Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout044-780-005PM •` �• • ;wy� a - i j ' .. • a .r 'fit ! � -a ♦ .T A'I-I � ,J. � 1. ��t n • y . t 1 r � , • • • �• ♦ I • , , •` ` a PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR LAIC DIVISIONS 84--07-2002 APPLICANT Prank Brazell ADPRM5 610 Tan .v ct . Chic -0 CA .95926 OWNER 5anl PROJECT DESCRIPTION `rentati *e Parcel Map , r ahr.s7 jjrr'i s.. @@ 0.49 ac. 1 prcl , @ 0 .50 ac`, , and _1 nrr- _ 0 n :<48 ac,_ LOCATION On the north side of Gas5cn Avonueannre z---�---X1Tllc1la,."4._.,..2:]_o.,p..-r-..t'... ty e s i< of the Esplanade. Chico area ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER (S) 4�} - 7 8- 0 5 ZONING S -R GEN. PLAN tow . Den . Res i� PROJECIT CONaV)". tNT? DATE APPLICATION RECEIIMD July 20 , 1084 R.P_('.: SttrirAvnrc- Tnr, ?31 'ltlmll C+waA+ r't,4v�n P ncnor. DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED PLACE NEWSPAPER, NOTIOEW PUBLISHED - O. C. P. Go B. DAVE MAILING LIST PREPARED DATE MAIL -OUT VOTICES WRITTEN- 14AILEDNUMBER DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED ENVIR()K ENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE Vll tt) DETERYiNA'TION AND DATE NEGATIVE DEOLArulTION DATE ADCPTE)) ,r MITIGATE NEGATIVE DECLARA'TI^N" - DATA, ADOPTED ENV. IMPACT REPORT .: DATE CERTIVIED� SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE ADV1SOVY AGENCY HtARIVO DATE ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION BOARD A TION ,`r, 10 4 y 85-398 Neil H. McCabe, attorney at law - on 'beha'lf of C►,0co Unified School District, appeals the Advisory Agency's approval of Frank Brazell tentative parcel map (proposed negative d'eclaratior regarding environmental fmpact), AP 44-78-05, four parcels, property located on 'the north side of Lassen Avenue approximately 21.00 feet west of the Esplanade, Chico area. (1014 SUPERVISOR MCLAUGHLIN ABSENT AT THIS TIME. SPERVISOR McLAUGHLIN PRESENT AT THIS TIME. MOTION: NOTING THE BOARD OAF SUPER41SORS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED A NEGATIVE DECLARATION; FINDING THE PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN; AND APPROVE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL t!VAP, WITH CONDI- TIONS IMPOSED BY THE ADVISORY AGENCY ON APRIL 29, 1985 AS SET OUT IN APRIL 30, 1985 LETTER TO APPLICANT SETTING FORTH PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 11 AND,HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 12 THROUGH 16, ADDING THE FOLLOWING 'CONDITION AS CONDITION 17 -NOTA- TION TO RE PLACED ON THE MAP THAT THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT To BUTTE COUNTY ORDINANCE 2463 AND RESOLUTION 85-40; M S VOTE: 1 N 2 Y_ 3 N 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried) r 85-398 Neil H. McCabe, attorney at law - on 'beha'lf of C►,0co Unified School District, appeals the Advisory Agency's approval of Frank Brazell tentative parcel map (proposed negative d'eclaratior regarding environmental fmpact), AP 44-78-05, four parcels, property located on 'the north side of Lassen Avenue approximately 21.00 feet west of the Esplanade, Chico area. (1014 SUPERVISOR MCLAUGHLIN ABSENT AT THIS TIME. SPERVISOR McLAUGHLIN PRESENT AT THIS TIME. MOTION: NOTING THE BOARD OAF SUPER41SORS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED A NEGATIVE DECLARATION; FINDING THE PROJECT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN; AND APPROVE THE TENTATIVE PARCEL t!VAP, WITH CONDI- TIONS IMPOSED BY