HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-130-076AIIPLICA14T
Shimizu ttos.r Inc.
P.O.. Box 3009, Chico, CA 95927
--------- - -
ADDRESS—,—
Same
OWNPaR
45 acres to create 2 VarO019
TPM to divide
pjOjECT DESCRIPTION,--—"
2 acres and I at 3.25 acres
I at 42.1 ------- — apprOXimate!Y
..... — ci, Road,
on the north side of Wilson Landing
T,OCAq!TON,�.1—_� lan Rd., North Chico area
2200 feet west of Mer3. d'I
47-13-76
ASSE,SSO aiS pARCEL
Cr
�(!
(10 GENERALPLAN 'r
—PROJE
11. 'REPORT_-DA Tr,
qnj�tRAL PLAN CONFORMANCE OF APPLICANT SDGNATURE
oN ACT CONTRACTS
iraqw CONSERVATI August 27, 1986
)MPT,l, APP V
E Roper Associates
I
SUp MCI
'VEyOR/CI'VIL ENGINE
Am.,mT/S F. 0. BOX Chico, CA 95927
ADD RE- SS
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
PrPAR
CATEGORICAL
V
'XE
M VrION 'DATE
ENVIRONMENTAL DATE
DMERMINATION NEGATIVE MCLARATION
IN D . DATE MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION
rmv- IMPACT REPORT - DATE
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
TTt
SUB.
COMMIMt-tTIN
A0VjSOp,Y AGENCY
HEARING DATB__LR_:nj'3rl(
ADVISORy AOENCY ACTION„„4,„ AppthL HEARING
APPt
A
BOARD ACTION-,
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIPIECTOR'S
NCJ
-A- CI
Office of Planning andllk-tt Le County
se4ch 1. 21
1400 Tenth Street, Rook521 D 11.11.11111j.ng Department
Sacramento, CA 95814 7 001111ty Center Drive
0 V OCT 1 7 198B Ovoville, CA 95965
X County Clerk
County of Butte MANOR M, BECKER, ' County Clerk
By — �4 '- ,XILILI Deputy
SUJa-7.V-C'X Filing of Notice �f Determination in complint)(icl with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP
Tentative Parcel Map 47-13-76 Shimizu Drop., In -q-, _
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephono Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
, Public Works John Mendonsa -534-42
Project Location On the north side of Wilson Landing Road, approx,-
2200 feet west of Meridian Road, north Chico area.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 45 acres to create
two parcels, one at 42.12 acres and one at 3.25 acres.
This is to advise that the Butte County .71VIvisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described project on 10-13-86 , . and hag made
(T)Atra)
the following determinations regarding the above-described project:
1, The project will, ,will hoti have a significant effect on the
environment,
2. An Environment.al, impact: Report was prepared Yor this project
pursuant to thu provisions of CBQAi
A'Negative beclatatiatt was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3. Mitigatioi! measures _�_t (Xei _Zyeee not; made a ceindition of bis
approval of the project.,
4. A statement of overriding considvrations ,woq riot, adopted
for this project,
This is to certify that the final CUR witti conuiaeriU,, and rdspormns and record, of
project approval is availabie to the aahti!dl public at:
tett-,e County Planning Department
7 County Center Dvive
Oeoville, CA 05965
Date Received for Tlilin
10-17' 86
posting at OPS —, '&'j- //ml � , , '�lz t . zle-510
H4 '46te
StePhon AI Streeter
,:W.'
Senior '?I, art n
L 10
Pevited Mrth 1986
s• ......
'�- co��—
DEPAWrMENT OF Puol.lc MIAI. 11
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. HLAI_Tl-1
C17 Counly Cenler .Drive 0 747 Gllrott Road
Address "r196 Metric, al 1Vnye .Dlnvilla, Co0ornia 95965 parndraa, coli(ornla 95969
Chico, Calllornla 3926
Telopione: 916/891.2727 Tolephon'+
n:'r6/534 A2t11 Talep{rane 91$/872.2961, 8r.1. 58
Reply to
.September 29, 1986
Sh . jizu Brothers, Inc. RN: Shl.miz:u Brothers PArce.1 MOP BuifoCo. planoingCMr
p. Box 30109 Wilson Lending Road, ChRO OCT 8 19$6
Chico, CA 9592; AP N�7�13�76
l�rovillo, Coliforat4
Gentlemen:
Works
This department has advised the Butte .edut,o3,actpontt`hetof abovlolto plicat;iOnl-end
peve.iopntent Suction. that; we are p�"ep z
Based on present: information we cat) recommdndion�xs��rantedl or �ft�rtParcel ional �2�.revel
provided a viable selvage disposal area e�.cep $
Recommended Conditxans ger Apl)roval,
1. Prdvido an area for lvolls and 100' laic hfiold free sahelck around
those areas an parcel 2.
