HomeMy WebLinkAbout045-230-025f
, v
�
,
I
r
,
,
I
t
r
,
„
1
r
1'
M
f..
IT
g.. i,. a -: ":.
.'. ....
,. ,
..
n.
� ..
.. .,. .' :• �: ',: ,.
r00
r ,
...
moo
..
.'rte
19
(
:• :".
.n ..: ., .,
u ,
i. ,. .,, a a t. .. 1 .. ':
1
. , V.
r
,:,
1
r
..,, a ..
ce, .. r w,r c•r. ._ a, ,
,n
r
,
a. a
r
n
r,
r ,
t : r
A
a? F
n
��
11
0:� Laap ns:cows
,,,..r:,..�..... ... , t.., it ' r• y
LOG ��t91-03-12-01
HARY GQNT r_
P,'0. Box 5 Chico, CA. 95927
Same as above
_..,-rte TENTATIVE PARCEL JJAP to divide 4.72 acres into 4 separate
'y�;CI�.,.. TION
Paz 3� C li22 + acres; 1 @ 1,47+ 1 @ 1.01 acres,J1 C 1.02 acres
4 a-reels located on the northwesterly side of Filbert Avenue approx. 500
feet s,-,jjijr4esterly of Sheridan Avenue, Chico area.
AssZ.S50R S 13ARc�.�� N17I�MR ts) .
045-230-025
w
G=UAL UA P? 'Y Low' Density/ Res VROZ-zCT CONSI.SM11T? 1 45� 3 _
�r
.RZPORT
:ISATE OF APPLIa-%NT SIG_dAiURZ
.jD; tCDT.;SMITVATION ACCT CONT:�CTS?
January 30, 1991
NPPILICATION iCE?V
S "Cly./C Ix ENGIN.. =x�: Roper Associates
v-
-p.o. Box 385, Chicon CA 02592.7
D Pr? IN�.NG DIALECTOR S ROUP- =-D PP-vPA-
IfSl��.y'
CA=C-OR DATE Fl, D.cs
_
F.� D DF TW NEC-a":IVE DEC TId?4 0 SATE ADOPT
T?Gr,'L'�..I7 KEG. D.XCT_'ARAT;CON DA�' ' I:O?' �'D
ENV. ZbL'ACT RE- POR2' DA'sE =12 : c;D
STATE CLFu."Z`r�`d�OUSE NG .
S s3. CO.&ZTTT= Vt-"T-NG DA''?
"3r DTt" r'1GENCr' �^'RiNC Dr7 T% -- f
a
ADVs.-CRY-Gc.,G'.0
'2o�b A=ON,
CD__r-'jTs oR =lN G D=-7=0.. 1 5 Rte. QST
a�
Page. 2
NAth� 0'F riEAREST PUBLIC ROAD; �ZjL aC-i2 A i/tf--7 ,, � A e -Y Ar/c
DISTMV1,E TO NEAREST PUBLIC ROAD: k1►�1AGc--iyT
i
(For information on nearest public road, check with Public Worms Department)
IF ACCESS 1SBY PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHT-OF-WAY, ATTACK DOCUMENTATION TO THIS
APPLICATION`.
IF ACCESS TS BY A RECORDED PRIVATE 'ROAD EASEMENT. INDICATE DEED REFERENCE:
VOIM PAGE'
IF 'THERE AFI' ANYX0 ACCESS STRIPS, THESE MUST BE ;SHOWN ON THE TENTATIVE' MA;;
AND THE RE00RDINCG DATA INDICATED :BE14)W,;
3IOL%L✓_E "—� PAGE
DISTANCE TO CITY LIMITS:
ADJO. ' 7XG ILLS PROPERTY? &0
DOES THE 01ti7iER OF THIS PARCEL NOW OM11 OR HAS HE IN THE PAST OWNED , �
I
Recetpt Nu=er:
sig �Uatuun�e�e,C U01
-8n.
l R OFFICE jFiSg OIv7,Y;
Butte County Planning yep(. Receipt #L`t
i County Center Drive
Orovi.11e, CA 95965-3397 Applicant air!
(916) 534-4601 AP # Q
Subdivision. Name (if applicable)
APPE-- NDiX E
Dae Filed%
LAND, DIVISION APPLICATIONS
Supplemental Information for Planning Department
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals
required for this project, including those requ red,bl* city, regional,
state and federal agencies: _LG/o_ry
2. Proposed scheduling/associated projects:
3. Anticipated incremental development (phasing of subdivision units,
future development plans)i
.. w y
4. What method will be utilized to accommodate surface drainage? Describe
stow ren -site and downstream drainage channels will be affected.
° Y Vater purposes (hydrants
Proxxmit of watr for fire fighting ,Ponds,
0.1
y
6. Will eXca+ration or grading be necessary? Cubicj yards (estiinate),.
f
7, Directions for travel, to property (rugal and mountainous areas only),
8. ENVIRONI;ENTALIIMrACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES*
Identify potentially significant environmental impacts associated with
the land division. What project design features or special conditions
of approval (mitigation measures) are proposed to alleviate potential
environmental impacts? VOAI
9. ENV RONIAENTAL SETTING*
i
a
a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animala, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of
the structures.�SlflGnrTir��:.
b) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on
i
plants andanimals and any cultural, historical or s-,enic aspects:
Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial.) etc.),
intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, depart-
ment stores, etc), and scale of development (height, frontage,
setback, rear yard, etc.),tZsrrr•gc_-
a CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify%t m,-- the statements furn1shed above and in
the attached exhibits present the d',�ta and information required for this
initial evaluation''to the best of my ability, andthat the facts, statement,
and information presented are'trup and correct to the best of any kcaowledge
and belief.
. G
&A Signat e
i
*Use separbtd sheet for lunger tesponse.s
4/85
•oaS juaWdotaAGQ taus
1.6k
W-
si � la
w Planning Department __�
Environmental Department De artment Nom' MARY GONT
—j— CDF (Forestry Department,) AP: 45-25-25
Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map)
�.7�,.,� Butte County Sheriff
PG&E (check title report for easement)
. ..,_ Pacific Bell
_ ,ke Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
r Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
S pool Distri;ct_(w ll map)
Water Company if individual wells are not indicated on application or map)
Durham Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co,
California Water Service Company (Chico area)
Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Orovilie area, SE of river)
Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito aria NE of river)
Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd.
to lake)
Del Oro Fater (Paradise fines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mall Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
_ Paradise Irrigation Distract
City of (check wall maps for :spheres of influence)
Oroville
__. Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
OROIIILLE AREA ONLY:
Lake Oroville Area Public. Utility District (see large map in cabinet)
Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet)
El Medio Fire District (check Wall map, a small portion of Or
i oville only)
BIGGS, RICHV'ALE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOM BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report
to see what applies. Some areas overlap
Drainage District #1
Drainage Distract #Z
.Drainage: Distract #100
.Drainage District SQC
Reclamation District #x833
Reclamation District #2056
Sacramento and San Joaquin, Drainage District
Butte Creek Drainage District
IN CERTAIN CASES-
Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions)
Y
Cel Trans (near and water and in rural and mountain areas)
De (
( 32 70, 90, 149 (Chico cut-off), 162 (Olive Hazy,
Richvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road.)
