HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-130-085APPLICANT Ronald Owens/Noel Owens Log487--04-24-01
ADDRESS, 80 Owens Road, Chico, CA 95926
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Waiver Application to divj c10 1.�52��� �jcres
to create 3 parcels at X+ acres each and 1 parcel at 42.1^SG dr;re.;
LOCATION on the e westerly side of Hwy. 99 approximato l.,y 0, 90 Miles
southerly of Cana Highway, North Chico area
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBRR(S) 47-13-85 47-1.0-138
A-40 Orchard &
ZONING� _..GENERAL PLAN—-Vie3wep&PROJECT CONSIST; 2?w,M�_.�ti.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REPORT',__
TATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATU E
LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?
DATEAPPLICATION RECEIVED 4--24-87
AMT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL ENOINEM Nor�thstar Engineering
ADTJR'SS 20 Declaration Drive, Chico, CA 95926
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT PREPARED �. .
BOVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE VXUD
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECF,AT2ATION - DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED
Mi IMPACT REPORT DATE CER'FivS'ED_
,S'T'ATE CLMAINGHOUSi: NO.
SUB. COMMITTEE MUTING _DATB
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DAT
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION-
APPEALED
CTIONAPPEALE 7 F AI PP'EAL HEARING DATE
SOARO AC'T'ION
COMMENT'S FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S S REPORT
a
To
.,._......1400 Tenth Street, Ro,)m Office Of Planning and Resehrch�'-�rzo�i r 11ut C 0 County121. pIntill }ng Department
Sacramento, CA 9581,'ar 7 COMILY Conter Drive
or a �. !, � 3 r OrOvi lle, CA 95965
X County Clerk
County of Butte��.. G, EMERO
SUBJECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance w) 111 :;Option 21.108
or 211.52 of the Public Resourcos Code,
Log X187-0
Oct Title
P
Tentative Waiver 47- 0• - bonald Owens
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person 'Telephone Number
(if submitted to Clearinghouse)
John Mendonsa, Public Works (916) 5N-7266
Project Location
On the westerly side of Highway 95) approximately 0,90miles
southerly of Cana Highway, north Chico area,
Project Description Tentative Waiver
application to divide 162± acres to create
three parcels at 41± acres ei�ch and I parcel at, 42i acres
This is r;o advise that the Butte County ,Advisory Agency
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-doscri'bed project on , 11-30-87 and has made
the following determinations regarding the above-describedprojecrt
1. 'file project „ will,, . X will not, have a significant effect on. the
environment,,
2, An Environmental Tmpdct• Report was prepared rot this project
pui;suant to thn provisions of CEQA,
A Negative Declaraiwirin was prepared for this
project pursuant to the
prOvisiotis of CEQA,
3. Mitigation measures-.....�',QM� L -Were not, made a condition of the
approval. of the ra t j q ec;t .
Vii. A statement of ovOrriding conbidorati.ons was, � wets not, adapted
for this project,
This is to certify that the final' EIR With comment's and tafspotts(An and Cocord of
project approval is available to tilt! general public at
ButLa CounLv Planning Department
CoUnLy Ccintet Drive
01-0vi I le o CA 9596
Date Received for ri.'l 1 ng ani
L
Posting at OPR
13111 TurpIn., S t>t' of 1�l�atinbl•
ON
p ����� r 1W'JA
(11"IRT.TFIED MAM
Butn
A(
DEPARTMENT Or: PUDLIC WORKS
WILLIAM IA" tmIi I I Noi I tA 1- r, Diroolor
Uuff* Co. r1annhig CMV9 OUNTY CENTER DRIVE - 011Ov . ILU, CALIFORNIA 19.965
Tol"Pholifil (9161 ORIW
DEQ 1 1987 RONALD,(), McCLROY
00puly Vff!'Clor
oroville, Callforpla November 30, 1987
Ronald Owens Rt : AP 47-10-1380 67-13-bi
80 Owens Road Tentative Waiver Application
Chaco, kA �JDVLU
Dear Mr, Owens:
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency nold on
November 30, 1987, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of
environmental impact anC approved. the tentative parcel map on the
obove-referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the
attached sheet,
Ir tiro appeals are timely filed—within ton (10) days or the date of
the Advisory Ag*.ncy's approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final,
When tho conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in order
for you to file Your "final Map" with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by the Advisory Agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contest this
office,
Very 'truly yoursi
William Chefr
Diroctor of Public Works
4 in Me_n&Vnk1
Ir
sistlazt Dirv(�too
III us
attachment
cc., Planning Department
thvironmontal ltealth�Departmeht
NorthStar tng,
Porinl.d Owens
85, 3 Parcels on Waiver A
m`ilas on rhe westerl 1'Alicataion, AP 47-10-
:8outherly o.� Cana t y side of ttz.8hway 59 a 138 and 47..11-
y- North Chico area. ' PPlox' 0.9p
1't►bl is Works conditions; 2n8ineer;
;I provide
two-way traversable
a county maintained access ,,b
.road. or stat g-LD�i to each
"� Access o i.ghway, 1�nreol.
