Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout056-080-128�,�.1 � .� 1 � . � �' � � � , iF1 ' � � i .� a ,t' e '1 �.� ��, •� ;�. . � -.. ... _tri � • � I ,� . n .� � � � o r . � � A _ • y� ` �� '� r. e �' s ' r �' ,n � „r ^ i. , t' � ' , fir. • � A w � i � ' .h w ` \ ti, I� � � � � ; � � � .. � � . y 1 � i � . , �' rt a ,d i � � I r _- , - � �� vM a u ,, i_ , p ,. �s 4r� J e � .� � r , � '.t � , APPLICANT Richard Batchelder & Michael. fiefs Liogi 88-04-14--03 /....+ . _—ww......1.w...ww..r...iw.i. .i�—...n41w.w..rN..r w:.<.. .w is....>•.. ADDRESS 12 Jenny Way, Chico, CA 95926 OWNER Same PROJECT DESCRIPTION AMENDED TPM to divide 20+- acres to creme 2 parcols, I - 10+ acres and 1. - 10+- acres LOCATION on the west side of Hollow Oak Drive approximately 1400 feet west of Cohasset Road, Cohasset area ,.:�.._.... _r_... ..moi._....--..K.�.,..—.._..r._.-�.w�...+�w,r....i+.M.....w...,.K.w,:..._....,:.....,...—._..i..d.....K . .w..4 wn. _,�.. 56--08-128, 130 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S) � ZONING TM -5 GRNERAL PLAN Ag -Res i PROJECT COPS ISTEN'T 1 GENE RAL PIAN CCONI'ORMANCE REPORT March 23,27, 1988 DATE OF APPLICANT SIGNATUAE LAND CONSERVATION ACT CONTRACTS?— No DATE APPLIC;A'"TON RRC NIViED April. 12, 1988 AGEN rt /SURVEYOR%CIVIL ENGINM: Roper Associates ARD RMS P.O. Box 885, Chico, CA 95926 �,.»..:,__ »...,.....,.K.r...r. ...,�,. r ,., DATt PLANNING D:IRECTOWS REPORT P132'ARED ENV;V�",tMVNTAL �- -. CATMORICAL EXEMPTION - DAVE P;CLrD­­­..»,,w..� DETP,'*C;W1,1AT TON , AND OATE, NEGA"PM 0VC',LARAT101q - TRATE r r....r..+w.+r•#.a ...-v..»i..-e ....4.» nn:j}hI4.D L"18G.. L44'7iRA TIOh- MT,EADOPTED. L'S✓D. aeYlti.. FNV :i ,1'A,'T t(r3PORl' DATE ;...��. YY.-yYi1«�yf,:.. ,,.f...+.,y»,1.,,It.I� y r� - .:n.,,t.... ...q t, � p 7� t `711Ax , V,4l+Rdl"fXT t E 1'I�. 'i N' i L�l'ir, I.' t,7'« Y �l I301d Ak11, AuC Y 11BP +. J. , 0,TE Z�9 /3 — ' � �ACaV"I`u,t_Ilt AGENCY y r�r , # ri,. ....�4 w....:4Nr..wl..0 • .K wru,..aii:iw,. w*�».wwra.. ,i . r.... .a+�s>:a e.v.tNw:wrwFMY�.V,.K .wi.q i.. „'feaA ,#. w:,u%M#L,.4iY-v..:. dam eN. APP1,34OLE1 �rr�t�aAL TIT�11Xttt C� rlr rt; 11 x104) w ix�N /"1 t �q1 VOR �t.:..r,.r..hh�}�.}._�.{�,y�.).V..._�tt>•w��,ay�,��_yy.`y.�.�)...:.ii..�ee��.m,�..y��...�...}-.�`y.�.,.�p.t..»��,.-.�a..Kr.�..»,,..�.,...,w.,R�...rK_.i...>�..�#,�,Ki.�.�.�.,.....r,.r..,,.,�KK..........�,_.-..... i::�.�0.i4f'.r 1'b ���OR PLANNING 1JIySL:1�r�LiS. R S, ��rl:k'�Wi'��tl. 15 9.f ", �i:iy�.:�ld*r »...i;r�.twt..+w..�:«C,-wy.or.,..'�:'..�..:.�'�ru,�.;��»...�:iW.+a�....+...i... uKiir.. ......�+,,.a.:.�.....:...+.r,p,Wiwi.r..+..w..«..,.....y:w•i--«.+..+,,,+a..r...ar.i».w.�,. ww..:.cw 1y1t'rV T C C:C7UNICY 0.- NMS ,� -Al- 111..AN 0-QNTf C>RM A.NC':'El RLo1V('-)Iti'.I" ► Guff0 Co. i1ann41vCosr.-n, .7~` or-z PARCH-'M, MAI} 011'Q'(. Bn- 'C V :1C'S: 0P4 MAP MAR 8 1988 Items 1-4 to bei comlalet.od by applicant.: i}r<,willo, Gali�oru3n 1. A1119.10i+N'3 NAME AND AIaDRI S5: C/✓Al; l4"/.� 13.4 7't z� � _ / /oaf,{l? L'41&/_ LG/1 1�C c. 7rf= ar /L�JjY c. r 4 161 7. PRtT. EUT DESCRT ITtON: _A AAZZ46 /LyZW 3. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL M iBER(S) : sig O ^ /Z 14' /20 fir. PROPOSED USE:._ &jai ..5/7.7,4e- ,rilk, ColloWing items axe, to be completed by the 'Planning; Department: CURRENT ZONING: 7M -nom LAND CONSERVATION AGRE1,24ENT: t+l'sNMI, JILAN DESIGNATION: `rya :;C r.r.� ('andiLion'll Criter In: AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL YES NO It is recommended that yoti perform the 1. Agrict►ltural Compatibility _ following checkrd itoms, J. Water and sot�er Capacity-=�?rt,.1�,���5 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECORDS CHECK' 3. Adequate Fire Facilities BOTANICAL SURVEY r, . Road Capacity and Ma .►ltrtl-aiitr� `'� GEOLOGICAL SURVEY -�J -�-•.