State 'Water Quality Control. Board (projects with more than 100 lots or 'units)
United Stares Forest Service (if project borders 'USA land —check AP books)
Warks and Recreation Department (property near Lake Oroville)
State mater Resources Department (property
near Lake Oroville ---= watershed)
Rock. Creek Reclaioation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of Kock Greek and
east of
y (see wall map)
Chico Area Recreation & park Dist (only for subdivisions)
H•S1nDuraloandhmountaxnSresjnto Dist. Corps of Engineers (near water and
SPECIAL CASES; check title report for any mention of special. services o;6.44 easements such
as toTheralalita Irri"g
atxo I?_,,trlct numbered steins)
NO C,E Off' ;D:ErrP_RM,ZNA.T:E0N
Q Office of 'Planning and tqta, ��� 4 Butte County
1400 ,Tenth Street, Room Planning Department
Sacramento, CA 9581.4 7 County Center Drive
or UN
g 6, `al Oroville., CA 95065
Country Clerk C ANDACE J. GRUBBS, Wta o, ft
County of Butte 8Y L:0AMON Deputy
,,;tTB.7E:CU: Filing of Notice of :Determination in compliance with Section 21.108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Cude,
Project ?title AP 11 Dame
Tentative :Parcel dap 0045-2330- u26 `nary Gon
State Clearinghouse ?dumber Contact Person
p Number
g Telephone e
(f submitted to Clearinghouse)
.iohn `riendonsa, Public works 9176-538-720556
Project Location On the northwesterly side of Filbert Ave, approx. 600 It, south-
kresterly of Sheridan Ave.,, Chic0 area
Project Description TPM to divide 4.72 ac. into 4 parcelparcels;1 at. 1.22 ac,, 1 at 7.47;
1 at 1,01 ac, i at 1.02 acres.
this is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
.:has approved the above-described: project on 6/1u/9i and has made
(Date)
the foll,o+aing determinations regarding the above-described project;
1, The project will, : ,wili not, have a significant effect on the
environment.
2, An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CE0A.
A. e <v
N gat�.e Declaration was Prepared or
.��. p p f this project pursuant to the.
provisions of CE0A.
5. Mitigation measures C wera were
► not made a condition o
f the
approval of the project.
4. fortthsent: of project�,erriding considerations was, i� was not, adopted
Thoseis approval certify
fisthat the final EIR with comments and responses and record of
p j pp vailable to the general public at;
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, 'CA 95965
Date Received for Viling and
Posting at CFR 6725`97
Signature
Paula Leasure; Asst Planning Director
111.
t,
Title
kevisl�d lta�ch inti
I
x.
r
I (At'.D OF t'r,i()L;At V.sT;x st r I,;' {:xf �Ty
DEPAR I fAMN I OF,, *xf v%, ,,.CRKS
WILLIAM (8111}CHEZ- , .r ," .o
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE • OROVILL a, CALIFORNIA 9S965�
Telephones (916) 538.7681
June 100 1991 RONALD D. MCELROY
Deputy Diteelor
Mary Goni RE: AP 45-23-25
1). 0:. BOX 599 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
Chico, CA 95927
Dear Ms. Goni
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on (,lune 10)
1991 ) the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
environmental mitigations and approved the above. -referenced project subject
to the conditions listed---on_.the attached sheeti
If no appeals are timely filed within ten (10) days of the date of the
AdvisoryAgency's approval ( June 20;, 1991 ) =— with the Clerk of the
Beard of Supervisors, this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it gill be in lorder for
you to file your "final map" idth the Butte County Department of Public Works
for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of the date of approval by
the Advisory Agency.
Recently enacted legislation (AB31158; Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990;
effective January 1, 1991, requires that the Department of Fish and Came
impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of manarxng
and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources, These filing fees are
collected during the environmental review process and are to be ,paid at the
time the County files a "Notice of Determination" with the County Clerk of
the County in which the project is lot,ated. This procedure is required
pursuant to Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code:
To increase administrative efficiency, the statute delegated the tullection
of filing fees to the County Clerk.. The fee required in connection with your
project is checked _ked below:
I
24
..
i
J t�5 f
SNER/OAF
- �.
AVE.
96.73 ` �2U.0
T7.fJ
07,14
1103
90.00dod
1
=
GV✓
•--
G 45
1D0
lo
?1
FRP2
2
lye
ISO
a
®
I
ISS.+aJ �r711zf3J
ti0349Js
tr
..
O.SAC
N
�
Q2S1at
Z.OAe:
A
`
0
y
1
67
14
0. J219 AC
irG
Z
L,.
h 6l
AcS
7. `LZZ �75
..�.. «y..
K}AGY AVE.
Iq
a
1
o®
on.
I
QAc! pJZbPD O ACC4 S
pC.L, w
w
iId
79�
...
!d
y
�.1]S GN iit'T
't a
It CARMA
2
war
a
J
04
_..13tlt4..-
U-O
MdP N 45- 23
Bil7WELt �o;'h svoi MOR. 6.4, i Pg., 14
OR.8Vd,
81 DWSIOE'
NbiE-A5 ES5bR'� PAkCEL 8LOC9
CbUitty Of BU
e, N' ik
1E'f7 AOE 2 MD.R.
_
Bk/� Py r 3iddfi'
14 [ot NUh18ER5 SHOWN
?` ¢
IN CIp,CLrt Irl q': sit
?/*Giix zw'O
k 0„7F N.A,KS
AF E[04BEki,
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
1iOTICE OF BION/STATEMENT OF ETION
{ )
A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$25.00 (Twenty --Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
X) B De Minimus Impact -- Certificate of Fee. Exemption
$25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
NOTICE OF DFTERMINATION — FEF I REQUIRED
{ ) A:, Negative Declaration
$1,250,00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25.00 (Twenty- Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
B. rnvironmen*dl Impact .Report
's $850 (Bight Hundred Fifty Dollars)
j State Filing Fee
$2,5:00 (T. ea- Dollars) Clerk's Fee
3. OTIE :R {Spec:ify
$25,00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
lite .gene should be paid to the PlanningDepartment by ( Juti 24, 1991
i.�
n 6rdet for the Notice of Determination to be 'timely filed. Make. checks
pa, gb. p to the . County of Butte
The project applicant should be aware that if, he„a»she.does not remit payment
of the :required filing fees; the project approval may be invalid by law and
may not be opel.ative, vested or final, pursuant to the provisions of Public,
F>esources Cade Secu.ion 21089 (b), fish and Game Code Sec. 711,4 (.c�_ and
Section 753.E (d) (3) and (7), Title 14,'Cali=fornia Code of Regulations
Should ,you have any questions regarding this matter, please conta'..f: this
office.
Ver! truly yours o
William Ch€ff€
Director. at Public Works
1
` EL
J.yhh �:end,onsa
Aisi'3ytAnt Director
jM/ds
co Planning Department
Envirdnmental 'Health IJepartment
Roper Associates
,
Su ite Count
+
LANp LTH AND OE NATURAL 4nd> UTY
Br!
.rte DEPOTMENT of PUOLIC WOAKS
WILLIAM (8111) CHEFP, Director
t 7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE , ORO /ILLS, CALIFORNIA 95965'
CERTIFIED MAIL Telephone: (916):,,384ae
Ma 2 1991 RONALD IJ, mcr:00Y'
y' , Deputy Dl-,actor
Mary Goni RE: AP 45-23-25
P. 0. Box 599 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
Chico, CA 95927
Dear Ms; Goni;
Please be advised that the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear
your applicatiol'i 'on the above—identified property On June 10, 1991.
