Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
048-010-009
t• � .• r ° �`? ,, � a ' � � i ♦ 71,.•*rem- ?:.i � � .. ', a �•. � � •� 1 F 1 1 � y .1 l a • AI 1 M .,A 1 .. t � ,_ �. �y � .� �. - � , � - � a F Q ��,. '� � � 1 _ .. , , 4 �r nnr�;'jay C#a�Ctt C n C1N Rnn "Sid �� �SL7'bu�b��n 12os�.dcn�a.a »» .... o.�» .hn.. arcels LOCATION ,,.�,i.��► ..�$%�.r..�.�i..»�-a..���t' Coha�����,.�d�a,�.��,,�� �;1��,,m�t�e� zioo� .�.w...r�h , .,.»..,L` _. A98ESSOR`S 'PAr7M NUMBDR(,S ZONING -.- ANY P �w.Wr:�1s5++..uaav+:1'T+r..4r,4_ts.�s r-r4;�.w�..aMvsaa ua Lan.S` .',• X?l17't:. APPLICATION FtTiCMED DATS RrZONINC; [T'CtI'CC1N SGNAirME;i CW t KFr) �,—Ts P'tTE LEGAL DF,8rftTPTtON PAPi'ARPI) OR CtTF,CX.Ut) D 1101 I'ClrBLICATTON NOTIC r-. h"tt'xTTPNDATE art a r t7r�r.I ril, 1Y AD TRLPARPMPLACE N r snAr n NnfirCr (S) P"I'"Ur D 0 PY c►,��-- PATP. MAXLING LIST hrtr:r'ARIM nnTr: NCA r,-crrrT No7'1C ,6S t4'R'Tl'GN c a" !�.!� MAUHMtirt`r:td �✓ 'DATE COMMIS$10N 9XHIBIT PREPARED DATE STAr`i. VINPINGS may.. LNr1tXrt ifiNTAL Ci TPOORICAr:UX83kwts'r I nN M DAR SG r i rat) �R UETUNATIMV AND T1!'."1" ;VSC;1l'TVI? M.CLAPAIJON t11Ttc)FM _ UPAIM' RtPORLT DATE ., OTHPIR rt'rrrlSSxO � N to=Art DATESWAD ACTION OItIIXNAN�;�?1 `�,t n�r�r'r'�T► �t7 %�.�..... C�. �-`�'.�.�,....��r.�.,>.. ; }� ,�,.. h i v C , •' - ,»h=i.;,. .n. ..e,.r:4;3YUY w.-<;:�xr. xe-aw.,;«.....;w>:. ,snw W /ice-h:.:w.:Yx,..ve+wn,.: ,.�. ca«�. :.-x. '....x .au. •.. s.a ....... APPLICATION FOR REZONING '? BUTTE, -,COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLIGANI`. And and follow instructions as sat forth on ravorsa sada of this form. Applicant's Noma A�q_. .__ �s' Phone No. � Applicant's M ailing Address Applicants Interest In propart), ibwoo, Lessee, Other) Owner's Noma=. ... ..,....., Phone No. '.. Owner's Address ,�_. _ _r>`"`'`�'�"� .. 2 Assessor's Parcel Number Is) - J Proteht. 050UE5'ii;D ZONING ' be ILL- r, Location, dimensions end site of aroa (s) to rezoned U ria lei�ltW'�► ifs r .` rC�Sf,.C: r.. ,t Appiicanu's reasont i'or rezoning .`. � 4 = -"r ~'' ' 1 `�`"'A'� - r 1 I heroby deelaro under perialty of perjury that I have read aril � rstand the. Inst cl1ldns and 'that the l6fogoing { statoments'are true, complete acid coteect to'tha boat of m no edgL a i j r Dated L)LA A ZL t`►42�NbL-' Appilaaht't SloatUra _ 1 A �.�%--z Pro act Fila Number. A �t Ott„ 1t`e» d �sEriu! 'I I 1 iV p ��� D fK nA �Reque s Consist General Plan Designatibh:A e e ✓L tl.- , , t n ht? � LooatlUn, OL o . vthlry: A.P, Nurnber(O L F� Looatl6h`bescrlption 1 ownorship Legal bescription.of-X\k 14► Peb6f of Agency (it headed) :zo mapr, of Arca b lrA1i}err s - W tent a �jtoV.►\1 bete Appllcatlon Recalued $ "— pacoipt Nd, % G C, Applicatloh'tlskon by 4 1 0r . .[ 40, INSTRUCYIONS TO REZONING APPLICANTS d, If applicant It not the owner, written =authorization by the owner orother proof of agency must be submitted In order for the applicant to legally sign the application, Application shall be conslderad void if not signod by the owner or Iegal agent, 2, All Items onapplicatinn shall be filled in as completely as possible, If an Item is not applicable, please indicate by the term VA', 3, It is vory.lmportaat that the application include an accurate and complete description f the e P recelva the toile proposedfor each requested zone, The application will not be�processed, until. Ni_ wing htfntmmlon about the oraa(s) to be razoned; a, Assessor's parcel number (s) (from the tax bilis or Assessor's Maps), b. Street addresses (if avallabla). c. 'Distance's and directions to named stmots, bodies o' ,titer or raliroads, d, `Legal description (subdivision lot numbers fractions of sections or distances VT and bearings of perimeter dimensions), 'a, 6 copies of map With rezoning aroa(s) outlined (Assessor's map, subdivision m9p, zoning map or other map showing parcals), 4. Application must include a completed 'Appendix 8-Environmental lnformatlon Porm%, 6, Callfornia Govdrnment'Code -Section 615.300 at seq. requires local zoning ordinances to be consistent With a jurisdictibn's adopted general plan, ;County approval of a rezoning request mutt be supported by findings of consistency With the Butte County General Plan, Appl?' Snts may request changes In General Plan designatlons by filing an 'Apply cation for t3aner01 Plan. Amendment', 6, Tho 'Application for Hatonlho' Is sUbjoct to public hearings and appo-ul b YL both the p p y P;anni'hg Comtnisslort and Board 'af 5U ervisors,l'he Pocadures for Ctlunt actionon � , rezoning applications arc stated In Chapter 24 of the Butte County Code," 1, Application fees es of , (data) are Pees may be paid In :cash ,or by check LMadd payable to 'Trenibrer, of nUtte County', „ 8, before submitting a rezoning dppl(catfoh, applicant is tequasted to discuss With staff all questions about applfcatlon requlrehietits, County procedures, consistency With the General Plan, and the provisions',of existing and eaquested zoning classificationt. zi , rt"�-4��"s, .Allo,..'t;�'•.r41�. .1 e�fM'a2'Yk�e .'.,..a ,_.,.. .._.... _. ..._ .. - 44-58-2 44-38-6, 8 44-58-10, 33, 34. '37 Rafispy Construction Inc. Calif. Water SCrVice 1720 w Co. ierra Pacific Ind. 493 B Ave., Suite 2 N 1st St. P.O. Box 500 Chico, Ca., 9S928, San Jose, Ca. 95131 Chico, Ca. 05927 44-S8-38 43-01'-3 48-01-9 - �� �,Fred Davis,_..,. Olt— of CiliCo R. L $ M. Brown Jay 6 Dorothy Plummer P.O. Box 3420 1084 Manzanita Ave: , Rt 5, Dox 227 1 Chico, Ca. 95927 �� Chico, Ca._ 95.9.25, Chico, Ca. 95926 48-01-10 98-01-12 �� 48-nI-15 I B. A. Barre k V. D. Ft P. V. McGrady Mapco Farms , 13, � f . Roe etal Box 133 Nimsheui Stg.. 2420 M Alameda St. 55S Rio Lindo Chico, Ca. 95925 Compton, Ca. 90222 jl Chico, Ca. 95926 48.01-19 745 C}terry St. Dan Hays Jr. Chico, Ca. 95926 755 CastWood ,Chico, Ca. 9 48-01-09-5926 AP i ,k c 1 A r r Receipt Project APPENDIX r r _ Date Filed Environmental Information Form (To be completed by applicant) GENERAL INFORMATION 1, Na e a d address of develo er or ro,ject sponsor, 7 ��', 1 -- 2, Address ofprofect.��-� ,a Assessor's Block and Lot Number d,. Z,_ C-A o--) tiName,g p nu ber of person to be contacted concernin at�hisssro oGttele hone Q 4. Type of project., (,e. rezoning, subdivision) r i rte " 64. F 5. List and describe any other related permits an6 other public approvals edqujred for this project, including those required by city, regional,, state and federal agencies 6. Existing zoning distFrict:; S 1, Proposed use of site., — -- j Lai ",s►�17iJI grej _ PkOjECT DESCRIPTION 8 Site size , C7 S.Cr 9: Square footage of building(s). -� 10,: Number of floors of cohstruc'tion. 11.Amount of off-street parRint, provided, h,i i4 1,2. Attach site development plan, 13. Proposed scheduling, Tt-tt--l�-rofilannnraCornn, pints 1C Associated projects, 13- Anticipated incremental development, a Appendiu F -'page of 5 ,APPENDIX 16If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, and type of household size expected. 17: If com^Qrciali indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales arca, and loading facilities, 18:: If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, i andloadin; facilities. !., IS,. institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,.loading facilit:iep , and community be.,nefits to be derived fromthe project: 20.. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. Are the following items applicable to the projector its effeets7 Discuss below all itemschecked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary): YES No, 21: Change iri existing featu`ces of my beaches, lakes, or hills, or substarit;,al alteration of ground contours: , 22, Significant change in scenic views 'or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads, 23. Si.-inifica.htly change pattern, scale or character of general area of project. 24. Significant, amounts of solid waste or litteri 25. Changs in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity: in lakeo 6. S quality r alterationo Significant change or ground water or y, f existing drainage patterns 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity, 28. Site ori filled land 'ox on slope of 30 percent or more,, 29, Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,' such as toxic substances, flammable§ or explosives, rtahnin9 ,to Cn' tit 13V�Iv, Appendix E nage 2 of 3 YES rr O .. __. -. 0. Substantial change in demand for monioipal services (police, firej firewater, sewage, etc.) - 31. S��G�ry increase fossil �sumnton (eicityoil,natucalgasetc) laticnship to part of a larger project or se ries 2. Re of projects. ENV:T:'<ONMENT1aL. SETTING 33 Describe the project site as it exists before the pros an G including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing atrucj�,Ares on the site, and the twe of the structures. 34. Describe thea surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects• Indicate the type of lana use (residential, commercial, pf;tc.), intensity of lana use (one -family, apartment houses, she , department. � steres, etc.), and soald of development (height, frontage, set -back, roar yArdi etc.) CERMIC&ION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above an n the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that tha tidt•s, statements, and information presented are txu►e and corxedt to the best v aaOy knowledge and belief. S S gnat re 'For Comm 'O,&G°'VWOO 15 JUL OraVllla� +�.drltatn,,� Appendix t - page 3 of 3 ,I y APPENDIX F ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) Lo g 80-07--03.02 I. BACKGROUNDERD 1. Name of Proponent -JaY D,plummpr 2. Address and Phone Number ot Proponent: 7`45 Chprry- St_ r/n nan Hawc jr- c 4 guns Chin, CA 95926 755 Fa§+wnnd-Avp- 111 CrnninnAt Ua11 AtrAe$ ChI ca o CA 25026 r.h'{'rn 3, Date of Checklist Submitted � CA_459?h 4, Agency Requiring Checklist 5. Name of proposal, if applicable R rnnP frnm "I -1 N_l,-- to M -],-- APW40-01-09, (prti on ) AP 48-01-09, II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. >iarth. Will the proposal result in sighificant t: -table earth conditions or in. a,nges in geologic substructures? wo 'eruptions, displacements, coml- ®n ' :tion or overcovering of thti soil? t tinge in topography or ground sur- { e relief feattires or removal of � p"soi l? )estltuction, covering or modi,fiea:- tion of any unique geologic or physidal features? e, Increase in wind or el°ue.Loli o:f soils, either oft or off the site? f, Changes in deposition or erosion if beach sandsi or changes in silta- tion, deposition or erosion ohidh may modify the channel of a tiver or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g, Los`s of prime agriculturalij prop Jg ductive soils outside designated urban areas? Ahperid k r page ]....o> 9 YES MAYBE NO h. Exposure of people of property to geologic hazafrds such .as earthquakes, landslides,s) ground failure, t or hazard4)7 ,-„ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in a. Substantial deterioration of ambient or local. air quality? I . The creation of objactionable odors, smoke or fumes? C. Significant alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water, Will tate proposal result in stbstant;ial i a, Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? --- -- b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of � surface water runoff? . c. Need for off -bite surface drainage improvements) including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert A� - installation? d. Alterations to the course or flow of florid viaters? -, e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body,? ._ f. bi;scharge into surface wagers, or in any alteration of surface Water quality, ivaluditig but not . limited tb temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?" g. Alteration of the direction or 4, rate of. flora of ground water's,? h. Change in the quantity car;qua Iity OLE ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by Outs or excavationsl Appendik V page 2 of 0 r.. YES MAYBE Nli I, Steduction' in the amount of water otherwise available for public water suppl .es? ji Exposure of people or pv9perty errelated hazards. such as floodi? p, Plant.Life, Will the proposal result �n siuibstantial a, Loss of vegetation or change in the diversity of species or number -` of any species of plains (including, trees, shrubs; grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species " of plants? c. - Int oduct:ic' 4 species of plants int or in a barrier,; to the norr 'nishkent of d: Reduction in acreage, of any agri- cultixr,�.. 4rop? 5, Animal Liy Will the proposal result fi in s'ubsst&i ati, „i Ai Change Iti the diversity of species, y or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles , fish ,end shell:- bdntna)'Y isms iftseat's or fish ., be. ►r mih, b, Reduction of the numbers of any iAniqu6, rare or e�,dangered "species of animals!; di Introduction of "new species of animals into an area, or result ii' a barrier 4,:d the migration or f. mnveinenC of sn�.h;al:s? d. Reduction of,.'dncroachment upon, or deterioration to dkiating fish or wi,l dli.fe .Habitat t \ Appendix p page 5 of 9' i Yrs myu NO r 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in suU—stantialt a� `\ in noise levels? Increases r—^ b, Dosure of people tc oevere noise �. l,avels? � 7. LiiAiit aY.s:a G , re, Will the proposal U1,P piro'duce significant light or glare? 8. Lanai Use. Will the proposal result ti aa gnif icant a. Alteration of the planned Land use of an area, or establish a trend which will demonstrably lead to such C altera tion't --- . �--- b. Conflict with uses 5n adjoining E °properties, or conflict with establia"lied recreational, educa- tional, religious or scientific. W10 uses of an urea? 9 Natural Resources, Will the proposal result in su F ant`ial ; a, T)entand for, or increase in the rate Of Use of any natural resource? b, Depletion of any nonrenewable c E natural resource? j 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal nvo ve a 'risk of an explosion or the �tel:ease of hazAidoits substances (including, but not limited. to, oil, pes.ticiiies, Ghemieals or radiation) Y in the event' of an accident or AI set p conditions, 11; Po ulation. Will the proposal Opg-n cantly alter the location, density,or th distt'ibution., gkM rateof the human population. of an area or phys tally divide an established comMUnity7 ".2 Hous UA : Will the proposal a g�cantly affect existin* hoixsing, car create a demand for addt• onssl housing?. AppendiX , '' page ` �o 9 - r 1i YES MAYBE NO' 13.E Transortat16n/Circulati6n,. Will the Proposal result in; A. Generation of'substantial additional vehicular movement? b, Significant effect's on exisring parking facilities, or demand for new Marking? c; S.ubstdntial impact upon existing ; transportation systems? d,. Significant alterations'''to present patterns of circulation,br movement of people and/or goods? e Alterations b6 waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 14, Public Services. Will the proposal have gn effect upon, or result in a substantial need for new or altered- governmental _ servicesin any of the following areas - a. Fire protection? Police protection?_ b ^� !' c. Schools? d., Parks or other recreational facilitie.�il 40, e,- Maintenance of public tacilities including roads? f. Other governmental services? 15. Sn , Will the proposal tesult in: a, Use of substantial amounts rut" Duei or energy! , �Ch b, Substantial increase in demand upon existing soures cof energy, or tdquirh the d6velopment of new sours es of energy? 16. Utilities. Will the propoeal result `need n�`aa for new systems, nr 'sub- starttial alterations to the following utilities; Appendik V. page 5 of 0 YES MAYBE NO a., Power or natural gas! :'b. Communications systems? C C. Water? d. Sewer (will trunk line be extended, providing capacity to serve new development)?a e. Storm water. drainage? _ ..�:L 17, Human Health: Will the proposal result in: I a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? ��%� b. Exposure of people to'potential health hazards? 18, Solid Waste, Will the :proposal result I n any any significant impacts associated *. with solid waste disposal or litter p control? I 19 -tics Will the proposal result nni ` trie obstruction of any public designated•or recognized scenic vista open to the public, or -rill the proposal result .in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public viFw? _ C 20. sult t�thepquality �I �nc�an�.tt,�act it�o�ll ` p p y or quantity pf existing puhlicrecrea- tion facilities? .� 21. Archd6l6`ical/Historical, `'Will the osa resu t in an a toratioh of ,• aro significant archeological or historical siter structure, object or building? 22+ Man�ator� P`indinps_ of $i�ificance, o, a, Does the _project have• the potent t] J to degradequality of the environme; ��+� �tarttially redo.z, tbo habwr dish or wildlife snecies ulatiorf ,3ibelow so-Igh or f pp � { 1 r Appendix' w page 6 of 0 R + YES MAYBE, sustaining levels, threa en to eliminate a plant or animal com- munity"reducei;;the number or restrict the ra, nge of mare or ,endangered !? plant Or animal br eliminate important cexamples of the major periods of ! California history or prehistory? b. Does the project liave the potential ` 'r �i to achieve short term benefits to the detriment publiclyadopted �! long-term 'environ _ goals? C, Does the project have impacts which rrry individually limited, but -;t;iulatively considerable? (a project, = tria,j' impact on two or more separate the impact on each 4_ ,°::sources where relativelysmall but t6souwherertheieffectf I the 'total of those impacts on the environment is significant , 1J d, 'Does the`projest have environmental cause substantial. effects, Which will adverse effects on human beings, either rlirectl- or indirectly? I a! i i i i Appenr�i�i µ page 7 of► `r4lYMQ] x ..^ 1 r • t +• ,�« . ���. 9•.x L'Y �411N1c •d+eY�M �.. ...�\�'4....,, .. .. .y ., 1 ,, .. «-«•'v •c✓>Y - � �.e...- :. , A. T, a 1 N', , m, , L 4 i .�.,..*�°'w •rx:.'•. >w., .: .. ... i« .- . .� .i 5 i � ,"w. IiM t!A+1 , f • / ,+'. T 2? Nti 1011 �t<Utv1t.lPm�1\AIti(, •<t,; , ,; t1� PAOJ c T'l umme oS'4 r. .� i L W !oe :r+M�reex •+1 -:i++••++•. c r 5 f' S�G.. ti t� y y i , f � l'ilq Sr i.NY•. '! iY-. ,.•4 +- P *r.r 'r. .§Z100mol't l^ r t Qom.., • . u' i rd YYIN i 1N0 J7(;IA� r , >w • +, � � f ,`•`'�., �••CftAI!'{I i, I'il��� +i ` i,cu ....� ,..1101 , AA.:,, •r,�r"•.` �;` V, '.f ice-�nf _ yam', _.. ;, �l - _.. w:.S i +, , ,. 03 �'�\ ,.`` � � .nor �' t'y�;l+ �rA` tin•il �� ) ,r: ' ++• + \��e 1 t 1 r.r �,'�' /,J�' �r d,... LPIrvlor + •i 1 �\ ii i , t , �+ +� • l3 203 +. I If r 5� 1Y r '�1 5i .i, ''�Ei.•.iy ASy ,h i .Y.... i. � . i .n +",1'i ..• .•�✓ � i .. �'' •. � �{ \ � Z i1VZ «"5.�.•, , r •` t �fSf l 1 � �� j r• A ,.` 'r , ��. 511.,, ♦ i +'i ti 'r I " •' i i , y�. 1M•. t 1'•' ' • �' o �'} . i . 1 '� • .. a + i•.e+' • f�+..? , rt1•Py -` W � it II Y Y i -, r' t i i + �t�, • f r` 5ti 1 5��"� ` d NIZ+snaf, 4K ± • � r , i ' •!�•, J ' �*y� �'�+ • • 1/B.) f • � 5 r ...f I1 k j ; ' � . ' j • 1 ' ...II f I r.'�, r t{ itill+ IN51..1 Z V Y''r�l,, ��� •r§••• "•1��i. • 5 Yxiii� i�i�i • fi � �i t � �� �li I, +'S R�1 �rf';, A 1 ' + •�� ����,,5�'i�!,. It }� S�`r; .i:, + � ( u ..5 S h�f ylp 411`f , I r ae • i!y'fi c.ji• Y° 5 C i -T I co 1 :' 5r'1. , 1 iy�'lly/` }y� + yi, ii �Y' i . r'•i � i i f Ilbl 'Sv'�1,Y3 i. \ • if,�• y 1 .¢•1 , iI �Gbt)00 %'r i 5 " 1 , •,, :`4 Cit�S �b5 • ,iy i � r le 1. 5 I►r�d «-y, tlMwa „ i r r t � q+m.O, •t '� +ti . 3 d � �iE1 .•` f*`i• + t �� .:,,erns ,ter , • i �+." r "' •. ' � ''* Y '"~ 1Yt � 11t ux, �� r 127 y . .Y� w'' Yn•«.• !' � +�`�bF iiOE ' 1�+i+� i f� "�r„ a.+"y,..ar1�,�tt��lrr ;afy.a+"C�r +•i .. ' ��� y.� '.i or 1 /,. 890451 f �.+�..r.. ♦ v i � err w.,.., 121=652'30' �9t recaryn00 PE&I Maopod, WHO, ord 17UbiishCd by dill 6ealattlsal Sutvoy (;4\0'Canttbf by USO$ trod t:800S +44 TapOgtuphy from a0W phofographS by iMultiplax thrthada r;h qnd by PISN+tbblo survoys 195L Aitial pholol,rt5yhhs toMh 130 1 1r,y1�\1nr _- io4vlyna .s i.i 1lo14o:..l:or.hZ1♦0.•u7l.N.nor 4rt1h-Ahioddah dot ht wrlc "I! ` N), Mes 100 oot grid bawd on Calllolhld tootdihol0 n stOrri, zona "ii4hlio11i'A fl%Le C IaI. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENVAt EVALUATION roec't Description Pone 9 SUburban 1. Brief Description-. o reninimumapa'rcels)cres i rto Mom R13(Light'lindustrial). Resident 2.. Locat�orth ofOEatonast of Ftoad, northset of Chico.appraicima e y Undetermined; minimal if well 3. Amount of Impebdsinessious u1ocates:on part of site. drilling Road to be provided along 4. Access and Nearest Public Roads) West side with access to pits `Cohasset Road. 5 method of Sewage Disposal: Septic systems/seepage 6 Source of Water Supply.. Individual wells 7proximity of Power Lines: Along Cohasset Road B. potential for further ulusefororezone applications ment: R zone of hto M-1for - Ve should n land to north, and south due to topography• � Envi ronmenta_n Physical Enyi-ronment: ,1, Terrain a,; General' Topographic Character: Rolling hills b. Slopes: 5 to 15% c, Elevations 195-2251 ",SL Sl d. Limiting Factors: opes on N.E. and S.E. portions of site. 24 Soils a. Types and Characteristics p. G'oodadrainage,�011 slorcianon. Dark brown clay 2=3 fee p• permeability, slow to M6,, 0c► runoff, law inherent fertility. b. Limiting Factors: permeability 3. Natural Hazards of the Land a Earthquake Zone l'uscan' Monocline Within 4 mile to the. northeast. b, Erosion Potential: Slight c. Fire Hazard:Moderate d, Expansive Soil Potentials Higt► 4. Hydrology Sheep Hollow (an intermittent stream) runs a. Susoucd Water! th-WesteF°ly through the areae, crosses N.E. corner of'site. bi Gtz-4und Waters . From 10-40 feet c. Doainage Ch8tacteristetsnoatoward ardweast toport Sheep Hallow generalT,y; south toward Cohass d Annual Rainfall (normal): DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (continued) • - Cohasset Road,, Sierra Pacific IndustriES 5. Visual/S°enic Quality Good to E., N. & S.; Industrial to W. b N.W 6. Acoustic Quality. Fa r & Sacramento Northern Railroad nearby. 7. Air Quality: Good Biological Environment! 8. Vegetation: Graenda xnd aak trees beyond project site to east; no rare or _ endangered plants on site as per botanical survey in May 1980. 9.Wildlife Habitat: Lower Sonoran Life zone Cultural Environment: 10 Archaeological cal and 'Historical Resources in the . area: None known', slight possibility exists along Sheep Hollow to E, 11. Butte County' General Plan designatton: In bordering Agricultural Residential; topography of site provides separation between SR -3 zoning to E. 12. Existing zoning! SR -3 ---undeveloped land 13. Existing.Land Use on -sire': Open 14. Surrounding Area: a. Land Uses: Vacant, 1 residt�.xce approximately mile to south- east, Cohasset Road & Sacramento Northern Railroad tracks to West. b. Zoning! M-1 to W. (since 7-1-80), A-2 General; 8R=3, A-405 City of Chico zoning in Airport area. public c. Gen. ,Plan_designations: Agricultural Residential; " Industrial to W. NW; Low Density Residential to S;. d, Parcel Sizes: Vary from 4.6 to 156 acres-. 1 56 dearest Urban Areat Chico Urban area Within mile 16, ReleVant Spheres of Influence: Adjacent to City,of Chico sphere of influence for airport,, California Water Service Co:' (Sta 44 & 46). 