HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-130-140j
.0.
O
s
cuFRT FOR LAND DIVISIONS
Mi chae AshbyLog#86-00-16-01
-
CANI'
3549 Esplanade, Chico, CA 95926
Same yn
TPM to divide 4.3 acres to create 3 parOclS
p1,tQ�7ECT DESCRIPTION
at (one acre plus each)
LOCATION
on the•east side of us Highway 99 approximately ,000'pouth
cf ads nterspction with Merridian Road, Chico area
47-1.3--140
P,SSESSCR' S PARCEL NU'MBER(S) _ — .
Agricultural PROJECT C0jjSjS1VENT?_
ZONING SRS I GENERAL PLAr1, Tt-�s�:der�t�'ai-'""� 1�O�LC. �.----�--
GENERAL .T•AN CONFORMANCE REPORT, ROE AP.PT,ICANT SIGNATUf
.I1AND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS'?
September 16, 1986 .:--
DATE, APPLICATION Eligl e & Assoc ates
i AGENT/SURVEYOR/CIVIL
P.O. Box 923, Red B111ff, CA 96080 �. .
ADDR'SSS s
DATELANNINO DIRECTOR'S REPORT' RE'ARND v
EN`VIAONM t NTAL _y
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
DETERMINATION � NEGATIVE DECLARATION - DATE
AND DA'1!1s�
MITIGATED NEG DECLARATION
ENV, IMPACT REPORT DATE
$12ATT CLI 117NCT OUSE NO. _ b_ .
.- .,
SUB.COMM7Tr1' % MEE.,rIN DA'x'1
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DATE_ ...�%
ADVISORY AGENCY
ACTION . w w
.ADV Y
APPEAL REAI
APPEALED
M0 DATE
HOARD ACTION' _ . ....�..��•�. »..,.�,.,,_ ..,�..,:»:»..
COMMENTS FOR PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPO:^T
CU116Co. Plarr+ing
MAY 8198)
orcW1ua,
CaMOMA
guite, coaft
:U OF NATURAL V.!11A1 i'1I H
.,, DEPARTMENT OF F'UCII,{ y WJFiKs
WILLIAM (Bili) Chlar'(" t?ir�c�or
%59b5
7 COUN-ty CENTER DP cE .ORO,111.N 1f,g ALIFOR141A
RONALD D. McELRROY
D�ppiy p�teciar
may 8, 1989
11 RE AP 47-15-140
Bachman. &Associates
Tentative Parcel tvl,.lp
3012 The Esplanade
Chico, CA 95926
Dear Gentlemen- � dvi sdry Age cyheld order
Oft,
the Butte County r
At the regular meeting ro erty, The new date
the Agency granted a time extension of 3 years
May 8, 1989s on the above-referented p P
to file the final�mapll; 1992,
or, expiry► ion 3s may x 15 days oC the date
filed --within fifteen r
no appeals are timely roval—with the Clerk of the Board of
If Agency's aP
oC the
Advisory
t theeryisors, this action will be f�na1 � leasa contract this
7f you have any gUe5tions regarding this matter, P
oCfice. Very truly yours,
tgi.11iam Cheff
Director of pub1l:c Works
"3o rl �iendons��
Assistant Diret��1.0r
,1h1/ ktc
attachment
cC. planning pepsrtmen
Environmenral lima th nepartment
Larry Knadler
1 ..... ii^rpl alp `y�ti i'^ E
AA
.':�:rpt'�GItRTtSIp''►1�IC�M+�'i! , .�rY,. ���'.Y.'3 �.:T�
T•se��x� �'.I:� i:�:i+:`1"7r+l.i.�Ty'1�T".5.�.
{^„ F . dM : Butte County
'nl Releah Planning Department
Office of Planning M;,r% Center Drive
County
1400 Tenth Stru t, om 121 oroville, CA 95965
Sacramento , CA 9581' Y j U Ti 1
or
XX County Clerk t�P.N17f�Ct� J. t,�r�li,a�a�'ati��� C� �ut�
(�.Y MER .,
County of butte JV �. -� ----
or 21152 of
of Determination in comp11ai1ce with Section 'L 110$
S'IJBJEC'x Filing of f the Public Resources Code.
