HomeMy WebLinkAbout056-020-084JN CMS
�
r
1"
JN CMS
..a
77
NS SUl�
, r�RxxE zsx NS
LANA iF�c �- .,
SHEET FOR LAND DxV,' .�
C Craig Acr
et Log489=07-t1.4- 02 �
SS 153 Prroderick St, Santa Cruz, CA 95062.
i
Jack Wallace, 8500 Cohasset Rd., Cbhasset, CA
pr CT pESORIPTIOi'f Tentative Parcel Map to divide 9.98 acres to create
2 parcels - one of 2 acres and one of 7.98 acres
.iC A'IIOtT on the southeast side of Cohasset Rd. , amLox. 1.4Q0' ,,aouth Dst
of Limpach Road, Cohasset area.
Sa�ssOAlS PARCEL'N[5Mi3ER(S) 56-02-89 .
U -t r%-7, GENERAL PDA 7Agri-_Kesi —PROCO24SISTENT7
PLAN 'CONPORf ANCE REPORT' J'._ne � ,_. 1989
C1ATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE
y
CONS;ERtlATION ACT CONTRACTS? �..
July 14 ,1989
DA ,z APPLICATION ztECE1'VED_- -
.5SUT/8UAVEYOR/CIVlL ENGINEER:
C.W. Bachman
3012 Esplanade, Chico, CA 9592E
PLANNING, DIRECTOR'S REPORT PRuFARED -
Y ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGC)�tICAL EXVYPTSON DATE FILED
C • LLRtirNATI:ON,
Rrl0 DATE � . NEGATIVE DECLARATION-- DATE ADOPTED . %i • �t'��
MITICATED MEG 4 DECLARATION - DATE ADOPTED,- �
ENV � TiRPACT REPORT - DATE C✓ RTIF LED
SITATE CLGAI�nlmlous } NOL «_�._._ -�•
.r:
. _:... _...r�.y..,,..:a..a.
ApV sO AdtNry E na.�NG DATE /r �,� _-
r
AC5'JISORSC AGENCY
APPEAL HEARING DATE
WNW
C-iJNdEt4TS }"OK �`Lx`tN IIJti �1Z j,EGTi i r S PEP�ORT,
iw+
.IA 141989
TTZ'O'.TT`J: PsU?13Yx:x.3[J xk a" 1'IYL" CEL t,iAP r Cnlifa
llo rniq
�t avy
PiuFX1 1,M ARY �U'I3UIJI aI. iT W 4,
' � ` � �� � � t�,', ,halt AP:'G`.LCA.TZOPi
l » chock JJ
� P�+ �uc .ck: <a`Ia1�t•��Z�r:.tjk� bo;j
,APPLICANT Craic{ Acrel MONE NO: 4o8-A2§-A729
DRE3S; 153 Frederick Street, clani,a Crnz�, CA 95062
I NO:
' ��iT * M1�. h , J T�'7 ] ace „,-y .r_.�.� PHONE
ADDRESS: 8500 CohAg Rad, .uh�Sss,7�Sa�.
t '
ETj(j,jMER OR UR'Wi0F' ^ . T^I BACBMA1'T, - -- ' ._ PiiONE NO: 34o.)-4136- '
,m`mss 3012 E..,j-'anade, Chico. CA '; 926
F
1AIL XOTTCP, OP NliARViG TO: Apblicant !L E ,cT neer and ow�.e_r
•
w
i
LOCATION OF FliOPER'Fl,• TOVINSHI P. 2. 23' -X Ram,, 2 E 51;CTION 4
ASSE`SSOR'S PARCEL NLRTt 56-02--0 -4,_ TOTAL ACREAGN �� 98 acres
?TZ ASE SUBMIT PPYLV4jjtARy TITLE MPORT 0A RECENT 'POLICY OFT TIE INSURANCE,_ .
(clat'ed within hist si-x mcnth3) Wit,, APPL --ATION. INDICATE B WW THE DATE
AND RRCORDIFIG INFOR1•fATION BY WIUCH TH124 100TICULrAR PARCEL WAS CREATED,•
DATE ., May 30i'1986 ROOK ; _ 101 PAGE 50
gjj1 jBER AND SIZE OF PARCELS; BE7NG CRFEA"JET' (inclUding ;ti* remainder): r,
2_paraels -- 1 of 2 acres a'nu the fatherr�� 7:98 .
DISTANCE TO 'iATUVAL WATER COURSE OR :s'rojtA MAIN:
II{OP{ stD 14ET1i01) OF S8WAOE DISP0,14At:, .�.�7ncliyiidual.se_ptic --
(,Check v ith Health Department)
PROPOSED SOURCEOF WA's':, xnd •lj, ;� ws ".s_.._____-'-------
(Check with Health bepertiaent
DO MIEFt AND PHONE LI TE i -EXII T TO '17iE, t'OUNIUIR'f Or TOE ORIGIML PARCEL4 . q&
IF NOT$ 8sTIMATE THE PIS2'A-Wt, 1I10fY WMi HAVE TO BE EX!I'ENbEb:
w
LT)
rage y
,Tf. of I`xGr"JO',ST PLTI$LTC M.!All: Cobasset Road
, ` �IdCE TO NF;AiiGF"J: I' BUtC Rw)l G, ad,Za int
(Fol in.cor=t on on n,+�arest palbliy check with PUbl:ic works Departme.gt)
IF AC(,"t:i.)I IS BY M-OCRIPrIVE liYiati'I'-►)F"-;SAY, A"."Mit DOCUMENTATIOTT TO 1'HIS
. ApPI�C.4TSUN
IF ACCESS TS BY A Rf,'CUMZ PftlWfE R00 F!'U -1EN I', INDICP.IVE DEED REY
/rt GE
IF `THERE ARE AIIY NO ACCESS STRIPS, THESE Idt 42..' LE SHOMI ON T'AE TENTATIVE `+r1P
1.11D THE PXCORDING DATA INDICAIED B, FLOW `
r
VODJmE FACE
l Dl OTAIICE TO CIV LIMI`IO 11 /A
HAS 1'i{C '0' NER OF THIS PARCEL ULATLD ANY MCCLS
L+T;,,, 1,41140 THTE PROFS}t1 ? n
1
aatMMII'I7R tF APPLIMIT
7CGRIA 'URI' O dWnT EI2 OF RECORD
TOR OFA _ USt ONLY _
To uubdivisioll Couj9 btery,.
