Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout045-014-005,.�,v,.�.�zr�_.�.._.�� ,��„� ..F_�b,.� .�x�.w.� �.�,��u.���, �.��s�« n�._�.�.,�r,,b���. ,� wwk��,� a��...x� .,3,.. ����,z�t,..,�,u..,.� v 1 r o E 'I inter-Departmental Memorandoin t• TOa' P6ahhIng Commission FROM, P I Bann 1 ng SU3JECT James January, Use Permit/Variance', AP 045-014-003 DATE: l)ecember , 19139 Thi$ memo has been drafted to correct the staff findings dated November 30, 1989, regarding the front yard variance. The staff finding stated the- applicant regUIred a two (9) foot variance to the Butte County CoUe Section 24-1:80.4 front yard requirements. This distance was k*tsed on the location of the walls on the building. However, an el;g�h (8) foot overhang and cement porch Will further encroach Upon the front yard setback requirements. Please amend your staff finding 'and motion to 10 feet rather than an IS foot front yard. The remalh ng findings and conclusion Would' be stli_I applicable ;las previously ttated in the staff fihding. Such a change in the staff findings Will have no effect on the public notice for this project. The project Was published -for>a varlahce to -and the front rear ,Yards and the distance 1s information or1ly and Is hot a requirement of the law i If you ►lave any questions, please advise: BLMIr . .n � i I ? '.` � w, � it I��1��1 v ^. ` ` � 4 ' ��... ..... _n .., ... ., �.:.: .. ,.. .. .. . .. ..a ... ._ r_ _ _. �. v �'1 Y � 7 �,�� �. °n t `1q(j1 � tjt�,,,, °{ � b saint ��� �9A E;`�5`#Sl�'.ntr� y�4� ��"F'a, 1A{ly - James Joseph January Architect_ Engineer Box 97 Cohasset Stage Chico, CA 95926 Uaar Mr, January: NEW CHURCH OF CHRIS _ , 2 FILE_..641 We have reviewed your request concerning th�� proposed abandonment f a portion of loth ,Avenue and Labqrham #45-01-014-03 PG&E has no objections to your proposed abandonment, However, pose maintains existing electric overhead facil'ities in the be�res+rvedaal'he�posed for abandonment and Would request that rights ested to Bunte County and the following or similar language can be suggested City of Chico for insertion in the resolution of abandonment. ,,gesorving, however, to Pacific Gas and Electric Company the rightrom_time to time to install, maintain, repair operatrtbot h , replace, remove and renew lines of pips, w°tr poles;* and other structures, equipment and fixtures, aboveground and underground for the open aiOn b�fi Avenue aid fAtiiit-ies in said loth Avenue (County)/ Yr.quest that the. County and City provide pGif With a copy M I Would al s ' , of the resolution of abandonment when available. ;should you,have any questions, please contact Mr. David Wiens in Chico at 894-4757: sincerely, PHIL LONGO support Services.Mahagor D :dais cct County of ButteCity of t`,hico publ i , Works/Engineerlig Dept, of Public Works p,o, Box 3420 7 County Center Drive Chico; CA. 95927 orov i l l e, CA 95965 5 u BUTTE COUNTY PLANNINGCOMMISSION NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING Notice Is 'hereby given by the Butte County Planning Commission that public hearings will be 'held on Thursday,'December 1'5, 19890 In the Butte County Board of SUpervisors' Room, County Administration Center, 25 County Center Drive, Oroville, r` Cz1llfornla, regarding the following Item at the following time- ITEM ime:ITEM DETERMINEDFROTO BE OREV REVIEW RICALLY EXEMPT January - Use Permit to allow the replacement (=Om. ofan existing church with a larger church, and a Vmarlance to the front and rear yard setback, to allow a building 48 feet from the centerline of E, 10th AVenue and 6 feet from the rear property line, on, property zoned 'R-1 (Resi'dent'ial), located on the northeast corner of l.aburnam Avenue and E, 10th Avenue, Identified as A130046-01-4-003, Chico, ITEM ON 'WH ICH A NEGATIVE DECLARAT I ON. W I TH MITIGATION MEASURES REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL.IMPACT HAS PEEN_ RECOMMENDED 9e00 a,Mi Teresa George - Rezone to modify a conditional C-1 ('Light Commerical) zone, Located on the southwest side of Highway 32, approximately 575 feet northwest of Oak Nay and Highway 32 Intersections Identified as AP*42- 14-114, Chico: ITEM ON -WHICH A NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVI_RONMENI,AL IMPACT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED 9400 a,m. OracC Ag, Partnership - Use Permit to allow the segregation of a 3.5 acre processln Op .