HomeMy WebLinkAbout047-200-060A }
o � 1
,' � 1 i r k •
s
No x XCE 0 D
TO Office of Planning andresearch c Z: Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 JUL 6 Planning Department
Sacramento; CA 95814 7 County Center Drive
U 10S= E1aRto Ca Gleik oroville, CA 95965
or CANDAC;E J„ GP, '
X County Clerk BY
County of Butte
SLJEJECT : Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
Project Title AP # Name
Tentative Parcel Map 47-20=60,61. Steven Fox
Contact .Person Telephone Number
State, Clearinghouse Number
(if subttitted to Clearinghouse)
Public darks John Mendonsa 538-?266
project Location on the east side of Meridian Road approximately 3000
feet south of Wookey Road, near Tehama/Butte County line.
Project Description Tentative Parcel Map re-configuring three existing
parcels into two lots of 40+ acres and remainder of 1.60± acres.
This it to advise that the Butte County Advisory Aclendy
(Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-descr: bea project. on June 29, 1987 and has made
(Date)_
the following determinations regarding the above--described project:
project k effect on the
1. The ro ect will, will not, have a s:�gnficant
environment.
24 _ An Environmental Impact Report i4as prepared ror this project
pursua:tt to the provisions of 'CEQA,
X. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant t.o the
provisions of Ct%
3. Nitigatiorl measures were, x_were not; made a condition of the
approval of the project,
4_. A statement of overriding considerations w__as, XWas not, adopted
for this project,
This is to certify that the final Er.n with comments and responses and record of
project approval is available to the general public at
Butte County Planning Department
7 County Center Drive
Oroville CA. 0596
Date Ai1ceived fer ',l:fiti8 o1d
postings; kit
ign ut��
Se
Stephen A.treete
Senior planner
Citle
.. .. -.. .•.3.•. Yu.v ., •w'w.i-ta : ..-..u',AY _. .:{.MY:Li•Y1M���� '
A •
1.
LAND OF NATURALVJd'A;9iI"
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Gill) CHEFF, Directs;
a��nningCO� 7,COUNTY CENTER DRIVE .OROVILLE LIFORNIA 45965
CERTIVIED MAIL ro:lephoner (916) 5x13-RNIA
JUN 3 1957 RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Director
C". Ga44atnia June 29, 1981
Steven Fox RE; AP 47-20-64 & G1
15676 "Meridian Road
Chico, CA 95926 Tentative Parcel Map
bear Mr.; Fox;
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held, on
June 29, 1997, the A$ency adopted a negative declaration and approved
the tentative parcel map on the above -referenced f nerty subject
to the conditions listed on the attached sheet
If no appeals are timely filed --within ten (.10) days L: -_j bate of
the Advisory Agency's' approval --with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors; this action will be final.
When the conditions of approval are complied with, it will be in. order
for you to file your "final map" with the Butte County Department
of Public Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by vuLt Advisory Agency,
f you, have, any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
o
ffice.
very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
J' n htendonsa
A88i8tant DILtect-or
JM/ds
attachment
cc Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
RFC
Steven C. Fox, Tentati`%eParcel Map, AP 47-20-60 and 61, 2 parcels
on the east side of Meridian rd. approx. 3000 it. south of
,+olocated
Wookey Rd., near Tehama-Butte county linea Englneeri RFC Surveyors
Public Works conditions;
1 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right-of-way :from the cenberlinIe
of Meridian Road and Wookey Road.
2 Indicate a 50 ft, building setback from the centerline of Meridian
Road and Wookey Road.
3 Show 611 easements of record on the final map.
4 Obtain encroachment permit for all driveways, new or existing, and
construct to county, standards.
5 Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
6 Place note on additional document regarding payment of Chico
Unified School ,District impact fees.
Planning Dept. condition:
7 All parcels to be at least 40 acres:
Health Dept. condition:
S Provide a 100 fto leacf;leld free setback around existing
wells either within the property or within 100 fti of the
property boudaries.
x,
SytFTT�.
c � r
Inter -Depart 0 U, 8 emorindum
TO: Advisory Agency -
PROW Planning Director
SUOJECT: AE REPORT
ENl,.
ATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR STEVEN' PDX ON
DATE;
June 23, 1987
This is a proposal to divide 240 acres into 2 Parcels at 40
acres each and a remainder of'150 acres. The present zoning
I's A-40. The Land Use Plan Map of the Butte County General
Plan designates this area as Grazing and Open space and the
Safety Element indicates that this project is in a moderate'
fire hazard area. There are no specific or community plans
for the area,
The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any
adopted or proposed element of the Butte County General Plan
nor any CountX,specific or community plan.
Recommendation
Find that the requirements of CEQA have been completed and
considered and adopt a Negative Declaration.
LTt me
c06 Steven FOX
RFC Surveyors
r, .
Al i
1�N17r� l� �
GC1I1MI 01 ;1311TTII
r IVV1C20NItIrN'C'AL CIfI1CCCLI811, ,.,pORNT
rtd bb Gomli'l�te b;y l,ca At;cticy) _;
> + 11 ACLog # 47-20-60, 61
hcl2al tll All # '87-04-21-02
1 , Name of proponont Stevexi ;Fox
>' Acldre$s of propolrt~ht Rnd relrrosontxrt:i.v.o ,(if app11Cable)
15676 Meridians RoadRFC'Stirveyors
Chico, ca. 95926 331_ Wall, Street""
Chico,_Ca. 95926
3 . Project description Tentative Parcel. MOP
y
Y1.S Li, 1317 NO.
CC. MANDATOR
a. Does the Project trtve triopototitial to clog -do tltc
dltlallt}� of the c�tit,,ironmont, SUIItial to co redoCd
the habitat caf:.t fi,sli rtt° i �'Icil°iCo S'peajo$, catisd tt
1'i sh or wildll i 1'e populat iorr to drop laeloty sel r,
stls>aa i ri ink i cve.l s , t j'iroatcrl to ela if) "ft'! a p'i trta t o1
11n,1111-11 c.tintntlni y, r0duCe the number or restrict erect plant or 4he
range of a rhr•e, or enclari l
� � < anin►a1 or
dlimirlato important r.,xanlpl;es of trio major pci-i.od.q
Of California history or proll 1stdry'
11. C1ocs* the p •t,jc.ct have the; Iiotenta.al'trr ablildvd
shol`t tr. rm bet7o i'i. t:: to the detriment ' 0'f tang;-td rin,
dnv,%rontnentrzl goals? CA snot}t-terns illiplet on dice
cnvil'onmdint is Otic wlrr.ch OCCUrs :111 a rclltti.vel}!
br°ie C' per'Od of ulna 1411110 1OAVtorltl irilpticts 11;'11
t'ndltlrtA
into the-:ftltlire_)
e, ,Hoes the pi�cajdcthave, imptrc�ts which fire
� � t 4
1111} Lirlrltodl, but cuitul'oti,voly considlorahlo't (',A
project may, impact ost Mo Or tttol'o sePat'ato rosotlrcr:s
where the impact oil, each resource is _-roltttivel,y
smal l , hitt %Ojerc 010 e trod or t:hc tdt,tl or thww
Imparts otl ;rho envirdiilllent 1; s tlaf;i,cant,) �y
d, sloe$ >rh'o .1-01oct have envlro,nmontal dffCcts t�ili,cll
WiTt�, 0%01is7 tl tlllsthntla : trdiv rso 0('foc�ts On litutino
ter dildctly bt indtroctly`,, V
l i l 111 1'1 11' I NA'1'I C�'J ("I'o ho c^O1n11 etedby the Loart Agency)
1 tiu bas1s or this initial evaluati011
rl ,,
X.
r
'1%Wl} llrtct the prolicrsot�dlN'Ojeot COULD NO't ha,vo a si lrtific."Itit orrec:t
Oh thdt onttlrot)ment, a N1;GAl1Vt; 111,C1,AIIA'110N tali 11 he llrepatc 1,
IJ1V1 C"irld that altllottth
t
c#tilt o,l`fo r on the 061'11"olimekto, t11or1o1�v�Ll.clotbbeclttttslo as,itgir,trI
e fifer; t it) t1l is rase be�d;tttls�iw tlld fi t'I�rr1ATT0N hiC3A, ,
tale ta'taehocl shdr.t have hags, acftlecl to tllo gra e��t�'� desori�hed r1t
" ' iClsl la! Il 11(" pi'eparel. 1 J A NHOATrVr.
