HomeMy WebLinkAbout055-290-081DATE: February !Z,.-1991.
SUBJECT- Barney BARNEJT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL;NUMBER(S)_. 55-29-81
LOCATION: 2 `parcels _ located_ on the west scale of Pentz Road across from
_ Wilderness Way. E:Irad se area.
Attached are documents re„ardiftg, and a copy of the above-described tentative
map for your tevido. If you have any suggestions; additions or recomnnendatiot
concoit n; this project,,, pl,ezwse return them Eto this office no later than
March 5 i 1991 '
Very 4ru]y yours,
William Cheff
Dirpctor of Public Work
1
nn Mendonsa
distant Director
dM/kic
LD 1160 (4/89)
T �TFTIVE SUBIVISION TENTATIVE FhRC L Mk?
r PREIr.7?MMPS SUBDIY_TS?OIi WAIVER APPLTCATIO'
/,.�/``O/�j
(Please cbeck a-mrJDr]L;i.e bog')
FIJON
.4 t7DRESS r+'i�
MoIvL Irt
ADDRESS
ENGThTER OR Su�?',�'Y03: dj �:i✓ C.•�s c eir / +OI�E NQ / �" , a'�J�
YA IL NOTICE of MkR-NGM.
PlEASE SUBMIT -PR-EL�lN�.►�z -,Y x TI �.?O f 02. It,c.EI T PXI19` OF TITLE INSLM NCE
(da e6� v i n:Lnmss-„ c_�: =xAll-;s)--T sz:, , laumku: T;-,nj ti
A20 RECORDING IMP-M-4`I-IOIi B--" w-tuCH TrHIS I'ARTICLTI-AR PA-11an VMS
'DATE BODE P4a
ii'ilh `'lti I:I'1D SIM- 0r �'_`L?C�IiS � : c rn C ri � f es.
:-NG FLAB i.nc7ud n �� re-.=ani
7DILM"CE TO 2 . FURAL WA CZ 3.S-E" OR STORM I)R4Ir t°'✓�J� .S~/'
.!��OIPOSED Z E:LHOD 0!'
ti ec v- h l -la It z•. ;,� �L� ,a
DO Plvi Tp, AJvD F-AOJF- i S :.:Ivy TO T7,X'.P,Ojlvik' RY Vii: " 'I'i O?iGD'-
a y YPOI'o 7.11m, WILL Akvt TO nt �:',IT,7s?1 r
lE'OR ARCS ' '` G 2
STSB 7D2V2SS01'T MAP:
w
_
2tema 1-4 to be completed by applicant.»
APPLIWIT NAME AM ADDRESS: BIS'. 1J �. _
S A "f2_ }J C
—54-17 �: 1 S A G :�- O L I V E Q i
'la PPMECT DES(R=ON.
' ASSESSORS PARaZ NMER(S): �. p
-;» PROPWM USE: _ fc'G5 f {T�N'r I A L
'S following items are to be completed by the Planning Department, .
�sRrrx zoN�rc A 2 M 1- •—
_..
I-M CONSERYATMAN AGRMMa:
MWERAL 'PLAX DESIMOMON. A G . — ,2 C- 5 I
�Coriditiona? Cziter3a
AGRICULTURAL-RESIDEN'TZAL YES 90
It is'recommended that you perform the
�L• Agri=ltural Compatibility
following checked iters:
Z.. Hater and Sewer Capacity
v
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK
3,. Adequate Fixe Facilities » J!
BOTANICAL SURVEY'
A. Road Capacity and PAintenancea �
(MOLOGICAL SURVEY
�5;. Access to Commercial and ;Schools
YES NO :
HARD AND FIELD CROPS
WITHIN DEPARIHMT OF FISH
AND GkM DEMOPMM ZONE':.
1. Predominant 5-10 ac. Parcel Size
„ 2 Vicinity of Urb&n 'Paundaries
WITHIN FLOOD PLAINT
10 Ag. Viability not_;Ympaired
.
.` _.
Staff DetermiriAUon: Substantially conforms to:
"o _ n
WrMIN
LAND USE PLANO ECIFI(: OR
MmtAL PLAN- 1 Land Use
If Yes PA 2�! iJ I s C
2. Conservation _ .
Name of Plan
3 Op?f 'Space
WITHIN URBAN RESERVE'S
4: Safety .,_.�,_„•- .�._..
S. Noise
_
If Yes)
6. Housing` �
Name of Reserve
7. circulation _ ,
AIRPORT LIM USE PLAN t
ZOMG: C0Nr=rJ27y'1 e
NiSt �-�i�1 y tr✓Fa7'C AV ti�',1
% T 7. CD2. /�!-7ACrrL. 2.
Staff signature.'
r
THE THE P2QUEBt'� 1ANb DIVISION I AN Rt H!~ ADOV$ STAFF DELE&L'1`&I
ANAPPLICANT FOR AWARt
�OF TON R.°G.1RD7f,G
VM CANFORHANCE ia= ME GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
`
�•
{
&�ew
Dated ,.� .. Sign3tu:ra of
App 'giant
*Thidw dobit 14ill t�"ixe and be discarded sit (6) mbnthi
from 'the date jk the staff signature.
U 1000A (tdw add 6-81) _
a Planning Department "" NAME: BARNEY .BARN � �� _.� �.
Environmental Health Department
CDF (Forestry Department) AP 55-29-81
Attn: J. Craig Carter (on areas north of red line on map)
X Butte County Sheriff
PG&E (check title report for easement)
Pacific Bell
Butte Coc;nty Mosquito Abatement OR
Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
S hool kstrict�CAall 4sp
Water Company (if inc,'vidual wells are not indicated on application or map)
Durham ;Irrigation OR Durham Mutual Water Co.
California ;Dater Service Company (Chaco area)
Orovi,lle4lyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river)
TI'hermalito Irrigation District:: (Thermalito area NE of, raver)
Limesaddle Community Services District (Paradise area along Pentz Rd
to lake)
Del. Oro Water (Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest Ranch area)
Paradise Irrigation District
City of . . (check wall maps for spheres of influence)
Oroville
Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
52,,OYILLE AREA ONLY:
Lake Oro—Ile Area Public Utility`�Distri.ct (see barge map in cabinet)
fe*ether River tecreRtioh `District (see large map in cabinet)
El Medio fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only)
K=, RICHVACE, GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY): check wall map and title report,
to see what applies. Softie areas overlap
Drainage District #1
Drainage District #2
Drainage District #100
Drainage District #200
Reclamation District #833
�} Reclamation, District #2056
Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District
Butte Creep Drainage District
VN CERTAIN CASES:
Superintendent of Schools (only for subdivisions)
Dept: of Fish and Game (neat water and in rural and mountain areas)
Cal Trans (near State Hwy: 32, 10, 99, .10 (Chico cut-off), 1.62 (Olive Hwy. &
Richvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State- Water Quality Contrbl Board (projects with more than 100 lots or units)
United States Forest Service (if project borders USA land --check AP books)
Parks and Recreation Department ('property near Lake Oroville)
State Water Resources Department (property near Ldke Oroville --- watershed)
Rock Creek Reclaimation Dist, (west'of Chico Airport, south of Rock Creek and
east of Hwy. 99 (see wall map)
Chico Area Recreation & Park Dist (only for subdivisions)
U'S,
Dept, of the Army, Sacramento Dict. Corps. of Engineers (near water and
in rural and 'mountain areas) I
_ CASES.
al�.tocheck
�;rr3. at�.on Districtfor
(numbe�:ed�items) special, servir�es or easements such �
SPECIAI,
'cis to 'ThdVji g
,II
a
OF, '71
iPACTS lJ11::�17i TTtr7�t 3011
TCSntlIV pQten=2iG.1..11� Slt4,*i2` 1Cc.i2t ei7Y'.:01773tental 1L^^.acLs'-'cSSC?ct_G
LlIE .tanC L'.41 .i.
6es3C: 7eatu: d: 5Pe=4c;' t¢nC i30n5'
o. appro%,al (rCitiFation ti,sasures) are Droposed to al'leviaLe potent3aw
env. r.ommenta! impacts:
Describi;, the prole= site as it w,ists before the Dvo ect
includinc -information on tonography, soil stability, plants �
and a»i.rcals, and ani cr_l'rual, historical or,
aspects.
besc-,yD9 ,anv �.3..1s:inc structures do the Site 2n>C't �1[°�0.
the s;.rutzurtt. 4c".) f %t. % ";N „ Q
al:a~�;� f
b)" Destribee the surrounding propertj,-,;s, it}t lading information or.
r�lants and anir a> and any cultura,i, historical o; scenic csnects�
��
ine%^ate
the type o.= lane use (residential, co=ercia,i, etc.
in:.ensitS� Of la.'nc use- (one-iamilY, aDarLflent houses, sndps) 4eDar-
mE'ni SidreS, etC. ), cnG scale. of deVelopment '(height, frontage,
setback, rear :arc)
TCA -T OK « hereDV cet ti"'" thZ`► i Yla SL LemenLs 7V r n1 s1]eC cUaNe and SZ
tt7 attacttee a?:n ,ksitS present Lhs, bats and irformation rEou;re6 Tor t -bis
initia-1. eValvation to the best off #,v ability, and that the facts, statement'
2C1 ;-niot—tati Ori presented are t� uE and COl�rect CG the pest of IIID' hyo l ef1E
atit belief.
L4r.G
S -
ria t a1 E.
rc:
�6;se $�,i+ai Boit sheet a`Ci: J l'i re: r:_
kr�
`.1ueWdojeaa,Ci p��'1 w �d -�
n
. nni:t,g '£�..;s-
receipt I
Counts Genter Drive �-
�--'
rhppl1cant
vrPV4lie, CA 9 063-:-I-9r
Sutxii„�; or. Name ( i app licatsle :
Dg r.e -Filed
LLzh-D D-TISION-I.PPLICA 11ONS
5Una'1 -ental lnlG`rmation, So_Plannlh,. T�::.c e per-tmen
�i Liss: an6 6escri be any oL he rely ed pe L"
and o:tne: L�ubli u approvals
required for this proiect, includl,
ing those required by cir , regional,
si.ate and feOe'i a l ager-cles;
Proposed scheduling/asso-c:atec projects; ✓v
a. A_c "� r =ntal ceveionment (phasing
o: su'bdxt*_sio'r. units,-
zutues 66-�rsars): d '
4. What method vii l be utilized to accommncate
surf tce. drainage? Lesct.IDS
no%: on-site and dovi atream drainage channels
will be Affectee..