- 5. Acr.est to Commercial. and Schools YES NO OR"HART► AND FIELD CROPS WITHIN DEPAMIENT OF FISH AND Grp."iE RVELOi'RM ZONE; i. Prodomina.'at 5-1.0 ac. Parcel Size 7. Vicinity of Urban Boundarios SWITTTIN FLOOD PLAIN: 3W Ag. Viability not Impaired WITHIN ATEA, SPECIFIC OR Staff Determination: Substantially conforms to: LAND USE PLAN: GENERAL PLAN; i. Land Use — If yes, .�',�. �4:�k �a,+.s� . \'jssr . 2. Conservation NamB o Plein � 5. Open Space -�,�'r-- -- WITHIN URBAN RESERVE: ---� A. Safety 5. Noise ---•-•'- if Yes, _ Name of Reserve 6. Housing 1 Circulation - `u_ AIRPORT ;LAND USE PLAT!, � CO@t1dk1V'I'�: , `a�I�y �-,� -_ ���•ti:^�.. �.�,�, i, r .. . ,�e.�^�, r,'." ���._S �' � taL� Com.,=y�C -� � ptt StatC 5agnature f n_..w A " Date ~ f ar ,� J'♦� - - AS THE APPLICANT FOR TIM REQUESTED LAND DMSION, t AM AWARE OF THE An VE ST FF711F1{�RMINATION R GAPDTN(3 TIM GOFii�t RMANC e WITH THE QVNERAL PLA4 AND ZCNING, � r t MiLod d ► i ,�� -C11 2_ ; "l ` •° ,._..�... Sig;taaturo of AFISICcant I�.R._...tl.:,... �,.,�,�,C.r .�C►::.. *111ts report will expiro and bu disc, cd o�x ('C) A fro•a tJir: data of the dtaff si.ghtituxe. LI) 1000A (rrvised 6-87) 70 ^pO ¢SCJ .0, Gple.0 9� Nc)'T"I"ECE 01' offices of Planning a Cotinty 2 12 11 Planning( Dep art IAOO Tenth Street jj!es Sacramento, CA 958 4 )m 7 countv Center Drivo JUN 14 1988 orovitle, CA 0596') XX County Clerk County of Butte CANDAGE,J GRUf3BS, BUILIG CA Clark G, EMER0 I)aputy t Tl< rN ( ,r Filing of By Notice or--Te—tQrmI0&t:L0n in compliance with Soct.ton 21108 or 21152 of the Public Rasourpus Code. )ject AP 0 Name Richard Batchelder Wended Tentative Parcel Map AP#SG-08-128,180 Michael Tef- St"jo Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Tolephone A but' (if nubmitLad to Cluaringhouse) John Mendonsa, Pub!, Works 530-7266 NI)ject Locat ton on the west Side of Hallow Oak I)i vapprogimately 1.400 feet west of Cohasset Road, Cohasset, area. r0ject, r)vscriptAon Amended TPM to divide 20+- acres to create 2 parcels, 10+- acres and 1 - 10+- acres. is Lo a&,risv H'at the 1"utto-GOin1tv Advisory Ag (Lead Agency ou haeminsiflo Agunty) :AA npproved the above -duscr i 6ud project 01, _ 6—`13-88 and irv� tiatle (MA the following doLarminations regardIng the above-do8eribod project! 1, The prnjnct will, X_ ,will now, have a signif Yant Pi YoN in tilt' "qV I VonMont.. Jk% i*nvIrnnmnntaI iMpnnL Report was praparA f.r 'his Pcoiect, puronant tel than provivions of CKA. :, ".ug at ive Vaclarat. in" was prnpar," for thih pvujvvt p,tr,uant r " thc venviAnns of VHQA, x A oi ovorvidirg unnsidnML&W V;&' tot IhK +h -t. t♦ t lie a I wa,t.li c tunwn c r au 4 ro: n w V jjt,,),iGqj jjpjjj,,,v& it availablo to thp guneral public m J+jjj t'; 0,()k'jjtV 7 Caunty Gantvr brivo Ormliv. CA 05965 Yr--\ Date Rvrolym lor Vilins antl ink; at 0110 t �Irti 8 9 4nil! Turpin, 8enior 4 Planner t TiLlo ktVised �Icwrh 1986 Inter -Departs a nta� Memorandum toy Advisory Agency PhOM: Planning Director suertrT: REPORT ON AMENDED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR BATE: RICHARD BATCHEL'DER & MICHAEL '1EPS ON AP¢#56-08-128,130 June 2, 1988 This is a proposal to divide 20+- acres to create 2 parcels, I of 10.1• acres and 1 of 10+- acres. The prE:sent zoning is TM -5 (Timber -Mountain, 5 acre parcels). The Land Use plan. Map of the Butte County General Plan designates this area as Agricultural Residential. There are no specific or community plans for the area. The proposal does not conflict with County zoning nor any adopted' or proposed element of the Butte County General, Plan nor any County, specific or community plan. Recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Place a note on the final map stating that "Residential construction shall be located within the easterly 750 feet of each parcel." 2. Utilize standard erosion control measures and construction practicesto minimize erosion and other construction irr,pacts. DRH • 'mc cc,. Richard Batchelder Michael Tefs Roper & Associates PATE: PRIORITY M,"e R ROPER ASSCIA'FE5FIDE No` —� . . [ BOON AS POSUIBLE M P, 0. Box 885 1346 Longfellow AvenUe J / Ej NO REPLY NEEDED C1 ADO, CALIFORNIA 95927 - ` 'll ATTENTION:Olt) Ur—l", 1-11IM111,11 OS' (516) 342-2059 suuaecT; O III Mee ca iM +. —.... Ap /1/6, - �: O P, 0 MAY 12 1989 G 06 : 8c"i 04- 14 " 0,3 Oroville, California ova GUs�c c Gores/ �r7 � Ti�rva �r/6a7©/ A SIGNED: y PATE DF NEPLY'. REP4Y TP'. .. _........ . E I' I. y 91QN�D; S6NDCR: MAIL RECIPICNT WHITE AND CLINIC SHEETS inter -Departmental Memorandum TG; Advisory Agency David Hironimus, Planning Staff FROM: SUBO'EGT Tentative Amended Parcel Map for Batchelder/refs Ap 056-08-0-128, 130 DATE May 5, 1988 re ared for the Larry Coonrod Marcel The attached initial study wasp P it is adequate for which created the subject parcels. additions: Map project with the following consideration of this current P � m the Department of Fish and Game 5d. See the attached letters or 1 project) and April 22, 1988 dated December 61 1982 (gina (new project). Completed survey of the property has been comp. f 2l, An archaeological y and clearance is recommended. See attached survey. Recommended Mita ation Measures'that "Residential plate a rote on the final map stating l'.on shall be located within the easterly 150 feet of each constructi parcel." Utilize standard „rosion control. measut�uction impactsres and uction 2 practices to minimize erosion and other cons TSRH : l r cc: Richard Batchelder/Michael ",refs Aoper Associates I.. II. 01r APPENDIX i ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To be completed by Lead Agency) BACKGROUND AP Lor; # 82-10-25-02 56-08-111 1. Name Of Proponent Larry Coon d 2 . Address and Phone Number or Proponent: 3806 Dell: Road Uaxm�.c 1,qP Bachman &_ Assoc. 3. Date of Checklist Submitted 4. Agency Requiring Checklist S . Name of Proposal, if applica ' e� Entative Parcel TIa ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets,) YES MAYBE No 1• Earth, Will the proposal result in significant, a, Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures?,. b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or o"vercovering of the soil? ' c, Change in topography or ;round sur- face relief; features or removal of topsoil? d. Destruction, covering or moda.fica- tlon of any unique geologic ov physical features? , e. Increase in Wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off th'e site? f Changes in deposition or erosioY of beach sands, or changes in silta- tion, deposition or erosion which may laid fy the channel of a raver or stream or the lied of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X g. loss of prime a8ticulturally pro» ductivd 80iis Outside designated urban areas? _ _ Append k 'F page 1 or-' 9 YES. NIAY13E NO l�. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in_; a. Substantial deterioration of ambient or local air duality? b. The creation of objectionable odors smoke or fum,28? C- c. Significant alteratian of air, movement, moisture or t=emperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 5. Water. Will the proposal, result in substantial. a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? v c. Deed for off-site surface drainage improvements, including vegetation removal, channelization or culvert installation? a= Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? VA e. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? f. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surfacd water quality, includ=ing but not limited to temperature, dissolved Oxygen or turbidity?' g. Alteration of the d1racti.,on or rate of f1014 of grounri waters? P Ii, Change in the quantity or quality Of ground watevs, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? lei- } App-radix V - page 2 of 9 YES MAYBE NO i. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as X flooding? -- tE , plaint" Life . Will the proposal result in substantial: a. Loss of vegetation or change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops$ microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of, plants? -- c. introduction of new species of in barrier plants into an area, or a to the normal replenishment of exist i.ng species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agri- cultural crop? 5 , Animal., , Will the proposal result in substantial. a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, benthic organisms, insects or Y microfauna) ? -- ---�-. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique., rare or endangered species of animals"? c xlk4roducti.on of new species of . an, mals into an Area, or result in a barrier to the vaigraf iOn or movement of animals? d, Reduction of, encroachment upon, or deterioration to existing fish or wildl,ie habitat? Appendix T page 3 of 9 0 I v IE' MAYBE N0 (. moise. Will the proposal result in substantial; a, increases in noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7; Li ht and Clre. Will the proposal. nro uce s�,g tic light or glare? 8. Land Use, Will the proposal result in a. significant a Alteration of the planned land use of an area, or establish a trend which will demonstrably lead to such alteration-? b Conflict with uses on adjoining properties, or conflict with establ,ishad recreational, educa- tional, reli-ions 01 scientific uses of an area? 9. Naturalnesourcs, Will the proposal result in substantial. a. Demand for, or increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?; b Depletion of any nonrenewable 1pi-, -al resource? lU, Risk Sl _Upset, Does the proposal- in" lve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (irtcluding, but not limited to, oil, vesticicles, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions 11. pu ation . ,ijll the prop��.K' qls 51 fi11 icantl+walter the location, distribution, dens 1ty, or VOWth rate of the human population of an area or pl=t, sjcall.y divide an esta.blisL,e.c1 COMM -unity? 12, dousing, Will t.17e proposal housing, sin cantle affect existing or croa.te a demand for additional housing? r 'Appendix F - page of g 0 � ? 13. Trans ortation/Circulation. MAYBE NO ___ Chill the proposa res u t in,- a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular 1''Wement? b. Significant effect's on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. alAbstantiul impact upon existing, transportation systems? Significant alterations to present Patterns of circulation or movement Of people and/or goods? Alterations to waterborne �." , or air traffic? r: increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? Public Services , taIll. the proposal have C"e tect ��pon, or result in a substantial need for new or, altereu governmental selllices in any of t.hn following areas . a. Fre Protection? b%. 1'OHCCr protection? ~" --- C' Schools? d, Parks or other recreatioral facilities? ei Maintenance of oubl.ic facilities - including roads? f= Other govO nmental sexvice;? 15 CnrPy Will the Proposal result in a, Use of substantial amounts of ftiel or enetgy? . Sub8tantial*increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of near sources of energy, w � .F A pp endik � -page 6.. of 9- YES MAYBE N0 16. Utilities. ,,Till the proposal result in a neec for new systems, or sub- stantial alterations to the following util....ties a. power or natural gas? Communications systems? Vb, y C. Water.? —.— d., Sewer (wall trunk line be extended, providing capacity to serve new development)'t e. Storm Grater drainage? ,._. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result gni a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental. health) 7 _ b. typosure of people to potential health hazards? l Solid Waste. . Wall the proposal. result in any significant impacts associated with solid waste disposal or litter � control? 19. Aesthetics , Will the proposal ';�'esul.t Ln tRe o " uotion of any pubic designated or recognized scenic vista open to the public, oY' will the pro- result itt the creation of an tposal ofyr.nsive site open to; public view? 20 Recreation. Will the proposal 'result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing public recrea- tion facilities? 