to be reserved in de
for dodication oh deeds a;
tie final, mep, per county ordinance rrttcl ulJcA�ed
3
pay any delinquent; taxes or current
Pl.ann:ing De -Pt. conditions; taxes as i.-equired,
�► l)oai
mate a 50 ft. 5etback alon
/+ ass n no dovelo � the swa�.e
pment area. crossin
.a
Note on Ma � parr.uti�s 3 and
the wcstorll residential structures
y right-
0111 -way Of Ni shall besetbn
tionlp' th Dept, condl�llway 99r ck 200 feet
.tio,�
6 8ither
prove that Parcels
usable sewa8e disposal or I, 2, 3 and
Subdivision Ordinancr, comply4 each contain 'the
for continued �+'xth Apehdix VII Butte County
a andards for the creation of Agri cultural �ricultural production.
pnrcels
(rater-Departoie tt 10 Memorandum
4� r:
7"01 Butte County Y Agency
r't6a�ta
y
Planning Director
au tri � r REPORT ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MATS OF RONALD & NOEL
(lGd
AP#47-13-85, 47-10-138 1:1dS ON
October 26, 1987
This is a proposal to divide 162 acres into 3 aa,,�
41. acres each and 1 parcel at 42 acres , P t.� .ls e�;t
A-40 (Agricultural., 40 acre parcels The prehiMIL zojj1 Lnq 1,s
of the Butte County General Plan des - TheSLah�sNf#{'! Pla.il MLip
Orchard and Field crops. The Safety Element indiarea as
this project is in a moderate fire hazard area. that
specific or community plans for the area: Whore are no
The Property is under a Williamson Act Contract Cf
vation Agreement) with a 40 acre minimum
division as (1nc1 Consca
Proposed complies with the CeneralP7saklo-� The
and LCA contract; , zoning
This project is one on which a Negative Declaration regardinc
environmental impact has been recommended,
.`environmental Quality Act and Butte. County Environmental
California �
Review Guidelines require that y mental
Declarations be approved or disapproved involving Negative
the date of a completed app1icationevedhe�shx11moix months
�ont so
expires October 24, 1987. The applicants' period,
NorthStar Engineering,repreSentative
and has verbally requestedaaawaiverof the Of timeo ur8ua time limits
Government Code Section 65950. ten requo8 t to
shortly. The waiver is nccessarYhtowcontinaeequest is expected
application and will processing of this
to meet the Heald; Departwmentthe
egapplican �with additional tame
being submitted }7riorLlrsua q this waiver
denial is recommended punt
shed
odGo�earift on this maps
In the event that the waiver of time linitstisodecoivddo'G595tl
applicant and the Health Department clearance obtained, from -the
approval �.s recommended subject L -o the following conClitions;
1. Designate a 59 foot setback along the swab: c A
8 and 4 as a no development are&6 I.rassing P�rcols
2. Note on Map: All resident .
ial structures sha1jleo setback
200 feet from the westerly right-of-way or i(l.(J)I 99
LT- jmc
cc : & Noel, Owens
NorthStar Engineering
Hutt® co. hlnnfiII14 " rflTtl..