The Agency w ]1 be reviewing. the findings from the Planning Department
and will be considering your tentative parcel map. Public Works trill
recommend that conditions of approval as listed on the attache.? sheet
The meeting will Commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors"'
- Room, County Administration Building, 25 County Center Drive,
Oroville, California_.
regarding tact this
if you hada any questions re a.rdin this matter, please con
office.
Very truly yo'ur's,
William Chef£
Director of Public Works
John Mendonsa
el—Assistant Director'
JM/ds
attachment
Cc! Planning Department
Envirbhmental Health Department
Roper Attociates
,rte- 0
Butt
LAh`D OF NATURAL W E A L T H AND V EAUTY
D2PARTMENT OF PUBLIC I BALTH
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL :•iFALTH
Address 19h bfoinorinl' 4foy Q 7 County Center Drive d 747 Elliott Road
69
p
Chico, C liforoio 95926 DrovIlI r California 95965 Telephone .California16/82 308
i2nply to _ Teleph 0. 91b/897.2727 Talephonet 916/538.7261` Telephone. 916/872.63Q8
iv
April. 25, '.991
Mary Gong RE: Mary Goni Parcel Map
P.O. Pox 599 'NWSide of Filbert. AT., 'Chico
Chico, CA 95927 APT 45"23-25
Dear Ms GOT1 ,
p advised the Butte County Department of Public Works,{Land
,his department has
at�velopment Section, that we are prepared to act on the above application.
used on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional
approval.
Racommended,Conditions for Ap removal
1. Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are proposed to be destroyed
under pe -nit: Destroy those wells under permit and connect the facilities
served by the wells to other approved water sources priorto .recording
final map.
` thit the are willing and able to supply domestic water
2. provide a letter or other documentation
to parcels 1. 2, 3 and 4:
.3, Provide a letter or other documentation from City of Chico statim that
y g upp p , 3 and
t,ae are willing and able to s ly sewer service to parcels � 2
4
44 Place a note on the map that states "Develbpmr- of parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4
will, require cont'i ,MiOri to a public sanitary'
5. Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels 11 2, 3 and
will require connection to a public water supply."
i.J...'.... a ..:- n .... fk�• .. -
Inter-Departmental Memorandum
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
1+"ItOM: Planning Director
$VBJECT Report on Tentative Parcel. Map for Mary Goni, AP# 045-230-025,
ONVE: April 4, 1991
`rhis is a proposal to subdivide 4.72 acres to create four parcels, at 1,22 acres, L47
- 'acres; 1.01 acres, and 1.02 acres: The present zoning is R-1. The Land Use Plan. Map
of tbo Butte County General, Plan designates this area as Low Density Residential,
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning n.or any adopted or proposed element
of the Butte County General Plan nor any County, specific or community plan,
I_
An. Initial Study was conducted in accordance to the California Environmental Quality
Act and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for the project. The
applicant has provided mitigation measures addressing all the issues of the initial study
which are considered to adequately mitigate the .negative impacts to a less than
significant level. The appli.ctmt received archeological clearance from the Northeast
Information Center, at California State University, Chico. All environmental
documentation has been forwarded to the Butte County Advisory Agency within the
required 105 days as -mandated by the Catifornia Public Resources Code Section 21151.5..
Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for Mary Goni, AP# 045-230-025,
subject to the following mitigation ,measure and condition;
Mitigation .Measures:
1 Apply for and diligently seep annexation to the City of Chico through the
Local Agency FormationL Commission prior to recordation of the final map
to mitigate the impacts on the Butte County Sheriffs Department,
Condition:
1. Lot area on final ,map shall conform to the 94 zoning classification
requirements concerning minimum lot size and setback 'requirements for
property improvements.
BLMarna
cc; Mary Gorii,
Roper Associates
ti
LL
)4
Collfornia � d Department of Anthropology
.Arcf'Ugolog►cal U U �U LASSN SiSK1Y0U
�sEN sure California State University, Chico
or MOOOC TENAMA Chico, CA 95929
J.nvent y rLaM&S TR,wm 916 895.6256
SM. rA
k,r _
April 4, 1991
Mr. Brent Moore
Butte County Planning Department
#7 county Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
PE. AP '# 45--23-25/GONr PARCEL MAP/
I.C. # 'L91-10
T22N, RIE, Sections 26,23; USGS Chico 7.5' quad
4.12 acres
Dear Mr. Moore,
In response to a request received March 29, 1991, a record
search for the above cited project was conducted by examining
the official maps and records for archaeological sites in
Butte County.
RESULTS:
PREHISTORIC'RESOURCZS;•_ There are no previously recorded sites
of this type knoini to be located within the project
boundaries. However, six sites of this type have been
recorded within a mll:e of the project area. These sites
include occupation locales, village or campsite, and lithic
scatter°s
HISTORIC ttESOURCES: There 'are no previously recorded sites of
this type known to be located within the project boundaries.
However, three sites of this type have been recorded within a
mile radius of the project area. Two of the sites are
associated with General Bidwell's estate. CA -BUT -295 is a
relocation village site of the Bidwell Indians (1849-1868).
CA-BUT=574 is recorded as a historic rancheria associated with
Bidwell.. The third site (CA -BUT -712) is recorded as a
.historic structure housing what was once at least three
individual business establishments. Additionally, the USGS
quad map indicates a Chico Cemetery in Section 26. This site
may contain unrecorded historic" cultural resources. Also,
Bidwell Park, south bt the .project area was donated by ,Annie
K. Bidwell to the cit of Chico 1,900 acres in 1905 and
another 3,01 acres in 1911.,
PREVIOUS _ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS: Accordin- to our"
ecoids the project area has not been previously surveyed for
cultural ,resources
- 3:ITERATURE SEARCH: Reviewed were the official records and
maps for archaeological sites and surveys in Butte County.
A"so reviewed were the National Register of Historic Places,
the California Inventory` of Historic Resources (1976),
Californias Historical Landmarks (1982) , California Points of
Historic Interest, A Century of California Post offices
(1955), Gold Districts of California (1980), and Historic
Spots in California (1966)
RECOMMEND
F �TIONS: Based upon the above information and the
local topography the proje t is located 'in an area considered
to be sensitive for cultural resources. However, due to
previous development of the area, we are recommending_that no
archaeological survey. be conducted of the project area .prior
to pro! ect.operations. However, should any cultural resources
be: encountered duringproject operations, all work should
cease within the areaof the find until the site and materials
can, be inc5pected by a professional archaeologist. This person
would then be able to assess ,site significance and suggest
appropriate mitigation measures.
Thank your for your concern in preserving Californiacs cultural
heritage;.
ncerely
LDi:. Makoto Kowta, Coordinator
I;ortheast' Information cerates
cc: Roper Associates
i
ti.
'I
&%mow aw v we %e V+' %r wr.i CNIV 94r
LAND OF NATURAL vVEALTH AND BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I COUNTY CENTER 0111VE - OROVILLE. CAIJFOFINIA 95965-3397'
TELEPHONE; (916) 53$-7601
April 5, 1991
Ms. Mary Goni
PO. Box 885
Zhico, CA 95927
Ret Tentative Parcel Map/APN •#0=15-230-025
Dear Ms. Gonii
The Butte County Planning Department, has completed $he environmental review of your
project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to
the Butte County Advisory Agency within the regt 'red 105 days pursuant to the
California Public Resources Code Section 21151..5. ,In addition, the Planning Director's
report required by Sections 20-63 and 20.99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance
has been completed. Please find enclosed the PIafthi g Directors Report which has been
prepared for your pr Jett.