2. Provide a 100.leacbfxe.ld free sr:tback around ox1,t, Ing Ivells either
1v1 thin the property qx lvithin ,100' of the property be undarltw..
'7. l.orrlte and zf. necossary- allocate t:he senrage disport] �ystt m .5ervitig
porcol 2 onto its rl 00Ctive pat c
4, If an oxcoptlon is granted for parcel 2, place
ca.ctnt.no wade disposal
;trues !'Parcel. 2 has nit*. been proven to con
for residential development"i,
if you have any tluo8tion4 regarding this 1 atter i please conLnct the Chxre Off! cc
Vory truly your,-is
71
'0httima8
Nttpervising ,rni t«tlr'1 �tft
01visjon ol° L'nvl.rommont al 11va1 th
.TP gw
CC PUL'11, Works
Planning; ENVIA MENTAL fl i.'�N
Roper Associatos
0,G` 6 196
Me7►VILU, OAUFOROAA
N
r rR,rTr'TBD MAIL
Uoun
..cam
DEPARTMENT Or PUbL.fC WORKS
Butto'CO• Pianniny Comethr
WIL.tI1�M ot3filLC.11i {'!', biroctC�r
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIYP taN�yVll � �, CAL>1FORMA9$945
QC 1 L U I�Ju 7`1000" 'Fitt') 1,14.4681
RONALD Q. MicCLROY
provi119, Cali4nru a La,,, vf, Director
October. 13, '1986
Shimizu BroLhers Inc. RE: AP 47-13-7fa
I'. 0. Boa 3009 Tenul'i' ve Parrol Map
Chico, CA 95926
Dear ricin L I amen
AL Lhe regular meeting of Lhe ButLe County Advisory Agency halt] on
October 13; 19,96, Lhe agency gran Led a negative declaration o.f
onveirr
anment,al impacL and approved your tentative parcel. mnia On Lho
caav
�-referencod property subject: to the cnndi.tions of approval, listed
on tho rat r arhod Sheet.
11' ur, uppeals art, timely filed—within ten (10) days of the da Lo of
L.hcr Advisory Agency s spprovn:L-- wiLh Lhe Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final;
-
Mien Oe condiL-,)ns of approval are complied with,
i t tail.], be in order
for you to file your ,final: maps tiLh the Butte County Department
of Public ]Forks for recordation within 0wet1ty--fOUr (24) months of
the Suite of approval by the Advisory Agency,
If you have any questions rognrding Lh;is matter, please contacL this
office
Very truly yours,
William Chefr
Director of 1ubl. is
Works
r a
,loiin Wndon.ar�a
AASIsUmIL Mrot I rat,
JM/ds
Planning Department
F:rviroramc..atal 110010 Department
Rcrpor AssociaLes
")ljlTJiru Brothers 1'nr, , TNNTATIV'!s PAHCt,f, MAP, A47-13-76,
I��r,,tcrl on the
rtc�rlh ide cal` Wilson
1ti5r.;l gar 1`lori.diari Road. North Chico
[,ending r nerd a � 7.efa
� Rprc7x. ?_7.(�(J ft.
area.
P
blit Works conditions;
vorify legal ijccess.
1
Provrdo two—wjay traversablo accessLate
a c unty maintained road car �
S t3-Lr)_f to ear.h P"I1 r+1 Froitl
>
hi�hw$y.
l
Access, to bo rOser'vedd in ('"'ds as
.
d0dicatiOn on the final
County rdintr riwrrr
.rr
jn,tp,
offered
4
Show 50 fL, building setback line
Oasomat,t .
MO,')sored .from ccin � ,.