� parcel for agricultural 8 property zoned A-40 (Agricultural, 40 acre parcels), located on the north and south side of Nelson West Road approximately i mile West of Aguas Frlas Road and approXlmately 6 miles West of the Town of Nelsons Identified as AP*38-14y-9,10,15,,16, The above applications, maps and Negati-ve Declarations WIthlwlthout Ml ti gat lon MeasUees are on fl le and available for public Viewing at the office of the BUtte County Planning Department, 1 County 'Center ')rlVe, OrOVllies California, if yoU challenge the above app IIc,lt[ohs In court, YOU may be 11MIted ej raising only those IssUes you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice or In written correspondence deilVe`red to the Planning commisslon, at or, prior toy the public hearing,. BUTTE COUNTY _PLANNING, COMMISSION JIRCHER, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING To be published in the Chico tnterprlse Record on '1'hUesday, November 00, 19139 h4 n� M Suite coy"t r LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH, AND BEAUTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 7'COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILL.E, CALIFORNIA 95985-3297 TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601 November 17, 1989 ,lames j4 January 102.93 Cohasset Road Chico, CA 95927 Ree Use Permit/Variance, AP 045-014-003 Dear Mr. January: The Butte County Planning Department has completed the initial studyof potential environmental consequences anticipated In connection with the above-mentioned project, a copy of which Is being forwarded to you. Please review the enclosed checklist, noting particularly any environmental problems which could be minimized or avoided by the case and manner -1n which the project 1s carried out;. Also, please review any recommended mitigation measures or conditions- of approval, After reviewing the checklist, yol may see ways to Improve the project design;. Design improvements to minimize problems are encouraged If You note any errors or OmItsions In our eva I uat'I on; please 'bring thein to our attention You will be notified of the time and place of the public hearing for your project. if You have any questions regarding environmental review, please contact this office 'between the hours of 10:00 A.m. and 3:00 p:m, Sincerely; B. A. Kircher Director of Planning } �l Brenc L. Moore Associate `Planner BLM: r Ene I: $ACI�Gi20'C7NL7 James J. January 1. Name of proponent 2: Address of proponent and representative (if applicable): 1n0Q1 Cohasset rt,,)ad tIII�r DETERM Z NAT 2 O1�T (To be coir»leted by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation; I/F1E find theproposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NCGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared: t1WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment) there Will not be a sighificant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MCA5URE5 described on, the attached sheet have been added to the project: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. I, /WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT }DEPORT is required: DATE:._ Chic 17; 1585 3. Project description: _ Use Permit/Variance II - MANI7ATcOi2Y_ F=1'TDZTTGS fir S2"GNMFT-CANC 1'E5 , MAYBE NO 1, Does the project have the potential to degrsde the quality of the environment; substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of major periods j of Califbxnia history or prehistory? �--- ' 1. Does the project have the potential to, achieve short -teem benefits to the detriment of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the. is one which occurs in a relatively brief period of time While v environment long-term impacts Will andure into the future.) --- 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small) but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.] A. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings) either dirctly or indirectly? --- .--- tIII�r DETERM Z NAT 2 O1�T (To be coir»leted by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation; I/F1E find theproposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NCGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared: t1WE find that although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment) there Will not be a sighificant effect in this case because the MITIGATION MCA5URE5 described on, the attached sheet have been added to the project: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION Will be prepared. I, /WE find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT }DEPORT is required: DATE:._ NoVember, 17; 1585 COUNTY OF $UTTE) PLANNING DEPARTMENT gy, B ent L. Moore ante Plahnex Assdoi � n Reviewed byt 4-cri (� (I`4J �` enl'or Plahrierre IV. Er7VSROIVMENTAi� �M1�ACT5 ' , (Explanations of all "YES'! and "MAYBE' answers are required on attached sheet(s). 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant: YES. MAYBE N0 a, Unstable earth conditions, or changes in geologic substructures) b. Disruption, displacement, compaction or overcovering of the soil? / C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ✓r, ,d. Destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay; inlet or lake? g. Loss of prime agriculturally productive soils outside designated urban areas? h. Exposure of people or propert» to geologic hazards such as earthquakes G landslides, mudslides,,ground failure or similar hazards? 