Please r., ..,8V Elie enclosed Planning Director`s Report Nvith conditions of approval if
applicable. 1f you note any errors or, omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to
our attention.
`ale Environmental Docurnents and Planning D rector's Aepurt for your project has been
sent to the Butte Gunty Advisory Agency for their action, California Government Lode
Sections
ons 65950 and. 65952.1 requires nd
the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings a
approve or disapprove your project- w thi'', six months from 'the- date o `c "
n Whx h your
application Was received and aecepted';kt month sionth bine limit for your project
.mandated by state laNv, will occur on September 11., 1991, The Advisory Agency will
notify ;you. of Ifie time aitd place of the public hearing for your project,
I
If there are modifications to your project, not related 'to mitigating an iderAtirted impact,
re-evaluation of your project: shall be required.
ROPER ASSOCIATES ,f
1348 hpNGFE6I;Q'W AVENUE ? P, 4. BOX 88, i'
CHICO, CALIFORNIA '9°3926
TELEPHONE (916) 342-20'-b
April 1, 1991
F,jtte County Planning Department
7 aunty Center, brive
t�r°ovi11ef California 9596+
Attn: Bradt Moore:
Re: Gond Tentative Parcel Map A91.. 45-23-25
Dear Mr. Moore,.
i
This is in regards to your le:ttev dited, March 22, 19S1, to Ctrs.
Gori, on your envi ornmental study,
In reading the suggested mit,,igation measures there doesn't Seem to
be much of a problem, I will'' respond to them as trey exist on 'page
t 'of your report
1 ,. Pol ice protection There is al ready one dwol 1 i ng an this parcel
which would not create any additional protection. realizing thet.
your are looking at tht- three other :,parcels after they are created,
we Id add to thf addi-(ion of polios protection, The City of Chico
is on each side; of this axisti;ng pdre6l and the owner proposes to
,,ir:ex to the City after the Parcel Map is finalized.
2. Archaeological Area - We missed the Archaeological . records chsci
on thti conformance: report but have since asked for this check, if
they find that a survey needs to be done then, we will Iiave the
survey made or if tho:y ,ju�,t want a note on the Parcel Map arse will
put Ono on. If they firtci that a. ��rvey Is not required them there
i nes p),oblom
S. Parcel s:~tbacks We realize that a property line hoods to be
5.00 feat from any building, and when a survey is made the final
ling will be a minimum of 5.00 feet from any building,
With .tf,aoa three, mitigation measures covered, wd do not ses why you
cannot ' �x,r oceed wit °r your Oval Uati on . If you have any, questions
plea«b
c,;01. 'hank yqu t ; t,k*Z,' ,.
'fiery truly yours,
k
Richard P, Roper
t,�g. 5151
- a
i3'i. *S J E CQUXVZ SEERI rte. `F S DEP,.F0RrEr3I.. XT
33 CGt7IQTY CEi�lER DRIVE
OROVILLEo CA, 95.965'
(91,6) 538-7321
I I CX GREY
SH"ERI"FF -CORONER
`O 4j"O N MENDONSA, .ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
., AWT E; 25 MARCH 1991
SUA E,CT MARY GONi AP# 45-23-25
The Butte County Sheriff's Department has the lowest
ofi:icer-to-citizen ratio of any law enforcement agency in
the entire state. Budget constraints severely limit the
services this department can provide the citizens of Butte
County.
New construction or re --zoning creates the possibility
off. further impact on. the resources of this depart.nent with
the additional calls -for -,.service, This will result, in a
rurther deterioration of the Level of service provided by
this department to all the citizens of Butte County:
In the event a funding mechanism becomes available to
increase the number of sworn personnel in this department
there would be no objection to the proposed development or
re -zone.
Until that time; however, this department .regretfully
opposes any new development or re-zonirig-. -
Very truly yours
hi'iok Grey, Sheriff -Coroner,
a 4
es 14, Nyland
Assistant Sher-iff
v
" - LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANp awAU7Y
,.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7' COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE: (916) 538-7601
March 22, 1991
IN15. Mary Cron
P,O. Box 885
Chico, CA 95927`
Rei., Tentative Parcel Map
:CPN 045-230-025
Log 091-03-12-01
Bear Ms. GoruY
An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially
adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To,
reduce or eliminate these impacts, suitable mitigation measures are required as part of
the project, Othelnv se, an EW ironmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to
the California. Ern-rironmer>tal Quality Act.
a.
Aft early resporiset to this notification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the
scheduling of 'your project: Please f9nvAtd your written response within 15 days from the
date of this letter.
A list ,of local consultants is included. These persons can determine thf: `need for a
survey by conducting a records search, conduct archaeological surveys or arriingr: for
sucl-, surveys. In the event of .at! EI.R requirement, a subsequent letter Will be sent
outlining the pra►cedure far the C6unty to select the consultant to prepare the. EIRY
MAR:` GONL TPM, AP 45-23-25, 4 parcels located on the northwesterly
side of Filbert Avenue approx,. 6O0 ft. southwesterly of Sheridan Avonue.
Chico area. Engineer. Koper Associates
Foblic Works conditions:
�..
Indicate a- 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Filbert Avenue.
Show all easements of record on the final map.
Provide stre,:,t name signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to recordation of the final map.
10
Provide permanent solution for drainage;
Pay off any assessments.
` 6
Provide cul-de-sac at the end of the street.
7
Obtain encroachment permit and construct standard road approach
provi.&Mv adequate sight distance at the intersection of Filbert
Avenue axed access road
Pay any delinquent-taxes_or current takes as required.
9
Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department.
10
Widen Filbert Ave. along property frontage to 1:.4 ft. half -width with
8" CL II A,B, and seal coat 14 ft. width.,
Health Dept. conditions:
11
Indicate on the tentative map those wells that are proposed to be destroyed
under permit: Dt;'troy those wells under permit and connect the facilities'
served b �wells to other approved water sources prior to recording
pthe
final ma
12
Proviue a letter or other documentation from Calif. Slater Service Company
suiting that they are willing and able to supply domestic water to
parcels 13 2, 3 and 4
13,
Provide a letter or other docimentatinn from City of Chico stating that
they are willing and able to supply , -wer service to parcels l" 2, 3 and 4..
14
Place a :,ote on the map that states "nevelopment of parcels 1, 2; 3 and 4
'will regV tte connection to a public sanitary sewer.►
15
Place a note on the map that states "Development of parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4
,will require connection to a public water supply'."
16
Locate and it hecessaiy relocate the existing septic tank system onto its
respective parcel or pump the septic tank and connect the dwelling to public
sewer
:�� =
r
Y 1. R
APPENDIX
_ COUNTS .OF BUTTE
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 'FORI+L
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
;ute No. 045-230-025 Log No. 091-03-12-01 AP No. 045-230-025
t BACKGRUJIND
Mary Coni
2. P o• Box abs Chico, can fornla 95927
I. project desetIptton. Tentative parcel Map to divide 4.14 acres to create 4 patcellst one 'pat ceI at 1.22 act es t, onL parcel at 1.47 acres,, one Parcel
at 1.01 acres; and one parcel at i.ol acres.
22. 1iANDATORSt FINDINGS OF - SIGNIFICANCE
' YES AAMW DISCUSSION OF ENVIR014MENTAL EVALUATION
ooesua1 th of je a have
thent, substantially reduce - p al will not significantly degrade the e0lrohment.