THE ADVISORY AGENCY ON APRIL 29, 1985 AS SET OUT IN APRIL 30, 1985 LETTER TO APPLICANT SETTING FORTH PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS 1 THROUGH 11 AND,HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS 12 THROUGH 16, ADDING THE FOLLOWING 'CONDITION AS CONDITION 17 -NOTA- TION TO RE PLACED ON THE MAP THAT THE PROJECT IS SUBJECT To BUTTE COUNTY ORDINANCE 2463 AND RESOLUTION 85-40; M S VOTE: 1 N 2 Y_ 3 N 4 Y 5 Y (Motion carried) i X14 84-890 RFCS 5 9) 4r Veyors - on behalf of denial of appeal of the Frank Brazell on 'tentative requi�.ement for , appeal the Adtriso , Parcel ma an environmental 1'y Agencyis parcels, propert p, AP 44-'78-05 dividin 1, Impact report mately 2lpp feet west located an the noith side of Lass nacres into four x west of Esplanade, Chico area Alenue approxi_ 84-830 �j, (from 12/ll/sg) Ikiotion:* UPHELD .4PL�F.AL. �,_(Cont'd) AbQPTSD A AIEGA2"r bEGT THE DIVISION OFA Y'ARCEL DOES NOT RAT,jok4 IMPACTS CREATjt , ARE No �'�`NDING �r}i t [b,S THEREFORE, TiiERE Vots; l ',Y S 2 N 3 Y A. S N carried UT MINTY )30A" It. APPEAT, 01` tl HEIR RE Qt�lR .VaNT: FranLasso Brazell., I , Ap �t-78-05, TFNi, 4 parcels un the north side ;of Lassen Ave., approx. 21gQ ft. west of the. Esplanade Engineer: RVC Surveyors Chico. It; was noted that the px of ec*t . �,s for 4 parcels , not 2 as stated in the environmental document. Mt.. riendonsa said that school clearance had not been: received.. �ry P',UTG_OPEl ' Russ Croninger said that they want to ,ap schools.. peal, the condition from tEe Hirvnimus said that an ETR is required unless a letter comes the school district stating ghat therE!, is no longer an Impact o in from. facilities. p n the. Mr. Crotlinger said 'that they don't wish geese the schodls. Ttjoy ;a anter into EM a just want to go before the Board and g nt with appeal., Franc. Bra:eli, the applicant, said that the schools are Per unit.. There will be X68 an the ballr�t in. November..terking for $625 what authoriey the schools has to ask for $625, ile pondered Mr. Hironimus said that the Board of Su pervisors agreed district that the schools are over -crowded. the Board did ynothe school, the suggested deve.l,o- meat fee struct approve ax for y circ since a avenues had_not bash P namely thea upcoming band a ssuc. Ye there is ri �n� ped unpac on e schools. a .. an recon n�ng opt, is in the Position o.4 requiring an t:M, ;unless the aVlicant eonvinces the school ais$rict that the . o'ect will. not have an impart. Eo', the Board has avtcic the f rldan� p j crotid i ,, the project cannot be approved tmiesa aver -.rid in�> " of aver- faund Under CES, that can only be dirge by cerci o tconcerns are ��g an I;IR first.. P+rs. Brazell wondered what 1;+0o11d ha at $68. ani someone ht, signpC7nanrreeenthGfee was established He wortuexed what t utharit t 5 per unit j. y she school, distxiot has for their actions:` The S ane affecting the actions of the planning Ticat,,. aid yet the Pla bept. .s su,ppt�rb na the school dis bri:et, plan or loss. nnitig tttl,Rc�ritr�ti.sa -lid tt" dxd tto� ketone if. the sct,ritil. d is tax .ct hrzq th= Police, tI ,.tM.y to charge a , but tCzis a�;�.rtcy doc,a :r,ot hAvc! th . ��i! 1�hor3;ty uo Crr,ningex,- w4arz beet tri ;,,lc rt the ik)art on the rnhor,.J,, arld art etl,rirunm� rt ,,! tdceurn nt tvtlu labhxty� was an t to be done. ���: t�iH�ndC3�,;;�1aairl tt7'at, ,,I ,y Board halt) a h�wnringf. oil t"�li; �„jtrt0, ���Y�t= �"hak; wr�c� the date the sclkot�i. rx.ft^ice. 7� .1984 tt,rt±trt fi;�t'ttr�i.r, ttzr,t;w t, l:ttc�i to t},n CT�a;�Lr, t�[��l�Itrr BUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY Z• 11i�t[!'