1 1 76 Fire Protection Service: a, Nearest County (State. Fire StatidOt Station 42 (Cohasset Road Within 2 miles; b, Water' AVai l abi l i ty; Fire hydrants to be yequi red. The following environmental 'concerns have been identified for this rezone proposal. Due to the recently approved M-1 zoning to the West, the topography of the site being suitable for light industrial uses; the limitation of expansion of the zoning to the east; north and south by the topography and the general co formance of the proposal With the General Plan !text and leap), this project is not anticipoted to Mitigation measuret dobe implemen-dd_for this propertyeasepart of a tentatiVe parcel enerate si gni fi ca'nt envi hon map k approved Mair 120 1980 by -ho Advisory Agency. Some i:ypes of M-1 uses (see page 60 of the zoning Ordinance) viould be subject, to further reVieW Under the use permit procedure. Apod-hdI x F ''page 8a of '0 80-07-03-02 DISCUSSIONOF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION' (continued) ' lb,c: Any construction on the site would disrupt, displace and compact some soil. Depending upon the eventual type of light industrial and/or commercial use on theproperty, the possibility exists for a Targe _part of the site to be covered with impervious surfacing. Mr. Plummer may relocate his well drilling business (currently Iodated at 745 Cherry Street in Chico) with related equipment (well drilling rigs, pipe, casing, etc.) onto a good portion of the site. In that event, the amount of impervious surfaces is expected to primarily be a shop and an enclosed storage area. A metal building to be used for warehouse space may be installed on this 9 acres or on the adjacent M-'1 parcels ;to the west. le, 3f: During any construction on the site for buildings, access driveways, etc, there may be an increase in erosion especially on the moderate slopes. The slopes are covered with grasses providing some protection for the soil,• however, measures should be taken to prevent large amounts of soil from washing downslope,,, 2ajb6 Uses that would ;generate offensive odoes, _smoke or .dust would ,- require a use permit. There may be an increase in traffic generated during and after location of a light industrial use on the site, possibly creating a deterioration in, local air quality. 3b,t: A sighifican't amount of imppervious surfacing is not expected that would create a significant change in absorption rates, surface Water runoff and drainage patterns, Refer to mitigation measure N1 of the tentative parcel map (TPM) conditions from May 12, 1900, Runoff frons the project site could be channeled in two directions.. tljInto Sheep Hollow, east of the proposed building area or 2 down the feonta a/access road and then along Cohasset Road and into Sycamore Creek, (Reference: Rock Ci,pek Flood Diversion Feasibility Study - Jon M. Andarsoh p. 22) 6a: An, increase in noise levels could occur depending. upon the -eventual limited industrial and/or commercial Use of the site, Increased' vehicular movement 'Would also add to the increase in noise levels. Appendix F - page tlb of 0 80-07-03-02 DISCUSSIONOF ENVIRONMENTAL E'VALUAT'ION (rontinued) 5b: The project sites lie near the clear zone of the Chico Municipal Airport. According ,to the Airport Environs Plan; Chico Munic pal Airport - August 1978, thL: project site falls within the 55-60 CNEL noise contour radiating from the airport. Sincul a noise Level of 07-70 CNEL or decibels (dB) is cun&ftionally acceptable for commercial/industrial uses, sound atter'wation measures are recommended, but not mandatory, to mitigate the aircraft noise. In the future, the project site may be within the 60665 CNEL contour zone of the airport;..' Refer to mitigation #2 required for the TPM. 7: Some light and glare could occur during the evening and night hours from protective lighting. This impact adds to the cumulative effects of the other industrial activities in the vicinity (includ- ing the airport). Measures should be taken to shield light and glare from Cohasset Road. 8a,b: The proposal basically conforms to the site designation criteria of the Industrial Land Use Category. Adequate sewage I capabilities of the soil is a constraint in this area. (See item 17a.) The need for this property to allow industrial development within the next 90 years has not been documented, A trend to rezone additional land to the north and south to M-1 it remote due to Cie topography of the 9 acres ti) the north and to the south. On the project site, the bluff area extends over most of the property: 9a,bi 15a: Some natural resources Would be used during construction of structures and the associated frontage/access road. Upon completion, the use of nonrenewable resources for heating, Or conditioning and industrial operations would occur at a sustained level. This sustained level would be higher for industrial uses than residential uses. 10: Depending upon the eventual light industrial and/o, commercial use, there may be some risk or hazard from an explosion or release of hazardous substances, fire, etc. Such uses would be subject to a discretionary an;dconditional Use permit 13a,f. There would be additional traffic generated from,,the industrial and/or commercial uses of 'this property. The amount would depend upon the type of use; number of employees, frequency of deliveries and number of visitors: Traffic counts on Cohasset Read (1979 Public Works) showed an ADT of 5460 to the north of Eatoo Road and 1100 to the south of ;Richardson Springs Road. , Appendix F page 8c of 9 4 80-07-03-02 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION ;(continvid) A left turn lane has been proposed on Cohasset Road near the common line of the McGrady and Plummer parcels. This proposal will be subject to approval by the Chico Department of Public Works. It is impossible at this time to determine the amount of traffic gen,. erated by this project because the exact nature of this development is not known. Refer to mitigation measure #3 for TPM. l4r-ibi The project would add another area for the sheriff's department to -patrol and the fire department to protect. the Butte County Fire Department recommended fire hydrants i 300 feet apart, canable of supplying 2,000 gallons per minute minimum fire flow for a sustained period of at least 2hours for the tentative parcel map. Refer to mitigation measure #4 for TPM. 16a;b,e: Electricity and telephone lines would need to be extended APA.c +aach of, the parcels. Due to the Other industrial activity farther t►ij� F.' •Iohg, Cohasset, Road, reinforcement of t`hc present electricity and telc,c rn�^ # lues should not be necessary for this project. 17a: The sui8:' 4M :4AlI0W on the site and practically non-existent in some areas. . 11 tp.'f , have been done to deteetnine 'areas where soil is available below thh. surf�c� which would be suitable for sewage disposal purposes. The parct)'i ,J :. is not the main variable; fihding is te soil area for sewage disposal liq oage pits on the 9 acres x adequate � :en heeded. See mitigation measure #5 % f'o, ; PM An M-1 use with high water needs may not be possible with seepagew pits, 10: The rezone will affect the scenic vista east from Road. The construction of buildings and associated ihdus'triK1 dial activity may result in an aesthetically offensivevivi:i, Outside stora"e of equipment or materials should be ehclosed With a sight - obscuring fence or landscaping, References: 1, Chino Airport Environs EIR 2: ban Hays Rezone EIk, December 1076 3. Initial, study for Hays, Plumttier, McGrady tentative parcel maps. ;. 1 APpe'ndix F,- page 8d of 9 . A � r Mitigation measures (conditions of approval) for tr;;a '' v p. Plummer tentative parcel map, AP 48-01-09, Advisory Agency, May s,: 1�'n• 1. drainage from the portion of the parcels sloping toward Cohasset Road is to be channeled by means of a storm drain 1d system and tie into the existing cUlverts near parcels 1 and 4, the northeast portion of the Plummer property, and Creek on the southwest portion of ParceTds into amore into the existing open channel which fee Sycamore 4 (Mt Syc property). 2. Record an air aVigational easement on all parcels 3. To facilitate traffic movements and improve traffic safety: (a) Obtain encroachment permits from City .of Chico for any necessary workwithin the right -of -Way of Coha set Road. (b) A one foot; no access strip is to be enforced along the Cohasset Road frontage except for apprr,Ved access roads. ` 4. Fire protection Facilities shall be provided at the time of development per the requirements of the Bdtte' County Fire Department,. 5, deet the minimum regUieements of the Subdivision ordinance for sewage disposal on each parcel. u t 1 IV. DETERMINATION (To becompleted by the meed Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluations I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the -environment,, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION s recommended Q I find that although the proposers pr6jt t could halve a significant effect on the environment, the a Fill not be a significant effect in this case beca,�ae the mitigation measures des6iibed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS RECOMMENDED [� x find the propcsed project MAY have a signtficant, effect on the 6 vironment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date. August 1: 1980 1naturs Far: ENVIRONMENTAL RE EPARTNUIT - ReviewRd ,bye Earl D. Nelson Enrriroxniiental Review Director p�t�pehdi�t k' page 5 f g 1.1 E a APPENDIX G: NEGATIVE DECLARATION REGARDING ENVIROWItNTAL IMPACT 1. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the project described: below has been reviewed pursuant to the pzoviaiono of the California Environmental Quality Act of 197O (Public Resources Code 21100, et seg.) and a determination has been made that it will not have asignificant effect 'upon the environment. Log # 80-07-03.02 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROJ'EOT:. Rezone from SR -3 to M-1 AP 0 4`8-'01-09 (portion) 9 acres t' LOCATION "OF PROJECT: 300' 3 east of Cohasset Road, approV inately 1k miles north of Caton Road, north of Chic,).; ; w 4. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PROJECT APPLIOANT r Jay D. Plummer c/o Dan Hays Jr. c/o Russ Cronioger 745 cherry St.. 755 Eastwood 'Ave. 331 Wall Street Chico, CA 95926 Chico, CA 55926 Chico] CA 95926 5. MITIGATION MEASURES None 6. ,A copy of the Environmental Review Director's initial study regarding the environmental effect of this project is attached. This study was K Adopted p. od as prosented. AdoptedWith changes. Specific modifications and supporting reasons are attached. 7. A public hearing ori this NegatiVe Declaration was held by the decision making body. Hearing body. . 6,Utte County Board of SUgeryisars Date of Determination _ _1080 '� Determination= , On the basis of the 7 nvi ronmental DiVectori s initial study, the i:nformati.on presented at Bearings, oomments received on the prob0sol and our own knowledge and independent research; K Appendil G page 1 of 2' ....� ,.«ar, _, r, aN..+,nv.�+.n,r„u�.)a.+.rye+tua�ai�naaxwrReeaeti.��.Nur,rM,;�rr: a , .:k;, a"m ..rN` : �.^:'.:�, T. 5a7,*�:L` . ::... - .. ... ;•;C .., .,_ , NOTICE Or DETER14INATIONd TO, /-7 Secretary for Resources s 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 CLARK A. .County',-derk " JULi�, ,/ilT�t �► � ' By _ wpuly �rrrrbM.. {Mrd°y rrr . /x7 County Cleric County of Blmte FROM: (Ltiead .A��ncy) 25 Court y enter rive ;Enyirorf-I'o Vial ,"Ie ivv .ie�aY`GILBYlG LT_ CI�OJ�'L AC. r:;sz# `i.�]$••�' C►all+�i*gin Cr?Y3e"' C' 4 d l ,: --� _ Ox•o>>:�..1 le;,;, ^ Flax D��r a `+�65 SUBJECT: riling of Notice of Determination in Comp]" 4, lce pith Section 21108 or 21152 ,of -':h,e Public Resotw 'es jde: ERD Log r 80 f)�03 (''? r O 71. Rezone �`AP n 48-01-09 (Portion) O'kIV D. 1�.lumner tate C earznB toes Num er Ir submitted to State fTear .ngouse ontact-, ersunLI Te et�lzone Nt_� er Earl D. i+iclaoil, DirvuLor c�lE�- Project vocation �--,y 300 east of Cahasset Road, apt r' x- 'm ,tely 1 miles �..t�_�f E��; oad, north of Chico. ro; ect Descr.iptiion To rezone 9 acres + from SR-3 (Suburban Residential 3 acre minimum parcels) -to-14-10,(light industr knl) This is to Advise that the B, I L we Cotaj,tit = Boai'd of SUpervisort has made the-fAlowi.ng, determinations r Lea lsency e�arding �-`e above de scribed �e nro�ect; ; L: The project— , will have a '�i�nxfican+. effect on the % will not environment !7 An Vnvi.ronment,al Itpacttepart "tas t��{epared far this ��r�7je,ct pursuant to fico pr�5vis ons of pn%,' -and was certified` as required by Section 15055(1), 14 Cal,for Code. na Admini,s'trative % A Ncl;ative Declaration teas prepared "for this nrojeCt pUtsuant to the provisions of CEQA, A copy bf the :rr8ative beclaza- 1. tion may be e::otnincd at the t"'r6htfifntill R0-vi,ew Department-, 'y ev Drive, Oroville, Galx,farnia 959G5, CnunL Gent , A Notice Of 4Xem6tion WA13 filed indicating this project. is exempt from envirenment;al revi�tia, _ Appet L_ td3.x 14 page I Of 2 �' r t � �� __ TR' -`is.. ..k?e .,,„..... .. •: .. _... .. _ „��.. --- ..:.:, ....._- _.-.. .. C. The demand for industrially zoned areas 3'M the Chico A.rport area is very low noting that only 22% of the total industrial acreage in the ,'airport Industrial • . �� Park is occupied: � Z. A-5 Zone (Agricultural - 5 Acre Minimum Lots). Thi; is proposed for the area immediately east of the industiial. ;I area consi.stirig of approximately 205 acres. This would continue the established agricultural use of this area and iillow it to, be parceled into about, rorty 5 -Acre lots. The t-ull use of this zone would allow single family dwellings:: .. homes, +. gvarious. other unesuLhatt wol: ActGequire aetheridd It ouoneld Ptovtne ' ft industrtaliti somewhat of 6 fer between west and the suburban=residential zone to the south. 3. 89-1 Zone (Sul,+u.rban-Residential - 1 Acre Minimum Lots). This is proposed for the area immediately south of the agri- cultural and industrial areas consisting of approximately 260 This would be a continuationnorthward of the already which how extends from Eaton el'stiblishd g � on Road + reel (see Appendix "C"). Thisro`ect p_ � north.toSYcamore�1 wduld "continue this 'established zoning north to the southern line of Section 2 iji Township 22 North, Range 1 'East. 4. p -Q Zone (Public -Quasi Public). This is proposed for the area of land in the flight traffic pattern of Chico Municipal Airport (referred to as 'Clear Zone") consisting of approximately "6Q acres. This would restrict the land to public use such as playgrounds and schools. However`; further restrictions may be necessary in light of the potential hazards associated with airport approach and landing zonesc 15142. Description of Snviron'mental•Setting. Appended to this Ympact Repast is a.pirtion of the Northeast, t Chico Asea Master `plan prepared by M,Cain Associates, Chico, Calif:, who also orov.ded much 01 the data used ill this report. The Master Plan can bereferred to for. some environmental data and and analysi's of potential development in the Northeast Chico Area. (a) Shope, of the Land! This site is at the beginning of the transitional area between the Sacramento Va11ey floor and the western slopes ` of the Sierra -Nevada Mountain Range, The site slopes from east t... 0 west With the southern porti,.-A of .the site being reld- _ • ti�tely flat azd the northern portion with some gently rolling he east to hills, Elevations on the site vary from 245 on the, 18.5 at the southwest corner., The average slope from east to West is less than lt, (b) 80i1 Ty p'e!s . , `,rhoto are ieveral different >o:il ty s on the sito. The areas to be zoned 811-1 and n�Q and the northern portion of r r ' the area tri 1,v!" A M-1 are classified as Tuscan stony clay loam. i':3 common over a Targe area on the eastern edge of the VLiielV floor.- This is a dull red clay loam that is granular and friable and contains a fair amount of organic matter. it has mAny cobbles and stones 'which are basaltic and andesitic roc:; and range in size from 3 to 8 inches. This soil type occupies old alluvial fans and the surface is covered by hog wallows;, or low broad mounds a foot or more in height with intervening depressions. Erosion does not effect this soil except where streams have cut through, There is a lonse of Vina Stony loam that runs from east to west generally occupying the flood plain along tho old Sycamore Creek. Since this soil typo does not occupy a habitual area, its characteristics are no't significant. The soil type in the :southern portion of the to be zoned as Valoam 1itsshallow Ia this hslsr-Na paseit than h the Tuscan soil and still has Y,ome agricultural potshtial, The sox;[ type in the,, area to be toned A -S is classified as Anita clay adobe, iPhis %'s a very dark dull -brown or dark chocolate -brown clay Miiciz_checks profusely when dry and duVelops a pronounced auobt structure,. It is well supplied with organicmatter. This soil is shallow, ranging to depths of about 30 inches. Like the V4'naloam, the Anita clay adobe is also underlain by the Tuscan rsoil. (c) Drainage Characteristics; g port and inrtheeTuscanasoilnishonly�if�airnand because there • re are many depressions that lack a natural outlet, standing Water is common. Subsurface drainage in this area is entirely lacking and the area is unfit for irrigation because of its shallowness and uneven surface. The northern portion of the project,'because of its gentle, rolling hills; has good surface drainage, but it also it lack- ing in subsurface drainage: (d) Proximity to Streams, Channels and Flood Plains: Sycamore Creek flows from east to west through the southern portion of the project., The Diversion Channel is along the southern boundary of the project. There are several short ephemeral channels that also flora through the project, the largest being Sheep Hollow "which originates up near Richardson springs 4 (e) Vd dttat�i've Cover The whole project site area is )ract;ically devoid of trees 3 F r 1 t primarily due to the shallow soil conditions. There are some occaslonal'ly scattered oak trees which have managed to secure an adequate root system and seem to be surviving: Basically, the only cover over the slto is native grasses and low weeds. There is no chaparral or iitanzanita on the site as is typical, of areas further north and east at slightly higher elevations 'into the foothills. Certain rare and endangered plant spe- cies are often found in vernal pools such as the ones found -in this area, Hower)er, there has been no on site study to determine if such plants do exist here. 1 (f) Mineral Deposits K 'There are no known mineral deposits on the site of sufficient concentration to be of commercial value. ig) IVihdlife � � Ground nesting types ), Ards such as killdeer and small animals were observed to �'iihatit the project site. There were no larger wildlife observed, probably because the area offers no cover. They may come in at night to feed on the grasses, however. No rare and endangered animal species are knoMi to exist here, (h) Geolabical. Features: the ting ct site at the lower edge of an aliu- Ycon 1iJ vaalr,_c fan the downe Sierras, The area is a mixture of Pleistocene honmarine and Pleistocene fan deposits of sedi- mentary rock of the Cenozoic period;. The sedimentary layers overlay Pliocene pyrocla.sti.c rock 'which are also, of the Cenozoic period-. The project ie5 about 5 miles southwest of Richardson Springs. i There are no springs on the project 'site, but there are several located about 3 miles,to the east, There are to known active or inactive earthquake faults 10- Gated on_the site. There are several minor surface and sub- surface faults located abotii; 5 mills to the west anti seVeral' more located about 7 mile's to the north followingcalong this alluvial fan. There are no recorded earthquakes in the immed- iate project area. (i) Archaoolog;ical iid Historicnl Sites in the Area, '. The project area is vated as }laving a low degree of probab- lity of finding archaeological sites according to the ARCHAEOLOGICAL SPNSxTIVITY MAP ptibl.isliea by the State of California Adjacent areas of ltichavdstinSpr°ings and Bidwell . Park are rated as having a high degree of probability on, this same map, . this area xalls on the borderline of areas occupied by the Kalli zndidn Tribe to the east and the Central Wintun Tribe to 4 Y the west. It was probably more of a no -mans land between the two tribes as it offered no natural shelter or food gathering �F potential to either tribe. There are some stone walls built mostly by Chinese laborers over a hundred years ago. These are found over parts of a northeastern California and are officially recognized: as historical artifacts by'the Butte County Historical Society. They ate not protected from dismantling by either State or County law,, (j) Major Land Use3 The prime use of this area for several past decades has been as grazing ].and for cattle and sheep, The land, as Previous- ly discuss , has minimal agricultural potential. The area >. immediate;; surrounding the proje.t site, except for the Airport,,' lalso grazing land, The ParWell and Vina loam soils will )have high agricultural potential are located a few miles b the west and south of ,this site. Further "to;. the north ;t;id east is scabland. (k) Commercial. and Industrial Areas: The area east of, the Chico Municipal Airport and adjacent to the northern portion of this project is an industrial area,,; which according to the Chico Preliminary General Plan, includes 25 ,industrial firms, which employ some 460 full-time employees,,' and about 200 part-time corkers. The :area is about 1.1/2 utiles north of the intersection of East Avenue and Cohasset [toad. The area around this inter- section is heavily commercial (1) Public Facilities and Utilities: WATER: Available from individual weirs. Based on the ex- perience of existing wells at Chico Airport, there should be adequate ground water to supply the development Which would follow the proposed rezoning. However, maximum water demand fur the 811-1 zone may exceed supply so- consideration should be given to this area to be 'nciud.ed within the California Water Service Area 'which borders the southwest corner of the project area, 8MMA: is a Sewa disposal Sewage p proposed to be by individual septic., tank and leach fields on each parcel, however, it is likely ;, that an alternative met}tod may 17e necessary. The Butte County Dept, of Environmental Health states in a memo dated May 6, 1076, "Soils in the area are in general poorly suited for septic ysystems, likely that a barge part of the i 'area Winlnot meet minimum requirements for septic tanks Subdivision Otdinahco,11 A letter from the State Regional Water Quality Control 'Board dated February 2, 1976, comments on the project, 118oil, conditions in this area are not readily Wonducive to standard septic tank leach field 1. systems and tie question the feasibility of their use." 1 St w i� ELECTR�/CITY;: Available from P: G. P, E Source has not been deterviined, but probably from existing transmission lines along`' Cohasset Roadi NATURAL GAS: Not available to the site. Closest existing facility would be along East Avenue,, about 111/2 miles south: TELEPHONE! Available from e,tisting P.T. T. lines along Cohasset Road. FIRE PROTECTION: Furnished by California Division of Forestry. For a structure ,,e For the winter months, four trucks can,, f be available (Fair Street Station, East .