To A.Avilox� PolencY -
J,utt Take Action Dy.
Appeal. to Doaxcl OP EuperviSOrAt
E.tpiratjoh date; -
f_.
commentPOO
Ph.54.
(J+ r_k:w'rr�trn5 Iecd�v�d: c?.,ry
Heecipt N b
Butte ,Ounty planning Dept. FC. Fri ICE USE ONLY;
7 County Center Drive Receipt (/
orovillei CA 95965-397
(916) 534-4601 AppXlcant
R AP
Sgbclivision Name
izf applicable)
1
APPL'NDI.Y E acme w
O'
Date Filed plsntfn
LAND .;DIVISION. APPLICATIOtJS JUL 14 -j989
Su Gler:ental Itifat..rnat on far Plana D
in �rovillo, C:a1#ornk
eoant
1• List and describe; any other related p'armxt
'e�t s and other public a
J , including those require b PProvals
required far this pro
state and federail agenciest _ Y cit
N A
Y, regional
•,
2• Proposed schedulin
g%associated projects;
3, Anticipated incremental develo• ent
(phasing
future development plans): r subdivision units,
Hi What
method Will be utilized to accommodate surface dtain
hoa e? D
W on-site and doWnstream drai
nage channels wi11 ted+ esciribe
be affoc
existing draiia a `------
9' at'��rns to r.Emairi;
5+ Proximity of water for fire fighting purposes (hydrants,
California be artmernt of Foresr is 2-1 . P
nds;
Of the site. o
--- —. , rdiles Northeast
6« Will excavaf;,.ion or gradin' be
g recpssarq? Cubic Yards (estimate):
1 i1'
Directions roe travel to Property (rural and mountay,.<
Ab, 1 -1, 2 miles. S nous areas only)
outhivest of the Greet'lwood 5toxe ,%n Cnha s set
--
� s,
r
S. ENVIRQNMENV1 IMPACTS AND Y• ITIGATIOy MEASURES
' envronme;'
Identify potentially sig►rificanlt;a). impacts associated with
the land division. 14hat. projects (le,-Jgn features or special conditions
of approval (miG18 on mcnsisrF,None are, proposed to alleviate potential
ano
environmental impacts. on
91 EMIIRON1iEN'CAL SETTING''
a) Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topct;zaphy, soil stability, plants
and animals, and arty cultural, historical of s,enic aspects.
Describe any e.:ist y' ing structures on t1te site, and the use of
the structures.: Existing siting homestes with cingle family ,
residences' and outbuildings, land is cel tired by foothill
b) gt3'cpsa'c48urgs.�rteq,CtLqutt"r��nPt�m��eortrq�r
plants and animals and any cultural, historical cwt scenic ,aspects.
Indicate the type of land use (residential, r,oinmercial, etc6�,
inteti:ity" of land use (o►te-family, apartment houses, shops, depart
Brent scot,;!s, etc.), and scale of development (height,frontage,
setback, reap; yard, etc.) ,. .11 ',stirrounding property is developed as
single family residences of various 8izez. Typical songblr"ds and
animals for the foothill area are present. Mixed conifer :and
Oak vegetation with bush and grass.
CEEtTIFICPTT ,I ''hereby, trtifv that the fitatemants furnished above and in
the attached exhihits pt'es nt the'data and inforntat,�on required for this
initial evaluation to the best of my a,l,tility, and that the facts, statements
and information presented are true
roreert: to the best of my knowledge
and belief,
�-a t wee
For _—
�tlse sopara'te sheep, for longer respoer _;es,
4/85
,
W, f zf � l rr 1+; c ,c)11 N'f•v_ rpp qq
2:]•:R71fJ C`C)Ni0( IM'NIANc Ij�l'f+:1_'C1}•:'1 KJL 6.. ! f�rR,1tp
}•^C7 t }'Ar�<;1 'T. NI/\]' t)1:: �i.111Itf V /.+ 1 C)tV MI+.F' .t �
—'�oti't�.or �f�s�fnrtir
x rP
inl1IrYLecl by ay^ lica►re` �.� J���c 1 ''�`
I +'ytil ft b IGAKfto tNAt4f, AND ADDYESS;
F � ;�as1 t6 `l , � J! (A -7,k. C Y ( � CJS rl
_...
r'p0Jl••-,T DESCRIPTION' iriV-u it:�n
7+s AOSE:;S'ON' 5 PARCEL NUHBE'�:W t �7 3
. �
"r. Tri �1PgSrIi USE:11» (�ri,�"Y1n t •� n _ IL.a l t•ti �G
"J t
;* rotlouirig items are to Ee completed by the Planning Department
LAND CONMVA'TION AGREr Orr:
4'LAN DESIGNATION: �.?�1_�. �; " ,.D ai rt ��,i'ti,,J
-reliti^n�nr. <,i'te no YES
critMria: YE5 NO
n
� lt iig t you perform
L, !In A the checked
items:
AR(IIAFOLOGICAL RECOP,DS CHECK
3, ,1' Yi 7,f r : x th t t 1 p_ S 1 t BOTANICAL SURVEY
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
r�
Er. YES NO
x,Na7rrir I)(�.Eiar+m r7a/�_ � C r 4r ' ;740 �....
)F FISH
n a 4.t /r. t , rtr_1✓ic r?v1 yr WI" IIIN DEPARTMENT I7: ZONE. .�
E o emery ' c, Due KkIc(.ts:hrfJrt� rttln'
^ AN GAME hEVELOPtM'
Ip. :ti+ r J W � i vchr_ e" WIHINFLOOD PLAit
MJ "
12. ,moi r r' i73 (rwrt +_,J ryM (t t r "•, i I' ail N AREA i SPECT VIC OR /
tntw'S LAD USE PLANt
StAff Determination: Stibstantiaiiy conforms tot
GENEP,Ai. PLAN: 1. Land Use
/ Name of las}.