.I'E';S Page 3 October 8, 1981 Mr. Hironii<iuy stated: finding that there is an identified j,mp..,ct ti14et has not been mitigated nor an offer of mitigation, I will make a motion to deny the appeal for the requirement of an EIR on the. Frank Brazell pa -,:cel map, AP 44-c18-05. Motion seconded by 24.r. Reid and cor: ri Fxl unanimousJ.y. (PARK PIACE TE.^ IATSVE SUBDIVISION --continued) Mr. Mendonsa said that a letter was veceivwl from the schools stating that there was no longer a problem with the ,project, HEARING OPEVI mill_Dinsmore, engineer, said that have offered to mitigate some items b= ought up in the initial study and he has , an arphaeological recormaisance. He showed the letter to the staff. it was agreed that sewage could be taken care of}with a condition rather than a mitigation measure. s' It wa,- ;agree' t s 'appeared to be adequate. ei that the.. t�a.tiga�ion meaUtzre Y, CLOSED HIEARING i Mr. fiixonimus hActede having received a recommendation for archaeological clearance ana three proposed ,miti.gat;ion measures, as ;.;all as cl oar anca from the schools, I will tike a ,motion to uphold the appeal for, the requirement of at E=LI% on the. Park, Place Subd tvision, AR 42-15-07. Motion econ(j�,cl 1v Ar. field qhd: carried unanimously. a 5. V. Buy jl c ram;.. °, AP '`tl. C )— -1.0; 3 parcels approx. one mile north of the l i Y ddlePork Suspension Bridge on the east; side of Oro Quincy Hwy. area. Engineer; fiat, t,Oonald (cont, from Oct. 1. 1984 OPEx; M Aruvo W_l c Evans, 011ineer For th18 ,ppli.cant `s noighbor.,,said tkmt boundary adjustments are necessary in order to cl.us t,cr and u-00 th,t� property most effidi.entl.y. They have workaJ. mi;tig,�gt,i ons out with tho Vin beet: A,p?perent.ly Vit h and Glume its, recept:ive to then p.e(ip ased dtnsi ty and °the project, r!Oot 01' the Ai.tigati.otm corican the roaet. Since there etre several hit }t czutlittnl:;z and tills they woull :like to w3c the road boA ortti pmvYt:,,'le. 16 i't-. min Muth and. 20 f%o where avaa lttk.)le. An exhibit iters becrl prol"aroa sho4ne, the orutws' worked Out, with the Vim Ue,i66 4HA101r 4 tremeani ni n e> orl 'e: etnd cart;:trua,t;ion, They hCLVe wori.(04 out, Matlgn4iottr, to cloal w1th potential.' evoc;ibn problems,. They have .prov-lelod V01, circulvIttion to th(, onst. The rwo are r. total of 7 lou Peupo'lo t On thin px`tJparty Itktcl tho add � t cml tv` o proport—i e;s . .: COUNTY OF AUTT1; ENVIRONMENTAL 'CHECKLT8T FOMI! - (to he completes by Lead AgeneY) 84-07-20-02 1. BACKGROUND All ii 44 78w0,5 1. Name of proponent Franit Brazell 2. Address of proponent and reprosontative (if applloubl;e) 610 Tandy Court R P . C. Sur v. Vi ,Ifhc . Chicci, CA 95926 33.1 fi7a11 Streel- 3. Chico, CA 9'5926 _ Project description Tentative Parcel. MI� 1' 1 . TANI)ATORY FINIIINGS OF STCNIFTC,�1�C1, 1'88 Pi..M of , NO a. Does the project have the potential to dogrtdo the quality of the env:i,rotiment, substantially reduce the habitat: of a °fish or wildlife specieS, ,CaUae a 11 rsh 'or wildlife population to dY°oft blow sei t`. i $11tpbling levels threaten to el t mi.nato a pl tint, or animal, commutlity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California 111story Cr prehistory" ✓ b. oes the project have the potential to achieve sjl ort 'tertn ;beniz,r is to the detriment of long-term, onvironmenta.l goals? (A short -terns impact tin the cnvl r olttnent i$ one wh i uh occurs in. a relatively brief period of time while long-toren impact; wi.il j',' oodore into the f0tllrC . � 1/ .