J U Nj a3 1('iRl
Orovillo i:a1i1►'�it
Aw L
1025 Village Lane
• Chico, California 95926 a (916') 342.5991
ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEY OF A.P.N. 47.10-138 & 47-13.07
BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
BY
JAMBS P. MANNING
PROJECT DES0RIP`fION: The proposed project is for a four pearc ni subdivision of
165± acres of land, A,P.N. 47,10.138 & 47-13-87.
Je of
PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located
adjacent to 110 Meridian Road and ('1tnrl est hwary, 3!'
Highway 90, between the intersections with
miles northeast of Nerd in Butte County. The property covers portions of tlae SSI,
1/4 of Section 23, the aW 1/4 ofSection 24 and the NW 1/4 of Seiction 25, T. 23
N., R. 1 W., Nord Quadrangle, 7.5' series.
PROJECT APPLICANT: Ronald Owens
PRIOR DATA REVIEW; Prior to conducting a field sur NortveY heast Information h
rsi terte t Of
o
archaeological site record files maintained by tile
determine if piny
Previously recorded i'culturalaresoaurces Wereventory were
locatedsiawithin t:obi adjacent to, the
_ p were listed eis:
protect Hated within the oproject area.d prehistoric car historic :spas
boing located
DATE OF 1?18,LD INSPECTION; June ?, 1gt3'1
1,aNVIRONMENTAL SETTING-, The site is relativel level
a9vicr on l�h�el land
r � ated
at an elevation of 1.00+ feet. Tile only surface
eplielneral drainages, howvevor Rock Creek is located approximat* 0,29 tulles to
the south. The nage +,egeteation has been disturbed by agricultural activities eared.
no trees are located on the property. The only structure berated on the propel^ty is
an open barn Witt, a metal room.
SURVEW N i,aT l()l)()l. KW;, The focus of tile field sarvv Mq ra visual ltaspection of
the a ,aticl surface felt anatari(ils cr fe 'Ile
indicative of prehistoric or early
hist ,:ac activities. The survey w+As ti`t�oa�i+likhetitl by walking rrr8ul:arlY spaced linear
t assorts with an bppro itnnt 15 inetor interval spacing over the enc;ire project
s.y°eo. (,round' cover was :sparse sand provided ve=ry good ground visibility.
N terisals or features indicative of Prehistoric or early historic
PINNINGS, o ins
activit=y+ were observed within tiro praject bciunelaries,
RrsCOMM'ENDATIONSs
It is recommended that archaeological clearance be uranted
for the proposed protect site. The proposed protect will not impact any oultural
resources of prehistoric or historical significance and it is highly unliholY that
buried cultural resources, not visible on the surface, are located on the proportY�
No further mitigatiori measures are recommended.
J ,nes 1, Manning
Archaeology Consultant
Al'I'I;01% V
Ah
W
I.NVI RONMENTAI, C11F.C:KI.l.`t'►" FORM
(t n tir c c,nil,l rt�ec["�}ay�l.�ric� /1�crc'Y1 I,og it 87^04-24m01.
All 114'1-:1,0-1361 47-1.3-85
liA(wK(�1tClllNl)
1 , Name�, I' proponent
Ronald 0wens/Noel,Owens� . _
Address or propoliel►t and rrprrsV"tnt 1 Ve i i r appl ic'nblr+l
80 Owens hoad._ ___ -..r
rthStar, E4 gineet 1T1
A Chico, Ca, ` o 95926 20 Declar,{ation_ 1)1.,1NO
" Chico, Ca, 95926
'1iengatve _4laiver
T l . �IANhA'CC�ItI'N1J 1 NC�ti It►_
a 1',�; tlAi' llli NO
0, Does the proper i have th }��atc�nt i;ll �❑ cle};rRarlGr �titc�
quality or the i►vn><irnnmvntor ,tr suhstattt9ally reduce
the habitat �,I tlnlllnticrntr drerpllbrlow,cause scir. .l
fish or ivi'ldilIc ► i
sustaininp lt'veis, threaten to eliminate a plant or
aniirinl t`olvitttnity, reduce the number o Strict
)1"the
range 01 ..1 1 'lTii
"are or enuangered plant or "
0011111 v important examplob of the mujnr periods
fir ('alit,>rnia hislory ol- 11170,his;tOry? d. �..
