HomeMy WebLinkAbout056-170-012jm
rI.
r
`
9
�
0
PLANNING COMMISSION '.'VUMMARY SHEET FOR LAND DIVISION'S
APPLICANT ' William E Reynolds
QDDRFSS 5055 HeinzStreet, AEAdwin, Park; Ca 91706
OWNER Same
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Tentative Parcel Map to divide 19 acres to 'create 5 parcels;
2 @ 5 acres and l 9 acres
LOCATION 1/4 mile southwesterly of the intersection of Cohasset Road
and VilaRoad, and approximately 800 feet southwest of Cohasset Road► NE of Chico,
► t 56-17-1Z
ASaESSOR 5 PARCEL NUMBEii�S)
ZONING Tht-S GEN. PLAN Ag, Residential. PROJECT CON81STENT?
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED 7/8/85
Engineer: Lippinco+-t-Gufb Assoc.,' T. , ax 6/ ► ParadiTe, Cas
DATE PUBLICATION NOTICE WRITTENPUBLISHED
PLACE NEWSPAPER NOTICES) PUBLISHED - 0. Ci* P. G. D.
DATE MAILING LIST PREPARED
DATE M
AIL -ORT NOT'ICE'S WRITTEN MAILED ►�IT1tHLR
DATE PLANNING DIRECTORIS REPORT PREPARED
ENVIPONMENTAL r CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATE PILED
DETERMINATION
AND DATE NEGATIVE DECLARATION — DATE ADOPTED
MITIGATED 'NEGATM DEOLA'RATXON DkU ADOPTED .
:..� ENV. IMPACT REPORT DATE MTIVIED
SM COMMITTEE MEETING DATE
ADVISOR' AGENCY HEMP= DATE
ADVTSOPY AGENCY ACTION
RD ACTION
Dt�A
eG,p d ;yrs s K 'ti- ttt sa�1A.4ti� I/Hi3R4-G7^` ts' IW r
r�.+� iso.
IG ►G) �- v i L=
O�I�tEN - y¢ (� �� erre �z-rrr kaam �rrr.
ScG7'rr,�t G
0411
t�.s; t.�-►�,�c�. ��'�r4�� ter.
APPENDIX E�
_ a
16. 7f' residential, include the number of units`, schedule of unitsi.�es, and type of household size expected.
17, if commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, cit
or 'regionally oriented, square footage of sa
facilities les area and loading
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated e
andloading facilmployment per shift
-i.tes
19. If institutional, indicate the major function's estimated
empl�-7lent
y- per shift, estimated occupancy, loading fac:iliticq,,
ant: Community benefits to be derived fromthe project;
20. If the project involves variance, conditioii'al use or rezoning
application, state this and indicate clearly why the appil;ration is
required.
Are the following items applicable to the project or atr, effects?
Discuss below all items checicpd es
necessary), y (attach addition shOe'ts as
YES N0
21, Change in ja sting features of any beaches{, lakes
or hi,ll.s, or ;sub alteration of ground contours
22 Significant change in scenic views or vi,,;tas from
23. Si.gnifxca
existing residential areas or public lands or roads;
---�; n t 1 chane
general area of project. f
_ cake or character o `
Y g pattern s
24. Significant amourits of solid waste or
litter-'-
25.
itter:25.
Change %n dust, ash smoke, £u
vicinity ' me5 Or odors In
g q ► g S
quality or quantity, or alteration of _ ter
26 Significant change in lake stream, or round water
patterns, exLsta.n drainage
8
27, Substantial change in existing noise or
102+tels inn the vicinity, vibration
. i 28. Si to on filled land or
on slope of 30 percent or more,
25, U:se or disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammables or explos%ves
r _
u
Appitndix E page 2 b 3
t n
APPENDIX H
NOTICE OF LDETEMINATION
To: Planning Department
Office of Planning and Research C?�� g p
1400 Tenth Streetp Room 121 7 County Center Drive
Sacramento,
CA 95814 Oroville,-CA-95965 �, r�K ,
or "
x County Clark , r.
of Butte
.. p , w' 985 .�
County yy �
of Determination in com 1lsanCt.
with Section 2110 Ar 11 �g2
SE�C'I'o Filing of Notice � -'�,>..
of the Public Resources Code. °"xw y
85-07-08-Oi r rw•...-�- ..w.'
lect itis AP Name,
l Map -12 William E. Reynolds
Tentative Parcel
a hone Num
Mate C eating Ouse' Num Contact Person Tel P
56-17
(YE submitted to Clearinghouse)
g dohnAendonsa, Publitr Works (916) 534-4,266
ect LocatiOn Approxi 1/4 'mile south of the intersection of Cohasset Road and
Visas -Road, and approxi 800 feet southwest of Cohas set Read; northeast of Chico;
n..le.Stiala ---
)eLt
peserip ls; two of 5 acres each
Tentative parcel Map dividing 19 acres into three parte
and one 9 -a
This is to advise that tyre - Putty County Advisory Agency
Lea Agency or Responsible Agency
has appy
ved the above described project and has made the fallowing determinations
r�gardirrr the' above described _project:
Theproject .�, Will, will fi
ll not, have a signicant effect on the environment
t I �mpa
ct Re rt Was prepared for thls project pursuant
x, An I!nvlronme; po
to the provlsI00$ of CEQA.
A Negative DedaroIon was prepared for this project pursuant to th¢
provisions of CEQA
TheEiFt or Ne ative C?eciaratian and record of project approval Mayrbe
examined att.
Butte bounty P141 ting �e�artment
7 Count' Centex,
X .were not, made a condition of the approval
Mitigation measures were L
of the proje-t. .
46 A statemonnt of
c rerrldin Considerations wast, X was not, adapted u "
this project
Oct, l,t►,. 19$� p ,� � .
Date Received for Filln ,,,.._.„-- Signet a Ste` hen A. Streeter
8d"i6t planner
Time
''IT,� ,+ P:tvisria "anuary 1985
ffat t
t-- LAND OF
N A T U 9 A L W 'A("(h( AND 'B LAU'1Y
DEPAAtMENT OF PU13L;IG WOFalCS
WILLIAMA (Bill) oIIf (=p, 011,0nior'
7 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE . DROVILLC, CALIFORNIA W65
Tolaphnpe:(�I,h) 59A.4bHT
O
RONALD D,.MeELROY'
Deputy Director
October g 1985
William 8. 'Reynolds
X055 Reim St.
R1 ; A�, ►, �J 17-3,2
13aldwin Park, CA 91705
Tel1-04.,i,Ve, Parcel Map
Nat Mr. Reynolds:
Please be advised that there is an additional. condition 0j, r)isproval
for your tentative parcel_ map On AP 56-17-12
the Butte County Advisory Aget1G'y on 3etuber
which vas im��r ; �d b
7, 1 35, but Wo
Thatthe itio of conditions in the letter to
That condition is;
emitted
you dated October $- 1985,
Meet the requirements of Ordinance 2453,
regarding Chico Unified School
and 1�esolut,ion 85-h-0
:Pis`trict ,fees, Rlace � Iaote oh
the Fina map; that issuance of develo rnent a
'K , p permi t8 may require
payment o� school fee„
If
office.'youhave any questions regarding this ttiatter4 please contact tact thla
Very truly yours
William Cherf
Director of Public work o
i
ohn Mendc�rYsh
ITM/d fi
��
i
S � y ' Z,
static laire�to
cc Planning
Health
Lippincott GUth Assoalaies
William E. Reynolds`TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, three parcels approximately 1/4
mile southwesterly of the intersection of Cohasset Road and
a
and approximately 800 ft. southwest of Cohasset Road, northeast ofRChico.
