HomeMy WebLinkAbout055-460-025t'.
r
i
r R
�/ 1�;,�7
Q,f
•r
a
q
.
�, I ", � .h•
�
•t
ate"
J
4 �q{
1
' •.
a .� ,
• '
i .. 1
�'.. r 1.
-
I I
PLANNING 'COMMISSION SUMMARY SHEET. FOR .LAND DIVISIONS
84-04-10-02
APPLICANT Cherie Smyze7C
ADDRESS P. 0. Box 159, Para4ise, CA 95969
OWNER Same -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel. Map dividing 15, G1 acres to create
ii three parcels 5.613 acres, 5.005 acres, and 5.001 acres
LOCATION On the soutlx side ofStoney Brook Lane, approximately
1600 feet 'gest b -C i.ts intersection with Round Valley Ranch Road, Paradises
ASSESSORIS PARCEL NUMBERS) 55-46-25
A�- 2 GEN. 'PLAN Ag -� Re s PROJECT CONSISTENT?
BONING _-
3 DATE APPLICATIO1� RECEIVED 4/10/84
Eng, I Lippincott -GU 7 OY oli, . u' x- l isc, CA _
DATE PUBLICATION NO'T'ICE WRITTEN PUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICE(S) PUBLIMD - 0, C. P. G. B.
t DATE MAILING, LIST PREPARED
DATE MAIL. -OUT NOTICES WRITTEN MA"IT 1) NUMBER
DATE PLANNING DI RECTOR + S R ,12ORT PREPAI4ED
ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - DATE PILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE � NEGATIVE DE( LARATrION - DATE ADOi 1T,D
.. MITIGATED NtGATI' DECT ARATION "-. 'DATE ADOPTED
lbNV IMPACT DEPORT! - DATI CBRI'Il"IED
SUB. COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISORY AGENCY HEARING DA'T'E_
ADVISORY AGENCY ACTION
HOARD ACTION
\ i
APPENDIX 14
<y .
NOTICE OF DETtRMINATION1 L E D
To. Secretary for Resources
❑ 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Jule 2661921ot
Sacramento, CA 95314
County ClerR, County of Butte ELEANOR M. BECKER, CouO/ Clerk 4
2S County Center Drive By _ rt;ACI' R pepu�
Oroville$ CA 95965
.FROM Planning Department
1 County Center Drive (Filed)
Oroville, CA 95965
SUBJECT! Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resour esnyCnode
Project Title
Cherie Sm zer Tentative Parcel Map AP 55-46-25
State Clearinghouse Number (If submitted to State Clearinghouse)
Contact Person: Telephone Number
John Adendonsa. Public Pdorks Departrient 9161 534-4681
Project Location! Southwest of Clark Road/Highway 191 on Round
Valle Ranch Roams, S of Parad' _(N- 1/4 of. Seca 34. T22N_. R3B
Project Description: Creation of three 5+ acre parcels for
homesites
This i,.s to aevise that the Butte county AdV1sor A encu
(Lead Agency
has made the following determinations regarding the above-described
project,
1. The project will have a significant effect on
the environment,
will not
2. An Environmental Impact Report Was prepared for this
ED project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, and was
certified as required by Soction 15085(g), 14 California
Administrative Code,
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provi,,ions of CEQA' A copy of the
Negative Declaration may be oxamined at the Planning
Department, 7 County Center Drive, Oroville; CA 95965:
5. A Notice of Exemption was filed indicating; this project
is exempt from environmental review,
4, A
statement tf Overriding Consideration M was, � was not,
adoptedEothis project,
s, Dlitigation measures adopted by the Leal Agency to seduce
the impacts of the approved project a .e:
None
r +
Sig ftury
Stephen _
,June 22, l5$4 ' '" � Senio°rnPlattne�.`eeter-- .
COUNTY OF BUTTE
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC l•IORKti CuttQ�a.