_ro;F irtW 07 ':z:e- o: sire lieht,ng burpcses (hvararitsy pones, etc.),
)
lvi'i l sxtav=ation o, v-.a6s,nr 'tic- necassary. Cubic yards kettiLsrte
.. u. �_. < !� / eft ►"� �..,_
W L"t reutiQ om' �y was vCr i. Y. p .fin srLy t -%l G.,�.. G)ii
irfOUll1 I -I C)U a1.'!.'G.•
y
n
r1�
tic
Wit
y
j- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bili) CHEFS, Dleector
7 COUNTYCENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 915965
Yelephonet(916)`538.7681
RONALD D. McELRDI
Depugf Director
November ,18, 1991
Barney Barnett RE: AP 55-29-18
5601 Penta Road TENTATIVE PARCEL MAS'
Paradise, GA 95969
Dear Mr, Barnett
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Adv,sory Agency held on (November
18, 1991 ), the Agency adopted a negative declaration with
environmental mitigations and approved the above—referenced project subject;
to the conditions listed on the attached sheet.
If no appeals .are timely filed, -- within ten (10) days of the the Clerk,, of the
Advisory Agency's approval (November 28, 1991 roc of the,
Board of Supervisors, this action will be final.
When the conditions of Approval are complied with, it will be in order for
you to file your "final map" with the Butte County` Department of public Works
for rocordatich within twenty"four (24) months of the date of approval by
the Advisory Agency._
Recently enacted legislation (A83158, Chapter 1106, Statutes of 1990,
effective January 1; 1991, requires that the Department of Fish and Game
impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the t^t of managing
andprotecting fish and wildlife trust resources. Thee filirfees are
Calected during the environmental review process and are to be paid at the
time: the County files a `"Notice of Determination's with the County Clerk of
the Country in which the project is located. This procedure is required
pursuant to Section 21152 of the .Public Resources Code
To increase administrative efficiency, the statute delegated the collection
<, of filing fe4s to the County Clerk. The fee ,required in toninection with your
project is che=ked 'below:
ii
,I
1
PAGE TWO
PROJECT NAME
r AP NUMBER;
CLASSIFICATION Or' ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
1. NOTICE OF mawnoN/sTATalENT OF ExEmFrION
( ) A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Feb
B. De Minimus Impact - Certificate of Fee Exemption
$25.00 (Twenty --Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINAIZON - FEE,REQUIRED
( X) A Negative Declaration
$1,250.00 (Twelve Hundred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25`.00 (Twenty -Five. Dollars) Clerk's Fee
( ) $; Environmental Impact Report
$850 (Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars)
State Filing Fee
$25.00 (Twenty --Five Dollars) Clerk's Fre
3. OTHER (Specify)
( ) $25.00 (Twenty -Five Dollars) Clerk's Fee
The fee should be paid to the Planning Department by (December 2, 1991
in order for the Notice of Determination to be timely filed. Blake checks
payable to the County of Butte.
The project applicant should be aware that if he or she does not remit payment
of the required filing fees, the project approval may be invalid by law and
may not be operative, vested or final., pursuant to the provisions of Public
Resources; Code Section 21089 (b), fish and Game Code Sec. 711.4 (c) and
Section 753.5 (d) (3) and (7), Title 14, California. Code of Regulations;.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
office
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
i
Jon Mendonsa
Assistant Director
JM/ds
cc Planning Department
Environmental Health Department
Sierra West Surveying
J�
DARNER BARtlETTS TPM, AP' 55-29-81; 2 Parcels located on the west side
of
Pentz' Road across from Wilderness Way. Paradise area.
Engineers Sierra West Surveying
onditions
13?li forks conditions.-
"Verify legal access.
Verify
Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-III to each pa el from
a cowity maintained road or state highway,.
Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offeree';
for dedication on the final map..
4
Show 50 fto building setback Line measured from centerline of access,
easement.
5
Provide road maintenance; agreement.
'C
Indicate a, 55 ft building setback from the centerline of Pentz
Road,
7
Show all easemelits of record on the final map.
8
Provide street ►dame signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to recordation of the find: map.
Provide cul-dei-I�ac at the end of the street.
0
Obtain encroacphinent. eerm:t and construct standard road approach
providing adequate tight distance at the intersection of access
road and .Peutz road
1.1:
Pay any delirguont taxes or turrent taxes as required.
12
Meet the requirOments of the Butte County Fire Department.
1.3
Show 1 foot no access strip along Parcel 1 frontage along Pentz
Road,
Planning Dept. conditions:
14
A Development Imapct fee for .Sheriff's Vacilities shall be required
at the time of the issuance of a building permit or Ilse ,'Permit in the
case of a mobile home park and said fee amount will be determined and
calculated as of the date of application for paid permit as required
by Butte County Board of Supervisors Ordinance No. 20404
15
In the event that construction s1ctivities on the property reveal the
r
presence of a buried cultural deposit (i.e:, artifacts, human sketal remains,
can And bottle dump; etc) that was not detected during the 8ur£aa6
recommaissance, work on that locus should cease immediately.uhtil a
qualified professional archaeologist can be consulted to evaluate the
resource and make appropriate mitigative recomimendations
I
'BARNEY BARNtTT, 4?m
Health Dept. conditions;
16 Provide a 1100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing wells either
within the property or within 1.00 fti of the property boundaries.
17 Show the usable sewage disposal area proven to meet the requirements
or thv Subdivision Ordinance on parcels 2 and 3-
18 Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are available to
parcels 1, 2 and, 3. Proof may be provided by letter or other documentation
that a Public Water Supply System is tilling and able to supply water,
19 Ti water is to be provided by a public water supply, place a note on the map
that states 'development of parcels will require connection to a public
water supply:"
20 Place a note on the map that stater "Dwelling on parcelo 2 and 3 shall
be located ''to access the soptic tank system by gravity flow."
21. Provide required usable sewage disposal area on each parcel.
Combine with adjacent parcel any parcel not proven to contaifi the
required usable sewage disposal area:.
'The following mitigation measure is required;
22. Contact the Dept, of ..Anthropology, CS7C; to�request a records check to
determ l e. the archaeological significance of the site and whether any
additiorj,U mitigation measures are necessary,,
-
N
YY r F
_..� ell
.:, f
'�- DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Rill) CHEFR Director
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965'
Telephone; (916) 538-701
CERTIFIED MAIL RONALD D. McELROY
Deputy Director
October ll, 1991
Barney Barnett RE: AP 55-29-81
5601,Pentz Road TPM
"Paradise, CA 95969
Dear Mr. Barnett:
Please be advised: that; the Butte County Advisory Agency will hear
your application on the above -identified property on November 18,
1991.
The Agency will be ritviering the findings from the Planning Department
and will be consiu_err.ng your tentative parcel map. Public Works will
recorzend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet
The
RoommeCoungyWAdtnin3trationtBuJCougm.25nCountgoCenter Dupervisorsf
rive,
Oroville,, Ca.lifotnia
If you Have any Questa.or,C ,,°egarding this matter, please contact this
office,
very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
4
John Mendonsa
Assistant Direc ,;w
V/ ds
attachment
cti. Planning Department
rtalHealth Department
Sierra West Surveying
4
1
�)+r
77
COUNTY OP:, BUTTI
DEPARTMENT OP PUBI,a?:C WORKS
7`County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
(916) 53g-7266
DATE.': Sept"ymber 5, 1991
8 �r MAP
Barney BA2NETT - REVTSEDr'TENTATIIVE` PARCEL�`
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL i(Jk�BER(S) 55-29-81
LOCATION, _ Located on the .west side f Pentz Road across from
Wilderness Way, Paradise area.
Attached are docutxaents regarding, and a copy of, the above-described tentative
P y8 P J y Y suggestions, ns
concerning this ro ect, please return. them to this office no later than
Map for our review. 2f you have an su estsons additions or recommendations
A.S.A.P.
Vcry truly yours,
_ WilYiain Cheff
i,
Director of Public Works,
o,
+" Jin tIendonsa
sstant Director
at tadhmerts
Cc! . Planning :DeptMITT
Enviroomental Health Dept,
Pacific Bel
Paradise CSnified School. Dist r
Town of .Paradise .�.�
Ca1�.f. State Dep
" f Pish and Game ...--.. .
Ru w E CA. PLANNING
t. o
bD 1160 (4/89) ..
STCgM� OF ;CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AdENCY PETE WILSON, Governor
ID,EPARTM ENT OF FISH AND GAWy _..
+�IfGG�I ria
"T' 0, , 0US • ROAD, SUITE A
RYA ae;INJA CORUOVA, CALIFOR141A 0567:
355--70201
September 13, 1991
Mr. John Mendonsa
County of Butte J�
,Depart-ment of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroviller California 95965
Dear Mr: Mendonsa,:
The Department of Fish and Game (DPG) has reviewed the
Barney Barnett Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), a proposal to divide
12,1 acnes into one 3.7 and two 4.2 -acre parcels,. Located near
the south edge of Paradise; the project site lies within critical
winter range of the Bucks Mountain deer herd and supports oak -
chaparral habitat in an area known to harbor sensitive plant
species.
Since the TPM lies within a Desigeated Development Zone, DFG
does not object to the land division provided that appropriate
mitigation measures are imposed as conditions of approval on the
firtal Parcel Map: Those measures include:
1. Assessment of deer habitat improvement fees,
2. Fencing to meet approved standards
Oak woodlands are a particularly important habitat because
they provide most of the essential life 'sustaining requirements
(e.g,,j food] shelter] testing and roosting sites) needed by
wimerous animal species. There has been significant cumulative
:losses of oak woodlands in California due to residentialr
commercial; and other, development projects. To mitigate the
project npacts on, oak woodlands] these restrictions are needed!
1. No oak tree removal except for that required to
provide space for buildings and associated
accessories and to meet health and safety standards.