I r.r, inc, of access
I
Provide roaci maintenanec, ngri-omens,
6
DOOd Lea the County Of Butte 30 ft,
Of- tQlson Lairdi:ng Road,
righL—of—Way f
Y rc,rii lyre
centerline
y
1ndir1tte a 50 FL. building
r.nnd.ing Ruad , SeLlaaclt
From Lhe conterl; i,ne of 1 ],1son
Silow r111 easements of record on the
final
`t
01at"'ll cync.roachtnent permit, ror all
C'MlA ruc t to
map,
driveways, now
county st�andad ns,
or existing,
ag , and
Pad' 'any delinquent taxes Or Current
taxes
i#c1,11lh
Dept, conditions:
as required.
'
1
Provide an area for wells and 1.00 ft. leachfiel.d
8r1711!lr1 those areas free
on. parcel 2,
setback
12
Provide a 1010 ft, leachfield .Free setback
either. within the property
ora n
u d ex.i,sting
or within
boundaries.
+�el1s
1:00 ft, of theProperty
13
LOCaLe and if necrass4ary re
servinglocate the
parcel. 2
sewago'dis ,
ontca its respective
Parcel;posa;i .system
14
rr Oh exception is PIrtanCcd for parcel 2, Place
LhaL ,states,, 'Tarcel 2 has (I tloto oil tile
riot been
`7c'iJ'ti;o disposal. area foe rc�.sidcntial
map
prove,, to ccanlnin ul:firrient
devcloirmenMl
r
3
TO: Bute County Advisory Agency
FRQMe Planning Director
SUBJECT: Report on Tentative Parcel Mtip for S11 mizu
47-W 13-76
X��` �a�
. r
, , )IO . , on. AP
DATE; September 29, 1986
This l rx a proposal, to divide 45 acres
zoning is A-40 (Agricultural ti �o create � per,,-,qs, The
of "o Butte County General plandosacre
Field Crops. ethic
hi'it
present
� tl. d Use Plan Map
aTho
There are no,specific or ates ris Orchard and
y Pl.r#�'tr� l�r�w
The proposal does not oon�'J,ict With t":�u
Proposed element
the arca. k
nor
of the Putte Bounty ��eneralo�l�n nr�r
,speclr,is or COMMtinit 3+ pl.�.sY.
rxr� y adopt pt~
Dirty Count;,
,
RecOIA1110-nd approval,
DRH Ir
cc ShilniZIa. Bras. i Inc.
Roper Associates
Tit
I'll
r
AI'1'1-*NI)IX I: or
T;NVIRONMEN'1"Ar. CIII?Cht r 51" 1 nR�t
ito e r�ilei~c i'1 I.u�t� A;cnCY)
BACKGR--ROUND
I.0 ,�' 1185-12-18•.[ll
1. Name of proponent • ShiAP 116713-7f
mizu Bros.
2• Address Of oroponant al Inc:
a d rc: p re s on t a t ve (if
P O• Box 300'9 11ppi.icah;l. j
Chico, Ca. 95927•_`_
P. 0-`-1>35ttz
3, project cresorilltiott------ Chico, Ca _95h27'
Cancellation of1.11"``�----�,.-._
Land Co ��"t
MANDATORY PINbTNGS Or STCNIrTCANGII y" -kP°- � ,t A t -ament
a . Does the project -
qual%ty of the e1V'ironm'enk"e the ,�osubstant.iall
the habitat of degrade tht
fish or wildlio 1'zsh or wildlife Y reduce
sustaini, s poiaulatiion to dospecies0 cause a
Sustaining
ng levels p bel:oty self.
c otntnunt t threaten to eliminate a
range of a unit $ t`educe the slur»her or plant 01,
eliminate Or endangered plant ar 'eStrict tile
important exam les ani.mal. ol.
Of California history or }�1'ehof tale jar
p of the ma periods
b, Docs t}
e,
le pro,]ect have
short-term bencrits the potentirt7 to aCllit�V0
enviranm,,ntal ?to the detriment Or lan
envi.ronmont is, fA short-term impact g -term,
brief p one which Occurs in a re on the
eriot1 of time while loni;-term impactsew ill
endure into the fuurr,7
Dock the Itroje">»t have impacts v
ally limited; but t� ►hich are individu-
lrraiect lila), cumulatively considerable?