2, conservation
3" Open Space
HI fIIN MAN RESES JE:
4. Safety
5. Noise 1 .' If Yes,6i HoUsinA _..r
J. t Buie of Reservo
7. Circu'xation N
Al :POP2 1.1$b USE t AN
.NM
co errs:-1 tr1`_�ta p t,�catr f s_ i/lir Iota ►rn, 11tzr�.ry
I1A ,Gt �/�t,�KS 4x�^Ila'I PrAG:�t� /fri li!^dl.�
.�
t (
p ' 4.T l ,r1� 1/f r� ' a/ j r'tt l eLi�r "•'
'/'t �+.� J r 'r` .YI' tlw.� �. ,� t.�.'`, r r't .✓.�.1 �i r (+ ..t :_. ..`..
► t /.f ` �] t/0 r r r r �.W r Yt..' c F' n�l!1, �J►�� f t. t. r ro
a ,5v�fa 5(,�LTA-3 Ct�?ri3lAJ t�t.t.t�-Q, }CP }
a>h C'..l1�cr ^
)ate
. % 1
Ste+ff Slr'lahtlrre � y
a
A5 THE At'PLACANT FOR TfIP; REQUtSTED LAhb DIVI,SIOh+r I Ari AWARE OF 7 tE ABO',•ii STAFF ETERNHATION MARLlINQ
Tal}~ (`Cf.'tr'tiF^:1ANr,F i?TTN THE GEtrl PAL PLAN AND LONING.
5grrAtu'rr~ of Applicant
c.
.dais sr.t+ott�kilt oXpice asrd be diw,cifded sial (6) Munths from the date oC the ttht'i tignotua«p,
1,000A (rlrv'ixed 6481)
l�
XPlanning Department NAME: CRAIG ACRET
X Environmental Health D%n ttmenC
X CDF (Forestry DeparLme,,.) APi 56-02-84
Attn: J. Craie. Carter (on areas north of red line on. map)
Butte County Sherif
PG&E (check title report for easement)
Pacific Bell
Butte County Mosquito Abatement OR
Oroville Mosquito Abatement (areas within large map in cabinet)
` Spool Dist Lqt (gyral map)
G!; 0-0 (,L_ r �
Water Company (if individual `wells are not indicated on application or map)
Durham Irrigation OR, Durham Mutual Water Co.
California Water Service Company (Chico area)
Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District (Oroville area, SE of river)
Thermalito Irrigation District (Thermalito area NE of river)
Limesaddle. Community Services District (Paradise area along`,Pentz Rd
to lake)
Del Oro Water (Paradise Pines area)
Buzztail Waterworks (Doe Mill Ridge/Forest. Ranch area)
Paradise irrigation District
City of (check wall maps for spheres of influence)
Orovi le
Chico
Paradise
Biggs
Gridley
OROVILLE AREA ONLY;
Lake Oroville Area Public Utility District (see large map in cabinet)
Feather River Recreation District (see large map in cabinet)
El. Medio Fire District (check wall map, a small portion of Oroville only)
BIGGS, RICHVALE GRIDLEY AREAS (SOUTH BUTTE COUTY)., check wall map and title report
- to see what applies: Some areas overlap.
Drainage District 011
Drainage District #2
Drainage District 0100
- Drainage District 7#200
Reclamation District, #833
Reclamation Di.str dt n205'6
Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District
Butte Creek Drainage District
IN CERTAIN CASES
Superintendent of School's (only for subdivisions)
Dept. of Fish and Game (near water and in rural and mountain areas)`
Cal Trans (near State Hwy. 32; 70, X39, 149 (Chico .cut-off), 162 (Olive Hwy. &
RSchvale Hwy.), 191 (Clark Road)
State Water Quality Control. Board (projects with more than ,1,00 lots or units.)
UhIted States Forest Service (if project borders USA land —check AP books)
Parks and Recreation
Department (propertynear
State 1�IatorrResourcesDepartment (property neaLake Orovilltake Orovill
r e -= watershed)
Rock Creek Rdclaimation Dist. (west of Chico Airport, south of P"" Creek and
Chico Area Recreation ,& Park Dist (only 'fo
east of Hw 99 (see wall ma )
_ r subdivivioris)
SPECIAL
chock;
stri.cLL(numberedtehis)
for
mention
special services or easements such
astoTherma5.i;to Irrigation Di
tI0
r: 4< OF` J3E'rt P-M`ZN
o - Office of Planning and ResearchiROMj_ Butte County
1400 Tenth Street, Room 12-1 � Planning Department
Sacramento; CA 9581=+ �'` 7 County Center Drive
or
OCT1-181 Oroville;, CA 95965
X County Clerkll
Uig+' �".�i�.t J. r.Zl1�Su3vf CS�'iw 4.r^
County of Butte
0XYB_`ECT Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.
pro j ert Title AP it Name
'tentative Parcel Map 56-02-84 Craig Acret
Hate. Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone Number
Cif submitted to Clearinghouse}
-
John`Mendonsa, Public Works, (916) 5.38-7266
Projects Location on the southeast side of Cohasset Road, approximately
1,400 feet southwest of Limpach Road, Cohasset area,
Project Description Tentative parcel Map to, divide 9.98 acres to create.
two parcels; one of 2 acres and one of 7.98 acres.
Tb Ls Is to advise that the Butte County &,1174 err,, h "n ii w
(head Agency'or Respponsi{5le Agency)
k�as approved the above-described project on October 16,.1989. and has made
(Date)
the following determinations regardinj the above-described project:
1. The project +�ill, � still not, have a significant effect on the
environment
An.Envitpnmantal Impact Report was ptdpared for this proddct
pursuant to the provisions of ct%
'X _ A Negative Declaration was prepared fox this project pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA.