Name
AP It
Project Tithe AP47_13-140 Michael Ashby
Tentative 'Parcel Map Telephone Number
Contact Person
State Clearinghouse Numbehouse {i6) 53g=7266
(f submitted to Clearing John Mendonsa
Public works Highway 99 approximately
Protect Location
On the east side of U.S. Chico,
6C0 feet south of its intersection with Merridian4R.acres to
1 to divide
Project scr prion Tentative Parcel Map
create Z parcels at
one acre plus eac;i)
Advisory AgencY ��_____---------"
utte.Count or Res onsble Agency)
'Chis is, to advise that the (Lead Agency5-11-8 and has made
has app
roved the above-described project on (Date)
determinations regarding the sbovE~described praj
ect:
the following X significant effect on the
1� The project
will, _x ill not; have a
environment, � act dr project
'.Report was prepared for this
An Environmental Yovisiot�s of CEQA;
pursuant to the p ro ect pursuant to the
X at ve DeClarat'on was prepared for this p
A NeS
provisions of CEQA=
asures ,�� sere; X _..-were not, made a condition. of the
�,, Mitigation me °ect,
approval, of the pro J was, was not, opted
de�atiotl5
4, A statement of overriding
consi__. X ad.
for this project;
1 ilii with comments and responseb and record of
that the fina eneral public at:
This is to certify
project approval is available to the g Butte County aville, planning Department
eriter Drive
7 County CA 95965
,• w
...-.-�-
Date Reeeived
for riling Si nature
ting at O]? Bill Turpin
pos _ ...
Senior rlanner
Title r
Naxi+ 1986
'j jy
Inter.Departr --a!) emorandu
res Advisory Agency
Fkow Planning Director
SUBJECTI TEN`XATIVE PARCEL MAP ON AP 47-13-140, MICHAEL ASODY
t rcc April. 14, 1987
This is a proposal to divide 4. 3 acres to create Lhtee p€trct ;l.p
at approximately 1 acre each. The zoning is SR -:1,: The Enc;i
Uce Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this arod
a8 Agriolitural-Residential.. There are no specific or comajurj-
ity plans for, the area.
This application is one on which a Negative Declaration With
Mitigation measures attached has been recommended. The times—
line-, set out by the Government code for acting on the project:
has expired.
The applicant has been unable to comply with Health Departmont
and. 8ubdivis.ion ordinance requirements. If the applicant can
demonstrate that Health Department conditions can be fret, than,
approval is recommended subject to the following conditions:
1. Determine the location of the Zone A flood boundary and
aes,.gnate it on the final map as a no -development area.
2. Construct a levee to the standards required for the Quail
Run Subdivision, or more stringent if determined to be
necessary by Department of Public Works, along Rock Creek,
3. Preservo the stand of mature trees along Rock Creek-.
46 Demonstrate that residential development can achieve a
CNEL of 45 dB indoors.
5. Deed a 1 -foot no -access strip along the east side of High-
way 99 to Butte County.
6. Designate a 100 -foot setback buffer along the creek as a
Fish & Wildlife constraint and riparian vegetation area.
7. Note on map aa� alteration of Rock Creek will requiro
streambed alteration agreement from the Department of
Fish & Game:
8. Meet the req:�irementy of CaVrtans includinq provision of
adequate `hood control -facilities,
Map on AP 47-J 3-- 40 Mich Ashby
Tentative Parc M p ,
April 14, 1987
Page 2•
In the event the applicant cannot demonstrate that Health
Department cc:nditions can be met within two weeks, the recom-
mended is as follows
Find that the applicant has been unable to meet the requirements
of the Health Department, the application has ,been pending for
an extended period of time, and deny the Tentative Parcel Map
application for Michael Ashby on AP 47-13-140 in accordance
with Section 15109 of the CEQA Guidelines
LMT/sjs
cc: Michael Ashby
Engle & Associates
0
AI'I,iTN1)IX 1:
ChuN't'Y (11 tu'C'1rP.