Where the imn��t�t on two or CA
more separate resources
small, but where ,each resource i.s relative] .,+
imparts on till the effect of, the
c rl� i ronin snt is sr r total of those
ti, bans the t • , . , Anil"ieaht")
tvilT earls tsiibstantial advr.tse elfero o .
have cnvironntental efrects tv►t,7ch
beings, either dire,:tllr n human.
or• indirectly?
rtrirTttrla�'A7'1 tt (,,,0 he t`OMP
lrtc�rl h�• ,
I -Vail
file
On the ba5irt 111' trl.r;; iritnl rv:tlulttican: '�I'0he,.)
�y t/1C1 r i illi' Litt ►rt•1)i'tlyt"sl It"�1 1,
oil the" 1 t1v i rc,ntnL,nI ( t t t C"tt N -D NOT 17aty ,
+ xtntl 11 N, GA'r'I'���I bl'f:i,A1;A'I'tON�t ;.i1,rt'Cflr,ttt"t efJ'cCt
rInt Iind that altholl � ►vt rl ite Ittt�)lrtroti
Cant c"Crt, ct the ►,h tfr< �trl�00st'd 01,010"
crl""Oct in ttt�il; ""Ontiir011111:"nt, tltc�rt> )rirlttlltrl
the attUchG'tl ; 1CtISt J)L4 "alts(% l'he if vrti t1r,lri 1'i�
b1 GJ.ARAI lti��1 a, 1 i l ehe"h4�� ew�i veli tltltlr"tl t,tA"CIC)N C•tliA;;lrllii� ►ti i'lvant
ht 1�rrtl,i tits 1' . stl r 1 lred Sr t
i t t Rttt i. A 1VLCihf Itrii
. I -/WI, fink tilt, 1tro11ubI'd 1) 1'() t 61r1�
the mncn
utt i to t, ttnt) have a ,
alt rsNFI:R(t-NmiI srtll'lt`�tnt rr"lett"t rill
t)11'I'I,s becetnbery 26.X1 $5 N'IAI, lbr1 1C;'i Itr;l"Ctlt`I'
-- .•-. ., .i5 tt✓'t�tt roti,,.
�..•...�a..,�.,: __ ... Cat '1r C1; I" 1)ll"11'
ill]'["l`I; pr,
N t
` N l NrInifVMRNT
avid R, Hit o -_ ..
Assoc`
Reviet�aetr llty, Planner
LIL'-S MAYrlE 1`10
re
Tit
I'll
r
AI'1'1-*NI)IX I: or
T;NVIRONMEN'1"Ar. CIII?Cht r 51" 1 nR�t
ito e r�ilei~c i'1 I.u�t� A;cnCY)
BACKGR--ROUND
I.0 ,�' 1185-12-18•.[ll
1. Name of proponent • ShiAP 116713-7f
mizu Bros.
2• Address Of oroponant al Inc:
a d rc: p re s on t a t ve (if
P O• Box 300'9 11ppi.icah;l. j
Chico, Ca. 95927•_`_
P. 0-`-1>35ttz
3, project cresorilltiott------ Chico, Ca _95h27'
Cancellation of1.11"``�----�,.-._
Land Co ��"t
MANDATORY PINbTNGS Or STCNIrTCANGII y" -kP°- � ,t A t -ament
a . Does the project -
qual%ty of the e1V'ironm'enk"e the ,�osubstant.iall
the habitat of degrade tht
fish or wildlio 1'zsh or wildlife Y reduce
sustaini, s poiaulatiion to dospecies0 cause a
Sustaining
ng levels p bel:oty self.
c otntnunt t threaten to eliminate a
range of a unit $ t`educe the slur»her or plant 01,
eliminate Or endangered plant ar 'eStrict tile
important exam les ani.mal. ol.
Of California history or }�1'ehof tale jar
p of the ma periods
b, Docs t}
e,
le pro,]ect have
short-term bencrits the potentirt7 to aCllit�V0
enviranm,,ntal ?to the detriment Or lan
envi.ronmont is, fA short-term impact g -term,
brief p one which Occurs in a re on the
eriot1 of time while loni;-term impactsew ill
endure into the fuurr,7
Dock the Itroje">»t have impacts v
ally limited; but t� ►hich are individu-
lrraiect lila), cumulatively considerable?
