPA�l=S7 F1 -,0 Sk &mment, 0eSCk'IP'TIQN OF PROJECT, ���II•�V��''�R.t�„i,J ��'.4� ��F'T �p�df�'�y �F 11 .i. �.:. 1Fes: t„ 1 i rt `%OCATIONrClem ,, `'luryap &vo,., Ali4t0ii�t�Y� �zwa�W; . �.. " APPLICANTt ,. hitt), OL81rtv llikti, i k .fA{9 �'r1�,�„ ' � � �, y�, r'(q�—ani ,4CyTY�,�,�,.� w�',r; ,r,. iw'•.r��� - �w• l--r.1�.a' '�I w.r.�.�j OWNE.Rt� Ak, 11Ath PLANNING COMMISSION AriT?ON G AEtURN KATE RE4;JeSTO: ASAP s DATE )ISfAl8UTED.- ?7C- ATTACHMENTS, RETURf�Eb rr � , COMMENTS-,, d , i A\1- w�i w . _...� i. - r i mss. rc' YA Ar'X OIDI', ' . �i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) l ,RDERD Loll; A 81-�01-�8-03 X, BACKGROUND Planning Me # 81--8 1. Naive of Proponent Butto Cour, ty Plaririing 2. Address ,and Phone Wvim er o 1'�- roponent: Commission & Cathy (fan Jenks, et. al Count] Cant:e:r Drive urov 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist t; r' S. Name of Proposal, If applicablc Rezone fx•om S -R to AP ENVIROMM-14TAL ztrnACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required' ; on attached sheets.) YES MAYlmNO — {" i, 1. 'Earth.. t•7il.l the proposal result in significant.. � a. Unstable. earth GdCiditiaY)s Or in _ t, changes in geologic substructures? 1 b. bisr)iptioas, displacements, come .j action or overcover in ' of the soil? P t; 3,1 c. Change in topography or, ground sures ieC features s offremov47 i n,i face -�re1l". to ps, dI Destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any uni quc f,evlogic or physi.Ga�. �'ertttire;a`? e, meted- in wind or mater erosion of soi.t.�, cither on or off the site? f, Chah8c,"s in deposition or erosion ' Of beach stands, Or chane ,n sa It a- tioh, depo4tt'lob Or orosion which `. may mo4lry the ch.-Innoi _oc a rivoi- or ystream or thc. boct or Lhe ocetata -or ,any.iIII lor Iako ? g Loss of primLs os-etcultutally pto- duGti,vc soilq outside designated urGun zii.'ct.is7 Appen'ti' x t+` - page o. ��. YES MAYBE'NO ;h, gwposure of poople or property to ,00hof,i.a hnzards such as e.arthquAlres, landsl,i.<ies , aaiudslri do-s , ground Failure; or similar hazards' 2, Airy. Will the proposal result- in: tip. Substantial r,lecoriotation OP, ambient or lou',J air quality? b. The c rea t ton of oli j t"c tl.ona tl,c } odors, smoke or l+taaaies"? c. Significant a.l.tcratlon or air Movement, moistvre or °ttqmpovat,ure 1 or any change in cl,imat:e, Olt he.- erlocally locallyor i•ogionally? _ .. 3, Fater, Will t c tproposnl; results in substantial~; a, Clt ng(xs in curre,nLs, or the course or d(re.ation of water movements? b. Changesin Absorptri.on a:ates, draiot ige pat:t-tcr s, or the mate and a mint o Q# ' surface glare)', 7<unorr� e, teed for of f -si,l c s-ut f acea dr.alttagt improvements, including vegetation removal, channeli:,.kation or cttivett inti ca lla tion? e>er:at ions to the , oLmgu ca;.. Fiw ot. a,'taod waters? d e. Chatnk;e; in the amount or surrilora water ill any' waaLQt b0(Jy.i, E. Dlscharga into surface waters, or in any Alteration of` s; ir,t~ace water quality, lnc°Iurilnt; but note limited to LhmperaLurc , dissolved o�ygett or turbidity? h. Alteration Or' the dieoati.ot1 or rate rate .t"low of s;ltotar.tl WA,trrs? I! 11, Change ill the quaint itv or quality y of grovintl tares, oit:h'ar thtough ad(Ittionscit witltd'rawals, or thro u¢ hittt'ttroopti.on of an 6. aquifer by ctits or oxcavatsa_ons'? A0pvhdIx V page f 2 o1 9 j .,$ - YESx MAYBE NO i, Reduction in the amount' of eater otherwise available r Public water supplies? {, j, Exposure of people or property I to Wat:ez; related iinz ards with as � i:loadint7 _'s 4, Plant lar -e6, 14ill, the _propostll result i'n S461 tantini } aLoss of vegoLation or Chaange in the I diversity of suec; es or number of any species of plarts (including; 1 trees, shrubs, grass, Lcops, micro corn and aquatic plants) ? { b Reduction of the numher,,4 of any, I Unique, rare or endangered species of olontsry 1 d, Introduction of new species of g, i planta itito an area, orin a bavrier to the norma], repleni,sha�ent of e:'istin species' d. Reduction in acrea. gf a o C any ahri- _ cultural crap? 5, Animal Life. Ui,ll the proposal result xn su stantial: a, change In the diversity of specie:, or numbers of any speoie'q of animals (birds, land animals { including; reptiles, .fish and shell- fish,, bontrhic organislrls, insect's or mierof:airla) ? b Aoductrion of the numbers of .any t i unique, taro or endant'aved species of animals? C' Introduction; of ntw spodies of animals inLo an arza, or result in 1 a bavrz ar to t=he miv,1H.on or movement of an 111,11,0 I d, Wuction of, oftav ochmont Upon, O deterioration to c+,\'Lsti►lA L3.si1 or wildlife. hctbint? Appendbt V pago 3 e f YES MAYBE 140 6. No.ist, Vill the proposal result Jn au stantia].-. A. Int!reases in noise levels? b, Exposure of pc.jt,le to severe noise lrvelt ? Se. , 7. L�t *h�t and Aare. Will the propo hl nr4riuce sl t1 t1t1t lif;tit + ;r glare?' $ , Land Will t t1r` >xit�lru: pad rc aul t :r niiGant a, Alteration of the planned land use of Z1I1 area, or establiA a tree d whichwil'Idemonstraka,ly load to such b. , With uses tut ad301 nin€ 'Conflict nt.'oportiep, or con!'lict with establ� 'k'.. CY recreational, oduca- t*ional, raj.joi,ous or scientific uses of an arca? — n, Natural.'-W-sources. Will the proposal result in sut�stantial: a. Demmrrd for, or increase in tie rate Of use of any natural resources'? b. DeOleti.on of any, nonrenewable, Natural. rcaource? 10. Risk d.i Upset:, fines the prOp0841 :.nvo vt a risk of an explosion or the release, of hazardous substances (including;, but not limited`' to y oil, ,b nes tidides, chemicals or radiatiots) in the event of an ticci:dant or upset conditions? 1lR 1'o ulq't4bn, Will thr propo it, s�.g;n�.- c:,antl.y�' e�l�,er t,l1e 'c)C''rtioN, dist t.