HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-130-0120
!
�,
r.
:,
�
p�
.
.
�
�
.
�
/
�
,'
,.
�
.. ..
~
I i
�
�
,
�
�q
`.
� �
�
.
.. +,
�
*
i
B
`
a
n
�
.-
�
,�
1
•'
I
��
Q
N
'
�1�
- �•
� �
�
..sir
. �
�
PLANNING COMMISSION S[]MNlARY SHEET FOR T,AMM
AVj),[j CCANT Bur)L Hennigan Lig#86-08-2.5.-02
1)1)RESS 5130 Anita Rid., Chico,, CA 95926
OWNER same
Tentative
PAW ICT DESCRIPTION Waiver Application to divide 120+-
acres to create
21 parcels, 1 at 40 acres+- & l and 80 acres +-
LOCATION on the north side of Anita Road a r 4
Pproximately 3200 reet
Gast of Hamilton Nord Cana Highway, North Chico area
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) 47-13-12,83 '
ZONING A-40 i.
--- --- G8NERAL PLAN Orchard & PRO�� C {fi
t SxSr EN" ?
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT�'LCT
DATE OF APPLICANT SI _ /
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVto August 27, 1986���
-. .. �...
AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENGINEER: Roper Associates
ADDRESS.- 1.346 Longfellow Avenue, Chico, CA 9592:6
1
DATI, PLANNING DIRtCTOR j S REPORT PREPARED
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION -- CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION � DA'CL FILED
AND DATE
w � - NEC�7ITIVE DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
NEG: DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
Mi IMPACT RtPORT
DA'x'E C.DRTIVIT�hD
STAT .�...
E, CLVALlTN4J.H0WSj.,, LV M
ADVISORY AGEN ...�_
C�' HEARING D
V4
ADVISORY AGLNCY
' ACTIGrI t j
APPEAL" ED
APP8,AL HEARING
BOARD ACTION
COM.hiBN� FOR PLANNING iiltRC_,,
- i
yy
TOR (S REPORT
µms:,.:...... _.
N 0 If 9-- (". r4.,
L Eno
Urf:Lice of Planning and
1,400 Tenth Street, Roo, X12:1 00, Planning 001mrtmoilt.
Sacramento, CA 95814 and, ;ear
V eAL1 r-
ButLe Comity
7 County Canter Dtive
IRS Orovillo, CA 05965
01.1
X County Clerk LEANOR M, BECKER, COMY Clerk
County of Butte P. 1W;1NY"
Deputy
,SUB -TECX Filing of Notice of Determination in COMpllan(.'(r wHil 1)'[4cl.i011 21,108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP # Name,
Waiver' Application 47-13-12,83 Bud Henhigan
State Clearinghouse Number - Contact Person Telophone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
Public Works John Mendonsa 5344266
ProjectLocationon the north side of Anita Road approximately 3200
feet east of Hamilton -Nord -Cana Highway, north Chico area.
Project Description Waiver Application to divide 120± acres to creace
two parcel8,, one at 40± acres and one at 80+- acres.
This is to advise that the Butte County Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-dosctibad project On 12-8-86 and has mlide
(Date)
tile following determinations regarding the above-desctibed project:
1. The project will, _)�_will not, have a significant effect on the
environment`
An 8nvironmellLal IM
pact Report yas prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQAi
X. A 'Negative De,Wlatation was prepared for this project pursu"lnt to the
provisions of CEQA,
3. Mitigation measures wete) _,ware not, made a condition of Ole
approval of the pro jecL,
4. A statement Of overriding considorations tint, adopted
for this projett.
0 0
This is to certify that the final 9111 with cOMMOnts i'lld d record f
project approval is available tk,, tile geilotal public at*#
Butte. County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
oroville) CA 95965
.0
Date Received for Vilin& and
1
posting at OPR 2- Y -86
14�
811:GPhtn Ai 8treetott Senior Planner
Titlee
kdvi8iad Hdtch 1966
I A
�.