& Cohasset Road Station, Nora Station. in North Chico and Durham Station). Minimum response time from the closest station would be less than 5'minutes. The Chico Fire Department, under a mutual aid agreement with the County,' could also respond to a major fire if requested. In summer months, only two trucks may be; available due to other Commi-tments by California Division of I Forestry. These would be at }cast 4 Cohasset Road Station and Fair Street Station.: f 4 POLICE PROTECTION; Furnished by Butte County Sheriff's Department from their Chico Substation, HOSPITAL: Closest hospital is Chico Commur;ity Memorial. Hospital on Cohasset ,Road- 10ss than 5 minutes from the project site SChOOLS: Children living in the project area would attend ono of the following ,"schools: John A. McManus Elementary Scl,iooli 1-1/2 miles south of the project site. Bidwell , Junior High School,1-3/4: miles south of 'the project site. Pleasant Valley Senior High School;'2 miles south of the project site: PUWC TRANSPORTATION: None available: (m) hocatie,',to'Parks, Scenic Highway Corridors and Recreation 1 The closest park and recreational facility is Bidwell Park, ; ,about 3 miles south of the project site; (n) Access to Rail bines; Streets, Highways.and.Airportst The project site is adjacent to Cohasset'Road which is a main arterial connecting the community of Cohassett and the Airport S with the City of Chico. Southern Pacifit aril Sacramento j Northern Railway provide 'Commercial rail service to the Chico Area. Sacramento Northern also provides rail sei,Vice along., Cohasset Road to the,Airporty but it is on the wrong side of the road to be of benefit to the project site. The closest passenger rail service would be Amttdck at Orlando 32 miles to the east, Commercial, and passengex air service is a:vailablo at Chico Municipal Airporu adja..ent`�to the project site. J (p) vi : - r' The� - ProJect site and ad'cace.nt areas to the north, east, and wCMt`are zoned A-2. From the Diversiion Channel south to Satan Road is zoluad SIZ-1 and further south is mostly b WI.so,,pe G`C (Community-Commercial) and R-4 (Maximum Density t Re`s'idential) tones. The Butte County General Plan Land Use Map designates the propase,�i M-1 and A,-5 areas as Grazing-<Open Land. (1-5 acres Per dwelling units). Proposed P=q and SR-1 areas just fait in the Low Density Residential areas (1-4 dwelling units per 1 acre). The New Chico General Plan calls for the entire area east of Cohasse-t Road to be Grazing/Open Space, so this project Mea would fall into, that category, ].5143. Ehyironm(,:ntal Imp act ` (a) The Environmental Tmpact of the Proposed Action;: 1+ Effect on Population Density in the Area: Other than a "'couple of farm Houses in the ;project area, there is no pop-`" ulation in this area, therefore, this project will have a definite impact. There are no specific projects proposed for this area as yet, therefore it is difficult to predict the area population, However, if we use certain parameters based iation wouldyporleoutopment in someth ngslikeat zoned areas, the popu on sitilar t - this.- A-5 Zoned Area: Depending anon the development of right-of- ways, the 205 acre area could have 20 to 35five-acre parc,eS4 Assuming four persons per parcel this would total approxi mately 80 to 140 people. SR-1 Zoned Area: Although this zoning allows one-acre minimum parcels, the developer feels that parcel size would ave'age about 2-1/2 acres due to soil ronditions: Approximately 95 2-1/2 acre parcels With four Persons per parcel wot I'd ec{uai 3o0 pedple, However, if'the area should build out to its maximum allowed use there, could be 225 to 240 one-acre t parcels. Assumingfour per parcel., the total could be from 906 to o60 persons This would still fall within, County General plan density designations.. This would mean an increase of approximately 460 to 1100 pMeOP e into an area that currcn.tly is not developed, Of c. ourse, the M-1 anis P-q zoned areas would not contribute to r . the population denslty5 but th&Y would contribute to the in J} creased demand fov public services, I,. 2. Detrimental Visual and Auditory Effects Induced by { construction! because nstruction! The visual impact during cons-truction will be i naficant it will b'e a radical change of land use, from open space, The auditory impact will be minimal tonsiy derl.ng the sepa'ration of the project sx ; e from e5� sting evolopment I. 7, 3. Destruction of Timber anti 'Vegetation Cover in the Area. There are no trees I.ri the project area, other than an occa- and aional oak. The vegetation consista of native low graase,,s weeds, the loss of wh'i.cil Would not be significant. 4: Disturbance of Wildlife and Loss of Habitat: The only tldlife In the area is small animals and ground nostina birds. Because parcel. sizes Will ba large and the pro;aomi.nate land use (grazing) Willprobably remain over most of the area,, the impact on wildlife will not be significant. S. Changes in Drainage Characteristics: Therc will bo no in of tile site which would major charges the contour project alter the dr.aiT,age claracter sties. The increased development Would increase the runoff, liowever, because of the large parte this would not be significant except 'possibly ;.'n the c±nificant a;ea to be zoned industrial., This type of area usually has a i1s; s.� g ncease in drainage because a greater portion of the property becomes impervious due to improvements; i.e., buildings, pavement, etc. 'There is a major drainage channel that through the proposed ndust-ial area andemptiesi passes into Sycamore Creek Diversion Channel, thorefore, this area would also not cause any significant impact on drainage as it liblates to the rest of the project or the surrounding area. The increasedrunoff may cause pools of standing water that could be potential breeding grounds for mosquitos. This would be a ntti.sance and health hazard to residents of the surrounding are'«+ 6. Change in Land tlse. This Ptoject would be a change in land use from open'spact to industrial, agricultural, and be in the i%dus- resident'lal ares The greatest change would trial area. The sR-1 area will change to a Suburban ro.,,iden- tial area with parcels most likely greethen than one acre; Both the P -Q and A-5 zones will remain relatively open so no major change would occur there. zricreased Demands on Public Pacilities; A. There will be an increased demand on parks and schools due to the increased populatiori. This impact on the schools could be si„ni.ficant as it could,cause a` redistribution of students to other schools in order to maintain operations within the capacity of the school plant.. The impact ori Flidwel.l Park would not be signi- ficant because it already operates on ft regional basist B. The addition of 460 to 1.100 people Wil, have ars impact on the hospital, and may create a demand for additional hearth services. C. The pvojcct will have an impact on traffic flow on Cohgsset ►toad as this will be the main road off of which access to the 'project site will be established: txcept for the curved portion at the north end of the project Sl Cohasset Road is straight and level With adequate site got estalilishinr cross street intersections', toque i' dis b , 8. Special consideration will have to be given for access onto Cohasset Road through the curved section. D The project will increase the demand :bar.police and "otection. The impact on police prftection should not be too significant, b,owever, thea kmpact on fire pro tection urobabl ' Y will be.The ra1'ifornia Division of Forestry is already beingg called upon to provide &otec- tion over a large rural area with 1.'I'mited,facilities. In addition, they ]lave" the added reesponsib.lity of forest fires during the .fire season at which time there are only two engines available. E. The demand for ground water may exceed supply making connection to California water Service necessary. F. Soil capabilities for septic tanks may not be ade- quite which would, cause a demand for extension of sewer lines. G. Development would create demands for extended elec. tricity, gas, telephone and refuse +service.. , 8; Effect of the Project on Mater Quality: A. SR -1 Zone - The impact on water quality in this area depends very much upon the extent of,,devel.opment and size of the lots. The developer anticipates about 95 2.1/2 acre parcels however, maximum build -out mould allow 225 to 240 one -acre parcels. The ircxeased runoff could`con tain contaminates such as oil products from automobiles and nitrates,; phosphates and phenols from fertilizers. Information from the State {Vater Quality Control hoard the County Dept. of Health, and the McCain Assoc. report' in Appendix L indicates that the soil conditions are not conducive to septic systems as proposed so it will e n.5sumed that any development ,will b -e served by serters. b Bi A-5 Zone - Most likely the continued use of the A-5 area will be grazing and there should be little if any additional runoff or OPPett on water quality. C. P -Q ,*one - This area also will be left open gild should not effect water quality, M-1 Zone A deVeloped industrial area will have a 'a1be percentage of imporvi.ous cover "so runoff will n- cruase substaritiall,y. Runoff Could contain chemicals and petroleUm prodUCts .from "Ilcreased traffic into the creek. These contaminates could be hazardous to plant and animal rife as well as to human health 9Impact Oil �Air jQualtyt In ojider to evaluate the poten= tial air 'qual;ty impact that this project Could 'hare' 'on the j surrounding area, it was first necessary to determine the the direction ,and duration c'Sf the surface winds, ai«l the ' current ambient air nuality?''in the Chico Area. s A compilation of 'tile surface Vinds was made using data ob- tained from the U. S. Weather Eu.�`eau.. The wind direction was .divided into gradrants and, ' area that would be affec- te`d is shown in Appendix "C";, . O i,"ugh• this data int: rather old, it was taken ` at the AirPo: + 7 rotr this data, the can make the followang'cbnclusionst. A. slightly over -so% of the time, the ,prevailing winds are from the south and mould blow pollutants created by this project away from the population areas: The ;re - er of t�hafrom the north and would blow pollutants the p pulated arta. Be Of the populated area, tho eastern part of Chico (Hooker Oak, upper Bidwell Park) would receive any pollu- tants from the site in the order of 10$ to 15$ of the time. C. The North Valley Plaza Shopping Area, the central. esi- dential areas and the,ddigntown business area would re- ceive any pollutants from the site in the order of 5$ to 10% of the time: In order to evaluate the currbnt ambient air following data was obtained from the State AiruResourcese Board, i I Appendix "WO Ambient Air Quality Standards, 11 Appendix "ii" - Spec fact contaminants for each day for a Period Pram October 1074 through Septem- ber 1975 Appendix 1,1,, Particulate matter for each day over this same period. Appendix OyJ - suspended particulates: Random samples° over this same Period, - i Appendix t' ri -sdoi dioris for. each day for this same Period. i i From this data the following conclusions can be dra,wni A: Append xc "Hi' zihows the various NOx contaminant;; which are pi'imari.l,? due to motor vehicles. Nate that on the few occasions the standard's Clave Ueen e�meeded,, there was a south whd, which ini�icate, the itontami- pants did not originate in this area. O� it Shows P I B: Appendix l:� ows the articulate msitter in CON values, This is a measure of "the soil effect that these ' suspended particullites have, CON is classified as foliotrs l �l COH,_UNVTS RANG1? OC SOILING 0 to 0.9 light soiling 1.0 to 1.9 moderate soiling 2.0 to 2.9 heavy soiling 3.0 to 3.0 very heavy sailing 4,0 plus extremely heavy soiling On this basis, the Chico Area. has;, on occasion, ``been into the heavy soiling range, especially duriT g 'the Winter months. Soiling is causal primarily �y par, ti- culates of unburned carbon (fly-ash) 'result#tg .From in'- Complete'combustion; such that occurs in orchard and residential, heaters, C. Appendix 10,7" shows the total suspended particulates which were taken on a random six flay sampling period as specified by the Air Resourt:bs Board whore several sta- tions were satrtpled the same day for .a comparison. On most days, where the particulate level axceeded 100 mi`rcrograms per cubic meter, the w1hid was .from the south, h�lwever,y there were occasions when the wind Was calm or frcm the north when this particulate level was high,' " 'riot this we would conclude that due to agricu7.tural burning in this area or for whatever cause, that occa- sionally we have exceeded the allowable particulate 1evol ; either with or without tho combination of p:articulat,es transported here from some other area Based on the above wind and t.tbient air-quality observations, we can conclude the following impacts of the proposed pro Pwt on the surrounding area; A. Increase in population due to the increase in resi- ; deuces and industrial activity Will .have the primary im- pact Of ruisinb the NOx pollutants due to increased den- sits of motor vehicles, The current dwicentrat or, of - NOx is only occasionally exceeded and on the )rage is } about 0.05 pilin, tviuch is tlIlt the allowable of •0.10 ppm. The additional motor vehi'cle5 Will not have a very sig- nificant effect. B. Increase in industrial a tiVityy when thinking in terms of the ultimate development of the Airport Indus- tr1,11 pant, together With the small acreage of industrial zoned property in this project, could havea significant impact on air quality nth respect to partitulate ettiis- sio ts. The 'Butte 'County Air »o"llution N,ntrol District has set a stariklard that he individum -.urce can dis- charge into the atmosphere particula'ttr matter in excess of 0,3grnins per cubic foot cf air ,brreetea to standard dAditions) with d maxim= pounds per,�,.hour tbto of emis- sion based on a process Weinht foflaultt. The key as to Whether 'or not there would be a signiPi%;aht iinp`act rn Qin quality would be tlt nutnbex of ha.,►h emission type in dus'triO3 that here concentrate ,� tbis area► orf o11 the at•ea Was occupied by high -4 -Sion industries opera- 4 ting within the rules of the A.p.C.D., there could be a significant effect on the air quality. Although present zoni,g would allow this. Tile type of industries to be i:ocated here has not yet been determined. (b ' AnyAdvo-rsse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided if le Rxoposa s Impl_emente �: There`Will be some loss of open space, especially in the meas to 'due zoned industrial and SR -I, The loss `:',n the A;5 portion of the proj�:ct will be. less significant due to the larger parcels; 2. There will be a loss of habitat for small animals and birds, especially, 'in' the arca to be zoned industrial. This loss of habitat will be less`ai.gnificant in the remainder of the •proj ect. 3. There will be a si nificgnt increase in y g'' populat�cn density and an expansion of the Chico Urban Area. 4. There Will be increased demands for p services, j : , public c especially police and fire protection ; 5i There will be an Increased traffl.d flow on Cohasset Road f as a result of this pr�)jbct. j 6. There will, be,.a lo:1s of 6esthetic siArro.tnding;> due to the parceling and `improvemi"t`s allowed by the Proposed rezoning. T. Mere will be increased demands for energy resources, 8. There will be degr4oation of air and waster auality especially in the area �Eo tie zoned NFI. '0 Th6re Will be an, itic llaa3ed demand :t6i, electrical_ �. nei gas, Water,, refuse, and sowe.Y service. � telepha (c) Mit- atien Measures.Proposed to Minimize Adverse Tmpqct4-; 1, The ar , to be zoned P"Q which is part of the "ClIdar` zone+' for the airport could remain as open .4p act and could be developed into a public recreational area. or 'a public 'park, x. No 'special mitigation measures are proposed Pot the loss k, of habitat for small animals and birds. The 1,65'8 in this area is not as significant because of the barren nature of l the,laijdscape as it would be in a forest arth where it would i. result in loss of habitat: and, feeding area of latgev animals by the removal of trees and brush cover. > 3.e '�o special mt atigi leasures are proposed to reduce N let �?pu ion, dent ty. This density Will avrerage slightly less than two persahs pdjacre in the 5R-1 zoned area, based 126 Y t Y r on an averagn of 2,1/2 acre par4;+1q. The dons ity would be greater if they we're split into smaller parcels. For example,, -1 if the parcels wejle l acre each, the densit would be ibout 4 Y probr�bl ' people per acre,. Y ' 4. No spe(;ial mitigation measures are r�,o posod to reduce, the demand 'dor public servicer especially police and, ;lre protection. The additional demand for these services ,Vill y' mean additional expense to the agencies providing the ser- vices. This Will belipartially Offset by the increased re,e nue that eievelopm And State ent in this area will return• to the 'c'winty through property taxes, sales taxes, ;�,id, personal income taxes: 5. The impact of increased traffic on Cohasset Road cm! be mitigated by providing special turn lanes i.n'io the develop- ment, This i;ould inure that the normal f-1014' of traffic on ('ohasset Road woule, not be ihipeded. Also, limiting of the number of access •-bads off of Cohasset "Road will help to _ mitigate this impact and make travel safer. one way of limiting access in, the industrial. area tivould be a frontage road' with access to Gohasset kor d only .a,;;peachIe , exd_ 6. The impact due to the loss of aesthetic surroundings could be mitigated by landscaping between the industrial urea And Cohasset Road. Also, a frontage road Would increase the setback of buildings from Cohasset Road which tvoule Aso help to mitigate this impact. 7. The impact of .incxeased deman>is for energy Could be mitigated by: g1 resources A. Reducing the heating requirementsby by the insulation of houi ses constructed n the ,project area to eXceedCounty codes, B. Limiting the industrial area to those that do not consume -large amounts of energy, C. Providing public transportation from the site to thy: urban area D. Pormingcarpools for work rs commuting to and from the ndustilial area,, i h. Drainage of vernal pools to abate mosquito breec�i►ig areas, 8, Any residential development i1, this Area should be served by setrers rather than septic systems. 9• 1 ow or non-polluting indu fries should be allowed devel :.. .. � Area -: W � to ��p in the Ai 1 area so that adver•ao Impacts to air quality could. tie ,kept to a 'hi.tiiilnum, (d) Alterrltritites to tl;e.rX.Pposed Action, i I _ ;.i,rG''WSr, ` k tilli..nn.i.IS>:h ... ,r I . The project site and ;impacts could be reduced by keeping the P -Q zoning and changing the zoning in the rest of the project area 'to A-10, A-20, or A-40. This Would remove the impacts associated with an industrj,al development and it would cause a minimal impact on the area, because it would essen- tially keep it at itipresent land use. 2: Change the M-1 zoning to a C -Z (General Commercial) zone With the ren, , :t4er of the project left as pro'Aose,.l. This would allow man`,, of the same uses as the industrial zone, but would bo more restrictive. Many of the imltacts associated with the industrial zone would still. 1,,bply to i� commercial zone; however, a commercial may generate more -traffic and induce other commercial development; 3. 'The area could be zoned into smaller, parcel sizes as allowed by 5 -It and SR -l.. This Would allow greater densities wouldand to a sewer system more feasible, mostJlikel.y'] �hook-ups tliisWou"ld have to be done through annexation to theCity of Chico, This would cause considerable impacts in the expansion of the Chico Urban Area and the demand for additional public and private services: This would exceed density designations of both the Butte County and Chico Gene;�,1 Plans. 4. 'the P -Q zone could be -changed to R -C (ltesour'ce Conservation). This is a more restrictive zone and would not allow any,. Nabi- table or permanent structures such as schools, hospitals, and public buildings allowed in the P -Q zone. This would guar antee that the airport clear zone be immune :from large public assemblages and public safety could be enhanced: 5. Reioeation of project. The applicant has no plane for an alternate location of the project at this time because its ` p p q ` feels that this area. has the s �eci;fic locational ualities desirable for ,the various ro osed: zones. 6: No pro'ec`c'at this location. Thiz, would retain the area t ,n the A-2 unc,lasslfied zone and would allow almost any use. Noting the soil conditions, existence o'f the airport c:lea"r zone, and stirrounding land use it is likely that this area would remain ih its prestht use-- opon sp;ir,e/grazing. This would con,forni to both the County and Chico Ge:ieral Plans. fie) S ThePelationship. Between Local hort-Term, lyses of Man's ' n7rorimeirt ane t ie.l�taintenance .stn' dFinhancetnent o;t Eong- $ecatise of soil conditions and locati.on within the airp6tt's sphere of ihfliiehLe, this area is probably best suited for grazng/open space aid 101�� density residential development. lhdustrxal, development would be compatible with the adjacent , Chico Airpo��t Industrial area although the shortwterift demand for such development Is �uest�onable: � substantial increase in air traffic and Indwitriai development is not expected at the Airport iii the neit� .future so a delay in the implementa- tion of tlxis project would not alter or mitigate impacts to 14.. any great degree,. (�) An rrreyersib!&� gnvironmental C}ran es Which Would lie;_ Involved An the 'Proposed—Action should- It 13 eTm�� :ementedt --- 1. There will be a loss of open space, especially in the industrial area. Tracditionally, these losses have been irreversible because once physical improv`ments are made it is virtually impossible to convert the arta: completely back to its previous use, 2. There will be some loss of vegetative cover dfid some loss' of habitat for wildlife. i. There will be an increased demand for public services; ,such as police and fire protection. 4. There will be an increase in storm runoff into the exis- ting drainage channels, with a probability of some water pollu- tion from ,industrial wastes: S. There 14111 be a decrease in ambient air duality ai).d an. increase in noise levels «4 b. There will be an increase in traffic on Cohasset Road. (g) The Growth -Inducing Impact of -the Proposed, Action_: It would not appear that the establishment Of an industrial tone on the east side of Cohasset Road Would have any growth inducing impact because there are still 'many vacant iixdustrial sites in the Airport Industrinj;l Park Tris project could have th, affect of stimieating some additional development to the north and east, bi.c any such dovelopment would also be large parcel rural residential development. This area; because of its shallow and impervious soil condi- 4 tions, will not be subject'to any significant gro�i►th-iriducig U mpact until such time that theme is a municipal sewer dis- trict and a water district serving the area, As longas there are individual, sewage disposal systems and indvidual wells on each parcel, the area will remain as a low density L'esidential area.'"V ) (see McCain. Assoc. .stud.