C1iit>I,AIZAT
f i.11d the proposed prO'kIct MAY hav�o a s1 p;h1. f � cattt� d f1°ctc 't on
t11Cvllt' i rOrl►11ant, ttltd ail 11N4t11trrN II N'1'�ttl'(dpAG'1' ltCil�Cllt`l' Is rnclla'i ircl,
.JMTIs . ,Ma COUN` Y tilt Bl115, i, PLANNI NC 1)N,I A Itl'htlEN'I'
Lada tt1--,.�..
Assncia ''""I.r. e� ✓' �
r ltovi dwedi b
t
�+L.4YW
r,
;, ,IV. ENVIRONMENTAL T CSS,, es,' and: "maybe" ansEvexs are required
Xp anations o a Y
on att'achr:d sheetCs) ) :yam MA� YBE
ND
1, E . gill the p-ropbsal re.�ujt in sig iif�cant:
ox in changes in
Unstable earth .condition's
a.zuctures'
geologic sub5t _ �
Disruptions, displ:�acemerits; compaction or y
X
b,;
of.
oti ercciVering the soiround sitr aCo
" in to—r,Aphy ox g
c , Change
relief features?
coveirin'g or modification of ant.,
d.. Des'tr'uct'ion,
unfit o geologic or pliyszcal, features?
water eros on-'Of -soi] $ ;
x
inwind or
e : "Increase ; , .
either on or 0if-s�te7
in deposition o�;• orosion ', ,*beach
f. changes
oz cl�ranges in sijtation, deposition
sands' ; rthe� channel of
modify
or etoslb3ll Which, may. or ,
" the •hed: o:f the ocean
stxem ox
a r ver o r rixa3l roductive ..
y MI.et o"x, lake
any' ba ` > rime' .agricult7 ' Y p soils
.p_
-
L65S , of
outs`9de designated urban areas?to
° geologic,
-
-
h: " Ecposure of'`people or propel'ty s
ase�,rthgtta.kes,• landslides, mud
as
hazards, such : _._
T sim�aax h"azaxds? ;
s�,idesround fa�.luxe o ,
20 AIR. Will ythe11 , sII , .o�ationsof�ambient+
X
a Aix em;Gss ons o _ ._._.
_.....
air quality''? _ ri ab�,e odors ; smoke
creatxnn of obj etio e
b . Th -
or �`umes? .
Alter4tidrx of air movement;i"moisture, or
C. chane in climate,
g
- temperature., oi- any
-- - —
locallYor: regionally? ..
--
. , . osal.result in,substantiali
WA1 ER W L!,1 the prop
3,
Changes in cuxrents _ or ,he course or
a , r
ion w-atex movements �n e� the
direct. :of <.-v
mrine or fresh waters? drainage patterns
aUsorption rat'e�s , . ,
b . Changes n
or the Fate and amount o surface rnorove-
drainage imp
_
dor off-site surface
Need , , , . channel -
e . ve e ta,t� on removal ,
tents, including g
.�
ration or cud-Vert .installation'?
or flow of flogd
�
Alter'atiOfts to the course 4 i
waters? amount, Of-' ny
Change sur�ece water in a =
e a n the
�y
water body ?
f. bischarge iritb,, sur a-de- t�ratergUglitin any uciing:
q Y
altelrAtidit of surf ace.ratx:
temperature; dissblvPd
X
but not limited to
oxygen or turbidity _
the d�.rection or rate of flow
p teration of
g of ground waters? rourirl. wates.�s
in the qunt.ity ox gtital�t of ,g . ...
h,. Change
ei thr through direct adds tibns or w thw
t:hroug'h iinterceptibli df an
o
dr , ' x ,.�:... aqui let by duts Ot oxcavationO
'the °caw
-
Reduction n ter supe les?exwise
available fox pubs to water
j :'tp o,surde of people pt property
relate azards such as flooding?_
,
YES MAYAE
NO,
4; PLANT LIFE: W,i11 the propose,3: seecies,arsulvin unumberial'
7a. d� t, o f p
C ange. in the yrs
any species iaf plants 'inalutding trees,
of
shrubs, grass, crops, and agiiatic plantis)?
the of a`ny ungue,; "rare
b: Reduction of -numbers
or endangered s,ecies of ,plants?