Assessors Parcel Number: 56-17-12
Engineer- Lippincott -Guth Associates
Public Warks Department conditions are:
1. Verify legal access`
2. Provide two"Way'traversable access RS -8 -LO -1 to each parcel from;a
county maintained road or state highway,
8. Access to be reserved in deeds as per county Ord
7n4tnce and offered
for dedication on the final map,
4. Shoementw 0 -ft building setback line measured fe.rom center1'7ne of access
S.
Provide road maintenance agreement.
G. Show a'11 easements of record on the final map.
7. Provide street name signs per requirements of the Department of
Public Works prior to recordation of the final maps
8. Provide cul-de-sac at the end of ti' street.
9. Obtain encroachment permit and constt.
standard read approach
andCohas
Providing
ansset Road. the adequate sight distance at ' intersection of access road
d
iO Pay any delinquent tastes or current taxes as required.
11. Meet the requirements of the 8u
Division of Forestry,
tte County Fire Department and
?,,�arrnica�; �.l,t" �'r�c7�it;l+,gin ira
iAll
100 ft, leac ti teed fror. "'rytback 11routti o::intina wells either
*'i 41ii% the PropE?rt"T' Or wa.th1r1 lk� r, M �of ttho PrOP ".l,4i! b nutadxari.es c
1 Gnaw a 1Lco Vit" icachi eld setback from l,he hi.ghwzIter l r,e of the Creek
on parcels 1 and 2
1.5- Prove that he 1,e to rcd i uarct;i;i.e �i' domes'tac wa
r ,d �J rce' a 5 ,ca'areaut zia li~
s
TO BLAtte County Advisory Agency
FROM
h1ani-iing Director
SLID0C(.'C'» Report on Tentative Parcel, Map for William E�« Reynolds on AP
56-17-12
DATE: October, 1, 198S
This is a proposal to divide appro.« 19 acres i nto 3 p.arce.] s y two of
acres, each and one of 9. The present zoning is TM --5 (Timber Mountain
5 acre parcels) in the'Cohasuet area. The General Plan designation is
g9bvidedLrfivec;ondtionlwhich
Critellaws parcels less than 2U acres
p ria arm met. This project does not
comply with the followso.
1. Adequately maintained approve road access with sufficient capacity
to service the area
2. riezonabl a accessibility,tb cbmmerci al services and schools:
N« Av i.labil%ty of adequate fire protection fac iitibs.
The wbject property is located _apprbXimatelY 1000 feet from Cbhasset
I�aad:
ppdown ar► e cisting pr,iva+*e road. 'This project would add
d
a imately 700 foet to that road in order- to service the Fri hposed
partol 7.5. Major commerci 41 tervite%7 servicesmedical facilities and Junior and
senior high schools are located approximately 15 miles away in Chico.
Cohasz et Road between :Chi ccs and Cohasset i s substandard and cumul i ti ve
increases in traffic on Cohasset Road will represent 'a sigh14icant
impart on that reads ability to carry traffic. While two fire station%
ex i vs in the Cohasset areal ohe is a sea Ona . station and i s only manhed
dUr-IMO the %Lkmmor- months and tl�tq other is a volun•leer� stc-►ti.on« The,`
.r3 }maned fire station is in Chic;b appro imat, ly '�5 Iisi'les away.
This project will i:ncr•eAse demahrJ ;or all gr,ww ► rs?s' k sewvicos in an
i sol aced area where it is hot cosi: effocti vo to provide trent. In a year
raf sovere budget cutbacki.-7 it io not purdtnt tea allow devF non °int where
service support (police, fire, medical) is iso costly. Available tA',J•4ricb
c'ltai 1 ars aro being directed toward more ut"bah areas. Othtr' Go'mev-al Pl a,"
Policies which suppbt-t dehial of the Tentative Map are:,
Page 36of , the Land Use I 1 emOMt for Orderly Development - b,
Promote the full utiliatiur of site served by ettisting public
f Ati, l i ti es ncCoUrago devil OPMOrtt in and armuhd' ett i sti ng'
cbfiIMQiities with public facilities.
2« Page 49 b,lY the Land Uso El. etoeht The site designation ite i teri a 4
cbnditibhai zeahiho and development criteria4 and 44phing factor's for
Agricultural Residdhtial db not mLuppbe+- the creation,
reation of pard ie of
less than 20 acres in size iri the proj6ct vicinity`
r 0age 57 of the Lana
t.lse_'Crlemont Required contsistohcy finding +iyr
e;i.thet- subdivision :Or, tpnithat; may not be based: solely oh a map
deter-minat"an (1 -4th a-crE range For Agricultural Residential) but
rather upon the objectives, pcaiici_es
sPecified in the entire General Plan. general land,usey 40d programs
4. Ci rain. at i on El e*nent .: Policy 1.1. z on Page 7+'a Ci rcul c�tti bn
plans
for the County, q foothill area should be design ar-oUnd patterns
which i.ncourage deVelapment next to existing highway corridors and
"Phasi z e devel o�7ment near r ;; i sti rig rural comrt�4ini tY. certters.
S. Circulation Element .:> Fol icy 1 '� 2 n
rMc�ads and highways Should be desion page 71' The mast important:
possible level servici
9" and maintained to the highest
ng convenience The least important; roads
and highways should receive only the improvements necessary to
maintain their structural integrity and operational safety.
rCohasset Road is designated as a minor cui act
t nd ;i it as far south as Keefer road r in the vicinity!
6. rcul ati on C1, emont pal icy 4.1.5 on page 7w; The County H+i l l
sure that all the road systems, including nous pt slat „ for g pr-ivate roads, coohoct
�Imr and to a Publicly Maintained lro,Adesystem rtt both to each
Circulation Element - Policy 4.1.8 on Page 76: Private subdivision
roads will be bui' It to full CaLt'nty st andard� and the
y g � y will be
r- ma htenenre cycle.