Where the imn��t�t on two or CA
more separate resources
small, but where ,each resource i.s relative] .,+
imparts on till the effect of, the
c rl� i ronin snt is sr r total of those
ti, bans the t • , . , Anil"ieaht")
tvilT earls tsiibstantial advr.tse elfero o .
have cnvironntental efrects tv►t,7ch
beings, either dire,:tllr n human.
or• indirectly?
rtrirTttrla�'A7'1 tt (,,,0 he t`OMP
lrtc�rl h�• ,
I -Vail
file
On the ba5irt 111' trl.r;; iritnl rv:tlulttican: '�I'0he,.)
�y t/1C1 r i illi' Litt ►rt•1)i'tlyt"sl It"�1 1,
oil the" 1 t1v i rc,ntnL,nI ( t t t C"tt N -D NOT 17aty ,
+ xtntl 11 N, GA'r'I'���I bl'f:i,A1;A'I'tON�t ;.i1,rt'Cflr,ttt"t efJ'cCt
rInt Iind that altholl � ►vt rl ite Ittt�)lrtroti
Cant c"Crt, ct the ►,h tfr< �trl�00st'd 01,010"
crl""Oct in ttt�il; ""Ontiir011111:"nt, tltc�rt> )rirlttlltrl
the attUchG'tl ; 1CtISt J)L4 "alts(% l'he if vrti t1r,lri 1'i�
b1 GJ.ARAI lti��1 a, 1 i l ehe"h4�� ew�i veli tltltlr"tl t,tA"CIC)N C•tliA;;lrllii� ►ti i'lvant
ht 1�rrtl,i tits 1' . stl r 1 lred Sr t
i t t Rttt i. A 1VLCihf Itrii
. I -/WI, fink tilt, 1tro11ubI'd 1) 1'() t 61r1�
the mncn
utt i to t, ttnt) have a ,
alt rsNFI:R(t-NmiI srtll'lt`�tnt rr"lett"t rill
t)11'I'I,s becetnbery 26.X1 $5 N'IAI, lbr1 1C;'i Itr;l"Ctlt`I'
-- .•-. ., .i5 tt✓'t�tt roti,,.
�..•...�a..,�.,: __ ... Cat '1r C1; I" 1)ll"11'
ill]'["l`I; pr,
N t
` N l NrInifVMRNT
avid R, Hit o -_ ..
Assoc`
Reviet�aetr llty, Planner
LIL'-S MAYrlE 1`10
x ti
1MCTS
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL I
xp tattutions o a l `'ryes" and "maybe" answers are required
on, attached sheet(s))
YES
MAYBE NO
1. UARTH. Will the proposal result in significant.
•'
e7—Un stable earth conditions or in changes it
geologic substructtires?
X
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?°
C.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of rtny
unique geologic or physical features?.
e
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g.
Loss of prime agriculturally productive suils
outside designated urban areas?
}C
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards, such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
r
2. AIR.
Will the proposal result in substantial.,
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
r,
b.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
}
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
locally or regionally?
�(
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial -
a.:
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, `
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c
Need for off-site surface drainage improve
ments, including vegetation 'removal, channel.-
ization or culvert installation?
d
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
x
e.
Change in the amount of surface Yater In any
water body?
f.
Discharge into surface Graters, or in any
."".
alteration of surface water quality, including
but 'not limited to temperature„ dissolved
Oxygen or turbidity?
g.
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
Of ground waters?
h,
Change in the quantit or
y quality of ground water
either throv,gh direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
s.quir-er by cuts or excavations?
i.
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise `-
available for;public hater supplies?
J.
Exposure of people or propert�r to water
»X
related hazards suc}t as flooding'
yES rIAY F
Nei
4, PLANT LIFE Will the proposal result in substtaritial
of species, or numbOT
"a-.-7, ange in the diversity
of any species of plants (including trees, _
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? _LL
the numbers o f any unique , xa t't
b . Reduct oir of
Re endangered species of plants?
of plants into tan
r_. Introduction of new species
in a barrier to the normal repleri.h-
X
area, or
meet of existing species'? - ---'
of any agricultural oVOp?
