Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout048-100-001The Staff recommends that the area should not be zoned as R-2. The recommendation is based on the finding that the proposed rezoning would be cQnsi(lered "spot zoning", and should be rejected by the Planning Corami;,,sion. Property owners and residents in the area have invested and relied on the. present zoning, and the staff feels that the rezQn inq would be harmful to property values and investments it in the area, Mr. Chan commented that it was previously stated by the. County Counsel that we should not "spot zone". There was considerable discussion regarding this item, Motion was made by Commissioner Xennedyt seconded by Commissioner Watson that this rezoningrequest be denied. The denial was carried, by the following vote; AYES: Commissioners Gilbert,Xennedy, Rypkema, Watson and Chairman Roberts, NOES: Commissioner Anderson, AB STU,, I N : Commissioner Thebach IV NEW BUSINLE8S! 1. 66-67 McMahan Furniture Company - Request for off-street parking and approval, of plant Coha8set Road, AP 48-10-01, Chico Mr. Henry Lanion, representing Damon Construction Company and McMahan, Furniture Store, went before the Planning Cr,ttmissdlon and the parking problem was thoroughly discussed. Motion was made by Commigsi,onek Watson, seconded by ComMisslonot Rypkema and unanimously carried, (Comm is sionv r,s Aftderson,j Gilbert,. Kennedyr Rypkema, Theb I ach, Watson and Chairman Roberts) to approve parking plans of a 3"1 parking- building ratioe and that it shall be based upon showroom area, 2. 68-69 Morris R. Long - Request for rezoning from R-1 to for property on south side, of Palmetto AVenue,i between Arbutus and 8hetidan Avenues-, AP 45-230-441, Chico The staff recommends that the request, for rezoning be denlede but, if Mr. Long insis.ts, another hearing will beheld. There was no action taken on this item at chis time. 3, 68-70 ,lack Harris - Variance, from ordinance #431 for (13,51 X 981 and 1351 X 98'), lot depth fortwo lots -P 48-112-0. Block 2. , �aq en Vie 22.99 North Avenueo A s Subdivision, Chico The staff recomends approval of, the variance from Ordinance #431 fot lot dePtht said approval is subject to all require-monts: of the Public Wor-ks Dep4rtment and tho Health Deportment,. � 3 . -