•y, Appendix: 15144. Organizations and persons Consulted, l City of Chico General plan - City of Chico Proposed Preliminary General ?lan Soil Survey; }J.5: Dept. of Agriculture (`86i1 T�pe bate) Geolo gy_of NorthernCalifornldy California Division oi'K.ne5 ` and Goology (adologidal Data) fault Hdtatd Zones in Californias Cal,3.fornia Division of Mines and Geology (8;1esmic }-tazards) is Enviro'nment.al. Tmpact Resort on t;... Rezoning of the r1oa-est Ranch Are allutto Count.), Planning, g eai tment Arc, 'h.ieaiogcaT Sensitivity,and Indian Tribes or tile Pto cot Area) Regulations. for Zoning Districts, Butte County flan Department (Zoning Criteria)ning Zoning Mars, Butte County Planning Dapartiitont (present Zoning 'U.S. Geological Survey, Rjchj►rdsOri ,)pIgjjgs Qi�aclrangle (TopograPhy) McCain Asset,-., Chico, Calif, NorthWast Chico Area Master Ptah, 197 Miccaln Assoc., Chioa, Cal i1`. EnvironmOnta] Data for Hays Rezone y i rl, � a a t INDEX TO APPENDICES - APPENDIX p 711TLir A Composite of Assessor's Parcel Maps 'B Portion of U.S.G.S-. Map of Richardson Springs Quay C' Composite of Planning Department Zoning Maps D Portion of Chico General. flan 1985 E, Preliminary General Plan (Proposed) p Environmental Data for Rezone of 'Northeast Chico Property J G Amh.ont Alt Quality Standards H Place and Contaminant city by Bm4ih J Month, Bftsi,n and Station 1 K Wind L Northeast Chico Arei Master Plan .(pages M industrial Property in Child6 Urban Area Zoned r4� l or qty 2 .r lk N 1Y, f e. M4 V. d, 6 'M. Portion,of r ASSESSORS PARCE MAPS yy 644 IS 900 " 170 .14 4 PROPOSED " REZONE ZA "�� �! rir,��.�r/ , ✓� r YrYf r/�`�+� �,/ ,r',S t'�,r r RI rtr✓�/r,'� ✓r r✓✓ar , �,r r r . ;, r Yr � /,rr,f,_ + r,r /fit fav'. j'�,,/ ,r•!I r'�,r ✓ '�l'i✓'+' �y!/'"'t .� � f �/',, �! r r. / ,rf'/ �,,/y/�r,llyY�r//�f�� �;iiPiM,�*Y/ '�%rr .�✓f� "' :�' rr�✓'rr '•,� "'r Y':rtr,,,rrr���dr, !' " b r �' f f " _' �f�✓eJ y! f r Y v � � , ,•',rrtrt'}/'/"� r °,` / rr ;,*� r r' �/ ,✓` y ✓�.r'r��`/irk r,�j'ri' f r�f ,. Q�,r r ', ^ r+" ,/ r ,r,� rr �� f ;%r� r',r'"r'r,�'! v 1` f r ! . r• �,�,J� r V � r I'r r , . �,I°",r�'r,r , •r, 'I✓ii r,�,f,r.� ���''f �• r bk.44; 5o0,;, t ,6 asrbr��r .�.�..:.=�;�.,.. �.«��: ��..�.�:.�.�...:.=.:•.:.——..:-.�.,=�. '` � rr� ' t, �s «. r r5 iQ pJ� ail f I.1 i0414ix Diet_ u. Re ray Il taPtl�c �� ..y� 9.2.d i4tF S ell- AMNIM 1t,A)r f - ':[ �+:5 . a�'•� 1 +.✓'✓�tr�+�� `1 \ f /'�y•' p (rrdI j-" A ��r'� ��r'� I?4 i �//�,r `�:1 27 26 7 ✓�).«•t i , r„r>•,r :'r +. :Y:c q i A .t, t',.�t r # .... ?""w:,�«=w,"ss+i�^ri:•r uu� t +/ „I} •i ,:' , li,f'i✓'+ ti"n i r Ir i• 7irU Kix t%q 6auo low Mt ' r ♦ � � f � i r M1 "\� ,•+d .. ^ , _ate ): I 1.. � f e`ii• Il t �t-�ji"�4'cw.=t%;t.:.r 'y_T-'."'��- ttrlu�lltN Y +.. A 1S 4 + •."r*. �lx.i«r•. x•.:..x � J�� �...:,�.... ,. r "*1. r r”+� lie Vu i'1 + 1{- t D IkUI!S .1 -'' ,�. �.. � ...._., �. A•.N •. NN'+ b1.A"loll ,dd • " i, � ,a.ty: � r/ I hd i.•.'''. '"'y� �`�S��y/, �Y � "�4 a� � y.. ...:.. •°.'' c ♦.• N t r ° ` c , o ✓lI \� , >,-r- ,, ;,ma.110 y} 34 ' t I35 44' �: !, ;� r � +,'' /; /�> r' ti i:, -,p �J �.» ;-°' ��,li��� •sem ::./ � �f i \�� � "+�. � ( �r��� "`�,.f � �}, �"t•_+ � t/ is /`"` �`�..,."`��t ��i�J�"r;'! s �i �i1 i+l ��r ,� \ i�....xyyil r,N 7'�i '4'k-.' % ✓ , + r,,,�° «,« '•d"i'� ,. +i5:. ".� . ,dam,..',✓ a.• / ��, +, w atr?' � /,� � ! jam,."' . d' , ,•; y ��', C'"' � .,��%✓„,,• .d�.-' f_ +�a _ r,; d, 3g�J •• `MUNIMPAI yAlRRORI� J+fi1 •11 4 �' :t//u ,� f Y ..,✓ �� ! �•� rf/;; \\ 'N•, � ` �® Vit'", ' i ,�' � .) ��if;,,� � �t �., jy��•`3` ♦• ,%�!�'.i " d -`'•. �' i"tNXrl 366 �. -,e-- PROPOSED UZI " ,.r . S-� r E\w -_. soh �`".r � � •i�'���t.: mss" `� ..n �..!'.!J ' /' -'� ♦ � \ t Al N *QA1 v « ODY IJ .• i ` 1" " e ' �1 . r , `"�,1 �✓� � +.,« .�� � Xe+'•;, +i.... ,! � [ +«"'"}}+`.' � `�`' 4:r `.i y � . + r �+�., .', { 1. f �� ,,- '� + �.. ,•r 1' iT v fir' � }h1•. 1♦ � +'• W &u�,,. ;«� y1'" ry♦ 4 9� �. i�Y •e«.nYl a !1 N� � ; " /« 60*i st N- � i • � i ti' +1x ii..' ?V }"lawn . �Iky '. � ] � u � i ....� � ' � � , +K�w:t• ,At Y P • 1 ' . « + ,•Ny'IA•. . i x :. "P1 hao) ,..�iWy:.AA. Il\ «.�.xi�, �tk'yo F�,iv.+.�_�" ' 'YDS ,o /•' ff 411i ♦' +:: C t . � t ',ran i i i �« +.� st . \ �+i.. .u" � }.►M�U � "� •)��i r".+. ,f: + y " r i i � +' . x 1 i.i "+• ` i C {'� � PNNM �g+� •o�y � j,F t "r• 1� I l •�u��rh ' • `' + y;r arw». )( H %� nom' s 1 1pi,)��1 r J ."�i, t �«.•.7: titn '' ,� i14p "N Gh6. ...}I�tw1yw.qtl �a.y.y. :i'"4Npp'�•.x.it a +�tr!:i^'t'�ta'"^i'�r I/ma° y. .•'�';` + ;"�+ " s^6�+ON POS i' mi a mhj "• A/ ' i. ��. I �.� • " 11Q '1� " •"^ A�t1 «1F +.. :♦% � ,1. *1 •a,. c t!3 � ,}�t" ' 111 , t 4 .d " r a� M1 4 rt'r•y .r t r 4 M1 1 ✓F�✓rdr, r,�✓ �Y r Y' � P ox _ ee rr t�rr' ✓✓ PROJECT, LOCATION. I .:�> N Y✓� w,� � ! � . �✓ rra✓ �id ./r I .!{++LdyFy,.J�,, rrr✓�i✓ r 'y+''✓ry' ✓,,, ... ✓rJ✓, r ' '! ` r'r p y �J''!i^ � ✓ %'''✓� 'r!/,/, f✓,a ,r�I + '. .� I ,t 1{1{1{ "IFp a r 1.1� /� ! ,Y: �✓�'✓+�Y �iJ/.r Yy . c ` w �. �.,• it a�yi � r� a> CSC `4.�"�� ' C�C ,,�� Y 1 � ;��. 4M `i;)} 1 } ' •`fit "��`��� :s• s i ,�i`��u , ' M)MCIPAc ,''4 (INDUSTRIAL) AIRPORr J�' 1� YI ,:r.t.W, •M . i t . ryc.r r',��ti% \.:+la+�.s4P'RVK OS.ET I' µ REZONE NE . Aa 5 M n �:+ra r j Y . OPEN spAct, .y 1 + AVENUE S ,i lAss✓ .� YY • Y \ 1N � 'h4�1�YOM.�1t } } i� y t:t. �`�•' (MEDIUM YY Alco C DENSITY i -MD •' CAYfr JR dti J y �. !• �/ t tL WI EL� t( a ��"Ji`iiliw � t i s tt✓k`C;AIN A'sst(bt.IATt-7 toirije� 11.16 « ,�•,••�• � i , � 5'�3 CA+it' �1NCrii1C t.S+N b,+".^liFt7tlNi� $ShiC � alt, 1 1 Ao,�4i7[&o Fih:o,Nnt-hil tuKIVGybt'-w -- + . . � � ' . �--►:moo '? 1 �, _ - "�,=. t� R 6clrl,Oe PRELIMI ENE f R��iF31( _RSL ALAN (Proposed.) � > z� RESIDENTIAL r PUBLIC &DUASI-PUBLItr l Q RUPIAL 1 D.U:/1-5 GROSS AC. l ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. l it LOW DENSITY-1-6 QiJ, /GROSa AL_- JUN10R HIGH SCHOOL `� _ :_ i ~ A - ;HIGH DENSITY UP TO 35`D:U:/3F(O$S AG. a HIGHSCHOOL - D� COMMERCiAi. tR e� f /�/. _._ 1 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY ATC ©©7 co�co� ._^ � ��'� NEIGHBORHOODZ t): tae c� .-. -�' JTHEP.PUSLIC FACILITIES; r n � ao`�ee --� �, tc CENTRAL-BUSINESS DISTRICT QPM SPACE n -I. i - r "SIGi7i 7= . GENRAL refs E /CLUSTER :- �, AGR;CULTURE ^. `v�' TFlORO::GHFARE 57 r c 4 ` z; o ;� L__--; GRAZING INDUSTRIAL = PARKS &CREEASIDEGRBENWAYS :NDUSTR`(& HEAV'f COMMERCIAL - TRANSPORTATION �o c l z *r,�r , �, o sooa', ���o s e . 3- ^ , t - MOMIT AIRPORT _ .. .� PROPOSED REZONE i {F �.- r _ - . R"+.... -w >, `- r�`t -- r ± y.�= �R ^ r ... .. tr- t / 1 •s G f 1 s s 3 ..: �:. < - -o; S- , L ti �'.^ s 'f i3 S r r r R .' *• 2}- is•`(y■ a } vR s , ifr .+l u r r rr s -'t Xt I [dY .9 f.�L.4 ti.LF r. . r • G S_i w►r:: uu ) ax rc t't }► e.. xlr. +ra lvr� za I wtw yyr.L r►: Arm �P2 --vst�a-�- t r�r _ __ - .. _ _ 'stir wu.: cm •s tsc Tr AMI .f' , r= :-.G:a.. �w:r Lig[ IwT: !.<JA ss4-d" 7-.2' rc.:e. c 1.«t„!.w i 1Z2t s 2:7 i S s Jr. flc]- S.1 ] i tic P :;S 1.e I35_ ;:SLg 2 '(153 j tt f I is f vx5 r L1 SG0. 1J. 5.1. - 2 ' f.2 7.D va[.. _'1- ay..T ise wiooa ty • 1 tla ]f. .!: t101 aa/ IY01 fill •.3:-=: UD] ' APPENUIX "Frt v. 7a. '1 i. .;.f.une i thr T j: [la3 . tic3 w Cal 1.2 Fa.2 'I203 .7.0 5:6- I(25) 4.7.' i:0 S.a a'.a S' 4 ;7 7.7 3.f.T 3.4 Y'.atall ' f. c n r ♦_ ^ i *»ctaa Iia) (it1' tial ss T.7' a1' , 1 +.S Y.a ] 7.] p hfa.r4f.a (2.1-�t 2.a a, Ila Ira ,.L 3.1 7.2. I.Ila t361 1131 IsfsJ '-✓- T Lc r.s c,7 g 6.4 t i.1: l:Slu�3.0 (=a1 • t701 .ciSc.tsT 120 LG 9.6 f 1_ 3.9- 1.0 7. 3.4 73 tz.r_ . _ ttt � 1201 (ltl t7t) {a.aa)7.5 f.ft2, teal16.{ 7.0 SS 12.7. f.D i r7.iaf rr. fife`- e *; 1 a 12.4'A G.L►'�: p.3� tI'to) 5-1 , 7{:.ff 3 22 .fK (20) S.S T.{ i_1f.F AY 'elal` S;i 7.1 -.fr2 call f.D f3 -'r't+f • +r FQ yte i SL L_ YY a :Y;g U.4 IZ2:a 11.6 lT f 1 ZS ]..'1 '].a-6.3 ss j fl:} c it 3 U5J3 ^ fa01 7 tla)• !aJ)K�[]c1Lt 12.4 351 (. xS.I - Y.l X17.7 _ tls.- 0.0 t7gJ 13.9 e.l it.3 tial lirf 111 •rt._..,r if lac 7 51.E -y ) c•a-�. ) 6.2 ..-; ^..�. •'� ,.. .z ash Hn <Cl r" s~ rs l •' gls.r. Ia;o. 2s.e 354'�t 6,g . (�� . _ i.G-... a.0 li• ^ 1'6I:0 l- l- 71.ti te.t C: TI. f s a:C i rnr d.ci...' rrA:by P.. I.- - e.5 t L .. I�aT•Y Air Tuar.• r. - - -i: -r 7 fM1'r tt.M.:'F't- 7aa �« ^' St.:tne- Oet•S �Sst�: . S �• 'Sn: - � t" J .. t t-r:C < h-+ �Iy CiTay. .t}iVrt3` eKs« 71L. Cun� n=,T `.'ewe .`at r r i[On aUl�IttiY o•.nt•-' a: _- ... _ __ - .. _ _ -"+� T t y .. R r-» m' sa}-. +:.Eac'r: c.`.:wttaaCct.:.. ee•F lervabt t C -.. - - � - :'S f .te u........ � ve,_h FEF..nF:: t�:uur.r.to • <.•.� C i G.. i...�j_..i �..rtG �Fw Llli ., . _.. .f' , r= :-.G:a.. �w:r Lig[ IwT: !.<JA _ .- Ery r_" C. e.a': is mF 1 . acs.cY is ':c irtis, et vy 4 Ci S=%..: -_ - t.� -•.. �frYtsF st.....v: .i is a�.1..- t"t -z-1.1 n:: V Ft'1].aG eZce. « ta:; ^"'L �,Y .rt'_Y Ln L t' SF ;:Mr 1r: �1� }:Yor VgfME.r.et St t4T••«- '.`•. > -. .';F:at'riVgf n(•ir.. «Lt0119. S7.!'=1eft t•�" 1 ..� �h.. Sf-- r•••'• _ -• ►� �•. ?G- .-c. «..J+....y fwc` ie2lC.vr tli.t. radz�m �aR6 r. ise wiooa ty APPENUIX "Frt v. f . IF flu Averaging_ OaLiforni2 Standard Federal Standards _ Pollutant, Time Concent -ration FRM.a5 econ� :ry - Same2 t6[OC;leIG1CaL O1'2ua.^i:S (Cozrected for O :I L Hour - _ 0.10 ppm - 0'.0$ ppm as Primacy Std. - 12 Hours 10 Ppm - Same as Carbon Ifa=xide 8 Hor-rs � - ^-19 PPm, tr nary 1 Btr _ 40 ppm: 35 ppm Standards' Annual 0.05 ppm Same as hitzagetx Dim-=,ide 1 Hour. 0.2 - Pp -I - Primary Std;. Annua)L "erage - 0.03 ppm - 24 Hours. 0.0!4 PPM7 14 ppm _. Sul€v` 3i ax de 3Hours: _ - 0.5 ppm I Hour 0.5 ppm - _. Annual -Geometric Mean 30 pgIm? 75 pgrm3 60 i $lm3 Suspended Farr.s`culate natter 10,) /m3 260; 150 pgim3 Z4 Houra' -pg' +g/2 Lead (Eattieulat'e) 3G Day A --rage 1.5 pg/m' Hydrogen Sulfide l dour 0.03 Ppm 3 Hours _ 0.2 Ppm Same: as Hydrocarbons (Corrected for 144 -thane) (6-9� I.Primary Std'. L Observation Visibility tr, less than. Visibility Reducing. 10 miles wh%t, the 1sa=ticI es relative humidi cy is. less titan 70%.. [ _ vlw'E - DAY, OF tl6MTx, _ Wt.' 0F'tl♦a •Es[ ""ALT Maa2l,7 - - y cAlcor QZtD:q'[' .61 .di .11 ;.47 ,05 ..OS .0► �.66 .C7 _07 .0• .OS .OJ .O• .G7 .OS ,Ci ,Oi, ,77 .06� .Oa .Oa -00 ,6f -._0• Of .0L .a• ...:03 .•S .f) _71 .f7 ,li QC CAR3ON: tlo.e'ICE !- t t • f l !' I 4 T 7 • / f 7 11 IO 33 1 2 3 / 16 _-10 NC7A3GEN: G IOZIDE .OT: .07 *1;..03 .as s', 05..03 _07 _0• .01 -.0a ,a3 ,06`.60 -a• .vr ,:0 6t -. T A• .OI .OS .Ot .i1 :0• .a7 '.Oa .4) c0) aa• .0♦ .7•- ,.H :3Z t MC7$iC'nYlaE ::Sa - .iT ,O) - .61 .tJ ".13 � .0• - 07 .T'1 .to .I3 ' .19 .It .10 .1i :17 4 .27 .Ie .Oi -.Ol .Ot .:li .IS .t7 .05 :60 :Ol .O/ .Q5 :05 .27 la :3a 3 DiiOfs. dF NItYO:.EN .T• _]) '. '.O► .o► .t7 1 .x7 .IS _Ia :I• .1f 017 :I) .0 .I3.1• al 1• .2J .Ia ,I! ,03 .7: s7 , x• as .Il �O: :e• a/ .01 .o/ .7T .13 at 1' 3 :lyi` -7a! a.._a S ! a -D ) • 3- ) e. a 7a 1 CNfCa' '�(�✓-s- O71t:a�iY .03 :4f .06.yi ,OS .6T ,01 ..0) .OA :.O• .0; 03 .04 .0• .03 .03�, :03 .07 .01 .Oa .eA .Oa� .83 _Oa .a7 .O4 .fa .i) _.ea :2! -- .OT 0a `.67 C♦R/7N: N04Or10E- s t 6 YO 11 / • : a 7 IO 1T 27 : 12 10 / 1 I 15 I3 $ 7 t2 ,. 't = 1 a 31 IO 2S - 7a� s NITROGEN DIOXIDE .0a : .01 .0► ':CS :05 ,0/' .7a : ,02 _Os - _Ot '.07 - .06 -D• �1f -.9as i: a2 .00 ,2• 20 .32 .:00 .)2 :]D .0• :0• ,xf -..30 .0 .1, .13 tf 1S :9/ r�� 'M CT$3L OtICE 020 : .OS .0• ! ,la .ZO .30 _a3 _01 ,IC .Z7 -7S _ ,:2i ! OZIDEs OF NITROGEN' .33 e:.0f .!S ,2• as :t1 _O7 .Oa .ta .23 .31 .S3 .75 .1. ,e7 _e3 .Oa ,f0 '.7a .17 :0! .3• Z) .0• .67 .aD .32 .07 .I• .a7 7 NYOR6C"llaxs a a t S 5 a ) D • 6 7 • ♦ • 3 3 '.1 6'-. S 3 :3 -� '.!a • 3 S • a L _ • �Y 1 �: .312 CNICO' r.07 ,:U3 +,OS..j _•2 fff ;O! E� OZtaaNT ,OS .03 -.Ol .43 .01 �,6) «O7 '002 .02 .02 .OI .O3 -•„02� .62 .02 .02 .03 02 .01 .91�_O1 .03..0) .03 .00 •.07 .b) +• i 'O 11.- 6 )• Cat/CN YOIIOZ2OG 7 ♦ 2 Il 1 - 1• ! S f 3 ) ! '.16 3 3 • 3 Y2 a 7 • 7 • 1 • ! 3 9 ,CZ .0� .OS .07 .aS NIinRGSN DaO10 .0• -.0• ..ai _6• _03 .Os 03<_O5 .07 .03 .02 ,07 :Da 47 .ate ,02 ,07 .03 .0) ,n) .07 .07 ,O7 .OS :0• .,al .07 Q �TTRIC aY33E- Sr ,]• :00: .s0 ,s7 -:_0• =33 t_.,03 -03 .0• _ii. .t¢ .0_ aDi-.00,..11 _Oa .02..01 .6• ..1! .I1 -12 •6•:.00 aOi :]t .a0 .30 .SI[- I t Y 0-1 EKT0f3G/$/a41TAGGER .0`1.0-4 <02 .2` .15 a•7 .IS -14 .2s ,41 0; i. .2+ -12 02 .Da .82 -! _a� •02 •14� •14 :1� =1` .I.� .ij .03 7 a v' . 23 .aYLi = 3i- tnTta. -p r ♦� al . OZ D2 _Oz -01 03'k. 02.a! :01� .ea 07• .Ol .D•t �"! :0)I`.0• y-6• .67 0. D"T .Ow .O .a)-s03 - r 0s .Oa:-0a .OY :Ol .0] .0) ..07 .a► .o► ..0♦ .si c:as� _7a ,0• _O• :OI . .Oa -.at 3' \2. 1 7 1 • to • x 7 i6' s • a M7 r u s (i f: u4eov' WvaiILE �' 1 • T a a 3 3 I . s is 17.. 1t 1a 1a I1 ii J ] 2 J d•fTROCEN DS6ZZOE: 111 +• .aa Aa c .a3 ,D3 -_ .03 .02 `- O: .6a ,03 OS - .9S =b• �3 . Ni7tFC tirtIIE .iT' ,23 .13: ,02 _ti :. Ga ,03 �:.Os ,a7 .70 - .:3Y .it �� ,70 X73 ,29 . :03� a5 -'6s _13 .I) .35 ,il .21 .fi ,02 �:l3 .iA :33 .131 .1• yl/ ;a/ I' a-DZ1DE5 ar`'NTIR�LEO .2't -2• _ . ,:..I 7 . a : ♦ a 3 I -2 • • • :a ! 3 )� •�. 1 7i.-` 2 30- a S6 /y1i - - A N . • • - lD a - -,• T , 7 Z 5 3 0�. 5 _ �- ..� �: _ f C', (1 6 eL� D• a7 O[tOaNF O),0s OY: O• 0l' 02 ,03E Os _Oa 0• _¢3 aaF b' .C` .O` 07 OS� ai 02� -07: Ti 02 .OS •035 fi•C7� 30 15 3 at `. taAnQ} NCNOYLCE l I 7 3 7 S '3- 3 S ?; ' -:Cc 107,_ +�.. _ Ni1�LGEN. IITCrICE -IXt OL :D1- D) .al O9 as OJ - +7 .OS ,02 :0• OS O• OS O• ,Oa' -a2 03 Og 03 .0• .Os .a• 13 -03 d7: 07 .07 at /1 `�' OFC.Si DOi16E�aGEN -62 of 'a 3 0i, a3:I2-¢7 of -4i .Q) .0) 02 7t 13. Il 0?1-:1.7 1'j(fr �Z2 1� 75 3 �a: .i. l` d' .T` ae .i` B SO 3; 11. ry'/3RQGtIIOCkS; j: Z'- 2 I 2 3 3- 2 2 7 2 Y 2 1 CIh.CII: i . 1 Oli aaYY .Oa ,05 •Os O•) ,a3' CJ .Os ,ta •:Oa� ,Oa :Oa OS :Oa 0e Ot ,Q1 .Oa ,Oa -Oa (i4 OS Oa Oa ,aa ,Oa - aS .Os .OS .OS .0• .Oi .Oa Oe .Oa ,01 Ca4GDN'a✓1Npi [OE' s 3 • • 3 D ) 1 lr a� Z i0 ] 2 - S f SI i 3k 7 2 3 t Z L 7 3 s • 1 7 le- 3 is 1� ESt:OGfN 7IOZTDE ,O7I .Oa: :OS .a7 ai 0•-SY:a2: 't12 6�LLL ;O) as OS 02 .al 03: .Ai ..07 07i _OS a2 Os' 0] 02- .O3 03 .aa _O;: 01 07 .03 C7•. .414tC 11-12 .'0♦{ DI ,Of LO--ai: a2 .4.1 1.: ..OD .O3 .OI -16 ,at "I -:OD -00 -00 Oa -01f 01 OC. 01 -00 00' ,Ofi 0Y 02 .4+!l, .a7� 05 .03 .'1 O7 _21 �� /� Dx3Df'SS of SITAOGfN . ,09 r,. D1 .t3 13 47: _O6 .OI- IXZ :621 07� :Ca� 20 .Qa A3 ai -03 aC3� 02't: CaE 07 .-a7 a3 aZ 02 ,.a1 ,63 .0• .11 F. •Ia!!!!!!� .0• .O• .1C s6• .2f - ar340J1$aLN9 tilil 7 • 4 Z 2 2: 2 3 2 a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 i 1 Z 2 2 } 1! a•_ -T : if SS cric...r .,a•:.,.. as OS Os as ,0• ..Oar O6' ..0• OS 0► 0• OS +♦ OS _43 Oa. .Of 07 _0s 0♦ Oa-d•':O1 03 .0•• .07 a-,,. 7 .Oa ,07, .•li : ►!T46CER�a12% OE o=�[ ,a: 2 a3, 02, ai 4t .07 cat, .o• C: .DS .a3 .OJ ;02 2 3 2 S J 3 1 z 1 7 2 • 3�I- 1 a 3a. 3 • 07 iii QS 03 0a 07 bI,Ca .OS -al CA _Oa 47 M:7RYC OtiLE .05� ?ca a0 0J 40 as O3 J• ti OS .a) ,¢0 .Oa rE0 .02 00�. :6i 0a 0Z 01 -6+ .Olt -Oa ,O1 .¢6 .03' :OS ,07 67: -01 O O-Tors 6F NLTRpGfii .IG .67 oz ,62 i3 .OT 02-:00 ,07 09 A0 .03 .03` .02�.-moi: o2 10 a/ .Oa ,OZ .87 .aa .9i .IXa' .12 ,OT� .0• ,07 _: _11 ,ca. n,D$pcaoaaaz 2 st I 2a a 3 Crl CO_ }� as/C.'aZ Cf' ai ,az OS .cs. ,IXb .67 `,cs _Osa Si- :01 .OS -Oi .0: 66 .as :bt 06 ,'OS •0•- SOS 07 .a•'.a1 0/ .FJ ,a5 .OS .01 .0•,II J31 .¢► -:52 fi4fla9 3K3tiiT�.. 7 1 1 3 3 ) 2`. Y 1. .I a 1 2 ' ) 1 2 1 I • -3 1 S s Z 2: 3 2 MtTRCLEN=D[arSOE r. `3 :0/.01 a•�. 01� .OS O7 0/ 02 OS .OF. ,06 a2 OS Q3 ,01 .Oa .01. 6i' as .DS ,ba .Os .03 ,Oa .OI .Oa-:a♦ 05. .Da _OIJ.. NTT4fe ait3E 97 DI SE Oa _01- - i ,03 .0Z .al aS_I DO 200 Ol-OI 00 :9I 00 :01 4i-al:pa: 01 .CI _07 4J.,Ot ,0) :O1 ,oa :all!(lF ,al` ,34 :Oi- ,at -'f NYDOCs:OCF ]CGEM _62.0 .a=: d2 02� O2 0�4._ 07 ,0=, 17 _J7 Da'. ,077 ,.Oj: :0= .0=.02 .02 .'d2 ,07- a2 .0=: :01� -47 at .07 .03 02 G2l -03 CD2 •031. 0.ISES OF 2 j CNICO- - G1L. _O6- .OS .Oa ,O. ,O• s01 .,0•:_06 ,01'.05 .O/ i0' .or ,00'.07 ,OE .01 ,01 .07 C► -07` .07 :05 ' _3: _Oa .OS ,fa .03 _'OS -01 a6K., .C• i 3C JCg2JE CIL,.]CM +K kaKIQE Z 3 1' a I 3 3 I 3 I 7 2: I I I ` 1 2 ♦ D s 2 1 a• 2 `` a a + k1.74CGE+r. alOiiDE. -St .OS .02 O3 ,Q2' ,6Z .OS: Os CS _' OS ',.0s -.0S .03 ,01 01 :0t 01 .03 .00. ,a1 ;OS" .0) .L• .0♦' ,OS .0a _03 .92 d•. .`3: .6• l { - N; 741E IMIDE -.40 0¢ .00 .OS _01- .00 .QI.C2 .O3 +t. .110 ,7a. .Of- ;CO Cc _00 1. OIX� ;00 ,00'.00 .¢d -.OD 00 .OI -.OI: .O1 _OS- :00 .`. :05 .O1 .00 ` _{ � Dr[OES=DF r7YA0cEN .02 -.03 .07 .00s 02 ,Cl ,0•- .05' .C► .,OS ,03 .4D ,03 ,OI _OS :at O3 .a3 .O1 .Oa ,02--.43 .'03 .06 ;Oi _06 01 .r) .62 .0/a: .64 13 NY-$3Cai/C!S` 2:. ! z 3 2'. 2 I 1 2 2 Z 2 2 `2 2 2 2' 2 Z- 2 2 2 1- Z 2- 3 2- ! 2 ,211- rrf CNICD: � J�,i fa D C+•i ¢S .0/ 06 -db[ .[6 07 -.Oa 09 .Oa- St 07 ,0/ .a2 a) -:CS 0•« .Oe V.6T:1;06 O6.07 -Of .07 :OS ,7a :¢3 .01 =TNT .04 t+..N3� W63TIIIz 2 2 Y 1t J 2 ] s 2 3 Z a t 1 -2 Z' 2 Y a z 1 3 Z • • • 1 i ♦Cln3igs DIOXIDE .0• ` _C3 02 .b21 O3: ,Oa .05 _0S OS a3�-. is ' .Oa .02 02 aZ .02. .61f .OZ a• .02. -03 0a .O3 .O• ;0• .a3 .01 :,61- .01 ,Oa C. - :0• ,0) 91 IwFT41L DrIDE_ ' 0o O7 `.a0 OTI 00 _OO .CI .00 a0i 4T .02 00 :00 00 .CO{ O1 30 :00 :05 .t0 .OI a3 ,Od _00 02 .DS O3 Oi 0t n7C, CYCLES OF NS TACLER O<.. .03 OI .C7 ,d•-. ,Oa .OS .61 ,aS .OS :.fa C0 OI�. .07 'D2 47` ,D' al - .0a -4T - .C3 .O• - :0/ .0t - .Ol -. O5 .O1 .01 .a1 .01 .01 ,Ofa .Oa: .12 _w7L�o:agd3l•.S: I 2 2] 2 2 2 3 -:Z ! z -3 2. - C ( WFCC _ / a SCAM a3:.0• ,C3'.07 O7; _OS .Oa •, CA�•.af .CS -as .01 :O6 OV o9 09 Oa* ,03 .Oa .03 .05Hill :06 .06 :0• .OS- 8a .03 .0a 07 :06 -.Oi♦ ,0• ,1,1 -1 `2CN 60♦IIZ1DE a a ]- a 3 1 3 G 3 a Z Y i 1 1 1 1 Y 1 3 3 3 2 1 T 1 2 ] 7 +•Z;I:.FN OIarCOE .a3 :.Oa .6• _OS .0�- .6Z ,Ol - .0L ,C♦ ,�• 01r 03 .:OS - 03 _O3 O2 :OJ -03 :07 .4s .Da: .0506.0• _Oz .0s .0) ,Ca 05 05 .0 ••. a0a .O7/"11RtL 6s[OE - 0i .0o:.CD .00-.01 00 .00 .00.Ot .al :.o♦ :DO .OI:O2 ,a1.00 .07' ;OS .02 aC 03 +at >O(saICES: 6G gtT$OGEK .05 .a7 .0I .0) .Gr .Oi -03' .03 .•03 01 .0•OS_070• ."02015.OY070.10 2 twrLMGCAXsC. 3 2 '2l� 2 2- 2 1 2 IZ ] 2 Z Z -�:2 4 2' ]- 2 2 '2 2 2 I Z 2 2 .. 'a a •_ 2' 10 2: ailG'aNT .O• ,O► .a7 .9! 03 .07 .Oa .Io .Of .OS .OS - .OL .Ot _O• .OS ,vi :Oi .01 .OSr-Jill :G! r:7 ' :GS _0• .O7 .1T :Z'6 .6• .Of Al � :11- .07 .Il _. Us1 4ODIDS, S 6 - • i s • ♦ 2 a - ) .• 2 2 3 •� • • 7 ai a • 7 -7 • - 3 i• Xtt2OG.c4 0tOf4.CE 05:..6 .O• .07 :OS .IIS 97 .63 ,0• .03 Ol DSifJGOs26E .' ./'♦ w _OJ _Ot :L7 : .0b :03 _ ,05 .03 .O• .D7 .0• ,O6 .OS :..Os .OS .01 _0► a0a .10 .Of .07 .07.73.IZ.e•.17.OI _05 O3 :03 - _01 :.00 ,OZ -.C3 .O7 .00 .02 .OI .63 «07 ,0• .11 :.10FF .4• O) _OSS :D/ .li .OS' .17 IGEY aG NCT$0efM 13�` ,OS .20 ' _07 .0.0• .0] .a7 _0•-i•-'ai _07 .01 .0•t .1337�_-1s� ,la� :Ix .O• .13 .3• iT .YO :22 133 3 ) 3 a 3 7- 3 )' Z 2 7 3 1 3 2 2 3 �! a s s 6 t 3 a e• 3 16 7 iinAYS EDR - Appendix "W" stir m__ -tam £Ow vACL•TS.ev U. AISt MET 00, t _ - CACIFORMIa AIPj:YOgIIOPIMG STAIIOMS: CITY - - !r - - *AY OF' rOMTK SAC70'ratLEt'laSTY'• - - Aa -v • 7 O."CO _ - SaCLO-CAEC[Si}E SCMO .7r a ] ' _1i 1 a • a 'S1CTC-lass?c ST y 3 : ,f •• _a - j �j PEDOIMG-u1PfET -7 3 :• 1 .2 .7 .3 - .J „7 7s 1.•I k rtiel CYTr .J ,] s ifr•JsR }'= SLPSE10C6lLUFfI_-S.E' ifM' Carf ..-. Q...]Z1t �z...2zY7:. . i ._o2•17 -.:IT•s :.:•S72:) .: =- ,.'_«.7)s!3 . ..73IS.} .` - ::.,r3i7• :.••7S• .-'♦`@ rs7 111" � .',,.1•SI11 •.....•J•tZ33 1..:.♦•<iIl ..a7l43 ,•T.17 : ={] .a•.2._.S1 a:,sJ 3 -0)•2 � --=«!33 _'..1s5 ._...S2SI J -SPEO lC07F-fIMC4Ck'• 2:-7 .♦9•1 Si_...♦3Pl --..�J• �.11 .:�s1t7 f..f]It x)1,...,. .•71 'aa2l73 :4 39 a , 7173i ,..„.•!72•7 aaIIEi7•P! S3CvaCt.i] ,21 k 1 .i ICC •42Sis VV S•CT• .q .< t.0 y .ssaC IE vu Cie_[SrI-,aEW•4w:7 I.O _J 7• A i:0 33.) .] .1=7 • S 7 T• 1 .s , .l t.3 .a • i"S .2 3.0 1- 1.3 TO -3 2 :1.S Aii.7i s. :, rALLEr /ATIP, 3 �RrtLHfa Ctiv3. F t _ •-.r= -.i -,,`2� _... SJ L,.. }23• ..E3i {t ,.33i< aa .:s1 ..I ,_ «:1 ,__- _ -Y'jQi i _.! ,.< .i i...•2 .2� r.2ilr _.atv _ -23 .7J. )•3 11 Aa2t7-2T0•S -)]lIs' 2 7�a3S.c:T sc.o •I7 -31 a t S♦ah aS:4 `7, ,• .` _3 .3. _• .21 I ){ 3 .a . 1. .I I4Ea l .2 2 2 3 2_T 3 201 SCC[0VaLiErEASIM2 3 i • _. s 7 3 ! r T o .t 3- C. a T 7 3i 7 • s -. s M1 �i s j'.. t¢ • _ x .i - {J{ (A - { Lt;.- li•ET s 7 '7 �7 7 ! 3 ..-1 IDSEF SCNa Sa ]s '- r S r.y .J2 1_1i Zi ?)I ,�: • { 7Z i. C . i. -e �II,`0a ti1•E 27S I37 !• S1S7 Y C 1. a • 3- ♦ i:i` 22 • aASb iSCLO) l Is3.: _. i .0 •t _ ` -.-i. J(- TI 7. r } F x. • / z� T S1C10-1774 i'ir = f'. :7 7 1 2 Z Tf 2 Z 3 Z I 1 .i i• I T 7.z-$ri"" Ta•a £it/ 2 T 2 1 2 3 J _.I �7 1: I' a♦ • 3+ a -1 )+ 2. I .. 1 t 1 I 1 3 `t a 3 7 A I,' 0 7. V1ttE4':a-v of I: T'' I it .2: Rl 2 •� xi T' z ) a .6 ... li .• 77' +•rf Jf '4-FP�'0T.'r'-�- s < 2 11{{ + +tt 1 �.: 0f7JISG Vlie[ u' 1 1 -i ^I� •41• � I 1 s: S,LiJ-1625 o Sv I.7S Tral. 7 7 li t 13 Ciit 'I 1 i i ) Ia 7 ]!. II, Y / S a T t .7 S .l •1 .i .7 • Al: p�nJ SC�fO Lal[Er StSIw I. p t •_T 7 h fiflll 1} -1�-� < i I a ♦: ✓�TA�. � ,.��. - Li T 7-.�, _ ass :awl AEBOt3i� a.. r a 7 7F It 7 3 .l A # E T 7 S1.v Cv EKziST scMa i i 1 r- i z i, i i i i T .ls z - .•p 3 ,T: T t 2. 7 T .7� 1 3 i rr _S 3 .i: 1<Tro_iozs a sr i i 1 z a i l .xi 7� Ij r E s 2 I' _. i lrl z: sl z. rtes stY 7 .S i T i i 7 J '7j ] t .1 il.. ! • Z -] 2 I i 2 2 I I .1 f 4 / .1 :7 �.. i .] 3 ) Aa. y♦ if S:Cis Y1LLEC lA, k Y i I a� C f , I T rf N1A 1 2I _T1 7 1 7! 2f 71 t D pE�01h u - f'- 1 -3 - {{ 10. }Q"j5SaCTO-L7EE<.SSOE SC.tOI� -1 .T .I .T .1 :7 12 .l s:cza-s�z)• r st 4F ,z 3 : 3 t I 2 1 1 s 3 .x i i i I i 14 _s[ i s i! • ii rU•1: Ciir J x ' .3 ,i .7 .2 -2 J -2 i 2( •I •Z .F_ 1 .1 T .I ,t T Y - 2 •2 .1i Z �1 .7 .2 .t .Y1 .1 1 .i - :1 2 V ,Alii'. I ljEj 1• tt[ ' :3 �7 .T.1 if A ,♦CA SACIII AC1.Er' :aSik _ - t NT. ( ( f f�E is -L L . 7: f 7 q •�a= . SACTOaC uZ.-ET ,) ,S ♦ . Q -j S1CT0 CAF -a C7E SCNO S o .a: .Z .f .1 .L - -1 '• '• ..y �• S 3 .a ,6 .s •E .S .♦ ,J .I -3 _ .I .3 .3 .1 .a Ala 1 12 .• 10- I I i� S+CtO laxT P ar Y .1 .l ,I .T •1 ,1 I 3 l I A22 . 3 17 .d rL•a Cltr 1 .I .7 .f - ,3 .T :Z ,a .] J .3 .J ;� :] .I .i >3 .3 .Z .,i .i .J AL .7 / 7r .1 .i .z .3 :1 ,7 „1 .2' .3 .2 - .1 ,< ,t - «3 .i .S T 17 1.! 17 SACTO YaLLEY :sAstR: u`Y C. ei 3� J' T 3 1 I. 2 • ♦ s ) st a 7 7 7 __s x 7 -s .a s 3: - y s s 7 .7 •1 7s i aa. T:. SAC[0 C•FEcStOE CND = _ SACTO [a7i. i -ST .T' 2 Y'. j i i 2'. .2' 7 IC T I •.1 I ,1 .x.: .i .l •i06Cu✓ :Wlc'ST I 1 - �� , ±i 2� 3 Z .2 .3 •3 .i 2 ,1 1 : ,l ,J �7 ,i :1 •; `3 ,3 .J •li rnva TY _ > a , • t _ : s 7 I .1 .3 t ._ ,•_ y. i „l :il 1 .2-J ,J < ! : • aT•. Ssro vrk 'GASI K' { _ .t _ a s •2� _ Y� 2 _.:I i z r, i A2C �'i'Qy t .I. j�u]J�- S1ETa-EREEAiTJE scot .3 _1 177 ScCT0=Io7S i Sr '� •] Y Y .z .T 7 2 2 7 .Y . Y _ 17 2 *'OOOLCMO-w'ua2M SF. `� 1 .1 -1 .] : .) s ' 2 .i Z .E :. 7' Z z .2' I _ Al t i f i a 3 2.a `xs �9., SC.'CG `CLEr' MSik t - - _ wi .1 �,I i -f • --. < S 7 • 3s S .S 7 y - - . s .` 7 -! A ! .7 All I SACTO 3075-. 9 ST ,] .�- .1 :) .1 :1 _ .I .2 .3 . :1 "1 .] ': :i : .• y '! .S - _ .! :• • .6 �`.1 7 +:• _i ]0 3.7 ]! MS, .aaslaka •,EATk 'aT. F i[ .3 1 ] I 1 1 1 I "T - 7 2 1 2 S 3 1 1 1 -2 7 .1 .I - .7 .3 I(;- '1 _ _ .7 :1 .2 .1 .S :1�: ,�3! . •_� S3 .1 -3 - .1. ^i «1 .3 is3 .3 -:3 7• 1.1 R ,. HAYS E i R Annendi•x "1 L t - 4 1 t` t Ta TrZ J.PENUL4' Y 4TICULAAt�T - - _ - - MICACCRAYS Pill CJBIG METER; - - - •. . rtixtx; [ wstX. 1Ra - DAY OF MONTH -12 Pilla7lrt0[I Sa .1 2: 3 3'' S' T =4: .1 lI0 12. 3)' it 3s: 16 17 1s 19 :2a 21. :22. 23 24 2S 26 - 27 8a <29 30 31 ?0 . 3 k r ANOERSOtt. Cx(CO -._ - T007. - 222` `- +111 - 129 _ JR tt4 - - lfl Y LIVE AIC'RE STBI14' 6f ahZixA7A-49 116 -261 134 19Y a7.. _.171 139 _ SI 160.. _. 31 - - - IT - 77 - 59` 27 txTtOS �.AVTr n- zisSS - 64 MA%Z CAT -EIRE STM: JVE MAIC --94 43, 33 ;30 - 2C 28 30 44 - _. -.75 491 - - ZEnSCxrt.-_-� . Cr _ 77 6S 66 24, . II7]p _ 74 _ I39: - SY .. -LIVE GAK-FIRE STM_ -• 76:. - - )9:- 37 - ,:SS 40. _.. WaVLiRF Ti -97 SS 25 - 40 _ - .. i" Z4 �- 32. _ _ _ 34. aa. �-'�� --afi0ERS01e 25, - 99 _ .. .- 44-« _ BURNE'r as 92 0.1CC' _ O4' _ T06 : - 53` F L LIVE GAC-- Si L LIVE GAC-FIrlE ST:Y _ 56: sA - 58. -_ 66: 65. 46 63 96`- 34-, UAXZANITA-qt: - :: ta46- -SS. BS:XEY' '30 -. 50' C1MIC0 - - 12. - 33 26. 79:.. 'Ci4i -SIM: T - 12 ,37, 44 —Ia 7b _. 27 -- A.9ERS£+I 44' '17' 16 19 - is - 23, 13 - �t .. 14 23 � IS. 0fv1&-S1A ST "_T_E 47, 'SO-. 