2, Establish a no disturbance setbackj commencing from
the outer edge of the oak tree canopy and extending
outwtird a distance equal to one -Half of the canopy,
radfusr around each tree. No disturbance includes
irrigation and root damaging activities.
3: Retain all snags except those which pose a, direct
safety hazard,
Mr. John Mendonsa
September 13, 1991
Page Two
4. No pruning or cutting of oaks except for safety
purposes. Deciduous .oaks should be pruned during the,
winter dormant season only and evergreen oaks during
July - August only.
This project site contains the habitat types known to Harbor
sensitive plant species which have been found in that general:
area. A botanical survey should be made by a qual,fied botanist
during the appropriate season to determine if such species do
occur onsite. if present, sensitive plant populations should be
protected by;
1. Establishing a 50 -foot minimum no disturbance
setback, commencing from the outer edge, around each
plant population.
2. Constructing barriers to prevent damage by foot and
vehicle traffic.
3. Excluding livestock.
4. No artificial dra mage into or the placement of
rilaterials and.. s464tances Inside of the nondisturbance
area.
>:
This
sp will
An mgacto fish
and/or wildlifelabitatAsscssmentoffo
under:- Public Resources Code
Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section 111.4
is necessary, Fees are payable t.p the project applicant upon
filing of the Notice of Determine• n'by the lead agency,
Pursuant to Public Resources clode Sections 21092 and
21092.2, the bVG requests written notification of proposed
actions and p6ndinq decisions regarding this project. Written
notifications should be directed to this office,
if we can be of further' assistance, please contact
Mr ` Ron Bertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist or
Ms, Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Management supervisor, telephone
(916i 355-70'1�,
Sincerely,
es b', Messers th
egional Manager
1✓
ffu
tic coun
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601
October 3, 1991
Barney Barnett
5061 Pentz Road
Paradise, CA 95969
Re Tentative Parcel Map, AP No. 055-290-081,
Dear Mr. Barnett:
The Butte County Planning Department has completed the environmental review of your
project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to
the 13utte County Advisory Agency wifLai the required 105 days pursuant to the
California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Director's
report required by Sections 20-63 and 20-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance
has beam completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning
Director's Report which has been prepared for your project.
Please review the enclosed Re sed Planning Director's Report with conditions of
approval pp y y please
a royal rf applicable. If you note an errors or :omissions: in our evaluation,
bring there: to our attention;; - -
sent to the Butte Court Advisb A en for their action. Califoxmia Governmentct has been
The Environmental Docur„gents and Plan un Directors Ae ort for our project
County ry cy Code
Sectlons 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set Bearings and
approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your
application was received and accepted': The six month time limit for your project
mandated by state law, will occur on March 5, 1991. The Advisory Agency will notify
you of the time and place of the public heaving for your project.
if there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact,
re-evaluation of your project shall be required,
re
1
Inter Departmental Memorandum
TO Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM; Planning Director
SUBJECT: P.EV;r EID Report on Tentative Parcel. Map for Barney Barnett, AP No,
0554290=081
DATE: October 3, 1991
This is a proposal to divide 1.2 acres to create 3 parcels; Parcel 1 at. 3,17 acres and
Parcel 2 at 4.2 acres, and Parcel 3 at 4.2 acres. The present zoning is FR -5 (Foothill
Recreational, 5 acre parcels) and AR -MH -1 (Agricultural Residential, Mobile Home,
acre parcels). The Land Use Plan. Map of the Butte County General Plan designates
this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the
area.
The proposal does not conflict with County Zoning nor any adopted or proposed
Element of the .Butte County General Plan not any specific or community plan
A Negative Declaration bias beers prepared for the proposed project in accordance to the
California 'Environnientail Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte County Advisory
Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the California Public Resources Code
Section 21151.5.
Recommend approval of the Tentative Parcel Map for Barney Barnett, AP No. 05.5-290-
0811 subject, to the following Mitigation Measures and Conditions;'
~Mitigation Measures
1. Contact the Department of Anthropology, California State University, Chico, to
0, request a records (,heck to determine the archaeological significance of the site
.+ and Whether any additional .mitigation measures are necessary,
.COtldltr6�15
1. A Development Impact No for Sheriffs Facilhies shall be required at the titre
of the issuance of a building permit or Use Permit in the case of a mobile home
park and said fee amount will be determined' and calculated as of the date of
applicationfor paid permit as required by Butte County Board of Supervisors
Ordinance No. 2949,
.i
September 25, 1991,
.`A
j
& a e co, l
F LAI �iw;,Nl r)FP.ARTMENT'
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE -OHJ1''�� _-r'JFORNMA 95965-3337
TELEPHONE! (916) 538-7601
Barney Barnett
5437 Black Olive Drive
Paradise; CA 95969
Re Tentative Parcel. Map, AP No. 055-290-081
Dear Mr. Barnett:
The Butte County Planning 'Department has completed the environmental review of your
project in accordance with the California. Enwonmentat Quality Act and forwarded to
the Butte County Advisory Agency within the required 105 days pursuant to the
California Public Resources Code Section 21151.5. In addition, the Planning Director's
report required 'by Sections 20-63and ?C-99 of the Butte County Subdivision Ordinance
has been completed. Please find enclosed the Environmental Documentation/Planning
Director's Report Which has been prepared. ,for your proj0ct,
Please review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with conditions of approval if
applicable. If you note any errors or omissions in our evaluation, please bring them to
our attention
The ntDocuments and P I cyfgt-Report project been
sent to the Butte. County nty Advisory Agency action, California Gverient
Code
Sections 65950 and 65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency .set hearings and
approve or disapprove your project within six months from the date on which your
application was recei-.ped and accepted. The six month time limit for your project
mandated by :state law, will occur on March 5, 1991. The Advisory Agency will notify
.you of the time and place of the public nearing for your project.
if there are modifications to your project, not related to mitigating an identified impact,
re>s valuation of your project shall be required,
SIERRA WF` ` 1
DlCFNSED LAND.SQ�k Y [NG
507 Black Olive Drive i'�adise, CA, 95969 --
PhonC. (916) 877-6253
September 24$ 1991,
ALtn. Jo'i fluntas-
cie Co,1:ni,1 ,Plar���in� Departmt;»t
"i ('ounty Cf. -Her llvi.ve
Pees Ba,rnetr ' : ,l map
AP 55-29..8'1
Dear Joa'
Thiw ; i e~ttr r i`s in response to Butte County's Environmental
Checiclist 'Form' sated Vebruar,y 20, 2991.
We op;rea with suggested mi f gatlon measures 1 and 4
The pr^opo;t-ty has already been surveyed for archaeological
significance Q,Iease find survey enclosed).
111.36 malp hths been vevised to 3 parcels. There sire q:o known impac:ts
t"x the PAradissc Unified. School, District or the Paradise Recreation &
Fitrks District as they did not respond to wire Cottnty's request for
P111view fo thl—tt projec,�A
S'heald you have any questions regarding this mot ter; please call
,I, 5ixcerely :�
Thowas R. Wrinkly. ,
TO/ku
1.
C".0
TTF CO. DEPARTMENT
a '
a
v .
OR A�
.x 4 1
! 5 X551 A� �f C�i
QrV fE{p[{AI SER15��
6635 Qu10 Way . Parldi$q. CA 9£969 916,872-3189
PIECOVE0... . ,,T�'April lo, 1987
DA
Mr. Dave Hironimus SJ --!�
RRA WESTButte County Planning Depar len UR
7 County Center Drive
Orovillet GA 9596-5
Subject; Archaeological Survey,: Hardy Rezone and Subdivision,
Penta Road, Paradise.
.near Dave:
On April 7 and 9 1987* I'per2ormed an archaeological survey
of the parcel foto Which far. David Hardy has proposed rezoning.
The parcel, which presently belongs to Mv. Burney Barnett of 5061
Rentz Road, Paradise, lies on the Kest side of Penta Road (Peutz
Magalia Highway) in the southwestern corner of Section 30,
Township 22N, Range 4E on the Cherokee 7.51 USGS (1970)
topographic quadrangle. Lt is shown as para of Lot J; nn'
Assessorls Map 55-29.
A mixed survey strategy was employed, The upper half, of the
property (i.e. to the east of the rim of Dry Creek Canyon) is
fairly level and. clear of underbrush, and it was surveyed by
means of a systematic strategy of parallel transects spaced
betwe�-,'n 10 and 15 meters apart. The part of the property that
drops into the canyon exceeds 30% slope, and 'is densely overgrotan
Kith manzanita, ceaflothus, and poison oak: The actual mid -slope
Is of relatively low archaeological sensitivity, but the bottom
of the canyon along the creek is sensitive with respect to the
presence, in places, of bedrock mortars. Iwalked to the bottom
of the canyon, and followed the stream bank as well es `the
terrain and vegetation would allow, looking, for rock outcrops and
other likely features that° inight have been the locus of intensive
prehistoric human activity. There were actually very few
outcrops on which bedrock wort tie8 o Auld have been placed. T then
meandered back and forth from north to south while climbing back
to the canyon rim, and spot-ehecke'd wherever I' could given the
limitations of access, x' checked the bottom of the basalt rim
for rockshelters,, dhiah were also favored locations of
prehistoric human inhabitants.
'Phe survey, which took more than three hour,:3 on two separate
days, revealed no evidence of historic or prehistoric cultural
resources other than the remnants o'f' an ,historic water transport
ditch. The ditch lies about 75, to 1001 east of the rim, 'and
follows ground contours from north to south. It is about three
to four feet wide,, about one to two and ones -half feet deep, and
has a berm on the doWnslope margin. It is partially ,filled in
from erosion and/or trampling, It has no oonorete Or wooden
structural elements, and ditches of this nature are ubigtritons
throughout the region, This p&rticular ditch probably has no
historic significance as defined by Federal gu.idelined,, and I
will mention it An my Nina.1 Peport as an isolated feature,
Cultural pesourtes 'Nianagement Atchaeologicat 5ur.4ley and 8xcav8tion Historical and Ardhival Reteatch
y
t-
u
however, I do not intend to formally record it as a cultural
resource, since it clearly lacks significance.
