Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout046-360-005YES: MAYI;. NO h. Expo'Sure of people or property to eOlo �• g gic ha�1, s such: as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides,. ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air, Will the proposal result'iri:' x a. Substantial. doteriaraton Of amhierit or local air quality? b + The c"reaCion of obqj ectonable x Odors.; smoke or. ,fumes? c • S;ignificant alte,rati.on of air movement; moisture`:or tempature or any ,change in climate, , ea thee' locally or re gionall y? ..: 3. Water:. �Jil..'l tIte proposal resu,l,t in sabstantjAj: x a. Changes in currents, or the course or' direct ion of water movements? b• Changes in absorptYori rates., drainage' patterns, or the rate and amount, of surface water runoff? x�t c.. Need for, o.Ei-site surface dra.ina o improvements, including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert install anon? _ k 1 A ,`aerations to th.e course oz flow o'Lflood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ` x .,Discharge into surface waters,, ox in any alteration of surface water quality, including but, =not ted to temperature, dxsso'lved oxygen or turbidity? g., Alteration of the' direotori or rate of:floc of, ground w sters; Change in the uanti ofp round q ,y or quality g t W , ers , either .through direct additions orwithdrawals or t�irough :interception of an agnifer,by cuts or excavations? x Appen F .:f 6, 19M _ YES, MAYBE NO; Reduction: in the amount of water otheraisoavailable for public .rater supplies! j.; Exposure of people or tdpOrty t0,,, wat-I-Ir related hazards such as flooding? 4, Plant', Life, GVill the proposal result in sU stantial; A, LdstL of vegetation", or change in' the diversity of 'species or number of any species of 'plates (inclu.ding trees; shrubs; grass, crops, m�dr' oflora and aquatic plants)'? , b.. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of. plants? -4- c. Introduction of new species of plants"into an, area, or in, a barrier ". to, the "normal replenishmer_t' of eistiizg species? d. Reduction in acreage o£ any agri- cultural :crop? , 5. Animal Life,. Gilt the "proposal result in s lbstsntiatt a. Change in thediversity ot'species,' or numb cr.'s" of ` atny species o'f 11 animals (bi"r-ds, land animals' includingreptiles, fish and shell-` fish; benthic. organisms, insects or; micx:ofauna ? x b: Reduction of the numbers of any unique, -rare or "endarigced',spec'es of an,iinals? x c. Introduction. of new species of an, Als into an arca; ior result: in a` barrier to 'the mig'rati.on or movemcnt of animals? Y d . Reduction o f ,` encraachme t 'upon', " or deterioration to kxist=i ng fish or wildlife it at, ' M x. Appexidi - page 3 of 9 v YES MAYBE t�0 6, Naise. Will -.he proposalresult in aubst;anta�,: a. lncreases in noise levels?; b. Ex osure` of people to 'severe noise levels? x 7 . Light and 'Glaze. Wil I the propoaa produce s,igni lcant light or�1;are? 84 Land Use Will the proposed result in a1 significant : . aAlter Alteration n of':the planned land,'use of an are or establish trend ,a which will demonstrably lead to such alteration? x b. C.onfl'ict -withuses' an adjoining, Properties,, or conflict with established re, creational, ed,sca- tional, religious or scientific uses Of an area? X. 9: Natural Resources. Will the proposal' -7d result in su t tial,; ' a, Demand for, Or it.crease in the,rate of use of'any natural resources?;� b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natur'a1 rell ce? sour777 x 10. Risk of Ups"et.' Dae"s the proposal ipn o ve a, risk of an exp'losio`n or the release of hazardous substances (inch udittg", but not limi"ted' to, o� 1 pesticides, chemicals or radiation;` in the event of an accident: or upset Gonditiotis IX 17 . PoRu l atiori t W.11 the proposal signifL a.cantly alter. `the location, rlistri bution; density, Or .growth rate of 1=le 1iu�naniopul;ation of an area or physically' de ail establishecd conzriunty? 1 ouSi,n W,11; the proposal' s gni _c,c 'y affect existing boos n , ,. .: or create 'a demand ,for additional A ` App;eridx'`F page; of 9 i 3 YES MAYBE ISO' 136 Trans ortatian/CirculAtion.: Wi1`l ' th6 proposal- result n a. Generation of ,subst`aat; ial additional wehicular,movement'l X. b,,,, Significant effects ori existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking,? x c, Substantial impact upon existing transportat;non systems?' x d.. Significant alterat;ions'to present pattens of circulation or movement of people and/or.goods?. x e. Alterations to, waterborrie, rail or air traffic? X f, Increase iri'traffic hazards eta motor Vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? l4 i public Servib�es . Will the proposal have an e7fectupon, or result in: a substantial need for ;new' or altered governmental` services in any of`the following areas: a. vire protection? x b . Police protection? x c. Schools? r. d, Parks oother recreational facilities? X e. Maintenance of public facilities, ncluding;roads? £. Other gbyernmenta services? l5 : Ener ` Wi11 "the pr�aposas 'resn'7.t in: a. Use o' substantial amounts of fuel or energy?' x . li, Substantial incretase'in demand upon" existing sources of energy,or require the development of neer Sources of. energy?:: I7ti�i:ties., Will the proposal result: in a EU!"for new 'S�isaems , .Or., 'sub= � . �. stant;ialaltera tions ,te the following' utilities w Appendi�c r, page 5 ..