7 County CeriLor Dr Ne t'lunntny mf
R
Orov•ille� A 5g6'a
C
916-5.,Pi-�4Z66 fd t1964
916-5534-4339 Qrovtlle, �aG
farpl�
'une 13., 1984
Cherie Stnyzer RE: AP 55-46-25
P. 0. Box 159 Tentative Parcel Map
Paradise, CA 95969
Dear Ms. Smyzer
At the regular meeting of tine B!jtte County Advisory Agency held June la..,
1984, the Agency adopted the nogative declaration regarding env ronmenti%tl
review and approved the tentative parcel raap for AP 55�46--25
subject to the conditions as listed on the attached sheet.
It no appeals are timely filed—within ten (10) days of the date of the
Advisory Agoncy's approval-�-with the C1Crk of 4hr Board of supeevisors
this action wi•11 be final,
.w
nueQi1o�'naaa��ohel►c:d with, it will be oer
for lotoio Your filraap"ttF�{ittO CuLl ty 0,,patrentof
Public Works for eecorda ri on within t.7440 fo,ir ("4) months of the date
of approval by the Advisory Agency:
If you should have d►ly questions rog.3vd ng this r.itLer, please: contact
this office. e+
v.--,,y tvuly yours
Williapt Cheff
At"�'.x.ttT, I�.i.reoto>�
,j
�d �.7t� r•isr�Janfa�
F,` ,ot;�ni; f�i�•�+�tnr
.�i
OM/r , ,r
At`c ch.-r-0n t
c{., PiP;r►.►ung .. f~nvii^an��:7':t1 R,,ts;_+ ,
Eto,iror►m $ilk �.� ii z 14E1 twL'e3C':ii«
ppinu.tlt�i�/dLttl
e
LC, 1'11t; (• �.t�g�1
Cherie Smyzer, Tentative Parcel Mav, three parcels on the south side of
Stoney Brook Lane, approx. 1600 ft. vies'- of its intersectio: with Round
Valley Ranch Road. Paradise area.
AP number: 55-46-25
Ingineer: Bippi,ncott/Guth Associates
Public Works condition$ are:
1. Provide two-way traversable access RS-8-LD-1 to each parcel
from a county maintained road or state highway.
R. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
for dedication on the final map.
3. $how 50 rt. building setback line measured from centerline of
access easement,
4. Provide road maintenance agreement.
Indicate a 50 ft. building setbacks from the centerline of access
easement.
6. Show all easements Of record on the final map.
7. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Dept. of Public
Works prior to recordation of the final map.
$. provide cul-de-sac at ",he end or the street,
j. Obtain encroachment permit- and construct standard road approach
providing; adequate sight distance at the ifttersdction of Round Valley
Ranch Road and 01n10s Road.
10. Pay any delinquent t;axFs op current to'Xes as vaquired.
Health Depti conditions are:
11. Provide an area for wells and 100 fig* leftOltltield free setback
iround th000 areas on parceIG 1s P. and 3.
12. Dhoai a 50 ft. leachfield setback from the dtuinagc Vay orl ,parcel.
i9.
20
roposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistc)ric or
historic building, structure or object?
c, -Does the proposal have the potential to cause
a physical change which would affectunique
ethnic cultural values?
d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious
or sacred uses within the potential impact
area?
RECREATION. Will the proposal result ire an impact
Upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Wall t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destr1;,ction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological Site?,
U
W,.'11 the p
YES MAYBE NO
X
V', DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
lb, c: Some compaction, disruption and overcovering of the soil will
occur due to construction of three additional. residences. The site prepara
tion for building pads should involve limited grading on the ridge area.
It Some increases in $oil erosion may occur from the g-rading for drive-
ways and construction acti�rities due to steep slopes on portions of the
site, however, the terrain on each site is predominately, moderate -gentle,
Access to the proposed parcels already ehists, reducing grading requirements.