loog' thv prnivet have the potential to ach`leve
h, I
tihnrt�t�Q benefits to the detriment o►' inny-try,
c'llti`i1"C21t11,el1tC11 i)ltl:+'.' lA short-term impact on the
V 11Vtre1111Ile 11t 1`i t'i:S' which occursill ;r 1`elat'i��e1
brief perl0d 111tlmv while 101111,-tc'lm impacts w1I1
a. a
l,pdtrre l;ntcl the t'�ltut`r.1 _
ore
c ,
Illy the test}i` but itrurltl}c�ltivcltiacts �Yrulli�icterahle? (A4
,rl ly 1 i.Illr
1,t 1'eic'r:t �m�t�� i1tlpRll"l flit flats t,rr tlitarL' separate t'CS�t)111`CL`'S
whole the impact on Bch resource i s real nt i vt } o
:;mal}, hot where the orre'ct of significant.) lOii1i>�1G� _.... h.
impacts oil the cn1 ironmCnt 1
tl. lrt,t"+ tlitr���t�ihstantialcE►Gl'c'111t.e orfacts on human lvil} �.,
hr� ,S, vithur" dim7tiv or inditectlwr':
Il►:llPMI.vA ION tTo �ht, , (11)t11letod by the lend AMM
trn the 1�,1 ar,.- r,t this initial V alutlt ion.
I 'ltil t inn tht 1'1�:1,r 4x11 Ill'olecti'ltl1,"}Il ltl'tJARA1 OT itftl�rw1i 11 heiprePur d..nineunt c
(' on 'tX11.` ,nvlrohmtrlt, and 1 ,r`1)ic`-1 tould have a signir
" rw
ilrv} that ;t►tllr,ut�,h Ole 1,r,11rtt xl 1
t`a�lt e � t i'u t trrl t ht' environment , 11rrc°Ate l C N [vli1:A"�t�ell°k+ described i bednoil
t't klet lit th i�; t"'u;v hc'r'3lv,t- th( il'1'lt� r�°r, , t`t , A Ni.0A'1' VY.
t}ic' atta heel :,llcyt,t: 11nu1' liven u.ldt'd to the l j'
1tl�a�f .�11!�� ► li'�'°r tai 61 fyv 1rt vlr,trpd.
�cn�A1hlecn ;;t,'iGttt et
loyl tW itupn;od PV"jVVl rPfs required,
equl l ed
.A an !"Citt}NIAL IMPA"r1Nt11i
the rtir,ltett,
11,1'11 , May 6 X987
C(1li"1"PT t1l° `}1U1'l'1:, PLANNTNO �hlil'Alt'16ii':N1
Lattr� M. mtlttrlls
Assdcia ',P �t `✓ '��
a
ENVIRONMENTAL IMOCTS
,5(plt lanations oF all "yes" and Itmaybeanswers are required
OR attached sheet(s))
YES MAYBBI NO
1, EARTH. Will the prnpn,_ni -roc"i+ 4 '4 ZX4
.tL sir cUnL:
-- --Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
a.
geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
- overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, cover%nj or modific,I
4t,*Qn, of any
-unique geologic or physical features?
e. Increase in 'wind or 'water erosion, of soils,
either on or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition ori erosion of•beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify -the channel of
a river or stream or the bed uf, the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of Prime -agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
hi Exposure of people or property to geologic
haza,.-ds such as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
24 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial:
'F—M Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes)
c, Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate,.
locally or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
0- the rate and amount o,(' -urgaca runoff?
c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve
ments, including vegetation removal, channel-
ization or culvert installation?
d.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
f.
discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, inclijdjLng
but not limited to temperature, -dissolved
oxyggin or turbidity?
9.