`ibu ion, density, or growth tflte of the 110MAn 'nopulaLlon of an ;.erect at: divide ate estatsl.i.:�I:�etrM cotstns►anity`l 19:, iil5usits „ , ill the propos"I' s3 hn OnntlY k FFOct 0xisting housing, Or OtOd(-O d cWftftnd tor additional housing? 4 '.tet 4 A ..p endi 4f YES M'l1YIIC NO Zi; Transportation/Circulntioh, Will the praposa_ re. u"7 t n: a; Generation c`f stal)stiant'ia1 rt�Itlati.,on,al vehicular movement? ��•; b. 5ienit:icant e fect;s on cfSC3sG ;it parking AcilAtios, or demind , oY k new parking? c. SubstaritMiral impact upon existing transportation syst oms f C+ d, $i,p"nificant alterations to present patternA Or ci:rcul�t ion or movement of neoplo anti/or j;ood.0 ..._ e, Al tern t3 ons to gaterht-)rne, rail, or air traffic? f. Incrcage In traffic ha7nrds to motor y vehicles, bicyclists or pedo9 tirinrns7 Qi'° 14, Public ces, Servihill thepropoan i`ave At r.-- an e : ,ect a -, n, or roaul.t in a st�bstantiaj need for new 'or ;altered !; ,governmental services in airy o1' the fo' llowinrr areas: a, Fixe, b. Police protection?^` !! C. 5chool.s? c1, T?r tkd or other tecroational :Enci:litirs'� 6.. Maint<ennnGe of Twblic raoilities, Including road v? i C, Other govet montal sovvices 15 P;ber . , 11111 the Proposal 'e cult; ;n: a, u8d or nub ttofttia'l amoutlta of tua or enort;v' b. Substaht ial. ioc'teaso in demand upon existing 8ou1008ot" On.orpyj or require elle dovoLopnrent of new 86urces of energy „ �= Appendix r p4Ae 5 of YT;;i LIAYaE 140 1it:ies . Y1ill tete nropo'gal rr sul.t i'n a need for new systems, or suli ' sta`ntial; alterditions 1�0 tile ro'l.lowin utilities it, Power or nra Lural taas Z � b. Communications sys`t.°ems � S C. Water? di« 5ewr (Cain txunit lima he rx_tcndCodl, Providing capacity Lo Serve new (1evd,lopment ) e. Storm water drainage? ' 17, Human Ilealth Will the proposal rM$u It In a, Creation Or any he 'lazarcl or Dotent:ial 110,11th hazard' (rxclttci%ni Mental health)? h. Exposure of' people to potential health ltazak'dt$? r!' 18. olid ��,�si e, Will the proposal, result �n-ny`"signir cant; impacts associated ith solidi 4laste disllogni or litter control? lg w Aesthetics , will the proposal result~ in t e o>struction of any , `r publ,;i,t designated or, recoghizodl scanic vista open to the public, or will the prooas€�l result in the crro;xtion or 4aesti �"a&ll.y offetisiVe site. Open to publ i'a viev? 20, 14ill Proposal result Upon' the, quality or quantity of e r stlbg public roereay tion► i�e3.ii.ti.e.3: 21, Archese ,d �f 4a1/ilt stori eal. Will the prnp� esu t a�n a texatiat, o a si a11, ieant arelteel o ictal. or .:is.t JricaI site, structure, ob foot ,o,- building,?" 1 4 A por rix r pf pa$o 6 of9 Y88 MAYBE No 22. Mandatory Pindings of Sii-mificnnce a Does the project have rhe potcntin:i t0 degrade the quality of tho environment, substantially voduce the habitat of, n r1sh or, wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop bolow selr- sustaining; lovels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal ca m _ y muni,ty, reduce tha number or restrict the range of n rare or endanfrorecl plant or animal or oliminate important examples of the ma,jot periods of California history o'; prehistory?' 1i. Does the project have the potential to a-chieva short term bariefits to the detriment o.E publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? c Does the Pru;est have impacts which ate individually limited, but cumulatively considerable'2 (a project may impact on two or more separate tesoutreds whore the impact on each resource is relatively ;mall, but ; where the effect of the total of thoseimpacts on the environment is sirificant,) , d, Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse atfocts (5 .1 human sk lindirectly? eitherdirectly or . j ; 4 Appendix r page 7 of 81-01-28-03 III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL W LUATION Pro;i'ect Description 1. 2. �Project:e of ef Descraption! Rezone To -rezone 3.03 acres from S -R ( Suburban Residential) -to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). 3. Locution: East, side of Durnap Avenue, about 800 feet from. both Eaton. Road and Lassen Avenue north Chico. 4: Proposed Density of Development: Avenue, at this point. 5. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: Unknown 6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Frontage on Burnap Avenue ranges from L�? to 141 feet for the five parcels. �j. Method of Sewas3e Disposal: Common septic tank - leachfield systems. 8. Source u ' lda.tpr Supply: California Water S-prvics Co. 9.r y of po,, .c Linen: Available to siuu. 10 Potential for further land divisions and devel"pment Parcels ra,n' s S DUeaCrem 0.23 to 1 acres at present; 814 total units at Environmental Setting Physical. Environment: 1. Terrain a. General Topographi : 'Character: bevel to gofttly sloping galley land on exi0ting urban fringe of Chico. b. Elevation: 11:33-1901- A.S.L. 2. soils a. Types and Charactevisticst Vina loam and vina clay loam, depth range of 3 to 10 ft. +t percolation rate of 4-10 rAn./inchy soils aro Class 1-1i 'type, excellent cultivable soils. b.unit ng Pectate: Shallow soils on north portion of parcels.. Natural Hazards of the 1iand a. Earthquake zone; Moderate Earthquake Xntensity lone VITT 4. Hydrology aSrce Water: Dry Geek channel lion 250 to 430 feet to east part of b: B(part e (d.nPleasant Valley Drainage District, LSA #23). t; haraoteristicoi Goo'Atural porcolation of soils,. drainage would be dispersed to Dry Creek channel ViA under - r1 gro, nd sy stem: 0" Annual, Rainfall .'(normal)-' 831I. 5. Acoustic Quality: Within 55 CgtL contour from airport. Appwndik F - pane 8 of 9 1 114i DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL tVALUATIMr (conz;i„n,xed) Biological Environment 6. Vegetation., Grasses, star thistle, oak trees, family gardens (. and landscaping. ; Cultural-Environment:j; 9. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area, No known sites in area; low oenai.tivity. $. Eutta County General Plan do $ignationMedium density Residential; 5-S DU%acre. 9. Existing Zoning: S -R (Suburban. Residential) as of 5-19"80 10. Existing sand Use on -cite: 1• i_ve single ftinily residences including one mobilehomej horse corrals, pasture area, old Dry Creels drainage swal,e 11 Surrounding Area f a Zand Uses: Single family residences (including mo"bilehomos) to west and north; some small orchards, pasture areae, mobile- ! home park, apartments i;nd mini -storage complex to south, orainege channel to east-northeast; condominium project being develo 'ed to east, AP # LI -4-33-101.4 _b. Zana.xig: R-3 toeast and south, Midi' to southwesti ,RT -I to west S -R to northwest. Geri kan designations: Median density residential to southj . east and west; Low density residential further north. 12. Charadtor of Site aa7d Area: 'Ur'bara friaage residential area. I 1 Relevant Spheres of incl # • u �, ;: Giby o Ch�c.o primary spheae: CfiA 23. '14. Im rovements Standards U'rb&,n Area: Chico (curb, gutter, sidtiwal.k). re Protection service a. Nearest County (State) Vire Station: Station 42 Cohasset Road. b. Water Availabili.'ty: Additional hydrants would bo installed on Californiawater Sorv>�.ce Co. water mains. i 'i6 Schools in Area.i Chico Unified School, District; CSU Chinai sPhe following impacts have been identified for this proposal. Due to the cumulative ttAXf"ic situation in this area and 'the nearness of the site to the Chico Municipal Airport, .mitigations are necessary for future multi -family developments to ,i�acilitato vchioular traffic flow and for mise from hi,raraft Another key issue pertajr s to the density allowed by the General Plan, Items Sa and 11 in the checklist disctitssian deals with this factor. 'lb, 3b, 'i Be: Disruptions, di.nvlacements, cohipactIon and overoavoring of the soil will. occur generating i4cveasod xlunoXf to the nearby drainage dh,a"01, a facility of the Pleasatrt Valley �)Va i,nago Districti i Appendix ;V page 8& of 9 1c; Addition of engin.eored fill: material (90 rotative compaction) to old drainage sw4le traversing the parcels.' 'This measure is to be implemented for the condominium project on AP LI-4-3�-101. 3h: t"easibility, of installing common septic tank - leachfield systems utilizing the avail4bl.o soils, The Enva.xonmental lJealt'a Department is doubtful; that an R-3 density can be 4 r�oilshareepxesontjd due o higher deasitiosthe Soil oareipossiblen this, locality; Where deep loam 6b; laxpasure of residents to aircraft noiso, 9 The project site may be subject to aircraft noise of a moderately severe .nature in °fahe range of 55 to perhaps 60 CNl i, (Com�iderat Noise gitivalent level) Light aircraf,, fly over this area. sound attenu- ation measures should be i)lcorporated into the design and construction of future residential units. 84a II: Establishment of mtUti-family residen=tial developments at densities higher tan XOOOM;�ended by the ]Butte County General Plan. j, Use Ma of the General The Chico Area Lard � Map flan indicates a maximum �. Onn rty of 8 dwelling units per acre ,for new, residential, projects.y parcel whero a higher density is passable and is desired by the applicant; sps.gific finda.ngs would need to be made to approve' such a project, l 134, c, f: 1'n� � Traffic generation, &longurnap AF impact on traffic safety slaaffi « congestion at 40X-nap Avenuo/.> assah AIV, intersection. The 60 terata ll 'Vr. ; � p y i pvad dwelling units On the adjacent ra.6ert would gen gate, gibed 420 vehicular trips der day, Traffic Oidinity (1979 Public Words); G�urlt� «t.n� � x 7'?0 ADT 8urnap Avenue, N: of Lassen Avenue ; x 00 ADS Lassen Avenue W. Of Cohasset P.oaa, 4.150 AZT, tasson Aveh0 � - f of The Bspl.anerte �ATf Average baijy TrarXjo) burnap Avenue is a narrow paired road; it is less than feet w'cle in this area except for the frontage it the inini-storage comp' s� t t� the south at Lowen At`enue. Widening the section of turnap Avenue akin each g y property f'ronta e may be necessary to provide adequate access far the amount Of traffic that would be. generated. The North Chaco ,Vezone l iR tapD to W reference, partioularly agesx�- and34-368dea] g With Pxi tin by traffic anal fut�°e �;xaf��.c projections g Appendix riv - page 8b of 9 ncreased demand fox public Sepvices available in the Oha co area, j? ei oro nces Initial atudy cbeoklisf, for Cedar Spring Village Condominiums, Air # i.�. -33-1011, lam �p �3d-� North Chico .Rezone BIR, l;c f/ OS -2g- , � SUGG STTM MrtwrtiAmj,OIJ 1�LS UOV future developments} 1< place a Statement on the V.nal map s�%at� ng '��aat the property, lies Within the 55-60, ON`l' (Ccmmiin�ty Noise Biquivalent Levell)' contour radiating Cxotft t110 airport and anmay' bo subject �o ai.r.Oxaf t no:i.se section along the propor� X o 24 foot wide paved street 2- Recor�aAruct Burna Av`e luo to a circulation y r nage to -faCili.tate tra.Uic 1, { M �u s 1 ; IV. DETERMINATION (To he completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation I find thero osed project COULD NOT have a significant environment, effect on the and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4s r6c6mmended. Q I find that although the proposed pxoject could have a significant effect on the environment-, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet �. have been added to the project. A NEGATXVE DECLARATION is RECOMMEMBID. [] I find the prr• project MAY have a aiygnificant effecton th( + ment, and an EWVX2RONMENTAt IMPACT effe 1 Date Vebruar 'l 1 (Siqeliture 0 i ?orf 'E.NVIRONMl:UrAL• t2E1.'1 �:IJ UC'AEtfif flti lT Rovi©wed by,-, ..Earl D. 1101.0,6n Fnvirohmw �a1 �rwviow Ditoc-tor Aape►cl.k - �1a3' of 9 `. %i3y •} jq DU3'T!F 04TY PI"NING C0MMY8SION H tide is Aoraby ;liven by the Bvtte County Plazaning Commisciift ti -tat public hearings w,.11 be held on Wednesday March 11, 1"11 at ?