HomeMy WebLinkAbout048-090-046'PLAN
8`0-
SITE
CC
_,.-
CrATES
s SdUGEer
.SAL
-
j
s
v
_ � _ _
_ - { -_ .�� -
T _ :. er _ - , . -- 4 �
� � _ -"Ty x ,.. _ ; .�1, :...� w _ ._. t. � -_ •c -Ate:... l �.�'� 'k �-3.�"-'y` _.- _ ,.o
.
t�J
c1
FQ
� i t4
E
Pit( i
s ,
u tl
� � 1
4�r+4 c�i
,
lbar f9*01no loot
a .
e
Motlon`,by +
{
_'���_P«_ ,. ..
Seconded p �----
'+
Absent
Absent
Benita# I I I I
''
AOX I I L
9
Wheeler
..
t
i
i6tAlS
rto .Tr
y
r, r C,. G
�
r
P , E R M T'S (
P E I VOUM
U.
—
.,
tREBUEST: ,gview& ,onmerlt
-48"- D9- 46
AP NO.,.
;
c� Cansderaion o sign dorelopinont. 'plan
DESdkIPTION OF PROJECT: _ _.__
.._.._.. ,. _.. . ih rr, 7.nnra�IGnn
iieT Sa'lad's
n�
y
-
r
�
LOCATION:
-rr�v--
{
j
is
APPLICANT': pingel F Associates
'3'S1 Wa11 Street
t' AD DR ►
Cna.co Ca. 95926
r
"
'
OWNER:
A; PLANNING-COMMISSI.ON`ACTION SCHEDULE DecemUer 7 9, 1979
p -
; '
RETURN DATE REQUESTED: ASAP
,•
u
i DATE DISTRIBUTED: 12 /10
ATTR CHMENTS: Co of p"
py application & lot plan.
o F
+h�
AE'TURNSD M
Coo
C0MloENTS:
•
"v/i
1
.
cri
h i" ►^Gn l"G..Gi C" / rK. �j Ir1�vt�
P :�L�'St iri I � E? � `' /'J IT,eal
;
�
�t'"a 7%t r'/.� . dt. ifl U✓ r� [c
[ Woo
tt Q��, "�"I G
.-�
�'�
;
...5'd,/ Y
, t �
i�0OIL
RA , I "y
if
%
y5Hy�N�}1d
-itiilAlG 11JEPAF{T{"JIEI�'SIN'> ER®EPARTfVlE111T,► L R,�il� R1EST
tot
�; u �.-� Q rnm ni
RECIUEST,., „Ai3W
AP NO, 4Rtl�
•
'
F .
DESCRIP7I,ON OF PROJECT:
r:
cl�lco
a
LOCATION;
APPLICANT! R:; `�`•��'
331 Wal , Can 959
1 StreeC Chico', �, ..
r�
ADDRESS:
OWNER -
WNER:PLANNfjVG
P'LA'N N) N GCOMMISSICIN ACTION SCHEDULED
}{88iAI!
Butte gyp, DIY. G��V.
RETURN DATE REQUESTED:: ASAP r,
19j9
ti2/10/79, i}
DATE 0j$TRIE30TED: �ltfomta
�ovitle�
lication & plot'pian.
bt, ATTACHMENTS. Copy of alp_,. r
1;
R`ETURIVED: n 0
_
COMMENTS:
fi u
rx,
J h
BUTTE COUNTY, PLANNING COMMISSION
_-MINUTES :." pede'mber 19 1979
C. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN I0 CC ZONE; Soup er Salad,,
AP 48-,091-46
R ngel & Associ$tes
i, 80-33-L'.-303, •
Mr. Gainer called ention to teff findings and a letter, from
att
the City of Chico, dated October, 25:197" concerning th1:s project:
Copies ,of both had been mail od to the C61mmigsi;oners earlier.
RUss Croninger, `engineer £rIm'`Ringel & representing the
Associates;
applicant, saa.d that he had been worka.n with the Cit of Chico and
called attention to discrepanci;e! in standards set by the County ander
by the; cities in the 'County.