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
h,
Change in the quantity or quality of waters —
'or
,ground
either through direct additions inth-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations?
14
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
available for public water supplies?
j.
Exposure of people or Property to water
ards such
related h . az h flooding?
�2,
YES
MAM Nig
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the Proposal result in subsWntial-
Change in, the diversity of species, or
nunsbor
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. tion of the numbers of
any unique, rapo
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into 11
�-~
area, or in a barrier to the normal. replex7.1sh-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. fill the proposal result in sti})AttAntial
a. C7ange in the diversity
of species, or r1r�r►tfiarars
ospe�-it:.
of animals (birds; ,landsar�l,�ttalsIng reptiles, fish and shell fish,
N',".thic organisms or ins cts) ?
b.
Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rtirG
or endangered species of animals?
_
c. Introduction of now specie, of animals into
an area., or result i,Y a barrier to the tnig'ration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration
to existing fish or wildlife:
habitat?
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial.-
F.—Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
7.
LIG14T AND CLARE. Will the proposal produce
gni ficant Light and
glary:?
B.
:AND USE. Will the proposal result in: a
si :est 'al alteration Of the ,
present or 1)1,anned
land use of an Area?
9'
NATURAL RESOURCES: Will the proposal rosult in
subs tanthal:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
b. Depletion of any non-renewable natural
Ix
re irce^'�
OF U1)5ET. w;'.l? ;'Ic. t",Mlposal involve:
ox expiosinn. of !-he releaso Of hazard-
ous substances (xne lai' i ?:, but not limited iso,
Oil, Pesticides, chemical .�r -radiation) iti the
event of an accident or up .-t ,, r4nditions';�
b. Possible intev'orence with at. r-mv
}�
r�
n ency
response plan or emergencyerrac ,,? plan?
11:
POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the
xstribution, density, or
groWth rate of thu
Population?
12-,
HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?'
�.
18.
13 T.FtANS�p�ATIONICIR'
result ink"_' 4ULA?'ION. Will the
a. Generation of substantial proposal
movement? additina7. vehicle
b• Effe:ts on existing
demand ��r n,ety parking?king facilities, or
Ce Substantial g
Systems: impact on existing transportation
dA Significant.alterations to
Of circulation or movement Present patterns
goods? people and/or
e• Alterations to waterborne
f* Increase ill traffic hazardsra l` or air traffic? --�
bicyclists or pedestrians? to motor vehicles,..
14. PUBLIC SRRVICES.
}ti'il1 the p
upon, or result in a need faro Proposal have an
governmental net, or altered effec�
a. Pirtental services
Protection?
b, Police protection?
Ce Schools
MA Nr.}
d= Parks or other �--
e„ rlaintenanco of recreta1*nal facilities?_._.
roads? Publie facilities
including �.-
OtheY governmental services?
'rLRGY, }yi,1 the----
proposal result in;
d' U of substantial amounts of
�' Substantial increase. fUel.or
sources of encz" in demand u on existing gy or requi.^e the deve sting �
Of new sources of energy?
o meiit
U`,PILITIh�, }gill t;he
neiy ms or prope�al result in a need
following; ' substantial altera�:Ions to thei"� r
a. Power or natural ga,s?
b, C,)r:imunications sYst`ems?
4. }t'i'ter avai:lab'1i.t , —'-
c. Serer or sept:, tank?
e. Storm water drainage?
�. Solid waste grid---
disposal?
HUMAN HPALT'II . 1Vi l l the
oat of ani Proposal. result in:
health half health haiard or potential.
h. Exposure of people mental health)?
hazards? Pntent..a.l he"111th
Ah8Tr-}VTICS. Will the �t1 of a.ny scenicposal vistaroi•ult vie no e
the public; or will the OPen to
1.
creation oi` an !esthetically Sal result in the
ti, public drier? Y Offensive site opei
WE
YES MAYBE
NO
1.0. Lg 11, AT'Will the proposal -result in an,,impact•
or quantity or existing recreational
j yr the quality
opportunitie,s?
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES. e
W11"" j tie proposal result in the alterati
ge
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b, gill the proposal result, in adverse physlca.