As always, T intend to produce a complete archaeological
,survey report that will contain an introduction stating the
.nature and purpose of the investigation; a section summarizing
the geographic and environmental setting, archaeological;
Othnographic, and historic background; the result's of the
Investigation including an explication of field methods, records
is results, results of the survey; recommendations;.
references cited; and a project location mai. This report will;
toeet the specifications and requirements of the California
.Archaeological Inventory and the State* Office of Historic
Preservation (SHPO). Two copies of this repovt will be filed
with the California Archaeological Inventory, Northeast
Information Center, California State University, Chico, as
required
by Depntta state. Copies of thereports are available to
the q y
rtment upon request.
My specific recommendations as they will appear in the Final
Peport are as follows. Given the apparent absence of significant
cultural resources within the study area, it is 'my judgement that
the proposed land -use will have :no effect on cultural resources.
Archaeological clearance, is accordingly re-commendod:., I Will
further add the standard precautionary clause that v_),Oars in all
of my reports: In the event that construction activities on the
prop. ty reveal the presence of a buried cultural deposit (i.e.
artifacts, human skeletal remains, can and bottle dump, etc.1
that was not detected during the surface reconnaissance, work on'
. ,
that locus should cease immediately until a qualifiOd'
professional archaeologist can be eonsulto.d to evaluate the
resource and make appropriate mitigative recommenda},io,is.
1 hope that you now have all ;of the information you require
to make a ruling on this permit application with regard to the
cultural resource) issue. 1 will be out of town until, Monday
April 20. if you need Additional information; please oontact me
at that 'time:
Very truly yours,
Alfr d Farberti
Principal Archaeologist
Copies to
Sierra iWost ,Qurveying, Paradise
tsar. Aaeft6y Harnett
-aSA?e OF CAIIFORNIA—THE RESOURCE i AGEN PETE WILSON, Governor
015PARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
17ai f.11MOLIS ROAD, SUIJ*E A
WAJJOJ�0 C.011DOVA, CALIFORNIA 95610
355-7020
September 13, 1991
Mr. .john Mendonsa
County of Butte
Department of Public Works
17 CountyCenter: Drive
0goville, California 95965
Dear Mr'. Mk%ndonsa
Phe Department of Fish and Game (DFG) has reviewed the
Barney Barnett Tentative Parcel Map (TPM), a proposal. to divide
12.1 acres into one 3.7 and two 4.2-acre parcels. Located near
the south edge of Paradise, the project site lies within critical;
winter range of the Bucks Mountain deer 'herd and supports oak-
chaparral habitat in. an area known to harbor sensitive plant
species.
Since the TPM lies within a Designated Development Zone, DFG
does not object to the land division provided that appropriate
mitigation measures are imposed as conditions of approval on the
final Parcel Map: Those measures include:
1 Assessment of deer habitat improvement fees
21Fencing to meet approved standards:
Oak woodlands are.a particularly important habitat because
they provide most of the essentia„L Life sustaining requirements
(e,g;, food, shelter, nesting and roosting ,sites) needed by
numerous animal species. There has been significant' cumulative
Losses of oak woodlands in Caliibrnia die to residential,
commercial, and other development projects. To mitigate the
project impacts on oak woodlands, these restrictions are needed:
1. No oak tree removal wetoePt for that required to
provide spare for bul.,Ungs and associated
accessories and to me4, - health and safety standards,
2. Establish a no disturbance setbacks commencing ;From
the outer edge of the oak tree t:anopy and extending
outward a distance equal to ot,e-half of the canopy
radius, around each tree. No disturbance includes
V
rrigation and root damaging activities:
3: Retain all snagsexce t those which
p pose a direct
safety hazard,
Cohn Mendonsa
;$eptember 13, 1991
Page Two.
4. No ;;—uning or cutting of oaks except for safety
purpob-'�s� Deciduous oaks shouldbe pruned during the
winter d-)imant season only and evergreen oaks during
July _ August only.
This project site contains the habitat types known to harbor
sensitive plant species which have been found in that general
,area. A botanical survey should be made by a qualified botanist
during the appropriate seasor to determine if such species do
occur onsite. If present, sensitive pkant populations should be
protected by
1. :Establishing a 50 -foot minimum no disturbance
setback, commencing from the outer edge, around each
plant population,,
2. constructing barriers to prevent damage by foot and
vehicle traffic:
3. Excluding livestock..
4. No artificial drainage into or Chet placement of
materials and substances inside: of the no�ldisturbance
area.
This project will have ars impact to fish and/or wildlife
habitat: Assessment of fees under Public Resources Code
section 21089 and as def ihed by Fish and came Code Section 711.4
is necessary: Fees are payable by the project appl-cant upon
filing of the Notice of Determination by the lead agency.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code sections 21092 and
21092.2, thFr DFO 'requests written notification of proposed
actions ane',, pending decisions regarding this project. Written
notifications should be directed to this office.
If `we can be of further, assistance, please contact
Mr: Ron tertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist car
Mg. Patricia Perkins, Wildlife Management Supervisor, telephone
(91 6) 355-70104
Sincerely,
es D: Messers, th
egil o n a I Manager
i
is
Nor IDETERNizNl�'��ON
Office of Plann; ng and Research V.nom Butte County
1400 ,Tenth Street, Roam 121 Planning Department:
Sacramento, CA 9581+ 1 County Center Drive
Or-oville, CA 95965
of
County Clerk
County of Butte
„�'U:B T3EC2 - vi-li'vg of Notice of .Determination in compliance wit11: Section 21.108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
;t "title AP # Namr
'Tentative Parcel Map M 055-290-081_ r Barney Barnett
tate Ctedtol
le,AgusNumbe'Contact, Petson Telephone Number
ghou�r��
B. A. Kircher (916) 538-7601
Project L ocat ;, on
''est side of Petitz Rd, across from WildernessWy, south Paradise area
Project Description
'QPM to divide 3.2 acres to create 2 ps cel, Parcel 1 at 3.8 aa: &Parcel 2 at 8.3 au,
This is to advise that the Butte County _
(bead, Agency or Responsible Agency)
has approved the above-described projecton and has made
(Date)
the fc,'lowing determinations regarding the above-describer project:
1. The project Will, mill no-t, have a significant effect on the
envi `onmeat
LAn Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
AL.. ativo Declaration Was prepared for this project pursuant to tate
provisions of CEQA
3. ti'itigation treasures Were, Were riot, made ,e condition of the
approval of the project
4. A statement of aver Aiding considerations --k4as eras not, adopted;
for this project.
This is to tdttify that the final E1`q with comments and responses and tecotd of
project approval is available to the penexal public at;
Butte Count-,,l Planning, Dapa tment
7 County Centor Dvivo
Otoville, CA 95965
p,.Ite I0e e ved fat filing and
Posting at CPR
-- Signature
August 71 1991
Re: Barney Barnett
Pal -001 Map
Ah 55-28-81
ben Fulton
Fulton Boo'k,s to re
5826 Clark Road
Paradise, CA 95969
Dear Len:'
'This is a letter to request that you look into the
fee of $ 563.+00 rAs required by the Butte County Planning
Department for a revised Parcel Map from two parcels to three
parcels. The present two parcel proposal was modified to
three parcels at the: request or the Butte County Planning
Department. Aithough the request was made due to an existing
structure on the site, it was later rescindecl because 11 was
an art studio, not a dwelling;
After 'reviewing the ;request by the Planning Department
my client advised me lie would like to add anothev parcel
anyway.
we cantactod the Public WorksDept , Planning Dept. and
Health PGpt. as to a fee Adjustmdht+
The additional fees werel.
Public Works $ 25.00
Health cif:pt NO C11
Planiiinit Dept,; $ 563.00
Tho Planning Department wants eomplete total 6+ 0. They
did, not and could not spend the entire initial, fee of 156;1.00
at this point ill 010 process. After di:5e11ss'i rig this tvi th
varioits mcmbe:rs of the Planning Staff, it is under!stond that
very 111tle work would be required Lb a;djus;t thei.c' reports to
include an additiohat parcel. Ile sire wilting to pay fa- any
additional bine required to perform those tasks but to Psr.y a
complete new ree is not juslifitlble.
Timillk you for your consideration in this ina't ter.
S' cerely5 ,
'1'haritas its Wrinkle
qnf
.�- + .tfe%
+ I ; x r •rrrr .
LAND OF NATURALWEALTH AiND BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DMVE - OSOVILLE, CALIFOf3MA 0965-33V
TELEPHONE. (916) 538-7601
kay 8, 1-191
Thora R . Wrinkle
SieS`:'.q West Surveying
5407 Blach Olive Drive
Paradise, California 95969
RE; Fees for Barney Barnett Revised TPM AP// 055-290-081
Dear Nir' Wrinkle
Tate fees which the Planning Department requires concerning' the
Revised Tentative Parcel Map for Barney Barnett is $563.00. Due
to the increased number of lots being proposed by the Revised I'M
it aril, be necessary for the Planning Depeirtment to re-�evalua.te;
thta, environmental documents for your project: The increased
de:jsity of the Revised TPM 47111 also require the project be
recirculated to responsible agencies for comments.
Your coope�:ation .tn the -above' matter is appreciated: If you have
St
anli questions concerning this Department I s fee requirements 0 please
fe 31 free to conttict me between the hours of 1.0:00 a.m. and 5:00
1,, „�. € Monday through Friday:
5;� ncerely,
t
Kir0 er
Director of Planning
gAXtma.
A
M
a
j)
RCE5 AG�"
RES0UENCY GEORGE bt:UKi- �y_ �4JIAN, Gotrormr
ARRTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
tj.vj ;t4l/h6US ROAD, SUITE A - ++✓✓.
Oior.Nq CGRDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670
t 0 16) 355-7020
February 26, 1991;
Mr. L77ohn Mendonsa, Assistant. Director
Department of Public Works
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, CA 95965
Dear Mr. Mendonsa
The Department of Fish and Game (DFO) has reviewed the Barney
Barnett Tentat'i'ie Parcel Map (TPM), a proposal to divide A.F.
55-29-81 of 12.2 acres ;into parcels of 3.8 and 8.3 acres. Located
to the south of Paradise, the TPM lies within critical winter
range of the East Tehama deer herd.