4,
r:� vatei mai htax r�,�.d tie such thrt�u
hout ,.hei,
Y
. rc�.tl ate an El.emeht �� p�ol i �; 4,1.10
,
,l.l0, On Page 76Y
shc�-(I d be held i~esPonsi bil e for thsi iv. fail- f the�,f fsi teroad
oe
x mprcrvemand �iencs needed f' �l handle the Lraffi.c in�r-eases that thetheycau5o,
�;. Open apace Clement �N -t .a l4. �,
c,reati ren of resi denti z;l g The County 'should d permit t; the
d p similar ch arae ewi st i s rrlreiX y i f Oat" sr,tlarge
h a nnumbers of vacant sites
arse 14. I",�e County She,uld regulate r�5idem'ialadeb�lo�meini�tit, tth
g
�a the survial and rna r�atir�h ref deer herds.
athills i,a facilitate
In, C'afety dement - Table' � Mai•.e protection from fire hatard�, a'
ddhoi.deration in all pl,anni hg, regul tarYv and capital improvement
programswith special oareas and l+extro6e
ha..ardY
he pr-UPOsed design of the
prrrtaer~t :will, divide .
fA road,to provide access to pareel three. PrOPOsed Parcel two wi h
shcil,Ild be discouraged as they. lead to rer�uestufor varst �ancesitclncM"eat�
er parcels, one car each side of the road.
lots
small -
"The ".>�a�trtmeht of Fish and Came has indicated that this Project
tho pra,aeeoidable '� ` .w will
have ari av impact on wi l d l s i n cat area.
ifmwnx.a.t is r;�ommended Thweft,'r�e� Jeri%
fbant to
Cc-tx.on 66474 (e) of tho
Act pur-sbr ntyncah F r�t.mi;by with th
L+iatte Countya(3eneral spl ah
e policies °2f the
rMH r
•
..• 6�.i �`_ _� +, ��! a n. '� �� ,, r' r--
.q
i (•d bllflr .' ' AMM• �` 1 � � 11, ,' �'s n � I""1
,`ren• ,� ,Q,,�, • aIN .1 r. 1\�'t,,1= ` r1 ` 1 1 r Y ,`��/ •�j It,. �,:
to. f7s
'� , ..e 1 IfP er. :,I' , •nnMN ` ti ,4 •i. k• 1 V4'.
.1. e
'A...4 4 Jos,1 .�r'1...YSIw.Y.: r
'� • l " D \ f Vin, �`"', I ''
pill
"
1 "
go.
r •o,, • .ti. �" MSP n.t r+.�, ` tr. YM«,P ••
�. � r •t.. f` ,
/'' ` ~ .. r't-� ��ll'" • `,� . •` 1` 1 I(. �•' ..;r'Nr1f«4 rr• ,. I'.. •..
✓ur13
`." / +.. '•t 1 1 r•. �'' r rrN Qvt r t •. r
lrw
f M y ^A•. .r.r. r tFlrf
A 7 36 inW 1 G 41" 1 i f
sr.Yr•Yr. r . U u.
1 m -�tpyry,
'IMH rl 1 f. s =r i�r'�t !/ ,r �• p,. CA•.� :L Ci .• p
Yr _. • • '`� •sit 6.1 it
'� ,�[ ` f �injy GArto_` lJr+r•. }' .- F w: 1' ;W'' i i�![`a ��� *.'� vs
rill �' t \ " sr� r �Sr••l�:i l
u
0•Fe,i
rte.. T[.or LP
.1 1
s. ,. • „�FIIr • L[ 1 t y�l. N � el l3f Y,.
I LMJ
1rTi .. `mgr { • 'tu I �., ry/•nN _ f ,^ ( , 11 t �
1 J r r.•4 tte1YA..xN + rN .{Ye. YY
t •� f� +� . tee• t � trpV J ti rf+I~r♦ ] r .
- � ; dnf.• � AJ,r. C � ' f ',!� i } .. I d ,• e:. 1 ra"'14� ��i ;: "'
I11 I N1r q Y• a
1 � � M• ti, '. a" IS `i. ♦�O � ►`e..•d ficin r J fi r,
sp + � `. 1`y � "'•c"}ya^_. 't• (n V�% bf[N {—� / r .'�i"u `� .e{;�'u��Y Q•rdr rj �,1,�YV •.
;,, d �?: , ^ r r � i Y �..r. , �+ , ' ;� I . � �� ` Y iY j" ,, , . Ati+rrwr h►r ',
It" n«.
I y S ,r >, • vn a.,,,
''� '� �,, � 'fit 1> , . b�+• � ;, i f ,, ,. �,t� �Y r , ,e.
j
'iii Y ;,. L "~� `� ••� hl•Yw= ' �:. 't , o . i, [ pig M:r rr ri"ew}sj
lV. f `' ° �' , s � iiiJt[. � - L~: •t•.r _ �� � .: vr�! i e.6'r, r„�
`+ r � _(t��M i � [ ► 5 r. i 1 net ,+
.. �l i+ rt es •..i. q . �.h pr[[� ,. �� r ' 'r�»�' l n r Yu � '
.f. a•r w +, `` . r 1 b LII dA �, � r"�- ;.?' q Ajr '
Sol. ""ljrySJ•
� v
4n w�� � �Qr I�, rf ie..• Y � � -w, ' I w � ��b• "�� I��i3 n�F'LF'11'H [� 14Arej�
1�� r • rrl (, Y , r�+ \� �� �, [ .. IW.. �.. ` Y...- �.+-.► ew16w a } MI �' Lwo ++t
too
Figute a bu Cull is' , r �.
Y one s s c� � cad y �r ActiVe Pati l torn �'ennngs y 197 j
r°
iii _�
MODIFIED MERCALLI EARTH UM
4 E
INTENSITY SCALE
I. Not felt except by a very few under
VYII, Damage slight in specially designed
specially favorable circ mstances.
(I)
structures; coruidirablr In ordinary, `
II: Felt only by a few, persons at trait,
substantial buildings, with partial
collapse•, great in poorly built :true.
especially on upper floors of build.
tures,Panel wait, thrown out of
Ings. Delicately suspended objecte
frame structures. Fall of chimneys,
uta»t?; swing. 0 to ii)
IY>: Felt
factory stiacka, columns., monuments,
quite ,noticabiy indoon� 'es.
walla Heart' furniture orerat,
pedally on upper floors of buil.lings,
Sand and mud ,ejected, in (mall
but many, people do not recognize it
amounts. Chante in Well water, Per.
as an earthquake. Standing motor.
sons driving .motorcars disturbed,
can may rock slightly, Vibration like
(VIII+ to IX)
X:
passing of truck. Duration estimated,
t iroblr in specially
(YII)
IV Dunn the day; felt indoors by
S
designed d struiage
tures; well-designed
frame struciures thrown
many,
outdoors b • r, few. At night some
out of
plumb; great in substantial buildings
D�shes, windows, doors
, ,
with partial coils se buildings shift•
disturbed; all's make creaking
g
cd off founf h dont. G round cracked'
like 'h
striking buildingnStandi g motorcars'
conspicuously, Undo
broken.; (IX,}) Bound pipes
rockednoticeably. (IV to V)
V� Felt by nearly everyone,
X. some well-built wooden itructun
destroyed;
manv
awakened Some dishes. wndmaa
mat masonry and frame,
strueturej destroyed with their frxtn•
a�.. broken; a few instances of »
cracked plaster
, unstable objeea'
dations; ;ground badly cracked.'Tialts
bene. Landslides conside
overturned. Disturbances of trees.'
rmbla from
river banks and steep slopes, Shifted,
poles, and other tall objects »
sctnedrnes mired. Pendulum clocks
sand and:mud. Water splashed (sl'op.