'
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric ar
or object?
historic building, structure
c. Does the proposal have the 'pot, ntial to cats is
a physical change which Would affect un.igoo
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing rel 91OU9
or sacred uses. within the potential impact
area', ,
V. DiscuSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
�x5x4�N tyr, NVIRONMENT'Al- EVI�I�UATION
AP it 47-10-138,
or
l h, Approximately l acre will be overcoverd i � l ona l t �ivorr overai ng�can be
tine ,-access easement t o Cfj,)o l i
Ad the 4C1
expected upon leve1oprnent of homesites on each Parcel, Iver?
acre, parcel size, this impact i s not significant.
l of the Anita clay acaiae
{s r
101 Erosion potentiain order to
n^eatest along drainage sw�les.
slight°. Erosion
ft. sep issetback along the
minimize y potential always� rds, the 50 ment
should
siHiale cr�sslng Parcels and, e designated a no-ev=
lOP
area. for
vttlon
1 ,yid-t The property 15 oductlonr. a The acontracterstat",es theepermltted
Intensive agricultural pr
use {s gr8ting, with a 40 acre minimum. The division meets the minimum
rrqu i rements Of the cont=ract, and Is not expected to change the
Mgr d cu l turd use
ect to 60
6b t Highway `�9 is a ono l se carr i dor^wPaC,bedb w 1 thls 1 di n 100-200, 2 are hand 60 db
db within 1 00 feels o f the right-of way , 61 flan i tion�t;, l f l es 60 db as 8
thereafter. The Butte Countyno I Se
reasonable exterior rro i �eshou should of the fo orderOti in ow i �no t minimize
ei ona ,e
exposure,, the appl l Gran CJemonstra�e at
ra 1,o Mtaot building setback on
Parcel l and 2 Gir,
the.
he time of bu 1 di ng peras i t that construction V4,111 t Meet
d�ha ULAt ;e
Gounty Nolse E1emont, and achieve an indoor noise levol
H The property is des1gnated r hard and alcad slZO, Theedivisalon �;d
Under LCA c=ontract for 40 acre m 1 n l mum p r
pr_Opo,sed compiles with the General Plan and
zoning,
l 1 ti* i s%ory and development: of the. four 1 ots w1 1 1 Marq I nal l`y l hCt-ease
housing opportunities
in th 1 s rural aree.cou 1 d be generated d I `;+ l e i ran
{ e Up to 4U vehicle l.rl ps per c{�y
and f r.r l 1 buildout of the propert { es .
1 c, t : rorata�re 9� 4 s l onal enrar�aer.rrmonts G,r,t.r, t,t7e
on 111 ghway . , ar :1 acid l t
o f dancer I . Numerous dr 1 vt_w y'� con st i tru+�e a tro f `F { c t,0Zar_d
h l hwray .nre of h 1 cih I-Vi J low
l ncre8a aed turning movein�Ints, and the m 1x { n 1
end t,r �a f f 1 C . Any encroachment onto the h i ohwny x1101 1 raaeet w & �f, the
Spti_
,
z- The map m~�y need to be ruler 1 ryrrael , conso 1 l �Ja+, i nrr
r pi;,rrj,/a1 of r altren5
titre two proposed access points. {��rrwcel s l and 2r'r^arxl rl share a rlr�mmon
dr 1 vew�y with pnrce 1 s � rind 4 a ccess t ng from acu 1-P10-� 50c W
for
1 � Residential devol oprnent Will Qenerate
end ��c*tar��t�li�►"oi��isedr�arar�cedl
governmental serelcesr Given the current l :�e
site, this Impact is not slgnlflcant.
t r t i i r.t.�
for
208! A Nre'�c.ord ose i search
}rdehtbl fyrethierasens l t l v l ty 7+yof� I�rht ieverp� ae�l oF�
er�chaeol nth 1 cal resources, and determine whethor� an
��rch
survey
0
shQr..rld be pr,�pmr^ed In the event the records search r + K��ntn��►iil� rr��alnsi
r Ut-Vey, i t w i l l not be requ i red by the County.
i. T a: A record search will be required to determ i rtie t.i jet +3cNrr", l �,1 �4i i ty Q
l i pl-operty to archaeological resources
r.