Subdivision of land into small parcels has an ;adverse impact on
migratory deem. As hands within crit+ical winter range are divided
into parcels smaller than 40 acres, deer use becomes impaired,
migratory movement affectad, and forage and space needs drop below
the level to sustain herd. numbers.
Subdivisions have adversely affected more than 40 percent of the
winter, range (i.e., critical and designated :winter ranges) in
13utte County. in an effort to resolve the subdivision7deer
r
conflict in Butte Count, the Department has recommended a series
of actions for the Ebard of Supervisors to impr7ement. The
Department also identified a "Designated Development Zone" (DOZ)
where development may occur, provided cortain mitigation m6asures
are adopted and implemented by the Board,.
Since the TPM lies, within a DDZ, the BFG does objodt to 'the land
division provided that appropriate mitigatiot measures are imposed
on the TPM as a condition o£ approval. However, until the Board
has an opportunif;y to adopt and implement mitigation measures for
resid6ntial encroachment an .deer winter range, the i1FG recommends
that the TPM be denied.
If we can be of further assistance, please contact
C Mr. Ston Bertram, Associate Wildlife Biologist telephone
(5 16) 355 -7010 -
'lam, A
55-7010James Mes;se math
("Regional Marmgg t
' 111
BIT7TE COUNTY
IDEPZLI& ENT' OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Divisions of Environmental Health
737 Elliott Road
Paradii1e, CA 959691
(916) 872--6308
T,��br fat 27, 1991.
Bt�r`X�ey Ba�'nPt
01 pe .rz Road
' rel,wr.%Ldisa, CA 95969
51,a-A, TPM - Pent.z Road,' Paradise Area/AP#55-29-E1
Z,ear Mr,; Barnett:
2%in department hits advised the Butte County Oepai°,tment of Public Works Land
Development Section that 'we are prepared to act on the above application,,
ziast_-u or_ present information we can recommend approval or conditiona.2.,
�V Val'.
ii�?cemmended Condi"tions for. Apr�royail
„. Provide a 100' leachfield tree setback around existing wills either
within the property or within '1.00' cif the property boundaries
.. Show the usable sewage diSOOSAJL area proven to meet the requirements of
the Subdivision Ordinance on parcel 2.'
,. Prove that the required quantities of domestic water ave available to
parcels 1 and 2. Proof may be; provide by letter or other documentation
that a Public Water Supply 5y tem. is willing and able to supply 'water.'
44, if 'Water is to be provided' by 'a public water supply, ,place a note on the
map that states' ”"development of parcols will require connection to a
public hater supply'+„
a- 5 Place a note on the mal, that. stater "Dwelling on Parcel g shall be
located to access the septic tank sys,ttAm" by gravity flow'".
if you have any guostions rega.rdinj this litter please contact the Paradise
of'f'ice at the above listed address or telephone. number between 8.00 9:00
A.mo weekdays:
very truly yours',
Tom geid, x711; d+C:t6
Division of llnvironmental, Health
'.rk/kf
cc PlannIng Bepartment
Public Worker
Sierra West Surveying
P l �
i
4
a®IL
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH ANO BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COUNTY CENTER DRIVE- OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3397
March. X!, 1991 TELEPHONE! (916) 538-7601
Mr. Barney Barnett
5437 Black Olive Drive
Paradise, CA 95969
Rei Tentative Parcel Map
A.PN 055-290-081
Log 091-02-15-07'
,Der Mr. Barnett:
An initial study of your proposed project; a Tentative Parcel Map, indicates potentially
adverse impacts to the environment (refer to the enclosed environmental checklist). To
reduce or eliminate these impacts, ,suitable mitigation measures are required as part of
the ;project. Otherwise, An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required pursuant to
the 4 alifornia Environmental Quality Act.
An early response to this notification, sent to the Planning Department, will expedite the
sefieduling of your project. Please forward your written response lvithin. 15 days from the:
date of this letter..
A list of local consultants is included, These persons can determine the need for a
survey by conducting a records search, conduct archaeological surveys or arrange for
such sutveys. In the event of an'EIR requirement, a subsequent letter will be sent
outlining the procedure for the County to select the consultant to prepare the :ETR.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office between
10,00 a.m and 3:0Q p.m., any weokday
Sincerely,
B. A. Kircher
Dire r of P anng
$rent L Mo(3''e L
Associate Planner
13LM:tma
Enclosure
cc Sierra 'West Surveying' & Public Works
r ,,
APPENDIX I
ENVIRO CIDil'N'iY 4F i3[tfiZ'E -
IMJ31CP CHECitLIS.T FORM
MM' L 7ATION OF EW190Nt+lENTAL IMPAC'
Fitt
N0. 055-290=081 Loo NO,
91-�02-15-07 AP NO. 055-290-051
Z.
BACKGROUND
r. narnev satnett
2. 5457 black olive Drive. Paradise. 0411 fornla 95969'
3. pfoo ur Wrscription; Tentative Parocel Nap t0 divide 12
acres to create 2'parcelt. Parcel 1 at 3.8 acres and Martel 2 at a 3 acres,.
II.
MANDATORX FINDINGS 03a;:RIGNIVICANCE
C_;S MAYDr• _.ML DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
1. Does
ualtiV op the enviionmhave eilt.' bbs`tantially reduce the
tocause�aptise
X Thin. ronosaj, of siilrll
p W111 n" ficant ly' degrade the environment.
habitat of a itch of, wtldlitetspeclesentjaj
of Wlldlire,�opulatfon to drop belowself-sustaining
levels, thrhaieh to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restflct the range
of a tare or endangered plant of animal of eliminate
uxa
of major perlods'of callrorhla'
pies
hlstorpnt
x. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term benefits to the detriment of long-term
__ x_ This proposal Will not Impede lone -term environmental goals.
ehvitonment goals? (A shoat -term impact on the
environment Is one which occurs In a relatively
brief ,7erlod of 'time While (,ohg-tetm Impacts will
endure into the future.)
3. [foes the project have impacts which ate individual IV
x_ _ This 'proposal may have a significant cumulptfve' lhipact on the
limited but cumulatively cohslderablet to project
environment,
MAY Impact on two of more srioarate resources who e
the imparit on each resource Is relatively small,
but Where the effect of the total of those tmpacts
on the ehviranment Is significant.)
q, bees the project have environmental- effects Which
� X _ Th ptopo3at will hot have a significant adverse' �effect �ah human
Will Cause"
bdtAhtlal� Adverseeeliticts an human
bels
I rigs .
III:'DETERMTNATI0N
on tie arils o this hitlai evaluation:
IM find the prbpbSed ptalect dWLD Not Have a slghiflUilt effect on the envllOhment 06i a NECAtIVE bECLAAATION will be prepared,
IIWE find thatA lthough (he„prtmosed pfojeet CbUt:D have a significant effect on, the envftonment, there will nit be a sioniticarit effect In this
We bewause the MITICAT)ON M SUZI $ detef)bad. on the
attached sheat have been added to the prOJOCt, A NECATIVE MCLARATION wlII be ptepared.
I/We find the ptboosed project mY have a s'1_ghiticaiit
etfeet on alio crlvfroltia°til, and all t-WiltDNitiNTAL IAPACI REPORT is required'.
c6ulfr. bh nkfox, HL"'I NC CR; T T
bATE:
Ecbruary 261991by
._ _ i ._ _. ..
bb! L.° Moore ..
it& l ewed bye
tM
ii
7 xpr inen'tia
'checkiist * Evaivation o>
Envnmentai
xmpaci:
..y
'ENVIRONMENTAL_ IMIPACT$
vet ruYn ND
DIaSCVSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
s, P
`Will'—the ptcoosal result in significant:
A.
Unstable earth conditions, or changes in
tructurest
x _,
The proposa.i Will not affect subsurface earth condlltons.
b
avercoYeriitbset phCspin, compactlgn or
o l
x
this proposal Will not result In significant dlseuptlon'
its
`
placement, compaction or overcovering of he site. The pfUpbsed
protect will create one additional lot which will allow the
development of one dwelling unit, currently parcel kl Is tally
deveibped udder the existing zoning classif►tation. The pr-ai+:ct site
't
Is characterize by a mountainous W rash whith Wlll require
extehslve earthWotk to provide access to
1
the second lot and a
building pad, improper sitting and construction of residential
dwellings on the htoleel site may lead to an upset of the slope
equl►ibrfum because of the alteratloh of vegetation, slope materfals,:
is
Itis'
and drainage. In order to ensure slope stability and reduce soil
ettislon adherence to the standards of the Butte COunty Crading[
p..
ordinance should be maintained. It Is anticipated standatd grading
pr't,tices and eroslon control ptattl es Will adequately mitigate
`r
Identified issues tit slope stability, soil eroslon, drainage, and
alteration of Vegetalloo of slope areas
tt�.
C.
change In topography or ground surface
relief features#
X
The project site Is characterized by mountainous trsrraln which will
tequlre extensive grading to accommodate the ptaaosed residential
deyelopmeht. Etosloli pbtenllal in the area 4 high. It is.
antl0 paled standard erosion control ptactices Will mitigate erosion
to aless than significant degree,
1
d.
Destruction, tbVetlng or mod)tication of any
unique geologic or physical featured
X
The prosect site has 110 unrque physical features.
t
e.
Increase In WI'hd or water Oros [on of Solis,
either on of off sftet.
�� X
Wholesale exposure of still during the construction phase of
devrlopmeht allowed by the pr
the erosion rales, When const temporarilyi
considering the tactors of the site
stxee'ant/tincllirialtun `uch
It
a§
shallowsoils, vegel"lon l paosl P
1Y . frequency
and intensity of rainfall and pto><)mt.y to,Dry Cteelt sail erosion
Potential and sedimehtatlon loading of the creek is very high, 11,
It anticipated that the Butte Count Cradi, o
Y tdfnance wi I I control'�1
t+rosldn during eonslru'ctIon toa less than significant level.