©fess YES MAYBE' NO a- Power o' al naturgas'` x b. communications systems? x C :' Waver? x d, Sewer •' (w� ll trunl, line be_ extanded, providing; capacity,, to s.erV6 indI4 development)'? e , Storm water drainage? x 17, Human Health'. Will the pxopasal resuIt 'a. (;reg,�dOn of .any heal.th hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? . _ b. Exposure. t,of geopie to4 potential health hazards? x 18. Solid Waste. Wil the proposal result in any significant impacts' associated with solid waste disposal or ] .i Iter' control?. thetics , Will the proposalresult an t e o. structio'n of any -public designated - .or, recognized scenic vista open to the public, or ui1;1 the y proposal result in the creation of an, aestheticallyoffensive J.-teli open to pubc veva? 20 . kecrea.tion,: Cai ll the proposal result x in an impact upon ,the quality or quantity of exi.s ting public recrea- ; tion faci;li'ties?, Atcheollol z ca1��Historical : Wxl-1 the '�li x Pap4sa ' resu t.:n an a .teratxoii of ' a' signific�arit,;archeologcal or. historical site, s;ructurc, object b bt ild'ing? ?'; P?t'andatary' Findiri s, of Si ni:ticance, may. a., noes the project have the potential to degrade the 'qua-lty of the environment, s.ubs'tanti ; , al ly reduce the.ab%ta: off. a fi�eli or w;l-dl�e; species, cause a fish, ; or .i1 dlif population' to ,clrap below' self r. WI 1;� A'en d IX ., a �Pa�e� b YES �1AYBB .� _ . _ _. S'A staining ,levels, threaten to eliminate a plantor animal com- munity,, reduce the number o� restrict; the range of a rare or endangered plant oranimal or eliminate i 'mportan ' examples of: the ma. or ,7_ periods of ' California history or rehistoy? x b., Does the project have the potential to achieve, ho term benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted lonterm envir g- onmental goals? _.�.:... x' c,. Does the project haveimpacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (a project may impacton two oz more separate resources'whore the, impact on each resource .is relati've1.y small but where the of fec t of the ;total of - those impacts on the environment is significant.) d Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects an human ;beings, either directly or i.ndir,�er,tly? X „ 1 •, A e nd3 F Pp � pa:ge � . JA Y � F IY, I '1 , C. I / 1 t r ' k r �' r G 1 1 w� Stu ��� i+1�s< ., Butte County Board of $uperyjsors Sgt February 1" 1576 a etjtfion for y R P r W i�t of Mandate was ii1eu b eighboring residents in the Superior Court alleging that the adopt on of the S - ;R zoning o.rdinarce lya; 1��3 Wad illegal. The Petition sought, jn part, that ordinance No. 1693 be'reyoked, S -R Zoning had notbeen�included in theP!anning pro osa, Co�rrission's Proposals forthe area, and the petition alleged`that the Qoard had not properly, referred the S -it Pro oat bacl, to the Planning Conurission for its report and reconjtnendation thereon. Tpe Petition also alleged a fai1u:re by the Board to give proper notice and hold proper hearings regarding the S -R ard�.i.nance a d n a fajlure. p1' the EI�t' ori the rod ing, tp cohSjder file impact of S -R zonjng, After the fr1ing of the Petition for Writ of. Mandate, the Board appareptly directed ;that new zoning hearings be heldi howeyer, it did $, not roscind or retake Ordinances 1693 This led to t'he cur�.pnt`strange proceed ngs to "re,zope'� the are from 'tS-R to S -R,'! a The litigation 1 is still pndln though it 1 apparently nqt beilctivrr]. pursued at', presf~nt4 ' our position, on behalf of Mr.,.Johnson, is that hisproperty Was neYer� legal rpx 094 f roar A-2 to $-R an.d that j t should not zoned nqW a S On Jar►uary 27, 197T, the PIanni'ng Commission took action (on a_ split vote`) amounting to a reCornniendation against the 'rS-R to S -R" It is r proposal. ITLy under - standing that the commission recomiends that the zoning for this area be reStudied, with the area being divided Into a number of different zoning categorjes Regard- _: Less of What your action may be 1p thet rbgard', We request an im�redj:ate elahiflFatl:all 9f Mr! 0plln5pn s sj tuition. eeuId.specifea1ly propose the followlBg altr~rnatiVey 1. DQ not rezone the area S -R.: If yot� dQ rezone the .area in general R p - lease deete Mr. Johnsnn `s paCe1 thou; from, This would, reCognlxe that �hf$. par u 1 �jn fact, different k f o t e e a establisf�u;d use,, r In h other �' parcels 7n aria, because of his prey 1!l�'l ; M 2, Rescind and revoke Ordinance 1693, Th' 7s would make "it clear that P^r; < < Johnson'SIP roperty has remai.ned'; A An 41ternat'r6 . ould be �tc �nl!�tiate; proc���ltl��s � "rezone�r ' Q �Peci 4l,ly' r. Johnsop, s property �2.1. 3, Tnstrust the Planning `,epartq�ent to immeci7;ate1Y 1^ecamr�jence proressir►g of Mrd: Johnson, pending permit applicatj6 Deta�1�od questions" regii>ding the prgyl4us . use whi ch Mr, Johnson has ,establislibd, hi s proposed moth f ca ti ons thAreof., an,c1'x >approp.riate conditions which be :l could niadrr a part of new perrn�t, could p e I s cls h' t0 ,the U:.e P r sled during proceedi gs rejat7v` r ermit applicatau p Thank'you for your gonsidehation of thosa'matters; Very truly yours, KINo, HARRIS,- MCCl1BC SANFDW y . cc. ri;l a Jo so M ,nr r . hn r►� 'Butte �nuntya. ,N. 4:6011.9 Qepartrireptt byte Caurj'ty P�CaUnsel