LNVI RONMCNTAI. C111i
� y `
. I1f: ENVIRONMENTAL IPACTS
tip anatxons of a 1 "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheet(s))
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant;;
Unstable earth conditions in
YES MAYBE NO`
or changes in
geologic substructures?
b• Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the
-..
soil?
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
d. Destruction, covering or modi°icatiort o (' t11
unique geologic or physical
�-
features"
Increase in wind or water erosion of so3,ls,.
either Cn or off-site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach --�
sands, or changes in
siltation., deposition
or erosion which may modizy the channel
of
an river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
y bay, inlet or lake?
g. Loss of prime agxiculturall soils
outside designated urban
h. E areas?
Expo cuire Of People or property to geologic
uch
as earthquakes, landslides, mud-
slides , ground :Failure or similar hazards?
2. AIR, Will the—
proposal result in substantial.;
a. Air emissions or deterioration
air quality? of ambient
b.' The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
or fumes?
C, Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in
._.
climate,
locally or regionally?
3; WATER4 Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Changes in
currents, or the course or
direction of water movements in either
marine
or fresh waters?
b• Changes .in absorption rates, drainage
patterns,
or the rate and amount of sur
C. Need fface runoff?
or off-site surface
drainage improve-
ments, including vegetation removal, channel•
izatio'n or culvert installation?
.�--
d. Alterations to the course or fl
waters? ow of flood
e} Change in the amount Of ,surface water in any
.:water body?
f. Discharge :into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface
water quality, inclu&i,ng
a but not limited to temperature, dissolved
OxYgell or turbidity?
• Alteration of the direction or rate
Of ground waters? of flow
hi
Change in the quantity or qualityof ground woLex�s
either through direct xddi ions
or With-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
ik Reduction ill
e°rwase
available. t�Publiuwater waternt of
for c '�
+ upplies
J Exposure of people or property to
water
related hazards such as flooding?
2
lo. RISK OV UPSET. Will the proposal involve,
YES
NWBE No
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
event of an accident or upset conditionsl
a7--C-TTv_,_e in the diversity of species, or number
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
of any species of plants (including trees,
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal altOr the location,
shrubs, grass) crops, and aquatic plants)?
JL
population?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
12. HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing)
or endangered species of plants?
ci Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
C,
d Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result insubstantial ,-
a-7--CTiange in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, iltsh and shell fish,
benthiQ organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the -numbers of any unique) rtclre
or endangered species of animals?
C. Introduction of new species of animals into
an, area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
t
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
6.
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a,increases in existing noise levels?
b. E-,,cposure of people to severe noise levels?
JL
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce
sigijificTn—F �ii_ght and glare?
AL
8,
LAND USE. tVill the proposal result in a
subst4ntiai alteration of the prosent or planned
land use of an area?
9,
NATURAL RESOURCES:. Will the proposal result in
subsiantial:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
JL
resources?
b, Depletion of any non-renewable natural
resources?
lo. RISK OV UPSET. Will the proposal involve,
a. A risk Of explosion or the relOase Of hazard-
ous substances (including, but not limited to,
oil, pesticidesi chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditionsl
b, 'possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
11. POPULATION. Will the proposal altOr the location,
81stM"5tTon, density, OV growth -rate of the human
population?
12. HOUSING, Will the proposal affect existing housing)
or create a demand for additional housing?
13.
14.
1s.
16 4
YES MAYBE
NO
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Willthe proposal
resin In:
a, Generation of substantial additional vehicle
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
:C Substantial impact on existing transportation
systems?
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services,,
a. Fire protection?
Z'
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks of other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
ENERGY. Walltheproposal result in:
64 Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b, substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy,?