Pcd) over banks. (X)
.-nay stop. (V to Vi)
Ft
VI, h by all, irtany Crighiened arta!
XI. Few, if arty, (maaOmy)
run
outdoors. .Some heYW furniture
remain standing:; $nd t desstruccw-a
Broad fjisur. in I;»
moved; a few instanter of fallen
Plaster ar damaged chimneys.
di tin'
der'ground` i gmpIcte tin.
P Peitnes'eompietely out
)amay slight. (VI to `VII)
service, Earth' slUmps and land
slips in 'soft
VII. Everybody, nsns outdoors. Danuse
ground. Rini bent
greatly,
iviglt`aible in Suiidings of good design
and eonstrvaion; tlifhf to ntodim(e in
XII. Dania `
go tors/. Wailes aeon on ground
well-built ordinary structures; ej*4
r dmtbls ire i.00rly built badly'diszot;ed.
tur(aces. Litter of sight and level
Obpo,•ts thrown
x
dcsigaed sMictu ,
res, some chimneys'
upward
into "air.
broken. -Noticed by Persons driving
atatOfCats. (VIII -j
r
THE CHICO6.
MaNOCLTNE'
A monocline according to Z;on we
is a one 1 ' g ll, Flint
imb flexure Ind Saunders
on either, (1969)
horizontal side of which the
4r dip. uni�orml strata: are:
Y at low angles,
Views of'�gury
.monoclines fo shows cross
.,ection
Chico rlonocline
formed liY f°ldIng or faulting., has recently been described: -b The
g•
and Doukas (1981 Y Harwood, He
� � Figure 3 shows the 11ey
Monoclinax locabaon of Axis and other T the Chico
northeastern lineaments and aul.ts border'
l :i n
sage o, the Sacramento Val bordering the
Burnett (196;1 ley.
studied fracture
which generall traces;n the
Y occur Tuscan Formation
along the axis
t -_.
ett f the Chaco Monocline.
0
(1963) faults urithin t Prior'
Chico rn he Tuscan
onocl.ine Fo
M Axis, were cons' rxnation, along the
formed 1dered small displacement frac
during the flexi.n
g of the nonocl.ine. tures
Between Richardson S
Prings and
us
fracture an Sprin e exists a
c
Mid aPProxmatel
miles wide along
y 30 miles long and aPproxigs theymatel
the axis pf the Y 2.o
generallyChico MonocYine,
have short These s
lengths and f"tactors
trend in a
The fractures are steeply,.. ,. northtaesterl
dipp n direct,
Y
1;0 degrees o g: as most OP hem 11aVe
7'he macihium dips with
rtical.
t
is approxi f 'vertical..,
Probable Vert,
mately 30xcal eParation
meters (98 feet) Most o s
little or no vertical the fractures ` the
the lar res have
brit
ger ve
tions encountered between Co _ rt�.ca,� separa-
Predominate hasset Ridge and bye Creek.
moveinenb along the fractures a The
down with 1. r no PPears tt be West. $lad
little o horizontal se ar
e"vdenoe su P ation. Tho 'geologic
9'ges�$ that
most al the fracturing and �.
].. S
Milla.on
Years old or. 6
lcer. d� apl Cement is
1
J
oc
Mopoita '!
i
F
•
,
�•
o'
i'arctllio �
Chico
'' %•
C i r
' • V
.i�i.a:••• Photo linea m�nf
;OROVII 4X
POobably t=oulf
•,
.,.r ., Pou'Llected
�f 'known,
•.at, rY
i0 aviii. •
•
Palermo
1 � •
iM,
•
3C
9
�
�••
c SCAR 0/ kl '
t,ONtTRR•
�
�,
�
Y066.
figure �' heaments
Maiyevilla
and
fa UI, is in
the notthwesteets Sierran foothi its
i
Burnett (1963) suggest., 9.
str
result of ract,ure; system ;1oa,med as
uctural readJuthat the fracture
the Tuscan F
response to foldin T ormation in
9• the .fractures Probably do not extend to
great do evidenced by ground water
c
Richardson Springs. Not onlytY of Tuscan and
are oalthese
they are saline and have m nex�-tl springs cool, lout
a high. sulfur
With natural content and are ass
gas seeps. This suggestsociat�d
from that
the marine s the water is derived
sedimentary, unit of the Chino' For'...
directly underly the Tuscan fio mation which
rmation` along
the monocline. fractures 9 the western 'ed
The go of
or Chico. aP"pear to be less continuous south,
At the scale Used in Figure g_
along the anis of ► the fracture
the chico Mohocline a system
alignment '�t3. Ppears to be in approximate
Portions of the Faothill Fault
System
OrotTille, south of
Lake
Figure 4+ taken from Watkihs et
l
fracture zone aloe a, 11985) + shows that the
g the ,�ronoclxnal axis
Ment with the as in aPPrOgimate aljgh-
in:Eerred boundary
bas;rl de. Y between'the shelf and
Posits in the underlying slope and
Ying cretaceous d
Formations rt is posits`
;probable .that of the Chico
the monoclinal flexu-
overlying competent deposits of t
in the
f bondin he Tuscan Formation
g and �'ractur.in is the result.
�. g at this loca
t1oh of the fine-- n in respn:tse to
grained material s coinpac-
ao
deposits due to the Within' the slope and basin
wex�ght of the overt ia7
materials: The. �' S" Tuscan a
inferred chap hc� alluvial
Would also change an the slope at th location
produce flexurin n
g 'within the
most of the len Tuscan'materials�
length, of the "morocline qtr Along
+� esses were rolioved by
R3W'_ R2W RtW R1L, R26: R3R R4!
l2.
THE FOOTHILL FAULT SYSTEM AND THE 1975 OROVILLE' FART ;#C;UAKE
South of the town of Oroville there are a n=br,�r of prominent
faults and lineaments which are a part of the F'oot,llill Fault
System which extends along the eastern ,margin of the Sacramento
and San Joaquin Valleys. The Foothill Fault System is not.
comparable to the fracture system within the Chico Monocline even
though their strikes appear similar at some map scales.
I
Some of the major differences between the two systems include
1. The faults in the Foothill system have a mor* n+)rth-south
trend than the trend for fractures which dol,inoatc the axis
of the Chico Monoeline.
2. Major faults within the Foothill System extendhorizon-
tally for tens of miles, while the fractures within the Chic
Monocline are significantly; shorter,,
3. The fractures within the Chico Monocline are neaz:lt vertical
while the established fault planes 'within the rt --.hill System
dip less steeply to the east of west.
4. Fractures within the Chico Monocline are pro`6bly shallow{
fractures while measured focal depths for earthquakes within
the Foothill System are':*ignificantly deeper.
Figure 3 shows` the location's of the fractures in the Chico
Monocline and the major faults within the Foothill l Fay.l t System.
The major faults within the Foothill. Syntem in sou�h��y,�� Hi�tte
County are the Paynes Peaky SWain Ravine and rrairie Cvaek Faults
which are also shown .in Figure 3.