Applicant: lona i d t Awens/Noe l Owens Assessor's Par(- 1 it
Ate 47-10- l 11) i a17..1 �-85
dg 1# 57--04 x,olmill
DATA SHF_GT
A. Pra_iec-t Descr_i at.i on
I. ryp'e of Protect Land Division
2. Brief Oescr pt i ori Tentative Parcel 1"100 by Waiver to vreate
4 parcels at 40+ acres each.
3 L.otat i on On the west side of Highway 99, approx i' ma to 1 y .9
Miles south of lana Highway, North Chico area.
4 Proposed Density of Development: One dwelling unit pnr 40
acres.
S. Amount of Impervious Surfacing: 1111nimal
6 Access and Nearest Public koad(s ): Parcel1 and , 2 Frant on
Highway 99 Parcel 2, 3, and 4 will take access off new road
(:c, be constructed.
"• V hod of Sewage Disposal Sertic tank 1eachfields.
rjf '.)urce of Water Supply: Individual wells.
' . Oro'x`i in i ty of Power L i nes= Along H I ghway 99.
1 .:' : Potent 3 al for further land divisions and development
C"' w *•runt i on of 4 houses are possible.
S0- t 1 a a
bl�l,,> . .. env � r•anmort L-
1. Terrain
a� General Topographic Character Level valley land
b slope$ 1;
c. E 1 evat i inn 175"180 ft.
d. L i ra l t I ng ractors None
2. Solis
a -
Types and Characteristics Anita clay adobe, darl,
brOwn , 1-3 f= t . , with Pronounced checks whon airy, may be
underlain by coment ed beds at 6 ft
b. Limiting Oactorsw Poor drain age,
a. Natural Hta'zards of t•,he Land
a. 1znrthquak-Y Zonae Moderate .
b• I�ros i can Poto t l al Slight.
C. L.andsl l de Potpntl al e Low.
d . Pira Haz�ird e IH�,d�rate .
a Ppakls i vo
80111 Potential,.11 i :71�
4. Hydrology
A. Surface wbter`a' SM811 8wal e er-gasses Darnel a, and
borders Parcel 1 and 4.
b: 01-duhd Wator: Area of h i fah groundwatew withdrawal
C. Dralnagc Characteristics Natural avcrland flbHf,
generally southwest.
d. Annual Rainfall (normal)"- 20-22"
e. Limiting Factors: None.
6. Visual /Scenic Quality: Highly scenic vlewt� of mountoln to
east,
6. Acoustic Quality: Impacted by Highway 99 1r�jiCic.
7. Air Quality: Good
B 10 of og I cal , (Env I ronmant
6. Vegetation: Grassland pasture.
9. W I I d1 I f e Hab I tat= No rare or endangered spec I es _,J,jt)Vin On
Department of Fish and Game maps.
Cul Lural - Environment=
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources In the area: f t #_, c o r d
search required.
ii. Butte County General Plan designation: Orchard anr3 I-leld
Crop.
12. Existing Zoning." A-40,,
13. rExigting Land Use on-site: Grazing lane, 'barn.
14. Surrounding Area;
a. Land Uses: Gt-atiog land, duck club) welding shop5o
b. Zoning: A-40.
c� Geh4 Plan Doslonation. Orchard and Field Crop, Oran and
Grazing, Aerlcwltura l Residential Last of Highway 99.
d4 Parcel Slzez'. 80-
0. Population". Sparse..
15. Character of Sitai and Area'. Rural grazing area,
'16, Nearest Urban Aroa: Chico.
17. Relevant Spheres of influoncet N/A
18. Improvements Standards Urban Area= N/A
19. Fire Protection Servicet
in. Nearest County (State) Fire Stotlohlo #41 2 mlle5 south
b. Water Avallabilityg Eholno Capacity,
20, Sthe)ols in Area. Chico Unir-led School Dlstrlct.