UTILITIPS. Iftll the proposal result in a need for
new- systems, or substantial alterations to the
following.,
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
C. Water availability,
d. Sewer or septic tank!
e. Storm water drainage;,
f. Solid waste and disposal?
'HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding Mental health)?
b, Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
AESTHETICS. 11ill the proposal result in the
obs ruct an of any sca4ic vista or view open to
the publico or will ';1e proposal 4sult in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open,
to public view?
.4-
YL
X_
YES
MAYBE NO
19i RECREATION. Will the proposal ."esul t in an impact
upon the; quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
X
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical,
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building., structure or object?
c. 'does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred ,uses within the potential impact
area?
:a
V= DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
See :At-Lachpd
DISCUSSIQU _QF ENV I RQNMEX1AL_KyALMAZ1jaN AP 47-1a-1-1()
1b: Disruption) displacement and compaction of the nod; surfaces will
Occur with development of the three homesites and a"ftdft toads. An
absolute figure an overcovering can not be determined access tc,
all parcels is resolved. -ess
New road construction would highificantly
increase the amount of overcovering which will resultthis project.
1: Soils On-site are Vina loamy shallow phase.
inches deep and are underlain at less ThOY Average 6 to 36
than feet by A�ils of
Tuscan stony clay loam. The8e Bolls may be underlain bybgocjated cementedsobeds.
I-roperties are not considered prime agricultural.
1h: Hazards to persons and Property from earthquakes tare considered
moderate. NO mititgation is therefore necessary.
3b., Dc-%'Slopment can be expected to reduce absorption rates) increase
storm water runoff and modify existing drainage Patterns. Drainage
currently natural flowing Into the Rock Creek chaniiel located at theis
north line of parcels Land 3, thence flowing south, southwest.
3dt Rock Creek is an Identified, zone A flood boundary by the Federal
Government. 'rho extent Of flooding is approximately 100
as
south side of the creek. The zone A flood boundat-y shall be mapped feet from the a
no development area. Developable area on lots
considerably reduced by the floodplain, and 3 have been
be Pormii-,bed In this area either. NO wells Or septic systems will
In order to reduce the Potential for flood related damage of property
On-site, a levee should berUct
cOnst ed along Rock Creek. An adjoining
subdivision) Quail Run, has constructed a levee 2 feet above the high
Water mark. A study Of Rock Creek entitled Rock Creek
A planning feasibility study of Flood, biversioftt.
physical project f eatured Was prepared
by ion M. Anderson in May of 1979for the Butte County Public Works
Department, The design discharge for Rock Creek is 2700 CFS'(cubic
Peet Per second), Assuming the proposed Upstream diversion channel is
eventually Constructed, increased flood ptwOtectiotj Would be provided.
3e; COns-41`uQbiOri of the levee and residential development may
ank ulaalter the
'� OP surface water runoff now Plowing into Rock Crook.
4a: ""10 f)W) vegetation of significance on the
stand of treoprapepLy is a Atu
- i m re
limited riparian plarlbs along the Noolc Creek thdlln6l,
All efforts be made to Preserve the trees.
6b 6. Vehicular tragi -,h3;c,
level exceeding 70 =`tl Highway 99 subjects the PPOPOr* to nnlso
within 100 feet of the travel Wave. Noise
lovela are reduced to 6,�
,4 within 2o0 feet and 60 de-dible Within
400 feet OP the rlghb-of-lw,�^t, L*,
n
EleineOto establishes e Bul;te County Uebor"al Plan Noise
aras, will have 60 d8 ?AL; thO acceptable noise level for residential
e
The applicant to demonstrate that all re61d0y1t1A1
construction can meet the t-equ3.v-ej1j,.pt,,s of the noise clement of the
General Phan;. SPdcifIdAllY) eRteriai, 0,mlse levels shall be 60 decibels
with interior nbibe lev,010 of 45 CN6L*
8: An existing open grass field will be, transformed Jr' o three
resi aential homesites - The proposal cont arms to tine rotting; and Zerxeral
plan density limit; but does noir conform with all poly,(.!cea of the
renoral Plan. See Ii;em Nos. 6 and 1.3.
ion of
11 and 12.3 This project wdincohoU�teigthe
willnorthward
impaC�Gedaby7i�tt".ctreasedthe
Chico Urban Area, Surrounding
activity on the property. of particular concet .a) to L11e impact on
residf.,. ces along Songbird if the easement is construe od as proposed.
