HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-130-123�
� '
'syr
.. e
•
; .
�� 6
� � ,
'b1
l
LAL:
Pr R A '
4J!
f : t a
1OTICE OF NX.F.1'lE''`L'YMI
{ tJ
`llt)' Q sec'r:ou ry for R000lxroe a JUL 6
._r
z tk� �•f;,L c e• � a Room 1311
1t•1(� Ni r�
S.ac.ramot:t-o California 958111
A. JAciNTR
UY
CNI CounLy Cil.rrl{, Cottony Of ljugr
25 Cou_ ntj,Oon•r,or Drive
FROM: Planning nepartmertt
7 County Center Drive
O;rovil.l e Cala f oPnia 95965_ (Filed,)
83_ 07 05 02
Project Title METE McMnEock
Boundary Line Niodiiic.ation AP 47-13-123,124,t.26
Project Looa,ton Speci'Cic Approximately 2400 feet west o M.
Highway 99, on the south 'side of Anita Road, Chico area.
Project Location - City GOUAty
Chico _ Butte
Desoripti8n of of Project
Boundary Line Modification
Name of Public Ae eiicy Approving Project
Agellcy `
Butte _County Adtrisoyy
3
Name of Pernon or Agency +;airy inn out Pro j ec t
Mark McClintock
Exempt Status: (.Chock .Uzie)_
Ministerial (Sec.
Derl,arert. lanergeticy (Soc. '50711 (a) )
_.
Emeren ; Project 81;yO71 (b) wtt[ (c) )
X Catc�;o7�a.c�tl. Exemption. t�.ott. S�t;��t;e i� e and, sect
.._..; � Type on, number:
7
class, 5 (a)
it asons why project
r ' � 1i
1
Ptoyect Meets the defin'.Ition of a Class 5(a) exemption.
r
1
0ontact Peroon Area Codi: Telethon e Ext:elasion
]:s 5916 534,-4266.
Me cl.bnsa Public �Vor � .
tLb
If fiI by p n "
'h
i. Ati, ach er tIzied dt,ou on.tr of exemption " � �'1 en. f].Tlt'iing
2. 1T -ns a r.et;iao of Ox.emption been filed, by the public,
1
i agoncy kpprov:iu the) pro j eo t;? Yos_� No,_
'i
S:C4ato
8tepliotv A. Streeter
- Smnxor tlanaer _
6
Ole
re aun
All '11.1
LAND OF NATURAL WPAITFI AND SEAUTY
r
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CLAYCASTLEBERRY, Dlrec:tor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95465'
Telophonei (06) 534.468)
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF
DopUty Director.
�uAugust 1,, 1983
{o Co, Planning Comm
Mark McClintock 1983 RB;: AP 47-13-123, 124 and 126
Rt. 4, Box 430 orooto, Boundary Line Modification
_Chico, CA 95926,11
Dear. Mr. McClintock
At the regular mecting of the Butte. County Advisory Agencit held
on August 1, 198's, the Agency approved your Boundary Line
Modification for AP 47-13-123, 124 and 126, noting that the
project `is categorically exempt from environmental review and
SUbiett totheconditions of approval as listed on the attached
sheet.
if no appeals are timely filod--within ten (10) days o1= the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval --with the Clerk of i:he 'Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final.
If you Should have any questions regarding this matter, please
contact this office.
Very truly .yours
Clay Castleberry
Director of Public Works
I
_ a � n Men tis a
Asistant Director
JM/ds
attachment
CC Plannin"'/
Hea? th
Northstar Bnriheering
is
Mark McClintock BOUNDARY LINE MODIFICATION, approximately 2400 ft
West of Highway 99, on the south side of Anita Road, Chico area,
Assessor's Parcel Number: 47-13-123, 124 & 126
Engineer: No1•thStar Engineering
Public Works Department conditions are:
1. Prepare necessary deeds for recordation. Submit to Department
of Public Works for checking.
2. Verify that partial reconveyance of trust deeds has buten
accomplisheds if necessary,
3 Verify that there are no delinquent taxes due prior to
recording deeds or map,
4. After recordation of deeds, contact the Asses'sor's, Office and
request that the necessary parcels be combined so that no new
parcels are Created.