32 _ 30 25 SS: OAT-FTRESTU - Is - 20 - }0' - S<: - :I21. .. :YAiZAx1Ts-94� _ 37. I)',.:._-__.«�_. ... IS__,..,.� aNaERSGIf '-�' - BL'R�EY 25. 45 53 - 34: 62: 23 45 36' - 10: Lt.- - COwV.Nu, ?5 --- 66 :WOAVIS-STW - 33` d7 26 -. 30 DUhKIGAW _. _ -: - LIVE CLs=FTRF 4CTrr, - __ - -. .> 2T—: - ... •�T _ _ ,. - :. ') ANOERSCYU f�►�i c ` SUKEY 26 S8; 61 - 75 6e r4TCO ,. a1 al _ 53" 73'. _.SS -t CCR/iRNs. i�- aAVFS STIk Sr 49 S9 '. _ 26- 7410, 0a - •x.^ERSt4t - 376 - � 244:._- J,YC -Unca: �_ - 112; _ '` 69 -. - 21. - 77., T SOS''. - 106 -:..: . _ a6 , - 177 '39 3=?t.- ,0►VLS�STN`ST' - 4- - - JA - _. _ 9di 1 06: _ _ - LOv 12• ss. SACRAMcERM VALLEr AIR- BASIN' •' IGy" GURNEY LNYCO' 67 3� 64 -f1 J - tsSj... lei 97 2 DUR%ET CHICO' _-- 17 765, - 51 65' 37' 31 C Y . �� h h - CAVES -ST" Sr _ 76 - V 140: - - 4s 66 ;a .�-._.—OUxwIGAt-_ �_., ,x, _.jg 74 - - 67: BURK£L __ CKICO` - - 4T 'rig bs - 4a - _ T33 _ .: ;-- - _ ----`i16 OAVIS-STM:S.: - 100 _ IIa .Sig 87- Be 22 112 •3 OUxxIGAX — aecaa *. v ii` t09' �.. . _ OF'' -. - .. :100,. _ :: 307. ;. ' - - �HA1f 5 __ '.E.l k t • bniNMf. 'YON; NM J VrE ENE' :NNENN NOIENN Illw g ww WWW W W W41W ..o-0wmYt OO NNp omNmt NNp �' IrfAVftA: NV+NA VHtl♦M: VN N V +H`I w =NNNN h!ttlN W41 NNNNN tytlo NNp I I W WWWw I t 1 h»MhP �a agi NNNNN A H A i III Iw•11WriW VIi AHeVINnr yt1!■y WWWWW+ �■ �jINNN �1 ^ANrr A.l NNH,.N W 0�sry„ WW WWW'. NPNNN W WWWW'11 NN y't� 1 d m Vh MN N.Y N VHN Ol u N NNNrn. NI WWWWW NNNNN. HI W ;W W t/f Y1i41l Aw' et 'UE NNN Mw.0kyd�tI r WWIJ N N W W N +.bl1� NMNVI ul 1111, WWWwWQ 'NNNNN NNN A nV •++A -MN MO—P. ^ M NVIN YN' pr,AN.N M ;Wlyiww SoVENN: 'wwwolw W www A O N N V `tu Cit E L C 'N A N N A. 0. EEENE'E1ItWEE =. mil W. WWw t#�tWW M. HOhhH N A+aV - N PA V rNNN NA NA •NI NN ;RWuI WN(ANN Nt ;u1WW NNN .uNHhVNV ' UNInNN rnjw NN WL=wII N NN � '4JW WWU{ A Nk P! NN ♦INVNN N -0bN V I `NNN I. NNw N wNWNWWENUI 'EYEEe WEWtWwWE EiEeY EN.�■1i jj, WWIu i NNNN N 'AtlNOh. N .TAEYbE-u- NtiA.1N . M - Am. ryNANN APNhP. ni��na tl WW#Wlii MNNNN W WWW NNNN WW WWUi NNNNN N C Z iC M i.X A k k WW Y W41 h ANNN NNNNN NtlhOlt'. MMIamN WN »x NVAN DHw aM 'W W�c 41yJ WW41WW YI. ■■ W W EYNNE W /: # ESZ Y��t } WO NYSn.?S W k WWW litEWW N Nryn riy Li wlawW .. I NNNNN ry NNNNN M •Paha VHN wryrNltlAr M.Ki A[ 33xjCC M�xA.N. r+eWWw e ..... iEnNNNh"�UJNUa) jWtY WW<Wx WE W WN. ltlrill WCCi 1/Nmr^a uMNNN NN NNNN AwN.WN N44I) U o41 oY»uoWntn W # ; WW WWWIUW 'ANNACN NNA NN NNN rN,iryryry M. .NW ANh+A .... wWWW wW tti NYIN NNNN tl N N NNN N. U914iNu W u141 W W 1 M Ak■t 'NVN N 'N NNNN M1Wrj N. N. APuO. :rrt ft. 6 M : tRNA * ",N MEEZ•Ri tdPY�tAN YEEY E. jN�rpN Ns to Ell N E. Mh Y1W(a '� N N+Ie NNIP rvVNN' r+lOaN Gy Y. NNNNN NN -0+♦ �W t4�1 olg-.o IYY♦NVP i'uwWWlli p '» 'El1EEE oo WWIJ oo.. NNNilN rr l to EE�2YT N ul uNNl lu UlN WN' W;WWw i.. wW41Wid N h mP HN MNNNN' �mMY1N + P N NA tNY N N g R N N w� N h N MHhmHI E EEE 41JrWJ1W' ww;ulw: -UvvtIINNN 22 NH �� £ 'IPY NNAO+ N MMVA1 fNVN nnNAAS2NNN ..n-.2ElR hM an E.r di'. n✓rn Y. P UEANN StYENE' NNNr#[N ww WWw WUIwWW' WW"I-i'd wWlll WWWIJw. 'b W. NNNN r+AAIV NHNNA NNN ZN VNN.ry'A NNNNN. +:Ambw ,1111 —.o Y NAP.H x UEENX NNNVN NEENE e' 'fj NNNN r wultaww +AHN+ rvm HN+. N NNNN MtlN Y NAVwA. \Sn.}ENi� AA�N•� VW11Wi1NNN fJ'—mm NNNNU{Y1 V 1<VI 'SNNNN NNHAA »... wwtuS kk E`ZNNN Yk �` NNVIEN ��{1 Ei o. M N w 11W �• NNNNN' . O U NNN' HNN N ryNAMV'. N.. ANv:NA +A -ANA »NHaw wwwww UEEE' V WWRJit 'VIS, UiwIJ><lil NNNlN t�3W; WR:R¢t WWWWW 1 �N N' N ZS NNfINN A+MN.r'1' 7 ZZN:t NNN-+'A VI`rt".Y NO'V Nm NNNNN Y.IwwwW Ny'INNN UNNNII�1 pp iM' eeY UIS«UE....NNN2N.: "~A _ .k .Y Ev#Z1E+E: o, WREWi #RWE 'N le y 'Y1J U.';W; N PrerHNJ l irii N.. .SiN rN+« eao"M NNNNN i j.r u W pWWpiWW > • WW��yr u EZI/IE WWW#w NNNYN ww tt:i N SNNN NNNNN NhY1V V. (,{;2NNYtkRWWW NNNN ,� 01'1 P.�.„✓1p NVhP.L A- M y E11k aN` �etSeUiwwlgw w:w;lyYw N MNNNN N NNNeY' AA + NN N N A N NNNNN M P :-0 A P M.P + n m r J EEEY•�q .. } W �•EUE- NVWINN Ww W w W NYINZVI W WW W W YIN NI'm EN N. q' Yil -NHaNA N N H NNNNN 7NNTkN a+ MN:N NIy NN ♦y1hH s :: 'uEE:E Una wt g : t it t )t N2 wwwww NNNNN tks*Ii .O N bNf`IV NAN NNNN „N AA+NN hN'.P Pm Zitr VP�am uo ENN VEEVE NNNAN+ N# Wtlw UWWW NPNPNWNd WHIZ*W4N3 I ^_; N AntNry: ryA N »NW VYZN HnAA a • ulwt W NN WN 'Ww�INIL NN N �t#WWW Sw w } kEEW# Nx N W' wwwww WillW Ww VAM. ry NNNNr�.. NnINAN NA V.tlH NNNNN o= - S[ Y Anull ]tit :S XX tnf WWWwW NNN2YN wW .:#W ViSN ww 1u WW Yu u1W4111i, N NHI�A� AVANA NN tltlV'hb NNNNN Hm OMP n:N.IONC h .fit R '.E ICNX. �t NNNk 3 t f�tt YY Ye. WWIJW :w IJ IJwWW WWw Ww ■'. ■ NAHvnY -0OAN4 N ANPAVI' NNNN NANO 41 N.In NN 044NN NNNNN NPPda a YNi1 d g �y ".i E.rtii wWwkiw' RWWUIW YNAwN. NN NNNE.N 1� Eo o,—, »..H WNrr yjNNNN i AAaw1�: MNMwN NNNJVN VANAA NVya NV1 1 N ee■Y==qYty ry+p4„ ;W 'W W# WWWWW ui iu;t* NNd[t2 ft; : *-}`_1114! uI gm N�AnN.. »NNNN hn.*hh Iri A'.rf tl+ NNN' A.NWUM r ♦ EE1tJE 1•'jEY.IE NNENN. lrwww NVPVV .,NNN N. NVANN. NN;`2N »V V»N }"NNNN J1 mP db �NAAN A WMWWWi WWwW WWWWW WitW W'W uiwWWW AI�YtlAAV NrN+IN OPV�N NNNNN NNti'.h r1 NNNNN OOMNN :NHN. N N H N H 1'I.w-0»V N WwtIW4i NNNNN k :EEEES }RWWWW' NNNNN' 11 Wwu111iW WWWwW ANNAN. `IhmNH NNANA.: �[N A-0VV NNNNN ONNON N N 1. H INNTN MNm Nm'. .4 �,iWN OWN tt Elc 5rYf tYp�r yu iNE WWoIS wUltiWw ww wulW' NNAN #"t '. NmAVI Antltl1 NNN ! N AHMNM NNNNN VP, 6NN NNNNN A,HNNd. NNNAM WNWN. t • bniNMf. 'YON; NM 'ihHhM1Y p NNNJ; 1111•+ NNNia� 4M1^NW 1111w Hr1N/r )•r ONNNJ 1111:N NNi. A�.• PNNNuI 111w N'WNAi ;.IN 41 00NN0 o�arvat. pOONi•kp ..o-0wmYt OO NNp omNmt NNp P�'Nmd 'Fp•p (Ny kJdNNfd 8tlNr.l NNANryx `q'yoO V iO. y:a'yy is tytlo NNp I } Rt �' W WWWw I I �a agi NNNNN A H A III Iw•11WriW VIi AHeVINnr `<W; :U ��MN. :IJWIUWW NNNVIN:. �■ �jINNN �1 ^ANrr A.l NNH,.N W WW WWW'. NPNNN W WWWW'11 NN 1 d m Vh .WWWWW NNNNN N .tl HN PNfV Ad N+IV WW tIJW NNIIyNN N N V V A W IIIt••2i 2Y N1�tJi2 NHtlHT E2YEE NNE < 1 Wwwsw NNNNN N + P V M N N N W W W W W NNNN N wWWWIJ NN✓y1NNN N M r -0i W eAi WWWWW TXEi�! N b P N;a W; 3x# N xZ. +NhN+ wwwww :NNNN N H P H H P N 11kNL W;WWW Y.ZZNZ N+HAA 1UW WW W NNNN N NPd v-0' tt # vu Sia 2 { N a m A N n i'xx WwwkW N N N Z N A N d N w E1l dJ �EH+ NNS;N d V i11H V wwufwyw! S NNm1', H JE;NIwn NArrYn W 41 U) w NNNV N MNPVid H N M iuyyWnlwww n rV nN'1 V. M NNN i Wluww'w [yNwwN N0OP0 W W 41 W w IN VINN VI A MV H R Hid Ek; W ��•• dNS; NhmAd W f �t 111 L NNNNU NAV V n �wwwu N nNIN'In YP�M1� VNw NES€S NaPdY WAND° yyN Aa. }}y« Y s Y Y i Nmh Nt H t. twcjw V w^rnov W 1:Wti14 MNN:iV �dctAVNN i•i ScEi d M N A h �rNa AxO w w1R0IR NZi1C AN�µv rvNNV ww#ww NNNN N N A A N.N wwwww N N N.Z N H+'HN♦ wwuiww NNN m N PMO'�P N w;WwW M N N N N N;;� •I A;; i.wlno WoE i E M A wwwww NNNN N wwwww NNNN N 41 w W W W NNNNN N V b V V 1wi1 'kkiN NI#rl N A V w N W I!'w W NZNwo wk N V N N N i�wttdNA sYYsE MN h'wN 41wWytw N N N xx N rVVNOrPiN WWwww NNNN N mo- ✓�.NI .P. jWwww NVIVIN NA+p:.+ 'H N1k Ai> NNYy FI'� pd Nb.f odNbt unowwp Soa..Nn NNNNN. ,—mv u NNNNN �. NNANryx 1 i ww41WW ,r :WWWWWtIt y e1 WWWWW d oellIls itj i NNNNN. ,—mv NNNNN F NAHA.A NNNNN �. NNANryx 1 I } Rt �' W WWWw I �a agi NNNNN A H A III Iw•11WriW VIi AHeVINnr `<W; :U ��MN. :IJWIUWW NNNVIN:. �■ �jINNN �1 ^ANrr A.l NNH,.N W WW WWW'. NPNNN W WWWW'11 NN 1 d m Vh MN N.Y N VHN Ol u N yy✓1 WWWWW NNNNN. WWWWW W ;W W t/f ANbtld. -0HHN:♦. NV[NNN •. ANKNf• N N W W N +.bl1� W;WWw WWWwWQ 'NNNNN NNN MNNNN NNWII♦ 'Nd Ohd. Ud#II • CSG! pr,AN.N M ;Wlyiww SoVENN: 'wwwolw W www `tu Cit E L C 'N A N N A. NNNNN A d P P h! y. iNNyyl N N A'NN i Nw NA RRW; W:A W. WWw t#�tWW `xlwN. Nl#wvNN ANI YNN xrN/V. .. U^V« ;RWuI WN(ANN ;Ww; yNNNN ;u1WW ■■ UNInNN rnjw NN WL=wII N NN � '4JW WWU{ err tt N N N N N A+ e A A ♦INVNN N -0bN V I `NNN I. NNw N ♦. WNNww#wWW uNN �WWr Ww W N O��� NNNN N A A Nr N A A WWWwW WWu1Ww wwwww yl4p, j ni��na NNNNN N A N N A -NNN SN :N EyluJ NNNN i w WuJII V�WN 41WWWW NNNNN !; W r2Z�N� • WW Y W41 nI+ NA NNV NN NN WWwNN WWWWW 'W W�c 41yJ WW41WW .+A+V NNNNN NN Z.N r :Airy YrlNA NNNNN N V A A+ 1 ... N Nryn riy Li wlawW .. I NNNNN W#WWW Y NNNNN. V.N.N NVbrv... .NNNNN I r+eWWw e ..... nti WWWWW' WWt W1u. �' NNSS::NN'. WI1W Witt' WCCi 1/Nmr^a Ntl+NV l N NNN NryVNA Y ♦.i1wa. yikWWW It wwwww, W # ; WW WWWIUW 'ANNACN NNA NN NNN rN,iryryry M. ANh+A wwwww- wWWW wW tti WW41WW --N:h NNNN tl N N 'Uo-.” "4.m I NNN N. v M s e y 1 N n A WW1WWWWWWu1 'N NNNN WWw4iW' wW�tWW A nyRM♦ ANP P/T' f NYHV r I NN 1NN ANA'♦A' �iWNI .WWWWW wWWWW'i WWWWW N rrN 'N VyNNN N+H++ 'NNNNN " NV NN♦ NNNNN IWiI IrwiN Wta WW 1 W1JWW.�- IYY♦NVP i'uwWWlli NNANn MV NNN .'I N N V uwU1NN V N N kj � 1AVIVIVIVI N H V A• W uNW W nhv» WWWWW W;WWw i.. wW41Wid ' N MNNNN .NNN N N '1 NNNNN ■ N % ~ V NC Www U�NNN -UvvtIINNN £ ^^ WWwWw'YJ;WWW' ww>jl ;N NNNNN NAHHA :ZNNN N '1 Nry VNN � NNN NNA N ` N�:eAH lil#w W41 ;WWW'. WWWIJw. N■■ 4d.WN :NNNNN N.NV N. A. '� .INV IN'1MN NNVINVI NAANA Y NAP.H x W1)W WUI WWWWW 'NNNNN f l3W a�`.�i111u N e' 'fj NNNN r ✓j .e dNl yNli +AHN+ rvm HN+. NNNm WWWW W#WWw WWWWW y1 WWW,I V 1<VI 'SNNNN NNHAA NVINNN :hm NNO 5t n1ArNwN ieE#www WitVWVyIWW x rwivwy U NNN' NNVIVA. : s VVWlI: »HrINN r ■ uylCC NNVwIw1 UNMNN. wwwww AANA+ NaAA �YnM�. '. NNNNN Uy A:e HH 4i UwuiW NC:�NN W'k Www �N N' 'Wwlt.Ww NV iNNNN NNHIVN NN N nn Ni: Y.IwwwW Ny'INNN UNNNII�1 w w El, N A d++ N V M N I' A N n H iIk NY. IJ 41WWO 'Y1J U.';W; wk WI k* PrerHNJ l irii .NNNNN NddAN NN 1\ANN Ii ANANN w iV o wiF`d IVJ I'll, I :1N}kjs ONNIV j b dfimt 4O oellIls itj IU1 11 -rt pNNQ• u VOONwr. js ii Oorryw .Olp 1J rINTRODUCTION' The Chice Area has been growl,„q .steadily Northward since it was originally founded; Evidence of this progression°{s .clearly shown by the de;velopment;,:of the Chico Vecino 6rea, then the L on.q- -fellow area, and the 99E "North area, More recently the general area of Ceres - Mariposa Avenues has been substantially developed. Althlough many vacant parcels still exist in thele pre- viously developed areas, ;the land usuage and utility arrangements are fairly well established. One of the last general areas remain- ing. to be planned and devoloped is the Northeast portion of Ch;co bounded by Cohas.se.f Road on the 4iest, EtAst AIrenue on the Sd.v�th and the. 14i►d..9lu ori: Cre��, i Mrsion facilities 'gin the North and E,a 4 !ip on'ti'l.recent years, this Hortheasp. area wat, ;lowly being popula,tod with scattered utilizing indi,, Oldual septic yank tend l.aa�'liir;p sy'rwrc of sewage disposa'1 Because of health and si,Y,itty problems, all further r,u°nstruction has recently been -prohibited by the CoUhty of Butte_ As that demand for -a soluti-on, to the heaath and saf'e+,v 'problems of the area increased, the County of 9ut:te attempted to create a Service Area to finance a Study to -_ determine a feasible solution, Upon receivinq a poor reacti)h from many of the property owners of the smaller parcels, the County " of 6L tete abandoned the attempt, it then became evident that if any solution to the problein did '. exist$ it would have to be found by this individual property owners involved. In Noveiuber of 1972, McCain Associates stere retained by :s a group of private property owners to study the feasibility of pro. viding sanitary sewage collection and treatment for just the Northi. easf Chfeb Area, R 'Pm OF, MASTER PLAN As an area makes the transition from a ruraI4 low density residential and agricultural use to, a medium density residential and commercial use, many public utilities becojno necessary, When a advance Iplanning is done to establisK the most feasible manner of providing said utilities., d Substantial savings in the actual cost of imp eme., tLPtion can be realizeTo be effective, however, the advance planning must be 41MOlemented and .:used as a guide in the I actual deveTohmeht of the area. In many areas there can be minor I, variations in the plan if the overall Continuity of services is j ,maintained. To accomplish these ooa'ls and fairly represent the i interests of the public, a 'caster Pian should be based unon a wide spectrum of data input from'all interestednuhlic agencies and indiVidualt. The initial purpose of the contract was to determine a neacti calway of providing a sanitary setaree system, Because the area also must have a storm drainage 'system ir: order to develop, and since both systems must be cmmnatible, the study was exnanded to include storm drainage, Much of the area involved consists of I fairly 'large, undeveloped parcels. The l'onical selection of trunk line locations and related 'facili-ies is dependent upon the topo. graphy and actual parcel development. Bocause of these reasons, it became necessary to actually attempt to des 11h a preliminary ! street arrangment for ail par+cels affected. Once the anticipated land use is select d and all coniponents assembled, the actual end a result was a-comprehensive area i•laster Plan, { The value of this plan to those owners who financed its preparation will be dntermi ned nrivitlei ly by its d8gree of accept- 1 ance and implementation, dei,nn a private endeavor, this Plaster Plan can serve as a guide to those public aclencies having juris- diction over the development of this area, On the opposite hand;, most elements of the plan fticornorate the policies, requ'ireme'nts, 6h objectives of those same anatic Iat Consequently, the plan nro- vides the property ota,ners frith an undorstandihn of the nr4tz;.b10 i conditions to be imposed by the etoverninn agencies, � Should the public agencies so desire, public hearings and ap'hropriato procedures could bo imploriented to adbot this t,161-th- i east Chico I'lastef` Plah as the Spocif c Mn in accbrdance ►lith the provisions of Assombly hill 1,107. If this were dohe, the many desirable objectives of the plan would theh be assured of evehtual 1 aot'uality z I . G r i SCOPE OF MASTER PLAN The Master Plan includes co'nO deration of existing owner 'ship patterns, sanitary sewage, storm sewage, street improvements, land usuage and population densities, traffic needs and circulation; public education and recreation, and preservation of our environment,. The 'plan attempts to,co'nsolidat;e these factors and influences into j`�• a compatible arrangement. Water, telephone, gas and electrical systems are beyond the scope of the Master Plan. They are designed ..� anddetermined by the unlit com ani y ,p 'es involved and they are not ` the primary determining factors in cormunity de;sigtr. y -The Master Plan hasendeavoredto meet the goals and require- ments of the following agencies and corresponding documents., Butte CountyGeneral Pla.h � Existing Zawllnq Subdivision Ordinance City of Chico 1961 General Plan 1970 Waste Water l Management. Plan Chico Area -Recreation District Master Facilities Plan In addition, the Plan reflects extensive consultations-With the staffs of the multitude of public agenr«`ies that goVern and affect land development. Consequently, although this Master Plan is privately financed, it should delineate a land project compatible a,. to the approving Jurisdictions. DESCRIPTToN OF,EXISTING_AREA �. Boundaries Upon initial authorization] no specific limitation Wa's imposed eegokHing boundaries. The boundary beingonly generally uriders,tood' as being the Northeatt area of Chico. As 'hod study for the Master Plan progressed, the batsic boundaries were established by 0o topo f graphy and ex,astih9 d6veloped area. The East boundary was naturally the Mud-Sycamore Diversion Project because of the extreme expense and difficulty in crossing such a wide and deep 'chAnhOli The North boundary became the natural channel of Sycamore and Mud Creek be- cause of the Bicap change in topography At that l i he And the fact; i i `e i that the creek now must carry substantial flood dUap),tities. The Westerly bo,ondary evolved. as Cohasset Road and the existing Pleasant Valley Drainage District Outfall Channel, The combination of typical street configurationo toponraphy, size of the outfall -' channel, general traffic circulation pattern, and the boundaries of existing storm drainage districts produces the boundaries as selected. The Southerly boundary is almost completely determined by topography and the lhilits of presently served or planned oarcels. it should be Noted, hoviever, that the boundaries as selected are not absolute or definite lines In tiffany cases, the outside boundaries are a result of economic considerations only. Sih'd'e economic comparisons are quite often subject o chez,, fn p 4 ,1' g� n conditions ' and therefore changing conclusions, many boundaries could also .. change'. The boundaries shote n for the benefit zones a're particularly a k subject to 'changes, in general, they are determined, by ownership ' patterns, trunk line locations, toponraphy, and a reasonable eco- nomic—size, Uepeodintt upon enq i iieeri no feasibility and ownership attitude, however, the actual size of a zone could be varied con- siderably without basically deviating from the plan. Topography. The I;ortheast area of Chico consists of the trans-1 ti on area ' between a job Orlida1ly youno stream and the flood a 11 uvi a1 Plain of thd,,,Mley, It has a braided, comnlicated erosion oattern with the major drainages r'airly dell definod , Ilahy dramones 1-Te orad- u.al gentle swages and not ,'nhysical l,y defined adr.:luately to be obvious to the `faymah. There are many d;eprossioot and irreoular low areas that loud water for the majority of each precipitation season, Average slopes of the drainages are between 0,4 and C.0 percent, Cross ;slooes perpendicular to the drainaties rands on to approximately 8 percent, There arr 'four basic drai,ha.10s Within the area that flow in a hehOral Westerly or Northwesterly direc tions The drainages and rE.sultant taporrahhy are sighificant enough in magnitude that 611 future developm.nt should be dictated by their a:eeafioemelit I` i y A Soil Conditions the Chico Area <Soil Map (see Append x) indicates that the Southerly portion of, the area consists of the Redding Clay Loam t soi 1 type, much of i t, i n the q,ravell;V phase. The depth of permi- able soil varies considerably, but over the maJority of area it is quit r shallow and is underlain by hardpan and cemented sandy gravel. in v heeal, the soil strata has very poor subdrainage and the sur- face drainage is only fair. The soil is a relatively poor Agri- cultural soil and is generally only fit for Use as pasture land. The deeper stra`4as are typically cemented sand and gravel that is essentially impervious. Because of this soil configuration, storm runoff is quite high even in the undeveloped sta.tUs;. Once the upper clay loam has reached saturation from previous rainfall`-, r a perched water table then exists since the underlying foema`ti on Will not provide vertical drainage. Other than the slow surface evariorationprocess, the only way the perched water table can tub - tide is by .horizontal flow. the topsoils" are of relatively Tow petrmki6bility due to 'their clay content and the surface and hardpan gradients are small, Cansegmitly,- the -rate of horizontal-moistur" r..eedingly low, Plant consumptive use is alto minor, movement is ex . because of• the swallow soil depth ,and the t ia'l l amount. of Veqeta- tion that can be supported without artificial irrigation. These variou a combine to produce a 'condition that will not allow septicst tankefrburnt to be' consi:,tentl y, safely Absorbed by the � soil' 'strata. During periods of rainfall;, the discharged effluent � quickly surfaces due to hydrostatic pressure or elsd�the system ompletely refuses to accept addV ional discharge. The soil strata within the Master Plan area is relatiVe1j► uniform. The. depth to the underlying cemented sand and gravel being about the only significant variable; However, the area mmodiatel„y North of Sycamohe Creel; and Last of Cohasset Road has a substantially different soil profile, The surface soils are sand's silts, they are underlain by sandy gravel and clay lenses of corn- plicated configurations. The upper soils are not cemented and have relatively good vertical and horizontal dra,Cnage, Ground water exits at depths between 4 and 12 feet; depending upon location and Axl oi: seasoni the area has been farmed and cultivated in field crops for many years. Land Use The North ;pobtion of the Master Plan area is completely un- developed at this time and is used only for grazing. The Southlerly portion has scattered single family residences with a few small , areas of medium density single family residential_ subdivisions. other than an el ec trsubs-s to ti on tit the end of Mari posa Avenue, there are no public or quasi -public land usages presently within the Master Plan boundaries. Immediately South of the Plan boundaries, however, :here are two Kindergarten through Sixth -Grade Schools, one Junior High $0ool, one Senior Nigh School and a Special Education School It should also be real i zed that the Plan area i s boundedon the extreme Southeast by Wildwood Drive; the primary entranceto Upper Bidwell Park. When projected, the Westerly and Southerly bourdaries' 'of the Plan area intersect at one of the foremost and i extensive shopping centers in the North Sacramento Valley. This '- cente"r; called the North Valley Plaza, -is only one-half mike from thr pl,arin.ed area; I' Sllido m and- Sahi ta,ry Sewage Facilities , At the present time, there are, only two ways ;of e', 'ding seW- age treatrilent in the Chico Area. The City of Chico n and treatment facility provides sei'vi ce to the Southern portion downtown area, the Southern portion of Chico Veciho, the Lon(JlL'"10W area and a portion of North chrco alone) thc ltorth side ofL-Indo Channel. The remaining area of Uhico is served by individual sebtic tank and leach Tine systems. Storm sewer systeMs have beeh installed in most of ,the "same areas`at sanitary sewers and also in the areas served by existing St6em 'Drainage Assessmeht Uistri,;ts. Many areas adjaceht to the streahls that traverse the Chico arr3a are simply drained directly into tije chahnels, A portion of the Master Plan area 1 within the Pleasant Valley braina9e District; however, other th4'h butfall pro Visions] complete draihage hat not yet been provided. Since ali it � t, r- properties presently within the Pleasant Valley Drainage District have already been assessed for outfall construction, any necessary costs for ;outfall enlarq`ement would have to be born by only the properties outside the District. The County of Butte is presently designinc "he w1deninq of East Avenue from Ceres Avenue to Ceanothus AvenUe. They intend to install aw extension to the Pleasant Valley District system out to the Easterly boundary of the District. Because of state and federal ,equiremehts, this extension will be the minimum size pipe and its' primary purpose will be Just to provide drainage for the roadway., Because the ten -acre area at the Southeast corner of Floral a.nd Cast Avenue is included in the Pleasant Valley Drainage District, and since it will have undernround facilities relatively convenient', it should not be included in this Master Plan area, The forthcoming Cast Avenue project will not be solVinq the existing drainage problem betWeenIMarinosa and Ceanothus Avenue, . .. , but will merely pats the runoff into the existinq swales. Copse- quently, the undrai-lied area South of East Avenue should be in the Plan in order for it to pay it;s' future share of odtt ll costs, The existing Pleasant Valley iJieainage District outfall channel was originally destgned to drain dtiveloped' property within the bouhdaries_.Runoff from property A tside the bouhdaries that physi- dally drains into the channel was, calculated on the basis of unde- velope.d area, Consequehtly, when -this area developer and installs the corresponding underground system, the original desioned channel • size will probably be inadequate, However, the original channel' has been considerably ehlargenea by� erosion and maihtenance work since its'origihal constructiohi l'n order to be on the conserva- E' t`iVe side, we would recommend that 5,0 feet of additional right of -way be obtained, This would allow for hlisure channel widening if experietice or' hydrological and `Hydraulic ahalyris indicates that complete development will exceed the peotbnt chanhel capadit,y`, � A significant influence on the proposed plan Storni drainage system and 'the treatment plant locdtion is exerted by the existing ' Corps of Engineers Mud'Creek-Sycamore Creek Diversion Project•1 This flood control measure diverts the larger storm flows from ' Chlao Creek _over into Lindo Channel and Mud Creek, Their design Was based Upon the premise that each channels' flow would be limited to its capacity in its natural state and all excesses wo 0AA be diverted Northwesterly over to. Mud Creek. Consequently, l M�� Creek carries larger flows and more frequent flood quanti-ties thin it otherwise would. To contain these larger quantities the naturalchannel was widened, deepened, and leveed where it Was hechssary to prevent flood'i'ng of the adjacent propohties. The 14.aster Plan area is located South and 'higher than the flood plaid level of the'Sycamore Channel, and levees: were h9t regUAred. The area immodiately East of Coh,�sset goad and North of tithe Sstamore brunch. is lower than the design l'�iod plain and copseq ue'ntiy was leveed by the project.. F. One possible m�thod off' R 1 '',sposal of the treated sewage would be to d-iscliar * during the florid flows in wyydamor�e Creek. possible 111 t!