� pm e.in the Butte County Hoaxd of Ou ervY8or6' Raon a y, , Butte County Administration Oentrer, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, dalifrmnifa• regarding Lho XallowinF ; Irin-0001 nw UuTn.TZ VP-AgIIrV1 ntrr.x,n�:�g.o�rnnr RWARD:Ci V §i 1R0I UTAU-tlylT'A ''l` RA111: "'BTB'+ N ARLC ai ML'NS� U 1. Flume County Planning Commi esion - Rezone from "S -R" Suburban-Rosidontial) to 11R-3" (Mu7 ti Family Residential) property Located on the east side rif turnap Ave.,, between t, r .H u 33-12Y 13 '14, X15 & 102 more prartieularly�described as��� ?Tht SW 309`0 fto 6i. the NW 14-1 ft. ; the SW 41$18 V,-- of Uhe BE 104 tt. of the My 3.50a0 Pi.; bt�o SW 290a4 ft, of the NW 75.0 ft, of the 8B X30,0 ftA ; and the SW 306.9 ftpo of the SE ? 40 ft' of tho W 150.0 -ft. of the S, 330 ft. of Lot lI 36 of I'.obark, Sud" per map of .,a� ` ' reword in map book 40 on page 24 on file i a the of,fla Q._r G , e Put tc County r Rcdordo , and. all. that: pa of ua.nap kv,. r located rad 6,goent to the NW 480.0 ft. of said Zai 36. (Iontaluing 3.03 acros, more or lose, Chico, 2pail Hayes -- 'Modification or a condition of approval, of rt use p(�rr it: ollOdng a ;rack cruohs.Ai, to extend a yO day ti.iiue limit an add .t:i.otiftal. 6 mon6ho on property +ouad "A-2*rr (General.) located Approx, r4 ui.l.e east of Canyoza Shadows ltd. , app; >X6 1)y mile BE of St. Ilwy. 32, i detitif ied as AV 46- 3i-55 and % � south of Pores t Rano.. ; ho above mont3 onod hppl,iea tiona, pat i, do ts, niapv, d.vaft; anvi- aronmottal impact report and/or ntgati,ve reporU6 ere on fila and cavae labl.e fnr publ.ie, v. owing of the office of th, Flutte Ooutaty a Environmmentalrl"Ipaot J,oportsytrro A1,a,oContav pOvaw�ilablovatl00110 rio.a,►1'd . °� c��un.ty li'bx�aries ? RU11%, COUPIiY l' 1'T'NU t101aM1"i a1:0N' BETIT'YL B JAI Nlltl lOU 'Op l iaAIMl'.V x TO lU l't1ltF,xS11IM TIM, 0111:00 UM"W13 =100W) 014'T,'F1U1't MY, �. Foya S. Duke C.M. & 11•0. �rl9V n Rt. 5 Box 65(�"E Rr— 5 Box 6% B • Chico) CA 959;,6 Cha.,,,o CA 95()26 Ryan ltlen c T �rry & Judith bion .B ��' tion & q Rt • r� i�oyu 659 'R � Rt • 5 -Bwt 659 At� �ryCon{ iteruo • 0. .CJoX /lrj3 f i"h oo, CFS 9 51}::6 011 -co, OAL 9,5%1c, itav rit px, CA 9'514 g. L441-5- 44- 5-85 Ad.r4 Gnmvron Anittu W. Ntrurr ?, .Billie i/• Raker Rt.. 5 Box 656A int • 5 Boy: G58 R Rt. 5 Boy: 654E Chico, W Chico, CA 95926 Chino,. CA 959 6 James & Joanne Tigue Joe & Guzole Mallory R.D. & S.B. Dagosta.tt 3041 Springer Rd. 30rI3 BLt.,nnp Rt. 5 BOX GL[6A PlaaervillQ, CSA 95W? Chico, CA 95926 ChxLco; CA 959,5 Carpal Ann Lund E.0• J•111. Spreen Alberta t, Engle 2950 Burrrnp 302' Burnap Aye. ) Rt. 5 Ro•t 65�+ G Ch400, CA 015926 Chico l OA 959, G Chico, CA 95926 44-3-349 t4�llso- c-. Dutchak Harvey &- Dally Raze R" F..L. & D.R. Srmrl.ock r RG 4m Box 1" 4 Chir;Ca, CA 0598',6 5 :Sox 61.9 Ct�iCc�, CA 959 Rb. 5 Boy, 2955 Burnap Chicon CA 9 59 26 44-37-9a ti -M. & M.A. 'Taylor Rt" 5 Box 2943 Chico, CA 95986 4= � "►r 44-3-39 ► . L4.53.191 &1 93 Al'bev, t Susan tJnx 1310,t FIC M.11. �ow 11 Rt,by L. McNally Rw, 'X'f,285G Burnap Avo.RG: 5 Bost 554 R Ch..v:f , G-11159ZG Qhi o y CA 9,1,906- Chico, CA 9592, ry r au- tris'err , & JI .Ltk� <Ivion M.B. ,C K,A• ttawLhorno k ni 1. Box U1 A BUt-i mp Avc Rt. Box 654, D 5 S959CA6 � Chico CA a , t. , s.1,9 *; Gk���.Ca� CA a.��.aC� C11tc�a� CA ,1 F� E 1 V' w q TTpp y µ t t t G -16R, 8. tD.R1 4A.ill)mS Bta t ray �.la l�rhv s orIq f1.4 �+�yy�n�; L'41100 i� '4 K=.,Y�! r . , t d'� �t �,a'le qq1. a. 1 1 -R�i � Chico) CA 959' 6 Di -11. &. 0*ji Tay tor 300'1 buran Jr�ma .� �h1uLLo, 0t.,ioo t, CA; 5�) 0 ovov 11 It. CA 95965 1 a H m ,-4t, CA "4604 ;. f tea{•^" nt},�� �: 1 _ � "" 49%, earner Ave.. G:iry W mit } '23 Ninwhev stag C,LLCO, CA 959:' 44-3-1C Dan & Cathy Conks Chieo, ck 9592 . Dan & Cathy Jenks 0998 Sea s. Drive Chico, CA 9592 , r u r; r w r 1' � p7L8 81-86 ....0 • w, TO Butte G�. .ht1 y ,PJ(zrnninn Staff Findings � ComriissS.on, March lY, lt)s1 APPLICANT., n�\- J3ttttc County ,Board of Supervisors Clt►;{F'R' Dan 8 Cathy Jenks, 2998 Sar ii J?ra.ve CAico, Ca, , and others . REQUEST Rezone to "R -s"'" (Multipamily Residential' EXISTING 4ONING: SR -1 {` LOCATION: East side of Furnap Avenue, between Eaton Road and Lassen Ave. F AP NO: 44-33.0-102, 44-33-0-12, 13, 14 15 SIZE' 3.03 acres EXISTING LAND USE,: Single family dwellings. Mobile home on Jenkst property C44-33-102) SURROUNDING LAND i15I. North -sin mobgle family; west-siigle fami 3y ile homes; south-Mob'i Ilepark, apartments; le house being project 0 veloped. iN SURROlJNO G PARCEL S12.r. i Vara ee 1/4 ZONING HISTORY: acre to 5 acres an,'ii larger ' �r�� 2wi' Ord, 13.3 R 522, August 29, 1955; At�r`acenxd> u�g 1.9, `1980; to south 21:,1)1 � and east, f7r3 m e tr 16, 198o a. GENERAL PL AN: DieI��m llet it •. Residential APPLICA1 U REGULATIONS,, Den' si' y al towed is ''up ° Units to 8 dwelling per acre, aNALYS18., Stal'P recohmends that R_`3 zort n he adopted (ill all ti ve g F parce�,s� The R-3 4one is consistent with bo adopted and proposed General Pth the h bo Tile recently adopted Rua zone to the east and south a180 extends to the north and connee ;s to gurnap Avenuep cres ting �risland r r of single zramily ziining Z side o:E Duratap AVZOn along the east ; T)ie existing single family homes 146UId i•etnain 68 ali.olvcd usos in tltr. -3 zolie, ✓' FILE 8.1--86. To Butto Ciunty, Plannin Comma.ssi.on Staff Findings M irch. 11, 1.981 The mobile home could romain as a prey: existing, non-conforminS use in either the ex,i,Sting S-It 'Zone OR the proposed R-3 Zone. R-3 zoning would allow the future con- version to multi-`amity uses similar to other adjacent