1.
sands. in deposition of elusion of beach
sands, or thahges in siltation, depbsitiott
x
Earthwork associated With fila pptoposrad project may result in
sedimentation
�d
or erosion whl+,h may modlly the channel of
A flVilf or site-IM oi• the bed
Of Dry creek. Water gtj!IIly of DIV Creek may be
reduced by added turbidity and chemrtaixi such as nitrogen and
1"y�
l
of the ocean
Of any ba inlet br lakep
V�
hosphotut, Which ate —Washed in With g Water
p so11 artteles. to reduce11Is
setlimentatltin and possible euCttphlcrl'titin o surtat�r
recommended the following note be pitted on the map: Within loo
tt Of the tenter Iihe of aII draIhage swales, or surfrtte Watot there
shall be designated a natural vegetation xnne which shall not be
cultIuch valed. gfaded, dlsturbel, or �.rrtipetty ImottiYemenls placed wlthin
�
9.
O fine agticulturally ptoductive
Of d^.signated urban areast
sails
X
this proposat does not reptesbnl a signll'icant loss or prime
Agriculturai tolls, the Is 'AMOUhtafhous
!'
ptoJect site ibcated Within
area which does not lend itself to eXlentive agt►cliltural uses.
i
h+
f
Wedsesur,hpeaSl�atttwgtak s�y i�ncgts►oiHes�
�—� X
The of Butte County Is in a siodetgte t:arthquaka Intensity zohd vttr;,
h p olect site located
mudslides, ground failure or sl�l�iier
ha ardst
is apfiroxlmately 2-m miles southwest of
the pill den Paull sys►em Construction of bulidings to the uniform
Building Code standards (Of sellmlcailY active afeas should provide
adequate protection to otcupatlts In case of seismic activity.
--71
'
r' f
3
nivitormenta] Chackl ist *; VVal.ut�ti cry of Env ��nmental` Iratpalclr
3V E14V'IRON14ENTAL IMPACTS tcontinued?, Yes
morig No
DISCUSSIOM OZ_ENVIRONMEttTAL ,%VALUATION
(Con tInued)
21 , wild
the proposal tesult in substantial.
a.
All 0MISSIMIS or deterloratlon of ambient_�_
x ..
The 'proposed project. will result in A cumulative Impact on air
air quality?
quality due to related increases in tratfic generatted by the project,
the Califotnla Alt Resources control 'board has identified butte
County as a Nonattalnment Area in meeting the standa=ds of the
California Air quality Act. Tile Butte counts, Air Pollution Cohttol
Plan does not address air quality Impacts .,t small resider,11at
developments for possible mitigation measures
b.
The creatioh of objectlohable odors, smoke
x
Acme ShotI term 'Att quality Impacts villi probably result' during the
or fumest
constructionphases of deVeloplrig an additional housing unit.
Increased vchlcle and equipment emissions as well as increased dust
during site grading and prepafation will occur,
c.
Alteration of air movemerit, motsfura or :
x:
The proposal WlII Kot Viet', the atmosphere
temperature, or any change In climate,
locally of regfonaifyt
wATEII,
will the proposal 'feiult In subs:anttal;
a.Ghailges
to cutrentw, or the course or _�
x
The: proposal will nr. affect any Watercourse.
$ reckon of water movements to either
urine or fresh waters?
b.
Jtltnges in r'rsorptibl 'rates,
x
the proposed ptoit;ct will not cheinge the abs,rption rates of the
,dralnage
pattetns, of .ne rate and amount .df surface
protect, site and subsequent coelilclenl of runoff due to chahges,In
runoftt
land use. and Iand cover,
C.
Need lot
x
No extensive drainage Imprwworitii Wlfl be hecessary to accommodate
j
thtsculvereletAlalr tebo al ��
improV4mehts, intiutling vegetation ternoVa[,
(lie proposed project.
chanhelients,
d,
AtteralIons to the course or Ilow of flood
_ ;� x
The ptoposal will not Impact Ilootl cbh(rol thanneis or watercoUtles,
Waters!
0,
Changeb t a arp'uht of surface %vatei lit any
x
The proposal will,not affect anybody of water within the: area.
water 00
I.
DItChAttle intra tutface u$ters, Ou in Any
x
T�e proposed protect site is located In a setting of ridge tops And
alteration of iuttace Water quality,
fianyons. AS such, there existi, the potential for dddradatlon.of
Including .but hitt ilmited to temfrer1tufo,
surface water qquality due to erosion and sedimentation associated
11
P
dissM ved oxygen Of tutbi ditya
With canstrULtIon activillks and lite exposure, of bare and sir
disturbed ground. Runoff from paved
assoclated Witt! residenliaf devolopmcril
,ground surfaces and roottoo
may carry "olganle matetiat3
and Q01 tal urbah polrutants in►b bty
Creek. Excessive fertillxatioh
of Iands,eaped treat, and irrs'atlon
runoff or possible teAthtleid
tabule Could gehetalo nulti%sn�rich (lows downstream, thus resutting
In euttophicatfoh of (lid t3ty Creak, setback requirement's otitli'hed ;
In 11 above Is ahtloipa►ed to tnitbgaie sunt dhvirbninonlal issues,
g.
At tertitCinori ote he, diror.tion or la' to of flow
k _
The roppsal will not affect lilt,-direatio
p , n or f low of ground waters.
h.
ohange iii the quantity or quaflt� t5f ground
___ x
the proposal will not directly affect any aquifer.
waters, dithet through dieect a dfilOtis or
wl,'hdri6d is, Or through InUfception of Art
aqul'tet by Guts or excavallohit
I'
Riductibri
the Amount of filarsUop
x..
The plrooSod project will hot sighilicanlly Impact public water
ehdrwisc
In
avallablj. st
tnosolo of people or oioopfty to water-
_ 7t_._
the ptopoSAi wilt riot "expose occUOAMS to Hood haxs.rds.
re,Ato,d hatards Stith as floodlnpt
i
1.,
R
vitonmettai
C,heck:list * Evaluation "of EiaYroWitdnta1
4
Xmpacti
i
z,V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS(contlnuedf
DISCUSSION OE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
vFs MAvnr: rfe
(contrilued)
4. lMIT LtF>7: will the proposal result In
su stantla
a,
change In_the dlversity of species, or
x
the dlvetslty' of plant species W1II be expanded a5 residentlal noh-
ntunber of any specs' of plants (including
native landscapes are Installed, The vegetation on site is of the
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, And aquatic
yellow And pohdetosa pine forest commurlkres.
plants)t
b.
Reduction of the numbers or any unIquo, i are
x _
No rate plants have been identified on the project site.
or endangeted species of plants?
C.
Intr'oductikn of new Too ios of piant5 nto
- X
The proposal will not affect exi ting plant life.
U
art area. o arnormal
l
replenishment of eXlsting specltst
d.
Reduction acreageofeanyagriculura i
X
The site does not contain any cornmetclally Vlabte agrlcultuFal cr+.
crop)
s, 1111 MA,
IIFk, will the proposal result in
subs an al:
a.
change In the dlvorsity ,of species, or
- k
The pr)ject site is located Within an area tdehtlfled by the
numbets of any species of animals (birds,
land AniiWils including' reptil'es.,'Itsh sad
"d arh,ont of r1sh grid came as a 4rllical deer Herd winter range.
The protect site is located within a desighated development zone
shellfish, benthic otgartisms or Insects)!
(WZ). Residential development at hither densities of over one
dwelling unit per 40 acres has been determined to be adverse on the
migratory deer herd habitat. As land Within erlticni deer herd range
Is developed Into utban densities deer use becomes Impaired,
migratory movement atlected, and forage And space needs dropped below
the level to sustain herd numbers, To 'nate no policy has been
Adopted by the Butte County Board of supervisors to mltigatt impacts
of development on 'the migratory deer herds, The county of
Su lit
currently tequites olI maps in the t6z to place the follow
dote nh
the ftrial map. `beer herd Impact feta shall be paid at
time C
bullding hermit issuance if applicable."
1r.
Reduction in the numbers of any uniltue, tare
x..
'rhe site contains fit, rate ahlmhts,
or ehdahgetetj specles of ahlmaItt
c.
Introduction of new
k':_
and 5a abnve>
an arear, or In �barrio(�tofthelMigration
si
d,
Det-ridtatlor of existing fish or Wildlito
it
sed ba atiovc,
hauftate
e>N51SE,
will the proposal result In substahtiala
�.
increases In d9isking noise levelst
x
The prrpdsal Will hot result in a substantial lhctgas'e In 01`e
'site
created on of in the vicinl V.
b.
1
Exposure of petiole la severe noise levtlst
k
The pfoposal Will not expose beap'ie to severe holie jevats.
�:or
proposal ptoduC'e
gigand
�, �"
x,.
The proposal Wilt not result In A substantial Increase th light
Pu i
can A gla}etlhe
Blain Ureai+3d an site of th the vicinity,
ii t.,Nb.ug, Wit I Ind proot)tal fexul.t In a substoi,tlit'I
!x.
The 0000W Will trot Alter the land ute in the area. Tile pfeject
a ,drain of the ptesent of pla ad land Be f a'h
site Is zoned Al.wi which allowu ane dwelling unit pet We cod is
designated by the butte count Ceneral Plan as Agticultnra.l
ateat
osed t At no* constTLtlled does not rteet
IndIbh which ail�:vs only erne
lyenstilY,
requl 0(AdfiLpebir he
Ing p atcet ftumbei one of the
Ioningcu p
tentative map has t,Wo dweiltng units. hillier the kentative 41110 must
r� � �. ..
II_ ._`,:;_._, ..'. q''.
ill,. .;_ 11111 kc Y� _ .t. y�l•�•�•
,
av tbnmez�ta Checklist * Evaluation o� Env3'roiam »etal xm act `
ONVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (c,)ntlnUed? N OF EAVIRONMENTAL EV'ALLY
IAYrIE No DISCIISS CO P; X _N
Ccarittnusdl
1!C5 A
bet tevi sdd to e each dwel I Ing unit on a separate ti or the
applicant nitsnhktejounyPlhe
lluopae
q,
OA" AI RESOLRCNs will the proposal result in
I suostan al:
I` a, increase to the rale of use of any natural x The proposal will not affect any natural resouttes.