�sa causing surface runoff: Du The wint�lerthe effluenlin sda%0,11 iwi be�ya �.ini+� When it -may not be rinSl to sprig these times, the effluent must"be stored in the holding ponds ;htil the surface +coils d'ry out enough to accept additional moist- k' Ure. It is conceivable that an exceptionally wet year could cause F the holding capacity to be exceeded. This same wet year, however, would probably also ca Use, .storm flows to be carried' in Sycamore x° Creek which could then safely recOive the treated sewage. The system woUld of course have to 'be designed, operated, and blanneh properly, but is definitely acceptable in theory. y History a The area covered by the Matter Plan has been gradually settled by, the occassional colistructiorl of 'residences and 'installati'on of mobile homes. This process has produced a very rural primary resi- dential l hd use. No legitimate subdivisiohs Have been allowed for many years due to the lack of storm and aanitary facilities,, Con- sequently, most parcels Were created by 101 r»Iittnq other than the original Bidwell Subdivision, to March ,, 1972 a new state law a was passed which required all newly created parcels and any divisions, of property to be done under the control of the local jurisdiction. This -law, Assembly Ci,ll 1301, requires that all smaller divisions be done with the recording of parcel maps, and further states that the local governing body may prohibit divisions if b,oublic problem will result. j Primarily, because of the soil conditions, the .County of Butte has since been prohibiting any land dig-i,41r,hs and even many build- ing permits, As this fi.t became known to more and more 'property owners of the area, pub'lla support grew for a unified solution to the problem. Much of the area consists of 51 10, and 20 acre Un- developed parcels which are ideally suited for subdivision develop- ment, Without storm and unitary sewer facilities, however, these parcels cannot be developed, divided, or used for anything exchpt grazing. In other words, without sewers, the property is of ex- tremely low value. In FobrUaey of 1970, ;le City d ofCChico retained Trotter f1nnd Associates, Consult Consulting: E_ ..,.�e to an overall Wastewater 14anagement Plan (see Appendix) for the Chico area that included the Noetheast.'Chico Master Plan area, Their study concluded, that eventually, the Northeast Chico area would have to be served by a I oop trunk line going around the West and Northerly portions of -the urban area and providing tWo,collection points on Cohatset Roadi Ohe near Lassen Avenue and the other At hindo Lane, Although the Trotter plan has its limitatiohs b.r {use of its3'sc1Dpe, it is important to the Northeast Chico area gewause of the decision to F eventually provide sanitary sewerage by some sort of 'loop trunk 4t line: to May, 1971, Gook and Associates of OroviilP were retained 'by the gut -to County Association of Governments to provide the Water and Sewer Clement of the Butte County General plah The Cook Study basically Just expanded -the area of service into a' "Ghcn Basin Servic+ Area", This service area was much larger and included the Municipal Airport, lower Cohasset Ridge, the 'loWOO portion of Califorhia Park and iadditiohal areas South and West of r. r the Trotter Waste Water Management Unit Boundaries. The Butte County General Plan, Sewer Element was adopted by r the Board of Supervisors, Basically, the adopted General Plan c611s also for eventual service by a loop trunk line to the City of Chico Treatment Plant. ANTICIPATED DEVELOPMENT G In planni,19 the Northeast area, we have endeavored to incor- porate and expand upon the previous studies and general plans which have been done. The needs of the various public agencies k.: have been considered and a sincee effort has been made to accomo- date their needs: Land :Usage The Plan is based upon the area` developing into si nal a family residential land usage. Areas for aopropria te schools, community shopping, and recreatijonal facilities have been provided. Density varies somewhat depending upon the present degree of land division and the local amount of public service area. The average anticipated density is 3,5 dwelling units 0.,er gruss Were assumed to be 8700 squire feet or 5 dwellingaceei units sizeserage 'lot units per net acre, Net acreage is the gro's's acre less pubiic rights of way and property. If the area planned for recreational usage is applied, the over all :average planned density for the ehtiee Master Plan area works .� out to be 3.5 dwellings per gross acre, The Chico General Plan (see Appe"ndit� calls for 1,5 to 3,0 families per gross acre and the Butte ja County Geheral Plan calls for e', tiler 1 to 4 or 5 to S dWe] 1 i ncl units 'planned densities are Well, Within de'acres Consequently, our actual plan the County pt an densities and only slightly over the City of Chico , y. Plan densities; School apdas Bind otherp otential concentrations of people Were p laced in areas as far away from the airport approach area as Possible,,1 Nigh densityresidential, churches, private sehools theater's or i other commorcial devO o�pmentt which cause :population concentra'tiohs 1 should ,not be allowed within the approach f'`n (tee City of Chico General plan `in llpp endixi One of the primary reasons for using . i ,1 �lp� the area near Cohasset Road for park and recreation facilities,. and sewa,g,e treatment is because it is also within the critical airport south clear zone. The overall affect of the airport alto serves to enforce the planned low density residual usa4e as en- vis1oned by the Northeast_ Chico Master Plan, Population Sanitary s'�ewage flows are generally based upon estimated bobu Mations served: Future populations of areas usurally being 'based' u"pon past history, average growth rates, and correlations nth other comparable areas. When large or complicated areas are planned,. the future population can vary substantially because of the wide discrepancies in densities that the various "types of developments can produce, However, when an individual single-family residential subdivision is designed, the actual number of dweilinn units i known exactly. The situation we are faced with is somewhere in beNeen these two eXtremes. By analyzing g p can make a tentative ,. Q nalJzin each individual parcel, we design of a subdivision and fairly accuratel;, +determine the prob- able number of lots. Those parcels that are, •, small to subdivide and that have been developed in such a manner .vpreclude land division, were assumed to remain in that condition. Parcels front .• ng on Casve'hue that are ►+flt now improved were separated from the wear o;r Northerly portion and presumed to become quasi-commer cial in usage. Once the total number of dwelling units in each zone are de- termined, at) average factor of 3;b persons per dwelling unit is applied to determine the estimated future potential pooulation Trunk and collector 'lines should be sized to provide "service to the potential ;population if that pooulation will' be reached within the life of the system, In View of the extreme length that a properly constructod sys't,.m will last, and the fantastic recent groWth' of b the Northern Chico area, there is 'no doubt Whether that will happen, When Viewing the design of the temporary treatment facilities, however, a completely different condition exists, '8ventually, and as soon at possible, the 'loon trunk line to the City of Chico t a i Y4 � ' 1 treatment plant should be constructed. Whatevp;r is done in North— cor h-east east, Chicovthould be done in such a manner as to encourage and promote said line. By intentionally underdesigctiinq the area re- quired, and by appropriate financi.nq procedures;, thi, can be accom- plished. When the actual loop trunk line will be constructed will in large part be determined by the attainment of the des.igvnopu- 'lation. In order to provide adequate tax base and financial4re- so urces to finance the construction, a design population was selected d at 75 percent of the potential population, in other words, by the time 16 percent of the future lots are dctually 'habitated; it will ' be necessary to construct the loop trunk line and financih;'1 should there be available to do so. Traffic Circulation �. Considerable thought has already been given to the future cir- II culation patterns for this area. All that was needed Was an updated', and more detailed design. The County Road System 1911 calls for F. Eaton Road to loop around the Horthern portion of the area and connect wi-th Manxanita Avenue near Wildwood Avenue. In general', the Master,-Plan follows said route. However, it is likely that fast Avenue will remain the. primary East-Wept thoroughfare of the f Borth Chico area for many years and perhaps indefinitely, Further- ` more, since anticipated land usage-, along the future Eaton Road Easterly extenOon are recreational and low density residential In nature; through traffic should be encouraged to use East Avenue {� rather than the loop Eatolr Road; Consequently, the Master 'Plan call 4 for Eatoe, hoop Road to intersect East Avenue at a right a-hgle, re- ;E designed intersection ;at Manxanita Avenue, , ht Y t The., ul t't�3 Cou, y i�t�ati System 1 71 also calls for s „ra i qh extetst-,:'- of Lupin, Floral and Mariposa Avenues, These extensions are only schematic in nature and do not purport to be based upon any detailed c,ow do,ation of proP�rty ownership or topography. When these are c factors � onsidered, 'the locations shown on the ; Plan hAturall,y result; i'he l-ovation of the loop street shoWn on the City of Chico "c `961 G60bral Plan Was of course extremely schematic, but it did . l Y indicate a direct connection to Mariposa and Marigold Avenues. While the Master Plan does not provide for a through and,primary connection to Marigold, the street pattern North of the proposed loop street does encourage and provide a through connection to ,x. Marigold, Ceanothus and Floral Avenues. Recreation The ChicoAreaRecreation and park District in 1969 adopted a 20 -year A`&,ster Facilities Plan.- The purpose of Said Plan was to guide the District in the development of recreation and park facil- ities. A portion of the Plan that covers the area of the North- w east Chico Master Plan is contained, in the Appendix.' it will be noted that a comOlu'ni ty park including a community building was shown in the Northwest portion of the Master Plan areal P The Northeast Chico Master Plan, does call for a large community park and golf course in also the same area, however, because of the proximity to the airport clear zone, perhaps the community building would be better 'located at. the neighborhood park: The proposed trail network along the banks of Sycamore and. Mud Creek could be substantially enhanced by proper and appropriaf landscaping by.ihe abutting resider:ces Restrictions ,should be applied to all'sub'divisions which abut the trail network in order to prevent an unsightly and objectionable environment to the trail user. A multi -use green belt adjoiningthe 'trail network could` w provide both the privacy necessary for the resident as Well, as the natural setting appropriate to the hiker or equestrian. Low den city residential zoning that allows for personal boarding of horses, such as S-1 should selectively be applied to a fedi lots backing, up to the trail` netwdek, it is envisioned by the Northeast;Chico Master Plan that Chico Area keereation District will undertake the operation and mainten- ante of a portion of the area necessary for the disposal of treated effluent. This could be done on a'lease ba"s'is from the County service Area until the time the loop trunk line is in''stolled, When the lease on the unneedod portions of the sprinklered area etas been t. 1.3 allowed to expire, the lease of the park area then simply transfers' to Chico Area Recreation District from the Service Area. Should Ch ald .� p Oleo Area Recreation District not desire the lea'se,, the ark coi be converted to private operation. The lease's drawn would be con= �R tinueusly renevtable for asufficiently long enough period of time to allow for adequate amo:rtiza'tion of any capital improvements. Public Facilities The Northeast Chico Master Plan provides for 'k-6 and 0 or High School sites "ear Mud Creek in the Northeasterly portion of the area. The sites were selected because of their location on 'a minor but thi-ough street, their distance from the airport approach pattern; their proximity to a primary traffic arterial, and also because they balance the distances in geographical relationship to the existing schools, The existing Pleasant Valley High School must serve the Northeast Chico Master Plan area. Direct street connections from the area are provided to the high school site; �:..... Shopping se-rvices to be provided within the area ;are limited to only neighborhood retail services such as food, automobile and f household related items. Primary purchasing and major commercial services gill be adequately and more properly provided by the ex- i'sting shoppingcentor at East and Cohasset Avenues The neigh- borhood retail center is located at the central tra0fic intersection, 'Maripnsa and Fstoo Loop Street. PROPOSED IlIkO`t_EMENTS It has been a :,sumod that tiie i mprovemeni s will be installed in ac,cordahce with the County of Butte and City of Chico Standards. Because of the method of implementatioh, finahcinci, and the Magni, tulle of eveh �he first xohe, special designs and consider'at'ions are involved. Streets Because of to•ography and soil• conditiohs, the most ef`ficiebt position for the s,\-,eets is where the primary natural s%400 a`Fe locatedc ,,otitjon, provides for minimum q� Ading and maximum , �'hi. uti11nation of the limited topsoil by the abutting Oe6peet es. 6114" t Profiles should be selected that Will. balance the excavation from the edges with the fill at, the center. Since almost all lots will C then be higher than the street, the trench depths for sanitary and storm sewer lines are minimized. See typical cross section in Appendix: Storm Sewage_ System In des.Agning storm seWer systems in flat topodr;aphy4 a point is usually reached where the quantities become so large that underground u conduits acre economical y impractical. At this point open channels, must be used. The maintenance costs of open channels are considerably more than undergrounk nipes Channels also have inherent'safety,and esthetic considerations. For these reasons, the transition poirft from pipe to channel should be carefully considered. Since the design of the Pleasant Valley Drainage District used open channel to intercept the various natural swales of the Northeast Chico Master Plan area, it of course, should remain; The basic question then is whether the channel system should be extended. In our opinion the maximum allowable extension of the channel should be to Ceres Avenue, practically, even that is quest- ionable. With land costs of $4,000 per acre and assessment ,cIharoes `of $3,000 per acre, a 45-foot width of right-of-way is worth'S7.25 per linear foot. When the detrimental 6tpeCtS are considered the selection is a matter of Judgement. To go beyond Ceres Avenue, however, the factdeg are definitely in favor of an underground tystemi, Sar►ita_ ry, sewer Collection System p ection system are shown on the Most ertinent items of the colt plat and the typical street trots section in the Apra ,x The typical location will be in the averaq'e 'flow line of theswale in order to minimize trenching and provide for maximum service to abutting lots. Sanitary sewer depth will be primarily determined,, by storm sewer Size and locatioh. Soi.t q, Sewage Treatment Facilities x The ihiti'ai treatment facilities are schema ticaIly indicated P on the Plat and the eveh'tual landusage indicated on a separate plat rt5w In the Appendix. The basic approach is to design a facility that can be extended +- parallel increments with th ear;h successive developed zone. Each could`` then pay for its own plant and di snosal systema it was sequentua�ll;y improved. ay using Package Waste Treatment Equipment on an interim basis, complete primary and/or secondarytreatment4L _ toren could be provided. Treatment could consist of extendeda or contact stabelization, holding ponds and sprinkled effluent, Each- ,zone would be required to landscape art area appropriate to the pro } ject_d'flotr to provide for disposal by irrigation, The plants themselves would be placed in excavated depressions in order to minimizP the ,esthetic 'impact on the envirOhment,`provide loose permeable soil to absorb the sprinkled effluent and decrease the chance of odors reaching adjacent habitable areas. The plant location was determined by the future loop trunk line position, gravity flow of the entire collection system, prevailing winds and future utilization of spoil area. since the holding ponds are for effluent retention during periods of continuous rain, thoy"can ;be quite deep, Denending upon the degf-46 of excavation difficulty, they should have at least 10 feet.of, water. The spoil from the pond excavation sho;ld be bermed around the area to insure against inadvertant Surface runoff of sprinkled effluent and to provide an absorbent container for the sprinkled effluent. A collector ditch should be constructed with a rainwater d`ischa'rge valve that wuuld pass storm surface waters but divert any effluent discharge back into the holding ponds. fay utilizing the natural partially cemented strata that exists at the site for the holdthd °pond.;, the possibility of ground water contamination is virtually eliminated. Sprinkling dosage should be limited to just that amount that can ,e consumed and lost to evaporation. Excessive dosades will percolate down to the top of the underlying cemented soil and then gradually move horiontally along that surfaCe; BY the time the effluent Were to reach the boundary of the treatment area because of i2x;.;sive dosage; it will have been to thoroughly treated and polished that no damage or dL,t6r16ration in gUSlity could possibly occUr► X10- i If deemed necessary, a vubsurface interceptor drain could be installed along the property line and any collected s,ubsurfaz-c' ;W,suu,h'_a sub�a`ai flows then returned -to the hnldin'q'pondsere , installed, the flow could be tested and correlated W h opeY sig j_ records to determine refinements in procedu:•.es... When the need for the holding ponds is eliminated by the ' construcuion of the loop trunk line, the spoil from the excava06n would be conveniently located. to facilitate refillint7 thel and , rnl�� r s oil area wil r0s "thereby freeinq the spoil a ea. Since the p consist; of fill the natural grade and soil will not be disturbed. Future of the buildings placed on former spoil area k, ,foundat'ion's c`an then be standard typ es, The actual refilled pond areas should be landscaped to provide a visual screen between the golf course ,and the commercial usages along Gohasset Road. r i `V z ' i aPr r INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY IN CHICO URBAN AREA ZONED N-1 OR M-2 i � ar• VACANT TOTAL -�- AREA DEV%tOPED UNDEVELOPED OCCUPIER ACRES WI ` THIN CI=TY FIMITS' Various locations within city limits, but not ins- 250 -- 70 320 Ace cludinq airport property Airport Industrial Park 275 -- 75 350 A0 _LTYLIMITS IN CO. Southgate Industrial. Park 5 175 165 145 Ac. & adjacent areas 10 14 �.A1anq 59 83 Ac. Park Avenue ------- Along` Midway below Park Av. 12 -_ 39 51 Ac. • :East ,of Freeway on Humboldt -- -" 4 2 4 2 Ac . r' North Esplanade } Diamond International West Chico _^ Northwest Chico on, Hwy, 32 77 3 20 Ac• a TOTAL WITHIN CITY LIMITS X525 — 145' • c. 670 A-�V F ✓ r - TOTAL OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS 44 189 44S 1 681 Tic• � 569 18.9 l 3 51 Ac 06593 TAGE VACANT INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY WITHIN CITY i,IMITS..••::•., PERCENTAGE 78 " PERCENTAGE VACANT MUSTRI'At PAOPERTX OUTSIDE' CITY'LIMITSi.::i• 34 *($ Developed)•:.• 19 ' ($ Undeveloped) 81 - pERCENTAGE TOTAL VACANT INO08TRIAL PROPERTI Citeria £or establish -lopedVacant area industrial is : c Y C subdvivaott�, r i l• The area is riot part o9 an established The d roads• 2 i Th' area is not acres"sable by publi HAYS 1AiJ{'811C lk „ ' I t 1W6. Final j Environmental Impact Report, TAEL;F, Or 'CONTENTS I Synopsis II. Certification of Review of Draft E.I.R. by State Clearinghouse - 11/8/75 III. Comments from Dept. of Transportation - 10/18/76 IV. comments from dept. of Fish 4 Game - 10/18/76 V., Comments from Air Resources Board - 10/20/76 VI Comments from California !Vater Service - 10/26%76 �. VII. Comments from City of Chico - 10-27-76. VIII. Planning Commission Minutes - 11/4/76 IX. Letter from PlanningDirector notifying applicant of Plann'+-'j Commissaonrecommendation. xi Responses to Comments by planning Dept. L i' } i,ti GOVERNOR'S OFFIGF� -, - OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENTH STREET SACRAMENTO 65814 CDMUNO 0 ®MOWN ;Jh« �ayswnoA . t, ►;r. ,Iry !',c'�et��an 7 courts cf�tor, nr�;r x rovlle G „r. ��r r03Jrr' h ?'; 5�,.: I60020532 - �'�';,'� ':a�'S� �:'t,��, t;,'gti,,•r PROJECT ►'.1,, 7fi�5 Ph%s is to certif tbr•t ;;tit: rev c:,' of. vo�jt (,nvironr+crt,1 occur ,ent is comnlo'te. rhe 'rGsul't;. OC the ',: ate « rev'iow are r«tt chow. Lou shoulf, r_5..cmo to tile cor";i0►t.. , a:• r_rui_ _c bv t1lo ..Gli_r.rr=� ..rvirnr- .gent 1 li `� - Act. You uhc !*.lcF,630rc ,s yoiir rcc, cnsat to tho 'bncy ,r t{t z cm,"I to t zc �1 0� L ih„2oilsc. _ i G 3 ii Ki t f:0t i ,L .