21, Archeolo ical/Historical, C�Iill the propria' res t- an a�teazatian of a signi.fi.cant arc v olo tical or historical site, st-tucture, object or building? w � .F A pp endik � -page 6.. of 9- 0 YDS MAYBE NO ti 1T1dLnJ;S 0L ��ficance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, Substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a :fish or wildlife Population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plantor animal com- munity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate importantexam Ins f h Califajor periods of ornia histor y prehistory? b Does the project have the potential to achieve short term benefits to the detriment of publicly adopted long-term environmental goals? „ c Does the project have imparts which are individually limited, but cumulat Pk7ely considerable? (a project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environmental effects wh",ch will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? k r Appendix p page 7 of dF m All 5f -08-1 f ,' IIT. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL`EVALUATION Project Description 1. Brief Description: Land division of 43 acres I. to erC;a`t e Eour parcels, three at 10 acres and one at 12A' acres, for residential use, 2, Locat ,an: West side of Hollow Oak Drive, al>proxintsa'toly 200-0 feet west of Cohas$et Highway, Cohassat arca. 3. Access and Nearest Public Roads) Hollow O alt 1)rive and Hollow Oak Lane extend to the property from the e,cast Oak .Drive borders the property on the east: 4. Proximity of Power Lines: Exist to site 5 Potential for further land divisions and development Limited clue to terrain and useable area for sewage disposal, Environmental Setting 1. Terrain a. General. Topogra hic Character: Gently sloping to stoop terrain toward the west. Western edge of the Collasset ridge. b: 81oposi Generally less than 200 except to the avest of t'a bluff. C. Elevation; 2600-3000 feet ASL d, Limiting Factorst. Steep terrain to the west of the bl:t .�t line. 2i Soils a. Typos and Characteristics: Aiken soil series, a clay loam generally over 60 inches deep, moderately slow permeability, medium to very high sui'tabil'ity for timber production. b, Limiting Factors, Moderate erosion hazard 3. Natural. Haz�,tds of the Land a. Erosion Moderate-Higl b. Landslide. Potential.. Moderate c„ l?i'C Haz°:r,d Extreme 4. Hydrology a, S'urfa'ce •'ger Rock Creek with' 'n 14 mile + to the west, b. Ground Ila:,r: Resource not identified, P'Ossibly limited on the AAgo. c, Drainage C aracteristics : Property drains into tributary of hock ",reek. d, Annual 1166 alCall (normal.) 50 inches 5. Visual/Scenic Quality: Very high 6 Vegetation! k-11.ow pine - mixed forest region, with foothill oak woodland and chaparral communities, 7, Wildlife Habi ..t: Area to the west of the bluff line t;ith.in deer wint;wr range for the East Tehama l -lord, Ah 56-08-77:3 I)ISCUSS[ON Ol, ENVIRONMENTAL, EVALUIVFION (coI1tinued) 1 an 11istoracal Resources inetile acletcrntilned�°trio Arc.hrxeo;L0s0c 0- a survey wa.11 be rotlucst sens9.tivity; ncr,essary by a local a Ghaeologist• ricra 1.ura.l-Resiclr ii"Lia'a. Butte County General Plan deSign�taon Ag Zoning: TM -5 en land with ve} rw"tti.on Previously -Existing zoning: Land Use on -sate: Op described. Surrourxding Area: Land Uses: Uispersed rural residences (Cai)ventional and a, open .forested landi mol'>ilc homes) ; TM -20 to the ~vest and bZon}.ng 'I A9- 5 . T�1.2 to the southeast; further north. Agri cultilral-Residential C. Gen. Plan designations: acarsel pol ul,tc mountainous area. d, Parcel Sizes: y Charactor of Site and Arca: Zprmiles + Nearest Urban Area: Chico, Volunteer Fire Protection Serrrice i a, rorestaFiretataons ##22(seas Nearest County (State)onal) Station 1121, collas set response time is within 3'minutes b, lV a to Avai°lability. None other than wells and dire