3, aiitigatian measures _'were, .X were nota made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding considerations was, ___X_was not; adopted
for this project.
This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of
project atsproval: is available to the general public at:
Butte County Planning'Departrnent
1 County Center Drive
Oeoville, CA 95965
Date Received for Filing and,,
Posting at OP1t
Si' 4iatute- A. Kircher
- Director of Planning"_..
Title
' :��vasett t!a'r,�h 1p!1b
F ti p
fop
,,«9t LAND CF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (Bill) CHEFF, Director'
7 COUNTY CENTER DR)VE - OROVILLE, CALIF.ORNI.AZ965
Telephonet (916) , 538-7266
CERTIFIED MAIL RONALD D. McELRO`(
Deputy Director
October 16, 1989
Craig Acret RE: AP 56-02-84
153 Frederick Street TPM
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Dear Mn Acret;
At the regular meeting of the Butte County Advisory Agency held on �•
October 16, 1969, the Agency adopted a negative declaration of
environmental impact and approved the tentative parcel map On the
abovo-referenced property subject to the conditions listed on the
attached sheet.
If no appeals are tirmel,y filed ---within ten (10) days of the date of
the Advisory Agency's approval--with-the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, this action will be final. G
When approval complioa
will be
order
foryou to yourfinal map" withtheButte�Count Department
of Public "Works for recordation within twenty-four (24) months of
the date of approval by tate Advisory Agency
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this
Office,
'Ver truly Y yours,
William Cheff
"d Co. kannin9 Comm. Director of Public Works
OCT 171989
orovills, 'California
J' n Mendansa
' A sistant Director
JMIds
attachment
cc Planning Department
Fiivironmen'tal Realth Department
$t,chtan
a He 0
LAND OF NATURAL WEALTH AND BEAUTY'
'r- DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC, HEALTH
'r" * DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHI
Address IR 196 Memorial Way ❑ 7 County Center Drive C] 747 Elliott Road
Reply to Chico, Calitorfdo 95926 Orovllle, California 95965 Paradise, California 95969
To ephonat 916/891.2727 Telephone, 916/538=7281 Telophonef 916/872.6368
September 19, 1989
I As
Cram Acrel RE Craig Acret Parcel Map
1.53 Frederick Street S/E Cothasset Rd.) Cohasset Area
;, U4j Santa Cruz, CA 95062 APm56-02-84
Dear Mr. Acre t rI
This department has advised the Butte County Department of Public
Works band Development Section that we are prepared to act on the
above application
Based on present information, we can recommend approval or conditional
approval.
Recommended Conditions for Approval
l.. Provide sufficient area for wells and 1001 leachfield free get-
back around those areas on each parcel.
2. Provdfs a 100' leachfield free setback around existing wells
either°wi'thin the property or within 100' of the property bound
cries.
f�
3i Show 6 100' leachfield setback .from the highwater line of the
creek',
44 Indicate on the 'map that areas with slopes in excess of thirty'
(�0) :percent are unsuitable for sewage disposal ,
5: Show the unsuitable areas for sewagr? disposal .such' as todk out-
croppings and a 50 ft, setbadk from those areas,
6: Prove that the required quantities of domestic water are avail-
abl a to parcels J., 2.
If you 'have any questions regarding this letter, please contact the Chico office.
Ver; truly yours,
Thomas Reid, R. E. 11, 6
,Supervising Sanitarian
Bivis,ion o f 'Environmental Health
'cd, cs Bachman Asso:,
�I i.annifi Public t�orl
Y
I&Ufie couft
—
LAtwJD 4P hIATURAI WEr,tTH At:y I'lAi:'a
DEPARTMENT OF PUOLIC WORKS
WILLIAM (81H) CHEFF, Dlrr,ctor
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE * OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 45965
'(rleryhcne! (9i'3j ,cr�o,7r3»
RIMALD D. McELROY
CiERTIVIBD 1 A L Deputy Diteetor
September 28, '1989
Craig Acral~ kti AP 56"02•-04
153 Frederick Street Tentative Parcel Map
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Dear Mn Actret;
Please be advised that the Butte- Country A6 isory Agency will hear
'your application on the above -identified property on October 16, 1.989;
The Agency will he reviewing the findings from the Planning Department
and will be considering your tentative parcel map,: Public Works Will
recommend the conditions of approval as listed on the attached sheet,
f' The meeting will commence at 9:00 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors'
Room, County Administration :Building, 25 County Center Drive;
Oroville, C81i.fornia,
if you have any questi.otis regarding this matter, please contact this
office.
Very truly yours,
William Cheff
Director of Public Works
JoltMendonsa
Asa stant Di'tector
attabhment
ccaililing Departme t.
Environmental Hearth Department 90% Co. MAnnino rexnn
Bachman
SEP hth5 fi
Qrovtl+g, �litarn
4
, �r If ilt
i,
Craig Acret, Tentative Parcel Map, AP 56-02-84, 2 parcels on the
.southeast side of Cohasset Road, approx. 1,400 fti southwest of 'i
Umpach Road. Cohasset area. Engineer; Bachman Associates
oblic Works conditions
Provide two-way traversable access Ll o,i)--III to each parcel from
a county maintained road or state higtiway.
Access to be reserved in deeds as per county ordinance and offered
,for dedication on the final map.
3 Show 50 ff_i building setback line measured from centerline of access
- easement.
4 Deed to the County of Butte 30 ft. right -cif -way from the centerline
of Cohasset Road:
5 In.d7icate a 50 ft. building setback from the centerline of Cohasset
Road:
6 Show all easements of record on the final map:
'y Obtain encroachment permit for all 'driveways, new or existing; and
construct to county standards.,
;S Pay any delinquent taxes or current taxes as required.
9 Meet the requirements of the Butte County Fire Department,
10 Meet requirements of Butte County Mosqu3tto Abatement:
Health Dept. conditions;
11 Provide sufficient area for wells and 100 ft: leach -field free setback
around those areas on each parcel.