Health Dept. condition is
5. Locate if necessary relocate sewage disposal systems
g
xistiog buildjngs onto the rtdspectiVe parcel.,.
Planning Dept. condition is:
N'
6` All parcels to be at least 40 acres in size to comply with the
zoning.
j
_ I
t
`i
i
l
PLANNIO'COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET FOR IANTDIVISIONS
84_07-02-02
APPLICANT Mark Mcclintock
ADDRESS R -c. 1 Box 614 Cl ico ; CA 95926
MWER Shasta Vista Orchards,.Inc. Rt.1 Box 614 Chico,CA 95926'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel
Man dividing 159.02
acres to create j2ci.
P
�
_ a c c 1 2@ -4 61 a c
p c ,._-
cam- m4 Ca� ,15E .0 a ti
LOCATION
Annroximately 2400 Lt,
iyest of Highway 99,
on the south side of
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL'NUMBER(S)
1)c A tk t115 -
ZONING A-40 i -[V GER. F
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED_
lcl.--Crops PPOJEV;T CON 1STENT
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRII.i''�1.11 r7ll LISTIED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLISHED .- O. C. P. G, B.
DATE MAILING L.WT PREPARED
DATE MAIL -.OUT NOTICES WRITTEN .� 'MAILED NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DIRECTOR r S REPORT PREPARED
ENVYRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE FILED
,DETERMINATION
AND DATE X_ NEGATIVE DECLARATION w DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION DATE ADOPTED
M. IMPACT REPORT DATE OEPmIE'IED
SUB. COMMI'PTtE MELTINq DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE
ADVISORY AG'ENCY ACTION
BOARD ACTION
a.� V
COMMENTS
NOTICE OF DETERM1NfATI
1p
x'C?:offic , of Planning and 1, esearch FROM: Planuingrtlentin
1400 Tenth Street, Froom 121 7 Count. rater brivt
Sacramento, CA 95814 Oroville, 'C.4 -95q(
ti
County Clerk
County o Butte ELEANOR M, BECKER, County Cierk
By �,%;Wt !r ITM Deputy
�UB1EECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152
of the Public Resources Code.
84-07-02-02
jest Title
Tentative Parcel Map AP 41-13--123,124,126 Nark McClintock
State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone N,tmber
(11 submitted to Clearinghotise)
John Mendonse, Public Works (916) 534-4266
►�'ojeet
Location APPtox 2400 feet mast of Highway 99, 011 the aotith side
of Anita Road, Chico area
PFoject Descripticn
Tentative
Parcel p dividing 1.59.02 acres to create two parcels, one at
1.43.6acresandone at -II. - acres,
This i5 t; advise that the Bat.te Count' Adv sory Aaencv
tLeaa t-►ge icy or ttesponsible agency)
has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations
ragarding t�%e- above described project.-
1.
roject;1. The project „_, will, 4 will not, have a significant effect on the environment.
" 2. An Environmental Impact Reportwas prepared for this projeot pursoant
to the provisions of CEQA.
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the
provisions of CIrQA,.
The EIR or Negative Detlaraticn and record of project approval may be
exambied at
i
uxuu J. 4; Urs YJY0J
3. Mitigation measures were, were not, made a condition of the approval
of Mlle project.
40 A statement of Overriding Considerations was; was not) adopted for
this Project.r
Date Receaved for p'il'ing 1/11/S
Signature
S;tephetx A. Streeter
Senior pla,►ter
to
!Y, eti 'Tanuary L'5-95
fi
3
��-_NJNENNNDMWMMM�
N*AtiVV eV�
Safe
LAND OF NAYURAI,
DEPARTMENT or' PU13IC WORKS
WILLIAM g3m,- 411(° I4, Olrectrjr 1
7 COUNry Cf_'NTJEP DRIVE_ - orlOVII I r, CALIFORNIA 95965
TaI00,1nu* (91fj) 1.1,1.'1681
J,-rlu,�ry 3, 1985 '
mark McClintock
Rt- 1, BOX 614 RE: AP 47-13-123, 124 & 126
Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Parcel Map
Dear Mr. McClintock:
At the regular* meeting of the Butte County Advisor
y Agency held
Deuember 31, 1984, the Agency ado pted the negative
regarding environmental review declaration
LOW and approved
Map for AP 47-13-123p 124 & the Tcntc-ltive Parcel
listed on the attached sheet. 126 subject to the condit,
Ions as
If no appeals are tamely filedwithin ten (10) d
the Advisory Agency , s approval - da -
the of the date of
"-With the Clerk of the
this action will be final, hoard of
SuPervisOrs, c , h
When the 0 to conditions of approval
order foare r yo complied
file your ,final mapit With, it Will be in
D(partmenL of Publicorks With the Butte County
. for recordation within twenty
Months of the date oE approval by the Advisory Agency. -four (24)
If You should have an
conta-y questions regarding
:�t this off -ice, this matter; please
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director Of Public Works
JOhh
ontq
$istanL Director.