uses. COMMENTS RECEIVEbt Public Works: Burnap Avenue needs to be reconstructed to meet county stalards. Environmental Health: No objection to rezone, hotoever, due to soil conditions con .tions in the area it is doubtful that R-3 density can be obtained. Any development or land division shall comply with the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance, and the 'Septic Tank Ordinance, ! and Regulations for the Butte County Department of Public Health and the California Regional Water Quality .Control Board, p City`, of Chico: Chino General Plan calls for Altham Density Residential allowing up to 12 units/gross acre. The above re£erenc,"4 ,project 'will be consistent with this designation.. k Calli-,rnia dater. Water service available in adcordante with our rates rules and regulations as filed with the CPUC. i. The Sheriff's Office, POSE and Division of Forestry have no objections to the rezone. RECOMMENDATIONS Ai Pind the project In conformity with the General Plan, and B Note that the thv�ironm,ental RevibW Department checklist has been reviewed and tecbmmend adoption of a Negative Declaration of Env1tbhmentt l Impact; and C Recommend approval, of the project to the Butte Comity Board of Supervisors, .n f M1 ill l • March 11, 1981 Be It hereby known, that I$''': ,� Y � `_ � t''_i.t• �.-l.r_r � .�� +� legal owner Of parcel number �.)�( � � -��. (�"j . `� on Eurnap Av-, do appeal the r y decision of the Butte County Planning Commission, in which property located ;on the east side of Eurnap Avej, between Eaton Rd and Lassen Ave; and identified as AP hh-33-12,3r 1 1h, 15 & 162 more particularly described The SW 309 , ft. of the NW lbl ft.; the SW u18.8 ft. of the 8=4 ft. o£ the NW 330.0 ft.; the SW 290.4 ft. of the r'IW 7,5.'0 f t. of the Se 330.0 ft.; and the SW 305.9 M, of the SE 75.0 fte of the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot Y( of "Hobart Sub+l per map of record in map book 40 on page 24 on file in the office of the Butte County Recorder, and 0:1 that part of Bi rnap Ave. located adjacent to the 'NW h80,0 ft. of said Lot 36. ,Containing 3.03 acrea, more or less,_Chico was approm;d for rezoning -from I►S-RII (Suburban -Residential) to "R -3i' 'Mtl.ti Family Reiridential) T hereby state that I am 'opposed to the rezobO` taid property £tom "S41 to nR-3'}, S y j y p n�� 1 March 17, 1981 Be it hereby known that I,, ?Au S legal owner of parcel number .4y3�• on Burnap 0e, do Appeal the dee sion of the Butte County Planning Commission, in which properly located on the east side of Burnap fTe, between Eaton Rd and Lassen, Ave; and identified as Ap 44-33-12,13,14,15 & 102 more particUarly, described as u, The SW 309.0•fti of the NW l41 ft.; the 8W 418.8 ft. of the SE104 ft. of the Nil 330.0 ft,; the "SW 29G:4 ft, of the ANW 75.0 ft. of the Se 330.0 ft,; and the SW 306.9 ft of the SE r; 75.`0 ft. of the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot 15b of "'Hobart Stub" per reap of record in map book 40 on page 24 on file in the office of the Butte County Rocorder, an6 all that part of Burnap A*e. located adjacent to the SW 06,0 ft. of ` said Lot 36. Containing 3.03 Acrea, more or lass, Chico, was apt)ftTed for rezoning from IS -R" (Suburban-Rsdidentiil) oto "R-3" !! �*Jlti Family Residential). l I hereby ,tate that I am opposed to the rezoning of said property ttom "S -R" to "R-311' i is i1 1 March 1T, 198't�. i Be :it hereby known that I legal owner of Parcel number on Eurnap Ave, do appeal,, ',fie decision of thi Butte County Planning COM!MiSSion, in which property located on they east side of Burnap Ave, between Eaton Rd and Lassen Ave; and identified as AP Ula-33.12,13jlhl5 & 102 more particularly described' ass The SW 309.0 ft. of the NW 141 ft,,; the 'SW 418.8 ft. of the SE1C.ls ft. of the NW,3?0.0 ft.; the SW 290.h ft6 of the NW 75.0 ft. of the Se 330,0 ft.; and the SW 306.9 ft. of the SE 15.0 ft. e the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot36 of "Hobart Subif per map of record in mai book h0 on page 24 on file in the office of the Butte Counnty Recorder, and all that part of Burnap Ave. located adjacent to the IN 480.6 ft. of said 'Lot 36. Containing 3.03 acrea, more or less, Chico. Was approved for rezoning from "S -R" (Suburban -Residential) to i19 -3r + (,Multi Family Residential),. I, . x I hereby state that 1 am opposed to the rezoning of said property 'I from "S -R" to R i i 9 . Uu�I� Ciu, Ci�rniq� �; Ornhl. MY �2rcvfllec Ilfs�et;gx ' .etYiMk.4t. i Aft March 17, 1981. '-y "' Be it hereby )mown that I, ✓.L ,� legal owner, � of parcel number 1 d d 11 on Burnap Ave, do appeal the decision of the ;Bute County Planning Commission, in which property located on the east side of Burnap Ave, betueen Eaton Rd and ,Lassen :Are; i and identified as Ap hh-33-12,13,14,15 & 102 more particularly described y as. 3 .; 418.8 ft. of the, The SW 09.0 ft. of the NW 141 ft the SW SE104 ft. of the NW 330.0 £t.; the SW 290.4 ft. of the NW � 75.0 ft. of the Se 330.0 ft., and the SW 306.9 ft. of the SE 75.0 ft. of the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot 36 of "Hobart Sub" per map of record in map book 40 on page 24 on file in the office of the Butte Counaty Recorder, and all that I part of Burnap Ave. located adjacent to the NW 480.0 eft. of said Lot 36. }. .0 taining 3.03 acres, more or less, Chicoi was a tly d for rezoning from iiS-R" (Suburban -Residential) to "R•y0Multi Residential): q I hereby state that I am opposed to the rezoning of said property from 11841 to +iR-�3 it 9 1 n March 17� 1981 ` 4 Be it hereby kno,.m that I, `'r'1 �. �, r.'