Motion, was made lip 'Commissa.nner Bennett, econled by Lambert,
for approval of the proposed site development plan subject to the
followingco ndit-ions:
10 East Avenue and Cahasset.t 'Road rights=of=way :are in the City "
of. Chico and .all roadand 'frontage 'improvements should ,be
approved by the city.
2. Provide'a permanent solution for drainage. Submit drainage'
plans to Department 'Of Rub is Works for approval and install
j
the required facilities.
3: Meet all requirements of the City o'f Chico: These are as
'
fcillows :
y
show rEmovaI of existing Unused driveway "appxoaches and' re-',
E
placement of same with standard PCC sideWa,lk, curbs and gutters,
Dedicate to City of C}iico as, public. rigrit-of,-wIay any' portions
�
of theproperty`;lying' within ten feet from the face of
axis ting curb -
S!oW installation of ,:ZO-foot wade PCG sidewalk _at, ',soutii_ex'lY'
,n
p et Road i vicinityof ower Pole>
end oi' 'Pro" ert on Cohass P
J�
11
"Provide 110-"66t deep PCC sidewalk 5 feot each side of
�. si nal st�undard at �so�aheas
%� Ming traffice cornea of
g t
Cohass;et and Ease Av:entie,
n dr.vet5a a roac}�ieW to provide for.` a "40=
Modify exi Vi g, , y Pp ,
foot wide bottom' cut With, S- -00't tr�nsiti'ons.,;
r
pick up all' on -s. to drainage and take to j of
1 Suggest relacati-ng lob D. Y'. l0"eat hack,fromprop;:erty :line"
and back, -slope same; ;or .provide !A:C 1%erm along. property
'fine
AY1:S; Commissioners ert, Denneit, ;Lamb6rt and Chairman, �VheeJ.er.
NOE,8 : No 'one.
,
ABSENT': Commissioner h�aSc,
Motion. carried",. .
Q
dot'"�;ide bottomc,ut 14 X, t - oot transitions.,
Pigk up all on -silo drainage and take to 'lot ILI.
Suggest' relocating .'lot D. T 10 feet ;back from property line
and back -slops same, or provide A.C. berm along property
line.
f l` i4
AYES: Commissioners Gilbe'rt,'Bennett, Lambert and Cha rmanY'tiUhee'ler':
NOES ; No one . Ij
�
ABSENT'Commssioner Max.
Motion carried.
Vi. ADD ITEM
A. Retention of"Homesites>in AGricultural AReas
The 'ever -,present �problem o how to handle the_ problem of retention of
p' re zoning. will
small Itomestes -� art of If or ranc�zes �n ureas where
not
permit splitting off small paxc;els-=was briefly discussed. .:
Staff 'was instructed to do some research to dtermine how other
counties handle such a problem,
r;r
VII, ADJOURNMENT
There beim no other business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:05-
'
P.+ M.
TAPE: 80"32-2=239 to end
34-1-100
�
Rae Wheeler, Chairman.
-l'g-
Mr`, Gaiser called; attention to staff 'findings and a, letter from
"r
the City of ��Chico,, dated OGtobex ZS,l"979concernir�g this project;
Cop`s es of both ha'd been mailed to th'e Commiss, otters`: earlier,
Russ C7roninger, engineer from Rngel-P, Associates, =representing the
applicabt, said` that he had been. wor,, with the Ci.ty of Chico and
called attention :to discrepancies -in standards set by t1'e County and "
by the Ca ties in the County`""`
Motion }vas made by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Lambert,
fn;r an„�rr3,rn1 { r ,•, rir��s?ri ci #n rlr-'�ir�l nnmPnt rel an cnh� Part to tf�ty;
��
'��� � I�,..���t+� �� •rfi� ?t`,� ea�o- ,,5
S.3'� tt.-ht� � ya��W 1�Y�1r '.:
r x
TFY �' —
1
,
�r ,
?
t
n
��
� s
'y�
s.
�f..
�f
�. .l
��
�.
{
'� 1
��
'
-
_.�
,:
�
._
� � _
�,
qi
i
�,
� ,
..
..
��..