� I V. Hors tide project have impacts which are individo- ally limited, but cumalatively cons.iderable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources tahere t:11a impar cell e;te:h 1'f"4( llrce is 1=e1�at vtr'ly sm,ll : , but where =tho effect o � tb tot'Ctl of 1 h#t5e i11111act5 on the environment is signiticant.) d, Docs the project have 'environmental effects wil,ich will cause sllbstantint aCl1ersc effeCtB on human beings, eit"ht;r di-reetly or indirectly? 111, nrill :lt�lllNA`f�QN (To be completed by tete Vead Agetic:yr'i � OP the basis or this initial e:valuati©n, I/wlo rind time prtipnsVr.] ,��.�,��'� f;C ULI) .NOT have a ,gIgnil'ic,ant orfe'ct on the cbVirr rtWaInt, and a NrVAl1'1VE MICT,ARA` ION will. be pi,oparad. I J1VI? I'incl that although the prnpwwd .1yrrest could have a s i.gniri ., Crint o f-ro t _ on the enwi ronmont , �thore 'wil?; l not be a significant o rtect int this case, hecaust, tho MITIGATION MVAyUl IS described oil tho atrucllecl Sllret helve bec`rt rte cit%cl to the jfrojec>'t� A. NBC, I TV1: DI-C1MMVON will be prepatt od. 1J111`i find the livoposed project MAY have a signFricant rl`tect on tho cnvironml nt, and an,1iNV`'tlt0NMUNTAi, NPACT' ltlx1t�1RT is reclt,irectr DAT1:. AUcjrll�5t 31, 1984 COUNTY OV' BUTT1 , PLANKING, DhTARTNIJW)' Crai 5ande'f"s Plarlna. n g Tachiich RIP vlewed Ity. i rM ACTS d ENVIRONMEN'T'AL IV. ., . xp anat:Lons o all '`yes" and "maybe" ar�swars are required on attache d sheet(s)j YES MAYBE 140 EARTH. Will the, proposal. result in significant: a. Un.5table earth conditions or in changes, in „ geologic substructures? --- b, Disruptions, displacements, compaction or i � overcovering of the soil?' c. Change in topography or ground surface. relief features? d.. Destruction, Covering or modification of any unique ;geologic or physical features? Increase in hind or water erosion of soils; e=. either on or f, Changes in deposit] ori. or erosion of beach sends, or changes =„'r! siltation, deposition or erosion which mt' y T►tod. fy the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? prime, p?O uG oals g Loss ofagriculturally outside designated urban areas os ]i. Exposure of -people or prOpert� to geolO ]C hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides ground failure or similar hazards? AIR. Will the proposal.result in substantial. a , Alr emtssjons or deterioration of ambient a. y ? IC e b. Thecrsat'ion of ob ' ectioxable odo rs smoke � 01: fumes?' T. . Alteration of air movement, ITOISture, or , temperature o or any change in climate, r y regionally? - :.�, p sLll t ri, sub's tants al Will �ai Changes in cuxrrentso or the course or in direction of water movements either marine or fresh renters? _ r, hi* Cha.ng4.s inabso_ .on rotes, drainage patter;ls of surface runoff? or the rate and amount C, Need for off-site surface drainage imptYove- stents, including vA- otation removal, channel- i at.ion or culvert installat�ion? i d. Alterations 't'o'� the course or, flOU, of f100,1 waters? surface i water 3n any. o, Change in the amount of su face �.