�CG
a, Reduction in acreage
5 4NIMAL LIFE. will the proposal result in sub,3L`ant ial
diversity of species, or nun11)exs
a, C tinge in the
of any species of anim'lls (birds , land an1,11 tals
including reptiles, fish and shell fl.sh,
benthic organisms oz' insects)?
in the numbers of any unique, rare
b Reduction
or endangered species of animals?---
of animals into
c, Intxoduction of new species
result in a barrier to the migration
an area, or
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6. NOI5E. will the proposal result in substantial;
levels?
V
a. Increases in existing noise
b, Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
X CI
7. LIGHT.' AND GLARE. W6'11 the proposal produce
srgnifleant a.:.ght And glare?
�DstUaSn'tial. will the proposal rosult in a$'salteration. of the present car •���.x�t�ned
land use of an area?
9, NATURAL RESOURCES: will the proposal result in
substantial
Increase in the rage of use of any natural
a. �w
resources? �reneatable natural
b. Depletion of any non
resources?
lq. RI_SK OF UPSET. will the proposal involve:
the release of h�zd
a. A Tis• of explosion or
to,
substances (inc but not, limit0d t
l�
y p chemicals ox radiation) In the
oil est cider, chemic
�---
---�•
event of an accident or upset conditions? •�.
b, possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? -.-.
11, POPULATION, 1Vi11 the proposal alter the location,
rate .5f the human
OsULA ION,
density, or growth
population?
lea HOUSxNC3. 1Vi11 the proposal affect existing housing,
housing?
or Create a demand for additional
YDS r111Y131� N(7
13, 'I'I ANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. W;]i the proposal
rtrsult in;
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
bi Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact on existing trarisportati,on
systems?
d'. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people anchor
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafflc?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehic'loaa
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an ef,I'oct
upon., ar result in a need for new or altered
governmental, services
a, Fire protection?
b. Police protection" --
c, Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental; services?
15 ENERGY, Will the proposal result in.
substantial
r energy?
b: Substantial inc
tease minnf
demandponupexisting
sources of ener P
gy, or require the developmeenn
t
of new sources of energy?
1.6. 'UTILITIES, Will the proposal result in a need for
new systems, or subs+antial alterations to the
following:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c, {Vater availability:..,:.._:
d, Sever or septic tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
f, Solid Waste and disposal? ----
17. HUMAN fiPALTI-t. Will the proposal result in
a. GreatiR of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)',,
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18, AESTHETICS, �Will the proposal, result in the
oobstructz-on of any scenic vista or view open to
the public, or Will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically Offensive site open
to public view?
-4
ly
11 1
.,X
1
YES
MAY1111 6rc�
? i 1:CREATION. Will the proposal result in an 111,1pact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recrergional
opportunities?
20. CULTURAL, RESOURCES.
a 'ill the proposal, result in the alt,eratian
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
Xe
b. Will the proposal result in advors phys'cq'1
or aesthetic effects to a Prehistoric or
historic building, structure or 01.aiject?
c. hoes
the proposal have the potential to CM.1 to
a physical change which would affect
uniqut'
ethnic cultural values?
d.. Will the L:roposal restrict exist ,ng relit; ,Uu
or saoY°ce) uses within the potential impact;
area?
X
V. DISCISSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
See attached
0 el
D Z 5�U ,�;x �{��a�,�Et�IV I ROhiMEi`ITAL EVALUAT I SIV AP 47-11-76 { p nr'l; a. oo }
This project consists of the segregation of an Oxi5ta.nq a0ricultural
Processing Plant from an almond orchard. Si nco the
Projoqt
consist of removal of the aq. processing plant from �i1liamnc�m Act
Contract restrictions, a use permit to allow the se r� atl on o 12
aO' processing plant of lcss than 40 g q ' ��
acres and a sca���t��ltte►-tt parcel moo
the environmental review procedure is necessary. Hawogor», Onao no
change in the operation_ ref the orchard will occur and
changes will take Place with the a � s'i mi l arl y no
g processing oper kti. Cit°l, no
significant impacts are e;•tpected. Theroject cons l
organization of the farm business. Items in sect%onf;t1 jc7``t3cl►�r�s�b in
and 14, that are marked for comments are Covered i �
TtOm X200 is chocked fF,r• a comment because while y tf1fs disCttt�t� on.
the is located within an archaeological
changes are to take place on the sensitive �irea,tne�physiC��l���tpty
significant, impacts to archaeological ate eexpected,.
•
App I itarit: Shimizu Bros. Inc.