� �' 1""ri l L1 " o al b- e r of parcel number on Burnap Ave; do appeal he decision of the 'Butte Countw Planning Commission, in which property located on the east side of`Rurnap Ave, between Eaton Rd and Lassen; Ave; and identified as Ap hh-33-12,131plh,15 & 102 more particularly descrih9d as The V 309.0 ft. of the NW lhl ft the 'SW 418.6 ft. of the. sEloh ft. of the NW 336.0 ft.; the SW 290.4 ft. of the NW 75.0 ft. of the Se 330.0 ft.; and the SW306.9 ft. of the SE �1ar :',t of the hu 15ox ft, of the SE 330 ft. of Lot 36 0!' '+No aivu ^u ner map of record in map book 40 on page 24 on the its a,�r OM1.` "`d nF ,f the 'Butte Counnty Recorder, and all that part of Burne, �.4 ? ',�,;:.+,.nGi adjoident to the 1V h80.0 ft. of said Lot 36., Containing` 3.03 acrea, mora or.�;�, tlh�,ro_ was approYed for rezoning from 'IS-R++ 'iR-Y+ (-Multi Family Residential), I hereby 'state that I am opposed to the rezoning of said property' from S R " G e" n - iM'" n0 t-3n � 1 tlu}la CO, i'lotvilaio Comm, UG�vill�e ��ltidtrtx March 17j 1981 Be it hereby �=ovn that 1, �Z � /Ina %/,.i �JrwN?�+ �s� �' legal aritber of parcel number &N-3-3- Id on Burnap Ave,, do appeal the decision of the Butte County Planning Commission, its which property located on the east side of Burnap Aee, between Eaton Rd and Lassen Ave,; and identified as Ap 44-33-12,13,1!',15 & 102 more particularly described a The SW 309.0 ft. of the NW 141 ft.; the SW h1.8.8 ft, of the SE104 ft of the NW 330.0 ft.; the SW 290.4 ft. of the NW 75.0 £t. of the Se 330.0 ft.; and the 'SW 306.9 ft. cif the SF 1 75.0 ft. of the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. Ot Lot 36 of "Hobart Sub" per -nap of "record in map book 40 on page 2h on file is the office of the Butte Counnty Recorder, and a11. that part of Burnap Ave. located ad jtodht to the NW 1180.0 ;ft. said Lot 36. yContaining 3.03 recrea, more or less, Chico, was approved for rezoning from "S-R"` ("Suburban-Residential)-to 't-a" 1 k �ldulti Fm�tily Residential) I' hereby state that I am opposed to the xetaning of said property a ! `ok "5-R" to "R-3'+ F A 'vi y t d x i w r q O .March 17, 1981 Be it hereby knoun that CtQ u,i legal owner' of pax cel number �%�f `�' ,i on Burnap Ave, do appeal the docis on of the Butte County Planning Commission, in which property located on the east side or Burnap Ave, between Esv�oon Rd and L<ascen _A.ye; and identified as A 4 P � 33-12,13,1li,15 &.102 more particularlg deioribed as The St. of the NW ft.; the SW 018,'8 ft. of the o 'S ft. ©f t� 309.0'f 141 he Nib 330.0 ft. the SW 290.4 ft. of the NW 75.o ft of the Se 330.0 ft.; AM the SW 306.9 ft. of the SE 75.0 ft, of the NW 150:0 ft. of the SE ITobart Sub" .330 ft. �f LaY '36 0£ p of record in map b",jk 40 on page 2!1 on r file in the office of they Butte Counnty kocoxar-and 411 that, Part of Burnap ave. located adjacent to the NW-48'040 ft. of said Lot 36.. r1 Containing 3.03 acrea, mora or 'lessj Chicq, was appro^red for rezoning from I'S-Rig (Suburban-96bidontial) to 0R-30 Multi Family Residential). t 1 hereby state that I am oi ppol ad to the �:o rening of said tiroperty �* t7row "S-Rn to OR-Pi/ 4 r. March 17, 1981.�,;.rh r .I Be it heraaby 1SnoFR1 that I, _ ? ital owner of parcel number yy_3.1—&f on Surnap Ave, do aippeai the decition of the Butte County Planning Connission, in which propertg located on the east side of Burnap Ave, between Eaton Rd ar�tt Lassen Ave;. and identified as AP Gly-33-7.?';13,14,15 & 102 mor+ particularly descir3bed as . a The S'd .309.0att. of ,;he NW lul ft.; the SW 118.8 .fit. of the -SE104 ft. of the Ni ;330.0 ft.; the SW 290.4 ft;, o£ the; NW 75.0', ft. of the Se 330.0 ft.; and the SW �06a';9 1f s i:he 5E 75.0 ft, of the HVA 150.0 ft. ;of the SE 330 ft. o' !�.cc 4i V) of 'IHobart Sub', per Gap of record in map book 4o on pa a -44 on g art of the o Ave.located Butte County Recorder, and 90.1 that f;�le in the office of the Butte p P adjacent to the NW 1180.0 ft,. of said Lot 36.; ,Cobtai n 3 G3 aarea, more or less,., Chie was approvedfor rezoning from I'S -R' (Suburb,an-Rssident:Lal) to 1IR..3" (Multi. Family Residential). I hereby state that I aln oppososd to the rezdnih,tL of said Property from "S -Ah to hit -.301 i h i'1 i !ro�rr. March 1T) 1981 ` Be it hereby imosr. tihat `i, /r3Pr4/A - �I+�9� Utis�i f� J 1-Hor, legal owner ` of parcel number J/,Y-.1 I T S'Z.3 on Burnap Ave, do appeal, the � decision of the Butte County Planning Commission, in -which pruper y located .on the east side of Burnap Ave, bdttfeen Eaton Rd and Lassen Ave; and identified as 'gip 4-33-12U3 1h,15 & 102 more particularly described as: The SW 309.0 ' ft. of the NW 141 ft.; the Sot418.8 ft. of the SE10h,fti. of the NW 330.0 ft.; the SW 290,4 ft. of the NW-, 75.0 ft,of the Se 330.0 ft.; and the 'SW 306.9 ft. of the SE 75.o ft. of the NW 150.0 ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot 36 of "Hobart So b's per reap of record in map book 40 on page 24 on file in the office of the Butte Counnty Recorder; and all that part of gunkp Ave. lbeated adjacent to the NW 480.0 ft. of said Lot 36 Containing3 X , , uas approved r t scree more or loss Chico,, � a � if o e oning from S-Rt1 (Suburban Residential) to R_3 (-kulti Family ';Residential.)'. I bare state that I am opposed to the "rezoning of said prop,6rty by pp from '"S -R11 to '"R..3111* 0 , P46 March 17, 1981 Be it hereby `knoNn that I, v►. �.,,,,_ � �.,.,�. legal oxner cf''parccl number -L on Burnap Ave, do Appeal the decision,of the B+itte Count* Planning CoRtm ssion in which preperty located on the east side of Burnap ATe, between Eaton Rd and I.asoen A`'a'3 }; and identified as Ap I;l1-33-12,13,14jl5 & 102 more part rulaxlx described 3 The SW 309 ase lhl f# .�; sw l" ft. of tho .0 ft. of the NW the =x 0 .ft. • the SW 29044` .L Of the '.NW - 8-zlo4 ft. of the NW 330. , ;. 15.0 f�.. of the Se 330.0 ft.; end the SW 30i �9 ft. t?f �' ' ' E 75.`0 ft. of the NW 1$0.0 ft. oma`' tho 6$ 330 ft. of Lot �tb Of tt �� r na ; of record. �.