Attachment
PlPnnihg - Environmental PeVjeW
�',nvi'rOtimental Rerllh b0partmenE
North tar Engineering
Yb4l0ez Orchards, p. 0. BOX 34, Chios
PON -
Co.
mark McClintock., Tentative Parcel Map, 2 parcels approx. 2400 ft.
west of Hwy. 99► on the south side of Anita Road. Chico area.
r' AP 47-13-123, 124 and 1.26,
Engineer.: North Star
Public Works conditions:
1.. need to the County of Butte 30 right-of-way from the
centerline of Anita Road.
2j indicate a 50ft. building setback from the centerline of
Anita Road.
3. Show all easements of record on the final map.
4. Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
Health Department conditions:
5i Provide a 100 ft. learhfield free setback around existing
wells either within the property or within 100 ft. of the
property boundaries.
6. Show e 50 ft. lea4iiield setback from the drainage way on
parcels 1 and 2.
1
7
Inter-Departmental- Memorandum
Butte County Advisory Agency
TO:
FROM: Planning Director
Report on Tentative Parcel Map of D'a.rk McClintock on
SU$JECTI
AP 47-13-123, 124, 1.26
DA'TEs September 14 1984
< :
This is a proposal to divide 159 acres to create two parcels
62.68 acres, and one parcel at
at 40 acres +, one parcel at
acres. The present zoning is A-40 (Agricultural,
40 acre
General
15
parcels). The Land Use 'Plan Map of the Butte County
orchard and Field Crops.
There
Plan designates this area as
specific or community plans for the area.
are no
The proposal does not conflict IJith County zoning nor any adopted
County General Plan nor any County,
or proposed element of the Butte
specific or community plan.
Rccor,mend approval..
UIT:1k
cc Mark McClintock
NorthStar Engineering
CollOF BUT i`1?
l".NVt iltaNfitf N'1'Al, Ch1I'CKi, P T FORM
C-ta be omr__ _ems--b> �I;ericy l Log `n 83-,09-27-02
AP 47-13-123, 1249 126
t . 13AUUROUNLS
1 Name of prupea rent Maxl. McC].int,oek .. .
2. Address of propanont and toPiosent.ativrr Cit appl cablr�)
14 North
Box 6Starx ..�_... ;
_I �p v _.. _ _�. _,
.� �` Chi ca p CA 95926 _ 377 Conners Court �u� to B
Chi
3 Project 'description�emjy = 4
1l 'S �l _SC;,NITiCr11 CIi 'I 1'1AYIIL, NO
DiAN1iA'I OItY F l 1� U I1�C�.
quality o tht& ~eny environment, substantia de rode the
a. Does the project have the �tantial tol ogredO t .
he habitat of a fish .nr. wildlife species,, cause 0
fish or wildlife litipulatiott to drop bolow self
g levels, threaten to eliminate a plant he
an mal.rtcommuni ty ' reaude the number or rests ct `the
range of a rare or endangered plant of animal or
eliminate important examplos of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
h, Uoes the project hate the 11k)tt,ntinl to achieve
short-term, benefits to the detriment of 'lona-tr,rm,
environmental goals? toshort term impact nit the
environment is one which oae"Is In a relatively
t
brier period of ime while loligrtarm impacts Will
endure into the future �
Does t:ltu pro-sect have. i,�17t;'ts auhcla erre individu-
z . but e:uma 1, - - c�insiderabla, (A
ally limited, y
projdct ma)' impact otl two or more ,urate~ resources
where the impact on cash re (IJre t~ .4 relati'>elr�
maij, but wharir the effectof the teitell of those
milact:
rhe environment is sigilifiCanfi�)
on
cl, 000.% the project have environmental effects which
Will �„Ousd substantial advor;re effects ort human
b�rrngs, either directly Or_indirectly?