truck edl arritY following potential. impact$ and environmental mental Roll lodevelapment.nceras have been g l.ed for this site and subscnttc construction Tncreased erosion potenti"Al .from road improvements, Nat` ^atitat =�vs and four homeSites ~unix r�tid thecactual areasaof urs 1 vegetation so�rl be retained except , xoteoty on ptlrpases !j}x'ysical development and its needed for fixe P �.o high :�:Lta potential for erosion and landslide earth 11x. blacicratc g movements. generation from ntldatl.orra7. vehicular use Of area 2' Increased dust g dirt and gravel Toads,s. Clearance . . on=sitr, sets � disposal vptltlregavdmto sewage 31x: Soil limitations ('or has hoer rCclilreC� 1"rcimyi.n4�ironmolntli.t the x"etlazx'ocl quantities Of di.spos'ti. They Will rccluii•c r ar,col, Acmestic water etre averrlal��r~ to raGlx p to the Dopariment ot Of f the tentati; "Y 11"gp lints boom Sent ordcrrs a key Hinter 5d , A copy , tti, , S'Lace the �propo r°t�Y r be recommended Fislx and Game for anp." range for migratory ticci' C'1.L15te1�.i1S, a�i' hcxltta5:ttcs mai as a mitigation measure at_tr additional p arcols are 1)Otoi tial undor the TM -5 Fzeniilg 9a, ..t, xli:�sicaT rzrcl go pl.aix constraints tttay limit sttCl though other physical further division ndx 1 page Sri of 0 S. 9. 10. 11. 1.2 . or AP 56.08-11 DfSCUSSTON OF I NVIRONMEINTAL EVALUATION ('continue(!) 11; Population and residential. growth in a, rel-JJ(lvr.ly rr, TLo area. l.3c: Provision of traversable access to a county-maintained road. Verification of legal. access will be required. A neighboring property owner has submitted a letter concerning use or access roads in the vicinity. 14, Increased, demands for public services, part7 c ulara,y fire protection in an area with low demand at present fol.' such services. 17b; Exposure of future residents to an extreme IlAtUral fire hazard. Also, the Mosquito Abatement District in�l:ica`tcs that the area is characterized by Black Oak trees Which ar(:4 a source of tr0ehol.e Mosquitoes: 21: The Rock Creels canyon is an archaeologically sensitive area. Tf deemed necessary by a local archaeolog:.st a survey will be completed and mitigation measures proposed for any signif'ican't cultural resources which are found. Appendix p page 8b of 9 1. 2. W IV. DETERMINATION (To he completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Q I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION s rE commended. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment_, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS RECOMMENDED. 0 I :Find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required Date December 10 1952 ✓ (sig-atur Stephen A. Streeter Senior Planner For., butte ounty PIanfilFig De`pf. HevieWed by MITIGATION MEASURES Indicate homesite locations in a cluster arranc;oment, near the . existing access road, to provide unobstruc d 'taccess to migrato"Nr deer. If significant cultural resources are found clearing the archaeological survey, the tentative map is to be reforred back to the Advisory Agency for appropriate mitigation measures Utilizo standard erosion control measure: and construction practices to minimize erosion and other constt-ticti.on impacts, Appendix V - page 5� of 9 December 15, 1982 ILII B AC HIM A N & ASSOCIATES COUNTY OF BUTTE Department of Environmental Review 07 County Center Drive Oroville, California 95965 RE: Larry Coonrod Tentative Parcel Map APO 56-08-113 Log 782-10-25-02 ATTN: Mr. Steve Streeter cwl,to Co. planning comrm DEC 20 1982 OrOY01131, C011tomia near Steve: Or! behalf Of MY clients, Mr. & Mrs. Larry Coonrod, :r am respond to the mitigation measures contained in the Appendix 'IF'-, for t ing referenced project. he We have no problem with accepting Measure 42 and Measure 43 of the Appendix 'IF" and Offer the folloW,ng comments� All construction will be undertaken in a non --rain JjLlriodof the Year and standard construction ptact, erosion. Ices Will