Existing residences to the south will be impacted by ,jjt,reased use of
the 20 foot driveway easement, in the event an addl�lari&l encroachment
onto Highway 99 is not approved.
13a At full buildout, traffic generation potential to estimated at 30
vehicle trips per day. Ten of thesetrips are proposed to be
accommodated through development of a new access easement to the east of
Parcel 3. 'twenty 'vehicle trips will: access onto Highway 99, either at
the property frontage, or appro3.lmately 250 feet to the south.
1 Sc, f : A new encroachment a ted Hone�tencay roahas
chmentbeen
wasrOproposed toWhen
serve
property was originally created,
all three lots onto Highway 99. This encroachment is apprproperty
bfoot
feet to the south and is connected to the subject property
by
driveway easement. The parcel map creating the property was t^ecorded
Book of Maps 87, at page 27, with the following note: An encroachment
altrans prior, to development of parcels
permit shall be obtained from C
112 and 3. Access to be located at the property
n common
o mon torparcel
2 and S. An accost at lot 1 was clearly prohibited
Within the immediately vicinity Vtherelarare
c ore tyaand safety are redu4�ed
,rtcroac hments co the Highway.
by those numerous encroachments; thr-,) situation w311 only worsen with
additional ei`icroachme"ts• Allowing numerous driveways along major roads
and highways is contrary to tJP�licrc4l�t�ast����e�hebCountyButte
will insure
General Plan. Specifically, y
that arterial runne"ssaryufutureserve
intersectionso driveways,ion-street
and
remain free of
parking and traffic overloads.
A bridge rail On hock Creek bridge reduces aright distance, further
jncreaning :safety hazards.
15dt Access to parcel. S in proposed to be .ria a 50 foot easement across
Ap047-50-21 And out onto Songbird. Songbird currently Provides access
to 25 parcels and exceeda $00 feet in length, Sutto County Code Section
2Ci_133 states that cul. -day -sacs In rural areas s'liall pct servo more than
20 lots or p►rcels, unless the parcels are 20 eaces .AG2h. It
tCisculation
will have to be provided in accordance with County Code,
recommended that the existing encroachment onto Highway 99 be utilized
and a new road be constructed up through the common lot lines between
parcels 1 and 2 with a cul-de-sac on parcel 3.
The access o Mont to parcel -3 is shown to be 50 feet. Should this
access be approved, a.cul-de-sac would havo to be provided.
z,d,ef: .Division and development- as proposed will not result in
An inc `saae'd need for newi or altered governmental servid6s-
7
Aft
16c: Water will be provided by individual wells.
within 50 feet from
WeIIA shall be
located within the floodplain Or
levee. m the -boo of the,
16d: Individual septic systems will serve the
shall be Prohibited within the floodplain. property. Installation
16e: Storm water drainage may be required along the flip ay 9
frontage, �11�j 9
Suggested list Of mitigation measures:
1. Determine the location of the zona- A flood boundary and
designate it on the final map as a no development Area.
2. Construct a levee to the standards requirod
Run Subdivision along Rock Creeki for the Quail
Preserve the stand Of mature trees along Rock Cre8k,
4.. Demonstrate that residential development Can achieve CNEL
off' 45 indoors.,
Sa Provide access and circulation in accordance with "Zhe Butte
County Subdivision Ordinance and Circulation 8lemett,
6. Construct a road to the appropriate road section down
through the entroa,-hmeht located between original lots 2 and 8.
Deed a 1 foot no 4cElers strip along the east side of Highway 99 to
Butte Cotn+,y,
After Mitigation Measures have been submitted; the map Will be
circulated to the State Clearinghouae.. Caltrans and the Reclamation
Board are expedted to have conditions of approva 1.