12 Provide a 100 ft. leachfield free setback around existing wells
either within the property or within 100 it. of the property
boundaries.
15 Shots a 1:00 fti leachfield setback from the highwater line of the
creek«
w'th slopes in excess of thirty erce it'
14 `Ind�cat.e on the map that areas, , a.'� y p
are unsuitable for sewage disposal.
15 Show the unsuitable areas for sewago disposal such as rock outcroppings
and `a 50 f L setback from those at(!ts.
16 Prove that the required quantities )f domestic water are available
to parcels 1 and 2
,i
Craig Acret
1.63 Frederick Street
Oanta Cruz, CA 95062
-Rew Tentative Parcel Map
AP#5.6-02-84
Dear Mr'. Acret,i
the Butte County Planning Department has completed the
environmental; revieW of your project in accordance with the
,r-Alifornia Environmental Quality Act and forwarded to the Butte
CdUnty Advisory Agency within the reg4ir'ed 105 days pursuant to
the California Public Resources dvein Section 21151.5: In
ad4i:tion the Planning Director' S teport required by sections _?0-
63 and 20-95 of the Butte "County Subdivision C:`dinance has been
completed. Please find enclosers the Planni;ig Director's Report
which has been prepared for our project.
Please review the enclosed Planning Director's Report with
condi boas of approval, if applicable, If you note any errors or
omissiofts in our evaluation, please, bring them to our attention.
T.he Environmental,.bocuments and. Planning Director's Report for
your project has been sent to the Butte County Ad'.'isory Agency
for their action. California Government Code Sections 69580 and,
65952.1 requires the Butte County Advisory Agency set hearings
and approve oz disapprovo your project.. within six months from the
date ba which your appl.ic;ation was received and accepted, The
tix month time limit for your project mandated by state :Law, will
octurx on Jy
anuar 11, 19b9 The Advisory Agency will. notify you
occu
he time and place of the public hearing for your project.
I4 there are modifications to your project, not related to
�I '
mitigating an identified impact, re--eval uatinal of your project.
shall be required:
w
�x
APPENDIX
CA INXY Off' lauxxn
{'
'F_NV'xn0NM3_7NTAL CURC e.T�xS'r V0P'
(To be completed by Lead Agency)
LOG No. 89-07-14- 02
AP No. 056-02,-0-084
•' �. F'iA.cI�Gi2oL7ND
J,,
Name of ,proponent Craig Acret
2,
Addrvas of proponent and representative (if applicable):
153 Frederick street CCW. Bachman
Santa Cruz, CA Ub2, 3012 EspianaU�e
hlco, CA 9b926
y
project description: Tentative Parcel Map to divide 9.98 acrea to create
.f pares s one of des and one o acres.
M MANDATORY V7CI D-rNGS dam" SYGN7�:FTCA.N'Cr... YES MA BE,
NO
3,
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment;
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self=sustaining levels* threaten to eliminate
a, plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare
or endangered plant or animal or eliminate it:sportant examples of major periods
of California history or prehistory?
1,
Does the project have the potential to achieve short -terra benefits to the
detrimont of long-term, environmental goals? (A stir5rt-term impact on the
envitc+6ent is one which occurs in A relatively brief period of time while
long-Earm impacts will endure into the future.)
3.
Does the. project have impacts which are innsyidually limited but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effrct of the/
of
total those imj)acts on the environment is significant,)
4,
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial
advarse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _
fT. ' E'r hMYN1=. f Y[7N (Td he completed by the Lead Age,icy), On the basis of
than ,initial evaluation.'
ilVg find the COULD NOT have significant effect on the
ptoposed project a
envirohment and :#, NEWATIVE DECLAPATION will be prepared.
I/WE find that althcugh the proposed project COULD have a significant etZat.t
on the tl.vi�7onment, there will not be a significant effect in Wks case bedattLie
the MITIGATION MEASuag described on the attached sheet have bona added to t'ne
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared,
thePiave. a, nif it antt dff'er,� h the envirdoxoi*)
heNproposed
M
isignificant
acrid aninnd projectCT T
COUNTY OP MTV) ]PLANNING DEPARTAM
J .25, '1589, &y;S V.,
aniella H m•iltono AsSodiate
Planner
Reviewed by.-
�► i
l:NVz#kQ NU�Ar. TMPACII
(Explanaj.ionr, of 411 "YES" and 10MAYBE" answers ire required on attached sheet(O.
l,. EARTH.
Will the proposal result in significant:
YES iE i40 ..�
a.
Unstable earth conditions) or changes, itt geologic substructu_:a?
b.
Disruption, displacement, compaction or ovorcovering of the soil?��
C,
Change in topography or ground surface relief features7'
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of ,any unique geologic or physical
features?
e,
increasein wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site?
f..
Changes in deposition or erositin of beach sands, or changes in 'siltation,
deposition or erosion which miry modify the channel of a river or stream
�✓`
or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g.
Los's of prime agriculturally produckive soils outside designated urban
areas?
h.
people
Exposure of eo le orto eolo ,i hazards such as earthquakes')
g
r;milar
Tpropertygo t
landslides, .mtdsla,de5 round. £ailus�e' o� s'�' hazards?
✓ G
7., A'IR,
Will the proposal result in substantial:
!V
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable'odors,'smoke or, fumos?
c.
Alteration of air movement_; moisture or temperature) or any change in
V
climate, locally or regiei allyl
3. WATER. Will the proposal 2elsult in substantial:
a.
Changes in currenta, or the course or direction of Water movements in
either marine or fresh. Vaters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount
VC
of surface runoff?
e.
Need for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation
reinaval, channelizatien or culvert installation?.
d.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
e.
Change in the amount of surface water in any wat'et body?
f.
Discharge into surface waters', or in any alteration of surface water
quall.ty, including but not 13niited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbi4lity?
go
Alteration of the dired.tion or rate of flow of ground waters?
h.
Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by .ufs or excavations?
i.