111111 tesoufcest
p. Depletion of any non-tenewabl'e, natural x-- TI-u proposal will not deplete any natural resources.
resourcest
io. RiSy tl,- tk5r:T. will the proposal involve,
A , A risk of e-plosion or release al hazaPlousx The otdoosal will not involve the use v'r hazardous materials, nor It
substand6 (Trictuning, but not limited to, 1.1-loctlled- close to anV facllitles Which store or utlI110 such
oil, pesticides, chemicals or tadlatlon) In materials.
the event of an accident of -UPSat
COnditlont?
b, Possible Interference wJth an emergency x the proposal will not affect any emergency services.
response plan or emergeiicY evacuation plant
i1. emu A1'ii)Nr. dWillens the proposal alter location, because
et ih the area a
X The prOpoial wt11 hot sl9niticantlY affect the population of the ate
dis r dut7ah. density ar 9ro�uth rale of the ftUman because the proposed density does no exceed that planned and btliin
ti. usINo wall thet�t000sal affect existing x. The ptoposaK will not st9nlflcahttY affect ncusing demand.
pcipulalTiynt
houring,
or create, a demand tot additlbhal hoUsingt
ia. tRANSPrxt` A[ !10N1CiRcxJLATiGrt, will the proposal
n. ens t iantiaiaddsClonalveh[cte x_ The pto oral wlII rdoresent 1n Incremental increase Ih tra
A. cehoratlonot subs pp ' ;tic In the
arca« �fhe proposed project will generale apptoxtmatelY to addttitsnel
result f mov nt vd icle tri-pt par day. The prosect s,lto It serviced by the
Ate
the addltibnai,vehick; trips oathe rdayegenataledabycthe ptoposed7PM,
b. sting parking facilities, r sr the proliosat wtil hot aftect pafkiho because the proposal will have
r1fect3 on exi
demand lar new parking# iii complly With Ana patkihgfegUitements contained wlthinttultc County
Code SBCItCn 24-35,
c. substantial 000act on exIstIhit x TheprA)pbsai Wilf not signlfitantly Impact the trahsobttat Ion iystem,
trrtnsportattan sYslemst
significant atItfations to oteseht 06ttetn3 xthe proposal will not slgnititant�y impact the eT:ttUlatlon of people
of circulat.tan or movement of people and/or
gwadst
e AlterallOns to Waletbothe, tail of air x The proposal will hot Impact rai't or airborne traffic.
traffic#
f. Increases ,in traffic hazards to rrotnr _, .. The proposal will nal slonititahLly Increase ttaltic hazards,
vehicles, bicyclists of pedestttpnst
KA. upon,4 pi'' r R res�Tt inlfa theed op(OrainewvOAn r Altered
government setvleex: will
bs
lwlslonool nr�restuil lilt a incrdmisunt Tnctea�le Ndemand ►at t1,tt
a., mire ptbitctlon2
ttactioh,lo the arae. Tee DuKle County rire bepattmentlCafitotrla
ty rias Indicated that cumulative developmeW in
r
�I �:'.
6
t'nvir;a.=ental Checklist Evdlua'tiozx. or 'Environmental irtpAct
,ENVIROMENTA.L 'IMPACTS {Contlnuc%1l DISCUSSION,0F E;NVIRON14ENTAL_ EVAYibATTON
(ton llnued)
lho county will Impact INN ability to provide lire protection
serYices. i.
ervices. line saddle community service District malnlalto, a
p
water system with fire hydrants atahg Bentz Road. A Ilre
Hydrant
Is .ocated directly In font of the project Me whtC
ptovldes
water at flows welch meet minimum standards tot tide
protection services.
b. Police motectlont R
The proposal will result In a Incremental Increase Un demarr9 for
police protection in the area. Which cannot be servIcedby the pttsent
Shatiff'S oepartmeht„ 5lnte t9oo the popUlatfort oS' Butte county has
Incrdased by over 2sx, while at the same time the police torte has
been decreased In portonnel by 5e% due to Fiscal difficult iel;n
s beg
experienced by Butte County, Currently„ Butte County has the lowest
officers per raphe In the stale with o.35 01`flcers per 1000
y
population. The state average of swotn off Ice per population
-
ranges fromi 5 to t.8 officers'' pet 1000. Currently. police
pfolectiori Services are InadedUate, and do not meet the service
expettations of thepublic. continued rural deve.oPmdh1 has resulted
In tunulalive Ilroncts on polite oto ectiOn s^rviteS which conlihues
to retute tilt Sheri'ff's Department tapatlty to provide adequate
polite im idet. The Butte C00ty Sheri0 has dstabifshtil the base
line level of service of I sworn officer Oct i000 p(Vulatlnn whlth
mus! be meet to not Constitute a significant impact on police
prdlettloh tervlces.
The present number of tubdtvislons and parcel maps being considered
(Or apptuval
In the nUtte County sheriffs North Patfol Area will
Increase
the papulation by approximately s,000 pebole. The.approvai
Of the d result In
in the Patrol Area 1V
toldefitlal slbased
bepatlmehl, 5projectloh
This I on Ah�Y rage ottiShtetVicA
calls pet Capita per year which was the average number of seri'ice
calls last fiscal year per 0pIla. The applitant will havr, t
00vide mftlpatlon Measures Which will reduca the impacts oq the
police protection 5ervlres of the county to file approval of the hutte
0un , sheriff.
C. Schoolsf k .,
The proprltai will ketuit It! a incrementa'1`-lncrease In demand `or
'sch001
setvlt.e5 in tilt area. Uhobl letpact feet collected by the
vocal school district 1s antleipatoi! to only partially reduce sehrxoi
Impacts. presently the sthool district Is at capacity and IS
cutrenil stoking d0antlon of the loedl 30loot faculties. Tae
applicant Wlll hod to c66to0ate with the Paradlse Witted school
olsttiat to fully m1'tiflate the, impacts of the project an edutation
servlti!4, it appticpnl cannot utter raltipdtlonmeasutes which reduce
the Impattt on schools to a less than signl!fieant level a'n, elk will
be_required.
d. Parks sir other `ecreallonal l6cliftles7 � .� :..
pt�5eeall W Illati�ltult Th ental Intre�te i0 demand for Dark
a
and ktl oa
d. ltaitfl nan'tedt s',ukrllC f»c'flittts, li;WtucJftlgX_,
the p,;M sal wail result in a Incremental ihtfease In the need tot,
Ydadf't
mdinl6r,11at of toads 'and barer public faiaittiet til the aneli.
t. ljtet g0r��- rlla �strvloe ,l , �,.�� sC - --
The ptOpb9n1 will result lh1 iheremontal I:nero53e to dzmand tot oil
olflet h0vetnmerital .Oryltes in the area.
99. Nep` v. Will the olopotai otui t ltt
a. e of, 3tJtb+t$arllld
lis'lat amounts of 'fuel -e k
'the proposal will not 001146 subftahtial fuel be eherfly.
y
7.
Eavironmenta3, Chuck] "st * )9VAIttaa'tio' of Environmeh,tal Zznpact
17. ENVIRONMENTAL; IMPACTS (continued)
YES MLYLk NO
DISCUSSION OV ENVIRONMEEdTAL_EVALUATION
(continued)
tv, substaltial Increase in demand upon existing
x
'rhe proposal Wth not substantially lhcrease the demand for energy.
sources of energy, or fequlre the
development of new sources of energy?
16.
LIT[CJ*tl6S. Will the pttoposal result in A need lot
new systems. of substantial oltoration5 'to the
folfawIng:
a: !Tower or natural gas?
— x.
affect electr'icai power or natural gas
Tile b
►olbnisysitl not
'b. Cctmujtications sys{emst
X
Tha pr000sal Will not atfedt coarrosnicatioh systems.
C. Water avalfabtlity#
x
The "Psa) "topoWill not atlect public Water systems,
r
d, sewer or septic sy, ems#
x
The proposal wlII halt to meet the requitements of the hU►'te county
Environmental Health;pePt_,
e. $tottn Water dralnaget
x
The proposal Will not direct storm Water drainage,
I. solid Waste and dttposal#
The Proposal Will have a cilW at0 - Impact on solid Waste disposal .
ill.
HUMAN HFALTH.: WIII the proposal retul I. Ins
a. creation of any health hazard or potFirltial
x
Tha OfbposFI Will not create any health hazard,
hazard (excluding mental health)?
_
b. uposufe C1r peopl, to poteotla'l health
x
The 016priv,0 'i I hot expose people to any health hazard,
hazards?
iii.
FSIrljEtlr' , Will the Oreposat iresult in the
x
The proposal `ikrll not tesUl't in an aesthetically offensive view
obstruct or oYi,g scenic M100'orview open to the
because It It donsistent With sUrrounding development,
public, or will the proposal result in tit -r creation
of an resthulicail'y offensive site op#an to the
public view#
12,
1treggAr1w. Will the proposal rustilt Ih an Impact,.
x
the ptoposal may tosu'lt In An incremental lhdr6ate in demand for park
Pon t s +puaiity ar quantity lS( existing
and "rect6atlon taeflltlos,
tecreatfonal opportunitie5#
.
_. 20.
MMAXI, itt?s"CES.:
p
a, orldestrU,•toonot �Itltb#�icotihistoric
the
lbiiedto
arpt
liltesnutt0tn the 111911 3ehSIUv Y rAc or Or t
Ity tadt6r of lbe
archaeoldg�cal sleet
r�ro)ect site, it is nedessaty to perform a records dlikk throughthe
060arllnent of Anthropology. ;;alilotnla state Unlv6rsity, Clilco, Ili
sl
order to deteril It glitticant sites MAY be located bn the
property. A records check Will delotmlhe Whether An archaeologlcat
surVey of flu prepetty Will be netossary and Wh6lhef any other
mitigation measures W11I be needed,
b. W1li thdorupasaI tesult innbetsdphyslcal
_. .., X
the proposal will not attect historid sl es
;�r aetthetr6 dtfecit tj a pxeliMbric or
_
It atorld building, t(0)ttuto or nbfndt4
d. beet the liave the 061�hllal to
_. x
The pr6potsl will not affect cultural ttiourctt.
.proposal.
tlaute a physical cnahge Whlh Woutd affect
,dhique athnlc cul turril mluosi
;r With the broosa,! rostrlct existfng
Tho proposal will not Affect religious resburcos.
rel ll)lous or sacrtid uses Wi thin the
potential Impact area?