Erosion. potential is high in this area.
if, '3b, f t The drainage patterns will
llebe affected to a slight degree by this
b p• o the west branch of Clear Creek,
protect, Drainage is y
The watct quality of the creek could be affected Prom ail, phenols,
particulates and other substances associated with residential uses as well
as sediment production Prom ally increased erosion, The hater quality
effects are expected to be minimal from this prgject, considering the
fives -acro parcel size.
2a Increased dust generation on Roula 'Valley Ranch Road and. Stoney Brook
Lane wil1 occur from the traffic created,
Sh; 16c; Groundwater resources are unknowtl and may be limited in :his
area. Soil limitations will restrict onsite sewage disposal.
4a; Considerable vegetation removal could increase erosion,
41t, There could be a reduction of acreage available, for grating purposr:$
- ,
Some (11 the land Is suitable for grating various l.ivastock during the
spring and Sumpter
Sa; d: 'The poriect Will contribute to a loss of open foothill vi,ldlife
habitat and a reductiotl of the number of species on the sitt:, IIowevevy
this ridge is not considercd prime wildlife habitat,
'Thi,` main environmiIntal OPf Oct of this land fli.v'.si,rn is the extension
of residenti ll use into 6.11 `opoll, undcvelopod area g,,1d the associated
growth -inducing impacts
n `
YES
MAYBE NO
r 13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
l
a. Generata, ^ onal vehicle
• m""",��TT• ?
b. ffects on existing parking facilities, or
nd for new parking?
-c.tantial. impact on existing transportation r`
Systems?
X C,
d.ificant alterations to present patterns
irculation or movement of people and/or
s?
e.rations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Ition?
f. re in traffic hazards to motor vehicles
clists or pedestrians?
-
14.
PUSE VICES. Will. the proposal have an e ect
upr gu;Ct in a need for new or altered
gota. services:
A'pro ction?
C
b. Police pro ection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or otl r recreational facili les?�
e. Maintenance o public facilities including
roads?
services?
f. Other governmepT'Sj6\saI
15.
ENERGY. Will the °:esul ' in,
a. Use of substantial mounts f fuel or energy?
b, Substantial increase in der incl upon existing
sources of energy, o req re the development
of net ,--$", tG� of ene
16.
UTILITIE8. Will the props 1 result in a need"�or�r,�
new systems, or substanti 1 a terations to the
following.
a. or natural g
'Communications
�
b. n cations s ems?
ay
-C-
c, Water: -
�c
d. Sever or septi tank?
e. Storm water d inagoT
f, Solid waste nd disposal?
17,
HUMAN ;HEALTH, Will the proposal. resul in,
a. Creatio of any health haward or po nti.al.
lth iazard (excluding mental. heap �?
h/AtMMC8.
re of people to potential health
ds?
18.
Will the proposal result in the
of any scenic vista or view open t
or will the proposal result in the
f an aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
v4-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AP 55-46-25
A large lot zoning should be considered for this property and vicinity
to reflect the planned land use as recommended by the General Plan.
Consideration should be given to slopes, soil types and conditions, and
water availability in determining the appropriate zoning classification
(perhaps A-5 or FR -5).
13a: Traffic on Round Valley Ranch Road will. result, which currently has
minimal use.
13c: Round Valley Ranch Road will require some improvements to facilitate
access from Clark Road to the now parcels for vehicles of residents,
emergency vehicles, etc. 1
149- Fire protection in, this area is a concern. A water storage tank
may be n'-oded on the site to provide adequate fire protection..
16a, b: ',-(tility lines do not exist to the property and must be extended.
16e, Dninage Aqill be via natural systems. EToslin control measures
should be implemented along any disturbed drainage courses.
20: An archaeological survey was previously done (sac attached letter) and
clearancegranted.