I Does the project have the potenilal to degrade the X th13. ropos
the habitat of a (Tibor wildlife species, cause a
r
Itsh or wildlife population to drop below sell -
sustaining levels, thteaten to eliminate a plant of
antra) community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant of animal or
ellhsfnate Important rxampies of majot petlods of
catlfornia histoty or ptehfstoryt
21
boos the project Have the potentlal to achieve
_ x this ptoposal will not Impede 1600-t6r10 cnvltonYmnial goats.
sliott-ierm benefits to the detftmeot of long-term
enVttonmdnt goalst iA short-term Impact on the
envttonment is one which occult In a relatively
btlef period of time while long-term impacts will
endute Into the futire,F
s.,
Impacts
DodkvivjeclyCllYlte;
e0vlr proposalmay have 'a stgnittcant cumulative Impact ae the
butcumulatively
ulati a yhc
m nt.ai
u lisetable
rdscut,cO where the Impact on each resoutce Is
latiVOI itnafl, but whole the effect of the total
�t V Impattl on the environment is
signtflcant,)
4
bods the prolect have environntehtal effects which
X. thin pr000tal will not have a significant adverse effect on human
Will cause substantial ativetse effects oil human
beings.
beings, either ditectly or lndirectlyr
III. DET>vlzMINrATION
on the basts of tni,s initial evaluation:
IIwt find' the proposed proltict COULD 1st have a significant effect on the enyitohmen.t.'And a NMATIVE DECLAhATIbN wlll be prepated.
liwe Ilnd that although lite proposed project (MLI) have a significant effect ccs the envitonmeril, there Will not be ' significant eflest In this
case because the Ml7ICATIW- MEAsLiRts described on the
attached sheet haVe been added to the protect A NMAT)Vt: t7EO MXtICN wfII be'Ofdoated.
I/WE rind the proposed project MAY have a xlgnI(Idhnt
effect on the ehvitb tment, and an ENVIA01,41ENTAL IiPAot REPORT Is redulted.
varch 21
Mi
GOI.NrI' . - L '7 •, p U tMf7tt'
bY:, /A�i Lol
,
-
etenr t.. sloare
...
G1 n... OW
ttaViowed by:... +
2.
nnyironmentoi Checkl1st Evaivat±on of Environmental Impact
ZV. LI'NVIRONMENI'AI IMPACTS ]Lt
ttnyttE W
DISCUSSION OF ENVIROMENTAL EVALUATION
i eE]Lj,
will the proposal t-�sult in slgniffcants
a.
unstable earth conditlons, or changes in
X
The 'proposal will not affect subsurface earth condillons.
geologic s�jbstructures4
b.
olsruption, dispittcement, comdacticm or
x_
This proposal will result in sone dfsruptldn, displacement
compaction and overcovering of the site as a tesuit of developmeni
overcoveting of the sOlt1
of structures, driveways, parking areas, etc. The that valley
terrain also minimi?es the need for extensive earthwork.
rltat4 :. in. tc.Iwa0hii of
,L ,ra characterized by t?xl vatioy land ihieh tends
relief features?
IIse,it to twilehtlal development W.lthoutW., need lot large amounts
of grading,
d.
mt truction, covering of modification of
_, x,_,
The protect Site has no unique physical Ycatures,
any unique geologic or physicat tealurest
e.
increase In wind or water erosion or soils,
X
The proposal Will nit, cause erosion,
dither on or oft silex
t.
changes In of etOsion of beach
x
The proposal will .tot affect any w4t0course.
,deposition
sands, of changes 1n ltlitat.lon, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the Ocean
I
or any bay, Inlet or aKel
g,
toss of ptinse agr'icuttutaily Woductive _^_
X
This i�'roposal does not tepresent a significant loss of ptlme
agrcultstral Solt%. The project site is located within the urban
tolls outside deslgnated urban areasl
area of chleo,
h,
haxatdse orpeople or property to geologic
X
At of nutte county is In a Moderate ttarthquake l tehsity zone VIM ,
construc0eil of buildings to Uniform nuildlrfg Code standards velli
as earthquakes. IaOdslldet,
mudslides, ground failure at , similar
provide adeguaie'prplecttonto occupants I,hcas,a of 'setsmlc activity.
hazards?
Y, Arxt,,
will the ptoposal result in substantfe[:
a,
Alt emissions of deterioration of ambidtlt
X.
No sfgnlficant fmpact to at qua-ilty is expected as a result of thls
air qualityl
project.
U.
The cteatloo of obieiitlohable odora, sm6ke
W x
the p100001 wlII not create objectionable odors, Smoke or fumes,
of tumeo
C.
Alteration or aft Ihovernent, mot'sture of __
x
the proposal wtll not affect the atmosphere,
tempatalute, or atilt change In climate,
locally Of teglohallyl
WATta
wiil !he,proposat result art substantial:
the of
Changes (n currt:nls, Or the course of
choges
k
The proposal wil'I riot affect any Watetcoutte,
dira.
of ween , of is either
marine or froth watt:rsl
U,
Changes in absdttlt106 tato%, .dralnage ,__
_ x
The proposed project WlIl hav an ins lonl
or Ilse tata and amount of sutfanitit:ant impact on absorption
runoff, The nVOW:stat sloe
terns, o the rate and amount of surface
Oat ern_, r h
tuhOlil
rates,
Is sovlced by existing drittiage impcovemenks, in addilioh. the
parcel flu of one plus acre lit II reduce off -i ltd dralnage.
C,
Head fpr oft -site 5urtace dralna'e
X
Grainago improvements have been m,1de to setVicA strtroundthg
deVelopmeht. Tire proposed fnib WIII aIIow the cfaatIon of three new
iMprbveinents, inctittiingvegetalionfemova
chanhdiliailon or culvert Illstallittl6n?
singib family &dllings on, 5.25 ,acres whtclr is hot anticlpattO 10
over burden the silsting drainage system. rt Is antICIbated no naw
sttffatMe dt'ainage lmptov,¢s are hecessary to accommodate Ilia
� �J
3
nvl:ronmenCft► Check] ist EvafUation of rnvironmehCal impact
IV. LVIRCDNmENTAIL IMPACTS (continued)
YES AjAYBE „too
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL .EVALUATION
(Continued)
proposed Terntative M&Ael M01
d.
Alterations to th snit" .,e of .f"Il7k'?i {'loodSC
The proposal will. not 3igniticantl% SII -;i ti1t� i ''t `iir' ^{+t"t4�'•}
waters(
or watercourse .
rel rnI:, in the amount of surface *sker in
x
The pr000sai will no!, aw wateicaurse,
ails' water body(
1.
Discharge Into surface craters, zit In ante'
x _'
Fac otoposal will not significantly affect surface water quality,
alterarlan at surface water rrf�at rt,.,
'-`" —" —
71(1 :proposed size of the parcels will allow storm water and
rr,.,lsrarr:g but vEat__=lG+�+t„ ; ,. xt�,�,�.u�cm
ltrlgatloil water to remain mostly an the prolect site due to the
dissolved oxygen or turbiltys
relative flatness of the project site,
g,
i,,» ? . r &ha o►teeUon or take of f low
,N_ x
The propositi will not al Iect the dl rection or f low of ground waters,
h.
change In
� taddf�ionouQd
x . _
The=proposal will not directly affett any aquifer.
�equantItr diQeri
irlthdrawals', or through Interception of in
aquifer by .cuts or mavations?
i.