Ettvi anmental Checklist Evaluiatidn of EnViranmbhtal Xmpaa ii
IV. E1TVXR0NMENTAL IMPACTS (continued) -YES_ MAY85 Wo IDISCUSSION OF EW1IR01R4tWAt EVALUATION
(continued)'
tT, SUGGESTED Mxj`' GATION MEASURED j
t. ;ptovfde mitigation iiwawr,is to itse approval of J 6. ReVis,a map t rovirie eparatr Parc lot aaclr
ah� putts county 51�et1lfi to reduce Impacts on ex sii g dwelif g rtFt r s elt a vidian Ntrom the
Pt�91cq protection services. BU a 9u?t.iy 1 b P., Cc�inml sio �l0 611°oto, lwa
dwe l J g Un(l''t�t�n orle�Pprr:cl , • a.
oVf� .tigati easures the z' tnYai of
2Gae pa dlse ed chool Is to fully
rsS Ri o Impacts on eduta I sa, 1" "s.
V-
4
mitlgat on_ measutps� o approval ut
the. i'ari n Recte lon stt fully
mittAlthe tulaU mpacls on r.crea oni
sr � teduca SedImenlallon nd possible
o ", t cc 'w ether I e t I drainage
erattoP fcatUpgr�,� nt SuRlace '*?0 r It
iln a nd tbonl bhc late'd neeot li drainage
swt.1 r r l II e,tiesignated
a raatu al ve9ratl n 'zone /which f al- not be
wI t fva d, dr ad dI tutbed,'1,+. t roper ty
t�rr�tovrmentt piac tthin such 'zone
Contact the beparttnenl of Anitiropology,
state Yl
dhstondwthyhdItn�lIIcana ofto determine
tAheeranadiiioal
m4tigation ridasuret are meeessar'y,
t
5� r ltlanta� Checklist Evaluation of Environmental
Tmpaciv
y B14VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS tcontinuadi ves. MAygg No
DISCUSSXON
OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
(continued)
DATA SHCIi1
A. rt7.,Litt
r)C3tH010n
Cenerral
11.
Butteencounty'y
Plan designation: Agricultural
!,
Type of Project: Tehtative parcel 430
Residential
2.
nrler Description, TPM to divide 11 acres to create 2 parcels.
12..
w it tina zoning, ARMH--1
Parcol #1 at 3.a acres and arrel 02, t 6.3 acres
13.
Fxtsting land use on sites single Family/vacant
3,
1.ocatIoil � wast side of Pentz Rd, across from wilderness Way,.
14.
surrounding Area:
South Paradise Arca.
a. Land Uses: residential and open space
Al
Ptoposed Density of Development: i unit/3 acres;
b, 'zoning: 1`11-5-, FR -4o and ARMH-I
5.
Amount of Iirparvlous Surfacing: Minimal
C. ul; , Plan Designatlont Ag -Rest
6.
Access and Nearest Public Road(s), Pentz Road
d, RUCel Slzest 1/2 to '64o acres
7.
Method of sewage Disposal, septic/Leachfield
e. Population: Rural Population
s,
source or Water. supplyr Indfyldual wells
15.
character of Site and Arca, 'RW AI
S.
Proximity of Power tines, AdjAceh( to property
16.
Neatest Urban Arca: Parallse
30,
Potential for further land diVislons and devclnpment: Cxisl-Ino
17.
Relevant Spheres or influences Lime -saddle, -Paradise
ohing clastilltation allows for the division Of property to 1
1tt..
ta>rrovemenls standards Urban Atca, No
acres parcet sizes.
19.
Fire Protection servile:
a. Nearest county (state) Fire station, R33 paradite
H. �rvifohmehtal
Setting
Pines
b. Water AVatlablllty; hydr6ht3
Physical Fnyl'ronmentr
20.
:.chools in Arca: Paradise Unified school District.
i,
Terrain
A. ccnofai Topngraphia character: Mountainous -
b. slopes: 10 to 30 +x
C. Elevat:inh: 1200" to 1640' ASL
d.., Limiting Pactorst Steep slOpes
2,
5011$`
A. Types and chatacterlsticss Akins storty Phase- stones
COMP(lse aopro, SOS. or'mbre of the volume,bt the sal I .
Residual soil Prot, a*r(3 flow, rcMgh rock )WOOPOIngs;
and boUldors, shallvk soils ovsriying Titican torNl tlons
MAO exist all this
b, L(miling Factdt,'s, shbll,w 50113 oil $100S.tdoO $tos.
3.
Natural' hazards of the Land
a, Eatthquake zone: Modetat', earthquake intensity zinc
b, toAlon Potentlal t High
t.. Landslide Potential. High
d. Fite tiaxard: High
e, Ckpahttve noil td(ehilal, Low
A.
ltydrologSUrfaCd
a, drainagewASand Dty creek
Wt0iWumerosf
runt tile neae fl t i td.
b, ctouthd Water: Aqui lets ate seheralIV found at depths of
Over too feet, cutrentt/ two welis;exist on the prolect
site.
c. Drainage characteristics, Property drains Into (he'bry
t;reek drainage basin.
d. Annual Rainfall thormal), 40M. to SS"
e, Limiting Factors: High etosion p0terltlAl
l/scehtc Quality, coag
a5. ,
Atn�is I d Qua I I ty I, cood
7.
Alt duality: good
tiloJonital wnvironmen"_;
�stkndA�isg
,
ildlif�It
Wetabil2 tmatl btd and 2bmmon to (00 Illi 11
_
area's,
cuilutai CnVirdnments
io:
Arthacotoglcat and lltstbrlcal Resources In the ate High
10
nv,j,:r,otmental ChoOklist * Evaluation of E svirdr mdAtal xmPac t
Y . riV V xAVmj%mm i n" LKJ,rAW..& 4 lw146 tiawcu,
(Cotit'Inued)
j ENvVIRONMENTAL REFERENCE MATERIAL
Mfd�etlV.-� l e� �e7nt hgguuC CeaCQUnty General IPI ah. reV l se�
J-77 b y CH)A H i I I.
7;. MTP 11-2, Liquefaction Potentl h Seisms f'ety
E eCH,mHnitt,l Butte County General Pan revised ci-i , Uy
3, hip II1-1 Subsidence & Landslide Potehtiaa s fety
9jeMm Itl,l butte County General Pian 'revise 'l-7�I, by
Sic. dao Ill -2, > rc�s�c�n Pcter�tial � Safety Elem(Mt,, Butte
Co my Genera an ev sed i --i7, tby 61
ch1M I I.
GoUnty IGeneraPaP�f anereuiisied i 77feby Ctilerp 1`111,1 �eutte'
6. Map 1V-1, Nose. Noise Eie e t Butte County General
PIai1 revise nI-77, ggbyaCN,hA It. G y, EI roe t
�, $Upte-Cdunty Gene �IhP1Xs`revisendl. I 77, yyCil,�ieHln(;
Bw h' p .i 11= Nat tai .l=ire Ha pr Classes; fety
H
t, Utte ounty Genera Happr rev i sect I - by
9.forh ut eoCoufltyePlann no Department, 1,Pa yMati"nln0,
E itl tty.Map by James
to. S5chool 0i'strict Map, Butte County nlahnjhfl
t7epartment
11, C t Nltra� stud §1a0, Nlt6ate concentr ti In
S�'a haw. We s, 1 s b narto nt o tor
Resources or hweTl?rn �iir CC, The Meso rces
of SU e'ry so
'B to County Board
Agency, State o Ca.lornia
12, gg�eICU) tU5al Pt slerves Mapyestabi fished b peso U.tIon
y7 178>
NN
13. rogdram, FeoeralREmergeney hianagemehtlAgehcysUlsE3ar
14, USG$ Quad Maps, Cherokee, 1970"
15. 8001 - �rit a,tco,r 1gfflirorovI I Ie (1926) Area, U,S,
16, 8oI I Survey of CHI co(j?25)/Oroy1' l le (1926) Area, U.S.
epartment of AUricU ure,
i7, ut ouht rl e Protection Iurlsdlctlons ant
ayi ooit ees rearpn�, utt0 .Cr u t f iFe 0e artment ani
�IAannlnnIpehat tmerlt�nt of �o entry. nUtte County
i E ';
SIE NEST SURVEYING
I ICENSED LAND SURVEYING
5431 Black Olive Drive - Paradise, CA195969 _
,Phone: (916) 87;-5253
September 19, 1991
At,tn.: John i4endonsa
Butte County Advisory Agency
7 .County Center Drive
oro'Vi l l.a, CA 95965
Roo Barnett Parcel Map; AP 55-29--91
Dear Jahn:
Upon reviewing our present design of parcels for the Barney ,Barnett
Parcel Ntap we would like to make the following amendment;
1 Consiruct the cul -de -sue at the Northwest corm., o!' 1r Ya
2 Cbhstruct a dei-1aw� y to serve only Parcel 3 with a Fire
Departmentapprovecl turn around area and a note on the map
which date$, ".. o furtb.e; division of Parcel 3 except when a
county approved road'; is provided"
Due to the terrain in this area, there would be less tree r°emoval
and erosion potential that a normally approved road standard.
`thank you fol your consideration in this mette.r.
Sincerely
d
2—
T
homa's
R. Wi inkl e
TRW % Stu
4
BUTTE CUGHTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMEMT
33 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE
CROVILLE, CA. 95965
(916) 538-7321
I
MICR GREY
SHERIFF-CORONER
TO: v"OHN MENDONSA, ASS18TANT DIRECTOR
DATE: 19 FEBRUARI' 1991 )
SUBJECT' BARNES BARNETT
The Butte County Sherif'f's Department has the lowest
officer-to-citizen r-.'" of any law enforcement agency -,
the entire state. Budget coastra.ints severely''t
services this department can a',ovide th.r
County.
New cons::ruction Will further impact the resources of
this departmnt with tete additional calls-for-service.
",ll result in further deterioration of the level of
►'± servicz provided by this department to all the citizens of
�nx Butte 00afity.
- In the event a.-funding mechanism becomes avail_able_to
increase the number of sworn personnel in this department
there would be no abject4,on to the proposed development:
Until that time, however, this department regretfully
opposes any new residential development.
Very truly yours
Mick Grey, sheriff-Coroner
`+ es M Nylan er
Assistant Bheriff
.Ps
•�� i