Since the proposed parcels a-ro relatively large', have existing access, and
since the subsequent residential development is not expected to cause
substantial modification of the site or disrupt any known critical environ-
mental resources this project is not expoct2 to cause significant impact.
i
Rowevor, devolopm'ent in this is0latcd, outlying aTta, could. nitiate a
residential development and land use trend. in the area,
APPENDIX P - Page 6
I
Data Sheet continued,
b. GroLmd Water: Resource not identified (potentially iim tedl_-
c: Drainage Characteristics;
d. Annual Rainfall (normal) :
e. Limiting Factorst
5. Visual/Seenic Quality:___
5 Acoustic Quality: -
7 Air Quality
Biological Environment:
ant G,�r�,1, nn ,rii,{; sonic grassland
$. Vegetation: rh..T rr —�
areas and scattered trees Dense Manzanita and brush is abundant
9. Wildlif e Habitat r
Oultuval Environment
X10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in thearea: Stnsi jz zva,
Previous survey of si e waF--done, and clearance �vh� �;`^ri*
11. Butte Cotmty General Ilan designation: Agr10-tjti,r"11 12r�iAnnt`n� -
:,,h - ...-4- .,,ArI4, ro"Arnl Pt nn rnndit onal Development
12.
13.
14.
90,
....
,,_._ -----
isting nd s G11 -sitar 0 �Gn r Undeye
7� a nf1,; 7 1 .r; rlc*� 17nr� tnrr 11
s�
Surroutldin,g Area.:
a.. :Land Uses: Undeveipped and open �'razinfi lands A .few scattered
rural rrasidc nces and ranches near by Paradise airt�ort is one _
b. �Uningqut-Ti n. G
Gen Phan designa-t,iono l.— cuLtura t.=.lesidait-- l
d. ParcelFSiZeCx . CcIreclsl� lame (AO-��td acres to the south and
. ,O e ease and north
ew ul t n � e v owin �r s ty use
C�t a ae,t x of Site and .AV, -a: t�r7en 1artIv—ti
i-
oi l�araxse ry th hatnesl los tl,ouji tha.s
1e`arFpt Upba��airyAyreay:{••+��Py'%�a�, n ie 'Ts �'oivn limits or�e�haii m ile
Relevat IS 1jx''I W W u ��� �i\ �i :� L/ G n iJ uJ�—
Improvements Standards U:obmi Area:
Fire Protection Service:
root oun�t� ('t to v e S ani o l�utto Count r�ixo TJe arta
�'rov noal'iva outside axh.ci se '
b. Waten Av' ----, li y7 Truck ctgM c3 ty iaells
schools in Area,:
Appendix V (b)
t
Applicant:_ Cherie SmvzL
A ssor's Parcel. # 55-46-25.
kjm�iL;tT1ET ERD Log # 84-04-10-02
1. Type of Project: Tentative Marcel Man
2. Brief Descrap :ion Srezt on of three 5+ acre t1a.S'cels for homesi,tes
3. Location: _.Southwest of Clark Road/14i&h1vay l01 on Round Valley Ranch
Road., south of j'pr r cF+ fN1� 1.%4 oi` S rt 1 r 22-N- R 1E) ---
4. Proposed Densit;Y of Development: One residence nor iye acres
5. Amount: of ImpOrvious Surfacing: ---
b. A -cress and Nearest Public Road(s) to pronosed _parcels
.., nhii"el Vn7 i by Rauch Road and Stoney, i3rook Lane (d 2000 foot_ access
7. NFe'I; o oY'&age Disposal on-site 5en`tic leach fields
8. Source of Water Supply:
g Proximity of Power Lines: To divisions o
10. Potential for further land d' ` and development: Limi ations
D.nvix�bal t7t°�g allows numerous smaller parcels
Physical. Environment,. - -
1 Terrain
a. General: 'Topgraphic Cllara.cter: Terraizi; variably.. Western Pollion.
is gentle to modisrate rolling ridgeland terrain (portion of White
Snr I ;e
b. 3. e s
c Eler Ston; 122.5-1400 feat -.
d Limitil.1tq Fa(,,tors:_ . Some areas of steep slopes ._ .