�'r map book 110 on page 24 on I Hobart Sub pe p file in the office of tho gutta County Record3r, and all that part of Burnap Ave. located adjacent to the NW 1180,0 ft. of said Lot 36 Containing 343 acres, more or lesgy: Chico. wed for rezoning from "S-�Rl'' (Suburban-Residential} to i'Fi-3tr was appro q-Multi'1'=ily Pt tidential). $ x hetsby ata te that x am opposed to the reioniing of said property rom to hR-3nr+ Fr�. i 1 March 17, 1981" F Le i, hereby 'known that (�,a.�., Z.�!;" + legal owner " Of' pad°cel number . .4L/ •,13 Xy cnturn�tp Ave, do appeal the de(;i;a9.on of the Butte County Planning Commission, in which property locatsd on the east side of Bdxnap Ave. between Eaton Rd and Lassen P.v►e! avd ,;identified as Ap h)4-33-12,1:3,14115 & 102 more particularly described ase "he SW 309.0 ft. of the *1 1h1 ftp; the SW h18.8 fti of the MOO £t. of the til 330.0 ft.; the SW 290.4 ft. of the IN 75.0 ft of the Se :30,0 ft.; and the SW-306.91M of the SE `"Oec0 /"t:, of the NW 150.0 ft. of the $E 330 ft. of Lot 36 of 1 �x 11bb6.1A SubO per map of record in map book 40 on page 24 on Viz;% in the office or" the Butte County Recorder) and all that "Art of �urnap Ave. loc..t,ed adjacent to the NW ty80.0 ft. of oid Lot 36. 3.63 acrea, more or i iso Chico. was 4poeored for rezoning, from 115-RO (Suburban-Residential) to "H-31t Owiti Family Residential). I'hereL- 'stnte�that Y am opposed to the rezoning of said property from ht'),,o*% tb` 11it.31i ;r 1 r t March I?j 196i, P^ it hereby known that I', e Vit, ,4- legal Ohio { of ,parc(.l nu7ber-,r'. on+yrnap ),ra, do Rep^al the decision' of the Huiste Couni°y Manning Commission, in which property i located on the. ear, F aica df Hurnap Ave,between Baton Rd and. Lassen lives and identified as AP hh-33�-12)l3plh)I5 &,,102 more particularly describer y,,.>Q.0 ° ft:. of the NW llkl £t„ the SW 418.8 £t. of the 75.0 ft- off the eSe 33000NW 0ftt; andethe SW03e C6 g M a£the S M 75.6 ft, of the NW 150-01 ft, of the SE 3Ab ft. of Lot 36 of OH6b6rt Sub" per map of 'record in map book 40 on Page 24 on ,file in the office of the $utte Counnty Recorder, and all that part of Bt;,rnap Avai located. adjacent to ,the .NW 110.0 ft. of said Lot 36; Containing 3;d3 acrea, more or less, Chico« was apoiboved for retoning tram k1S-R11 '(Suburban_Residential). to 111A-41 �mfiti Family 'Residential). I� k .�� I horeby state that l a appoeed to the reigning oi` said property from "S-R"" to 11R-3"'« ma Co.plomlllgGomk �r�Y�llar (will�btktl� `,. : r * V, 1 �i O 13uHa Ga, l~Inmh�nh Obtntn. , �r Ri,,,.a1 March 179 1361, 7�dy(/ylalafarr�► w„'°�r't � rv, 1144YI-8 Be it hereby known that It SC G? - Ij 14 legal owner of parcel num'oe~— �j'" on Burnan ave :o appeal the j 3hich property decision of the Butte County Planning� �omroission in located on the east side of Burn4p ATej betWeen Eaton Rd and Lassen Ave; and identified as Ap 4W3-12,13,lh,15 P 1:02 More particularly described as: The SW 309.0 ° ft. of the NW 1111 ft.; the SW h18.8 ft. of the SElOU ft. cf the NW 330.0 ft.; the SW 290A ft, of the NW MO "£ of the Se 330.0 ft,; and the SW 305.9 fti, of the SE 75.0 ft. of the NW 150.0 .ft. of the SE 330 ft. of Lot 36 of u " p p p,Y ' iP g file in the office of the Butte Counnt Recder and fallofhat, Hobart Sub per ma of record in ma .book 110 on page 2 on part of Burnap Ave. located adjacent to the i Oo. said Lot 36 Contai'h:ng 3.03 acrea, more or less, Chico. liras approved Por rezoning from 08-RO (Suburban -Residential) to ((9-,,1" z (Multi Family ResidetitiU). 1 I'hereby state that I am opposed to the rezoning of read property from 1841, to 'aR-30: �i r� d i 1 i l Y ` ORDINANCLI NO. X107 , THE COUNTY CT' TY AN ORtiiNANC3CN.NC, 'Tf# A PORTION OF RDUM n1?NSl i BUTTE, `STATR OS- CALIVORNIA�; Atd "R•3'. (� RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICTr pup,SUANT TO C#1APTHR 24-20 4 The Board at Supervisors of the County of I1uttop state of 2 IiCali,fornia, under and PUTS11411t tO Chapter 24-2q of t110 Butte Ca tarty de. of :gad County DO ORAAM a.s fa�':Iar,rs; � � Cts �j SECTION 1, The ,11(;jroi'naftbr described area situated in l h ij .1 the County Stxrtey State of Ca:l,ifo- nia shall, be end it is haze y 6 ztaned as an 'rI#� " (Medium Den,ity Residential.) District and .such. 7 restricted lases and ax,ea i1ul lie subj ect to the restrictions' a.t�. g . regal at at s purs t�rn't to Dutto County tode , ction 9 Staisr aerr .odtted eyeing locatq ii; the unincorporated rgotp, , -:txti AAa.rl.y described as Eo11gw,5: „lo area iluttp �.iun t y r i;111pu, i 1�" The, SY; 306.9 It, Of tate SR 75.0 ft. of the Nil ;G1 150.0 ft: of the SH 330 ft. of Lot 36 of -, 4108.rt rr 11 c p « Y 24 Sub }i'ex ma of #;;.ward an boa b;�a AQ pn Aago alt do ,i1e iii the office of the nut`.e Cbunt Recorder, 1,3 and :411 that part of 1111rnap Aventfe locatedad;acent to the NW 480.0 ft. Of 581A Lot 36. to1lt;ai.niri �►,q acres, maga pr loss; C11i, b► { 1S S�,TION 2. This CrditlFinr"b shalx F�.r"� and It i'§hcreby J V 1 and after thirty (SO) yry i1J 1"o�,'C.C3 anC1 effect; Pratt ieC1lla'Ld tp be in fi days after the date of its rnssaK;e,, ani. bo£oxe the eatpixatiaal p>" Z fi,£teon (�5)ay d 6 a.ftctx its past pe, this Otai.n�anpe slittil be 20, ubli,thod ctrtco with tale riairtes 'of t11,r ,neinbecs of the A OaVd O� t 2 ',&5uperviso'i s vptiYig fox and against it in the Chico 1?1.`tetpr�,so, �atrsp apex �pubi. i, hea :in the Co unty' r f Dutto, State Of Cali :Erti rrii a r 2 1St . ; . t',%S1 0 AND 1kDOPTV.10 h�' the #laa d of Sulsoxvisaxs rs the ?attite Of Calif.Dizi`i`'1� on the 7t1i day' of April, 24 duff+ of Dutto 4 -by t ho f6110vi.itg votd, ' 2s I � .i .�1"> .. .,, n .•u i. .'R` ,�, 'f.s a .�. "�..4nd:4.�1'^., '.aeuhe a""ps .w.o',+.nnFod _.n _:u^�✓.4 n..a.,u,re. s. u.,.uaM w....,:...,...:.. a...L. .�ti_, .. .rk."