Rale_gUEET
Assessor's Parcel
AF A-7-17-76
Log # 85 -12 -IQ -01
1. Type of Project-. Cancellation of Lard Conservation (Act
agreement, SLAbSOqUent Use permit, anti tentative parcol map,
2. Brief Description: To segregate e'xcisting ogricultut-al
processing plant from the neighboring almond orchard.
3. Location: On the north aide of Wilson t-,.,Andihg Road,
appruximately 1/2 mile west of Meridia-ti Road, northwest of
Chico.
4. Proposed Density of Development: N/A
V Amount a+ Impervious Surfacing: Aq, procetsing plant
poteltially as IOQ% cvercovored. Minimal Overcovoring in the
almond circhard.
6. Ar-oss and Nearest Public Road(s)-. Existing property +i-ontt-3
on Wilson Landing Road.
1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic systems
0. Source of Water Supply: Individ,.tal wells
9. Proximity of 'Power• Lines: to 01-cDerty
0. Potential for- further land divisions and development: 1\1 u ri L'�.-
under existing zoning.
Etygical EnvirohmL-nt!
i. Terrain
A. General Topugraphit Character: Flat valley orchard 1,qnds
b. Slopes: 0-2%
C. Elevatioh4, Approximately 1615 +t, A -8.L.
d. Limiting Factors: None
Soils
a. Types and tharactorititits: Thu pi-ccotsiho olanl.- is
predominantly yin il*,nitia Clay Loam while thoz arahord is
PrOdOmirlacltl-Y r-krwoll Clay Loam rind FG)rviell rJjiy hdotie,
the rarwell �r-rir--M it-, GMPN-a11Y Oily 10M61, and cicty adobes
ovor IoAm and WAIIdy lcl,=xm while thtf., Anitc r'.1,A-y [,.oars
tnvurlic,4-a-, ;a lvyer of hardpan.
b. Limiting 17actors-. A hardpan laypr in tho ar(sa of the ao.
proamssing plant at various depths.
:3. Natural Hazards, of the Land
a. Earthquaka- Zone,. Moder�,,te oarthquako intrItit;ity zone VITT
bi Erosion tzk'AbnU-'h None
to Landslide Potentialt Noho
d. rire Haizardl. Unclassified
ei Expansive Soil Potentiil: Mo6urato
4. Hydrology
a. 8utfatL- Water.- N000- on sito
b, Ground Water- t Abundant valloy aqui-fers
C, Drainage Characteristics-. Land droint, g*hcrally zuvathwosit
to road'•"id(i'2 (Inches CYnCi Ilii e1� Crai,r'5yCrar
d, Annual Rainfall (normal):
e. Limiting Far -tors: Nooe
5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Coad
b, Acoustic Quality:. road
I. Air Quality: Good
ij ol✓ogial �Environmeri
8, Wildlife Habitat"Vegetatirnt. Aj(iRond or hbir
q. ds and animal. ct��tiltircrn �.rr valley
orchard land.
Gu1�ur�I�Envronment
in the area:
14. Archaeological and Historicalal Resources tizgh
5ensitivity area"
11. Butte County General Plan. designation': Orchard and F1el.
Crops A_grr
12. Existing Zoning•rices"'ng
1:5. Existing Land Use on-site; Almond rarchsrd and atj p.
plant
14. Surrounding Area:
a Land Uses: Qrch�rds and agric:ultUrcli lands with sine 'e
at rural d
anvily dwel1.ing ensities.
b. Zoning- a-4Ca orchard and Field t r cap
e Gen. Plan designations: wt par,.c,l�, rlc�ine
d. parcel Sues- Generallyacr,� and 1t{rr��w
two to three acres .rr�tnesite="cryisr rrr��rrh'{•
e. Population: Spart; e Agri .tli,-Lkral area
Character of Site and Area- Rr.u� al. Ag rr
16. Nearest Urban Area: Ch'to
17. Relevant 5pheros of Influence: Negro
men
. Standards Urban Area. No
ie. improve on 5ervice� Nord Station 41
19. Fire PeOte i (State Fire Station
'
a. Nearest .ottbi . 4)el1s and +ire �ankor only
b. Waver F1vai1a6i1i.,y,
2 Schools in Area% Chico Unified School I)i', utri ct.