� �vater body'` f. Discharge it to surface tivatot oxo in any j ty, including altevition of surface water :tjual but not limited to temperatt.ire, oistOlVe; d, ozy,getx or 'turbidity? gY Alterat'101 of the dITtcttiOn or rate o;C flow Of ground waters?,t of round itrsters, h Y Change in the quant. y g either through direct 111 tions of w th- . draWals, or through intercept on of an jLquifer by cuts Or, e."tcavatiOils1 •ctibn in the amount of 1�tater otlie�^rJ se �.. Redu available' for public water supplies? t. j + E:cposure of people or property to 1va.ter related tazards such as flooding? .�-� - YES 4.. PLANT LI - FE , 1"1-kll Ethe blrtYBE NO -__ �. proposal res 4t in - " in the diversity of species; orunuinbxial anv species of` � o�, planar, shrubs (including trees b. neductiogxoherumbersdof aquatic' plants} unique, Or endangered: species Of 'Plant' ? rare c • Introduction of new species es are,:., or in a barr'ierpto tllty Of Plants into an ment of existin, rmal replenish- d.- G S'peci'es? c . Reduction in a - g - crea e of an a r�.cult;ur� -' Y, g crop`? -- . S ANIMAL i T FE . Will the proposal result in subst, ' —a1 s a • C ah` nge zn the diversity =,.�..,. '. o any species of animals 'spec o,E species , or number, s including reptiles Land animals bonthi,c organisms 1) finsecnd ?hell fish, b, Reduction in the numbers of any unique, or endangered species of animals? c. Tntxgducta,on o �, n iJ s ecies area,all - p of animals into r in a 01r movement of animalsO barrier to the migration eab' I-oration to exIst,ing fish o wildlife habitat? 6. NOISj. Will the p in sUbst ,a—pro osal result' ` 'ncreases iii exis tin anti,xl : _4! Vii. Etposure o g noise levels? people to severe noise levels? 7+ LIMT AND GLA Will E. Withe pxoauce s gni icaiit light and ,Proposal glare? 84: LANE US . ', wilhe Proposal vesult in a ---r: l t sttb"� n•ti,•al alleralti.on of the present br land use Of an area? planned 9• SUTs�antAL �affTl1�100t - 1Vi1?: aIle proposal result in a+ Increase .. in the rate o use o of oat resources?' ural y b Depletion o _;� any. non=Te rey1soutte�8 ? , ncWable natural YNt 10..,' I.L. AT, d V� L L i .LII the L l/ �S fi J. rr.,. RISK a. �+ ra h al // - .Y_'LI ,of explosion o the iln elof;lla oras substances hazard- ding, but 0 not oil, postic,'tdes limited ta, y..chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident b or upset contiitiohs"� Possible interf, with all response is emergency p' n car emergency evacuation plan? ✓� 11 p0I?ULAI ION. 11�i11 the proposal locatin- alter t7ye t tjorl, cerasit car , grOwth rate nopa.�l.�tt"L�1,n? c f the human ROuS l N C .t . , Ivi.11 the I housin,I OV... create a d.emantl pros �additi�na� t}.�us t Y gngr L 13, YES rRA.NSPQRTATTON/CIRCULATION. Will theproposal MAYBE NO result in` a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parRi.ng facilities, or demand for new parking -7 e.Substantial impact on existing transportation -� systems? d: Significant alterations to present patterns Of circulation or movement cf people and/or goods? e. Alterations to }vaterborne, rail or air traffic? Liz . Increase in traffichazards -to motor vehicles bicyclists or pedestri.alis? lr4 , PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon,or.need for now or altered governmentaluserviceseed a, Fise. protection? b, Police -Protection? c. Schools? - d, Parks OTL other 'recreational faci,l tries"? e. Mfinmance Of public facilat .1es) including road f: Other govevnmen'tai services? is, ENERGY, Will the proposal �gsuit,in, Y' --Use of substantial amoL '� a of duel:.or energy b. Substantial. increase in %and upon e�xst�ng sources o£ energy, or regjire the development — of new sources of energy?' 16;`TTLTT:ThS: ,lil,l the propsai result in a need ,foY{ newsy stems-, or subs'tanti,al alterati.or s to the following; a, power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. S d, Setewer or septic tank? e/. utorm water ' drainage? .�... , `� fSolid waste and disposal G 17:F l -I MAN HEAL`T'HY Will, the proposal. result In a, Creat o of any health hazard or PQtentia,i health hazard Ce ,cludi&g mental. health) 7 b Exposure of People to potential health � hazards 18' AE5THEI'TC8, Will the proposal, result in the of ailyw scenic vista Or Vic -IV open to the publ ie; or will the proposal result jl °the creation of an aestlieticall, offensive y , . n,siv�e site open to public view. p 1 41 :Iolicant : Frank Braze t y v4TA SHEET EI�D Lig t#' 84-07-20-.p- -- .A �'. �'o,Lect Descxp�xon �. 'Type of Pi-oiect:� Tentative Parcel Map . Brief Descrip,(;ion: Land d� s one parcel at -o create two arcels at 9 .S0 acre and one on parcel at ag ----cr 3. Location; On the nortlj tide of Lassen acre 2100 feet west of the Es n Avenue approximately P" ,nae e, Chico 4. Proposed Density of Development: 2' DU/AC 5. Amount of Impervious ous Surf/aC P acing Acs^ess and Nearest• , I, Road(s): Sp Lassen Avenue - rivate road access to r�• Piethod. of Sewage Disposal: Individual--�- Source of Water Sup 1 se tic . p �_ California Service 9. Proxim5 t3 of Power Lines: '1G• Potential for further lard a acent a7.on Lassen Avenue zoning and divisions and dovel.n o , general plan further land divisions arepossiblr current Environmental, Settin e L�Zsical EnyLlonment. '« Terrain a. Genera. Topographic Character: revel b. SYow..--":.�-.---- � 3S • Les; - a 2. c Elevation 180' ASL d. Limiting Factors None Soils a, Tees and Gharacteris �i.s: Vina fine sand --- friable loam, 2-8 f Y loam; rich brown, eet thick. drained and y detains �t�oisrure _well: Well permcable. b. LimItine. I+'actc>. s • natural Hazards of the Land. a. EAVthquake Zone: general Butte COUity seismic at, b. EP03ion Potential.. Slight io, Landslide raza�d.ial. None-Low� ---- Unclassified c . Expaxisivo 8,41 Potential: -- 4• Hydrology L'o'w r Moderate liquefaction. ur at:b Water.._ Pat Sheet continued Data AP 44-78-05 b. Ground Water: c. Drainage Characteristics: Property within Shasta Uizion Drainage District d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22-24 inches per year e. Limiting Factors: None 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: 6. Acoustic Quality: Air Quali't'y Good; declining Biological Environments $. Vegetation: Annual grasses, _,2yng almond trees 9. Wildlife Ha) itat Cultural Environment 10. Archaeological and. Historical Rosou.rces in the area Moderate to low sensitivity includes unknown 11. Butte County General Plan designation: Low Density Residential. 12'. Existii-, Zoning S-A 1 �3. Rxistint, Band Uue tin- site �'oung. almond orchard 14. Surrounding Area: a Land Uses: Single family residential, duplex PA -C, scattered orchards, multi -family b. Zoning: A-R.S-R C. Gen. Play^ designations. Low Density Residential d Parcel. Sizes: 3 acres to .3 acre P- generally averaainct 1.12 acre e. Population: = 15. Character of Site and Area: Low density, resid0htial with scattered 16. Nearest Urban Area _ Chico orchard 17 .Relevant Spheres o:� Influence: SUDAD j City ref Chico 18. Improvements Standards Urban Area: Yes 19. Vivo protection Service: Station 42; Frontier Circle; a. Nearest County (State) l''ire Station: approximately 3 fi les b. Water Availability? H dram located at corner of: 'Lester Court 20. Schools in ls...ea . r Chico Unified 8dhool District and. Lassen Appendix l+') IArai, r , raA7111 III AHD n'LAUI DEPARTMENT OF P"L,IC WORKS WILLIAM (dill) CFIErij, Director 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE : OROY11 LC, CALIFORNIA 95965 Telephone:(916) 5,14.4, 81 gtl Co. .MnntngCoQ14MRONALD D, McELROY June 10, 1985 Duty Director JUN —10,1985 Neil H. McCabe Orovilltge r�titsrru>s Attorney at Law RE: AP P. 0. Box 3155 Chico, CA 95927 44-<76-05 Tentative P'Wcel Map for Frank (3razell Dear Mr. McCabe: At their meeting of June 4 negative declaration of environm�ntallmpdto Supervisors adopted a Brazell tentative parcel ma and ',;,proved the crank as stated in the letter dated APr44-il subject to the 30'05, Advisory Agency to the applicant. conditions 1985, from the Butte County The Board of Supervisors added a condition shall be placed on the final that s „ A thicaat map that app permits on these Parcels are subject to and_. Resolution X35-40. It onsates, notation Butte Couhtyo0rd7r1��7n9 ce 24-63 If you should ,have any questions regarding this matt this office. - er, Please contact Very truly yours, William Cheff Director of Public Works Ur Whal signed by JOHN MBNdONSA John Merr onst JMjns Assistant Director cc: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Chico Unified School District Robert J, Jeffries Superihtenderit Thompson, Robin Thompson, Business Fr . C, Manager Inc e } 331 Wall St., Frank Brazell, Chico, C 610 Tandy Court, Chico,. (Ufanning - Cnviroriniental .i 95926 CA 96g26 E RevI rlyirc�rI�.ienta Health APPENU1l{ H DETVRMV4ATJ0. TO;, Office of Planningand Research 1400 Tenth Stree t oom l�.l, lannin ,FROM Pri Sacramento b epartmgnl or CA 9381 7 Count Center L CountY Clerk -._.. Orovil.l.e CA 596r'"";`-------.. County of Butte !;LQ33E(:T: Ing of Notice of i�terrrrinaton in com :fiance -.y��• PA�' � qp of the Public P,esources Cede. P Section'121jf or 211.52 ; ELEANOR M.. BECKER, Counly Clerk TitleR, #----------.� w �- Al—iN. JACI(UtW . )ect Tentative Parcel Ma p AP 44-78-05 NamepepEibj tate C Baring ou� m fr Frank Brazell. {!f suhtntrtesd toConfct erson Clearinghouse) Telephone Num r )ect j4cationSohn Mendonsa Public Works df the �s On the north side of Lassen vanr�e i9lG) 504-�2GG Planade, Chico,. Ar apProk, 2100 feet west ect criPtion Tentative ti Par,.el Map dividi,n 49 acc•e ane at g 1.96 acres to create your 50 sere and on at 48 acre K parcels; two at This Is to advise that the Butte Cnunt Advisory has A^enc approved the above described `l+ea Agency or `'` ttgarding the above P;Sponslb e A en described Project and "%s made 'hhe follovrin project: Ing determinations k►r' 1, Theproject � will. :Ill, ill not ha:, a a;gni Ic An Environmental Im ant effect on the enVit0nment, u to the provisions of Pact eport was prcPar ,-I for than Project � pursuant A Negative j]eelaration was Provisions of Ci~QA. prep'sred far thl,= project pursuant to th, The 1: DEPARTMENTTOPaPUBLICE 7 County Center Drive KS Oruvi l le, CABidleC o, 95965 PJ"rtn7ngCoe��. 