� • , i4viglc'r chief i "tzte ��learin;ho�ise tt&C";cr t (^, °h^t �F hiry ur;",. !i:rV` taclltl;l i u`4�tY iiL�.r«':rs' 1 X51 f• a! Gdtifo �" 'vilness and TransporWjon Agency Memo "rajndum 1y r Daiivl October 18, 1976 To , Honorable Donald Burns, ,ec,retary l; 'Business and Transportation Agency File = Clearinghouse i l ,, , f•p.^ Chico Municipal A/I' Attention, Jo P. Grattan f .. +, S, i.. ^h� Jim-tsG 'tVGD y V J 1076 From t DEPARTMENT AE TRANSPORTATION tate of Planning & ' Divinlon of Avehoulles Relowch . 5ubjech Project 'Review - 5CHp76092082 - Dan Hays, tt al Hezone, !".roject No. 76-59, $lute County planning Department. The Division of Aeronautics, Caltrans, ha;, rcviewed the above project and. submits the following comments A. paragraph 15141(b) states that "tile i)r.oposed project is intended' to provide appropriate zoning classifications for the ares in order to provide a guide for orderly growth and to be eompatible with ad,iauent land use and zoriin �pucT en j ro oin ara-4 - gsed raph l51_t c) _4, it iss tated that the. I'-Q p p �I pattern Chico fox the area of land in the flight traffic o") c gi Municipal Airport (referred to as clear zone ) consisting approximately 60 acres. This would restrict the ].and to public use such as kjg, rounds and schools. However, further 'rest~ ricitionb may be nrec;essary in Light of the potential hazards k associated with airport approach and landing zonesy The Division urges that further restrictiohsberoundseanand tsahaa],s no consideration be given to ltuilding p L in the airport approach zones or clea. As indicated r zones under Mitigation MeasUrea, paragraph 15141(d), the areaairo be zoned P-Q which is part of the "clear zone u for th edeintopart be ddv should remain as open space and could p public recreational area or a public park as Noet Chico Area Master Plan, page 10, last pa#agraph, B. 'The rth Cu App Nort 'e recognizes and adaresaen the above problem. The dictates of the master plan should be followed to assure that within the airport llca,ear 7one�� is compatible anq development� 1 *ith airport operations: C, The Butte Gaunty planni'f►g Deprcrttnent has done #i, good job in 4 assessing a the .enviro7twl:ntl impact of this zoning action. However, since the specific development projects which may result tram this action are unknown, further ass essnent may i, �IIa � i Mmorand urs To s 1 L. Frank Goodson, Projects Coordinator Date: October 18, 1976 Resources Agency, 2 Jay, McKeeman Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Orovil.le, California 95965 From t ftp.urhmnt of Fish and Game Subjects Draft Environmental Impact Report for Dan Flays, t al Rezone (SCH 760924$2) The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Draft Lnvironmental. Impact Report for Dan Hays et al'Rezohr (SCH 76092082). The report does not adequately describe wildlife impacts of the projects, and existing{ wildlife values are not accurately depicted; i To.comply with provisions of CEQX, additional information should be incorporated in the final EM We offer the following comments: 1. Page 6; - item 4: This section should reflect, the facts that birds other than round-nesbin species utilize the area and the impacts g C p , P 4 . resultiig from the presence of domestic animals, noise; human aativtyt structures, etc. will serve to degrade existing habitat >'nl" discourage vildlife use wrlthin and adjacent to project lands. y 2. Pae 12.. .tem 2: The loss of wildlife hobitat is a significant 'loss i to wildlife at the ;site, no less on this site than any other, minimum patcsl si.zo's oi8 -0 acres would retain most of the natural value of the site: ;xxad wok -d ,wsai, �nl++i.gate for adverse isrlpacts of this project on wildlife, SSU, 11er 'pard;A, s �.::sxlc preclude economical 'use of the land for grazing and a,l:,)w uses w.Lcrr;.•gater adverse impacts. C.. Director 1 p ZV M Siafe of California, Memorandum To c i) L. Frank Goodson Or 20, 197' Projects Coordinator Resources Agency subjects pan Hays, at al. Rezone, Project No. 76-59 2) Butte County Planning Dept. Chico, Butte County 7 County Center Drive SCH No. 7092082 Orovilla; CA 95965 From i Air Resources Board i We have reviewed the draft environmental impact report (DEIR) for Dan Hays, at al. Rezone, Project No; 76-55• The project Is the proposed rezoning of 570 aeras of A-2 (unclassified) zoned' land to 115 icres of ,1d-1 (light } industrial), 205 acres of A-5 (agricultural,), 260 acres of SR -1 '(suburban),i and 60 acres of P -Q (public -quasi public) near the City of Chico: I The DEIR includes air quality background data and states that air quality w'II,I be degraded especially if industries that emit alr pollutants are developed on the H -1 -toned 16nd: However, the DEIR lacks quantifcatlon of the increased air pollutant b(irden that may occur upon project development completion, The DEIR needs to Include dataonthe oxidant levels that Chico hes experienced in past year's. The DElk needs to note that low density housing development is not conducive to public transit service and increases the dependence upon the private automobile, Also, the DEIR steeds to inform decision makers of Ale Resources Board (ARB) programs that will affect agelcultural and urban lands that are not presently covered by air quality maintenance area programs (AQMA). ARB has recognized. a need for a' 'h414 program to protect those areas of the state that have superior air quality levels and to provide for urban and 1:•,Mstrial develop Ment in other areas within the constraints of State and"Natlonal Ambient Air Quality Standards: To accomplish those objectives the ARD is developing :the Air ConsehVatloh Program to protect presently superior air quality in certain areas and permit necessary development In other areas. As this project will affect both agr'idulture and urban land's, the decision rhakers need to weigh carefully the effects project approval will have upon air quality and needs to decide the necessary tradeoffs to halnta;in ate quality:. Wiillain C. Lockett, Chief { Planning Dlvision cc; W, H. LeWis, dry �rtEl'tf'Nil r{��r 1;?I+'Si+ H4 Nichols NOV 10 �r?6 AL ,F 00,-41pANy October 26, 1976 ITQo WORTH FYAST tTRIB T SAM JOSS) aAL11rO1M.*1A Alt" 400 • '980-1414 P, t Butte County Planning Commission 7 County Center Drive Ir"!!."M. Oroville, CA 95965 281 �5 Attdnt,.on: .Tay McKeeman Envir,4,,►en-al Coordinator Re; Project No. '16-59 Centlemen In response to p your letter of September 14, 1976, we have :eviewed_a copy of tht,Lra�t environmental iirpact report for Dail Hays, et al. Rezone Project No. 76-59. Chico Municipal Airport which adjoins the area to lie zoned M 1 is serviced by California Water Service Company. Service is contingent upon approval by the California State Public Vtilit es 'Coiiw►ission to expand our service area: To rrovide domestic water service'and £ire protection, it will be necessary to drill►ew wel1.5 t rhe areas proposed for 1r6zin future appropriate sites must be repierved for this purpose p use is expectdd to be about Average y , 1000 gallons bper iresidential parcel 240,000 gallons for the 240 one acre parcels in the SF?4 (Suburban -Residential) area { Impact on ground water resourt ,'would be slight very, truly yours, CALWORNIA WATER SE V COMPANY Itarold H nmmericli Assistant Secretary HHheb oc; E. Grant i i I s VI _ a t � Sri OFFICC Ue THE CITY PLANNER -P. U. dd)Y .' ARM -45926 TELEPNhNr (916) MC3444171 -AFTER 5:00 1y M• 343 431!11 r' t �rnalase ctl`h Couot4 Planning Pelpartment 7roof l 1 y,uC l i Drive 5 Oc'tobetr 27, 1975 Flai Draft PIES for Dan Nays, et al Rezoning ri7`6_59 "Ar Jay, ffeferencz 1s made to your letter of Septzmber 1!i, 19'76 requesting comments , do %he above Deft EIRE Flo N ` '►tr 7 ;ui o%7+Intal Review E3oard of the Cit, of yftico has reviewed the.. referenced ' clrZ and WbMts thei folIowing comments for your consideration. section 15143 Environmental Impact subsection a is The Environmental Impact of the Propoo-2d Action; one additional i'ma ct concerns the ;safety of the nroposed development Ab, ~ 1ocatin• on this si to b, cause of the easte'rly f119` i� pa ttorn used by the majority of airaraPt. ! Subsection c - Mitigation Maasures Proposed to Minimize Advnrse Impact. An additional mitigation measuw-. slio!.ild bn adidd to P5 which is as follovis:; t. Another mitioatwiva measure ,could by the Widenir!•j of Cohasset Road 'ta four 1�n 5 ba��!t°an dile dirpUrt s,`d burnap Avenues ,I Subsection 9 - The Orckh-i+ ducing lrvidt o U)e Prapo,ed Action The E;1t3 disagre0s pith tha conclus'lon the project would not be growth inducing, Th'� M-1 zoninj could eni`!ourage strl;, commercial industrial y 6e0eloprient along Cohass'�t koad, both north and south of the project site. It may also act to encourage r�sidOntial Jzvelopmont in areas which should be more ap,propriAtely left open fol' grazi'i g act=ivity or open space due to Nije etEvird6Me. adi r,o•�,'�r rots oh' th4 1 ynd, Pp The area shorn as "medium., dkinsity vletidential" is iii orror and should be ch,atlged to i1loW density reSidential1l, ,o- CCT ` V�xB BUTTE COUNTYPLANNTNG C(P,)MIS:'''ON MINUTES NOVEMBER h, 1976 f� 77-3411:1-70• ; A letter from Califo,rO;;q Haty,* Service Company dated October 26, and one - from.•the City of Chita: 'OatO 0, tober 27, 1976, were ',toyed. a.ia was present, ikt ' he tience, to speak either for or against the ►� .. p o s a' Commis pr Smith '-ok, i s su:e w r + ith comments made in Paragraph 4 on Page 13,` It was 'suggested thaw perh� s a community service district could be fo0add to handle sotr6 of the problems: The hearing was clot>ad a.nd:motion made by Commissioner Smith, seconded= by Commissioner Wa*t—�rs' t.o find the draft enviranmental impact report sufficient with the: addi zian of comments made tonight and the two letters noted earlier. AYES. Cont�,is5it�ners Carnenzind, Gilbert, Moore; Smith, Watson, Thebach, Watters, and Chairman Hanford. NOES: No one; ABSTAINED: I.e Cleed who disq [alif od himself. ABSENT: No one. Motion carried. Viii z , November 22,, 1976 r Dan Hayes, etal c/o MccAin Assoc. 5S5 Cast Avenue Chico, Ca. 95926 t� Re: Rezone '76-59 Ginn tl Omen - At their vogular meetings ori November 18 1976, the tutee County Pnning 'Department recommended action on your r;p= zoning proposal as folloWt " SR -1 as pro'po'sed a. A -s as proposed Delete M-1 as proposed and add ."O A -S Delete P -Q and substitute 9.6 Y Thitapplication 'will be set fol hearing_before linty Board of SuperVisors and you will be theBube., notified of that ,date; �t Should you have wny questions regarding this matter, ObAse feel free to cohtaCt our office. Si hcerU. ,.Y ErA MVIC6 J, LAWW DIRECTOR '0F 0LAIN 11JNG , j /hd 4 .:4 wlaYyw�wpM W 1 X Responses to Letters and Comments by Planning Dept,: it. Response _to Comments from Dept. of Transportation III It is highly unlikely that any permanent structures or large assemblages of people would occur in the proposed, P=Q zone even though the zoning would allow this. Xt was the intent of the applicant to keep this area as a "clear zone" and per- haps sell it to the City of Chico. Section 15143 (d)i Alternative #4, notes that the proposed P-Q zone could be changed to n-C (Resource-Conservation) Which is a more restrictive zone and does not allow an permanent st�`uctures. On November 4, 1976, the Butt4ounty Planning Commission recommended this change and it will be considered before the Board of Supervisors for finaX approvaw,The . necessary since therenaresnO specificedevelopmenttproposal.s` Planning Dept, y be Without such proposals the draft E.I.R. can only address prop bable.impacts, in general terms that the proposed zoning u: would allow b. Response to Comments from Dept. of Fish Game IV On page 8, #4 of the draft B.I.R., please note the following changes: `Delete the second sentence starting with "Because - parcel sizes will be large.4.44 and change to "The impacts resulting 'from the presence of domestic animals, noise, human activit;, structures, etc. will serva to degrade exist- ing habitat and to discourage wildlife use within and adjacent to project 1 ands . " On page 12, #2 Delete :sectiO,, o.nd change to ItThere will be a loss of 'habitat for several bird, reptile and small mammal species,11 On page 4 Lg)c Delete section and change to 'This area is ;an important wintering grounds for various bird species including sarrows, finches, hawks, and fravis falcons. There are also various ground nesting type birds including kili.deer,'quail and rarely pheasant. Manpals which inhabit or frequent L•he area are mostly'noc- turnal. These would include various rodent species, rabbits; coyotes, skunks, rind occasionally foxes and bobcats, Snakes and lizards are comirion and amphibian populations 'ai•e small and intermittent' Ci kesponso tn.Comments.from Air Resource; Board M-1 Quantification of lin.creased air pollutants upon ptbjedt coon ple"ti'on is very difficult to dscer-vain as the project is only a zoning proposal and impacts due to subsoquent development would only he speculation. The: draft D.I.R. addresses thi: Xa C Z1Sint. Any valid quantifit-,ation would have to be derived from further enn:lysis of a specific development proposal. The oxidant and other contaminant levels for CRiico are shown in Appendix "'ll" The tablb givos daily levels in parts per million for a one year period, Oct 1, 1974 to Sept. 30, 1975.. The draf text should note on 'page 11."A",'''1�ow dansity Mous- in g G,levelopment is itot co:tiduclve to pub!lc transit service and -increases the dependelice upon the private automobile., Mitigation 7 (c) on pago 13 of the drMit does suggest formation of gar pools to reduce the use of the automobile mid help con- _ serve energy. The Air Resources Board is currently developing an Air Conser- vation Program and details or the plan can be found in the Plan Develo mein Program For an A.ir Conservation Program for Gaiifiv.51a 5:� t -p .�1�7.. ,is plan calls Tot a classification syste :� b tie elYtare 'tato 'jflj ch will permit the formulation of programs designed specii.cally to meet the needs of each area classification. As ref noup, there is no classification for the proposed tbzone at`ea n'or i's there a specific program that deals with agriru".io:al ateas4 The program is ex1ected to be implemented iii Chi s, or ;July; 1977 Decision makor 'should be �r7ro of potential air giaality problemA, and ctrl; invited to parti.cipate in the Air Conservation; Progiam, D. Response to Comments from City_ef Citicc (VII)_; Plteas'o add to Sec. 15143 (a) of the draft D. I At. , page 12 9j Human habitation ',n thii area poses a'potential safety hazard hecattse Of the alrcritft flight pattern east of the ClUto Airport. Potential, hatalyds could be reduced by a lower dwelling unit density.`' Please add to Sec. 1510 (c) to N5, nage 15 'Increases in traffic congestion could be mitigated by the widening of Cohanset Road to tofu ].-Anes butween the airport and Burnap ,AvotWb,: t' As stated in See, Would, occur because or' '-lid man a�,,tead 151.43 (9) it Is uiilikely that additional indus'tri.al zon,tt y y ��acant industrial ptirtbis it', that thea; Thero Is also no evidence to irtdi epite that the filtico area will havd any sub- stantia! industrial, dbvel.o ffidnt. Thi.4 prOject haay hbweirer; stimulat- commercial developnibnt around tho Lassen Avenue/ Cohasset Road thtersectioh, 'l PJ,ease correct the area ib Appendix 0, show`Tt aS "medium detisa,ty resa,tiEi�t3a'I:�� an cltiingo to �#pow density resiadnt,id 'l. Xb M E M O RAN D Uri To Dutte County P1,•'►ning Commission FftC'M i Bob Gaiser, Planning Department SUBJECT: Ckico Airport noise Study DAT8 October 13, 1977 Copies of the complete version of the "Chico Municipal Airport, Noise Study" were distributed to #,ommission members before the last meeting: �In orderto promote the best use of alis document and a complete understanding of its contents, I have prepartA a summary of the report. It is important to keep in mind tWo considerations when reviewing the report and my summary, First; the scope of the study is limited strictly to aircraft noise levels and does not include safety hazards, p C height restrictions, specific zoning plans or comprehensive long-range plans. The F.A.A,, Planning Grant proposed by the City of 'Chico would allow an experienced consultant to York aspects of a Com rehensive plantforCthe airport area, all with the Commission, staff a City ! forecasts o pert area., Secondly, P b�cauGe reliablef future aircraft operations, espec iall„t future air carrier flights, have not yet been developed fear Chico Municipal Airport, this study does not speculate on future noise levels. If the Commission Wishes to develop a zoning scheme based on tate data on hand at; this time, please note the consultant's' statement that dbublinq the number of aircraft operations increases the CNEL value by three units at all locations, According to the Control tot,jer Chief, operations have increased fJ' about 10 percent a year the past two years and should increase at least five perce►itpQr year for the next fent years, Thus; operations should at least double over the next 20 years and may triple. To adehuately plah for long-range development of both the airport and the area around it, I would recommend 'that we mentally increase all CN8L values a't least 'five units to account for probable increases in noise levels. On Monday night we can discuss the effect o" moving the 60 CNEL line to where th '," is now:, moving the 65 to where the '60 is nott, etc K B0-db attachment cc Jim Lawson Fred ba vi s File; 77-73y'C 5 SUMMARY OE ,JOISE STUDY Aircraft Operations The Federal Aviation Administration control Tower recorded 30,000 takeoffs and landings in 1976. Hughes Ar►►est is the',nly air carrier at present rith daily flights to both San Francisco and Klammath Falls; Airwest accounts for eight operations daily or about 3,000 annually. These operations by large DC -9 jet;, are tine loudest at ti's {j airport and largely determine the noise contours , Air taxi service to nearby cities is provided by Ilot and Eu ea Aero; •their twin -engine propeller aircraft recoYded 6400 t. operations in 1976. Small private aircraft, both local and r � k itinerant, account for more than 85 percent of t,te o P erati`pn s_ but only small portion of the noise impact. General aviation totals include frequent operations by crop dusters'servinq ' agricultural areas to tit vie st and training flights In small i jets by Japan Airlines pilot trainees based in Napa. i-iiscel',,aneous r1 and 5evet°al hundred times during year, military aircraft also 1 I rf, During the fire season, Pacific Aero Union operates a variety of aircraft for the air attack facility of the State Division' ;! of Forestry, ihcluding old military propeller bombers converted to tankers for fire retardant chetti cal s . Due to their size anti heavy load, the noise impact of these fire bombers during the infrequent periods of intensive use can be significant: F1 %ght Patteell st the two parallel runvjays are oriented in a n8h1►vreStlsoutM►east direction: The main operational runttay is :: 6,72,2 feet long and is used by all larger aircraft and 70 percent of general aviation flights. Sixty-five percent of Air.gest takeoffs and landings use the south end of the main runway the flight path for these operations extends out from the runway to CoitasseRoad and then turns eastward toward the Hooker Oak Aredi The Airviest DC -=9'0s approach Chico Airport at a standard angle of 3° wi't;h the ground surface and take off at an an, -le of 70. The 3,()00 ft,, runway to the West is used by small general aviation aircraft: These enter the local trafficpattern about. 3 0/'4 miles from the ends and sides of the runway i t t t ffi E v i t Present 1i01se Levels; Dep4cnding on the proxim y o ra c, construction and industrial 'uses, the typical background noise levels around the airport range from 30 to 40 decibels during the day and from 27 to 39 decibels` at night: Aircraft noise 1 levels are related to the sine, power and dumber of enaines i' r i the type of operation and the distance to the listener. The areas under general aviation flight Paths may experience up to 25 flights a day With peak sound 'levels of 56 to 62 decibels comparable to the noise of automobiles passing on Colasset Road lOo ft, away: The riost significant aircraft noise pposures result from the daily air carrier flights, the Japan Airlines training flights and the sesaonal fire bomber uyerAtions; noise levels can reach 95 to 97 decibels ori the ground during DG -9 t operati�ts; a. Comhtur7;ty Iloise tou=tvalent level s,_(Ctl ); The C;iIEL method adopted by U^bl Trans and specified in California legislation on aircraft noise is an attempt to combine all aircraft noise 42v ' exposures over an average 24-hour day into a single number reflecting average human response to cumulative noise effects. The noise levels of single events are addod by computer with penalties included for events during the evening (7 - 10 p.m;) and night (10 p,,m. 7 a.m.) account for the increased annoyance of,noise during these hours The location 'of present CNEL values 55, 66, 65, 70, 75 and 80 are s,uvin as lines around the: main runway and flight on Exhibit IV Putuwe Nowise Levels: Increased noise,exposure levels will result from the fo11owing' 1. More A1rwest flights, 2. Adding a new carrier. 3. Increased evening or night operations. 