Lu�.oai
nN
'
Iwix1:
541, /��
•� ►.ue» wry
[
Q •tam fae�ctlfH tris
...
AmomimArt tlMt-
Ona CA ~*& Op %arm
M11tlo7J
j w. •. �
�'KYtp
us" %Wtm mesa &AM" or PVC.Amvw
uaa uw►o vtattsc" w..aMOU"kA : .
WOI-w9fWAd*-eirN mNwiveMil ..
�'ti
ho[ rse+►K "0 . adr:r�e ;arrMv
yet
vat
W.I. ' d
r
Ia.A4f
�
�is
n
r'
1w
v
in
OROVILI.EV- T rj r \`fes f
_ j�►.
ti9 ar.1 r
,
;�1 fNA
RA 'AX
Pomr-
LEVEL
ANC6 S,
�t' PAIRMO { Fli rWEbE:3
�- FtAr
y.� ,�„ ' '4 f p .a1
M.
41 1
v.
.TOApGF?APHI C 4• flj�<�.•4 ('1 '
10
qF
r- N
121.30—•�'-+r.`•f.'o � '--=�.:.:,:::�w f !E_.._„�•
12l`2D'' 'r
0y
Fi 9-1 re 6 A Geomor h
ares P Ic aces`
� Cleve
Hunte CounCy. surf
All) +I �t and Hi l i
P9inCs Of Cross-Isecriot7 indica,, end
► F i ,g'U re
A
FMt
2000 aa
1600
CLEVELAND HiLL'FAULr R4TTLESNARE POINT U
1000TERF?AC>: p �YANOOTTE SURFACE
t �1
BANGOR SUR
SURFAFACE SWEOES
F! quell 1 \ .L. I ti
6 Cross-.Iactran ViCw of � I ''� � �r ��
00
dlsadctad, mountain j cone /
jstii ndottr and 9angow i
>�arsfit. Crnss-sOctlon to the chat. View fain 9Qo►�rphlc sUrfacas
std lrtts Ij��1,. a r, 9 no in vt C of-Cieve� d a
show cine )arid 'l>lifir
tz on mep Pi N
ar, gura
„I
a `
a
Arl/A A
•
• f
IH.Rb•.�d :9
CALIFOR IA + '
+ • • f .wAu^ � �f e
qV
°
i • 1 t
•i +s � f
f ► • IV-V
+
' • f�. i. �.• • �•�;. � •. i
, r
It
c • � e i +t•; ` f.f i
wed
T .♦ +.••••anti S' 1 J 1 1 ♦':
,
'
,
+
, u• r it
c
•�
Iri. ' syr
hr +tr
surll�'t i,lijtlriRc•
is�issf t♦ ills♦ tl+ijt3.i rtc
"�
jlsssl9+
- 1sstIMlPMsr 1tliiisl+Al pAr it t�!
�. K
« it • r4,.W
!y
re'y
i
..yillw .w
.r.♦•GJY N. .yam -_.,
:,..
20,
(1973): Acceleration data obtained by the California Division of
Ms.nes and Geolo
gY (1975) is shown in Figures 10A and 10B. Figure
10B shows that the rock accelerations in the oroville-Chico area
are less than those inferred from the regional models of Schnabel
and Seed 1972) Using a micro -r
egionalI: on technique based
upon measured rock accelerations 'from the 1975Uroville Earthquake
and attenuation curves s -i.lar to those developed by Schnabel and
Seed, it is possiblo to estimate maximum probable rock ;accelera
tions associated with another Uroville-type earthquake having a
Richter Magnitude of 6.5.
The 'William Reynolds Parcel consists of
approximately 19,. p
acres located near the central
Portion of Section 34 T 24 Nj
R 2 MDB M, Figure 11 shows that the property is located
east of the CoIhasset Highway and is bounded on the north by the
Ande-son Fork and on the south by Maple Branch, The parcel is
at an elevatir,n Of approximately 2120 feet. This parcel is
located near the eastern edge of the fracture zone which de-
lineates the axisof the Chico Monocline described by Harwood
et al (1981)
stereo air photos and
p infra -ted variscan analysis suggest
the presence of three fracture systerils Southwest of the property
but none of them intersect the property, A field aheu-k- conte
41
ducted on July 24 1905 did' not reveal the presence of any other
fractures within the parcel. Harwood et al ;(1.581) shows the
lineament
also shown in T'igure 11 (nearest the property) and
p tureccording
records no verta.cal dis lac€ment For the ,frac
'.
t
I
21,
to 110rwood c.`t c-tl(198:] 1 , the: fracture near:=s �,
recorder vu t the pxopoj4tY
1: displaromcnt of q , tt 'I
r`taca 6 feet ar,; 1 , f35
of the m3 les west
property. Within the prop
zones. J there tre ,no mapable fracture
r , Ncarb
r` y fracture zones are probably older than 1.1
Years and have no historical million'
(last 200 Years) ) record of, nQve
The Re
ynol:ds parcel is located apP1oximatr_l
the 1915 Orovi,lle r y 32.5 miles Crom
Picenter, Using the techniyue described on
tiage 20 of this report., the maximum anticipated rock
tion at actelera�-
this location from another Oroville�-tyPe earthquake
th'quake
ing a Richter Ma:gnitade of
5 would tie
6.
approximately
0,
v
�' s• A figure of at lean g's should be 05
st 0.05 used for engineering -
Ions.
design can iderations,- 5
According to Sherburne and Naug a 1975 ( ) r a,ccelerat.ons of
0.03 and 0.08 g's were recorded f`or alluv%unt in Chi
r during
the 19'75 orovi ;1.1e Earthquake
i,magnit`ude 5 . , co d
and accelerations
of 0.04 g's were recorded '.n volcanic rock
cities of Chico and Paradise are Paradise. The
a,
pprdxitna r at
miles respectiVely from the 1975 Orov l" ely 20.5 and, 19.9
�e .OPicenter. Although
y opertis nearly 1,2.0 miles fart
the }7e »olds. Property her,
epicenter than chic or Paradises
the evidence su rom the
Qrorille ggests that an
"type earthquake havii � � ,
g a Rlchtel Ma of 6, 5 could
Produce rock acceleration of about 0.05 gigs at th
Most of the `iproporty is locate a site,
and j bedrock terrain
ground water tables are rel, c1 near so1�d
atively deep so liquefaction should
r REFERENCES
Longwell, Chester R., Flint, Richard F. and 'Sanders, John E..,
Physical Geology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1969, 685 p,,
'Harwood, David Si.Halley, Edward J., and Doukas, Michael P.,
Geologic Map of the Chico Monocline and Northeastern ,Sart of the
Sacramento Valley, California, Dept. of the Interior, V.S. Geol.
Sur., Misc. Investigations Series Map 1-1238 (1;62, 500), 1981.
Burnett, John L., Short Contributions to California Geology, Fracture
Traces in the Tuscan Formation/ Northern California, Calif. Div.
of Mines ,and Geol.., Special Faport 82, 1963
Guyton, J.W., and Scheel, A.L., Earthquake Hazard in Noy.th6ast
California, Regional programs Monograph No.1, California State
University, Chico.