be Used to minimize If any sighif*caht cultural tutal rOsOuftO sites are found, we W,11 no objection to returning to il have the Advisory Agency for their dotis, On PtOtOctiori measures, ion page 1 of - 2 ENGIN I EERING - SURVEYING PLANNING - DESIGNING 3012 The I=-splanadL,, Chico, California 969p-6 Taleohohe,- (016) 80-4136 Larry Coonrod Ap* 56-08-113 Lot *82-10-25-02 December 15, 1982 We cannot agree with Measure 01 for the following reasons: 1. The deer herd actually migrate on the north si Cle of Rock Creek and down in the canyon- 2. The existing building in the area has already pre-empted any benefit of "cluster homes". (See attached plat) parcels are to be ten acres plus in site. The 3, The proposed p sense.. idea of clustering on parcels this size does not make much sites should be chosen to meet 4. The location for the building to,access,viear etc.. the optimum number of requirements;P �.g•, se p If you have any q uestions, 1 would be happy to discuss them with you. very truly youra C 'Vr tACHMAN EDMUND 'G BROWN JR.i STATE OF CALIFORNIA -RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAMS; t REGION 2 1101 NIMBUS {LOAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) 355-7030 December 6, 1982 Mr. Steve Streeter Butte County Planning Department 7 County Center Drive Oroville, CA 95955 Dear Mr. Streeter; The Department of Fish and Game has reviewed the Larry Coonrod tentative parcel map which proposes a four -parcel split of 42.9 acres near Cohasset. This project will have an adverse impact on wildlife habitat. potential impacts are: 1. Loss of deer winter range. Cougar and bear would have a range loss.; 2. Loss of upland game habitat, especially for wild turkey. 3. 8abitat loss for bird species of special concern such as merlin, sharp -shinned hawk, Cooper's hawk, golden eagle, and prairie falcon= we recommend that 20 -acre minimum parcel sizes be required. If the Department can be of further assistance, please contact Gerry Mensch Environmental Services Supervisorr tclephone (916) 355-7030. Sincerely, Paul. T. Jenson Vtegional Manager OU410 Co, planning Corm -m DEC i4 1982 Urovilh, Galiforh I . Peel,nI, IV SfAYE OF CALIFORNIA- THE RESOURCES AGFNCY GEORGE DEU04E.11AN, Gowrno, DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME REGION 2 1701 NIMBUS ROAD, SUITE A RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95670 (916) X55-7020 Buffo C01 P14"hing Cornn APR 22 1988 1988 Mr. John Mendonsa, Assistant Director Butte County Department of Public Works 7 County Center Drive ()roville, CA 95965 Dear Mr. Mendonsa: The Department of Fish and Game (Department) has reviewed the Tentative Amended Pavcol Map for Richard Batchelder and Michael Tefs, a proposal to remove the restriction that -esidential construction be limited to the eastern 500 feet of the existing parcels of 12.9 and 10.0 acres (AP 56-08-128 and 30). 13o th ­.arcels are located in a "Designated Development Zone" in western I! Both parcels extend into Rock Crook Canyon. Pho Departm_­.it oi,.jects to the removal of residential construction setbacks from the subject patcels as the western portions of the parcels serve n8 butfur-,; r o large parcels which lie immediately outside of the "Dezz`,,inated T.)-, --lopment Zone". Also, any construction activities on the b_o*,,,�." Of Rock Creek Canyon could Lead to --,edimentation occurrin-,i os e k in Roli� Department staff mot with Mr. Batchelder on April , * , 1988 and inspected both parcels. Based upon our tiold review, we would not object to the building restriction that limits residential dwellings to the eastern 500 feet of both parcels being incr(i,,sOd to the eastern 750 feet of each parcol, as the change would not adversely affect the adjacent fish and/or wildlife values. If we can oe of further assistance, please contact Patricia P­_rkinst Wildlife Managomonb 3upervisor? telophono (916) 355-7010. Sincerely, es"a i t 1-1 17 (am e 8 Messe , Regional Manager