Arl rN1)I X 13
C:(1tlNTY clip CI[l'1`'1'I.
13NVtR0NMr-,NTAL CIIIICUTS`r IiOCZm
t to a campletec aTy 1.Gi A cY)
1J0L 08
Il30 �-2A-02
j P3ACKGROUND T' tl 47-13-12, 83
I. Name Or proponent BUD HENNIGAN
AcIdress or proponent ahci, reprasetttative r
Bud npplit}tleiHaa5130 Anita Road'CiaL-c:s
C ico CA 959 __- 1r3,: Silllt�11
3 Project, dosctyi}rtian Waiver' Chicon.,, 4A .95926
.?L?catari�
Il', MANDATORY lil`ND'INGS Or STONIICANci.,
YH-S h1A:l':Cits NO
Does the project Cttave the pateitti,al. to deRratltt t It(i
duality of Che anvironment, substantially to liic�tt
the h:b� tat of a rs.slt Or wildlife ,spoties, c4tusct tl
fish )r wildl re Population. to drata below se 1 C w
sustaini.ng lovels, threaten to eliminFt
animal cpitimto a Plant
,ar Y, reduce the number, or restr�,ct: the
range of a rare or enclattgered plant or animal
eliminate .important e'xantples or the major perioci:»
or ;Cali forma history Or prehistory?
b Does
ttitc pproject have, the potentin'1 to achi.avt:
s
Short-term benerits to tile, detriment of l.ang_torflt,
environtnetital Coals
� CA short-term Lmpact an the
environitient is one which occut°s In a relntivol.y
brief period of time tQhiae '}et't,;«term Impacts 14111,'
enclti'•e Into the t'uture.
t � t future.,),
C: Does the ra ec t hctvc, impacts,
p 1. , 'wh1c�h are 'ind vidti-
till)' lititi.tecl, ,tit CUIlIU1atiire.ly eonsiclarable? (A
prO.Wt� ditty impact on lure or more separate rerottroos
Where Lite imtt On ottcic resdtrrcct is relatively
SM,111, but wh, , the erfect of the "total or those
, _w ign1rjctltlt,)
inipact,5 on the,�.nvtltanntont ti 5
d, reacts Cho erajoet ittIV(' onvi.vomiiienta] of"i"e:ct5 which
wild, cattle st►tsscant'}tt1 a�c)vr rye er ects on human
hai,n�s, iaitltel" dlt"tr'�tly tti" Cnci}1•c"c t1y� �p
1 } 1 Ct}ti l R IT,NA'i Ct1N C'ro bo eollip i t`G�i cl ir" tlto i. Gid �tg Ott c)? :
Oil the Telesis of th1;; 10i t ►it1� c`lttctt _on;
„ 111 i t°}nd thu propost`ii pr( ii*c`tCttG1 M NttT have ri1 ,
oil tlt�rita} t"c7n'utent , attil ,t NC`rr1'C"1V1� lti;(:Lr111�1�1"r.r tv wi` l l`ttt cT`i1��titltarecll cwt
,
i It'1, t"irt�}` that alrhoui,}t tilt, pl,t)pcit,ra,l cttnlil htivtw' tt ;til;ttlt"i�.
1�1'4c tvl ittct oil th} >"the
obecatts,cflIQ P11'}�IGA`►ION MI S01 et 't pita C a�`�'ttt
tt 1
ntGdclte�l Slti.�c�t helve,+ lti�c�tttttiic Ithc ti. t4i"I,1 ttc ..