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water
V
suppliesl
V
J.
Cxposure 'of people or propoxty! to Water-relrated hazards such as floodi.ngl
4. PLANS LIQ. Siill the proposal result in substantial
n.
Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass] crops) and ,quatic plants)?
b':
tteduetion of the numbers of any unique) rare er endangered species of
piantsi
c.
lntroduction of new species of plants into 01 area) or in a battier to
the normal replehb4hment of existing speciest
}
d
iteduction in acreoga of any agricultural crop`?
.'
tirI
40
f 5,
ANIMAL ,LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
YES MAYBE NO
a.- "Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals
(birds)land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish; organisms
or insects)?'
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of
animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals, Into an area, or in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
d, Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6,
NOISE. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a- Increases in existing noise levels)
b. Eyposure of people to severe noise levels?
'7':
L'IGIff AND GLARL., Will the proposal produee significant light and glare?
8.
LAN'u USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the
/
Vc.
present or planned landuseof an area?
I,
NATURAL RESGURCM . Will the proposal result in substantial;
a. Increase in the rate bf use of any natural resources?
b. depletion 6f any non-renewable natural resources?
V
10,
Pis OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but+
not limited to) oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions)
b, Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
I'l,
POPULATION, Will the proposal alter Iodation, distribution, density or
p
G
growth rate of the human population?
v
112,
'HOUSING. Will the proposal, affect existing housing; or create a demand
for additional housing?
'.3.
TRANSPOkATIONICIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in.,
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle"movements
V
b. Effects on *xisting parking facilities; or demand for new parking?
c, Substantial impact on existing transportation system's?
d. Significant alterations to presont patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods?
e, Alteratl.ons to waterborne- rail or air traffic?
£. increase in traffic hazards to 'motor vehidles; bicyclists or pedestrians?
'.4.
PUBLIC 57-I-TC,ES: Will the proposal have an effect. Upon, or result in a need
,for new ter altered government services;
a, fire protec tion?
b., police protection?
do schools
d> Parks or other recreational facilities?
C
e. Maintenance of public facilities) Including roads?
fi other governmental'serviddbl
,"
V
�J
(:l
„
u
'ENERGY, Will the proposal result in
JILL bG N�
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
`
'b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energyO or
require the development of now sources of energy?
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
,,,✓✓✓
substantial alterations t� the following:
a. Power or natural gaff?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water availability?
1,/�j'
d. Sewer or septic systems?
G
e, Storm waiver drainage?
c
V
to Solidwaste and disposal?
170
HUNAN IMA99i. Will the proposal, result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential hazard (excluding mental'
health)'1
,�..
i.
b. Exposure of people to potential health.hazards?
W.
AESTRETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic
vista of view open to the public„ or will the proposal result in the
creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
l9.
Y.ECREATIM Will the proposal ,result in animpact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational opportunities?
U,
CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration or destruction.of a
J
prehistoric or'historic archaeological site?,'
..W�.
b Will the proposal result in adverse physical aesthetic effectsi,
to a prehistoric or historic buildingstructureobject?_
to Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unigf.be ethnic cultural Values?
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within
the potential impact areal
V
1DXSCTJSS7[:GN OTP ENVT1 ONMENTAT-, 'IEV"A` AJATTON
Zba attached.
*4- -
47 .
p1.icant; Craig Acret Assessor's Parcel
056-02-0-084
Log' #' .89-07-19;-02
DATA SHEET
'Project Description
1. Type of project: Tentative Parcel Map.
2 Brief Description Create two lots, one at 2+ aures, one
at 7.9`8 acres
3., Location: on southeast side of cohasset Road,
approximately 1,400 feet southwest ofLimpach Road,
Cohasset area.
4. Proposed Density of Development: .2 units per acre.
54 Amount of impervious Surfacing: Varies.
6. Access and Nearest Public Road(s): Cohasset Road.
7. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic.
86 Source of Water Supply;: individual wells.
91 Proximity of Power Lines: To property.
10. Potential for further land divisions
anddevelopment: bone
'under U zone:
1W Environmental se;;ting
Physical Environment:
1. Terrain
ax. General Topographic Character Hilly foothill ridge
top:
b. slopes: 0--20%
C. Elevation: 1,640 feet above sea level.
d. Limiting Factors: None;
2. Soils
a. Types and Characteristics: Scabland, dissected
remnants of lava flow. Non agricultural,
b. Limiting Factors: shallow and stony:
3. Natural Hazards of the Land
a. Earthquake zone: Earthquake intensity Zone V1Y14
ltear site of 0.1-3.9 Richter Magnitude earthquake
epicenter, area of inferred fault
b. Erosion Potential; High:
C. Landslide Potehtial,: Norge to low.
d. Fire Hazard: High.
e. Expansive Soil Potentia: Low,
44 Rydrology
a Surface Water: Maple Creek flows through southern
portion of the site:
b. Ground Water: No constraints other than low`
groundwater availability on some parts of the ridge,
c. Drainage Characteristics; Slopes to the southwest.
5
t
' � JJw�•♦ it .. �� _.,... ,? I � L. r
P
d. Annual Rainfall (;
normal ) : 35".
e 41 Limiting Factors None.
5 , Visual/Scanic Quality:, Cohasset Road is a scenic hig.hWay':
6. Acoustic Quality; Good.
7. Air Quality; Good, ..
Biological Environment;
8. Vegetation: Foothill oak and chaparral, conifers
y. Wildlife Habitat: Deer winter range, East Tehama herd,
designated development zone
Cultural Environment
10. Archaeological and Historical Resources in the area: Area
of high archaeological sensitivity.
1.1. Butte County General Plan designation: Agricultural --
Residential.
12. Existing Zoning-. U, Unclassified, 20 acre minimum.
13. txisting Land Use on-site One single family residence on
proposed parcel 1
14. Surrounding Area:
a. Land Uses: Rural- Residential.
b. Zoning: Uncl.assifiPd'.