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial.- ubstantial:a. A. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? �.� _ r ✓/ b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? _ v c. Alteration of air movement) moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, locally or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal r"ult insubstantial, a.. Maanges in currents, or the edurse or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters" b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and wilunt of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improvements; including vegetation r /� removal, channelization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water t «r quality, including but not limited to temperature) dissolved oxygen or turbidity? - -- g: Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? WCL h. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, -or through interception of an aquifer by outs or ekcavations? --- - i. Reduction in the abunt of water otherwise available for public Water supplies'! i J, Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding? 4. PLANT LIFE, Will the proposal result in substantialt a; Change in the diversit•v of spediest or number of any species of plants (including trees) shrubs; grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b, 'Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of j plants? ..._. .� t. Introduction of new Species of plants into an area, or in a barrier t0' the normal replehishment of existing species d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultuftl drop? -� J 5. ANIMAL LIFE: Will the pioposal result insubstantial.- YES MAYBE NO a. Change ,in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, organisms or.insects)? b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of ✓ animals? —^-- c. introduction of new species of animals into an area, or in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ----- d. Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial; a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7, ,,IGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce significant light and glare? �G 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned lard use of an area? 9. NATURAL REsouRCES. Will the proposal result in substantial; a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. 'Depletion of any non-renewable natural resources? 10. RISK. OF UP5ET. Will the proposal involve; a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event �— of an accident or upset conditions? --- b. Postiblo interference With bergency response Planor emergency evacuation plan? 11, POPULATION, Will the proposal alts, location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population? 12i proposal OUSINO.il the proposal affect existing ,housing or create a ,demandfor y t additional 13, Tf2ANSPORTATI6NJCIRCULATI0N. Will the prnpbsal result ins a. Generation of substantial: Additional vehicle movement? - b6 Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for now parking? a c, Substantial impact on existing transportation systems3 G d. �Sigftificaht alterations to present patterns of circulation or ✓� movement of people and/or goods? e. AlterdLions to Waterborne, rail or air traffio,7 f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians! _! 14, PUUBLId SERVICES. Will the prw.posal have an effect upbnt or result in a need for new or altered government services' oo a. Fire protecttibftl b. Police protectibn? c Schools? 'r`_ d. Parks or other recreatiohal kddiliLies? e, Maint6handdok public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental Services? .3.. -4- . 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: YES_MAYBE u Ntl ' �4 a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? WW�� b. Substantial incroase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the deve).opment of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the follo;�ing: ✓� a. Power or natural gas? b. Coumunications systems? c: Water availability7 d. sewer or septic systems? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? 17. HiiffAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:. a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental ... r health)l b. Exposure of p;,ople to potential health hazards? 18; AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstructln of view open to the publl,c� or will the proposaoany scenic l result in the Ir vista or creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? - Will the proposal result ::in an impact upon the quality or 19� quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20.CULTURAL RESfgJRc1 S . _ Will the proposal result inthe alteration or destruction of n ✓e a. prehistoric OV historic archaeological site result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects b. i1i1the propos al res to l prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? ' Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change rP c: which would affect unique ethnic cultural. values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses witha' . the potential impact area? a, � 'I7�'SCVS�=O'1V iOY+ ETTt7='h(77NMEIVTEsr.r 'G'4'A7�%TA:'T�C7I�i' See attached, f -4- AP D45-014-003 r ROrMENTAL EVALUATION 1` ®ISCUSSION OF ENV1 r down an existing church k lb; The proposed project consists of tearing existing site has no off- urch4 The, and replacing It with anew hhr ject Will provide off-street parking *heti street parking. The Proposed which will Increase overcovering of t ill notoresueitpi�jaGsignificant is anticipated such overcovering impact due to the scale of the project and drainage lmp''ovemen requirements of Butte County Pub'Lic Works. i,c The project sit Is is located In an existln9 developed urban Y flat and no additiona neighborhood. The area Is relativei to accommodate the new church. No earthwork or grading Is necessary , change In the topography or ground surface relief features will occur as a result of the Groposed project Ig; No loss of prime agrlcuitftomiytherpdroposed project The outside designated urban areas wIII result The pro!ect Project site Is located within the Chico Urbana Areas a church site was developed approximately 50 year g ih: All of S' ithin a Moderate Earthquake intensity �nty is w Zone VIII. It bated that adheren�.e to the uniform Building Code for seIt �ac.tive areas will mitlgate the seismic hazards of the project s ,z. 3b,c Some minor changes In absorption rates; drainage patterof the ns or s a res the rate and amount of surface trun willmbe oconveur atzd frumita smail proposed project. The Project sl church building and grass areas to a slightly larges existing The proposed off-street park I hO s�anotuary and off-street parking.er Will create additional impervious surfaces OV behanecessary to exlstlnd. Som off-site drainage imp accommodate the proposed pr-lect. So e stirface drainage Improvements -, 4 proposed project. It 1s Wlii be ect,ssaty he a" . Ards of the Butte County Department of anticipated that the s ,R. �'+ Pub iio Works will mitigate .rjy adverse impacts to drainage. 4a: The proposed project has Incorporated site plan designs to on the protect the existing mature stands of trees e cl°oject site. In 7: Security and street "slganti cipatedlthatasshields anre d alllhoUtdoar the hear vicinity. It 1Ube lighting Will d I rest I l ghtI nhasard a manner to motor I ttondEastg 10th or surrounding properties, or any LabUrnam Avenue, g; The project site is designated by the Butte County General Plan ect on the pr It a as ''Medium Density Residehtlal". The exist;inngczo i ng condl'tlonalluse site Is RI Th proposed project of a c ra osed project is the -within the R zoning classlficatloh The 00 5�' rep church replacement of an existing con the protect site. The feXlsfl, ng ` church was the late 1920s and created :during has been 1n openatlon for approximately 60 + years, The !Butte County General Plan of Medium Density Residential allows for public and quasi-pubilc bulldl:ngs such as the proposed rellgious structure. 13: The proposed project Will result in a benefit to the existing t-ansporta:tlon-facilities in the nelghborhood. The proposed proJect. will Provide off-street par,kIIng. which currently does not exist: No new traffic generation is expected since the proposed project Is only a replacement of the existing church, not an expansion. 14a,b: The proposed project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for crew or altered goverhmental services. The project site til Is currentyy Utilized as a church sanctuary. The proposed project will demolish the existing sanctuary and build a new sanctuary on the same site. No expansion of the existing church is anth,Ipated lea,b The placemwnt of the new sanctuary will require existing electric and telephone :llnes which connect single --family residential housing to be re -aligned in order to accommodate the site plan as proposed. It is anticlpated that such new connections can be accommodated by the Utilities: 20a: The project site Is an existing church site, Which was developed approximately 60 years ago: The project site is designated by the archaeologica-i sensitivity map as being in an area of low sensitivity. As such, no archaeological records search Is required: 6LM:lr tt, II Arilicant: James J. January Assessor's Parcel 4 045-014-003 Log * 89-11-8-01 DATA SHEET A. Project Descrlptlon 1 Type of Project: Use Permlt/varlance. 