he I ic�t f. u A N1�tt�Al tiI}
r►l;i.l>AItA'1"l [�N t�'t -I 1 Itr+ Ctrc�ir�t ►°ctrl " ,
cctI to tby itti
l�rV11 1'lttcl t'htt propo.sotlpi°ct,ic�tt A1,11 1►sive �a ipli}"}�'�I�ttt'�x,l"1'oct'oil
tilt-, a=tl0vonutellt, ltliil till 1 NViltCtwliN'1'Alt TfilPAC:T l ls[iC1 t'[" rt, rerluirt�tl t
$eptembetl _ _0 9,8.x. COUNTY oiz t# I Tli , phANN } Ntl'MWAR`I Witi"i'
ttra M:
TU b1e r As ctc�. � pl.�nnar
Re v i is Luo ,cl by ,✓'� ,;/ 4. ,i%
.'W- ' ✓
Etr
"1
VENVIRONMrNTAL IMRICTS •
xp aiia tions o 1 a l "yes" ,and "maybe" an axc xecZuired
on att,xclied sheet (s)
1: EARTH, Will the proposal result in significa Yrs
'YES
a,. Unstable earth,crnd tions
D?AYEE NO
or in changes it,
geologic substructures?
b.
Disruptions, displacement,;, compaction
overcovering
of the soin ar -�
c. Change in to
a rash or
relief features? Y ground surface
d. Destruction, covering or modification of tt'
Unique g • riy.—
z,c or physical
,
r e 'n , features?
e• Increase in wind or water erosion of sai7.s
either or, or off-site?
Y,
--�
Changes in deposition Or erasion of beach
sands, or changes in
siltatio'
or erosion which tray modify the ch
a river annel�o
or stream ar the bred t�f �'he ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g= Loss of prime agric:uitura;ll
outside y productive soils `—
designated urban
-�.... X
areas?
h• Exposure of people or
hazards, such geologic `
---C
as eartlquakusrtandslides, rttud-
slides ground failure or simlar.hazards?
Ar
2: R, Will the proposal result in :substantial -..
Air emissions or in
air quality? Of ambient
b, The
creation of objectionab
or fumes? le odors; smoke
c; Alteration of air movement; moisture, Or
temlocally
0 ,'or any change in climate,
locally_or regionally?
3 WATER. 1V1 11 the
a, g proposal result in substantials
nes
—�-
•
direction currents, or th'e course or
n a£ Water
�
Movements S 1'n
"t _ e at er
arine or fresh waters? -
b.
�Ihanges in absorption' rates, drainage pa'tt:er`
ar the rate and ns,
�. -=
amount of surface runoff?
Need for of-fa
ci mems
surface drainage improve
�nclud g '..--
g getation removal
azation nr culvert ans-talldtion? channel
d. Alterations to the course or £l oiv of flood
waters? --• ---
e: change in theamount of surface water
body?WIqtet
_
i�ischareSurface
nto Sul .race waters , o r in �--
alteration of surfaoe any
water ua1�t
but not l,irnited to tepex°afore, disolnedtrcl3.hg
-Oxygen
at turbidity?
�
g Alteration d
of the irects
�f
.�
gro►, on or ate
nd waters `of f'lci�v ,
h. ?
Chantae in the quantity or' ,qualif-,V cif gro
,und 'Waters
ezther through dirtions or
ect; addi
draWals
W th-
or through interception of �n
aqui for by outs
or excalratiazas 7
i. Reduction in the amount of ti�ater
aysilal'Ie otherwise
fa �publ.io
+
J Wates suppi �,os�
Exposure n f eo e or �•aport to tvate�•
people, l p .. �' 4
related hazards such
as fl,00ding? �.'
YES
MAYtr Pat
+
.it.�lr
pyosof unutri
aL�ANT antze inwthe dliversispec es,nOrsa
of y species of, plants (includingtree,s,,
shrub:, , grass , crops , and aquatic plants) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, 'rr�ro
or endangered species of plants?
C . Introduction of newspecies of plants into
area, or in a barrier to the noxmal, repl,enfall.
meat o£ existing species?
�
d: Reduction in acreage of any agricultural; C.PLip7
S.