Soils
a. TA)en and Chart:c:•t,ex* sticr:: Toomes-Pentz Soil Association Scabland
and Rou h Bronken-Stone Lands eons 1 g4- "I gof_ shallo�v to _ er- shy low
cla)r soils on tacdrock. 5C5. Class -VII
�
� rosion .sIto cnt
nal�irk�soi]
b. Lim.�..t,iri. ic��s.i�Shallo�v soils : �,_,�_
depth to-stOd, 1=5 feet Rerierally �4 Cc L
Natural Hazard.n of the Land
b. • Erosion Zone:
high d. 1!"1:00 Huvard; 113 h
y
0. `C,and Aide POtcutial.;, Moderate e. EXI)a-as're 00" Potential.`
4. 11)rdrol OgY
a. Surfac,€ Wa ;c r; Intermittent tril�rt �r'f' s �; ,..ol. a hrapeh of
clear Crook, 'approximately x'00 feet oast of site
Appendix I" (a)
District L Clearirigliouse
October 14, 1978
t -;r. Earl No. -I son, Director'
�nvironmintal Review Department
=7 County Center:- "rive
Crovill.e, Cts 95965
On liursday, October 12, 1.978 1 conducted an archaeological
reconnaissance of 160 acres of land located along Pound
'."aI ey Ranch Road approximately west of Clark Road, south
of the tom o;e !�aradise. The property is owned by Robert
A Braiin - Alar 55~25-23 and is scheduled to be subdivided
into four parcels. The property is the M�-of Section 34,
22- 0, , 1Z. 3 E, , Cherokee Quad. , '7.5' series.
he property is characterized by a relatively flat ari e al.ong
the westem half of ';he property cov'erod with oaks, pine and
shrubs. rClYe ea tern hall" of the property slopes do% -m into
me hest branch of Clear Creek, a stall seasonal, drainage.
lvrior to my recorna.isya:ice l consulted the archacologica�_ site
record files mai..na;cinod at California Mate Unci- {er ity, Ohic�.�
' to (letermine at any k-notvn archaooJ_ogical altos yore Iocatod
vi tt?in the aroa of the property. Pio sates wore previously
recorded.
reconnaissance of the property was complete in that all
areas that coiald roasonably be expocted to contain toatorlials
o arcllacological or l istorical: value wore inspected by myself
a.id another arche.eologist. Sn the eastern portion of Parcel. 1
t �t?v cal bedrock ort ars of the typo utilized by the .Native
AAmerimn inhabitants of the erea ware discovered. Those mortars
%',ere recorded otd moasured in the fields The Measurements and
data recorded in the field arc wifficient to mita.,ate any
"..pact the subdivision tray have ujl,�,n them. No other archaeological
or historical sites were observed w, the property :and A.; is
r coram+.ndcd that archaeological clearance be given to the
propc�ri;y
U:.nrare.7.y;: �rours,
gra oS 1� Mamning
'.strict 1�rcl`.x��,y, 4„ sv
�Wtftmcolal pta�w ooph
rK1 (916) 40"197.
Inter-Departmbntal'Memorandum
TO: Butte County Advisory Agency
FROM: Planning Director
SUbJtCTa Report on Tentative Parcel Map of Cherie Smyzer on
AP 55..46-25
DATE; May 30, 1584
This is a •proposal to divide 15.61 acres to create
three
-parcels, 5.613 acres, 5.005 acres, and 5,001 acres.
The
present zoning is A-2 (General.) . The Land Use flan
Map of
the Butte County General Plan designates this area:
as
Agricultural -Residential. There are no specific or
community
plans for the area.
The proposal does not confli.c°t with County zoning nor
any
adopted or proposed element of the Butte County general
flan
nDr any County, specific or community plan
Recommend :approval
1JTtf11�t
CC, Cherio Smyzer
Lippincott -Guth
d