�i w r,; APPENDIX G NEGATIVE .DECLARATION REGARDING MIRONIIENTAL IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS IMMY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, (Public Resources Code 91100, et se ) and a determination has boon made that it will not .have a significant effect upon the env'iro=ent ?, Log # 81-01-88-07,'_ 2. DEOCRIPTION OP PROJECT: f. Rezone AE To rezone 73.03 'acres fr6iv. S-R Car burbez -Resp dont+ a1 to I '(medium Density Residential), ' 3., LOCATION OF PROJECT: i East side of Burhap Avenue about 800 ,feet from both Eaton ;Road and Lassen Avenue, north Chico, 4 NAME .AND ADDRFZ,. OF PROJECT APPLICANT.- PPLICANT:Butte ButteCounty Planning Cofitn.ssion (Dan Cathy Jenks) et.al.) k 7 County Oonter Drive OrbV lle, CA 95965 � MI!!?IGAI'TON 14T�ASi1RE�: _ _ '1 . Hone i S A copy of the Environniontal Review Ditectoris initial study eparding the environmental effect of this project -is attached. This study was X Adopted as presented. p Adopted; with dhanges. Specific Modifications and supporting reasons are attached. A public hearing on this Negative Declaration was held by the � decis;.on mak hg body. Hearing body Sutte County Board of-Su Date or beterniftat on AtzrII y, 1g�i Determination On the basis of the Environxdental Diractori s initial study the inforu►ation presented at hearings, comments received on. the �. proposal. and our own knowledge and independent research: /'0011 taqrxcE or, DLTRRt4xtVAfi..ON I L TOt %7 Secretary for Rcsources. 141. b ,Nl n t'h S tr, de t , Room 1 511 GLARk A. NeUoN, comfy clerk Sacramento, CA 958.1:,6. X JACIta"NO k /x`T County Cleric .--,.— County of Butte rROM: (Lead Agenvy) 2 County en:uer rive Enviirwimant;dl. review Dep -'a merit � "CiSaTo czia �A �, "3�"_`COiIlz Cantor Drive CA1 ifornit 95965 SUBJBCT: Piling of Notice of Determination in Compliance ',With{ Section 21.1.08 or 21.1.:52 of the Public 'kesources Code " E D tot # 81-0148-.:0 ro�{jecC 'lit o RbIqAo Air ;44-337102 Dan Ci►th_y Jenks S -Lata C earinh ouse um er (1f su m tte to Stage Clearing e Contact Person Telip one I um er l;arl D. N61oon Divevt,or 5 777 krcr act Eocation Past ,-;Ida of Mirnap _Avenue, betwoen ;baton Road and' Lassen AvenUe.> .Project_ escr pti.on: north chico. Rezonefrom S - ft to R-3 04S3 aures This is to advise. that the Bnr`'" Fs. Cotrxitay--.....__Ftaa •rl oC .Supervisors ,uy kueaa Ngency; has made tht "following determinations regarding the above-described prof act ; 1. Thero; ect l-7 r:,i`l1, have a si nificant effect on thc' 7 .! p wUl not , ,.. eilVironment, /7 An Cnvirot"IRIent'll xfttpact kbpo,tt was prepared for this project 2, " pAwauan' to the provisions of CCC1A, and ira's certified as rogiree b SeetVion 1508,5(,), 14 California Admiftiatrat.tive Co e 1 A Negative beej.arati.on_ was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CLQA. A copy bf the Negatiiveeclaxa- bion fituy b� ekattiinad at ttie Environmental. Rdyiety Ddpat tfiient , County C' neer Drive, Oroville; California 95965. ' Notice L7filed Indicating this project %s, 0-kempt from envirotunotibd . revi.eW, Appandl.�t Ii pose I a£ 2 U \r'p 4a ' •. ., 1. , Ef7' 1. '.i 1 �l � �GbT' i , r �' I. ".:_ _ �� a ` ,� � It / - S� Terry Xt on. rir. Trion waa Interested in stopping;futurei 4 d�' elopment He asked that ,the line 'be 'drawn, attd allow 'the rest of thal ara to be single family residential. �. Dan Jenks. Mr. Jenks statr_d h,e-wnia1� much rather see � de_ veto p'ment on Rurnap Artenue than by taking 'nut orchards. A Carol Lund.Lund stated she owned the ty_0 ;g;tory oia,se `. being discu , ssed. She was against high rise apartments. y k, " 1 1L Kathy Jenks. Mrs. 'Jenks stated�'ahat Mr. Trion wassaying _ let the 66 condominiums ;be built aiid then stop them. there. That is. 1, a for' hitn 01 say.r these types of develops e.nts .completely surround .the�i,r roperty. It Mr. trionr.is Saying stop the lire tfidtes why not`stop it one over and alloFt their land to be an.,,tihe r't-3" zoning, 12:Alta Cametan.Ms. Cameron stated her property tans under coci33deration. 5nn did' not sunt to be ineluded in the "It 3rr zoning. The'ao3se and traffic are heavy. She would fiatz to see the "R-31° zoning behind. her ptoperty. Sear"ing closed to the public and confined: to .the Boatd. y On motLon of Supervisor Wheeler, seconded by Supervisor feta ke ; and uuanimortsly carried, finding i�he proposed pro could. not have. a i significant effect da tie enviromuent, a negative declaration recommended. On: motion o£:" Supervisor Wheelers seconded>by Supervisor br�Jan ` and unanimously carried, finding 'the project ,in conformity with thew 'General Plan; 'noting, :that"iYe Environureatal Review Pepartinent vhedklis't has been reviewed and completed'; ehP rezone ,frotiti r'S-R" (suburban r;esidenial) '. nR-31' to (multi fa<nil�y residential) , property,,.166ated on , the east side of Burctap Avenue, between.Wat"on ;Road sed Lassen Avenue, identified as A' �4-33 102, Chico 'Ordinance was approved; 2207 was adopted and the ) Chairman authorizeg to signi.' motion of $upervisor L Wheeler, seconded'bl°-Supervisor Dnlan' and unanimously .carried;; the, �zezoneroni.rrS-&" (suburban ,xeoidantial); I1 ' to_ air Lt (mulai ;Iaiaily residential)!, PropeV,,y .oaatad oz the east aide: - of Eurnap Avenue, between Eaton toad and;T,assen Avenue, lilentiFied' ms AP' 44-33-12, '13, 14 end; 15, Chico .was denied without prej,:udice' On 'mo, 0#1 of Supervisor 'Fllieeler, ecanded by Supervisor Dolan an'd unanimously carried'- the Planning Department was instructed; to ' _study and .initiate ,zoning for the remaining' parcels 'in the °'R-3r!zoriag: dpsi$.naCion n that area, excluding: the paedel,.cutreritly under %:evelopment and for the .sma1 ller parcels that are curreritly;;''S-R1r zoning to be considered ' de'ncer� in thid," f _area. for,, dingle. fatn�:l x esi S y