ANIMAL, LIFE. Will the proposal result in sub,[��ttial
a.G Dawe in the, diversity of species, or nu.11111 .ts
of any species of animals (birds, land atfl►tials
including reptiles, fish and shell fish„
benthic organisms or insects)?
m�
b". Reduction in the numbers of any unique,
or endangered species of animals?
.�.
C4 Introduct;a.nn of new species of animals
an area, or re$iilt in a barrier to the mi g-ration
or movement of animals?„
d. Bete; ioration to e'::isting f 1sh or wildlife
habitat?
5
NOISE.' 11111 the propo,al result in substantial,
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
JL
b: Exposure of people to severe noise levels?JL
7.
LIGHT AND SLAltla, Will the proposal produce
r
'
sa.gni Ficant. light' and glare?
�.
8.
LANL [1St. Will the proposal result in a
su"bsFa-ii—tial alto-ration of the pro,sent or plannod.
land use of an area?
0
NATURAL, RESOURCEWill the proposal. re �
result "n
su stantial
a. Increase in the rate y of use of an
{ natural
resources?
b. Depletion of ,any non-renewable natural
resources?
1.0:
R.18 X O); UPSET,: Will the proposal involve
a, A r s ^ o 64108ion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (ircluditg, . btat riot limited t;o,
oil) pesticides, chemicals or radiation) .ift t O
event of an accident or upset conditions?
b, possible interference w1th an emergency
res ponse plaor emergency evacuation p 1a7r?
ll:
kOPULA'TION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution) deh9 ,ty, or growth 'rate of the hull nn
population?
14:
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housl,ng,
or Createg
a demand fo additional, housin" ;
qt
..;
i
:
1
7 3. TRA TRA.I�SP2RTATION/CIRCULATION, IVill
YES tILL13 NO
result-'xn-_..
the Proposal
a. Generation of substantial additional ve}l�c'le
movement?
b. Effects on existing
C. parking facie„hies, 07•
demand for
X
new parking?
c. Sutastantial impact
p on existing transportat;l,���
systems?
d. .Significant alteratiOP ons to Present
circulation or eea
g bods 7 movement pecpl
goand/0,11
e+ Alteration$ to `waterborne rail,
Increase in
ivehi�J?ric
traffic hazard'
stbmotor
bicyclists or pedestrians`?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the
proposal have
a need for
upon, ox result in an e ("1"to�
new or altered.
governmental services;
a,. Fire protection?
b. Police protect4on?
c: Schools'?
~-. --
d Warks or other recreational facilities?
e, �4aintenanc6
of public facilities, including`
roads ?
—
f• Other governmental services?
15: j��—tR—UCY� IVill the pro os y
s- of substantial
.
amounts of fuel or energy?
b� Substantial 4ncrease in demand upon
sources
of energy, or require thedevelopment.._
existi
of new sources of
.._._
energy
16. tjTrj,r"'lpa5. Will the p
pyo asa1. result in a need for
ne►v systems, or substanti l
LL
following; alterations to the
a. Poluer or, natural gas ?
b: communications
systems?
C, Nater aVailabil ity;
_
d. Sewer or Sept'ic tank?
e • Storm
water drai:nageoL
f: Solid waste and d ,spoSal.?
17, HUAIAN. Mq LT14' Will the proposal re"suit
a ,rca Ori of a�ay head th
lxazard or potent$ a�
health, hazard (excludinq
b. hazards? bf ?
,
_
t�sopls to Potential'healtli)
hazards?
� �,
18 s AES'THET'ICS. wi.11 the
o s txu t an of` any scenzc�istaoruviewno th
open the Pu 11c) 0, T' will '��1G' +r M � n to
pro Ciw�ir,;w
sl�lt' in the
Cv`1'eatlio C5f an aes: o�lGally o fch8ive site open
to public '�ietN?
YES
%1AyiLf No
. RECRtATIOM— Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quanta.ty of existing recreational;
opportunities?,
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
'ET ualterationlt in the
`of1ortthep
destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
h. Will the proposal result_ in adverse physzcal
-A,'
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure or object?.�
C, Does the proposal have the potent;i.al to cause
r�
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacared uses within the potential impact
area?
V, DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 47-13-12,,83
See attached,:
�DTSCU S_l ' f' f� _q LNK1a0VMrN'V6 - UATTC�N AP 47-13-12,6a
1b: Deve1opment of two homesrtes could disrupt ;and othori,,►}se,
ovir"cover approximately 'i/3 of an acre each: This potential already
exists because there are prosentlY two Parcels, and two parcels w111
c.t .
be created by this proae
1g The soils on site are a MIX Of Anita Clay Adobe, i%n,lto Clay Loam
and parweils �1�ow�ruotedAll
crops.these
The landsoils
}sr~cuwell
entlyip�ant�� d to bra:ins
and other h rt�v l i n
orchards and f 1 el d orops • The project will r^el ocate one pr�rrr e
so that an SO -acre parcel front$ on Ah l to Road ' and a 40- acro+ ptircel
will be located to the north. The project will not
change thin
development potential on site. Agricultural 8o'}ls,w1}1 not
Axlsti►g
tyke lost at'a rr sul t of this Prole:ct
1h' Earthquakes measuring up to 3.9 on the Richter acolo have be
recorded In the vicinity. Hazards to persons and prcPtarty are
cc n;.Y 1 dared moderate Exposure of people to, e8rthquako hazards will
not he 1 ncreosecf as a result' of this project, No r
nitlgation` }s
there Fore necessary
3c improvement of the ex}strn9 access road to the north off H.ighw7y
y ected, by tho Department
99 may require upgrading or replacement of drainage structures. of
bra}na9e improvements wL11 be mads as lir _
ipubl i c :forks.
:b'. (haps of Mare and Fhd6n9ered species available i ri the Butte County
planning beparttnent'office indicate the site may provide habitat for
l�lP ccosa a Rare and Endangered plant species. Because the
n{ -►gas f,l o
i t c has teen extensively disturbed by agr i cul tura l operat } ons, no
jrvey will be r~erlu } rod
The, land is curt^ent1'y under Wl1l1 myon Act contracts for intent ive
aqr }cultural product I on. Thi zon} 1.10 1 s A-40 w:i th m i n i fium
parcel size. The «rinirnum c:ocrtract size is also 40, acres. The present
and planned land use v.0 l l rotiia l n- agr } cu l tura t '.
13r,fA'letter has been recplved firom Cal'Trans indicatin9'that the
proposed oasement to the northerly parcel may'creatrr a;sI y hazard
on Highway 59. The easemont would be i ocated approx i ttr,ate l y X50 feet
aotJth of the i2otk Creek br i dge atopp i ng. s i ruht d i stonooa for veh i cl as
.r, v i _ ;rig 55mph is 500 poet. The br l dge: rail, at Rock Creek w i l l
1 t!ip� W .� a.,�str i ctod sight d i stenrre . Cal Traria recortimends thatthe. access
easomorit wwe located 250' feet to the south, Or approNi mc"Ol y acNbss
from Ro,ad, Althow0h the legal access to the northerly parcel
Out to Hip6vrs�; 99 }las not yet boom secured y the ph ys } ca } access has
a }ready been ,dor : I,r%ucte 1. When this access was crier" tod, there Was a
dl scuss i on of p au : atg l i
5a f`oet to the south The ri pilcant was
persuasive i n hay h '`: re 1 oca bod to the riorth; g i v i nio reasons such as
Ap �, ; y L l l " v which now }army i Iles mccbss to Highway 95 .