C. Gen. Plan Designat,'on Agricultural -Residential.
d. Parcel Sizes: 9-67 'acres.
e. Population: aural Residential.
15. character of site and P,,:ea: Rural Residential.
16, Nearest Urban Area: Chico.
17. Relevant Spheres of Influence: Chico.
Standards Urban Area N/A.
19. lirre�a
ProtectionService:
a. Nearest County (State) Fire Station: 8 mikes t,o
Stations 441 and 442.
b_. Water Availability: Tanker._
211. Schools in Area: Chico Unified
t)X,SC�USSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVAL13ATION AP # 056-02-0--0$4
t The project site is located! in. an Earthquake intensity Zone
11,11. it is near the site of a 0.1 to .,3.9 Righter Magnitude
6p�denter and in the area of an inferred fault, No significant
Sfect is expected to occur.
21), 3b As with any rural residential development,, a ct :ain amount
elf soil will be overcovered by residence,;, outbuildings u.I'
ft
iveways No significant disruption of soil nor any subs`�G: ial
.bhanges in absorption rates shall result from this project
Id.- Maplo Creek flows through the southern portion of the site. No
Oubstantial alteration to its course will result from this project.
40,0!. The development of oneadditional homesite may involve the
,introducti,r,n of residential landscaping and ornamental plantings. No
ibstantial change in diversity of species or introduction of new
species of plants will result from this project.
bat The development of an additional homesite will result in a
slight :increase in .residehtialo-related noise. No substantial effect
is expected to occur.
7 The development of an additional home;3 to will result in a
slight increase in residential -related Light and glare: No
saibstantial effect is expected to occur.
11 This site was approved for a .Rezone from "U" (Unclassified)
to TM -2 (Timber Mountain, 2 acre minimum lot size) by the Butte
County Planning Commission ,on ;May 11, 1989. -
14a,f The proposed project: will represent an incremental increase
iti need and demand for services,
16c,d; The proposed projec{; will 'utilize individual septic systems
and individual wells. No need for new systems gar substantial.
alterations to existing util.iW es will be, necessary as a result of
this proj ect;.
20a; The project is located in an area of high archaeological
sensitivity. The owner has obtained records survey from the
Northeast information Center at Chico State Univer8lty todetermine
whether there may be cultural resources on the site, The records
survey recommends that no archaeological survey be oftducted for the
Rezone, however, if any fututo development involving ground
disturbance is anticipated; then those portions of the project area
;should be surveyedfor cultural resources by a r�usl.ified professional:
a.rrhaeologi.st,
roti f cu
w
, 989 RAC H M A'N
ASSOCIATES
lulfe. co. Plawno Q
MM
,J0L 31 '1989,
OrcAlle, C410wnia
OP BUTTE
gpr;mezit of Planning
ty Center ,rive
Ciol7,e �; Califozn; 15965
x�k Aa'miella Hamilton
ACRET` PARCEIL MAL'
AP# 056-02.0-084
Lo'g# 89--07--14-02
our Jab No,. 89-001
�eaar Daniella;
Zv�!.sb letter is in response to Your initial study of the above;
riz-:-#-10project.
"dit � ,regat:d to numbers; 8 & 11 in the "D scussictn of Vnv,ironmental
Z7alaatlon"' this project was approved for rezoning from "U",
reclassified_ to "T14-2", timber mountain - 2 acres, at the Butte
Coe, my Planning Commission meeting' May 11, 1989.
, o num MA in the same section; an. Arcaeo,logic� l 'Records
gearch has previously been requested and ordered, a complete copy of
w1 b,":ch is attached. The findings were negative.
If you have any ;further questions that i can answer for 'you, please
let me ItnoW
Very truly yours,
�ZV r-A rL;
C..���»
i r k r ttb
FNGINEElRING i E'3)UF1�I -`YING PLANN►NG3 DESIGNING
3012 The �s;)Ianade, Obidd, 06,11f0thia 95026 Telep hone; (916) 84t-4106
i
�+��'� -' _o
., M, x ... i' ... �:,,' "'�F ld•.�d 1 °4fn�w�,""�`h '�.'.& qgA :. 1 r - Wi
,-0' ,.t,
lifor��ia
fill QPIfII ��COCtI�
OUB
GLENN
810PAoe
SISKrrou
�►rt�an a n
a rchauoiog4uai
(� a
�'���P
Calltornia state Unlvoroity, Chic
Chico, CA 95929
inventory
UdbOG
uaooc
TEHAMSUTM
tENa►ati
JIM
pwuAs
TRINriY'
(916)'895-625(3
SHASTA
Da es Marsh 1 1989
s,
,a
Butte CoLmty Planning
#7 County Cater Dr
O=ou'lle, Ca 95965
re
t3ear County Planners,
_ t.
A re*�zp,+ of ' ,.ne above project has: revealed the following+.
rw: ma e, area indicated as within the project boundaries is axisidered'to be
archaeologically sensitive. Present are:
y access to natural sources of water
Flat meai3owland or flat land near 'water
XX South aWor east facing Slopes
XX Previously recorded sites in the vicinity
Other:.V�e are reconn-nding mate no archaeological survey i�"'
ooncluc: ry -Fezone. project;Tvwwever i any
eva .oilmen invo vuig gi:oun a s'. ur ance IS an lcipa .
�� ac arca s cau surveye car u ural
o0p f W loni o _ prod
r— P ws y a qua 3, iP pr.0 =est ona arc a?o 3� lcted of
We 5trong'ly recoarrend that. an art:haeologa,cal reoonnaz.�
a ified archaeologist and appropriate ittitigation measures
the area by quay
prepared,
A known site or sites has/have n previously recorded in I the projt--ct area.
Proje^t operations wM have a negative it pact on the=e cultural. ret,outces.