Reduction In the amount of water otherwise
X
i(is proposed that each home will be WVtted by calltoirtla water
available for public water supplies?
Seryl Ge UrmbanY. Mn additional connection to the Water System
Is not anticlilvied to have a slonitic3nt Impact on water supplies In
the area.
)„
i?xposute o1 people or ptcoerty to waken-
x
the proposal wit) not expose people or property to flooding.
,:elated hazards such as flooding(
4 0W
Lirrwit the proposal result in
s—uostantial
ls
A,
change in the div0 sitY of species, or
X
The divertlty at plant species will be expanded as residential *tion.,
nUmbet of any species of plants (including
native landscapes ate Installed.
trees, shrubs, grass, rtoos. and aquatic
plants)( ,
b.
Reduction of the numbers of a,,, unique,
X
The pro►ect sale A:oiltalrls no rare or endahgared plants,
rare or endangered species of ptantsi
t;
introduction of new species of plahts into
,, X
Tile proposal will not attc'cf: bXis't:ing plant life.
an,area, of In a battler to the normal
replenishment of existing species('
d.
Reduction in acreage of 41Y agticultd(af
X _
The site does not cohtain any commercially Viable agricultural crop.
cf op 7
5. ANIMh
Q twl I I the proRrisal resul t In
sut:stantia
a..
change In the diversity of tpecle$, of
x_
- `^
The proposal will not affect anon
ihabitabecause lite site does not
numbers of an speclo's of animals (birds.,
y of Arles,
support sirtniticant animal I'lte or'
land animals tncttelot
repfish And
hii
sheilitsh. benthle organisms or Insects)¢
b.
oeductIon In the nUmbors of any unique,
: , : X
The sl to contains no rare animals,
tate at endangered sodeles of 401malst
c
ewsp ekt)fthcikmals TOW
'""'— —�
"rhe proposal will riot attest existing ahimal life,
lot r
aver,enihlof�
of c
d.
Deteriolaildn of existing fish or wildlife
� ,,,� Vic-
Tile 'site contains no significant wildlife habitat.
tubi tate
i
4
�► rpr�mehtaI Cheel�:t Eva Iuatian of !Environmental I,rnPact
<_ l --.� I rntJ n� &!t�7VTT2nT�t1�t1�Nr['Zi �''VAT3U�t�rw']:C)lN
"fVjitO AG TIU!ACTS (continued)
res Ma -Tui
(continued)
G
NOISE. Will the proposal result In sUbstantlat:
a. Increases in existing noise levetstX
-
"--
The proposalWill not result in a substantial incr;ase In Pals
created on site Or ill the Ill cinil5.
b. Expcis-ufe of peopld to Severe noise levelsz
r ,_1_
.�_
Will not ekpos>K people to sev ere noise t�iv+sls,
7.
1-1 f pfopJsa�x produce
!r
---
The proposal
ernpe�andwonlsite arsiliithe Yiclnilyntiui inettss0 lit ilithl'tlt -
glare
sli ca TlD acrd 91afcZivle
In a
x_
lite proposal will not Ill ter the land in the area. The projtbt.t
t.
g,
LAND USE, Will the proposal result
substant al aItefatIon n[ the present of planned
_ _ __
lIIsL,
site Is zoned Rpt which al1cM's one dwelling unit plsf 6,500 si
R-1
and Is deslgnat;d by the guile county Cenefal Ptah as Low' OensiltY
[and Use of art cleat+
ens not meet
rile ential. TN� Rozoning bcilasslifications which requires a`he
tteeqgiltement:t of
notOprovideand
asetbacknbetw hd thepPool
tentativeamiIpfor does A 5d toot
lfrwSe and the northern 14t Ithe for Parce_ Aa, Redesign., proposed _.
tentallve map to meet the requirements of the R-'1 zbnP. of seek a
variance lrcm the setback requirements from the eutte County Planning
Ca=t s s 1 on,
�.
will the liivapsal t esult In
subsub�antlai:LRCt:S.
increase in the rate of use of a& natural
, X.—
Tie proposal will rot affect any natural resources.
a;
rd6ourcest
b. Ocptetiontit any non-renewable natural
-
The proposal' will not deplete any natural resources.
rC3outte#3 ;
,
So.
thSln00d3al Involve;
RISK of Upte:I?
ftre:f?fnposa�t will not involve the use nl liazardnus male( fail, hot is
Ofill
{ of teleaid of lhazafdous
`� �'�
s in store or ,dtlilze Such
it located close to any facilities wh
sUbstante5�tinclu
sU t1alces .',les, u)no. but not limited tis.
llemicals or tadfalion) In
materials.
the event.. of an accident or upset
cnd,i t I ons i
,
b, Possible InletletcrlCe w10 aW emergency
x_
the proposal Will not alfctt any nergncy setVices.
respi�hse plait or emergency evacuatkon plant
PCPUTA'r115N. will the p.topbsal altet l6t4tton,
x-
attec the hal, planietiondf thearea
The proposal wilt sol density
density does mol exceed lttal plansled and being
because the Proposed does
Distil ut on1 cTensI ty or growth falc� of lht human
ar
developed 'In the area,
pnpulatibni
the affect OXIstIP9'
x...
Tate ptdposaf will not signiitcanity atii!rl housing demand.
i MM—No. lVr , propotiat
ltnus n or o ;ate a demand for additlonat housittgt
iS.
TI ANSPORTA7;it fRCt1lAT CN will the pr4jyasai
resui� ins
a, Cenciatloh or Wbstahtlal Ildditlonal
., x.,
representan incrnental InrfeaSe to tt tfic In the
Thcpt000sa i will repte5e
010 act will generale aoofoyimateiY 40 vehicle
vehitlle travel me
area. The ptopbsetl
ttt';ps pct day. ,rte pro ect. site is serviced by PIIbO t Avenue which
ht tilt: heeeSSOY CapaditY to catty 40 addittbnat vel"lcle trips Per
day wlthoUt a reduclton In th. revel of service. The proposed
project will have a tumutative Impact on ';the regions ttallit of the
r'hi+�p Urtlan urea. tlOwCverF it is ahtfCipated the adopted ttallic
fees rot the chlcq Urban Area will m111911e the cumulative
itapacI
Itat( Ic Impacts to ieis than a significant degree.
b, El tufts rn� � sl Ta,Y t4ti" Lliel' or
� �
The o plpy w'l wilt hof affect parklhgemen because the ' I thin at will have
fowtxnplYwith the parking req�jireraenls conlaittadwithlhlluth+County
dna d It 1 t�1ttkiri"
elide S016104 24-'35.
i
rim
check to l EVa l la t i on ;t fiv t t0 m6ht a! I MpO C tryi aonme -
Z!6's !�"GrIRf;))"ii %21t7ISE!l]� Omlkllt.ls CGbiititluetl) J+I �,: -m"ky- E Bio' LL'►:G6917>3sION OF ENVIktCiN111MlLUA,' 1Ob[
C, substantial Impact on eitiktljig _,�;� k -the,proposai'•wiII not significantly itmar.t thea transportbttop systen.
tlanspprtkitPbrl sysiemsr
d. signi,ticant litelerations Represent patt6ml; .,r_•s� -X 'rhe`plopaal will not alter the present pattian of circulation In the
f el or movement of peop10 and/or arell.
goods?
trairict
eAltcratiortr to Vralerbcftto,;, tall or aft ._, X_ The ptoposal will riot attest tail 'or air traffic.
, +
I. Increase In traffic haz:atds tai rMor _ X The proposal will mit, result inn significant Increase 9rl tralticand
vehicles, irfr,Ycllsts or oo-desttlahst related traffic hazards In the rtes,
14.Pxslti<5 SEAVtCM Will the ptopc'sai have art etaect
upon, or result. In a need fov nev, or altered,
gover-n+;uent services:
a, Flte Prbteclionr _ _:: x Tile ptoposi i will result In a "arementai Inctrease in demand (of tire
protection In the area. The Butte 'County Fire DepastrrentlCalltbrnla
Dlvision of Forestay has Indicated that eumulative development in
county areas will lmpact their ability to provide tits: protection.
services. The Prolect site Is serviced by tire hydtantls which ate
located along Flibett Avenue. The location of the existing hr'dranti
is anticipated to be adequate to provide water for Rltit Protection
Incpreaasing hes and will fire ifightinghcapab Itties ofto hthefirriteddtpaftment�y
b, polite ptotectiont X _ The proposal will result In A Inctemental Increase in demand for
y
police prbteetion In the area which cannot be servltedtsy nfie pt,sent
sheriff's Departmot. .since Isco the population of euMt County has
Increased by over 2s%, while at the same time the police force hAY
been decreased irk personnel by So% due to fiscal dlfticul ties being
eXperteneed by Wild County. cuttently, build County trail the lowest
officers pet capita In the stale. �t Legislative Ccmittee Nearing$
t�tld last year on t3utte county's Fiscal crises, coenty officials
n
dllfted that pbiice protection services are presently =inadequate.
Ado not Reset the service e%pettatlon3 of the public, continued
rural development fiat resulted In Cumulative lWacts on polite
protection services Which contiflUes to reduce the 'sheriff's
bepariment capaclly to pfovide adequate police services.
The appitcana will hate to provide mlllgal[on measures 'which wire
tedute the impacE
s on the police prbtdctloh seryiCet bi the country
to Ills apProyai of the butte county shdrlt't.
t, 5choolt7 x. The proposal will f6sult In a inefeWfittil tnctease In demand for
school services In the area. School impar( tees eolter.ted by the
locat school dfstritt Is anticipated to mitlgat:e the: 'OrOACtz on
schix+l s,
d. Pawks or tither recteatiotlal hole ICO x' :. The pr000fal hilt result In a incremental Increase In dersa:nd for park
and tecteation fbellitfes In the area. However. it Is sintictpaled
that the.bxItting tecreatlorl inoact fees charger! in the t;hico Urban
Aida will reduce impacts On recreation to a less than slynilicahl,
revel.
e. AalritenahCe of public faclli'tfes, Including X Tile Proposal will result in a inctemental thctease in the heed tot
roadsi i'�alhtenance of toads and other public latlitties In the ztea.
A i other i;oWethmzhtal services In the area, lid lot all
f. other grncY' dental set" �cCs X The proposal will result In a Incremental Increase to dtiti
it. tNracy, wif1 the proposal result In:
a. Use. of substAh'tlal amount$ of '1061 bt X ._ TI'ic poposal' will hot ulliite subslalll4al fuel for endriiy.
eherpy
t
4 �
6
St ono{i npact
-nvl ronmenta1 ceck si
- .�,.......«....N-...�.�• r,w :r.��ntrv�.�w�rne�c�aiivtTt `ce[TTT.TfTR1Tif1R7.
%'w j = d) J� �T (Cohlinuedj.
yes MAYBE NO
LLO%Ouoa�.LWA- — ,....,.,........,,...�...
ottenslVe site open to the
( con'.
I titled)
b. substantial Incroiate In on
x
The
ptopr,"al
will not substantially Increase the demand lot enerlly.
o
existing sources of eneigy, or feq
existing s
r to Ire tiredev,
oJU 'OAAt_ OF5_d RCE
�.
20. .
a, the ssite?al cult in the alteration
x. The pfoiett site Is iddriti:tted as an area of high se WI Vlty fol
arch aeologtcal resources. nue, to the atchadological sensii.iv"I of
gy?
sources of energy?
of new sour
the protect site as documented by the California slate University,
afchaedlogicalIli,,
Clic
Vo Atchaeologlcai Resources Map, it WIII be ridcestaty to cohtact
ts. LiTiLives, tYtli the proposal result in a need lot
new`sy,lems, or substantial altetallohs to the,
caIIrUr01a tllato uhIv6ttIty,
hecessaty of ahy iurthet milk?atlom
_
measures
to, ICwlnd.
x ►he proposal will mot Inert hittoric slues,
physical or aesthetic elteets to a
prehistdtic of hislorle bulldirig, W,uclutb
Paver or natural gat?
_ x
The
proposal
Will not affect electrical power or natural Vas
a.
distribution
systems.
b, cgriturileatlons systems?
_'x-:
The
proposal
will not affect ce municatior systems -
c, water avai habl MV?
x
the
ptoposal
will not affect public water systems,
d, sewer or septic systems?
x
The
Iof
proposal will utilize individual septic and feachtleld sysiehis I'
Wastewater disposal. At soli absotptloh Wastewater systems lna' t
- - - - -
-
meet the Chico Nitiaie Act -ion plan standar&,
e, storm slater dfalhager
x
The
proposal
Will not affect drainage,
f. solid Waste and disposal
x
Tile
ptopo5at
will not affect solid waste dlsptssal,
17, F ALAN. eAH LIH- will the proposal result In.
it. Creaatlon of any health hazard of potential
k
The
ptoposal
will not create any health hazard,
huzatd (excludlmg'mehtal health)?
b, w:xpostrre of people to potential hearthThe+.
x -
l+
p ropo5al
a _
will hot expose people to any health hazard
hazards?
t rHteTirs wilt the ptoposal result In the x ... the proposal will not result In ah aestdetierjaMlA �ffettsive v'►i:W,
of thyscenic th
esul'lview
because it is eonslstent with surroun ing eV sip men .
avis
nubl coop In tbothtocita
ottenslVe site open to the
public vieW�ellcalfy
t�. IOubl A7E LIO will the proposal result In an Impact
x .- -rho pt osal will not result ih a' sigrilticant demand for patk and
`� _— Iddilllte5, the Recreation Imaatt Fee eltatged Ibr the
teoreatloetalOualittl hIR(es?quantity of existing
recreation
Chico Urban Area Is dkpe4ted to reduce all linoact5 on recrdation to
a lass than sidniticaht level.
oJU 'OAAt_ OF5_d RCE
�.
20. .
a, the ssite?al cult in the alteration
x. The pfoiett site Is iddriti:tted as an area of high se WI Vlty fol
arch aeologtcal resources. nue, to the atchadological sensii.iv"I of
of destruction of a prehistotie or histotic
the protect site as documented by the California slate University,
afchaedlogicalIli,,
Clic
Vo Atchaeologlcai Resources Map, it WIII be ridcestaty to cohtact
114" artheast Ihfotmatloh et at the nihrop rac ra check of
y, Chico to conduct a tecotds check and
caIIrUr01a tllato uhIv6ttIty,
hecessaty of ahy iurthet milk?atlom
_
measures
tl, Will the ptdposaf ttsuil ih adverse
x ►he proposal will mot Inert hittoric slues,
physical or aesthetic elteets to a
prehistdtic of hislorle bulldirig, W,uclutb
or object?
t. bads thellit,,ecimai havd the potential. to
x_ Tildptoposai wilt lot Watt cul ural rt'sdurcds.
du'id atf+»cl
OhigUdad�iilircCultlUthgievaludt?