F iif plant's into 'an
c. Int'roduc:tion, of nets species
or eft 'a barrier to the, normal rep�.enish-
axe's,
j et of: exis;tino spec'ie's?
me
'af any agricultut 11 crop"?
d Rec, on in acreage
ANIMAL LIFE. ' tidi11 thy'. proposal. resultµ in substantial:
diversity of species, ar numUerp
e
a G ang in- the
,spec�:es of ana,mals. birds , .land; animals
`
o,f any
including reptiles , fish and shell fish,
benthtcori innthesnumberS of asy un'
-ague., rare
Ttecluc �,
b,
e riciangered species Of an�.mal5? �.—
or
c, Int r, duction of new, spe .ies of animals into;
in a barrier to the Th gratio t
�
an area, or result
or movement of animals? ---`
. fish or wild life.
d, Blot ti arat�.on to e xi :stip
i
h abitat?
6. 1401SE Will the proposal restat in substantial:
levels?
a_. Increases in eXisting, noise
b,, 13Yposure of peapl.e to severe noise levels?
7 I,IGIIT ANIS' GLOP . 1gll the proposal pr" oduce
:
sigscant light and glare?
8 LAND USF{ Will the'.. proposal result in a;
5u Stant' 11 alteration of the present or planned
3.
�
' land Fuse of an area?
,
9. NATURAL nSOORCESi, 19111 the proposal result. in
substantial; natural
a. 'Increase in the rate of use of any
resources't
o any non-tan . ewab I e natixral
b . Dep1e'tion
resources?
10. 1�ISK°,.OFp5pT Will the proposal involve;
u eXpl os ori or the release of hazard-
_
ous substance$ (xncludin, but not. limited to,
in the
oil pests cider , ehetna c;als r radiation)
an ox' upset conditions? .----
�
event of accident
with an emer envy
b. Passible interference g
evacuation plan?
res onse Ian or emerge nG
p
l POPULATION61 Willtheproposal 'alter the location,
rate of the human
�s`trsbtxt�on; density' arrot3th _.
papi:tlatidn? '
� . , .. exsti g iris;
d tonal housing"hobs
12. I�OUSIN� Will the proposal affect
ad
or create a demand for.,,
f
YES MAYBE
NO
.�
14111 the proposal
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATIoN.
result n. -
a. Generltion of substantial addit anal vehicle
movement's
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
X
demand for new parking?
Substantial impact on'existing transportation
c,
systems?
d. Siplfxcant alterationsto present, patterns
of circulation or movement of peop7.e and/or
goods?
e Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic haza'rd's to motor vehicles,
bicyCl.ists Or De.destr any?
14. PUBLIC SERVICES: Will the proposal have ar effect
upon, or result ;in. a need foal new Or altered
governmental services:
a Pire protection?
b. Police protection?
G. $chool5`?
d." Pants or other recreational facilities?
e Nairitexance of public I facilities, including
roads?
f, otiler governmental services?
ENERGY: Ivill the proposal result in:
of fu6l'or energy?
a; T)so of substantial amounts
b. Substantial increase in demand upon 1�Xisting
sources of energy, or require the development
of nes . sources _of ener ----�
gY
-
16, UTILITIES « Wall the proposal result in a need for M
alterations to the
n(e systems, or substantial
�1.o jioivin i
power or natural gas?
b Communications sys.tenslo
c. jIater availa -i' l ,it Y'
- -
d,. Sewer or septic tank? —=
e : Starm tiaater drainage? - ---
A
f Scilid waste and disposal`
17 .HtiliAN .HPIALTH. Wil 11 the proposal 'result in':
Creation o£ any health hazawrd or potential'
a. g ealth) ?,
h'eaItI ha.tard (exeludsn mental h
b4 P,xposvre of people to potential health
18. AESTIITxCS;. Will the proposal result in the
ar V1ow open to
0 structs bn of any scenic vista
the -ublic, or Will the, ropos�l result in the
p p
creation ofan aesth�:tioally Of e nsiwe site open
to ub1iG view?