1 1 1 . ils i _�;Rt�1INl `r T (` o be eomilletod `by the Lead Agertoy) . �.
On tro basis of this initial. evAlUatiOn
I/1V1, find the proposal project 0001,1) NOT have a s.igrt Cicaiit e:ffoct
1. � repared.
on the
ertvlrortmcnt, anti n NktrACrtp� tTC?CLAtiCN will kit p
1/lgla find thrat althotIgh the proposed JitojOet 061-ild have a sign,' i
rant erfoct ort the enulranllltint, th01,10 W111 not be a sl.gnificant
effect in this case because the HTTt(1,AT10N W.A,URns described on
the! attached sheet hove been adOod to the proje�:t. A N11�A�TVF
hW.A1 T1ON will, be preparett ,
1/W11 rind the propostea pro;lcct MA) 110VO a :significant etfer<t art
covirooment, anti an: 1?Nt�IRONMI1XIA1. IMPACT 11111PClRT is ro�tuired.
th t.
Ct�tIN'1"" (11w 1t11C"111, PLAN
ilEPKATMIIN`i'
taUry Nt. T ttls
'r Ass 3.s ant p>l,anner
R v1
e;weel kiV:
U
TS:
? V , ENVI RONNIENTAi,0AL1
n.,yes", ", t0maybe" 1 required
xi' anat sons aly� s and maybe answers are r
on attached sheet(s).)
YES
MAYBE NO
1. EARTH, 1Yi11 the prapusal result in signkficant:
'-
a.
Unstable earth cozjdit*on,s or in chan`es in '
eazo rc su:bs°tructures?
g g,
rr,
b.
Disruptions, displacomeft"-sj compaction or
over coverinn of the soil?
C.
Change in topography rr ground surface
relief features?
d,
Destruction, covering or modification of any
features?
unique geologic or physical
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or °off-site? �...
,.�
f
Changes in de os:,tion or erosion Of beach
ori de osiL
Bands, or changes in, siita',"tzdeposition
or erosion ti�ltrch n ay modify the channel of
a riVor oe fitream or the b,ed. of the ocean a7!
,any bay, iM et or lake?
.,
g,
Loof prime agriculturallroductive,soils
ss yy p
"
outside designated urban areas2
h.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landsl>ides mud-
L
slides, ground failure or similar h'aza'rds?
2,. AIR.
Will the proposal result in substantial:
} a.
ambient
Air emissions or deterioration of a
b.
air quality?
The creation of gbjectionable odors, smoke,
or fumes? -.
c
Alteration of air movement;; moisture, or
4
temperature, or any change in climate,
v
locally or regionally?
R
: WATER.
Will the result in substantial:
proposal -
,
a
than es in currents or the course .or,
direction of wat,, r movements in either
b.
marine or fresh graters? �.
Changes in absorption rates; drainage patternsf-
.�.
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
c
Need for off-site surface ` drainage ' imp�`ove-,
ments, including Vegetation removal, chennel-
'
ization or culvert; installation!
d.
Alterations to the course or flow of
floodwaters.
e,
Change in the amount df surface water in any
wager body?
f r
we waters, or in any,
Discharge into surfa
alteration of surface water quality; including
` .
but not, limited to temperature, dsolvted
g.
ozyygen or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate of flow,
of ground waters?
he
Change in the quantity of.growid waters,
either thro'agh direct additions of wi,th-
drAwals, or through interception of an
q = s?
a t�..�ex by cuts or eX�a1� ation
i
Rdauction in the amount of water otherwise
avexla le for ubJ,a, o water supplies!
,.
J
Ex osure. o f people or property tq 'Mater
p
velato.d ha a:rat such as flooding?
-+
U
+ ,
�r S rIA d B F, NO
• 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the pxopcsa]
result in:
a. Generation of substantial adiitionnl vehicle
movement'? ,. C parking or
b Ltr,,.cts on existing Arkin ' facilities,
'
demand for g tation
ci SubstailtiAlnimpactkon "'sti