24 Brief Descrlptlone. Use Permit to allow the replacement of an existing church with a larger church, and a Variance to the front and near yard setback requirements. 3. Location: On the northeast corner of Laburnam Aven(Ae and E. IOth Avenue, in the Chico Urban Area. 4 Proposed Density of Developments N/A. 5. Amount of impervious Surfac8ng: +/- 8696. S. Access and Nearest Public Road(s)t Labur"nam Avenue and East i0th Avenue. a'. Method of Sewage DistOosai: individual Septic and leachfleid system. 8. Source of Water Supply* California Water 'Service Company. 9. Proximity of Power Lines: Adjacent to property. 10. Potential for further land divisions and development: N/A: B Environmental Setting, Physical Environment: I1 Terrain a. General Topogra0hl c Character Level valley land, b..Elepes: 0-2%, C. b. Elevation: +%- 206 ft. A.S.L, d. Limiting Factors; None, 2, Solis a Types and Characteristics: Viha loam Well suited to growing or Irrigated crops. b. L W tLng Factors: ?Moderate Iiguefaotlon potential 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a+ Earthquake zone -e Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone' Villi b. Erosion Potential None. 04 Landslide Potential's None: d Fire Hazard; Unclassified. e. Ekpanslve Solt Potential; moderate 4. Hydrology a. Surface Water't' Llndo ch. —1 is located approklmateiy 1600 feet to the northof the project slte. b. Grouhd Water: Overlies area of heavy groundwater W i thdraWa c Drainage Characteristics- On-slte. d. Annual Rainfall (no"rmal)t 2224" o r i,s e. Limping Factors; None. 5. Visual/SeenIc %jatllty: Good. 6. Acoustic Quality: Good. 7. A i r Qua I I ty : Good. - Bloloc�ical Environment: 8. Vegetation: Common urban landscape. yr} 9. Wildlife Hablt;^t: Wildlife IIMIted to domestic pets and songbirds. Cultural Environments l0. 1-1 . Archaeological and Historical Resources In the area: low. Butte County General Pian des I gnat I on: Med l um Dens I ty Residential. 12. Existing Zoning R-1, 13. Existing Land Use on-site: Church. - 14. Surrounding Area; a. Land Uses: Muitl and single -family resldentlal, and industrial/agricultural. b. Zoning: R-1, A-2, and city, c. Gen. Plan Deslgn6tloh4 Low Density Residential, Medium Denslty Residential, and City. d. Parcel Sizes: 1/4 and 1/8 of an acre. e. Population: Urban 15; 16. Character of Site and Area: Urban resldentlal': Nearest Urban Area: Chico: Relevant Spheres of Influencer Chico, California Water' Service Company: 18. Improveme�j;s Standards Urban Arca: Yes:' 1^,. Fire Protection Service. a.. Nearest County (state) Fire Station: Station *44.b. Water Avallablllty; Hydrant. 20. Schools In Area: Chico Unified School District. r i 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REFERF,',ICE MATER (AL ; a t47ap H-Ij Earthquake and Fault Activity: Seismic Sa°f et ,. Element, Butte County General Plan revlsed'.1-77, by CH2M HII`I.! 2 Map 11-2, LIquefaction Potent I a I Seismic Safety Element, Butl�e County Genera! Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M 1-1111 3. Map 111-1, Subsidence & Landslide Potential Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH HI 11: 4. Map General, Plan 111-2, Erosion P1t77tby i•CH MSafety a liey EElement, Butte County 6.. Map 111-3, Expansive Soils Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hili 64 1kitaP IV-1, Nolse: Noise Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M 1-1111: 7• Map V-1, Scenic Highways: Scenla Hlghway Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hili. i 8. Map 111-4, Natural Fire Hazard Classes: Safety Element, Butte County General Plan revised 1-77, by CH2M Hili: 9. Archaeological Sensitivity Map by James P: Manning, for Bitte County Plann ng Department, 1983. 10. S,ohoo l b 1 stio' 1 ct Map, Butte County Planning Department '11 eA'do Niteate Study Map, Nitrate Concentration In Shallow Wells-, 15',:r3, b;e Department of Water Resources, Northwestern_DIstelct, 'Galt: Resk-+,.jrces Agency, State of California. 1 ? Agr I cu 1 t• t-a I P Ms0?-ves Map, estab'I I shed by Peso I tit i on No i 67- 178, Butte' CoUhttij °:board of Supervisors, December 6, 1987: 1 3 . Flood Insurance Rate Maps:,Nativnal Flood insurance Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1988, 14. USGS Quad Maps► Chlco, 198o, 15. Sol! Map, Chico (1926)/OroVlile (1926) Area, U.S. Department of 1 Agrlcultul-e: 16, Solt Survey of Chi0o(1925)/0roV!II a (1976) Area, U.S. bepartment of Agr'icUltUrew 17 Butte County Fire Protection Jurisdictions and Facilities Map, Butte County Fire bepartme"nt and California bepartment of Forestry. Butte County Planning bepartmeht. NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIRO'NIENTAL IMptiCT NOTICE IS iiEREBY GIVEN that the project described below has been reviewed pursuant to .the provisions of the Cali:ornia, Envixoneen Quality Act of 1970 CPublic Resources Code 21100tat determination has et seq.) and a been made that it will not have a significant effect upon the environment. AP Z• x(0:45-014-003 Log Tt 8q_ll:_8 01.. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Use Permit to allow. the r existing church with a larger church, and a Variance and rear replacement of an yard setback. ' 3. to t he front LOCATION OF PROJECT-. on the northeast corner and E. 10th of La Avenue, Chico. burnam Avenue 4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLICANT: James J; January 10293 Cohasset Road Chi' Co, CA 9592`7 S. MITIGATION MEASURESO 6, A co PY of the initial study regarding the environmental effect Of this project is on file at 7 County Center Drive Oro vi11e, This study was: Adopted as presented. Adopted with changes. supporting reasons s atta hed modifications and are attached, 7., A public hearing on, this Negative Declaration_. decision malting body,. Was.held by the hearing Body Date :of Deter urination Determination: n On the basis of th 1nitxal study of environ information presehted at heat ngs, comments maact> the receivedmental proposal and our own knowledge and independent research:the We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION is hereby adopted. We find that the On project will ho have a significant effect; the environment but will t attic not in this case because of � which lgat on 'measures his in item above y this re,('erenco Made conditions 0� Prnject Approval, A conditional NLGATI'VE adopted. DECLARATION is hereby Signature No 03F IaETEM3NtZON and Research FROM _ Butte County 'T0 - Office of Planning planning Department 1400 ,Tenth Street, Room 121 S7 County Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95514 Oroville, CA 95965 or X County Clerk County of Butte SUBJECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title AP It Name Use Permit/Variance 045-014-008LTames J January State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number (if submitted to Clearinghouse.) B. A. Kircher, D:rector' o£ Planning (916) 538-7601 Project Location On the northeast corner of Laburnam Avenue and East 10th Avenue, Chico,, mit to allow the replacement of anex Project Description Use Persting church With a larg,sr church, and a Variance to the front and rear yard setback This is to advise that the Butte Count _ (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency) has approved the above-dascrNed project on and has made (Date) the following determinations %e:Yding the above-described project-. J. The project _.will,will not, have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the: provisions of CEQA A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA "sMitigation measures were, were not, made a condition 69 the approval of the project: If. A statement of overriding considerations was not, adopted for this project, This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general. public at Butte County Planning Department 1 County Center Drive Ot�oirille, CA 95965 bate Received for Filing and Posting it OPR Signature 'fide ttuised pis, i9, t to you. LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 9596503399 P1ONE: 588.7601 October 13, 1989 James Ji January 10293 Cehasset Road Chico, CA 95927 RE: Pre -Application _ Review. APO 045-014-003; File 4i 90-'2 Val/ 90-14 UP Dear Mri TanUary This is. to notify you that we have received sufficient assurances from Butte County Enviroimental Health and Public Works Departments t;bat your project can meet their require- ments: This fulfills the Are -Application review process. No additional work shall be performed on this project until iwe have received the remaining application fees in the amount of $ 147.50. Please submit these fees to the Butte County Planning Department in 'person or by mail. Make checks ;payable to the Butte County Treasurer. We are also including afield marker for identification of the project. Please secure the ribbon to a conspicuous place, preferably visible from the roadway. should you have any quest Ens regarding this matter, please feel free to contact this office any weekday between the hours of 1.0:00 a.m. and 3;00 p.m. Sincere.`Ly,, B.A. X±RCHER Director of Planning %'i�"�"c.:..,,�• . - . �„ �,.