E,,
K
` h
'YES MAYBE,
NO
y ,
RECREA%• Ivill the proposal zes�ult in an; impact ,
recreational
upon the quality or quantity of existing
opportunities? _--'•„ -*'
20. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
Will t e proposal result in the alteration
a,
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or -
((
historic archaeological site?
the result in adverse physical
xti
b.' Will proposal
or -aesthetic effects to,a prehistoric .or
tructure o
historic building; r object? _---
have the potential to cause
c. toes the proposal
a"physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will' the proposal restrict Existing religious
or sacred uses Within the potential impact d�
area?
V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL' EVALUATION
°' S
M
DISCUSSION OF`ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP #47--20-60, 61
lg Soils on-site ata the Tuscan stony clay loam with almost no
agricultural value. They havebeen historically used for $razing with
some success. Division of the property will set one homesite on each
irectly stimulate development nor remove any
parcel, but will not d
soils from ag. production.
3b Changes in the drainage pattern already occurred with the
development of the two homesites. Given the 40 acre parcel size,
drainage problems are not anticipated.
yds prairie falcon has been known to occur in the vicinity immediately
north of Wookey Road. Residential. u,ies at these densities should not
impair the habitat for falcon use.
8. Division as proposed complies with the A-40 zoning, and 40 acre
minimum of the General plan.
l3a,c: The project is currently generating an estimated 20 vehicle
trips per day. Meridian Road is approximately 16 feet wide and paved.
Its lower r6ac'hes are'i.n poor shape along the edges. Continued use of
the road will prey-,pitate a need for maintenance. No improvement will
be required at this time given the parcel size:
20a A reco ds search will be'required from Cal State University at
be
Chicc to determine whether or not an archaeological survey should
prepared. In the event a survey is required,, the applicant should
contact one of the consultants listed on the encosed 'sheet.
v6u
r 'w
�! ,r
APpl3.r#ant Steven Fox
Assessor's PAreel it
AP 47--20-60, 61
I.og t87-04-21-x,06
DATA SHEET
Ai. Pro_3 ert _pescrion
1. Type of projec
2- t: Land Division
Brief Descri7taorn:
- exstin Tentative Parcel. Ma
)p
into 2 lots of 4D� ap'e^col figuring; 3
160 acres /_ acres and '1 re,ainider of
3- Locationm On the east side of
south 5,260 ft. Chico Meridian from WookE3y Road
4. Proposed Density of Developmentctlon E,, T23N RIE
acres dwelling unit per 40
5- Amount of Impervio13s Surf, !he: Minimal
6. Access and
Nearest 't'ubl
tJookey, a Road(s): Frontage on Moi~idiari and
7 Method of Sewage
Dispose]
8- Sl�urce of Mater SuX:PSeptic tank - leachfielr7
4. ProIV: Indivi.dua�. Wells
ximity of. Pain x- ',.ansa
10. potential for land
o parcel
Unknown land divisions and development:
B- Environmental Seton
phsical Env,roninentr
1 � Teni�ain
a. General Topographic Character: Level valley land
`- Slopes: 2% +/_
c. Elevation= 500-260 s Limiti
oft. A.S.,
2- ng FactorsNotiP
a-Is
a- Types and edharacterclay 10istics:
$+� Tuscan stony clay loam 2-
beds to a depth of �, ft:
ft 6 under i , in by cemented dobble
b. Limiting Factors.
Cemented beds Impervious to Olant
rootsa na subdrai'riage
Nfatural Hazards of the Land
a. E-arthquake Zone.
mile east Moderate, small earth4iiake8 recorded
b, Erosion Po'etttia = Slight
c Landslide Potential" Lots
d . Fare HaZaed`
4 hioderat'e
�hYdro�Expansgyive Soil Potohtial 419h
.o
A. Surface 'Water:
b- Ground Watcre Small rrairage nn-site
c'.
Drainage Unknown
g Characteristicac
Natural Overland plo,
`7`
generally southwest
d - Annual Rainfall (nornxal : 22+,
e. Lianiting Factors: None t4`0 acre lots
5. Visual/Scenic Quality:
o
and east Scenic views of mountains to north
6. Acoustic Quall.ty: Goo
7'. Air Quali