916-534-4266 9161-534-4339 �''��'" 1 1385 Orovilta, Califor q k;crii 3C, 19 8; 61c Vlmy Court. RE; AP Chico "A c ant;ut,i yr Parcel. map At the regular meeting of the Butte Count 1985 , the Agency adopted the negate linty Advisory Agency review and a g -y held April 21) sub`ect PProved the tentative parcel ma �f'onA e aiding environmental to the condi tions aslisted pn the attach 4`-« ll�_�c; Advisory MO appeals are timely filed-.with'in ten ed sheet, y Agency s a ppinal, ►v th the Clerk Of�theaBoard ofOf e date of ,pie this action will be final. Supervisors, When the. conditions of a for you to file yaun "final map" we tpe Bu ' nal mal are cot liedttetth it will be in order Public Works for recorda`on wii,hin tt�yent -f County gepartment of of approval by the Advisory pgenCy, y our (24) months of the date if you should have any queStions this office. regarding this matter, please contact Very s.ru 1Y yours, William Chef Director of Public Work, 'Y A�sistant Director n Men o�1sa JM/ns Attachment cc $I Planning - C"i"OPMental PevicjV, exll Environmental Health Departent «, r o ;til w.1is'r' ' r _ Lb 7110 (Revised 2-28-84) Frank Brazell TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, four parcels on the north side of Lassen Avenue, approximately 2100 ft. west of the E=splanade, Chico area. Assessor's Parcel Number; 44-73-0 Engineer; R.r x. urveyors, Inc. Public Work, Department condi t i n,is irr c 1. Provide two-way traversabl,. access to each parcel from a corjnty maintained road or state highway. 2 Access to be roserved in deeds ar, por county ordir�►nce and offered for dedication on the final 111311- 1. Show 50 --ft. building sY>tback line measured from centerline of _ acoes5 0,1$011011t - 4. Provide road maintenance agreement. 5. show all oasoments of record on the tInal map. 6. y Provide stroet nrie signs peir rcquirements of the Department of Public Works prior to recordation of the final MAP. 1. Orovide prr-ionent solution for drainage. 8 Pay off any assessmcrtts. g. rrovidri cul -do -Sac at ttie end of tho street. 10. Pay any del inga ivnt 'taxes or current taxos as required. 11: Meet the ro%iu ir,„nonts of the butte cou:ity rire DepYartment. � ft t ,,ir,k r'c,, rt l i,,�t3 rtem Wn,1y� ` �.• ,•s � k� �,� ,r ,C'ty ..v,i I;• �,.t,�•it i� �, a. t, r�'rl��,1i parr ' 1 u � � �1 � 't 'd 'i� ^�*�? .1. •'lri:.' t'�` l rta i f1r � .h t tt1�. L�[r".11..1.+' J • 6' F r �z7 � ,' ,' 1 i s ,#L..rrtir, is th1-' vk r�1,z.,v. u:%. 11' rit'i n Vr• 1lr`g %ntl Cry t" 011'11 131 , Y ihr�t0rndi�c' '-Iutrl'ts' Di �ik ft1�5�i1�' 0 FRANK BPAZELL, TPM 15. If individual, wells art., to be provided, place a note! =in t,hr, maty that vcquire:3 dwelling currsr,rLwtion within tt.w wat(:-rs w�)lllyr�t•llf';i.r31�� 2re:+a wetback on parcel►, 1 and 3 (recd m and that a mora s,at ,,-,far-tory hcxm,�r ,ite be lovat(,,d for parcel. 1 4,142Approval wil i require ur age of road cca#,bwk arrsa ()<t` l,arcelg 1 r`tnri lt. for computation of u.-ablu 5ewu6lFs (tiSpr OM1 arun. If 11OU w1c;h tt..) rc:qu+s: t the usage, submit a writtom re'quel-t,. 1b omply with t.hkF t?ut:te t;ounty Nit,ra.0 AcU-n Ace,-nPlan. F inter.Departn0ent"I 'Memorandum Butte County Advisory Agency TO, vir44-11-11�_p5 Oplanning tor of - ranR BTa.zell, Ap 44 Re ort oa Tentative Parcel Map suaJEcrx (Appeal of BIR Requirement) At S. September 26' a 1.96 acre parcel to create roposal to divide 5 acres. The present This is a p each at aPP,s ie tia four parcels, Resa dents al) , Surveyors is S�R IS zoning 1.984 from RS'Can Bx1� tember ?, uixement of contact Was received Sep, the renin A letter appeal1ng licant has beenistrictr for Frank Brazell. acts. The a�?p School of school imp for C11 co Un1 iia act. because McCabe, attorney 1,ave an imp ,11th Nell this proj,;ec't wild. not and feels CBS:Ikt cc crank Brazell RPC Surveyors