41. Use of noisier aircraft, 5. Changes in aircraft flight paths 1' Doubling the total number of flights would increase the CNEL values by three units at all locations. Land Use Guidelines;, , kriteria for' evaluating the noise compatibility of various land uses have been adopted by the California biepartment, of Health: The guidelines' are based on years of experience around airports ; in other' cbtnAhities, The range of acceptable hoise levels , for 'specified land uses in Exhibit VI (Pg. 26, attached) is wide enough to allow tons i, Local discretion, Areas above OM 65 should be eostrictdd to nonwresidehtial land uses in order to comply With the "noise Standards for California Airports" in the j A'dmi:nisthative Code, 0 f EXHIBIT VI LAPID usE i; OMPATABILITY FOR CO�L`•i M);T4' N0I4F [ IyI1;0Yw•l1r^tT5 I; i LAND USS CATEGORIi' COhIMUNITY NOISE CXPOSURE Ldti OR CNCL, dB S5 60 65 70 75 80 RES100TIALLOW DENSITY SINGLE FAMILY', DUPLEX, hIOBILE HO,11E$, RESIDENTIAL �- MULTI. FAMILY . .F TRANSIENTLODOINfr- 61OCELS, HOTELS r;"�• �� ' } — SCHOOLS. LIBRARIES, CHURCHES, HOSPIVALS, NURSING HOMES ------------ AUDITORIUMS. CONCERT HALLS, AhIPHITHC ATR'ES SPORTS ARENA, OUTl7CJOR SPECTATOR SPORTS PLAYGROL'NDS, NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS - —� -- GOLF COURSES, RIDING STABLES, WATER RECREATION, CEh1ETERlE5 OFFICE BUILDINGS, tiUSINES5 CO'Sb1fERCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL » '� INDUSTRIAL,hIANUFAC7URING UTILITIES, AGRICULTURE iNTI"RrRLLAT 10!.4 NORMALLY ACCEI,TABLE Sperified bind use is sahsfat,tory, based' ulibn the adsumption that any buildings involved :ire of norroal cunventiunal tonshucliun,withont AnY speeiil nuisd lnsul boli requirdmonts, CONDITIONALLY AC'CLPTABLE New. conplructlon or developniont should be.. undertaken only after a detailed analYsls of iite noise reduction requirements is madd Slid needed noise insulation fdatures included In the design, Conventional Construction, but with clused windows and fresh air supply Systems or air conditlooin$ Will normally suffice. NORMALLY UNACCEPTABLE New eunsti tit tion or development should i guneratlyire disrourA;ed. If new construction or devuidpinent doth proceed, a deviled anilysis df tint noisy= rcductiun requirements most be � made and needed noise insulatiun features lntludud hr the ddilgn, CLGARLYUNACCEPTABLE New constrtictlon or development shotild genernll>i'Ilk be undbrtA;ten: i the Act, resldontfatUses bolted in C &Nhity ltotse 000ture A. t10RHALIZiEO HbiSt EXPo51 R! ItIFORi AMN DESM0 Areas .greator than 0 dD thauld be di4tour5ged and considered Where located kithiat1oh.Ally unak;ibptahlo areas; suffidient eAta existt, evaluate land n5d suitabllity With Ire t, to thble e d iaed't value of Clisl or Ldn, Aril t3dettr values k Fes ret to a nay+ :ire t,bWined by adding ar subtraeting Ills cpnstants desci`ibed in Asurad or talculatbd value of CiiEL dr' Ldn. C, SUITAALE_liltl:00R Ei1Vff10O.MS One bbJoetive of ibcating hesidontlAl units Felative to a knaarr f noise source is to rraintain,a tuitabie interior noise enViron�+eiit lit 6 Hry15 30u [E tf1Aw,patib�slitS rbcorm:ndA'lons should be ulowi!d the�typoeorastrueturacundolrat6nstd ra lon,�shauldAglvvrrt the pled the romance of the land use noise torp E1, 1 y 46 rolatian to OL, zpvtttit soured of the rilso, For, exAtvlo , inlhihun ACCeptahlu distnnee to a hoiso source, slrci-aft and eAil'tdad 001sO Is AOthAlit Main L. of hlghte singly 01te ovents than Auto traffic but occuet loss frequerltlyr there foret dI MI Nnt sources yielding the s,a a torposita nbiso exodt're ACCLpTAgL¢ 4bTO60g EtllADlit!Ei'TS dti riot no"mrity Croatd the Sara noise bnvir»nrent, The S.A.e D. , Arronautits A;t usez fS d3 Gt,fL az the crit, r+hith airports rrucf uvoritaAllyy rrht Eo prctett ttrl'ttihil rbiidontial Comrunitles Another consld Pation,,bhith in stirs torttunitlet is art overriding ren undCetlp,,tblt kvposure to atrcraft noizb, In t'der to facili• factor; is the dbsire for an accaptible outdoor no to edvironrehU, y s ei the Act, ale Of which Is to encourM land Whon "this Is the caso�.iore restrictive standards or tans use #Ate the Cu✓ �•e usFs eurpAtt�lb zflth the 65 cA Cttt4 trlteriiSri uhrrever pdsifol!tw tohpatlbstltyr tY�, IdAlly below the raxinurAcbnsld4reJ "norr»�►1 y Ind 16 otter to Neillta�to the ability of a�irpdrts to torply with �a,cceptabio" (be -that ,iAhd u%o cQttliory, ray be Appropriate, �6 j Y r , V f 1, ��"'�'`r, � � � i` ' �» • # r � ���, 3 �� �� ti , ' "YM aw••wy.•1 Vi1Ysi'# „°„ "� I M' ✓ J �'y'. o , r. r j . �,,,, � �. ' l /,' •'�� �'� w„r. +... Yom. � j 1, 1 �� �1 • \1 °I � r s nM. It 6 41 •1' N r1+ �! � y 4 y!•J % `Jif ✓'4�°'I��` ^• J •aY +�/ !1 �i•aY li llila i! •"ial Y° "a. Y:. �' a''f'.G �,' ,, C. fl al ,IyY 4 `I'Y/Ja t NIyi l+Y ly 1"1 Y' Y° y Z i T ';.0 wvy. �� rr•,. ` ',. y •"Y Y it' � t � .. p yiilY Y • ! yili °iilJy iiil 11'i .✓ ."' .[^.. � �� 1 � /a Y>•. �•*11 yyYl •rY""/11 Y{i ! ry/iY 1 � +'v.+» � ' iy/ !4 .� : s'Yyl Mi ly/ / �° • i � " ,w,. �.;,y' � t"�` `}y�j ,. � "�. _, Y1II Y !y 1•JIY YYY � aYlY•ly Yal/{IY:/�Y. i�.�Y� Y '1/Y{" t , +r1` � Y i YYIi IVY y/" YY//"`,'! f!i•. 1 ii'JL" ,a Y Ll IN ' �•\U Q `• fY 1J 1.1!1.1 Ya YY"Y i . 1 +Yaal •Y 1 Y � Y ,.Ili Y � .,�1 "M�c'/i V�I i - ,�• ° � 1 y'i�1i!'Yi� "1 4. 4 � `~• ,� Y� k i1 ^; iUly .1?i I1980 St. Chico acjl 9592 Re! igetono rile #81.,.5 'e67 RV, r-lummeltt s: This is to notifyou that we have received your application for a rezone from '8Pi-3" (8uburbsn Residential 3 acre parcels) to 1IM-1'0 (Light Industrial) plioperty :located approximately 300 Feat east of Cohasse t Ra., approximately 116 mi os` north of 'Eaton Rd., identified as A-P 48-01-09, north of` Chico. We will achd, ule public haari.ngo at such time as the On-vi roe mental dete9loinat ou and tYie reco►iaznmuudatiobs of the Department of ItOiic 4iStks and Ehvitonmental Sanitation have beet ruceiv©d: ,o by this of�i ce. :Yi,zacer�J.y � Bettye Blair bitedtor of Plah ing BB, c P Y a s ....,. _. ..... ... C PLANNINQ'QEPARI';NT'S INTERDEPARTMENTAL REVIEW REQUEST 7'Hun,y Canter Lr1�o rv7llo, �,(,�ftrw 95961 Rynn �.a art — REQUEST: R, lew & G AP N0. ; (81-5148-01-0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: RpZnngl from "SR 2 (S)ib»rhan Residontti al--- 3 acre na=e10 LOCATIONtnpl)-ax- 500 ft. Oast of CohaaGat• Rd ,$ ayrr - 1jZ miles north of Raton R north of` Chico APPLICANT: ; lily -D 8 r•g 40;rL-.-zy�(" ADDRESS;q4o C!htgrQr a a OWNER: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RETURN DATE REQUESTED, ASAP_ _ _ 19ufft ca, r DATE DISTRIBUTED: . 2-21-80 JUL • IS Ou ; 01 01110, CL-lifomla ATTACHMENTS; Copy of application & plot'plan. RETURNED; COMINENTS: .%6 A;L- ex:bkke OK - A e. Vogt- s0;ra,, 'I kA, -ler' Zrtt& r + ,us ,r►ic i- CK t �po�t� � S !W& VAR 'tip ,- F a_ , , , -Couniy of Bt;� ,, '' pi�,r�>inq Qe�mmia�ion PLANNING DEPART NT'S INT R-DK--PAhTMENTA' EV�IEWW REOUE V 7 �vrils�,y4��iiifrrnia'i�� ue.} C' Mfic�� Or 96465 TO:",i ., _ Qhieo . Planning lommi on � cc -- . RCOMST $m1IE � .N � Comment. It ,araylle� L�11'tata�a AP NO,'.��� 't111LG -Son'l ro „ Y1.. a6 i DlS06Yl_ DESCfiIPTlQN OF PRa IJECT: f --- " to nK��i tl Q�z �1�n annrfxh of LOCATION:m rs3. 300 rt-0t—aah" ...,. — I APPLICANT: — nCE' ADDRESS'; . ---r45=` * at...-ChOWNER'e4i�-;—``JUL 2 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDIJLED.� PLANNINitTURN DATE REQUESIED' ASAPGIN t�F DATE. DIST RIBUTED:_7i-21- 0 ATTACHMENTS. Coi+!'v An�^ ation & plot plan RETURNED,' COmmeNTS' Ju_.1 +y 29 1980 ,. The 01aning 'Office of the City of Chico wishes to 16spond by e9pressing erioil5 I�oncei�ns about the access onto Cohastett' Road; We sthon9Ty recommend_ r ' s R the ekistihg industhial `zoning NOT be,eka� d County of Bu"a P.�� yiEP6RTM9NT'S._IEl [-EPARI F' "'� ..V EVIE4�f_f l•Cl E T Nlaronfnq i:ommits 0 7 Cdu-ty Confor Drivo r T0:_: OA Wa�4- 8ervicO Co. (Chico-),-- �Arovllla, Calliforrila 96965 REQUEST- RMIIS ►& Comment jut, ;�'198Q AP INIM t ($:L— -(�� Cl�i; broellloi californtq DUCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ReZbae 9rbm. IIS�t-`3r� _CSu'buri�;", i�F?nial xit3a� - � acr© �arcoys) r x � 0 f, '. �' of. CO LOCATION:. ngnrax. x�y t_.:..._. 1 6SaP, ' RCI. �, F31gq�'n7C 111 lriI G' X]orth of Eatdb, Rd.s north of ,Chibb � ..... rte. •-tUi"n Fl L li` � ft ADDRESS; PLANNING COMMilStION ACTION SCHEDULEp,.,_. 1 RETURN DATE REQUESTEM ;MAP DATE DISTRIBUTED:.'^ ATTACHMENTS: Copy of a"pplfcatloh & plot plan.. Comm l' &2 � CztgvG�7'T , Lu g ,FJri o • nf' G'i✓�T` r� .,�,�c-�r�� �.�r u+�.'�'�� r F y�j ' frr,�°,u �..�1.� ,�'r��,r��� `, V J ( 1 .,.ru...._.-.......-._...., ,,, .. ..- ..li... vi •' ri ny. .m; :.34dFY'5.9� County a'l Buffo Ma�mintr, Conimisslon ` ENT S INTERDEPARTMENTAL NG DEPARTMENT'S REVIEW RI:QUES' 7 Cunfy C onfor Qrlya TOC_ . P�AGAo. &_ E] ect:r .`c _.Co. (Chicon Dutl u Co. Planoing Comnli Orovi1lo, Cnlif�ornin 95465 JUL 2, 919 REQUEST: Reye mn�enx OroYMN C;nfffarni�; AP NQA t .;Oil 5) "MOOIMQ9 DESCRIPTIONOF PROJECT; BASQUE i fl �lOil ">I8� =...,a►a�, ee : ea�iz ,l� Ito IndUm VIA'" LOCAT�ON -IIPn p�C—?SQA t�' sus t of Oah�esta�� .$fie ,. g ,1Ga )i jai `Adon Jed s� Hearth n ggtc r, APPLICANT; _ ..Yrs Yf. ADDRESS!(Zhs,rrr rA:. t'.hiP0� _ „+ ONINER:am�.-., PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION SCHEDULED RJET:URN DATE; REQUESTED: ASAP �. DATE DISTRIBUTED: MENTS! Copy oUbppll otion & plot plan, ATTACH „ ! RETURNi -. COMNIEN�rS: 1� h►+mers, S �' Ila , ------------ 7 :u i(4 _ _, � BU�� Vii � �y...... � n �� I .. _._ __. _, v +. r ,�,r�a telyiorile p Ir.. � .. _ ... ,:. _. .. .. ._..., �g i. _.. - w . �.. Y.. ...._...... ......, .. .,,, ��':Ij J t BUTT13 COUNTY PLANNING 001MISSION IT71EARINU Notice is hereby given by the Butte County planning Commission that -public hearings will be he'd on Wednesday, August 270 l9goo at 7!30 in the Butte County Board of SuPeTvl.sOrs' ROOMO Butte County Administration Center, 2S County Centet , Dr . � IVGP grov,illeP California, regarding the follovdhg. ITHM ON WHICH MICATIVE DECLARATION REGARDINrENVMPM 71it m-I-Ft` R-ff COMM NDE D li Jay D. -Plummer - Rezone from ,SR-,,,),, (Suburban Residential 3 acre parcels) to 0IM-10 (Li Aht Industrial) for property lod,atbd gpproximatoly 300 feet east of CohAssot Road, appjoy,jt4tely 1 1/2 miles north of 11aton Aoad$ idbntified as A�. 48-01-09, more particulatly destribed AS: The easterly 300'f-t. of the westerly Goo ft.—Of ho SIf 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 2, TZZNj RIH, Containing 9,00 acres, more or less, north of Chico. The above mentioned appl'icatiousj potitionso wapso draft dnViton- mental impact reports and/or n6gotive roports ace: an file' and aVailable for public Vjevting"at the office of the Butte C00ftty Planning Department, 7 County Cantor Dr!Ve, OroVillo-o California.trwironmehtal Impact I R6poTts are also eiVailab16 at doli6gd and County librarieso BUTTE COUNTY PLONING COM1881ON BETTYE BLAIR DIRLICTOR OP PLANNING i0 BE t13lL�iS TI3if 11 7,11P. CHICO MMIPAISt RtCORb ON THLMSDAY, AUGUST 14, 198011 4 l August ln, 1Qgn Mr �, Jay `S� . p lumme r 745 ChbxxY Strbet4 Chico, c;n 95926 k ei jtexone+ �! Filb �f R1•+i r 1 rl Rn t nc ar Mr. Plummer. of Staff Vind1n9s concerning'your Pnclosed i"s a copy 5R• 3 , to Al-1 for aprlication for a rezone from "• +, ++ +' rRprroximatc�ly ;iQO fent east of Co" property located 1/2 mile north of Baton hasSet Road, app oximately rgmd, no of Chaoa. }gas l eon set for the A 'Public hearirt�; on this n Ltbx bTi A. tlir t planniCor,'uiiisaionrt their, regular moeinp, 27, logo. This Mdeting �ti11 he helcl �.n the 'Board of eSu�25 County Center nrivo Cxovilie, ervsars Roam, • y and is scheduled to begin at Should you ]lave any Dost ons. rlease feel free to cdn'�Act this office, �� ', i �Siricerely `� Ali ,gdttye M"tdr, �rectar of Planning,' /hd F3nc f, .t .�� CUA' ( OF CHMO, C AUFOR�QA cw� drou * OF CITY F.ILANNINq - 0. 0, Dog '34 m cOHUNt (916) tl4p•QACII - i��TCR fxltlp P"M� pdt,•7p 1 0SIUIrm" _ y1 August Tot 1l6i!Caiaor '�f. County 1'UNII g Departmerit Frotht of istn a Chico I"la ning poohr", ent This It to aan,t'!rm our tralt0hone conversation of this mo}•:►ing regarding yozone ,roquost• OurprItnary concern had uoen 666020 onto' r Ja Yl�lmmor�fi Cah*snot Iyhich ve understand hpn boon resolved through a ono foot toe oimpto dedlfcatlon. `} ` We no longer have any major problemb with tho roxonl,t►g and 141A to �1t�ittr�ti out k'oviauss statamont in o ppas'It1on. I aUI norry f6r ariy i0CanV0nl0nck; that thim'may have causod you o :'the. Pplicnnt. }fl 1 'i n 0ca`�1�IoI wy �p n op" W'M 4F IPC QP CITY PIANN(Nq'o� r".n1 DOX, 342[1, ; Ti;Ph0NC f91G1 �g404�• PrM h5qx % ,ArTCR 5tO] `k m ,q 343'7337 � , i '; �r s a " �5y1t1�►G� P��tlt'tP,Y�,>p �e��:�!t°rtne�l'� " ,f ,, uy had ray ��ypy�n yy�94 j�tp�rt y� �j,qj� ry this yC y�M, � /� 1/.pw• .�..� tinYCY I�4Yl1,�M:J A.�'1' r'*vlt Y4)u + fr'lr.O t1 t it oPpo,�ng this F.�'T.�i�✓ntil"; ��{aqust♦,:. t :halt hate tSKlEkTi St f zd,tad 't 11 �t; t ,+ atcv'4 aotnks, onto C.-Own0 t :ire , "e'd anLI Its filot Imasant: t1a Prob?,0119« ThVrcff= r t:h-r; ;tt;'fits +t1a longer, to 4xy ut)PISItian to thin reque.tr'" L 4,4 »» .y� al,`ll.tahJ.» +1�cyi�YRlf/lawix�M' x ttsnni Ali VMK41�� cc.,. qtr: Dan :days �r3; o All F f. I i Ali; U y I, 1 tfG "ail a. .,. '•.. .��. d. M1.y k .x1 Y'M�i °5 iPW '[?':��� R p•,v. .. f ` f �1�,tr. .,,1. i a•R «� � . ,n H�. a ; .�'i � �J:. 1 1 � a �y, rrr r � s, ,�� o.' ,BVTTE,COUNTY PLANNING c0mMIS8Ib% 8T,kpp FIND IGS AUGUST 2?, 1980 Jay D. Plummet, - Rezone from 11SR-311 (Suburban Residetntifril- 3 acre parcels) to "M-1" (Light industrial) XOV PrIOPerby located apprOximat01Y 3MO feet east oX Cohosoeb Road) approximately J)j jj�iles north of Eaton 'Road, identified as AP 48-01-09, more particularly described as: The easterly 300 ft. Of the west-rly 600 ft. Of -c 2 11;�2N, RIB, MbB&K- the SW }+F of the NW A of 6e ng 9.00 adrOM4 more ,r la8s,, north :Of Chico, The b"plicant states that; the reason for the a0li-cs'_ion is Pp s xi ting & be is 0.6 same topography a ext S for the hishost st U80 M-1 The Land Use Element of tle General Plan designates the: site as Industrial to the west transiltion ing to AgriculburalReciidential to the o6st. The topography Of the atea causes the site to relate mor,o, closely -to the industrial designation. The '�M_111 zone does tu�,i8t ant,i ally conform to the, General 1`16n, however a proposal for (tight industrial) zoning Initiated by the Butte. Coilnqr Planning Commlss'ojj for the area immediately West currently 1 IK -111 is nearing hearings. The site lies east of the Chico Airport and is In Rolling "'lls' I PO industrial development to the West and northwest, with undeveloped rural land to the north and east-. Comments received from public agencies area Public -Works - Some roads in this area are substandard. Sn-FLm.5—T71 -Hpalth - No bbjection to rezone. 110wovor dub nEnv. ITecilth t—o— -jo—Us in the area any development must meet 7 poor Requirements and will need to prove usable area for Sewage iyizioh of --Forestry - California Department of Forestry Mid Butte County Fire Department hove no objection to this rozotO request providing that the following fire Protection requirements are d ozone area is located aa6aceftt to 8 met. . Tlijo,ptopose rezone 611 fixe hydrdtito, located 300 ft; Mutual Watex' 5ervice t`i:bre�br pp ying a to flow of 2000 OPM for ti SLisbsifted apart, dapalltle O.r su fixe -V 6 1 bet of hyarallbaL and BPOC:Lf' loca- J, pelpiod of 9b least 2 hours. Number - la a tion of each to be dot�artined by ,,vb and. vocorded oil final. m P` The Plannilig Office of the City OT, Chico wishes to zee: sand by ("NI)rOssing soriotis 0oactrao about tho access ont;O 00- I I hasoot good. We strongly recommend. the existing itftstv'al "n'ng IMI be OY-PonidOd-'ds�, WoUld Set=joo i,.b 0 C istjng W,.jbor AreA and water;main ex - of 0,W,Si 00- 80-tvice to provido NO COMManto. St verlj,ff The Hutto County Shetlift 8 Del),arb nb afttidij)atOs no -'isalfidant impaot On out ability to Provide Police ootvite8 to PrOP000d t0t0r1q, CO BUTTE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION -MINUTES . August 27, 1.080 As tM ON wti I TION 1, Jay D. Plummer - Rezone from "SR -3" (Suburban Residential (81-1) 3 acre parcels) to ".A!-1" (Light Industrial) for property located approximately 300 fort east of Cor"+,Road, approxmAtely 1 9,/2 miles north of Eaton �, :identified as AP 48-01-09, more particuladescribed a The easterly 300 ft. of the westerly 600 ftp Of � the SW 1/4 of the NtV 1/4 of :Sec. 2p T22N, Alto, Containing 9.00 acres, more a less; north of Chico, .80 Gais'ev-called attention to staff findings ana TOAd the .following 'memo {rom Tom Lando; Planning pixector of the Csty of Chico; Thi, Ss�to confirm our telephone conversation of, this moraines lcegardin3 �pay'+�141t�nar�s ratan request. A*jr ori.tatY con-,",cn had been *gems onto Co.gspat,,w:'_ch Na understand has been resolved through,A one foot fee slmnia ?„divation. _ ,;�: ue no t�nget' gynva any rta�or �,roblems t�tth the rezoning lid o1Oi to •r;ithc ssr oj:r pr.mt1o►ia statement in opoo9itlon. I nm aorrY for any Inconvenience that tela n�,r hake roused you or the n.plicant. o s TA,t C 'Io 1 e e ` x car briefly a'eviewed the RnvironmentaY-'SvalttaLion; pointing out tiiti* a Negative •bdclaration was recommended, P opoa�e s 755 Eastwood 00AUdo Chico, said that the topography nts t Dan E#ay wa's almost the same as that of040o000rtforjroadnimprovements forpthis and added that they were Spendc►�g , � , � t:he cost adjoining P gut the now have ah engineers report -indicating ample;'water of $275,0 00ro ertiesyand that water was aya�,labie from Cal afar at is available at a depth of 120 feet Opponents: No one: The hearing was closed. l r L&AF, ataNd beithrthiOn had bePlan�ns�iler' l edmands ind that hthe�prop6galtwas i tasosearm y made a motion for approval, 14er motion i corded h,Y ��mmi5sione"r �lioe� er f AYES: Cotrmissioners tamhe�ct;, Wheeler and Chairman Gilbert, NOF�S : No one Ah5PNT» Commissioners r4ax and S?eXlri;et+, Motio carried Dan F#here ys thanked the Gommisslon for `their actoofahousindtll�attshcon is erg Indiana £irm who manufactures it nevi typ a ng ftp a y0, f100 sq+ :ft : plant on the proptriy tfat would term ting`putti enploy 230 people► �✓ P 4, Auepgt 28, 1980 �= �lum�:exy '%4; Cherry S C . ch oor CA 9Sgp-G ? ails: 'Rc�one Vile No 81- i pf�ar Mr, :Plu beer , At tie meeting � the Butte Cauu;y iLV Colutiaeian - held August 27, 19180" your applica eNane Frnm �x "E3I- " lE�uburb h 5 4: idoutI - re araO to "M-1" (Ligh-t Ihduetr�.61) 1ocat(:d 'Op" a y ely 500 tt-4 ea.;t of Ooasae,t Rd., appahax.�/� Mil s af Patau toad, north Y Of Cktjoa, w6a recommended fox aI. A report of �° ��ia attox3 iu the,Dhacd of <isr m Optomb 78 twhich t uvothe Super ' ' f will ,aet, 19 Public hearE . will be nottred a', that dFito, Should Ybu have que 1-ioue wegnvc ing this matter, plass- w'eai fro. •o co t ct ou- cf.itie•r Sine arell Bettye Blair I i `,-- , Vit•.. 1l .J p,,.,.;,.:a ....... ,,,s�amw�. w.�:Mw.whtin,•K'hdb'wr,JNuwimaCrywx.�s,4ty,o-w.ya5wal«�:a.3nt,:n.+,,.,. r'wrwautv;;H.a6a-my';rw w.A"daa=,N'r,Uu.�p,WWII!4i»bVINW+NNM,.�:1;�INIwJGa"..c;^.,;?r;�..cht ....'e,w. .u-.,,-MIJ.; s ., S:I:e7M,�AS'. Ilf 't ,v a i Septoabtr 17, '1980 tr Oy O a Plu®�etr , 4 S 'Cherry Stt *e E Chjdor Ctt. 9592 r Re: Rotonp File' 51-5 bei4 Mr Plcm ar; �. �t the regular meoting of tt County noard of Supervisors i( hold Sertu+sber 16, 19800*b h aring date was gat for 1 October 7, 1080 at 10:4 .rd c sid0r you rennin, Brom "SRP t ubuAan Reside t Al - 3 acro parcoxs) to '%1'° (Light Industrial) property 10 d "oxieoately $00 foot. Ovist of Cohesse °' Road, app a /Z miles north of Raton Road,, north of Chico: the Ao'et ng Will he ' io 'the Board of Super isorsRoofN, County AdAinintra ter, 2,6 County Cannan naive; OroVille,, Ca1'igarn�ia. �� , t this htVd any qu6stions xeRnrding their ►netters, 1y1r�'ae Go��r tact this office. Sincer+ty CLAWA a WEE-80N � Caurity C1osh'-Redordet And ,•'fix-df Mid Clo rk of the Butte: Cotiuty 'Doard of _ Su�ervi�q,ra ii AZuistpnt C1'grk to tho Raard Ax' 7 ,} r, ,r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - MINUTriS October 7j 19$0 ADOPT 01tDINANCE ;2146: PUBLIC HEARING' JAY D. PLUMMER -PROPOSED NEGATIVE I DECLARATRE PA ION AND RFZO@iE FROM "SR-3" (S,UBURBTED APPROXIMATELY 300 FEES 'EASTRCELS ATO "NF-1(LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) PROPERTY.AN RESIDENTIAL F NORTH OF EATON ROAn2 IDFNTIFIRD 'Cp COHASSET ROAD, APPROXI ICOY 1-1/2 MILES f . A5 AP` 48-01-09. NORTH 0. i'. 1 T-ha public hearing on Jay D. P.lummur proposed negative declaration w,r and rezone from "SR 3" (suburban residential - three acre parcels) to 1IM-111 property located approximately 300 feet seat M-1 (light industrial), of Cohaseet Road, approximately l-1/2 miles north of Eaton Road, identified as AP 48-01490 north of Chico was held 8s advertisad, Uttye Blatr, planning director, set oVt the background, of the �._• rezone. The ,Planning Commission recommended for approval: Earl nelson, e��wti.ronmental review direttor, set out th;e background p g.. 8 +1 s added of the negative declaration. There will be some m,tigation measuSe tc the arccl map: Ile recommended a ne ,tine declaration, Hearing open to the public. Appearingt No one, Hearing closed to tho public rind confiaed to the Board, �hdeimjeon finding of Supetj ctrco`11dlnot havenfi signi.f4cant effectnonothe and carri' , n B p environment, a:negative declaration was recommended: on tjot.ion of Supervisor Wheeler; seconded by Supervisor Winston Arid carried; the rezone from "SR-3" (suburban residential - three acre parcels) r6 qi I" (light industrial); property located approximately 300 fecc east of Cohasset 'Road} approximately 1-1/2 milia north of Raton Road identified ad AP 48-01-09, north df Chico for Jay D, PlumizAt was approved; noting a negative declnrdticn has been considered and the project td in cdabrmity with the General Plan; OrdinanFn 2146 was %airman authorized to signs a�3opted and tRd 1 , ti! t REZONE REPORT' Applicant: Chico.., Ca. 959 ��Ta` y I)� F_lummex , 745Cherry St . , _ .�.---._....,_._.�..-- owner I, ...:;.._----- . _ Request; n 3,' to Rezon�9: +from SR- 300' E of Cohasset Rd,apProx:, 1 1/2 mis: H Of Location: g rox. ._..p-'..—.-- Eaton Rd., N of Chico.._. r Date Ach'lan Requesbed.,- Number of Parcels: Acreage. 9.00 acres, more or less _,..�. ...-.- Negative beclarat ion Commission Ti.ncla.ngsa . natttg that the �. Planning fposal was inconformity: had been cMlsi:derca and find that the nxt� with the general Plan-- Cya n s a on Acta on: mp'de a mot`lon , tot approval ...;. planning Vote: ' 3 Y Y . @1•t Gommass� vers .amberti Wheeler and Chairman Gilb Ay NOV 0 Goh►missiondts Max° and Dennott 0 i1 y ORDINANC13 N021 46 AN ORDINANCE ZONINO A PORTION4r THE COUNTY OF G„,�•�.<, BUT#,, 'STATE OF C'ALIFOR.NYA, AN "M -11i (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) OISTlt CT, UASUANT TO CHATTER 24-29',, P 'the Board of Supervisors of the County of Butte, State of r\ ;§ Californias under and pursuant to Chapter 24-29 of the Butte Count 2 ;, 3 caao ofsaI County DO ORDAIN As fallovrs t 3ECTION 'l. The herein"after described area ituatpd in 4: the County ;af puttee State or Caalifornia► shall be and it is hereby 8 l a ;-ahall' ' zoned an "MA" (Light Industrial) iscrict, end such r;ia e �$ be, sub jeet to the restrictions and restricted uses and regulations ? e ' pursulkilt tp Butte Count Code section, 24-114. `_o zo«ed bel- locaxad in the un Said area a -�` �y> 9incorparnted described as fdllowaa area of Butte Countyy Chico, mors particularly . 0 11 The SW i./d1of3Oh,''MN0 t IV )./athe of 5ecte2i MNOly 000 R of ktlb , -/ R h it a r MORAY 1 Containing 9.00 acres, more or'loss; north of .Chico. } ' V*j14 " S CTYON 2i This Ord hAftce shall be and it is hereby 16 declared to be in full force and effect from and after thirty (B')' aftom the date Of its passage, and before the expiration of �., days after its passage; this Oralnancb shall be fifteen (l5) Y lg p ublished onto With the names of the members of the board of, h x9 Superv3,sors voting .for and against it In, the Chico iintezPris' tte- t0 Cord, it rAewkpaPe - poibl.isl ed. in ''thv CouhO of 'Butte � Str�tc of 21 Cajifornia kPASSR'U AND '-AbOMMD by thea Bo)kTa of Supervisors of the ,y Z3 ., da of 0u�,Oboe County` of butte? State of Callfai:�iQ, on the "jtka y Oso l by the following votcf �6 Yrs da olori �r►� .�r, . � � a Vice � � n el ��; P,� NOI# o o 001 p ,,, praYll�e, 4alitoFnia 'r so, +.1 t. \ ,T 1� -. ... .f'' x ., 1 1� ti J xAfMp.�i T _ MRM1wWrwYMMrra w�4Rw.+y1 '1.H �1 r .`n M OT 1 �a., ' M. ��i�1� _ 1 �1110, MUT T 4 F ' 9 k F.1 i a ro " October 81 1980 a Al \1 Chico, 26 file '81-5 Deer Mr. P`lummer� 6 Wa oadoptotistpsa cars e Bounty vhich re- �ti; the ro ",ular ms;aGin�; ;, ina r' bald Oetdbdt, 71 198 + bats, a idential . care ieraals), to " —'I,r �, noted apPraximetely X00 fest east zGrres frotQ "��t—�S" Csn ; {�i.&t, ludUstrial) Pt miles north of .Mori nS . poha,sset Road Q1 b9+eI uoxth of Ohico. p r. "�' identified as b ease'. fesl fro+ to cii�taat f th,e ahoiucI yca hav�`jz1,y tiono, p a County - ClerkRecorder and ent—offiaio Clerk Of the Btitte Couny t Hoard 'c z suporv3.6ors Mets arit clerx Ca r ?� '`'i �k i ' r j �, 2 �1 •© ib . ��n .11Y ri `• , i74#`O'� r d .w.,l d rr rZ .M" • � 'M �t 1 � is � ; r +/ .1t ��, t - �, � �w.n /, tea tR Irk ,A ' It Y � VA ' ,ya i� w a.-0 , .L�'." fib• 1 s� . a � • it A-2 r h V dh t� tx.r< ll tr, o +` a 6ts,die-nq ti rr" y ;•. Cor000. 100 cwco ' ti ,I �I I 1 : „ �.; . � � v►..� wJ II till t � ��, k r eUTT.E NT GAU 1C ..,PLANNING.., COhl1MISSICD HEARING . DATES3 x duds>: ec►, ''UPPLICANT.. WNERI RE'QUESTk, R*4piM._ ,ro "M-ryr EXIS" IN0 . ZONE,.,-'SyciLE, 00, tern