Jennings;_ Charles W.,, Fault Map of California, California: Division
of Mines and Geology, Geological Data Map.,.No. 1, 1975:
Watkins, R., Baum, S.L., and Russell, J.S., Palpog,rography of Late
Cretaceous Clastic Shelf Deposits, Northeastern Sacramento Valley
California, 1985, unpublished in review.
California Department of Water Resources, The August 1, 1975
Orovzlle Earthquake Investigations, 'Bull 203-78, 669 p,
Feb:_, 1979. _
Schnabel p.B. and Seed H.
r , B., Acceleration in Roc}c for Earthquakes
in the Western United States, Bull of the Seismological Soc. of
Amer, ► Vol. 63, No 2, p• 501-51.,60
Sherburne, R.W, and Hauge, C.J.; Eds, California Di,vk of Mires
& Geology, Oroville, California; ,Earth uake l August 1975 Special
Report 129, 151 p. 7.975, q g p
Real, C -A, Topbzada, T.R. and Parke D.L.
Earthquake Catalog of
California, January 1, 1900-DecembOt 31, 1974, Calif. Div, of
Mines and Geology, Special Publication 52, 1978,
Green8kelder,'RiW.; Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from
Eakthcitiakes in 'Califor.nia, Calif. Div, of Manes anc4. Geology,
Map Sheet 231 Revised 1979
w,
Al?1'I3NU f K T�
COUNTY Or, IU`YTh
t NV RONMENTAL CN11M IS'T FORM
(to e Forlp? etcd by Lead Agency1
Log 11 85-07-08-01 '
I
11 BACKGROUND AP !t 56-11-12
1. Name of proponent w� William. Ei Reynolds
2,, Address of proponent and representative. (if appl i il)le
5055 Heinz Street Lippincott -Gut)) Assad,
Baldwin Park,_CA 91706 P 0. Box 6,71,_,_ .,:
Paradise, CA 95969
3. project description TAtive Parcel Map _Rr
.,�,� :en _ ,...�.,.r,�.,
11,, MANDATORY FINDING, 2f �1GNtx�TCANQI. 'l�Bh1Al`I3E NO
ai hoes the project have the potential to degrade o4ty
q,uaiity of the environme,,nt, substantially reduce
the Habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause ca
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to olimi,nate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restriett til
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
el,i.minato important examples of the major periods
of Cal,ifornici history or prehistory'
h. does the, project have the pots pial to achieve
short -team benefits to the destriment ot long—term,
environmental goats? (A short-toren impact on the
onvironment is one which occurs in. ti, relatively
of time i ili
endureperiod
inothe future.) long-term impacts Ia
cY
Iloes the project have impact; which are ndividu-
.illy limited, but cumulativelyconsiderable? (A,
project may impact on two Or more separate resources
where the impact oil each resource is relatively
swhere'orrect of the total of these
small, but
the �nviironment rs signi ric:ant ,)
d. Does the t rojoc.t have etvi ronmental, e I•fee is Idlicli
beings, vithor ciirec°tly' or indirectly?
cwn human
cause substantial ativeese effects
1.11 11I,TT.RMINAI ION (Tei be. completod by tiler t,ea 1 Agoiicyr7'
I.'ri the basis of this initiu'I evailurItion
IfIVI: tilId thV proposed pl•oJecwt C0111,I) NOT have a slgniricint erfect
on the environment, amjr o NJ:GA'I'TVI-' 'IliIU. ARATION will be prepared
TYNE, rliidthat although t}ie proposed prof oct could have a si,gni ri
ennt ofNct on the environmont, theme will not be a stgliifi »ant
cffoct in this case becamge the MITIGATTON MVIASl ARS described oil
the attachod shoet have beoi added to the Iirojert, A Nhr)ATTVh
I1T;CLARA'T`tON will be prvparccl. `
l7IQ rino the proposed project MAY have a significant affect on
the onvii.�c�macmt, and all FN1�l ONTIIINTAt, 91PACT '114110111' is required.
t1A'IT, August 50 1985 o *-\' 01 MITTI'. PLANNTNCI t1hhAR.TMPNT
fly
Y i
David 11, Rirofttlmus
Asso 1 36
te, plana
IV, ENVIRONMENTAL TMP TS
(Explanations ot all yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached s,heet(s)
YES
MAYBE N0
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in significant:
a.
Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures?
X
b.
Disruptions, displacements, ,compaction r
overcovering of the soil?
jCG-
C.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features'?�
d.
Destruction, covering or modification of any
--
unique geologic or physical features?
�(
e.
Increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
either on or off-site?
f.
Changes in deposition or erasion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of,
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, i,ylet or lake?
Xr
g.
Loss of pLime agriculturally productive soils
outside designated urban areas?
_ K
h.
Exposure of.people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, muds
slides, ground failure or similar hazards?
Z. AIR;. Will the proposal result in substantial.
a.
Air emissions or deterioration of ambient
air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors, smoke
Or fumes?
c.
Alteration of air mo`oment, moisture, or
t�emper,ature, or any change it climate,,
locally or regionally?
3, WATER. Will the proposal result in substantial:
T.—
Changes in currents, or th� course or
direction of water movements in either
marine or fresh waters
X
b.
Changes in absorption rates; drainagepatterns,
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?c
c.
Need for off-site surface drainageimprov'e,-
t�hents, including vegetation removal, channel-
`nation or culvert installation?
�
d:
Alterations to the course or Plow of Mood
haters n
,
Change .in the amount of surface waterin any
water body?
f�
Diteharge into surface watt rs, or in any
a1teratiox of surface watei, duality, including'
4
but not limited totemperature, dzssol.ved
ozygen or turbidityy 7
�
y
of the direct�oh or rate of flow
4f
of ground waters?
h.
Cha,tlge 1.1 the quantity of ground waters,
either th-mt.tgh direct additions or withi4
drawa.l.s 5 or through interceptim of an
aquifo:r by cuts or excavatlors?
il
Reduction in the amount of water otherwise
ava.al;�bl.e for public water supplies?
j,
Exposure of people o-rproperty to water
relatect1a7ard s1tc11 tis tl ooiirig?
YES
MAYBE NO
a.
PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in substantial,
a: ange in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
'crops,
shrubs, grass, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. introduction of new species of plants into an
area; or in a barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any, agricultural crop'?
S.
ANIMAL LIFE,. Will the proposal result in substantial:
a. Change -in the diversity cf species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell fish,
benth,c organisms or insects)?
b. Reduction in the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into,
an area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d, ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
5,
NOISE. Will the proposal result insubstantial.
a. Increases in excistin noise leve
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levees?
p p p
7.
LIGHT AND_GLARE, Will the proposal, produce
S iini.ficant, Light and glare?.
8 ,
LAND USE . Will the proposal. result in a
substantial alteration o£ the present or planned
land use ,of an area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES Will the proposal result in
substantial:
a, Increase in the rate of use of any natural
'resources?