`,�t�. ice- Larry Painter Planning; Technician LP i tdm E>'iclr�4ure RE; AP# 45-01-4-003 Use Permit and Variance Dear Mr. January: We received your pre -application review request for the subject Use Permit and Vaniance. Butte County Public Works and Environmental: Health have received the ;information you submitted. The Planning 'Department will consider this application complete only after we have assurances from the above departments that the project complies with apprcpriate ordinances and any conditions imposed, can be meti It iL the applicants responsibility to provide any additional information needed by Public Works or Environmental Health to,meet their requirements. Public Works may be 'contacted by telephone at 538"1266 and Environmental Health at 538--7281 for further information as to their evaluation of the proposal and their requirements, The Planning Department staff will also be reviewing the application for any special conditions or modifications that are appropriate. Should you have any questions about the'pre"application review, please contact this office. Sincerelyy b 4A. KIRCHER Director of Plahh1ftg i tidy Y amen Planning 'Technician M tdm Enclosure: teceipt #1.0961 - $195.50 ,1.U' ATTN: HOWARD SNYDER RE: Pre -Application Review Information for: Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated the following project- James J January _ Use PA=,i t A -concerning g - allow the replacement of an existing church with a larger church, and a Variance ` to the front and near yard setback, on property zoned R-1, located on the north- east corner of taburnam Avenue and 10th Avenue, identified as AP# 045-0164.003, Please indicate ate your. response by checking the appropriate box. No requirements for this project. The project as proposed can meet this Departments requirements. sufficient proof has been given that the applicant can meet the following conditions approved: .w �.a,�t� a.. rh ak r r•. v --i The project as proposed can/does riot meet the LJ requirements of this departmeht. A revision of the prgject will be necessary, The applica-t with this infor has been contacted mation. Env)ronmehtai Neai�h 9 ` SEP 1989 Signature.. Oroy►rye, Caiitorn) W Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project. James J, January - Use Permit•fo allow the replacement of an existing church with a larger church, and a Variance { to the front and near yard setback, on property zoned R-1, located on the north eas t corner of Laburnam Avenue and 10th Avenue, identified as API 045-01-4-003, Please inslica.te your response by checking the appropriate box. No requirementV, 901.' ',.'his project. Thero`'ect as proposed can meet this Departments requirements. Sufficient proof has been given that F 7 the applicant can meet the follotvilig conditions approvedt ,J va SOD ez[00 , r does n Lt` bar Ndo �� of meet the thedro p Sect as proposed Can/ requirements of this depavtment. A revision of thep roject,Wiil be necessary. The applicant has been contacted with this information. 5ignature.. - o � Q BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 7 County Center Drive E Orovil'le, CA 95965-3397 � --(916) 538-7607 TV BUTTE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT October .i7, 10ft" O „c �4 :i TO, DATE RE: PROJECT REVIEW & ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Enclosed is preliminary data our office has received or generated concerning the following project: James J. January - Use Permit to allow the replacement of an existing church with a larger church, and a Variance to the front and near yard setback; on property zoned R-1, located on the north- east corner of L&burnam Avenue and 10th Avenue, identified as AP# 045-01r4-003; Chico. We are malting an assessment of possible environmental. ;Xipacts and will be preparing an environmental document, either a Negat=ive Declaration, Negat::ve Declaration with Mitigation Measures or an Envixonmental Impact Report (EIR). Please provide any factual statements, ideas for investigation, or opinions you can offer in your area of concern or expertise that ,relate to either physical, social, or economic impacts that this project may generate.a, Please respond within 14 days of the above -noted date: If no response is generated by this ingiAry, then it shall be assumed that there are til impacts which are potentiali:rom the no significant environmen project, We appreciate any assistance you can provide= Dote Co. Pinnaing Corm Sincerely, OCT 271J8J ,J � jc?rovllle; Coli#ornia Comments : - MList�have a fire hydY.s� J -d n 400 ft Q the new- facility thaw deliver 2000 g.p.m, 4 'boos your 43ency wish to receive a copy of the environmental. document (initial study dor t`fegativ'e beclaration (with or withoutMitigation Hea",tlres) or Eiji for this project) ,E NO December15, 1988 Gentlemen: This letter authorizes Jim January to act as re- presentative for the Church. of Christ at vast 10th and baburnw, Avenues in applying .for the itecessary permits involved in the building. of a new church at the Wast 10th and Laburnum site. Sincerely yy Tris Gees is `.