f 1 wrier Ground 45 and 48-816, No Indication was found
was created by parcel >.gip
that CalTrans commented'�,n trr�Z project or rdoulred a private road
approach Since tti his projot�v} 1 1 not i ncr ease the development
Satent } al ! add } ti brie l t'rmf f i c or,' impacts to Highway 9'' are riot
expocted,, In the event that C� en's raid not }slue an encroachtnde
pei�tni t to the 'highway an al tgrrjj�At i �,.e act ess to Art i to Is recommended
-LL
APPI 1 CO"It'
11
Bud Hennigan
Assessor's i;lo, col it
47 -1 S- 12,U
Lag # 86-08-i�Jrl02
,DA -T _A SHEET
_
A
I. Type Of Project: Land Division- tIon to - ciEVidlvIdtone 120 aarOrt
2. Brief Descriptio+/n: waiver APP11at $0 ocreS
to create two Parcels, one at 40 08acres I
e north side of Anita Road approximately 8200
3. Location: On the H-19hWaY) north Chico aroO.
feet east Of Ha of Development: MId.w./40,1- acres.
4. Proposed Density nIM81.
5. Amount of impervious Surf Frontage on Ahl ta Road.
,6 . Access and Nearest Futilic Road(s): systems
7. Method of Sewage DiSPOsa ItOnSeptic .
-site wells'
8. Source of Water Supply" To property.
Power Lines=
Zoning
Proximity Of and divisions and deVolopment:
10. potential for further 1
and W1111arnson Act Contract permit I d.u./40 acres.
nfItal Setting
n m el,
Environment:
P—hys-OLC�3i E��nv`
Terra inLevel Valley loodd
a. General TOpographIc Character -
b. Slopes-, 0-2%o
to Elevation: 165-17" A.S.L.
do LIMItIM0 roators: Nome' 11 Series to
Soils claracteristir-s: Mixed Anita_Jarioie
a. Types acid .-1 -6-
at, generally very compact with hardpan at 9 poor
b. Limiting Factors . Modor�,ate liquefaction potentlali
surFaceand subsurface' drainage,
3. Natural Hazards of the Landar Earthquakes UP to 3-9 on the
t-tarthquake Zone: moderate.ordod in the vlalmltyo
Richi,or Scale have been rec
114 me t
bo Erosion Potential'
c. Landslide pOL_eht,,Ial:NoLOW.o sllOht-
do Fire Hazard: Unclassified' J�Jodqrote 0 high.
do expzihslve ,-'
Soil Potential
44 Hydrolow
a. Surface Water= SM811 8walo crosses property*
ti-idrawal
b. Gr6uhdw8t0r*. Area Of heavy 0roundwater q1Jm6ge to SO .
cDraihaqe UthweSt-
CharOcbOlrlstid8t Natural are
i
do Annual Rainfall (normal?e. LimitinG t
Factors".
Qualltyt Scenic pastor
ttl' views.
VisualtScenic'. Jsw
64 Acoustic Quality: Good.
7. Air Quality= Good,
X81 Cnyironment_:
g. Vegetation.. Potential L'imnanthes floGcosa,
W i i dl i fe Habitat: Unknown. Native Nabi tat exl':Cina" ve'i y
modified by ago operations.
jy#�tara�Fnyi ronment:
10. Arehaeol o9 i cal and Historical Resources i n tho firea= Low,
i nc i ud i no uIlknown .
1 1 . Uutt;e County general Plan des i gnat i on � Or0iar cj and Field
urops .
12. Existing Zon i nta A-40.
19. Cx st: i ng Land Usj+ on-site: Almond orchard and field crops
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses- Orchards$ rola crops, rural residential$ LCA
contracts.
b, Zoning'; A-40.
C. Gen. Plan designations= Orchard rind Field Craps
d. Parcel Sizes; 4--200 ac.$ generally 40+•
e. Population= Sparse..
115. Character of Site and Area: Farm country.
16. Nearest Urban Area. Chico, 6+ miles.
17. Relevant SphCres of influeh es None
16. improvements :standards Urban Area: nla.
J9. 1=ire Protect i cln Service
a. Nearest County ( State) Fire Station= 441 milesi 0420 6
miles.
b. Water Availability: S.ngine capacity
90. Schools In Area: Chico Un l f .i ed School District.