?b.
Depletion of any, non-renewable natural
-
resources 7 .�
101
RTSX.Op UPSET. Will the proposal involve:a,
A V�sk of explosion or the release of hazard-
ous substances (including) but hot limited to
oil, pesticides t chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset conditions?
Y„
b, possible interference with an emergency
response plan or onorgency evacuation plan?
.
11.
POPULATION, dill the proposal alter the location,
is�tti `tz Son, density, or growth rate of the human
.population?
i2,
HOUSTNC. Wil], the. proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand fo.r additional housing?
r
;4.
YESMA
� NO13.
TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION': Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicle'
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
nantial
X
C. Substantial porta-tion
impact on trans
systems?
Xc,
d. Significant alterations to present patterns
of circulation or movement of people and/or,
goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
"""
X
traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
nrease in traffi
f. Ic
y or ;pedestrians?
I
XC-
14,
PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal have an effect
upon; or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services;
a. Fire protection?
L
b. Police protection'
C. Schools?
d, Parks or other recreational facilities?'
e: 14aintenance of public facilities, including
roads
�. Other governmental services?
15.
ENERGY. Will the proposal result in
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel.or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existi�lg
�-
sources of energy, .or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16,
UTILITIES, Will the propsal result in a need for
new systems, or substantial alterations to the
following,
a, power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
k
C. Water availability:
septictank?
e, Storm Ovate drainage?
.
f, Solid waste and disposal?
I7.
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal, result in:
a. - reation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)7:
b. txposure of people to potential health
hazards?
18,
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal, result in the
o 5struct o Of any scenic Vista or view open to
the public, or will the proposal result in the
in aesthetically offensive sate open
publlo
toedtib covif
;4.
19. RECREA�N. Will the YES
MAY}I N4
upon the quality or proposal result in an impact
a Y quantity of existing recreational
Opportunities?
2.0. CULTURAL RESOURCES,
-1
ai 171 t e proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction
of a
historic archapolo �,, prehistoric or
gical
b. site,
Will the proposal result in adverse h si
or aesthetic effects p Y cal
3�
---�
to a
historic bu.ldi prehistoric or
g, structure
C. Does the -or object?
proposal have tht, potential to cause
a physical change which
x
would affect unique
ethnic cultural values
dWill
the proposal restrict existing religious,
or $acred uses within the
area?_ potential impact
Vi DISCUSSION OR rNVIR;ONMENTAL EVALUATrO
y
AP 56-17-1
See attachment
1
ee
,a
tl nr i�vrar<rr�►<< cv�t
.��trr� Arm M�
V
hb , ,F Development of two ;Aldi ti. om,,xi hcame+;itt"ts car: the
proporty, ,both in close prati,mi.ty to Maple til-aricha, Will result. in ► t nle
d;:r<spl:tacement.h disruptimn, ct7mpac.ti(3n and crvemmvr~rinq of t,:hr» zoil
which could lead to inrareases in erazion and remlkl,t; in ziltation ol,
t`1�aple Bl-ant--h- Dim to tho sizo of thtn parcels, and thc, 1-eC[uir�ed
building setback%, this stir ttl d not br,-. a signi•t;ic ant', or,oblerg. The
acc ss rta,Ad servi. ma, mg Par=el '3 will have to crocsq Maple Br4Anth r Any
stir-,:Atn mi,rasminq mvtt:•h must the requirements of the Dr•!par t,nront of ritkh
rtd C ctme °I'n►- strectnbed alt ioration.
!I"►: '►.1 t tr ,tktr. Cc)canty iz within a Moderate .,,r t Yrr trt,;t:f.� 1lr'ttensitar
Zone V111 The rar bjvct larcapo- "-ty j.Lr,, located in the vi,r lirlity
in-For-rod i'vul,ts and t:nown • zxUl't:s tts*tu~iated with thr.! Itt...s���n i"Icrnhdlirt
�,a •F,Iukl t. sys'rr-Mm of unknown activity„ lw;ecau%e of the ptr r~ri bi 1, i ty of the
in•Ferrt'ed ++alta beintj l.Cytuated on-%i,'t;o, a goal agi r71 �4itr,vvy ahOt..tld be?
per°Fcrr°mod -t•O determind if a sitlni•Fi,c-Ant 000100idi�kl IhIukik-1 trd artists, 11nd
if so to develop p, prcrpr-iztty tnitinatidrr measawc-s
.;Ira C'tt �trrrlbrs t ►^ rr,ct t ttr in the t'id9e arOLA 61-V limited
lr.;tr=i rare tic-.ri rids of low rainfall and/or dt-ot,:rghtw. , ttvc.j beers i nttrV m
t'.d clo coir v I'hrer ' c: x i" sti nq wells r rti !nt on the property, W,tt
wot t,;,r" .tsotm will in(-.re alzo Fa1z resi,donti+--al htt'imes are ton.otP"uctod..
V0,ru� ksn of tho l,>:al,go Size o+ the p arrel:� ,-any wat-.or di,awdown ft-am thecn. t r't t'rr,7' as rt syr U.blin �,hrlvld not bry ilrris+i.Camt,_
stj ma subjx.,ct prutm is lot AvLod in 'At) ar,e;a tt•F lon--tar°i.ti.caviintmr�
aioct. art r �r tyf i � r rLL�tc~at�,ed in an area
d c r htt c r~t h�abit,,it, �+r►t e the ,�t,tE`
mf: p 4:m- r°: t- 1. s r-,�m q i ri q + v r. m J,*5- i t� h � n 1. r„xc, r o i. o �� r.� p i" u%j m �t. �;l y 3 a+.�;t� ds„
dtawr' lta.l trrwahrrt± , i than , prcO'VrtY UJIQt,;tl d nr,.!t» inni 4icartt.ly d toriorate the .
triiclitd habit�a•t, art 1'I10 tkl-MM. HUv10Vt??►r.4 jnpt,r .:;r a cttrrd :" n •Ft"tnat' t:,hQ
17 r,!.tt":t:(rrt'tat': r,rF r y t l't c1r`fd Ui Ilo 'YJtAch may otter- that
1 ,t„te, p 4 w rlr� <.p►atr jin,,l: will ,Acid 't:wr, dwc� l a iq, tali is to the 4t,xoutk.
TI"E0 rpt• r t "rrr r� rtrori toy! rs! raiclhrrt.;r af Ott;;, pt r pt rt°y>ai.l 1 ari retrrr r t awll y
irar tt�kf t tr°:F °ate ;wrrt►i r t "l 'I� t:P tr trtir in the iav,ue, ;z;i:rj+ t� Only i*Wt,3
uko ldirt 1 t'vr--irin awt'de—t.,, any rkf+mtti ehrould nets t3o ,iiq"nibit,ant•M`
'144 I'mr•tt,trtlt no,, t-iriniti.tzentthi% projerJ_ will reT � rert't: n
kit'tw,,tid 'Frjr pt;tbli t,; tvt�vii.:'ov' j it, o r Lkjl"al, .t;1r"t`_ejA
i\10 mi u'i tyation vnu3a.,m1rt:?s am 1sulp ejet od at tta e ` t.it± *. Due to 'thr
prt R inr r r" r n, r tt art ° tilt.
in, 't'hre t7ri ra, ckrt c!l.drCit C.xl 5ur'voy i
nem etasary taxa r. ot,0t-mUM., Wh0�th011• el Ol ratla.t:al h azz ands cstti, A do-zite dr• i n
,O.turr e pr" ,"i'tmiy ctrid i'4' L01tj (9t"t tli"a its t* tiro t. �1' C,9n l{ w1 t,.Cri' ,6 tYrt.t haE,
Onve1 a0`"`id u
I�r�h"Ir l t.t°
Appendix T Page 6
n
ptpp�,iCant:
,kt
wl
Tentative Parcel Map
D.3' vi, d i nt p rwrrA, g 1 art
is � t i tM1�"s each arMd wt1 a•F 9 a rcM o
k on, p FtgtrM"�.; i rrr t.�i �! 1/4 mi l Q ���uth �� iF�rr a r7tc�r rare ��
(jr oet
t~t Rc� rd id Wi ter t~1 h xtt d t err t .ti rrr=atc-1 v t=�0f), a �? .
of I��al��asso:. Rcad, mor�.l-tnaz 0+ �,hic,, iv �.1-�e
x�y
t'ropoimd Density tali_ Duvelt~rpmontr aurtm (aur dwelling Qnit
FNm t.trjt Of 1mpnr.,i,uulz Stat~+-it;irngM NjniMal
:,.
At».tvnit� ztnd Nur«trost pl.ktaliar road (s : Via, priavatP. roads
trq��t 0tit to Coh}yaymtsf)il.�{Road.-
tja �1t:trwrry
4
++ }. { y p f iµµ
yr ]�a�ji Yy,,
yi
P10- V»t lad 4.I� I' .. ri'ra'r {tri O i. r-"P .r!z"l b iR �1 F41 L X �u MI t.t P..ti R '�4 .a. 4v tY �••t �1:.: 111 w�aT
otl
r �trt�t 'C UJe3k 4 1^` ;i�,ip ai. 111divi,d`t�l wells
t-)j Pc7mer Linezz Ttt e;:ittinn mabilea humO On pt"cr>wst'rt,/
„
proR!imi.ty
per. l i; i F rte >wt► k l�t�r nd di wi carr n+ do w I ttpmc t � a 'gore
undor e,,ti, ,tincj zonium,
C rr�F
7 t�rs►rtPAo1�tA1 „ 6 Q'hti,,trl
bakr� � a vta Finvi.rorimOl,;k;x
4aR i rt �r°ori � ii{ rrr� ;e 17 i. 'Ch,,.r�aatr ' I�kcatrrrt�ira i��*. k�i.d�JrIhrtp sir �t
Ltrl"aouudder by rpouPhOd canyons. ,
ri w t,arrri. k i.trtr rr. i.s,et"°+s: V u~tcttt_N �AruaG O•F ��tVopcl, t:;� ntit~Ir4tl
a« °I ykw!o €Artd ilr"attar i z t 3 C, ',,WPJm !Ull;
scA l ,,,! �AV ld
txt�1 ttr �J. tt ,� rr'd � Irl' thO 1 Xld
,
r. E�irt: f•��,�rz+:�t.r.�� Iwlac�h
u,, EJDtutnsivii„ Soil Potenti.61% 4odor t>
1
AP 56-17-12
4« CCdrlpr,
►w. CFrt ani I�Jaker. t1apX );iranh,, trbtt'+tt"Y ct'F C�1�tdrJ C;rrr,
crF aaF tl° '
s_OtAt.horly por•hion a+ 'E h
h« around Water„ Unl,ntawn. pot�+nti. ith property.
r. y Dr�air►ago ` (~ har,yr=t~ r l C„icw
S.
on�-sitc, "Once =south tow rds,�tMuddCrYpet, z to 1-1��ippe ►"�xnr:l�
j «
r� N.
a n►1 i i nq c t 1r th ,v p Cc inc
hF� per, year
Annual �ta:� n�F al
pondz r 3ht 114:1 l c.+ Branrjj and on-si to-
a� C..� f
ter► tiro Ha.tal �"Cc gni t;.!F, a] i tY Hi,c1h
b. Acoustic D!F.talitY HicYjh
w r<li r C'lulll i tY, Hi qh
EmPv rarrrnr'~rii::
C « vopotation t Cali ,fornia s(--r-LFkj rnOun«=,Ain%maho any, White 10aaE"r r1t
yoat
plroa aaarsep� hnaManz! anitg1
i«{"IGi"
9- 11"d"+F+ FfiNorr-crJ tr al wi r y door t� t i
r att Tehama D(,;c r- i � rr� a jai;
t"car r:lir
C:�t�,t�Fr �vl r,`�w�i r.rantn�rr'�,s
ix� • r"�► yyy.9 M peri ryarji rial �y��{{nd Cji st Corm+�c��rr'rb�� i r► ��i�+ ar�e�
I'I0 1sitIv:ttY tom"'". „.1M « (..Clw
' ti'rlrpF`aplccn t;i";:1Gtieet��ut� hqr"�E��U"Gy?;;
ldl. 1"�ti��-a°rrq c,rrair- ,
i q uirirl cj �n p,14 Strrgundirq (jr•s�t~ 4nO zinglf-m, faa
milY mobile homo
�,►Lccnd l;Cw-.za �,irwplt� �aoi1;�� ,
Lunn Uwr.r r* dtwcllir,, at rural darIzItiom canci
br or"mcla M-2 tura tho rtc►rth and wit tq �t�l�-ter t~� � �ar�
oath w t Arid
f3onw rgtttj dF� apnt�ta, n 1 r tlt,
dparcel h,� �:t ttr•aCw dontwa al
"Yo to. 160 a�w � l era to -h north
+mare::14arrd
i r% tri the r a t -Ind � .. t^� t
l,-lt9,r�►rs Gc attOrr d o r t:F°kh
1tv4 C"h"%r4,+ctrie Of Sits - end ��rµr�a Crrin r�
Ca�,tarft�nt ��"�1 �Fa�rr►tr►F,„n`,'Ctn� q� ana of, r°tte=ca1,
lex i t klr k��tn r Baa
Chi c1
c;
Of In;lt.tvn t-*. Norio
1C:iripr�^M�rrrr�rtt.� �'k:�lnd�at~�.; tCt'"wit�r1 r�r�«
Ft w C`;C
r o
+gip C'��Rtr rt►� C+�t,tr�ty� rtat,r.�> P _
i:ro tationt
C,r ttlra! + yi: Mmazor :tl twt t a car* t� ,
w�C+Car a. 'a rtat twpY tra .ria 1 "
hM kJC�t�°:r" t'rr�>�.l, hat l.i t�Yt � 0Z riaar«tuhw
r i.r m a antrm-t z only
rC°a,i al t rt rr°r�Ga Chico
Appetidik F (b
ice" `....___ .....