Applicant:
Michael ,Ashby
DAT_._ A__SHEET
A. P�S�_il+ct DeBCs`iotir)n
Asses6or `s Parcel. 41
47-13-140
Log # 86-09-16-01
1. Type of Project: Land Division,
2. BriefDescriptions 'Tentative Parcel
create 3 parcels at 1¢ acre each,
Map dividing 4,3 scree to
3- Location= On the east side of U -S.,
High1600 99
feet south of its intersection withway
4. Proposed Density of Developments 1 Road,
9• Amount of Impervious Surfacim d'u./acre.
6• Access and Nearest Public �oad(u)Less than 1 acre,
access to Parcel 3 via easement Frontage on Highway 99,
?» Het,o,d of Sewage Disposal: Individualesepti,c tanks.
8. Source of'rater Supply: Individual. Neils.
9. Prox3anity of Poser Lines,:
l.
10 • Potevt* lal for fuirti er land divisiionsaand deevelopment
will, permit construction of 3 houses. Division
_S el
P,►yscal Environment
1 Terrain
a. General Topographic Character.- Level valley 'hand.
b • Slopes 0-29
c. Elevation.. 180 feet +/
da Limiting Factora: None.
2 Soils
a Types and Characteristic=s: Vina loam shallow
brown soil. 6-3600 deeUnderlain * by
br r -i ch
associated soils of Tuscanstony clayloamss ,
6' by
» Limiting Factors: Cemented beds
seriesi Associated with the Tuscan
3. Natural Hazards of the Land
aw Earthquake bones Moderate$ Class VIII.
b. Erosion, Potential: slight.
c. Landslide Potential None.
d Fire H42ards Unc,,assi fied,
e. Expansive Soil potentials
4Mod,era;te-
. Ilydrol,ogy N i,gh
A. Surface Mater:
Pock Creek croasea Parcel 1 sand 3.
b Ground mater: Valley aquifer area of heat/
withdratai�l� Potential subsidence area, y Groundwater
c. Brainage Characteristics:sbUthwoat. Drain:, to RockGraQks thence
d• Annual Rainfall (normal); 20-22�'.
ew
the sou PectorsR N"'trate contamination of grouhdWiatop 'i.
the south.
5• V'iduai/'Scen3:c quality: Views of Orchards to the wast and
orchards to 'the east,
6, Acoustic Qua1Itys Moderate to pond^ depending On traffic volume's
5
on Highway 99.
7. Air Quality: Fair to poor depending on ag oporntions
Biological: Environment:
B. Vegetation: Riparian vegetation along Rock Cr—aiek, stand of
mature trees, grassland.
9. Wildlife Habitat: Limited habitat availablo v.long Rotk Cpor.'x
Cultural Envirorwkent=
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources inL*ho area:
survey on 47-13-19 recommended clearance.
11. Butte County General. Plan designation: Ag-Aesidenti.al.
12. Existing Zonint: SR -1.
13, Existing Land Use on-site: Undeveloped.
14. Surrounding Area:
a Land Usos : W' orchards, L.C.A. contracts, E . �-tjral
residential, dry pasture, N house, Se douses, pl-oduca
stand.
b. Zoning SR=1 , A--40.
c. Gen. Plan designations; Orchard and Field Crop,
Agricultural—Residential.
d. Parcel Sizes W: 60, 100+, E 2.40 10
e. Population: Sparse.
15. Character of Site and Area: Mural, area showing signs ,r
suburban encroachment.
16. Nearest Urban Area City of Chico, 6 miles South,
17i. Relevant Spheres of Influence: None.
18. Improvements Standards Urban ':Rea. N/A,
19., Fire Protection Service:
a. Nearest ,County (State) Fire Station: 041, 1 1/2 milk,=s
south.
b. beater Availability: Tanker truck only.
20. Schools in Area= Chico Unified School District.
0