'ted archaeologist aintacted to azsess ;site
Wr,�rs7cnee p eaa cn'i igative proposal
Otherw ,� _
.: too -rt
thank you frit the opportunity to review al,8 cmon this proposal-. pleas, let
us know What decisions are made regarding the project.
tit, M koto Ko a
Wiftheasti information a�hterCoordinator
a
-sit to ivun,
LAN b fJF NATURAL WEALTH 1.hlD BEAUTY
PLANNING DEPAr4TMENT
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE - OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 96365-3337
TELEPHONE; (916) 538-7601
4ruly 25, 1989
Craig Acret +
153 Frederick Sa reet
Santa Cruz, CA 95062
Ae Tentative Parcel Map
AP'# 056--02-0--084
Log# 89-X07-14-02
r
Dear Mr. Acretz
An initial study of your proposed project, a Tentative Parcel
488, r to the otentially adverse impacts to the environment
��, indicates p
(� enclosed environmental chacklist). To reduce or
eliminate these impacts, suitable mi�igatioft measures are
required as part of the project Otherwise, an "Envi'ronmental
Impact Report (81R1 is requireel pur:,uant to the California
Environmental Quality Act.
An early response to this ;notification, sent to the PjannIng i
Department, will. expedite the scheduling of your project. Pleas(--
forward
leas+aforward your written response within 15 days from the date of ")
this letter
I
A list of local consultants is Ivrcluded: These persons can.
determine the meed for a surrey bj conducting a records search,
conduct archaeological surreys or arrange for such surveys. Ta
the event of an EER requitoment, +a ;'subsequent. letter will ,be %eat:
w g � p y consultant,
totprop, rett�-�e EIA,
fs;�1_ the (,'aunt to seT.ect the consul
,V ,
IY �%.
K n COLYNTX OF BUTTIa'-
DEMM'Mq, OF PUBLIC WOMS JUL 1,11
7 County Center Drive
Oroville, Cn 95965nbriliQ,a9iforrirw
(916) 538-7266
July 13, 1989
Craig Acret RE: AP 56-02-84
153 Frederick St.Tentative Parcel, clap
Santa Cruz, CA 95062 y
Dear Mr. Acret
t'"Y►is is to notify you that your application for a tentative map for the
above -referenced property is being submitted to the Planning Department
for envi,.romental determination, and to the Environmental Health Department
for its review.
This application will be considered complete when we have received
notification from the Planning Department aiid the Environmental Health
Department that a11. necessary data have been received,. These departments
will c ntact you regarding any additional ,Information they may require.
Very truly yours,
W.11iam Cheff
Director of 'Public i40tk5
• r j ,}
John Mendonsa
Agsistant Director
,fit/}k
ee; Planning Department
tnV-ironmental Health Department
Bachman & Associates
1110 (ttevised 2/88
;I
�� ► -JUL141989
yune141989 ACH AN
ASSOCIATES
COUNTY OF BUTTE
-OUTTE COUNTY ADVISORY AGENCY
J,7 Cou.nty Center Drive
d QV41le, California 9596
L'I'N Mr. John Mendonca
RP,t ACRET, CRAIG
Tentative Parcel Map
Section 20-12.2
Dear John:
In accordance with Section 20-122 of the Butte County Code, an
behalf of my client, Mr. Craig Acret I wish to requost an
eXception to tine requirement for the 3 to 1 ratio of PCoPerty,
length to width for the following reasons,;
1 The rear of the property i.1 very steep and rugged, and is
traversed by Maple Branch Creek. The building site could only be
located to the. front of the property.
2, Thee existing well for the proposed parcel is at the Southern
most portion of the proposed parcel.
3. The Butte County Planning Commission, at _their meeting ^f Ray
11, 1989, upheld a re2bne request from "U" to T(9-2 with the
condition that an open space/no-development easement be
established and recorded on the back 933 feet of „the property.
Very tLuly yours,
r:.w. BACHMAtJ
C4�13:'trb
cc Crajq Acret, Applicant
lack Wallace, '`OWner
ENGINEERING SUIRVEYI�JG ti PLANNING DESIGNING
3612 The t5splensde, Chico, l ellinrnis 95925 Tefephohet (gib) W4 4136
,
„
Office of Planning and R121archi la rRC7Nt` PlanningBu le uDty
1400 Tenth Y epnrtmetat
Sacramento, C.4 95814=' 7 County Center Drive
_or
OCT 1 1�8� Orov lle, CA 95965
X County Clerk
County of Butte
C;�;:'�,1CCJ.G^ni:L3�;641et^ v'►iti
Ver J
� tr$=c= Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108
ar 2115' of the Public Resources Codei
o ject Title AP It name _
,Tentative Parcel Map 56-02-84 Craig Acret
:tate Clearinghouse Humber Contact Person 'Telephone Number
(if. submitt-e4 to CleAtitghouse)
John Mendonsa, Public Work:c 191G) 538-7266
.oject 'Location On the southeast side of COhasset Road, ,�pproxirnat-, '��r
1,400 feet STN!12' timpach Road, Cohasset area,
�oje4t Description Tentative Parcel Map to divide 9.98 acres to create
{ two parcel,:.,; one of 2 acres and =e cl7..98 aGxes.
that the Butte County Arlyi cn4-v_-A
w (Lead Agency or Responsible Agency)
=; eppro_ved the above-descr o- project on October 1., .1989 _ . and has made.
(D;3te)
tbi, following `etermin. tions rebarding the above-described project:
1. The project _ will, will. not, Wle a significant effect on the
environment:
2; An Environmental impact Report was prepared for this project:
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA,
X A Negative Declaration was prepared for• this, project purstaht to the
provisions of CEQA.
3.
t•'
tate "gation measures mete,' _K_,Were not, made a condition of the
approval of the project.
4. A statement of overriding conOWO-rations was, _x was note adoptee
for this project.
This is to uertify that the final: RIR with commerit;s and responses and tecord of
project approval is available to the general public at
Butte County Planning Dtspartment
7 County Center Drive
OroV'ille, CA 95965
DAIte Received for Filing and
Posting at OPR ,
sig ature 'B, -A, Klieher
9, 78 3;�
birectar of Planriin,
Title
�Eyrie�E i'"= teas: