The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About055-460-028zip � e� ..K.�, ., '�u .;_� - � � � �� r � , 1 � , • , r • e � � t ., �4� � . e ,, � ... r i ' � • _ � � . � a� �� .. O � ° qq 1 n4 n , � � p - r � � � � � � P � � � • / O 1. -. _ �%1t � ^ � ! � .. � � .'. �. ,.y � ,'. Jl .��/� � ' e � � '� w ' , / ,t . , i� > �• ' A e. ' �j: u • � �' X04 r , �� •s • ' :�"'. r�ry v ` r. , .. � � � ,� `, t � ,O 1 � �� . ,, �^ � � ' - • r� � y ^ + �ti�i��i � � ' i � _ ►' , e � �� *.� BUTTE ,COU14'17 GENERAL PLAN CONFORMA14CE REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP OR SIMDI VISI.QN IMP Items, 1-4 to be completed, by applicant: 1. Applicant Name 2. Project Description', 3., Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 4. P-roposed Use The following items Are ;to be completed by the Planning Department: Current zoning 2" ?rind Conservation Agrect-neut V-42 General Plan Des ignat.iou Ac- RAr Anplicable ConditionallCkiteria: Not Applicable Agricultural -'Residential YES I. Agricultural Compatibility 2.., 14ater & Sewer Capacity 3. Adequate Fite Vatilities 4. Road Capacity & Maintenance X 5. Access to Commercial & Sdbools orchard & Field Crops 1. PtedominAnt 5"10 Ad. Parcel Site 2. VicinitS of Urban Boundadles 3. Agric. viability not impaired Staff Dtterminationt; Project does does not substantially conform to the Ceneral Plan. Comment.q,. Staff Signature, bate f.yAz6, AS THE APPLICANT FOR THr, REQUESVb JAND DJVISTON, I AM AWARt. OF ABOVE STAFF DtTEIIINITNAITON REGARDING TRE CbMAHOCE 14TH THE MMERAt Pr i. 1)ateC4 gighdturo of Applitairf _44 A6- To Butte County Advisory Agency FRoMI Planning Director' susilmT" ;Report on Tentative= Parcel Map for George Cabarrus on AP#.55--46--'28 0ATC February .17, 1987 This is a proposal to divide 13+ acres to create 2 parcels. The present zoning is "U" (Unclassified) The Land'Use - Plan Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural-,Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the ax-ea. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted or proposed element of the Butte. County General. Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recokumeha approval. DRi:j nc cc: George Cabarrus Sierra West Surveying .: i µr. NOTICE SOF DiLTERMWAMON a MAR 191985 Y T( office of Planning and Research FROM -. Planning Department 1400 Tenth Strut, Room 121 1 Coufy Sacramento, CA 95814 Orovi� a.... or sWIV" epllly County Clerk County of Butte S'U&'WCi ' Filing of Notice of Determination 'in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152, of the Public Notice, Code, 84-12-07-02 Project Title Tentative Parcel Map AP 55-46-v28 George Ca6arrus tate ?N��Inghoilse Number Contact Person Tele one Num r (if submitted to Clearinghouse) John Mendonsa, Public tlorks (916) 534-4266 ject Location On the west side of the intersection of Round Valley Ranch Roan and Rainbow Ranch Road, Paradise. 11560,fit I?iscr106cr. Teotati"ae Parcel Map dividing 13 acres into two parccia, one of 4.15 acres and one of, 8+ acres This is to advise that the Butte County AdvisoryA enc e►gency or ReSponsible Agency has approved the above described project and has crude the following determinations regarding the above described projects L itsr project, `wi110 . will not, have ;a signiflcaot effect on the environment. An Environmental impact Report was prepared for V-6 project pursuant to the provisions of 'CEQA. A Negative Declaration was pmwad for this project pursuant to the provislomi of CEQA. The EIR #.V Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined ats Butte.'County Planang'_ Croyi.11e, _CA 95965 �), Count Celt a ._e, 3. Mitigation measures ,.vete, : tare not, made a condition of the approval of the prof :acct. was not adopted for 4. A 'statement of Overriding CArsiderations was, __ { this project.7-1 ,v Date Received for Filing 311%. 8�.�.. SI re Stehen. A. Streeter „kI antler. . Title �4p!'J L" Rev 3a�nUar1+ 1085 s�I TO Butte County Advisory Agency FROM'. Planning Director SUBaECT4. Report can Tentative Parcel Map Vin► George BabarrUs on AP 55-46-28 DATE. February 20, IgBS' This is a proposal to ai vi de il, acres into two par"cels, one of 4.75 acres and one of 8+ acresw The present zoning is A-2 (Oeneral) . The Land Use Plan Map cif the Butte :County General Flan designates<thi s area as Agricultural-Residential. There al-e na specific or communitY plans +or the area. The proposal does not conflict with Col,tnty zoning nor any ado'ptO.d Or proposed y element of the Butte County Ge neral Flan nor any C"ounty, sped neral i. c or community plana Recommend approval. DRW 1 kt c Ge► rge cabar SAS si gra West Surveying APPN IXH C,OONTY OP BUTTE (To be CHECKLIST F,.0 •i UNVI RONI omplete y I,eacl Agency p 1,0 # 84-11-07-02 I BACKGROUND AIS It 55-46-28 I. Name of proponent George Cabarrus 4 2, Address of proponent and representative (i!' applicable) 15204 North.Lake Road Sierra TJesb EnQ, Magalia, CA 95954 547 B ac _ 7 ._ O ve Drive .�. Pakadis,c CA 95969 3. Project description Tentative Parcel Map TJ, MANDATORY FTNDINGS OF STGN7FTCANCE PS MAYBt NO a. floes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the envirmiment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish Or wildlife species, cause a: .fish or Wildlife population to drop belowself- sustaining Levels, threaren to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rWro or endangered plant or animal or eliminate ,important examples of the major periods of California h ,star), or prehistorvY bi 170e�a the project have the potential to achieve sho, t;-torm benefits to the detriment of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on tine environment is ono Which occurs in a relati.vel.y brief period of time 14hile long-term impacts lvil'p cndun into the future.)' C, 1pos 'Le project have impacts which are individu- ally 1-imi.tted, but cumulatively consi.deroble7 fA project May impact on two or Mot, e s0parate resources whero the ".iiipact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on t'ho environment is sigili-ricant.) d> Barrs the project have environmental ofrects which Will cause s,tbstantial adverse effects on i llmnn beitegs, either divectly or indirectly? 1 I p . pl 'fCl i`tI'NA,T1 IN (To be Comnlet ed by the Lead Agrnc.y ) On tine brigs Or this initial evaluation-, I/IVU ,find the proptosed '}sro,j�ect COULD NOT have a sig;nil'ic,tnt effect Oil the Onvironiitent, and a NHGATM. MIC1.APATTON will be r-, epared, i%1V1I flPl t that although the proposed project could hav'.° a sig;nifi cant efiec,t on the environment, there will riot be a signiCiegnt errect in this case because the MTTTC3ATTON N1 A5UiiCS 10scribod on thr nttac-bed shr.ot have been idled to the Project. A NPOATTV11 DECLAUTCON will be prepared, UIVH find the proposcd project MAY have a si.g;n ti,cant offect c>n the environtittnt, and an i.NVIRONWsNTAL IMPACT RI POR`r is required, DATE; January, ,22i 1985 C:tl' or, BUTT;', PLANNING i1Hl?Ait'rDli?N`t ..� ._y.� David R, lif Coni out Associate yl.annet Ite+�ienvecl by CTS IV ENVIRONMENTAL xp. anations of a l "yes« and "maybe" answers are .' equired on attached sheets YES MAYBE NO 1.. EARTH. proposal in sa:gnifcan�G' a—"unstable earthr�condi,t•x�esult ian es in or in changes g geologic substruct.uresons b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or >e c- overcoverin;g of the soil? c Change in topography or ground surface . relief features? d. Destruction, covering or modification cf any or features? unique geologic physical ..' e. Increase in +rind or i+r,ster erosion of soils,, ?CC either on or Off-site? f. Changes in depositionor erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may ;nodify the channbl of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or g • any bay, inlet or lake? Loss of s�ti:l s outside= desgnarime tedcurbanaareasorlucti+te h. Exposure of people or propertr� to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, Mud- YC slides, ground failure or similar hazards? - 2 AIR. Will the proposal result in substantial: i Aix` emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors, smoke or fumes? c. Alteratioil of air- movement, Moisture, or temperature„ or any change in climate, locally or regionally? �. 3. NATER. Will the proposal result in substantial a. Changes in currents,` or the course or direction of water movements in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, Or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Need for off-site surface drainage improve- ments, including vegetation removal, channel- ization or culvert installation? d. Alterations to the course or flo1v of flood waters? e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body'? f; Discharge .into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved o zygen or turbidity? �G g, alteration of the direction or rate of flow of grouad waters? h. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions of with- drawals,. or through interception of an, aquifer by cats or eXcavatiotis? ;i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? .. Exposure of people or property to water related ha aYds such as flooding? ...� JI YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT 'LaFE, Will the proposal rosu_'t in substantial: a: C-. nge, in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction. of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants:' c. Introduction of new species of plants into an n?the normal replenish ofrexistinbrspecierier meaitarea, , d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 5 . .ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in ti4b'stantial s' a. Change in the diversity of species, or r1vmbers 'of any species of animals (birds, land uniti►als including reptiles, fish and shell fish,; benthi.c organisms or insects)? jC c.-. b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, 'Tare or endangered species of animals? C. Introduction of now species of animals into an area, or result in a barri»er to the migration or movement of animals? d., Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? G. NOISE. 14111 the proposal result in substaintial a. ]Increases in existing noise levels? X b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels;? , 7. LIGHT AND GLARE, Will the proposal produce signa IcYnt light and glare? ( 8 LAND ill the ppad result in a " st�antiali�al teraltion o f suthe present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATuR.AL RESOURCES: Will the proposal re ,u,, in su staRtial: a. Increasel in the rate of use of any natural resources'? b. Depletion of any non-renewable ha ural: -- ' resources' 10. RISK O1; UPSVT. Wi.11 the proposal involve i. A rzsl; of explosion or the release of hazard- ous substances (including, but'not limited to oil, pestic:�i.des , chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 1.1. POPULATION, Will the proposal alter the location, density, a rib ti r growth rate of the human ptributx.on, �xo � 14. HOUSIC`M Will the proposal affect existing housing, , or create a demand; for additional housing? r' YES MAYBE NO 13. TRAN51-ORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in; a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ci Substantial impact on existing transportation systems? K` d. Significant alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or oods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffi;- hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians; 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an etfect upon; or result in a need for new or altered governmental set'rices a.. Eire protection? b. Police protection? ,.._ _. XC - c School -s d. ' Parks or other recreational fazilit es? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? �C f. Other governmental services? 5a 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal, result in: a. use of substantias amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand, upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? yC' 16. UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following: a. Power or natural gas? b.. Communications systems? c. Water: X d. Seder or septic tank? e. 'Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal,? 17. the a4 C e tioH of��any healill a. th�hatard ortpotent �' health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Etrd of people to potential health aard_.. ' AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obMucton of any scenic vista or vier open to the public, or will, the proposal, result in the creation of an aestheticalI offensive site open y to public view? -4 YES IlAyat NO 19,. RECREATION. 1Vi11 the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities?, 20, CULTURAL RESOURCES,,; a. Will the proposal result in the alteration, of or, the. destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Will the proposal 40sult in adverse Phys;ral or aesthetic effects to e prehistoric or historic budding, structure or object'? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause A change phly'sical which would affect unique ethnic cultural values'? d,. will the proposal restrict existing religious or ,;sacred uses- within the potential impact area?. V. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EV.ALI7ATTON AP 55-46-28 See attachment: AM DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL. -EVALQATIQN AP 55-46-28, Ibla: Some c' action, disruption, and overcovering of the soil will occur- due to construction. of additional residences. The site preparation for building. pads should involve limited grading an the sites. le: Some increases in soil erosion may occur from the grading for driveways and construction activities due to steep slopes on portions of the site. However, the terrain on each site is predominantly moderate to gentle. Access to the proposed parcels already exists, reducing grading, requieements.. Erosion potential is high in this area. if;ZbIf- The drainage patterns will be affected to a slight degree by this prcd-ect- Drainage its readily alvAildble since the West Branch of Clear Creek is locattli just- to the east of the site. 'The Water quality of the creek could be affected by oil, phenols, particulates and other substances associated with residential uses as Well a sediment produced from any increased erosion. The water quality effects are expected to be minimal from this project consi4t�?ring the 5 acre plus parcel sizes. 1h: All of Butte County is within a Moderate Earthquake Intensity Zone V1114 The subject propp-rty it I &ated approximately *3 miles northeast of the Tuscan Mandcline4 a portion of the Foothill Shear Zone,, in an area of inferred faults. Construction of remidences, to Uniform Building Code standards 4or seismically active areas should provide adequate protection for residerce in case of seismic activity. '2a: Increased dust generation an Round Valley Road will occur from the traffic general ed by this project. 3ht drouftdwater rozources are unknown and may be limited in this area. Soil limitations Will restrict on-site sewage disposal: 4a: Considerable vegetation removal Could increase erosion. pd: There could be a reduction of acreage available for grazing urPotses, Some Of the land is suitable for- grazing various livestock during the spring and summeTM-. Sald: This project Will, CbhtribUte to a loss of open foothill wildlife habitat and a reduction of the number of species on the site. Howevee-, this t-idgo it not considered prime wildlife habitat and other Similar development in the af-ba has considerably reduced the value as wildlife habitat, Appendix V - Page 6 AP 55028 a 1 The main QMvironmental and increase in intensity of reeffeffect o this P aject i the e � c:ensian sideh'tial use intrr Open, generally undeveloped area4 and the associated growth inducing impact, A large lot honing should be consider ed for this property and vicinity to reflect tiro— planned land use as recommended by the General Flan. Consid,--ration should be given to slopcsy sonI types and water availability in determinin the appropriate and manditions, �3 ppropriate Zoning class,�icatiort (perhaps q-5 or �'R-5.) w R«Uhd Valle. Ran -h Road will experience an increase in traffic as a result of this project. i3c: Round Valley Ranch Road will requ%re same improvements to facilitate access •Pram Clark Road to the new parcels •for vehicles of residentsq, emergency vehicles, etc. 14; Though not significant this r prta j et:t wi l l represent an i ncromental increase in demand far public services in a rural area. The pro.jecL site is in an are,- a+ high archaeological archaE!alorical. survey Vias been se sensitivity., An per formed as part o a Previous project > and clearance was granted. Appendix F - Page 7 SON=V'. Hpplicantz George Cabarrus Assessor's Parcel. # 55-46--28 Log # 84-12-07-02 A, Piaget Dscrietion 1 Type of Proj ect a Tentative Parcel Map 2-. 8rief Descripti n: Dividing i' acres into two parcels, one a+ 4.75 acres and one of 8+ acres ; G. Location: on the west side of the intersection of Round Valley Ranch Road and Rainbow Ranch Road) Paradise. 4. Proposed Density of Development: 6.5 acres per dwelling unit 5. Amount of Impervinus Surfacing. Minimal 0. Ranch d Access and Nearest Public Road(s)-. : Access is via Round Valley (private) appr-o,s a. motel y i mile southwest of its intersection with Clark Toad (State H.lnhway 191). 7. Method o+ Sewage S Source of Water Supply; Individualalt Individualptxc systems elly 9 Pro;rimity of Power Lines: To property 10. Potential for further land division's and development Limited clue to soil conditions and topography S . „nvz _ronm�n'�al Sett t'tg I�Hysi cal.,,,,Env_i rcarrment I. Terrain a. General. Topographic rj' racter; Variable. Western portion 's gentle to moderate rolling ridgeland terrain (portion of White Spring Ridge) Steeper slopes gccur along the drag on the eastern portion of the property 410rg Round Valley R4ncN Road Well defined canyons to the south b. 81opes Senerally 5 to 1U"l. slopes, :307.4- in the ravine L: El evat fl'3n:r 1240 feet tofeet ASL Rand d. Romxti.awc� Factors: Steeper slopes along Round Valley Ranch . 2 Soils a. Type($ and Sharactoristice; Toomey-Pentz Soil Association (scabland and rough* broken, stone} lands) consisting of sha . 'oar tc) very shallow clay soils on bedrock:; b. Limiting ractors; Shallow soils, erosion susceptibility, rock. Appendix F (a) ,1 3 Natural Hazards of the Land a. Earthquake done, F_ q Moderate arthquai a Intensity Z mne VIll b. Erosion Potential: High a. Landslide tPtitential: Moderate d,. Fine Hazar=d High UkA Expansive Soil Potential`: Low 4 Hydrology a. Surface Water: Intermittent tributary creek of West branch cif Clear Crec4t is located just east of the subject property. b, limited)Water: Resource not identified (potentially C. Drainage Characteri sti c:i Parcel drains to the south and east to the West Branch of Clear Creek. d. Annual 1Rainfall (normal) 35 to 40 inches per ,year e* Limiting Factors. Potentially limited water' supplies 5. Visual/Scenic Gualit High 6. Acoustic Quality,. High 7. Air Quality: High Etxo� og cad _Erty rohment_ a. Vegetation Chaparral and scrub oak, primarily, With some grass lana areas and scattered trees. Dense manxanita and brush is abundant. 9. Wildlife Habitat: East Tehama Deer Herd winter range. Cultural Environ��c�t, 10. Arch aeolo0ical and Historical Resources in the area, Archaeelogzcally sensitive area* Previous survey of site has boon completed and clearance granted. 1Butte County General Paan designation: Agricultural -Resi denti ai 12. EXisting Zonings A-2 1Z. Existing Land Use on-si to; Open _tndevel aped foothill ridgeland 1.4. Ctirroundi.ng Area. a. Land Uses; Undeveloped and ►aper: grating land* A few scattered rural residences and ranches to the northeast near ClArk Road. Paradise Airport approximately l mile southk b. Zrrningt A- o. Cert. Flan designations: Agricultural-Residontial d. Par=cel Cites: Generally 5 •t;.o iQ acre parcels. e. Populatidht Very low intensity of use AP 55-46- 15. Maracter of Site and Area: Open, largely undeveloped ridge Land south of Paradise With homesites and small ranches to east near 'Clark Road 16. Nearest Urban Area. Paradise town limits approximately 1/2 mile, though this locality is well removed from central Paradise (2 1/2 to 3+- tniles) 17. Relevant Spheres of Influence-, Paradise IS. Improvements Standards Urban urea: No 19 . Fire Protection Service. a Nearest County (State) 'Fire Station: Butte County Fire Department - Oroville or Magalia (outside Paradise FPM b. Water Arrailabili,y;. Truck capacity,, wells 20. I i Schools in Area% Paradise Unified School. District, Ap, - .fix V (c) r • STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE RESOURCES AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, :Governor, DEPARTMENT OF FICIH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROADO SUITE A RANCHO CORJOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355="7030 ,1 January 9, 1985, tit. Dave Hi ronimus Butte County ,Planning Depar°tment. 7 County Center Drive orovill.e CA 95965 Dear Mr. Hironimus The Department z;f Fish sand Gare has reviewed the Tentative Parcel (TPM) for' George Caba is (AP 55-46-28) , a proposal 4.75 to divide 13.63 nacres of 1.ar,j into two parcels of and 8488 acres each. "",e s' to is located southeast of Butte Community College: The ��artment has no objections or environmental co,r.u�.:ns rogar the* subject TPM. if the Department, can be Of assistance, please con- tact Jerry Mc-isch, Bnv'irc nmt .,rvices Supervisor, tele- phone (91.6) 355-1030• S1.ncerely, Paul Ti Jensen Regional Manager