7
Env I' I'0001eri to I check l S t Eva I Ual`t i o'h of Environmental impact
JV', ZNVXP.ONMEMAL IIWACTS (Continued)
its Mare
r4o DISCUSSIOtl .OP,ENVIROIa74ENTAL EVALUATION
(continued)
d. will the proposal resttict existing
X The proposal will not affect religious resources.
religious or sacred uses within
the
potentialImpact pleat
gUGGESTED NmrrIGATION 'MEASURES
i. lite at,pllcant will have to 'provide millgatlon
3. Redesign parceis
$o tis to provide s fool
matures which
will reduce the Impacts on the
tetbacRs from existing
but idling$ and prerty lines
pom,,ij protection
of the county to the
or seek a Variance to,
the lelback regVrements of
_services
appitwal 0 the.eutte County sheriff.
tine R-1 zoning cla stticatiOn.
- The protect rtjts Is identl(led as an atea of
high sensitivity fol archaeological resources. Due
to the archaeological sensitivity of, thi; project
site as documented by the caliloinia State
wino city, Chi eo.ArchaeologiCAI Resources Asap, It
will be necessary to contact the Northeast
inlotmation Center at the Anthropology Di*hatttlent
W California stare univetslly, Chico to i;tinduel a
Tocords check and determine if a survey Is
wessary or any further rp'Itlgatlon meaWrusr
8
EnVI rorImenta,I Check! is t 'EVa I teat 1()n Of Env I roninentaI Icripact
WMIR®NIS MAL 1HPACTS (continued) YES MAvBC No
DISCUSSION
OF ENVIRONMEW2AL EVALUATION'
(continued)
a. land Uses: Resldentlal
DATA SHEET
b. zoning: R-1
C. Gen. Plan Designation: tow bons lly Resl
n, proiect Description
d, Parcel sues: 6,soo sq, it. to i acre
C, Population: Suburban Population
Type of Project: Tentative Parcel MAO
ts.
Character of site and Area: suburban
�tl.
F.
Brief Description: TPAs to divide 4.72 acres to create 4 parcels
16,
Nearest Urban Area. Chico
at 1.22 acres, 1.47 'acres, 1,01 acres, and 1.02 9dres.
17.
Relevant spheres of Influence: Chico, CARD, & X 150..
y.
Location: North side of Filbert Me. West of Sheridan Ave. In
18.
Improvements standards�Urban Area; no
the Chico Urban Area,
19.
Fire Protection service:
4,
Proposed Density, of Development: _1 Uhl (/acre
A. Nearest County (State) rite station: 042s,
Amount of.irtperviout surfacing: minimal
b, Water Availability: fire hydrant
6.
Access and Nearest Publlc Road(s): Filbert Avr
20
schools in Area: Chico Unified School District
7.
Method or Sewage Disposal: 1ndiVidUAl Leachffe ,a'Septfrr
a.
Source of water supply: Individual wells
9.
Proximity of Power_ Lines'. Adjacent to propert$N
mPotential
for further !rind diVlsions and devdIO5wenl: Nd further
potential under current Standards of the Chico Nitrate Pian
Unless services by sanitary sewer system.
triyi ronmen a l Se l t f na,
Physical Environment.
L.
aerrain neral Topographic rhatactet: plat Willey Land
b. slopes: 0 to 1'rt
c, Elevation: 16V ASG
d. Limiting Factors: Neftti
2;
a. 'types and characteri', tics; Vlha toamc a rich btrmrL 16am,
2 to 't inches thick. 'aimc Ag soli.
b. Limiting Paetors: None
J.
Natural mdzards of thc,4and
a. Earthquake loner .Aioderall;• tatth4uAke thtensfty Zone
Vill.
b, Eroslan Potential: None
c. Landslide Potentlal; None
d.. Fttc Iward Unelasslfied
e, Expansive 5611 Potentiai., Mbdetate
4.
a, surface Water., None
ti drologaroundwater.,
At:a of Nealy trolundwatet wlthatawa l .
C. aralhagd Chatacterls(lds,1 On Mt,,,
d. Annual Rainfall (normal): 22"
e, Limiting raitbts: none
$,
Visual/5cenit Quality: [xcellen(
6.
Acoustic Quality: Cood
<<r
Air QuailtYt Ccwd'
nfot'oiiical t hvt ronment
@,
VcgelatfOn. Urban Non�ha(iVe plants and lirchartt.
g
Wi ldI f fe habi tat • SMAI I birds and Ahlmkils cOWi n lt1 urftalt ixti ii s.
ctrllutal, rhyitonmditz
1p.
Atehacblbgt'cal and Historical kesoUtcdt In Alit arca:! .,lion
ScnstlivitV Area
it.
Butte
county ceheral Plan deslonationt LbvMfis�ity Retldehtla[
12,
I'xistinil
70ning• k-1
0.
rkisting
l.arfd 115e bh-titer kesloLhtlat
14.
SutfWhding Ar+":
I
-
nv'ironmentaI Check 11st EvaIua 1Qn of Cnvironmenlai'.impa.Ct
ENV-XRONMEkTAL XHPACTS (cont[nued) yes M&Ynp, rio L).L0Uu00.r%J11_..r
�C ntInued)
ENVIRONMENTAL REFBREN68 MATERIAL
F. Mal II -1 Earthquake and .Fault Act lty; Sei' ml
Sa ty Ele ent, utte County Genera Plan rev seed
-%, by Ct��M H i I �,
r p 11-2, Li uefact io Potent I: SolSMl GZfety
HeMmchltl,l Butt County�eneral an revised cf=
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEP.ARUiF'iIT OF PUBLIC WORKS
County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 9965 _
(916) 538-7266
DATE; Manch 11, 1997
SUBJECT., Mary CONI TENTATIVE PARCEL MAF'
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 45-23-25.
LOCATION.; 4 Parcels located, -on the northwesterly. side of FilrPzt Avenue
:
approx_ 600 ft. southwesterly of Sheridan Avenue. Chico area.
Attached are documents regarding, 'aryl a copy of-, the above --described tentative
map for your review. I: yoti have any suggestions, additions or recommendations
concerning this project, please return them to this office no later than
April 1, 1991
Very truly yours,
William Cheff,
Director of Public Works
Jam. Mendonsa
Ah8i3tant Director
JM/kk
attachments �yyr�x
,IL 09 OUT E
9 I
; x ryr""{1@�4/
".u,
LD 11,60 (4/89)
COUNTY OF B
DEPAtt TMM'.0 OF PUBLIC WORKS
i
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(916) 538-7266
r
March 11, 1991
Mary Gon RE: AP 45-23-25
P.O. Box 599
Chico, CA 95927 Tentative Parcel Map
Deaf his. Go-ri
This is to notify you that your application cation fora tentative map for the
above-referencedro
p petty is being submitted
to the Planning Department
for environmental determination, and to the Environmental HealthDepartme
for its review, .r�t
This appl cati0r, will, be considered complete when we have received
notification from the Planning Department and the Environmental Health
all data have en received.
wil2artment l ontactouhat
These departments
regardinga3ny additional�iiiforma tion they may require,,
:.
Very truly yours,
W1 1l iam Cheff
Director of Puhl ac tiork s
AL
.T7 . klendonsa
Assistant Director
1MIk1t
cc: Manning Department
Environmental Health Department
Roper Associates
LD 11,20 (Revised 2/88)
1 1
k'